Subject: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
From: Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>
Date: Thu, May 10, 2012 1:03 am
To: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Cc: Radcliffe Clerks Email <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>, Katharine
Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"
<gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,

 INLNews admin <news@inlnews.com>

Dear Mr Rosen

I have previously asked you to provide me with your full name and address because your conduct in sending these scandalous emails is in breach of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

I note that you have failed to do so.

Kind regards

Marie-Claire

On 10 May 2012, at 08:57, David Rosen wrote:

Urgent Attention:

Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale, Radcliffe Chambers

"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,

CC:  Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583* \

CC:
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
news@inlnews.com,
news@newsoftheworld.bz,
admin@awn.bz,
tony.standen@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,

26th February, 2012


Dear Marie 

I think you have received your final warning to stop presenting false and misleading information ( facts and law) to the court and withholding material information from the court in the Haywicks Farm matter and other matters you are involved with that the INL News Group are involve din helping with.

The Editorial department of the INL News Group are wanting to publicize your wrongful activities which includes so many courts of contempt of court.

They want me to prepare a submission to the Attorney's Board to have to struck off as an Attorney.

The Editorial Department have a particular dislike for Attorneys that are not honest with the court as you have been on so many occasions.

I have been holding back on presenting this report to them because I am still hoping you are going to start to act for honesty and justice rather than dishonesty and injustice.

You have now tried to drag Katharine Brothers into your and your clients fraudulent, immoral, illegal, wrongful and devious scheme to defraud Valerie Ann Jouai her legal rights to Haywicks Farm, by working with corrupt treasury solicitors in preparing false and misleading facts and legal submissions to Katharine Brothers, so repeats these false and misleading  facts and legal submissions and is got herself into a lot of hot water.

You and Katharine Brothers are being used by these powerful greedy Freemasons and London Jewish Mafia brothers and in the end it is your necks on the line not theirs. they are all hiding behind you and Katharine and when it all blows up it is you ans Katharine that are going to cop the blame for it all.

Yours Sincerely

David Rosen

INL News Group

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:31 AM, David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com> wrote:

Urgent Attention:

Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale, Radcliffe Chambers

"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,

CC:  Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
High Court of Justice Order  made the 29th December, 2011  in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545 ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for
 the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583* \

CC:
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
news@inlnews.com,
news@newsoftheworld.bz,
admin@awn.bz,
tony.standen@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,

26th February, 2012


Dear Marie

Please note the submissions and serious allegations against yourself and Owen Rhys acting as the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and your clients Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and others acting in what appears to be a criminal conspiracy to defraud Valerie Ann Butler and her partners in Haywicks

We hereby attach a copy of the Regulatory requirements of Code of Conduct that the Barristers Board have set down for you to operate under and maintain.
Reading the attached submissions that are also attached to HC12C00678 in opposition to your fraudulent, false an misleading submissions presented to Owen Rhys acting a the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry applying for a stay on the orders made by Owen Rhys over the title deed of Haywicks Farm, it is clear you have many times breached  the Regulatory requirements of Code of Conduct that the Barristers Board have set down for you to operate under

Urgent Attention:
Attorney, Marie Claire Bleasdale, senior attorney for Radcliffe Chambers, London
Re: Criminal Contempt of Court Committed by attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale on the 16th February 2012 before Owen Rhys, acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry in Ref No: 2011/0422 over the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, UK.

Also criminal defamation committed by attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale against John Carew-Reid and many false & misleading statements stated by attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale of Radcliffe Chambers to Owen Rhys in writing & verbally at the land adjudication hearing on 16th February 2012 concerning Haywicks Farm.

Note the INL News Legal & Investigative & Editorial Team have following your court & adjudication hearings & appearances in different matters for sometime now & are very shocked & disturbed that you are willing to continue to attend court & or adjudication hearings & try & win those hearings by presenting false information. why?

----------
Sent from my Nokia Phone

------Original message------
From: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
To: "Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>
Cc: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Date: Sunday, February 26, 2012 7:32:40 AM GMT+0800
Subject: Attachment file INLNews-LegalTeam_Marie_Claire_Beasdale_25th_Feb_2012.

Urgent Attention:

Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale

Radcliffe Chambers

"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,



25th February, 2012



Dear Marie



Please note the submissions and serious allegations against yourself and Owen Rhys acting as the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and your clients Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart.



It is time for you and your clients sake to write to the HM Land Registry
to inform the HM Land Registry that your clients, Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart no longer want HM Land Registry to process the transfer of the  property known as  Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 8QE, and also known as title number GR327583 and also known as title number GR351346 from the said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart.

It is time that you start using your great legal ability and resources in
helping your clients retrieve the 660,000 pounds sterling back from their
former solicitors Madge Lloyd Gibson and/or the said Gary Roger Joaui’s
former solicitors, Langley Wellington, rather that wasting any more of your clients money and your valuable time, money and energy trying to obtain an unattainable goal of having the property known as  Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 8QE, and also known as title number GR327583 and also known as title number GR351346 transferred from the said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart.

We have continually explained to your clients that their right of action is
against their former attorneys Madge Lloyds Gibson and and/or the said Gary Roger Joaui’s former attorneys, Langley Wellington, who have your clients 660,000. You and your clients and their former attorneys Madge Lloyds Gibson and and/or the said Gary Roger Joaui’s former attorneys, Langley Wellington, are all well aware that there was an undertaking from the said Gary Roger Joaui’s former attorneys, Langley Wellington to your clients  former attorneys Madge Lloyds Gibson, that until your clients Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and Mr N Mrs Nicolosi all received good and clear title of the property known as  Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 8QE, and also known as title number GR327583 and also known as title number GR351346, and all possible legal disputes and/or disagreements, and conditions in the very complex contracts and agreements associated with the attempted sale and attempted purchase of Haywicks Farm,
between Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi and the said”Gary Roger Joaui” and the both sets of Attorneys involved, then the two set of purchase monies, 12,000 and 60,000 would not be paid out to the said “Gary Roger Joaui”. We suggest that you have another good read of all the correspondence and agreement files that are between Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi and the said “Gary Roger Jouai”^ and two sets of former attorneys, Madge Lloyds Gibson and Langley Wellington, and you see clearly that even though the transfers and contracts had been signed and dated the 13th December, 2011, even as late at the end of February, 2011 the said “Gary Roger Jouai’s” former solicitors Langley Wellington, were making it quite clear that unless certain legal issues were resolved and agreed between the parties, then the two sets of contracts for the proposed and purchase and sale of Haywicks Farm would be declared null and void and the two parts of
Haywicks Farm will revert back to the name of the said “Gary Roger Butler” and the two proposed purchasers, Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi would have their money returned in full.

The quite false story that is being presented to the court and the
Adjudicator

Now, it is also a clear and undisputed fact that, besides that fact that your clients and their attorneys, the estate agents involved with the sale of Haywicks Fram, the Stroud Council, Attorney Simon James Fisher and his legal firm Luttons-Dunford and others involved in the Haywicks Farm deal, Estate of the LATE HERBET Henry Butler etc were well informed from at least November, 2010 onwards of the serious allegations of fraud involving the purported will of the Late Herbert Henry Butler dated January, 1984 and the a forged will and/or not properly executed will, was used to obtain the Grant of Probate naming the said “Gary Roger Jouai” as the sole administrator and beneficiary of the residual Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler, but from the 6th January, 2011 onwards, Valerie Butler/Jouai and/or her representatives had placed warning notices over the title deed of Haywicks

Your clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart have not once in the 18 months this has all being going on, asked for their money back from the two sets of
attorneys . (Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington) and/or have showed any willingness and/or  interest in walking away from the proposed purchase of Haywicks Farm and requesting their money back. In fact when the selling agent were approached at the end of November, 2010 about the property by Jamison and Associates, who said that the property was sold. Jamison then said,

 "well we have a buyer for one million pounds, so if the vendor can in any way get out of the deal, then their buyer will be willing to pay 340,000 pounds sterling more than the asking price on the internet,  and if for any reason the vendor can not get out of the sale, then Jamison and Associates buyer will be prepared to pay the buyers, one million pounds for Haywicks Farm, which would be a 340,000 pounds sterling instant profit for them, which is 50% instant return on their original outlay of 660,000 pounds sterling".

 The answer came back that neither the original owner or the new buyer were at all interested in looking at the offer of one million pounds sterling for Haywicks Farm This is all rather odd behavior, if Haywicks Farm was sold for its true value. The reality is that Haywicks Farm being on 26 acres with a two street frontage, ( Haywicks Lane a gazzeted road running between the property), has a strong potential to be approved for the development of a very valuable luxury housing estate with as likely profit from such development approval of over 20 million pound
sterling. That is why the vendor the said “Gary Roger Jouai” and his former attorneys Langley Wellington, made is clear to any interested buyer that he was not in the least interested in selling the property for 660,000 pounds sterling as a straight out sale, where the buyer receives all increases in value from any future development approval, and the cheap price of 660,000 pounds sterling was only available to a proposed purchaser  on the condition that the purchaser agreed to allow an overage deed to be part of the contract of sale where by the purchaser will have to pay the vendor 50% of any increase in valuation of Haywicks Farm in the next 20 years as a result of any development approval on the land that makes up Haywicks Farm.

This means that if  the development of a luxury residential estate was
approved  in say 15 years time that meant the new valuation of the land
comprising of Haywicks Farm was 30,660,000 pounds sterling, then the
Urquharts and the Nicolosi’s would have to pay the said “Gary Roger Joaui” a further 15, million pounds sterling. However on the plus side for the Urquharts and the Nicolosi’s is that they could sell the property to a
property developer for 30,660,000 and walk away with 15.660,000, being 15 million pounds net profit. It is no wonder that the Urquharts and the Nicolosi’s were not in the least interested in taking a small profit of 340,000 pounds sterling ( the Urquarts would have received the lions share of this), there was a lot more profit in it than that. Also it was actually almost impossible for them to on sell the property as a straight sale, as there was no straight purchase ( it was a development partnership agreement), as they would have to on sell their right and obligations in the property which also included the buyer having to agree to take over the responsibilities of the overage agreement.

Now the factual background to all this over the last 30 years shows clearly that the same set of solicitors that were involved with creating the forged and/or not formally witnessed will purportedly dated January, 1984 (Eccletons, whom attorney Simon James Fisher worked for at the time that they used to create the forged and/or not formally witnessed will purportedly dated January, 1984) were also the attorneys for Peter Leslie Ann Jaqueline Ann Urquhart for 30 years. Then when Eggletons were struck off as solicitors by the Legal Complaints Tribunal, all their clients were taken over by Attorneys Mage Lloyd Gibson. Now add the fact that it was Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson that were used to present the quite obviously not formerly executed and/or witnessed will of the Late Herbert Henry Butler purportedly dated January, 1984. to the Probate District Registrar to have the grant of Probate issued in August, 1990 making the said “Gary Roger Jouai” as sole administrator and beneficiary of the residue estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler, Then it is attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson that
represents, encourages and guides Peter Leslie Ann Jaqueline Ann Urquhart  on the purchase of Haywicks Farm the whole affair becomes more and more incestuous. Then when Madge Lloyd Gibson is sued as HC11C00473 long with Mr and Mrs Urquhart and others, it is Rickerbys Attorneys whom  Colin Gibson, one of the founder’s of Madge Lloyd Gibson,("Colin Gibson" < colin.gibson@rickerbys.com>) is a partner, that takes up the defense for Madge Lloyd  Gibson, Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart   and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi.  Now neither Madge Lloyd Gibson or Rickerby’s want anything to do with defending either Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart   and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi.  And left them to hang out to dry, because

  "They have too much to cover up. In fact evem Master Teverson said at the first strike out hearing of HC11C00473 that they advised Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart   and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi,  to obtain some separate legal and independent advice from Madge Lloyd Gibson and Rickerbys. This was because the Master could see quite clearly that Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart   and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi. had a professional negligence claim against Madge Lloyd Gibson if made Lloyd Gibson did not get their 660,000 an 12,000 pounds sterling back.

As much as Valerie Ann Butler would like all this to end, she also would
also quite welcome a full trial of this matter where everyone involved had to give evidence under oath and the whole truth of the matter is brought to light.

If your clients Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart  are not prepared to
withdraw their application from HM Land registry to have the transfer  of
Haywicks Farm lodged on the 27th January, 2011 processed into their name, then could you please respond  as soon as possible to the below submissions in opposition  and response to your submissions handed to Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai  for  the first time at the hearing on the 16th February, 2012 before Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry

We look forward to hearing form you on an urgent basis

Yours sincerely


David Rosen, INL News Legal and Investigative Team

Email: “David Rosen” david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com


20th February, 2012


From:

David Rosen, INL News Legal and Investigative Team

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com

david.rosen@inlnews.com



Attention: The HM Land Registrar

Attention:, Katherine Brothers
Deputy Registrar, Land Registry
Tel: 01452 511 790
Attention:, Katherine Brothers, Deputy Registrar, Land Registry
Tel: 01452 511 790
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB

 Adjudicator to the HM Land Registrar
Owen Rhys, Mark Southby
Saru Hargreave
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry
Care of: Mandy Smart,Listing Team
 Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, HM Courts and Tribunal Services
7th Floor, Victory House, 34 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6EX
Tel: 020 3077 5829 | E-mail: mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
 oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
Re: John Hastings Carew-Reid as Trustee and Attorney for Valerie Ann
Jouai 2) Valerie Ann Jouai  Your Ref: REF/2011/0422


Please see email attaching a Copy of High Courtdecision  sent  today to the HM Land Registrar made the 29th December, 2011  in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545 ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583 by deleting the name of the said  "Gary Roger Jouai" and replacing it with "Valerie Ann Butler" of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title Number GR327583.

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law, INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com


From: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
To: "gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk" <
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
      Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, davidrosen@inlnews.com


Attention:

Katherine Brothers Deputy Registrar, HM Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

Attention: Katherine Brothers HM Deputy Registrar, Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790, gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
Dear Ms Brothers

Please see attached High Court of Justice Order made the 29th December, 2011  in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583 by deleting the name of the said  "Gary Roger Jouai" and replacing it with "Valerie Ann Butler"
of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title Number GR327583.

It would be much appreciated if the Registrar of Titles attended to this
title amendment as soon as possible.

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law
INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com


Marie Claire Bleasdale is likely to got to jail & lose her license to
pratice law for presenting false facts to Owen Rhys Adjudicator 16th February 2012

"davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com"
<david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.co


*Date:* Thu, Feb 16, 2012 5:01 pm

*To:
<MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com
<alr@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk #
<mandy.smart@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk
<oluwatovin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
<jbk@bnilaw.com 
news@inlnews.com 
admin@awn.bz
news@notw.bz 
robertjamisonandassociates@gmail.com

Dear Marie,

 Just have spoken to the INLNews jourmalist that attended the hearing today before Adjudicator Owen Rhys and it seems that the editorial people are keen to put a article about your illegal,wrongful, & or immoral activities in the courts and adjudicator hearings.

You seem to keen to become famous for the wrong reasons, to become known on the world stage as a high priced attorney that makes her living from telling lies to the courts & withhold material information from the courts for your clients. Just as you have done today for clients P & J Urquhart by lying in your submissions that there was no order to amend probate of the Estate of Henry  Herbert Butler, when you & your clients are well aware that there is a High Court Order made 29th December  in 1MA30545 by District Judge Iyer," that a new grant of probate be granted to administer the estate of the Late Henry Herbert Butler appointing the said Valerie Ann Butler as the personal representative of the Late Henry Herbert Butler."

 You then withheld presenting a copy of HC11C04156 being a Current High Court Action issued in the High Court of Justice Chancery Division being Valerie Ann Butler Claimant v P E Urquhart and J A Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi for declarations that the purported land contracts, agreements and overage deeds were of no valid to legal effect and were null and void. You have read the judgment and directions of Master Teverson striking out the original claim HC11C00473 issued by John Carew-Reid as trustee and power of attorney for Valerie Ann Joaui against Gary Roger Joaui and others to try and obtain a judicial determination as to the Valerie Ann Joaui’s rights to Haywicks Farm, which was struck out only for the reason the master Teverson
believed that Mr Carew-Reid did not have the legal right to issue such
action in his own name as Trustee and power of Attorney for Valerie Ann
Joaui, and in fact gave directions in his judgment to Valerie Ann
Joaui/Butler that she should commence a new High Court Claim in her name against P E Urquhart and J A Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi for
declarations that for declarations that the purported land contracts,
agreements and overage deeds were of no valid to legal effect and were null and void., and a separate claim against the said Gary Roger Joaui to obtain a court order that the original grant of probate granted to the said Gary Roger Jouai had no legal effect and was null and void and a new grant of probate be granted to administer the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler appointing Valerie Ann Butler as the personal representative of the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler. and for a further order that “HM Registry of Land Titles  amend the HM Land Registry records for the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title Number GR327583 by deleting the name of the said gary Roger Jouai and replacing with Vslerie Valerie Ann Butker as the registered owner of the property known as Haywicks Farm title number GR327583”

(The overage deeds were a term of these contracts and agreements which have the legal effect that these were not normal sales between seller and buyer for all of the rights of the property of Haywicks Farm to be transferred to the buyer, however was in effect a development partnership agreement between the said Gary Roger Jouai and P E Urquhart and J A Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi whereby the buyers paid over a very small portion of the potential worth of the Haywicks Farm and that for the next 20 years when the property known as Haywicks Farm is approved for development then the profit and valuation difference between the valuation of the property based
on the development approval and the amounts to be paid over to the said Gary Roger Jouai being 660,000 pounds from Mr and Mrs Urquhart and 12,000 pounds from  Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, would be shared on a 50.50 basis between the said Gary Roger Jouai an Mr and Mrs Urquhart and 12,000 pounds from  Mr and Mrs Nicolosi).

So as a result of Master Teverson’s directions in his judgment striking out HC11C00473 Valerie Ann Butler using her maiden-birth name, in respect to her late father Herbert Henry Butler to keep the Butler Family name on the title deed on Haywicks Farm, as her Husband hade died, issued two new High Court Claims HC11C04156 (still waiting or a trial to be set down for hearing) and 1MA30545 which has been finalized as per court order made the 29th December, 2011 by District Judge Iyer sitting at Manchester District Registry. As attached to this letter which you and you clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi had a copy of on the 14th February, 2011 as posted by guaranteed delivery to your clients on the 13th February, 2012 the day the court extracted the order for the first time, even though it was made the 29th December, 2011, the court having appologised for the delay in extracting the order.

You are well aware that the appeal in HC11C00473 against Master Teverson’s directions in his judgment striking out HC11C00473 has not legally been fully determined with John Carew-Reid as Trustee and Power of Attorney for Valerie Ann Joaui still awaiting for a hearing of the oral leave to appeal hearing application. The judges listing have stated that it is likely that this leave to appeal application will not be listed til sometime in the middle of March, 2012.Then if leave to appeal is refused then we are informed Mr John Carew-Reid will appeal against that decision to the Court of Appeal, and that is likely to take another six months at least to be dealt with, and the Adjudicator to the HM Land registry can not make any orders and/or directions to the HM Land Registry until that appeal processes involving HC11C00473are all fully dealt with and fully determined.

Some of the Factual and Legal issues and problems with summary of facts and summary of law presented by Attorney Marie-Clair Bleasdale to the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry on the 16th February, 2012 in the hearing of Peler Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart applicant and Valerie Ann Jouai and John Carew-Reid Respondents over the property known as Haywicks Farm Title Number GR327583 also known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 9QE.

1.       Section 204- law of property Act 1925- Orders of the Court
Conclusive. So the court order made of the 29th December, 2011 by District Judge Iyer sitting at Manchester District Registry, Civil Justice Centre, 1 Bridge Street, West, Manchester, M60 9DI is completely conclusive and takes complete priority over everything- Thus HM land registry must act on this court order above all other directions from the Adjudicator to the HM Land Registry- Adjudicator has no power to overrule Court order from District Judge Iyer- If Adjudicator is acting in a correct, proper and non corrupt way in carrying out his duties as an adjudicator then the adjudicator has no choice but to instruct the HM land Registry to act on this court order –
Until this order is set aside nothing else can be done by the Applicants-Mr and Mrs   Urquharts to oppose the registration of the title deed of
Haywicks Farm being registered in the name of Valerie Ann Butler- The HM Land Registry must immediately act and register the property known as Haywicks Farm Title Number GR327583 also known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 9QE. Into the name of Valerie Ann Butler.

2.       Land registration Rules 2003/1417-Misellaneous and Special cases death of a proprietor- 162- Transfer by a personal representative (i) an application to register by a personal representative who is not already registered as proprietor, must be accompanied by  a court order appointed the transferor as the deceased personal representative .Thus the court order made by Iyer J in the High Court of Justice, Manchester Registry satisfies this land registration rule because in paragraph 2 of the court order it states:
2.  An order that a new grant of probate be granted to
administer the estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler appointing the said Valerie Ann Butler as the personal representative of the Estate if the Late Herbert Henry Butler (ii) The registrar is under no duty to investigate the reasons for transfer of property by a personal representative of a deceased and must assume that the personal representative is acting correctly and within his or her powers which have been given to Valerie Ann Butler in the court order made the 29th December, 2011 in 1MA30545.

3.       Land Registration Rules 2003: 16.If an application is not in order
the registrar may raise such requisitions as the registrar considers
necessary specifying a period (being not les that 20 days) within which the applicant must comply with the requisition. It is noted that attorney Marie –Clair Beasdale has deliberately misrepresented the true facts in her submissions to the adjudicator. Also the HM Land Registrar seems to have breached its duties by only giving 7 days to rectify the requisition given on the first set of UN1 and RX1 notices lodged the 13th January, 2011, when the Land Registration Rules 2003 Rule 16:Applictions Not In order: States: “if an application is not in order the registrar may raise such requisitions as he considers necessary, specifying a period (being not less than twenty business days) within which the applicant must comply with requisitions

4.       Marie-Clair Bleasdale did not mention to the adjudicator that  that
there were serious allegations in the statements of truth filed in the High Court and with the Adjudicator that someone in the HM Land Registry acted in a wrongful, illegal and/or corrupt way in that something wrongful was cdone with the original UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged on the 13th Januray, 2011 over the title deed of Haywicks Farm by Valerie Jouai to protect her rightful interests in Haywicks Farm, in that on the HM Land Registry Records it shows they were sent out for requisitions to be complied with to solicitors for Valerie Ann Jouai being Simon Muirhead Burtons at their London address, however such UNI and RX1 Notices never arrived at Simon Muirhead Burtons’ s offices and in fact seem to completely disappeared somewhere between the HM Land Registry and/or they never were sent and just placed in a draw somewhere out of the way and/or were thrown in the bin.
Either way they have never been found. It is understood that the INL News Investigation team have a witness form the HM Land registry woul will appear at any trial of this action that will verify what happened to these UN1 an RX1 notices and that they were lost as a favour for the powerful legal firms in Gloucester being Langley wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson, who fairly well control most of the land registration business in Gloucester and their power base also helped by the fact that one of the main attorneys and partners of Langley Welling is a Deputy Judge and and an assistant coroner in Gloucester and has a lot of power and influence in Gloucester to get anything done he wants done, even if it is wrongful and/or illegal, and thus to get a clerk in the HM Land registry to lose a UN1 and a RX1 Notice and ask for a seven day requisition instead of the statutory  20 business in day requisition request was probably not a very difficult thing to do in consideration they were dealing with Valerie Ann Jouai and her representatives being in Australia handling the matter, and by the time they found out what has happened the title deed of Haywicks Farm would  have been registered in the names of Mr and Mrs Urquhart and all a bit legally difficult to correct. After all the expected development
profit from a luxury development of Haywicks Farm into a luxury residential subdivision was expected to be in excess of 20 million pounds and so there was a lot of money at stake for  the said Gray Roger Jouai ( his real name being Gary Roger Butler not Gary Roger Jouai) and his silent partners being the various legal firms involved and their development company Edgon Estate Limited  and the other development partners Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi. Langley Wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson knew they had to
get the first UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged with MH Land Registry disappeared and/or lost otherwise they could not have been able to the title of Haywicks Farm transferred to Mr and Mrs Urquhart by a transferred lodge on the 27th January, 2011, unless there first UN1 and RX notices had lapsed by getting them to disappear and so the 7 day requisition notice could not be complied with and would not even no known about. The reason why Madge Lloyd Gibson waited till the 27th January, 2011 to lodge the transfers of Haywicks Farm, because that was after they assumed the original UN1 and RX1 notices would have been fully lapsed because they had been lost. However their plan failed because the due dilligence  of Deputy Land Registrar Katharine Brothers who was watching a serious fraud alert on the title deed lodged by Reid and Associates and told Reid and associates  on the 14thJanuary, 2011 that the first UN1 and Rx1 Notices had been requisitioned and sent to attorneys Simon Muirhead Burton’s address in London, however it was
quickly ascertained by Reid and Associates that such UNI and RX1 notices never arrived, and thus there was no doubt that they were never sent, sent to the wrong address, and/or put in the bin and a false record of HM Land Registry files stating they had been sent to Simon Muirhead Burton. So action was quickly taken by Valerie Ann Jouai to instructing Reid and Associates to urgently courier over two new replacement UN1 and RX1 notices to replace the ones first lodged on the 13th January, 2011 ( as a continuance of the application notice lodged against Haywicks Farm by Solicitors Simon Miurhead Burton on the 6th January, 20111 for and/or on behalf of Valerie Ann Jouai) and these arrived for lodgment at the HM Land Registry on the 19th January, 2011 and were formally lodged on the 19th January, 2011 by HM Land Registry over the title deed of Haywicks Farm. as replacement UN1 and RX1 Notices, to replaced the UN1 and RX1 Notices that lodged on the 13th January, 2011 that went missing.

5.       Some points of the true outline and time line of facts And Law
that Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not present to the adjudicator in
her written and verbal submissions on the 16th February, 2012: (i) Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that everyone that was concerned in the buying, selling and transferring, conveyancing, etc of the property known as Haywicks Farm including legal firms an attorneys Langley Wellington –Mage Lloyd Gibson – Simon James Fisher – Luttons Dunford, the Stroud Council, Estate Agents Fox-Grant and Vince Pullen, the purported seller of the property the said Gary Roger Jouai and the proposed buyers of Haywicks Farm being Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi were all notified and well well aware of the serious allegations form, at least the beginning of December, 2010, (and earlier) that were being alleged against the said Gary Roger Jouai, Attorney Simon James Fisher, Eggletons Solicitors, legal secretary using the name Vivienne Hobbs ( which is a false surname and a false Christian name, the correct Christian name is Vivian, not Vivienne as was used on the fraudulent purported will of the late Herbert Henry Butler purportedly dated January, 1984 and the surname name is not legally Hobbs) and others being involved with a criminal conspiracy to defraud and possibly murder the Late Herbert Henry Butler and the defrauding of the late Herbert Henry Butler’s only child Valerie Ann-Butler of her rights ownership of Haywicks Farm by the use of a fraudulent will and/or not legally witnessed will to obtain a wrongful and/or fraudulent grant of probate for the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler wrongly naming Gary Roger Jouai as the personal representative of the Estate of the late Herbert Henry Butler with the long term purpose of
the said Gary Roger Jouai fraudulently obtaining the title deed of Haywicks Farm into the name of Gray Roger Jouai. This the two purported buyers of Haywicks Farm, being Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi and their two legal firms Langley Wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson were all well aware of these serious allegations surrounding claiming a criminal conspiracy against the said Gary Roger Jouai and others as to how the title deed of Haywicks Farm was registered in the name of the said Gary Roger Jouai from at least the beginning of December, 2010 and thus the to propose buyers and their solicitors can not claim their clients are innocent third parties in the proposed purchase of Haywicks Farm. It s also noted that
although they were all well aware of such serious allegations of  criminal
nature as to how the said Gary Roger Jouai obtained the title deed of
Haywicks Farm to be registered into the name of the said Gary Roger Jouai, the two buyers of the Haywicks Farm were happy to proceed with the partnership agreement with the said Gary Roger Jouai to development Haywicks Farm through  the contracts/agreements/ Overage Agreement and hand over 660,000 and 12,000 pounds to their solicitors Madge Lloyds Gibson as part of the conditions of the development partnership agreement. The answer as to why they were prepared to do this lies in the fact that the to sets of legal firms involved both gave advice that even if such criminal conspiracy was proven to be true, because of the law of Statute of Limitations, the said Gary Roger Joaui and his partners  including Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi would be able to get away with defrauding Valerie Ann Butler of her rightful ownership in Haywicks Farm.
However even though master Teverson through that legal argument out at the first hearing of the strike out application in HC11C00743 as not legally valid, neither Mr and Mrs Urquhart nor Mr and Mrs Nicolosi have asked their solicitors Madge Lloyd Gibson for their money back from the day they alleged they paid the 660,000 and 12,000 pounds to Madge Lloyds Gibson on the 17th December, 2010, and have been more than happy to rely on their various legal teams, now amounting to at least five sets of attorneys involved in advising them, on and off the court record, to bulldoze their way through the3 courts with false, and misleading factual and legal submissions and withholding material facts, with none of the sets of legal teams now being game to be officially on court record anymore for Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, because they are all too scared to be seen officially being responsible for the presenting of false and
misleading information to the court  and want to advice them from behind the scenes.  It is also noted that is is highly unusual that a top attorney like Marie Clair Bleasdale would  risk her whole legal career to come to the adjudicator’s hearing presenting so many false and misleading facts and withholding so much material facts and information. It is also highly unusual that a top Attorney like Marie Clair Bleasdale would take direct instructions form a litigant, rather than take than the litigant giving the instructions to a legal form and then the legal firm instructing Attorney Marie-Clair Bleasdale. This situation never happens in the legal process.
Attorneys do not take instructions directly form a litigant, they always
take the instructions from a legal firm who then instructs the attorney.
However, it seems that as Marie-Clair Bleasdale was being blamed by her other clients, legal firm Bude Nathan Iwanier, who were instructed by Finelend Investments Limited,  for being sue for one billion pounds in
damages by the INL News Group and others with such damages being caused as a result of advice proved by attorney Marie-Clair Bleasdale, she became desperate and determined to destroy the chance of Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai obtain her Haywicks Farm back because Valerie Ann Bulter.Jouai was being supported by the INL News Legal  and Investigative Team that were also suporting Janice Pritchard against Bude Nathan Iwanier and their client Fineland Investments Limited  with the INL News Group and other suing Bude Nathan Iwanier and Fineland Investments for one billion pounds in damages.

6.       Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that there was no
doubt in the evidence filed with the High Court and the Adjudicator that Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, the said Gary Roger Jouai and their legal firms and attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington  and their estate agents Vince-Pullen and Grant-Fox etc  all well know about the serious allegations as to a criminal conspiracy to defraud the late Herbert Henry Butlerand hus only child Valerie Ann Butler of their rights to ownership of Haywicks Farm from at least the beginning of December, 2010 ( and a lot earlier) before contacts were signed between Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, the said Gary Roger Jouai and their legal firms and attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington  and their estate agents Vince-Pullen and Grant-Fox etc   for the proposed sale and purchase of Haywicks Farm and thus Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, can not be considered as innocent third parties to the transactions.

7.       Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that the proposed
sale and transfer of Haywicks Farm from the said Gary Roger Joaui to Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, was in any respect a normal sale and/or transaction where all present and future rights in Haywicks Farm are transferred to the buyers because the terms of the contacts include a condition that the purchases enter into an overage deed where by 50% of any future increase in value in the next 20 years of Haywicks Farm as a result of any development approval will have to be shared with the said Gary Roger Jouai and the two proposed purchasers Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi on a 50/50 basis, so this is a partnership agreement to develop Haywicks Farm over the next twenty years and not a normal sale transaction.

8.       Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that did not
mention that the expected new value of Haywicks Farm on 26 acres as prime potential luxury residential development land over the next 20 years would be around 20 million pounds,which is around 30 times the combined price of 672,000 pounds the Hackwicks Farm was being transferred to purchasers Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi for.

9.       Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that that was an
application notice lodged  on the 6th January, 2011 over Haywicks Farm to stop any dealings of the Haywicks Fran title by London legal firm Simon Muirhead and Burton for their Client Valerie Anne Jouai.Butler. and that application notice was renewed three times by London legal firm Simon Muirhead and Burton for their Client Valerie Anne Jouai.Butler  and each time the application notice was renews it was extent for a six day period thus the Application Notice ran for 18 days.from the 6th January, 2011 to the 27thth January, 2011 and was continued on the 13th and 19th January, 2011 by UN1 and RX1 Notices.The the UN1 and RX1 notices lodged13th and 19th January, 2011 took over as a continuance of the Application notice.

10.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that the first set of
UN1 and RX1 Notices that were lodged on the 13th January, 2011 over the title deed of Haywicks Farm did not lapse because they did not comply with the statutory minimum 20 business days required for a requisition notice.
They were accidently and/or deliberately lost, mislaid and/or sent to the wrong address so they were never received by the London legal Firm Simon Muirhead Burton at their londo9n office the address for service for Valerie Ann Jouai.Butler for these UN1 and RX1 Notices.

11.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that there were a
second set of UN1 and RX1 notices lodged on the 19th January, 2001 over the title deed of Haywicks Farm to replace the UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged on the 13th January, 2011 that were lost. Mislaid and/or sent to the wrong address ( deliberately and/or accidently by a clerk in HM Land registry Office), which were accepted by HM Land Registry as replacement UN1 and RX1 Notices for the 13th January, 2011 ones and as a continuance of the Application Notice lodged over Haywicks Farm on the 6th January, 2011 that continued by three renewals till the 26th January, 2011.

12.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that in any event the replacement UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged over the title of Haywicks Farm by Valerie Jouai/Butler on the 19th January, 2011 are still and were still current at the date of the Adjudication hearing on the 16th February, 2011, so even if it was considered that the original set of Un1 and RX1 notices lodged on the 13th January, 2011 had lapsed ( which is argued strongly that
they did not lapse) then the second set of UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged on the 19th January, 2011 are still valid and lodged over the title deed of
Haywicks Farm and are a continuance of the Application Notice lodged on the 6th January, 2011.. thus from the 9th January, 2011 onwards and continuing till the 16th February, 2012 and after the 16th February, 2012 there has been a continuing Application and/or UN1 and/or RX1 Notice lodged against the title deed of Haywicks Farm to protect the rights of Valerie Ann Jouai/Butler in the title deed  of Haywicks Farm.

13.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale tried to present a false picture  of
facts to the Adjudicator that the objection to the application to have a
transfer in the name of Mr and Mrs Urquhart registered on the title deed of Haywicks Farm lodged the 27th January, 2011 was solely based on an email dated 15th February, 2011 from Reid and Associated to the HM Land Registry objecting to the application to have a transfer in the name of Mr and Mrs Urquhart registered on the title deed of Haywicks Farm lodged the 27th January, 2011 and Part 8 Claim HC11C00473 which was issued on the 2-3-2011 by John Carew-Reid as Trustee and Power of Attorney for Valerie Ann Jouai against various defendants which included Mr and Mrs Urquhart, Mr and Mrs Nicolosi and their solicitors Madge Lloyd Gibson, the said Gary Roger Jouai and his solicitors Langley Wellington and others. This presentation of the facts was completely false in that the objection was based on the Application Notice lodged the 6th January, 2011 and the continuance of such Application Notice in the form of UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged the 13t and 19th January, 2011 against the title deed of Haywicks Farm. Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale and her clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi were all well aware that the real legal and factual basis  of the objection was originally based on the application notice lodged the 6th January, 2-11 and the continuance of such Application Notice in the form of UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged the 13th and 19th January, 2011 over the title
deed of Haywicks Farm to protect the interests of Valerie Ann Jouai/Butler in Haywicks  Farm, and also now the court order made by Judge Iyer in the Manchester Registry in 1MA30545 the 29th December, 2011 ordering that the title deed of Haywicks Farm be transferred to Valerie Ann Butler ( the maiden and birth name of Valerie Ann Jouai). Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale and her clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, all know full well that the truth of the matter in that all legal actions issued such as the the first two earlier actions in the Cardiff an Queensland Australia Courts in January, 2011, and the later actions HC11C00473 and HC11C04156 to have the legal rights of Valerie Ann Joaui/Butler in Haywicks Farm determined by the courts, which were just in support of such Application Notice lodged 6th January, 2011 and the continuance of that Application Notice being UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged the 13th and 19th January, 2011 and not the main basis of the objections. This was a very tricky and clever type fraud on the court by Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale and was a legal and clever way of presenting  a  false impression to the Adjudicator but a very dishonest thing to do by Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale.

14.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale has deliberately not told the truth to
the Adjudicator in her written submissions in paragraph when she falsely
states: “ Gary Jouai’s title to the property derives out of a grant of
probate of the will of Herbert Henry Butler. Gary Jouai being the sole
executor and residuary beneficiary of that will. Herbert Henry Butler died
on 18th February, 1990 and Gary Jouai was granted probate on 21st August,
1990. That Grant of Probate has not been revoked.”  Attorney Marie Clair
Bleasdale’s clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi were sent
in the mail on the 13th February, 2011 and also Attorney Marie Clair
Bleasdale  and her clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi
were at the Adjudicators hearing on the 16th February, 2012 given another
copy of the court order made by from District Judge Iyer sitting in the
achester District Registry on the 29th December, 2011 in 1MA30545 which
states that: (i) “An order that the Grant of Probate dated 21st August,
1990 granted in the High Court of Justice Probate Court of Wales for the
Administration of the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler that
appointed the said,’ Gary Roger Jouai’  as the appointed representative of
the Late Herbert Henry Butler be declared null and void and of no legal
effect. (ii) “ An order that a new Grant of Probate be granted to
Administer the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler appointed the said
Valerie Ann Butler as the personal representative of the Estate of the Late
Herbert Henry Butler..”

15.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale has deliberately not told the truth to
the Adjudicator by not openly declaring to the Adjudicator that she has
been the main legal counsel directly advising her clients Mr and Mrs
Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi in how to lodge a defense in HC11C0456 and also has been advising her clients in great detail as to what to place in their defense and submissions and how to word their defense in HC11C456 and thus knows the full details of HC11C0456. Thus Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale well knows that until the full determination of HC11C0456 and/or until Valerie wants to by her own agreement, the Adjudicator can not legally by pass the determination of HC11C0456, or the pending leave to appeal in HC11C00473 which is still to be heard at an oral hearing, and can not order the removal of the UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged the 13th and 19th January, 2011 over the title deed of Haywicks Farm and can not order the HM Land Registry to register the transfers from the said Gary Roger Jouai to P L Urquhart an J A Urquhart of the property known as Haywicks Farm.

16.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale has deliberately not instructed the
adjudicator on the law that the order made by District Judge Iyer on the 29
th December, 2011 in 1MA30545 “ordering that the HM Land Registry amend the
title deed of Haywicks Farm to show Valerie Ann Butler as the registered
owner of such property”… is conclusive and can not be interfered with by
the Adjudicator and that the HM Land Registry are forced in law to
immediately act on such court order to immediately register the title deed
of Haywicks Farm in the name of Valerie Ann Butler

17.   It is also noted that Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jacqeline Ann
Urquhart have deliberately lied to the High Court of Justice and the
Adjudicator when they have stated: (i) They both had no idea and/or
knowledge of any sort prior to the 2nd March, 2011 of the serious
allegations of the said Gary Roger Jouai, legal Firm Eccletons and their
family development company Egton Estates Limited, Legal From Madge Lloyd
Gibson, Legal Firs Luttons Dunford, Attorney Simon James Fisher, Legal Firs
Langley Wellington an others being involved in a criminal conspiracy
started in 1884 to 2010 and continuing to help the title deed of haywicks
Farmto be wrongly and/or fraudulently registered in the name of the said
Gary Roger Jouai., in circumstances that there are a number of statements
on the High Court of Justice files and the Adjudicator files proving
conclusively that these statements are untrue and that the facts that Mr
and Mrs Urquhart and their attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, well knew about such serious allegations of a criminal conspiracy involving Haywicks Farm against the said Gary Roger Jouai from at least the beginning of December, 2010 and as far as their legal firm Madge Lloyd Gibson advising them on the settlement and transfer of Haywicks Farm, they have known about such serious allegations since 1990.

18.   It is also noted that Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jacqeline Ann
Urquhart have deliberately lied to the Adjudicator when they have stated:  That they do not have formal legal representation and/or help in dealing with the Adjudicator regarding their claimed right to have HM Land Registry process their application dated the 27th January, 2011 to register the transfer the remainder of the property known as Haywicks Farm from the said Gary Roger Jouai to PE and J A Urquhart. They have stated in a statement and submissions to the Ajudicator that the only legal assistance they have has is a little assistance from a friend who is a solicitor, and have given the Adjudicator that they were mainly dealing with the matter themselves without formal legal assistance. The without any warning to Valerie Ann Butler/Joaui, Mr and Mrs Urquhart appear with Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale , who is one of the top attorneys in London that specialises in land argument matters, to appear for them against an old very sick old lady in her 70’s (Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai) before the Adjudicator on the 16th
February, 2012, with well researched and detailed legal and factual
submissions that obviously took a number of weeks to research and put
together because of the great detail in them and were not a last minute
rushed set of submissions. Valerie An Butler/Jouai  is a very frail sick
old lady in her 70’s that known noting about the a law and how the argue
her rights who has travelled all the way from Australia for the hearing,
even though she is English by birth and spent the first half of her life in
England.

19.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale came armed with a well researched and
detailed set of factual and legal submissions at the hearing before the
Adjudicator on the 16th February, 2012 which had never been seen before by
Valerie Ann Butler Jouai, who though she was going to attend a friendly
sort of adjudication hearing where she and the Urquharts were going to
speak for themselves in lay mans terms and try and sort things out on a
friendly basis. Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai was not even given an adjournment to be able to be try and read and understand such detailed factual and legal submissions prepared by one of the top Attorneys in  that specialises in land an property arguments . Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai this had no chance to respond to the detailed legal and factual submissions, let alone even had a chance to read them. The fact that such legally and factually detailed and complex submissions were presented against Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai an only first given to her at the hearing and not the normal at least 24 hours before, which is a standard minimum, and when there is a top Attorney against a frail old sick lady who knows nothing about the law, the such detailed factual and legal submission should have been provided at least seven days before the hearing date to Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai. Civil law is not meant be won by ambushing the opponent. The whole concept of
civil law is for each side to present their factual and legal submissions
and arguments to the other side to give the other side a chance to respond
to these factual and legal arguments, to find out where they agree or
disagree on the facts and were they agree or disagree on the law. Then when
there is a disagreement of the facts and the law then it is then up to the
adjudicator, magistrate, judge etc to hear the evidence on the facts form
all parties and decide what the true facts are and then adjudicate on the
law based on these settled facts. That is why all sides are obligated under
the riles in civil hearings of any kind to provide the facts and law they
are going to rely on at the hearing to their opponent at the earliest
opportunity as possible as soon as they are prepared. If detailed,
statements, and factual and legal submissions are given at the hearing
without notice to the other side the adjudicator, magistrate, judge etc
hearing the matter is duty bound to adjourn the hearing to another date to give  the opponent to chance to read, understand and respond to these last submissions. The adjudicator failed in his duty in not giving and adjournment to Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai to respond to these last minute detailed legal and factual submissions presented to her for the first time at the hearing on the 16th February, 2012 by Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale. Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale should have appologised to the Adjudicator and Valerie Ann Butelr/Jouai for the late service of her submissions and actual herself insisted that there be an adjournment to the adjudication hearing to give Valerie Ann Butelr/Jouai a chance to obtain some legal avice on Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale’s very detailed factual and legal submissions.

20.   It is noted that had there been an adjournment to the proceedings
before the Adjudicator on the 16th February, 2012 to another date, then
Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai would have had the opportunity to ask the free
help of the INL News Legal Team, as she has done now, to read and analyse the detailed factual and legal submission presented  by Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale an have the INL news Legal and Investigation Team respond to them for her. Thus by the time of the next hearing date all the falsities, misleading statements and withholding of material facts and misleading submissions , misleading time line would have been exposed in written submissions in opposition as they have now been exposed is these submissions.

21.   It is also note that it was false for Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale
to state in her verbal and written submissions that the leave to appeal
application in Hc11C00473 has been finally determined when in actual fact John Carew-Reid is expecting a hearing date to be set in about the middle of March,2012 for an oral hearing to argue leave to appeal the decision oMaster Teverson to strike out claim HC11C00473.

22.

*23. **David Rosen*

*Attorney at Law*

*INL News Legal and Investigative Team*

----------
Sent from my Nokia Phone

------Original message------
From: Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>
To: "davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com" <davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Cc: "alr@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk" <alr@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk>,"
mandy.smart@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk" <mandy.smart@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk>,"
oluwatovin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk" <oluwatovin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,"
jbk@bnilaw.com" <jbk@bnilaw.com>,"Radcliffe Clerks Email" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>
Date: Thursday, February 16, 2012 7:33:12 PM GMT+0000
Subject: Re: Marie_claire bleasdaile is likely to got to jail & lose her
license to pratice law for presenting false facts to owen rhys adjudicator
16th February 2012

Dear Mr Rosen

Please supply me with your full name and address. If you continue to send these threatening emails I will involve the police.

Kind regards
Marie-Claire Bleasdale

On 16 Feb 2012, at 19:08, "davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com" <
david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sent from my Nokia Phone
>
> ------Original message------
> From: davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
> To: "MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com
>
> Date: Thursday, February 16, 2012 6:59:02 PM GMT+0000
> Subject: Marie_Claire Bleasdaile is likely to got to jail & lose her
license to practice law for presenting false facts to owen rhys adjudicator
16th feb2012
>
> Dear Marie-ClairBleasdale

, the INL News Group have given so many warnings to stop presenting false
information to the courts & adjudicators on behalf of your clients to
obtain fraudulent & or wrongful court orders for your clients. The INL News
journalist /actor Today reported that you have lied again. You have to
write to the adjudicator & request his orders to be cancelled because you
deliberately lied in your written submissions presented to Adjudicator  Owen
Rhys & withheld material information. P2 of submissions false & you did not
mention hc11c04156 which P & U Urquhart have stated you advised them on as
they have requested your costs to be paid to the court. You have been given
the court cases showing you will end up in jail & lose your license to
practice law for the criminal contempt you committed today. The INL News
Group have gone easy on you up to now because you are female & not a
freemason. However the INL News group's patience is running. The editors of
various INL News websites as well > Yours sincerely David Rosen
>
> ----------
> Sent from my Nokia Phone
>
>

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fwd: HaywicksFarm_HighCourtOrder_dated-29thDec-2011 Your Ref:
REF/2011/0422
From: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, February 17, 2012 2:07 am
To: John stolarczyk <john.stolarczyk@bigpond.com>
Cc: Martin Chapman <martinchapman542@hotmail.com>


 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *David Rosen* <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:10 AM
Subject: HaywicksFarm_HighCourtOrder_dated-29thDec-2011 Your Ref:
REF/2011/0422
To: Adjudicator to HM Land Registry <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>



Copy of High Court sent today to the HM Land Registrar



Attention:

Owen Rhys, Mark Southby
Saru Hargreave
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry
Care of:
Mandy Smart
Listing Team
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, HM Courts and Tribunal Services
7th Floor, Victory House, 34 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6EX
Tel: 020 3077 5829 | E-mail: mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
 oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
Re: John Hastings Carew-Reid as Trustee and Attorney for Valerie Ann
Jouai 2) Valerie Ann Jouai  Your Ref: REF/2011/0422





Please see email attaching a Copy of High Court sent today to the HM Land
Registrar

 made the 29th December, 2011

 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583*

by deleting the name of the said

 "Gary Roger Jouai"

and replacing it with

"Valerie Ann Butler"
of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title
Number GR327583.



Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law
INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com

.

From: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
To: "gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk" <
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
      Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, davidrosen@inlnews.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=14dae934082130bd2c04b8eeb78f


Attention:

Katherine Brothers

Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

Attention:

Katherine Brothers

Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
Dear Ms Brothers

Please see attached High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583*

by deleting the name of the said

 "Gary Roger Jouai"

and replacing it with

"Valerie Ann Butler"
of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title
Number GR327583.

It would be much appreciated if the Registrar of Titles attended to this
title amendment as soon as possible.

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law
INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com



Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
Dear Ms Brothers

Please see attached High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583*

by deleting the name of the said

 "Gary Roger Jouai"

and replacing it with

"Valerie Ann Butler"
of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title
Number GR327583.

It would be much appreciated if the Registrar of Titles attended to this
title amendment as soon as possible.

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law
INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com

Urgent Attention:

Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale

Radcliffe Chambers

"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,

CC:  Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB 

High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester

GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583* \

CC:

"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>, 

news@inlnews.com, 

news@newsoftheworld.bz, 

admin@awn.bz, 

tony.standen@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, 

26th February, 2012

Dear Marie

Please note the submissions and serious allegations against yourself and Owen Rhys acting as the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and your clients

Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and others acting in what appears to be a criminal conspiracy to defraud Valerie Ann Butler and her partners in Haywicks

We hereby attach a copy of the Regulatory requirements of Code of Conduct that the Barristers Board have set down for you to operate under and maintain.

Reading the attached submissions that are also attached to HC12C00678 in opposition to your fraudulent, false an misleading submissions presented to Owen Rhys acting a the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry applying for a stay on the orders made by Owen Rhys over the title deed of Haywicks Farm, it is clear you have many times breached  the Regulatory requirements of Code of Conduct that the Barristers Board have set down for you to operate under and maintain. We would image the best course of action is for an application should be made to the Bar Standards Board to ask them to remove your license to practice as a Barrister in England and Wales so you cannot kept carrying on in the deceitful and wrongful way using your good name as a barrister and a recorder who acts as a crown Court Judge five week a years to try and convince adjudicators, magistrate, and judges that the fabrications, falsities and misrepresentations that you present at the bar table are true. 

The whole of the English Court System relies on Barrister, Attorneys and Solicitors telling the truth at the bar table and not presenting false and misleading information. When you obtained a license to practice as a barrister you swore an oath to always tell the truth at the bar table in your written and verbal submissions. You have clearly deliberately beached that oath for the payment of a large fee for your clients and in doing so have breached your clear duty to the court and/or land adjudication process (which is a type of court)  which are set out in red below.

The INL News Legal, Investigative and Editorial Team are at present looking through your files to see whether they should:

(a) prepare and issue a High Court Criminal Contempt of Court Application against you for orders 

(i)  to have your license to practice as an attorney/barrister removed; 

(ii) for your imprisonment and/or

(iii)  a heavy fine and damages against yourself  that have have been caused as a result of your deliberately criminal contempt in knowingly preparing and presenting false and misleading factual and legal submissions to Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Registry on the 16th February, 2012 in the Haywicks Farm Matter.

Of course your criminal type behaviour in clear breach of your duties to the court as a practicing attorney/barrister does not excuse Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, and HM Land Registry in their criminal type involvement with in this matter with they also well knowing that your submissions were false and misleading and that the factual basis on which the the order made by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry on the 16th February, 2012 in file reference 2011/0422- known as the Haywicks Farm Matter is based on false facts and false submissions presented by yourself, which not only you knew to be false, but also Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, HM Land Registry and your clients Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Urquhart  knew to be false. That is why it is alleged that yourself, Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, HM Land Registry and your clients Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Urquhart  and others are all involved in a criminal type conspiracy to defraud Valerie Ann Butler and her partners Thomas Allwood and Stephen Carew-Reid ( the author of the well known series of books "The Triumph of Truth ( Who is Watching The Watchers?" that specialise in exposing corrupt, criminal, illegal, immoral and/or wrongful behaviour in the legal, political, business, and police systems throughout the world, and particular wrongful behaviour by attorneys, barristers, solicitors, magistrates, judges, adjudicators because if they are allowed to get with wrongful an/or corrupt type behaviour then the whole integrity of the English Law System will break down), of the rightful and lawful rights in Haywicks Farm,

(b) Make a formal complaint about your criminal type behaviour to the Bar Standards Board,

and/or

(c) expose your criminal type behaviour in news articles in world wide websites 

with a news headline

High Priced Star Radcliffe Chambers London Attorney Marie-Claire Bleadale well paid to tell lies in court for her clients and breaches her duty to the court not act in a dishonest or otherwise discreditable manner as a Attorney/barrister and breached her overriding duty as an Attorney/Barrister  to the Court to act with independence in the interests of 

justice and to assist the Court in the administration of justice and duty not to deceive or knowingly or recklessly mislead the Court.

and put you in the shame file in the next volume of Stephen Carew-Reid's "The Triumph of Truth ( Who is Watching The Watchers?" that specialise in exposing corrupt, criminal, illegal, immoral and/or wrongful behaviour in the legal, political, business, and police systems throughout the world, and particular wrongful behaviour by attorneys, barristers, solicitors, magistrates, judges, adjudicators because if they are allowed to get with wrongful an/or corrupt type behaviour then the whole integrity of the English Law  

PART III  -  FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES

Applicable to all barristers

301. A barrister must have regard to paragraph 104 and must not:

(a) engage in conduct whether in pursuit of his profession or otherwise which is:

(i) dishonest or otherwise discreditable to a barrister;

(ii) prejudicial to the administration of justice; or

(iii) likely to diminish public confidence in the legal profession or the administration of justice or 

otherwise bring the legal profession into disrepute;

(b)  engage directly or indirectly in any occupation if his association with that occupation may 

adversely affect the reputation of the Bar or in the case of a practising barrister prejudice his ability 

to attend properly to his practice.

Applicable to practising barristers

302. A barrister has an overriding duty to the Court to act with independence in the interests of 

justice: he must assist the Court in the administration of justice and must not deceive or knowingly 

or recklessly mislead the Court.

MARIE....

What happens next is entirely in your court.

It is not the aim of the INL News Group to destroy a well respected and talented attorney/barrister such as yourself. in particular because you are a female and this not a Freemason and the English Legal System needs more female non Freemason Attorneys/Barristers to create a balance of power in the legal system that has been for centuries controlled by mainly male Freemasons.

Marie you have been well paid and used by senior Feemasons such as Peter Urquhart and his legal Freemason partners and associates involved with helping Peter Uquhart defraud Valerie An Butler and her partners Thomas Allwood and Stephen Carew-Reid of their rightful and lawful ownership of Haywicks Farm. You have been also used by other senior Freemasons in the Janice Pritchard cases over the fight over ownership and possession of the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey that has now caused Stephen Carew-Reid, the INL News Group, Thomas Allwood, Fusako Tusji and the other partners in the planned Fringe Shows Have Talent TV Show to sue your clients for one billion pounds in damages for being responsible for the loss of unreplaceable film, video and music files from 1 Garratt Close, Bedington, Surrey, London, that were to be used in the production of the planned Fringe Shows Have Talent TV Show.

We appreciate and understand that the pressure and blame has been out on you for the legal advice you provided to Attorneys- Bude Natham Iwanier, and their clients Fineland Investments Limited, Nathan Tietelbaum and others that has caused them to all to be sued as being jointly and severally liable for the one billion pounds sterling in damages claimed against them by  Stephen Carew-Reid, the INL News Group, Thomas Allwood, Fusako Tusji and the other partners in the planned Fringe Shows Have Talent TV Show. That is why you felt the only way out was to set a plan in place to try and destroy anyone connected with the INL News Group and who might use their assets for legal fees to help fight your clients in the courts and thus you thought by presenting a lot of false and misleading submissions to Owen Rhys, acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry on the 16th February, 2012, knowing you had Owen Rhys, a corrupt Freemason Adjudicator hearing the case, who even know he knew a lot of what you presented on the 16th February, 2012 was false and misleading,  you would make sure that Valerie Ann Jouai and her partners in Haywicks Farm being Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood who are founding members and shareholders of the INL News Group who lose Haywicks Farm which has potential development value of  over 20 million pounds sterling, and make sure Peter Leslie Urquhart and his fellow Freemason Partners end up with Haywicks Farm after plotting and scheming a criminal conspiracy since the early 1980's to illegally, unlawfully and/or wrongfully obtaining the ownership of Haywicks Farm.

We will leave things up to you to see what happens next in this sordid affair.

Yours Sincerely

INL News Legal, Investigative,

 and Editorilal Team

and

WIJAT

WeekendNews

 Investigative 

Journalistic 

Action 

Team

http://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/regulatory-requirements/the-code-of-conduct/ 

http://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/media/1353125/word_version_of_full_code_of_conduct___annexes_jan_2012_.pdf 

PART III  -  FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES

Applicable to all barristers

301. A barrister must have regard to paragraph 104 and must not:

(a) engage in conduct whether in pursuit of his profession or otherwise which is:

(i) dishonest or otherwise discreditable to a barrister;

(ii) prejudicial to the administration of justice; or

(iii) likely to diminish public confidence in the legal profession or the administration of justice or 

otherwise bring the legal profession into disrepute;

(b)  engage directly or indirectly in any occupation if his association with that occupation may 

adversely affect the reputation of the Bar or in the case of a practising barrister prejudice his ability 

to attend properly to his practice.

Applicable to practising barristers

302. A barrister has an overriding duty to the Court to act with independence in the interests of 

justice: he must assist the Court in the administration of justice and must not deceive or knowingly 

or recklessly mislead the Court.

303. A barrister:

(a) must promote and protect fearlessly and by all proper and lawful means the lay client's best 

interests and do so without regard to his own interests or to any consequences to himself or to any 

other person (including any colleague, professional client or other intermediary or another barrister, 

the barrister’s employer or any Authorised Body of which the barrister may be an owner or 

manager); 

(b) owes his primary duty as between the lay client and any other person to the lay client and must 

not permit any other person to limit his discretion as to how the interests of the lay client can best 

be served;

(c) when supplying legal services funded by the Legal Services Commission as part of the Community 

Legal Service or the Criminal Defence Service owes his primary duty to the lay client subject only to 

compliance with paragraph 304.

304. A barrister who supplies legal services funded by the Legal Services Commission as part of the 

Community Legal Service or the Criminal Defence Service must in connection with the supply of such 

services comply with any duty imposed on him by or under the Access to Justice Act 1999 or any 

regulations or code in effect under that Act and in particular with the duties set out in Annex E.

305.1.  A barrister must not in relation to any other person (including a  client or another barrister or 

a pupil or an employee or a student  member of an Inn of Court) discriminate  directly or indirectly  because of race, colour, ethnic or national origin, nationality,  citizenship, sex, sexual orientation, 

marital status, disability, age,  religion or belief.

305.2.  A barrister must not in relation to any other person, victimise  that person for carrying out a 

protected act as defined in the   relevant legislation .

305.3. Deleted from 1st October 2005.

306. A barrister is individually and personally responsible for his own  conduct and for his 

professional work: he must exercise his own  personal judgement in all his professional activities. 

307. A barrister must not:

(a) permit his absolute independence integrity and freedom from external pressures to be 

compromised;

(b) do anything (for example accept a present) in such circumstances as may lead to any inference 

that his independence may be compromised;

(c) compromise his professional standards in order to please his client the Court or a third party, 

including any mediator ;

(d) give a commission or present (save for small promotional items ) or lend any money for any 

professional purpose to or (save as a remuneration in accordance with the provisions of this Code) 

accept any money by way of loan or otherwise from any client or any person entitled to instruct him 

as an intermediary;

(e) make any payment (other than a payment for advertising or publicity permitted by this Code or in 

the case of a self-employed barrister remuneration paid to any clerk or other employee or staff of 

his chambers) to any person for the purpose of procuring professional instructions;

Provided that nothing in paragraph 307(d) or (e) shall prevent a barrister from paying a reasonable 

fee or fees required by an alternative dispute resolution body that appoints or recommends persons 

to provide mediation, arbitration or adjudication services, or from entering into a reasonable feesharing arrangement required by such a body, if the payment or arrangement is of a kind similar to 

that made by other persons who provide such services through the body;

(f) Deleted from 26th March 2010.

PART IV – SELF EMPLOYED BARRISTERS 

Instructions

401 A self-employed barrister whether or not he is acting for a fee:

(a) may supply legal services only if appointed or instructed by a Court  or if instructed:  [1]

(i) by a professional client; or

(ii) by a licensed access client, in which case he must comply with the Licensed Access Rules 

(reproduced in Annex F1); or

(iii) subject to paragraph 204(c), by or on behalf of any other lay client, in which case he must comply 

with the Public Access Rules (reproduced in Annex F2); or

(b) must not in the course of his practice, except as permitted by the Public Access Rules:

(i) undertake the management administration or general conduct of a lay client's affairs;

(ii) conduct litigation (for example issuing any claim or process or instructing any expert witness or 

other person on behalf of his lay client or accepting personal liability for the payment of any such 

person) and must not conduct correspondence or other work involving other parties save as 

permitted by rule 401A below.

(iii) conduct a case in court if the barrister has previously investigated or collected evidence for that 

case unless the barrister reasonably believes that the investigation and collection of that evidence  is 

unlikely to be challenged.

(iv) attend at a police station without the presence of a solicitor to advise a suspect or interviewee as 

to the handling and conduct of police interviews unless the barrister has complied with such training 

requirements as may be imposed by the Bar Standards Board in respect of such work.

(v) act as a supervisor for the purposes of section 84(2) of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999.

(vi) Conduct in court any criminal proceedings in which the barrister has attended at a police station 

for any defendant in connection with those proceedings or any associated proceedings unless the 

barrister reasonably believes that nothing said, done, heard or seen by the barrister at the police 

station might require him/her to give evidence in those proceedings.

Conduct of correspondence

401A.1    If instructed to do so, a self-employed barrister may conduct  correspondence with other 

parties (in the form of letters, faxes,  emails or the like) provided that the barrister:

(a) is satisfied that it is in the lay client’s best interests that    the barrister does so and that he has 

adequate systems, experience and resources for managing appropriately such correspondence; and;  (b) has adequate insurance cover in the event that the lay client suffers any loss arising from the 

conduct of the correspondence for which the barrister is responsible.

401A.2   Where a barrister conducts such correspondence and is aware that another party has a solicitor or barrister representing that party, the barrister must not correspond directly with that 

party.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:35 AM
Subject: Criminal contempt of court by attorney Marie_Claire Beasdale 16thfeb2012
To: Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>, "William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>, David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>

Urgent Attention: attorney, marie claire bleasdale, senior attorney for radcliffe chambers, london re: criminal contempt of court committed by attorney marie clair bleasdale on the 16th feb 2012 before owen rhys, acting as adjudicator to hm land registry in ref no: 2011/0422 over the property known as haywicks farm, haywicks lane, hardwicke, gloucester, uk. Also criminal defamation committed by attorney marie clair bleasdale against john carew-reid and many false & misleading statements stated by attorney marie clair bleasdale of radcliffe chambers to owen rhys in writing & verbally at the land adjudication hearing on 16th feb 2012 concerning haywicks farm. Note the inl news legal & invest igative & editorial team have following your court & adjudication hearings & appearances in different matters for sometime now & are very shocked & disturbed that you are willing to continue to attend court & or adjudication hearings & try & win those hearings by presenting false information. why?

----------
Sent from my Nokia Phone

------Original message------
From: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
To: "Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>
Cc: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Date: Sunday, February 26, 2012 7:32:40 AM GMT+0800
Subject: Attachment file INLNews-LegalTeam_Marie_Claire_Beasdale_25th_Feb_2012.

Urgent Attention: Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale, Radcliffe Chambers

"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,

25th February, 2012

Dear Marie


Please note the submissions and serious allegations against yourself and Owen Rhys acting as the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and your clients Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart.

It is time for you and your clients sake to write to the HM Land Registry
to inform the HM Land Registry that your clients, Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart. no longer want HM Land Tegistry to process the transfer of the  property known as  Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 8QE, and also known as title number GR327583 and also known as title number GR351346 from the said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart.

It is time that you start using your great legal ability and resources in
helping your clients retrieve the 660,000 pounds sterling back from their
former solicitors Madge Lloyd Gibson and/or the said Gary Roger Joaui’s
former solicitors, Langley Wellington, rather that wasting any more of your clients money and your valuable time, money and energy trying to obtain an unattainable goal of having the property known as  Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 8QE, and also known as title number GR327583 and also known as title number GR351346 transferred from the said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart.

We have continually explained to your clients that their right of action is
against their former attorneys Madge Lloyds Gibson and and/or the said Gary Roger Joaui’s former attorneys, Langley Wellington, who have your clients 660,000. You and your clients and their former attorneys Madge Lloyds Gibson and and/or the said Gary Roger Joaui’s former attorneys, Langley Wellington, are all well aware that there was an undertaking from the said Gary Roger Joaui’s former attorneys, Langley Wellington to your clients  former attorneys Madge Lloyds Gibson, that until your clients Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and Mr N Mrs Nicolosi all received good and clear title of the property known as  Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 8QE, and also known as title number GR327583 and also known as title number GR351346, and all possible legal disputes and/or disagreements, and conditions in the very complex contracts and agreements associated with the attempted sale and attempted purchase of Haywicks Farm, between Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi and the said”Gary Roger Joaui” and the both sets of Attorneys involved, then the two set of purchase monies, 12,000 and 60,000 would not be paid out to the said “Gary Roger Joaui”. We suggest that you have another good read of all the correspondence and agreement files that are between Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi and the said “Gary Roger Jouai”^ and two sets of former attorneys, Madge Lloyds Gibson and Langley Wellington, and you see clearly that even though the transfers and contracts had been signed and dated the 13th December, 2011, even as late at the end of February, 2011 the said “Gary Roger Jouai’s” former solicitors Langley Wellington, were making it quite clear that unless certain legal issues were resolved and agreed between the parties, then the two sets of contracts for the proposed and purchase and sale of Haywicks Farm would be declared null and void and the two parts of
Haywicks Farm will revert back to the name of the said “Gary Roger Butler” and the two proposed purchasers, Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi would have their money returned in full.

The quite false story that is being presented to the court and the
Adjudicator

Now, it is also a clear and undisputed fact that, besides that fact that
your clients and their attorneys, the estate agents involved with the sale of Haywicks Farm, the Stroud Council, Attorney Simon James Fisher and his legal firm Luttons-Dunford and others involved in the Haywicks Farm deal, Estate of the LATE HERBET Henry Butler etc were well informed from at least November, 2010 onwards of the serious allegations of fraud involving the purported will of the Late Herbert Henry Butler dated January, 1984 and the a forged will and/or not properly executed will, was used to obtain the Grant of Probate naming the said “Gary Roger Jouai” as the sole administrator and beneficiary of the residual Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler, but from the 6th January, 2011 onwards, Valerie Butler/Jouai and/or her representatives had placed warning notices over the title deed of Haywicks

Your clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart have not once in the 18 months this has all being going on, asked for their money back from the two sets of
attorneys . (Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington) and/or have showed any willingness and/or  interest in walking away from the proposed purchase of Haywicks Farm and requesting their money back. In fact when the selling agent were approached at the end of November, 2010 about the property by Jamison and Associates, who said that the property was sold. Amison then said, well we have a buyer for one million pounds, so if the vendor can in any way get out of the deal, then their buyer will be willing to pay 340,000 pounds sterling more than the asking price on the internet,  and if for any reason the vendor can not get out of the sale, then Jamison and Associates buyer will be prepared to pay the buyers, one million pounds for Haywicks Farm, which would be a 340,000 pounds sterling instant profit for them, which is 50% instant return on their original outlay of 660,000 pounds sterling. The answer came back that neither the original owner or the new buyer were at all interested in looking at the offer of one million pounds sterling for Haywicks Farm This is all rather odd behavior, if Haywicks Farm was sold for its true value. The reality is that Haywicks Farm being on 26 acres with a two street frontage, ( Haywicks Lane a gazzeted road running between the property), has a strong potential to be approved for the development of a very valuable luxury housing estate with
a likely profit from such development approval of over 20 million pound
sterling. That is why the vendor the said “Gary Roger Jouai” and his former attorneys Langley Wellington, made is clear to any interested buyer that he was not in the least interested in selling th4 property for 660,000 pounds sterling as a straight out sale, where the buyer receives all increases in value from any future development approval, and the cheap price of 660,000 pounds sterling was only available to a proposed purchaser  on the condition that the purchaser agreed to allow an overage deed to be part of the contract of sale where by the purchaser will have to pay the vendor 50% of any increase in valuation of Haywicks Farm in the next 20 years as a result of any development approval on the land that makes up Haywicks Farm.
This means that if  the development of a luxury residential estate was
approved  in say 15 years time that meant the new valuation of the land
comprising of Haywicks Farm was 30,660,000 pounds sterling, then the
Urquharts and the Nicolosi’s would have to pay the said “Gary Roger Joaui” a further 15, million pounds sterling. However on the plus side for the Urquharts and the Nicolosi’s is that they could sell the property to a
property developer for 30,660,000 and walk away with 15.660,000, being 15 million pounds net profit. It is no wonder that the Urquharts and the Nicolosi’s were not in the least interested in taking a small profit of 340,000 pounds sterling ( the Urquarts would have received the lions share of this), there was a lot more profit in it than that. Also it was actually almost impossible for them to on sell the property as a straight sale, as there was no straight purchase ( it was a development partnership agreement), as they would have to on sell their right and obligations in the property which also included the buyer having to agree to take over the responsibilities of the overage agreement.

Now the factual background to all this over the last 30 years shows clearly that the same set of solicitors that were involved with creating the forged and/or not formally witnessed will purportedly dated January, 1984 (Eccletons, whom attorney Simon James Fisher worked for at the time that they used to create the forged and/or not formally witnessed will purportedly dated January, 1984) were also the attorneys for Peter Leslie Ann Jaqueline Ann Urquhart for 30 years. Then when Eggletons were struck off as solicitors by the Legal Complaints Tribunal, all their clients were taken over by Attorneys Mage Lloyd Gibson. Now add the fact that it was Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson that were used to present the quite obviously not formerly executed and/or witnessed will of the Late Herbert Henry Butler purportedly dated January, 1984. to the Probate District Registrar to have the grant of Probate issued in August, 1990 making the said “Gary Roger Jouai” as sole administrator and beneficiary of the residue estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler, Then it is attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson that
represents, encourages and guides Peter Leslie Ann Jaqueline Ann Urquhart  on the purchase of Haywicks Farm the whole affair becomes more and more incestuous. Then when Madge Lloyd Gibson is sued as HC11C00473 long with Mr and Mrs Urquhart and others, it is Rickerbys Attorneys whom  Colin Gibson, one of the founder’s of Madge Lloyd Gibson,("Colin Gibson" < colin.gibson@rickerbys.com>) is a partner, that takes up the defense for Madge Lloyd  Gibson, Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart   and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi.  Now neither Madge Lloyd Gibson or Rickerby’s want anything to do with defending either Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart   and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi.  And left them to hang out to dry, because......

  "They have too much to cover up. In fact evem Master Teverson said at the first strike out hearing of HC11C00473 that they avised Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart   and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi.  To obtain some separate legal and independent advice from Madge Lloyd Gibson and Rickerbys. This was because the Master could see quite clearly that Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart   and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi. had a professional negligence claim against Madge Lloyd Gibson if made Lloyd Gibson did not get their 660,000 an 12,000 pounds sterling back.

As much as Valerie Ann Butler would like all this to end, she also would
also quite welcome a full trial of this matter where everyone involve had
to give evidence under oath and the whole truth of the matter is brought  light.


If your clients Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart    are not prepared to
withdraw their application from HM Land registry to have the transfer  of
Haywicks Farm lodged on the 27th January, 2011 processed into their name, then could you please respond  as soon as possible to the below submissions in opposition  and response to your submissions handed to Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai  for  the first time at the hearing on the 16th February, 2012 before Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry

We look forward to hearing form you on an urgent basis

Yours sincerely


*David Rosen*

*INL News Legal and Investigative Team*

Email: “David Rosen” david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com


20th February, 2012


From:, David Rosen, INL News Legal and Investigative Team

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com

david.rosen@inlnews.com


Attention: The HM Land Registrar

Attention:, Katherine Brothers
Deputy Registrar, Land Registry
Tel: 01452 511 790
Attention:, Katherine Brothers, Deputy Registrar, Land Registry
Tel: 01452 511 790
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB

 Adjudicator to the HM Land Registrar
Owen Rhys, Mark Southby
Saru Hargreave
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry
Care of:. Mandy Smart, Listing Team
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, HM Courts and Tribunal Services
7th Floor, Victory House, 34 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6EX
Tel: 020 3077 5829 | E-mail: mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
 oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
Re: John Hastings Carew-Reid as Trustee and Attorney for Valerie Ann
Jouai 2) Valerie Ann Jouai  Your Ref: REF/2011/0422





Please see email attaching a Copy of High Courtdecision  sent

 today to the HM Land Registrar

 made the 29th December, 2011

 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583*

by deleting the name of the said

 "Gary Roger Jouai"

and replacing it with

"Valerie Ann Butler"
of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title
Number GR327583.



Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law
INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com

.

From: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
To: "gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk" <
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
      Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, davidrosen@inlnews.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=14dae934082130bd2c04b8eeb78f


Attention:

Katherine Brothers

Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

Attention:

Katherine Brothers

Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
Dear Ms Brothers

Please see attached High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583*

by deleting the name of the said

 "Gary Roger Jouai"

and replacing it with

"Valerie Ann Butler"
of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title
Number GR327583.

It would be much appreciated if the Registrar of Titles attended to this
title amendment as soon as possible.

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law
INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com



*Subject:*



Marie_claire bleasdaile is likely to got to jail & lose her license to
pratice law for presenting false facts to owen rhys adjudicator 16th feb2012

*From:*

"davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com"
<david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com<http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>
>

(Add as Preferred Sender<http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>
)



*Date:*

Thu, Feb 16, 2012 5:01 pm

*To:*

<MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com<http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>>,
<alr@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk <http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>>,
<mandy.smart@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk<http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>>,
<oluwatovin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk<http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>>,
<jbk@bnilaw.com <http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>>, <
news@inlnews.com <http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>>, <
admin@awn.bz <http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>>, <
news@notw.bz <http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>>, <
robertjamisonandassociates@gmail.com<http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>
>

Dear Marie,

 Just have spoken to the INLNews jourmalist that attended the hearing today before adjudicator Owen Rhys and it seems that the editorial people are keen to put a article about your illegal,wrongful, & or immoral activities in the courts and adjudicator hearings.

You seem to keen to become famous for the wrong reasons, to become known on the world stage as a high priced attorney that makes her living from telling lies to the courts & withhold material information from the courts for your clients. Just as you have done today for clients P & J Urquhart by lying in your submissions that there was no order to amend probate of the estate of Henry  Herbert Butler, when you & your clients are well aware that there is a High Court Order made 29th December  in 1MA30545 by District Judge Iyer," that a new grant of probate be granted to administer the Estate of the Late Henry Herbert Butler appointing the said Valerie Ann Butler as the personal representative of the Late Henry Herbert Butler."

 You then withheld presenting a copy of HC11C04156 being a Current High Court Action issued in the High Court of Justice Chancery Division being Valerie Ann Butler Claimant v P E Urquhart and J A Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi for declarations that the purported land contracts, agreements and overage deeds were of no valid to legal effect and were null and void. You have read the judgment and directions of Master Teverson striking out the original claim HC11C00473 issued by John Carew-Reid as trustee and power of attorney for Valerie Ann Joaui against Gary Roger Joaui and others to try and obtain a judicial determination as to the Valerie Ann Joaui’s rights to Haywicks Farm, which was struck out only for the reason the master Teverson
believed that Mr Carew-Reid did not have the legal right to issue such
action in his own name as Trustee and power of Attorney for Valerie Ann
Joaui, and in fact gave directions in his judgment to Valerie Ann
Joaui/Butler that she should commence a new High Court Claim in her name against P E Urquhart and J A Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi for
declarations that for declarations that the purported land contracts,
agreements and overage deeds were of no valid to legal effect and were null and void., and a separate claim against the said Gary Roger Joaui to obtain a court order that the original grant of probate granted to the said Gary Roger Jouai had no legal effect and was null and void and a new grant of probate be granted to administer the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler appointing Valerie Ann Butler as the personal representative of the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler. and for a further order that “HM Registry of Land Titles  amend the HM Land Registry records for the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title Number GR327583 by deleting the name of the said gary Roger Jouai and replacing with Valerie Ann Butler as the registered owner of the property known as Haywicks Farm title number GR327583”

(The overage deeds were a term of these contracts and agreements which have the legal effect that these were not normal sales between seller and buyer for all of the rights of the property of Haywicks Farm to be transferred to the buyer, however was in effect a development partnership agreement between the said Gary Roger Jouai and P E Urquhart and J A Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi whereby the buyers paid over a very small portion of the potential worth of the Haywicks Farm and that for the next 20 years when the property known as Haywicks Farm is approved for development then the profit and valuation difference between the valuation of the property based
on the development approval and the amounts to be paid over to the said Gary Roger Jouai being 660,000 pounds from Mr and Mrs Urquhart and 12,000 pounds from  Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, would be shared on a 50.50 basis between the said Gary Roger Jouai an Mr and Mrs Urquhart and 12,000 pounds from  Mr and Mrs Nicolosi).

So as a result of Master Teverson’s directions in his judgment striking out HC11C00473 Valerie Ann Butler using her maiden-birth name, in respect to her late father Herbert Henry Butler to keep the Butler Family name on the title deed on Haywicks Farm, as her Husband hade died, issued two new High# Court Claims HC11C04156 (still waiting or a trial to be set down for hearing) and 1MA30545 which has been finalized as per court order made the 29th December, 2011 by District Judge Iyer sitting at Manchester District Registry. As attached to this letter which you and you clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi had a copy of on the 14th February, 2011 as posted by guaranteed delivery to your clients on the 13th February, 2012 the day the court extracted the order for the first time, even though it was made the 29th December, 2011, the court having appologised for the delay in extracting the order.

You are well aware that the appeal in HC11C00473 against Master Teverson’s directions in his judgment striking out HC11C00473 has not legally been fully determined with John Carew-Reid as Trustee and Power of Attorney for Valerie Ann Joaui still awaiting for a hearing of the oral leave to appeal hearing application. The judges listing have stated that it is likely that this leave to appeal application will not be listed til sometime in the middle of March, 2012.Then if leave to appeal is refused then we are informed Mr John Carew-Reid will appeal against that decision to the Court of Appeal, and that is likely to take another six months at least to be dealt with, and the Adjudicator to the HM Land registry can not make any orders and/or directions to the HM Land Registry until that appeal processes involving HC11C00473are all fully dealt with and fully determined.

Some of the Factual and Legal issues and problems with summary of facts and summary of law presented by Attorney Marie-Clair Bleasdale to the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry on the 16th February, 2012 in the hearing of Peler Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart applicant and Valerie Ann Jouai and John Carew-Reid Respondents over the property known as Haywicks Farm Title Number GR327583 also known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 9QE.

1.       Section 204- law of property Act 1925- Orders of the Court
Conclusive. So the court order made of the 29th December, 2011 by District Judge Iyer sitting at Manchester District Registry, Civil Justice Centre, 1 Bridge Street, West, Manchester, M60 9DI is completely conclusive and takescomplete priority over everything- Thus HM land registry must act on this court order above all other directions from the Adjudicator to the HM Land Registry- Adjudicator has no power to overrule Court order from District Judge Iyer- If Adjudicator is acting in  a correct, proper and non corrupt way in carrying out his duties as an adjudicator then the adjudicator has no choice but to instruct the HM land Registry to act on this court order –
Until this order is set aside nothing else can be done by the Applicants-Mr and Mrs Urquharts to oppose the registration of the title deed of
Haywicks Farm being registered in the name of Valerie Ann Butler- The HM Land Registry must immediately act and register the property known as Haywicks Farm Title Number GR327583 also known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 9QE. Into the name of Valerie Ann Butler.

2.       Land registration Rules 2003/1417-Misellaneous and Special cases death of a proprietor- 162- Transfer by a personal representative (i) an application to register by a personal representative who is not already registered as proprietor, must be accompanied by a court order appointed the transferor as the deceased personal representative. Thus the court order made by Iyer J in the High Court of Justice, Manchester Registrysatisfies this land registration rule because in paragraph 2 of the court
order it states: “2.  An order that a new grant of probate be granted to
administer the estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler appointing the said Valerie Ann Butler as the personal representative of the Estate if the Late Herbert Henry Butler (ii) The registrar is under no duty to investigate the reasons for transfer of property by a personal representative of a deceased and must assume that the personal representative is acting correctly and within his or her powers which have been given to Valerie Ann Butler in the court order made the 29th December, 2011 in 1MA30545.

3.       Land Registration Rules 2003: 16.If an application is not in order
the registrar may raise such requisitions as the registrar considers
necessary specifying a period (being not les that 20 days) within which the applicant must comply with the requisition. It is noted that attorney Marie –Clair Beasdale has deliberately misrepresented the true facts in her submissions to the adjudicator. Also the HM Land registrar seems to have breached its duties by only giving 7 days to rectify the requisition given on the first set of UN1 and RX1 notices lodged the 13th January, 2011, when the Land Registration Rules 2003 Rule 16:Applictions Not In order: States:
“if an application is not in order the registrar may raise such
requisitions as he considers necessary, specifying a period (being not less than twenty business days) within which the applicant must comply with requisitions

4.       Marie-Clair Bleasdale did not mention to the adjudicator that  that
there were serious allegations in the statements of truth filed in the High Court and with the Adjudicator that someone in the HM Land Registry acted in a wrongful, illegal and/or corrupt way in that something wrongful was done with the original UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged on the 13th Januray, 2011 over the title deed of Haywicks Farm by Valerie Jouai to protect her
rightful interests in Haywicks Farm, in that on the HM Land Registry
Records it shows they were sent out for requisitions to be complied with to solicitors for Valerie Ann Jouai being Simon Muirhead Burtons at their
London address, however such UNI and RX1 Notices never arrived at Simon Muirhead Burtons’ s offices and in fact seem to completely disappeared somewhere between the HM Land Registry and/or they never were sent and just placed in a draw somewhere out of the way and/or were thrown in the bin.
Either way they have never been found. It is understood that the INL News Investigation team have a witness form the HM Land registry woul will appear at any trial of this action that will verify what happened to these UN1 an RX1 notices and that they were lost as a favour for the powerful legal firms in Gloucester being Langley wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson, who fairly well control most of the land registration business in Gloucester and their power base also helped by the fact that one of the main attorneys and partners of Langley Welling is a Deputy Judge and and an assistant coroner in Gloucester and has a lot of power and influence in Gloucester to get anything done he wants done, even if it is wrongful and/or illegal, and thus to get a clerk in the HM Land registry to lose a UN1 and a RX1 Notice and ask for a seven day requisition instead of the statutory 20 business in day requisition request was probably not a very difficult thing to do in consideration they were dealing with Valerie Ann Jouai and her representatives being in Australia handling the matter, and by the time they found out what has happened the title deed of Haywicks Farm would  have been registered in the names of Mr and Mrs Urquhart and all a bit legally difficult to correct. After all the expected development profit from a luxury development of Haywicks Farm into a luxury residential subdivision was expected to be in excess of 20 million pounds and so there was a lot of money at stake for  the said Gray Roger Jouai ( his real name being Gary Roger Butler not Gary Roger Jouai) and his silent partners being the various legal firms involved and their development company Edgon Estate Limited  and the other development partners Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi. Langley Wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson knew they had to get the first UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged with MH Land Registry disappeared and/or lost otherwise they could not have been able to the title of Haywicks Farm transferred to Mr and Mrs Urquhart by a transferred lodge on the 27th January, 2011, unless there first UN1 and RX notices had lapsed by getting them to disappear and so the 7 day requisition notice could not be complied with and would not even no known about. The reason why Madge Lloyd Gibson waited till the 27th January, 2011 to lodge the transfers of Haywicks Farm, because that was after they assumed the original UN1 and RX1 notices would have been fully lapsed because they had been lost. However their plan failed because the due dilligence  of Deputy Land Registrar Katherine Brothers who was watching a serious fraud alert on the title deed lodged by Reid and Associates and told Reid and associates  on the 14thJanuary, 2011 that the first UN1 and Rx1 Notices had been requisitioned and sent to attorneys Simon Muirhead Burton’s address in London, however it was
quickly ascertained by Reid and Associates that such UNI and RX1 notices never arrived, and thus there was no doubt that they were never sent, sent to the wrong address, and/or put in the bin and a false record of HM land Registry files stating they had been sent to Simon Muirhead Burton. So action was quickly taken by Valerie Ann Jouai to instructing Reid and Associates to urgently courier over two new replacement UN1 and RX1 notices to replace the ones first lodged on the 13th January, 2011 ( as a continuance of the application notice lodged against Haywicks Farm by Solicitors Simon Miurhead Burton on the 6th January, 20111 for and/or on behalf of Valerie Ann Jouai) and these arrived for lodgment at the HM Land Registry on the 19th January, 2011 and were formally lodged on the 19thJanuary, 2011 by HM Land Registry over the title deed of Haywicks Farm. as replacement UN1 and RX1 Notices, to replaced the UN1 and RX1 Notices that lodged on the 13th January, 2011 that went missing.

5.       Some points of the true outline and time line of facts And Law
that Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not present to the adjudicator in
her written and verbal submissions on the 16th February, 2012: (i) Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that everyone that was concerned in the buying, selling and transferring, conveyancing, etc of the property known as Haywicks Farm including legal firms an attorneys Langley Wellington –Mage Lloyd Gibson – Simon James Fisher – Luttons Dunford, the Stroud Council, Estate Agents Fox-Grant and Vince Pullen, the purported seller of the property the said Gary Roger Jouai and the proposed buyers of Haywicks Farm being Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi were all notified and well well aware of the serious allegations form, at least the beginning of December, 2010, (and earlier) that were being alleged against the said Gary Roger Jouai, Attorney Simon James Fisher, Eggletons Solicitors, legal secretary using the name Vivienne Hobbs ( which is a false surname and a false Christian name, the correct Christian name is Vivian, not Vivienne as was used on the fraudulent purported will of the late Herbert Henry Butler purportedly dated January, 1984 and the surname name is not legally Hobbs) and others being involved with a criminal
conspiracy to defraud and possibly murder the Late Herbert Henry Butler and the defrauding of the late Herbert Henry Butler’s only child Valerie Ann-Butler of her rights ownership of Haywicks Farm by the use of a fraudulent will and/or not legally witnessed will to obtain a wrongful and /or fraudulent grant of probate for the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler wrongly naming Gary Roger Jouai as the personal representative of the Estate of the late Herbert Henry Butler with the long term purpose of the said Gary Roger Jouai fraudulently obtaining the title deed of Haywicks Farm into the name of Gray Roger Joaui. This the two purported buyers of Haywicks Farm, being Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi and their two legal firms Langley Wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson were all well aware of these serious allegations surrounding claiming a criminal conspiracy against the said Gary Roger Jouai and others as to how the title deed of Haywicks Farm was registered in the name of the said Gary Roger Jouai from at least the beginning of December, 2010 and thus the to proposed buyers and their solicitors can not claim their clients are innocent third parties in the proposed purchase of Haywicks Farm. It s also noted that although they were all well aware of such serious allegations of  criminal nature as to how the said Gary Roger Jouai obtained the title deed of cHaywicks Farm to be registered into the name of the said Gary Roger Jouai, the two buyers of the Haywicks Farm were happy to proceed with the
partnership agreement with the said Gary Roger Jouai to development
Haywicks Farm through  the contracts/agreements/ Overage Agreement and hand over 660,000 and 12,000 pounds to their solicitors Madge Lloyds Gibson as part of the conditions of the development partnership agreement. The answer as to why they were prepared to do this lies in the fact that the to sets of legal firms involved both gave advice that even if such criminal conspiracy was proven to be true, because of the law of Statute of
Limitations, the said Gary Roger Joaui and his partners  including Mr and
Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi would be able to get away with
defrauding Valerie Ann Butler of her rightful ownership in Haywicks Farm.
However even though master Teverson through that legal argument out at the
first hearing of the strike out application in HC11C00743 as not legally
valid, neither Mr and Mrs Urquhart nor Mr and Mrs Nicolosi have asked their solicitors Madge Lloyd Gibson for their money back from the day they alleged they paid the 660,000 and 12,000 pounds to Madge Lloyds Gibson on the 17th December, 2010, and have been more than happy to rely on their various legal teams, now amounting to at least five sets of attorneys involved in advising them, on and off the court record, to bulldoze their way through the courts with false, and misleading factual and legal submissions and withholding material facts, with none of the sets of legal teams now being game to be officially on court record anymore for Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, because they are all too scared to be seen officially being responsible for the presenting of false and misleading information to the court  and want to advice them from behind the scenes.  It is also noted that is is highly unusual that a top attorney like Marie Clair Bleasdale would  risk her whole legal career to come to the adjudicator’s hearing presenting so many false and misleading facts and withholding so much material facts and information. It is also highly unusual that a top Attorney like Marie Clair Bleasdale would take direct instructions form a litigant, rather than take than the litigant giving the instructions to a legal form and then the legal firm instructing Attorney Marie-Clair Bleasdale. This situation never happens in the legal process.
Attorneys do not take instructions directly form a litigant, they always
take the instructions from a legal firm who then instructs the attorney.
However, it seems that as Marie-Clair Bleasdale was being blamed by her other clients, legal firm Bude Nathan Iwanier, who were instructed by Finelend Investments Limited,  for being sue for one billion pounds in
damages by the INL News Group and others with such damages being caused as a result of advice proved by attorney Marie-Clair Bleasdale, she became desperate and determined to destroy the chance of Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai obtain her Haywicks Farm back because Valerie Ann Bulter.Jouai was being supported by the INL News Legal  and Investigative Team that were also suporting Janice Pritchard against Bude Nathan Iwanier and their client Fineland Investments Limited  with the INL News Group and other suing Bude Nathan Iwanier and Fineland Investments for one billion pounds in damages.

6.       Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that there was no
doubt in the evidence filed with the High Court and the Adjudicator that Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, the said Gary Roger Jouai and their legal firms and attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington  and their estate agents Vince-Pullen and Grant-Fox etc  all well know about the  serious allegations as to a criminal conspiracy to defraud the late Herbert Henry Butler and his only child Valerie Ann Butler of their rights to ownership of Haywicks Farm from at least the beginning of December, 2010 (nd a lot earlier) before contacts were signed between Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, the said Gary Roger Jouai and their legal firms and attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington  and their estate agents Vince-Pullen and Grant-Fox etc   for the proposed sale and purchase of Haywicks Farm and thus Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, can not be considered as innocent third parties to the transactions.

7.       Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that the proposed
sale and transfer of Haywicks Farm from the said Gary Roger Joaui to Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, was in any respect a normal sale and/or transaction where all present and future rights in Haywicks Farm are transferred to the buyers because the terms of the contacts include a condition that the purchases enter into an overage deed where by 50% of any future increase in value in the next 20 years of Haywicks Farm as a result of any development approval will have to be shared with the said Gary Roger Jouai and the two proposed purchasers Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi on a 50/50 basis, so this is a partnership agreement to develop  Haywicks Farm over the next twenty years and not a normal sale transaction.

8.       Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that did not
mention that the expected new value of Haywicks Farm on 26 acres as prime potential luxury residential development land over the next 20 years would be around 20 million pounds,which is around 30 times the combined price of 672,000 pounds the Hackwicks Farm was being transferred to purchasers Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi for.

9.       Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that that was an
application notice lodged  on the 6th January, 2011 over Haywicks Farm to stop any dealings of the Haywicks Fran title by London legal firm Simon Muirhead and Burton for their Client Valerie Anne Jouai.Butler. and that application notice was renewed three times by London legal firm Simon Muirhead and Burton for their Client Valerie Anne Jouai.Butler  and each time the application notice was renews it was extent for a six day period thus the Application Notice ran for 18 days.from the 6th January, 2011 to the 27thth January, 2011 and was continued on the 13th and 19th January, 2011 by UN1 and RX1 Notices.The the UN1 and Rx1 notices lodge3 13th and 19th January, 2011 took over as a continuance of the Application notice.

10.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that the first set of
UN1 and RX1 Notices that were lodged on the 13th January, 2011 over the title deed of Haywicks Farm did not lapse because they did not comply with the statutory minimum 20 business days required for a requisition notice.
They were accidently and/or deliberately lost, mislaid and/or sent to the wrong address so they were never received by the London legal Firm Simon Muirhead Burton at their londo9n office the address for service for Valerie Ann Jouai.Butler for these UN1 and RX1 Notices.

11.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that there were a
second set of UN1 and RX1 notices lodged on the 19th January, 2001 over the title deed of Haywicks Farm to replace the UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged on the 13th January, 2011 that were lost. Mislaid and/or sent to the wrong address ( deliberately and/or accidently by a clerk in HM Land Registry Office), which were accepted by HM Land Registry as replacement UN1 and RX1 Notices for the 13th January, 2011 ones and as a continuance of the Application Notice lodged over Haywicks Farm on the 6th January, 2011 that continued by three renewals till the 26th January, 2011.

12.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that in any event the replacement UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged over the title of Haywicks Farm by Valerie Jouai/Butler on the 19th January, 2011 are still and were still current at the date of the Adjudication hearing on the 16th February, 2011, so even if it was considered that the original set of Un1 and RX1 notices lodged on the 13th January, 2011 had lapsed ( which is argued strongly that they did not lapse) then the second set of UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged on the 19th January, 2011 are still valid and lodged over the title deed of Haywicks Farm and are a continuance of the Application Notice lodged on the6th January, 2011.. thus from the 9th January, 2011 onwards and continuing till the 16th February, 2012 and after the 16th February, 2012 there has been a continuing Application and/or UN1 and/or RX1 Notice lodged against the title deed of Haywicks Farm to protect the rights of Valerie Ann Jouai/Butler in the title deed  of Haywicks Farm.

13.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale tried to present a false picture  of
facts to the Adjudicator that the objection to the application to have a
transfer in the name of Mr and Mrs Urquhart registered on the title deed of Haywicks Farm lodged the 27th January, 2011 was solely based on an email dated 15th February, 2011 from Reid and Associated to the HM Land Registry objecting to the application to have a transfer in the name of Mr and Mrs Urquhart registered on the title deed of Haywicks Farm lodged the 27th January, 2011 and Part 8 Claim HC11C00473 which was issued on the 2-3-2011 by John Carew-Reid as Trustee and Power of Attorney for Valerie Ann Jouai against various defendants which included Mr and Mrs Urquhart, Mr and Mrs Nicolosi and their solicitors Madge Lloyd Gibson, the said Gary Roger Jouai and his solicitors Langley Wellington and others. This presentation of the facts was completely false in that the objection was based on the Application Notice lodged the 6th January, 2011 and the continuance of such  Application Notice in the form of UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged the 13t and 19 th January, 2011 against the title deed of Haywicks Farm. Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale and her clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi were all well aware that the real legal and factual basis  of the objection was originally based on the application notice lodged the 6th January, 2-11 and the continuance of such Application Notice in the
form of UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged the 13th and 19th January, 2011 over the title deed of Haywicks Farm to protect the interests of Valerie Ann Jouai/Butler in Haywicks  Farm, and also now the court order made by Judge Iyer in the Manchester Registry in 1MA30545 the 29th December, 2011 ordering that the title deed of Haywicks Farm be transferred to Valerie Ann Butler ( the maiden and birth name of Valerie Ann Jouai). Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale and her clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, all know full well that the truth of the matter in that all legal actions issued such as the the first two earlier actions in the Cardiff an Queensland Australia Courts in January, 2011, and the later actions HC11C00473 and HC11C04156 to have the legal rights of Valerie Ann Joaui/Butler in Haywicks Farm determined by the courts, which were just in support of such Application
 Notice lodged 6th January, 2011 and the continuance of that Application
Notice being UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged the 13th and 19th January, 2011 and not the main basis of the objections. This was a very tricky and clever type fraud on the court by Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale and was a legal and clever way of presenting  a  false impression to the Adjudicator but a very dishonest thing to do by Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale.

14.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale has deliberately not told the truth to
the Adjudicator in her written submissions in paragraph when she falsely states: “ Gary Jouai’s title to the property derives out of a grant of probate of the will of Herbert Henry Butler. Gary Jouai being the sole
executor and residuary beneficiary of that will. Herbert Henry Butler died on 18th February, 1990 and Gary Jouai was granted probate on 21st August, 1990. That Grant of Probate has not been revoked.”  Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale’s clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi were sent in the mail on the 13th February, 2011 and also Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale  and her clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi were at the Adjudicators hearing on the 16th February, 2012 given another copy of the court order made by from District Judge Iyer sitting in the Machester District Registry on the 29th December, 2011 in 1MA30545 which that:
(i) “An order that the Grant of Probate dated 21st August,
1990 granted in the High Court of Justice Probate Court of Wales for the
Administration of the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler that
appointed the said,’ Gary Roger Jouai’  as the appointed representative of the Late Herbert Henry Butler be declared null and void and of no legal effect.
(ii) “ An order that a new Grant of Probate be granted to
Administer the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler appointed the said Valerie Ann Butler as the personal representative of the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler..”

15.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale has deliberately not told the truth to
the Adjudicator by not openly declaring to the Adjudicator that she has
been the main legal counsel directly advising her clients Mr and Mrs
Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi in how to lodge a defense in HC11C0456 and also has been advising her clients in great detail as to what to place in their defense and submissions and how to word their defense in HC11C456 and thus knows the full details of HC11C0456. Thus Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale well knows that until the full determination of HC11C0456 and/or until Valerie wants to by her own agreement, the Adjudicator can not legally bypass the determination of HC11C0456, or the pending leave to appeal in HC11C00473 which is still to be heard at an oral hearing, and can not order the removal of the UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged the 13th and 19th January, 2011 over the title deed of Haywicks Farm and can not order the HM Land Registry to register the transfers from the said Gary Roger Jouai to PL Urquhart an J A Urquhart of the property known as Haywicks Farm.

16.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale has deliberately not instructed the
adjudicator on the law that the order made by District Judge Iyer on the 29th December, 2011 in 1MA30545 “ordering that the HM Land Registry amend the title deed of Haywicks Farm to show Valerie Ann Butler as the registered owner of such property”… is conclusive and can not be interfered with by the Adjudicator and that the HM Land Registry are forced in law to immediately act on such court order to immediately register the title deed of Haywicks Farm in the name of Valerie Ann Butler

17.   It is also noted that Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jacqeline Ann
Urquhart have deliberately lied to the High Court of Justice and the
Adjudicator when they have stated: (i) They both had no idea and/or
knowledge of any sort prior to the 2nd March, 2011 of the serious
allegations of the said Gary Roger Jouai, legal Firm Eccletons and their
family development company Egton Estates Limited, Legal From Madge Lloyd Gibson, Legal Firs Luttons Dunford, Attorney Simon James Fisher, Legal Firm Langley Wellington an others being involved in a criminal conspiracy started in 1884 to 2010 and continuing to help the title deed of Haywicks Farm to be wrongly and/or fraudulently registered in the name of the said Gary Roger Jouai., in circumstances that there are a number of statements on the High Court of Justice files and the Adjudicator files proving conclusively that these statements are untrue and that the facts that Mr and Mrs Urquhart and their attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, well knew about such serious allegations of a criminal conspiracy involving Haywicks Farm against the said Gary Roger Jouai from at least the beginning of December, 2010 and as far as their legal firm Madge Lloyd Gibson advising them on the settlement and transfer of Haywicks Farm, they have known about such serious allegations since 1990.

18.   It is also noted that Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jacqeline Ann
Urquhart have deliberately lied to the Adjudicator when they have stated:  That they do not have formal legal representation and/or help in dealing with the Adjudicator regarding their claimed right to have HM Land Registry process their application dated the 27th January, 2011 to register the transfer the remainder of the property known as Haywicks Farm from the said Gary Roger Jouai to PE and J A Urquhart. They have stated in a statement and submissions to the Ajudicator that the only legal assistance they have# has is a little assistance form a friend who is a solicitor, and have given the Adjudicator that they were mainly dealing with the matter themselves without formal legal assistance. The without any warning to Valerie Ann Butler/Joaui, Mr and Mrs Urquhart appear with Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale , who is one of the top attorneys in London that specialises in land argument matters, to appear for them against an old very sick old lady in her 70’s (Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai) before the Adjudicator on the 16th February, 2012, with well researched and detailed legal and factual submissions that obviously took a number of weeks to research and put together because of the great detail in them and were not a last minute rushed set of submissions. Valerie An Butler/Jouai  is a very frail sick
old lady in her 70’s that known noting about the a law and how the argue
her rights who has travelled all the way from Australia for the hearing,
even though she is English by birth and spent the first half of her life in
England.

19.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale came armed with a well researched and detailed set of factual and legal submissions at the hearing before the Adjudicator on the 16th February, 2012 which had never been seen before by Valerie Ann Butler Jouai, who though she was going to attend a friendly sort of adjudication hearing where she and the Urquharts were going to speak for themselves in lay mans terms and try and sort things out on a friendly basis. Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai was not even given an adjournment to be able to be try and read and understand such detailed factual and legal submissions prepared by one of the top Attorneys in  that specialises in land an property arguments . Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai this had no chance to respond to the detailed legal and factual submissions, let alone even had a chance to read them. The fact that such legally and factually detailed and complex submissions were presented against Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai an only first given to her at the hearing and not the normal at least 24 hours before, which is a standard minimum, and when there is a top Attorney against a frail old sick lady who knows nothing about the law, the such detailed factual and legal submission should have been provided at least seven days before the hearing date to Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai. Civil law is not meant be won by ambushing the opponent. The whole concept of civil law is for each side to present their factual and legal submissions
and arguments to the other side to give the other side a chance to respond to these factual and legal arguments, to find out where they agree or disagree on the facts and were they agree or disagree on the law. Then when there is a disagreement of the facts and the law then it is then up to the adjudicator, magistrate, judge etc to hear the evidence on the facts from all parties and decide what the true facts are and then adjudicate on the law based on these settled facts. That is why all sides are obligated under the rules in civil hearings of any kind to provide the facts and law they are going to rely on at the hearing to their opponent at the earliest pportunity as possible as soon as they are prepared. If detailed,
statements, and factual and legal submissions are given at the hearing
without notice to the other side the adjudicator, magistrate, judge etc
hearing the matter is duty bound to adjourn the hearing to another date to
give  the opponent to chance to read, understand and respond to these last submissions. The adjudicator failed in his duty in not giving and
adjournment to Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai to respond to these last minute
detailed legal and factual submissions presented to her for the first time
at the hearing on the 16th February, 2012 by Attorney Marie Clair
Bleasdale. Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale should have3 appologised to the Adjudicator and Valerie Ann Butelr/Jouai for the late service of her
submissions and actual herself insisted that there be an adjournment to the adjudication hearing to give Valerie Ann Butelr/Jouai a chance to obtain some legal avice on Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale’s very detailed factual and legal submissions.

20.   It is noted that had there been an adjournment to the proceedings
before the Adjudicator on the 16th February, 2012 to another date, then
Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai would have had the opportunity to ask the free
help of the INL News Legal Team, as she has done now, to read and analyse the detailed factual and legal submission presented  by Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale an have the INL news Legal and Investigation Team respond to them for her. Thus by the time of the next hearing date all the falsities, misleading statements and withholding of material facts and misleading submissions , misleading time line would have been exposed in written submissions in opposition as they have now been exposed is these submissions.

21.   It is also note that it was false for Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale
to state in her verbal and written submissions that the leave to appeal
application in Hc11C00473 has been finally determined when in actual fact John Carew-Reid is expecting a hearing date to be set in about the middle of March,2012 for an oral hearing to argue leave to appeal the decision of Master Teverson to strike out claim HC11C00473.

David Rosen, Attorney at Law,  INL News Legal and Investigative Team

----------
Sent from my Nokia Phone

------Original message------
From: Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>
To: "davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com" <davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Cc: "alr@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk" <alr@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk>,"
mandy.smart@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk" <mandy.smart@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk>,"
oluwatovin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk" <oluwatovin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,"
jbk@bnilaw.com" <jbk@bnilaw.com>,"Radcliffe Clerks Email" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>
Date: Thursday, February 16, 2012 7:33:12 PM GMT+0000
Subject: Re: Marie_claire bleasdaile is likely to got to jail & lose her
license to pratice law for presenting false facts to owen rhys adjudicator
16th feb2012

Dear Mr Rosen

Please supply me with your full name and address.

If you continue to send these threatening emails I will involve the police.

Kind regards
Marie-Claire Bleasdale

On 16 Feb 2012, at 19:08, "davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com" <
david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> ----------
> Sent from my Nokia Phone
>
> ------Original message------
> From: davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
> To: "MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com
>
> Date: Thursday, February 16, 2012 6:59:02 PM GMT+0000
> Subject: Marie_Claire Bleasdaile is likely to got to jail & lose her
license to practice law for presenting false facts to owen rhys adjudicator
16th feb2012
>
> Dear Marie-ClairBleasdale

, the INL News Group have given so many warnings to stop presenting false
information to the courts & adjudicators on behalf of your clients to
obtain fraudulent & or wrongful court orders for your clients. The INL News
journalist /actor Today reported that you have lied again. You have to
write to the adjudicator & request his orders to be cancelled because you
deliberately lied in your written submissions presented to Adjudicator  Owen
Rhys & withheld material information. P2 of submissions false & you did not
mention hc11c04156 which P & U Urquhart have stated you advised them on as
they have requested your costs to be paid to the court. You have been given
the court cases showing you will end up in jail & lose your license to
practice law for the criminal contempt you committed today. The INL News
Group have gone easy on you up to now because you are female & not a
freemason. However the INL News group's patience is running. The editors of
various INL News websites as well > Yours sincerely David Rosen
>
> ----------
> Sent from my Nokia Phone
>
>

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fwd: HaywicksFarm_HighCourtOrder_dated-29thDec-2011 Your Ref:
REF/2011/0422
From: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, February 17, 2012 2:07 am
To: John stolarczyk <john.stolarczyk@bigpond.com>
Cc: Martin Chapman <martinchapman542@hotmail.com>


 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *David Rosen* <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:10 AM
Subject: HaywicksFarm_HighCourtOrder_dated-29thDec-2011 Your Ref:
REF/2011/0422
To: Adjudicator to HM Land Registry <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>



Copy of High Court sent today to the HM Land Registrar



Attention:

Owen Rhys, Mark Southby
Saru Hargreave
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry
Care of:
Mandy Smart
Listing Team
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, HM Courts and Tribunal Services
7th Floor, Victory House, 34 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6EX
Tel: 020 3077 5829 | E-mail: mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
 oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
Re: John Hastings Carew-Reid as Trustee and Attorney for Valerie Ann
Jouai 2) Valerie Ann Jouai  Your Ref: REF/2011/0422





Please see email attaching a Copy of High Court sent today to the HM Land
Registrar

 made the 29th December, 2011

 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583 by deleting the name of the said
 "Gary Roger Jouai" and replacing it withm"Valerie Ann Butler"
of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title Number GR327583.

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law
INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com

.

From: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
To: "gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk" <
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
      Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, davidrosen@inlnews.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=14dae934082130bd2c04b8eeb78f


Attention:

Katherine Brothers, Deputy Registrar, HM Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

Attention: Katherine Brothers, Reputy Registrar, HM Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
Dear Ms Brothers

Please see attached High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583*

by deleting the name of the said

 "Gary Roger Jouai"

and replacing it with

"Valerie Ann Butler"
of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title
Number GR327583.

It would be much appreciated if the Registrar of Titles attended to this
title amendment as soon as possible.

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law
INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com



Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
Dear Ms Brothers

Please see attached High Court of Justice Order made the 29th December, 201 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583 by deleting the name of the said  "Gary Roger Jouai" and replacing it with "Valerie Ann Butler" of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title Number GR327583.

It would be much appreciated if the Registrar of Titles attended to this
title amendment as soon as possible.

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law
INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com