Canadian Holocaust

The Untold Story of the Genocide of Aboriginal Peoples by Church and State in Canada

by (Rev.) Kevin Annett

Hidden from History:
The Canadian Holocaust
A Chronology of Attacks made against Reverend Kevin D. Annett (1993-2005)
http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/index.html

Dear friends and supporters,

I've compiled the following chronology of the assaults made against me and my work since 1993, because of my relentless pursuing of the truth about crimes against aboriginal and poor people in Canada.

I hope you'll not only circulate and cite this Chronology to others, but will support the call being made to Amnesty International to adopt me as a Prisoner of Conscience, and will support me in other ways so that the evidence and truth will not be buried.

with my thanks,

Kevin Annett
ph:+ 1-888-265-1007

A One-World Government In this Free Trade Agreement, the US gets the clean profitable business.

Canada is the attic - the warehouse of all the raw materials.

Mexico is the boiler room, the basement where all the dirty work is done. That's the plan.

Kralik: Do you see this as a stepping-stone toward the building of a New World Order and its consolidation in a single global economy?

Glen Kealey:

Of course.

The government that is being set up through the United Nations resembles a church:

five percent of receipts goes to the poor - in Somalia, Ethiopia, or whatever - although sometimes, as in Somalia,

it comes accompanied with guns. 95% goes toward the maintenance of power and control.

 What control?

The International Monetary Fund,

The World Bank, and The Security Council, GATT.

Kralik: Who runs the International Monetary Fund?

Kealey: The bankers.

Kralik: Do you know who these bankers are?

Kealey: There are some fifteen or sixteen different families but by far the two most influential are the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers.

Up to the end of the last century the Rothschilds operated strictly in Europe, but they were anxious to synthesize the American operation with their own.

Investigators were sent out and it was agreed that a railroad family, the Rockefellers, were prepared to play the game, and so they became the western arm of this operation.

Then in 1913 we have the biggest scam of all: the denationalizing of the making of money and the creation of the Federal Reserve [Bank],

a deal between the bankers and the politicians whereby the bankers promised some politicians backing and almost certain re-election in the elections they contended;

 in return, the politicians handed over to the bankers the right to do nothing less than print the money for the country.

'We'll do that for you," the bankers said, and you can borrow from us.' It was passed on a Friday afternoon with no warning and with Congress pretty well empty.

So much for democracy when the invisible bankers really want something.

Kralik: The incredible implication of this is that the Federal Reserve, which prints the greenbacks for the American people, is a private bank.

Kealey: It is a private bank. The same thing happened in Canada, after the customary twenty-year delay - in 1935. MacKenzie King had won, lost, won, lost four elections in a row.

He wanted to ensure his hold on the Prime Ministership for a long time, so he in turn gave the bankers The Bank of Canada.

Let us examine the implications of that. Before you give away the Federal Bank there is no need for consumer or income taxes.:

you can manufacture an amount of money based on the resources of the country, including its capacity for labour.

The value is constantly changing as new minerals are found and the labour force becomes more and more productive.

In a situation where the National Government prints money, for every dollar sold to banks two percent remains with the government: that two percent pays the bills.

Kealey: A government should not be there merely for what it does today.

There are nine reasons for a government: health, education, welfare, energy, transportation, communications, housing, food, and clothing.

Defence is not part of that: if you are not fighting anybody, there is no need for defence.

Some countries in the world can't survive on their own because they don't have the resources.

There is nothing in Canada that we do not have.

 In fact, we could make a decision tomorrow that the critical mass of all consumer products needed in Canada would be made in Canada,

from Canadian raw materials, by Canadian labour: the result would be that everybody would be employed.

Kralik: Incredible!

Kealey: We have the raw materials, the labour force, but we don't have the plants.

The raison d'etre of the Free Trade Agreements being concluded throughout the world is to consolidate international control over a country

by making sure that all of the parts needed for the manufacturing of every thing are not made in any one country.

Kralik: So that a country cannot be self-sufficient?

Kealey: The carburettors are built in one place, the exhaust pipes in another, as are the tuners for your VCR.

All the parts have been disbursed in different countries, all over the world. No one country can manufacture the parts for everything produced within their own borders.

That is, with three notable exceptions: Germany, Japan and the United States - the European Community, the Pacific Community, and the Atlantic Community.

A One World government begins by eliminating boundaries, ending up with three regions.

Kralik: Initially?

Kealey: Initially, and then merging them into a One-World government under the United Nations.

The Free Trade Agreement between Canada, the US, and Mexico is only the first step of an Agreement that will encompass both the Americas, North and South.

Kralik: Exactly. The South American dimension was only mentioned during the last week.

Kealey: But it has been planned all the way through. You must remember too that the Free Trade Deal was not a negotiation:

 it was transnational bankers saying to the Governments involved:"This is what you are going to do and here is an implementation schedule.'

 Everything in the Free Trade Deal had to fit the implementation schedule. The final time slot is 2005.

What is being created is a United Nations in which the rich governments send money to build a fund, the International Monetary Fund,

causing the country from which money was sent to borrow more and more money, thus causing more and more debt.

Money is then sent to the poor countries, creating a debt there. So everybody is indebted to the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund.

One branch of the Fund holds the money, the other makes the decisions as to how it is to be used, usually for projects that don't go anywhere:

these waste money and cause the debt to grow.

Then one day countries can't pay and the bailiff is called.

The bailiff is the United Nations Security Council.

The real assets of the world, therefore, are re-possessed either by the bank or by the Security Council and are put under the control of the United Nations.

Over time the resources of each country are gathered under UN control.

The guy who was in charge of that section is now working in Ontario as the Head of Ontario Hydro:

Maurice Strong. Would you like to know why Maurice Strong is working in Ontario?

It is because Bob Rae [then-Premier, socialist and a Rhodes Scholar; the current Ontario Premier, Conservative Mike Harris,

recently went on a several-day private fishing trip at a remote camp with George Bush -

just before the Quebec "crisis" erupted in the neighbouring province!] is in on the deal: he brought Maurice Strong in to do what he does best.

What did Strong do first? He shut down some of the nuclear plants. Why? Because as long as you have nuclear plants you have too much electrical power.

If you shut them down, then you can convince people they must dam more rivers.

Make a Free Trade deal, move the jobs out of Canada, cause unemployment, and the people of Canada will scream:

"Give us jobs! Give us jobs!" Ultimately they will be told: "You want a job? We've got some terrific jobs - building dams!"

Kralik: Is that why only yesterday Chretien signed the Free Trade deal?

Kealey: Chretien is a puppet. He is the Ronald Reagan of Canada. Today Mitchell Sharp is the Prime Minister of Canada.

Mitchell Sharp is our George Bush, and he was not elected.

He used to be Chretien's boss as Minister of Finance, but today he's got his hand on the back of the puppet [Prime Minister] Jean Chretien.

About the Authors

Kevin Annett is a former United Church minister in Vancouver, Canada, who was fired without cause in 1995, and then expelled from the same church without due process, after he had unearthed evidence of the theft of native land by church officers, and of the murder of native children at the United Church residential school in Port Alberni, British Columbia, where Kevin ministered.

Since his firing and blacklisting by the United Church, Reverend Annett has worked as an advocate and counsellor in aboriginal healing circles on the west coast. He organized the first international Tribunal into Canadian residential schools in Vancouver in June, 1998, at which a United Nations affiliate, IHRAAM, presided. This website is a partial summary of that investigation.

Reverend Annett is working with aboriginal and human rights groups around the world in an effort to bring charges of complicity in Genocide against the government of Canada, the Anglican, United and Roman Catholic churches, and the RCMP. He is serving as the secretary of the recently-established Truth Commission into Genocide in Canada, and has authored a book about his experiences, "Love and Death in the Valley". He can be contacted at this email: kevinannett@yahoo.ca

Men and women of the Pacheedat, Ahousat, Cowichan, Haida, Songhees, Penelakut, Carrier, Halalt, Tseshat, Inuit, Chemainus, Squamish, Hesquait, Cree, Blood, Sto:lo, Dene, Lakhota and Metis Nations wrote this report with their own witness, suffering, and courage. Some of them have chosen to remain anonymous in the face of death threats and other perils both to themselves and their families which have been made by agents of the state, the churches, the RCMP and government-funded native organizations.

Note: Kevin Annett's personal website and his book, which contain a chronology of the events which have led to the publishing of this website and the report, "Hidden from History: The Canadian Holocaust", will soon be posted on this website. More information can be obtained from Kevin at his aforementioned email.

Chronology of Events: Genocide in Canada

1857: The Gradual Civilization Act is passed by the Legislature of Upper Canada, permanently disenfranchising all Indian and Metis peoples, and placing them in a separate, inferior legal category than citizens.

1874: The Indian Act is passed in Canada’s Parliament, incorporating the inferior social status of native people into its language and provisions. Aboriginals are henceforth imprisoned on reserve lands and are legal wards of the state.

1884: Legislation is passed in Ottawa creating a system of state-funded, church administered Indian Residential Schools.

1905: Over one hundred residential schools are in existence across Canada, 60% of them run by the Roman Catholics.

1907: Dr. Peter Bryce, Medical Inspector for the Department of Indian Affairs, tours the residential schools of western Canada and British Columbia and writes a scathing report on the "criminal" health conditions there. Bryce reports that native children are being deliberately infected with diseases like tuberculosis, and are left to die untreated, as a regular practice. He cites an average death rate of 40% in the residential schools.

November 15, 1907: Bryce’s report is quoted in The Ottawa Citizen’s headline.

1908-1909: Duncan Campbell Scott, Superintendent of Indian Affairs, suppresses Bryce’s report and conducts a smear and cover-up campaign regarding its findings. Bryce is expelled from the civil service.

November, 1910: A joint agreement between the federal government and the Roman Catholic, Anglican, Presbyterian and Methodist churches establishes the structure of Indian Residential Schools and the contractual obligations of churches running them. Duncan Campbell Scott refers to the policy of the government as that of seeking a “final solution to the Indian Problem”.

May, 1919: Despite an escalating death rate of Indian children in residential schools from tuberculosis - in some cases as high as 75% - Duncan Campbell Scott abolishes the post of Medical Inspector for Indian residential schools. Within two years, deaths due to tuberculosis have tripled in residential schools.

1920: Federal legislation makes it mandatory for every Indian child to be sent to residential schools upon reaching seven years of age.

1928: Sexual Sterilization Act is passed in Alberta, allowing any inmate of a native residential school to be sterilized upon the approval of the school Principal. At least 3,500 Indian women are sterilized under this law.

1933: An identical Sexual Sterilization Act is passed in British Columbia. Two major sterilization centres are established by The United Church of Canada on the west coast, in Bella Bella and Nanaimo, in which thousands of native men and women are sterilized by missionary doctors until the 1980’s.

1933: Residential school Principals are made the legal guardians of all native students, under the oversight of the federal Department of Mines and Resources. Every native parent is forced by law to surrender legal custody of their children to the Principal - a church employee - or face imprisonment.

1938: Attempt by the federal government to close all residential schools and incorporate Indian children into public schools is defeated by pressure brought by Catholic and Protestant church leaders.

1946: Project Paperclip - a CIA program utilizing ex-Nazi researchers in medical, biological warfare and mind control experiments - uses native children from Canadian residential schools as involuntary test subjects, under agreements with the Catholic, Anglican and United churches. These illegal tests continue until the 1970’s.

1948 - 1969: Offshoot programs of Project Paperclip are established in United Church and government hospitals in Nanaimo, Brannen Lake, Sardis, Bella Bella, Vancouver and Victoria, British Columbia; in Red Deer and Ponoka, Alberta; and at the Lakehead Psychiatric Hospital in Thunder Bay, Ontario. All of these programs use native children abducted from reserves, foster homes, and residential schools, with the full knowledge of church, police and Indian Affairs officials.

1969: Indian Affairs Minister Jean Chretien tables his White Paper in Parliament, which reaffirms the "assimilationist" policy of the past century that denies sovereignty and equal status to native nations. As a token gesture, Chretien assigns a limited control over Indian education to local, state-funded band councils. Many residential schools are phased out altogether or simply taken over by band councils.

1984: The last Indian residential school is closed, in northern British Columbia.

1990: State-funded leaders of the Assembly of First Nations discuss “abuses” in residential schools for the first time publicly.

1994-95: Eyewitnesses to murders at the United Church’s Alberni residential school speak out publicly, from the pulpit of Reverend Kevin Annett in Port Alberni. Annett is summarily fired without cause within a month, and is expelled from United Church ministry without due process during 1996.

February, 1996: The first class action lawsuit of Alberni residential school survivors is brought against the United Church of Canada and the federal government. The church responds with a counter-suit and an attempted “gag order” on Kevin Annett, which fails.

1996-7: Further evidence of murder, sterilisations and other atrocities at coastal residential schools are documented by Kevin Annett and native activists in public forums in Vancouver. The number of lawsuits brought against the churches and government by residential school survivors climbs to over 5,000 across Canada.

June 12-14, 1998: The first independent Tribunal into Canadian residential schools is convened in Vancouver by IHRAAM (International Human Rights Association of American Minorities), an affiliate of the United Nations. Evidence is submitted by dozens of aboriginal witnesses to crimes against humanity. The Tribunal concludes that the government of Canada and the Catholic, United and Anglican churches are guilty of complicity in Genocide, and recommends to the United Nations that a War Crimes investigation be held.

1998-1999: Under strong pressure from the government of Canada, the United Nations refuses to act on IHRAAM’s recommendation. Further evidence and reports of Genocide in residential schools is blacked out of the mainstream media across Canada. A concerted smear and misinformation campaign is launched by the United Church and the RCMP against Kevin Annett and his network’s efforts to document and expose genocidal practices by church and state in Canada.

October, 1998: The Vancouver Province reports the admission of United Church lawyers that their church has engaged in a joint cover-up with the federal government of crimes committed at its Alberni Indian residential school since at least 1960.

January, 1999: The New Internationalist magazine in Great Britain reports the findings of the IHRAAM Tribunal, including the evidence of murder in Canadian residential schools, but is subsequently threatened and silenced by United Church and Canadian government lawyers.

February, 2000: The number of lawsuits brought by residential school survivors climbs to over 10,000. The federal government introduces legislation limiting the number of such lawsuits. It also announces that it will assume primary financial responsibility both for residential school damages and the legal expenses of the churches which ran the schools, despite the fact that Canadian courts have ruled that the churches bear either a majority or an equal responsibility for crimes at the schools.

April, 2000: The federal Health Department admits that it used native children from four residential schools, including Port Alberni, in medical experiments during the 1940’s and ‘50’s, including the deliberate denial of vitamins and dental care to them to study the effects. (The Vancouver Sun, April 26, 2000)

August, 2000: The Truth Commission into Genocide in Canada is formed in Vancouver by forty-eight native and non-native activists, with Kevin Annett as its Secretary. Its mandate is to carry on the work of the IHRAAM Tribunal, and bring charges of Genocide against churches, the RCMP and the government of Canada.

February, 2001: The Truth Commission publishes its six year study of Genocide in Canada, “Hidden from History: The Canadian Holocaust”. A second edition is published in June. Efforts by the United Church to legally prevent its publication fail.

September-October, 2001: Judicial decisions in British Columbia and Manitoba deny the claims of residential school survivors that genocide was practiced, absolve the churches of any direct responsibility for damages, and block any future lawsuits from claims older than thirty years, when most residential schools were closed more than thirty years ago. (!)

October, 2001: New eyewitnesses come forward with first-hand evidence that native children are being used in west coast pedophile rings involving senior judges, politicians, church and aboriginal leaders. One of these pedophile networks operates out of the prestigious Vancouver Club.

December 15, 2001 - The Roman Catholic Church discloses that it hired a known and convicted sex offender and murderer, Martin Saxey, to work as a dormitory supervisor at its Christie Indian Residential School in Tofino, British Columbia, during the 1960's. Saxey subsequently raped and terrorized children at this school without ever being reprimanded or prosecuted.

April 27, 2002 - The first television documentary featuring eyewitnesses to murders in Canadian Indian Residential Schools is broadcast in Vancouver, on CTV's "First Story" program. The show is aired simultaneously in Winnipeg, Toronto, and Halifax. Rev. Kevin Annett and native survivors of genocide give their stories. On the same program, United Church official Brian Thorpe admits for the first time that criminal actions occured in his church's residential schools, validating the claims made by Rev. Annett, which had caused him to be expelled from the United Church in 1997 by Thorpe and others.

July 22, 2002 - A gag order in the form of a defamation lawsuit is brought by the government of Canada against Rev. Annett and others through its paid agent, Chief Edward John of the state-funded First Nations Summit.

The lawsuit seeks an injunction banning Rev. Annett from discussing the allegations of secret land deals, murder, drug trafficking and pedophilia made against Chief John and other state-funded native chiefs by members of his own tribal council, Frank Martin and Helen Michel. Chief John's lawsuit is handled by Queen's Counsel Marvin Storrow of Blake, Cassels and Graydon law firm in Vancouver. Storrow is a personal friend and legal counsel to Prime Minister Jean Chretien.

August 22, 2002 - Although Rev. Annett was never notified or subpoenaed, the lawsuit goes ahead and Ed John wins his injunction against Rev. Annett in the British Columbia Supreme Court. The injunction is granted by Judge James Taylor, who on behalf of the Law Society of BC helped disbar lawyer Jack Cram in April, 1994 after Cram had made similar allegations as Rev. Annett concerning possible pedophilia and corruption among judges and politicians in BC involving native children.

September-October, 2002 - Despite the injunction banning his constitutional freedom of speech, Rev. Annett continues to refer publicly to the allegations against Ed John and the conflict of interest of Judge Taylor, over Annett's radio program, Hidden From History, in Vancouver.

October 18, 2002 - A Restraining Order against Rev. Annett is issued by Judge Taylor, who also bans native eyewitnesses Frank Martin and Helen Michel from discussing their evidence about Ed John, and strikes their statements from all BC court records. Judge Taylor also indicates his intention to seek a banning of Rev. Annett's book on genocide in Canada, "Hidden from History: The Canadian Holocaust".

November 1, 2002 - Rev. Annett's latest book, "Love and Death in the Valley", is published by First Books in the United States. Acting for Ed John, lawyer Marvin Storrow tries to prevent its publication, but fails.

Early December, 2002 - An all-party Parliamentary meeting in Ottawa discusses "Hidden from History: The Canadian Holocaust", and "hashes over how to deal with all the Indians who are starting to talk about murders in residential schools", according to a source who was present.

December 14, 2002 - A sheriff from the Port Coquitlam office of the Attorney-General attempts to serve court documents on Rev. Annett, but is unable to locate him. The documents are reported to be either a summary arrest warrant for Rev. Annett or a more severe Restraining Order.

December 18, 2002 - A spokesman for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva confirms that the Commissioner will "probably" be sending an official investigator to Canada in the spring of 2003 to examine evidence of crimes against humanity committed against native peoples. She confirms that Prime Minister Jean Chretien could theoretically be summoned to publicly answer charges of complicity in Genocide.

December 28,2002: Kevin Annett is interviewed on KFI radio station in Los Angeles about genocide in Canada, and is heard by an audience of over two million people. Kevin discusses the attacks he is experiencing from the government of Canada through the law firm of Blake, Cassels and Graydon in Vancouver.

Dated 11 January 2003 .... Updates to follow

Hidden from History: The Canadian Holocaust website:

http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/

Hidden from History:
The Canadian Holocaust

Let Justice Begin in your own Back Yard, and Church Yard: An Open Letter to the United Church of Canada

 
https://bbsradio.com/users/rev-kevin-d-annett

Rev. Kevin D. Annett
11759-248 St.
Maple Ridge, BC V4R 1H6
www.hiddenfromhistory.org

cc: media and world opinion

 

Biography: 

Kevin D. Annett (Eagle Strong Voice) is a renowned Canadian whistle blower who has been twice nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. A former, now blacklisted minister of the United Church of Canada, Kevin produced the award-winning documentary film on the Canadian Genocide, Unrepentant, in 2007. He has authored twelve books including the definitive account of the Canadian Holocaust: Murder by Decree - The Crime of Genocide in Canada(Amazon, 2016, http://murderbydecree.com). His works can be found at http://kevinannett.com.

His persecution by the Canadian establishment over his persistent, selfless advocacy for indigenous victims of church and state genocide is an object lesson in the true nature and corruption of Canada and its churches.

In 1990, after obtaining degrees in Anthropology and Political Science at the University of British Columbia, Kevin graduated from the Vancouver School of Theology with a Master of Divinity, and was subsequently ordained by British Columbia Conference of the United Church of Canada. In 1990-1991 he served in churches in rural Manitoba, and in 1991-1992 served at the Fred Victor Mission in Toronto, an outreach street-ministry of The United Church of Canada. He was appointed minister to St. Andrew's United Church in Port Alberni, British Columbia in 1992.

From early in his Alberni ministry Kevin discovered evidence of horrible crimes by his church shared by aboriginal survivors of the notorious “residential school” system.  Giving them a platform from his pulpit, Kevin soon raised the ire of those responsible for the rape and murder of children in these “schools”, inside and outside his church. When he uncovered secret deals involving the theft of west coast native land by the United Church and its corporate benefactors, Kevin was fired without cause and expelled from ministry without due process, between 1995 and 1997. Church officers helped destroy his marriage and have his children taken from him, and defamed and blacklisted him across Canada.

All of this persecution merely fueled Kevin’s determination to bring out the truth of the Canadian genocide. Over the subsequent twenty years, he has made history by bringing out this truth and bringing to trial those responsible, in Canada, London and Rome.

In 2006, Kevin produced a documentary on this topic: Unrepentant: Kevin Annett and Canada's Genocide which won the 2007 award for 'Best Documentary at the Los Angeles International Independent Film & Video Festival.

On 15th June 2010, Kevin Annett helped establish The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State, which unites survivors of these crimes in 26 countries. The Tribunal established The International Common Law Court of Justice in September 2012, which successfully prosecuted Pope Benedict, Queen Elizabeth, Stephen Harper, Jorge Bergoglio and others for crimes against humanity.

Kevin Annett was a founding convener of the Republic of Kanata, proclaimed under common law on January 15, 2015, which lawfully replaced "crown" authority in Canada. He hosted the Republic's media arm, Radio Free Kanata, from its inception in March 2015 to September 24, 2017. The complete programs of Radio Free Kanata remain archived at https://bbsradio.com/radiofreekanata.

On May 1, 2016, Kevin helped to establish the Covenant of Free Congregational Christians - the Covenanters - and with other elders of the Covenant launched its official voice, the blog radio program Here We Stand, on Sunday, October 1, 2017. It can be heard every Sunday at 3 pm pacific, 6 pm eastern, at https://bbsradio.com/herewestand.

 https://bbsradio.com/users/rev-kevin-d-annett

 

http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/let_justice_begin.html

March 23, 2004

Dear members and officials of the United Church,

In recent weeks, you have made public statements of concern about the aboriginal women and children who have disappeared in Vancouver's downtown eastside, and along the "Highway of Tears" west of Prince George.

I am perplexed why you have not made a similar outcry about the thousands of aboriginal women and children who disappeared in the Indian residential schools run by your church across Canada until the 1980's.

While lawsuits brought against you have forced you to admit to sexually violating generations of Indian children in these "schools", you have remained continually silent about the allegations of murder, torture, involuntary sterilizations, and mass graves brought against you by the same native men and women who have successfully sued you for their sexual abuse.

How do you answer these allegations?

I have been taken to many sites on Canada's west coast where survivors claim that hundreds, perhaps thousands of Indian children are buried in secret, after having died in United Church residential schools.

Why have your voices and consciences not been lifted on behalf of THOSE disappeared Indian people?

Do you not realize that simple decency requires that, first and foremost, you help the relatives of these fallen children locate and recover their hidden remains, so that they can receive a proper burial, and their souls may finally be at rest?

What is stopping you from doing so?

Do you not realize that your words of "healing" and "concern" for native people today are empty and meaningless, when you refuse to start at square one, and help find the women and children who were made to disappear by your own clergy and employees?

Sadly, until the first lawsuits were brought against you by native survivors of the residential schools in 1996, you remained silent about ANY of your crimes in these "schools". The commands of lawyers appear to have outweighed the dictates of your own consciences -and the requirements of the Gospels. Before the world, you have declared by your silence that your money and worldly power is more important to you than is doing what is right by your victims.

Perhaps it is suddenly safe and politically expedient for you to "apologize" today, and "stand in solidarity" with the people you once tried to exterminate. Now that so many aboriginal survivors have been silenced by legal gag orders and paltry out of court financial settlements won by your lawyers, it is undoubtedly possible for you to have your cake and eat it, too: to appear to do the right thing by native people without having to risk losing any money or property or credibility.

If so, such careful, manipulative behaviour is certainly not an affirmation of either your spiritual and moral integrity, or your right to speak out on behalf of anyone - least of all the native people whom you continue to wrong by your refusal to take responsibility for their murder and disappearances in your residential schools.

There is more than enough hypocrisy in our sad world. You are simply adding to it in a particularly grotesque manner by posturing as the defenders of native people when their blood is still fresh upon your collective hands.

There is a way for you to wash off this terrible stain from your church and lives, but it doesn't lie through self-justifying behaviour, or by following the instructions of the lawyers who unfortunately run your church.

To get right again, you must follow the advice of your own Bible, and as the Book of Lamentations and all the Prophets prescribe, stand naked before God, and "rend your hearts, and not your garments". You must know the truth of what you have done, and speak it honestly and publicly - even at the cost of your property, and bank accounts, and very lives. You must simply admit to your wrong, and agonize for forgiveness, as any oppressor must do to get healed.

You must know that it is you yourselves who are in need of healing - from the stain of murder, and lies, and mass denial. You have betrayed and dishonoured your own soul, and your own God - and as your own teachings command, such a spiritual wrong, such apostasy, can only be answered by an ending: a dying to yourselves and to all the filth you collectively carry.

A good man whom you claim to worship once did what you are refusing to do, and found that by dying to ourselves out of love for the Truth, we can discover paradise, and eternal life.

Do you actually believe this? Are you his followers in more than name?

The world is waiting to see.

In that hope, I remain,

Rev. Kevin D. Annett
11759-248 St.
Maple Ridge, BC V4R 1H6
www.hiddenfromhistory.org

cc: media and world opinion

 

 https://bbsradio.com/users/rev-kevin-d-annett

 

Hidden from History:
The Canadian Holocaust

CONTROL OF WATER = CONTROL OF PEOPLE

http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/water_control.html

This is the plan to control the water.....and you.

THE GRAND CANAL PROJECT - GLEN KEALEY INTERVIEW

The Quebec Referendum
The Grand Canal Project
US-Canadian Continental Union by 2005

http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/index.html

Also look at:

The Untold Story of the Genocide of Aboriginal Peoples by Church and State in Canada

by (Rev.) Kevin Annett

Recent Additions:

• A Chronology of Attacks made against Reverend Kevin D. Annett (1993-2005) - January 22, 2005
• Vigil for Justice outside a "church" with blood on its hands - September 12 - September 6, 2004
• A Call for Help from many people, and from the Truth Commission into Genocide in Canada - June 25, 2004
• Control of Water = Control of PeopleThis is the plan to control the water.....and you - June 25, 2004
• Olympic Boycott - Demand Justice for Indigenous Peoples in Canada! (please reprint and circulate) - June 22, 2004
• Duplessis orphans call for exhumations: Aim to show children were experimented upon - June 19, 2004

To see all additions, and archives, please visit What's New

The series of postings that you are about to see tell a story so amazing, so full of callous corruption and greed, so destructive to the Quebec and Cree peoples and to the Canadian nation, and so *well-concealed* by those in the Canadian media who are *fully aware* of these details, that you deserve a full and clear introduction to each of the main narrators:

GLEN KEALEY:

Glen Kealey Speaks about the Hidden History of Planet Earth

is the former Hull, Quebec, commercial developer who exposed the system of organized crime and corruption run by ex-Prime Minister Mulroney's government and the complicity of the RCMP and the justice system.

In 1986 Kealey was asked for a bribe by Public Works Minister Roch LaSalle, who offered him government support for his project in exchange for 5% of all government contributions on top of $5,000 up front. Investigating, Kealey found evidence of a massive bribe and kickback scheme operated and controlled right out of the Prime Minister's Office, and a close collaboration between the Tories, the media and the police. Kealey successfully charged 16 people, including members of the government and RCMP, with criminal conspiracy. He is co-chair of THE CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR POLITICAL INTEGRITY in Ottawa [819 -778 1705; fax 613-747 1644]

SHELLEY ANN CLARK: the executive assistant to Germain Denis, Brian Mulroney's personal appointee to the Free Trade Agreement negotiations, during which plans were made to dismember and demolish Canada, first by Quebec's separation, and then by Continental Union in 2005.

GEORGE KRALIK: An eleven-year veteran of the Canadian Armed Forces.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE FOLLOWING ASTOUNDING INTERVIEW HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FROM "NEW WORLD ORDER: CORRUPTION IN CANADA", PUBLISHED IN DECEMBER, 1994, BUT NOW OUT OF PRINT

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kralik: I would like to ask you about the water, our natural resources in water. What is it to be used for? How is it to be transported?

Kealey:

Glen Kealey Researching the Hidden History of Planet Earth

 Think of money. If you had your choice, if you could pull a genie out of a bottle and the genie could grant three wishes, what would your three wishes be? Remember your goal is to make the most money possible?

Kralik: I should really have to think a lot about that, but...

Kealey:

The Glen Kealey Paper

 I would say: 'Number one, give me control over the sun. Number two, give me control over the air. Number three give me control over water.' Now, leaving our little genie aside, we know we cannot control the sun, nor can we control the air. BUT WE CAN CONTROL WATER. On the scale of things that are required for human life, it is the most important element that can be controlled.

Kralik: What do you mean when you say 'control'?

Kealey: OK. In GATT, General Agreement on Trades and Tariffs, it says that free-flowing water is not a'good'. The key wording is 'free-flowing'. If you construct a dam it is no longer free-flowing and therefore it becomes private property, owned by somebody, capable of being sold to others, or mortgaged.

Kralik: If it is dammed?

Kealey: If it is dammed. Any time the free-flowing water has been obstructed. Of course in GATT, there is much talk about bottled water.

Kralik: It's a side trick?

Kealey: It's a side trick. The biggest scam ever to be pulled on the entire world is Free Trade and I'll tell you why.

There is a lady in Ottawa by the name of Shelley Ann Clark. She was the executive secretary to the third highest negotiator during the Free Trade deal. His name was Germain Denis. His two visible superiors were Gordon Ritchie and Simon Riesman. Before he became Free Trade negotiator, Simon Reisman had a difficult job. He was the director of a project called the Grand Canal, which is to be built from James Bay.

In 1985-86, my offices were in Hull in the commercial part in Place de Portage, the government complex which houses the Supply and Services Offices. [NOTE: Hull, Quebec is just across the river from Ottawa, Ontario, and is filled with federal offices and civil servants] One day I was visited by a man named Art Bailey. Bailey was a former Assistant Deputy Minister of Supply and Services and had been following the development of my project, the Micot Building. I had raised a hundred and sixty million bucks to build this high tech centre in Hull. We had bought the land and were just about ready to start construction when Art Bailey walked into my office. 'Mr. Kealey,'he said, 'You've done a fantastic job of marketing this Micot Building. Nobody would ever have believed that anyone could raise a hundred and sixty million dollars to build a building in Hull - this is totally out of sync with anything that anybody believed.' So he said, 'We think you're the best marketing man in Canada and that you should come and join our team and become the Marketing Manager for the Grand Canal.'

I said, 'What the hell's the Grand Canal? I don't know what you're talking about.' So he gave me a document -a twenty to twenty-five page document - which I read. This is what I read: James Bay is five hundred miles north to south, is a hundred and twenty miles across at the mouth, salt water on the average thirty-five to forty-five feet deep. If a dam were to be constructed at the mouth of James Bay and Hudson's Bay and a second one, one third down, and a third, a third down again - therefore three dams - it would allow over a period of ten years for water to flow from the fresh water rivers and would push the salt water back beyond the dams and create the largest fresh water reservoir known to man. So much so that a canal could be built leading out of the south-east corner of James Bay, south over the mountain ranges with dykes and locks and whatever you need to lift water for eight hundred miles, then at Rouen-Noranda in northern Quebec, nature's gravity would take over and the water would start going down the other side of the mountain range, in Ontario, the Ottawa River and the French River systems, past Kirkland lake and eventually it would end up in Georgian Bay [in Lake Superior]. The amount of water that would be brought back - fresh water from that Canal - could double the flow of water that now enters the Great lakes. Of course, if you can double the water entering the Great lakes you can take half of the total water out without changing anything in the Great Lake System.

The water would be removed in two places: at the base of Lake Michigan - they don't need it this year, this year they have enough water - they would open up the sluices and move water down to the Mississippi Delta, almost all the way to Mexico, in the Gulf of Mexico; the second outlet would be from Lake Superior, moving water across Manitoba, into Saskatchewan, then down into the United States to bring water to the Mid West and South West of the United States. We must understand, of course, that since we are living in a period of global warming, the bread basket of North America which is situated in one place now, moves further north as it gets warmer, making the bottom part arid. So water is absolutely critical to enlarge the bread basket of North America as the earth gets warmer.

There is another dimension: if Canadian waters, presently flowing into and towards the Arctic and the North of Canada, are diverted and artificially made to flow in a southerly direction (for instance diverted towards the United States for water use), then the Northern cold climate temperatures will move in a southerly direction and the Canadian terrain will become colder and more frigid; the balance of the Canadian climate will be reduced temperature, which will cause a massive environmental shift in Canada, all to Canada's detriment.

This theory can be supported by simple physics and hydrology. The waters flowing north are of a warmer temperature and have a warm front pushing against the Arctic North temperatures; if removed, the Arctic North will move South. It doesn't matter whether this occurs in summer or the winter seasons. If the rivers and waters are diverted to flow southerly then one will require more fuel to heat our homes and buildings; however, Canadians will only have what is available after the U.S. has its needs supplied under the NAFTA Agreement, etc.

The two transnationals who were pushing this plan were R. J. R. Nabisco (the biggest agribusiness in the United States), led by a Mr. Johnson out of Winnipeg -there's been a film made of him recently called "Barbarians at the Gate" and it shows how he tried to take over the company with junk bonds and whatever; and the other one was Archer Daniels Midland, which cans and boxes or packages all of the agri-business that comes in from R.J.R. Nabisco and distributes it throughout the world. It is interesting, of course, that Mr. Johnson was Mulroney's sponsor, bringing him on tours throughout the U.S. and that Archer Midland Daniels has just hired [ex-Prime Minister] Mulroney [who pushed both Free Trade and NAFTA through the Canadian Parliament] as a director.

I traveled across Western Canada and there have been public demonstrations recently in B.C., Alberta, and Saskatchewan over the building of dams and Kemano in B.C., Old Man River in Alberta and Alimeda in Rafferty dams in Saskatchewan. People ask why are they building dams where there is no water. Once you understand the relationship of the Grand Canal to the entire area you then know where the water will be coming from.

Kralik: Do you see any possible ecological disasters as a result this ?

Kealey: Of course. Some natives believe the sheer weight of the water behind the dams will cause the axis of the earth to shift and if you build a dam you change the chemistry of the earth. You cannot flood the areas that we are talking about without changing the configuration of the soil and landscape. But transnationals don't think in those terms: they think in terms of money. In 1985-86 it was stated t hat the project would cost two hundred billion dollars (U.S.). It was also stated that the money was available.

American Express wants to be the banker and do you think that it is by coincidence that American Express was allowed, by Order of Council, to become a Bank in Canada, with Brian Mulroney breaking fourteen banking regulations just to allow them to achieve this status?

As well, Alcan Aluminum needs dams for their mines and Barrick for their gold-owning concerns. Mulroney also signed Orders in Council breaking the law that made it illegal for foreigners to own more than fifty percent of a mine in Canada.Now foreigners can own mines outright in Canada: there are no restrictions.

None of these changes in the rules were made through Parliament but by a stroke of Brian Mulroney's pen. Most people in Canada Live with the illusion that laws are written by Parliament, but most regulations are changed by politicians in power. For every law that passes though Parliament, there are three thousand laws that are changed unilaterally behind the scenes.

In any case, Simon Riesman put forward a plan to have us put aside our 'old concepts' and to start thinking 'boldly about the future'. By that he meant nothing less than giving up Canada: we need to have a new political reality, he argued, and therefore Free Trade and water diversion go hand in hand. We also know, he surmised, that if the US asked us for either water or free trade, Canadians would rebel: so let us make it appear that Canada is doing the asking. Mulroney was bought with the Bankers' money and he did the asking, publicly stating the opposite of what he had always contended: that he didn't believe in Free Trade, etc.

Back Room Manipulations in the Free Trade Deal I know what was negotiated in the Free Trade deal and how the deal was done because my executive secretary [NOTE: now his wife] is Shelley Ann Clark, who worked as the executive secretary to Germain Denis, the third highest-ranking negotiator. This is how the deal was done - Simon Reisman and Gordon Ritchie went to Washington and gave away Canada and as they were giving away Canada they were at the time preparing a briefing book on a computer which appeared simultaneously on a computer in Ottawa. Mulroney and Denis worked together and Shelley Ann Clark was the secretary working between the two of them.

There was one hitch. Although the Federal Government did not legally need the permission of the Premiers, politically Free Trade would have been impossible to sell unless the Premiers were on side. So two Premiers were bought by Mulroney - the Premier of Alberta and the Premier of Saskatchewan. They became Mulroney's moles within the Premier's camp.

Their job was to go around and identify the acceptable bottom lines in terms of textiles, agriculture, mining, subsidies, unemployment insurance, health care - all of the things that affect our sovereignty. What would the Premiers be prepared to sacrifice? The two moles would then bring the info to Denis, whose job it was to brief the Premiers approximately eight times during the negotiations.

How was this done? Since there were a bunch of Premiers who would have disagreed fundamentally if they knew what was really happening, and you knew what their bottom lines were, Premiers' briefings were always given at 50 O'Connor on the seventeenth floor. At midnight the night before a briefing, Shelley Ann Clark would be told to come into Denis' office - only he and she would be in the office - and call up the briefing books on the computer. She would then be ordered to re-name a copy of the entire briefing book negotiated that day to The Provincial Briefing Book. Denis would then take the notes he had got from the Premiers about the bottom lines and go through the main document paragraph by paragraph.

Here are some examples. He would come to the section on 'Water'- build a Grand Canal, build dams, move water to the U.S. - and he would say,'Delete that paragraph and insert a line that says 'free-flowing water is not included in this deal." Textiles? 'If it said we have given up sixty percent, change it to twelve.' Ms.Clark would change it to twelve.

Agriculture? 'Cut back on the production of turkeys forty percent. Write in eight.'

And they would go through the entire book like that. At the end - at about three o'clock in the morning -they would produce ten copies. Every page of each new copy was numbered so that if a page went missing or was copied in any way, they would know which Premier would have done it.

Not that they were given a chance to do this! The Premiers would arrive for the briefing session, always complaining about not having been given the books ahead of time. 'It is too sensitive,' they were told, 'here's the Briefing Book.' At the end of the session Denis would pick up the Briefing Books, and Shelley Anne Clark would shred nine of the books and keep one, so that Denis would remember what lies he had told when he would have to change the books next time.

Kralik: The reason why he changed the percentages of the cutbacks in productions was to make it look favourable?

Kealey: And acceptable, politically, to the Premiers. That they were not giving away what they *were* giving away. And once it is given away, how can you ever get it back?

Kralik: What they were negotiating, with relation to textiles, turkeys, or whatever was a kind of smoke-screen cover for the big Grand Canal ?

Kealey: Everything in there was doctored. There were two key issues that we didn't hear anything about: the integration of Canada into the United States, and the movement of water through the Grand Canal. Those are the two key issues. How do you do that without anybody knowing? On 3 October 1987 the Free Trade Agreement was signed in Washington. A thirty-three page summary was delivered to Parliament. *The original text has never been seen by the public.* A year later a legal document of some fifteen hundred pages detailing the ramifications of certain items was made public and is used by lawyers today. *But what is not known, what has not been seen is the original Free Trade Deal which is at least two hundred and some odd pages long.* Because Shelley Ann Clark knows what she knows, and because of the contacts that she now has, she is a threat to the government [i.e. the previous, Mulroney, government] Last December (1992) they sent her home on full pay.

Kralik: Laid off.

Kealey: No, not laid off. She has her full pay. She was told, 'Go home. We don't want you talking to people.' What they didn't know then, was that home for her meant, in July 1993, becoming my executive secretary.

Kralik: What a bonus! That is great!

Kealey: They haven't touched her in any way because they were afraid. She still has her top security clearance, but when she went to the archives and asked to see the Free Trade Documents, she was given an index which she skimmed through and questioned: 'There's no Premier's Briefing Books here?' The guy answered: 'Well it's possible. We didn't get everything. We don't know. We just get what we get.' So she said, 'May I see the Free Trade Deal ? "Oh, no,'he resumed,' under the Statute that governs access to information, ninety-five percent of the Free Trade Deal has been declared a security problem for Canada and is not being made available to the public. Even with your top security clearance, you could not get it unless you had the 0.K. from the Deputy Minister of External Affairs.' So she said, 'You know who I am and that's not possible: he would never give it to me.' She was told, 'In any event the Free Trade Deal is in canisters 16 miles outside of Ottawa and is not to be seen by Canadians for thirty years. "This doesn't make any sense in a democratic country,' she said,'Why can the people not see it? I know what is in it and it's a danger to our national security all right. It gives the country away and thirty years from now it is going to be too late. The implementation schedule ends at 2005. The Grand Canal must be in place and Quebec must be separate.

The Integration of Canada and the United States Kealey: Plot for a movie: The date is the early 1960's. Dag Hammerskjold, the Secretary General of the UN, is flying between countries on the Lower African continent. He has been trouble-shooting border disputes which are being caused by the competition for access to mineral deposits.

Suddenly two fighter planes pull up alongside the UN plane and, without warning, shoot it down with missiles. The next day the world media report it as an 'accident'.

Fade to secret rendez-vous: Two mercenaries (the pilots of the fighter planes) are paid by under-cover agent employed by the TRANSNATIONAL MINING CABAL (funded by Rothschild-Rockefeller).

Fade to the New York (or Philadelphia) boardroom of Hanna Mining. It is now the late 1970's.

The same under-cover agent, an employee of Hanna Mining, quietly admits his role in the assassination to the Board of Directors. The admission bothers no one. Attention then turns to another internal problem. A Canadian branch operation company President, Brian Mulroney, of The Iron Ore Company of Canada, is being asked to shut down the Schefferville mine in Quebec. This is a very profitable mine, but one which competes successfully against the less profitable U.S. mines the Cabal also own. Mulroney is not-so-subtly reminded (blackmailed) by other directors, who threaten to expose the way he once looted the company pension fund in order to start the construction of his grand pet project, the Lord's Inn, which is to be built in Labrador (the hotel is an exact replica of Montreal's Ritz Carleton Hotel). Mulroney wisely agrees.

Fades to Schefferville. Families are being torn apart by the closing of the mine. Mulroney pays off the trouble-makers and the local media to keep things quiet. He badly wants to become a national politician and doesn't need bad publicity.

Fade to Paris, France. It is now October 1980: George Bush, Edward Meese, Earl Casey and a Dr. Brian are observed surreptitiously negotiating with Iranians. They want them to hold onto the American hostages until after the US elections and the inauguration on 20 January 1981. They promise arms for the hostages if Ronald Reagan is elected. They also agree to sell the Iranians more arms later, to raise money for the Nicaraguan Contras.

Fade to Washington. It is 20 January 1981: Reagan and Bush are being inaugurated. The hostages are being released simultaneously.

Fade to Oval office. It is 21 January 1981: Trans-national corporate leaders and bankers tell Reagan, 'The US is broke. If it were corporation it would be shut down. The answer lies in a political merger with Canada. But first the two countries must be 'HARMONIZED'. The plan evolves on the spot (between 1985 and 2005):

Back Mulroney with cash and spin-doctors. Send money through the Mormon Bishop of Virginia, up to Winnipeg, and then to Montreal.

Once elected, link Mulroney with Simon Reisman, the former Deputy Minister of Finance. Reisman is presently the Director of the Grand Canal fresh water diversion scheme.

Appoint Reisman to lead a negotiating team which arrives from Canada begging for a Free Trade Deal. Let them pretend to be negotiating while they actually just follow a given pre-set IMPLEMENTATION SCHEME designed to harmonize Canada's laws to the USA.

Write into the Free Trade deal the secret arrangements made to change Canada's foreign ownership laws by ORDERS IN COUNCIL, at once.

Replace the Canadian Government with the Bankers' second division team, the Liberals (TORY II). This will help allay most peoples' fears and continue the illusion of existing democracy and independence.

Manage the separation of Quebec by placing the trans-national bankers' man, Lucien Bouchard, at the head of the separatist movement.

Get the Canadian Government to back native claims against Quebec and publicly support the native's right to self-determination.

Keep scaring Canadians with talk of the deficit. Raise taxes, reduce services. Increase drug patent protection. Cut employment to a minimum. People will then accept any conditions for employment proposed later, by the wealthy trans-national job creators. Build more dams.

Borrow 100 billion dollars for the construction of water diversion projects across the north. When the project is at its mid-point, try to borrow a further 100 billion dollars. This second loan will be denied.

When the International Monetary Fund declares that Canada is clearly insolvent, a general panic sets in. The Prime Minister runs down to Washington to plead for more credit. He is told loans are available on the condition Canada merges with the USA. This new deal would create a new country - the United States of NORTH America.

The PM returns to Canada and informs Canadians about the American offer. He states, 'there is no other choice'and civil war breaks out in Quebec. Natives of Ungava (northern Quebec) declare unilateral independence. The QPF attack native reserves from helicopters. The PM calls upon the UN for military assistance - on the pretext of defending the CREE [from the attacking Quebec forces].

Military from Fort Drum, New York, all wearing the UN Blue Berets, cross the border at Kingston. Within two hours they surround Parliament in Ottawa. Others move north by air and take charge of the power Plant at James Bay.

Later, Quebec is partitioned by the UN and the World Bank takes control of the water projects. Quebec is placed under a UN-sponsored economic blockade until they finally agree to use English as the working language. Quebec becomes the 55th State of the USNA etc., etc., etc.

Kealey: Let us take all of this a little more slowly: a plane is flying over Africa with the Secretary General of the United Nations sitting in it when all of a sudden two fighter planes show up alongside and shoot it down. Movie switches back over to a boardroom with the heads of TRANSNATIONAL corporations in mining, agri-business and finance in the US planning for the election of their man to lead the United States for four terms, George Bush. The strategy is devised: put a Charlie McCarthy-type dummy in for the first eight years, Ronald Reagan, with George Bush's hand in the back of the jacket which wags and makes him talk.

Kralik: So it's your opinion that Reagan was a good front man for George Bush?

Kealey: Bush was the man fronting for the transnational corporations, former head of the CIA, involved in drug peddling and raising money for them in that way.

Upon taking over the reins of the country, George Bush and Ronald Reagan call in the presidents of the key transnational companies with their accountants and say: 'Tell us the real picture.' The accountants tell them that if the United States were a corporation it would have to be shut down immediately. It is bankrupt. 'We have wasted our resources. We have ruined our cities. Our assets and debts don't balance.'

The critical question is then put: what is the solution? 'There is only one solution. We must merge Canada politically with the US if we are to re-balance the books. Canada is virgin country with a multitude of natural resources, water, mines, oil, gas, etc. Add Canada to the U.S. and you'll have re-balanced the picture for a long time to come. "How do we do that? We can't merge Canada and the US politically. Canada has a province that speaks French. "Get them to separate! "How do we do that?'

Then the president of Hanna Mining, who has been sitting the table, stands up and says, 'I have a division called the Iron Ore Company of Canada and I have a man there by the name of Brian Mulroney. He just shut down the town of Schefferville, Quebec for me, and he did an excellent job. Shutting down Canada wouldn't be much of a problem for him. Let's bring him in'. 'Exactly, but, can he be trusted?'

'Well our man Reisman has been Deputy Minister of Finance in Canada for a while. He is in charge of this Grand Canal project.We need the water and we can get them to work together as a team. "But how do we get the money to them? "The Mormon Church in Virginia is tied into the Republican party, so we can move the money across to Utah, then up into Winnipeg (Jake Epp and his group), keep it all secret and fund Mulroney's campaign for the leadership of the Conservative party - then we're in business. 'Don't forget there's just been a Referendum in Quebec and they voted to stay with Canada. So there is a job to be done and it can't be done in a short period of time.'

They decide that it is going to take fourteen or fifteen years to put the whole project together; in the interval, the economies, social programs, and laws of the two countries would be quietly harmonized as much as possible. 'But you know Canadians are pretty up tight about things like that, so you can't tell them, you've got to keep things fairly quiet. "Don't worry about it. We own the leaders of the Liberal party and the leaders of the Tory party. They are all on our team: it is just that ordinary bureaucrats don't know what game they are playing.'

We have here a project that begins in 1981, is formalized through 1981 and 1982. In 1983 Mulroney wins a seat in Nova Scotia. In 1984 there is one Tory in Quebec, his name is Roch La Salle and he sees this hoard of people and money pouring in in support of this Brian Mulroney. If Mulroney gets elected in Quebec, Roch La Salle's power will evaporate, so he fights tooth and nail with Joe Clark to try to keep Mulroney out.

On election day Mulroney wins. He is now the leader of the Conservative Party and he becomes the leader of the government of Canada on 4 September 1984. The next thing that happens is that within eleven days of the election four break-ins occur: at PC headquarters in Montreal, PC party headquarters, PC Canada Fund, and at the office of David Angus (Mulroney's communications director) and Rodrigue Pageau (Mulroney's chief of Staff).

The four break-ins are noticed on the following Monday morning. Montreal police are called in. The break-ins are unusual in the sense that only information has been taken: the safe that contained the documents as to the source of Mulroney's funds, computer discs, a photocopier on which they had attempted first to copy documents but obviously ran out of time, and a computer.

Yet there was cash, calculators, and typewriters that were not touched at all. The safe was heavy enough that it required at least three people to lift and take out.

The Montreal Police were conducting their investigation when along came a member of the RCMP, Denis LaPointe, who stated: 'I've been sent from Ottawa to find out how the investigations are coming along. Can I help?' Without his knowledge, a reporter overheard the conversation, Richard Cleroux of The Globe and Mail, and a story is printed in the Globe that night.

The next morning the phone rings at The Globe and Mail. Denis LaPointe is mad as hell: 'What business is it of yours to write that?' Of course, in fact, LaPointe had no authority to be there: he hadn't been assigned to go there, but was acting undercover for Brian Mulroney or Roch LaSalle and other politicians, without Commissioner Simmonds knowing this was even taking place.

When you probe into Denis LaPointe's background you will find that he was raised in Joliette, Quebec. His best buddies were Roch LaSalle and Frank Majeau and he and Roch were involved in businesses; Majeau was LaSalle's executive assistant but Majeau's main business was 'prestige entertainment'. 'Prestige Entertainment' delivered strippers to all the clubs in Eastern Ontario and Western Quebec and moved drugs out of Mirabel airport and the port of Montreal through these strippers. This was actively assisted by a limousine service owned by two Iranians. These people were all linked.

Within a matter of days, the Montreal Police were told to forget the investigation: 'It's not important. Nothing they took was of any value.' But when Frank Majeau came to testify at the hearing in 1991, he revealed what subsequently had transpired. It was that Roch LaSalle was invited to Quebec City by Mulroney's accountant, Michel Cote, who had just been elected and who had become the Minister of Consumer and Corporate Affairs responsible for the Post Office as well. And Michel Cote did something very strange for Roch LaSalle, the sworn enemy of Brian Mulroney: he paid off his entire debt load - four hundred thousand dollars, mostly gambling debts to Frank Catroni. He was THE BOSS: they are the Mob - the Mafia.

The second curious thing that happened was that Brian Mulroney appointed Roch LaSalle Minister of Public Works; when you understand the potential for corruption at Public Works you realize that you don't put Colonel Sanders in charge of the chicken coop and expect the chickens to be there when you come to collect.

The third thing that happened was that Andre Bissonette, who had won the election in St. Jean, was made Minister for Small Business, responsible for the Federal Business Development Bank and although the Federal Business Development Bank will normally loan seventy-five thousand dollars to companies to save them from going under and laying off people (a large loan is a hundred and seventy-five thousand dollars, but the average is about seventy-five). Lo and behold, in this case The Federal Business Development Bank made loans to thirty-nine strip clubs in Eastern Ontario and Western Quebec, loans of five hundred thousand dollars, nine hundred thousand dollars - a total of seventeen million dollars.

The preponderance of circumstantial evidence therefore suggests that Roch laSalle, Lapointe (a member of the RCMP) and Frank Majeau (a member of the mob), stole the safe, got the goods on Mulroney, blackmailed him and got him to appoint LaSalle to his important position: Minister of Public Works.

Of course [RCMP] Commissioner Simmonds, not knowing about this internal arrangement proceeded to investigate almost all of them during Mulroney's first mandate as they were being caught all over the place with their hands in the till. Simmonds, you wilI remember, was called to a meeting with Trudeau when Trudeau was looking for a new Commissioner of the RCMP. Simmonds was asked the question, 'If you were made Commissioner of the RCMP and you discovered tomorrow that I was a crook, what would you do?' His answer was, 'I would arrest you personally, Sir,' and Trudeau to his credit appointed him Commissioner of the RCMP.

Facilitating the Separation of Quebec Simmonds was not the type of RCMP Commissioner that Mulroney needed. For Mulroney was empowered to destroy the country and to destroy the country he had to build a fund that could finance the separation of Quebec. As we know, he brought in his friend Lucien Bouchard to lead the project: by adding five percent to the contracts and getting his team in position within the RCMP so that they could peddle drugs, the fund grew to such an extent that when he left power there was sufficient money to continue playing the game from behind the scenes.

What we have today is Mulroney's plan: one truly National Party, the Liberals, with the most hated politician in Quebec as its head, Jean Chretien. Next you have Lucien Bouchard leading the Official Opposition with the biggest block of Separatists ever, and last you have Preston Manning, leading a Reform Party - one gang that says, 'We're leaving,' and the other one that says, 'Go to hell.'

Kralik: To facilitate the split?

Kealey: To facilitate the split because this is what is required. You cannot integrate Canada and the United States as long as Quebec is there. Step number one is the separation of Quebec by 1995. Step number two is, sadly, to merge the rest of Canada with the United States. Shelley Ann Clark says the material she saw in the Trade Negotiations Office cited Canada as a fifty-first state. Other CIA agents I know have stated fifty-first, fifty-second, fifty-third, and fifty-fourth states: the maritimes, Ontario, the prairies, British Columbia with the northern territories - four states. The third step is a revolution by the Cree of Northern Quebec against a separate Quebec - saying we're not going!

Kralik: A smoke screen?

Kealey: While the natives don't know the game, their leaders must certainly know where they are going. More likely than not they would have been bought off. The natives themselves have no way of fighting back. Quebec cabinet ministers want to buy helicopters because that is the only effective military vehicle for that kind of war, to put the natives in their place. In all likelihood the United Nations would be called in under the pretext of 'protecting'the indigenous peoples of Northern Quebec from the 'oppressive' Quebecois who want them to be a part of an independent Quebec. Blue berets will be placed on the heads of whom? Most likely, the soldiers located at Fort Drum, across the bridge from Kingston [Ontario]. Fort Drum is the largest military establishment in the US, with a ground surface larger than Metro Toronto, supposedly there for desert and jungle warfare training but really to control the subversive elements in Canada, and specifically the Cree in the north.

First, they overwhelm the Cree in the far north. Then they get their hands on James Bay. Quebec is shrunken down to its 1867 boundaries - five hundred miles long, a hundred miles north to south along the St. Lawrence River.

Now they have a hand on the hydro switch: they build the Grand Canal with the water moving not through Quebec but around Quebec: Quebec becomes an island surrounded by the United States of North America. The water is not free-flowing and is, therefore, a 'good' under GATT and the North American Free Trade Agreement. So it becomes saleable and controllable, but under the agreements we must give the US always at least what they feel is necessary for their purposes. We can increase the supply in gas and water but we can never cut back. We can never get back what we are giving away. During a crisis we would have to plead with them to rescue us, and in that situation we would, in all likelihood, be treated like Louisiana or some of the poorer states of the US.

A One-World Government In this Free Trade Agreement, the US gets the clean profitable business. Canada is the attic - the warehouse of all the raw materials. Mexico is the boiler room, the basement where all the dirty work is done. That's the plan.

Kralik: Do you see this as a stepping-stone toward the building of a New World Order and its consolidation in a single global economy?

Kealey: Of course. The government that is being set up through the United Nations resembles a church: five percent of receipts goes to the poor - in Somalia, Ethiopia, or whatever - although sometimes, as in Somalia, it comes accompanied with guns. 95% goes toward the maintenance of power and control. What control? The International Monetary Fund, The World Bank, and The Security Council, GATT.

Kralik: Who runs the International Monetary Fund?

Kealey: The bankers.

Kralik: Do you know who these bankers are?

Kealey: There are some fifteen or sixteen different families but by far the two most influential are the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers. Up to the end of the last century the Rothschilds operated strictly in Europe, but they were anxious to synthesize the American operation with their own. Investigators were sent out and it was agreed that a railroad family, the Rockefellers, were prepared to play the game, and so they became the western arm of this operation.

Then in 1913 we have the biggest scam of all: the denationalizing of the making of money and the creation of the Federal Reserve [Bank], a deal between the bankers and the politicians whereby the bankers promised some politicians backing and almost certain re-election in the elections they contended; in return, the politicians handed over to the bankers the right to do nothing less than print the money for the country. 'We'll do that for you," the bankers said, and you can borrow from us.' It was passed on a Friday afternoon with no warning and with Congress pretty well empty. So much for democracy when the invisible bankers really want something.

Kralik: The incredible implication of this is that the Federal Reserve, which prints the greenbacks for the American people, is a private bank.

Kealey: It is a private bank. The same thing happened in Canada, after the customary twenty-year delay - in 1935. MacKenzie King had won, lost, won, lost four elections in a row. He wanted to ensure his hold on the Prime Ministership for a long time, so he in turn gave the bankers The Bank of Canada.

Let us examine the implications of that. Before you give away the Federal Bank there is no need for consumer or income taxes.: you can manufacture an amount of money based on the resources of the country, including its capacity for labour. The value is constantly changing as new minerals are found and the labour force becomes more and more productive. In a situation where the National Government prints money, for every dollar sold to banks two percent remains with the government: that two percent pays the bills.

Kealey: A government should not be there merely for what it does today. There are nine reasons for a government: health, education, welfare, energy, transportation, communications, housing, food, and clothing. Defence is not part of that: if you are not fighting anybody, there is no need for defence. Some countries in the world can't survive on their own because they don't have the resources. There is nothing in Canada that we do not have. In fact, we could make a decision tomorrow that the critical mass of all consumer products needed in Canada would be made in Canada, from Canadian raw materials, by Canadian labour: the result would be that everybody would be employed.

Kralik: Incredible!

Kealey: We have the raw materials, the labour force, but we don't have the plants. The raison d'etre of the Free Trade Agreements being concluded throughout the world is to consolidate international control over a country by making sure that all of the parts needed for the manufacturing of every thing are not made in any one country.

Kralik: So that a country cannot be self-sufficient?

Kealey: The carburettors are built in one place, the exhaust pipes in another, as are the tuners for your VCR. All the parts have been disbursed in different countries, all over the world. No one country can manufacture the parts for everything produced within their own borders. That is, with three notable exceptions: Germany, Japan and the United States - the European Community, the Pacific Community, and the Atlantic Community. A One World government begins by eliminating boundaries, ending up with three regions.

Kralik: Initially?

Kealey: Initially, and then merging them into a One-World government under the United Nations. The Free Trade Agreement between Canada, the US, and Mexico is only the first step of an Agreement that will encompass both the Americas, North and South.

Kralik: Exactly. The South American dimension was only mentioned during the last week.

Kealey: But it has been planned all the way through. You must remember too that the Free Trade Deal was not a negotiation: it was transnational bankers saying to the Governments involved:"This is what you are going to do and here is an implementation schedule.' Everything in the Free Trade Deal had to fit the implementation schedule. The final time slot is 2005.

What is being created is a United Nations in which the rich governments send money to build a fund, the International Monetary Fund, causing the country from which money was sent to borrow more and more money, thus causing more and more debt. Money is then sent to the poor countries, creating a debt there. So everybody is indebted to the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund.

One branch of the Fund holds the money, the other makes the decisions as to how it is to be used, usually for projects that don't go anywhere: these waste money and cause the debt to grow.

Then one day countries can't pay and the bailiff is called. The bailiff is the United Nations Security Council. The real assets of the world, therefore, are re-possessed either by the bank or by the Security Council and are put under the control of the United Nations. Over time the resources of each country are gathered under UN control.

The guy who was in charge of that section is now working in Ontario as the Head of Ontario Hydro: Maurice Strong. Would you like to know why Maurice Strong is working in Ontario? It is because Bob Rae [then-Premier, socialist and a Rhodes Scholar; the current Ontario Premier, Conservative Mike Harris, recently went on a several-day private fishing trip at a remote camp with George Bush - just before the Quebec "crisis" erupted in the neighbouring province!] is in on the deal: he brought Maurice Strong in to do what he does best.

What did Strong do first? He shut down some of the nuclear plants. Why? Because as long as you have nuclear plants you have too much electrical power. If you shut them down, then you can convince people they must dam more rivers. Make a Free Trade deal, move the jobs out of Canada, cause unemployment, and the people of Canada will scream: "Give us jobs! Give us jobs!" Ultimately they will be told: "You want a job? We've got some terrific jobs - building dams!"

Kralik: Is that why only yesterday Chretien signed the Free Trade deal?

Kealey: Chretien is a puppet. He is the Ronald Reagan of Canada. Today Mitchell Sharp is the Prime Minister of Canada. Mitchell Sharp is our George Bush, and he was not elected. He used to be Chretien's boss as Minister of Finance, but today he's got his hand on the back of the puppet [Prime Minister] Jean Chretien.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Journalists and radio-talk show hosts who would like to interview Glen Kealey or Shelley Anne Clark should call
THE CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR POLITICAL INTEGRITY, Ottawa,
at 819-778 1705 [fax: 613-747 1644].

Grand Chief of the Quebec Cree, Matthew Coon-Come, can be reached by faxing 818-673 2606, or calling 613-761 1655.

WHERE ARE THE BODIES OF OUR CHILDREN, KILLED IN CHURCH-RUN "RESIDENTIAL SCHOOLS"?

Hidden from History:
The Canadian Holocaust

http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/vigil_for_justice.html

Vigil for Justice outside a "church" with blood on its hands - September 12

WHERE ARE THE BODIES OF OUR CHILDREN, KILLED IN CHURCH-RUN "RESIDENTIAL SCHOOLS"?

Come and rally for the Disappeared Native Children:

Sunday, September 12
10 am
St. Andrew's Wesley United Church
Nelson and Burrard streets, downtown Vancouver

Thousands of children were killed or died in United Church, Catholic and Anglican "residential schools" between 1890 and 1984.

Their remains are buried in secret grave yards across Canada, according to eyewitnesses and recent forensic evidence.

We demand that the churches and officials who killed and buried these children answer for their crimes, and help recover the remains of these innocents so that they can receive a proper burial and know final peace.

The United Church led this genocidal assault on native nations, and caused the deaths of more than 50,000 children in their "residential schools". This "church" has yet to be charged with the murder it committed, and continues to commit against residential school survivors and innocent children.

Come and pray for the souls of the departed, and fight for those who are still living.

Until justice is done, we will continue to remember, and protest. We are the guilty conscience of a genocidal culture.

Come out on September 12!

Help us build a Boycott of the 2010 Olympics at Whistler - until Genocide in Canada ends!

Sponsored by The Truth Commission into Genocide in Canada.

For more information:

1. See these websites:

http://www.hiddenfromhistory.org/
http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/

2. Listen to our radio program: "Hidden from History", on CFRO 102.7 FM every Monday from 1 to 2:30 pm (Vancouver).

3. Contact our Commission at 1-888-265-1007 or through this email address.
kevinannett@yahoo.ca

 

 

Hidden from History:
The Canadian Holocaust

Rev. Kevin D. Annett
11759-248 St.
Maple Ridge, BC V4R 1H6
www.hiddenfromhistory.org

cc: media and world opinion

 https://bbsradio.com/users/rev-kevin-d-annett

http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/let_justice_begin.html

 

A Call for Help from many people, and from the Truth Commission into Genocide in Canada

http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/call_for_help.html

Dear friends and supporters,

Yesterday, I received another two cries for help, from groups of aboriginal survivors of residential school atrocities, in Alberta and the Yukon. And once more, I had to helplessly say, "I'm sorry, I wish I could come and help you. But I can't afford the airfare."

One older woman told me she's been on the verge of killing herself because of the trauma of being sterilized by Anglican church doctors, until she read my book, "Hidden from History: The Canadian Holocaust". Now she's more angry than suicidal.

"I want them to answer for what they did to me and my little brothers. They were trying to wipe us all out."

Her band council chiefs are too scared to speak about the murders at Carcross "residential school", in the Yukon, where she was imprisoned. They've threatened her, telling her she'll lose her home if she speaks about the secret graveyard near the old school site. Last night, someone threw a rock through her window.

So she called me, hoping against hope that somehow I can change all that.

After speaking with this aging woman, I took my tears and frustration out into the back yard and walked among the trees, eventually screaming my anger at "God" and a deaf and uncaring world.

I demanded to know: With all the money and means in this world, why am I unable to come to this woman's aid?

Why must I beg and plead for help to do what so obviously must be done, if "justice" is something more than a nice idea?

Why can't every one of the hundreds of people who profess support for my work pledge even ten bucks every month towards a travel fund, so that I can answer such desperate cries and do what the Creator has placed before me, at the cost of my family, my safety, my very life?

I ask this question, repeatedly, in email requests that go unanswered. The last time I asked all of you for help, only two of you responded.

I have taken this indifference to mean that most of you consider renting a video movie or going out for dinner more important than helping me comfort the victims and bring the truth to light. So be it.

But surely there are enough of you out there whose principles amount to more than words, and who are willing to CONSISTENTLY fund the work I have been given to do?

I cannot do this work without such support. Time and again, my inability to get to people who need me has caused me to want to forget this work and do what most everyone else seems to be doing, and that's to live in a little pleasure-zone bubble cut off from the suffering around us. But my honour doesn't allow me to surrender like that.

I wish you could all experience what goes on when I visit a native community and speak at a healing circle or public event. Lives change. Voices are recovered, and long-hidden stories are shared. I have helped to save some peoples' lives.

I have never been good at self-promotion, but this isn't about me. It's about witnessing a miracle and helping to feed it.

When I returned from the prairies awhile ago, I brought with me some tobacco given to me by an Ojibway (Anishnaabe) elder. He was in tears when I left, and he said to me as we embraced,

"I will never be able to thank you for what you and your book has brought to my people. It is changing history and bringing us hope. We can finally tell what happened."

This elderly, gentle man told me of a vision he underwent in 1946, when he was transported to Ottawa to a meeting at which Prime Minister Louis St. Laurent and Lester Pearson were present. The topic of the meeting was how to "eliminate by any means" the remaining Ojibway people in order to get their land.

There are countless stories like his that are disappearing every day, because the eyewitnesses are dying quickly, and with them, any final hope of justice being done.

I can and will stop that from happening. But I need your help to do it.

If you believe at all in the truth of Genocide by Canadian church and state being documented and exposed, then please pledge a sustaining amount of money to my work and our Truth Commission every month. This will allow me to travel to wherever I am needed.

You can make a direct deposit to our bank account, and we will issue you a charitable tax receipt, even.

That account is:

Scotia Bank, City Centre branch, 65 Commercial St.,
Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Account of Lori O'Rorke
Account No.: 40220 00189 29

Or mail your cheques made out to Lori O'Rorke to:

260 Kennedy St.
Nanaimo, B.C.
Canada V9R 2H8

I hope your heart hears my words and your will propels
you into action to help sustain this work. For the
sake of these elders, and the children who died and
are still waiting for justice.

my thanks,

Kevin Annett

www.hiddenfromhistory.org

Hidden from History:
The Canadian Holocaust

Olympic Boycott - Demand Justice for Indigenous Peoples in Canada! (please reprint and circulate)

http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/olympic_boycott.html

Kevin Annett

Biography: 

Kevin D. Annett (Eagle Strong Voice) is a renowned Canadian whistle blower who has been twice nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. A former, now blacklisted minister of the United Church of Canada, Kevin produced the award-winning documentary film on the Canadian Genocide, Unrepentant, in 2007. He has authored twelve books including the definitive account of the Canadian Holocaust: Murder by Decree - The Crime of Genocide in Canada(Amazon, 2016, http://murderbydecree.com). His works can be found at http://kevinannett.com.

His persecution by the Canadian establishment over his persistent, selfless advocacy for indigenous victims of church and state genocide is an object lesson in the true nature and corruption of Canada and its churches.

In 1990, after obtaining degrees in Anthropology and Political Science at the University of British Columbia, Kevin graduated from the Vancouver School of Theology with a Master of Divinity, and was subsequently ordained by British Columbia Conference of the United Church of Canada. In 1990-1991 he served in churches in rural Manitoba, and in 1991-1992 served at the Fred Victor Mission in Toronto, an outreach street-ministry of The United Church of Canada. He was appointed minister to St. Andrew's United Church in Port Alberni, British Columbia in 1992.

From early in his Alberni ministry Kevin discovered evidence of horrible crimes by his church shared by aboriginal survivors of the notorious “residential school” system.  Giving them a platform from his pulpit, Kevin soon raised the ire of those responsible for the rape and murder of children in these “schools”, inside and outside his church. When he uncovered secret deals involving the theft of west coast native land by the United Church and its corporate benefactors, Kevin was fired without cause and expelled from ministry without due process, between 1995 and 1997. Church officers helped destroy his marriage and have his children taken from him, and defamed and blacklisted him across Canada.

All of this persecution merely fueled Kevin’s determination to bring out the truth of the Canadian genocide. Over the subsequent twenty years, he has made history by bringing out this truth and bringing to trial those responsible, in Canada, London and Rome.

In 2006, Kevin produced a documentary on this topic: Unrepentant: Kevin Annett and Canada's Genocide which won the 2007 award for 'Best Documentary at the Los Angeles International Independent Film & Video Festival.

On 15th June 2010, Kevin Annett helped establish The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State, which unites survivors of these crimes in 26 countries. The Tribunal established The International Common Law Court of Justice in September 2012, which successfully prosecuted Pope Benedict, Queen Elizabeth, Stephen Harper, Jorge Bergoglio and others for crimes against humanity.

Kevin Annett was a founding convener of the Republic of Kanata, proclaimed under common law on January 15, 2015, which lawfully replaced "crown" authority in Canada. He hosted the Republic's media arm, Radio Free Kanata, from its inception in March 2015 to September 24, 2017. The complete programs of Radio Free Kanata remain archived at https://bbsradio.com/radiofreekanata.

On May 1, 2016, Kevin helped to establish the Covenant of Free Congregational Christians - the Covenanters - and with other elders of the Covenant launched its official voice, the blog radio program Here We Stand, on Sunday, October 1, 2017. It can be heard every Sunday at 3 pm pacific, 6 pm eastern, at https://bbsradio.com/herewestand.

Rev. Kevin D. Annett
11759-248 St.
Maple Ridge, BC V4R 1H6
www.hiddenfromhistory.org

cc: media and world opinion

 

 https://bbsradio.com/users/rev-kevin-d-annett

http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/let_justice_begin.html

 

Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:36:26 -0400 (EDT)

Dear Friend,

If you wish to express your solidarity with the indigenous peoples of "Canada," please sign the following letter and email it to all National Olympic Committees whose e-mail addresses are included at the bottom of the page.

You may send a copy to the "Canadian Prime Minster at pm@pm.gc.ca

Thank you.

MSRB
www.restorative-business.org

=========================================================
Celebrate Humanity: An Open Letter to the Olympic Community
=========================================================

Dear Olympic Athlete:

"Celebrate Humanity" is the global promotional campaign for the 2004 Olympic Summer Games.

Celebrating Humanity is indeed an appropriate theme for the Olympic Games because the Olympic athletes represent the best of their nations; they are the local heroes who are bestowed with the responsibility of promulgating the Olympic Values: moral principles, truth, self-respect, fair play, respect for one another, fraternization between people, friendship, collaboration, emulating noble ideals, solidarity, polyphony (diversity of voices), harmony, development of free and critical thought, and creative activity.

The Olympic Values are more essential today than ever for the continuity of civilization. And the Olympic Athletes continue in their prominent role more than ever to upholding the Olympic Values.

***Solidarity with the indigenous peoples of "Canada"***

On May 20, 2004, a representative of three indigenous groups in Guatemala presented a formal protest letter or "denuncia" to the Canadian Embassy in Guatemala City.

This protest letter accused Canada and its mainline churches of committing and concealing acts of Genocide against its native populations for more than a century, in their Indian Residential Schools and hospitals.

The letter called for the Canadian government to support an international investigation into these allegations of Genocide by Canada and its churches. Below are excerpts from the letter:

--- To the Government and Prime Minister of Canada:

We are deeply alarmed and concerned by the fact that crimes of Genocide are alleged to have been committed against the indigenous peoples of Canada by your government and by the Roman Catholic, Anglican, Presbyterian and United Church of Canada.

According to eyewitnesses and official documentation, these crimes are alleged to include murder, torture, rape, involuntary sexual sterilization, forced labor, biological warfare, medical experimentation, land theft, cultural eradication, pedophilia, and the conducting of a prolonged war of extermination against non-Christian aboriginal people.

These crimes are alleged to have occurred for more than a century in the state-sponsored and church-run Indian Residential Schools, which legally interred every Indian child across Canada between the years 1890 and 1984. During this period, more than 50,000 children died in these schools, according to the statistics of your own Department of Indian Affairs. Most of the bodies of these dead children have never been located or recovered.

According to the evidence before us, paid employees and officials of these Indian Residential Schools perpetrated, condoned and concealed every act defined as Genocide by the United Nations Convention on the Prevention of Genocide, which was passed by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948, and ratified by Canada in 1952.

The same evidence indicates that the highest officials of church and state in Canada knew of these crimes and continually approved them as a matter of policy. As such, your government and the churches in question appear to be responsible for having committed and concealed intentional Genocide, as defined by the United Nations.

We understand that your government and the churches in question have only acknowledged the physical and sexual attacks on native children in these schools, and have refused to take responsibility for any of the other crimes attested to by eyewitness survivors. In this way, your institutions can be considered to be openly violating international law, and holding yourselves unaccountable for crimes against humanity committed by your employees and accountable officials.

As representatives of indigenous organizations throughout the Americas, we therefore call upon your government and the churches in question to abide by morality and international law, and do the following:

1. Support a motion before the United Nations General Assembly and the International Criminal Court to establish an International War Crimes Tribunal into Genocide in Canada.

2. Surrender to this Tribunal all evidence held by your government and the churches in question pertaining to any and all crimes committed against indigenous people and their land, including murder and Genocide.

3. Surrender to this Tribunal the names of all persons who are guilty of such crimes in the Indian Residential Schools.

4. Respond publicly to the allegations of Genocide made against your government and the churches in question by survivors of the residential schools.

5. Revoke the charitable, tax free status of the churches in question on the grounds that they are accused of having committed and concealed crimes against humanity, and should therefore not be subsidized and aided by the public until these allegations are proved or disproved.

We are communicating this appeal to the world community and its media, prior to further public action on this matter.

Unfortunately the "Canadian" government has failed to respond to the issues of Genocide and murder raised in the protest letter.

Regrettably, the Canadian Olympic community, too, have remained silent about the Genocide and the official cover-up, which is being perpetrated in their name. They have thus failed in their moral obligations both as human beings and as Olympic athletes upholding the Olympic Values. They have no place, therefore, at the 2004 Olympic Summer Games, Athens, and should not be made welcome.

We ask YOU both as an Olympic athlete and a free human being to express your solidarity with the indigenous people of "Canada" to:

1. Sign the petition for an international tribunal to investigate the genocide and crimes perpetrated by "Canadian" government and its churches against humanity. http://www.petitiononline.com/watergod/petition.html

2. Copy this letter to your friends, colleagues (including all athletes and National Olympic committees - see below for contact details), and inform everyone you know.

3. Boycott the "Canadian" athletes at the 2004 Olympic Summer Games, Athens.

Thank you.

In the spirit of Olympic Values,

{ PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME HERE }

=======================================
For more information contact:
=======================================

Rev. Kevin Annett, Secretary, The Truth Commission:
kevinannett@yahoo.ca (ph: 1-888-265-1007)
MSRB: stop-genocide@restorative-business.org

Related Websites:
http://www.hiddenfromhistory.org
http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org
http://www.restorative-business.org/the_canadian_holocaust.htm

Sign the Petition: STOP COMPLICITY IN GENOCIDE
http://www.petitiononline.com/watergod/petition.html

=============================================
Email addresses of National Olympic Committees:
=============================================
cospjasgam@cstome.net; cnoss@sentoo.sn;
noas@seychelles.net;
olympic@sierratel.sl; nocsom@hotmail.com;
olympic@ecoweb.co.zw; nocz@microlink.zm;
tanolympic@raha.com; nocug@spacenetuganda.com;
nocug@spacenetuganda.com; President.Cnot@Email.ati.tn;
cnot@laposte.tg; socga@africaonline.co.sz;
sudnoc@sudanmail.net.sd; nocsa@nocsa.co.za;
cnorw@rwandatel1.rwanda1.com; cnog@intnet.ga;
gnosc@qanet.gm; noc-ngr@hyperia.com; cosni@intnet.ne;
wce-ins@nied.edu.na; noc.moz@tvcabo.co.mz;
goc@africaonline.com.gh; cnosg@sotelgui.net.gn;
colimbis@sol.gtelecom.gw; coa@wissal.dz;
olympang@netangola.com; minnoc@intnet.bj;
bnoc@info.bw;
cnosb@cenatrin.bf; cnobdi@cbinf.com; cnoc@camnet.cm;
co.cpv@cvtelecom.cv; cnosca@intnet.cf;
oic.tchad@intnet.td;
ray_ibata@yahoo.fr; cnociv@africaonline.co.ci;
wembosako@yahoo.fr; cnom@iam.net.ma; cnod@intnet.dj;
eoc@idsc.net.eg; coge@intnet.gq; enoc@enoc.org.er;
eth@telecom.net.et; nock@iconnect.co.ke;
olympic@ilesotho.com; lnoc@awli.net.lr;
marwan@lttnet.com;
mnoc@intnet.mu; olymp.mali@datatech.toolnet.org
olympicom@malawi.net; madolymp@simicro.mg;
webmaster@coa.ca;
pminard@olympic.ca; odepa@oem.com.mx; aboa@candw.ag;
coarg@sinectis.com.ar; noc.bar@caribsurf.com;
olympics@ibl.bm; congua@guate.net.gt;
sports@guyana.net.gy;
mail@olympique-haiti.org; coh@infanet.hn;
nocjam@cwjamaica.com; sgeneral@com.org.mx;
info@sports.an;
con@tmx.com.ni; cop@psi.net.pa; cop@rieder.net.py;
cop-secretaria@telefonica.net.pe; olimpur@coqui.net;
SKNOC@CARIBSURF.COM; sloc@candw.lc;
SVGNOC@Caribsurf.Com;
surolcm@sr.net; contact@ttoc.org;
international@usoc.org;
cou@adinet.com.uy; virginislandsolympic@attglobal.net;
comiteolimpicove@cantv.net; grnoc@caribsurf.com;
coes@integra.com.sv; secregral@coe.org.ec;
c.olimpico@verizon.net.do; doc@cwdom.dm;
cocuba@enet.cu;
olimpico@ice.co.cr; coc@col1.telecom.com.co;
colimpico@itn.cl; cioc@candw.ky; bvioc@candwbvi.net;
cob@cob.org.br; colimbol1@caoba.entelnet.bo;
vasanoc@vanuatu.com.vu; tasanoc@kalianet.to;
nocsi@solomon.com.sb; niko@sasnoc.org.ws;
pngolycom@pngsfoc.org.pg; pnoc@palaunet.com;
office@olympic.org.nz; noc@cenpac.net.nr;
knoc@tskl.net.ki;
gnoc@ite.net; fasanoc@fasanoc.org.fj; fsmnoc@mail.fm;
admin1@cisnoc.org.ck; asnoc@samoatelco.com;
aoc@olympics.com.au; noc.yemen@y.net.ye; vie@fpt.vn;
olympic@sarkor.uz; uaenoc@emirates.net.ae;
noctkm@online.tm;
joaocarrascalao@bigpond.com;
postmaster@olympicthai.or.th;
noc@tajik.net; natolcom@slt.lk; admin@snoc.org.sg;
saoc@saudiolympic.org.sa; qnoc@qatarolympics.org;
coc@olympic.cn; poc@olympic.ph; pal-noc@palnet.com;
olympic@wlink.com.np; mocygn.mya@mptmail.net.mm;
noc@olympic.mn; noc@themaldives.com;
lebolymp@cyberia.net.lb; olympicl@laotel.com;
info@kuwaitolympic.com; koc@sports.or.kr;
olymp@nursat.kz;
jor@nets.com.jo; jpn-noc@joc.or.jp; nociri@neda.net;
KONI@bit.net.id; ioa@nde.vsnl.net.in;
secretariat@hkolympic.org; tpe.noc@msa.hinet.net;
camnoc@online.com.kh; noc-ban@bdonline.com;
Olympic@batelco.com.bh; bhusport@druknet.net.bt;
Olympic@batelco.com.bh; afghan.olympics@att.net;
secretariat@eurolympic.org;
secretaria@nocalbania.org.al;
coa@coa.ad; armnoc@arminco.com; office@oeoc.at;
info@noc-ukr.org; info@olimpiyatkomitesi.org.tr;
info@swissolympic.ch; info@sok.se; correo@coe.es;
info@olympic.si; office@olympic.sk; pr@olympic.ru;
noc_romania@cor.ro; president@olympic.md;
pkol@pkol.pl;
tor.anders.hanssen@nif.idrett.no;
international.affairs@noc-nsf.nl; Comonaco@monaco.net;
moc@nocmalta.org; komitetas@ltok.lt;
sekretariat@losv.li;
lok@olimpiade.lv; segreteria@coni.it;
admin@olympicsport.ie;
steko@isisport.is; hoc@ath.forthnet.gr;
boa@boa.org.uk;
info@nok.de; geonoc@access.sanet.ge; office@oeoc.at;
noc-aze@noc-aze.org; NOC-RB@belsonet.net;
info@olympic.be;
okbih@hotmail.com; bocbg@infotel.bg; hoo@hoo.tel.hr;
cypnoc@cytanet.com.cy; info@olympic.cz;
cnosf@cnosf.org;
mok@mok.org.mk; office@noc.fi; eok@eok.ee;
noc.denmark@dif.dk

 

 

Hidden from History:
The Canadian Holocaust

More Canadian Horror!

 

http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/duplessis_orphans.html

 

It wasn't that long ago that me, Nancy Mayer, Irene Deschenes and George (a Duplessis orphan) followed the Canadian Bishops from their conference in Cornwall to a church in Kingston, Ontario, where they planned to co-celebrate mass. We planned a VERY SMALL demonstration..3 women and an aging man. I carried a sign that said: "Female victims ignored" and Nancy, Irene and George carried crosses with a heart in the middle with the words "sexual abuse" written in red. A formidable group!

A priest told us to get off church property or he would phone the police. A Catholic woman tried to form a physical barrier between the "protestors" and the bishops. The priest/pastor hissed at the woman: "Don't talk to them!" The bishop's had security tightened and they entered their bus without a word to the 4 "terrorists" who were held at abeyance.

Duplessis orphans call for exhumations: Aim to show children were experimented upon

National Post
Saturday, June 19, 2004

Byline: William Marsden

A group of orphans are fighting for the bodies of children to be exhumed from an abandoned Montreal cemetery in a bid to discover whether they were the subject of medical experiments. The group has hired a lawyer to ask a court for permission to dig up the bodies of the children, who were also orphans, and perform forensic examinations.

Rod Vienneau, a spokesman for the orphans, said, "We want to show that these people were the victims of medical experiments such as lobotomies." There were about 20,000 orphans during the 1940s, '50s and early '60s -- generally called the Duplessis era, after Quebec premier Maurice Duplessis -- who were handed over to various religious institutions.

Thousands were labelled mentally deficient and sent to asylums and other church-run institutions because the nuns running the establishments received larger subsidies for the mentally ill.

The orphans' group claims children buried in an abandoned cemetery in east-end Montreal may have been victims of medical experiments performed at the old Cite de St. Jean de Dieu insane asylum, now Louis-Hyppolite Lafontaine Hospital.

The group's lawyer, Daniel Lighter, said, "If there is evidence of this kind of activity, then it would certainly be important evidence in a suit against the government, church and doctors."

Mr. Lighter said it will take several months to analyze whether there is enough proof to persuade a judge to order the exhumations. Many orphans were sexually abused and forced to work in slave-labour conditions. Some claim as well that many were subjected to medical experiments inside the asylums.

Albert Sylvio, 62, was a Duplessis orphan who lived at St. Jean de Dieu in the 1950s. He said that during that time, he transported about 60 bodies of fellow orphans from the operating rooms to the basement morgue. "I undressed them and washed them and prepared them for burial," he said. "We put them in cardboard boxes. Some of them were children." He said the bodies were then taken to the cemetery and buried in unmarked graves.

"There was never any ceremony. Some of these people died on the operating table. Some had been sick and some had committed suicide." The medical experiments are alleged to have been performed on living orphans.

Paul St. Aubain, another Duplessis orphan, said he was lobotomized at age 18 at a mental hospital in Joliette called St. Michel Archange. "I wasn't ill," he said. "They did it without my consent, without my permission. They were experimenting with me. I was a prisoner." Mr. St. Aubain, 52, said he spent 25 years in various mental institutions run by nuns in Quebec and during that time saw "other orphans who were lobotomized."

He said doctors also gave him electroshock therapy and numerous psychiatric drugs. Mr. St. Aubain now lives on welfare in Joliette. He cannot work. A Quebec law passed in 1942 allowed the nuns to sell unclaimed bodies to medical schools for $10. Many dead orphans, whose names and identities had been changed or erased, were dissected. What was left of their bodies was buried in cemeteries such as St. Jean de Dieu.

One government registry indicates there were about 2,000 bodies buried at the St. Jean de Dieu cemetery, which locals called the "pigsty" because it was next to a hog farm owned by the nuns. At least 42 were children.

How many orphans ended up as cadavers for anatomy students is not known because hospital registries have disappeared from government archives or were never properly filled out.

The practice of selling unclaimed cadavers to medical schools continued into the 1960s. In 2002, a group of 1,100 orphans settled with the government for about $25-million for wrongfully placing them in mental institutions. Other Duplessis orphans, who had been placed in religious institutions and claim they were sexually abused, are still fighting for compensation.

----

"The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in times of moral
outrage retain their neutrality." (Dante, Inferno) Or, to put it more
clearly: You are either part of the problem or part of the solution.
The dye is cast.

 

 

 

 

Hidden from History:
The Canadian Holocaust

Canada and its Churches are Accused of Genocide by Major Guatemalan Indigenous Organizations

http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/guatemalan_genocide.html

Vancouver, May 23:

On Thursday, May 20, 2004, a representative of three major indigenous groups in Guatemala presented a formal protest letter or "denuncia" to Monica Izaguire of the Canadian Embassy in Guatemala City.

This protest letter accused Canada and its mainline churches of committing and concealing acts of Genocide against its native populations for more than a century, in their Indian Residential Schools and hospitals.

The letter called for the Canadian government to support an international investigation into these allegations of Genocide by Canada and its churches.

The letter was endorsed and signed by the Defensoria Indigena, the Consejo de Esperanza of San Andres Itzapa, and the Consejo Asesor Indigena of San Andres Itzapa.

To quote the letter,

"To the Government and Prime Minister of Canada,

"We are deeply alarmed and concerned by the fact that crimes of Genocide are alleged to have been committed against the indigenous peoples of Canada by your government and by the Roman Catholic, Anglican, Presbyterian and United Church of Canada.

"According to eyewitnesses and official documentation, these crimes are alleged to include murder, torture, rape, involuntary sexual sterilization, forced labour, biological warfare, medical experimentation, land theft, cultural eradication, pedophilia, and the conducting of a prolonged war of extermination against non-Christian aboriginal people.

"These crimes are alleged to have occured for more than a century in the state-sponsored and church-run Indian Residential Schools which legally interred every Indian child across Canada between the years 1890 and 1984. During this period, more than 50,000 children died in these schools, according to the statistics of your own Department of Indian Affairs. Most of the bodies of these dead children have never been located or recovered.

"According to the evidence before us, paid employees and officials of these Indian Residential Schools perpetrated, condoned and concealed every act defined as Genocide by the United Nations Convention on the Prevention of Genocide, which was passed by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948, and ratified by Canada in 1952.

"The same evidence indicates that the highest officials of church and state in Canada knew of these crimes and continually approved them as a matter of policy. As such, your government and the churches in question appear to be responsible for having committed and concealed intentional Genocide, as defined by the United Nations.

"We understand that your government and the churches in question have only acknowledged the physical and sexual attacks on native children in these schools, and have refused to take responsibility for any of the other crimes attested to by eyewitness survivors. In this way, your institutions can be considered to be openly violating international law, and holding yourselves unaccountable for crimes against humanity committed by your employees and accountable officials.

"As representatives of indigenous organizations throughout the Americas, we therefore call upon your government and the churches in question to abide by morality and international law, and do the following:

"1. Support a motion before the United Nations General Assembly and the International Criminal Court to establish an International War Crimes Tribunal into Genocide in Canada.

"2. Surrender to this Tribunal all evidence held by your government and the churches in question pertaining to any and all crimes committed against indigenous people and their land, including murder and Genocide.

"3. Surrender to this Tribunal the names of all persons who are guilty of such crimes in the Indian Residential Schools.

"4. Respond publicly to the allegations of Genocide made against your government and the churches in question by survivors of the residential schools.

"5. Revoke the charitable, tax free status of the churches in question on the grounds that they are accused of having committed and concealed crimes against humanity, and should therefore not be subsidized and aided by the public until these allegations are proved or disproved.

"We are communicating this appeal to the world community and its media, prior to further public action on this matter."

This statement has been delivered to the world press, as the first in a series of further denuncias anticipated by the Guatemalan indigenous groups, which are working with The Truth Commission into Genocide in Canada to make these facts known.

For more information, contact The Truth Commission into Genocide through this email or (in Canada) at 1-888-265-1007.

Kevin D. Annett, Secretary
kevinannett@yahoo.ca

websites: http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/
http://www.hiddenfromhistory.org/