Media  Leveson Media Inquiry


".....
"..."...."....



DISCLAIMER: THE POSTING OF STORIES, COMMENTARIES, REPORTS, DOCUMENTS AND LINKS (EMBEDDED OR OTHERWISE) ON THIS SITE DOES NOT IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM, IMPLIED OR OTHERWISE, NECESSARILY EXPRESS OR SUGGEST ENDORSEMENT OR SUPPORT OF ANY OF SUCH POSTED MATERIAL OR PARTS THEREIN.

SATURDAY, MARCH 12, 2011

Read the Story below
UK PRIME MINISTER David Cameron; MURDER; MURDOCH


Jonathan Rees, who has links to David Cameron. 

UK Prime Minister David Cameron hired Andy Coulson as his media adviser.

Cameron knew that, as editor of Rupert Murdoch's News of the World, Coulson employed Jonathan Rees. (Jonathan Rees.)

Rees stood trial for the murder of Daniel Morgan.

Police believe Morgan was murdered because he discovered his business partner Jonathan Rees was using their company to launder money from drug trafficking.
, Daniel Morgan  

Morgan

In the UK, in 1987, Daniel Morgan was murdered "because he was about to expose a drugs conspiracy linked to police corruption."

One of the people who has been accused of murdering Morgan is Jonathan Rees.

Rees , a private investigator, has links to powerful police officers and to Rupert Murdoch's News of the World.

The case against Rees has collapsed in court.

On 12th March 2011 we read that in the Daniel Morgan murder, the family cry 'cover-up' as the case collapses. 

A Scotland Yard officer has said that police corruption during the initial investigation in 1987 was a key reason that no one had ever been convicted of Morgan's murder.

The prosecution case 'was significantly weakened' when a judge excluded the evidence of a Mr Gary Eaton.

Sally Ann Wood, the ex-girlfriend of one of the suspects, James Cook, allegedly claimed to have seen 30 murders, some involving some of the suspects.

Morgan was murdered in the car park of a pub in South-East London. An axe was left embedded in his face.

Police believe Morgan was murdered because he discovered his business partner Jonathan Rees was using their company to launder money from drug trafficking.

Rees was said to have obtained information from corrupt police officers about operations.

Daniel Morgan's brother Alistair claims that Daniel was murdered because he was about to expose police corruption.

An agency run by Rees conducted ‘confidential inquiries’ on behalf of the News of the World and newspapers in the Mirror Group in the late 1990s.


 


Ex-News International chief executive Rebekah Brooks leaves her lawyer's office on May 15. David Cameron received a text message from Brooks - one of Rupert Murdoch's closest aides - saying they were "in this together", Britain's press ethics inquiry heard during testimony from the prime minister



Former Downing Street communications chief Andy Coulson leaves the High Court on May 10. David Cameron received a text message from one of Rupert Murdoch's closest aides saying they were "in this together", a British press ethics inquiry heard during testimony from the prime minister



  • inister

  • A video grab from footage taken inside the Leveson Inquiry shows British Prime Minister David Cameron giving evidence at the Leveson Inquiry into press ethics at the High Court in London. Cameron received a text message from Murdoch's British newspaper boss saying they were "in this together", a press ethics inquiry heard during testimony from the prime minister

    A video grab from footage taken inside the Leveson Inquiry shows British Prime Minister David Cameron giving evidence at the Leveson Inquiry into press ethics at the High Court in London. Cameron received a text message from Murdoch's British newspaper boss saying they were "in this together", a press ethics inquiry heard during testimony from the prime minister

British PM told by Murdoch aide: 'We're in this together'

Rebekah Brooks told Cameron "we're in this together"


NEWS RELEASE
Morgan J of the High Court of Justice in london has be voted the most corrupt judge in english legal history by the INL News Legal investigative team 
see inlnews.com
to read the full story


 Attention:
 rcjchancery.judgeslistings@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk
ccSimon Jackson <jacksons@fishburnslaw.com>,
Francis Bacon <francis.bacon@hailshamchambers.com>,
"Watson, Heather (HMCS-RCJ, RCJ-Chancery)" <heather.watson@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
Sophie Ruffles <SRuffles@blg.co.uk>,
Tony Nurse-Marsh <tnurse-marsh@blg.co.uk>,
Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>
,
geraldinepaletz@iwg.co.uk,
info@iwg.co.uk,
JKandler <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>
 
Please note the film being made called
 
Nighmare in Garratt Close
 
Staring
High Court of Justiic-Judge Paul Morgan
Jonathan Barry Kandler
Nathan Tietelbaun.
Bude Nathan Iwanier Attorneys
Marie Clare Bleasdale Barrister
and others
the real  names have kept to expose the guilty
 
Yours Faithfully
IN
INL News Group


Urgent Attention:
 
 
Francis Bacon <francis.bacon@hailshamchambers.com>,  Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,  "Watson,  Heather (HMCS-RCJ,  RCJ-Chancery)" <heather.watson@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,  Simon Jackson <jacksons@fishburnslaw.com>,  JKandler <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>,  geraldinepaletz@iwg.co.uk,  "William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>
,  Tony Nurse-Marsh <tnurse-marsh@blg.co.uk>,  Sophie Ruffles <SRuffles@blg.co.uk>,  admin@jamison.bizadmin@inlnews.comsuzanne.gifford@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
 
 Please note article published on the world internet
http://awn.bz/CorruptHighCourtJudges.html
 
 Morgan J of the High Court of Justice in london has be voted the most corrupt judge in english leghal history by the INL News Legal investigative team
Please see Australian Weekend News
awn.bz
here
 
 
 to read the full story

Submissions of behalf of Defendant in HC06C03629

Being

 Fineland Investments Limited Claimant

v Janice Vivien Pritchard Defendant

 in opposition for Injunction application dated 12th May, 2011 and in support of Morgan J setting aside his own orders made the 12th May, 2011 in HC06C02639

1.                   Morgan J must immediately set aside his own orders made 12th May, 2011 because of the facts

listed below in items (a) to (e).

(a)    The statements submitted by the claimant are based on evidence that does not exist such as the so-called non-existent witness statement of Mr JB Kandler that was meant to be dated 12th May, 2011.  The two orders made by Morgan J in HC06C02639 dated the 12th May, 2011 were both according to Morgan J’s signed and sealed orders, based “UPON reading the draft application notice and witness statements of Mr KB Kandler and Mrs TJ Wright both dated 12th May, 2011”. The only witness statements that were provided by  Mr JB Kandler of Bude Nathan Iwanier solicitors in support of the orders sought by Fineland Investments Limited before Morgan J on the 12th May, 2011 were two witness statements by Mr Nathan Tietelbaum which was dated May, 2011 but had no actual day of signing such statement and by Ms Tracey Julia Wright, the head of property and security services for Sherforce Limited dated the 12th May, 2011 and their enforcement services section Sherbond.

(b)   The two statements of Mr Nathan Tietelbaun and Mrs TJ Wright that were provided to Morgan J on the 12th May 2011 were full of false and misleading information and facts that have been deliberately wrongly assumed and/or deliberately just made up and not based on any real provable evidence against the defendant

(i)                  The  was no breaking and entering of the property by the Defendant at any time

 

(ii)                The defendant never took possession of the property as it was the caretaker for

Mr.Carew-Reid the new owner of the property that took possession of the property and Mr Carew-Reid is not a party to this action HC06C02639, so no orders made in this action HC06C02639 can be binding and/or enforceable on Mr Carew-Reid

 

(iii)               The caretaker for Mr Carew-Reid the new owner of the property that took possession of

the property at about 6pm on Monday the 9th may, 2011, not 5am as deliberately falsely stated in the statements of truth filed by the claimant

 

(iv)              The defendant never had possession of any keys to the property after the 1st April, 2011

 

(v)    Any attendance of the property by the defendant from the 9th May 2011 onwards would

have only been on the invitation of Mr Carew-Reid who claimed to the Defendant that the claimant’s representatives had given him possession of the property and they had willingly given up the legal fight for possession of the property and not in any way in the defendant’s personal capacity as claiming possession of the property

 

(c)    As the order were based on only one statement by Mrs TJ Wright, and the statement of Mr JB Kandler  simply does not even exist, so the mention of it is a deliberate false claim and statement signed by a Judge of the high Court of Justice in the Chancery Division and sealed for and on behalf of the Lord Chancellor of the High Court of Justice the Honourable Kenneth Clerk QC.  The statement of Mrs TJ Wright is not enough to support the initial orders of restitution and the other orders granted by Morgan J at the urgent exparte hearing without notice heard at 1.45 pm during Morgan J’s lunch hour as a special favour for powerful barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale, powerful Mr JB Kandler and his well connected and powerful legal firm Bude Nathan Iwanier and their even more powerful clients Nathan Tietelbaum and his company Fineland Investments Limited under instructions from the Lord Chancellor of the High Court of Justice Kenneth Clerk.

 

(d)   Because of the misleading statements made in the claimant’s submission the court is

requested to award costs and damages in favour of the defendant and her agent

Mr. John Carew-Reid

 

2.                   Statement by Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale in her skeleton argument dated  14th May, 2011 but emailed to johncarewreid@gmail.com the 15h May, 2011 is a deliberate distortion if the truth. Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale’s skeleton argument dated  14th May, 2011 is meant to be a true summary of the facts sworn to by the witnesses. The witness Mr Nathan Tietelbaum in his statement dated May, 2011 (no actual day date) only states that the next door neighbour  Linda McIntyre, who lives at 2 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, told him “the defendant had moved back into the Property” and does not mention that there was any break in.

3.                   It is completely denied that anyone broke into the property and in fact none of the witness statements state there was a break in. In fact all the witness statements produced in support of the Claimant’s order indicated that in fact there was no break-in and that in fact the way the bearded man must have entered the property was having the keys handed to him and thus there was no need for anyone to break in, and in fact the locks were changed with permission from Sherforce and while Sherforce were in attendance at the property.  This is a deliberate attempt by a Barrister to misrepresent the truth to the court and is a clear contempt of court by Barrister  Marie Claire Bleasdale.

4.                   It is completely denied by the Defendant that she or anyone else she knew was involved in anyway in any break in of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Monday the 9th May, 2011 or any other date and there is no evidence whatsoever presented to the court that the defendant and/or anyone else the Defendant knows  was involved with any break in of at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Monday the 9th May, 2011 or any other date.

5.       The Defendant denies to have taken possession of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Monday the 9th May, 2011 or any other date since being evicted by representatives of the Claimant on 1st April, 2011.

6.       As far as the Defendant is aware and understands that it was a person whom she knows a ‘Rob of the Little Family’ who took possession of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Monday the 9th May, 2011 at around 6pm under the authority of Mr John Carew-Reid who claims to be the new legal owner of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey who the Defendant believed was handed legal possession of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Monday the 9th May, 201 by authority of the claimant’s representative by being handed the keys to the property in the afternoon of the 9th May, 2011.

7.       It is the Defendants belief that the keys to the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Monday the 9th May, 2011 from an representative of the claimant based on barristers Marie Claire Bleasdale’s  submission on the 13th April, 2011 to Morgan J that Mr Carew-Reid’s prior claim dated the 4th June, 2004 to the property  was legally correct in that Mr Carew-Reid’s agreement with Mrs Janice Vivien Pritchard dated the 4th June, 2004 to purchase Mrs Pritchard’s right and interests in at I Garratt Close, Beddington, is a clear legal prior claim to the ownership of the property rather than the Claimant’s purported contract dated 9th August, 2011. It was understood by the Defendant that the Claimant’s representatives had realized  there was no need to continue the legal fight and had willingly handed  over possession of the property at at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Monday the 9th May, 2011 to Mr Carew-Reid. Any attendance at the property by the defendant from 6pm the 9th May, 2011 onwards and any letters handed to the next door neighbour about the cutting of trees would have been done on instructions of Mr Carew-Reid as the new owner of the property, and not done under the Defendants’ own authority. The Claimants and it’s legal representatives in including barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale and her instructing solicitors Mr JB Kandler and his legal firm Bude Nathan Iwanier and the Morgan J all aware of the written statements of truth filed by Mr Carew-Reid that Mr cardew-Redi has appointed Janice Vivien Pritchard and her son Robert carter as life time caretakers of the property on his behalf and thus any actions the Defendant has taken in relation to attending the property and/or protecting the property, and/or maintenance of the property has been done in the Defendant’s capacity as caretaker of the property on behalf of Mr Carew-Reid and not on the Defendants own behalf.

8.       Keys were used in a legitimate way by Mr Carew-Reid’s other caretaker Rob of the Little Family to enter the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Monday the 9th May, 2011 at about 6pm to open the door of the property.

9.       The Defendant denies that the time of entry to the property was 5am on Monday morning the 9th May, 2011. In fact as far as the defendant has been told by Rob of the Little Family, Mr Carew-Reid’s other caretaker of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey that the date of entry of the property was around 6pm Monday the 9th May, 2011. This can be verified by Sutton Police Records. The Defendant maintains that the truth of the matter is that only under instructions by Mr Carew-Reid, ‘Rob of the Little Family’  who was given the keys entered the property at about 6pm on Monday 9th May, 2011 and was keen to have the police come around to further the police crime report number CAD 363 on behalf of the Claimant sin HC11C00580 for things that were stolen by the claimant Fineland Investments Limited  in HC06C02639 and /or Nathan Tietelbaum   and/or the claimant’s other representatives, agents, servants or otherwise during the period of the 1st April, 2011 and the 6th May, 2011. So when the next door neighbor Linda McIntyre under instructions from her boss Nathan Tietelbaum rang the police to try and convince the police to have ‘Rob of the Little Family’, Mr Carew-Reid’s other caretaker of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey arrested by the police for being on unlawfully on the premises, Rob of the Little Family, Mr Carew-Reid’s other caretaker of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey was very pleased to see the police arrive. The Defendant clearly maintains as an undisputable fact that Rob of the Little Family, Mr Carew-Reid’s other caretaker of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, went outside and met the police and spoke to the police at length and after about an hour and a half after the police did all their normal enquiries and checking shook the hand of Rob of the Little Family, Mr Carew-Reid’s other caretaker of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, saying they agreed that this was a civil matter and had no rightful police authority to take any action against ‘Rob of the Little Family’, Mr Carew-Reid’s other caretaker of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey for being in possession of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey as a caretaker  for the new owner Mr John Carew-Reid.

10.   The Defendant Mrs Janice Vivien Pritchard denies she was at any time on or after 6pm on the 9th May, 2011 intending, or did return to the house at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey to live at the house as she was already been re-housed by Social Security with alternative accommodation after spending a couple of days homeless when the Defendant , her son and Mr Carew-Reid were evicted from  I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey by the Claimant in HC06C02639 and/or its appointed agents, servants, representatives or otherwise on the 1st April, 2011. Any attendance the Defendant had at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on or after 6pm on the 9th May, 2011was only to show the new caretaker appointed by the new registered owner Mr John Carew-Reid the various house facilities and house they work etc.

11.   The timing of the emergency hearing at 1.45pm without adequate notice and the exparte orders granted by Morgan J to grant “the Claimant permission to issue a writ of restitution to enforce the possession order made in these proceedings on 31.01.2011”  is unprecedented in English law and is not in accordance with the Magna Carta 1297, clause XXIX Administration of Justice which says  “ No Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or be deseased of his freehold but by lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land. Wel sell to no man, we will not deny or defer to any man either justice or right”  In modern times the word man applies to woman.

12.   The defendant does not admit that the person Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale refers to in a statement by the next door neighbour who lives at 2 Garratt Close, Beddington, Linda McIntyre has made, that has not been served on the defendant and/or Mr Carew-Reid who has been given leave by Briggs J to represent the defendant Mrs Janice Vivien Pritchard in HC06C02639,  was at any time a squatter. In fact as far as defendant is aware, the person she suspects is in the photo was at the property as a caretaker for Mr John Carew-Reid the rightful new registered owner. However, regardless if this person is deemed and/or accused by the court and/or the claimant and/or the claimant’s representatives to be a squatter, and/or a representative of Mr Carew-Reid, there is no way this person is acting under any orders and/or instructions of the Defendant Mrs Janice Vivien Pritchard.

13.   The Defendant denies that the Bailiffs acted correctly in removing the caretaker appointed by the rightful registered owner of the property being Mr Carew-Reid because among other reasons: (a) they could not have obtained a writ possession in the time available by the morning of the 13th May, 2011 (b) they removed the caretaker without showing any evidence of any writ of possession and in fact showed the caretaker no paperwork from the court whatsoever, and in fact no paper work whatsoever before forcibly removing the caretaker at about 11am on the 13th May, 2001 after drilling the old locks out and placing new locks into the doors of the property.

14.   It is also noted that it is rather odd that after the claimant’s witness Tracey Julia Wright in her statement dated 12th May, 2011 stated in paragraph 11 “when the locks had been changed one set was given to the man who was in occupation on site for the claimant who Mr Bushnell believes was Czechoslovakian. The other set of keys was retained by the locksmith….” Then why would there be any need to apply for a new writ of possession and/or forcibly break into the property by drilling out the new old locks and placing new locks into the property.  Why didn’t the representative of the Claimant who had a set of keys simply just use his keys to enter the property at anytime he liked on behalf of the Claimant. In fact the statement of the claimant’s witness Tracey Julia Wright goes on to say…” Mr Bushnell and Mr Ferrier left the property at 18.00 hours. Mr Bushnell’s recollection is that when he left, the Defendant and her son were outside the property with the boxes of goods. And the Czechoslovakian man remained in the Property…” This Czechoslovakian man was left inside the property and had a copy of the new keys, and obviously had orders by the claimant and/or by one of the claimant’s appointed representatives to vacate the property and allow Mr Carew-Reid and his appointed representatives to take possession of the property. The Claimants own witnesses, clearly admit willingly vacating the property and allowing the locks to be changed and allowed the new registered owner Mr John Carew-Reid to have himself and/or his appointed representatives to  take lawful possession of the property at around 6pm on Monday 9th May, 2011 and allowed Mr Carew-Reid and/or his appointed representatives stay in lawful possession until the 12th May, 2011 without any complaint to either the occupiers of the property and/or the courts. The claimants have therefore in law deemed to have willingly vacated the property  and handed over legal possession of the property to Mr Carew-Reid on the 9th May, 2011.

15.   The evidence is clear that this whole thing now seems that the Claimants application and orders sought and obtained on the 12th May, 2011 is a very devious and well planned fraud on the Court and on the Defendant in HC06C02639 with no legal and/or factual basis whatsoever, and in fact seems to have been planned to try and set up the defendant is a very devious and deliberate way using a lot of false and misleading facts and information being presented to the court by the claimants and the claimant’s agents, representatives, servants including the claimant’s legal representatives to try and obtain the orders sought on the 12th May, 2011 form Morgan J at a hearing without proper notice falsely pretending to Morgan J that there was some urgency about needing to have the hearing without notice and without having to serve the defendant the application and/or any of the supporting statements in support of the application.

16.   The Defendant denies that that the caretaker appointed by Mr Carew-Reid was offering any resistance to the bailiffs and was courteous at all times to them even after being threatened by the  enforcement officer Mr Stephen Ferrier that he would smash his head against a steel garage door if he did not leave the property and the street immediately. Mr Carew-Reid’s caretaker was quite willing to leave once he was shown a court enforcement writ of possession that shows that he should leave pursuant to a court order issued against him.

17.   The Defendant claims that the bailiffs action was not in accordance with normal legal requirements. The bailiffs and enforcement officers wrongly and illegally threatened the caretaker with violence and also breached confidentiality by discussing the matter with the next door neighbor Linda McIntyre.

18.   Mr Nathan Tietelbaum’s statement also showed court disrespect by discussing the matter with Ms Linda McIntyre. A High Court case is a confidential matter between the claimants and the defendants and is not a subject that is propper to make into neighbourhood gossip and is none of the neighbour’s business. It is clear that there is a business relationship between the next door neighbor Ms Linda McIntyre, which actually was admitted by Linda McIntyre to the Defendant some time ago when Linda McIntyre bragged she was working for a powerful property investor Nathan Tietelbaum and also admitted to Mr John Carew-Reid that she was working for Natham Tietelbaum and that she was fully protected from any criminal investigations and/or complaints to the local council, as she said that Mr Natham Tietelbaum was that powerful he has the local Sutton council, the police, politicians and certain judges such as Morgan J  in the courts under his payroll.

19.   Ms Linda McIntyre was heard by two different witnesses to be libeling Mrs Vivien Pritchard by calling her crazy. The defendant refers to the recent chancery judgment given by Mr Justice Eady in a libel case where a neighbour was called a pervert and an order was given for 1,600 pounds damages and costs against the defendant who committed the libel.

20.   The defendant denies that all statements were received by Mr Carew-Reid, quite contrary to Briggs J’s order that Mr Carew-Reid could appear at any subsequent hearing and was also an interested party in any proceedings concerning 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey. By 12 noon on Monday 16th May 2011 no posted court notices have been received by Mr Carew-Reid or by the defendant.

 

The Defendant has pointed out a mass of false and/or misleading statements in the dated May 2011 being statement of truth signed by Nathan Tietelbaun and the statement of truth dated the 12th May, 2011 signed by Tracy Julia Wright who is head of property and security services for Shergroup Limited who has claims to have been responsible for the day to day management of the eviction process in the proceedings HC06C02639 against Janice Vivien Pritchard, and has been instructed by Bude Natham Iwanier Attorneys, who instructed Sherbond (who are the enforcement services section of Shergroup) to have herself along with two other Sherbond employees Mr Richard Bushnell and Mr Stephen Ferrier to attend 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, CR0 4PW on 1st April, 2011, 6th May, 2011 and 13th May 2011.
In these statements a lot of third hand false and/or misleading information provided by the next door neighbour Linda McIntyre who has admitted to Janice Pritchard and Mr Carew-Reid as being in the payroll of Natham Tietelbaum ( who himself has admitted in his statement that he regularly obtains information form Linda McIntyre the next door neighbour) has been supplied to Morgan J to convince Morgan J to signed and sealed two quite clearly fraudulent High Court orders in HC06C02639 dated the 12th May, 2011 under direct instructions to do so my the Chancellor of the High Court Kenneth Clerk.
Morgan J who has been personally appointed by Chancellor of the High Court Kenneth Clerk as the only judge that is allowed to deal with the two court actions HC11C00580 and HC06C02639 from now on, even for set aside and appeal applications, has no choice but to adjourn the application for an injunction to a special appointment for hearing for at least two days, to be issued against Janice Vivien Pritchard made by barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale, Jonathan Barry Kandler on behalf of attorneys Bude Natham Iwanier, Daniel Jacob Ginsbury and his attorney firm Ingram Winter Green, Sophie Ruffles and Barrister Francis Bacon and their legal firm Barlow Lyde Gilbert and Simon Jackson and his attorney firm Finsbury and Fineland Investments Limited, and at such hearing the following will have to ordered by the court to be put on the witness stand for cross examination on their witness statements and/or to inform the court everything they know about this matter:

1. Attorney Jonathan Barry Kandler
2. Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale
3. Attorney Daniel Jacob Ginsbury
4. Attorney Sofie Ruffles
5. Nathan Tietelbaum
6. Linda ( next door neighbour living at 2 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey) who is in the payroll of Nathan Tietelbaum and who has suplied a lot of false information to Nathan Tietelbaum to place in Nathan Tietelbaum.
7. The four other young men who also live in Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey who also are in the payroll of Nathan Tietelbaum to make violent threats to Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter, Mr Carew-Reid and anyone else that looks like being connected with either of Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and/or Mr Carew-Reid.
8. Tracy Julia Wright who is head of property and security services for Shergroup Limited
9. Sherbond employee/agent Mr Richard Bushnell.
10. Sherbond employee/agent Mr Stephen Ferrier.
11. The two police officers who attended 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey at  5pm to 7pm on Monday the 9th May, 2011 as a result of Nathan Tietelbaun getting the next door neighbour at 2 Garratt Close, Linda to ring the local Sutton London Met Police to try and have Mr Carew-Reid arrested for being at the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, after Nathan Tietelbaum originally organising for Mr Carew-Reid to be given the key of 1 Garratt Close, Beddington through his agent Joseph on Monday the 9th April, 2011and telling Mr Carew-Reid that all the security people had been removed from the property, the locks have been changed and Mr Carew-Reid was free to move into the property and take full possession of the property and all objections to Mr Carew-Reid's transfer with the titles office of 1 Garratt Close, Beddington by Fineland Investments Limited's attorney's will be withdrawn by Ingram Winter Green.
12. The Police reports and files that attended 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey at  5pm to 7pm on Monday the 9th May, 2011 as a result of Nathan Tietelbaun getting the next door neighbour at 2 Garratt Close, Linda to ring the local Sutton London Met Police to try and have Mr Carew-Reid arrested for being at the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, will have to be ordered to be brought into the court for examination by the court.
13. The four London Met police officers in two Met Police Squad care that attended 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Friday afternoon the 13th April, 2011 on orders of Nathan Tietelbaun to threaten, intimidate and/or scare Mr Carew-Reid's caretaker Robert of the Little Family and others will have to be ordered to attend this court hearing for cross examination and be alos ordered to bring all their police reocrds and reports associated with their attendance at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Friday afternoon the 13th April, 2011 on orders of Nathan Tietelbaun.
14. Morgan J on behalf of High Court will have to order all London Met Police records from the 1st April, 2011 until the 17th May, 2011concerning anything that has to do with the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey.

Tex messages dated 15th may, 2011 from Janice Pritchard setting  important information relevant to the injunction application issued by the Claimants Fineland Investments Limited controlled soley by Nathan Tielelbaum in HC06C02639 on behalf of his  solicitors and barrister Marie Claire Beasdale, and solicitors Jonathan Barry Kandler and their legal firm Bude Nathan Iwanier

" I can’t deal with all the hatred and abuse against me.  Anymore. I can’t cope anymore. I have not being able to cope for sometime now, and have since July 2004 when I was first threatened with physical violence against me and my son Robert by Nathan Tietelbaum that if I did not sign the papers that Nigel, Matthews and his solicitor firm Denniss Matthews where trying to force me to sign in July, 2004. I did not want to sign them as I did not want to have anything to do with Nathan Tietelbaum and his gang of what I am told is a very powerful gang called the London Jewish Mafia who would have no hesitation of carrying out their threats to kill my son if I did not sign the documents that they told  Denniss Matthews to get me to sign. I signed these documents without reading them and signed them because I was too scared not to sign them because if I did not sign them I believed that my son Robert Carter would be killed under orders of Nathan Tietelbaum whom I was told has had many people ordered to be murdered and or physically harmed in difference ways like having their knees capped with a sludge hammer, or having one of their fingers cut off etc. I was also told that if I ever spoke about these threats of violence by Nathan Tietelbaum to anyone, then my son will be murdered. John, I was in a very difficult situation having already signed an agreement with yourself to sell you all my rights and entitlements to 1 Garratt Close, Beddington on the 4TH June,, 2004, I now had threats of having my son murdered by Nathan Tietelbaum’s gang called the London Jewish Mafia if I did not sign the documents he wanted me to sign that he had given to Denniss Matthews Solicitors for me to sign. I was also told that it was no good going to the police to complain about these threats of the murder of my son and/or other physical types harm to my son Robert, because I was told that Nathan Tietelbaum and his other even more powerful connections of people he works for and with control and pay the police as they are all senior Freemasons and/or jewish and in fact they  have enough senior and lower ranked police that are all part of their London Jewish/Freemason Mafia gang that any complaints to the police will be covered up and the fact that I have told the police about the threats will get back to Nathan Tietelbaum and his the other members of the London Jewish Mafia and that will cause the Nathan Tietelbaum to carry out his threats to have my son murdered and/or some other serious physical harm done to my son Robert Carter. I was told that did does not matter what crime Nathan Tietelbaum and any members of his London Jewish Mafia gang commit including murder, that there will never be any serious police investigation into any of then as they are all completely protected by people as senior as the head of the London Met Police, the Mayor of London, the prime minister of the United Kingdom, the Lord Chancellor of the High Court who also are far to scared not to do what they are told because they too are frightened of physical violence against their family members by those even more powerful people in the shadows whom Nathan Tietelbaum and all of them work for,  that never get named or exposed, charged or prosecuted in any way because the powerful people in the shadows effectively control the whole legal, political, banking and financial system and have trillions of pounds in assets behind them, have large violent criminal networks working form them that control their illegal drug, prostitution, human slavery operations etc and can have anyone just disappear without a trace and without fear of any investigation and/or prosecution including having prime ministers, presidents etc and their families killed and/or harmed in anyway they like. I am told these people recently had the leader of Hamus murdered by the world Jewish Mafia using Mossad Agents using false Australian and United Kingdom passports and this matter was never seriously investigated by any Government and/or police organization and they simply got away with the open and blatant murder of apolitical leader. So what chance would I and my son Robert Carter have against the criminal gang that I believe are called the London Jewish Mafia.
John I can not cope anymore with all this.. I may have to end my life to escape from all this.. but I am scared of what will happen to my son Robert. Who will take care of Robert if I end my life right now… otherwise I would…right now end my life. Why doesn’t all this stop? What have I done? I’ve had enough of this life. Each day gets worse. Nathan Tietelbaum, solicitor Jonathan Barry Kandler, Sherwins and Sherforce, Justice Morgan, the Chancellor Kenneth Clerk, solicitors Bude Nathan Iwanier, Solicitors Daniel Jacob Ginsbury and his legal firm Ingram Winter Green, Nigel Matthews and his legal firm Solicitors Denniss Mathews, Solicitors Barlow Lyde Gilbert, Barrister Marie Clare Bleasdale, barrister Francis Bacon, Simon Jackson and his legal firm Finsbury, the whole criminal network of the London Jewish Mafia which has a large gang of violent Hungarian Criminals run by their head man Joseph who reports personally to  Natham Tietelbaun, my next door neighbor Linda who has bragged to me that she and another gangs of boys living in other council houses in Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey have for years been personally employed by Nathan Tietelbaum to harass and threaten and blacken my name and my son Robert Carter and now anyone else that is seen to be associated to me, and/or helping me in any way to obtain my things from the house at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington and or are seen in any way to be trying to protect mine or my son Robert carter’s interests in any way. John Your life is now in danger. I did not want to have to tell you all this and I am sorry you ever got to know me in 2004 at our chance meeting at an art gallery in London, and you then agreed to purchase all my rights and interests in my right to buy and my life tenancy of my council house at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey. But I have to know tell you the whole story and my advice to you is to get away from these dangerous people as soon as possible and stay as far away from them as you can.. they are protected by corrupt judges, magistrates, politicians, police, bailiffs, bankers, financiers, violent criminal Hungarian gangs ..these people are untouchable and can get away with murder without any fear whatsoever..they are likely to already have a contract out on your life already… I am sure of that…These wnt you and Robert dead and now also want you dead….for standing up for me and Robert..John you are in great danger now.. all because of me…These people think I am not Human… They make me feel I am not Human…I am not human..an I? I am ad my son Robert now beggars on the street with nowhere to live….now Jonathan Barry Kandler and his legal firm Bude Nathan Iwanier and Daniel Jacob Ginsbury and his legal firm Ingram Winter Green and Sally Ruffles and Francis Bacon and their legal firm Barlow Lyde and Gilbert and Simon Jackson and his legal firm Finsbury have organised someone to speak to the people in charge of my temporary council accommodation and have told them a lots of lies so that I have now been thrown out of the temporary accommodation that was provided to me a couple of days after being homeless on the 1st April, 2011 for a few days after myself and my son Robert Carter were forcably removed by Sherwins and the London Met Police acting on behalf and instructions of Jonathan Barry Kandler and his legal firm Bude Nathan Iwanier and Daniel Jacob Ginsbury and his legal firm Ingram Winter Green and Sally Ruffles and Francis Bacon and their legal firm Barlow Lyde and Gilbert and Simon Jackson and his legal firm Finsbury
I am now a beggar and a piece of crap for all to see. What’s the point of living any more."
 
 "I was told Natham Tietelbaum is the head of one of the powerful violent criminal networks in London  and has a violent criminal Hungarian Gang ready to carry our his violent orders at any time headed by a man whom is known as Joseph. Previously to all these threats of violence from Natham Tietelbaum and his violent criminal gang which started in July 2004 against me and my son if I did not sign papers with Denniss Matthews Solicitors signing my rights away to my home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey to Nathan Tietelbaum’s company Fineland Investments Limited which is also connected to his other companies Fineland Properties Limited and Northern Holdings Limited, I had to endure year of fear form violent threats from my son’s father who constantly threatened my with knives and guns. I am a person who has been living in constant fear for over 20 years, first from the father of my son and then starting in July 2004 from Natham Tietelbaum and his violent Criminal Gang which I believe is commonly known as the London Jewish Mafia who are even more powerful because they all are Freemasons who are well known as the most powerful organization in the world who were responsible for the Jack The Ripper killings in White Chapel with 90% of judges, magistrates, senior  and many lower ranking police, 90% of senior politicians, 90% of senior bankers and successful businessmen. 90% of mayor of local council and other male clerical staff in Local Councils in London and the United Kingdom, being Freemasons. It is well known that Freemasons have to protect their own and under their Freemason oath have to at all times regardless if they breach their other oaths and duties in their official office they work for, and thus will act in an illegal, wrongful and/or immoral way in their normal duties as a judge, police officer, council employee, council mayor, banker, financier, politician etc if they have to do so to protect the interests of fellow Freemasons.
I was also told by Nigel Matthews of Denniss Mathews solicitors, that there was no need for me to read the documents I was signing because they were fair and reasonable and there was nothing in them that was not in my interest and that I would not have to leave my home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington until the title deed of the property was transferred into the name of Fineland Investments Limited at land registry and I was handed the 20,000 pounds as soon as I had signed the documents, but not have to leave the property until the title deed of the property was actually formally transferred into the name of Fineland Investments Limited which I was told would take at least three to four years, and this  I had plenty of time to organize myself and my son into alternative accommodation and purchase another place in France as I was planning to do and would have immediately had the 20,000 pounds in cash to do so in August 2004 and would be able to get as far away as possible from Nathan Tietelbaum and his criminal gang commonly known as the London Jewish Mafia, and star a new life.
The homeless unit has been in discussion with Jonathan Barry Kandler and his legal firm Bude, Nathan Iwanier, but refuse to talk to me. That’s why Robert and me have been thrown out of the temporary accommodation the council provided after being a few days in the street after we were thrown out on the street on the 1st April, 2011 by Nathan Tietelbaum, Fineland Investment Limited, Jonathan Barry Kandler, Daniel Jacob Ginsbury and their legal firms Bude Nathan Iwanier and Ingram Winter Green from 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, without any warning on a Friday afternoon, without any of our possessions, personal toiletaries, spare underwear, ID, money etc.. just the cloths we walked out with when we were thrown out."

The defendant requests the immediate resignation of organ J form this case and as a judge of the High Court of justice, the Strand London United Kingdom after being voted by the INL News’ International legal Investigative Team as the most corrupt and incompetent Judge in all the English Court System.

Janice Prichard the defendant ha s a doctors certificate that she is too depressed to attend any court hearings for a long time.

 As a result of the illegal and wrongful and immoral actions that have been done against her and her son Robert Carter by the Claimants Fineland Investments Limited and its director Powerful Jewish Investor Nathan Tietelbaum and his legal, police and other enforcement associates and representatives who will stop at nothing to destroy the defendant Janice Pritchard and her son Robert Carter

Signed by
Defendant Janice Vivien Pritchard
Dated 17th May 2011

 

 

From Press Bureau at New Scotland Yard - last updated Wed 23/3/11 16:26 
(
Please refresh the page to ensure you see the latest update)

Telephone: 020 7230 2171

JAIL FOR DRUGS, THEFT AND CORRUPTION

Images are available.

A prisoner who ran a criminal empire from his cell, dealing in drugs and the theft and ringing of luxury cars, after corrupting a prison officer, a police constable and a member of police staff has today, Wednesday 23 March 2011, been jailed alongside those who helped him.

Robert Talbot, 33yrs, [Date of birth 17.06.77], of no fixed abode, was jailed for 12 years at Southwark Crown Court following an investigation by the Met's Anti Corruption Command.

The investigation uncovered that Talbot:

Corrupted HM Wandsworth prison officer Ian Cooper to smuggle mobile phones and drugs into prison hidden in large cartons of orange juice.

Used an outside 'runner' Thomas King to handle the theft and cloning of high value vehicles totalling £500,000.

Encouraged Cooper to corrupt his partner, MPS Police Constable Hayley Cloud, to carry out vehicle checks on cars he could 'ring'.

Instructed MPS staff member Natalie Ricketts, corrupted by Cloud, to unlawfully authorise the release of a seized Lamborghini from an MPS car pound.

Ordered that checks be carried out on criminal associates, including checks made on behalf of associate Stephen Palmer.

Talbot was jailed today alongside:

= Ian Cooper, 35yrs [Date of birth 02.01.76] - jailed for five and a half years

= Thomas King, 27yrs [Date of birth 12.05.83] of Sutton at Hone, Kent - jailed for four years

= Natalie Ricketts, 28yrs [Date of birth 16.03.83] - 10 month suspended sentence.

= Stephen Palmer, 28yrs [14.09.82] of Temple Road Croyden - jailed for 12 months

= Hayley Cloud, 28 yrs [Date of birth 10.12.82] was also jailed for two years on 17 June 2010.

Carl Bussey, Acting Commander of the Met's Directorate of Professional Standards said: "Today's jail sentences should serve as a stark warning that the MPS will root out and deal robustly with police officers and staff who engage in corrupt activities, and also with those that corrupt them.

"There is no place for the likes of Ricketts or Cloud in our organisation and they no longer work for the MPS.

"This has been a significant and complex investigation with officers from the Met's Anti Corruption Command working closely with the London Prison Anti-Corruption Team, her Majesty's Prison Service, and the Met's Stolen Vehicle Unit.

"Be assured, the Directorate of Professional Standards works to ensure the small number of officers and staff who do not meet the very highest standards of professionalism and integrity expected are identified and dealt with so that Londoners can have confidence in their police service."

A Prison Service spokesperson said: "The vast majority of prison service staff are decent, hard working, professional people.
"There is no place for corrupt members of staff within the Prison Service and we deal with them in a robust manner. 
We do all we can to ensure that corrupt staff are identified, prosecuted and brought to justice through close working with the police. We will always press for the strongest charges to be laid. The prosecution of Ian Cooper demonstrates our commitment to root out corruption."

Background

On 6 May 2009, officers from the Met's Anti Corruption Command arrested 12 people following a series of early-morning raids at 14 locations in south east London, during which officers seized vehicle documentation, computers and mobile phones for examination.

The intelligence led operation was carried out by members of the Anti-Corruption Command, in conjunction with officers from the London Prison Anti-Corruption Team and the Met's Stolen Vehicle Unit.

The arrests followed an investigation, which began in October 2008, into a network of individuals believed to be involved in the theft and ringing of high value cars and the supply of controlled drugs to prison inmates.

The investigation uncovered that the 'ringleader' of this network was Robert Talbot, who was running operations from his cell at HMP Wandsworth [later at HMP Coldingley, Surrey] after corrupting prison officer Ian Cooper.

Cooper provided Talbot with mobile phones and facilitated the smuggling of drugs and other contraband into the prison system, on occasions hidden within large cartons of orange juice.

The other side of Talbot's business, the theft and ringing of luxury cars, was run with the assistance of Thomas King, a 'runner' on the outside who also acted as a go between to supply contraband to Cooper. A police search of King's address revealed a package containing heroin, cocaine and cannabis worth a total of £22,000. The package was believed to be headed for the prison system.

Vehicles stolen included high value Porches, Mercedes, BMWs and Range Rovers totalling £500,000. They were taken from driveways of homes in south east London and the Home Counties.

To 'clone' the vehicles, Cooper corrupted his partner Hayley Cloud, who was then a serving MPS officer based at Lewisham Borough, to carry out unauthorised vehicle checks on police databases.

Talbot would then obtain log books from identical vehicles to those stolen, allowing the vehicle to receive a cloned identity before being sold on to innocent purchasers.

On one occasion, on Talbot's instruction, Cloud also unlawfully authorised the release of a Lamborghini Gallardo from an MPS car pound in south east London and arranged for the vehicle to be picked up by King. The vehicle had previously been seized by police as part of a criminal investigation.

Cloud went on to corrupt her friend Natalie Ricketts, a MPS member of staff based at Bexley borough.

The pair would also carry out checks on Talbot's criminal associates, including checks made on behalf of Stephen Palmer to find out whether he was wanted by police.

Ricketts also stole police radios from Bexleyheath Police Station and passed them to Cloud for the groups use.

Talbot, Cooper, King, Cloud and Ricketts were arrested during the raids on 6 May 2009.

Palmer was identified and arrested at a later date.

All six were subsequently charged with and dealt with as follows:

1] Robert Talbot jailed for a total of 12 years after previously pleading guilty to:

= Conspiracy to bring or otherwise convey prohibited articles into prison- sentenced to five years imprisonment to be served consecutively
= Conspiracy to steal- sentenced to five years imprisonment to be served consecutively
= Two counts of conspiracy to cause misconduct in a public office- sentenced to two years for each count to be served concurrently to each other but consecutively to each of the five year sentences.

2] Ian Cooper jailed for a total of five and a half years after previously pleading guilty to:

= Two counts of conspiracy to cause misconduct in a public office and handling stolen goods- sentenced to four and a half years for each count to be served concurrently to each other and consecutively to; 
= 12 month sentence for handling stolen goods

3] Thomas King, jailed for four years after previously pleading guilty to:

= Conspiracy to bring or otherwise convey prohibited items into prison- sentenced to four years imprisonment to be served consecutively
= Conspiracy to cause misconduct - sentenced to three years imprisonment to be served consecutively
= Conspiracy to steal - sentenced to three years imprisonment to be served consecutively

4] Natalie Ricketts received a 10 month suspended sentence for two years after previously pleading guilty to:

= Conspiracy to commit misconduct in a public office
= theft

Ricketts resigned from the MPS in June 2009

5] Stephen Palmer jailed for 12 months after pleading guilty to:

= Encouraging or assisting an offender

6] Hayley Cloud jailed for two years on 17 June 2010 after pleading guilty to:

= theft
= Conspiracy to commit misconduct in a public office
= handling stolen goods

Following a fast track misconduct board, Cloud was dismissed from the MPS in April 2010.

+ On 17 August 2010, ten men were jailed for a total of more than 20 years at Croydon Crown Court after being convicted of stealing high value vehicles, 'ringing' them and then selling them on following an operation led by officers from Bromley Borough and the Met's Stolen Vehicle Unit.

These convictions are directly linked to the anti corruption investigation.

NOTES TO EDITORS: Pictures of Talbot, Cooper, King, Ricketts, Cloud and Palmer are available via the names highlighted in blue above or from Press Bureau. Please quote ref: 'Pics1' CO273-09 Talbot/Cooper/King/Ricketts/Cloud/Palmer

Met Police Apologise For Corrupt Investigation


The Metropolitan Police has made a public apology to the family of a man murdered in south east London 24 years ago after admitting corruption in the first investigation.
Thirty-seven year old private detective Daniel Morgan was found with an axe in his head in Sydenham in 1987.

Nobody has ever been convicted of murder and the latest of five inquiries collapsed at the beginning of March after 19 months.

Metropolitan Police acting commissioner Tim Godwin has admitted there were "failings" by officers, saying:

"I recognise how important this is to both you and your family and that this is acknowledged publicly.

"You are entitled to an apology, not only for this failure, but also for the repeated failure of the Metropolitan Police Service - my organisation - over many years following Daniel's murder to accept that corruption played such a part in failing to bring those responsible to justice."

His family have called for a full judicial inquiry.

What we have been required to endure has been nothing short of torture”

Statement from Daniel Morgan's family

Daniel Morgan's family said they had been "lied to, fobbed off, bullied and degraded" by Met officers





Daniel Morgan Port
























Daniel Morgan's family said they had been "lied to, fobbed off, bullied and

Metropolitan Police apology over Daniel

Morgan murder

Scotland Yard has apologised to the family of a private detective killed in south-east London in 1987, for a corrupt investigation into his death.

Daniel Morgan, 37, was found with an axe in his head in Sydenham but nobody has ever been convicted of murder.

Acting Commissioner Tim Godwin told a Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA) meeting "failings" by officers. The entire legal case collapsed this month.

Mr Morgan's family has called for a full judicial inquiry.

The father-of-two from Monmouthshire was found with an axe in his skull in a car park outside the Golden Lion pub.

Five people were arrested in 2008 but none was ever convicted.

The cost of the five police inquiries and subsequent legal hearings was estimated at about £30m.

'Repeated failure'

"I am deeply sorry that the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) has failed to bring to justice those responsible for the murder of Daniel," Mr Godwin has said in a letter to Mr Morgan's family.

"The MPS has accepted that police corruption in the original investigation was a significant factor in this failure."

Start Quot


The family was "entitled to an apology" for officers' "repeated failure" to acknowledge this corruption, he added.

"I am also very sorry that for many years your concerns regarding the failure of the MPS to bring those persons to justice were not properly addressed."

He acknowledged the family felt a "deep sense of loss, frustration, anger and distress".

Mr Morgan's relatives said in a statement that a judicial inquiry was "urgently required" as the initial police inquiry was "crippled" by corruption.

"Through two decades and more of public protests, meetings with police officers at the highest ranks, lobbying of politicians and pleas to the media, we have found ourselves lied to, fobbed off, bullied, degraded and let down time and time again.

"What we have been required to endure has been nothing short of torture."

Smiley Culture protest

Meanwhile the meeting descended into chaos when friends and relatives of a reggae singer who recently died during a police raid made a noisy interruption.

On 15 January singer Smiley Culture died of a single stab wound at his Surrey home.

An inquest has heard the wound was self-inflicted.

Asher Seator, his best friend, wept as he called for an inquiry.

He said: "No one is doing anything. What are you investigating?"

MPA member Cindy Butts was reduced to tears. She said: "It has been 30 years since the Brixton riots and so much has changed - [but] we have so much to do."

More on This Story

Related Stories






31 March 2011








 



Submissions to Morgan J for 13th April 2011 for application in HC11C00580

 

Fax To: Court 19 Royal Court of Justice Chancery Division, the Stand London,

Heather Watson Asssociate of Morgan J for urgent attention of Morgan J

Tel: +44 (0) 2079476419 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0) 2079476419      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Fax: +44 (0) 207 947 6062

 

TO: "J Kandler" <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>

"Hibbert, Nick" <N.Hibbert@kennedys-law.com>

 <johncarewreid@googlemail.com>, "Sophie Ruffles" <SRuffles@blg.co.uk>, "Jonathan Kandler" <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>, "Simon Jackson" <jacksons@fishburnslaw.com>, "Mooney, Eamon" <E.Mooney@kennedys-law.com>Mendy Bude <aeb@bni.co.uk>, JKandler <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>, Tony Nurse-Marsh <tnurse-marsh@blg.co.uk>, sallylpalmer@gmail.com, geraldinepaletz@iwg.co.uk, admin@jamison.biz, david.rosen@inlnews.com

 

Re: HC11C00580 and HC06C02639 in the High Court of Justice Chancery Division

Parties: Janice Vivien Pritchard and others

v

Nathan Tietelbaum, Fineland Investments Limited, Fineland Properties Limited, Nothern Holdings Limited Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors, Denniss Matthews Solicitors

 

Submissions to Morgan J for 13th April 2011 for application in HC11C00580

 

12th April, 2011

 

Attention:

Geraldine Paletz

Daniel J. Ginsbury Partner Ingram Winter Green Solicitor

Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Solicitor Sophie Ruffles, Solicitor Tony Marsh Nurse, Barlow Lyde Gilbert Solicitors

 Solicitor Jonathan Barry Kandler, Bude-Nathan-Iwanier Solicitors,

Solicitor Geraldine Paletz, Daniel J. Ginsbury Partner Ingram Winter Green Solicitor,Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Denniss Matthews Solicitors, Solicitor Sophie Ruffles, Solicitor Tony Marsh Nurse, Barlow Lyde Gilbert Solicitors, Solicitor Simon Jackson, Finburn LLP Solicitors, Solicitor Nick Hibbert, Kennedys Solicitors, Nathan Tietelbaum, Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors, Barrister Clair-Marie Bleasedale of Radcliff Chambers

 

Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors

1-2 Temple Fortune Parade, Bridge Lane, London NW11 0QN

Tel:  +44 (20) 8458 5656 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (20) 8458 5656      end_of_the_skype_highlighting, Fax: +44 (20) 8458 5065, DX: 92006 Temple Fortune

www.bnilaw.co.uk SRA no 70758

Partners – N N Iwanier, A E Bude V Vernick

 

Sophie Ruffles, Tony Marsh Nurse, Barlow Lyde Gilbert Solicitors

Tel:  +44 (0) 207 643 8407 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0) 207 643 8407      end_of_the_skype_highlighting, Fax: +44 (0) 207 071 9258

It looks clear that the warrant of execution which was used to evict and lock Janice Vivien Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid from the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, London Borough of Sutton fraudulently, wrongly, immorally and unjustly in complete disregard for natural and human justice in clear bread of normal guidelines and acceptable standards used in balliff evictions of residential properties, is a completely fraudulent documents and fraudulently has the words “County Court Claim” typed on it. The action HC06C02639 to do with being a county court action and was never heard in the county court. This action has always been High Court of Justice Chancery Division and the orders made were in the High Court of Justice Chancery Division. This was obviously organised by Jonathan Barry Kandler of Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors, Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Solicitor Geraldine Paletz, Daniel J. Ginsbury Partner Ingram Winter Green Solicitor, Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Denniss Matthews Solicitors, Solicitor Sophie Ruffles, Solicitor Tony Marsh Nurse, Barlow Lyde Gilbert Solicitors, Solicitor Simon Jackson, Finburn LLP Solicitors, Solicitor Nick Hibbert, Kennedys Solicitors, Nathan Tietelbaum, Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors, Barrister Clair-Marie Bleasedale of Radcliff Chambers and Claire Louise Sandbrook, The Sheriff’s Lodgement Centre a Division of Sherwins Solicitors of 3-4 Freeport Office Village, Century Drive, Braintree, Essex UK  CM 77 8YG (SLC Ref 235977) as agents for Bude Nathan Iwanier on behalf of their clients Nathan Tietelbaum and his companies Fineland Investments Limited, Fineland Properties Limited and Northern Holdings Limited,

did this as a deliberate attempt to pervert the course of justice, conspiracy to defraud, by the aforementioned. This was done by the aforementioned as a deliberate and fraudulent attempt to bypass orders 45 and 46 of the Supreme Court Rules which state, “ notice of the application must be given to the tenant &… leave to issue the writ of execution should not be given without the tenant having the opportunity to be heard”

Also Barrister Marie-Clair Bleasedale of Radcliff Chambers has admitted to Morgan J that Fineland Investments Limited claim to the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton ranks second to John Carew-Reid’s claim to ownership of the property who has lodged a transfer signed by Janice Vivien Pritchard with HM Land Registry prior to any other lodgments pursuant to a contract agreement dated 4th June, 2004. On this point alone the orders made by Acting Judge Alison Foster QC on the 31st March 2011 in HC06C02639 should be immediately set aside and then the warrant of execution dated the 30th March 2011 will have to be set aside and peaceful possession be granted to Janice Vivien Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid of the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton.

Thus as John Carew-Reid has priority claim to the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton and John Carew-Reid had appointed Janice Vivien Pritchard and Robert Carter life time caretakers for the property and Robert Carter beneficial owner of the property then this is another clear reason why the eviction and locking out of Janice Vivien Pritchard and Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid from 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton was illegal, wrongful and immoral and that an Morgan J has no choice but to make orders reinstating Janice Vivien Pritchard and Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid in possession of the property 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton and grant peaceful possession of 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton.

It is also noted that before Morgan J makes any formal court orders regarding the application by Janice Vivien Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid for peaceful possession of  1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, he must place the following on the witness stand for cross examination regarding their full knowledge of who prepared the fraudulent writ of possession dated 30th March, 2011 in HC06C02639, and who typed the worlds, “ County Court” on this document, who presented for stamping at the High Court, who actually stamped the document with the High Court Seal on the 30th March, 2011, what room in the High Court was the High Court Seal paced on the document, who and how was the document used  to evict and lock out Janice Vivien Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid from their home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton on the 1st April, 2011:

(a)    Jonathan Barry Kandler

(b)   Nathan Tietelbaun

(c)    Daniel J. Ginsbury Partner Ingram Winter Green Solicitor

(d)   Clare Louise Sandbook of Sherforce_Sherwins Solicitors

(e)    Mr Bushnell of Sherforce_Sherwins Solicitors

 

The so called Mortgage Document that Solicitor Jonathan Barry Kandler, Bude-Nathan-Iwanier Solicitors,

Solicitor Geraldine Paletz, Daniel J. Ginsbury Partner Ingram Winter Green Solicitor, Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Denniss Matthews Solicitors, Solicitor Sophie Ruffles, Solicitor Tony Marsh Nurse, Barlow Lyde Gilbert Solicitors, Solicitor Simon Jackson, Finburn LLP Solicitors, Solicitor Nick Hibbert, Kennedys Solicitors, Nathan Tietelbaum, Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors, Barrister Clair-Marie Bleasedale of Radcliff Chambers have all being fraudulently and false saying to the court over the last few years in favour of Heritable Bank dated 9th August 2004, but signed 6th August 2004 could never in any stretch of the imagination could be considered a valid mortgage deed. The fact that this is the only document in existence that the aforementioned solicitors and barristers says is evidence that Janice Vivien Pritchard had a signed registered, real mortgage of 126,000 pounds sterling with Heritable Bank, is a complete disgrace and one of the biggest legal fraud on a court and Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and others in modern English Legal History. Please see some of the reasons why above.

 

We note that you have communicated with Jonathan Barry Kandler to request a copy to be emailed to us being what you all purport to be a signed mortgage for a 126,000 loan from Heritable Bank to Janice Vivien Pritchard secured against 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey CRO 4PW the title number

 

SGL660272.

Please note the following:

1. This purported mortgage document could only have been signed by a person with have a name of Janice Pritchard and purportedly dated 9th August, 2004

2. This is not signed by heritable bank

3. This was not signed on the 9th August, 2004

4. This does not have a title number and without a title number no bank can register a mortgage

5. This does not have an amount of money borrowed

6. This was not in the bundle of papers presented to the court in 11th and 12th October 2010 hearing in front to Foster J. The solicitors and barristers involved presented an unsigned copy ot the judge in the bundle of papers, because if the judge saw the signed one, the judge would have picked all the holes in it and declare it a document that had no legal effect.

7. This was never registered

8. The Heritable bank never lent any money pursuant to this purported mortgage charge and never was a part to it and never knew anything about it's existence

9. the funds 126,000 pounds that were paid to the Sutton borrow cams form overseas to Fineland Investments Limited 800,000 pounds, to Fineland's bank account with the Royal Bank of Scotland, then to Ingram Winter Green's account with Barclays, then to  Denniss Matthews Account then to the Borough of Sutton, this Heritable bank was used as a falsified image that they lent these funds but in reality there was never any money coming from Heritable Bank for the purchase of 1 Garratt Close Beddington

10. One can sign a legally valid mortgage with a bank until the bank has accessed and approved the loan. there is always a paper trail in existence to show an application form signed by the proposed borrower, being Janice Vivien Pritchard, the a letter of approval from the bank with whatever conditions the bank agree to the lend the money..interest rate, type of loan, whether it is interest only or principle and interest... the time given to repay the loan... if the bank requite a guarantor.. etc...the a paper banking trail showing the bank paying out the money directly to the seller of the property (in this case the Sutton Council) and at the same time obtaining a free title deed to be able to register their mortgage over ...   ..which has to be in existence which would go to prove the reality that such a mortgage was approved, paid out, and repaid at some point in time.

Before Royal Courts of Justice High Court Chancery Division Morgan J makes any ruling on whether he should grant possession of the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, back to Janice Vivien Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid, he will have to order that solicitor Jonathan Barry Kandler of Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors, Solicitor Geraldine Paletz, Daniel J. Ginsbury Partner Ingram Winter Green Solicitor, Nathan Tietelbaum, Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors on the witness stand to give evidence of their knowledge of the so called 126,000 pounds sterling had with Heritable Bank. The reality no such mortgage ever existed and this was one of the many false and misleading statements presented to Acting Judge Alison Foster QC on the 11th and 12th October, 2010 to obtain the orders made on the 31st January, 2011 by Acting Judge Alison Foster QC in HC06C02639. On this point alone these orders have to immediately set aside by the High Court of Justice Chancery Division.

 

11. One can not sign a mortgage over a property that is not one ones. name, with no title deed number and no amount of mortgage that is owed on a date that is not the real date....This so called ridiculous Mortgage deed is simply not a document that could have any legal effect and in any event would be void for uncertainty and void because Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors used the trust and faith Janice Vivien Pritchard had in him, to use undue influence to ge3t Janice Vivien Pritchard to sign documents of the 6th August, 2004 that were not in any way in the interest of Janice Vivien Pritchard and/or her son Robert Carter, when Janice Vivien Pritchard was in no fit mental health to know what she was signing being under the care of Sutton Hospital at the time for mental problems and depressions. Please see letters written by Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors to Sutton Council and to Ingram Winter Green Solicitors in August and September, 2004.

 

12. All that has happened is that Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors had a blank copy of a standard Mortgage Charge Deed on file and typed the name of Heritable Bank and Janice Pritchard ( not even her real name, her real name is Janice Vivien Pritchard, no bank would ever allow a borrower to sign a mortgage deed without placing the person's full real name), and had Janice Sign the document along with a mass of others papers that were just shoved in her face to sign, which were never read by Janice Vivien Pritchard and simply relied on her solicitor Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors that he was looking after the interests of herself and he son Robert Carter who is very ill, and still very ill. Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors should be struck off as a solicitor for getting his client to sign the documents he di get her to sign, and the other solicitors involved such Solicitor Geraldine Paletz, Daniel J. Ginsbury Partner Ingram Winter Green Solicitor, and Fineland Investments Limited and Nathan Teitelbaun agent involved in the preparation of these douments and using Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors as an agent should all be put on trial by the court for contempt of court and should end up in jail and be struck off as solicitors and barristers so they can not do any more damage to other innocent people.

 

The reason why this document was never produced to the court before because of if had the  court and the judge would have laughed it out of court and the whole case would have fallen away.

 

Your immediate comments to this email would be much appreciated

 

Submissions to Morgan J for 13th April 2011 for application in HC11C00580

 

The so called Mortgage Document that Solicitor Jonathan Barry Kandler, Bude-Nathan-Iwanier Solicitors,

Solicitor Geraldine Paletz, Daniel J. Ginsbury Partner Ingram Winter Green Solicitor, Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Denniss Matthews Solicitors, Solicitor Sophie Ruffles, Solicitor Tony Marsh Nurse, Barlow Lyde Gilbert Solicitors, Solicitor Simon Jackson, Finburn LLP Solicitors, Solicitor Nick Hibbert, Kennedys Solicitors, Barrister Clair-Marie Bleasedale of Radcliff Chambers have all being fraudulently and false saying to the court over the last few years in favour of Heritable Bank dated 9th August 2004, but signed 6th August 2004 could never in any stretch of the imagination could be considered a valid mortgage deed. The fact that this is the only document in existence that the aforementioned solicitors and barristers says is evidence that Janice Vivien Pritchard had a signed registered, real mortgage of 126,000 pounds sterling with Heritable Bank, is a complete disgrace and one of the biggest legal fraud on a court and Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and others in modern English Legal History. Please see some of the reasons why above.

 

1. Letter dated 27th September from Ingram Winter Green (IWG) their client Nathan Tietelbaum  says that is their opinion the purported contract between Fineland Investments Limited (FIL)between Janice Pritchard (JV) dated 9th August 200 was void for two reasons

(a) JV did not sign the transfer

(b) JV was not mentally well enough at the time to understand the documents she signed, please ask the defendant’s solicitors to provide the letters from Denniss Matthews Solicitors to IWG and the Sutton Council in this regard, the claimants copies are wrongly at locked up at 1 Garratt Close Beddington Surrey

as well they have a copy of the letter dated 27th September from Ingram Winter Green their client Nathan Tietelbaum

 

2. Statement prepared by Sophie Ruffles of  Barlow Lyde Gilbert Solicitors dated the 11-04-2011 for Daniel J Ginsbury ( partner of IWG) to sign as the truth was deliberately false and misleading  in a number of material ways

(a) JV's name was never used in the council letter. Also JV constantly liased with the Sutton council at the time  on many occasion and informed the council of her plight and at no time did the council ever mention about have to sue the council.

(b) in relation to para 19 and 20:

It is a false statement to say the Fineland Investments Limited and their solicitors and/or Nathan Tietelbaum had never offered 75,000 pounds to settle the matter, There are legal letters confirming this arrangement being acceptable to all if documented and carried out on a proper fair and  legal basis. All this is a fact:

Nathan Tietelbaum rang up JV and stated this

" I will bring around 75,000 pounds in a bag to give you if you sign the paperwork I bring you to sign to sort of this deal"

 

This is actionable by Contempt of Court see Linwood v Andrews and Moore 1888 High Cotr Chancerey Division MATCH 20TH AND 21ST 1888

ALSO SEE FOR SETTING ASSIDE FOR INOCENT AND/OR DELIBERATE FRAUD

MARSHALL V JAMES cd 1905 Vol1

Moore v Peachey 1892 66LT 198

The ENGLISH LAW IS CLEAR

no one can gain by a court order obtained by either innocent and/or deliberate fraud and in all circumstances such an order will be set aside

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Mrs J V Pritchard
From: J Kandler <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>
Date: Thu, April 14, 2011 8:44 am
To: "'david.rosen@inlnews.com'" <david.rosen@inlnews.com>

Dear Mr Rosen

In relation to your emails, we wish to make it clear that it is disproportionate that we should have to read through the same to see if there is anything new in them.

If there is anything new, then please advise us separately.

Yours sincerely

Jonathan Kandler, Messrs Bude Nathan Iwanier

Direct Fax: 020 8731 7204
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by telephoning
  +44 (20) 8458 5656       and request to speak to the sender of the email. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person.
Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors
1-2 Temple Fortune Parade Bridge Lane, London, NW11 0QN
Tel:
            +44 (20) 8458 5656       Fax: +44 (20) 8458 5065 DX: 92006 Temple Fortune
www.bnilaw.co.uk

PARTNERS:                           N N Iwanier                         A E Bude                                     V Vernick

CONSULTANTS:                  J B Kandler                          D Zysblat                                    B Dubiner                 

This firm does not accept service of notices or proceedings by email Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority SRA No. 70758



SherForce_and_Claire_Lewis_Sandbrook_Head_of_Sherforce-Enforcement_and_Mr-Richardson_Head_of_SherForce_of-The-High-Court-Justice_On_Behalf_Of_Jonathan_Barry_Kandler_have_Corruptly_Used-The-Name_Of_The_High_Court-Of_Justice_Chancery_Division_and_Kenneth_ClarkeQC_and_The_Lord_High-Chancellor-And_House-of-Commons_To-By-Pass-All-The_Normal-Correct-Legal-Procedures_to-Illegally-Evict-Janice-Pritchard-and_Robert_Carter_From_Their-Home_at_1_Garratt_Close_Beddington_Surry_Sutton_on_1st_April_2011


Need some money laundered:

Call us or our other money laundering Legal Firm-
Ingram-Winter-Green,

Nathan Tietelbuam and his Fineland Investments Limited, Fineland Properties Limited have laundered millions through us successfully each month...

We have the protection of our corrupt police Inspectors in The London Met at the Croyden-Police Station, Inspector Rushworth & Inspector Tandy To Protect us from prosecution and they have Constable-Owen ZT253  and Constable Turley ZT479 to have all opposition arrested on false charges to keep them quiet.

The system works well.

Read our success story below.... how we helped well known Corrupt Drug Money Laundering Nathan Tielbaun, defraud Janice Pritchard and Robert Carter of their home and possessions and with the help of Corrupt London Met Police and corrupt SherForce Employees, we were able to put them on the street for the weekend with no money ...no cloths... no possessions... no ID... no food...

A REAL-SUCCESS STORY FOR OUR CLIENTS NATHAN TIETELBAUN, Brian Bau, Fineland Investments Limited and  Fineland Properties Limited...

Bude-Nathan-Iwanier-Solicitors Master Minds behind inhuman illegal wrongfull criminal teatment of
Janice Pritchard and RobertCarter
Read the Full Story Below

Bude-Nathan-Iwanier-Solicitors-Photos-BackGround

Bude Nathan Iwanier
1-2 Temple Fortune Parade
Bridge Lane
London NW11 0QN
DX: 92006 Temple Fortune
Tel: 020 8458 5656
Fax: 020 8458 5065
Email: info@bnilaw.co.
 
 Jonathan Barry Kandler

Jonathan_Barry Kandler_BudeNathanIwanier-Solicitors
Jonathan was admitted as a solicitor in May 1983. He joined Bude Nathan Iwanier as a Consultant in November 1994 and now heads up the Litigation department.
His work for large property holding groups and private clients has included both residential and commercial landlord and tenant disputes, work with the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal and collection of ground rent and service charges, as well as dealing with cases concerning assured short hold tenants and tenants protected under the Rent Acts.
Outside work, Jonathan enjoys extra curricula study and spending time with his family. Jonathan is also involved in work on behalf of local educational institutions on a pro-bono basis, and sits on two school fundraising committees.
 
Bude Nathan Iwanier is a leading commercial property and litigation law firm in the United Kingdom providing comprehensive services to clientele ranging from the local to the international.
The close relationship we have maintained with the industry is based on the expertise we have developed in our chosen areas of specialization and our in-depth awareness and understanding of the property trade and its investors and developers. Bude Nathan Iwanier is a law firm in the business of providing legal services to corporate UK, international and entrepreneurial clients. At Bude Nathan Iwanier, we thrive on our uncompromising dedication to provide innovative practical solutions to all varieties of complex transactions of a property nature.
Our ethos of excellence is underpinned by an emphasis on providing quality, service and precision to the needs of our clients. We advise on a comprehensive range of legal services including property, commercial real estate, corporate litigation and private client. Our clientele is vast and complex, as is our innovative approach in providing them with the commercial solutions they desire. We value our clients’ interests as if they were our own and in so doing we strive to continually provide to our clients a service that consistently exceeds all expectations
 
Messrs Bude Nathan Iwanier Direct Fax: 020 8731 7204
Bude Nathan Iwanier-SolicitorsBude Nathan Iwanier
1-2 Temple Fortune Parade

Wednesday 16th March 2011
 
Money Laundering associated with Nathan Tieitelbaum-Fineland Investment/Properties Limited-Attorneys-Ingram_Winter_Green-Heritable Bank & Others- 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey CR0 4PW
 
Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors
1-2 Temple Fortune Parade
Bridge Lane
London NW11 0QN
 
Tel:+44 (20) 8458 5656 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (20) 8458 5656      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax: +44 (20) 8458 5065
DX: 92006 Temple Fortune
www.bnilaw.co.uk
 
 
Bude Nathan Iwanier-SolicitorsBude Nathan Iwanier
1-2 Temple Fortune Parade
Bridge Lane
London NW11 0QN
DX: 92006 Temple Fortune
Tel: 020 8458 5656
Fax: 020 8458 5065
Email: info@bnilaw.co.
Bude Nathan Iwanier is a leading commercial property and litigation law firm in the United Kingdom providing comprehensive services to clientele ranging from the local to the international.
The close relationship we have maintained with the industry is based on the expertise we have developed in our chosen areas of specialization and our in-depth awareness and understanding of the property trade and its investors and developers. Bude Nathan Iwanier is a law firm in the business of providing legal services to corporate UK, international and entrepreneurial clients. At Bude Nathan Iwanier, we thrive on our uncompromising dedication to provide innovative practical solutions to all varieties of complex transactions of a property nature.
Our ethos of excellence is underpinned by an emphasis on providing quality, service and precision to the needs of our clients. We advise on a comprehensive range of legal services including property, commercial real estate, corporate litigation and private client. Our clientele is vast and complex, as is our innovative approach in providing them with the commercial solutions they desire. We value our clients’ interests as if they were our own and in so doing we strive to continually provide to our clients a service that consistently exceeds all expectations
 
 Jonathan Barry Kandler


Jonathan_Barry Kandler_BudeNathanIwanier-Solicitors
Jonathan was admitted as a solicitor in May 1983. He joined Bude Nathan Iwanier as a Consultant in November 1994 and now heads up the Litigation department.
His work for large property holding groups and private clients has included both residential and commercial landlord and tenant disputes, work with the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal and collection of ground rent and service charges, as well as dealing with cases concerning assured short hold tenants and tenants protected under the Rent Acts.
Outside work, Jonathan enjoys extra curricula study and spending time with his family. Jonathan is also involved in work on behalf of local educational institutions on a pro-bono basis, and sits on two school fundraising committees.

 Aaron Emanuel Bude (Mendy)

Aaron Emanuel Bude (Mendy) _BudeNathanIwanierSolicitors
 
Mendy is one of the founding partners of the practice. He graduated from LSE and gained his initial legal experience at a leading city firm, Berwin Leighton which he used as a springboard to develop his own practice.

He has over 20 years experience in commercial property law and in particular specialises in retail property portfolios including acquisitions, sales, leases, banking, property development and landlord and tenant issues.

His client base includes listed Plc’s and major private property investment companies and trusts.

He is also an active member of his community and provides significant pro bono services to institutions and individuals.
 
 Bernard Dubiner (Booky)

Bernard Dubiner (Booky)_BudeNathanIwanierSolicitors
Booky studied law at University College London and graduated in the year 1999 before taking the Legal Practice Course at The College of Law. He joined Bude Nathan Iwanier in 2000.
Booky specialises in commercial and residential property working on a broad range of transactions across all disciplines.
He acts on the purchase and sale of investment properties, portfolio restructuring and financing as well as general landlord and tenant transactions for commercial retail clients.
He also advises on landlord and tenant law, in particular business tenancies and the new changes to the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954.
 
 Daniel Gideon Zysblat

Daniel Gideon Zysblat_BudeNathanIwanierSolicitors 
 
Daniel joined Bude Nathan Iwanier as a trainee in January 1995. He deals with purchases and sales of commercial and residential properties, acting for many private property investment companies, and dealing with large portfolios. He also has considerable experience in dealing with Landlord and Tenant disputes and dilapidations.
Outside work, Daniel has been a magistrate since 2002 and also sits on the Family bench.
 
 Nathan-Naftalie_Iwanier

Nathan-Naftalie_Iwanier_BudeNathanIwanierSolicitors
Nathan is one of the founding partners at Bude Nathan Iwanier. He qualified as a solicitor in 1976 and following qualification worked at Kuit Steinart Levy until 1981. In 1981 Nathan joined the partnership at R G Freeman & Co until he set up partnership at Bude Nathan Iwanier in 1989. Nathan specialises in commercial and residential property as well as commercial Landlord and Tenant work
 
 Vivian_Naftali_Vernick


  Vivian_Naftali_Vernick_BudeNathanIwanierSolicitors
 
Vivian obtained his law degree at the City of London Polytechnic and joined Grangewoods for his articles. Following work as an assistant solicitor at Green David Conway, he joined Bude Nathan Iwanier in 1992.
He acts for a variety of commercial property clients dealing with all aspects of relevant law.

Vivian specialises in development work and advising on property law and landlord and tenant matters.

Statement of truth signed by Janice Pitchard lodged in the High Court of Justice Chancery Division

On April 1st 2011, in the afternoon, I opened the door to a delivery man and a bailiff pushed his way in with his foot and body, followed by another man and a police officer. I was forceably ejected from my home. I was manhandled. A man picked me up and threw me out bodily. I was very frightened and I didn't know what to do. There were two men from, I believe, a divisionn of Sherwins as I saw a badge on one of them that said: “Sherforce”. The taller male from Sherwins threw me out. The officers were both aggressive when they threw me out and they treated me with distaste and contempt. The police officer was a fair, blue eyed male I will describe and refer to later. I was not sure why Sherwins had the police there as their “agents” and “enforcers”. The fair officer told me that I had to leave the house. He seemed to be directing operations. The other two men were fairly quiet, that is the men from Sherwins. There may have been another police officer with the fair one.

I wasn't able to collect anything that I needed or argue my case, in that my son had a right of tenure and was not mentioned on the notice from the court. I was also unable to explain that service of the order had not been effected, in that I have only ever received from solicitors acting for Fineland a sealed order from Bude, Nathan, Iwanier Solicitors, but that this was not sufficient to obtain a warrant of execution. I couldn't explain that this meant that the warrant of execution must have been obtained by fraud or negligence. The order came through the post from Bude, Nathan, Iwanier Solicitors. It is a sealed order, however, there is no sealed judgment, that sets out the reasons and grounds for the order, subsequent to a trial of the issues (which by the way took place without me being present, without me having any legal representation in a complex matter, and now it would appear, without reasons for refusing an adjournment of the trial, cited by Mr Butcher's at the RCJ, as they are “missing”). The only document that was sent to me in the post, apart from the sealed order from Bude, Nathan, Iwanier Solicitors, was one titled “draft judgment”, and it does not contain a court seal. I have scanned and emailed to you, by way of service of this document, a letter from Mr Butchers, Associate, Royal Courts of Justice, saying that there is no judgment filed with the court: it is “missing”. There is no sealed and filed copy of the judgment and it hasn't been served on me by the court. I also scan and email to you an excerpt from the Civil Procedure Rule, Part 40.4 which deals with how service of orders and judgments must be effected. I also do not think that a sealed order has ever been served on me, as I have said, because it was posted to me by Bude, Nathan, Iwanier Solicitors, not by the court. Without service of the judgment, I understand, service of the order is not effected. In any event, I don't think service of the order was effected either the court record doesn't record that there is a sealed order and one wasn't sent to me by the court. I will return to this point again later. I wanted to add and say too that I have never been served with the reasons for Ms Foster, the trial judge, refusing me a right to appeal. This is something that is required, as a matter of law and procedure, as is proper filing and service of orders and judgments. Mr. Butchers told me that the reasons for refusing permission to appeal were written but were missing along with a copy of the sealed judgement and sealed order. His file and copy file were missing, that is what he told me. I ended up with a copy of the sealed order, that the court doesn't have, incorrectly served, I think, a draft judgement only, and no sight of the reasons for Ms. Foster refusing permission to appeal. As far as I am aware they were still missing as the time to appeal ran out. In the event I did not hear from Mr Butchers that the missing documents had been found at any time and they were never served by the court itself. The warrant of execution, therefore, was invalid and void.

My son was out when the enforcers came initially. I presume these people waited for him to go before gathering outside, because I believe they knew he had right of tenure and he couldn't be removed. Ithink they knew that there was no enforceable order and judgment. If Mr Kandler, who obtained this warrant of execution, knew that the order was not enforceable, that amounts to offences of: aggravated trespass, (attempted) fraud, (attempted) theft, perjury, or akin to, concealment of evidence, attempt to pervert the course of justice, intimidation of witnesses and effecting a public mischief. These offences I think may have taken place as part of a conspiracy, an agreement. If Mr Kandler didn't know of the law and procedure and that he could not take possession because of my stay of execution in relation to the matter, then he should answer for his actions as they appear to be negligent. He did not address the court as to the law and procedure in this matter which he must do professionally, as a matter of ethics, if a party is unrepresented. All parties are required to address one another on the law, I thought. It is derived as a matter of professional conduct from the common law about ensuring equality of arms.

At the scene, at the time I was been forceably ejected from my home, and my son's home, a short woman, with straggly unkempt hair of an indeterminate colour, wide in girth, approx. 4 feet 11 inches tall, between 40 and 50 years of age, in motorbike leathers, arrived on a motorbike which a man was riding. The male was younger than the woman, about 30 to 40 years of age, tall, on the thin side, maybe average build, with brown wavy hair. I should make it clear that when I asked someone when I was forced bodily outside if I could have time to remove things the tall enforcer said, “ask her”, pointing to the short wide woman. She refused to look at me and talk to me, or give me her name. She said to me, when she was pointed at, like a well trained dog, by the police officer: “I am here for Mr. Kandler”. She was disdainful and haughty. I repeat: she would not even look at me. I then saw 3 men in a white van parked by the garages next to my house. I went up to them to talk to them. I asked them if they were anything to do with the bailiffs. They didn't appear to speak much English or understand me. I asked them for their card as there was no name on the van. They made no comment. The short woman spoke for them and said they were builders who were taking over my property and would be living there. She couldn't bear to look at me but she was directing operations as if I didn't exist. I was horrified and very upset. I asked for the name of the representative of Mr Kandler but she replied: “I am here for Mr Kandler”. She refused to talk to me, so I could not, I presume, ask her to arrange the removal of my property.

A man had quickly changed all the locks, and grinned at me when I said someone else had rights over the property. I was heartbroken for my son. I was also heartbroken as there was cash and jewellery in the property and other valuable possessions, many with sentimental value, that simply cannot be replaced. I felt like I had been violated, raped in a way, and burgled. My home had been taken over. People were taking over my home and I thought about men in my house rummaging through my possessions. I thought about wanting to kill myself. My son arrived, as I was on the phone to a friend. I was desperate. I was hoping my legal friends would help me. The blue eyed, fair officer, went away after the locks had been changed, but I refused to leave. I did not see why I should leave my property and my son's property. You might also like to know at this point that I currently hold legal and equitable title to the property – as per office copy entry 4 April 2011. Because I was defending my property, and my son's property, by refusing to leave, more police arrived with the fair haired one and talked to me in an uncaring manner. I did not want to leave and I wanted to defend my property.

I was on the phone when the police arrived. After a short time, after about 15 mins, my phone was snatched from my hand and my arms were twisted behind my back which hurt me and handcuffs clipped on. The cuffs were ratcheted up really tightly. It was the fair, blue eyed officer, who snatched my phone and twisted my arm without warning aided by PC Turley. I was arrested so forceably that I could not but struggle, and they went beyond what was necessary and proportionate. My arms were twisted so high the pain was searing and the cuffs so tight, that they left bloody marks and brusing, I was caused to try to seek to avoid the pain the officers were causing me. I was not resisting in any way when they arrested me. I am not alleged to have resisted violently or at all. I was desperately trying to call for help on my phone. I was marched to a police van and locked in the back without a seat belt and I fell about as the driver, the fair haired one, was going quite fast. I was then “processed”. I felt I wasn't human and I wanted to die, being so traumatised.

I would like to ask the three police constables at the scene – PC Turkey, PC Owen and the fair, blue eyed male – whether they know what their job is. They did not behave like “justices of the peace”: as per Lord Denning. I didn't resist them and I do not know what time they had to obtain evidence about the matter before an arrest that they undertook took place. The woman “for Kandler” or the man on the bike called the police – she told me they had, I didn't see them do it. None of the officer's had notebooks at the scene, that I saw. I didn't see any report of the scene being recorded. PC Owen says on tape in police interview under caution that he took witness statements at the scene. I think he must be confused. He only took a statement from one process server and one builder, and that was at the scene. My son says that he saw no evidence being obtained at the scene when he was there. It must have been taken after my arrest. I believe there was collusion between the witnesses and the evidence is tainted because their statements which were read to me in interview were almost word for word the same. My friend Stephen Carew-Reid, I think, has the collar number for the blue eyed, fair male officer that directed and enforced my bodily removal from my home, and who was party to my arrest, that I do not have the details for.

I was arrested and cuffed by PC Owen for aggravated trespass, as I have explained. I felt like I was dreaming by this point. I was in severe pain. I cannot recall if PC Owen cautioned me. The police acted as agents and enforcers for Fineland Investments Ltd and Mr Kandler for and on behalf of Nathan, Bude, Iwanier Solicitors. They were cruel in their treatment. They subjected me to inhumane and degrading treatment, in that, the arrest was not proportionate and necessary and they did not act, at that time, to ensure I could obtain my personal possessions that related to maintaining my dignity, and my son's dignity. I was flung on to the street without underwear and clothing, money and other essential items. We have no access to our phone chargers so our phones have died, and no-one can get in touch. My son's medication is still there as is important paperwork and important legal documents. I am concerned legal evidence may have been tampered with, evidence in this case. They could not have cared less about my dignity nor my son's. My son was at the scene of my arrest, so even if the officers thought they were right to arrest me for aggravated trespass, they should have ensured our dignity was preserved. My son was not under arrest, he could have been helped to “keep the peace” and to respect our human rights, which are part of English law, and actionable in the English courts. He should have been allowed to collect possessions. The police officers were rude and quite aggressive.

PC Owen said to me: “If you don't get off your phone you will be arrested”. That is not a ground for arrest. Did PC Owen intend to arrest me, with reasonable suspicion, for making calls for help? The arrest was wholly unlawful. As was my dehumanising and frightening experience in custody – I was falsely imprisoned. PC Owen in substance didn't have grounds to arrest me for aggravated trespass as I cannot trespass in my home (my home for the reasons explained). He couldn't arrest my son either because of his tenure, but my son can detail his experience, which I witnessed. He was not under arrest. He was threatened with arrest despite there being no grounds and told he would get a criminal record if he did not move. He could not defend himself against 3 police officers including PC Owen who had threatened to send him to prison for doing nothing. It was not a fair fight. And my son was shocked and scared. PC Owen didn't say I had done anything wrong that I could be arrested for, he just told me I had to to get off the phone.

The police, after they attended to enforce our forceable removal from the property, came back as I explained. They did not witness any alleged incident of aggravated trespass. I had been treated like a criminal by the blue eyed, blond officer, who grinned at my shock and distress. After I refused to leave the short wide woman said to me she had called the police back, and the police arrived with a van. Shortky after they arrived, and after I had tried to make calls for help, PC Owen, like a petulant and damaging father telling off an innocent child, to get off the phone. I am a woman of 62 years of age. I was treated like I was a child that was doing something seriously wrong. I was trying to phone my legal representative and a friend. I explained to PC Turley the legal position about my son and his legal and equitable title to the property. She seemed sympathetic initially but she assisted with the arrest. There was another officer in the background, the one with short fair hair, 30 years odd, with blue eyes, as I have said. He appeared to be psychotic as he had a strange grin on his face. I would remember his face tomorrow. He seemed amused by the whole incident. I thought he could be dangerous because I thought he could be psychotic. As he was Director of Operations I was very frightened.

When the phone was grabbed out of my hand and PC Turley and this officer twisted my arms, I was told to stop struggling as if I had a choice about that. The pain was so bad given the incorrect way they put the handcuffs on (I believe intentionally or recklessly, or negligently) and the pressure they had applied that all I could think about was the pain. The arrest was brutal and inhumane. I was not resisting nor was I aggressive. These officers that arrested me knew not what they were doing and they put me in to a catatonic state because of their treatment. This happened shortly after I was arrested. The police were, I repeat, brutal and, therefore, inhumane. In the van I asked PC Turley to remove the handcuffs as they were very painful, but she refused saying, “don't struggle, you will make it worse”. But I had to try to manoeuvre myself to stop the pain. At the station I saw that my wrists were very red and quite deeply scratched. The skin was cut. That is assault occassioning actual bodily harm if PC Owen intended or was reckless as to whether he caused me to sustain immediate and unlawful violence. The officers degraded me in my neighbourhood and they degraded me in front of my son At the station some of the officers were respectful and caring to me and watched me in the cell as they appeared to think that I was vulnerable. I was very vulnerable. I did feel that I wished I was dead as I was so embarassed and hurt in every way. I felt violated and inhuman.

My son arrived at the station sometimed hlater, but we were not allowed to see each other at all , and I was so worried for him, but it appears that they were fairly respectful to him. But all the time I was there my heart was beating very rapidly with intense shock fear and panic. I did see a doctor, but he did not take my blood pressure. He said I was fit. He didn't say in his custody record FME report whether the cuts I sustained as a result of my arrest were recent even though the scabs were formed of fresh blood.

My legal friend Miss Palmer has been undermined and abused when trying to do her job by police. She is a complete professional and a very experienced advocate so this was completely uncalled for.


Statement of Truth signed by Robert Carter onthe 3rd April 2011 lodged with

the High Court of Justice Chancerey Division

On the 1st of April, early afternoon, I arrived at my house having been informed by my mother that she had been manhandled out of our house. She had texted me to ask me to ring her. This was when I was in the library. When I got there there were policemen, some men next to a van and 2 persons next to a motorbike. She was extremely upset and trying to reason with all the people around her. I approached and said hello to my mother. One of the policemen asked me who I was and I introduced myself to him as her son. I was extremely worried by the situation seeing so many people around. My mother was talking to one of the officers explaining that there was a dispute between herself and a property company. My mother informed me that she had been served with something and had been forcibly manhandled out of our house without a chance to go to the toilet or even get a drink of water. I went over and stood next to my mother who was making some phone calls and trying to sort the situation out. All this time the atmosphere was very intimidating with a large group of people seemingly surrounding us.

A taller policeman came over and introduced himself as Owen and said that as the leading officer he would be dealing with the situation. My mother was still on the phone at this point and he said “Get off the phone now or you will be arrested for obstruction”. His tone was extremely threatening. My mother finished her phone call and he said that the people on the bike had served my mother with a court order and we both had to leave immediately. My mother tried to explain that there was an ongoing dispute between us and a property company. He went over to the woman next to the bike to talk to her. My mother then made another phone call while we were waiting. After a few minutes he came back and said that the woman was an enforcer and had a legal order and that was that. My mother said that we had some papers in the house that would prove her ownership if we could just look for them or all they had to do was check the Land Registry website to get the correct information. A short officer with fair hair and a pained expression chimed in and said that asked “Do you have the deeds?” We explained that this wasn't necessary as the information could be checked online. PC Owen then closed down the conversation by saying that there was an order and that was the end of the matter. My mum then started talking on the phone again to check something and Owen then raised his voice saying “Get off the phone NOW!” in an extremely rude and threatening manner. My mother carried on talking so the fair haired officer grabbed her phone and twisted her arm behind her back and put handcuffs on her. Owen then said “You are under arrest for Aggravated Trespass”, grabbed her phone and pulled her away towards a waiting van in the most undignified way possible. I tried to follow but 2 officers jumped in my way. As she was hauled away Owen turned and looked at me. I stood in front of the house and said that I needed to try and sort this out. Owen then said “You have to leave as well.” in a threatening way. I had no idea what my rights were so I said “Can I at least go into the house to collect some possessions like some clothes and loose cash. Also some medication that I am taking and some important forms” and the fair haired officer said “No we already asked your mother if she wanted to collect her possessions and she said no so you are not allowed and you have to leave.” I later found out this was a complete lie. Owen then approached me and stated that I could leave “as a free man” or I would be arrested and put in the van on the same charge as my mother and would get a criminal record. I had no idea what to do against 3 PC's and a number of others so I left.

Shortly after I received a phone call from my mother saying that she had informed them that I was vulnerable and that would send a car for me to go to the police station. Owen than turned up in a car and drove me to Sutton police station. I was made to wait for several hours in a back room with no information and no idea what the hell was going on. Eventually my mother was bailed.

The whole situation was extremely distressing and intimidating with no regard for our feelings or safety.

I intend to sue everyone involved for damages and so I believe is my mother..

.

Statement of truth

3-4-2011


INL News Legal and Investigations Group


INL News Legal and Investigation Team

David.Rosen@inlnews.com, admin@inlnews.com

Subject:

[FWD: FinelandInvestments Limited 800,000 pounds dirty money form overseas send to Ingram Winter Green]
From:
<david.rosen@inlnews.com> (Add as Preferred Sender)  
Date: Wed, Apr 13, 2011 3:25 am
To: SRuffles@blg.co.uk, "Jonathan Kandler" <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>, admin@inlnews.com, admin@jamison.biz
Cc: "Simon Jackson" <jacksons@fishburnslaw.com>, "n.hibbert@kennedys-law.com" <n.hibbert@kennedys-law.com>, "l.maiden@kennedys-law.com" <l.maiden@kennedys-law.com>, "Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>





Sophie Ruffles
Associate
Direct Telephone:             +44 207 643 8407 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 207 643 8407      end_of_the_skype_highlighting      
Direct Fax: +44 207 071 9258
Mobile:  
Email: SRuffles@blg.co.uk



Fineland Investments Limited 800,000 pounds dirty money from overseas send to Ingram Winter Green
Fineland Investments Limited RBS Bank October 2008 Statement13 April 2008


Fineland Investments Limited Bank account statement with Royal Bank of Scotland
Investigations by the INL News Group's legal ahnd accounting investigation team show clearly that Fineland Investments Limited, Fineland Properties Limited, Northern Holdings Limited, Solicitors Ingram Winter Green, Solicitors Bude, Nathan Iwanier, Solicitors Denniss Matthews, Borough of Sutton, and others arr heavily involved with moving hundreds of million of laudered black money make form selling illegal drugs  through their various bank accounts with Heritable Bank and Barclays Bank and other banks. This is part of the trillions of pounds moved through Barclays Bank in London every year by various people and organisation as fromnt for the Rothschild Family who are involved world wide with having agents to sell illegal drugs from which they make trillions of pounds each year from the misery and deaths it causes ordinary people. because the Rothchilds have about 60% of the worlds wealth and effectly sanction all the appointment of all Britsh Prime Ministers and Chancellors and the USA Presidents, and they can make sure with their powerful connections that there is never any investigations into the trillions of pounds of illegal drug moeny laundered through Barclays Bank in London each year by their agents such as powerful solicitors Ingram Winter Green, Bude Nathan, Iwanier, Denniss Matthews, Barlow Lyde and Gilbert, Finsburns and people like Nathan Tietelbaun and his Fineland Investments Limited, Fineland Properties Limited and Nothern Holdings Limited

Jamison and Associates: Investigative Accountants and Attorneys

admin@jamison.biz www.jamison.biz Tel: +44 (0) 740 724 7764 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0) 740 724 7764      end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Urgent Attention Duty Inspector Rushworth and Inspector Tandy

Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253 and Constable Turley Met number ZT 479

Met Police, Sutton Police Station London Tel:  0208 7731212 Fax:  0208 649 0790

 

 

2nd April 2011

 

Urgent Attention: Fishburn Solicitors, Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP, London Met Police, Corrupt Inspector Rushworth and Inspector Tandy and constables Owen Met number ZT253-Constable Turley Met Number ZT 479 of the London Sutton Met Police, Sherforce, Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors, Denniss Matthews Solicitors


Conspiracy to Defraud, money laundering, unlawfully and wrongfully threatened damage unlawful and immoral Physical and mental harassment, assault, robbery , physical and psychological damages, conspiracy ot pervert the course of justice, contempt of court, breaking and entering, stealing electricity gas and water and/or helping to cover  up all these criminal and civil wrongs committed by and/or with know of Fishburn Solicitors, Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors, Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Denniss Mathews Solicitors,Tony Nurse, SherForce Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP and their partners and solicitors, Fineland Investments Limited, Nathan Tietelbaun,  Sher Force,  the London Met Police including Inspector Rushworth- constables Owen Met number ZT253-Constable Turley Met Number ZT 479- Inspector Neil Tandy, Commisisoner of police of the London Met Police and others.

You all have along with other civil and criminal wrongs conspired ot be involved with the deliberate theft of Gas Electricty and Water from Janice Pritchard, Robert and Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid form the roperty known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW. It is noted in Particular that Inspector Rushworth and Inspector Tandy of the London Met Police stationed at the Sutton Police Station has worked ina corrupt and wrongful manner in a clear breach of his duties as a police officer to deliberately has been happy to work in with the unknown criminal and thugs that all the herein named conspirators to refuse to arrest and charge the thugs and criminal that have forcefully taken possession of the property at  1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW for deliberately stealing gas, water and electricity from Janice Pritchard, Robert and Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid. This is a clear criminal offence and Inspector Rushworth has over ridded all attempts by other London Met Police and staff to allow any London Met Police officer to attend at  1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW to take the name and ID’s pf all thise wrongfully in possession of the property and arrest and charge them for illegally using gas, electricity and water at the property belonging to Janice Pritchard, Robert and Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid

The London Met Police with the help of constables Owen Met number ZT253-Constable Turley Number ZT 479 and Inspector Rushworth and Inspector Tandy conspired on the 1st April 2011 to help the other conspirators named herein illegally remove and/or force Janice Pritchatd and Robert Carter to leave the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW. They did this by flaselyt and wrongfully arresting Janice Pritchard at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW on the 1st April 2011 with out any due and/or reasonable just course, when shed was rightfully there as a caretaker for the property on behalf of Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid who are the new owners of the property. They asaulted her and caused her extreme physical and psychological damages. Then  they wrongfully and illegally outside their normal duties as police officers acting as agent servants or otherwise for the other named conspirators named herein, told a false statement to Robert Carter by falsey saying that his mother Janice Pritchard does not want him to go into the property. Then they worngky and without any due and rightful  cause threatedned Robert carter with arrest for trespass if he did not immediately leave the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW, incircumsatnces that this property has been hi sonly home for over 16 years and there is no court order with his name of it that states that he has to leave the property and also in circumstances that John Carew-Reid has lodged a properly signed transfer for the property to go into his name at HM Land Registry and this is the rightful owner of the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW and John Carew-Reid has made both Janice Pritchard and Robert carter the caretakers of this property for their life time and has made Robert Carter the beneficial owner of the property.

Under the High Court decision of  Tony Webster v Sergeant Lampart Robert Carter and Janice Pritchard and John Carew-Reid have the right to sue the individual police officers involved and their employers being the other conspirators herein named for damages in common law, Statute Law and Tort Law including a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, conspiracy to defraud, and malefiance of public officers. With the common law tort of malefiance of a public officer, the public officer can not hide behind his badge and just  plead a defense that they were thought they were going their job, but got it wrong  There are many legal precedents that support the wronged litigant to sue public officers as individuals for damages and in the Tony Webster v Sergent Lampard case it was clearly established that a police officer can be personally sued if he or she goes outside his or her normal and accepted and fair duties as a police officer. This case is very similar to the current case of the wrongful arrest of Janice Pritchard for trespass, all because Janice Pritchard rightfully refused to leave her home where she was a rightful caretaker having been appointed by the new owner of the property John Carew-Reid and being a place where she had been living for over 16 years. Then their wrongs were compounded when the police officers The London Met Police with the help of constables Owen Met number ZT253-Constable Turley Number ZT 479 and Inspector Rushworth and Inspector Tandy wrongfully threatened and/or gave authority to wrongfully threaten Robert Carter not to go into his rightful home to be able to get some of his belongings and that he would be immediately arrested by the London Met Police id he did not immediately leave the property and the versinity of the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW. In the Tony Webster v Seargent Lampard case Seargent Lampard walked into a fuel and food roadhouse and told the existing tenants who had been running the roadhouse for a number of years, that they has 5 minutes to pack up and leave the premises. It was a civil matter and the police should not have got involved without a court order listing the removal of all persons who had been living at and running the roadhouse for a number of years. This the current case of Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid against the Met Police and others, the London Met Police have helped the other named conspirators named herein to obtain control of  possession of the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surrey Sutton CR0 4PW by encouraging and supporting those who have just wrongly taken control of the property and have thus gone out of their way to interfere in a civil matter, and then actively supported these same conspirators by wrongly and unjustly and without proper cause arrested Janice Pritchard, the legal caretaker of the property for trespass and firstly lied to Robert Carter saying that his mum Janice Pritchard had told the police to tell Robert Carter that she does not want Robert going into the property and then wrongfully threatened Robert Carter that if he did not leave the premises and the versinity of the premises, the the police will immediately arrest him for a trespass. and he will have a criminal offence in his name. Now the London Met Police have compounded their civil and criminal wrongs but not arresting and charging those persons currently wrongly in possession of 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW, for illegally using gas, electricity and gas that belongs to and being paid for by Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid. A couple of weeks ago it was widely publicized in the London Evening Standard that the owners of a multi million pound home in London and the London Met  Police were having removing some squatters form the home. Then the owner sof the property and the London Met Police realized that the squatters were using electricity gas and water belonging to someone else and that was clear theft. So on realizing this the London Met Police immediately went around to the property and arrested the squatters from the property for stealing gas, water and electricity. A number of reports since the 1st of April 2011 have been made to the London Met Police asking the police to go and arrest those in the home for stealing gas, electricity and water and the police phone operations section have stated that some police offers would attend the premises at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW and arrest those there illegally stealing gas, electricity and water. Some of these report number are 8268 of 2nd April 2011 and CAB 2587 of 2nd April 2011 and 82681 of 2nd April 2011. However Inspector Tandy and Inspector Rushworth have both gone out of their way to override other police officers authority if lower rank form going out to attend the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW to take the names of those who are at the property and arrest and charge them for illegally using and stealing electricity, gas and water being paid for and belonging the Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid. Thus these police officers and the whole of the London Met Police are nw accessory after the fact in the continuing offense of stealing gas, electricity and water and protecting those guilty of this crime as they are working for their other co-conspirators named herein who the police have powerful business and religious connections with being all powerful freemasons, Zionist Jews and Illuminati members.

There is no doubt when this debacle hits the world news headlines the police officers constables Owen Met number ZT253-Constable Turley Number ZT 479 and Inspector Rushworth and Inspector Tandy will be swiftly and quickly brought before the Commissioner of Police and Scotland Yard and they will be stripped of the police badges and police rank lose their positions as London Met Police Officers and charged with conspiring to pervert the course of Justice, Conspiracy to Defraud, malicious and devious behavior, assault, failing to protect the property of Janice Pritchard, Robert carter and John Carew-Reid, threatening behavior, and the list goes on and on. They all the other conspirators as named herein will have to be named on the world internet and will have to hold in shame before their families and friends and the world as a whole for their not only illegal and wrongful behavior but their immoral and inhuman behavior, conspiring together to defrauds innocent people of their rightful home and possessions and placing them onto the street without any of their belongings, cloths, personal effects, money, ID, and other valuable belongings and no where to live on a Friday night to live on the street over a cold weekend. The operation was calculated and organized by the conspirators herein named so that it would take place on a Friday so time that Janice Pritchard was released on bail from  the Croyden Police Station (even if she obtained bail) with her son Robert Carter there to see that she was OK, the courts and lawyers officers would be closed till Monday to be able to start to get any legal help or redress on the wrongs done to them by the London Met Police and the other herein named conspirators.

The way the co-conspirators organised this devious, illegal, wrongful and immoral plan was to watch to first watch the property to see when Robert Carter who had been living at the property when out shopping. That way they knew that Janice Pritchard would be a defenseless old sick woman at home on her own. They knocked on the door and when Janice Pritchard opened the door she was faced with a group of about 10 men coming into the home and surrounding her home and they immediately pushed her out of the house by man handling her and scaring her. Then they went and had the locks changed and locked her out of the house with all her, Robert Carter’s and John Carew-Reid’s personal possessions in the home. Then they organized corrupt police officers being officers constables Owen Met number ZT253-Constable Turley Number ZT 479 and Inspector Rushworth and Inspector Tandy arrested Janice Pritchard to wrongfully arrest her for being trespassing on the property. Then Robert Carter came back a short time later from shopping and attempted to ether his home and was falsely told by officers constables Owen Met number ZT253-Constable Turley Number ZT 479 at first that his  mother Janice Pritchard had told the police to tell him that she did not want him to going into the property. Then Robert Carter stood by the front door and a short time later after seeing his mother Janice Pritchard was arrested, was told by the police that the same thing will happen to him if he does not immediately leave the premises and the varsinity of the premises. That is he will be arrested for a trespass of him own home where he has been living for over 16 years, and has a life right to be caretaker of the property with his mother Janice Pritchard and John Carew-Reid who purchased the property from Janice Pritchard holds the property in trust for him. There is no court action against Robert Carter and no Court order against Robert Carter to have him removed from the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW.

 

 

Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP-London

Beaufort House
15 St Botolph Street
http://www.blg.co.uk/7.aspx

London    EC3A 7NJ

For online map and SatNav systems please use: EC3A 7DT
Tel: +44 (0)20 7247 2277 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7247 2277      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Fax: 44 (0)20 7071 9000
John Hanson Special Counsel London and Singapore 44 (0)20 7643 7130 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            44 (0)20 7643 7130      end_of_the_skype_highlighting jhanson@blg.co.uk
Tony Nurse-Marsh Managing Partner (Oxford) +44 (0)20 7643 8598 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8598      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
tnurse-marsh@blg.co.uk
Neil Jamieson Partner London + 44 (0)20 7643 8030 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 8030      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
njamieson@blg.co.uk

Katrina McAteer
In-house Counsel London +  44 (0)20 7643 7211
kmcateer@blg.co.uk

Clive O'Connell Partner London + (0)20 7643 8477
coconnell@blg.co.uk
Patricia Orr Associate Director London +44 (0)20 7643 7878 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7878      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
porr@blg.co.uk
James Parker Partner London + 44 (0)20 7643 7117 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 7117      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jparker@blg.co.uk
Timothy Parsons Partner London 44 (0)20 7643 7312
tparsons@blg.co.uk

Patrick Perry  Partner London
+ 44 (0)20 7643 7894
pperry@blg.co.uk

Claire Petts Partner London + 44 (0)20 7643 7698 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 7698      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
cpetts@blg.co.uk
James Preece
Partner Mancester + 44 (0)161 829 6436 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)161 829 6436      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jpreece@blg.co.uk
Ian Plumley Associate Director London +44 (0)20 7643 7810 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7810      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
iplumley@blg.co.uk
Julian Randall Partner London
+ 44 (0)20 7643 8592 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 8592      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jrandall@blg.co.uk

Keith Richardson Partner London +
65 6578 6105
krichardson@blg.com.sg
James Roberts Partner London + 44 (0)20 7643 8549 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 8549      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jroberts@blg.co.uk
Malcolm Rogerson Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8581 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8581      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
mrogerson@blg.co.uk
Marianne Robson Associate Director London + 44 (0)20 7643 7488 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 7488      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
mrobson@blg.co.uk


Simon Konsta Senior Partner +
44 (0)20 7643 8085
skonsta@blg.co.uk
Miranda Karali
Partner London 44 (0)20 7643 8070 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            44 (0)20 7643 8070      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
mkarali@blg.co.uk

Giles Kavanagh Partner London 44 (0)20 7643 8008
gkavanagh@blg.co.uk
Richard Keady Partner Hong Kong +852 2840 2683 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +852 2840 2683      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
rkeady@blg.com.hk
Maurice Kenton Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8566 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8566      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
mkenton@blg.co.uk

David Knapp Partner London
+44 (0)20 7643 8572
dknapp@blg.co.uk

Gaby Kaiser Associate Director + 44 (0)20 7643 8005 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 8005      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
gkaiser@blg.co.uk
Catherine Kearney
Associate Director +44 (0)20 7643 7838 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7838      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
ckearney@blg.co.uk
Adam Lambert Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8029 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8029      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
alambert@blg.co.uk


Janet Lambert Partner London
+44 (0)20 7643 8534
jlambert@blg.co.uk
Eurof Lloyd-Lewis Partner London 44 (0)20 7643 7447 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            44 (0)20 7643 7447      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
elloyd-lewis@blg.co.uk


Patric McGonigal Partner Singapore
+ 65 6578 6116
pmcgonigal@blg.com.sg
Roderic McLauchlan Partner London 44 (0)20 7643 8474 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            44 (0)20 7643 8474      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
rmclauchlan@blg.co.uk


Damian McPhun Partner London
+ 44 (0)20 7643 7337 dmcphun@blg.co.uk
Mike Munro 44 (0)20 7643 7348 mmunro@blg.co.uk


Robert Muttock Partner London +44 (0)161 829 6405 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)161 829 6405      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
rmuttock@blg.co.u

Estelle Machell Partner Mancester
+44 (0)161 240 2633
emachell@blg.co.uk

David MoonPartner Mancester +44 (0)161 240 2653 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)161 240 2653      end_of_the_skype_highlighting dmoon@blg.co.uk

Chris Morrison:
Partner Mancester+44 (0)161 240 2655 cmorrison@blg.co.uk
Hugh Mullins Partner Mancester+44 (0)161 240 2656hmullins@blg.co.uk
Siobhan Mullins Partner Mancester 44 (0)161 240 2657
smullins@blg.co.uk

Chris Murray  Partner Mancester +44 (0)161 240 2659 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)161 240 2659      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
cmurray@blg.co.uk

James Major Associate Director London + 44 (0)20 7643 7815
jmajor@blg.co.uk
Marriam Malik
Associate Director London + 44 (0)20 7643 8839 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 8839      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
mmalik@blg.co.uk

Marlene McConway Associate Director London + 44 (0)20 7643 7671 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 7671      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
mmcconway@blg.co.uk


http://www.blg.co.uk/contact_us/manchester.aspx
Manchester- Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP
Chancery Place, 50 Brown Street, Manchester, M2 2JT, DX 14448 Manchester
Hong Kong, Barlow Lyde & Gilbert
19/F Cheung Kong Center 2 Queen's Road Central, Hong Kong
Tel: 852 2526 4202 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            852 2526 4202      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Fax: 852 2810 5994

http://www.blg.co.uk/contact_us/oxford.aspx
Oxford
Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP
420 Nash Court
Oxford Business Park Oxford  OX4 2RU
DX 155700 Oxford 1
Tel: +44 (0)1865 336600 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)1865 336600      end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Fax: +44 (0)1865 336611

http://www.blg.co.uk/contact_us/s%C3%A3o_paulo.aspx
São Paulo
Barlow Lyde & Gilbert
Av. Paulista, 1337 - 21°
Andar - cj.211
Bela Vista - São Paulo - SP
CEP 01311-200
Brazil
Tel:  + 55 (11) 3179 2900 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 55 (11) 3179 2900      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax: + 55 (11) 3179 2914


Shanghai 
Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP
http://www.blg.co.uk/contact_us/shanghai.aspx
Suite 2601-2602 26/F Azia Center
1233 Lujiazui Ring Road
Shanghai 200120 PRC
Tel: +86 21 6169 1500                            
Fax: +86 21 6169 1501

Singapore
Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP
http://www.blg.co.uk/contact_us/singapore.aspx
61 Robinson Road
#18-02 Robinson Centre
Singapore 068893
Tel: +65 6578 6100 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +65 6578 6100      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax:+65 6221 1608


Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP is a leading international law firm. Especially renowned for our commercial litigation and dispute resolution, as well as insurance and reinsurance, we provide an extensive range of legal services to clients from many different industries across the world

Our core values include a strong focus on helping our clients and our own people to achieve their ambitions.
Our international focus is reflected in the work that we (and our affiliated undertakings) do all over the world

Our People

David Abbott
Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7338 Email: dabbott@blg.co.uk
David Abraham Head Of Costs London + 44 (0)20 7643 8095 Email: dabraham@blg.co.uk
Fernando Albino
Associate Director São Paulo  +55 (11) 3179 2901 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +55 (11) 3179 2901      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email: falbino@blgsaopaulo.com
Tracey Anderson Associate Director London + 44 (0)20 7643 8338 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 8338      end_of_the_skype_highlighting tanderson@blg.co.uk
Chander Agnihotri Associate London 44 (0)20 7643 7243 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            44 (0)20 7643 7243      end_of_the_skype_highlighting cagnihotri@blg.co.uk
Sue Barham Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7856 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7856      end_of_the_skype_highlighting sbarham@blg.co.uk

Kevin Bitmead
Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8574 kbitmead@blg.co.uk
Richard Black Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7444
rblack@blg.co.uk
Andrew Blair Partne London +44 (0)20 7643 8006 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8006      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
ablair@blg.co.uk
Helen Bourne
Partner London+44 (0)20 7643 7036 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7036      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
hbourne@blg.co.uk

Chris Brennan
Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7093
cbrennan@blg.co.uk

Clive Brett Partner Oxford London +44 (0)20 7643 8580 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8580      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
cbrett@blg.co.uk
Jason Bright
Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8834 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8834      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jbright@blg.co.uk
Charles Brown Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7277
cbrown@blg.co.uk
Stephen Browning
Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7709 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7709      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
sbrowning@blg.co.uk
Jim Bryant Partner Manchester +44 (0)161 240 2534 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)161 240 2534      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jbryant@blg.co.uk
Tony Nurse-Marsh
Managing Partner (Oxford) +44 (0)20 7643 8598 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8598      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
tnurse-marsh@blg.co.uk\
Fergal Cathie
Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7870 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7870      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
fcathie@blg.co.uk

Simon Chumas Partner London
+44 (0)20 7643 8490
schumas@blg.co.uk
Sarah Clover Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8544 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8544      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
sclover@blg.co.uk
Jeb Clulow 
Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7682 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7682      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jclulow@blg.co.uk
Peter Coles Partner Hong Kong +852 2840 2634 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +852 2840 2634      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
pcoles@blg.com.hk

Rupert Connell Partner London
+44 (0)20 7643 8100
rconnell@blg.co.uk
James Cooper Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7554 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7554      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jzcooper@blg.co.uk
Simon Cooper Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8486 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8486      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
scooper@blg.co.uk
Adrian Cottam Associate Director +44 (0)20 7643 8128 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8128      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
acottam@blg.co.uk

Nick Dent Partner London
+44 (0)20 7643 7222
ndent@blg.co.uk
James Dadge
Partner Manchester +44 (0)161 240 2552 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)161 240 2552      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jdadge@blg.co.uk
Tanguy De Schwarz Associate Director
London +44 (0)20 7643 8032
tdeschwarz@blg.co.uk
John Flaherty
Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8593 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8593      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jflaherty@blg.co.uk
Patrick Foss Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7727 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7727      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
pfoss@blg.co.uk

Tom Fyfe 
Partner Hong Kong 852 2840 2695
tfyfe@blg.com.hk

Kevin Finnigan
Partner Manchester 44 (0)161 240 2727
kfinnigan@blg.co.uk
65 6578 6101 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            65 6578 6101      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
mhifzi@blg.com.sg
Andrew Forsyth Associate Director +44 (0)20 7643 8098 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8098      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
aforsyth@blg.co.uk
Simon Gamblin Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7217 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7217      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
sgamblin@blg.co.uk
Richard Gimblett Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8069 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8069      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
rgimblett@blg.co.uk
John Goodman Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8467 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8467      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jgoodman@blg.co.uk

Stephen Gorman Partner Manchester
+ 44 (0)161 829 6432
sgorman@blg.co.uk
Simon Gibson Partern Manchester  +44 (0)161 240 2578 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)161 240 2578      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
sgibson@blg.co.uk

Stuart Hall Parter London 44 (0)20 7643 8473 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            44 (0)20 7643 8473      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
shall@blg.co.uk

Mert Hifzi Partner London Senior Partner Singapore +65 6578 6101
mhifzi@blg.

Andrew Howell Partner London
  +44 (0)20 7643 8987 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8987      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
ahowell@blg.co.uk
Douglas Howie Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8484 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8484      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
dhowie@blg.co.uk
Nicholas Hughes Partner London   +44 (0)20 7643 8459 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8459      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
nhughes@blg.co.uk

Stewart Harper Partner London + 44 (0)161 240 2592 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)161 240 2592      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
sharper@blg.co.uk
Ann Hughes Parter Manchester +44  (0)161 240 2606
ahughes@blg.co.uk

Rod Hunt
Partner Mancester 44 (0)161 240 2610
rhunt@blg.co.uk




UK - London

Fishburns
60 Fenchurch Street,
London,
EC3M 4AD

DX 584 London

Tel: +44 (0)20 7280 8888 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8888      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax: +44 (0)207280 8899

Click here for the map

UK - Bristol

Fishburns,
Redcliff Quay,
120 Redcliff Street,
Bristol,
BS1 6HU

Tel: +44 (0)117 301 7390 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)117 301 7390      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax: +44 (0)117 301 7391

Click here for the map

Ireland - Dublin

Fishburns
5 George's Dock,
IFSC,
Dublin 1,
Ireland

DX Dublin 49

Tel: +353 1790 9400 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +353 1790 9400      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax: +353 1790 9401

Partners

John Bennett
Peter Campion - Chairman
Andrew Davis
Aoife Gaughan
John Groome
Philip Heartfield
Mark Klimt
Robert Lloyd
Antony Marsh - Senior Partner
Simon Mason
Jonathan Moss
Denise O'Connor
Harriet Quiney
Tracy Sell-Peters
Peter Sewell
Ian Welland
Angus Wilson
Sheona Wood

Solicitors

Welcome to our list of solicitors, please select contact:

Charlotte Adol
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8925 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8925      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: adol@fishburnslaw.com

Nicola Barnett - Barrister
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8934 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8934      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: barnett@fishburnslaw.com

Elizabeth Bell
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8943 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8943      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: bell@fishburnslaw.com

Joanna Bower
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8979 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8979      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: bower@fishburnslaw.com

Jonathan Brown
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7220 5218 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7220 5218      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: brown@fishburnslaw.com

Dominic Burke
Direct Line: +00 353 1 790 9423 Email Address: burke@fishburnslaw.ie

Dominic Collier
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8941 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8941      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: collier@fishburnslaw.com

Pierre Dagonnot
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8834 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8834      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: dagonnot@fishburnslaw.com

Noel Devins
Direct Line: + 00 353 1790 9406 Email Address: devins@fishburnslaw.ie

Sara-Jane Eaton
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8827 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8827      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: eaton@fishburnslaw.com

Joanna Fookes
Direct Line: + 44 (0)20 7280 8949 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7280 8949      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: fookes@fishburnslaw.com

Alexandra Goddard
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8820 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8820      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: goddard@fishburnslaw.com

Robert Goodlad
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8829 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8829      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: goodlad@fishburnslaw.com

Dan Hall
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8935 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8935      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: dhall@fishburnslaw.com

Gary Hazelton
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8821 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8821      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: hazelton@fishburnslaw.com

Manuela Heise
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8962 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8962      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: heise@fishburnslaw.com

Jennifer Hutchinson
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8924 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8924      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: hutchinson@fishburnslaw.com

Jonathan Hyde
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8927 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8927      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: hyde@fishburnslaw.com

Simon Jackson
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8944 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8944      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: jacksons@fishburnslaw.com

Helen Jenkins
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8816 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8816      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: jenkins@fishburnslaw.com

Sophia Kashmiri
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8823 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8823      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: kashmiri@fishburnslaw.com

Rosemarie Kelly - Legal Assistant
Direct Line: +00 353 1790 9408 Email Address: kelly@fishburnslaw.ie

Carine Kesserwani
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8952 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8952      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: kesserwani@fishburnslaw.com

Robin Lambert
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8879 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8879      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: lambert@fishburnslaw.com

Elinor Lamerton
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8876 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8876      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: lamerton@fishburnslaw.com

Ruth Lane
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7220 5207 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7220 5207      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: lane@fishburnslaw.com

Barry Lewis – Consultant
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8833 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8833      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: lewis@fishburnslaw.com

Marion Mabille - Legal Assistant
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8911 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8911      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: mabille@fishburnslaw.com

Sarah Mahoney
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8825 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8825      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: mahoney@fishburnslaw.com

Michele Malson
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8872 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8872      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: malson@fishburnslaw.com

Helen Matson
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8870 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8870      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: matson@fishburnslaw.com

Lidia McCarthy
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8968 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8968      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: mccarthy@fishburnslaw.com

Hazel McElwain
Direct Line: +353 1 790 9424 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +353 1 790 9424      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: mcelwain@fishburnslaw.ie

Damian McKinnon
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8877 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8877      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: mckinnon@fishburnslaw.com

Helen McLean
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8871 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8871      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: mclean@fishburnslaw.com

Keira-Eva Mooney
Direct Line: +00 353 1790 9415 Email Address: mooney@fishburnslaw.ie

Ravi Nayer
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8981 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8981      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: nayer@fishburnslaw.com

Matthew Olorenshaw
Direct Line: +44 (0) 20 7220 5210 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0) 20 7220 5210      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: olorenshaw@fishburnslaw.com

Caroline Omare
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8957 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8957      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: omare@fishburnslaw.com

Joanne O'Sullivan
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8980 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8980      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: o'sullivan@fishburnslaw.com

Eileen Pathiraja
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8878 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8878      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: pathiraja@fishburnslaw.com

Clare Reed
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8938 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8938      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: reed@fishburnslaw.com

Kiley Rogers
Direct Line: +44(0)20 7280 8815 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44(0)20 7280 8815      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: krogers@fishburnslaw.com

Steve Rogers
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8828 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8828      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: rogers@fishburnslaw.com

Alexander Rozycki - Barrister
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8819 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8819      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: rozycki@fishburnslaw.com

Sinéad Ryan
Direct Line: +00 353 1 790 9418 Email Address: ryan@fishburnslaw.ie

Mirjam Schorr
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8831 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8831      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: schorr@fishburnslaw.com

Richard Senior - Barrister
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8814 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8814      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: senior@fishburnslaw.com

Tim Sheldon
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8830 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8830      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: Sheldon@fishburnslaw.com

Kasia Stavrou
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8917 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8917      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: stavrou@fishburnslaw.com

Michelle Thomas - Legal Assistant
Direct Line: +44 (0)117 301 7396 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)117 301 7396      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: thomas@fishburnslaw.com

Annemarie Topliss - Legal Assistant
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8824 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8824      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: topliss@fishburnslaw.com

Donal Twomey
Direct Line: +00 353 1790 9414 Email Address: twomey@fishburnslaw.ie

Philippa Varcoe – Professional Support Lawyer
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8848 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8848      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: Varcoe@fishburnslaw.com

Dan Ward - Barrister
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8936 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8936      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: ward@fishburnslaw.com

Natalie Ward Karas
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8940 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8940      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: wardkaras@fishburnslaw.com

Clare Ward-Smith
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8874 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8874      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: ward-smith@fishburnslaw.com

John Wevill
Direct Line: + 44(0)20 7280 8948 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44(0)20 7280 8948      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: wevill@fishburnslaw.com

Jennifer White
Direct Line: +44 (0)117 301 7395 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)117 301 7395      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: white@fishburnslaw.com

Janet Williams
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8822 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8822      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: williams@fishburnslaw.com

Nicola Woodhouse
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8826 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8826      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: woodhouse@fishburnslaw.com

Chancery Place, 50 Brown Street, Manchester, M2 2JT
DX 14448 Manchester



http://www.sherforce.net/

Claire Sandbrook

Claire leads the Sherforce team to deliver services which are innovative but remain balanced and fair to the parties involved.

Claire Sandbrook was appointed as a High Court Enforcement Officer by the Lord Chancellor in March 2004. She is the Chief Executive Officer of Shergroup and is also a practicing Solicitor having qualified in 1989.

In her career as a lawyer in which she has made the enforcement of judgments her specialism, Claire has written for some of the leading texts in this area of law including:

The Fourth Edition of Halsbury's Laws of England on the topic of “Sheriffs'

The Fourth Edition of Halsbury's Laws of England on the topic of “Interpleader"

“Execution of a Sheriff's Warrant” – published in 1995 by Barry Rose Publishers and co-authored with Bill Podevin and James Keith, FCA

“Enforcement of a Judgment” (9 th Edition) – published by Sweet & Maxell and co-authored with Duncan Black

“Enforcement of a Judgment (10 th Edition) – published by Sweet & Maxwell

In edition to writing, Claire was appointed to the Lord Chancellor's Advisory Group on Enforcement Service Delivery in 2001, a group which contributed significantly to the reforms in enforcement we are seeing today.

She has aimed to share her knowledge with the credit industry through lecturing for Central Law Training and other training providers so that more practitioners are aware of how to enforce court judgments using the methods available.

Claire is the current Chair of the High Court Enforcement Officers Association and is working with the Ministry of Justice and other stakeholders to promote the Association's stated aimed of “Responsible Enforcement”.

Christopher Badger

Chris has been part of the Sherforce team since December 2001 when he joined as an administration assistant.

Since then he has gained a wide experience of all areas of High Court Enforcement and has built up an impressive portfolio of case histories where he has handled the execution of the Writ in what may be seemed as very complex issues of law.

Having passed the Sheriffs Officers Association Exam in 2003, Chris was appointed an Authorised High Court Enforcement Officer by Senior Master Turner in October 2007.

In 2009 Chris took on the role of Sherforce Operations Manager in which he liaises with Operational Support, Client Services, Debtor Services, Offshore Operations, and Finance Service Teams who make up the service delivery structure of Sherforce.

He frequently attends Court before the Masters of the Queens Bench Division where he deals with Interpleader, Tools of Trade, and Private Sale applications of which can arise during the course of the execution of a Writ.

He is also has a wide knowledge of High Court Enforcement Officer's fees and has dealt with detailed assessment applications at the Supreme Court Costs Office as well as summary assessment applications for fees.

Chris is also Sherforce's Complaints Officer and complaints about Sherforce should be directed to him in the first instance using the Complaints information on this website.

In addition Chris is willing to assist Judgment Creditors on any technical queries regarding the execution of a Writ, including third party claims, interpleader proceedings, fees or any other matter, and can be contacted at  c-badger@shergroup.net.

Sherforce Enforcement Officers 

The named Officer on the Writ is appointed by the Lord Chancellor to carry out enforcement duties. Authorised Officers do go out from time to time to carry out enforcement and remain at all times personally liable for any action taken in their name.

Day to day however, the Authorised Officers, delegate their duties to a team of trained Enforcement Officers who are controlled by Sherforce to carry out the enforcement across England and Wales .

The names of these Officers are set out below: Gary Allen, Sue Allen, Richard Bushnell, Sarah Bosworth, Darren Burgess, George Bright, Mac Ferguson, Michael Hyde, Mark King, David Carvell, Lynda Carvell, John Himpfen, Kevin Thomas, Steve Michell, David Wharton, Kerri Reynolds, David Flowers, Scott Hines, David Sulway, Chris Stokes, Andy Forrester

Claire leads the Sherforce team to deliver services which are innovative but remain balanced and fair to the parties involved.

 

David Asker 

David Asker was appointed as a High Court Enforcement Officer by the Lord Chancellor in March 2004. He is the Chief Technical Officer of Shergroup, having joined the Sheriff's Office in Greater London in 1983. David's career in enforcement has spanned many different types of execution including the recovery of large value Writs of Fi Fa and high profile Writs of Possession. However early on in his career David became involved in the mainframe computer system used to process the work of Sheriff's Officers in London . This interest led David to achieve his Microsoft Network Engineer qualifications and to build and design the Shergroup computer network of which the processing of Sherforce business is a vital part. Built in collaboration with the needs of the user community, the network which David has created sees Sherforce enjoying a global network for both onshore and offshore back office and voice operations.
 This network is the backbone of a modern and well organised enforcement office. As a result of this expertise he has supported Government initiatives for successful enforcement models including:

the successful implementation of the National Information Centre for Enforcement database (referred to as “NICE')

the online DVLA look up system (known as “Shercar”) which is used by other High Court Enforcement Officers, county court enforcement staff, and magistrates' courts fines officers as well as LACEF member

The Fourth Edition of Halsbury's Laws of England on the topic of “Sheriffs”

The Fourth Edition of Halsbury's Laws of England on the topic of “Interpleader”

“Execution of a Sheriff's Warrant” – published in 1995 by Barry Rose Publishers and co-authored with Bill Podevin and James Keith, FCA

“Enforcement of a Judgment” (9 th Edition) – published by Sweet & Maxell and co-authored with Duncan Black

“Enforcement of a Judgment (10 th Edition) – published by Sweet & Maxwell

“Debt Recovery Through the Courts” (1 st Edition) – published by Sweet & Maxwell

In edition to writing, Claire was appointed to the Lord Chancellor's Advisory Group on Enforcement Service Delivery in 2001, a group which contributed significantly to the reforms in enforcement we are seeing today.

She has aimed to share her knowledge with the credit industry through lecturing for Central Law Training and other training providers so that more practitioners are aware of how to enforce court judgments using the methods available.

Claire is the current Chair of the High Court Enforcement Officers Association and is working with the Ministry of Justice and other stakeholders to promote the Association's stated aimed of “Responsible Enforcement”.

Christopher Badger

Chris has been part of the Sherforce team since December 2001 when he joined as an administration assistant.

Since then he has gained a wide experience of all areas of High Court Enforcement and has built up an impressive portfolio of case histories where he has handled the execution of the Writ in what may be seemed as very complex issues of law.

Having passed the Sheriffs Officers Association Exam in 2003, Chris was appointed an Authorised High Court Enforcement Officer by Senior Master Turner in October 2007.

In 2009 Chris took on the role of Sherforce Operations Manager in which he liaises with Operational Support, Client Services, Debtor Services, Offshore Operations, and Finance Service Teams who make up the service delivery structure of Sherforce.

He frequently attends Court before the Masters of the Queens Bench Division where he deals with Interpleader, Tools of Trade, and Private Sale applications of which can arise during the course of the execution of a Writ.

He is also has a wide knowledge of High Court Enforcement Officer's fees and has dealt with detailed assessment applications at the Supreme Court Costs Office as well as summary assessment applications for fees.

Chris is also Sherforce's Complaints Officer and complaints about Sherforce should be directed to him in the first instance using the  Complaints information on this website.

In addition Chris is willing to assist Judgment Creditors on any technical queries regarding the execution of a Writ, including third party claims, interpleader proceedings, fees or any other matter, and can be contacted at  c-badger@shergroup.net.

Sherforce Enforcement Officers 

The named Officer on the Writ is appointed by the Lord Chancellor to carry out enforcement duties. Authorised Officers do go out from time to time to carry out enforcement and remain at all times personally liable for any action taken in their name.

Day to day however, the Authorised Officers, delegate their duties to a team of trained Enforcement Officers who are controlled by Sherforce to carry out the enforcement across England and Wales .

The names of these Officers are set out below: Gary Allen, Sue Allen, Richard Bushnell, Sarah Bosworth, Darren Burgess, George Bright, Mac Ferguson, Michael Hyde, Mark King, David Carvell, Lynda Carvell, John Himpfen, Kevin Thomas, Steve Michell, David Wharton, Kerri Reynolds, David Flowers, Scott Hines, David Sulway, Chris Stokes, Andy Forrester

Claire leads the Sherforce team to deliver services which are innovative but remain balanced and fair to the parties involved.

David Asker 

David Asker was appointed as a High Court Enforcement Officer by the Lord Chancellor in March 2004. He is the Chief Technical Officer of Shergroup, having joined the Sheriff's Office in Greater London in 1983. David's career in enforcement has spanned many different types of execution including the recovery of large value Writs of Fi Fa and high profile Writs of Possession. However early on in his career David became involved in the mainframe computer system used to process the work of Sheriff's Officers in London . This interest led David to achieve his Microsoft Network Engineer qualifications and to build and design the Shergroup computer network of which the processing of Sherforce business is a vital part. Built in collaboration with the needs of the user community, the network which David has created sees Sherforce enjoying a global network for both onshore and offshore back office and voice operations.
 This network is the backbone of a modern and well organised enforcement office. As a result of this expertise he has supported Government initiatives for successful enforcement models including:

the successful implementation of the National Information Centre for Enforcement database (referred to as “NICE')

the online DVLA look up system (known as “Shercar”) which is used by other High Court Enforcement Officers, county court enforcement staff, and Subject:

Pritchard and others v. Ingram Winter Green and others

From:

Tony Nurse-Marsh <tnurse-marsh@blg.co.uk>

(Add as Preferred Sender)

 

Date:Wed, Mar 23, 2011 7:18 amTo:"'admin@jamison.biz'" <admin@jamison.biz>, "sallylpalmer@gmail.com" <sallylpalmer@gmail.com>, "dm@denniss-mathews.co.uk" <dm@denniss-mathews.co.uk>, "William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>, Jonathan Kandler <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>, Mendy <aeb@bnilaw.co.uk>, N Iwanier <ni@bnilaw.co.uk>, "'david.rosen@inlnews.com'" <david.rosen@inlnews.com>

 

Dear Sirs ,

 

 Please note that we have been instructed to act for Ingram Winter Green in the above matter. Please would all parties correspond with us and not Ingram Winter Green in relation to all aspects of this matter.

 

Please would Jamison and Associates / Sally  Palmer confirm that they have relayed this message to all the Claimants  and any other relevant parties .

 

Please would Jamison and Associates / Ms Palmer and Mr Rosen confirm who is acting for the Claimants in the above action in order that we can correspond with the appropriate legal representative.

 

Yours faithfully ,

 

Barlow Lyde and Gilbert LLP

Tony Nurse-Marsh, Partner

Direct Telephone: +44 207 643 8598 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 207 643 8598      end_of_the_skype_highlighting,

Direct Fax: +44 207 071 9151, Mobile: +44 7920 231321 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 7920 231321      end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Email: tnurse-marsh@blg.co.uk

************************************************************************

Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP

Beaufort House, 15 St. Botolph Street, London EC3A 7NJ.

Telephone : +44 (0)20 7247 2277 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7247 2277      end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Fax : +44 (0)20 7643 8500

Web Site : http://www.blg.co.uk

VAT Number: 945619101

 

Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP is a limited liability partnership, registered in England and Wales with registered number OC325641. It is an international law firm regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. The term partner is used to refer to a member of Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP or an employee or consultant of Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP with equivalent standing and qualifications. A list of the members of Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP is open to inspection at the registered office, Beaufort House, 15 St Botolph Street, EC3A 7NJ.

 

BLG Claims LLP is a limited liability partnership, registered in England and Wales with registered number OC344148. BLG Claims LLP is affiliated to Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP. It is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Partners marked * are members of BLG Claims LLP or employees or consultants of BLG Claims LLP with equivalent standing and qualifications. A list of members is open to inspection at the registered office, Beaufort House, 15 St Botolph Street, London, EC3A 7NJ.

magistrates' courts fines officers as well as LACEF member

To:"'admin@jamison.biz'" <admin@jamison.biz>, "sallylpalmer@gmail.com" <sallylpalmer@gmail.com>, "dm@denniss-mathews.co.uk" <dm@denniss-mathews.co.uk>, "William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>, Jonathan Kandler <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>, Mendy <aeb@bnilaw.co.uk>, N Iwanier <ni@bnilaw.co.uk>, "'david.rosen@inlnews.com'" <david.rosen@inlnews.com>

Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors, 1-2 Temple Fortune Parade, Bridge Lane, London NW11 0QN

Tel:+44 (20) 8458 5656 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (20) 8458 5656      end_of_the_skype_highlighting, Fax: +44 (20) 8458 5065, DX: 92006 Temple Fortune, www.bnilaw.co.uk

clerks@radcliffechambers.com, "'N Iwanier'" ni@bnilaw.co.uk CC: admin@jamison.biz, david.rosen@inlnews.com

Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Bedfprd House, 21A John Street, London WC1N2BL Tel: 020 7845 7400 Fax: 020 78457401 www.ing.co.uk

Partners: ND Green, DJ Ingram, CDWinter, PS Sheeter, MA Compion, DP Daws, SE Woolf, DV Popal, MJ Pangbourne, D Ginsbury Consuktants: G Paletz and MA Gordon

 

INL News Legal and Investigation Team

David.Rosen@inlnews.com, admin@inlnews.com

Jamison and Associates: Investigative Accountants and Attorneys

admin@jamison.biz www.jamison.biz Tel: +44 (0) 740 724 7764 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0) 740 724 7764      end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Urgent Attention Duty Inspector Rushworth

Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253 and Constable Turley Met number ZT 479

Met Police, Sutton Police Station London Tel:  0208 7731212 Fax:  0208 649 0790

1st April 2011

Re: Illegal and/or wrongful  removal and arrest of Janice Vivienne Pritchard from 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW and the wrongful and/or illegal  threat to arrest Robert Carter form his home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW, and wrongfully acting as a private security firm for Bude Nathan Iwanier solicitors, Nathan Teitelbaun and fine Investments Limited in clear breach of their duties as London Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253 and Constable Turley Met number ZT 479, under instructions from Duty Inspector Rushworth of the Sutton Police Station. Such actions being civilly actionable in the courts under the common law tort Male-fiance of the public officer as well as being civil and/or criminal offences such as conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, wrongful and illegal arrest, damages to property and person. There is no doubt that the above names police officers will lose their jobs, likely criminal charges and themselves and the Met Police sued for damages, along with the Media exposing world wide the illegal, corrupt and wrongful actions committed and/or authorized by London Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253, Constable Turley Met number ZT 479 and Duty Inspector Rushworth

Dear Sirs and Madame

Further to our earlier letter as attached, we inform you that the London Met Police will be help personally responsible for any items and/or goods, papers, money jewelry, videos, CDs, computer equipment, stereo equipment and/or any other items at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW that we at the premises when your selves on behalf of the London Met Police helped criminals break in to the house and wrongfully stopped the rightful people who had been living in the house stay and protect their belongings. The facts, background and seriousness of the situation is set out in the attached letter that was faxed to you earlier tonight.

Please note unless this matter is resolved to the satisfaction of Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid who are the rightful occupants of the house at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW by Monday at 4pm, then all possible civil and criminal action will be taken out along with a complaint to the head of the Met Police and the Mayor of London and other senior politicians as well as all media outlets around the world

We look forward to an urgent and sensible response.

Yours sincerely

 

INL News Legal and Investigations Group

 

INL News Legal and Investigation Team

David.Rosen@inlnews.com, admin@inlnews.com

Jamison and Associates: Investigative Accountants and Attorneys

admin@jamison.biz www.jamison.biz Tel: +44 (0) 740 724 7764

Urgent AttentionDuty Inspector Neil Tandy and Duty Inspector Rushworth

Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253 and Constable Turley Met number ZT 479

Met Police, Sutton Police Station London Tel:  0208 7731212 Fax:  0208 649 0790

Aaron Emanuel Bude (Mendy) Founding Partner of Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors

 

Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors
1-2 Temple Fortune Parade, Bridge Lane, London NW11 0QN

 
Tel:+44 (20) 8458 5656Fax: +44 (20) 8458 5065 DX: 92006 Temple Fortune
www.bnilaw.co.uk

Barlow Lyde and Gilbert LLP and Tony Nurse-Marsh
Partner Direct Telephone:             +44 207 643 8598      
Direct Fax: +44 207 071 9151 Mobile:             +44 7920 231321       Email: tnurse-marsh@blg.co.uk

Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Bedford House, 21A john Street London WC1N 2BF Tel: 020 7845 7400 Fax: 020 7845 7401

Partners: ND Green, DJ Ingram, CD Winter, PS Sheeter, MA Compton, DV Popat, DJ Ginsbury, EJ Bartie, BA Horak, Consultants: M.A. Gordon, G Paletz

1st April 2011

Re: Illegal and/or wrongful  removal and arrest of Janice Vivienne Pritchard from 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW and the wrongful and/or illegal  threat to arrest Robert Carter form his home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW, and wrongfully acting as a private security firm for Bude Nathan Iwanier solicitors, Nathan Teitelbaun and fine Investments Limited in clear breach of their duties as London Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253 and Constable Turley Met number ZT 479, under instructions from Duty Inspector Rushworth and Duty Inspector Neil Tandyof the Sutton Police Station. Such actions being civilly actionable in the courts under the common law tort Male-fiance of the public officer as well as being civil and/or criminal offences such as conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, wrongful and illegal arrest, damages to property and person. There is no doubt that the above names police officers will lose their jobs, likely criminal charges and themselves and the Met Police sued for damages, along with the Media exposing world wide the illegal, corrupt and wrongful actions committed and/or authorized by London Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253, Constable Turley Met number ZT 479 and Duty Inspector Rushworth and Duty Inspector Neil Tanday

Dear Sirs and Madame

Further to our earlier letter as attached, we inform you that the London Met Police will be help personally responsible for any items and/or goods, papers, money jewelry, videos, CDs, computer equipment, stereo equipment and/or any other items at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW that we at the premises when your selves on behalf of the London Met Police helped criminals break in to the house and wrongfully stopped the rightful people who had been living in the house stay and protect their belongings. The facts, background and seriousness of the situation is set out in the attached letter that was faxed to you earlier tonight.

 

Please note unless this matter is resolved to the satisfaction of Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid who are the rightful occupants of the house at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW by Monday at 4pm, then all possible civil and criminal action will be taken out along with a complaint to the head of the Met Police and the Mayor of London and other senior politicians as well as all media outlets around the world

We again remind you all what we said in your earlier letter faxed yesterday>

If a sensible response is not received, rest assured this letter and previous letters will be published on the wortld internet in many international news websites very soon. Once thisd is done there simply is no turning back. Wew are giving yourselves and the London Met Police this once only opportunity to amend the serious wrongs that have been done today as set out in our previous letters dated the 1st April, 2011. If this warning is not acted upon in a sensible manner, you can not say you all have not been warned and please understand that you will then deserve to be exposed in the world media and be prosecuted with the full weight of all the possible civil and criminal laws available. If things are immediately rectified in a sensible manner we can then look at considering  that yourselves and the London Met Police have made a tragic innocent error and have been hoodwinked by the representatives of solicitors Bude Nathan Iwanier, Fineland Investments, Solicitors Ingram Winter Green, Solicitor Tony Nurse-Marsh, Solicitors Barlow Lyde and Gilbert LLP who all work Nathan Tietelbaun who is a  well known criminal and money laundering involved in a massive International Illegal drug operation who uses these names solicitors to money launder hundreds of millions of pounds each year of black illegal money through their trust accounts and through local council trust  accounts in a scam to defraud life tenants of council flats of their life tenancies.

Representatives of solicitors Bude Nathan Iwanier, Fineland Investments, Solicitors Ingram Winter Green, Solicitor Tony Nurse-Marsh, Solicitors Barlow Lyde and Gilbert LLP who all work Nathan Tietelbaun have used the London Met Police Force and the authority that goes with London Met Police badges in such a wrongful manner yesterday the 1st April 2011 and besides the fact that what was done was illegal, corrupt and/or wrongful, it was also immoral and inhuman to the highest level. All those involved should hang your head in absolute shame over what you have all being involved with doing and/or ordering to be done and/ot allowed to be done and/or covering up from be rectified and exposed, Iy you all do not immediately

(a)  Apologize to Janice Vivienne Pritchard

(b)  Apologize to Robert Carter

(c)  Release Janice  Pritchard from your custody

(d)  Help and allow Robert Carter to return to his home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW. in a peaceful manner with police protection

(e)  Help and allow Janice  Pritchard to return to her home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW.in a peaceful manner with police protection

 

Legal action will commence against yourselves and the London Met Police for damages in excess of 10 million plus other civil and criminal complaints will to made against you to have you all charges with criminal and/civil offences and reports filed to encourage the Met Police to remove you all from your duties to act as police officers so you can not do any more damage to ordinary people

We have already faxed to various fax number being  Fax: 0208 649 0790 and Fax: 0208 649 3712 some 150 pages that have been filed with the High Court of Justice Chancery Division in support of a 100 million pound damages claim against yourselves. As a result of what the London Met Police have done yesterday and continuing today we are about to have the London Met Police, Inspector Neil Tandy and Duty Inspector Rushworth, Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253 and Constable Turley Met number ZT 479 joined to High Court of Justice Action HC11C00C580 as defendants for being involved with assault and threatening behavior  on Janice Pritchard and Robert Carter and a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, conceiling evidence, helping in a robbery, stand over tactics, and the list goes on and on. If the matter is not resolved my Sunday night the met police and your selves as  individual officers will be joined to this court High Court Action.

We have reported for Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid the theft of elect4ricity, water and gas bu unknown persons who illegally broke into the house at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton CR0 4PW on the 1st April, 2011, when the life tenant Robert Carter and new owner of the property John Carew-Reid were away from the property and manhandled and assaulted their caretaker Janice Pritchard, bodily through her out the door and changed the locks and brought a van full of unknown Romanian heavies who say they do not speak English to move into the house. These men threatened Janice Pritchard and Robert Carter and later on re-threatened solicitor Sally Palmer and Robert carter with a shovel with violence that was in the house belonging to Robert Carter with When the police were called by Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid and the INL News Groups investigators the police said it was a civil matter, but 10 minutes later brought a number of policed over to assault Janice Pritchard and wrongfully arrest her without any due cause and wrongfully threatened Robert Carter with arrest if he did not walk away formt he drive way and leave the property altogether.

These people in the house are stealing electricity water and gas form Janice Pritchard and the police and letting them get away with this crime which was reported 12 hours ago. The police have to go and arrest all the people in the house  at 1 Garratt Close Beddington Surrey Sutton CR0 4PW for this crime their names are known so the police have to demand all their names and have their all arrested immediately for steal electricity and also have their bosses charged for conspiracy to steal electricity, gas and water from Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid. These criminals in the house  have been instructed b the legal firms of Bude Nathan and Iwanier, Ingram Winter Green, and Barlow Lyde and Gilbert LLP and Tony Nurse-Marsh as well as Fineland Investments Limited and Nathan Tielelbaun. If the police d not go around and immediately arrest them then the police are continuing to aide and abet a criminal offence and the police themselves refusing to carry out their duties ot arrest these people will have to be also charged and also joined to the above mentioned high Court Action for damages.

We look forward to an urgent and sensible response.

Yours sincerely

 

INL News Legal and Investigations Group

 

 

INL News Legal and Investigation Team

David.Rosen@inlnews.com, admin@inlnews.com

Jamison and Associates: Investigative Accountants and Attorneys

admin@jamison.biz www.jamison.biz Tel: +44 (0) 740 724 7764 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0) 740 724 7764      end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Urgent Attention

Duty Inspector Rushworth

Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253 and Constable Turley Met number ZT 479

Met Police, Sutton Police Station London

Tel:  0208 7731212 Fax:  0208 649 0790

 

Re: Illegal and/or wrongful  removal and arrest of Janice Vivienne Pritchard from 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW and the wrongful and/or illegal  threat to arrest Robert Carter form his home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW, and wrongfully acting as a private security firm for Bude Nathan Iwanier solicitors, Nathan Teitelbaun and fine Investments Limited in clear breach of their duties as London Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253 and Constable Turley Met number ZT 479, under instructions from Duty Inspector Rushworth of the Sutton Police Station. Such actions being civilly actionable in the courts under the common law tort Male-fiance of the public officer as well as being civil and/or criminal offences such as conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, wrongful and illegal arrest, damages to property and person. There is no doubt that the above names police officers will lose their jobs, likely criminal charges and themselves and the Met Police sued for damages, along with the Media exposing world wide the illegal, corrupt and wrongful actions committed and/or authorized by London Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253, Constable Turley Met number ZT 479 and Duty Inspector Rushworth

 

Dear Sirs and Madame

Please note that yourselves have acted in a very wrongful, corrupt and/or wrongful way in arresting Janice Pritchard from her home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW.

Please note that yourselves have acted in a very wrongful, corrupt and/or wrongful way in threatening to arrest Janice  Pritchard from his home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW and forcing him to leave the home he has been living for over 16 years under threat of arrest if he did not leave the property.

You have used you London Met Police Badges and authority in such a wrongful way to day and besides being illegal, corrupt, and/or wrongful, it was simply immoral and inhuman to the highest level and you all should hang your head in shame over what you have done. If you do not immediately

(f)      Apologize to Janice Vivienne Pritchard

(g)     Apologize to Robert Carter

(h)     Release Janice  Pritchard from your custody

(i)       Help and allow Robert Carter to return to his home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW. in a peaceful manner with police protection

(j)       Help and allow Janice  Pritchard to return to her home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW.in a peaceful manner with police protection

 

Legal action will commence against yourselves and the London Met Police for damages in excess of 10 million plus other civil and criminal complaints will to made against you to have you all charges with criminal and/civil offences and reports filed to encourage the Met Police to remove you all from your duties ot act as police officers so you can not do any more damage to ordinary people

 

We hereby attach copies of relevant papers  that have been filed with the High Court if Justice Chancery Division and the HM Tiles office to show that solicitors Bude Nathan Iwanier who represent Fineland Investments and Natham Tietelbaun are acting in a wrongful and/or illegal way by employer heavies  to forcably removing Janice Vivienne Pritchard from her home and ASSAULTING HER to day at  1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW and acted in a wrongful and/or illegal way by employer heavies  to forcably removing Robert Carter from his home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW. They have lied ot the police in saying Fineland Investments is the registered owner of the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW.  The Met Police, including as London Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253 and Constable Turley Met number ZT 479have not acted in a proper and fit manner in refusing to speak on the phone when they were at the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW to find out the truth and facts of the matter under instructions from duty Inspector Rushworth. The situation is clear. Inspector  Rushworth was rung up by power people and powerful connections associated with the powerful Jewish Solicitors Bude Nathan Iwanier, to instruct junior constables who had no idea of the real legal situation ot assist a private security firm and solicitors and corrupt greedy and powerful multi-millionaire property developers who are all involved with money laundering of millions of pounds of drug and other illegal money in trying to buy council flats from councils, abusing the rights of life tenants and defrauding them such as Janice Vivienne Pritchard and Robert Carter.

The facts of this case is that:

1.       Solicitors Bude Nathan Iwanier and their representatives lied and misrepresented the truth and with held material facts to the London  Met Police today in order to get the met Police to interfere with a civil matter in circumstances that met Police undertook a few minutes earlier not to get involved as it was in their opinion a civil matter. Some the material false facts told to the Met Police and facts that were with held form the Met Police today are:

(a)     They falsely told the met Police the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW was registered in the name of their client Fineland Investments Pty Ltd, when they know full well that the property is registered in the name of Janice Pritchard and that a transfer has been lodge with the HM Land Registry sign ed by Janice Pritchard transferring the property to John Carew-Reid pursuant to an agreement dated 4th June 2004. This transfer has been lodged with the HM Land registry and has priority to any other lodgment against the title deed and there is no reason why the transfer to John Carew-Reid will not completed in due cause,

(b)     Robert Carter has been living at the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW for over 16 years and as such has tenancy rights and can not be forceably removed by anyone without a court order against him as he is a long lasting 16 year tenancy, he is the beneficial owner of the property pursuant to a trust letter signed by John Carew-Reid and pursuant to his right under the original 16 year tenancy that Janice Pritchard and Robert Carter had with the Sutton Council which gives them both life tenancies of the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW

(c)     There is a court application due to be heard on the 7th April 2011 in the High Court of Justice- Chancery Division set aside the orders made by Action Deputy Judge Alison Foster on the grounds that the orders were obtained by fraudulent misrepresentation, misleading facts and information provided to the court and withholding of material facts form the court. The attempt to forcibly remove Robert Carter and Janice Pritchard from their home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW with wrongful  and/or illegal and immoral help form the London Met Police force has been an attempt to pervert to course of justice, a civil and/or criminal physical and psychological assault and a most shameful act by agents of solicitors Bude Nathan Iwanier, Fineland Investments Limited, and the London Met Police.

(d)     Janice Pritchard’s right to peaceful possession of the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW results form a number of angles which(i) include the fact that John Carew-Reid who is the rightful registered owner of the property have lodged a legal and binding transfer of the property to his name with the Land Registry, has appointed both Janice Pritchard and Robert carter as permanent caretakers of the property on his behalf as the rightful owner of the property (ii) Janice Prichard has been a tenant and in possession of the property for over 16 years and has the right to remain as such, whether under her  inherent rights and/or under the rights given to her by John Carew-Reid as caretaker of the property for him and Robert Carter’s behalf So even if one wants to support the view that the wrongful, fraudulent and illegal court order of the 31st January 2011 has given some purported right to have Janice Pritchard removed from the property, she can remain under her right as appointed caretaker of the property as appointed by Robert Carter and John Carew-ReId

(e)     They all have had a copy of the statement of truths lodged with the courts  by Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid as attached to this letter and all know what they have done today is civilly and/or criminanly actionable. The sad part about the matter is that the Met Police have decided to take the law into their own hands and help them with their civil and criminal wrongs committed today. The police know they have done wrong and can be sued and those involved are likely to be removed from the Met Police Force with their careers in a legal and public mess with the whole scandal being exposed all over the world media to warn others that that this sort of behavior will not be tolerated.

 

Solicitor Sally Palmer will soon be at the Sutton Police Station to organize with the met Police to immediately release Janice Pritchard form custody with no charge and help with a police escort to be allowed to peacefully move back into their home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW. If the above requested actions are not taken by the London Met Police then the yourselves and the London Met Police will face the full extent of the civil and criminal law against them As well as the the greatest media publicity possible to make it known to the public world wide what is going inside the Met Police and what corrupt, wrongful, immoral and/or inhumane and illegal actions London Met Officers are prepared to be involved with. With all the wrongs going on in the world there is no need for yourselves to shame the London met Police with this sort of behavior.

 

Please email back you immediate response to

admin@jamison.biz and a CC: david.rosen@inlnews.com

If a sensible response is not receive rest assured this letter will be publish on the world internet in many news websites very soon. Once this is done there simply is no turning back. We are giving yourselves and the London Met Police this once only opportunity to amend the serious wrongs that have been done today as set out above, if this warning is not acted on in a sensible manner, you cab not say you all have not been warned and please understand that you deserve to be exposed in the world media and be prosecuted with the full weight of the all possible civil and criminal laws available

If things are rectified in a sensible manner we can accept that yourselves and the London Met Police have made a tragic innocent error and have been hoodwinked by the representatives of solicitors Bude Nathan Iwanier, Fineland Investments Limited and multi millionaire property investor Nathan Tietebaun

We look forward to an urgent and sensible response.

 

Yours sincerely

 

INL News Legal and Investigations Group

                                                               Frontline Club

The London hub for a diverse group of people united by their passion for the best quality journalism

http://frontlineclub.com/

 Frontline Club


Contact us
You can find us on 13 Norfolk Place,
London W2 1QJ
Tel: +44 (0)20 7479 8950
Closest Tube Station: Paddington

 

Frontline Activities

Keep up-to-date with what Frontline does outside of the club - such as the fixers' fund and our journalism awards - and watch out for projects currently being planned across the globe

 

Who we are

Julie Tomlin - Programme Editor
julie.tomlin@frontlineclub.com

Charlotte Cook - Documentary Programme Manager
charlotte.cook@frontlineclub.com

Millicent Teasdale - Events Organiser
millicent.teasdale@frontlineclub.com

Flora Carmichael - Photography and International Coordinator
flora.carmichael@frontlineclub.com

Silje Rise - Membership Co-ordinator
silje.rise@frontlineclub.com

Megan Johnson - Club Co-ordinator
(Private events)
megan.johnson@frontlineclub.com 

Training Department 
training@frontlineclub.com

Events Enquiries
events@frontlineclub.com

Vaughan Smith - Founder and Managing Director
vaughan.smith@frontlineclub.com

Pranvera Smith - Founder and Director
pranvera.smith@frontlineclub.com

General Enquiries
mail@frontlineclub.com

 

 

 

The Frontline Club is the London hub for a diverse group of people united by their passion for the best quality journalism. It is home to over 200 talks and screenings a year. With our elegant restaurant serving the best of British cuisine and our members' bar, Frontline is a unique place to discuss, debate and be inspired.

 

Frontline Memorial Award

FL Memorial Award

The 2008 winner of this award cannot be revealed because of security issues. The award, however, is given to those who work behind the scenes who are rarely acknowledged but are integral to the process of news reporting.

Read more

Frontline Club Award for Journalism

FL Club Award for Journalism

The 2008 winner of this award was photographer Yuri Kozyrev for his coverage of the war in Iraq. The award is given for an outstanding body of work with journalistic integrity, courage and the independence of spirit.

Read more

 

Fixers' Fund

Fixer's Fund

Prompted by the murder of Ajmal Naqshbandi in Afghanistan in 2007, the Frontline Club has initiated the Fixers' Fund - a special project to raise money for the families of fixers killed or injured around the world while working with the international media.

Please support this worthy cause. The death of fixers and support staff in the field are all too often swiftly forgotten but foreign reporters could not operate in the field without them. To try and help these unsung heroes of the industry, the Frontline Club has set up this fund and pledges to pass on 100 percent of all the contributions it receives to the families involved.

DONATE

 

Read more

 

  • Membership

    Membership

    Become a full member of the Frontline Club and you will be part of one of the world's most important networks of journalists, photographers, diplomats and aid workers.

  • Private Hire

    Private Hire

    Our spacious forum is available for private hire, so whether a press conference, meeting or party we're ready to accommodate.

  • Restaurant

    Restaurant

    Nowhere else within 100 miles sources raw materials from it's own farm, offers wines at not much above retail prices, and has a chef who puts his heart into every dish.

The changing nature of protest: does the mainstream media get it? 

 

clubfront1.jpg
Members meeting with Vaughan Smith on WikiLeaks

 

  • Media Podcast

    Podcast

    Our talks are available to listen to as a free podcast the day after the event. Subscribe now!

  • Media Podcast

    Forum Blog

    Where we talk about the people, issues and debates at the Frontline Club: The Forum blog is the place to go to have your say and catch up on any events you missed.

  • Media Podcast

    Broadsheet

    FRONTLINE: A BROADSHEET aims to be a high-quality, quarterly publication, in some ways radical; in others resurrecting traditions lost from the British market.

Frontline Correspondents RSS

With over 40 bloggers covering 30 places and numerous issues, our blogging network is an essential read for those wanting a closer look at the issues we cover.

Upcoming events

Events We Recommend

 civilunrest.jpg

 

Panel Discussion: Covering the Chilean Miners' Story

foto81.jpg

18:30 8th of March, HOST Gallery

1-5 Honduras Street
EC1Y 0TH
London

 

Themes & Places

Recent Comments & Discussions

How Wikileaks is changing journalism

by Jonathan Swann on August 14, 2010 8:18 AM
posted in The Forum - Journalism, insight and debate at the Frontline Club

"How Wikileaks is changing journalism" Any chance of downloading the video?...

 

At the centre of a media storm: The Frontline and WikiLeaks in links

by Michael S. Mitchell on August 12, 2010 12:59 AM
posted in The Forum - Journalism, insight and debate at the Frontline Club

wikileaks and woo go together as the new event of right over might. God bless her and her friends. Those...

 

At the centre of a media storm: The Frontline and WikiLeaks in links

by David Manchester on August 8, 2010 12:56 PM
posted in The Forum - Journalism, insight and debate at the Frontline Club

I would like to see Obama focus on the organisational and reporting deficiencies highlighted throughout the War Diaries, and stop...

Recent Events

by events@frontlineclub.com on 02 March 2011

As protests continue across the Middle East and North Africa, March's First Wednesday event will be an opportunity to discuss the Libya crisis and take stock of events elsewhere in the region....more

view all

 

The world's most wanted house guest by Vaughan Smith

by pranvera.smith2@frontlineclub.com 16 December 2010

Having watched Julian Assange give himself up last week to the British justice system, I took the decision that I would do whatever else it took to ensure that he is not denied his basic rights as a result of...read more

From the blogs

First Wednesday: Libya - what does the future hold?

by Millicent Teasdale 03 March 2011
posted in The Forum - Journalism, insight and debate at the Frontline Club

By SHYAMALIE SATKUNANANDAN The end of Muammar Gaddafi's rule in Libya is in sight - this was the consensus at the Frontline Club’s March First Wednesday, which focused on the situation in Libya. As Norman Benotman, a senior analyst......more


The age of "the inexpert" and the unexpected?

by Julie Tomlin 03 March 2011
posted in The Forum - Journalism, insight and debate at the Frontline Club

Two blogs in the past seven days from different perspectives on the upheaval in the Middle East, raising the question of whether we are in uncharted territory or if the Western media in particular has been talking to the......more


China's Twitter - inside Sina Weibo

by Daniel Bennett 02 March 2011
posted in Daniel Bennett - Reporting War

I was reading a Foreign Policy article about the Chinese government's "deep suspicion of social media and the Internet" which included a link to a very interesting presentation about Sina Weibo - one of several Chinese answers to Twitter.      ......more

 

view all

 

Inside out
© Andrew Testa

More Articles

user-pic

The Secular Fatwa on Julian Assange by Charles Glass

by pranvera.smith2@frontlineclub.com on 14 December 2010

In February 1989, Ayatollah Khomeini issued a fatwa inciting the faithful to murder author Salman Rushdie for blasphemy. Within a few days, professional writers convened in London, New York, and elsewhere to discuss countering this threat. In London, we met......more


user-pic

The Secret War - Iraq War Logs

by pranvera.smith2@frontlineclub.com on 23 October 2010

With the ‘biggest leak of military documents ever’, Wikileaks has reestablished its position as the pentagon’s no1 hate object. In a special four-page report, FRONTLINE discusses the shocking results of the whistle-blower’s collaboration with the Iraq Body Count group and......more


user-pic

Welcome to the Global Shadow State - Julian Assange talks turkey about Wikileaks

by pranvera.smith2@frontlineclub.com on 22 October 2010

Julian Assange reaches to take a book from a shelf behind him – any book. The commodity in which hedeals is information, and he wants to make a point about how information travels, and why. Or does nottravel, and why......more


user-pic

Enough is Enough by John Morris

by pranvera.smith2@frontlineclub.com on 21 October 2010

As president Obama struggles to persuade congress to renew the Start treaty, John Morris, ex-LIFE magazine, makes an impasioned plea for peace and introduces photographs from the a-bomb attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, some previously unpublished.Life photographer Bernard Hoffman, arriving......more

view all

 

 



WIKILEAKS founder Julian Assange's lawyer says he has seen police documents that prove the whistleblower is innocent of rape claims.

Bjrn Hurtig, who is representing Assange in Sweden, said the documents, which form part of the official Swedish investigation, revealed two women had lied about being coerced into having sex with Mr Assange, 39. Assange is being held in Wandsworth prison, London, while fighting extradition to Sweden.

Assange met both women at a seminar in Stockholm last August. After having intercourse with each, at different times, he faced sex charges, which he strenuously denies, that were withdrawn and then reinstated.

 

In an interview from his Stockholm office, Mr Hurtig said: "From what I have read, it is clear that the women are lying and that they had an agenda when they went to the police, which had nothing to do with a crime having taken place.

 

"It was, I believe, more about jealousy and disappointment on their part ...

"If I am able to reveal what I know, everyone will realise this is all a charade," he said. MAIL ON SUNDAY


WikiLeaks cable shed light on Singaporeans' view of Anwar

 2010-12-12 16:19

KUALA LUMPUR, Sunday 12 December 2010 (Bernama) -- Singapore's intelligence services as well as its senior minister Lee Kuan Yew believe that opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim "did indeed commit the acts for which he is currently indicted."

This was revealed by WikiLeaks through a release of a US State Department cable issued in November 2008.

The cable was exclusively released to the Australian tabloid, The Sun-Herald, and was widely reported by other Australian newspapers today.

WikiLeaks is a website that publishes anonymous submissions and leaks of sensitive governmental, corporate, organisational, or religious documents, while attempting to preserve the anonymity and untraceability of its contributors.

The US State Department cable that dealt with Anwar's sodomy case, dated November 2008, and was released exclusively to The Sun-Herald by WikiLeaks, had stated:''The Australians said that Singapore's intelligence services and [Singaporean elder statesman] Lee Kuan Yew have told ONA in their exchanges that Opposition leader Anwar 'did indeed commit the acts for which he is currently indicted'.''

In the newspaper report, it said the document stated that the Singaporeans told ONA that they made this assessment on the basis of ''technical intelligence'', which was likely to relate to intercepted communications.

WIKILEAKS founder Julian Assange's lawyer says he has seen police documents that prove the whistleblower is innocent of rape claims.

MySinchew 2010.12.12

Martijn Gonlag


Second Dutch teenager arrested for WikiLeaks-related DDoS attacks



by Graham Cluley on December 12, 2010 | Comments (4)

FILED UNDER: FeaturedLaw & orderMalware

Police in the Netherlands have arrested a second teenager in relation to the pro-WikiLeaks distributed denial-of-service attacks seen earlier this week.

The arrest of the 19-year-old man follows Friday's attacks on websites belonging to Dutch Police and national prosecutor's office, which were themselves widely seen as retaliation against the apprehension the day before of a 16-year-old Dutch boy alleged to have participated in "Anonymous" pro-WikiLeaks attacks against a number of websites, including MasterCard and PayPal.

Prosecutors claim that the 19-year-old, from Hoogezand-Sappemeer, in the north east of the Netherlands, flooded the prosecutor's website with internet traffic:

"From behind his computer, the man used hacker software to flood the website of the prosecutor’s office with as much digital traffic as possible. Investigations by the National Police Services Agency showed that the man, who was active under the internet nickname Awinee, urged other internet users to participate in the attack."

However, it is reported that the DDoS attack software being used did not hide the IP address of the computer involved, making it easy for high-tech crime cops to identify where the attack was coming from.

That's a pretty silly mistake to make if you're going to attack the website of your country's national prosecutor.

Who is "Awinee"? Well, a quick search on Google found a gaming website of a guy who lives in Hoogezand-Sappemeer, is 19 years old, and uses the online nickname "Awinee", going by the real name of Martijn Gonlag:




Wikileaks Mirrors

Find all the current Wikileaks Mirrors and Links here. Helpful, if the main site - wikileaks.org - is down.



Important Wikileaks Links

Protests expected outside court for WikiLeaks Julian Assange


Protests expected outside court  for WikiLeaks Julian Assange

Tuesday 14 December 2010
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange will ask to be granted bail when he appears before City of Westminster Magistrates' Court for a second time today.
The former computer hacker was remanded in custody last week, despite the offer of surety from a number of high-profile backers, including journalist John Pilger, director Ken Loach, and charity fundraiser Jemima Khan.

If Julian Assange is denied bail, he is expected to appeal at the High Court.

The Australian, 39, turned himself into police after an international warrant was issued accusing him of sex offences in Sweden. Charges are thought to include rape and molestation in one case, and molestation and unlawful coercion in a second. Assange has denied the allegations, which he has claimed stem from a dispute over "consensual but unprotected sex." He has vowed to fight extradition to Sweden.

According to Australian media reports, supporters of Assange and WikiLeaks are expected to protest outside the court.

Yesterday, around 15 supporters of the 'Justice for Assange' campaign gathered outside the Swedish Embassy in central London. They held banners saying "political prisoner" and "gagging the truth" and wore masks of Assange's face.
His court appearance comes as another cable released through the WikiLeaks site reveals the United States was concerned that the UK was struggling to cope with home-grown extremists in the year after the 7th July bombings in London.

In the cable, a diplomat noted that Tony Blair's embarked on a drive to isolate radicals from the mainstream Muslim community after the 2005 attacks.

The message from the US Embassy states: "Since 7/7, HMG [Her Majesty's Government] has invested considerable time and resources in engaging the British Muslim community. The current tensions demonstrate just how little progress has been made."

Another cable suggests British police helped 'develop' evidence against Madeleine McCann's parents as they were investigated by Portuguese authorities investigating the disappearance of their daughter.

Julian Assange
Enemy of the State Hero of the People
By Lucy Carne LONDON
SEEDS OF CHANGE: Julian Assange the boy and the thorn in the side of governments, and a rally by his Brisbane supporters this week
In front of an adoring crowd at the Frontline journalist’s club in London last month, Australia Julian Assange explained why he’s risking the wrath of the world’s most powerful governments.
In his face could still be seen traces of the sweet natured, sensitive little boy his Sunshine Coast-based mother has described and, smiling, the Queensland born 39 year old leaned into the microphone.
“They say I enjoy crushing bastards and. Yes, that’s part of my motivation,” Assange said.
“For some reason, the White House finds that offensive.”
Today, the founder if whistle blowing website WikiLeaks and the man on whom the world’s spotlight is focused, sits is a grey tracksuit in one of western Europe’s biggest prsions.
This week he was remanded in custody of rape, sexual assault and unlawful coercion stemming from alleged  non-consensual sex without a condom with two women in Sweden.
Assange’s imprisonment, after he handed himself in, was met with relief in the US, where authorities were angered by his website’s release of embarrassing diplomatic cables last week.
The man who kicked the hornets’ nest had been silences they thought.
“I hadn’t heard that but it sounds like good news to me,” US Defence Secretary Robert Gates said on being told of Assange’s arrest.
But while Assange grows restless behind bars – he has already complained about the “boring” daytime television and his request to be reunited with his own laptop has been denied – a global groundswell of support has grown.
The strongest act of revenge is coming from a group of ”hacktivists”  known as Anomymous, which temporariiy shut down the websites of US and Swedish corporations this week.
The group also froze the websites of credit-card companies Visa and Mastercard,n which had cancelled financial donations to WikiLeaks.
Post Finance – the Swiss bank that froze Assange’s private account – was disabled too, as was the Swedish prosecution office and the Swedish lawyers representing the two  women who claim  to have been sexually assaulted by Assange.
The Anonymous group’s spokesman, known only as Coldblood, told reports they had not met Assange and were not connected to his organization but felt the need to defend him.
“If we let WikiLeaks fall without a fight then government will think they can just take down any sites they wish or disagree with,” Coldblood said.
In Brisbane on Thursday, some 300 protestors took to the streets in anger at Assange’s imprisonment.
Protests in London were due to be held today.
More than 35,000 people have joined a Facebook group to support Assange, with calls for all members to donate to his legal fund, while around 28,000 Australians have signed a letter to US President BARACK Obama supporting him.
In an open letter published yesterday, prominent supports, including Australia documentary film maker John Pilger, Minty Python member Terry Jones, English actress Miriam Margolyes and author Iain Banks, call for his immediate release from jail
Assange’s unusually harsh imprisonment for allegedly ignoring two women’s  requests to use contraception has caused this sudden swell of skepticism and fury.
Many believe it is a flimsy excuse to keep Assange, who was placed on Interpol’s most wanted list, within reach of the US Justice Department so it can prosecute him under the Espionage Act.
Even while he is hailed by the public as a champion of transparency, to the governments of Australia and the US he remains a menace. To them he is not an innocent messenger but an anti-government terrorist who wants to harm the US and governments across the world.
Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard labeled WikiLeaks’s activities illegal but, despite calls for her to do so, has failed to outline any Australian law that Assange has broken.
Federal Attorney-General Robert McClelland also has stood by his condemnation of Assange, while arch-conservative US politician Sarah Palin called him an anti-American operative with blood on his hands.”
How did the tousled-haired boy in overalls grow up to become an Andy Warhol-esque hero of the people.
“Hr can seem – with his spectral white hair, pa8iled skin, cool eyes, and expansive forehead – like a rail thin being who has rocketed to Earth to deliver humanity some hidden truth,” The New Yorker wrote in June.
Born in Townsville in 1971, Assange has described his childhood as “pretty Tom Sawyer”’ filled with horseriding, building rafts and fishing.
I was, however, far from Idyllic. By the age od 14, his family had moved 37 times, living everywhere from Magnetic Island to Byron Bay. It set the scene for his future nomadic life.
The young boy was home schooled, sporadically educated by university professors and even taught himself in hours spent alone in council libraries.
But his life changed when his mother’s abusive boyfriend tried to gain custody of Assange’s half brother in order to submit him to religious sect The Family.
His mother and her young family “disappeared”, constantly moving, never leaving a trail.
But at the age of 16, in 1987, Assange got a computer and modem and his life was suddenly transformed.
He embraced the random problem-solving and solace if life as a computer hacker.
“We were bright sensitive kinds who didn’t fit the dominant subculture and fiercely castigated those who did as irredeemable boneheads,” he wrote of himself and a teenage friend.
He was arrested in the early 1990’sw for hacking into the computer system of a major Canadian telecommunications company, but avoided a prison sentence of up to 10 years.
A brief spell in hospital for depression soon followed, as well as time spent living rough in the Dandenong Ranges National Park in Victoria and a stint motorcycling across Vietnam.
While working towards a physics degree at the University of Melbourne in 2006, He founded WikiLeaks.
It was a site for anyone wishing to “reveal illegal or immoral behavior in their own governments and corporations” he wrote at the time of the site’s launch.
“ I am the one who9 takes that risk,” he said prophetically, explaining his role at WikiLeaks while addressing the Frontline club last monthly. “As a consequence, I also get a lot of undue credit. I also get all the criticism.”
His original WikiLeaks mandate was to9 “make the news, not be the news”.
But that seems to have backfired, with Assange now a household name around the world.
“Is is weird?” an audience member asked him of his new celebrity status.
“No,” Assange shrugged.” Actually, I find it quite boring.”
Lucy Marne is The Courier-Mail’s European correspondent

Dear Friend,

Sarah Palin wants Julian Assange hunted as a terrorist.1 She's among a swelling chorus of American politicians calling for the arrest - and even the death - of the Australian citizen who runs WikiLeaks. It's a shame that real terrorists, the kind we should be focusing our attention on, don't show up at British Police stations with their lawyers, as WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange did yesterday.

Here in Australia, Prime Minister Gillard pre-emptively judged Mr. Assange "illegal," even as the Attorney General confirmed that no Australian nor international crime by WikiLeaks has been identified.2

The death penalty? Judgment before trial? This isn't the kind of justice system we have in Australia. If our Government won't stand up for the rights of Australian citizens, let's do it ourselves.

We're printing ads in The Washington Times and The New York Times with the statement our Government should have made, signed by as many Australians as possible. Will you add your name to the signatories, and invite your friends to join too?

http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/Wikileaks

The statement:Dear President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder:

We, as Australians, condemn calls for violence, including assassination, against Australian citizen and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, or for him to be labeled a terrorist, enemy combatant or be treated outside the ordinary course of justice in any way.

As Thomas Jefferson said, "information is the currency of democracy."3 Publishing leaked information in collaboration with major news outlets, as Wikileaks and Mr. Assange have done, is not a terrorist act.

Australia and the United States are the strongest of allies. Our soldiers serve side by side and we've experienced, and condemned, the consequences of terrorism together. To label WikiLeaks a terrorist organisation is an insult to those Australians and Americans who have lost their lives to acts of terrorism and to terrorist forces.

If WikiLeaks or their staff have broken international or national laws, let that case be heard in a just and fair court of law. At the moment, no such charges have been brought.

We are writing as Australians to say what our Government should have said: that all Australian citizens deserve to be free from persecution, threats of violence and detention without charge, especially from our friend and ally, the United States.

We call upon you to stand up for our shared democratic principles of the presumption of innocence and freedom of information.We're printing this statement in The Washington Times and The New York Times early next week - and the more Australians sign, the more powerful the message will be. Please add your name by clicking below, and forward this message to friends and family:

http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/WikiLeaks

What has started with WikiLeaks being branded as terrorists won't end there.

In fact, just yesterday U.S. Senator Joe Lieberman, Chair of the Senate's Homeland Security Committee, said thatThe New York Times should also be investigated under the U.S. Espionage Act for publishing a number of the diplomatic cables leaked to WikiLeaks.4 We can help stop such plans in their tracks, by showing how they are affecting the image of the US in the eyes of their staunchest friends and allies.

Click here to sign the statement before it's published in The New York Times and Washington Times.

Thanks for being part of this,
The GetUp team

---

1 Beckford, M., 'Sarah Palin: hunt WikiLeaks founder like al-Qaeda and Taliban leaders', The Telegraph, 30 November 2010.

2 Oakes, L., 'Oakes: Gillard gushes over US leaks', Perth Now, 4 December 2010.

3 The quote is widely attributed to Jefferson, but some now dispute whether he actually said it. We know, at least, that he said "knowledge is power," even if Francis Bacon did say it first.

4 Savage, C., 'U.S. prosecuters study WikiLeaks prosecution', The New York Times, 7 December 2010.



Julian Assange from Jail to Masion






Former Guantanamo Bay detainee David Hicks. Photo: Jacky Ghossein

 \

Assange gets bail but still locked up (01:12)
British judge grants bail to WikiLeaks founder under strict monitoring conditions, but he remains in jail as Sweden appeals the ruling.

Assange will never receive a fair trial: Hicks
Cameron Atfield
December 15, 2010

Hicks answers the tough questions
Former terrorism suspect David Hicks has come out in support of jailed freedom-of-speech campaigner Julian Assange, saying he feared for Mr Assange's safety should he end up in American hands.
Mr Assange, the founder of the WikiLeaks website, has been returned to London's notorious Wandsworth prison despite winning bail from a British Court.
He will be held there for another 48 hours while Swedish prosecutors, who want to extradite him to Sweden to face allegations of sex crimes, mount a High Court appeal against the decision.
Supporters of Mr Assange, including his lawyer, have claimed the charges are politically motivated after the release of thousands of secret diplomatic cables, causing embarrassment for several governments.
Yesterday, Mr Hicks told Fairfax Radio he was concerned about what might happen to Mr Assange if he was extradited to the United States.
"He will never receive a fair trial," he said.
"We have already established that it's a political decision rather than a legal one. It's important that our governments are held to account for any war crimes they may be involved in and that is why the work of WikiLeaks is so important."
Mr Hicks spent six years at Guantanamo Bay, the US-run prison camp in Cuba, before he returned home to Australia to serve nine months at Adelaide's Yatala jail.
He was convicted by a US military commission of "providing material support for terrorism".
Mr Hicks said he believed future WikiLeaks releases could contain information about his incarceration.
"I will watch with interest in more leaks released because I have heard that they might contain information about my treatment in Guantanamo and the political interference in my case," he said.
"I just hope the Australian government doesn't abandon him like they did to me."
WikiLeaks: Julian Assange sex assault court case branded a 'show trial'
The Swedish authorities are turning the sexual assault case against Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founder, into a "show trial", his lawyers claimed.

Mark Stephens attacked the decision by the Swedish authorities to appeal against a judge's ruling to grant the 39 year-old Australian bail.
He said their decision was now a "'persecution" rather than a prosecution and was politically motivated.
He accused the authorities of stopping at nothing to have the Wikileaks founder behind bars, a claim they denied.

 

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is refused bail
15 Dec 2010
WikiLeaks: summary of the latest disclosures
15 Dec 2010
Julian Assange: is 'Wikileaker' on a crusade or an ego trip?
15 Dec 2010
Julian Assange: Jemima Khan comes to aid of Wikileaks founder in Swedish extradition fight
15 Dec 2010
Julian Assange: 'don't shoot the messenger'
15 Dec 2010

Julian Assange: 'don't shoot the messenger'
Governments around the world must not "shoot the messenger" by attacking disclosures by WikiLeaks, Julian Assange said on Tuesday.
Julian Assange says his whistle-blowing website deserves protection and has not cost a single life despite the claims of critics

The former computer hacker said his whistle-blowing website deserves protection and has not cost a single life despite the claims of critics.
Writing for The Australian newspaper, Mr Assange quoted its founder, Rupert Murdoch, as once saying the truth will inevitably win over secrecy.
He said: "Nearly a century later, WikiLeaks is also fearlessly publishing facts that need to be made public."
Mr Assange said WikiLeaks has coined "scientific journalism" that allows readers to study the original evidence for themselves.
He added: "Democratic societies need a strong media and WikiLeaks is part of that media. The media helps keep government honest.
"WikiLeaks has revealed some hard truths about the Iraq and Afghan wars, and broken stories about corporate corruption."
The campaigner denied he is anti-war, but said Governments must tell the truth about their reasons for fighting.
He claimed the United States, supported by its "acolytes", has attacked WikiLeaks instead of other media groups because it is "young and small".
Branding the website "underdogs", he accused Australia Prime Minister Julia Gillard of "disgraceful pandering" to the Americans.
He said: "The Gillard government is trying to shoot the messenger because it doesn't want the truth revealed, including information about its own diplomatic and political dealings."
Mr Assange highlighted some of the most high-profile revelations made by his website over the last week.
He added: "The swirling storm around WikiLeaks today reinforces the need to defend the right of all media to reveal the truth."

In news
  
The WikiLeaks bunker
  
WikiLeaks: 10 greatest scoops
  
WikiLeaks: do they have a right to privacy?
  
The key WikiLeaks revelations
  
Why law is powerless to stop WikiLeaks

 

WikiLeaks 'will continue releasing documents'
15 Dec 2010

 
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is driven into Westminster Magistrates Court in London Photo: Stefan Rousseau/PA
WikiLeaks 'will continue releasing documents'
WikiLeaks has pledged to continue releasing confidential documents after Julian Assange, the website's founder and chief, arrived at court for an extradition hearing.
Wednesday 15 December 2010

Richard Edwards and Nick Collins 2:53PM GMT 07 Dec 2010
Mr Assange handed himself over to police in central London on Tuesday morning after a warrant was issued for his arrest on rape charges.
But ahead of his first court appearance a spokesman for the website insisted the arrest would not prevent the planned release of further cables on Tuesday evening.
The spokesman wrote on Twitter: "Today's actions against our editor-in-chief Julian Assange won't affect our operations: we will release more cables tonight as normal."

The 39-year-old Australian was due to appear before a district judge at City of Westminster Magistrates' Court on Tuesday afternoon, where his lawyers were expected to fight extradition proceedings.
A Metropolitan Police spokesman said: "Officers from the Metropolitan Police Extradition Unit have this morning arrested Julian Assange on behalf of the Swedish authorities on suspicion of rape.
"Assange is due to appear at City of Westminster Magistrates' Court today."
Supporters of Assange were told to protest against censorship outside the Horseferry Road court house on several websites.
His arrest came after an Australian newspaper published an editorial written by Assange, in which he urged governments around the world not to "shoot the messenger".
He wrote: "Democratic societies need a strong media and WikiLeaks is part of that media. The media helps keep government honest."
He accused the Australian government and prime minister Julia Gillard of "disgraceful pandering" to the Americans, adding: "The Gillard government is trying to shoot the messenger because it doesn't want the truth revealed, including information about its own diplomatic and political dealings."
Mr Assange has not been seen publicly for 31 days, since an appearance in Geneva, and was believed to have been in hiding in the south-east of England as the latest tranche of WikiLeaks material was released.
A European Arrest Warrant was issued by the Swedish last month but could not be acted upon because it did not contain sufficient information for the British authorities. A spokesman for Marianne Ny, the Swedish prosecutor, said the extra details were sent last week.
Police processed the warrant yesterday and arrangements were made with Mark Stephens, Mr Assange’s British lawyer, for the Wikileaks founder to attend a central London police station.
Mr Stephens said his client was keen to discover what allegations he was facing so he could clear his name.
"It's about time we got to the end of the day and we got some truth, justice and rule of law," he said.
"Julian Assange has been the one in hot pursuit to vindicate himself to clear his good name.
"He has been trying to meet with her (the Swedish prosecutor) to find out what the allegations are he has to face and also the evidence against him, which he still hasn't seen."
The 39-year-old Australian has been under intense pressure since the release of thousands of secret documents in recent weeks.
Kristinn Hrafnsson, spokesman for WikiLeaks, said Mr Assange had been forced to keep a low profile after several threats on his life.
Sweden’s Supreme Court upheld a court order to detain Mr Assange for questioning on suspicion of “rape, sexual molestation and unlawful coercion” after he appealed against two lower court rulings. He denies the allegations.
His details were also added to Interpol’s most wanted website, alerting police forces around the world.
Mr Stephens said he would fight any bid to extradite his client. He added that Mr Assange “has been trying to meet with the Swedish prosecutor since August this year”.
Mr Assange’s troubles deepened when his Swiss bank account was shut down after it was found he had given a false address. Postfinance, the financial arm of Swiss Post, said: “The Australian citizen provided false information regarding his place of residence during the account opening process.”
Mr Assange had allegedly told Postfinance he lived in Geneva but could offer no proof that he was a Swiss resident.
News of his potential arrest came as WikiLeaks was criticised for publishing details of hundreds of sites around the world that could be targeted in terrorist attacks.
Among the British sites listed are a transatlantic undersea cable landing in Cornwall; naval and motoring engineering firm MacTaggart Scott, based in the small Scottish town of Loanhead; and BAE Systems sites, including one in Preston, Lancashire.
The revelations prompted Sir Peter Ricketts, David Cameron’s national security adviser, to order a review of computer security across all government departments.
Julian Assange: Jemima Khan comes to aid of Wikileaks founder in Swedish extradition fight
Jemima Khan appeared in court to lend her support to Wikileaks founder Julian Assange as he was put behind bars over sexual allegations originating from Sweden.
By Andrew Hough, and Caroline Gammell  07 Dec 2010

Khan, the socialite and charity worker, offered to provide a £20,000 surety to prevent the 39-year-old Australian from being remanded in custody in Britain over the claims.
Swedish officials want him extradited to answer questions over the alleged rape of one woman and molestation of another while he was in Stockholm this summer.
Mr Assange, who was also supported in court by film director Ken Loach and four others, has repeatedly denied the claims.

The 36-year-old former wife of Imran Khan said she would pay “whatever sum was required” to ensure he was granted bail.
However, a district judge at City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court decided he was too much of risk as it emerged that there was no record him ever arriving in Britain.
During Tuesday's hearing he was accompanied by officials from the Australian High Commission after asking for consular assistance.
Outside court, Khan said: “I am not here to make any kind of judgement on the Julian Assange as an individual as I do not know him and I have never met him.
“I am here because I believe in the principle of the human right to freedom of information and our right to be told the truth.”
Mr Assange’s supporters believe his arrest is a political stunt to detract from the revelations being made on a daily basis on the Wikileaks website.
Geoffrey Robertson QC, a prominent Australian human rights barrister who was a defending lawyer at the Brighton Bombing trial in the mid 1980s, has reportedly agreed to act for Mr Assange in future hearings.
The former computer hacker claims he had received several death threats since the secret documents were published and that someone had called for the kidnap of his 20-year-old son in Australia.

Julian Assange in British prison on rape charge
08 Dec 2010
Julian Assange: Extradition case involving Wikileaks founder could last many months
08 Dec 2010
Julian Assange: question of consent
08 Dec 2010
Julian Assange: 'don't shoot the messenger'
07 Dec 2010
The Scarlet Pimpernel of cyberspace
07 Dec 2010
US Attorney General taking 'significant' action
07 Dec 2010

 

Julian Assange: is 'Wikileaker' on a crusade or an ego trip?
Julian Assange, the man who published the Afghan war files on his Wikileaks website, is unlikely to be chastened by Admiral Mike Mullen’s claims that he might now have “blood on his hands”.
Julian Assange outside court in Melbourne in 1995, where he was later convicted of hacking offences.

Julian Assange, pictured in London this week, relies on donations and the hospitality of wellwishers as he travels the globe.

WikiLeaks: summary of the latest disclosures
The latest round of WikiLeaks releases disclose more detail about the US's relationships with allies and foes across the globe. Here is a round-up of today’s headlines.

Britain
Prince Andrew criticised a variety of governments, including those of Britain and America, as corrupt, stupid and backward in a conversation with a US diplomat.
In his wave of “almost neuralgic patriotism”, the Duke also made the bizarre claim that British geography teachers are the best in the world.

Families of British servicemen killed in Sangin, Afghanistan have reacted furiously after it was claimed WikiLeaks would disclose dismissive remarks by US commanders on British efforts to secure the town.
The Welsh family of Bradley Manning, the US soldier suspected of handing the classified documents to WikiLeaks, have flown to America but been prevented from visiting him in prison.
The internet has been rife with speculation about which former Labour minister was labelled “a bit of a hound dog” with women by an American official.
David Cameron was seen as “lightweight” by Barack Obama after the first meeting between the two leaders, leaked files will show.
Prince Charles does not command the same respect as the Queen, according to a senior Commonwealth official.
International
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, dismissed claims that Arab countries had asked the US to attack his country as a deliberate attempt by the US to destabilise the Middle East.
Released Guantánamo Bay prisoners should have electronic tagging devices implanted so that they can be followed by security officials, the King of Saudi Arabia suggested to a White House official.
Silvio Berlusconi responded to leaked claims by American diplomats that he has a penchant for “wild parties” by claiming he only throws parties in a “proper, dignified and elegant way”.
One of the more unlikely stories to surface from the leaked documents was that of a 77-year-old American dentist who fled Iran on horseback after the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
American officials suspect that North Korea has been secretly aiding Iran in its attempts to build nuclear weapons under the auspices of the Chinese government.
Colonel Gaddafi was believed to be very close to a “voluptuous” Ukrainian nurse who followed him everywhere he went, a US cable claimed.
An exile from Iran was living in London when he was targeted in an assassination plot by an Iranian agent, who was later arrested in America.
Hillary Clinton asked US diplomats in Argentina about the mental health of President Cristina Kirchner and questioned whether she was using medication to help her “calm down”.
The White House has told federal agencies to tighten security around the US military computer network following the leaking of classified information.
China would support a unified Korea controlled from Seoul because it believes the North is behaving like a “spoiled child”, documents show.
Sarah Palin has accused Barack Obama of taking insufficient action to prevent the release of the latest batch of WikiLeaks files.
The Supreme Leader of Iran, Ayatollah Khamenei, could die within months from terminal cancer, an Iranian informant told American officials.
Angela Merkel is the only leader “man” enough to lead the European Union, according to American cables.
The United Nations has angrily hit back at American “interference” after learning that Hillary Clinton ordered what amounted to an espionage campaign on its senior officials.
Julian Assange
The WikiLeaks founder is in hiding after an international warrant was issued for his arrest on rape allegations.
Assange’s next target will be the banking sector, with one American bank in particular to suffer from his next revelations, which he compared to the Enron scandal.
Assange has accused Barack Obama of attempting to smother the freedom of the press.
A criminal investigation is underway into how the latest batch of documents was made public, and Barack Obama could take legal action against Mr Assange.

Kazakh defence minister 'was openly drunk'
01 Dec 2010
WikiLeaks: Best quotes from Duke of York's Kyrgyzstan breakfast with US ambassador
30 Nov 2010
WikiLeaks: bereaved families' fury at US 'insult' over Afghanistan
30 Nov 2010
WikiLeaks: British and US governments stupid, says Prince Andrew
30 Nov 2010
WikiLeaks: Criminal investigation underway into leak of classified diplomatic documents
30 Nov 2010
WikiLeaks: Hillary Clinton states WikiLeaks release is "an attack"
30 Nov 2010



Wikileaks Mirrors and Links here. Helpful, if the main site - wikileaks.org - is down


Julian Assange's alleged dating profile surfaces

December 14, 2010

Julian Assange allegedly used dating website OkCupid, his supposed profile now becoming fodder for media scrutiny around the world.

Intrepid internet users tracked down the disused profile that existed around 2006, revealing insightful information into Assange's personality, if it is to be believed that the information was written by Assange himself.

The WikiLeaks founder reportedly describes himself on the website: "Passionate, and often pig headed activist intellectual seeks siren for love affair, children and occasional criminal conspiracy,"

Prefacing his profile with a "warning", Assange explains: "Want a regular down to earth guy? Keep moving. I am not the droid you are looking for. Save us both while you still can"

When asserting what he likes in a woman, Assange's alleged profile states a woman should be "spirited, erotic, non-conformist. Non-conformity is not the adoption of some pre-existing alternative subculture. I seek innate perceptiveness and spunk"

"I like women from countries that have sustained political turmoil. Western culture seems to forge women who are valueless and inane. OK. Not only women!" he continues.

When describing what he is doing with his life, the profile states "Directing a consuming, dangerous human rights project", not without giving reference to his background in mathematics, neuroscience and philosophy.

According to the profile, Assange would have last used it on New Year's Eve December 2006. It states that he has never used drugs and only drinks socially, and that he spends a lot of time thinking about "Changing the world through passion, inspiration and trickery."

Ellingham Hall near Bungay, Suffolk

Pheasant dinners, port and brisk walks may be just days away for Julian Assange, whose bail address is to be Ellingham Hall. Photograph: Alban Donohoe

Julian Assange offered bail haven at former soldier's Suffolk manor


guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 14 December 2010

Maverick libertarian Vaughan Smith rescued WikiLeaks founder from jail - but then came appeal


His supporters include teenage hackers, freedom of speech activists and a motley group of celebrities. But it was the maverick British establishment that rode to the rescue of Julian Assange, offering to whisk him from dull confinement in Wandsworth jail to a large and comfy manor house in Suffolk.

For once, Assange was not the star at the afternoon bail hearing at Westminster magistrates' court. Dressed in a white shirt and blue suit, he watched the proceedings impassively. Instead the hero was Vaughan Smith, a former army officer, journalist adventurer and rightwing libertarian. For much of the past five months, until his arrest last week, Assange has been living at Smith's Frontline Club in Paddington, west London.

Standing to address district judge Howard Riddle, Geoffrey Robertson QC announced that "Captain Smith" was now ready to put Assange up at his rambling country home, Ellingham Hall, near Bungay in Suffolk – that is, should he be granted bail. The WikiLeaks saga has so far been short of jokes. But Robertson had one ready-made.

It would not be so much "house arrest as manor arrest", he quipped. Not only that, but it was inconceivable Assange would attempt to escape "since darkness descends rather early in that part of Britain". Additionally, Assange was willing to give up his Australian passport and wear an electronic tag. Finally, he wasn't likely to get very far given that "media exposure" had made him "well-known around the world", Robertson said with understatement.

Last week Assange was refused bail after he unwisely gave an Australian postal address as his place of residence. This time his legal team would allow no such mistake.

Robertson, Assange's new barrister, asked Smith to give his own assessment of WikiLeaks' controversial founder, in the light of Sweden's attempts to have him extradited on sex allegations.

"He is a very honourable person, hugely clever, self-deprecatory and warm. Not the kind of things you read about," Smith said loyally. But the clincher came when Robertson asked Smith to explain what precisely Assange's new rustic home would look like. After establishing that Smith was a former Guards officer and one-time captain of the British army's shooting team, the QC asked for details of Smith's family home and organic farm. "It has 10 bedrooms and 600 acres," Smith replied. Better still, there was even a police station. "It's a short distance on a bicycle. I can cycle it in about 15 minutes," Smith explained. "It's about a mile. Perhaps a little bit more." Smith added helpfully: "It's an environment where he would be surrounded. We have members of staff. My parents live in proximity as well. My father was a Queen's Messenger and a colonel in the Grenadier Guards."

On the second floor of the court several celebrity supporters had gathered outside next to the coffee machine and green metal benches – John Pilger, Jemima Khan, Ken Loach, Bianca Jagger, and others. But it turned out they weren't really needed – though their money was. Outside on the pavement, a polyglot scrum of journalists waited impatiently for news.

Judging from his appearance, Assange appeared to be surviving his ordeal in Wandsworth prison pretty well. From inside a glass box for the defendant, he confirmed his identity and address. He also gave a cheery thumbs-up to his team.

Robertson, however, made clear that Assange was having a miserable time of it. His conditions inside Wandsworth were nothing short of living hell, he suggested. "He can't read any newspapers other than the Daily Express. This is the kind of Victorian situation he finds himself in," Robertson lamented. He went on: "Time magazine sent him a magazine with his picture on the cover but all the person would allow him to have was the envelope!"

To no one's great surprise, the judge announced that "bail was going to be granted under certain conditions". These turned out to be not overly onerous: an electronic tag, an afternoon and night curfew and a requirement to report to Bungay police station between 6-8pm every evening. Oh, and £200,000 in cash.

Assange's lawyers asked if it might be possible to hand cheques into the court instead? The magistrate was unimpressed, insisting in these financially troubled times it had to be money up front.

Outside, the tweeted news of Assange's bail brought a loud cheer from the 150 or so people who had gathered opposite the court to cheer on their hero and share their banners and placards with the world.

One read: "Sex crimes! My arse!" Another, "That's just what we need – another innocent man in jail", and a third: "Sweden: muppets of the US." Despite the indignant slogans, the judge's verdict plainly delighted the protesters. Three young activists were so thrilled, in fact, that they broke into an impromptu chorus of We Wish You a Merry Christmas.

Soon afterwards, however, there was confusion as news filtered through that the Swedish prosecutor was to appeal against the bail decision, meaning that Assange has to remain for the time being in jail. But his lawyers appear confident he will be out in time for Christmas.

Pheasant dinners, port and brisk walks around the estate may be only a matter of days away.

If he wins his next bail hearing in the high court, Julian Assange's new home will be a historic rural estate on the borders of Norfolk and Suffolk. For more than three centuries Ellingham Hall, a sprawling and elegant Georgian manor house near the village of Bungay, has belonged to the Smith family.

Its owner today is Vaughan Smith, a friend of Assange, and a strong supporter. Smith has previously given the WikiLeaks founder a home at his Frontline club in Paddington, west London, which includes several flats.

Surrounded by 600 acres of woods and fields, the estate is the perfect retreat. It has 10 bedrooms, a large dining room with a convivial circular table, and portraits of Smith's ancestors hanging on the walls. There is a housekeeper who cooks meals. There is also a well-stocked cellar with wine and port – the decent Quinta Do Infantado.

The estate is usually home to Smith's wife and their two children.

Speaking to the Guardian before today's bail hearing, Smith made clear that Assange and his team will be expected to pay for food and accommodation. Other paying guests have included games sports enthusiasts – the hall boasts a pheasant shoot, with pheasants wandering freely over the grounds. The local Norfolk hunt sometimes clatters through the gardens.

"It's a Georgian house from the 18th century. It's been in my family as Smith for the past 225 years, but before that it belonged to the Johnsons, whom the Smiths married into.

"Some of the buildings are even older. On the walls are paintings of the people who bred me," Smith said. "My grandfather liked shooting and I'm partial to it myself."

The estate is exceptionally isolated. The nearest train station is Diss. From there it is a £27 ride in a taxi. It takes half an hour by car from the hall into Norwich, the nearest city.

The remoteness of the location is likely to afford Assange some privacy, since it is impossible to reach the manor house without trespassing on Smith's land.

According to friends, Assange shows little interest in food, and is invariably late for meals. But Ellingham Hall is also home to a large ecologically conscious organic farm. Smith looks after it himself together with two employees; the organic produce is served at his restaurant at the Frontline Club.






Wikileaks Mirrors

Find all the current Wikileaks Mirrors and Links here. Helpful, if the main site - wikileaks.org - is down.



Important Wikileaks Links

"Could become as important a journalistic tool as the Freedom of Information Act." - Time Magazine

WikiLeaks is a non-profit media organization dedicated to bringing important news and information to the public. We provide an innovative,

secure and anonymous way for independent sources around the world to leak information to our journalists. We publish material of ethical, political and historical significance while keeping the identity of our sources anonymous, thus providing a universal way for the revealing of suppressed and censored injustices.

WikiLeaks relies on its supporters in order to stay strong. Please keep us at the forefront of anti-censorship and support us today.

You can also read more about WikiLeaks, our mission and objectives.


Cablegate: 250,000 US Embassy Diplomatic Cables

2010-11-28

On Sunday 28th Novembre 2010, Wikileaks began publishing 251,287 leaked United States embassy cables, the largest set of confidential documents ever to be released into the public domain. The documents will give people around the world an unprecedented insight into the US Government's foreign activities.

All released leaks archived

2010-11-28

Due to recent attacks on our infrastructure, we've decided to make sure everyone can reach our content. As part of this process we're releasing archived copy of all files we ever released - that's almost 20,000 files. The archive linked here contains a torrent generated for each file and each directory.

War Diary: Iraq War Logs

2010-10-22

The 391,832 reports ('The Iraq War Logs'), document the war and occupation in Iraq, from 1st January 2004 to 31st December 2009 (except for the months of May 2004 and March 2009) as told by soldiers in the United States Army. Each is a 'SIGACT' or Significant Action in the war. They detail events as seen and heard by the US military troops on the ground in Iraq and are the first real glimpse into the secret history of the war that the United States government has been privy to throughout.

War Diary: Afghanistan War Logs

2010-07-25

From here, you can browse through all of the documents that have been released, organized by type, category, date, number of casualties, and many other properties. From any document page, clicking on the green underlined text will open a popup that links to other documents that contain those phrases, making it possible to see important search terms and connections that you might not otherwise notice.

Video: Collateral Murder

2010-04-05

WikiLeaks has released a classified US military video depicting the indiscriminate slaying of over a dozen people in the Iraqi suburb of New Baghdad -- including two Reuters news staff. Reuters has been trying to obtain the video through the Freedom of Information Act, without success since the time of the attack. The video, shot from an Apache helicopter gun-sight, clearly shows the unprovoked slaying of a wounded Reuters employee and his rescuers. Two young children involved in the rescue were also seriously wounded.

Spamhaus' False Allegations Against wikileaks.info

Published 15-Dec-2010, 8:00 AM GMT

On Tuesday, 14-Dec-2010 Spamhaus has issued a statement wherein it labels wikileaks.info as "unsafe", as they consider our hosting company as a malware facilitator:

http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=665

We find it very disturbing that Spamhaus labels a site as dangerous without even checking if there is any malware on it. We monitor the wikileaks.info site and we can guarantee that there is no malware on it. We do not know who else is hosted with Heihachi Ltd and it is none of our business. They provide reliable hosting to us. That's it.

While we are in favour of "Blacklists", be it for mail servers or web sites, they have to be compiled with care. Just listing whole IP blocks as "bad" may be quick and easy for the blacklist editors, but will harm hosters and web site users.

Wikileaks has been pulled from big hosters like Amazon. That's why we are using a "bulletproof" hoster that does not just kick a site when it gets a letter from government or a big company. Our hoster is giving home to many political sites like castor-schottern.org and should not be blocked just because they might have hosted some malware sites.

Fortunately, more responsible blacklists, like stopbadware.org (which protects the Firefox browser, for example), don't list us. We do hope that Spamhaus hasn't issued this statement due to political pressure.

Wikileaks.info will always be safe and clean. Promised:

Google Safe Browsing Check for wikileaks.info

Update (15-Dec-2010 17:00 PM GMT): Spamhaus has updated their statement to say that they don't blacklist us.

The wikileaks.info Team


http://213.251.145.96/iraq/diarydig/

WarLogs.Wikileaks.org is a website which provides an easy way to search through the Iraq and Afghan War Logs, which were made public by Wikileaks on 22nd October 2010. The documents are a set of over 391,000 reports which

cover the war in Iraq from 2004 to 2009 and Afghanistan from 2004 to 2009.

From here, you can browse through all of the documents that have been released, organized by type, category, date, number of casualties, and many other properties. From any document page, clicking on the green underlined text will open

a popup that links to other documents that contain those phrases, making it possible to see important search terms and connections that you might not otherwise notice.

Our hope is that this tool will be helpful to reporters and researchers who are interested in learning more about the US's war in Afghanistan and making sense of this important database. If you wish to support this work, we encourage

you to make a donation to wikileaks.

Source code for this website is freely available on github – we welcome any contributions, improvements or suggestions.

On to the documents.

  • CACHE FOUND/CLEARED Other 2003-12-31 18:00:00
    AFG: Cache Found/Cleared, RC EAST, 0 casualties

    KAF-1BDE -S3 REPORTS: GERONIMO 11 SALUTE AS FOLLOWS: S - 1 CAVE, A CACHE, L - 42 SWB758 778, U UNK, T 0641, E - 1X UXO, 2000RDS 7.62MM....

  • IZ RUNS TCP BY /%%% IN ZONE %%%: NO INJURIES 2003-12-31 18:00:00
    iraq: Accident, MND-BAGHDAD, 0 casualties

    WHILE CONDUCTING A JOINT CHECKPOINT /%%% MP CO FIRED ON A VEHICLE WHEN THE DRIVER FAILED TO OBEY THE POSTED WARNINGS AND COMMANDS OF THE IPS WHO WERE MANNING THE CHECKPOINT. THE VEHICLE, A %%% SEDAN ...

  • CACHE FOUND/CLEARED Other 2003-12-31 18:00:00
    AFG: Cache Found/Cleared, RC EAST, 0 casualties

    USSF FINDS CACHE IN VILLAGE OF WALU TANGAY: USSF CONDUCTED A MEET AND GREET IN THE VILLAGE OF WALU TANGAY. USSF MEMBERS WERE APPROACHED BY A LOCAL BOY WHO SPOKE OF A CACHE IN A CAVE ON A NEARBY HILL....

  • PROPAGANDA Other 2003-12-31 18:00:00
    AFG: Propaganda, RC SOUTH, 0 casualties

    (M) NIGHT LETTERS DISTRIBUTED AROUND HAZARJUFT: THE FOLLOWING IS A TRANSLATED VERSION OF ONE LETTER: ISLAMIC IMARATS OF AFGHANISTAN. FOR THE BRAVE WARLORDS OF AFGHANISTAN, SALAM ALAIKOOM. AS YOU KNO...

  • DIRECT FIRE Other 2003-12-31 18:00:00
    AFG: Direct Fire, RC EAST, 3 casualties

    KAF-1BDE -S3 REPORTS: SUMMIT 09 B CO ELEMENT SALUTE REPORT AS FOLLOWS: S- 3-4 PAX, A- SMALL ARMS FIRE, L-IVO 42 SWB 3910 1617, U-UNK, T-0415Z, E-AK-47. 0448Z ENEMY ELEMENTS BROKEN CONTACT. 0442Z AIR Q...

  • DIRECT FIRE Other 2003-12-31 18:00:00
    AFG: Direct Fire, RC EAST, 8 casualties

    KAF-1BDE -S3: SUMMIT 6 REPORTS TIC SALUTE TO FOLLOW: S-18X ACM, A- SMALL ARMS FIRES, L-WB340120, T-1256Z. 1319Z: BDA UPDATE: REPORTING INDICATES POSSIBLY 8X SUSPECTED

  • ACM&apos;&apos;S WERE KIA....

  • A /%%% and local car have been involved in a RTA. No any CAS were reported. 2003-12-31 18:10:00
    iraq: Accident, MND-SE, 0 casualties

    A /%%% and local car have been involved in a RTA. No any CAS were reported. Imported MND-SE Report Event ID:%%% Number of Rounds: Number of Blinds: Number inside the Wire: : : %%%: ...

  • /%%% INVOLVED IN TRAFFIC ACCIDENT: NO INJURIES 2003-12-31 18:10:00
    iraq: Accident, MND-SE, 0 casualties

    DURING A ROUTINE PATROL A /%%% GOT INTO %%% TO A CIVILIAN CAR. NO ANY CAS WERE REPORTED....

  • SAF ATTACK ON CAMP %%% GUARD TOWER IN BAGHDAD (ZONE %%%) - NO BDA 2003-12-31 18:20:00
    iraq: Direct Fire, MND-BAGHDAD, 0 casualties

    RED SEDAN WITH A WHITE TOP WAS DRIVING NORTHWEST ON ROUTE %%%, AND ENGAGED ONE OF THE TOWER GUARDS AT CAMP %%% WITH SMALL ARMS FIRE. THERE WERE NO INJURIES TO US PERSONNEL OR DAMAGE TO ANY EQUIPMENT....

  • %%% CONDUCTS RAID VIC BALAD: %%% DETAINED 2003-12-31 20:00:00
    iraq: Raid, MND-N, 0 casualties

    %%% REPORTS THAT %%% CONDUCTED A RAID ON 2X %%% VIC %%% AND %%% (SOUTH OF BALAD) AT 0200C. THE INTENDED TARGETS WERE SUSPECTED IED ATTACKERS. %%%

  • OBSERVED 4X IZ RUNNING FROM THE OBJ AND CAPTURED THE...









Further Submissions for Claimants in HC11C00580 being Janice Vivienne Pritchard and others v Natham Tietelbaun and others

This should be read by Morgan J before he agrees to sign his proposed orders regarding the hearing dated the 13th April, 2011 in HC11C00580 and before the below mentioned Attorneys further encourage Morgan J to sign to such his proposed draft orders orders regarding the hearing dated the 13th April, 2011 in HC11C00580. If these orders are signed they will have been based on false and misleading information put before the court and the withholding of material information from the court by the below names attorneys and their named legal firms, this such orders would automatically set aside by the Full Court when the criminal contempt application against all these attorneys and their firms is successful and these attorneys and their other legal partners will end up in prison, lose their legal license to practice law and have to pay substantial damages that has been caused by their obvious and blatant contempt of court
David Rosen Attorney at Law INL News Group
21st April, 2011
Emailed to:
"Watson, Heather (HMCS-RCJ, RCJ-Chancery)"< heather.watson@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
"Katie Birchall" <kbirchall@4pumpcourt.com>,  "Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale"@radcliffechambers.com>;, "Francis Bacon <Francis.Bacon"@hailshamchambers.com>;,
"Tony Nurse-Marsh" <tnurse-marsh@blg.co.uk>,
david.rosen@inlnews.com, admin@jamison.biz, sallylpalmer@gmail.com,
Urgent Attention:
Watson, Heather (HMCS-RCJ, RCJ-Chancery) heather.watson@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
Clerk to Mr Justice Morgan
T: 0207 947 6419
F: 0207 947 6062
Sophie Ruffles
Associate
Direct Telephone:             +44 207 643 8407      
Direct Fax: +44 207 071 9258
Mobile:  
Email: SRuffles@blg.co.uk

Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP
Beaufort House, 15 St. Botolph Street, London EC3A 7NJ.
Telephone :             +44 (0)20 7247 2277      
Fax : +44 (0)20 7643 8500
Web Site :
http://www.blg.co.uk
VAT Number: 945619101

Daniel J Ginsbury
- Ingram Winter Green Solicitors
Bedford House,
21A John St.,
London WC1N 2BF
DX1055 London/Chancery Lane
Telephone: 020 7845 7400
Facsimile: 020 7845 7401
Email:
info@iwg.co.uk

geraldinepaletz@iwg.co.uk
 
 
Marie Clair Bleasdale – Barrister at Radcliffe Chambers
11 New Square Lincoln’s Inn London WC2A 3QB DX LDE 319
Tel:             +44 (0) 20 7831 0081       Fax: +44(0) 20 7405 2560 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44(0) 20 7405 2560      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
CC: Johathan Barry Kandler-Aaron Emanuel Bude- Bernard Dubiner- Daniel Giden Zysblat- Nathan Naftalie Iwanier -  Vivian Naftali Vernick -Bude Nathan Iwaner Solicitors
1-2 Temple Fortune Parade Bridge Lane LondonNW11 0QN – DX 92006 TempleFortune
Tel:             +44 (0) 20 8458 5656       Fax: +44 (0) 20 8458 5065 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0) 20 8458 5065      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Emails:info@bn1law.co.uk,  jbk@bn1law.co.uk,  “ N Iwanier”<ni@bnilaw.co.uk>, 
“Vv” <vv@bnilaw.co.uk;   “Bd”<bd@bn1law.co.uk> “Daniel Zysblat” <dz@bnilaw.co.uk
CC: Alison Foster QC, Sitting Deputy Judge Chancery Division
Care Of  Clerk for Alison Foster Sitting Deputy Judge Chancery Division
: Alistair Davidson Tel:             +44(0) 20 7832 1111       Fax: +44(0) 20 7353 3978 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44(0) 20 7353 3978      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Background on Daniel Jacob Ginsbury partners of Ingram Winter Green London Attorney at Law-Sophie Ruffles .. Tony Nurse Marsh partners of Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP Attorneys at Law , Jonathan Barry Kandler of Bude Nathan Iwanier Attorneys at Law, Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors, Attorney Marie Calire Bleasdale, Alison Foster QC, Morgan J- Judge in the High Court of Justice in London-Chancery Division and others...



There is no doubting that the conspiracy to defraud, damage and completely destroy the lives of Janice Vivienne Pritchard and her son Robert Carter that committed by a group of corrupt and immoral attorney and barristers in the United Kingdom, namely
Soffie Ruffles and Tony Nurse March and their legal firm Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP
 Johathan Barry Kandler, Aaron Emanuel Bude, Bernard Dubiner,  Daniel Giden Zysblat, Nathan Naftalie Iwanier,  Vivian Naftali Vernick,  and their legal firm Bude Nathan Iwaner Solicitors,
has been done many time before, and these devious, immoral, illegal and wrongful acts have not gone unnoticed in the worls media on the world wide web and one has ot assume they are all true becaus etere has not been any attmepts whatsoever to take legla action ot have the information on these various websites removed from the world wide web, and uless a criminal contempt application is made against these attorneys, QC's and judges etc to have them inprisoned and pay damages thathave resulted form these criminial contempt, conspiray ot defraud , conspiracy to purvert the course of justice, knowingly and deliberately presenting false and misleading information to the court and withholding material information from the court to obtain wrongful, unjust, immoral andillegal court orders and other crimes and worngful and immoral acts,
these these people will simply carry on doing all the worngful, immoral and illegal acts and the court system and the legal system, that their mates control in the United Kingdom will continue to protect them from be exposed and from being accountable to their actions.
These people are turning  the legal system in the United Kingdon into a complete public disgrace...the English legal system is a fair and honourable system, however these people are working together to abuse the system so badly that the general public will in the end not trusting the English Legal System, and when that happens.... the United Kingdom will end up having no rule of law that the general public can trust and rely on..... and when that happens there will be absolute caos in the United Kingdom, and people will start taking the law into their own hands... so the honest people in the English Legal System must immediately stand up and prosecute those that are acting in a corrupt, illegal and/or wrongful way before it is too late... or those that are acting in a corrupt , illegal and/or wrongful way must stop and start to act in a proper manner before it is too late for them, and before it is too late for the legal system as a whole.
 
David Rosen
Attorney at Law
INL News Group -USA
Daniel Jacob Ginsbury, Solicitor,
Solicitor London
Daniel Jacob Ginsbury
Ingram Winter Green
21A John Street
Bedford House
London
WC1N 2BL
England
Address
Daniel Jacob Ginsbury
Ingram Winter Green
21A John Street
Bedford House
London
WC1N 2BL
England
Contact data
Phone :             +44 (0) 20 7845 7400      
Contact data
Qualification
  • Solicitor
Fields of Law
  • Commercial property
  • Conveyancing residential
  • Landlord and tenant - residential
Languages
  • English
  • Spanish
  • Italian
  • Hebrew
  • Punjabi
  • Urdu

Daniel Jacob Ginsbury ...
Terence St J Millett 34 Sumner Place London SW7 \

http://www.aboutus.org/MetPoliceCroydon.co.uk

A Solicitor enters a bar and spots a tasty looking girl sitting on a stool. He walks up to her and says, "Hey there, how's it going?" She turns around, looks him straight in the eye and says, "I'll screw anyone, any time, anywhere, your place, my place, it doesn't matter." 
"Really," he replies. "What firm do you work for?" 
Wiki Title Home page Description
Excerpted from the website description:
NOT Croydon Policeone of the non bovine excrement sites that give you the reality of Policing and Local Government in the Banana Republic of Croydonia.
Languages
English
Address
21 Agaton Rd, New Eltham, Sidcup
Kent SE9 3RN UNITED KINGDOM
Additional Information
Related Domains
http://www.legalbullies.co.uk/links.htm

http://www.legalxchange.co.uk/colinlinks.htm

http://www.ingramwintergreen.org/ 
why the malevolent disparagement herein? . . . . Ingram Winter Green not only have the problem of what to do about these sites as far as the general public, who search on their name . . . but sometimes more importantly what to say to their’ peers about why they are not doing anything about it. . . I want my readers to be in absolutely no doubt just how much of a problem this is . . . . and hence my excruciating letters . . .I WANT TO DEMONSTRATE BY INFERENCE, THAT BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT INGRAM WINTER GREEN WILL NOT GO TO COURT to prevent me doing this because they know that they lied and dare not admit it in court. Ingram Winter Green deserve this excruciating disdain.
Yet another of my own sites . . this site is not for the sensitive who don’t know what a W*nker is.
http://www.ingramwintergreen.co.uk 
What is not in doubt is the incompetence of Ingram Winter Green solicitors, and Daniel Ginsbury in particular in not being able to solve this problem.. . . . . me. . . . . the only solution they have come up with so far is bar their fax machine to my own, then hide behind the sofa and hope it will all go away. These are the people who sell the service of protecting others at exorbitant cost. Yet they can’t even protect themselves as these sites verify.
One of my own sites . . where all the sensible letters are, that IWG will not reply to.
http://www.dennissmatthews.co.uk 
I have now asked you THREE TIMES . . . . “Did you or did you not conspire with your client S J Patel of 2 Wickham Avenue, Shirley and with Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Islington, to LIE to me in order to defraud me of my considerable claims against the freeholder of the above address? Are there any words you do not understand?
Another of my own sites . . where all the sensible letters are, that Denniss Matthews will not reply to
 
·     Barnett-Ross.co.uk
·     BarnettRoss.org.uk
·     BlogSpot.com
·     British-Gas.org
·     Cracc.co.uk
·     Glalibdems.org.uk
·     Google.co.uk
·     HomeOffice.gov.uk
·     Mcp-law.org
·     Nscglobal.com
·     OmbudsmanWatch.org
·     Piba.org.uk
·     Police.uk
·     RedPepper.org.uk
·     Uk.org
·     Vnunet.com
Taken (with permission) from here http://www.lawyerbaiting.co.uk/page8a.html 
 Colin's comments are in green.
My favourite quote is however from . . . . http://www.law-society.co.uk/ . . . . . . According to Mr Taranjeet Babra the Caseworker of the Law Society, quote "if a Solicitor has been negligent it does not mean he has given poor service"
Doesn’t that just about say it all?
 
http://www.name-n-shame.co.uk/
The power of words versus the stench of corruption
Society is full of people with no scruples; people who are morally and/or financially corrupt; people who are determined to rip us off at all costs; people with no integrity who will never recognise or acknowledge the truth because their own world is based entirely on lies.
These people usually form themselves into like-minded groups and close ranks to present an almost impregnable barrier to outsiders. Or they may find an innocent scapegoat to blame; some innocent fool who tried to speak the truth. If good people continue to turn a blind eye to the activities of these parasites, they will continue to prosper. In many cases, the law actually protects them but perhaps that merely confirms that those who introduce and enforce laws have in their midst some of the most dishonest and corrupt members of our society. Our aim is to name and shame these people and we welcome your help. Though our current government seems determined to deny our right to freedom of speech it is still our right and we must use it.
The POWER of words indeed . . . great site . . does exactly what it says on the tin.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/cash/story/0,6903,1328964,00.html
“The Law Society's less-than-heroic track-record on complaints has dogged the profession for years. In fact, it could well be its undoing. Sir David Clementi, former deputy governor of the Bank of England, is conducting a review of regulation of the legal profession which reports in December. Which?, the consumers' association, reckons the profession's inability to deal with unhappy clients is 'the greatest threat to self-regulation'.”

AND NOT BEFORE TIME . . . Let’s  hope we can rid ourselves of these dishonourable people.
http://www.perceptions.couk.com/laworjustice.html#well  
“Are corrupt / pervert males appointed as judges, magistrates and police-chiefs? 
" We think the evidence says so " 
A great site with hundreds of actual examples and argument.

http://www.unjustis.co.uk/ 
England has a serious problem with organised crime - The Law Society and rogue solicitors ARE the problem. Criminals - committing fraud and theft in England is easy - get a solicitor to help you. If you believe that solicitors belong to an honourable, trustworthy profession, you are gravely mistaken.
Another great site ’unjustis’ with hundreds more examples. . . . They have a link page similar to this one. http://www.unjustis.co.uk/Support/similar_sites.htm 
http://www.tribweb.co.uk/milligan28112003.htm 
Lawyers have been a law unto themselves for too long. Duncan Milligan advocates a speedy reform of the legal profession. MPs described this as deceitful and dishonest and are calling on the Law Society to ask the lawyers to repay the money in full. Unfortunately, the Law Society will probably do what it always does: nothing. 

http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/ 
Welcome to
the Human-Rights web site. THE independent group of public spirited citizens whose aim is none other than to expose the established practices many fall victim to within the United Kingdom.


http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/committees/historic/justice1/reports-02/j1r02-12-02.htm 
This has led the Ombudsman to "question seriously" whether the Society balances correctly the interests of the profession and the interests of the public.12 
They’ve got there same problem in Scotland. . . . . And they are always complaining they don’t get the same service we do in England?

And in Ireland . . . . . . . 

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2091-1632764,00.html 
O’Sullivan, who does not admit distributing the leaflets, said he initially set up the Irish website because he “couldn’t get anywhere with the legal system”. “The way people know each other in the legal profession seems to me to be the biggest problem,” he said. 

http://www.derbygripe.co.uk/law.htm  . . . . By Martin Mitchell 
LAW SOCIETY GRAVY TRAIN HITS THE BUFFERS AT FULL SPEED
A great site well worth a visit . . .lots of other stuff too about Derby Council
http://www.olso.org.uk/ 
This Web Site is being established to warn people that if they make a complaint to the Law Society about a Solicitor's poor service and incompetency the chances of getting a proper or fair resolution to your complaint is probably about NIL. What you will find is that instead of trying to find any positives in your complaint they will do their very best to make every possible excuse under the sun so that the solicitor will be found not guilty of doing anything wrong.
How can I improve on that?

A Solicitor enters a bar and spots a tasty looking girl sitting on a stool. He walks up to her and says, "Hey there, how's it going?" She turns around, looks him straight in the eye and says, "I'll screw anyone, any time, anywhere, your place, my place, it doesn't matter." 
"Really," he replies. "What firm do you work for?" 
You cant get into this site probably for legal reasons?
Book THE MOST CORRUPT BRITISH JUDGES: Dr A Adoko Dr Adoko won a landmark case against the law society for racial discrimination but costs over £14,000 were awarded against him by judges. He was obliged to write this book which indicates the judiciary`s bias for British authorities against the ... http://www.corruptjudges.co.uk/ 
But you can get an explanation here. 
http://www.elc.org.uk/papers/2000Adoko.doc
http://www.scottishlawyerwatch.org/ 
Of all the professions that have evolved in our society, none have ever come close to matching the legal profession for downright deceit and dishonesty. The legal profession is immutable, intransigent, self-protective, unaccountable, incompetent and corrupt.
THIS IS A FABULOUS SITE . SO PROFESSIONAL . WE NEED AN EQUIVALENT HERE . . IT NAMES AND SHAMES (you’d like to think so . . but some are so thick skinned) THEM ALL . . WONDERFUL STUFF. . . . Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers
http://www.sfo.gov.uk/news/prout/pr_131.asp?id=131 
Five persons have been charged in connection with an alleged investment fraud perpetrated through three solicitors' firms. The defendants are:
Peter Edmund Barnett, solicitor (resident of Bishops Stortford) formerly of Rhodes Barlow, Hertfordshire.
Michael Wilson-Smith* (Haywards Heath) formerly of Wilson-Smith & Co., London (* Wilson-Smith and Ruparelia are former solicitors) Martin Tobias-Gibbins (Berkhamstead), a former client Imdad Ullah (London ), a former client
http://www.ingramwintergreen.co.uk 
What is not in doubt is the incompetence of Ingram Winter Green solicitors, and Daniel Ginsbury in particular in not being able to solve this problem.. . . . . me. . . . . the only solution they have come up with so far is bar their fax machine to my own, then hide behind the sofa and hope it will all go away. These are the people who sell the service of protecting others at exorbitant cost. Yet they can’t even protect themselves as these sites verify.
One of my own sites . . where all the sensible letters are, that IWG will not reply to.
http://www.dennissmatthews.co.uk 
I have now asked you THREE TIMES . . . . “Did you or did you not conspire with your client S J Patel of 2 Wickham Avenue, Shirley and with Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Islington, to LIE to me in order to defraud me of my considerable claims against the freeholder of the above address? Are there any words you do not understand?
Another of my own sites . . where all the sensible letters are, that Denniss Matthews will not reply to
http://www.legalbullies.co.uk/ 
In their "extreme defence" first of all their Council Catriona "Merciless when necessary" Duthie, St Johns Chambers, Bristol tried lying to the Judge regarding that damning "heading" on their original estimate (the heading that stated they had included costs which were NOT my responsibility and which they had refused to explain to the Law Society or the Judge). However, they didn't push this too far because the Judge said he was tempted to ask for a transcript. If he had done so I'm sure Catriona Duthie would have weaseled out of it by claiming that her memory was at fault. Yeah, Right! It's STILL a misleading lie as far as I'm concerned... it WAS untrue... and she IS on record... trying to mislead a Judge in a family case. Umm, a bit "extreme" when all I wanted was a detailed bill? There is MORE...
A Rant about a firm of Solicitors . . .FDC Law, (Faulkner, Daniel & Cruttwell Solicitors) Norton House, High Street, Midsomer Norton, BA3 2DF - and Patricia Wayman Senior Ptnr, in particular.
This firm also has offices in Frome and Paulton. . . LOADS to see . . lots of interesting links . . . and a whole section about Fathers . . could do with linking up to parents 4 protest
http://www.standyourground.co.uk/ 
Certain business people, their accountants, solicitors and bank managers have been together in a 'ring' for some thirty years in driving people out of business and picking up their business premises, homes, farms, plots of land etc way beneath market value, financed by amongst other things black market and drugs money. Originally it was thought the area was around Aberystwyth, Mid Wales but it quickly became apparent that these scams are widespread throughout the country.
Started off as a local RANT but soon spread out.
http://www.roughjustice.org.uk/ 
The purpose of this website, is to give information based on my own experiences in using solicitors, ombudsmen, the Law Society, (The Office for the Supervision of Solicitors). This experience, gained from bitter and hard lessons in dealing with people who you might think were on the side of justice, especially the Law Society, hopefully will forewarn you, and make you more able to seek justice in a prepared manner. . . .
Can’t say fairer than that.
http://www.ex.ac.uk/~RDavies/arian/scandals/ 
While most of the cases in these pages involve real or suspected criminal activity a few are included simply because the scale of the incompetence or greed makes them scandalous.
Self explanatory.
When a person assists a criminal in breaking the law before he gets arrested, we call him an accomplice.
When a person assists a criminal in breaking the law after the criminal gets arrested, we call him a lawyer.
to which I'd add - i.e. NOT in Colin's words
When a person assists a criminal lawyer in breaking the law, we call him "Your Honour".
 
Theoretically it is an independent body but the Law Society has removed the previous director and taken direct control. Its inefficiency is so great that the present Lord Chancellor gave the OSS until the end of the year 2000 to put its house in order.
Less of a RANT . . but plenty of facts.
On 8th July, 1997, Nolan recommended a statutory criminal offence of misuse of public office to apply to everyone, including "Ministers and Civil Servants; Councillors and Local Government Officers; the police, magistrates and the judiciary; and to non-governmental public bodies." 
John Major had promised that he would implement anything Nolan recommended. Tony Blair came to power saying Labour would change what was wrong. But somehow this important change to the way we're governed has fallen by the wayside.
The mystery is not why it was "disappeared" but who-done-it? 
caught Good solid political stuff . . This is what it’s really all about.

http://www.law-society.co.uk/ 
If the complaints system was run by an independent and impartial body many more solicitors would be found to be incompetent and have given poor service. The Law Society does not want to happen as it is not in their interest, and thus it controls the complaints procedures itself ,ensuring that the decisions lack what the man on the street would call logic and fairness.
This is still my favourite site . . And closest to my heart . . It takes on The Corrupt Law Society going straight for the jugular.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/3340901.stm 
Even when they are caught they are let off.
http://www.ibtl.org.uk 
IBTL has been established for the sole purpose of offering help, advice and assistance to people who have been ill served by the law. We are a charitable organisation who are funded entirely through grants and donations. We have been established now for almost 10 years.
Contact & Help Site for victims of the rest of these pages.

http://www.bentjudgejamesgoss.co.uk/ 
DAVID BLUNKETT AND YVETTE COOPER KNOW ALL! They covered up and kept the lid on Pandora’s Box of undeniable premeditated judicial corruption!! Also included in this DOCUMENTED PROOF, he has deliberately lied!
Mans got a beef. . . 

http://www.freeclaim.co.uk/nnews_story6.htm 
Solicitors' commercial arrangements with claims management companies undermine their duty to the client, says John Barstow. SOLICITORS ARE seen as “arrogant, slow and crooked” according to an article in the Guardian on 26 August 2002 reporting the ICM Poll commissioned by the RAC.

http://www.unjustis.co.uk/News/News.htm#Special 
The Law Society in England and Wales appears to have abandoned all pretence of maintaining any decent standards at all. For those of you with an interest in this matter, you might consider how another solicitor who was struck off for lying to clients and stealing their money has been recently restored to the Roll.
Fantastic site . . full of information . . facts . . . and RANTS in between.

http://www.ingramwintergreen.org/ 
why the malevolent disparagement herein? . . . . Ingram Winter Green not only have the problem of what to do about these sites as far as the general public, who search on their name . . . but sometimes more importantly what to say to their’ peers about why they are not doing anything about it. . . I want my readers to be in absolutely no doubt just how much of a problem this is . . . . and hence my excruciating letters . . .I WANT TO DEMONSTRATE BY INFERENCE, THAT BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT INGRAM WINTER GREEN WILL NOT GO TO COURT to prevent me doing this because they know that they lied and dare not admit it in court. Ingram Winter Green deserve this excruciating disdain.
Yet another of my own sites . . this site is not for the sensitive who don’t know what a W*nker is.

http://www.which.net/media/pr/jun04/which/solicitors.html  
Almost all those who did complain to their solicitors' practice were unhappy with the way their complaint was dealt with. Nearly three quarters said their complaint wasn't resolved.
 
http://www.which.net/press/releases/other/050321_watchdogs_nr.html 
Nick Stace, communications director, Which?, said "Self-regulation isn't working. People complain to Which? time and again about the second rate service they receive from solicitors; often during stressful times. Other professions can't get away with this type of behaviour and it's time for the government to rein in this complaint-riddled industry."
Hear Hear

http://www.solicitorsfromhell.com/freedom.htm      
http://www.solicitorsfromhell.com/lord_charlie.htm#slj  'The Times' Charlie 'Lord of Nonsence' Click Here
A letter I sent to 'Tony's Crony', Lord 'Charlie' Falconer, who I have so far found to be as straight has a '9 Bob Note' that shows just how corrupt the 'Legal Mafia' are. I'm sure there are some 'Nights in Shining Armour' out there; we know there are plenty of 'Al Capone's' but the ones that 'Severely Damage Your Health' are the 'Cowboys'. A label Mr A Higgins QC put on Thos Boyd Whyte Solicitors in Bexleyheath, Kent, UK. Unfortunately for any Complainants the 'Legal Mafia' have 'Sammy the Bull' and 'Mikey' who between them had never heard of the 'Marquis of Queensberry'. Click Here to read the letter and some remarks 'Charlie' made on 'Human Rights'. 
It seems to me that a great number of the people who sit-in judgment on the 'common English' public are either pedophiles, or paying shirt lifters of young persons or god knows what and if they are caught with their trousers down' then Lord 'Charlie' first of all try's to do a 'cover-up' which ends up with a year's 'gardening leave' and then a £1,000,000.00 pay off. 
Just what happens if a 'common member of the public' is foolish enough to make a complaint against these 'Custodians' of the English Law System? http://www.solicitorsfromhell.com/ombudsman.htm 
Big site . . this one has run for years . . . I first spotted it a year ago and it gave me the ideas to do my own sites. . . It certainly works . . when I was looking for a Solicitor . . . I did indeed avoid Thos Boyd Whyte as the site says . . and I only live round the corner.
The bit about the Law Society acting against complainants leads us nicely on to . . . 

http://www.sir-ian-blair.co.uk/page4.html 
The point is Law Society . . that if there is defamation or harm to a Co caused by this. . . then it is 
up to that Co to use what everyone else has to use . . . THE LAW . . . NOT other devious means like have a go at the service providers. . . . THOSE back hand days of (usually Masonic influence) are going to be over. Your impotence freely admitted in The Gazette shows that. The point is Law Society . . . These firms of Solicitors have an advantage that none us has. FREE Legal Advice . . . FREE Legal Representation . . . FREE Access to Legal Services. . . .the trouble is they wouldn’t want to rely on that advice . . if they were any good they wouldn’t be on these web sites. But we are supposed to rely on them and they expect to charge a fortune for it. “CONCERN MOUNTS” YOU SAY? . . . NOT HERE IT DOESN’T . . . YOU JUST DON’T GET IT DO YOU LAW SOCIETY? IF YOU ACTED PROPERLY HONESTLY AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE and were INCORRUPT ABLE. NONE OF US (and there will be lots more) WOULD NEED TO DO THIS. AND THE MORE PEOPLE THAT DO, THE MORE TENUOUS YOUR POSITION BECOMES. . . One day it will be GOOD RIDDANCE. THIS IS ALL YOUR FAULT . . YOU CAN’T DECEIVE ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME. Similarly the
LEGAL SERVICES OMBUDSMAN for condoning your disgraceful bias. What you’re annoyed about is your total IMPOTENCE. The fact that matters are being dealt with outside your control.
OK I admit it . . from another of my sites . . but it is a RANT entirely on behalf of Rick Kordowski in his dispute with Moss and Coleman Solicitors, Hornchurch. The point is . . there is published evidence of The Law Society’s meddling and circumnavigation of the LAW. They publish it in their own journal The Gazette 24/02/05. . . . THEY’RE BLOODY WELL PROUD OF IT . . . . for goodness sake.

http://www.geocities.com/profrogues/   
It is a complete and utter waste of time contacting the Legal Ombudsman, as once again staff at the Ombudsman's office like Simon Entwistle, are selected by non other than the Law Society. They are swamped with client complaints, and consequently cannot cope with the influx. It is far easier for them to dismiss a claim, and hope you won't bother them anymore,than to spend time investigating your case. The Law Society and it's members top the list when it comes to "cover ups", simply because they do NOTHING to assist the public in a negligence claim. Judges also "cover up" serious solictor/barrister misconduct, and I have evidence to back up that claim.
Brilliant site . . . very concise . . gets it exactly right . . . more of the same but well put.

http://www.lawyerbaiting.co.uk/ 
WALLYBALL . . . The excruciating game that any no of Solicitors can play.
HAVEN’T-A-CLUEDO . The page that shows these people up for what they really are. A bunch of tossers.
ARE YOU BEING SERVED? . . . The page that teaches 5 year olds what to do with intimidating letters issued by TOSSERS.
Yet another of my own sites . . this site . . . well . . . basically takes the piss out of the lot of them.

http://www.hartjournals.co.uk/le/volumes/6/issues/2/457.html 
The Regulatory Crisis in the Solicitors’ Profession .Mark Davies .Sussex Law School, Uni of Sussex 
Self-regulation and discipline by the solicitor’s profession is in crisis. There is evidence of failure at all levels, from the efficient resolution of straightforward complaints, to ensuring the public is not exposed to dishonest solicitors. Changes by the Law Society in recent years have either failed to meet expectations or have diverted resources away from other problems. In this article I draw together a range of criticisms of the current approach to self-regulation and raise the question of whether or not the current regulatory model is sustainable. I will consider whether changes in the size and nature of the solicitors profession has resulted in the need for radical rethinking about the fundamental nature and structure of the regulatory system.
So it’s not just us that’s saying it. The Government know it’s true . . WHY DON’T THEY DO SOMETHING?

http://www.ca-la.org/html/lawyers.html 
WHY CROOKED LAWYERS GO FREE "a grievance system that moves in secret , then winds up disciplining a minuscule percent of those whose conduct is complained about, can be neither effective nor creditable." Here's what must be done If your lawyer mishandles your case, charges exorbitant fee or steals your money, what can you do about it? Short of suing for malpractice , you must take your complaint to a grievance committee made up of other lawyers. What are your chances of getting a fair hearing? According to all available statistics, they are so slim that you would be wasting your time.
De je vue? . . Well actually it’s NOT The Law Society’s fault . . . This is AMERICA 

http://www.parents4protest.co.uk/p4p/solicitors.htm 
P4p believes this webpage published two years ago in the naming of whom we believe are bad solicitors is justified. An opinion supported by hundreds of letters that P4p receive yearly from Fathers, Mothers, Grandparents and even Children who have reported to us the listed offices below. P4p never include on the webpage any unscrupulous FC office/s until we have received two or more detailed complaints about the same legal individual within that office.
This one is going to need a page of its’s own . . there are dozens of ‘blacklisted’ lawyers on this page. . . . I don’t know what the cases are . . I DON’T CARE . . if the allegations weren’t true the Solicitors could do something about it . . . by definition they do not deserve to be Solicitors. . . CLICK HERE >>>>
... of Ingram Winter Green solicitors, and Daniel Ginsbury in ... conspire with your client S J Patel of 2 Wickham Avenue, Shirley and with Ingram Winter Green Solicitors ...
Ingram Winter Green 21A John Street London WC1N 2BL ... Jane Bartle » Nathan Anthony Edwards » Daniel Jacob Ginsbury ... Terence St J Millett 34 Sumner Place London SW7 ...
www.mcadvo.co.uk/GB/en/advoofficelist/372_f14da_conveyancing... - Cached
IWg-Solicitors.co.uk; KentPoliceFraud.co.uk; LawyerBaiting ... Croydon_Council_GUILTY, Croydon_Police, Daniel_Ginsbury's ... East_Anglia, Gun_Crime, IWG, Ingram_Winter_Green, ...
 
 
Sophie Ruffles
Associate
Direct Telephone:             +44 207 643 8407      
Direct Fax: +44 207 071 9258
Mobile:  
Email: SRuffles@blg.co.uk
Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP
Beaufort House, 15 St. Botolph Street, London EC3A 7NJ.
Telephone :             +44 (0)20 7247 2277      
Fax : +44 (0)20 7643 8500
Web Site :
http://www.blg.co.uk
VAT Number: 945619101

Daniel Jacob Ginsbury
- Ingram Winter Green Solicitors
Bedford House,
21A John St.,
London WC1N 2BF
DX1055 London/Chancery Lane
Telephone: 020 7845 7400
Facsimile: 020 7845 7401
Email:
info@iwg.co.uk
 
Not there yet - but a few more - Updated November 2006
New! Website - www.echr-action.co.uk - Human Rights - New!
A few new ones too ... new contacts ... new pages
Dr. Rita Pal - (one could say a LOT here) - http://ritapal.com 
Families and more .... http://www.troublesover.co.uk
I am leaving the majority of my old links on the main page and the tiny weenie bit I did before at the bottom...
Going Great Guns... In the mean time try Rick's site if you are looking for a solicitor (or to warn the world about an awful one) http://www.solicitorsfromhell.co.uk/ ... not to be confused with Brian's original http://www.solicitorsfromhell.com - I like the style and giving NAMES to the enemy.  It seems hell is a lasting theme associated with solicitors. More listed every day ;-)
For my money Paul's http://www.unjustis.co.uk/News/NewsRoundup_2005.htm is an excellent and worthwhile publication.  Just a few of the older sites still worth a special mention.
No, I'm still not properly organised - efforts are (were) going into the Legal eXchange www.legalxchange.co.uk which (I hopeed) will (would) launch in pilot form very soon.  Something you can participate in - please keep an eye out. Still not there - Nov. 2006 - keep checking :-) ... sorry.
Protest sites are a growing phenomenon.  All have their own styles but one thing is certain - all those who take the trouble to create them really believe that things need to change and all are disgusted and cannot accept that there is NOTHING we can do...
The following links are lifted directly from Colin's web site (with permission).  Colin's style is very 21st Century - children cover your eyes or we'll be hearing .... "Dad, what's that place?"  "It's a solicitor's office, son."  "Do Tossers live there?"  "Yes son. Who told YOU?"
Colin certainly works hard and has collected MANY links...

The contents of this page have been taken from: - http://www.sir-ian-blair.co.uk/page7.html
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/cash/story/0,6903,1328964,00.html
“The Law Society's less-than-heroic track-record on complaints has dogged the profession for years. In fact, it could well be its undoing. Sir David Clementi, former deputy governor of the Bank of England, is conducting a review of regulation of the legal profession which reports in December. Which?, the consumers' association, reckons the profession's inability to deal with unhappy clients is 'the greatest threat to self-regulation'.”

AND NOT BEFORE TIME . . . Let’s hope we can rid ourselves of these dishonourable people.
http://www.perceptions.couk.com/laworjustice.html#well
“Are corrupt / pervert males appointed as judges, magistrates and police-chiefs?
" We think the evidence says so "
A great site with hundreds of actual examples and argument.
http://www.tribweb.co.uk/milligan28112003.htm
Lawyers have been a law unto themselves for too long. Duncan Milligan advocates a speedy reform of the legal profession. MPs described this as deceitful and dishonest and are calling on the Law Society to ask the lawyers to repay the money in full. Unfortunately, the Law Society will probably do what it always does: nothing.
http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/
Welcome to the Human-Rights web site. THE independent group of public spirited citizens whose aim is none other than to expose the established practices many fall victim to within the United Kingdom.
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/committees/historic/justice1/reports-02/j1r02-12-02.htm
This has led the Ombudsman to "question seriously" whether the Society balances correctly the interests of the profession and the interests of the public.12
They’ve got there same problem in Scotland. . . . . And they are always complaining they don’t get the same service we do in England?
And in Ireland . . . . . . .
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2091-1632764,00.html
O’Sullivan, who does not admit distributing the leaflets, said he initially set up the Irish website because he “couldn’t get anywhere with the legal system”. “The way people know each other in the legal profession seems to me to be the biggest problem,” he said.
http://www.derbygripe.co.uk/law.htm . . . . By Martin Mitchell
LAW SOCIETY GRAVY TRAIN HITS THE BUFFERS AT FULL SPEED
A great site well worth a visit . . .lots of other stuff too about Derby Council
http://www.olso.org.uk/
This Web Site is being established to warn people that if they make a complaint to the Law Society about a Solicitor's poor service and incompetency the chances of getting a proper or fair resolution to your complaint is probably about NIL. What you will find is that instead of trying to find any positives in your complaint they will do their very best to make every possible excuse under the sun so that the solicitor will be found not guilty of doing anything wrong.
How can I improve on that?
You cant get into this site probably for legal reasons?
Book THE MOST CORRUPT BRITISH JUDGES: Dr A Adoko Dr Adoko won a landmark case against the law society for racial discrimination but costs over £14,000 were awarded against him by judges. He was obliged to write this book which indicates the judiciary`s bias for British authorities against the ... http://www.corruptjudges.co.uk/
But you can get an explanation here.
http://www.elc.org.uk/papers/2000Adoko.doc
http://www.scottishlawyerwatch.org/
Of all the professions that have evolved in our society, none have ever come close to matching the legal profession for downright deceit and dishonesty. The legal profession is immutable, intransigent, self-protective, unaccountable, incompetent and corrupt.
THIS IS A FABULOUS SITE . SO PROFESSIONAL . WE NEED AN EQUIVALENT HERE . . IT NAMES AND SHAMES (you’d like to think so . . but some are so thick skinned) THEM ALL . . WONDERFUL STUFF.
http://www.sfo.gov.uk/news/prout/pr_131.asp?id=131
Five persons have been charged in connection with an alleged investment fraud perpetrated through three solicitors' firms. The defendants are:
Peter Edmund Barnett, solicitor (resident of Bishops Stortford) formerly of Rhodes Barlow, Hertfordshire.
Michael Wilson-Smith* (Haywards Heath) formerly of Wilson-Smith & Co., London
(* Wilson-Smith and Ruparelia are former solicitors)
Martin Tobias-Gibbins (Berkhamstead), a former client
Imdad Ullah (London ), a former client
http://www.ingramwintergreen.co.uk
What is not in doubt is the incompetence of Ingram Winter Green solicitors, and Daniel Ginsbury in particular in not being able to solve this problem.. . . . . me. . . . . the only solution they have come up with so far is bar their fax machine to my own, then hide behind the sofa and hope it will all go away. These are the people who sell the service of protecting others at exorbitant cost. Yet they can’t even protect themselves as these sites verify.
One of my own sites . . where all the sensible letters are, that IWG will not reply to.
http://www.dennissmatthews.co.uk
I have now asked you THREE TIMES . . . . “Did you or did you not conspire with your client S J Patel of 2 Wickham Avenue, Shirley and with Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Islington, to LIE to me in order to defraud me of my considerable claims against the freeholder of the above address? Are there any words you do not understand?
Another ofmy own sites . . where all the sensible letters are, that Denniss Matthews will not reply to.
http://www.legalbullies.co.uk/
In their "extreme defence" first of all their Council Catriona "Merciless when necessary". Duthie, St Johns Chambers, Bristol tried lying to the Judge regarding that damning "heading" on their original estimate (the heading that stated they had included costs which were NOT my responsibility and which they had refused to explain to the Law Society or the Judge). However, they didn't push this too far because the Judge said he was tempted to ask for a transcript. If he had done so I'm sure Catriona Duthie would have weaseled out of it by claiming that her memory was at fault. Yeah, Right! It's STILL a misleading lie as far as I'm concerned... it WAS untrue... and she IS on record... trying to mislead a Judge in a family case. Umm, a bit "extreme" when all I wanted was a detailed bill? There is MORE...
A Rant about a firm of Solicitors . . .FDC Law, (Faulkner, Daniel & Cruttwell Solicitors) Norton House, High Street, Midsomer Norton, BA3 2DF - and Patricia Wayman Senior Ptnr, in particular.
This firm also has offices in Frome and Paulton. . . LOADS to see . . lots of interesting links . . . and a whole section about Fathers . . could do with linking up to parents 4 protest.
http://www.standyourground.co.uk/
Certain business people, their accountants, solicitors and bank managers have been together in a 'ring' for some thirty years in driving people out of business and picking up their business premises, homes, farms, plots of land etc way beneath market value, financed by amongst other things black market and drugs money. Originally it was thought the area was around Aberystwyth, Mid Wales but it quickly became apparent that these scams are widespread throughout the country.
Started off as a local RANT but soon spread out.
http://www.roughjustice.org.uk/
The purpose of this website, is to give information based on my own experiences in using solicitors, ombudsmen, the Law Society, (the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors). This experience, gained from bitter and hard lessons in dealing with people who you might think were on the side of justice, especially the Law Society, hopefully will forewarn you, and make you more able to seek justice in a prepared manner. . . .
Can’t say fairer than that.
http://www.ex.ac.uk/~RDavies/arian/scandals/
While most of the cases in these pages involve real or suspected criminal activity a few are included simply because the scale of the incompetence or greed makes them scandalous.
Self explanatory.
http://members.aol.com/lawawful/ Theoretically it is an independent body but the Law Society has removed the previous director and taken direct control. Its inefficiency is so great that the present Lord Chancellor gave the OSS until the end of the year 2000 to put its house in order.
Less of a RANT . . but plenty of facts.
http://www.action4justice-fairhearing.org.uk/
On 8th July, 1997, Nolan recommended a statutory criminal offence of misuse of public office to apply to everyone, including "Ministers and Civil Servants; Councillors and Local Government Officers; the police, magistrates and the judiciary; and to non-governmental public bodies."
John Major had promised that he would implement anything Nolan recommended. Tony Blair came to power saying Labour would change what was wrong. But somehow this important change to the way we're governed has fallen by the wayside.
The mystery is not why it was "disappeared" but who-done-it?
caught Good solid political stuff . . This is what it’s really all about.
http://www.law-society.co.uk/
If the complaints system was run by an independent and impartial body many more solicitors would be found to be incompetent and have given poor service. The Law Society does not want to happen as it is not in their interest, and thus it controls the complaints procedures itself ,ensuring that the decisions lack what the man on the street would call logic and fairness.
This is still my favourite site . . And closest to my heart . . It takes on The Corrupt Law Society going straight for the jugular.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/3340901.stm
Even when they are caught they are let off.
http://www.ibtl.org.uk IBTL has been established for the sole purpose of offering help, advice and assistance to people who have been ill served by the law. We are a charitable organisation who are funded entirely through grants and donations. We have been established now for almost 10 years.
Contact & Help Site for victims of the rest of these pages.
http://www.ingramwintergreen.org/
why the malevolent disparagement herein? . . . . Ingram Winter green not only have the problem of what to do about these sites as far as the general public, who search on their name . . . but sometimes more importantly what to say to their’ peers about why they are not doing anything about it. . . I want my readers to be in absolutely no doubt just how much of a problem this is . . . . and hence my excruciating letters . . .I WANT TO DEMONSTRATE BY INFERENCE, THAT BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT INGRAM WINTER GREEN WILL NOT GO TO COURT to prevent me doing this because they know that they lied and dare not admit it in court. Ingram Winter Green deserve this excruciating disdain.
Yet another of my own sites . . this site is not for the sensitive who don’t know what a Wanker is.
http://www.bentjudgejamesgoss.co.uk/
DAVID BLUNKETT AND YVETTE COOPER KNOW ALL! They covered up and kept the lid on Pandora’s Box of undeniable premeditated judicial corruption!! Also included in this DOCUMENTED PROOF, he has deliberately lied!
Mans got a beef. . .
http://www.freeclaim.co.uk/nnews_story6.htm
Solicitors' commercial arrangements with claims management companies undermine their duty to the client, says John Barstow. SOLICITORS ARE seen as “arrogant, slow and crooked” according to an article in the Guardian on 26 August 2002 reporting the ICM Poll commissioned by the RAC.
http://www.unjustis.co.uk/News/News.htm#Special
The Law Society in England and Wales appears to have abandoned all pretence of maintaining any decent standards at all. For those of you with an interest in this matter, you might consider how another solicitor who was struck off for lying to clients and stealing their money has been recently restored to the Roll.

Fathers etc...
I hope the following links may be useful to someone.  This is certainly not exhaustive but please read the notes below.
http://www.mensaid.com - forums, news, advice and more.  Now a registered charity - formerly UK Fathers - Their very useful "Megaphones" are restored http://www.mensaid.com/megaphone/index.htm 
http://www.fathers-4-justice.org/ - one of their many, many sites - try a search.  I doubt these people need an introduction.
http://www.courtservice.gov.uk/View.do?id=2466 - I came across this judgment when searching the Court Services website.  It is clearly very sad and I feel that more judges should speak out. They should be critical of the law.  They should also be far more critical of mal-practicing legal "professionals" than they currently are.
It is impossible to research "injustice", "solicitor complaints" or "family law" without turning up some really serious, often heart-rending, cases and issues.  It is plain that there are inherent injustices in the substantive law and the way many judges view matters in family cases.  The complete lack of regulation of the so-called "professionals" who deal with these cases must be even more infuriating, exasperating and soul-destroying for many, many other people.
I am thankful that I have NOT had to become an "expert" in such injustices but I am certainly more aware and more concerned than I was.  This website itself may be of little use to such people.  Indeed, my own problems may seem trivial.  On the other hand, we have some common ground and who can really tell the true "cause and effect"?  What will strike a note with any given reader pursuing their own problems?  One example - shortly after I contacted my MP (Dan Norris) regarding my complaints with FDC Law and the OSS he made the news - 
One Other From the Post-Bag
From someone who has suffered appallingly at the hands of a solicitor and the Law Society.
Please do let me know if you have any more links that belong under this or any related heading.
Home ] [ FDC ] [ Misconduct ] [ Deception ] [ Lawyers ] [ OSS ] [ Police ] [ Links ] [ Feedback ]

Two more arrived in today's mail-bag (08/06/2008) under the title "Name & Shame websites":-
Two new websites to add to your links page
 
Does the failure to regulate the legal profession breach the European Convention of Human Rights?
Have you ever complained to the Law Society about the conduct of a solicitor only to discover that, far from regulating the profession, the Law Society was biased in favour of the solicitor and did not investigate your complaint?  Have you complained to the Office of the Legal Services Ombudsman, expecting final justice, only to be confronted by more of the same, seemingly inept and biased behaviour?  If so, you are NOT alone.
The British Government has long been aware of the inadequacies of the so-called regulators of the Legal Profession and yet in REAL terms very little has changed.  All so-called improvements seem to offer a flavour of jam tomorrow whilst doing little or nothing for affected citizens today.  New legislated "powers" go unused and it remains business as usual for mal-practicing lawyers and their protection racket.  Access to Justice is thereby denied.  For many 1000's of people a year this may be a grave breach of their basic Human Rights.
If you have persistent genes (Q21) and the LSO gives you a "report" that dismisses your complaints then that is the end of your options, right?  Wrong!  There is no appeal from the Ombudsman's decision but you can have a Judicial Review.  Very few people, it seems, are this persistent.  Fewer still will be willing to take matters to the European Court of Human Rights.
The vast majority of complainants will fall into this last category.  Even if this is YOU, you should not give up so easily.  There is still a GREAT DEAL that you can, and perhaps should, DO.  Some of these positive actions may be far less difficult than you may think.  The purpose of this site is to raise awareness of some of these options.  Together we are much stronger.  Together we may achieve a great deal where individually all will be doomed to failure.  Please read on...
Did you know that the European Court operates a well established and important system for intervention by third parties in existing cases?  "Any person concerned" may adduce supporting information if it is considered to be "in the interest of the proper administration of justice".  This means that some people can have their say where it supports another application.  Read more (new window).  The process is simple and the only financial outlay is the cost of the postage. The only drawback...
How do you find out about such applications?
Here is our mission statement:-
http://www.echr-action.co.uk/_themes/capsules/capbul1a.gif
To attempt to "advertise" relevant applications filed with the ECHR
http://www.echr-action.co.uk/_themes/capsules/capbul1a.gif
To put any applicants in contact with one another to enable them to compare notes and assist each other with their applications, research and resources.
http://www.echr-action.co.uk/_themes/capsules/capbul1a.gif
To put would-be 3rd Party Interveners in contact with applicants in hope that they can help one another.
http://www.echr-action.co.uk/_themes/capsules/capbul1a.gif
To publish any information, guidelines, tips, hints, links and resources that may help others bring their own cases to the ECHR. (Please read the disclaimer).  Contributions welcome.
http://www.echr-action.co.uk/_themes/capsules/capbul1a.gif
To suggest other actions that YOU can take which may help ALL of us afflicted with this problem, now and in the future.
http://www.echr-action.co.uk/_themes/capsules/capbul1a.gif
To listen to YOUR suggestions to improve this site.
Interested?  Please study the pages linked below.
Thank you for reading.  Please don't give up trying.  Make those persistent genes count.  Many decent individuals and organisations have been trying to change things for years.  Insist on your Article 10 rights and add your voice to those on the inside.  If you are able, add your voice on the outside too, through the European Court of Human Rights.
Notes:  References to the Law Society generally means the regulatory arm of the Law Society.  This organisation has the dual and conflicting role of both "regulator" and "trade union" to solicitors and their firms.  The Solicitors Complaints Bureau (SCB) was replaced by the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors (OSS).  In April 2004 the OSS re-branded itself as the Consumer Complaints Service (CCS).  Many folks might say that nothing has changed for the better in all this time.  Research carried out in 1998 gave us the Willing Blindness Report - the name says it all.  In 2004 we had the Clementi Review.  Once again we are promised "jam tomorrow" in the form of White Papers.  For more information on these subjects please check out the links page.  So far we have seen "too little, too late" - and we ask the question "How much is likely to change when those resisting change are at the heart of our society - the legal profession as a whole?"  Please act.
Disclaimer: Please note that nobody currently associated with this website has any legal qualifications.  We cannot offer legal advice.  Any information given here is provided in good faith only.  You are advised to check the facts thoroughly for yourself.  If you need legal advice then you may wish to consider consulting a suitably qualified professional.  We cannot (currently) recommend anyone or even tell you who to avoid.  If anything published here is incorrect then please let us know.
To contact us by email please type the address exactly as it appears below...
http://www.echr-action.co.uk/images/email1.GIF
Ingram Winter Green
Ingram Winter Green
21A John Street
London
WC1N 2BL
England
 
Daniel Jacob Ginsbury, Solicitor,
Solicitor London
Daniel Jacob Ginsbury
Ingram Winter Green
21A John Street
Bedford House
London
WC1N 2BL
England
Address
Daniel Jacob Ginsbury
Ingram Winter Green
21A John Street
Bedford House
London
WC1N 2BL
England
Contact data
Phone :             +44 (0) 20 7845 7400      
Contact data
Qualification
·     Solicitor
Fields of Law
·     Commercial property
·     Conveyancing residential
·     Landlord and tenant - residential
Languages
·     English
·     Spanish
·     Italian
·     Hebrew
·     Punjabi
·     Urdu
Legal Practitioners
Michael Adrian Compton
Michael Adrian Compton
Commercial property, Conveyancing residential, Landlord and tenant - residential
 
Sanjay Chandarana
Sanjay Chandarana
Commercial litigation, Landlord and tenant - residential, Civil litigation
 
Elizabeth Jane Bartle
Elizabeth Jane Bartle
Employment law, Commercial litigation, Professional negligence, Civil liberties and human rights
 
Nathan Anthony Edwards
Nathan Anthony Edwards
Commercial property, Conveyancing residential, Landlord and tenant - residential
 
Daniel Jacob Ginsbury
Daniel Jacob Ginsbury
Commercial property, Conveyancing residential, Landlord and tenant - residential
 
Malcolm Alan Gordon
Malcolm Alan Gordon
Commercial litigation, Insolvency and bankruptcy, Civil litigation, Professional negligence
 
David Peter Daws
David Peter Daws
Business affairs, Corporate finance, Mergers and acquisitions, Tax law, Employment law, Aviation law
 
Pauline Helen Glen
Pauline Helen Glen
Commercial property
 

LEVESON INQUIRY

A video grab from footage taken inside the Leveson Inquiry shows David Cameron giving evidence Thursday
News Corp Chief Rupert Murdoch (left) his wife Wendi and son Lachlan are driven away from the High Court in April 2012. David Cameron received a text message from Murdoch's British newspaper boss saying they were "in this together", a press ethics inquiry heard during testimony from the prime minister
Evidence for John Carew-Reid
 Managing Director of the INL News Group
presented to the  Leveson Inquiry


Re: Evidence for Leveson Inquiry

 

Attention: Admin Manager for Leverson Inquiry

The Leveson Inquiry
Royal Courts of Justice,
Strand,
London
WC2A 2LL

For telephone queries, please call:
020 7947 7361

generalenquiries@levesoninquiry.org.uk,

 john.toker@levesoninquiry.gsi.gov.uk 

 

14th  March, 2012

 

Dear Sir/Madame

 

My name is John Carew-Reid.

 

I am the managing director of the INL News Group which started many years ago in Australia as the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group which owns the newspaper  called

" Australian Weekend News"

at great annoyance to Rupert and James Murdoch and their News Corporation and News International media companies.

The INL News Group was originally started in Australia to try and develop an effective opposition the the stranglehold that  Rupert and James Murdoch and their News Corporation and News International media companies have in Australia in the newspaper and media industry.

 

However, since 1990 when the INL News Group (formerly the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group) starting developing to provide independent news and information to the public that was not being provided by News Corporation's Australian newspaper, it has become clear to myself and others who have observed the events in the last over 20 years, that Rupert and James Murdoch and their News Corporation and News International media companies  have used all sorts of clandestine, undercover, devious, illegal, immoral corrupt and/or wrongful methods which can best be described as Industrial Espionage to make sure the INL News Group could not develop in a serious way, so the INL News Group could never bee any serious competition to Rupert and James Murdoch and their News Corporation and News International media companies.

 

The real concern that Rupert and James Murdoch and their News Corporation and News International media companies really started in a serious way when the INL News Group, then the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group, approached Rupert and James Murdoch and their News Corporation and News International media companies to see if they wanted to provide $2 million for a 20% shareholding in the Australian Weekend News newspaper masthead owned by the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group (now known as the INL News Group). It had been planned in 1990 to launch a hard copy of the Australian Weekend News (formerly the 100 year old Weekend News that had been the Friday Edition of the daily News published in Perth, Western Australia) Australia wide as a Weekend Newspaper coming out of the streets in every capital city in Australia on Friday afternoon, in time for people to see what is happening for the weekend, as the Weekend News in Western Australia had come out for over 100 years under various names.

 

Note the Daily News in Perth Western Australia, which had been controlled by the various owners of the Western Australia Newspaper Group (the publishers of Perth's  Western Australian Newspaper) went into voluntary liquidation the beginning of the 1990's as part of a master plan by the owners of the Western Australian Newspaper Group to find a way of getting around the directions of Bob Baxt, the then head of the Monopolies Commission in Canberra, to force the Western Australian Newspaper Group to sell the Daily News to an independent owner and operator because it was deemed by Bob Baxt that it was an monopoly for the one owner to own both major daily and weekend newspapers in the one town.

There is a long and complex story surrounding all this which involved the Western Australian Newspaper Group which published the Western Australian Newspaper from Monday to Saturday and the Sunday Times ( published on Sundays) owned by Rupert and James Murdoch and their News Corporation finding a way of stopping the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group (now known as the INL News Group) from re-establishing the Weekend News, as the Australian Weekend News as a Friday afternoon weekend newspaper in serious competition to the Western Australian Newspaper Group which published the Western Australian Newspaper from Monday to Saturday and the Sunday Times ( published on Sundays) owned by Rupert and James Murdoch and their News Corporation, which were then, and still are, massive cash cows that make over $500 million a year combined through the lucrative weekend classified and display advertising market.

To cut a long story short all sorts of clandestine methods were used by the Western Australian Newspaper from Monday to Saturday and the Sunday Times ( published on Sundays) owned by Rupert and James Murdoch and their News Corporation to stop the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group establishing the Australian Weekend News at the time, with  a private agreement between the Western Australian Newspaper from Monday to Saturday and the Sunday Times ( published on Sundays) owned by Rupert and James Murdoch and their News Corporation, that they would jointly own the only other serious competitor in the Western Australian Newspaper Market, being the Community Newspaper Group, which they could deliberately and conveniently run at a loss, as they did with the Daily and Weekend News, to frighten off any other serious investor from launching any other opposition newspaper in Western Australia.  The Western Australian Newspaper from Monday to Saturday and the Sunday Times ( published on Sundays) owned by Rupert and James Murdoch and their News Corporation worked out that the way around being prosecuted by the Trade Practices Commission ( now known as the ACCC) for being a monopoly was for the West Australian Newspaper Group and News Corporation to both own 50%  of the community Newspaper Group so that the monopolies commission could not say that either newspaper and media group was in control. The private agreement behind the scenes was that they both put in $5 million each to conveniently run the Community Newspaper Group at a yearly loss of around $10 million as year to show to any serious investor that there would be no profit for another newspaper to be established in the Perth and Western Australian Newspaper Market, with Community Newspapers making around a $10 million a year loss. For years that same was down by the various owners of the Western Australian Newspaper Group to keep the Daily and Weekend News newspaper showing $5 50 10 million a year loss, and deliberately made sure they did not make a profit, so that no other serious investor would think of entering the Western Australian Newspaper Market. That way they could keep what has been a dulopoly in the Western Australian Newspaper Market for a long time between the owners of the Western Australian Newspaper Group and the owners of the Sunday Times which had been Rupert and James Murdoch's News Corporation, for a long time. The Sunday Times newspaper in Perth, Western Australia was the first newspaper that Rupert Murdoch organised the for News Corporation to purchase after his father left Rupert Murdoch controlling interest of the small Adelaide newspaper company called News Limited which owned a small newspaper in Adelaide called News.

 

Things moved on from there with the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group having obtained control of the Weekend News Newspaper masthead after the voluntary liquidation of the Daily/Weekend News in Perth, Western Australia and had the word Australian approved to be added onto the name, this making it now the

" Australian Weekend News "

Not fully understanding the devious ways of Rupert and James Murdoch and their News Corporation, and the extreme lengths ( legal, semi legal and/or illegal) they would go at all costs to make sure that a possible competitor could become established, the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group had an venture capital finance broker approach Rupert and James Murdoch and their News Corporation to request if they would be interested in taking up 20% shareholding in the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group for an outlay of $2 million, which would be used to launch a hard copy of the Australian Weekend News as an Australia wide weekend newspaper coming out on the streets on Friday afternoons to provide a weekend view of what was happening for the weekend. The market research showed that Australians were very much weekend driven and from Friday lunchtime they were wanting a newspaper that specifically told them what was happening inn their local area for the weekend as well a run down of the Australian and worldwide news.

The answer came back from Rupert and James Murdoch and their News Corporation's solicitors in no uncertain terms. That unless the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group immediately removed the word "Australian" from the newspaper master "Australian Weekend News", News Corporation Limited would sue the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group for hundreds of millions of dollars because they said that News Corporation owned the "Australian" newspaper which was and still is the only Australia wide mainstream newspaper in existence, and it was claimed by the lawyers for News Corporation that News Corporation controlled the word Australian by having published for many years as newspaper called 

"The Australian"

The response by the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group was to send a fax with a covering letter and a draft front page of the Australian Weekend News showing headlines stating

" Rupert Murdoch and his News Corporation has sued Mr Wijat and his the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group for hundreds of millions for damages because Rupert Murdoch claims to own the word Australian.."

The covering letter with this draft article stated it would be appreciated that the lawyers for News Corporation Limited work hard on completing the court action over night and that a representative of the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group would fly over night from Perth Western Australia to arrive at the offices of News Corporation's solicitors to be served the legal action so that the article could be published to create world wide media attention to the fact that Rupert Murdoch, who was trying to become an American Citizen, thought he owned the personal use of the word Australian.

As a result of that one letter and draft newspaper article being faxed to News Corporation's lawyers, Blake Waldron and Dawson, who at the time were one of the biggest and most powerful legal firms in Australia, representing a multi-billion dollar media company that has unlimited funds for legal expenses. not another official word was ever heard from News Corporation Limited and/or any of its lawyers about this matter.

The Australian Weekend News Publishing Group and its supporters then continued to publish a low budget small edition of the Australian Weekend News with very limited financial resources using  latest Apple Mac publishing software on an new Apple Mac computer which was financed by leasing, to create a weekly edition of the Australian Weekend News...

Then the clandestine trouble started happening with corrupt police and ex-police being involved in making sure this newly leased  latest Apple Mac publishing software on an new Apple Mac computer was repossessed when the payments became a few days behind, and even though the funds were offered to bring the payments right up to date..

What happened was that an ex Western Australian police officer, who became a private investigator after leaving the Western Australian Police Force, came around the the house were the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group was creating the weekly edition of the Australian Weekend News on this newly leased latest Apple Mac publishing software on an new Apple Mac computer, and broke into the house and a car that was parked in the drive way and stole the this newly leased  latest Apple Mac publishing software on an new Apple Mac computer.

The private investigator did this without any fear or worry of being charged by the police and was obviously very confident that he was fully protected by the Western Australian Police to commit any crimes he wanted and if fact when I came back to the house and found the this newly leased  latest Apple Mac publishing software and the new Apple Mac computer had bee stolen from the house and the car parked at the house,I also found this private investigator parked outside the house on the road, who stated that I he was going to have me arrested and taken to a mental institution, from where I would venr be released, by his police friends, if I did not immediately tell him where the rest of the this newly leased  latest Apple Mac publishing software was. He had realised after he had removed the this newly leased  latest Apple Mac publishing software boxes from the boot of the car, that some of the hard disks containing the original version of this software were not in the boxes.

I then drove off with great fear towards a friends place so that I had a witness of what was going on,. I was fearful that he was going to be arrested on a false charge and locked up without bail and maybe put into a mental institution to make sure I could not continue with the publication of the Australian Weekend News..

The private Investigator stated to me with a lot of authority and force that he was employed by News Corporation to make sure I did not continue to have possession of this newly leased  latest Apple Mac publishing software and the new Apple Mac computer, so that I could not continue to publish the Australian Weekend News. He told me that if I valued my life that I would obey his bosses and stop the publication of the Australian Weekend News and give him all the desktop software disks that were being used to create the Australian Weekend News. I stated that I would make sure all the payments were up to date and stay up to date on the leasing of this newly leased  latest Apple Mac publishing software on an new Apple Mac computer. He replied, don't you understand, they do not want you to have access to this equipment and software and it is not about the payments on the leasing, it is about making sure you do not have possession of this newly leased  latest Apple Mac publishing software on an new Apple Mac computer, so you can not continue to publish the Australian Weekend News.

Having lost the newly leased  latest Apple Mac publishing software on an new Apple Mac computer, and starting getting a taste of the power base, that I was up against I realised I really needed a solid financial partner behind me that could help me take on the Murdochs and their all powerful News Corporation which obviously had unlimited contacts  with corrupt private investigators and corrupt police and a unlimited finance to make sure I could not continue on with the publication of the Australian Weekend News.

I then had my venture capital finance broker approach  Rodney Adler, a well known venture capital funder in Sydney for him to take up 20% share holding in the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group for an outlay of $2million. The venture capital broker presented a number of proposals from different clients he had that wanted venture capital for their business ideas, and Rodney Adler was only interested in the deal to provide $2 million for a share in the Australian News Publishing Group and invited me to Sydney for a meeting. I had to meeting with Rodney Adler and he said he would put up the $2 million dollars for purchase a share in the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group and would help me get the company floated on the Australian Stock Exchange. Mr Addler told me to come back to his office the next week to pick up the $2 million cheque.

However, when I attended the next week, Mr Addler told me that even though he was excited about the idea of investing in the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group, he had spoken during the week to people in the media world and had been told in no uncertain terms that he and his businesses venture would be absolutely destroyed by the Murdochs and the unlimited tenticles of News Corporation if he put any money up to help the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group and would eve go to the extent of setting him up on false charges if he was seen in nay way to become involved in financially supporting the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group.

He wished my good luck as he thought I would need it and said for these reasons he simply could not become involved financially or any other way with the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group.

Now things progressed and I was determined that I would somehow obtain the financial capital base to launch the Australian Weekend News as an Australia wide Australian Newspaper.

I am a qualified management accountant and investment consultant and have always made money myself and my from real estate and business investments which I know a lot about.

So in 2004 and 2005 I found a street with a number of houses for sale on about 10 acres each, on top of a mountain ridge in the Gold Coast, Queensland which was only 10 minutes drive from the Pacific Ocean and sweeping views of the Gold Coast City and the Pacific Ocean on one side and  the Massive Hinze Dam and 100,000 acres of catchment area for the Hinze Dam which is the water supply for the Gold Coast.

I had these properties valued by an independent qualified real estate valuer who said they were all worth around $3 million each.

I ended up purchasing seven of them in the street for around $3 million each as single residential houses without allowing for their real estate and/or business development potential and borrowed about $6 million from various lenders to complete the purchase of these seven houses on about 10 acres each. some of these houses were next door to each other and were ideal for a future luxury residential development as well as idea to set up a media, internet and television base from because of the hight of these house meant that TV and Internet Towers to service the whole of the Gold Coast would make it an ideal position, which made the potential value of these properties combined of up to $100 million

To make a very long story short myself acting as trustee for the INL News Group ended up with real estate that had a potential combined worth as a residential development or media/TV/Internet business base of up the $100 million with a combined debt of only $6 million.

This gave the INL News Group around $90 million in real estate and business equity to use as a financial backing to launch the publication of the Australian Weekend News as an Australia Wide newspaper.

At the same time a deal had been done for me to purchase 20 million shares in a publicly listed company called Chapmans Limited, which had been listed on the Australian Stock Exchange for around 30 years,which was about 19% of the issued capital, and at the same time Chapmans Limited had taken up an option to purchase 60% of the INL News Group in exchange fore further Chapmans Shares, and Chapmans was to provide the finance to help publish the Australian Weekend News newspaper as an Australia wide newspaper.

It was expected that once this announcement was made public, the Chapman Shares would ride over night from around 5c (Australian) a share to over 5 a share with Chapmans owning controlling interest of the INL News Group, which in turn owned the Australian Weekend News newspaper masthead, which once published as an Australia wide newspaper, would be worth over $2 billion and make Chapmans Limited a very valuable company with controlling ownership an Australia wide newspaper called the Australian Weekend News.

Again to cut a long story short, Rupert and James Murdoch and their all powerful tenticles of News Corporation with real estate agents, real estate valuers, corrupt police, corrupt private investigators, bankers, financiers and other business people, politicians etc made sure that the INL News Group's seven properties could not be refinanced from short term bridging loans costing up to 10% per month in interest, make sure none of the equity in these properties could be accessed to support the launching of the Australian Weekend News, that the official property values were reduced to around $500,000 per house and made sure the properties were foreclosed and sold by the mortgages at less that what was owed on them.

Rupert and James Murdoch and their all powerful tenticles of News Corporation even went to the extent to make sure that none of the properties in Red Oak Drive, Tallai could be valued for about 12 months at any price, so that it would be impossible for the INL News Group to refinance these properties t pat put bridging loans costing up to 10% per month in interest and could not refinance these properties to access the around $90 million in equity owned by the INL News Group in these properties to help fund the publication of the Australian Weekend News.

Rupert and James Murdoch and their all powerful tenticles of News Corporation also made sure that the directors of Chapmans Limited renegged on the arrangement they had made to take over 60% of the INL News Group and left the INL News Group with having invested around $500,000 in cash into Chapmans Limited by purchasing around 20 million new Chapmans shares at 5c a share, and stopped the shares from increasing to their expected  over $5  a share to actually dropping to around 1c a share, after the INL News Group purchased them for 5c a share.

As a financial reward to the managing director of Chapmans Limited, Borris Ganke, for renegging on the deal to take over 60% of the INL News Group and agreeing to allow Chapmans Limited to fund the development and launching of the Australian Weekend News as an Australia wide newspaper, Rupert and James Murdoch and their all powerful tenticles of News Corporation helped organise Borris Ganke and the other directors and managers of Chapmans Limited float a new oil development company called AusTec Oil with $20 million in cash working capital in the bank to to run out of the offices owned personally by Borris Ganke in Sydney, where his other public companies such as Chapmans has been running for many years. This way Borris Ganke did not have to worry about Chapmans Limited shares only selling for 1c a share and Chapmans not having much working capital to run the company with so that the general overheads could be met, because all the office expenses including salaries for the directors could all be met from the $20 million cash in Austec Oil that Borris Ganke now has access to b controlling AusTec Oil, a company with $20 million cash in the bank.

 

Then the situation gets worse. 

I was forced to move INL News Group and set up a new base in the UK and the USA, and had International News Limited and the INL News Group registered in the UK and the USA and I have a loan approved for 500,000 pounds from Lloyds Banking Group in September, 2008 to purchase a large freehold hotel in Blackpool to be used as a profitable working hotel in the  main street in Blackpool as well as an international base to run the INL News Group from.

Rupert and James Murdoch and their all powerful tenticles of News Corporation  discovered what I and the INL News Group were doing and had their powerful contacts in Lloyds Banking Group refuse to continue on with the loan settlement, even though I had the loan approval in writing from Lloyds Banking Group. The refusal of Lloyds Banking Group to continue on with the loan approval cost many millions of pounds in damages and left the INL News Group with out creditable an office and residential base to work from, which was need to help complete the back door listing of INL News Limited on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) which is part of the London Stock Exchange.

Then the story moved on from there to the INL News Group's 10 year plan they have been working on to produce a TV shows called Fringe Shows Have Talent in Edinburgh, Scotland, to help create an international publicity platform for the talented struggling artists that perform at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival and other Fringe festivals in the UK and all around the world.

Again, Rupert and James Murdoch and their all powerful tenticles of News Corporation have constantly monitored any project of the INL News Group to make sure it fails. So Rupert and James Murdoch and their all powerful tenticles of News Corporation discovered that well known USA character comedian Ronnie Prouty had agreed to come over from his home in Los Ageles for five days at no payment whatsoever, to help host the INL News Sponsored pilot of the Fringe Shows Have Talent being filmed in Edinburgh in April, 2011.

Rupert and James Murdoch and their all powerful tenticles of News Corporation  knew through a personal friend of theirs, Tommy Meers, who is a well known international chef based in Scotland with his own cooking show on television, of the exact date and time of arrival of Ronnie Prouty at Heatrow Airport from Los Angeles and on his way to Edinburgh Scotland to help with the filming of the pilot of the Fringe Shows Have Talent TV Show at no payment whatsoever to Ronnie Prouty.

So to make sure that the INL News Group''s filming of their pilot of the Fringe Shows Have Talent TV Show could not be completed successfully, Rupert and James Murdoch and their all powerful tenticles of News Corporation  organised through their strong friendship with David Cameron the Prime Minister of the United KIngdom, and George Osborne, the Chancellor of the United Kingdom, to have Ronnie Prouty wrongly removed from the transit line at Heathrow Airport while he was waiting to board a British Airways flight to Edinburgh, Scotland and have him arrested for 24 hours and then the next day put in handcuffs and on a plane using his own return airline ticket. back to Los Angeles, so he could not continue his planned journey for his planned 5 day visit to help his Scottish, English,Irish and Welsh musicians friends make the pilot of the Fringe Shows Have Talent TV Show.

The UK Border Agency were trying to say to me on the phone the day Ronnie Prouty was arrested at Heathrow Airport, that even though Ronnie Prouty was not being paid any fee to be involved in the making of the Pilot of the Fringe Shows Have Talent TV Show, he was deemed to be working by being in any way involved in the making of the Fringe Shows Have Talent TV Show.

However, since then  I have issued a High Court claim for damages against David Cameron the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, and George Osborne, the Chancellor of the United Kingdom,the UK Border Agency and the Government of the UK over wrongfully arresting Ronnie Prouty  from the transit line at Heathrow Airport while he was waiting to board a British Airways flight to Edinburgh, Scotland and have him arrested for 24 hours and then the next day put in handcuffs and on a plane using his own return airline ticket. back to Los Angeles, so he could not continue his planned journey for his planned 5 day visit to help his Scottish, English,Irish and Welsh musicians friends which included Sher Watson and his Das Contras Band and The Irish Band Halcyon Daze which are both set to tak ethe world by storm and following the footsteps of bands like Bono's band U2 and and Mick Jagger's English band the Rolling Stones to make the pilot of the Fringe Shows Have Talent TV Show.

So to stop the clam for damages against  David Cameron the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, and George Osborne, the Chancellor of the United Kingdom,the UK Border Agency and the Government of the UK proceeding,  David Cameron the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, and George Osborne, the Chancellor of the United Kingdom,the UK Border Agency and the Government of the UK, have instructed solicitor Toby Spanton from Treasury Solicitors and  barrister Sarah Love from Brick Chambers in London, to prepare and file a falsified and fraudulent document on UK Border Agency forms falsely saying that Ronnie Prouty stated to UK Border Agency Staff that he has been paid $2,000 by me to host the pilot of the Fringe Shows Have Talent TV Show in Edinburgh. Ronnie Prouty has made a statement that he has never said to any UK Border Agency Staff nor anyone else that I had paid him $2,000 to host the pilot of the Fringe Shows Have Talent TV Show in Edinburgh. I have never paid or agreed to pay Ronnie Prouty any money or any other type of remuneration to  host the pilot of the Fringe Shows Have Talent TV Show in Edinburgh.

This whole sordid affair started with  David Cameron the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, and George Osborne, the Chancellor of the United Kingdom,the UK Border Agency and the Government of the UK doing an off the record favour for Rupert and James Murdoch and their all powerful tenticles of News Corporation, and now they have all compounded their criminal, corrupt, and/or wrongful behaviour by having their solicitors and barristers prepare and file a false and fraudulent statement to the High Court of Justice.

 

The above is just a brief outline of the come of the illegal, wrongful, corrupt and/or immoral Industrial Espionage and clandestine behaviour carried out by various people for James and Rupert Murdoch and their all powerful News Corporation and News International.

 

I am happy to be a witness in the Leverson inquiry if required.

In any event a copy of this letter should go on file in the Leveson Inquiry to show how people like Rupert and James Murdoch that control a very powerful media group can use that power is wrongful, illegal, immoral, devious and/or corrupt ways.

 

Kindest regards

 

 

John Carew-Reid

 

 

 

The above is a very brief summary

http://www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/contact-us/

 

http://www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/attending-the-hearings/

 

Attending the Hearings

The public are welcome to attend the hearings which are being held in Court 73 of the Royal Courts of Justice (RCJ) in London.  Please see the HMCTS website for a map.

Due to limited seating (up to a maximum of 14) in the Hearing Room tickets will be allocated on a first come basis and will be valid for both morning and afternoon sessions. 

Members of the public are requested to take their seats no later than 9:50am  for the morning session and 1:50pm for the afternoon session and are requested to remain in their seats while the Inquiry is sitting. Please note that there will be short breaks during each session.

Upon entry to the Hearing Room all those sitting in the public gallery will be encouraged to leave their belongings on a coat rail at the side of the Hearing Room.

Proceedings will be streamed live to an annex within the grounds of the Royal Courts of Justice.

Upon arrival at the RCJ, please follow signs to the Bell Yard North entrance and then to either the Hearing Room, which is on the second floor of the East Block, or to the annex.  Please note that the Bell Yard North entrance opens at 9:00am.

 

About the Inquiry

Process

The Leveson Inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the press is running in four modules. These are:

  • Module 1: The relationship between the press and the public and looks at phone-hacking and other potentially illegal behaviour.
  • Module 2: The relationships between the press and police and the extent to which that has operated in the public interest.
  • Module 3: The relationship between press and politicians.
  • Module 4: Recommendations for a more effective policy and regulation that supports the integrity and freedom of the press while encouraging the highest ethical standards.

Requests for written evidence in relation to Module 1, were sent out in August, and Lord Justice Leveson also invited comments, evidence and submissions from any other interested parties.  As part of this process, Lord Justice Leveson held a series of seminarsin September and October to set the context for the Inquiry.  Formal evidence hearings for module 1, started on 14 November at the Royal Courts of Justice. We are now inviting submissions for module 3 – issues relating to the press and politicians, and haveset out some key questions to help with this.

Module 3 commenced on Thursday 10 May 2012 and will run to the end of June 2012. Module 4 will commence in early July 2012 and Lord Justice Leveson intends to finish the formal part of the Inquiry by the end of July. The Inquiry will not sit in the week commencing 4 June 2012.

 

Contact us

For press enquiries please contact John Toker at:

john.toker@levesoninquiry.gsi.gov.uk  or by phone on 020 7947 7816 or 07860 678 864

For all other queries, please contact:      

generalenquiries@levesoninquiry.org.uk

The postal address for the Inquiry is:

The Leveson Inquiry
Royal Courts of Justice,
Strand,
London
WC2A 2LL

For telephone queries, please call:
020 7947 7361


British PM told by Murdoch aide: 'We're in this together'

  • Former Downing Street communications chief Andy Coulson leaves the High Court on May 10. David Cameron received a text message from one of Rupert Murdoch's closest aides saying they were "in this together", a British press ethics inquiry heard during testimony from the prime minister

    Former Downing Street communications chief Andy Coulson leaves the High Court on May 10. David Cameron received a text message from one of Rupert Murdoch's closest aides saying they were "in this together", a British press ethics inquiry heard during testimony from the prime minister


  • Ex-News International chief executive Rebekah Brooks leaves her lawyer's office on May 15. David Cameron received a text message from Brooks - one of Rupert Murdoch's closest aides - saying they were "in this together", Britain's press ethics inquiry heard during testimony from the prime minister

    Ex-News International chief executive Rebekah Brooks leaves her lawyer's office on May 15. David Cameron received a text message from Brooks - one of Rupert Murdoch's closest aides - saying they were "in this together", Britain's press ethics inquiry heard during testimony from the prime minister

    • Ex-News International chief executive Rebekah Brooks leaves her lawyer's office on May 15. David Cameron received a text message from Brooks - one of Rupert Murdoch's closest aides - saying they were "in this together", Britain's press ethics inquiry heard during testimony from the prime minister

      Ex-News International chief executive Rebekah Brooks leaves her lawyer's office on May 15. David Cameron received a text message from Brooks - one of Rupert Murdoch's closest aides - saying they were "in this together", Britain's press ethics inquiry heard during testimony from the prime minister

David Cameron received a text message from Rupert Murdoch's British newspaper boss saying they were "in this together", a press ethics inquiry heard Thursday during testimony from the prime minister.

The 2009 text from Rebekah Brooks -- who now faces criminal charges relating to the phone-hacking scandal at the News of the World tabloid -- raised fresh questions about Cameron's links to Murdoch's US-based News Corporation.

But during five hours of televised evidence at the Leveson Inquiry, Cameron repeatedly denied making secret deals with Murdoch's empire in exchange for the political support of the mogul's newspapers.

Brooks was chief executive of News International, News Corp's British newspaper wing, when she sent the text to Cameron the night before a crucial speech to his Conservative party conference, when he was still leader of the opposition.

"I am so rooting for you tomorrow not just as a personal friend but because professionally we're definitely in this together. Speech of your life? Yes he Cam!," said Brooks in the text, which was read out to the inquiry.

"Yes he Cam" was the headline the next day in The Sun, Murdoch's top-selling British tabloid, which had come out in support of Cameron just over a week earlier.

Brooks also suggested that Cameron -- who knew her husband Charlie from their schooldays at the elite Eton College and lived near the couple -- have a "country supper" to discuss an "issue" with the Murdoch-owned Times newspaper.

The inquiry heard in May that Cameron signed texts to Brooks "LOL", thinking it stood for "lots of love".

Brooks, 44, appeared in court on Wednesday charged with hiding material during the last days of the News of the World, which shut amid public outrage when it emerged the tabloid had hacked the phone of a murdered schoolgirl.

Her husband and four other people have also been charged and they will all appear before a judge on June 22.

The prime minister set up the Leveson Inquiry in July last year after the News of the World was shut down to examine the ethics of the press, but in recent weeks he has seen his own government effectively put on trial.

But Cameron hit out at "conspiracy theories" over his relationship with News Corp, especially his government's handling of the company's bid for control of pay-TV giant BSkyB.

"The idea of overt deals is nonsense," Cameron said when asked about claims of some kind of deal with Murdoch. "I also don't believe in this theory that there was also a nod and a wink and a covert agreement."

Cameron admitted however that relationships between the press and politicians had been overly close.

"I think in the last 20 years the relationship has not been right. I think it has been too close. I don't think the regulatory system we have at the moment works," he said.

Cameron also defended his decision to hire his former media chief Andy Coulson, another ex-News of the World editor, who has been charged with perjury and arrested over hacking and bribery allegations.

"This has come back to haunt both him and me," Cameron said.

But he said he took full responsibility for the decision and said he had sought assurance from Coulson during a face-to-face meeting in his office that he was not involved in phone hacking.

The News of the World is believed to have illegally accessed the voicemails of thousands of people including royals, politicians, celebrities and crime victims.

Murdoch still owns The Sun, Britain's best-selling tabloid, The Times and Sunday Times in Britain.

The senior judge leading the inquiry, Brian Leveson, is due to produce a report in October. It is expected to include recommendations on the future of press regulation.

Police have arrested around 50 people in combined investigations into phone-hacking and bribery of public officials which opened in January 2011.

Scotland Yard said it had arrested three more people on Thursday in a bribery probe linked to the hacking investigation, including a former prison officer.


Sean Hoare was found dead-Leveson Inquiry:
Phone Hacking 'Widespread'

"....Sean Hoare Murdered to stop him exposing powerful people in the media just before Sean Hoare was due to give evidence at the Parliamentary Committee Into Phone Hacking and Police Bribery by staff of Rupert and James Murdoch's all powerful News Corporation Limited  and News International Limited..." as explained in a special report by the INL News Legal and Investigative Team

Leveson Inquiry: Phone Hacking 'Widespread'

Live Blog: Leveson Media Inquiry

His family say the former News of the World (NOTW) entertainment reporter had started drinking again to cope with the stress he was under after going public on phone hacking and claiming the practice was widespread at the Sunday tabloid. James Hanning... 
Sean Hoare
Sean Hoare was found dead at his home in Watford in July
5:37pm UK, Monday December 19, 2011
Mark White, home affairs correspondent

A senior journalist, who interviewed News of the World whistle-blower Sean Hoare before his death earlier this year, said Mr Hoare told him there had been at least another eight journalists at the paper involved in phone hacking.

Giving evidence to the Leveson Inquiry into media ethics, the Independent on Sunday's Deputy Editor James Hanning said he interviewed the former tabloid reporter on a number of occasions.
48-year-old Mr Hoare, who suffered from alcohol related liver disease, was found dead at his home in Watford last July.
:: Follow all the latest updates from the Sky News team at the Royal Courts of Justice for the hearing.
His family say the former News of the World (NOTW) entertainment reporter had started drinking again to cope with the stress he was under after going public on phone hacking and claiming the practice was widespread at the Sunday tabloid.
James Hanning said he had met Mr Hoare and had several detailed conversations with him in the months before his death.
Although he was aware Sean Hoare had also suffered from a drug addiction, as well as alcoholism, Mr Hanning said he did not appear to be suffering the effects of drug addiction on the occasions they spoke. "His memory did not appear to be impaired" he said.
The witness said Mr Hoare had told him he had personally hacked the phones of people on numerous occasions.
When asked if he had been told whether others at the NOTW had hacked phones, Mr Hanning said: "He was speculating about who might go into the witness box and testify. 'He said X will probably sing in court' he then went on to name about eight people."
Mr Hanning told Lord Justice Leveson that phone hacking was referred to as "screwing" at the NOTW.
He was asked if Sean Hoare had ever had a conversation with him about hacking at the NOTW's sister paper the Sun.
He said: "I don't remember him saying that specifically. I am not speculating. He would assume I knew that. It was implicit."
Earlier, Sean Hoare's brother Stuart told the inquiry they had "shared a lot of secrets".
He added that he wanted to "let his word still be heard", adding "I was fortunate enough to retain certain information that Sean had left with me. Sean and I regularly discussed this and there are emails in existence which support Sean's description of a practice referred to as the dark arts."
Mr Hoare said his brother had told him that phone hacking and another of the "dark arts" known as pinging, where celebrities and people of interest were tracked down through their mobile phones, also occurred at the Sun.
Stuart Hoare said his brother had initially enjoyed working at the NOTW, when he was hired by the tabloid in 2001, but was struggling to cope in the latter years before he was sacked in 2005.
Sean Hoare later went on to become a phone hacking whistle-blower, telling his story to the New York Times and other publications

tony Blair is iraq war criminal unknown man shouts at

tony Blair is iraq war criminal unknown man shouts at Leveson media inquiry

Tony Blair's appearance before Leveson media inquiry

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18232204 
Key points  Mario Cacciottolo,  John Hand and Sarah Bell 

Bell
  • Tony Blair gives evidence to Leveson Inquiry for just over four hours, the day's sole witness
  • Ex-prime minister's evidence briefly interrupted by protester, who hurls accusations at him
  • Former PM says "unhealthy" relationship has evolved between press and politicians, but interaction is inevitable
  1. 0953: 
    Good morning and welcome to this BBC live page for the Leveson Inquiry. Today, former Prime Minister Tony Blair will be giving evidence. He is the day's sole witness and the action is scheduled to start at 1000 BST.
  2. 0955: 
    Mr Blair is the first of a series of high-profile figures who have been called to Leveson HQ - otherwise known as court 73 of the Royal Courts of Justice - this week. Education Secretary Michael Gove and Home Secretary Theresa May are scheduled for tomorrow and Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke on Wednesday. Then on Thursday, Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt is giving evidence.
  3. 0957: 
    The BBC's Ross Hawkins reports that protesters are beginning to gather outside the inquiry, which is being held at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. The police look on as they do so, he says.
  4. 0958: 
    The thrust of Mr Blair's appearance is set to revolve around his relationship with the chairman of News International, Rupert Murdoch. Labour's former communications director, Lance Price, says the relationship was perhaps handled in too secretive a manner. "A lot of the stuff that was going on behind the scenes, a lot of the meetings, a lot of the discussions weren't known to the public," he told BBC News this morning.
  5.  
    0959: Peter Hunt News correspondent 
    tweets: Leveson: barrister Robert Jay has a copy of Tony Blair's autobiography A Journey on his desk. #Leveson #hacking
  6. 1004: 
    The action's under way - a tanned Mr Blair has taken his oath and his seat, wearing a dark blue suit, blue tie and crisp white shirt.
  7. 1005: 
    The BBC's Peter Hunt has spotted an entourage in the inquiry room for Mr Blair, in the form of two assistants and three bodyguards.
  8. 1006: 
    Mr Blair begins by saying there is always "certain tension" in the relationship between politicians and the media. He also says that relationship is "inevitably going to be close".
  9. 1008: 
    Mr Blair says he'd "like to make it clear right from the outset" that he feels British journalism, at its best, is the "best in the world".
  10. 1013: 
    Counsel to the inquiry Robert Jay QC, who's sporting a rather dazzling stripey tie, asks Mr Blair whether he will be able to speak objectively. "I think I'm the worst person to say if I'm objective or not," the former PM replies.
  11.  
    Brian, Newcastle 
    emails: "A well rehearsed and choreographed performance so far"
  12. 1019: 
    Referring to the Labour government that he led from 1997 to 2007, Mr Blair says: "I cannot believe we are the first and only government that has ever wanted to put the best possible gloss on what you're doing. I would be surprised if governments hadn't done that throughout the ages."
    But he stresses that it "is a completely different thing to saying that you go out to say things that are deliberately untrue".
  13. Tony Blair arrived at the Royal Courts of Justice by car, shortly before he was due to start giving evidence.
    Tony Blair arriving at the Leveson Inquiry
  14.  
    Amy Tee 
    tweets: Regards the Leveson inquiry, when I walked past earlier, there appeared to be more journos than protestors.
  15. Mr Blair says that the biggest problem with journalism is when the boundary between news stories and comment becomes "blurred". It stops being journalism at that point and becomes a political instrument, he says.
  16. 1030: 
    As Mr Blair began to give evidence, anti-war protesters held up a doll depicting the former prime minister outside the inquiry at the Royal Courts of Justice.
    A doll of Tony Blair
  17.  
    Geraint Jones from Wiltshire 
    emails: How can anything Mr Blair says be 'objective'? The King of Spin will have been well rehearsed and will never admit to doing anything innapropriate. As a Socialist, I wonder how mant of his million pound fortune will be used in presenting an image of 'perfection'?
  18. 1035: 
    Ofcom is the right body to decide issues of media policy, Mr Blair says. He doesn't evisage it replacing the Press Complaints Commission, he adds.
  19.  
    Frank from Harrogate 
    texts: Whatever you think of Blair politically or personally he's far and away a better communicator than anyone in government today.
  20. 1038: 
    The protester carrying the doll pictured below - with the slogan "Blair: the day of judgement" - was interviewed by the Press Association outside court. Londoner Mary Macmillan, 78, said: "I was a 1997 Labour Party person when Blair got his majority and I'm afraid he's proved a great let-down.
    "We got very few things that he promised. The war in Afghanistan is the greatest treachery. I'm glad we could get here today because it's very difficult to get hold of Blair."
  21.  
    Ross Hawkins Political correspondent, BBC News 
    tweets: (Blair clearly thinks this'll be ok - his twitter account is tweeting link to live feed @tonyblairoffice)
  22. 1043: 
    We're now into a lengthy discussion on media coverage of Europe. Mr Blair says the Times newspaper is "Eurosceptic" but still reports the issue of Europe "fairly".
  23.  
    Des from Rotherham 
    emails: This man is a true politician, answers nothing and talks over people that he can't answer.
  24. 1046: 
    "The Sun and the Mail, frankly, are the two most powerful of the papers," says Mr Blair.
  25.  
    Lorna Wilde 
    He's good isn't he? He has real style. Cameron must be watching this and weeping. #Blair
  26. 1050: 
    Rupert Murdoch gets his first mention today, as Mr Blair discusses the importance of the Sun as a paper that is influential but has changed its political views over the decades. "Rupert Murdoch is not actually an identikit right-wing person," Mr Blair says.
  27.  
    Molly Moggs 
    tweets: Pretty impressed by #Blair so far. He's making a very coherent case for the distinction between tabloids and other press.
  28.  
    Peter Hunt News correspondent 
    tweets: Leveson: Blair on Murdoch -- I wouldn't describe him as a tribal Tory. #Leveson #hacking
  29. 1059: 
    Mr Blair says that anyone falling out with the "controlling element" of the Daily Mail will be subject to a "huge and sustained attack".
  30.  
    Danny Harris 
    Most of the people who had close contacts with the Murdoch Empire have had selective memory.The King of Spin is among them.
  31.  
    Lauren Laverne, BBC Radio 6 presenter 
    tweets: Sound is down in the studio so can't hear #Leveson, but we have all been hypnotised by Blair's "honesty hands". It should be a dance.
  32. 1100: 
    Mr Blair on the importance of the country's best-selling daily newspaper: "Was it important to get the Sun on board? Absolutely. They do represent a certain strain of support Labour might have had but hadn't had during the 1980s and early 1990s."
  33.  
    Peter Jackson from Preston, Lancs 
    emails: Blair is making a powerful statement about the power of the press, especially the Daily Mail. Does make you wonder if they got too close to News International in order to push back against the Mail?
  34.  
    James McConkey 
    tweets: Blair putting on a brilliant display, you can clearly see why he was Prime Minister
  35. 1104: 
    Rebekah Brooks now becomes a topic. Mr Jay, while brandishing a red pen, glances up and asks if Mr Blair had got too close to her when he was in power. Mr Blair says a lot of his meetings and calls with her were "towards the end" of his time in office, and that he was "pretty close" to anyone still offering him support in that period, when his popularity had faded.
  36.  
    Susan from Isle of Benbecula 
    emails: Will someone please clamp his hands to the chair? Hearing his drivel is bad enough, but the arm-waving is driving me to distraction.
  37. 1108: 
    Mr Blair follows up his discussion about Rebekah Brooks by putting the position of the former Sun editor and News International chief executive in some context. "Bluntly," he says "the decision maker was not Rebekah Brooks". He explains that at all times he felt that Rupert Murdoch was "key decision maker" at the media group.
  38.  
    Martin from London 
    emails: Mr Blair keeps saying "Look ..." as if he were in command of proceedings. I would very much like Robert Jay to go into "attack dog" mode as he has done with others. Somehow I doubt it will happen.
  39. 1116: 
    A spot of paper-shuffling ensuses. Mr Jay leafs through a document and goes through a few points of clarification with Mr Blair about how many meetings he's had with various people.
  40.  
    Dominic Rose from Isle of Man 
    emails: So it seems that he's saying the tabloids don't just report policy, they seek to influence or halt it depending on their political bias, and do so fairly successfully. So much for politicians heeding the mandate from the electorate.
  41. 1117: 
    Mr Jay is now moving on to the build-up to start of the war in Iraq and asking Mr Blair about his relationship with the media at the time. "This was a huge issue, obviously," says Mr Blair.
    He says he had three chats with Rupert Murdoch in the run-up to the war. He had conversations with newspaper editors too, he points out.
  42.  
    Richard Armitage from Birkenhead 
    texts: Someone please make Mr Blair stop repeating the words 'frankly' and 'bluntly'? Almost a verbal tic.
  43.  
    Jim from Yeovil 
    texts: Blair is so accomplished. He makes the current crop of politicians look like rank amateurs - with the exception of Mr Miliband (David not Ed).
  44. 1125: 
    For the first time, Lord Leveson speaks directly to Tony Blair as he expresses interest in how the Labour Party viewed the power wielded by the News International newspapers in the aftermath of the party's defeat in the 1992 election.
    "They were powerful but there were others that were powerful as well," is the gist of the former PM's long reply.
  45. 1130: 
    What if the main media blocs, including the ones owned by Rupert Murdoch, had opposed the Labour Party in the 1997 election, Mr Blair asks rhetorically. He provides the answer himself: "My view is we would still have won."
    Continuing to refer to the influence of the press, Mr Blair gestures towards himself, indicating the government he led. "We were sometimes guilty of ascribing to them a power that they ultimately don't really have and actually have less today than I think back then."
  46. 1130: 
    Lord Leveson calls for a short break for the court.
  47.  
    Andy Hutchcraft 
    Blair looks a different person since his strained, defensive appearance at the Iraq Inquiry.
  48.  
    Alexander Lowe 
    tweets: Break at Leveson inquiry, interesting to see Blair admit (in as many words) that he was basically in thrall to the Murdoch empire.
  49. 1135: 
    More on Blair's bodyguards - the BBC's Peter Hunt reports that there are three inside the inquiry room, and three outside.
  50. 1136: 
    And they're back in the court room.
  51. 1140: 
    Mr Jay is making plenty of references to Andrew Neil's book Disclosure, looking back at the political scene of the 1980s and 1990s. Perhaps someone should point out that the book's actually called Full Disclosure.
  52.  
    Natalie Peck 
    Back at ‪#Leveson‬. Blair: I saw an ability to go out there and persuade the Murdoch group, as with others, as important.
  53. 1147: 
    Lord Leveson is addressing Mr Blair directly again, asking him whether his attempts in the 1990s to court the support of Rupert Murdoch's newspapers could be described as a "charm offensive" and whether he had to "calibrate what Mr Murdoch would have wanted to hear".
  54.  
    Kenneth Hobbs from Worthing 
    emails: I certainly feel Mr Blair is clear in his recollections of over 18 years ago and I do feel he is answering Mr Jay very well. He is, however, just seeking to confirm how ALL political parties have been in the pockets of the press and media in this country.
  55. Mr Blair's frequent gesticulations have been the subject of many comments already so far from a fair few people watching the coverage. Here's the sort of thing that his hands have been getting up to this morning.
    Tony Blair
  56.  
    James Stevenson from Middlesbrough 
    texts: Blair's break from politics has certainly benefited his well being, turning back the years with this performance. This is why he was Prime Minister
  57. 1157: 
    Mr Blair was given an angry reception from about 25 protesters when he arrived this morning, who waved banners reading "Troops home", "Bliar" and "Afghanistan out". It is clear they are protesting about his role in committing the UK to wars in Iraq and Afghanistan rather than his relationship with the media.
  58.  
    Daily Telegraph's Benedict Brogan 
    TB on attacks: 'I hate that type of politics and did not engage in it'. Unlike the guy next door, he means. Slap to Brown ‪#leveson‬
  59. 1205: 
    Mr Blair is asked about a couple of meetings he had many years ago, which were written about by former Labour spin doctor Alistair Campbell in his book. Mr Blair says that he's happy to accept Mr Campbell's version of those events, quickly leading to a tweet from Mr Campbell himself. "Publisher will be pleased TB endorsing diaries as accurate account!" he writes.
  60. 1205: 
    Lord Leveson again addresses Mr Blair directly and says he has one question that he'd like an answer to. "Was managing the press interfering with the time you had available to solve the most important questions you had to solve and what you did about that?" he asks.
    The former PM, who is calling Lord Leveson "Sir" every time he speaks to him, assures him that the phone calls he had to make tended to be very short.
  61.  
    Carl Eatson 
    Is Blair trying to pitch himself as the greatest PM we ever had? It's I did this, I did that, Im great... he never changes
  62. 1214: 
    Mr Blair is pressed on how close his friendship was - and is - with Rebekah Brooks. He responds that it became closer once he left office and he was "free from the constraints".
    Asked by Mr Jay whether he had contacted Mrs Brooks to sympathise with her leaving her New International post in the wake of the hacking scandal, he says: "I'm somebody who doesn't believe in being a fair-weather friend and obviously I said I was very sorry for her."
  63. 1215: 
    Mr Blair says he was "pretty ambivalent" about Sarah's Law, a campaign backed by the News of the World and Rebekah Brooks, which allows parents to request safety checks on adults with access to their children. It is often cited as one of the former editor's biggest successes in journalism.
    "I understood why she thought it was a big problem. The trouble with any of these campaigns is if you're not careful, the way they're conducted ends up getting out of hand," says the ex-PM.
  64. James Al 
    tweets:‪#Blair‬ on time as Prime Minister: "you begin at your most popular and least capable and end at your least popular and most capable" ‪#Leveson‬
  65. 1217:BREAKING NEWS 
    The court has been interrupted by a shouting protester, calling Mr Blair a war criminal.
  66. 1220: 
    The protester was a man in a white shirt who began his court interruption by saying "Excuse me." His politeness ended there, however, as he then began shouting that Mr Blair was a "war criminal" and made further accusations that the former PM had been paid off.
    The protester continued to make further accusations, while clinging on to a desk with both hands. He has to do this because a security guard had both arms wrapped round his chest and was desperately trying to drag him away. In the end, he was pushed out the room by three guards.
    Lord Leveson is now quietly but firmly asking how the protester managed to get into the courtroom, "through what is supposed to be a secure corridor".
  67. 1223: 
    This is the dramatic moment that an unidentified protester, dressed in a white shirt, briefly disrupted the proceedings
    Protestor interupts proceedings at the Leveson Inquiry
  68.  
    Simon from Leeds 
    texts: Blair handles the intrusion with super composure, and even addresses his points.
  69. The BBC's political editor Nick Robinson has written a blog in which he says Tony Blair opened his evidence to the Leveson inquiry with a guilty plea, but in doing so was really preparing to declare himself innocent on a much more serious charge.
  70.  
    Jack Thomas from Liverpool 
    emails: Well done to that protester, Blair is trying to come across as a nice sort of guy when in fact he bears part of the responsibility for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent people.
  71.  
    Dean Glover 
    just watched the mad protester calling ‪#Blair‬ a war criminal etc live... nothing like watching current affairs unfold in realtime ‪#Leveson‬
  72.  
    Nick Robinson Political editor 
    tweets: Blair denies protester's claim but says nature of modern journalism means he'll get more coverage than what anyone else says
  73.  
    Ross Hawkins Political correspondent, BBC News 
    tweets: For those who missed it the protester got in behind #leveson himself; little wonder judge looked furious
  74.  
    Leandra Briggs from Wallingford 
    emails: Blair talks about the desirability of "competition in media ownership". And look at what has actually happened! Thank heavens for the internet and social media (so mistrusted by Blair, because it cannot be controlled) as a counterpoint.
  75. 1242: 
    One more point about the protester - Mr Blair denied all the claims the man shouted out in court, saying that "for the record" were "completely and totally untrue". A sympathetic Lord Leveson said that the former PM did not need to give any response at all and apologised for the disruption.
  76.  
    Ross Hawkins Political correspondent, BBC News 
    tweets: Blair confirms he asked Murdoch straight out whether he'd back them at meeting in 2000, was told Murdoch wd #leveson
  77. 1254: 
    For those who missed it, here's the footage from the moment when a protester burst into the Leveson Inquiry and hurled accusations about the Iraq war at Tony Blair before being bundled out of Court 73.
  78. 1254: 
    Mr Blair says the strongest lobbying he had from any media outlet during his time as prime minister was from the BBC over the licence fee.
  79. 1302: 
    The inquiry has now broken for lunch. You can expect Lord Leveson to be giving someone a grilling over how an intruder popped up right behind where he was sitting.
  80. 1310: 
    The protestor apparently told reporters his name was David Lawley- Wakelin and he was from the Alternative Iraq Enquiry. He spoke as security guards escorted him away.
  81.  
    Andrew Neil Presenter, BBC Daily Politics 
    tweets: Interesting - despite all Jay QCs mentions of me and my book at #Leveson and 5,500 words of requested evidence they don't want to call me.
  82. 1326: 
    Away from the High Court, police investigating phone hacking have arrested a 42-year-old woman on suspicion of money laundering offences. Of course, it was allegations of hacking at the News of the World that sparked this inquiry in the first place.
  83. 1338: 
    City University journalism professor Ivor Gaber tells BBC Radio 4's World at One there was a sea change in the nature of the links between politicians and newspapers under Mr Blair. He says he identified with News International in particular, creating a relationship and giving scoops to them.
  84.  
    Alastair Campbell 
    tweets: Ivor Gaber on r4 says we gave Sun election dates and Hutton report. Totally untrue
  85.  
    Louise Mensch MP 
    tweets: Lord Justice #Leveson dealt with protestor with great dignity. As a nation we do need to beef up our security arrangements at these things.
  86. 1353: 
    According to the Press Association, the Leveson protester has told reporters his name is David Lawley-Wakelin and he's from campaign group the Alternative Iraq Enquiry. Following his intervention, #Blair, War Criminal and David Lawley-Wakelin are trending on Twitter in the UK.
  87.  
    Adam, in Brighton, 
    emails: Blair has handled himself with care and precision reminiscent of the late 1990s and early 2000s. I think the question on everyone's lips is when will he make a resurgence in British politics?
  88. 1358: 
    The protester has been arrested on suspicion of breach of the peace and is in custody at a central London police station, a Metropolitan Police spokesman says.
  89.  
    David Gwilliam, in Exmouth, Devon, 
    emails: It could be the protester will have the biggest impact today, but was Blair right to defend himself? I think it would have been better to have ignored it!
  90. 1407: 
    The inquiry is back up and running again now with Tony Blair still in the hot seat. Lord Justice Leveson begins with a few words about the protester who intervened earlier - stating again that an investigation will be carried out and he will consider how to deal with the individual in question.
  91. 1409: 
    Lord Justice Leveson adds that he "very much regrets" the interruption this morning.
  92.  
    Hashim, in Yorkshire, 
    Tony Blair the war criminal? I believe my fellow Kosovans would disagree. He led Nato into our country when we had huge problems... Blair helped us.
  93.  
    Stop the War Coalition 
    tweets: Brilliant! Anti-war protestor gets within feet of #Blair at #Leveson and makes "This man is a war criminal" statement.
  94.  
    Ross Hawkins Political correspondent, BBC News 
    tweets: Blair #leveson: Sun overstepped mark with front page on Brown letter to serviceman's family, raised with Brooks
  95.  
    Peter Hunt News correspondent 
    Leveson: inside Court 73 one of Blair's bodyguards is sitting right next to me. I feel instantly guilty. #Leveson #hacking
  96. 1421: 
    Mr Blair says he was on the brink of dismissing Labour MP and former minister Tom Watson from his government in 2006 when Mr Watson resigned. Mr Blair described Mr Watson as a "prime organiser" of a so-called coup against him in September of that year.
  97.  
    @iancollinsuk, 
    emails: Blair is Cameron's best ally and defender right now. He's almost cleared this Government of its shady image in a few short answers.
  98.  
    Ross Hawkins Political correspondent, BBC News 
    tweets: Jay says @tom_watson was bringing postman pat dvd to Brown on famous visit ... Blair: Yeah, I'm sure #leveson
  99.  
    Gwyn Jones, Cardiff, Wales, 
    emails: I would appreciate Mr Jay intervening more often to stop Mr Blair waffling - it seems to me that all Mr Blair is doing is trying to deviate from answering the question.
  100.  
    Nick Robinson Political editor 
    tweets: Blair reveals that his wife Cherie instructed lawyers to challenge press coverage on more than 30 occasions #Leveson
  101. 1432: 
    Mr Blair criticises press attacks on his wife and children, which he describes as unnecessary and wrong. He also says that the Daily Mail carried out a "personal vendetta" against his wife, Cherie. Her solicitors sent at least 30 legal warnings to the Mail from mid-2006 to Nov 2011 over its coverage of her, Mr Blair says.
  102. 1435: 
    The court service responsible for staging the Leveson Inquiry has issued a statement about today's interruption.
    It reads: "Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service take security very seriously at all of their venues. An investigation has been ordered into an incident at the Leveson inquiry, Royal Courts of Justice today. It would be inappropriate to pre-empt the findings on this investigation".
  103. 1438: 
    Mr Blair recounts a tale of a government minister who came to offer his resignation, because he had read in the press that the prime minister was about to sack him. "I literally tried to spend half an hour persuading him I wasn't going to sack him, but it was no use. He was convinced because he'd read it." The former PM does not name the former colleague at the centre of this tale.
  104.  
    Andrew Dougherty from London 
    emails: I'm watching Mr Blair, with the sound off (the best way I think), and his body language is fascinating. Using his hands either as a shield, or as tennis racquets, to lob the questions back at Mr Jay. Whilst appearing cool and calm, he is very much on the defensive.
  105. 1445: 
    After Lord Justice Leveson points out that the PCC code of conduct demands that all newspapers differentiate clearly between comment and fact, Mr Blair says he has long believed that certain papers do not abide by that.
  106. 1447: 
    Mr Blair is pressed on claims that former minister Peter Mandelson and spin doctor Alastair Campbell briefed against people. "The fact is, I never authorised or said to someone 'go out and brief against'. I hate that, it's the lowest form of politics."
  107. James from Nottingham 
    emails: Is Leveson going to call some typical Sun, Mail or other readers to talk about what makes them buy papers? Or is everyone just going to keep making assumptions as to what sells papers, and therefore what they write about?
  108. 1456: 
    Mr Jay looks directly at Mr Blair and asks if he's ruling in or out a statutory underpinning for an independent system of press complaints. "I'm certainly not ruling it out," says the former PM.
    "The important thing is it is independent of government and media, that it is capable of investigating, adjudicating and taking action, and that it is seen genuinely to be a place where people can go if they've got a legitimate complaint and get legitimate redress."
  109. 1456: 
    Lord Justice Leveson asks whether such regulation can work if papers are able to opt in or out of it. Mr Blair responds: "In other walks of life, you can't have that." The judge adds: "In other walks of life, you certainly can't have that."
  110. 1500: 
    Mr Jay says those are all the questions he has for Mr Blair but Lord Justice Leveson indicates he wants a little more insight from the former PM in the area of the best way to regulate the press.
  111. 1505: 
    Lord Justice Leveson says he believes any effective complaints system must be framed so that it works for those who can least afford to take action against the media, it can deal with complaints speedily and will be effective. It's a fairly lengthy explanation - he says he is just throwing out ideas and has yet to invite Mr Blair to add his own comments.
  112. 1514: 
    Lord Justice Leveson says that it is critically important that there is a political consensus on how to regulate the media.
  113. 1514: 
    Labour MP Tom Watson has written a response on his website to Mr Blair's denial that he received emails from Rebekah Brooks regarding Mr Watson's resignation. "[A] former Secretary of State, who is considered very close to Tony Blair, told me there is evidence to show Rebekah Brooks made the offer to exact retribution for the resignation," he says, adding: "I think it probably best that I say no more on this matter. It's better we all move on."
  114. 1514: 
    The judge still seems tickled by a comment made by Jeremy Paxman when the BBC Newsnight presenter gave evidence last week. He recounts to Mr Blair that when he said he hoped his final report wouldn't just end up on the second shelf of some journalism professor's study, Paxman quickly quipped: "As high as the second shelf?"
    "That sounds like Jeremy," adds a smiling Mr Blair, possibly recalling times when political friends and foes were put in line by Paxman.
  115. 1516: 
    Lord Justice Leveson thanks Mr Blair and the court rises. The former prime minister's testimony has come to an end.
  116.  
    Media commentator Roy Greenslade 
    tweets ‪#Leveson‬: 3.12pm close! Blair handled matters with calm aplomb. One big plus: he explained his media strategy more candidly than ever before.
  117. 1528: 
    The BBC's Robin Brant reports that an egg was thrown at and hit the car carrying Mr Blair as he left the Royal Courts of Justice.
  118. 1537: 
    The BBC's Nick Robinson says that there might have been more "persistent and tough questioning" for Mr Blair about a range of issues, including Labour changing the law in order to make it easier to have foreign ownership of media companies. "He was asked [about] them all, but I don't think he'll feel that he was put really in any uncomfortable position on any one of them."
  119.  
    Fi Wainwright 
    tweets: Tony Blair given easy ride on ‪#Leveson‬ and shown way too deferation and engagement in his ideas on media landscape...I'm not impressed
  120.  
    Dave from Abergavenny 
    emails: Is Leveson Inquiry an attempt to take everyone's minds of the economy and real problems we have in the UK at the moment?
  121.  
    Hannah Cutting 
    tweets: So there's going to be an immediate inquiry into the security of the ‪#Leveson‬ inquiry? This could go on and on...
  122. 1555: 
    That concludes our live page coverage of Tony Blair's appearance at the Leveson Inquiry. Tomorrow sees Education Secretary Michael Gove and Home Secretary Theresa May take to the stand.

tony Blair is iraq war criminal unknown man shouts at Leveson media inquiry



Leveson Media Inquiry

LIVE: Paxman And Marr Give Evidence At Leveson Inquiry

Huffington Post UK | Michael Rundle | Posted 23.05.2012 | UK
BBC presenter Andrew Marr has given evidence at the Leveson inquiry into press standards. He said that the country had looked "agog" at some of the...

Jeremy Paxman Tells Inquiry Piers Morgan Told Him How To Hack Phones

Huffington Post UK | Michael Rundle | Posted 23.05.2012 | UK
Newsnight presenter Jeremy Paxman has told the Leveson inquiry into press standards that Piers Morgan told him how to hack phones at a dinner in 2002....

'Why I Ran McCann Stories', Former Express Editor Tells Media Inquiry

PA | Posted 12.01.2012 | UK
The Daily Express ran stories suggesting Madeleine McCann's parents could be responsible for her death because at the time "there was reason to believ...

Newspapers 'Offered 400 Pictures Of Pippa Middleton Photos A Day'

PA/Huffington Post UK | Posted 11.01.2012 | UK
British newspapers are offered between 300 to 400 paparazzi photographs of Pippa Middleton every day, the picture editor of the Daily Mail has told th...

LIVE: Paxman Gives Evidence At Leveson Inquiry

Huffington Post UK | Michael Rundle | Posted 23.05.2012 | UK
BBC and Newsnight presenter Jeremy Paxman is giving evidence at the Leveson inquiry into press standards. Earlier fellow BBC presenter Andrew Marr ...
Page:   1





David Cameron's five secret meetings with Rupert Murdoch

Rupert Murdoch on Wednesday night disclosed that he had met the Prime
Minister on at least five more occasions than David Cameron has
previously admitted.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/leveson-inquiry/9227491/David-Camerons-five-secret-meetings-with-Rupert-Murdoch.html

Mr Murdoch, 81, was cross-examined on Wednesday over his meetings with
prime ministers stretching back decades

The chairman and chief executive of News Corporation provided details
of diary entries to the Leveson Inquiry which showed that the two men
had met on at least seven occasions since Mr Cameron became Prime
Minister.
Downing Street has previously acknowledged only that the Prime
Minister had met the media tycoon twice since May 2010 and the
contents of Mr Murdoch’s diary will add to concerns about Mr Cameron’s
relationship with News Corporation executives.
In the wake of the phone hacking scandal, the Prime Minister published
details of his meetings with media executives and editors. In the
House of Commons, he pledged to MPs that “every contact” had been made
public.
On Wednesday night it emerged that only one-to-one or “substantial”
meetings were disclosed officially, whereas Mr Murdoch recorded
meetings at social dinners and other events. Mr Cameron had previously
been reluctant to disclose details of his interactions with people
connected to the Murdoch empire, including the recent admission that
he had ridden a horse owned by Rebekah Brooks, one of Mr Murdoch’s
former key executives.
The inconsistencies between the recollections of the two men regarding
their meetings are expected to form a key part of Mr Cameron’s cross
examination at the inquiry when he appears within the next two months.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/leveson-inquiry/9228040/Ed-Miliband-Jeremy-Hunt-is-being-used-as-a-firewall-to-protect-David-Cameron.html

Ed Miliband: Jeremy Hunt is being used as a firewall to protect David Cameron
Ed Miliband today suggested that the Prime Minister was seeking to use
Jeremy Hunt as a “firewall” to protect himself from embarrassing
questions over his own dealings with the Murdoch empire.

The Labour leader claimed it “beggars belief” that the Culture
Secretary remained in his post following revelations his special
advisor tipped off James Murdoch’s lobbyist about an announcement made
by the media regulator Ofcom.
Adam Smith is alleged to have given details of Ofcom’s statement on
News Corp’s proposed takeover of BSkyB the day before it was made in
Parliament and while stock markets were still trading.
The special advisor resigned after emails detailing his discussions
were disclosed at the Leveson Inquiry. Mr Hunt, however, has insisted
he has “acted scrupulously fairly” and has so far resisted pressure to
step down despite claims he backed the Murdoch's bid to take over the
satellite broadcaster.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/david-cameron/9227311/Call-for-inquiry-into-Jeremy-Hunt-offices-role-in-BSkyB-bid.html

Call for inquiry into Jeremy Hunt office's role in BSkyB bid
David Cameron is under growing pressure to order a Whitehall inquiry
into Jeremy Hunt’s handling of the BSkyB takeover after the Culture
Secretary admitted that his office’s dealings in the case were “not
appropriate”

Adam Smith, Mr Hunt’s special adviser, resigned on Wednesday and
issued a statement saying that his activities “went too far”.
The scandal was prompted after News Corporation released more than 170
pages of emails and text messages which showed that its executives
were given confidential information about the Government’s view of its
bid for BSkyB.
At the time, Mr Hunt was charged with making a “quasi-judicial”
decision on whether the takeover would breach competition laws.
The messages emerged at the Leveson Inquiry which is currently
scrutinising the relationship between the Murdoch family and senior
politicians.
The Culture Secretary had to make an emergency statement in the
Commons in which he insisted that his adviser had “over-stepped the
mark”.

But Whitehall rules stipulate that ministers are responsible for
special advisers’ behaviour and Labour accused Mr Hunt of using his
aide as a “human shield”.
The Prime Minister wants to rely on the Leveson Inquiry to look into
Mr Hunt’s handling of the BSkyB takeover.
It is understood that Jeremy Heywood, the Cabinet Secretary, spoke to
Lord Justice Leveson on Tuesday evening and the Prime Minister decided
not to order a separate investigation in the wake of this
conversation. He has asked Mr Heywood to tell all government
departments to tighten up procedures.
The Culture Secretary is prepared to disclose to the inquiry all
correspondence between himself and his adviser – which he insists will
prove his adviser was acting without authorisation.
However, Lord Justice Leveson is not expected to report until the
autumn which means that Mr Hunt’s political career may remain in
jeopardy for more than five months.
On Wednesday night, senior Whitehall figures said that they were
uneasy about the lack of an official probe into whether Mr Hunt had
breached the ministerial code. Harriet Harman, the deputy Labour
leader, also wrote to Mr Cameron demanding an investigation by the
Independent Adviser on Ministers’ Interests.
A spokeswoman for Sir Christopher Kelly, the chairman of the Committee
on Standards in Public Life, said he was worried about the reports
emerging from the Leveson inquiry, but stopped short of calling for an
inquiry.
She told The Daily Telegraph: “Sir Christopher is concerned by these
reports and they raise important issues of boundaries.”
Sir Alistair Graham, the former chairman of the Committee on Standards
in Public Life, said: “At the minimum, there needs to be an
independent investigation into Jeremy Hunt’s conduct to see if the
minister has compromised his own independence. “Leveson is not a
catch-all inquiry to capture every misdemeanour – it has a very
specific remit that may not cover issues like this. If there is a
potential breach of the Ministerial Code, the Prime Minister has no
choice but to ask his independent investigator to carry out an
inquiry.”
However, Mr Cameron said that it would not be appropriate to hold a
separate probe into Mr Hunt’s conduct.
The Prime Minister said: “I set up the Leveson inquiry and its terms
of reference were agreed by the leader of the Liberal Democrat party
and the leader of the Labour party. I believe that to step in and
prejudge that inquiry would be wrong.”
He added: “The Culture Secretary will be giving a full account of
himself… in front of the Leveson Inquiry and he will give a very good
account of himself for this very simple reason: that in judging this
important bid, the Culture Secretary sought independent advice from
independent regulators at every stage.”

A Downing Street source added that the situation was “awkward” but
added that they did not believe that “Jeremy has done anything wrong”.
Lord Justice Leveson also made clear yesterday morning that his
inquiry should take precedence over other probes. He said: “I have
seen requests for other inquiries and other investigations, it seems
to me that the better course is to allow this Inquiry to proceed. When
it is concluded, there will doubtless be opportunities for
consideration to be given to any further investigation that is then
considered necessary.”
However, the Culture Secretary did make a statement to Parliament on
the affair and spent more than an hour answering questions from MPs.
He said that his adviser should not have communicated as he did with
Frederic Michel, News Corporation’s head of public affairs in this
country.
Mr Hunt said: “The volume and tone of these communications were
clearly not appropriate in a quasi-judicial process and Adam Smith has
resigned as my special adviser.
“Although Adam Smith accepts that he overstepped the mark on this
occasion, I want to say on record that I believe he did so
unintentionally.”
However, Mr Hunt defied calls from Labour to resign and said that now
was not the time to “jump on a political bandwagon”.
In a statement announcing his resignation, Mr Smith said: “While it
was part of my role to keep News Corporation informed throughout the
BskyB bid process, the content and extent of my contact was done
without authorisation from the Secretary of State. I do not recognise
all of what Fred Michel said, but nonetheless I appreciate that my
activities at times went too far and have, taken together, created the
perception that News Corporation had too close a relationship with the
department.”
Senior Government sources later said that it was a “mistake” for a
special adviser to have been involved in discussions with News
Corporation over a legally sensitive matter.

RELATED ARTICLES
'The night I saw Jeremy Hunt hiding behind a tree' 25 Apr 2012
Telegraph View: Cameron should not hide behind a judge 25 Apr 2012
Hunt advisor quits, saying he went 'too far' 25 Apr 2012
Secret Iraq war message 'just a myth’ 26 Apr 2012
Murdoch: Brown 'was unbalanced' 25 Apr 2012



Murdoch's malign influence demeans British politics
Phone-hacking is but one corner of a potent empire – just who stands
to benefit from the Tories killing the TV watchdog?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jul/11/rupert-murdoch-andy-coulson
New depths have been plumbed by Rupert Murdoch's newspapers. If the
Guardian's revelations only concerned lurid journalism it would be
disgraceful but not sinister. However, the way the police, the public
prosecutor and judiciary appear to have prevented exposure of this
industrial-scale bugging is a reminder of just how cleverly Murdoch
companies manipulate officialdom.

Something else happened this week, something that again raises all too
familiar questions about Murdoch's extraordinary power. The evidence
is circumstantial, but you may find it quite compelling.

On 26 June Ofcom published a report into the pay-TV market. After long
investigation, it concluded that Sky had a monopolistic control: its
80% of Premier League football and 100% of movies from the big
Hollywood studios prevent others from entering the market, and Sky
sells these rights to others at too high a price. As a competition
regulator, Ofcom's job is to keep the market open. Its new ruling
requires Sky to sell on its rights to all comers at some 30% less than
it currently charges. BT reckons this will drop the average cost of
watching top-flight football by £10 a month.

Ofcom's boldness drew an amazed intake of breath from industry players
and observers. This is the first time a regulator has seriously
challenged Murdoch's market power. Those who stood to gain – BT
Vision, Virgin Media, Top Up TV and others — were delighted their
protests were so bravely answered.

Sky's chief executive replied immediately that it would challenge
Ofcom using "all available legal avenues". This time, however, Ofcom
is not expected to allow Sky to use the tactic of delaying regulators
in the courts for years – it must comply and can appeal afterwards.
The battle is on, since historically Murdoch's empire has stooped to
manipulating regulators and avoiding taxes. How has he done that? By
leaning hard on politicians, who – knowing only too well his dominant
voice in newspapers – are frightened for their lives.

Sure enough, the next day his newspapers sharpened their knives. Here
is the Sun's Fergus Shanahan: "This is the world gone mad. Ofcom, the
official telly regulator, says a successful and popular firm – Sky –
must be penalised for doing well … This nonsense – rewarding losers by
punishing winners – is Ofcom's way of 'improving competition'. Ofcom
busybodies also have the nerve to threaten to dictate what prices
shareholder-owned firms like Sky can charge. That's despotic, not
democratic, and it's what they do in Russia." No, what they do in
Russia these days is to grant monopolies to oligarchs and that's why
Ofcom and the Office of Fair Trading exist — to prevent it happening
here.

Just 10 days later, last Monday, David Cameron made a surprise speech
about quangos. His team asked the rightwing thinktank Reform to set up
the event at just a few days' notice. It looked like the standard
speech made by all oppositions promising cuts in "the quango state".
But one astonishing new commitment stuck out, even though it was
barely noticed in most reports: "Ofcom as we know it will cease to
exist. Its remit will be restricted to narrow technical and
enforcement roles. It will no longer play a role in making policy." It
would be knocked back to "regulating lightly". Had there been a great
popular outcry calling for the demolition of Ofcom? Hardly, since this
is obscure, techie stuff. So what was this all about?

Within hours of Cameron's speech, leading market analysts UBS
Investment Research assessed the potential impact: "This bodes well
for Sky … We believe that a lighter-touch approach would result in a
far better and fairer outcome for Sky, the consumer and the pay
market. This could result in a valuation of over 750p versus circa
650p under Ofcom's current proposals." In plain English, if the
Conservatives come to power and abolish Ofcom, expect a £1 share price
rise for Sky – worth some £1.7bn.

The timing and content of Cameron's speech may, of course, be purely
coincidental. Former Murdoch man Andy Coulson may have nothing to do
with it. I have no shred of evidence to the contrary. The Tories have
every reason to dislike Ofcom chief Ed Richards, a former Blair
adviser paid £400,000 a year. But behind the scenes the players in
this drama, other companies, analysts and observers were stunned. Few
dare speak for publication, fearing the wrath of the incoming
Conservatives. Ofcom will not be drawn. The one bold voice was Peter
Luff, Conservative chair of the business and enterprise select
committee. "Ofcom is a bloody great regulator," he told me. "I believe
in free markets and I'm very pro-competition. It needs powerful
people."

Cameron's office says there was "no contact with News International"
about Ofcom but history should not be ignored. The Murdoch press has a
long record of winning pay-back from the political leaders it backs –
and it has recently swung behind Cameron. In fact, it is so ordinary
that too few political commentators bother to keep remarking on the
malign influence this man has had on our politics for the past 30
years.

Europe has been Murdoch's one unwavering political obsession. The
reason is commercial: the EU is the one regulatory power stronger than
his ability to twist the arms of national politicians. EU law nearly
stopped him launching Sky until Margaret Thatcher demanded a special
exemption to let him start up with almost entirely US content. The one
Cameron policy that sits oddly with his bid for centre-ground
moderation has been his anti-EU extremism, greater than Mrs
Thatcher's, marching his troops out of the influential EPP group in
Brussels. Murdoch has shaped our foreign policy by using his press and
his political power to inflame Europhobia.

In his memoirs, John Major counts his downfall from the day Murdoch
gave him the imperial thumbs-down. Blair fawned and obeyed, right from
his shocking acquiescence to the Tory 1996 Broadcasting Act, which
gave Murdoch total control of the digital future (later saved by Greg
Dyke bringing in Freeview). The night before the crucial Iraq war
vote, virtually the entire cabinet attended Sun editor David Yelland's
farewell party. Brown loses his moral compass down the back of the
sofa as he courts Murdoch. All Tory and Labour leaders canoodle with
the Murdoch apparat with a social desperation that demeans them and
their office. This political corruption is rather more alarming than
duck islands.




Murdoch cashes in on Cameron's woes
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/mediamonkeyblog/2012/mar/26/rupert-murdoch-sundaytimes
Rupert Murdoch: big trouble for Cameron?

Rupert Murdoch might have departed London for his News Corporation
offices in San Francisco, but the mogul is still making his presence
felt in Downing Street. Murdoch took to Twitter early on Monday to
heap the pressure on David Cameron over the cash-for-access furore
exposed by his Sunday Times at the weekend. "Great Sunday Times scoop.
What was Cameron thinking? No one, rightly or wrongly, will believe
his story," mused Murdoch on his favourite social network. "Of course
there must be a full independent inquiry on both sides. In great
detail, and with consequences. Trust must be established." A little
promotion of his own outlets has become something of a hallmark since
the mogul jumped on the Twitter wagon in January. But could there be
more to Murdoch's missives? Andrew Neil, former editor of the Sunday
Times, certainly thinks so: "Murdoch's tweets on cash for access are
bitter and gloating. I sense this is man on a mission to wreak revenge
on Cameron for #leveson et al." Monkey can only speculate, but it
sounds like time to batten down the hatches for the prime minister.



British PM Cameron grilled over media ties at ethics inquiry
By Richard Allen Greene and Laura Smith-Spark, CNN
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/06/14/world/europe/uk-cameron-leveson/index.html

London (CNN) -- British Prime Minister David Cameron was quizzed
Thursday about his links to former top Murdoch executive Rebekah
Brooks and his decision to hire former News of the World editor Andy
Coulson.
Cameron himself set up the inquiry into media ethics in response to
phone hacking at the News of the World, the Rupert Murdoch-owned
tabloid that shut down over illegal eavesdropping.
He has faced questions about his judgment as the scandal has unfolded,
amid suggestions that his government was too closely connected to
Murdoch's media empire.
Questioned about his ties to Brooks, who was also previously editor of
the Sun and the News of the World, Cameron said their friendship had
developed over several years, particularly after she married his
friend and neighbor, Charlie Brooks.
 Former PM Gordon Brown testifies Protester disrupts Blair testimony
Inside the UK phone hacking scandal David Cameron hacking scandal
link?
A text sent by Rebekah Brooks to Cameron on the eve of a major speech
by him to the Conservative party annual conference appeared to show a
close relationship.
"I am so rooting for you tomorrow, not just as a personal friend but
because professionally we are in this together," she wrote.
Cameron said he understood "we are in this together" to refer to the
Sun's support for the Conservative party.
The Sun -- the UK's most popular newspaper, with a daily circulation
of 7 million -- switched allegiance from Labour to the Conservatives
in 2009, a week before Brooks sent the text.
Cameron also had meetings with James Murdoch, the son of Rupert
Murdoch and a senior News Corp. executive.
His government's handling of News Corp.'s bid to take full control of
British satellite broadcaster BSkyB has come under scrutiny in recent
months, following the revelation of apparent back-channel
communications between the company and an aide to Jeremy Hunt, the
Cabinet minister who oversees British broadcasting.
News Corp. eventually dropped the bid amid the furor over the phone
hacking scandal.
Questioned about the appropriateness of appointing Hunt -- who had
previously openly supported the BSkyB bid -- to adjudicate it, Cameron
said it had seemed the best solution at the time to a political
problem. The move had been approved by lawyers and civil servants, he
said, and Hunt had acted properly at every point in the process.
The prime minister earlier said relations between politicians and the
media were "too close and unhealthy" but rejected the idea that he had
made promises about government policies, for example on media
regulation, in return for newspapers' support.
"There was no overt deal for support, there was no covert deal, there
were no nods or winks," he said.
He acknowledged trying to win over different media organizations to
back his party, but insisted he was "not trading policies for that
support. And when you look at the details of this, it is complete
nonsense."
He rejected as a cooked-up "conspiracy theory" a suggestion by his
predecessor as prime minister, Gordon Brown, that a deal had been
struck between the Conservatives and News International, a British arm
of News Corp.
Cameron said the inquiry was doing the job it was meant to in trying
to "get to the bottom of the media-political relationship and put it
on a firmer footing."
Asked how the relationship could work better, Cameron said more
distance, formality and respect were called for on both sides.
A new regulatory system is needed for the press because the current
self-regulation process "is not working," he said.
The rules should work to protect ordinary people, some of whom have
been terribly mistreated by the press, rather than being drawn up to
make the media or politicians happy, he added.
He said the pain of the Dowler family had been "trebled" by the
hacking of voice mail messages of their missing teenage daughter,
Milly, who turned out to have been murdered. The News of the World was
shuttered amid public anger about the scandal.
Earlier in the day, Cameron defended his decision to appoint former
News of the World editor Andy Coulson as director of communications
for the Conservative Party and then in Downing Street, saying he was
the best person for the job.
Coulson resigned from the Downing Street role last year when police
began a new phone hacking investigation, saying it had become a
distraction. He quit the News of the World after two employees were
jailed over phone hacking in 2007 but denies knowing of wrongdoing
while he was in charge.
Coulson was this month arrested and charged with perjury over court
testimony about phone hacking, according to Britain's Press
Association news agency.
Asked about the hiring process, Cameron said Coulson had given him and
others assurances that he knew nothing of the phone hacking while he
was editor.
Cameron said he knew that Coulson's appointment would be
"controversial" but that the party felt his experience as a tabloid
editor meant he was tough enough for the high-pressure role.
He thought Coulson had done "the honorable thing" in resigning when
the wrongdoing by his staff was uncovered, Cameron told the inquiry,
and was willing to give him a second chance.
Asked if he regretted the appointment, Cameron acknowledged it had
come back to haunt both him and Coulson. But, he said, "You don't make
decisions with 20/20 hindsight.
"I made the decision I made," he said. "I don't try to run away from
it, I just try to explain why I made it."
While in the role, Coulson performed well and behaved entirely
properly, he added.
Cameron testified all day at the Leveson Inquiry, a wide-ranging
investigation into media ethics and behavior currently examining the
relationship between the media and politicians.
In April, Cameron told politicians in the House of Commons: "I think
we all, on both sides of this house, did a bit too much cozying up to
Mr. Murdoch."
The prime minister's testimony comes a day after Brooks appeared in
court in connection with a separate police investigation into hacking.
She, her husband and four other people are charged with trying to
obstruct the investigation.
Three people were arrested Thursday morning on suspicion of making
inappropriate payments to police and public officials, the
Metropolitan Police said. The probe into alleged bribery was set up
alongside the police investigation into phone hacking.
Brown and another former prime minister, John Major, testified at
Leveson Inquiry this week.
Brown lashed out Monday at Murdoch, his son and his British
newspapers, raising the stakes in a highly charged and public battle
between the two men.
The conflict could affect whether Murdoch keeps control of the British
part of his media empire.
The former British leader flatly denied the most sensational claim
that Murdoch made when he testified at the media ethics inquiry this
year: that Brown had "declared war" on Murdoch's company when The Sun
endorsed the Conservative party rather than Brown's Labour party in
2009.
"This conversation never took place. I am shocked and surprised" that
Murdoch said it had when he was grilled at the inquiry in April, Brown
said Monday. "There was no such conversation."
Brown repeatedly insisted that there was "no evidence" of the phone
call, basing his assertion on phone records from his office when he
was prime minister.
The media tycoon said in April that Brown had phoned him and
threatened him when the Sun newspaper pulled its support for Labour
and switched to the Conservatives.
"He said, 'Well, your company has made -- declared war on my
government, and we have no alternative but to declare war on your
company.' And I said, 'I'm sorry about that Gordon, thank you for
calling.' End of subject," the News Corp. chairman testified.
After Brown essentially accused Murdoch of lying under oath, News
Corp. said its chairman stood by his testimony.
If British media regulators feel Murdoch is not a "fit and proper
person" to hold a British broadcasting license, he could theoretically
be stripped of control of BSkyB, a lucrative part of his worldwide
operations.
Murdoch's British operations are under scrutiny after revelations of
widespread phone hacking by people working for his newspapers. Police
and lawmakers are conducting separate inquiries into the scandal,
separately from the Leveson Inquiry.
At her eight-minute hearing Wednesday, Brooks, the former top
executive of Murdoch's British newspaper group, spoke only to confirm
her address and was ordered to appear in Southwark Crown Court on June
22. She is charged with obstructing a police investigation into phone
hacking and bribery.
Her husband, Charlie, and four current or former News International
employees also face charges and appeared with her, becoming the first
defendants to appear in court in connection with the wide-ranging
police investigation sparked by allegations of illegal eavesdropping.
The defendants, who include Brooks' former personal assistant, driver
and bodyguard, were ordered not to communicate with each other
directly, except for Brooks and her husband.
Cheryl Carter, the personal assistant, was also instructed to
surrender her passport.
The six were charged last month with perverting the course of justice.
They are accused of plotting to remove seven boxes of documents from
News International offices and hide computers and documents from
police.
When she was charged in May, Brooks blasted British prosecutors,
calling the case "an expensive sideshow."
She said she is "baffled" and angered by the decision to charge "those
closest to me."
"One day, the details of this case will emerge, and people will see
today as nothing more than an expensive sideshow -- a waste of public
money as a result of an unjust and weak decision," she told reporters
outside her lawyer's office.
Charlie Brooks said that his wife is the victim of a "witch hunt" and
that the charges against him and others are "an attempt to use me and
others as scapegoats, the effect of which is to ratchet up the
pressure on my wife."
Cameron established the Leveson Inquiry amid British public anger at
the News of the World about the hacking of Milly Dowler's voice
messages.
Her case came on top of apologies from the tabloid for the hacking of
the phones of celebrities and politicians, and proved to be the last
straw for the paper, which was shut down in July.
The inquiry is intended to explore media ethics in Britain more
widely, alongside police investigations into phone hacking, e-mail
hacking and police bribery by people working for Murdoch's British
newspapers.
David Williams
10:59 AM (10 minutes ago)
to me
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/has-cameron-done-a-deal-with-murdoch-1819010.html



Has Cameron done a deal with Murdoch?

Lord Mandelson's attack shines spotlight on Tory leader's links with media mogul

David Cameron has been accused of making a "contract" with Britain's
biggest media company to trade political support before an election
for government favours afterwards if the Tories win.


The accusation was levelled yesterday by the Business Secretary Peter
Mandelson, who is increasingly the public face of Gordon Brown's
government. Ministers are angry at the campaign that The Sun has run
against the Prime Minister all this week over the spelling mistakes in
a letter Mr Brown sent to the mother of a young soldier killed in
Afghanistan.

They suspect that the Conservative Party has been tailoring its
policies on media regulation and the BBC to suit the commercial
interests of News International, which owns The Sun, and that the
paper's aggressive support for the Tories is a pay-off that could
spread to other parts of the mass media.

Examples of the apparent tie-in between what News International's
boss, James Murdoch, wants, and what David Cameron is ready to promise
include the recent decision by the Conservatives to abandon the idea
of "top slicing" the BBC licence fee. It had been proposed that part
of the money paid to the BBC would be siphoned off to help regional
television companies meet the threat from the internet. But this would
also have helped them compete more effectively against Sky News, which
is part of the Murdoch media empire.

When the policy was abandoned in September, Jeremy Hunt, the shadow
Culture Secretary, said that it was because enacting it might make the
commercial television companies "focus not on attracting viewers but
on attracting subsidies". There was no gain for the BBC in the
climbdown, because David Cameron had already said that the Tories will
freeze the licence fee. What it will mean is that the BBC's income
will be capped, without the regional television companies seeing any
government help, which will strengthen the market position of
Britain's only satellite television company, Sky. "This was done for
News International," a Tory insider said yesterday. "Murdoch wants Sky
to go head to head with the BBC. He doesn't want the independent
companies strengthened."

In April 2008, James Murdoch complained bitterly about the media
regulator Ofcom in his first major speech after taking over as chief
executive of News Corporation in Europe and Asia. The following year,
David Cameron announced that a Conservative government would cut Ofcom
down to size.

Last summer James Murdoch attacked the "abysmal record" of the BBC
Trust – the body created by Labour to over see the BBC – in a lecture
he gave at the Edinburgh Festival, singling out its "total failure" to
stop the BBC buying the Lonely Planet travel guides, a takeover that
Murdoch denounced as an "egregious" invasion of private enterprise by
the state. Less than two months later, Jeremy Hunt promised that the
Tories would abolish the Trust.

In the same lecture, Murdoch complained that BBC performers like
Jonathan Ross are being paid salaries that "no commercial competitor
can afford". He had barely uttered the words before Ed Vaizey, a
shadow media minister, promised that a Tory government would compel
the BBC to publish the salaries of its top performers.

Lord Mandelson alleged yesterday that the Conservatives and News
International had "effectively formed a contract, over the head,
incidentally, of the newspaper's editor and their readers, in which
they are sort of bound to one another".

Speaking to the BBC's Today programme, he added: "What The Sun can do
for the Conservatives during the election is one part of the contract
and, presumably, what the Conservatives can do for News International
if they are elected is the other side of the bargain. But there is a
wider question. When The Sun creates the news in this way, this is
then followed up by Sky News, which then puts pressure on the BBC to
follow suit."

This was "absolutely, categorically" denied yesterday by The Sun's
political editor, Tom Newton Dunn, who accused Lord Mandelson of
talking "preposterous nonsense".

The Sun, which supported Labour through three general elections under
Tony Blair's leadership, announced that it was jumping ship on the day
that Gordon Brown delivered his annual speech to the Labour Party
conference in September.

Its onslaught on Gordon Brown for the mistakes made in a handwritten
letter to Jacqui Janes is the most aggressive attack that the
newspaper has directed at any Labour Party leader since Neil Kinnock
stood down after losing the 1992 general election, a defeat for which
The Sun claimed victory with the slogan "It was The Sun wot won it".

But there were signs yesterday that the attack may have rebounded on
The Sun. Mr Brown, who is blind in one eye, has admitted that his
handwriting is bad and has apologised to Mrs Janes, whose 20-year-old
son, Jamie, was killed by a makeshift bomb in Afghanistan last month.

A poll yesterday for the website PoliticsHome, whose main shareholder
is the Conservative Party deputy chairman Lord Ashcroft, found that 65
per cent of those polled thought that The Sun's attack was
"inappropriate" compared with 23 per cent who thought it was
"legitimate".

The closeness of the new Tory-Sun axis is shown up by the revelation,
from an inside source, that David Cameron personally consulted the
editor of The Sun, Dominic Mohan, in three separate conversations
before he abandoned his "cast-iron" promise to hold a referendum on
the Lisbon Treaty, now that all 27 members states of the EU have
ratified it.

Mr Cameron was understandably wary of how The Sun might react to the
abandonment of that promise. The paper has campaigned for years
against what it sees as the growth of an EU superstate. It was in an
open letter to readers of The Sun that Cameron first made his
guarantee, two years ago.

His announcement that a referendum is off the agenda was subjected to
a scathing attack in the Daily Mail, but in The Sun it was given
kid-glove treatment under the headline "Cameron's crusade for UK
rights".

The person behind this aggressively pro-Tory policy is James Murdoch,
not his father, Rupert, who created The Sun virtually from scratch in
the 1970s. Rupert Murdoch claimed in an interview with Sky News
Australia that he "regretted" his son's decision to turn against
Gordon Brown, "who is a friend of mine", but defended it on the
grounds that Brown has been a "disappointment".

Yesterday, The Times, another Murdoch newspaper, announced that its
veteran political editor, Phil Webster, is leaving the Commons, where
he has been based for decades. Mr Webster is very well thought of by
New Labour. His replacement, Roland Watson, was a friend of David
Cameron's at Eton but has no political ties with the Tories.

Tom Newton Dunn, newly appointed as The Sun's political editor, is
another Old Etonian. His father, Bill, used to be a Tory MEP, but
defected to the Liberal Democrats in 2000.




Latest in UK Politics

Other related articles by the Guardian
Leveson threatened to quit after public attack by Gove
The Leveson Inquiry: We're in this together!
Ed Miliband: 'Cameron is the last gasp of the old guard'
Asylum-seekers are told:'Go home and lie'
Miliband unveils plans for anti-austerity alliance in Europe
Osborne: The people’s damning verdict
Still standing: George Galloway reveals why his staunchly Leftist
outlook is still invariably right
'Why I can't give Gordon Brown a job'
After 76 years (and 13 reincarnations) the Dalai Lama still draws a crowd ...
Andrew Grice: A Prime Minister whose personal brand is bust

Rupert Murdoch pressured Tony Blair over Iraq, says Alastair Campbell

Murdoch joined an 'over-crude' attempt by US Republicans to accelerate British involvement in the Iraq war, Campbell says

Rupert Murdoch and Tony Blair attend news conference for Atlantic Council Gala
Rupert Murdoch previously told the Leveson inquiry: 'I've never asked a prime minister for anything.' Photograph: Mike Theiler/EPA

Rupert Murdoch joined in an "over-crude" attempt by US Republicans to force Tony Blair to accelerate British involvement in the Iraq war a week before a crucial House of Commons vote in 2003, according to the final volumes of Alastair Campbell's government diaries.

In another blow to the media mogul, who told the Leveson inquiry that he had never tried to influence any prime minister, Campbell's diary says Murdoch warned Blair in a phone call of the dangers of a delay in Iraq. The disclosure by Campbell, whose diaries are serialised in the Guardian, will pile the pressure on Murdoch in light of his evidence to the Leveson inquiry.

The Cabinet Office released information on Friday that raised doubts about Murdoch's claim that Gordon Brown pledged to "declare war" on News Corporation after the Sun abandoned its support for Labour in September 2009. It supported Brown's claim that he never made such a threat by saying that the only phone call between the two men during the period took place on 10 November 2009 and focused on Afghanistan. 

Murdoch tweeted in response: "I stand by every word is aid [sic] at Leveson." But there will be fresh questions about one of Murdoch's most memorable declarations from his appearance before the inquiry in April. The founder of News Corporation said: "I've never asked a prime minister for anything."

Campbell wrote that on 11 March 2003, a week before the Commons vote in which MPs voted to deploy British troops to Iraq, Murdoch intervened to try to persuade Blair to move more quickly towards war. "[Tony Blair] took a call from Murdoch who was pressing on timings, saying how News International would support us, etc," Campbell wrote. "Both TB and I felt it was prompted by Washington, and another example of their over-crude diplomacy. Murdoch was pushing all the Republican buttons, how the longer we waited the harder it got." The following day, 12 March, he wrote: "TB felt the Murdoch call was odd, not very clever." Campbell's description of Murdoch's intervention is one of a series of disclosures in his diaries, The Burden of Power, Countdown to Iraq, which are serialised in the Guardian on Saturday and Monday. The diaries show:

• Blair believed that the Prince of Wales had been "captured by a few very rightwing people", according to Campbell, after the Daily Mail published leaked letters from the prince about a US-style compensation culture in 2002. Blair "liked, rated and respected" the Queen but thought her heir tried to have a "dig" at the Labour government in a speech during her golden jubilee in 2002.

• Gordon Brown agitated so aggressively against Tony Blair – demanding a departure date soon after the 9/11 attacks – that Downing Street concluded in 2002 that the then chancellor was "hell-bent on TB's destruction". The diaries will raise questions about Brown's claim at Leveson that he and his staff never briefed against Blair. Campbell provides specific examples of when Brown and his chief aide, Ed Balls, were suspected of doing just that. In one example, the former health secretary Alan Milburn told Blair that Brown encouraged MPs to defy a government three-line whip to vote against foundation hospitals in 2003.

• Blair was "thwarted" from joining the euro by Brown and Balls in 2003. On 11 June 2003, two days after Brown concluded that Britain had not yet met his five tests on euro membership, Campbell wrote: "Things just hadn't worked on the euro and TB was pretty fed up...The judgment was settling that GB had basically thwarted him. TB feared we were making the wrong decision for the wrong reasons."

Campbell said he had mixed views about Brown. He told the Guardian: "I do have very conflicted views about Gordon. On the one hand he could be extraordinarily difficult to deal with. But on the other hand he could be absolutely brilliant. Often we were sitting there longing for the brilliant to be in charge and for the impossible to fade away and it never quite happened. During this period it is the first time that Tony does at least articulate the possibility of actually sacking him. And at various points [he] says I am going to do it. Of course he never did. I completely understand why he decided to stick with Gordon because, as Tony keeps saying throughout the diaries: 'Look, when it comes to ability, he and I are head and shoulders above the rest.' That may sound a bit arrogant but most people will accept that." Campbell's disclosure of Murdoch's intervention on the eve of the Iraq war is the second substantive example to raise questions over the News Corp chairman's claim that he never tried to influence any prime minister. John Major told Leveson on Tuesday that Murdoch told him in February 1997, three months before the general election, that he would withdraw support for the Tories unless the then prime minister changed his policies on Europe. Major told the inquiry: "If we couldn't change our European policies, his papers could not and would not support the Conservative government." Campbell told the Guardian that Murdoch's intervention on Iraq was a "very rightwing voice" that came "out of the blue" adding: "On one level [Murdoch] was trying to be supportive, saying I know this is a very difficult place, my papers are going to support you on this. Fine.

"But I think Tony did feel that there was something a bit crude about it. It was another very rightwing voice saying to him: look isn't it about time you got on with this? I think, as I recall Tony saying, he didn't think it was terribly clever."

Campbell also mentioned the Murdoch phone calls in a second witness statement to the Leveson inquiry last month. News Corp believes there was nothing improper about the phone call, one of three, because the support of the Sun and News of the World for the war was well known.

Lord Justice Leveson, whose lead counsel, Robert Jay, asked Murdoch about the calls, also indicated that it was "reasonable" for him to have views on such international matters.

Leveson told Murdoch: "You've mentioned that you talked about Afghanistan, and it would be perfectly reasonable for you to have a view on that. Lots of people will. And your view may be informed by your worldwide contacts through the businesses that you operate. That's merely your view."

Murdoch addressed the phone calls in his witness statement to the Leveson inquiry. He said: "As for the three telephone calls with the then prime minister, Tony Blair, in 2003, I cannot recall what I discussed with him now, nine years later, or indeed even if I spoke with him at all. I understand that published reports indicate that calls were placed by him to me. What I am sure about is that I would not in any telephone call have conveyed a secret message of support for the war; the NI titles' position on Iraq was a matter of public record before 11 March 2003."

He then cited four articles from the Sun and the News of the World which illustrated their "pro-war stance" before 11 March 2003 when the main phone call took place.

In his testimony to the inquiry said he did not remember the calls but added that the Sun's support for the Iraq war was well known. "I don't remember the calls. The [call on] 11th might even have been calling me for my birthday, but no, our position on the war had been declared very strongly in all our newspapers and the Sun well before that date."

The company said tonight: "It is complete rubbish to suggest that Rupert Murdoch lobbied Mr Blair over the Iraq war on behalf of the US Republicans. Furthermore, there isn't even any evidence in Alastair Campbell's diaries to support such a ridiculous claim."

POLITICS Iraq/Campbell

The Campbell diaries: Bush left in no doubt over Blair's support for Iraq war

The former Downing Street spin doctor recounts the days leading up to the invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein


The Campbell diaries: Bush left in no doubt over Blair's support for Iraq war

The former Downing Street spin doctor recounts the days leading up to the invasion that toppled Saddam Hussei

POLITICS Iraq/Campbell
Alastair Campbell and Tony Blair on the plane taking them to the Azores in March 2003 for talks with President Bush and Spanish prime minister José Maria Aznar as time ran out for Saddam Hussein Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/PA

The final volume of Alastair Campbell's diaries cover the period that came to haunt Tony Blair's premiership – the attacks on 9/11 and the Iraq war in 2003. The diaries show that Blair was convinced it was right to take action against Saddam Hussein but they show his frustration with members of the US administration, such as Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, who wanted to bypass the UN. Campbell gives a vivid account of the pressures on the prime minister who was even lobbied by Rupert Murdoch to speed up military action.

Wednesday 2 October 2002

Labour conference

Hans Blix [UN weapons inspector] seemed to be making progress and looked like he was trying to do a deal which would not necessarily include palaces. It wasn't good enough for the US but the UN were pushing it and suggested that we didn't need another UNSCR [UN security council resolution]. [US secretary of state Colin] Powell was very hard line that there could be no new inspections without a new UNSCR. We were saying the same but TB [Tony Blair] and Jack [Straw] had a very difficult meeting early on, Jack explaining that the US were getting very jittery re the UN route. TB was also conscious that he had told Bush that Blix was a good guy who knew what he was doing and he was worried Bush would doubt his judgment.TB would speak to Bush later, after Clinton's conference speech, and it became quite fraught because the Americans wanted one resolution that would allow them to hit Iraq at the first sign of Saddam lying or causing trouble. TB came off the phone around 4pm and said 'That was difficult. He is beginning to wonder whether we are going down the right road.' The Americans basically felt that Saddam was fucking them around and they were getting more and more impatient.

Thursday 21 November 2002

Nato summit Prague

George Bush felt there was a need for real pressure to build through troop movements, international condemnation, really tough and unpredictable inspections, to get Saddam off balance. He said that once we made that phone call that agrees Saddam's in breach, we had to do something militarily, and quickly. Quick sustainable bombing raid, and boots on the ground. He said if Blix gets dicked around, while a US or UK plane is shot down, we go for him.

He was clearly not keen on Blix, said he was wringing his hands and talking war and peace but 'That is our judgment. He is not going to get between us and freedom. Once we strike we go for it, we don't wait for the world to sing Kum ba yah, to hold hands and wait for Saddam to develop a better karma.' TB said he felt there was a 20% chance Saddam would co-operate, but Bush said he didn't know what co-operation meant. TB believed the regime would crumble pretty quickly, and Bush said both our secret services needed to be put to work to help that. They were thinking of a list of the top 10 most wanted as part of a divide-and-rule strategy, eg put some members of Saddam's family on there, not others. He felt Saddam was making Blix and the UN look like fools.

By March 2003 Tony Blair was fighting hard to secure a second UN security council resolution.

Sunday 9 March 2003

I listened in later to the TB/Bush call. TB started by saying he was 'fighting on all fronts'. 'Attaboy,' came the reply, a bit too patronisingly for my tastes. TB said the public opinion problem stemmed from people feeling the US wanted a war. We have to put up the genuine tests of disarmament, show the determination to try to do this peacefully. Bush said he had never come across a situation where the dividing line between success and failure was so narrow. He said we want it done peacefully, or any other way. His tone was very different to TB's. Bush was talking the diplomatic talk whilst clearly irritated by the whole thing. His worry was that we were negotiating with ourselves, that we get a resolution with a timeframe, everything they want, and we get nothing for it. [Bush] said if the swing countries [on the UN security council] didn't vote with us 'my last choice is for your government to go down. That is the absolute last thing I want to have happen. I would rather go it alone than have your government fall.' 'I appreciate that,' said TB. 'I really mean that,' said Bush. TB said it was also important he understood that he really believed in what they were trying to do. Bush – 'I know that but I am not going to see your government fall on this.' TB said 'I've got our troops there too. If I can't get it through parliament, we fall, and that is not exactly the regime change I want. We have to work out what [swing countries] Mexico and Chile need'… TB said we were in high-risk, high-reward territory. Bush said he was being eroded domestically by inactivity.

He also said he felt the hardest part would be after Saddam. Then Bush did a number on the changes in the Arab world that could follow. But Bush was left in no doubt TB would be with him when the time came.Bush said 'I'm not going to let you down. Hang in there buddy. You are doing great.' What had been interesting was that Bush listened far more intently to TB. TB did not make too much of his own problems, and was stressing he thought we were doing the right thing.

Monday 10 March 2003

Phone call with Bush

TB did most of the talking, set out where he thought all the different players were … TB said if we can shift Chile and Mexico, we change the weather ... Bush was worried about rolling in more time.

TB held his ground, said the Latins had to be able to say they got something out of all this talking to us. They need to be able to point to something that they won last minute that explains why they finally supported us. Bush said the first resolution was also tough – total and complete disarmament. 'We can't weaken.' 1441, he said, we should just put it down again.

TB felt the second resolution was important and this was the best way to get it. He felt that we needed UN backing, or at least a majority, on the assumption France and Russia would veto. Bush said 'Let me be frank. The second resolution is for the benefit of Great Britain. We want it so we can go ahead together.' His worry was that we would get rolled over on timings and also the inspectors would get used by Saddam again.

TB had not really wavered at all but as the time got nearer the politics got tougher. Bush said 'It's time to do this. We have sent tough signals and he knows that. So no more deals.' He had told Rumsfeld to move the ships.

Tuesday 11 March 2003

British plans were complicated when Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, said that Geoff Hoon, his UK counterpart, had indicated to him that British forces may not be involved in the first wave of attacks against Iraq.

TB went bonkers about it, then called Geoff, who admitted he had put the thought in Rumsfeld's head because he was trying to be very explicit about our difficulties as a way of reining him in. Rumsfeld must have thought he was being helpful, God knows. GH got on to the Defense Department and got them to put out a retraction, making clear we were with them. But it was all very ragged, and indicative once more of the difficulties.

Sally [Morgan, No 10 adviser], and I were both working late and waiting for his 11pm Bush call. We saw him in the flat when he came back. He said he couldn't believe how the US kept fucking things up, the Rumsfeld thing just the latest.

TB was pretty mellow, probably a bad sign. He had suddenly had a load of energy drained from him. He also took a call from Murdoch who was pressing on timings, saying how News International would support us, etc. Both TB and I felt it was prompted by Washington, and another example of their over-crude diplomacy. Murdoch was pushing all the Republican buttons, how the longer we waited the harder it got.

TB/Bush call 11pm Bush referred to Rumsfeld's latest gaffe. 'I want to apologise for that – one of those attempts to be helpful that wasn't very helpful.' These things happen, said TB, but with enough irritation in his voice for the message to be clear.

TB said we needed to hold their [UN security council members undecided on whether to support second resolution] feet to the fire. Bush: 'I'm waiting your instructions. If it falls apart I'm going to make a speech to the American people saying I tried, and now Saddam has 48 hours to leave the country.'

TB said he still felt Chile would come round and not walk away.

Bush felt seven days was too big a stretch to give them. He said Congress was getting restless and all the polls were showing criticism of the UN for inaction. 'We just got to go.'

TB said we had to do something to change the diplomatic weather and get on the front foot but if we can't get anything, we're in real trouble and there is no point pushing the UN beyond what it will take. Bush felt maybe we stand on Thursday and say there could be no new UNSCR, that it had failed in its mission so Saddam has 48 hours to leave. He did not feel the need to buy more time. He was more impatient than ever. TB said he felt a bit more give on the last Putin call but Bush wasn't really listening to this stuff now.

Wednesday 12 March 2003

Jack S said that Rumsfeld's idiotic comments gave us a way out, namely that we could not be involved at the start but could do humanitarian afterwards. TB was not keen but Jack was very blunt. He said we were dealing, however right we thought it was, with a US 'war of choice' and we had to understand, as Powell told him the whole time, that some of these people around Bush could not care two fucks about us whatever, and that went for TB as much as the rest of us. Jonathan [Powell, No 10 chief of staff] and I agreed that last night had effectively been a pincer movement. Rumsfeld fucking up had forced us to come out strong.

TB felt the Murdoch call was odd, not very clever. Jack had clearly been wound up big time while he was over there. He said we were victims of hopeless bullying and arrogant diplomacy. David M also felt yesterday had been a rather crude attempt to shaft us. He came to see me later and said we really have to work hard to keep TB in position.

He was so earnest about it but adamant that both America and France were so capable of doing the wrong things for the wrong reasons that TB was absolutely key to keeping the international community together. David felt he was in a different league to the rest and could not be sacrificed in all this.

David felt we should say to the Americans they could only use our troops after the first effort and also on humanitarian duties. TB did not want to go down that route, no matter how much he agreed the Americans were not being helpful.

Jack was absolutely vituperative about Rumsfeld and said we were being driven by their political strategy. TB said maybe, but it was still the right thing to do. Then to the secure room to listen to the Bush call. Bush said his people had watched TB at PMQs and said he was brilliant.

TB laid it on the line that we had to have a vote in the Commons. He said we couldn't pull the plug on UN negotiating because the bigger the gap between the end of the negotiation and a Commons motion, the worse it was for us. We had to keep trying. Bush said when do you anticipate a vote? TB said we had pencilled in next Tuesday. Bush: 'Erm.' Long pause. TB: 'You want to go on the Monday?' Correct.

TB: 'My military have given me formal advice re the full moon.' It's not a problem, said Bush. 'What – are they taking away the moon?' TB said he would have to check it out. There was clear tension between Bush wanting sooner and TB wanting later.

TB went over the politics here, how we were pulling out every stop. TB said there was a danger the Tories would see this as their chance to get rid of him, support us on a war motion, but not a confidence motion. Bush said they would make it clear to the Tories that if they moved to get rid of TB 'we will get rid of them'. He said he wouldn't speak to 'Iain Duncan Baker' himself – TB didn't correct him – 'but he'll know my message'.

Sunday 16 March In car on way to airport for Azores summit

[TB] was still angry at the way the US had handled it. 'If we had been totally in charge of this, I am absolutely sure we could have won the French round,' he said. I felt the US and France both, for different reasons, did not want to meet on this.

On 18 March Tony Blair won a Commons vote supporting military action. The invasion began the following day

An extract from The Burden of Power: Countdown to Iraq – The Alastair Campbell Diaries by Alastair Campbell, to be published by Hutchinson at GBP25.00 on 21 June. To order a copy for £20 with free UK p&p go to guardian.co.uk/bookshop or call 0330 333 6846

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/jun/15/campbell-blair-bush-iraq-war


Brooks texted David Cameron saying "professionally we're in this together".

Leveson Inquiry: Rebekah Brooks text 'we're definitely in this together' to David Cameron

The Leveson Inquiry reveals that Rebekah Brooks texted David Cameron on the eve of his 2009 Conservative Party conference speech saying "professionally we're in this together".

James Murdoch should disclose contents of second mobile phone to Leveson inquiry, says Tom Watson

James Murdoch is under pressure to disclose text messages from a second previously undisclosed mobile telephone to the Leveson inquiry.


James Murdoch
MPs are asking whether James Murdoch should have declared the existence of a reported additional phone to the Leveson inquiry Photo: AP

MPs are asking



Web Hosting Companies