AWN.bz   Australian Weekend News Publishing Group.. supports Independent Media... A division of International News Limited   INLNews.Com au1.us for DailyworldnewsHeadlines  USA MAIL  www.awn.com   www.awntv.com 
  INLNews USAWeeklyNewsNews Easy To find Hard To Leave  EdinburghFringeFest USAWeekendNews.com  
GMail HotMail  MyWayMail AOLMail YahooMail GMail  USA MAIL     ReutersNewsVideos  inl.org  inl.gov  inl.co.nz
INLNs   CNNWorld  IsraelVideoNs NYTimes WashNs WorldMedia  JapaNs  AusNs WorldVideoNs  WorldFinanceChinaDaily  IndiaNs 
 USADaily BBC EuroNs ABCAust NZNews QldNews WANs   NZNews  QldNews  MelbAge  
AdeaideNews  TasNews  ABCTas  DarwinN Top Stories Video/Audio  Reuters AP AFP The Christian Science Monitor U.S. News & World Report AFP Features Reuters Life! NPR The Advocate Pew Daily Number Today in History  Obituaries Corrections Politics   LocalNews o BBC News Video Reuters Video AFP Video CNBC Video Australia 7 News Video CBC.ca Video  NPR Audio Kevin Sites in the Hot Zone Video Richard Bangs Adventures Video Charlie Rose Video Expanded Books Video Assignment Earth Video ROOFTOPCOMEDY.com Video Guinness World Records Video weather.com
Your Subtitle text

RothschildZionistPromise

                                                        

Sweden reflects on Anna Lindh's death

AWN.bz 
Australian Weekend News Publishing Group.. supports Independent Media...
 A division of International News 
INLNews  ReutersNewsVideos  inl.org  inl.gov  inl.co.nz YahooMail  HotMail   GMail AOLMail MyWayMail 

www.inlnews.com www.inltv.com inl.org  inl.gov  inl.co.nz  www.awn.com www.awntv.com
INLNews YahooMail  HotMail GMail AOLMail MyWayMail USA MAIL
USA Weekly News EASY TO FIND HARD TO LEAVE 
Visit International News Limited for the best values on:  domain names . 
Fringe Shows Have Talent  Bebo   YouTube   MySpace   Twitter FaceBook. 
USA Weekly News EASY TO FIND HARD TO LEAVE 
Click For Your Up To Date World Live Sports Scores
Triumph of Truth (Who's Watching The Watchers?) 7 Volumes - The Australian Weekend  
Click here to get you daily dose of  Real  Independent USA News with Amy Goodman at Domocracy Now
CNNWorld IsraelVideoNs INLNsNYTimes WashNs WorldMedia JapanNs AusNs WorldVideoNs 
WorldFinance ChinaDaily IndiaNs USADaily BBC EuroNsABCAust WANs NZNs
QldNs MelbAgeAdelaideNs TasNs ABCTas DarwinNs USAMail
International News Limited Domain Pricing Per Year
.com* $9.99 | .net* $9.99 | .org* $9.99 | .info* $9.99 | .us* $9.99 | .biz* $9.99 | .ws* $9.99 | .name* $9.99
Save even more on multi-year registrations!

Visit International News Limited for the best values on: domain names, domain transfers and more!                                         



 

      Your Daily Motivation from Inspiration Line Add Inspiring Daily Quotes to YOUR Website

     Click Here For Your Up To Date World Live Sports Scores
   INLNews  YahooMail  HotMail  GMail  AOLMail USA MAILMyWayMail 
    CNNWorld IsraelVideoNs INLNsNYTimes WashNs WorldMedia JapanNs AusNs World VideoNs WorldFinance ChinaDaily IndiaNs USADaily BBC EuroNsABCAust 
     WANs NZNews QldNs MelbAge AdelaideNs 
    TasNews ABCTas DarwinNsUSA MAIL


     Google owned advertising software Adsense seems to have effectively acted in a sensorship role on the www.inlnews.com website, 

    by refusing to approve  a Google Adsense Advertising Account  for the www.inlnews.com website, which has been well established over the last 15 years,
    as a well known and well used International News and Information Website,
    where all forms of interesting and sometimes contraversal news and information is provided and discussed,
    to anyone wanting to access such news and information of the www.inlnews.com website.

     www.inlnews.com has a worldwide internet user ranking of around 900,000 in China, out of in excess of 8 billion websites on the World Wide Web.
     www.inlnews.com has a worldwide internet user ranking of around 300,000 in the World Wide Web News and Media Category, 
     out of in excess of 8 billion websites on the World  Wide Web.
     www.inlnews.com has taken 15 years to establish these World Wide Web Ranking. 

     All the web searches made on the www.inlnews.com website are purely organic, and are not as a result of any paid advertising to Google or
     anyone else to obtain its worldwide global ranking.
     The world wide global Internet Ranking of www.inlnews is purely organic web searches, because people around the world want to look at
     and read the news and information on the www.news.com website. 


     It is also noted that around seven years ago there were hundreds of www.inlnews.com web links on Google covering hundreds on different news and information subjects,

     that the www.inlnews.com website covers if one just typed in "INLNews" into a Google Web Search..

     ... at the time www.inlnews.com  was heading to be under  the 10,000th top website on the world wide web.

      Then overnight Google decided to cancel all these hundreds of z Google Web Links for hundreds on different subject matter we searches.

    There was obviously some very powerful people in Google that was extremely concerned about the fast improving world wide global rank of the www.innews.com web site, 

     so these powerful people inside Goolge decided that immediate action had to be taken ... to stop the fast improving World Wide Global rank of the www.inlnews.com website...

     It is believed that  the reason why all the hundreds of www.inlnews.com web links on Google were removed overnight from Google Search Engine was to stop the fast
    improving World Wide Global Rank of the www.inlnews.com website.

    It has taken the last 7 years for www.inlnews.com from Google cancelling all these hundreds of www.inlnews.com Google Web Links 

  
  
 
for hundreds of  Google Web Search Links on different subject matters, to try and recover its World Wide Global Rank..



  INL News World News Links

NEWS SOURCES

BLOGS

COLUMNISTS

ALL THINGS ARIANNA

World Liberal News Links  

AP WORLD
AP NATIONAL
AP WASHINGTON
AP BUSINESS
AP ENTERTAINMENT
AP ON THE HOUR
AP HEADLINES
AP BREAKING
AP REUT PHOTO WIRE
AP AUDIO 
ABCNEWS 
ABCNEWS THE NOTE
AD AGE DEADLINE
BBC
BBC AUDIO
C-SPAN
CHICAGO TRIB
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE
CNN
CNN POLITICAL TICKER
DAILY SWARM
DAILY VARIETY
ECONOMIST
EDITOR & PUBLISHER
BILLBOARD 
BOSTON GLOBE
BOSTON HERALD 
BREITBART
CBS NEWS 
EMIRATES TODAY
FINANCIAL TIMES 
FORBES
FOX NEWS
FREE REPUBLIC
HOT AIR
HILL
HUMAN EVENTS
IAFRICA
INTERNATIONAL HERALD
INVEST BUS DAILY
JERUSALEM POST
JEWISH WORLD REVIEW
LA DAILY NEWS
LA TIMES 
MEDIA WEEK 
MSNBC
MSNBC FIRST READ 
NATIONAL REVIEW
NEW REPUBLIC
NEW YORK
NY DAILY NEWS
NY OBSERVER
NY POST
NY SUN 
NY TIMES
NEW YORKER
NEWSBUSTERS
NEWSBYTES 
NEWSMAX
NEWSWEEK
N. KOREAN NEWS
PHILLY INQUIRER
PHILLY DAILY NEWS 
POLITICO
R & R
RADAR 
REAL CLEAR POLITICS
REASON MAG
ROLL CALL
SAN FRAN CHRON 
SKY NEWS
SLATE
SMOKING GUN
SPLASH NEWS
SYDNEY HERALD
U.K. DAILY MAIL 
U.K.DAILY MIRROR
DAILY RECORD
UNDER THE RADAR
POLITICO
R & R
RADAR 
REAL CLEAR POLITICS
REASON MAG
ROLL CALL
SAN FRAN CHRON 
SKY NEWS
SLATE
SMOKING GUN
SPLASH NEWS
SYDNEY HERALD
U.K. DAILY MAIL 
U.K.DAILY MIRROR
DAILY RECORD
UNDER THE RADAR
U.K.EVENING STANDARD
U.K.EXPRESS
U.K.GUARDIAN
U.K.INDEPENDENT 
U.K.LONDON PAPER 
U.K.NEWS OF THE WORLD
U.K.SUN
U.K.TELEGRAPH
U.K.TIMES
US NEWS
USA TODAY
VILLAGE VOICE
WASH POST
WASH TIMES
WEEKLY STANDARD
WORLDNETDAILY
Conservative News  
MARC AMBINDER
JONATHAN ALTER
PAUL BEDARD
GLORIA BORGER
DAVID BRODER
DAVID BROOKS
ELEANOR CLIFT
MARIE COCCO
RICHARD COHEN
JOE CONASON
DAVID CORN
CRAIG CRAWFORD
STANLEY CROUCH
DE BORCHGRAVE
MAUREEN DOWD
KEVIN DRUM
SUSAN ESTRICH
HOWARD FINEMAN
GEORGIE GEYER
ELLEN GOODMAN
MARK HALPERIN
PAUL KRUGMAN 
BILL PRESS
CARL HIAASEN
NAT HENTOFF
PEREZ HILTON
CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS
AL KAMEN
MARC AMBINDER
JONATHAN ALTER
PAUL BEDARD
GLORIA BORGER
DAVID BRODER
DAVID BROOKS
ELEANOR CLIFT
MARIE COCCO
RICHARD COHEN
JOE CONASON
DAVID CORN
CRAIG CRAWFORD
STANLEY CROUCH
DE BORCHGRAVE
MAUREEN DOWD
KEVIN DRUM
SUSAN ESTRICH
HOWARD FINEMAN
GEORGIE GEYER
ELLEN GOODMAN
MARK HALPERIN
PAUL KRUGMAN 
BILL PRESS
CARL HIAASEN
NAT HENTOFF
PEREZ HILTON
CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS
AL KAMEN


NPR Audio BY CATEGORY Top Stories  Politics  World  Business  Sports 
 Technology  Health & Science  Arts  U.S. 

VIEW LOCAL VIDEO KVUE-TV Austin  WJZ 13 Baltimore  WBZ Boston 
 WCNC Charlotte  CBS 2 Chicago

CBS 11 Dallas  CBS4 Denver  13 News, WVEC Hampton Roads  11 News Houston  
CBS 2 / KCAL 9 Los Angeles

WHAS TV11 Louisville  CBS4 Miami  WCCO Minneapolis  WWL-TV, 
Channel 4 New Orleans  CBS 2 New York

CBS 3 Philadelphia KTVK 3TV Phoenix  KDKA Pittsburgh  
KGW NewsChannel 8 Portland, Ore.  WRAL.com Raleigh

CBS 13 / CW 31 Sacramento  KENS 5 - TV San Antonio  Channel 8 San Diego 
 CBS 5 San Franc

isco

KING5 Seattle  KREM.com Spokane/Coeur d'Alene  KMOV 
Channel 4 St. Louis  FOX 11 Tucson

Video by Category
 U.S. Business  World  Entertainment  Sports  Tech  Politics Science 
Health Environment Weather Opinion  Odd 

Video by Topic Campaign '08   Wall Street  Iraq  Gas Prices  Mideast Conflict 
 Climate Change 

More INL News Video !Finance Sports

NEWS   NBA   NHL  Tennis   Golf   NFL   Soccer  NASCAR WORLD   LOCAL FINANCE    

More  Popular   Buzz  News 

More Great World News Links

AP WORLD
AP NATIONAL
AP WASHINGTON
AP BUSINESS
AP ENTERTAINMENT
AP ON THE HOUR
AP HEADLINES
AP BREAKING
AP REUT PHOTO WIRE
AP AUDIO 
ABCNEWS 
ABCNEWS THE NOTE
AD AGE DEADLINE
BBC
BBC AUDIO
C-SPAN 		 CHICAGO TRIB
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE
CNN
CNN POLITICAL TICKER
DAILY SWARM
DAILY VARIETY
ECONOMIST
EDITOR & PUBLISHER
BILLBOARD 
BOSTON GLOBE
BOSTON HERALD 
BREITBART
CBS NEWS 
EMIRATES TODAY
FINANCIAL TIMES 
 FORBES
FOX NEWS
FREE REPUBLIC
HOT AIR
HILL
HUMAN EVENTS
IAFRICA
INTERNATIONAL HERALD
INVEST BUS DAILY
JERUSALEM POST
JEWISH WORLD REVIEW
LA DAILY NEWS
LA TIMES 
MEDIA WEEK 
MSNBC
MSNBC FIRST READ 		 NATIONAL REVIEW
NEW REPUBLIC
NEW YORK
NY DAILY NEWS
NY OBSERVER
NY POST
NY SUN 
NY TIMES
NEW YORKER
NEWSBUSTERS
NEWSBYTES 
NEWSMAX
NEWSWEEK
N. KOREAN NEWS
PHILLY INQUIRER
PHILLY DAILY NEWS 		 POLITICO
R & R
RADAR 
REAL CLEAR POLITICS
REASON MAG
ROLL CALL
SAN FRAN CHRON 
SKY NEWS
SLATE
SMOKING GUN
SPLASH NEWS
SYDNEY HERALD
U.K. DAILY MAIL 
U.K.DAILY MIRROR
DAILY RECORD
UNDER THE RADAR
 U.K.EVENING STANDARD
U.K.EXPRESS
U.K.GUARDIAN
U.K.INDEPENDENT 
U.K.LONDON PAPER 
U.K.NEWS OF THE WORLD
U.K.SUN
U.K.TELEGRAPH
U.K.TIMES
US NEWS
USA TODAY
VILLAGE VOICE
WASH POST
WASH TIMES
WEEKLY STANDARD
WORLDNETDAILY


 
World Liberal News Links
MARC AMBINDER
JONATHAN ALTER
PAUL BEDARD
GLORIA BORGER
DAVID BRODER
DAVID BROOKS
ELEANOR CLIFT		 MARIE COCCO
RICHARD COHEN
JOE CONASON
DAVID CORN
CRAIG CRAWFORD
STANLEY CROUCH
DE BORCHGRAVE		 MAUREEN DOWD
KEVIN DRUM
SUSAN ESTRICH
HOWARD FINEMAN
GEORGIE GEYER
ELLEN GOODMAN
MARK HALPERIN		 PAUL KRUGMAN 
BILL PRESS
CARL HIAASEN
NAT HENTOFF
PEREZ HILTON
CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS
AL KAMEN



Conservative News
BRENT BOZELL III 
PAT BUCHANAN
HOWIE CARR 
MONA CHAREN
LINDA CHAVEZ
ANN COULTER
LOU DOBBS
LARRY ELDER 
 JOSEPH FARAH 
SUZANNE FIELDS 
JOHN FUND 
MAGGIE GALLAGHER
BILL GERTZ
JONAH GOLDBERG 
SEAN HANNITY 
HUGH HEWITT  		 LARRY KUDLOW
DAVID LIMBAUGH 
RUSH LIMBAUGH 
HAL LINDSEY
RICH LOWRY
MICHELLE MALKIN
JOHN McCASLIN
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER
 BOB NOVAK
MARVIN OLASKY
GREG PIERCE
JIM PINDERTON 
WESLEY PRUDEN 
BILL O'REILLY
ROBERTS/ARGETSINGER
DICK MORRIS
 MICHAEL SNEED 
JOE SOBRAN 
THOMAS SOWELL
MARK STEYN 
CAL THOMAS 
GEORGE WILL
WALTER WILLIAMS
PHYLLIS SCHLAFLY



Rothschild Zionist promise to the British, to take America into the war
 
Rothschilds murder history

World News Shock
www.USAWeeklyNews.com
Exclusive






The Great American Novel
                The Film
   You will never view the world again the same .......
                           after seeing
 The Great American Novel
      A must see film.....there is no doubt that  everyone in the
world will demand that the film

The Great American Novel
is shown in their town ...NYTToday
 to organise The Great American Novel too be shown in your town please email
mailbox@TheGreatAmericanNovel.info

www.TheGreatAmericanNovel.info
An INL News Limited Production
         www.INLNews.com

    You will find more about

   The Great American Novel at
          www.INLNews.com
     www.USAWeeklyNews.com
     www.USAWeekendNews.com


1917:
The Rothschilds order the execution by the Bolsheviks they control, of
Tsar Nicholas II and his entire family in Russia, even though the Tsar
had already abdicated on March 2.  This is both to get control of the
country and an act of revenge for Tsar Alexander I blocking their
world government plan in 1815 at the Congress Of Vienna, and Tsar
Alexander II siding with President Abraham Lincoln in 1864.
It is extremely important for them to slaughter the entire family
including women and children in order to make good on the promise to
do so made by Nathan Mayer Rothschild in 1815.  It is designed to show
the world what happens if you ever attempt to cross the Rothschilds.
As a result of Germany's offer of peace the Rothschild war machine
goes into overdrive in America, spreading propaganda which leads to
President Wilson under the instructions of American Zionist leader and
Supreme Court Justice, Louis Dembitz Brandeis, reneging on his promise
to the electorate and taking America into the first world war on April
6.

As per the Rothschild Zionist promise to the British, to take America
into the war, they decide they want something in writing from the
British to prove that they will uphold their side of the bargain.  The
British Foreign Secretary, Arthur James Balfour therefore drafts a
letter which is commonly known as the, "Balfour Declaration," which is
reprinted below.

Foreign Office
November 2nd, 1917

Dear Lord Rothschild,

I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's
Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist
aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.

His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in
Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their
best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being
clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the
civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in
Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any
other country.

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the
knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

Yours sincerely,

Arthur James Balfour

The House of Rothschild
David Allen Rivera
No other name has become more synonymous with the Illuminati than the
Rothschilds. It is believed that the Rothschild family used the
Illuminati as a means to achieving their goal of world-wide dominance.
Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) was born in Frankfurt-on-the-Main
in Germany, the son of Moses Amschel Bauer, a banker and goldsmith.
Their name was derived from the 'red shield' ('rotschildt') that hung
over the door of their shop, and had been the emblem of revolutionary
Jews in Eastern Europe. A few years after his father's death, he
worked as a clerk in a Hanover bank, which was owned by the
Oppenheimers. He became a junior partner, and soon left to take over
the business started by his father in 1750.

He bought and sold rare coins, and later succeeded in buying out
several other coin dealers. In 1769, he became a court agent for
Prince William IX of Hesse-Kassel, who was the grandson of George II
of England, a cousin to George III, a nephew of the King of Denmark,
and a brother- in-law to the King of Sweden. Soon Rothschild became
the middleman for big Frankfurt bankers like the Bethmann Brothers,
and Rueppell & Harnier. After expanding his business to antiques,
wineries, and the importing of manufactured materials from England,
the Rothschild family began to amass a sizable fortune.

Prince William inherited his father's fortune upon his death in 1785,
which was the largest private fortune in Europe. Some of this money
had come from Great Britain paying for the use of 16,800 Hessian
soldiers to stop the revolution in America, because the money was
never given to the troops. In 1804, the Rothschilds secretly made
loans to the Denmark government, on behalf of Prince William.

In June, 1806, when Napoleon's troops pushed their way into Germany,
Prince William fled to Denmark, leaving his money with Mayer
Rothschild. History tells us that Rothschild secretly buried William's
ledgers, which revealed the full extent of his wealth, a list of
debtors and the interest required from them, and 600,000 pounds
($3,000,000), to keep Napoleon from confiscating it. Buderus von
Carlhausen ( Carl Buderus), the Treasury official who handled
William's finances, was given 'power of attorney,' and he in turn made
Rothschild his chief banker, responsible for collecting the interest
on the royal loans. Napoleon announced that all debts being paid to
Prince William, were to go to the French Treasury, and offered a 25%
commission on any debts that he would collect. Rothschild refused.

Developing circumstances soon allowed the Rothschilds to formulate a
plan which would guarantee them the financial control of Europe, and
soon the world. It began with taking advantage of the outcome of the
Battle of Waterloo, which was fought at La-Belle-Alliance, seven miles
south of Waterloo, which is a suburb of Brussels, Belgium. Early in
the battle, Napoleon appeared to be winning, and the first secret
military report to London communicated that fact. However, upon
reinforcements from the Prussians, under Gebhard Blucher, the tide
turned in favor of Wellington. On Sunday, June 18, 1815, Rothworth, a
courier of Nathan Rothschild, head of the London branch of the family,
was on the battlefield, and upon seeing that Napoleon was being
beaten, went by horse to Brussels, then to Ostende, and for 2,000
francs, got a sailor to get him to England across stormy seas. When
Nathan Rothschild received the news on June 20, he informed the
government, who did not believe him. So, with everyone believing
Wellington to be defeated, Rothschild immediately began to sell all of
his stock on the English Stock Market. Everyone else followed his
lead, and also began selling, causing stocks to plummet to practically
nothing. At the last minute, his agents secretly began buying up the
stocks at rock-bottom prices. On June 21, at 11 PM, Wellington's
envoy, Major Henry Percy showed up at the War Office with his report
that Napoleon had been crushed in a bitter eight hour battle, losing a
third of his men. This gave the Rothschild family complete control of
the British economy, and forced England to set up a new Bank of
England, which Nathan Rothschild controlled.

However, that wasn't the only angle he used to profit from the Battle
of Waterloo. Mayer Amschel Rothschild sent some of William's money to
his son Nathan in London, and according to the Jewish Encyclopedia:
"Nathan invested it in 800,000 pounds of gold from the East India
Company, knowing it would be needed for Wellington's peninsula
campaign. He made no less than four profits: (1) on the sale of
Wellington's paper (which he bought at 50¢ on the dollar); (2) on the
sale of gold to Wellington; (3) on its repurchase; and (4) on
forwarding it to Portugal. This was the beginning of the great
fortune."

After Napoleon's defeat, Prince William returned to resume his rule.
Buderus was made a Baron, and the Rothschilds were the richest bankers
in Europe.

In 1817, France, in order to get back on their feet again, secured
loans from a French banking house in Ouvrard, and from the Baring
Brothers in London. The Rothschilds saw their chance to get a firm
grip on the French economy, and on October, 1818, Rothschild agents
began buying huge amounts of French government bonds, which caused
their value to increase. On November 5th, they were dumped on the open
market, creating a financial panic as their value declined. Thus, the
Rothschilds gained control of France.

Mayer Rothschild had established banks in England, France, and
Germany. His sons, who were made Barons of the Austrian Empire, were
set up to continue and expand his banking empire. Amschel Mayer
Rothschild (1773-1855, who in 1838 said: "Permit me to issue and
control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws.")
was in charge of the bank in Frankfurt, Germany, which was known as M.
A. Rothschild and Sons (which closed in 1901, after the deaths of
Mayer Karl and his brother, Wilhelm Karl- the sons of Karl Mayer
Rothschild). Salomon Mayer Rothschild (1774-1855) was the head of the
bank in Vienna, Austria, known as S. M. Rothschild and Sons (which was
closed during World War II after the Nazi occupation).

Nathan Mayer Rothschild (1777-1836, who once said: "I care not what
puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on
which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain's money supply
controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply.")
was the head of the bank in London, England, which was known as N. M.
Rothschild and Sons (and has occupied the same premises since 1809, at
2 New Court, St. Swithin's Lane in London, near the Bank of England
and Stock Exchange). Karl Mayer Rothschild (1788-1868 ) was the head
of the bank in Naples, Italy (closed in 1861). James Mayer Rothschild
(1792-1868) was in charge of the bank in Paris, France, which was
known as Messieurs de Rothschild Freres (whose name was changed to La
Banque Rothschild in 1967).

This was the beginning of the House of Rothschild, which controlled a
fortune estimated to be well over $300,000,000. Soon the Rothschilds
spanned Europe with railroads, invested in coal and ironworks,
financed England's purchase of the Suez Canal, paid for oil
exploration in Russia and the Sahara Desert, financed the czars of
Russia, supported Cecil Rhodes' diamond operations, aided France in
creating an empire in Africa, financed the Hapsburg monarchs, and
saved the Vatican from bankruptcy. In this country, through their
American and European agents, they helped finance Rockefeller's
Standard Oil, Carnegie Steel, and Harriman's Railroad. Werner Sombart,
in his book The Jews and Modern Capitalism, said that from 1820 on, it
was the "age of the Rothschild" and concluded that there was "only one
power in Europe, and that is Rothschild." In 1913, the family fortune
was estimated to be over two billion dollars.
After Mayer Rothschild died on September 19, 1812, his will spelled
out specific guidelines that were to be maintained by his descendants:

1) All important posts were to be held by only family members, and
only male members were to be involved on the business end. The oldest
son of the oldest son was to be the head of the family, unless
otherwise agreed upon by the rest of the family, as was the case in
1812, when Nathan was appointed as the patriarch.
2) The family was to intermarry with their own first and second
cousins, so their fortune could be kept in the family, and to maintain
the appearance of a united financial empire. For example, his son
James (Jacob) Mayer married the daughter of another son, Salomon
Mayer. This rule became less important in later generations as they
refocused family goals and married into other fortunes.
3) Rothschild ordered that there was never to be "any public inventory
made by the courts, or otherwise, of my estate...Also I forbid any
legal action and any publication of the value of the inheritance."

American and British Intelligence have documented evidence that the
House of Rothschild, and other International Bankers, have financed
both sides of every war, since the American Revolution. Financier Haym
Salomon, who supported the patriots during the American Revolution,
then later made loans to James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, and James
Monroe, was a Rothschild agent. As explained earlier, during the
Napoleonic Wars, one branch of the family funded Napoleon, while
another financed Great Britain, Germany, and other nations. Their
boldest maneuver came prior to the Civil War.

The Rothschilds operate out of an area in the heart of London,
England, the financial district, which is known as 'The City', or the
'Square Mile.' All major British banks have their main offices here,
along with branch offices for 385 foreign banks, including 70 from the
United States. It is here that you will find the Bank of England, the
Stock Exchange, Lloyd's of London, the Baltic Exchange (shipping
contracts), Fleet Street (home of publishing and newspaper interests),
the London Commodity Exchange (to trade coffee, rubber, sugar and
wool), and the London Metal Exchange. It is virtually the financial
hub of the world.

Positioned on the north bank of the Thames River, covering an area of
677 acres or one square mile (known as the "wealthiest square mile on
earth"), it has enjoyed special rights and privileges that enabled
them to achieve a certain level of independence since 1191. In 1215,
its citizens received a Charter from King John, granting them the
right to annually elect a mayor (known as the Lord Mayor), a tradition
that continues today.

Both E. C. Knuth, in his book Empire of the City, and Des Griffin, in
his book Descent into Slavery, stated their belief that 'The City' is
actually a sovereign state (much like the Vatican), and that since the
establishment of the privately owned Bank of England in 1694, 'The
City' has actually become the last word in the country's national
affairs, with Prime Minister, Cabinet, and Parliament becoming only a
front for the real power. According to Knuth, when the queen enters
'The City,' she is subservient to the Lord Mayor (under him, is a
committee of 12-14 men, known as 'The Crown'), because this
privately-owned corporation is not subject to the Queen, or the
Parliament.

There seems to be little doubt that the Rothschilds continue to
influence the world economy, and it is known that they are squarely
behind the movement to unite all the western European nations into a
single political entity, which is just another step towards one-world
government.
Current Headlines
Visible Origami: Practising the Presence of the Ineffable Divine Les
Visible sent this in this morning with a note: “This might be too
esoteric for your audience but I send it on in any case because I was
compelled to (grin).” We leave readers to decide if it's too arcane.
Ed. More ...
Hollywood Promotes Wrong Kind Of Girl Power You know the scenario and
you've probably seen it repeatedly in the media in recent years: the
tough independent female who takes on men on their own terms. Just
remember though: it's not about 'female empowerment'. This is social
engineering More ...
Enough is Enough Head of the influential Council for Foreign
Relations, Richard Haass is calling for ‘regime change’ in Iran. As
with Iraq, this amounts to an open declaration of war and we can
expect to see more of this in the coming months More ...
News Brief: Hezbollah and Syria on alert fearing IDF attack on
LebanonHezbollah have upgraded their alert status in Lebanon while
Syria has begun to call up reserve troops in anticipation of an
Israeli attack More ...
Gilad Atzmon: In Memory of Martin Luther King Martin Luther King once
spoke of having a dream. If only it were true of modern Israel. Gilad
Atzmon explains More ...
Beware the BBC Stuart Littlewood highlights the BBC’s chronic
pro-Israel bias, from allowing untruths about Israel’s onslaught on
Gaza in 2008-09 to go unchallenged, to its routine willingness to give
disproportionate airtime to Israeli spokesmen More ...
Henry Makow Ph.D.: Stock Market Porn There is a masturbatory activity
even more widespread than pornography, yet never identified or
discussed. Henry Makow explainsMore ...
With Populist Stance, Obama Takes On Banks After a slap in the face
from Massachusetts’ voters, Obama throws a very public punch at Wall
St and the big banks More ...
Dead Man Musings: The Impending Yellowstone Eruption and the Book of
Revelation I believe that most "terrorists" we hear about are the
creation of Western Intelligence Agencies governed by the Illuminati.
Could they be preparing to trigger a volcanic eruption in Yellowstone
National Park to further a program of depopulation? More ...
The Secret Bank Bailout I hear the sums that have been shoveled are in
the billions and they are showing up on the books of firms like
Goldman Sachs as pure profit. It's really pure scam More ...
Smoking Mirrors: Tezcatlipoca, Hunger Porn and Corporate ObeahAid
appeals for Haiti are going out all over the place but the likelihood
of even a small portion of that money reaching any particular Haitians
is slim. Smoking Mirrors includes an interesting link explaining what
you could do with your money insteadMore ...
Mike Adams - Natural News: H1N1 swine flu hoax falls apart at the
seams The Great Swine Flu scare of 2009 has fizzled out although it
did provide big pharmaceutical firms with a lucrative bailout More ...
Swine flu was as elusive as WMDWeapons of mass destruction, lethal
viruses, nuclear radiation, global warming … why should we believe a
word of it? And it is a short step from don't believe to don't care
More ...
Vigilant Citizen: Lil Wayne’s “On Fire”: A Video About Occult
InitiationThere are no “conspiracy theories” or wild allegations here.
The people involved in this know exactly what they are doing. The
darker aspects of Western Occultism have been heavily studied and are
now being exploited to the full in the music businessMore ...
Pilots for 9/11 Truth: Flight 77 Cockpit Door Never Opened During 9/11
“Hijack" The data stream from the flight data recorder (FDR) for
American Airlines flight 77, which allegedly struck the Pentagon on
9/11, shows that the cockpit door never opened during the entire 90
minute flight More ...


Essential Reading for Newer Readers
Coming Clean Chemtrails are not the product of some 'Conspiracy
Theory'. They are real. We get the low down from an aircraft mechanic
who has done his own investigating More ...
America Before Columbus Could it be that certain powers have a vested
interest in keeping our real history under wraps? Because a great deal
has been unearthed which is completely at odds with conventional
notions regarding the origins of what we know today as America More
...
Seeing Through the Illusion: Who’s That Man? It's Saddam Hussein of
course. Or so western media and Coalition authorities would have us
believe. But was the man sentenced and supposedly executed in Baghdad
really Saddam Hussein? More ...
Admiral Richard B. Byrd's, Diary Feb. Mar. 1947 Fact or fantasy?
Admiral Richard B. Byrd's account of his flight over the North Pole
and discovery of a “land beyond the poles” is legend. For those still
unfamiliar with it we present his classic account and leave you to
decide More ...
Smoking Mirrors: Magic Thermite and the 9/11 Fairytale The evidence is
in and it’s irrefutable: scientists have discovered traces of hi-tech
explosives in the WTC debris. Which means the UK/US/Israel will have
to stage another event on the scale of 9/11 to counter the brushfire
this report will ignite More ...
Rixon Stewart: Two Minutes to Midnight The clock is ticking toward
war, domestic clampdown and the long foretold appearance of a “dark
messiah”. And guess what? We think we’ve spotted him More ...
The Illuminati Chronicles Part 1 A historical countdown to the New
World Order More ...
Back to the Future!!! Part 2 Given Einstein’s endorsement of Hapgood’s
ideas it is reasonable to ask whether his hypothesis could actually
happen again and if so when More ...
Explosive Testimony: Revelations about the Twin Towers in the 9/11
Oral Histories “[T]here was just an explosion [in the south tower]. It
seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It
seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these
explosions.”- Firefighter Richard Banaciski More ...
Norwegian politician: Planet X is Incoming 2.000.000 To Go Underground
This partially ties in with information from a very reliablepsychic
friend More ...
The Lady, The Queen and what it really means Every picture tells a
story and with some photos and a few words Paul Powers shows us what
was hidden in the background when Queen Elizabeth II met pop sensation
Lady Gaga More ...
The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel Part I Jack
Bernstein was a rarity, an American Zionist who 'returned' to Israel,
not for a holiday but to live and die in Israel building a Jewish
nation. What makes him almost one of a kind, however, was his ability
to see through the sham of Zionism More ...
Click here: More essential reading for newer readers - ARCHIVE



The History of the House of Rothschild by Andrew Hitchcock



Notes:

   Hitchcock also wrote a history for the
bankers:DarylBradfordSmith_Bankers.htm
   One of our listeners added images and photos and turned this
Rothschild document into a PowerPoint presentation. It is very large;
67 megabytes:RothschildsTimeline.ppt
   If you don't have PowerPoint, get a free PowerPoint viewer from
Microsoft here.
   Hitchcock has this Rothschild history available as a paper book in the UK:
   www.theSynagogueOfSatan.com
   The book is sold in the USA by Texe Marrs here.
   We  also have an interview with Hitchcock at this page.

Definition of Zionism:

   an organization of Jews whose goal is to create a nation for Jews.

Definition of Judaism:

   Jews collectively who practice a religion based on the Torah and the Talmud.

   The Rothschilds have been in control of the world for a very long
time, their tentacles reaching into many aspects of our daily lives,
as is documented in the following timeline.  However, before you jump
to the timeline, please read this invaluable introduction which will
tell you who the Rothschilds are as oppose to who they claim to be.

   The Rothschilds claim that they are Jewish, when in fact they are
Khazars.  They are from a country called Khazaria, which occupied the
land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea which is now
predominantly occupied by Georgia.  The reason the Rothschilds claim
to be Jewish is that the Khazars under the instruction of the King,
converted to the Jewish faith in 740 A.D., but of course that did not
include converting their Asiatic Mongolian genes to the genes of the
Jewish people.

   You will find that approximately 90% of people in the world today
who call themselves Jews are actually Khazars, or as they like to be
known, Ashkenazi Jews.  These people knowingly lie to the world with
their claims that the land of Israel is theirs by birthright, when in
actual fact their real homeland is over 800 miles away in Georgia.

   So, next time you hear an Israeli Prime Minister bleating about
the so-called persecution of the Jews, consider this, every Prime
Minister of Israel has been an Ashkenazi Jew.  Therefore when all
these Prime Ministers have curried favour with the West for their
re-establishment of a Jewish homeland, they have knowingly and
deliberately lied to you, as they were never from that region, and
they well know it, because it is they who call themselves Ashkenazi
Jews.

   The Book of Revelation, Chapter 2, Verse 9, states the following
which would appear to be about these Ashkenazi Jews:

       "I know thy works, and tribulation and poverty, (but thou art
rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and
are not, butare the synagogue of Satan."

   The most wealthy bloodline in the world bar none and the leader of
the Ashkenazi Jews in the world today is the Rothschild family.  As
you will see in the timeline, the Rothschilds have obtained this
position through lies, manipulation and murder.  Their bloodline also
extends into the Royal Families of Europe, and the following family
names:  Astor; Bundy; Collins; duPont; Freeman; Kennedy; Morgan;
Oppenheimer; Rockefeller; Sassoon; Schiff; Taft; and Van Duyn.

   However, these are not the only bloodlines to worry about.  You
are probably aware of the centuries old pratice undertaken by many
Ashkenazi Jews whereby they would change their name, in order for them
to appear part of the dominant race of the country in which they
lived, so as they could obtain influential positions in that country,
which they would then exploit to serve their real masters elsewhere.
There is plenty of evidence to prove the Rothschilds continue that
deceptive tradition.

   Furthermore the Rothschilds are known to sire many children
secretly that they can put into positions of power when required.
This started with the very first man who took the name Rothschild, who
had a secret sixth son.  Finally, remember the world is a diverse
place, I could if I wanted change my name to Rothschild, or any of the
names listed above, and that would not make me part of this family
anymore than converting to Judaism in 740 A.D. will make these
Ashkenazis Jewish.

   Please, therefore, do not automatically assume someone you see
with the name Rothschild or any of the names listed above are part of
the Rothschild criminal network.  Furthermore and most importantly,
the majority of Ashkenazi Jews are innocent and not part of this
network.  Check the facts out for yourself first, this article is
designed to inform people who the enemy is, not single out people of a
particular race or people with a particular surname, who may have
nothing to do with this Rothschild criminal network.


   1743: Mayer Amschel Bauer, an Ashkenazi Jew, is born in Frankfurt,
Germany, the son of Moses Amschel Bauer, a money lender and the
proprietor of a counting house.

   Moses Amschel Bauer places a red sign above the entrance door to
his counting house. This sign is a red hexagram (which geometrically
and numerically translates into the number 666) which under Rothschild
instruction will end up on the Israeli flag some two centuries later.

   1753: Gutle Schnaper, an Ashkenazi Jew (future wife of Mayer
Amschel Bauer), born to respected merchant, Wolf Salomon Schnaper.

   1760: During this decade Mayer Amschel Bauer works for a bank
owned by the Oppenheimers' in Hanover, Germany.  He is highly
successful and becomes a junior partner. Whilst working at the bank he
becomes acquainted with General von Estorff.

   Following his father's death, Bauer returns to Frankfurt to take
over his father's business. Bauer recognises the significance of the
red hexagram and changes his name from Bauer to Rothschild, after the
red hexagram or sign signifying 666 hanging over the entrance door
("Rot," is German for, "Red," "Schild," is German for, "Sign").

   Now Mayer Amschel Rothschild, he discovers that General von
Estorff is now attached to the court of Prince William IX of
Hesse-Hanau, one of the richest royal houses in Europe, which gained
its' wealth by the hiring out of Hessian soldiers to foreign countries
for vast profits (a practice that continues today in the form of
exporting, "peacekeeping," troops throughout the world).

   He therefore makes the General's re-acquaintance on the pretext of
selling him valuable coins and trinkets at discounted prices. As he
plans, Rothschild is subsequently introduced to Prince William himself
who is more than pleased with discounted prices he charges for his
rare coins and trinkets, and Rothschild offers him a bonus for any
other business the Prince can direct his way.

   Rothschild subsequently becomes close associates with Prince
William, and ends up doing business with him and members of the court.
 He soon discovers that loaning money to governments and royalty is
more profitable than loaning to individuals, as the loans are bigger
and are secured by the nation's taxes.

   1769: Mayer Amschel Rothschild is given permission by Prince
William to hang a sign on the front of his business premises declaring
that he is, "M. A. Rothschild, by appointment court factor to his
serene highness, Prince William of Hanau."

   1770: Mayer Amschel Rothschild draws up plans for the creation of
the Illuminati and entrusts Ashkenazi Jew, Adam Weishaupt, a
Crypto-Jew who was outwardly Roman Catholic, with its organization and
development.  The Illuminati is to be based upon the teachings of the
Talmud, which is in turn, the teachings of Rabbinical Jews.  It was to
be called the Illuminati as this is a Luciferian term which means,
keepers of the light.

   Mayer Amschel Rothschild marries Gutle Schnaper.

   1773: Amschel Mayer Rothschild born, the first of Mayer Amschel
Rothschild’s sons. He like all his brothers who follow him, will enter
the family business at the age of 12.

   1774: Salomon Mayer Rothschild born.

   1776:  Adam Weishaupt officially completes his organisation of the
Illuminati on May 1 of this year.  The purpose of the Illuminati is to
divide the goyim (all non-Jews) through political, economic, social,
and religious means.  The opposing sides were to be armed and
incidents were to be provided in order for them to:  fight amongst
themselves; destroy national governments; destroy religious
institutions; and eventually destroy each other.

   Weishaupt soon infiltrates the Continental Order of Freemasons
with this Illuminati doctrine and establishes lodges of the Grand
Orient to be their secret headquarters.  This was all under the orders
and finance of Mayer Amschel Rothschild and the concept has spread and
is followed within Masonic Lodges worldwide to the present day.

   Weishaupt also recruits 2,000 paid followers including the most
intelligent men in the field of arts and letters, education, science,
finance,and industry.  They were instructed to follow the following
methods in order to control people.

       1)  Use monetary and sex bribery to obtain control of men
already in high places, in the various levels of all governments and
other fields of endeavour. Once influential persons had fallen for the
lies, deceits, and temptations of the Illuminati they were to be held
in bondage by application of political and other forms of blackmail,
threats of financial ruin, public exposure, and fiscal harm, even
death to themselves and loved members of their families.

       2)  The faculties of colleges and universities were to
cultivate students possessing exceptional mental ability belonging to
well-bred families with international leanings, and recommend them for
special training in internationalism, or rather the notion that only a
one-world government can put an end to recurring wars and strife.
Such training was to be provided by granting scholarships to those
selected by the Illuminati.

       3)  All influential people trapped into coming under the
control of the Illuminati, plus the students who had been specially
educated and trained, were to be used as agents and placed behind the
scenes of all governments as experts and specialists.  This was so
they would advise the top executives to adopt policies which would in
the long-run serve the secret plans of the Illuminati one-world
conspiracy and bring about the destruction of the governments and
religions they were elected or appointed to serve.

       4)  To obtain absolute-control of the press, at that time the
only mass-communications media which distributed information to the
public, so that all news and information could be slanted in order to
make the masses believe that a one-world government is the only
solution to our many and varied problems.

   1777: Nathan Mayer Rothschild born.

   1784:  Adam Weishaupt issues his order for the French Revolution
to be started by by Maximilien Robespierre in book form.  This book
was written by one of Weishaupt's associates, Xavier Zwack, and sent
by courier from Frankfurt to Paris.  However en route there, the
courier is struck by lightning, the book detailing this plan
discovered by the police, and handed over to the Bavarian authorities.

   As a consequence, the Bavarian government orders the police to
raid Weishaupt's masonic lodges of the Grand Orient, and the homes of
his most influential associates.  Clearly, the Bavarian authorities
were convinced that the book that was discovered was a very real
threat by a private group of influential people, to use wars and
revolutions to achieve their political ends.

   1785:  The Bavarian government outlaw the Illuminati and close all
the Bavarian lodges of the Grand Orient.

   Mayer Amschel Rothschild moves his family home to a five storey
house in Frankfurt which he shares with the Schiff family.

   1786:  The Bavarian government publish the details of the
Illuminati plot in a document entitled, "The Original Writings of The
Order and Sect of The Illuminati."  They then send this document to
all the heads of church and state throughout Europe, but sadly their
warning is ignored.

   1788: Kalmann (Carl) Mayer Rothschild Born.

   1789:  Due to the European ignorance of the Bavarian government's
warning, the Illuminati's plan for a French Revolution succeeded from
this year to 1793.  This revolution was a bankers' dream, it
established a new constitution and passed laws that forbade the Roman
Church from levying tithes (taxes) and also removed its exemption from
taxation.

   1790: Mayer Amschel Rothschild states,

       "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who
writes the laws."

   1791: The Rothschilds get, "control of a nation's money," through
Alexander Hamilton (their agent in George Washington’s cabinet) when
they set up a central bank in the USA called the First Bank of the
United States. This is established with a 20 year charter.

   1792: Jacob (James) Mayer Rothschild born.

   1796: Amschel Mayer Rothschild marries Eva Hanau.

   1798: John Robison publishes a book entitled, "Proofs of a
Conspiracy Against All the Religions and Governments of Europe Carried
on in the Secret Meetings of Freemasons, Illuminati and Reading
Societies."  In this book, Professor Robison of the University of
Edinburgh, one of the leading intellects of his time, who in 1783 was
elected general secretary of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, gave
details of the whole Rothschild Illuminati plot.

   He advised how he had been a high degree mason in the Scottish
Rite of Freemasonry, and had been invited by Adam Weishaupt to Europe,
where he had been given a revised copy of Weishaupt's conspiracy.
However, although he pretended to go along with it, Professor Robison
did not agree with it and therefore published his aforementioned book.
 The book included details of the Bavarian government's investigation
into the Illuminati and the French Revolution.

   That same year on July 19th, David Pappen, President of Harvard
University, lectured the graduating class on the influence illuminism
was having on American politics and religion.

   At the age of 21, Nathan Mayer Rothschild leaves Frankfurt for
England, where with a large sum of money given to him by his father,
he sets up a banking house in London.

   1800: Salomon Mayer Rothschild marries Caroline Stern.

   1806: Napolean states that it is his,

       "object to remove the house of Hess-Cassel from rulership and
to strike it out of the list of powers."

   On hearing this, Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau, flees Germany,
goes to Denmark and entrusts his fortune valued at $3,000,000 at that
time to Mayer Amschel Rothschild for safekeeping.

   Nathan Mayer Rothschild marries Hannah Barent Cohen the daughter
of a wealthy London merchant.

   1808: Nathan Mayer Rothschild has his first son born Lionel Nathan
de Rothschild.

   1810: Sir Francis Baring and Abraham Goldsmid die. This leaves
Nathan Mayer Rothschild as the remaining major banker in England.

   Salomon Mayer Rothschild goes to Vienna, Austria and sets up the
bank, M. von Rothschild und Söhne.

   1811: The charter for the Rothschilds Bank of the United States
runs out and Congress votes against its renewal.  Nathan Mayer
Rothschild is not amused and he states,

       "Either the application for renewal of the charter is granted,
or the United States will find itself involved in a most disastrous
war."

   However the United States stands firm and the Charter is not
renewed, which causes Nathan Mayer Rothschild to issue another threat,

       "Teach those impudent Americans a lesson. Bring them back to
colonial status."

   1812: Backed by Rothschild money, and Nathan Mayer Rothschild's
orders, the British declare war on the United States. The Rothschilds
plan was to cause the United States to build up such a debt in
fighting this war that they would have to surrender to the Rothschilds
and allow the charter for the Rothschild owned First Bank of the
United States to be renewed.

   Mayer Amschel Rothschild dies. In his will he lays out specific
laws that the House of Rothschild were to follow: all key positions in
the family business were only to be held by family members; only male
members of the family were allowed to participate in the family
business, this included a reported sixth secret bastard son (It is
important to note that Mayer Amschel Rothschild also has five
daughters, so today the spread of the Rothschild Zionist dynasty
without the Rothschild name is far and wide, and Jews believe the
mixed offspring of a Jewish mother is solely Jewish); the family was
to intermarry with it’s first and second cousins to preserve the
family fortune (of the 18 marriages by Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s
grandchildren, 16 were between first cousins - a practice known today
as inbreeding); no public inventory of his estate was to be published;
no legal action was to be taken with regard to the value of the
inheritance; the eldest son of the eldest son was to become the head
of the family (this condition could only be overturned when the
majority of the family agreed otherwise).

   This was straightaway the case and Nathan Mayer Rothschild was
elected head of the family following his father, Mayer Amschel
Rothschild’s death.

   Jacob (James) Mayer Rothschild goes to Paris, France to set up the
bank, de Rothschild Frères.

   Nathaniel de Rothschild, the son in law of Jacob (James) Mayer
Rothschild, born.

   1814: With regard to the $3,000,000 Prince William IX of
Hesse-Hanau had entrusted to Mayer Amschel Rothschild for safekeeping,
for an account of what happened next we turn to the Jewish
Encyclopaedia, 1905 edition, Volume 10, page 494, which states,

       "According to legend this money was hidden away in wine casks,
and, escaping the search of Napoleon's soldiers when they entered
Frankfurt, was restored intact in the same casks in 1814, when the
elector (Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau) returned to the electorate
(Germany). The facts are somewhat less romantic, and more
businesslike."

   This last line indicates the money was never returned by
Rothschild to Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau. The encyclopaedia goes
on to state,

       "Nathan Mayer Rothschild invested this $3,000,000 in, gold
from the East India Company knowing that it would be needed for
Wellington's peninsula campaign."

   On the stolen money Nathan made,

       "no less than four profits:

       i) On the sale of Wellington's paper which he bought at 50
cents on the dollar and collected at par;
       ii) on the sale of gold to Wellington;
       iii) on its repurchase; and
       iv) on forwarding it to Portugal."

   1815: The five Rothschild brothers work to supply gold to both
Wellington's army (through Nathan in England) and Napoleon's army
(through Jacob in France), and begin their policy of funding both
sides in wars. The Rothschilds love wars because they are massive
generators of risk free debt.

   This is because they are guaranteed by the government of a
country, and therefore the efforts of the population of that country,
and it doesn't matter if that country loses the war because the loans
are given on the guarantee that the victor will honour the debts of
the vanquished.

   Whilst the Rothschilds are funding both sides in this war, they
use the banks they have spread out across Europe to give them the
opportunity to set up an unrivalled postal service network of secret
routes and fast couriers.  The post these couriers carried was to be
opened up by these couriers and their details given to the Rothschilds
so they always were one step ahead of current events.

   Furthermore, these Rothschild couriers were the only merchants
allowed to pass through the English and French blockades. It was these
couriers who also kept Nathan Mayer Rothschild up to date with how the
war was going so he could use that intelligence to buy and sell from
his position on the stock exchange in accordance with that
intelligence.

   One of Rothschild's couriers was a man named Rothworth.  When the
outcome of the Battle of Waterloo was won by the British, Rothworth
took off for the Channel and was able to deliver this news to Nathan
Mayer Rothschild, a full 24 hours before Wellington's own courier.

   At that time British bonds were called consuls and they were
traded on the floor of the stock exchange. Nathan Mayer Rothschild
instructed all his workers on the floor to start selling consuls. The
made all the other traders believe that the British had lost the war
so they started selling frantically.

   Therefore the consuls plummeted in value which was when Nathan
Mayer Rothschild discreetly instructed his workers to purchase all the
consuls they could lay their hands on.

   When news came through that the British had actually won the war,
the consuls went up to a level even higher than before the war ended
leaving Nathan Mayer Rothschild with a return of approximately 20 to 1
on his investment.

   This gave the Rothschild family complete control of the British
economy, now the financial centre of the world following Napolean's
defeat, and forced England to set up a new Bank of England, which
Nathan Mayer Rothschild controlled.

   Interestingly 100 years later the New York Times would run a story
stating that Nathan Mayer Rothschild's grandson had attempted to
secure a court order to suppress publication of a book which had this
insider trading story in it.  The Rothschild family claimed the story
was untrue and libellous, but the court denied the Rothschilds request
and ordered the family to pay all court costs.

   Back to 1815, this is the year Nathan Mayer Rothschild makes his
famous statement,

       "I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England
to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls
Britain's money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the
British money supply."

   He would go onto brag that in the 17 years he had been in England
he had increased the £20,000 stake given to him by his father, 2500
times to £50 million.

   The Rothschilds also use their control of the Bank of England to
replace the method of shipping gold from country to country and
instead used their five banks spread across Europe to set up a system
of paper debits and credits, the banking system of today.

   By the end of this century, a period of time that was known as
the, "Age of the Rothschilds," it is estimated that the Rothschild
family controlled half the wealth of the world.

   However something that did not go well for the Rothschilds this
year was the Congress of Vienna, which started in September, 1814 and
concluded in June of this year.  The reason for this Congress of
Vienna, was for the Rothschilds to create a form of world government,
to give them complete political control over much of the civilized
world.

   Many of the European governments were in debt to the Rothschilds,
so they figured they could use that as a bargaining tool.  However the
Tsar Alexander I of Russia, who had not succumbed to a Rothschild
central bank, would not go along with the plan, so the Rothschild
world government plan failed.

   Enraged by this, Nathan Mayer Rothschild swore that some day he or
his descendants would destroy the Tsar Alexander I's  entire family
and descendants.  Unfortunately he was true to his word and 102 years
later Rothschild funded Bolsheviks would act upon that promise.

   Interestingly, world government fanatic and Ashkenazi Jew, Henry
Kissinger, did his doctoral dissertation on the Congress of Vienna.

   1816: The American Congress passes a bill permitting yet another
Rothschild dominated central bank, which gives the Rothschilds control
of the American money supply again.  This is called the Second Bank of
the United States and is given a twenty year charter.  The British war
against the America therefore ends with the deaths of thousands of
British and American soldiers, but the Rothschilds get their bank.

   1818: Following the French securing massive loans in 1817 in order
to help rebuild after their disastrous defeat at Waterloo, Rothschild
agents bought vast amounts of French government bonds causing their
value to increase.

   On November 5th they dumped the lot on the open market causing
their value to plummet and France to go into a financial panic. The
Rothschilds then stepped in to take control of the French money
supply. This was the same year the Rothschilds were able to loan
£5,000,000 to the Prussian government.

   1821: Kalmann (Carl) Mayer Rothschild was sent to Naples, Italy.
He would end up doing a lot of business with the Vatican and Pope
Gregory XVI subsequently conferred upon him the Order of St. George.

   Also, whenever the Pope received Kalmann, he would give him his
hand rather than the customary toe to kiss, which showed the extent of
Kalmann's power over the Vatican.

   1822: The emperor of Austria made the five Rothschild brothers
Barons.  Nathan Mayer Rothschild chose not to take up the title.

   1823: The Rothschilds take over the financial operations of the
Catholic Church, worldwide.

   1827: Sir Walter Scott publishes his nine volume set, The life of
Napolean and in volume two he states that the French Revolution was
planned by the Illuminati (Adam Weishaupt) and was financed by the
money changers of Europe (The Rothschilds).

   1832:  President Andrew Jackson (the 7th President of the United
States from 1829 to 1837), runs the campaign for his second term in
office under the slogan, "Jackson And No Bank!"  This is in reference
to his plan to take the control of the American money system to
benefit the American people, not for the profiteering of the
Rothschilds.

   1833:  President Andrew Jackson starts removing the government's
deposits from the Rothschild controlled, Second Bank of the United
States and instead deposits them into banks directed by democratic
bankers.

   This causes the Rothschilds to panic and so they do what they do
best, contract the money supply causing a depression.  President
Jackson knows what they are up to and later states,

       "You are a den of thieves vipers, and I intend to rout you
out, and by the Eternal God, I will rout you out."

   1834:  The Italian revolutionary leader, Guiseppe Mazzini, is
selected by the Illuminati to direct their revolutionary program
throughout the world and would serve in that capacity until he died in
1872.

   1835:  On January 30, an assassin tries to shoot President
Jackson, but miraculously both of the assassin's pistols misfired.
President Jackson would later claim that he knew the Rothschilds were
responsible for that attempted assassination.  He is not the only one,
the assassin, Richard Lawrence, who was found not guilty by reason of
insanity, later bragged that powerful people in Europe had hired him
and promised to protect him if he were caught.

   The Rothschilds acquire the rights in the Almadén quicksilver
mines in Spain. This was at the time the biggest concession in the
world and as quicksilver was a vital component in the refining of gold
or silver this gave the Rothschilds a virtual world monopoly.

   1836: Following his years of fighting against the Rothschilds and
their central bank in America, President Andrew Jackson finally
succeeds in throwing the Rothschilds central bank out of America, when
the bank's charter is not renewed. It would not be until 1913 that the
Rothschilds would be able to set up their third central bank in
America, the Federal Reserve, and to ensure no mistakes are made, this
time they will put one of their own bloodline, Jacob Schiff, in charge
of the project.

   Nathan Mayer Rothschild dies and the control of his bank, N. M.
Rothschild & Sons is passed on to his younger brother, James Mayer
Rothschild.

   1837:  The Rothschilds send one of their own, August Belmont, an
Ashkenazi Jew, to America to salvage their banking interests defeated
by President Andrew Jackson.

   1840: The Rothschilds become the Bank of England’s bullion
brokers. They set up agencies in California and Australia.

   1841: President John Tyler (the 10th President of the United
States From 1841 to 1845) vetoed the act to renew the charter for the
Bank of the United States. He goes on to receive hundreds of letters
threatening him with assassination.

   1844: Salomon Mayer Rothschild purchases the United Coal Mines of
Vítkovice and Austro-Hungarian Blast Furnace Company that would go on
to be one of the top ten global industrial concerns.

   Benjamin Disraeli, an Ashkenazi Jew (who would go on to become
British Prime Minister twice - the only admitted Ashkenazi Jew to do
so) publishes Coningsby, in which he characterises Nathan Mayer
Rothschild as,

       "the Lord and Master of the money markets of the world, and of
course virtually Lord and Master of everything else. He literally held
the revenues of Southern Italy in pawn, and Monarchs and Ministers of
all countries courted his advice and were guided by his suggestions."

   1845: The Great American Patriot, Andrew Jackson (7th President of
the United States) dies.

   Before his death he is asked what he regarded his as greatest
achievement.  He replies without hesitation,

       "I Killed The Bank,"

   This is in reference to the fact he banished the Rothschilds
Second Bank of the United States in 1836.

   Jacob (James) Mayer Rothschild (who by now had married his niece,
Betty, Salomon Mayer Rothschild's daughter), now known as Baron James
de Rothschild, wins the contract to build the first major railway line
across the country.

   This was called the Chemin De Fer Du Nord and ran initially from
Paris to Valenciennes and then joined with the Austrian rail network
built by his brother (and wife's father - all sounds a bit sordid
doesn't it) Salomon Mayer Rothschild.

   1847: Lionel De Rothschild now married to the daughter of his
uncle, Kalmann (Carl) Mayer Rothschild, is elected to the
parliamentary seat for the City of London.

   A requirement for entering parliament was to take an oath in the
true faith of a Christian. Lionel De Rothschild refused to do this as
he was Jewish and his seat in parliament remained empty for 11 years
until new oaths were allowed.  He must have been an invaluable
representative for his constituency, bearing in mind he could never
vote on any bill as he never entered parliament!  I wonder how he
managed to keep his parliamentary seat for 11 years?

   1848: Karl Marx, an Ashkenazi Jew, publishes, "The Communist
Manifesto."  Interestingly at the same time as he is working on this,
Karl Ritter of Frankfurt University was writing the antithesis which
would form the basis for Freidrich Wilhelm Nietzsche's,
"Nietzscheanism."  This Nietzecheanism was later developed into
Fascism and then into Nazism and was used to forment the first and
second world wars.

   Marx, Ritter, and Nietzsche were all funded and under the
instruction of the Rothschilds.  The idea was that those who direct
the overall conspiracy could use the differences in those two
so-called ideologies to enable them to divide larger and larger
factions of the human race into opposing camps so that they could be
armed and then brainwashed into fighting and destroying each other,
and particularly, to destroy all political and religious institutions.
 The same plan put forward by Weishaupt in 1776.

   Eva Hanau, Amschel Mayer Rothschild’s wife dies.

   1849: Gutle Schnaper, Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s wife dies. Before
her death she would nonchalantly state,

       "If my sons did not want wars, there would be none."

   1850: Construction begins this decade on the manor houses of
Mentmore in England and Ferrières in France, more Rothschilds Manors
will follow throughout the world, all of them filled with works of
art.

   Jacob (James) Rothschild in France is said to be worth 600 million
francs, which at the time was 150 million francs more than all the
other bankers in France put together.

   1852: N.M. Rothschild & Sons begins refining gold and silver for
the Royal Mint and the Bank of England and other international
customers.

   1853: Nathaniel de Rothschild, the son in law of Jacob (James)
Mayer Rothschild, purchases Château Brane Mouton, the Bordeaux
vineyard of Mouton, and renames it Château Mouton Rothschild.

   1854: Caroline Stern, Salomon Mayer Rothschild’s wife, dies.

   1855: Amschel Mayer Rothschild dies.

   Salomon Mayer Rothschild dies.

   Kalmann (Carl) Mayer Rothschild dies.

   1858: Lionel De Rothschild finally takes his seat in parliament
when the requirement to take an oath in the true faith of a Christian
is broadened to include other oaths. He becomes the first Jewish
member of the British parliament.

   1861: President Abraham Lincoln (16th President of the United
States from 1860 till his assassination in 1865) approaches the big
banks in New York to try to obtain loans to support the ongoing
American civil war.  As these large banks were heavily under the
influence of the Rothschilds, they offer him a deal they know he
cannot accept, 24% to 36% interest on all monies loaned.

   Lincoln is very angry about this high level of interest and so he
prints his own debt free money and informs the public that this is now
legal tender for both public and private debts.

   1862: By April $449,338,902 worth of Lincoln’s debt free money has
been printed and distributed. He states of this,

       “We gave the people of this republic the greatest blessing
they ever had, their own paper money to pay their own debts.”

   That same year The Times of London publishes a story containing
the following statement,

       "If that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in
the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a
fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost.
It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the
money necessary to carry on its commerce.

       It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of
civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all
countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed
or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe."

   1863: President Abraham Lincoln discovers the Tsar of Russia,
Alexander II (1855 – 1881), was having problems with the Rothschilds
as well as he was refusing their continual attempts to set up a
central bank in Russia.  The Tsar then gives President Lincoln some
unexpected help.

   The Tsar issued orders that if either England or France actively
intervened in the American Civil War, and help the South, Russia would
consider such action a declaration of war, and take the side of
President Lincoln.  To show that he wasn't messing about, he sent part
of his Pacific Fleet to port in San Francisco and another part to New
York.

   The Rothschild banking house in Naples, Italy, C. M. de Rothschild
e figli, closes following the unification of Italy. The Rothschilds
use one of their own in America, John D. Rockefeller, to form an oil
business called Standard Oil which eventually takes over all of its
competition.

   1864: Rothschild, August Belmont, who by now is the Democratic
Party's National Chairman, supports General George McClellan as the
Democratic nominee to run against President Abraham Lincoln in this
year's election.  Much to the anger of Belmont, President Lincoln wins
the election.

   1865: In a statement to Congress, President Abraham Lincoln states,

       "I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me,
and the financial institutions in the rear. Of the two, the one in my
rear is my greatest foe."

   Later that year, on April 14, President Lincoln is assassinated,
less than two months before the end of the American Civil War.

   Following a brief training period in the Rothschilds London Bank,
Jacob Schiff, a Rothschild, born in their house in Frankfurt, arrives
in America at the age of 18, with instructions and the finance
necessary to buy into a banking house there.  The purpose of this was
to carry out the following tasks.

       1.  Gain control of America's money system through the
establishment of a central bank.
       2.  Find desirable men, who for a price, would be willing to
serve as stooges for the Illuminati and promote them into high places
in the federal government, the Congress, Supreme Court, and all the
federal agencies.
       3.  Create minority group strife throughout the nations,
particularly targeting the whites and blacks.
       4.  Create a movement to destroy religion in the United
States, with Christianity as the main target.

   Nathaniel de Rothschild becomes Member of Parliament for Aylesbury
in Buckinghamshire.

   1868: Jacob (James) Mayer Rothschild dies, shortly after
purchasing Château Lafite, one of the four great premier grand cru
estates of France. He is the last of Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s sons
to die.

   1870: Nathaniel de Rothschild dies.

   1871:  An American General named, Albert Pike, who had been
enticed into the Illuminati by Guissepe Mazzini, completes his
military blueprint for three world wars and various revolutions
throughout the world, culminating into moving this great conspiracy
into its final stage.

   The first world war is to be fought for the purpose of destroying
the Tsar in Russia,as promised by Nathan Mayer Rothschild in 1815.
The Tsar is to be replaced with communism which is to be used to
attack religions, predominantly Christianity.  The differences between
the British and German empires are to be used to forment this war.

   The second world war is to be used to forment the controversy
between facism and political zionism with the slaughter of Jews in
Germany a lynchpin in bringing hatred against the German people.  This
is designed to destroy fascism (which the Rothschilds created) and
increase the power of political zionism.  This war is also designed to
increase the power of communism to the level that it equalled that of
united Christendom.

   The third world war is to be played out by stirring up hatred of
the Muslim world for the purposes of playing the Islamic world and the
political zionists off against one another.  Whilst this is going on,
the remaining nations would be forced to fight themselves into a state
of mental, physical, spiritual and economic exhaustion.

   On August 15th of this year, Albert Pike writes a letter (now
catalogued in the British Museum) to Guiseppe Mazzini in which he
states the following,

       "We shall unleash the nihilists and the atheists and we shall
provoke a great social cataclysm which in all its horror will show
clearly to all nations the effect of absolute atheism; the origins of
savagery and of most bloody turmoil.

       Then everywhere, the people will be forced to defend
themselves against the world minority of the world revolutionaries and
will exterminate those destroyers of civilization and the multitudes
disillusioned with Christianity whose spirits will be from that moment
without direction and leadership and anxious for an ideal, but without
knowledge where to send its adoration, will receive the true light
through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer
brought finally out into public view.

       A manifestation which will result from a general reactionary
movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and
Atheism; both conquered and exterminated at the same time."

   Pike, who having been elected as Sovereign Grand Commander of the
Scottish Rite of Freemasonry's Southern Jurisdiction in 1859, was the
most powerful Freemason in America.  He would retain that post for 32
years until his death in 1891.  He also published a book on the
subject in 1872 entitled, "Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and
Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry," in which he candidly states
the following,

       "LUCIFER, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to
give to the Spirit of Darknesss! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is
it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds
feeble, sensual or selfish Souls? Doubt it not!"

   1872:  Prior to Guiseppe Mazzini's death this year, he makes
another revolutionary leader named Adrian Lemmy his successor.  Lemmy
will be subsequently succeeded by Lenin and Trotsky, then by Stalin.
The revolutionary activities of all these men are financed by the
Rothschilds.

   1873: The loss making Rio Tinto copper mines in Spain, are
purchased by a group of foreign financiers including the Rothschilds.
These mines represented Europe’s largest source of copper.

   1875: On January 1 of this year Jacob Schiff, now Solomon Loeb's
son-in-law after marrying his daughter, Teresa, takes control of the
banking house, Kuhn, Loeb & Co.  He goes on to finance John D.
Rockefeller's Standard Oil Company, Edward R. Harriman's Railroad
Empire, and Andrew Carnegie's Steel Empire.  This is all with
Rothschild money.

   He then identifies the other largest bankers in America at that
time.  They are, J.P. Morgan who controls Wall Street, and the Drexels
and the Biddles of Philadelphia. All the other financiers, big and
little, danced to the music of those three houses.  Schiff then gets
the European Rothschilds to set up European branches of these three
large banks on the understanding that Schiff, and therefore
Rothschild, is to be the boss of banking in New York and therefore
America.

   N M Rothschild & Sons undertake a share issue to raise capital for
the first channel tunnel project to link France to England, with half
of its capital coming from the Rothschild owned Compagnie du Chemin de
Fer du Nord.

   This year Lionel De Rothschild also loans Prime Minister Benjamin
Disraeli the finance for the British government to purchase the shares
in the Suez Canal, from Khedive Said of Egypt. This was done as the
Rothschilds needed this access route to be held by a government they
controlled, so they could use that government's military to protect
their huge business interests in the Middle East.

   1876: Otto von Bismarck states,

       "The division of the United States into two federations of
equal force was decided long before the civil war by the high
financial power of Europe.  These bankers were afraid that the United
States, if they remained in one block and as one nation, would attain
economical and financial independence, which would upset their
financial domination over the world.

       The voice of the Rothschilds predominated. They foresaw the
tremendous booty if they could substitute two feeble democracies,
indebted to the financiers, to the vigorous Republic, confident and
self-providing.

       Therefore they started their emissaries in order to exploit
the question of slavery and thus dig an abyss between the two parts of
the Republic."

   1879: Lionel de Rothschild dies.

   1880:  Rothschild agents begin formenting a series of pogroms
predominantly in Russia, but also in Poland, Bulgaria and Romania.
These pogroms resulted in the slaughter of thousands of innocent Jews,
causing approximately 2 million to flee, mainly to New York, but also
to Chicago, Philadelphia, Boston and Los Angeles.

   The reason these pogroms were initiated, was to create a large
Jewish base in America, who when they arrived, would be educated to
register as Democrat voters.  Some twenty years later, this would
result in in a massive Democratic power base in the United States and
be used to elect Rothschild front men such as Woodrow Wilson, to the
Presidency, to carry out the bidding of the Rothschilds.

   1881: President James A. Garfield (The 20th President of the
United States who lasted only 100 Days) states two weeks before he is
assassinated,

       “Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is
absolute master of all industry and commerce…and when you realize that
the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a
few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods
of inflation and depression originate.”

   Edmond James de Rothschild has a son Maurice de Rothschild.

   1883: After 6,000 feet of tunnel in the channel tunnel project
being excavated, the British government halt the project citing the
fact that it would be a threat to Britain’s security.

   1885: Nathaniel Rothschild, son of Lionel De Rothschild, becomes
the first Jewish peer and is takes the title of Lord Rothschild.

   1886: The French Rothschild bank, de Rothschild Frères obtains
substantial amounts of Russia's oil fields and forms the Caspian and
Black Sea Petroleum Company, which quickly becomes the world's second
largest oil producer.

   1887: Opium trafficker in China, Edward Albert Sassoon, marries
Aline Caroline de Rothschild, the grand-daughter of Jacob (James)
Mayer Rothschild.  Aline Caroline's father, Gustave, together with his
brother, Alphonse, took over the Rothschild's french arm following
their father Jacob's death.

   The Rothschilds finance the amalgamation of the Kimberley diamond
mines in South Africa. They subsequently become the biggest
shareholders of this company, De Beers, and mine precious stones in
Africa and India.

   1888: Noémie Halphen, future wife of Maurice de Rothschild born.

   1891: The British Labour Leader makes the following statement on
the subject of the Rothschilds,

       "This blood-sucking crew has been the cause of untold mischief
and misery in Europe during the present century, and has piled up its
prodigious wealth chiefly through fomenting wars between States which
ought never to have quarrelled.

       Whenever there is trouble in Europe, wherever rumours of war
circulate and men’s minds are distraught with fear of change and
calamity you may be sure that a hook-nosed Rothschild is at his games
somewhere near the region of the disturbance."

   Comments like this worry the Rothschilds and towards the end of
the 1800’s they purchase Reuters news agency so they can have some
control of the media.

   1895: Edmond James de Rothschild the youngest son of Jacob (James)
Mayer Rothschild visits Palestine and subsequently supplies the funds
to found the first Jewish colonies there, this is to further their
long term objective of creating a Rothschild owned country.

   1897: The Rothschilds found the Zionist Congress to promote
Zionism (a political movement with the sole aim of moving all Jews
into a singularly Jewish nation state) and arrange its first meeting
in Munich.  However due to extreme opposition from local Jews, who are
quite happy where they are, this meeting has to be moved to Basle,
Switzerland and takes place on 29 August. The meeting is chaired by
Ashkenazi Jew, Theodor Herzl, who would state in his diaries,

       "It is essential that the sufferings of Jews….become
worse….this will assist in realization of our plans….I have an
excellent idea….I shall induce anti-Semites to liquidate Jewish
wealth….The anti-Semites will assist us thereby in that they will
strengthen the persecution and oppression of Jews. The anti-Semites
shall be our best friends."

   Herzl is subsequently elected President of the Zionist
Organisation which adopts the, "Rothschild Red Hexagram or Sign," as
the Zionist flag which 51 years later will end up as the flag of
Israel.

   Edward Henry Harriman becomes a director of the Union Pacific
Railroad and goes on to take control of the Southern Pacific Railroad.
This is all financed by the Rothschilds.

   1898: Ferdinand de Rothschild dies.

   1901: The Jews from the colonies set up in Palestine by Edmond
James de Rothschild, send a delegation to him which tell him,

       "If you wish to save the Yishuv (The Jewish settlement) first
take your hands from it, and…for once permit the colonists to have the
possibility of correcting for themselves what needs correcting."

   Edmond James de Rothschild is very angry about this and states,

       "I created the Yishuv, I alone.  Therefore no men, neither
colonists nor organisations have the right to interfere in my plans."

   The Rothschild banking house in Frankfurt, Germany, M. A. von
Rothschild und Söhne, closes as there is no male Rothschild heir to
take it on.

   1902: Philippe de Rothschild born.

   1905: A group of Rothschild backed Zionist Jews led by Georgi
Apollonovich Gapon attempt to overthrow the Tsar in Russia in a
Communist Coup.  They fail and are forced to flee Russia only to be
given refuge in Germany.

   The Jewish Encyclopaedia (Vol. 2, p.497) states,

       "It is a somewhat curious sequel to the attempt to set up a
Catholic competitor to the Rothschilds that at the present time the
latter are the guardians of the papal treasure."

   1906: The Rothschilds claim that due to growing instability in the
region and increasing competition from Rockefeller (the Rockefeller
family are Rothschild descendants through a female bloodline) owned
Standard Oil, this is why they sell their Caspian and Black Sea
Petroleum Company to Royal Dutch and Shell.  This is another example
of the Rothschilds trying to hide their true wealth.

   1907: Rothschild, Jacob Schiff, the head of Kuhn, Loeb and Co., in
a speech to the New York Chamber of Commerce, warns that,

       "Unless we have a Central Bank with adequate control of credit
resources, this country is going to undergo the most severe and far
reaching money panic in its history."

   Suddenly America finds itself in the middle of another typical run
of the mill Rothschild engineered financial crisis, which ruins as
usual ruins the lives of millions of innocent people throughout
America and makes billions for the Rothschilds.

   1909: Jacob Schiff founds the National Advancement for the
Association of the Coloured People (NAACP).  This was done to incite
black people into roiting, looting and other forms of disorder, in
order to cause a rift between the black and white communities.  Jewish
historian, Howard Sachar, states the following in his book, "A History
of the Jews in America,"

       "In 1914, Professor Emeritus Joel Spingarn of Columbia
University became chairman of the NAACP and recruited for its board
such Jewish leaders as Jacob Schiff, Jacob Billikopf, and Rabbi
Stephen Wise."

   Other Ashkenazi Jew co-founders included Julius Rosenthal, Lillian
Wald and Rabbi Emil G. Hirsch.  It was not until 1920 that the NAACP
appointed its first black president, James Weldon Johnson.

   Maurice de Rothschild marries Ashkenazi Jew, Noémie Halphen.

   1911: Werner Sombart, in his book, "The Jews and Modern
Capitalism," stated that from 1820 on, it was the,

       "Age of the Rothschild," and concluded that there was, "Only
one power in Europe, and that is Rothschild."

   1912: In the December issue of, "Truth," magazine, George R.
Conroy states of banker Jacob Schiff,

       "Mr Schiff is head of the great private banking house of Kuhn,
Loeb, and co, which represents the Rothschilds interests on this side
of the Atlantic.

       He has been described as financial strategist and has been for
years the financial minister of the great impersonal power known as
Standard Oil.

       He was hand in glove with the Harrimans, the Goulds, and the
Rockefellers in all their railroad enterprises and has become the
dominant power in the railroad and financial power of America."

   1913: On March 4, Woodrow Wilson is elected the 28th President of
the United States.  Shortly after he is inaugurated, he is visited in
the White House by Ashkenazi Jew, Samuel Untermyer, of law firm,
Guggenheim, Untermyer, and Marshall, who tries to blackmail him for
the sum of $40,000 in relation to an affair Wilson had whilst he was a
professor at Princeton University, with a fellow professor's wife.

   President Wilson does not have the money, so Untermyer volunteers
to pay the $40,000 out of his own pocket to the woman Wilson had had
the affair with, on the condition that Wilson promise to appoint to
the first vacancy on the United States Supreme Court a nominee to be
recommended to President Wilson by Untermyer.  Wilson agrees to this.

   Jacob Schiff sets up the Anti Defamation League (ADL) in the
United States.  This organisation is formed to slander anyone who
questions or challenges the Rothschild global conspiracy as,
"anti-semitic."

   Strangely enough, the same year that they do this they also set up
their last and current central bank in America, the Federal Reserve.
Congressman Charles Lindbergh stated following the passing of the
Federal Reserve Act on December 23,

       "The Act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When
the President signs this Bill, the invisible government of the
monetary power will be legalized.......The greatest crime of the ages
is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill."

   It is important to note that the Federal Reserve is a private
company, it is neither Federal nor does it have any Reserve. It is
conservatively estimated that profits exceed $150 billion per year and
the Federal Reserve has never once in its history published accounts.

   1914:  The start of World War I.  In this war, the German
Rothschilds loan money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds loan
money to the British, and the French Rothschilds loan money to the
French.

   Futhermore, the Rothschilds have control of the three European
news agencies, Wolff (est. 1849) in Germany, Reuters (est. 1851) in
England, and Havas (est. 1835) in France.

   The Rothschilds use Wolff to manipulate the German people into a
fervour for war. From around this time, the Rothschilds are rarely
reported in the media, because they own the media.

   1916:  On June 4, Ashkenazi Jew, Louis Dembitz Brandeis is
appointed to the Supreme Court of the United States by President
Wilson as per his agreed blackmail payment to Samuel Untermyer some
three years earlier.  Justice Brandeis is also the elected leader of
the Executive Committee for Zionist Affairs, a position he has held
since 1914.

   The middle of World War II.  Germany were winning the war as they
were being financed by the Rothschilds to a greater extent than
France, Italy and England, because Rothschilds, did not want to
support the Tsar in Russia, and of course Russia was on the same side
as France, Italy and England.

   Then a significant event occurred.  Germany, although they were
winning the war and not one foreign soldier had set foot on their
soil, offered armistice to Britain with no requirement of reparations.
 The Rothschilds were anxious to make sure this didn't happen as they
were expecting to make far more money off this war, so they played
another card they had up their sleeve.

   Whilst the British were considering Germany's offer, Rothschild
agent Louis Brandeis sends a Zionist delegation from America to
Britain to promise to bring America into the war on the side of the
British, provided the British agree to give the land of Palestine to
the Rothschilds.

   The Rothschilds wanted Palestine for the following reason.  They
had great business interests in the far east and desired their own
state in that area along with their own military which they could use
as an aggressor to any state that threatened those interests.

   The British subsequently agree to the deal for Palestine and the
Zionists in London contact their counterparts in America and inform
them of this fact.  Suddenly all the major newspapers in America that
up to that point had been pro-German turned on Germany running
propaganda pieces such as:  German soldiers were killing Red Cross
Nurses; German soldiers were cutting off babies hands, etc, in order
to manipulate the American public against the Germans.

   This same year, President Woodrow Wilson, ran a re-election
campaign under the slogan, "Re-Elect The Man Who Will Keep Your Sons
Out Of The War."

   On December 12, Germany and her allies offer peace terms to end the war.

   1917:  As a result of Germany's offer of peace the Rothschild war
machine goes into overdrive in America, spreading propaganda which
leads to President Wilson under the instructions of American Zionist
leader and Supreme Court Justice, Louis Dembitz Brandeis, reneging on
his promise to the electorate and taking America into the first world
war on April 6.

   As per the Rothschild Zionist promise to the British, to take
America into the war, they decide they want something in writing from
the British to prove that they will uphold their side of the bargain.
The British Foreign Secretary, Arthur James Balfour therefore drafts a
letter which is commonly known as the, "Balfour Declaration," which is
reprinted below.

       Foreign Office

       November 2nd, 1917

       Dear Lord Rothschild,

       I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His
Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with
Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved
by, the Cabinet.

       His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in
Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their
best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being
clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the
civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in
Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any
other country.

       I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to
the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

       Yours sincerely,

       Arthur James Balfour

   The Rothschilds order the execution by the Bolsheviks they
control, of Tsar Nicholas II and his entire family in Russia, even
though the Tsar had already abdicated on March 2.  This is both to get
control of the country and an act of revenge for Tsar Alexander I
blocking their world government plan in 1815 at the Congress Of
Vienna, and Tsar Alexander II siding with President Abraham Lincoln in
1864.

   It is extremely important for them to slaughter the entire family
including women and children in order to make good on the promise to
do so made by Nathan Mayer Rothschild in 1815.  It is designed to show
the world what happens if you ever attempt to cross the Rothschilds.

   U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway informs Congress that J. P. Morgan
is a Rothschild front and has taken control of the American media
industry.  He states,

       "In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel,
shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations,
got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them
to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and
sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily
press...

       ...They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of
25 of the greatest papers...An agreement was reached.  The policy of
the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month, an editor was
furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information
regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial
policies, and other things of national and international nature
considered vital to the interests of the purchasers."

   1919:  In January, Ashkenazi Jews, Karl Liebknecht and Rosa
Luxemburg, are killed as they attempt to lead another Rothschild
funded Communist coup, this time in Berlin, Germany.

   The Versailles peace conference is held to decide reparations that
the Germans need to pay to the victors following the end of the first
world war.  A delegation of 117 Zionists headed up by Ashkenazi Jew,
Bernard Baruch, bring up the subject of the promise of Palestine for
them.  At this point the Germans realised why America had turned on
them and under whose influence, the Rothschilds.

   The Germans, naturally, felt they had been betrayed by the
Zionists.  This is because, at the time the Rothschilds made their
deal with Britain for Palestine, in exchange for bringing America into
the war, Germany was the most friendly country in the world towards
the Jews, indeed the German Emancipation Edict of 1822 guaranteed Jews
in Germany all civil rights enjoyed by Germans.

   Also, Germany was the only country in Europe which did not place
restrictions on Jews, even giving them refuge when they had to flee
from Russia after their first attempted Communist coup failed there in
1905.

   Nevertheless, the Rothschilds had held up their side of the
bargain to spill the blood of millions of innocents and as a result,
Palestine is confirmed as a Jewish homeland, and whilst its handover
to the Rothschilds takes place it is to remain under the control of
Britain as the Rothschilds control Britain.  At that time less than
one percent of the population of Palestine was Jewish.  Interestingly,
the host of the Versailles peace conference is its boss, Baron Edmond
de Rothschild.

   The Versailles peace conference is also used as an attempt by the
Rothschilds to set up a world government under the pretext of ending
all wars (which they create).  This was called the, "League of
Nations."  Fortunately not enough countries accepted it and so it soon
died.

   On March 29th The Times of London reports on the Bolsheviks in Russia,

       "One of the curious features of the Bolshevist movement is the
high percentage of non Russian elements among its leaders. Of the
twenty or thirty commissaries, or leaders, who provide the central
machinery of the Bolshevist movement, not less than 75% were Jews."

   It is reported that the Rothschilds were angry with the Russians
because they were not prepared to allow them to form a central bank
within their nation.  They therefore gathered groups of Jewish spies
and sent them into Russia to drum up a revolution for the benefit of
the common man, which was actually a takeover of Russia by a
Rothschild controlled satanic elite.

   These Jewish spies were, in age old deceptive Ashkenazi tradition,
given Russian names, for example Trotsky was a member of the first
group and his original name was Bronstein. These groups were sent to
areas throughout Russia to incite riots and rebellion.

   The Jewish Post International Edition, week ending January 24th
1991, confirms Vladimir Lenin was Jewish. Lenin is also on record as
having stated,

       “The establishment of a central bank is 90% of communizing a nation.”

   These Jewish, Rothschild funded Bolsheviks would go on in the
course of history to slaughter 60 million Christians and Non-Jews in
Soviet controlled territory. Indeed the author Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
in his work, “Gulag Archipelago, Vol 2,” affirms that Zionist Jews
created and administered the organized Soviet concentration camp
system in which these tens of millions of Christians and Non-Jews
died.

   On page 79 of this book he even names the administrators of this
the greatest killing machine in the history of the world. They are
Aron Solts, Yakov Rappoport, Lazar Kogan, Matvei Berman, Genrikh
Yagoda, and Naftaly Frenkel. All six are Zionist Jews. In 1970
Solzhenitsyn would be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for literature.

   N. M. Rothschild & Sons’ are given a permanent role to fix the
world’s daily gold price. This takes place in the City of London
offices, daily at 1100 hours, in the same room until 2004.

   1920: Winston Churchill (whose mother, Jenny (Jacobson) Jerome,
was Jewish – meaning he is Jewish under Ashkenazi law as he was born
of a Jewish mother) writes in an article in the Illustrated Sunday
Herald, dated February 8th,

       "From the days of Illuminati leader Weishaupt, to those of
Karl Marx, to those of Trotsky, this worldwide conspiracy has been
steadily growing.

       And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from
the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America, have gripped
the Russian people by the hair of their heads and become the
undisputed masters of that enormous empire."

   1921:  Under the orders of Jacob Schiff the Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR) is founded by Ashkenazi Jews, Bernard Baruch and
Colonel Edward Mandell House.  Schiff gave his orders prior to his
death in 1920, as he knew an organisation in America needed to be set
up to select politicians to carry on the Rothschild conspiracy,and the
formation of the CFR was actually agreed in a meeting on May 30, 1919
at the Hotel Majestic in Paris, France.

   The CFR membership at the start was approximately 1000 people in
the United States.  This membership included the heads of virtually
every industrial empire in America, all the American based
international bankers, and the heads of all their tax free
foundations.  In essence all those people who would provide the
capital required for anyone who wished to run for Congress, the Senate
or the Presidency.

   The first job of the CFR was to gain control of the press.  This
task was given to John D. Rockefeller who set up a number of national
news magazines such as Life, and Time.  He financed Samuel Newhouse to
buy up and establish a chain of newspapers all across the country, and
Eugene Meyer also who would go on to buy up many publications such as
the Washington Post, Newsweek, ant The Weekly Magazine.

   The CFR also needed to gate control of radio, television and the
motion picture industry.  This task was split amongst the
international bankers from, Kuhn Loeb, Goldman Sachs, the Warburgs,
and the Lehmanns.

   1925:  This year's Jewish Encyclopaedia, states of the existence
of Ashkenazi Jews (who represent approximately 90% of so-called world
Jewry), with the startling admission that the so called enemy of the
Jews, Esau (also known as Edom, see Genesis 36:1), now actually
represents the Jewish race, when on page 42 of Volume V it is stated,

       "Edom is in modern Jewry."

   So what they're basically saying is that these Ashkenazi Jews, who
represent 90% of the so-called Jewish population, are actually
gentiles or goyim themselves.

   1926: N. M. Rothschild & Sons refinance the Underground Electric
Railways Company of London Ltd which has a controlling interest in the
entire London Underground transport system.

   Maurice de Rothschild has a son, Edmond de Rothschild.

   1929:  The Rothschilds crash the United States economy by
contracting the money supply.

   1930:  The first Rothschild world bank, the, "Bank for
International Settlements (BIS)," is established in Basle,
Switzerland.  The same place as where 33 years earlier the first ever
World Zionist Congress was held.

   1933: On January 30, Adolf Hitler becomes Chancellor of Germany.
He drives Jews, many of which were Communist out of Governmental
positions within Germany.  As a result of this, in July, the Jews hold
a World Conference in Amsterdam during which they demand that Hitler
re-instate every Jew back to his former position.

   Hitler refuses and as a result of this, Samuel Untermyer, the
Ashkenazi Jew who blackmailed President Wilson,and is now the head of
the American delegation and the president of the whole conference,
returns to the United States, and makes a speech on radio which was
transcribed in the From the New York Times, Monday, August 7, 1933.
In the speech he made the following statements,

       "...the Jews are the aristocrats of the world...Our campaign
is...the economic boycott against all German goods, shipping and
services...What we are proposing...is to prosecute a purely defensive
economic boycott that will undermine the Hitler regime and bring the
German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on
which their very existence depends...

       ...Each of you, Jew and Gentile alike...must refuse to deal
with any merchant or shopkeeper who sells any German-made goods or who
patronizes German ships or shipping."

   As two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and
could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported, if
Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would
starve, as there would be not enough food for more than one third of
the population.

   As a result of this boycott, Jews throughout America, would
protest outside and damage any stores in which they found any products
with, "Made in Germany," printed on them, causing stores to have to
dump these products or risk bankruptcy.

   Once the effects of this boycott began to be felt in Germany, the
Germans, who had demonstrated no violence towards the Jews up to this
point, simply began boycotting Jewish stores in the same way the Jews
had done to stores selling German products in America.

   Rothschild financed IBM, supply machines to the Nazis which
produce punch cards to help organize and manage the initial
identification and social expulsion of Jews, the confiscation of their
property and their extermination.

   On November 16, President Roosevelt recognizes the Zionist regime
of Stalin in Russia without consultation with Congress even as 8,000
Ukrainians march in protest in New York.

   Also this year, President Roosevelt, born of a Jewish mother,
therefore satisfying Ashkenazi rules of being Jewish, orders the
all-seeing eye to be placed upon all new dollar bills along with the
motto, "Novus Ordo Seclorum."  This is latin for, "A New Order of the
Ages."

   1934: Swiss banking secrecy laws are reformed and it becomes an
offence resulting in imprisonment for any bank employee to violate
bank secrecy. This is all in preparation for the Rothschild engineered
Second World War in which as usual they will fund both sides.

   Edmond de Rothschild dies.

   1936:  With regard to the increase in anti-semitism in Germany,
Samuel Landman (at the time, secretary to the World Zionist
Organisation), in his 1936 book, Great Britain, The Jews, and
Palestine states the following of the United States entry into World
War 1,

       "The fact that it was Jewish help that brought USA into the
War on the side of the Allies has rankled ever since in German –
especially Nazi – minds, and has contributed in no small measure to
the prominence which anti-Semitism occupies in the Nazi programme."

   1938: On 7th November, a Jew, Herschel Grynszpan, assassinated
Ernst vom Rath, a minor official at the German Embassy in Paris.  As a
result of this German hostility towards Jews in Germany started to
turn violent.

   The Rothschilds Austrian banking house in Vienna, S. M. von
Rothschild und Söhne, closes following the Nazi occupation of Austria.

   1939: I.G. Farben the leading producer of chemicals in the world
and largest German producer of steel dramatically increases its
production. This increased production is almost exclusively used to
arm Germany for the Second World War.  This company was controlled by
the Rothschilds and would go on to use Jews and other disaffected
peoples as slave labour in the concentration camps. I.G. Farben also
created the lethal Zyklon B gas that was used to exterminate the Jews.

   On 1 September, the Second world war starts when Germany invades
Poland.  This was because the German leadership were a Christian
leadership, who understood that Soviet Russia was led by Rothschild
funded Communists, and they feared that as the Soviet Union grew in
strength, these Jewish Communists would invade and wipe all the
Christians off the map.

   1940: Hansjurgen Koehler in his book, "Inside The Gestapo," states
the following, of Maria Anna Schicklgruber, Adolf Hitler's
grandmother,

       "A little servant girl…….came to Vienna and became a domestic
servant…….at the Rothschild mansion…….and Hitler’s unknown grandfather
must be probably looked for in this magnificent house."

   This is backed up by Walter Langer in his book, "The Mind Of
Hitler," in which he states,

       "Adolf’s father, Alois Hitler, was the illegitimate son of
Maria Anna Schicklgruber…….Maria Anna Schicklgruber was living in
Vienna at the time she conceived. At that time she was employed as a
servant in the home of Baron Rothschild. As soon as the family
discovered her pregnancy she was sent back home…….where Alois was
born."

   On the surface, it would appear Hitler was unlikely to be a
Rothschild, but then again, when you discover the benefits that the
Rothschilds got out of this war, both financially and politically, a
Rothschild connection does not appear as outlandish as it may
initially seem.

   1941:  President Roosevelt takes America into the second world war
by refusing to sell Japan any more steel scrap or oil. Japan was in
the midst of a war against China and without that scrap steel and oil,
Japan would be unable to continue that war. Japan was totally
dependent upon the United States for both steel scrap and oil.
Roosevelt knew this action would provoke the Japanese to attack
America, which they subsequently did at Pearl Harbor.

   1942: Prescott Bush, father of future American Presidents’ George
Herbert Walker and George W, has his company seized under the,
“Trading With The Enemy,” Act. He was funding Hitler from America,
whilst American soldiers were being killed by German soldiers.

   Jews are also being slaughtered by these same soldiers.
Interestingly the ADL never criticizes any of the Bushes for this.

   1943: February 18th, Zionist, Izaak Greenbaum, head of the Jewish
Agency Rescue Committee, in a speech to the Zionist Executive Council
states,

       “If I am asked, could you give from the UJA (United Jewish
Appeal) monies to rescue Jews, I say, no and I say again no!”

   He would go onto state,

       “One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Poland!”

   This is not a surprise, the whole idea of Zionist support for the
slaughter of innocent Jews was to scare the survivors into believing
that their only place of safety was Israel.  How else do you think the
Zionists could ensure Jews leave the beautiful European cities in
which they live, in order to settle in a desert!

   1944:  On 6 November Lord Moyne, British Minister Resident in the
Middle East was assassinated in Cairo by two members of the Jewish
terrorist group, the Stern Gang, led by future Prime Minister of
Israel, Yitzhak Shamir.  He is also responsible for  an assassination
attempt against Harold MacMichael, the High Commissioner of the
British Mandate of Palestine, this same year.

   Interestingly he also masterminds another successful assassination
this year against the United Nations representative in the Middle
East, Count Folke Bernadotte who, although he had secured the release
of 21,000 prisoners from German camps during World War II, was seen by
Yitzak Shamir and his terrorist collaborators as an anti-Zionist.

   In Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, two further Rothschild world
banks are created.  The International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the
World Bank.

   1945: The end of the Second World War. It is reported that I.G.
Farben plants were specifically not targeted in the bombing raids on
Germany. Interestingly at the end of the war, they were found to have
only sustained 15% damage.

   The tribunals held at the end of the Second World War, to
investigate Nazi War Crimes, censored any materials recording Western
assistance to Hitler.

   The Rothschilds take a giant step towards their goal of world
domination when the second, "League of Nations," called the, "United
Nations," was approved this year.

   1946:  On July 22 the future Prime Minister of Israel, Ashkenazi
Jew, David Ben-Gurion, orders another future Prime Minister of Israel,
Ashkenazi Jew, Menachem Begin, to carry out a terrorist attack on the
King David Hotel in Palestine, to try and drive out the British.  As a
result of this 91 people were killed, most of them civilians: 28
British, 41 Arabs, 17 Jews, and 5 others.  Around 45 people are
injured.

   Menachem Begin went on to proudly proclaimed himself as, "the
father of modern terrorism."  Just to put the gravity of the attack on
the King David Hotel into perspective, it was at the time the biggest
death toll as a result of single terrorist action ever and was only
surpassed over forty years later by the Bombing of Pan Am flight 103
over Lockerbie.

   1947: The British who prior to World War 2 declared that there
would be no more immigration of Jews to Palestine in order to protect
the Palestinians from their acts of terror against both them and
British soldiers, transfer control of Palestine to the United Nations.
 The United Nations resolve to have Palestine partitioned into two
states, one zionist and one arab, with Jerusalem to remain as an
international zone to be enjoyed by all religious faiths.

   This transfer was scheduled to take place on May 15, 1948.  The
United Nations had no right to give Arab property to anyone, as indeed
even thought the Jews owned 6% of Palestine at that time, resolution
181 granted the Jews 57% of the land leaving the Arabs who at that
time had 94% with only 43%.

   Information collected by the ADL in its spy operations on US
citizens is used by the House Select Committee on Unamerican
Activities. Subcommittee Chair Clare Hoffman dismisses the ADL’s
reports on suspected communists as "hearsay."

   1948: In the Spring of this year, the Rothschilds bribe President
Harry S. Truman (33rd President of the United States 1945 – 1953) to
recognise Israel (Rothschild owned Zionist not Jewish territory) as a
sovereign state with $2,000,000 which they give to him on his campaign
train.

   They then declare Israel to be a sovereign Jewish state in
Palestine and within half an hour President Truman declared the United
States to be the first foreign nation to recognise it.

   The Flag of Israel is unveiled. Despite tremendous opposition the
emblem on the flag is a blue coloured version of the Rothschild, "Red
Hexagram or Sign."

   This angers many Jews who realise this Hexagram was used in the
ancient mystery religions as the symbol of, "Moloch," (described as a
demon of unwilling sacrifice and is also interestingly the name of the
stone owl the elite worship at Bohemian Grove), and, "Astaroth,"
(described as the Lord Treasurer of Hell).

   The Hexagram was also used to represent Saturn, which has been
identified as the esoteric name for, "Satan." This indicates that
anyone killed in the name of Israel is actually a sacrifice to Satan.
These dissenting Jews believe the, "Menorah," the oldest Jewish symbol
should be used and pointed out that the Hexagram is not even a Jewish
symbol, but of course as the Rothschild Zionists use it that is what
ends up on the Rothschild, I mean Zionist, I mean Israeli flag.

   In the early hours of April 19, 132 Jewish terrorists from the
Irgun gang, led by future Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, and
the Stern gang, led by future Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir,
brutally massacre 200 men, women and children as they are sleeping
peacefully in the Arab village of Deir Yassin.

   Following the United Nations transfer of Palestine to an
independent Jewish state and an independent Arab state on May 15, the
Israelis launched a military assault on the Arabs with blaring
loudspeakers on their trucks informing the Arabs that if they did not
flee immediately, they would be slaughtered.

   800,000 Arabs with the recent memory of the Deir Yassin massacre
at the forefront of their minds, fled in panic.  They asked for help
from nighbouring Arab states, but those states did not get involved as
they were no match for the Israelis whose up to date military hardware
had been supplied by the Jewish Stalinist regime in Russia.  Following
this assault, the Jews now controlled 78% of the former Palestine as
oppose to the 57% that had been given to them illegally by the United
Nations.

   The Palestinians, many of them Christians, were never paid
compensation for their homes, property and businesses stolen from them
during this illegal Jewish assault, and these people ended up in slum
refugee cities of tents. Futhermore at least half of the Palestinians
in their hurry to flee, left their birth certificates behind.  The
State of Israel then passed a law that only those who could prove
citizenship were allowed to return to Israel, thus meaning these
400,000 Palestinians could not return and lost all their property they
had left there.

   Ashkenazi Jew, David Ben-Gurion, one of the father founders of
Israel and its first Prime Minister, candidly describes Zionist aims
in his diary (21 May 1948) as follows,

       “The Achilles heel of the Arab coalition is the Lebanon.
Muslim supremacy in this country is artificial and can easily be
overthrown. A Christian State ought to be set up there, with its
southern frontier on the river Litani.

       We would sign a treaty of alliance with this State. Thus when
we have broken the strength of the Arab Legion and bombed Amman, we
could wipe out Trans-Jordan, after that Syria would fall. And if Egypt
still dared to make war on us, we would bomb Port Said, Alexandria and
Cairo.

       We should thus end the war and would have but paid to Egypt,
Assyria and Chaldea on behalf of our ancestors.”

   1949:  On October 1, Mao Tse Tsung declares the founding of the
People's Republic Of China in Tiananmen Square, Beijing.  He is funded
by Rothschild created Communism in Russia and also the following
Rothschild agents:  Solomon Adler, a former United States Treasury
official who was a Soviet Spy; Israel Epstein, the son of a Jewish
Bolshevik imprisoned by the Tsar in Russia for trying to forment a
revolution there; and Frank Coe, a leading official of the Rothschild
owned IMF.

   1950: Israel passes their law of return, guaranteeing every Jew
worldwide the right to dwell in the state of Israel, however the
Palestinians even though they had lived there for 1300 years, were
denied that right.

   John Davitt, former chief of the Justice Department's internal
security section notes that the Israeli intelligence service is the
second most active in the United States after the Soviets and of
course both Israel and the Soviet Union are run by an Ashkenazi Jewish
leadership.

   1951: On 1 April the Israeli Secret Intelligence Agency the
Mossad, which will go on to terrorize the world, is formed. The motto
of the Mossad is probably the most disgusting secret service motto in
the world, it is,

   "By Way Of Deception,
     Thou Shalt Do War."

   1953: N. M. Rothschild & Sons found the British Newfoundland
Corporation Limited to develop 60,000 square miles of land in
Newfoundland, Canada, which comprised a power station to harness the
power of the Hamilton (later renamed Churchill) Falls. At the time
this was the largest construction project ever to be undertaken by a
private company.

   1954: "The Lavon Affair."  Israeli agents recruit Egyptian
citizens of Jewish descent to bomb Western targets in Egypt, and plant
evidence to frame Arabs, in an apparent attempt to upset
American/Egyptian relations. Israeli defense minister, Ashkenazi Jew,
Pinhas Lavon is eventually removed from office, though many think real
responsibility lay with David Ben-Gurion.

   A hidden microphone planted by the Israelis is discovered in the
Office of the US Ambassador in Tel Aviv.

   1955: Edmond de Rothschild founds Compagnie Financiere, Paris.

   1956: Telephone taps are found connected to two telephones in the
residence of the US military attaché in Tel Aviv.

   1957: James de Rothschild dies and it is reported (by the
Rothschild owned media) that he bequeaths a large sum of money to the
state of Israel to pay for the construction of their parliament
building, the Knesset. He states that the Knesset should be,

       "a symbol, in the eyes of all men, of the permanence of the
State of Israel."

   On page 219 of his book, "Tales of the British Aristocracy," L.G.
Pine, the Editor of Burke’s Peerage, states that the Jews,

       "have made themselves so closely connected with the British
peerage that the two classes are unlikely to suffer loss which is not
mutual. So closely linked are the Jews and the lords that a blow
against the Jews in this country would not be possible without
injuring the aristocracy also."

   Maurice de Rothschild dies in Paris.

   1962: de Rothschild Frères establishes Imétal as an umbrella
company for all their mineral mining interests.

   Frederic Morton publishes his book, The Rothschilds, in which he states,

       "Though they control scores of industrial, commercial, mining
and tourist corporations, not one bears the name Rothschild. Being
private partnerships, the family houses never need to, and never do,
publish a single public balance sheet, or any other report of their
financial condition."

   This attitude reveals the true aim of the Rothschilds, to
eliminate all competition and create their own worldwide monopoly.

   1963: On June 4th President John F. Kennedy (the 35th President of
the United States 1961 – 1963) signs Executive Order 11110 which
returned to the U.S. government the power to issue currency, without
going through the Rosthchilds owned Federal Reserve.

   Less than 6 months later on November 22nd , president Kennedy is
assassinated by the Rothschilds for the same reason as they
assassinated President Abraham Lincoln in 1865, he wanted to print
American money for the American people, as oppose to for the benefit
of a money grabbing war mongering foreign elite.

   This Executive Order 11110, is rescinded by President Lyndon
Baines Johnson (the 36th President of the United States 1963 to 1969)
on Air Force One from Dallas to Washington, the same day as President
Kennedy was assassinated.

   Another, and probably the primary, reason for Kennedy's
assassination is however, the fact that he made it quite clear to
Israeli Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion, that under no circumstances
would he agree to Israel becoming a nuclear state.  The Israeli
newspaper Ha'aretz on February 5, 1999, in a review of, Avner Cohen's
book, "Israel and the Bomb," states the following,

       "The murder of American President John F. Kennedy brought to
an abrupt end the massive pressure being applied by the U.S.
administration on the government of Israel to discontinue the nuclear
program...The book implied that, had Kennedy remained alive, it is
doubtful whether Israel would today have a nuclear option."

   Edmond de Rothschild establishes La Compagnie Financière Edmond de
Rothschild (LCF), in Switzerland as a venture capital house. This
later develops into an investment bank and asset management company
with many affiliates. He also marries his wife Nadine and they have a
son, Benjamin de Rothschild.

   1965: Israel illegally obtains enriched uranium from NUMEC
(Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation).

   1967: The treatment of the Palestinians by the Zionist Jews,
finally ignites enough anger in the Arab world for Egypt, Jordan and
Syria to mobilise on Israel's borders.  All of these three countries
are suddenly attacked by Israel and as a result the Sinai which
included Gaza was stolen from Egypt, and the West Bank and the Jordan
River stolen from Jordan.

   As a result of this, on June 8, the Israelis launch an attack on
the USS Liberty with Israeli aircraft and motor torpedo boats, in an
effort to blame it on Egypt, to bring America into the war on their
side, and of course follow to the letter, their Mossad motto,

   "By Way Of Deception,
   Thou Shalt Do War."

   As a result of their attack, 34 American servicemen were killed
and 174 wounded.  Israel lies as usual, claiming it mistook this
warship that was flying a large United States flag, for an ancient
out-of-service Egyptian horse carrier El Quseir, that was 180 feet
shorter.  They also claim the ship was in the war zone, when it was
actually in international waters, far from any fighting.  The
Israeli's attack on this warship lasts for 75 minutes during which
time they shoot up one of the United States flags, resulting in the
sailors desperately raising another one.

   In the aftermath of this attack, the American sailors who survived
are warned by the United States military not to discuss the matter
with anyone due to, "national security."  This story gets no
prominence in the Rothschild controlled mainstream media and as usual
Israel is in no way even rebuked for their crimes by their subservient
country of America.

   The following day, June 9th, Israel illegally occupies the Golan
Heights which it seizes from Syria. This area goes on to provide
Israel with one third of its fresh water.

   Israeli General Matityahu Peled, is quoted in Ha'aretz (19 March
1972) with the following statement,

       "The thesis that the danger of genocide was hanging over us in
June 1967 and that Israel was fighting for its physical existence is
only bluff, which was born and developed after the war."  Another
sickening and deceptive statement but again at least he's consistent
with the Mossad motto, "By Way Of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War."

   de Rothschild Frères is renamed Banque Rothschild.

   1968: Noémie Halphen, wife of Maurice de Rothschild dies.

   1970: While working for Senator Henry “Scoop” Jackson, Ashkenazi
Jew, Richard Perle is caught by the FBI giving classified information
to Israel. Nothing is done.

   British Prime Minister Edward Heath makes Lord Victor Rothschild
the head of his policy unit. Whilst he is in that role Britain enters
the European Community.

   1973: In his book, None Dare Call It Conspiracy, Gary Allen states,

       "One major reason for the historical blackout on the role of
the international bankers in political history is the Rothschilds were
Jewish…

       ….The Jewish members of the conspiracy have used an
organisation called The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as an instrument
to try and convince everyone that any mention of the Rothschilds and
their allies is an attack on all Jews.

       In this way they have stifled almost all honest scholarship on
international bankers and made the subject taboo within universities.

       Any individual or book exploring this subject is immediately
attacked by hundreds of ADL communities all over the country. The ADL
has never let the truth or logic interfere with its highly
professional smear jobs…

       ….Actually, nobody has a right to be more angry at the
Rothschild clique than their fellow Jews…

       ….The Rothschild empire helped finance Adolf Hitler."”

   George J. Laurer an employee of the Rothschilds controlled IBM,
invents the UPC (Universal Product Code) barcode which will eventually
be placed upon every item traded worldwide and bear the number, 666.
The Book of Revelation, Chapter 13, Verse 17 through 18, states the
following in relation to this number,

       "And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark,
or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

       Here is wisdom.  Let him that hath understanding count the
number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is
Six hundred threescore and six."

   The whole Satanic aims of the Rothschilds are now in full view of
the world, everything bought or sold carries the mark of the beast,
666.

   N. M. Rothschild & Sons British Newfoundland Corporation,
Churchill Falls project in Newfoundland, Canada, is completed.

   N. M. Rothschild & Sons also create a new asset management part of
the company which traded worldwide. This eventually became, Rothschild
Private Management Limited.

   Edmond de Rothschild, a great-grandson of Jacob (James) Mayer
Rothschild, bought the cru bourgeois estate of Château Clarke in
Bordeaux.

   1976:  Ashkenazi Jew, Harold Rosenthal, aide to Ashkenazi Jew,
Senator Jacob Javits, states,

       "Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer."

   1978: Ashkenazi Jew, Stephen Bryen, then a Senate Foreign
Relations Committee staffer, is overheard in a Washington D.C. hotel
offering confidential documents to top Israeli military officials.

   Bryen obtains a lawyer, Nathan Lewin, and the case heads for the
grand jury, but is mysteriously dropped. Bryen later goes to work for
Richard Perle.

   1979: The Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty in 1979 was underwritten
by United States aid which pledged $3 billion annually to Israel from
the United States taxpayer (not even a drop in the ocean when you
consider the amount they make off the Federal Reserve).

   Shin Bet (the Israeli internal security agency) tries to penetrate
the US Consulate General in Jerusalem through a “Honey Trap”, using a
clerical employee who was having an affair with a Jerusalem girl.

   Baron and Baroness Phillipi de Rothschild in a joint venture with
Robert Mondavi, begin the construction of a pyramid in Napa Valley,
California, where the leader/founder of the Church Of Satan, Ashkenazi
Jew, Anton LaVey, was based. This is known as Opus 1 (which means, the
first work), and the front for this temple is that it is a winery.

   1980: The global phenomenon of privatisation starts. The
Rothschilds are behind this from the very beginning in order to seize
control of all publicly owned assets worldwide.

   1981: Banque Rothschild is nationalised by the French government.
The new bank is called, Compagnie Européenne de Banque. The
Rothschilds subsequently set up a successor to this French bank,
Rothschild & Cie Banque (RCB), which goes on to become a leading
French investment house.

   1982:  From September 16 to 18, future Prime Minister of Israel
and then Defence Minister, Ashkenazi Jew, Ariel Sharon, orchestrates
Israel's invasion of Lebanon, which provided ariel lighting in order
to facilitate the killing of between 1000 and 2000 men, women and
children in the Sabra and Shatila massacres.

   1985: Eustace Mullins publishes, "Who Owns The TV Networks," in
which he reveals the Rothschilds have control of all three major U.S.
Networks, which are: NBC; CBS; and ABC.

   The New York Times reports the FBI is aware of at least a dozen
incidents in which American officials transferred classified
information to the Israelis, quoting (former Assistant Director of the
F.B.I.) Raymond Wannal. The Justice Department does not prosecute.

   Richard Smyth, the owner of MILCO, is indicted on charges of
smuggling nuclear timing devices to Israel.

   N. M. Rothschild & Sons advise the British government on the
privatisation of British Gas. They subsequently advise the British
government on virtually all of their other privatisations of state
owned assets including: British Steel; British Coal; all the British
regional electricity boards; and all the British regional water
boards.

   A British MP heavily involved in these privatisations is future
Chancellor of the Exchequer, Norman Lamont, a former Rothschild
banker.

   1986: Mordechai Vanunu a technician at Dimona, Israel's nuclear
installation, from 1976 to 1985, discovers that the plant was secretly
producing nuclear weapons.

   His conscience made him speak out and in 1986 he provided the
London Sunday Times with the facts and photos they used to tell the
world about Israel's nuclear weapons programme.

   His evidence showed that Israel had stockpiled up to 200 nuclear
warheads, with no debate or authorisation from it own citizens. On
30th September 1986, Vanunu was lured from London to Rome. There he
was kidnapped, drugged and shipped to Israel.

   After a secret trial he was sentenced to 18 years for, "treason,"
and, "espionage," (something Israel are very familiar with) though he
had received no payment and had communicated with no foreign power.

   He goes on to be held in complete isolation for 11 years, only
allowed occasional visits from his family, lawyer and a priest,
conducted through a metal screen. Although he completes his sentence,
the Israeli government continues to hold him against his will.

   1987: Edmond de Rothschild creates the World Conservation Bank
which is designed to transfer debts from third world countries to this
bank and in return those countries would give land to this bank. This
is designed so the Rothschilds can gain control of the third world
which represents 30% of the land surface of the Earth.

   On April 24 the Wall Street Journal reveals the, "Role of Israel
in Iran-Contra Scandal Won't be Explored in Detail by Panels."

   1988: The ADL initiate a nationwide competition for law students
to draft anti-hate legislation for minority groups.  That competition
is won by a man named, Joseph Ribakoff, whose thesis proposes that not
only must hate motivated violence be banned, but also any words which
stimulate: supiscion; friction; hate; and possible violence, these
must also be criminalised.

   This ADL prize-winning paper suggests that not only should
state-agencies monitor and restrict free speech in general, but they
should also censor all films that criticize identifiable groups.
Furthermore, even if the person making the statement can justify it,
for example Christians criticizing homosexuality because the bible
expressly forbids it, Ribakoff asserts that the truth is to be no
defence in court.

   The only proof a court will need in order to secure a conviction
of hate speech is that something has been said, and a minority group
or member of such group has felt emotionally damaged as a result of
such criticism.  Therefore, under these proposals which the ADL will
have forced into law all over the world less than 15 years later,
Jesus Christ would have been arrested as a hate criminal.

   This law is designed to protect the Rothschild conspiracy from
being revealed in that if you criticize the Rothschilds criminal
cabal, you will be targeted as anti-semitic, and thus risk
imprisonment.

   Philippe de Rothschild dies.

   1989: Many of the satellite states in Eastern Europe, through the
influence of Glasnost, become more open in their demands of freedom
from Communist governance in their Republics.

   Many revolutions happen in 1989, most of them involving the
overthrow of their respective Communist governments and the
replacement of them with Republics.

   Thus, the hold the Communists had over Eastern Europe (the Iron
Curtain) becomes very weak. Eventually, as a result of Perestroika and
Glasnost, Communism collapses, not only in the Soviet Union but also
in Eastern Europe.

   In Russia, Boris Yeltsin (whose wife is the daughter of Joseph
Stalin’s marriage to Rosa Kaganovich) and the Republican government
takes steps to end the power of the Communist party by suspending and
banning the party and seizing all their property.

   This symbolised the fall of Communism in Russia, and resulted in
the start of a mass exodus of 700,000 Jews from the former Soviet
Union to Israel.

   In the Israeli Journal, Hotam (24 November 1989), there is a
report of a speech that then Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister,
Ashkenazi Jew, Binyamin Netanyahu, gave to students at Bar Ilan
University in which he states,

       "Israel should have exploited the repression of the
demonstrations in China, when world attention focused on that country,
to carry out mass expulsions among the Arabs of the territories."

   The London and Paris Rothschilds announce the launch of a new
subsidiary, Rothschild GmbH, in Frankfurt, Germany.

   1991:  Following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait on August 2, 1990,
on January 16 of this year the United States and Britain began an
aerial bombing campaign of targets within Iraq.  On 24 February the
ground campaign commenced which was to last 100 hours until on
February 28 when a horrendous war crime occurred.

   This crime was the slaughter of 150,000 Iraqi troops with fuel air
bombs.  These Iraqis were fleeing on a crowded highway from Kuwait to
Basra.  President George Herbert Walker Bush ordered United States
military aircraft and ground units to kill these surrendering troops,
they were then bulldozed into mass unmarked graves in the desert, some
still alive.

   President Bush then ordered a cessation of hostilities.  What was
the significance of this slaughter and President Bush declaring the
war over on this day?  Well it was the day the, "Day of Purim," fell
on this year.  This the day the Jews celebrate their victory over
Ancient Babylon, now based within the borders of Iraq and a day when
the Jews are encouraged to get bloody revenge against their perceived
enemies.

   At the Bilderberg Conference on June 6 to 9 of this year, in
Baden-Baden, Germany, David Rockefeller (a Rothschild) made the
following statement,

       "We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times,
Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have
attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for
almost 40 years.  It would have been impossible for us to develop our
plan for the world, if we had been subjected to the lights of
publicity during those years.

       But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march
towards a world government.  The super-national sovereignty of an
intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the
national auto-determination practised in past centuries."

   1992: In March, former Federal Reserve Board Chairman, Paul A.
Volker became Chairman of the European banking firm, J. Rothschild,
Wolfensohn and Co.

   Stephen Bryen, caught offering confidential documents to Israel in
1978, is serving on board of the pro-Israeli Jewish Institute for
National Security Affairs while continuing as a paid consultant, with
security clearance, on exports of sensitive US technology.

   “The Samson Option,” by Seymour M. Hersh reports,

       “Illicitly obtained intelligence was flying so voluminously
from LAKAM (a secret Israeli intelligence unit, a Hebrew acronym for
Scientific Liaison Bureau) into Israeli intelligence that a special
code name, JUMBO, was added to the security markings already on the
documents. There were strict orders, Ari Ben-Menashe recalled,
“Anything marked JUMBO was not supposed to be discussed with your
American counterparts.”

   The Wall Street Journal reports that Israeli agents apparently
tried to steal Recon Optical Inc's top-secret airborne spy-camera
system.

   On September 16th Britain’s pound collapses when currency
speculators led by Rothschild agent, Ashkenazi Jew, George Soros,
borrow pounds and sell them for Deutsche Marks, in the expectation of
being able to repay the loan in devalued currency and to pocket the
difference.

   This results in the British Chancellor of the Exchequer, Norman
Lamont, announcing a rise in interest rates of 5% in one day and as a
result drives Britain into a recession which lasts many years as large
numbers of businesses fail and the housing market crashes.

   This is right on cue for the Rothschilds, after they had
privatised Britain’s state owned assets during the 1980’s, driven the
share price up, and then collapsed the markets so they could buy them
up for pennies on the pound, a carbon copy of what Nathan Mayer
Rothschild did to the British economy 180 years before, in 1812.

   It cannot be overstated that the Chancellor of the Exchequer at
that time, Norman Lamont, prior to becoming a MP, was a Merchant
Banker with N. M. Rothschild and Sons, who he joined after reading
Economics at Cambridge.

   1993: Norman Lamont leaves the British government to return to N.
M. Rothschild and Sons as a director, after his mission to collapse
the British economy to profit the Rothschilds is accomplished.

   Former Congressman, Paul Findley publishes his seminal book,
Deliberate Deceptions: Facing the Facts About the U.S. Israeli
Relationship.

   In this book he lists the 65 United Nations Member Resolutions
against Israel from the period 1955 to 1992, and the 30 United States
vetoes on Israel’s behalf which if not made would have seen Israel
have 95 resolutions against them at this point.

   No matter, even with Israel’s puppet the United States helping
them terrorise others, the 65 Resolutions passed against Israel are
more than all the Resolutions passed against all other countries
combined.

   Not that Israel care too much about the views of the United
Nations when you consider that less than two weeks after Israel’s
attack on the USS Liberty (an attack designed to sink the Liberty and
blame it on Egypt prompting the USA into a war with Egypt on behalf of
Israeli Lies, remember the Mossad motto, “By Way Of Deception, Thou
Shalt Do War”), the Israeli Foreign Minister, Aba Eban, stated of the
United Nations,

       "If the General Assembly were to vote by 121 votes to 1 in
favor of, "Israel," returning to the armistice lines (pre June 1967
borders), "Israel," would refuse to comply with the decision," New
York Times – 19 June 1967.

   The ADL is caught operating a massive spying operation on critics
of Israel, Arab-Americans, the San Francisco Labor Council, ILWU Local
10, Oakland Educational Association, NAACP, Irish Northern Aid,
International Indian Treaty Council, the Asian Law Caucus and the San
Francisco Police.

   Data collected was sent to Israel and in some cases to South
Africa. Pressure from Jewish organizations forces the city to drop the
criminal case, but the ADL settles a civil lawsuit for an undisclosed
sum of cash.

   1995: Former atomic energy scientist, Dr Kitty Little claims the
Rothschilds now control 80% of the world’s uranium supplies giving
them a monopoly over nuclear power.

   The Defense Investigative Service circulates a memo warning US
military contractors that,

       "Israel aggressively collects (US) military and industrial technology."

   The report stated that Israel obtains information using,

       "ethnic targeting, financial aggrandizement, and
identification and exploitation of individual frailties," of US
citizens.

   1996: A General Accounting Office report, "Defense Industrial
Security: Weaknesses in US Security Arrangements With Foreign-Owned
Defense Contractors," found that according to intelligence sources,
"Country A," (identified by intelligence sources as Israel, Washington
Times, 22 February 1996),

       "conducts the most aggressive espionage operation against the
United States of any US ally."
       A pdf file of the report is here:
       www.gao.gov/archive/1996/ns96064.pdf

       An unformated text version is here:
       http://fas.org/man/gao/gao9664.htm


   The Jerusalem Post (30 August 1996) quoted the report,

       "“Classified military information and sensitive military
technologies are high-priority targets for the intelligence agencies
of this country."

   The report described, "An espionage operation run by the
intelligence organization responsible for collecting scientific and
technologic information for (Israel) paid a US government employee to
obtain US classified military intelligence documents."

   The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (Shawn L. Twing,
April 1996) noted that this was,

       "a reference to the 1985 arrest of Jonathan Pollard, a
civilian US naval intelligence analyst who provided Israel's LAKAM
espionage agency an estimated 800,000 pages of classified US
intelligence information."
       www.washington-report.org/backissues/0496/9604014.htm

   The GAO report also noted that, "Several citizens of (Israel) were
caught in the United States stealing sensitive technology used in
manufacturing artillery gun tubes."

   An Office of Naval Intelligence document, "Worldwide Challenges to
Naval Strike Warfare" reported that,

       "US technology has been acquired (by China) through Israel in
the form of the Lavi fighter and possibly SAM (surface-to-air) missile

   Ben-Gurion: The Armed Prophet - Michael Bar-Zohar - 1967

   The Hidden Tyranny - Benjamin Freedman - 1971

   None Dare Call It Conspiracy - Gary Allen - 1972

   The Gulag Archipelago, Vol. 2, Parts 3 and 4 - Aleksandr
Solzhenitsyn - First English translation published 1975.

   Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler - Anthony C. Sutton - 1976

   The Rosenthal Document - Walter White, Jr. - 1978

   Two Rothschilds And The Land Of Israel - Simon Schama - 1978

   The Six Pointed Star - Dr O. J. Graham - 1984

   The Last Days In America - Bob Fraley - 1984

   Who Owns The TV Networks - Eustace Mullins - 1985

   The Samson Option: Israel's Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign
Policy - Seymour M. Hersh - 1991

   A History of the Jews in America - Howard M. Sachar - 1992

   Deliberate Deceptions: Facing the Facts About the U.S. Israeli
Relationship - Paul Findley - 1993

   Descent Into Slavery - Des Griffin - 1994

   Bloodlines Of The Illuminati - Fritz Springmeier - 1995

   Jewish History, Jewish Religion - Israel Shahak - 1994

   Satan Speaks - Anton Szandor LaVey - 1998

   The Elite Serial Killers of Lincoln, JFK, RFK & MLK - Robert
Gaylon Ross - 2001

   Never Again?  The Threat Of The New Anti-Semitism - Abraham H. Foxman - 2004

   The Elite Don’t Dare Let Us Tell The People - Robert Gaylon Ross - 2004

   Codex Magica - Texe Marrs - 2005


The same people and companies behind the Nazi German Holocaust and
produced the ZyklonB gas chambers, steel, other chemicals, munitions
for the death camps where they mass murdered  over 10 million Jews and
Freemasons are behind the Codex Alimentarius Commission food,
nutrients, minerals and herbs consumer protection code labelling
protection scam to mass murder over 3 million people on planet
earth......Click here to read the full story

Major Interntaional Industrial Companies, Banking Groups, powerful
banking and business families and media owners and controllers which
include Bayer, IG Farben, The Rockerfeller Family, The Rothchild
Family, Rupert Murdoch and his media companies News Corporation and
News International, Conrad Black, Fritz Teer Meer, have secretly
played their part in helping to create the Codex Alimentarius
Commission in 1963 and its mummy and daddy organisations the World
Health Organisation (WHO)and the Food and Agriculture Organisation of
the Unitd Namtions (FAO)  as world wide bodies rules and regulations
that can override an individual country's rules and regulations  on
food, nutrients, minerals and herbs consumer protection code labelling
protection.  scam to mass murder over 3 million people on planet earth
through various methods including starvation of nutrients in their
food and increasing levels of terrifyingly dangerous poisoness
pesticides and bovine growth hormones in all types of food including
fruit vegetables, seeds, net, fish, pountry, lamb, pig, cows, etc. to
completely control all food production, coding, labelling,
distribution etc.

The British Prime Minister Lloyd George claimed, in 1909, that Lord
Nathan Rothschild was the most powerful man in Britain.   By the end
of the century, the family owned, or had built, at the lowest
estimates, over 41 palaces, of a scale and luxury perhaps unparalleled
even by the richest Royal families. In 1816, four of the brothers were
each elevated to the hereditary nobility by Austrian EmperorFrancis I;
Nathan was elevated in 1818. All of them were granted the Austrian
title of baron orFreiherr on 29 September 1822. As such, some members
of the family used "de" or "von" Rothschild to acknowledge the grant
of nobility. In 1885, Nathan Mayer Rothschild II (1840–1915) of the
London branch of the family, was granted the hereditary peerage title
Baron Rothschild in the Peerage of the United Kingdom.Many Rothschilds
were and are supporters of the State of Israel, although other members
of the family opposed the creation of the state.[21] Lord Victor
Rothschild was against granting asylum or even help to Jewish refugees
during the Holocaust.[22] However, Baron Edmond James de Rothschild
was a patron of the first settlement in Palestine atRishon-LeZion, and
bought from Ottoman landlords many parts of the land which now makes
up present-day Israel. In 1917 Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild
was the addressee of the Balfour Declaration, which committed the
British government to the establishment in Palestine of a national
home for the Jewish people.

James A. de Rothschild financed the Knesset building as a gift to the
State of Israel.

The Supreme Court of Israel building was donated to Israel by Dorothy
de Rothschild.[23] Outside the President's Chamber is displayed the
letter Mrs Rothschild wrote to Prime Minister Shimon Peres expressing
her intention to donate a new building for the Supreme Court.[24]

Rothschild family banking businesses pioneered international high
finance during the industrialisation of Europe and were instrumental
in supporting railway systems across the world and in complex
government financing for projects such as the Suez Canal. The family
bought up a large proportion of the property inMayfair, London. Major
businesses directly founded by Rothschild family capital include
Alliance Assurance (1824) (now Royal & SunAlliance); Chemin de Fer du
Nord (1845); Rio Tinto Group (1873); Société Le Nickel (1880) (now
Eramet); and Imétal (1962) (now Imerys). The Rothschilds financed
Cecil Rhodes on his expeditions in Africa, the founding of De Beers
and the creation of the colony of Rhodesia.
http://www.blacklistednews.com/?news_id=5768
http://www.codexcorp.com/
CODEX CORP:  Specialising in Corrections and Healthcare, it may be an
unusual combination but it works for us, our partners and customers
who want to keep a close control and watch on the use of health care
and nutritional products in the community and with our unique and far
reaching security and monitoring systems we will be able to tell our
customers instantly if anyone in the world is using nutrients and
minerals that are not Codex approved  and compliant, and have them
quickly detained and punished for not complying with Codex approved
and compliant products. With Codex we are proud to say that no one
will escape detection. Codex Corporation and its founders have over
100 years experience in this business including the management and
design of the concentration camps in Germany. Codex Corporation was
originally the multi billion  International Giant I G Farben.
A quick background on our founding company I G Farben and its
directors and managers will help convince you that as far as security,
nutrient and health care management, people management, corrections
management, Codex ( Formerly IG Farben) is the company you should
chose for any issues in Corrections and Heathcare Management. Codex
and its security management has the ability to make sure there is no
health freedom. not just in the USA but all over the world... and
Codex has the ability to make sure anyone that tries to think for a
minute they can get way with trying to have health freedom, will
quickly be caught, detained and punished by Codex's unique and far
reaching security and monitoring systems...The Codex Moto
is
"None will escape detection and punishment of the unauthorised use of
nutrients with Codex on the job....just look at out success record in
designing and managing the concentration camp in Germany....our
success record at Codex Corporation, formerly IG Farben in people,
healthcare and corrections management speaks for itself"
Codex Corporation's, formerly IG Farben's 100 year History in People,
Healthcare and Corrections Management
provided from Codex Alimentarius Speach by Dr Rimal Laibox MD of the
Natural Solutions Fioundation, Produced by EON the Ecological Options
Network for Bauman College in cooperation with the Natural Solutions
Foundation and the National Association of Nutrition Professionals
(NANP) 2005 www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
Dr Rimal Laibox is an experienced healthcare professional and has
studies Codex Corporation, formerly IG Farben's progess ov erthe last
decade to become  the leaders in People, Healthcare and Corrections
Management in the United States.
Codex and Nutricide
" Let me tell you about Codex Alimentarius, let me define it for you,
let me help you understand the enemy..and let me assure you that
absolutely nothing that I am going to tell you, is exagerated, is
interperlated, or is imagined. Every thing I am going to tell you is
documented. A great deal of it is documented on my website,
whichwww.HealthFreedomUSA.org. Let me back up and tell you that I have
been watching Codex come toward us for about the last decade. ,,, and
I have been watching the vote sin congress, which God help us is our
bastion of support and protection against Codex and I will explain why
that is. I have been watching the votes to protect our health freedom
dwindle, until finally in the 109th Congress, without a good deal of
activity, we didn't have the votes to protect us. I have been watching
Codex excellerate and I have been watching it expand, and I have been
getting more and more troubled. Let me give you a brief run down of
Codex then. After the second world war, the Nuremberg Tribunals were
held in which people who had committed crimes against humanity were
judged by the world community in a court run by the United States and
Britain...  and they were sentenced to terms in prison if they were
found guilty of crimes against humanity. In 1948 some of the people
who were found guilty of crimes against humanity on the basis of mass
murder, slavery and other crimes were the president and 24 board
members and executives  of a hugh industrial megalith called IG
Farben. Amazingly enough however, by 1951 all of them had already been
released, and and continuing to consult with German Corporations IG
Farben produced the gas used in the gas chambers Zyklon B, they
produced the steel for the death camps and the rail road line, they
produced the munitions, they produced chemicals, they produced all
kinds of stuff. The Nuremberg Tribunal disolved IG Farben into
companies such as  into BASF - Hoechst - Bayer They produced
pharmaceuticals.. a big big pharacuticals company.  So the president
of IG Farben Fritz ter Meer, the senior manager at IB Farben, was
convicted of crimes against Humanity on the basis of mass murder,
slavery and other crimes on 29th July, 1948. Although he co-operated
with SS and the Final Solution, Fritz ter Meer was sentenced to 7
years only in War Criminal Prison, but only served about three years
in prison, no more someone that bounces a business cheque for say
$1,000 and is charged for fraud in the $1,000 bounced cheque for it
not being honoured on presentation. Someone steals an apple can get 3
years in prison also, or if he or she stole the apple as a servant
they can receive 7 years in prison,
Now Fritz ter Meer is sort of an artistic fellow and he was the one
responsible for the slogan that people saw as they entered Autswitz,
usually for the last time, "Work Brings Freedom". Fritz ter Meer was a
creative sort of fellow. Fritz ter Meer was responsible for the slogan
that people saw as they entered Auschwitz-, usually for the last time,
 " Work brings  Freedom....a creative sort of fellow.
You will notice that the institutions that Fritz ter Meer worked for
an/or had shareholdings in as listed by Wikepedia are
Institutions IG Farben, Bayer, Codex Alimentarius
The Bayer executive Fritz ter Meer, sentenced to seven years in prison
by the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, was made head of the supervisory
board of Bayer in 1956, after his release.
Fritz ter Meer ( July 4 1884 – October 27 1967 ) was a German chemist.
He was the son of Edmund ter Meer the founder of a chemical company
that later became part of Bayer. Fritz ter Meer also worked for Bayer
and later IG Farben. He was involved in the planning of Monowitz
concentration camp, a satellite camp of KZ Auschwitz. He was sentenced
to seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948. After he was
released in 1951 he became supervisory board chairman
(Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He retired in 1961.
The Bayer company then became part of IG Farben, a conglomerate of
German chemical industries that formed a part of the financial core of
the German Nazi regime. IG Farben owned 42.5% of the company that
manufactured Zyklon B,[2] a chemical used in the gas chambers of
Auschwitz and other extermination camps. During World War II, the
company also extensively used slave labor in factories attached to
large slave labor camps, notably the sub-camps of the Mauthausen-Gusen
concentration camp[3]. When the Allies split IG Farben into several
pieces after World War II for involvement in organized Nazi war
crimes, Bayer re-appeared as an individual business. The Bayer
executive Fritz ter Meer, sentenced to seven years in prison by the
Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, was made head of the supervisory board
of Bayer in 1956, after his release.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_ter_Meer
Fritz ter Meer
undefined
Fritz ter Meer
Born June 4, 1884
Uerdingen, Germany
Died October 27, 1967 (aged 83)
Leverkusen, Germany
Nationality German
Institutions IG Farben, Bayer, Codex Alimentarius
Fritz ter Meer ( July 4 1884 – October 27 1967 ) was a German chemist.
He was the son of Edmund ter Meer the founder of a chemical company
that later became part of Bayer. Fritz ter Meer also worked for Bayer
and later IG Farben. He was involved in the planning of Monowitz
concentration camp, a satellite camp of KZ Auschwitz. He was sentenced
to seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948. After he was
released in 1951 he became supervisory board chairman
(Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He retired in 1961.
   * Heine, Jens Ulrich (1990). Verstand und Schicksal. Die Männer
der I.G. Farbenindustrie A.G. (1925-1945). Weinheim; New York:
VCH.ISBN 978-3527281442.
   * Codex Alimentarius Commission [1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_ter_Meer
Edmund ter Meer ( 1852 – November 5, 1931) was a German chemist who
discovered the ter Meer reaction and founded in 1877 the ter Meer dye
company in Uerdingen. After the fusion with the aniline factory of
Julius Weiler the Weiler-ter Meer company was formed. This company
later became part of the Bayer company. His son Fritz ter Meer also
became a chemist associated to the Bayer company.
Edmund ter Meer
Born 1852
Died  November 5, 1931 (aged 79)
Nationality German
Institutions Bayer
Known for ter Meer reaction
References
   * Max Bodenstein, H. Leuchs (1931). "Sitzung vom 16. November
1931". Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft 64 (11):
A211–A212. doi:10.1002/cber.19310641139.*
   * ter Meer Prize University Bonn
   * "Ter Meer family." Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online
   * Uerdingen industrial area history
So Fritz ter Meer was sitting in jail and he said "well, that didn't
work..what else can we do?   I've got it food..he who controls food
controls ....the world..."  Fritz ter Meer  got out of jail he went to
his  UN buddies and said "Have I got an idea for you..if we take over
food world wide..we have power world wide, and his UN buddies said.
"cool idea". So they created a Trade Commission. That's a very
powerful set of words... A Trade Commission....called the Codex
Alimentarius Commission
It is not a Public Health Commission..it is not a Consumer Protection
Commission....it is a Trade Commission. Trade is about what? Money!!
Trade is about Business!! Trade is about Profit!! Well they said in
1962 we're going to work towards total, global implimentation of Codex
Alimentarius on December 31st, 2009. Long Term.... and they set up a
bunch of committees.. committees on fish and fishery...fats and oil...
fruits and vegetables... ground nuts...nutritian  for special diatary
uses and so on. There are currently about 27 Codex committees, they
are regional organisations, there are task forces and so anf so on. So
it's ahugh beaurocratic mostrosety.it's emence. Codex has promogated
well over 4,000 guidelines, standards and regulations on
everything...everything which can legally be put into your mouth, with
the excpetion of Pharmaceuticals. they are not part of Codex. That is
an importand point. Now Codex standards have no legal weight
whatsoever. Zero. So who cares about them..their just standards...so
we are talking about an industry setting regulation organisation, but
if it has no legal standing .. who cares? Right!! Here's the history
of Codex Alimentarius before 1962.
Please note here that Fritz ter Meer  was sentenced to seven years
prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948 having been found guilty of
crimes against humanity on the basis of mass murder, slavery and other
crimes . After he was released in 1951 he became supervisory board
chairman (Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He officiialy
retired as supervisory board chairman of Bayer AG in 1961 so he could
behind the scene concentrate of working with his UN buddies on
developing his idea of  setting up a syatem that will control the
whoole world's food supply under the code name Codex Alimentarius. It
would not look good publicly for Fritz ter Meer  who was sentenced to
only seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948 having been
found guilty of crimes against humanity on the basis of mass murder,
slavery and other crimes, and only served about three years of his
sentence because of his powerful UN buddies, to be seen to be publicly
be involved with Codex Alimentarius. Here's the history of Codex
Alimentarius before 1962. The Austian Hungarian Empire said we need
rules by which the courts can rule on cases involving food.o we'll
have regulations and rules that the courts will enforce.... that's how
they get their way. That was called the Codex Alimentarius and  was
put into place around 1893 and lasted until the end of the Austrian
Hungarian Empire in the first world war. So the idea was there in the
Germanic tradition. We need rules..lots of rules...lots a
nd lots and lots of rules..we need a lot of rules... let's have rules
for everything to do with food. So it was a natural extention for the
German Industrialists to say we'll go back to the good old days of
Codex Alimentarius back  when we had them in Austrian Hungarian
Empire. Cool. So they started promilgating their rules and regulations
and they were voluntary. They were sort of guidlines. Now Codex
Alimentarius Commission is administered by the World Health
Oganisation (WHO) and the Food and Aricultural Organisation (FAO)  and
they fund Codex and they run it at the request of the United Nations
(UN). So the're mummy and daddy to Codex Alimentarius.  And that's
very interesting because they're supposed to be about health and food
world wide. Some conflicts of interest that we'll talk about. So
Codex started promilgating regulations and rules, and the way that's
done is that the committees work up a rule, a standard, a guideline,
or regulation an dthey get it to what's called a step 8 which is the
final step in their administrative process... and then it's presented
to the Codex Alimentarius Commission for ratification, like the
vitamin and mineral guidline was presented to the Codex Alimentarius
Commission on July 4th this past summer (2005). It was ratified... it
was approved by consensus...and it is now...despite the propaganda
that your going to hear if you every hear about it in the media... it
is now mandatory on any member country and the WTO, the World Trade
Organisation. Well what in the world do they have to do with it? And
the answer is everything. The World Trade Organisation you see
accepted Codex when the world organisation was formed in 1994. They
said, "well how are we going to decide trade disputes around food if
we don't have a set of rules. I know..we'll accept the Codex
Alimentarius rules and all the members of the WTO will...willl world
wide...get ready for an Orwellian Term will harmonise with are
standards, with the codex standards.. I suggest you capitalise the
first four letters in your mind ...HARM... onise ... everybody is
supposed to .HARM... onise... with Codex....   and when they HARM...
onise with Codex, then if the get pulled into the WTO Dispute
Resolution Process they have a chance of winning because here's the
kicker... are you ready for this one ...  if two countries go into the
World Trade Organisation Dispute Resolution Process  and one of then
is Codex compliant, and one of them is not Codex Compliant.. the one
that is Codex Compliant automaticlly wins regardless of the merit of
the case.  People are using Codex Compliant in a much bigger economic
battle. So every couunty in the world is racing to do what?   Become
Codex Compliant. So in the United States...the situation is OK ..how
do we become Codex compliant when we have laws that protect us. You
have to remember that Codex does not serve consumer well being. Codex
does not serve what I call the five Bigs...Big Pharma Big Chema Big
Biotechna Big AgriBiz and Bid Medica ,,,little me and little you are
not served by Codex, in the least, so before we go forward and talk
about the rest of  what has to happen, let's ask what Codex does?
You probably all know about the vitamin and mineral guidline that was
ratified on July 4th ( 2005). You may not kow that although it is said
that CODEX regulations guidlines and standards that have been ratified
are volantary....That Are Not Voluntary...That is known as a lie!!!
They are mandatory..but  thye ar enot fully mandatory until December,
31st 2009. They're sort of kinda a little bit mandatory now. and
they're totally mandatory then. So what does Codex do? Why do I care
enough about Codex to close my practice and stop treating patients who
came to me from around the world..to help them regain their health and
be radiantly well with non toxic means which is a very satisfying
thing to do.. I love it...it also provided me with an income...  that
was nice. OK...;why am I concerned enough, let's talk about the
mineral and vitamin guidline first. In 1994 DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments
Health and Education Act was passed which classifies nutrient and
herbs as foods. As foods you can set no upper limit on them. You
cannot set an upper limit on lettuce...lamb or  roodibaggers.. and
similarily you cannot set an upper limit in vitamin C.. echanasia...
ginko bi loba ... vitamin D ...    to nutrients is freely given to
us.. We are allowed to have any nutients we want because.... this is a
very important point... under common law ...  What's not forbidden is
permitted.... Codex on the other hand  ... is a Napoleonic Code
...What's not permitted is forbidden law system... under Napoleonic
Code ...anything not permitted is forbidden ...  that's called a
positive list .... so vitamins and nutrients and minerals ... in 1994
we passed DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act was
passed which classifies nutrient and herbs as foods... we can have as
much of them as we want thatis our business... in 1994 Codex with no
notice here in this country whatsoever.. prepared nutrents ... put on
you intellectual seatbelts...declared nutrients to be toxins. they're
poisens ... dangerous Industrial poisens ... AS POISENS ... WE HAVE TO
BE PROTECTED FROM THEM ...how  do you protect someone from poisens ...
you use toxicology ... you use a science called risk assessment ..lt's
take a primer on risk assessment  .. first you take the substance
that's dangerous and feed it to animals, and the dosage that kills 50%
of them ..that's called the LD 50 ... and you exstrapulate what the LD
50 for human being might be.,,then you go down to the other end of the
dosage range ...and you start feeding ittie bittie tiny bits of it ..
 to test animals ... and you come up with the largest possible dose
...the maximum  permissable upper limit  ... that can be fed to an
animal before a discernable impact  is shown ..OK ... no discernable
impact .... then you divide that by 100 ... that's how they do it in
risk assessment ... and now you've got a safety margin ...  so you
have one 100th of the dose that can be given with no discernable
impact ...   OK nutrients! Under Codex!!!    Not only are limited to
those nutriants on the positive list ...and  we  anticipate there will
be 18 of them .. and they do not include.  .  CoQ10  Glucosamine ...
cundroyton sulfate ...thye do include floride ... which to my
knowledge as a Physician has absolutely no biological benefit
whatsoever. ... but it does make people complasent ... floride was
first used in the Goolog  ...because it was discovered that prisoners
who were fed floridated water ...  were complasent ...  and you could
do anything you wanted to them ...  they were easy  to manage ... so
you have 18 nutrients  ... you have ittie bittie tiny winy doses ...
that are determined scientifically to have no effect ...  on any human
being  now in this country we have a problem ... we have ...DSHEA
-Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act ... we have to get rid of
DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act  in order to  HARM
...on..ise ... with Codex... that part of Codex anyway .... so how do
we get rid of DSHEA ...  we attack it legislatively of course .. and
...  there are five.. count them.. five currently before Congress ...
designed to overturn ..gut ... invalidate .. and otherwise get rid of
DSHEA ...  because once DSHEA is gone we can HARM...on..ise with the
vitamin and mineral guideline   ...  so what we are talking about is
....  waking up one morning to find that high potency therapudicly
effective clinicly significant nutrients are illegal ....
(Codex want to make nutients illegal ) in the way that Heroin is
illegal ..not available with a prescription ... Illegal ...  If these
nutrients have any impact on  the Human body ...  they are illegal ...
that's just the vitamin and mineral guidline ... let's talk about milk
.... we have    recombinant bovine  growth hormone and now we can
choose milk with it and milk without it ... butter with it or butter
without it ..right ...not under Codex ... because under Codex ...
every dairy cow ...  on the planet must be treated with Monsanto's
recombinant bovine hormone.... furthermore ..under Codex ... every
animal used for food on the planent whether it has fins, feet or
feathers ... every animal on the planet must be treated with sub
clinical antibiotics and and must be treated with exogenous growth
hormones ... Codex requires (mandates) that all food be irradiated
unless it's eaten locally and raw. including organic food of course
... so is it organic afterwards... well of course the organic
standards are incredibly low ...the organic  standards allow a farmer
to use vetinary drugs including exogenous growth hormone, anti biotics
etc ....on animals and then at his whim, reclassify them as organic
...  but farmers are our friends  and they would never do
that...right!!!  Right!!  Codex sets limits for the dangerous
industrial chemicals that you can have in your food..and the limits
are increditbly high ... go to Codex Alimentarius Commission ... look
at the toxins and vetinary  Chemicals  and the levels that are set.,,
they are terrifying ot me ..Terrifying ... the names of the Chemicals
that are permitted and the amounts of the chemicals that are permitted
are terrifying to me ...Why am I terrified?  Well perhaps I am just a
cowardly person ...it's possible... think about this.. in 2001,
"The levels that are permitted, developed and maintained by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission, by the are incredibly high in toxins and the
levels that are set the names and amounts of the chemicals are
terrifying..." states Dr Rimal Laibox MD a director of the National
Association of Nutrition Professionals (NANP)
In 2001, 176 Countries including the USA got together and stated that
there were 12 really bad dangerous organic chemicals  Chemicals.
They're called "Pops".,,"Persistent Organic Pollutants. There are a
lot of them, but there are 12 that are so bad that, nobody could
disagree that those 12 Pops had to be banned worldwide.Nine of the 12
worst organic Chemicals known are pesticides...not
surprisingly..because they kill things..and of course we have many
processes and enzime systems that are very much like insects and other
pests so, they are not too good for us..but Codex has different
ideas...Codex has brought back 7 of the 9 forbidden POPS, that 176
countries  banned
worldwide,,,Dieldrin..Aldrin...hexaclorabenzine...etc..and the food
that is imported from other countries that contains these substances
can not be stopped at our borders..because otherwise it would be God
Forbid, a Trade Violation...that's how Codex works..Codex, according
to the World Trade Organisation  (WTO) and the Food and Agricultural
Organisation's (FAO) joint projections..now I didn't  make this
up...please if you have unfastened you're Intellectual Seat
Belts...put them back on again...if you do the numbers in the WHO- FAO
projections in their report headed Diet Nutrition and Prevention of
Chronic Diseases..that just the vitamin and mineral guideline
alone...when it goes into global implimentation..on December 31st,
2009...will result in a minimum of 3 billion (that's B... Bad... Big
Billion) deaths - onee billion through simple starvation..those folks
who die ar not particularily economicly successful from the point of
view of the Corporations..when you're starving to death, how much good
can you do, when the issue is that how much can you buy.. not a lot..
forget them..but Hah..but the next  two billion...they will die from
the preventable diseases (two billion people will die from diseases of
under nutrition)..of under nutrition// cancer.. the single most
profitable condition known to human kind..Cardiovacular Disease..a
good second...diabetis...pritty good producer of income...and a whole
host of other preventable diseases. Who will die? Who Knows? Who Will
Live? Probably those people who are wealthy enough and powerful enough
to have their own pushers of clean food and nutriants..that's who will
live!!!  You and I? ..probably not...our children? probably not...our
grand children?...probably not!!! So we're talking about food
regulations that are in fact are the legalisation of the mandated
toxicity and under nutrition..It will become illegal..if there is a
famine...where ever there is a famine...to ship high nutriant density
biscuits to that country.. and it will be illegal to distribute
them...that's what we're talking about!!! Codex is Big and It's
Bad..but it's not invunerable. So the point is...that we have to
protect ourselves, and I believe we have to regain global leadership,
which we have lost. surrendered..squandered..ah..sold..we have
sold..just joining the World Trade Organisation (WTO), surended our
sovereinghty...however as it just happens I have a team of
Constitutional Lawyers..looking at the following question...Are we
members of the WTO? Cause if you remember from High School Civics..the
way you get a treaty to be a real treaty..is to have it ratified by a
two thirds majority of the Senate...and the way we got into the WTO
was, they passed a law allowing Bill Clinton to fast track us into the
WTO. "That's Not A Treaty"...the USA is not legally not a member of
the WTO..now that's a piece of the battle...Someone says from the
audience.."you will have to tell George Bush.." we will tell George
Bush , but George Bush will not be relevant when we do tell
him..ah..so that's a piece of it, but that's not going to save our
lives right now because..do you know..picture in your mind...a wasp or
a bee trap..where the insect voluntarily goes down the funnel and then
can't get up out of the trap again..that's Codex..a regular law can be
over turned..it can be repealed...it can be corrected..by  another
piece of legislation..but once we become Codex Compliant...in any
area...as long as we are members of the WTO..it can never be
repealed...because we have lost the sovereignty to become un_codex
compliant as long as we are in the WTO, so it's like going down that
funnel and not being able to get back out of it. So it's very
important that we make sure that we do not become codex
compliant...but we will be hit with all those big trade sanctions from
the countries that are codex compliant.. so that the country will be
destroyed economically..right..no remember surprise..one of the
principles of war...remember mass..where you take your strength
against the enemies weekness andweek points. Well here's what we've
done.  We have a team of lawyers, who have spent hundreds of hours
with us pro bono..these are good guy lawyers...these two gentlemen and
we have spent hundreds of hours studying Codex, understanding it's
weekness..it's weeknesses..a lot of weeknesses.. and constructing a
strategy..which 'will take the succer down'....It will take it
down...but I need you...you are people that other people come to about
safe healthy food..and nutrients...
National Association of Nutritrional Professionals NANP 2005
Conference..you are ready made disenimation points..you are the
thousand million.... hundred million points of light. Here's what is
happening. Every country in the world has to be Codex compliant in
order not to get hit by WTO trade sanctions, as I told you of their
members of Codex and the WTO..and there are a few countries that are
not, but I can guarantee you they are not of any major significance.
So. the question is...What is Codex Compliance mean?
Well, most people in most countries..most legislators believe that
they have to adopt  as their national standard on that particular
subject...what Codex ratified. But that's not the case, any more than
we're in the WTO. That's not the case either. What this means is that
the format..the issues and the subjects..covered by a Codex
Guideline...Standard or Regulation..have to be addressed in the
country's guideline standard or regulation on the same topic. So what
we have done is create the first of many alternative Codex guidelines.
You can go to our website www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and you will see a
little button on the upper right handside that says sign this citzen's
partition. Now to briefly digress the citizen's partition is not like
a grocery store partition that you sign and bring to somebody and say
'I have 200,000 signatures and they dump it in the waist basket,
because it is in their mind, it is one signature that you and your
friends wrote 200,000 names. No...it is a legal challenge to the
policy of the United States Government on Codex. It's called a
citizen's partition. It's a legal challenge..We're suing the United
States Government..saying what you're doing is illegal folks...let us
tell you how..we want hearings of fact...we want redress..we want
correction..if we get what we want...that's dandy...if we don't get
what we want we have gone through a process..exhausting administrative
remedies.. we have made the case ripe for court.
So OK, I need you and everybody you know, to sign this citizen's
partition..stating this is a bad policy on mass..and you do this on
the web..and you will see the instructions and we present the
thousands and thousands of pages that we print out that have people's
signatures to the US Codex Office and to the FDA (Federal Drug
Administration) and they don't like that at all..but that's OK.
However, this time..this is the second amendment of the citizen's
partition that we're asking you to sign. This time the revised vitamin
and mineral guideline is part of it. It is part of the law suit saying
this needs to be US Policy. The more voices that say..this is what I
want...and you work for me..Mr and Mrs beaureaucrat and Mr and Mrs
congressman and Mr and Mrs Senator. The more voices the more weight.
So step number one is read and sign the citizen's partition. Step
number two diseminate the information..the weblink. put it out in your
office. get your patients...your friends and neighbours..your
suppliers..to sign the citizens partition and your suppliers..the
companies you use, are going to tell you that you're out of your
minds...they will tell you that Codex is not a problem..and they will
tell you..anyone here have a dog..OK...dog owners know that you ask a
dog to heal..sit down...stay..that's Codex in this country and
worldwide, because the more people that are in Codex comma, the less
trouble they have getting this through...anyone here of the NNFA.the
National Nutrition Foods Association..everybody's heard of the NNFA.
Did you know that the members of the NNFA and not just health foods
stores and manufacturers..but include companies with names you may
have heard...Pfizer ...Merck...Monsanto...Bayer...BASF..Archer Daniels
Midland..Glaxo....Aires..ClyneW elcome ..... you get the
idea..why?..because after DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and
Education Act was passed, and the nutriant business virgined..the
Pharmaceuticals, folks, who are not dumb, said there is gold in them
there pills..and they brought the means of production of many many
many companies.. and they brought the companies themselves..so there
in the nutrient business. What better way to kill the nutrient
business, which is not nearly as profitable as the toxic chemical drug
business, than to take it over. It works everytime..right!!
CRN...anybody here know about CRN..Council for Responsable Nutritian.
Same members...they have lots of multi level marketing
companies...same members..OK..and their serving their members needs.
CRN are saying....Yeh...Codex is coming..Codex is going to protect us
from those dangerous vitamins and minerals and herbs and CRN is saying
it's fine...go to sleep lulaby and goodnight..and everything is
fine...and they use a report that they commissoned at a reputed cost
of $800,000..a report prepared by Sydley Austin Brown and Rute..a law
firm in Washington...wrote a report for them..and it said
lullaby...and goodnight everything is fine..it won't have an impact on
the United States..everything is fine..Sydley Austin Brown and Rute
has one major client..who's name you might know..Merk. Now it's
entirely possible that the NNFA just did a spectacular bad job of due
dilligence..or not..anyway...the report says everything is
fine..everything is dandy.there will be no problem..we've got DSHEA
-Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act Yeh, sure we do. Now lets
talk about Australia...remember five laws before congress to over turn
DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act
and you can write to congress on the website...Now congress uses the
multiplier of 13,000 to one...every email, fa,x phone
call...letter..don't write letters...they get decontaminated, they
never get to congress...every email, fax and phone call..counts as
13,000 constituants opinions..they figure that if you write a letter
or send an email there are 12,999 lazy who can't bother to get to the
computer terminal to do the same thing, but they feel the way you do.
interesting..that's power my friends...that's power..that's 13,000 to
one. Suppose we have a million people...suppose we have 10 million
people..supposed we have 100 million people...saying,,  Don't You
Dare!!!  Now congress has one rule...above all others.. anybody know
what it is? Get Re-elected! That's the primary rule, the prime
directive is to get re-elected. Now DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health
and Education Act was passed you may remember by  unaminous
congressional consent. Was that because one morning all members of
Congress woke up and said..."I See The Light..
Nutriants Are Better Than Drugs!! "... They said, oh, If I don't go
along with this..I'll never be re-elected to anything.....remember
critical mass...remember we were out on the streets and we were up on
our hind legs and we were making noise and we were rallying...and
rallying and we were writing letters and we said....Don't You Dare To
Take Away My Health Freedom!!! Remember?   Expect that we got fat dumb
and lazy and stopped protecting ourselves ...and we're in the same
place again.... exept that it's all food instead of just nutriants.
So! Thats point number One. Use the freedom mouse..ride the freedom
mouse. We've made it as easy as possible in the site...Sign up, for
the emails. I will never sell your information to anyone. I promise
you. Plus I will never rent it, I will never share it, you'll only get
an email from me, and we need you to know what's going on. So I''ll
send you email blasts. I'll send you things that you can do... or not.
It is your choice.. Get everybody you know..informed....now what else
can you do? Now we're going to write a series of alternative
guidelines. Everything bad in codes will have an alternative guideline
that turns it into a pro health guideline. What have we done with the
vitamin and mineral guideline?  You can see that because we have a
marked up copy that has their guideline crossed out and ours written
in on the website..It's right there. What we've done is turn it into a
guideline that mandates "bio-chemicaly individually determined optimal
health" and it's still Codex compliant...So we said..OK. now we need
congress to adopt this, and we need other countries in the world to
adopt this, so, Burt and I went to Washington DC and we met Daniel
Rorobocker from Orange County, who said to us, he's a
representative.... he said "I believe in pesticides...  " I went Oh..
He said I believe in GMO's I went Oh... He said " I believe in
Iradiation of food"  I went OH... But he said..."I believe in your
right to eat foods that have not been processed that way more than I
believe in those technologies... I will take this one on..." We said.
" OH that's really nice.." He said now..."We need a coaition..."  So
we went across the isle ....across the office building to see Peter
Defozio's staff from Oregan who would was a Liberal Democrat., whereas
 Rorobocker is a Libritarian Republican, and Defazio's on board and we
have large numbers of others who actually has never heard of Codex.
before we told them about it. Never heard of Codex ...we have called
every health legislative aid on congress.  What's you're
Congressmans's position on Codex?  and they've said "Wah????"...We
have spoken to the trade legislative assistants and asked. What's you
congressman's position on Codex?  Congress and trade legislative's
assistants and staff are not informed on Codex   ... and they all
said.. Wah Wah.. They don't know.  We had a congressional briefing set
up on the 20th of September, I was going to address Congress...and
tell them about it.. I thought that that was cool...10 days before it
became a briefing on something else.  Another Freedom Click ... you
need to write to Congress on the site and tell them that they need a
Congressional Briefing, by God and tell them you want me to brief
them. They don't know about Codex ..they've never heard of it any more
than the general public has heard of  Codex.... Gee How did that
happen?.. Who knows? Every negative part of Codex can be over turned
by guideline, a regulation or a standard, that is positive, So we need
your help because the United States leadership in this guideline and
all the positive guidelines that is to follow is what is going to
literally follow, is what is going to save the population of  the
planet earth and save your jobs and your children and your families
and mine. Thank you!!
Speach by Dr Rimal Laibox MD a director of the the National
Association of Nutrition Professionals (NANP) Produced by EON the
Ecological Options Network for Bauman College in cooperation with the
Natural Solutions Foundation and the National Association of Nutrition
Professionals (NANP) 2005
http://www.blacklistednews.com/?news_id=5768
http://www.codexcorp.com/
CODEX CORP:  Specialising in Corrections and Healthcare, it may be an
unusual combination but it works for us, our partners and customers
who want to keep a close control and watch on the use of health care
and nutritional products in the community and with our unique and far
reaching security and monitoring systems we will be able to tell our
customers instantly if anyone in the world is using nutrients and
minerals that are not Codex approved  and compliant, and have them
quickly detained and punished for not complying with Codex approved
and compliant products. With Codex we are proud to say that no one
will escape detection. Codex Corporation and its founders have over
100 years experience in this business including the management and
design of the concentration camps in Germany. Codex Corporation was
originally the multi billion  International Giant I G Farben.
A quick background on our founding company I G Farben and its
directors and managers will help convince you that as far as security,
nutrient and health care management, people management, corrections
management, Codex ( Formerly IG Farben) is the company you should
chose for any issues in Corrections and Heathcare Management. Codex
and its security management has the ability to make sure there is no
health freedom. not just in the USA but all over the world... and
Codex has the ability to make sure anyone that tries to think for a
minute they can get way with trying to have health freedom, will
quickly be caught, detained and punished by Codex's unique and far
reaching security and monitoring systems...The Codex Moto
is
"None will escape detection and punishment of the unauthorised use of
nutrients with Codex on the job....just look at out success record in
designing and managing the concentration camp in Germany....our
success record at Codex Corporation, formerly IG Farben in people,
healthcare and corrections management speaks for itself"
Codex Corporation's, formerly IG Farben's 100 year History in People,
Healthcare and Corrections Management
provided from Codex Alimentarius Speach by Dr Rimal Laibox MD of the
Natural Solutions Fioundation, Produced by EON the Ecological Options
Network for Bauman College in cooperation with the Natural Solutions
Foundation and the National Association of Nutrition Professionals
(NANP) 2005 www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
Dr Rimal Laibox is an experienced healthcare professional and has
studies Codex Corporation, formerly IG Farben's progess ov erthe last
decade to become  the leaders in People, Healthcare and Corrections
Management in the United States.
Codex and Nutricide
" Let me tell you about Codex Alimentarius, let me define it for you,
let me help you understand the enemy..and let me assure you that
absolutely nothing that I am going to tell you, is exagerated, is
interperlated, or is imagined. Every thing I am going to tell you is
documented. A great deal of it is documented on my website,
whichwww.HealthFreedomUSA.org. Let me back up and tell you that I have
been watching Codex come toward us for about the last decade. ,,, and
I have been watching the vote sin congress, which God help us is our
bastion of support and protection against Codex and I will explain why
that is. I have been watching the votes to protect our health freedom
dwindle, until finally in the 109th Congress, without a good deal of
activity, we didn't have the votes to protect us. I have been watching
Codex excellerate and I have been watching it expand, and I have been
getting more and more troubled. Let me give you a brief run down of
Codex then. After the second world war, the Nuremberg Tribunals were
held in which people who had committed crimes against humanity were
judged by the world community in a court run by the United States and
Britain...  and they were sentenced to terms in prison if they were
found guilty of crimes against humanity. In 1948 some of the people
who were found guilty of crimes against humanity on the basis of mass
murder, slavery and other crimes were the president and 24 board
members and executives  of a hugh industrial megalith called IG
Farben. Amazingly enough however, by 1951 all of them had already been
released, and and continuing to consult with German Corporations IG
Farben produced the gas used in the gas chambers Zyklon B, they
produced the steel for the death camps and the rail road line, they
produced the munitions, they produced chemicals, they produced all
kinds of stuff. The Nuremberg Tribunal disolved IG Farben into
companies such as  into BASF - Hoechst - Bayer They produced
pharmaceuticals.. a big big pharacuticals company.  So the president
of IG Farben Fritz ter Meer, the senior manager at IB Farben, was
convicted of crimes against Humanity on the basis of mass murder,
slavery and other crimes on 29th July, 1948. Although he co-operated
with SS and the Final Solution, Fritz ter Meer was sentenced to 7
years only in War Criminal Prison, but only served about three years
in prison, no more someone that bounces a business cheque for say
$1,000 and is charged for fraud in the $1,000 bounced cheque for it
not being honoured on presentation. Someone steals an apple can get 3
years in prison also, or if he or she stole the apple as a servant
they can receive 7 years in prison,
Now Fritz ter Meer is sort of an artistic fellow and he was the one
responsible for the slogan that people saw as they entered Autswitz,
usually for the last time, "Work Brings Freedom". Fritz ter Meer was a
creative sort of fellow. Fritz ter Meer was responsible for the slogan
that people saw as they entered Auschwitz-, usually for the last time,
 " Work brings  Freedom....a creative sort of fellow.
You will notice that the institutions that Fritz ter Meer worked for
an/or had shareholdings in as listed by Wikepedia are
Institutions IG Farben, Bayer, Codex Alimentarius
The Bayer executive Fritz ter Meer, sentenced to seven years in prison
by the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, was made head of the supervisory
board of Bayer in 1956, after his release.
Fritz ter Meer ( July 4 1884 – October 27 1967 ) was a German chemist.
He was the son of Edmund ter Meer the founder of a chemical company
that later became part of Bayer. Fritz ter Meer also worked for Bayer
and later IG Farben. He was involved in the planning of Monowitz
concentration camp, a satellite camp of KZ Auschwitz. He was sentenced
to seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948. After he was
released in 1951 he became supervisory board chairman
(Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He retired in 1961.
The Bayer company then became part of IG Farben, a conglomerate of
German chemical industries that formed a part of the financial core of
the German Nazi regime. IG Farben owned 42.5% of the company that
manufactured Zyklon B,[2] a chemical used in the gas chambers of
Auschwitz and other extermination camps. During World War II, the
company also extensively used slave labor in factories attached to
large slave labor camps, notably the sub-camps of the Mauthausen-Gusen
concentration camp[3]. When the Allies split IG Farben into several
pieces after World War II for involvement in organized Nazi war
crimes, Bayer re-appeared as an individual business. The Bayer
executive Fritz ter Meer, sentenced to seven years in prison by the
Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, was made head of the supervisory board
of Bayer in 1956, after his release.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_ter_Meer
Fritz ter Meer
undefined
Fritz ter Meer
Born June 4, 1884
Uerdingen, Germany
Died October 27, 1967 (aged 83)
Leverkusen, Germany
Nationality German
Institutions IG Farben, Bayer, Codex Alimentarius
Fritz ter Meer ( July 4 1884 – October 27 1967 ) was a German chemist.
He was the son of Edmund ter Meer the founder of a chemical company
that later became part of Bayer. Fritz ter Meer also worked for Bayer
and later IG Farben. He was involved in the planning of Monowitz
concentration camp, a satellite camp of KZ Auschwitz. He was sentenced
to seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948. After he was
released in 1951 he became supervisory board chairman
(Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He retired in 1961.
   * Heine, Jens Ulrich (1990). Verstand und Schicksal. Die Männer
der I.G. Farbenindustrie A.G. (1925-1945). Weinheim; New York:
VCH.ISBN 978-3527281442.
   * Codex Alimentarius Commission [1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_ter_Meer
Edmund ter Meer ( 1852 – November 5, 1931) was a German chemist who
discovered the ter Meer reaction and founded in 1877 the ter Meer dye
company in Uerdingen. After the fusion with the aniline factory of
Julius Weiler the Weiler-ter Meer company was formed. This company
later became part of the Bayer company. His son Fritz ter Meer also
became a chemist associated to the Bayer company.
Edmund ter Meer
Born 1852
Died  November 5, 1931 (aged 79)
Nationality German
Institutions Bayer
Known for ter Meer reaction
References
   * Max Bodenstein, H. Leuchs (1931). "Sitzung vom 16. November
1931". Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft 64 (11):
A211–A212. doi:10.1002/cber.19310641139.*
   * ter Meer Prize University Bonn
   * "Ter Meer family." Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online
   * Uerdingen industrial area history
So Fritz ter Meer was sitting in jail and he said "well, that didn't
work..what else can we do?   I've got it food..he who controls food
controls ....the world..."  Fritz ter Meer  got out of jail he went to
his  UN buddies and said "Have I got an idea for you..if we take over
food world wide..we have power world wide, and his UN buddies said.
"cool idea". So they created a Trade Commission. That's a very
powerful set of words... A Trade Commission....called the Codex
Alimentarius Commission
It is not a Public Health Commission..it is not a Consumer Protection
Commission....it is a Trade Commission. Trade is about what? Money!!
Trade is about Business!! Trade is about Profit!! Well they said in
1962 we're going to work towards total, global implimentation of Codex
Alimentarius on December 31st, 2009. Long Term.... and they set up a
bunch of committees.. committees on fish and fishery...fats and oil...
fruits and vegetables... ground nuts...nutritian  for special diatary
uses and so on. There are currently about 27 Codex committees, they
are regional organisations, there are task forces and so anf so on. So
it's ahugh beaurocratic mostrosety.it's emence. Codex has promogated
well over 4,000 guidelines, standards and regulations on
everything...everything which can legally be put into your mouth, with
the excpetion of Pharmaceuticals. they are not part of Codex. That is
an importand point. Now Codex standards have no legal weight
whatsoever. Zero. So who cares about them..their just standards...so
we are talking about an industry setting regulation organisation, but
if it has no legal standing .. who cares? Right!! Here's the history
of Codex Alimentarius before 1962.
Please note here that Fritz ter Meer  was sentenced to seven years
prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948 having been found guilty of
crimes against humanity on the basis of mass murder, slavery and other
crimes . After he was released in 1951 he became supervisory board
chairman (Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He officiialy
retired as supervisory board chairman of Bayer AG in 1961 so he could
behind the scene concentrate of working with his UN buddies on
developing his idea of  setting up a syatem that will control the
whoole world's food supply under the code name Codex Alimentarius. It
would not look good publicly for Fritz ter Meer  who was sentenced to
only seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948 having been
found guilty of crimes against humanity on the basis of mass murder,
slavery and other crimes, and only served about three years of his
sentence because of his powerful UN buddies, to be seen to be publicly
be involved with Codex Alimentarius. Here's the history of Codex
Alimentarius before 1962. The Austian Hungarian Empire said we need
rules by which the courts can rule on cases involving food.o we'll
have regulations and rules that the courts will enforce.... that's how
they get their way. That was called the Codex Alimentarius and  was
put into place around 1893 and lasted until the end of the Austrian
Hungarian Empire in the first world war. So the idea was there in the
Germanic tradition. We need rules..lots of rules...lots a
nd lots and lots of rules..we need a lot of rules... let's have rules
for everything to do with food. So it was a natural extention for the
German Industrialists to say we'll go back to the good old days of
Codex Alimentarius back  when we had them in Austrian Hungarian
Empire. Cool. So they started promilgating their rules and regulations
and they were voluntary. They were sort of guidlines. Now Codex
Alimentarius Commission is administered by the World Health
Oganisation (WHO) and the Food and Aricultural Organisation (FAO)  and
they fund Codex and they run it at the request of the United Nations
(UN). So the're mummy and daddy to Codex Alimentarius.  And that's
very interesting because they're supposed to be about health and food
world wide. Some conflicts of interest that we'll talk about. So
Codex started promilgating regulations and rules, and the way that's
done is that the committees work up a rule, a standard, a guideline,
or regulation an dthey get it to what's called a step 8 which is the
final step in their administrative process... and then it's presented
to the Codex Alimentarius Commission for ratification, like the
vitamin and mineral guidline was presented to the Codex Alimentarius
Commission on July 4th this past summer (2005). It was ratified... it
was approved by consensus...and it is now...despite the propaganda
that your going to hear if you every hear about it in the media... it
is now mandatory on any member country and the WTO, the World Trade
Organisation. Well what in the world do they have to do with it? And
the answer is everything. The World Trade Organisation you see
accepted Codex when the world organisation was formed in 1994. They
said, "well how are we going to decide trade disputes around food if
we don't have a set of rules. I know..we'll accept the Codex
Alimentarius rules and all the members of the WTO will...willl world
wide...get ready for an Orwellian Term will harmonise with are
standards, with the codex standards.. I suggest you capitalise the
first four letters in your mind ...HARM... onise ... everybody is
supposed to .HARM... onise... with Codex....   and when they HARM...
onise with Codex, then if the get pulled into the WTO Dispute
Resolution Process they have a chance of winning because here's the
kicker... are you ready for this one ...  if two countries go into the
World Trade Organisation Dispute Resolution Process  and one of then
is Codex compliant, and one of them is not Codex Compliant.. the one
that is Codex Compliant automaticlly wins regardless of the merit of
the case.  People are using Codex Compliant in a much bigger economic
battle. So every couunty in the world is racing to do what?   Become
Codex Compliant. So in the United States...the situation is OK ..how
do we become Codex compliant when we have laws that protect us. You
have to remember that Codex does not serve consumer well being. Codex
does not serve what I call the five Bigs...Big Pharma Big Chema Big
Biotechna Big AgriBiz and Bid Medica ,,,little me and little you are
not served by Codex, in the least, so before we go forward and talk
about the rest of  what has to happen, let's ask what Codex does?
You probably all know about the vitamin and mineral guidline that was
ratified on July 4th ( 2005). You may not kow that although it is said
that CODEX regulations guidlines and standards that have been ratified
are volantary....That Are Not Voluntary...That is known as a lie!!!
They are mandatory..but  thye ar enot fully mandatory until December,
31st 2009. They're sort of kinda a little bit mandatory now. and
they're totally mandatory then. So what does Codex do? Why do I care
enough about Codex to close my practice and stop treating patients who
came to me from around the world..to help them regain their health and
be radiantly well with non toxic means which is a very satisfying
thing to do.. I love it...it also provided me with an income...  that
was nice. OK...;why am I concerned enough, let's talk about the
mineral and vitamin guidline first. In 1994 DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments
Health and Education Act was passed which classifies nutrient and
herbs as foods. As foods you can set no upper limit on them. You
cannot set an upper limit on lettuce...lamb or  roodibaggers.. and
similarily you cannot set an upper limit in vitamin C.. echanasia...
ginko bi loba ... vitamin D ...    to nutrients is freely given to
us.. We are allowed to have any nutients we want because.... this is a
very important point... under common law ...  What's not forbidden is
permitted.... Codex on the other hand  ... is a Napoleonic Code
...What's not permitted is forbidden law system... under Napoleonic
Code ...anything not permitted is forbidden ...  that's called a
positive list .... so vitamins and nutrients and minerals ... in 1994
we passed DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act was
passed which classifies nutrient and herbs as foods... we can have as
much of them as we want thatis our business... in 1994 Codex with no
notice here in this country whatsoever.. prepared nutrents ... put on
you intellectual seatbelts...declared nutrients to be toxins. they're
poisens ... dangerous Industrail poisens ... AS POISENS ... WE HAVE OT
BE PROTECTED FROM THEM ...how  do you protect someone form poisens ...
you use toxicology ... you use a science called risk assessment ..lt's
take a primeron risk assessment  .. first you take the substance thats
dangerous and feed it to animals and the dosage that kills 50% of them
..that's called the LD 50 ... and you exstrapulate what the LD 50 for
human being might be.,,then you go down to the other end of the dosage
range ...and you start feeding ittie bittie tiny bits of it ..   to
test animals ... and you come up with the largest possible dose
...the maximum  permissable upper limit  ... that can be fed ot an
animal before a discernable impact  is shown ..OK ... no discernable
impact .... then you divide that by 100 ... that's how they do it in
risk assessment ... and now you've got a safety margin ...  so you
have one 100th of the dose that can be given with no discernable
impact ...   OK nutrients! Under Codex!!!    Not only are limited ot
those nutriants on the positive list ...and  we  anticipate there will
be 18 of them .. and they do not include.  .  CoQ10  Glucosamine ...
cundroyton sulfate ...thye do include floride ... which to my
knowledge as a Physician has absolutely no biological benefit
whatsoever. ... but it does make people complasent ... floride was
first used in the Goolog  ...because it was discovered that prisoners
who were fed floridated water ...  were complasent ...  and you could
do anything you wanted to them ...  thye were easy  to manage ... so
you have 18 nutrients  ... you have ittie bittie tiny winy doses ...
that are determined scientifically to have no effect ...  on any human
being  now in this country we have a problem ... we have ...DSHEA
-Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act ... we have to get rid of
DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act  in order to  HARM
...on..ise ... with Codex... that part of Codex anyway .... so how do
we get rid of DSHEA ...  we attack it legislatively of course .. and
...  there are five.. count them.. five currently before Congress ...
designed to overturn ..gut ... invalidate .. and otherwise get rid of
DSHEA ...  because once DSHEA is gone we can HARM...on..ise with the
vitamin and mineral guideline   ...  so what we are talking about is
....  waking up one morning to find that high potency therapudiclly
effective clinicly significant nutrients are illegal ....
(Codex want to make nutients illegal ) in the way that Heroin is
illegal ..not available with a prescription ... Illegal ...  If these
nutrients have any impact on  the Human body ...  they are illegal ...
that's just the vitamin and mineral guidline ... let's talk about milk
.... we have    recombinant bovine  growth hormone and now we can
choose milk with it and milk without it ... butter with it or butter
without it ..right ...not under Codex ... because under Codex ...
every dairy cow ...  on the planet must be treated with Monsanto's
recombinant bovine hormone.... furthermore ..under Codex ... every
animal used for food on the planent whether it has fins, feet or
feathers ... every animal on the planet must be treated with sub
clinical antibiotics and and must be treated with exogenous growth
hormones ... Codex requires (mandates) that all food be irradiated
unless it's eaten locally and raw. including organic food of course
... so is it organis afterwards... well of course the organic
standards are incredibly low ...the organic  standards allow a farmer
to use vetinary drugs including exogenous growth hormone, anti biotics
etc ....on animals and then at his whim, reclassify them as organic
...  but farmers are our friends  and they would never do
that...right!!!  Right!!  Codex sets limits for the dangerous
industrial chemicals that you can have in your food..and the limits
are increditbly high ... go to Codex Alimentarius Commission ... look
at the toxins and vetinary  Chemicals  and the levels that are set.,,
they are terrifying ot me ..Terrifying ... the names of the Chemicals
that are permitted and the amounts of the chemicals that are permitted
are terrifying to me ...Why am I terrified?  Well perhaps I am just a
cowardly person ...it's possible... think about this.. in 2001,
"The levels that are permitted, developed and maintained by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission, by the are incredibly high in toxins and the
levels that are set the names and amounts of the chemicals are
terrifying..." states Dr Rimal Laibox MD a director of the National
Association of Nutrition Professionals (NANP)
In 2001, 176 Countries including the USA got together and stated that
there were 12 really bad dangerous organic chemicals  Chemicals.
They're called "Pops".,,"Persistent Organic Pollutants. There are a
lot of them, but there are 12 that are so bad that, nobody could
disagree that those 12 Pops had to be banned worldwide.Nine of the 12
worst organic Chemicals known are pesticides...not
surprisingly..because they kill things..and of course we have many
processes and enzime systems that are very much like insects and other
pests so, they are not too good for us..but Codex has different
ideas...Codex has brought back 7 of the 9 forbidden POPS, that 176
countries  banned
worldwide,,,Dieldrin..Aldrin...hexaclorabenzine...etc..and the food
that is imported from other countries that contains these substances
can not be stopped at our borders..because otherwise it would be God
Forbid, a Trade Violation...that's how Codex works..Codex, according
to the World Trade Organisation  (WTO) and the Food and Agricultural
Organisation's (FAO) joint projections..now i didn't  make this
up...please if you have unfastened you're Intellectual Seat
Belts...put them back on again...if you do the numbers in the who FAO
projections in their report headed Diet Nutrition and prevention of
Chronic Diseases..that just the vitamin and mineral guideline
alone...when it goes into global implimentation..on December 31st,
2009...will result in a minimum of 3 billion (that's B... Bad... Big
Billion) deaths - one billion through simple starvation..those folks
who die ar not particularily economicly successful from the point of
view of the Corporations..when you're starving to death, how much good
can you do, when the issue is that how much can you buy.. not a lot..
forget them..but Hah..but the next  two billion...they will die from
the preventable diseases (two billion people will die from diseases of
under nutrition)..of under nutrition// cancer.. the single most
profitable condition know to human kind..CardiovacularDisease..a good
second...diabetis...pritty good producer of income...and a whole host
of other preventable diseases. Who will die? Who Knows? Who Will Live?
Probably those people who are wealthy enough and powerful enough to
have their own pushers of clean food and nutriants..that's who will
live!!!  You and I? ..probably not...our children? probably not...our
grand children?...probably not!!! So we're talking about food
regulations that are in fact are the legalisation of the mandated
toxicity and under nutrition..It will become illegal..if there is a
famine...whereecer there is a famine...to ship high nutriant density
biscuits to that country.. and it will be illegal to distribute
them...that's what we're talking about!!! Codex is Big and It's
Bad..but it's not invunerable. So the point is...that we have to
protect ourselves, and I believe we have to regain global leadership,
which we have lost. surrendered..squandered..ah..sold..we have
sold..just joining the World Trade Organisation (WTO), surended our
sovereinghty...however as it just happens I have a team of
Constitutional Lawyers..looking at the following question...Are we
members of the WTO? Cause if you remember form High School
Civics..they way you get a treaty to be a real treaty..is ot have it
ratified by a two thirds majority of the Senate...and the way we got
into the WTO was, they passed a law allowing Bill Clinton to fast
track us into the WTO. "That's Not A Treaty"...the USA is not legally
not a member of the WTO..now that's a piece of the battle...Someone
says from the audience.."you will have to tell George.." we will tell
George Bush , but George Bush will not be relevant when we do tell
him..ah..so that's a piece of it, but  that's not going to save our
lives right now because..do you know..picture in your mind...a wasp or
a bee trap..were ot insect voluntarily goes down the funnel and then
can't get up out of the trap again..that's Codex..a regular law can be
over turned..it can be repealed...it can be corrected..by  another
piece of legislation..but once we become Codex Compliant...in nay
area...as long as we are members of the WTO..it can never be
repealed...because we have lost the sovereignty to become un_codex
compliant as long as we are in the WTO, so it's like going down that
funnel and not being able to get back out of it. So it's very
important that we make sure that we do not become codex
compliant...but we will be hit with all those bis trade sanctions from
the countries that are codex compliant,, so that the country will be
destroyed economically..right..no remember surprise..one of the
principles of war...remember mass..where you take your strength
against the enemies weekness ads week points. Well here's what we've
done.  We have a team of lawyers, who have spent hundreds of hours
with us pro bono..these are good guy lawyers...these two gentlemen and
we have spent hundreds of hours studying Codex, understanding it's
weekness..it's weeknesses..a lot of weeknesses.. and constructing a
strategy..which 'will take the succer down'....It will take it
down...but I need you...you are people that other people come to about
safe healthy food..and nutrients...
National Association of Nutritrional Professionals NANP 2005
Conference..you are ready made disenimation points..you are the
thousand million.... hundred million points of light. Here's what is
happening/ Every country in the world has ot be Codex compliant in
order not to get hit by WTO trade sanctions, as I told you of their
members of Codex and the WTO..and there are a few countries that are
not, but I can guarantee you they are not of any major significance.
So. the question is...What is Codex Compliance mean?
Well, most people in most countries..most legislators believe that
they have to adopt  as their national standard on that particular
subject...what Codex ratified. But that's not the case, any more than
we're in the WTO. That's not the case either. What is means is that
the format..the issues and the subjects..covered by a Codex
Guideline...Standard or Regulation..have to be addressed in the
country's guideline standard or regulation on the same topic. So what
we have done is create the first of many alternative Codex guidelines.
You can go to our website www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and you will see a
little button on the upper right handside that says sign this citzen's
partition. Now to briefly digress the citizen's partition is not like
a grocery store partition that you sign and bring to somebody and say
'I have 200,000 signatures and they dump it in the waist basket,
because it is in their mind, it is one signature that you and your
friends wrote 200,000 names. No...it is a legal challenge to the
policy of the United States Government on Codex. It's called a
citizen's partition. It's a legal challenge..We're suing the United
States Government..saying what you're doing is illegal folks...let us
tell you how..we want hearings of fact...we want redress..we want
correction..if we get what we want//that's dandy...if we don't get
what we want we have gone through a process..exhausting administrative
remedies.. we have made the case ripe for court.
So Ok, I need you and everybody you know, to sign this citizen's
partition..sating this is a bad policy on mass..and you do this on the
web..and you will see the instructions and we present the thousands
and thousands of pages that we print out that have people's signatures
to the US Codex Office and to the FDA (Federal Drug Administration)
and they don't like that at all..but that's OK. However, this
time..this is the second amendment of the citizen's partition that
we're asking you to sign. This time the revised vitamin and mineral
guideline is part of it. It is part of the law suit saying this needs
to be US Policy. The more voices that say..this is what I want...and
you work for me..mr and mrs beaureaucrat and mr and mrs congressman
and mr and mrs senator. The more voices the more weight. So step
number one is read and sign the citizen's partition. Step number two
diseminate the information..the weblink. put it out in your office.
get your patients...your friends and neighbours..your suppliers..to
sign the citizens partition and your suppliers..the companies you
use,, are going to tell you that you're out of your minds...they will
tell you that Codex is not a problem..and the will tell you..anyone
here have a dog..OK...dog owners know that you ask a dog to heal..sit
down...stay..that's codex in this country and worldwide, because the
more people that are in Codex comma, the less trouble they have
getting this through...any here of the NNFA.the National Nutrition
Foods Association..everybody's heard of the NNFA. Did you know that
the members of the NNFA and not just health foods stores and
manufacturers..but include companies with names you may have
heard...Pfizer ...Merck...Monsanto...Bayer...BASF..Archer Daniels
Midland..Glaxo....Aires..clyne welcome you get the idea..why?..because
after Tochet was passed and the nutriant business virgined..the
pharasutical folks who are not dumb, said there is gold in them there
pills..and they brought the means of production of many many many
companies.. and they brought the companies themselves..so there in the
nutriant business. What better way to kill the nutriant business,
which is not nearly as profitable as the toxic chemical drug business,
than to take it over. It works everytime..right!! CRN...anybody here
know about CRN..Council for Responsablr Nutritian.  Same
members...they hav lots of multi level marketing companies...same
members..OK..and their serving their members needs. CRN are
saying,,,Yeh...Codex is coming..Codex is going to protect us from
those dangerous vitamins and minerals and herbs and CRN is saying it's
fine...go to sleep lulaby and goodnight..and everything is fine...and
they use a report that they commissoned at a reputed cost of
$800,000..a report prepared by Sydley Austin Brown and Rute..a law
firm in Washington...wrote a report for them..and it said
lullaby...and goodnight everything is fine..it won't have an impact on
the United States..everything is fine..Sydley Austin Brown and Rute
has one major client..who's name you might know..Merk. Now it's
entirely possible that the NNFA just did a spectacular bad job of due
dilligence..or not..anyway...the report says everything is
fine..everything is dandy.there will be no problem..we'ver got dishet(
Touchet?) Yeh, sure we do. Now lets talk about Australia...remember
five laws befofore congress overturned dishet (?)
and you can write to congress on the website...Now congress uses the
multiplier of 13,000 to one...every email fax phone
call...letter..don't write letters...they get decontaminated, they
never get to congress...every email. fax and phone call..counts as
13,000 constituants opinions..they figure that if you write a letter
or send an email there are 12,999 lazy who can't bother to get to the
computer terminal to do the same thing, but they feel the way you do.
interesting..that's power my friends...that's power..that's 13,000 to
one. Suppose we have a million people...suppose we have 10 million
people..supposed we have 100 million people...saying,,  Don't You
Dare!!!  Now congress has one rule...above all others.. anybody know
what it is? Gte Re-elected! That's the primary rule,, the prime
directive is to get re-elected. No w touchet was passed you may
remember by  unaminous congressional consent. Was that because one
morning all members of Congress woke up and said..."I See Th Light..
Nutriants Are Better Than Drugs!! "... They said, oh, If I don't go
along with this..I'll never be re-elected to anything.....remember
critical mass...remember we were out on the streets and we were up on
our hind legs and we were making noise and we were rallying...and
rallying and we were writing letters and we said....Don't You Dare To
Take Away My Health Freedom!!! Remember?   Expect that we got fat dumb
and lazy and stopped protecting ourselves ...and we're in the same
place again.... exept that it's all food instead of just nutriants.
So! Thats point number One. Use the freedom mouse..ride the freedom
mouse. We've made it as easy as possible in the site...Sign up, for
the emails. I will never sell your information to anyone. I promise
you. Plus I will never rent it, I will never share it, you'll only get
an email from me, and wee need you to know what's going on. So I''ll
send you email blasts. I'll send you things that you can do... or not.
It is your choice.. Gte everybody you know..informed....now what else
can you do? Now we're going to write a series of alternative
guidelines. Everything bad in codes will have am alternative guideline
that turns it into a pro health guideline. What have wee done with the
vitamin and mineral guideline?  You can see that because we have a
mark up copy that has their guideline crossed out and ours written in
on the website..It's right there. What we've done is turn it into a
guideline that mandates "bio-chemicaly individually determined optimal
health" and it;s still Codex compliant...So we said..OK. now we need
congress to adopt this, and we need other countries in the world to
adopt this, so, Burt and I went to Washington DC and we met Daniel
Rorobocker from Orange County, who said to us, he's a
representative.... he said "I believe in pesticides...  " I went Oh..
He said I believe in GMO's I went Oh... He said " I believe in
Iradiation of food"  I went OH... "But he said...I believe in your
right to eat foods that have not been processed that way more than I
believe in those technologies... I will take this one..." We said. "
OH that's really nice.." He said now..."We need a coilition..."  So we
wnet across the ilse across he office building to see Peter Defozio's
staff from Oregan who would was a Liberal Democrat., whereas
Rorobocker is a Libritarian Republican, and Defazio's on board and we
have large numbers of others who actually has never heard of Codex.
before we told them about it. Never heard of Codex,,,we have called
ever health legislative aid on congress.  what's you're Congressmans's
position on Codex?  and they've said "Wah????"...We have spoken to the
trade legislative assistants and asked. What's you congressman's
position on Codex?  Congress and trade legislative's assistants and
staff are not informed on Codex   ... and they all said.. Wah Wah..
They don't know.  We had a congressional briefing set up on the 20th
of September, I was going to address Congress...and tell them about
it.. I thought that that was cool...10 days before it became a
briefing on something else.  Another Freedom Click ... you need to
write to Congress on the site and tell them that they need a
Congressional Briefing, by God and tell them you want me to brief
them. They don't know about Codex ..they've never heard of it any more
than the general public has heard of  Codex Gee How did that happen..
who knows? Every negative part of Codex can be over turned by
guideline, a regulation or a standard, that is positive, So we need
your help because the United States leadership in this guideline and
all the positive guidelines that is to follow is what is going to
literally follow is what is going to save the population of  the
planet earth and save your jobs and your children and your families
and mine. Thank you!!
Speach by Dr Rimal Laibox MD a director of the the National
Association of Nutrition Professionals (NANP) Produced by EON the
Ecological Options Network for Bauman College in cooperation with the
Natural Solutions Foundation and the National Association of Nutrition
Professionals (NANP) 2005
Codex Alimentarius summarized in 7 pointsPublished on 09-30-2009
Codex Alimentarius is scheduled for full global implementation on
December 31st, 2009, and not a word has been spoken in main stream
media about this threat to humanity.
The principle of self medication with herbal/vitamin/mineral food
supplements would be restricted to ‘prescription only’ status, if the
Codex Alimentarius is applied in the UK and elsewhere, particularly
the USA.
(UK only) Since the NHS priorities are ill health diagnosis and
treatment, the good health preservation that supplements provide will
be inaccessible to the majority of our population and the cost to the
NHS will increase.
According to the projections based on figures from the World Health
Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), a
minimum of 3 billion people will die from the Codex mandated vitamin
and mineral guidelines alone.
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Vitamins/
Deadline to sign the petition = 5th September 2009
Codex in Depth: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=161
Codex Alimentarius (World Food Code)
Summarized in 7 points
1) Started in 1962 by UN, Imposed by WTO Sanctions
Codex Alimentarius was created in 1962 as a trade Commission by the UN
to control the international trade of food. Its initial intentions may
have been altruistic but it has been taken over by corporate
interests, most notably the pharmaceutical, pesticide, biotechnology
and chemical industries.
Codex Alimentarius is backed up by the crippling trade sanctions of
the World Trade Organization (WTO). Any non Codex-compliant nation
would face huge economic punishment since they would automatically
lose in any food-trade dispute with a Codex compliant country.
2) “Nutrients are Toxins” Is Junk Science
Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) has two committees which impact nutrition.
One of them, the “Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special
Dietary Uses” (CCNFSDU), is chaired by Dr. Rolf Grossklaus, a
physician who believes that nutrition has no role in health. This is
the “top-guy” for Codex nutritional policy, and he has stated that
“nutrition is not relevant to health”.
As unbelievable as it may sound, Dr. Grossklaus actually declared
nutrients to be toxins in 1994 and instituted the use of toxicology
(Risk Assessment) to prevent nutrients from having any impact on
humans who take supplements! It is worth mentioning that Dr.
Grossklaus happens to own the Risk Assessment company advising CCNFSDU
and Codex on this issue. This company makes money when its toxicology
services are used for the “assessment” of nutrients. Here in the U.S.
we call that a “conflict of interest”.
Codex is made up of thousands of standards and guidelines. One of
them, the Vitamin and Mineral Guideline (VMG), is designed to permit
only ultra low doses of vitamins and minerals (and make clinically
effective nutrients illegal). How can the VMG restrict dosages of
vitamins and minerals? By using Risk Assessment (toxicology) to assess
nutrients.
While Risk Assessment is a legitimate science (it is a branch of
toxicology), it is the wrong science for assessing nutrients! In fact,
in this context, it is actually junk science. Biochemistry, the
science of life processes, is the correct science for assessing
nutrients. Codex Alimentarius treats nutrients as toxins, which is
literally insane.
Nutrients are not toxins – they are essential for life.
undefined
No matter what Codex Alimentarius officials say to convince you that
Risk Assessment is a “science-based” approach to nutrients, it is not.
And it is worth repeating that Dr. Grossklaus, the head of Codex
Alimentarius, owns the Risk Assessment company advising CCNFSDU and
Codex on the “benefit” of using Risk Assessment to assess nutrients.
3) Not Consumer Protection – That’s Propaganda
Contrary to the propaganda, Codex Alimentarius has nothing to do with
consumer protection. Nothing! Codex is about the economic ambitions of
multi-national corporations, in particular, the pharmaceutical
industry.
Using their multi billion-dollar marketing budgets, these industries
have launched a massive media propaganda campaign to paint Codex
Alimentarius as a benevolent tool of “consumer protection”, as well as
to negatively taint the image of natural health options and mislead
people to fear them as “dangerous”, so they will take drugs (which
really are dangerous). Natural health products and options have an
amazing safety record and are remarkably effective, especially when
compared to pharmaceutical drugs.
Unfortunately, one-time defenders of health freedom such as National
Nutritional Foods Association (NNFA) and Council for Responsible
Nutrition (CRN) have joined the propaganda bandwagon and are spreading
false information saying that Codex Alimentarius is either “harmless”
or benevolent “consumer protection”. Neither is true.
The membership of these one-time defenders of health freedom has
become permeated by people from the pharmaceutical industry (for
example, CRN counts as its members corporations such as Monsanto® and
Bayer®).
4) Codex: Serious Threat to Health and Health Freedom
If Codex Alimentarius is implemented in the United States of America,
therapeutic dosages of vitamins and minerals (and all other nutrients
soon to follow) will become unavailable because they will literally
become illegal.
Here’s how it would work, in a nut-shell:
Due to the junk science use of Risk Assessment (toxicology) to assess
supposedly toxic nutrients, a false belief is being engineered saying
that “nutritional supplements are dangerous to people’s health”.
Using this false belief generates calls to “protect” people from these
“toxic” nutrients. After the calls come the bills to set ultra low
permissible dosages (remember, nutrients are deemed “dangerous toxins”
under this false belief). If enough of us and our Congressional
delegates buy this nonsense, we and Congress would blindly comply with
Codex Alimentarius’ VMG. And blind compliance is what the industries
behind Codex Alimentarius intend.
Blind compliance goes hand-in-hand with lack of activism. This lack of
activism allows our protective laws, classifying nutrients as foods
with no upper limits (such as DSHEA), to be easily repealed and
replaced with draconian laws to classify nutrients as toxins. And
“harmonization” with the pro-illness, pro-pharmaceutical industry
Vitamin and Mineral Guideline is there to fill the void.
Only intentionally ineffective, ultra low dose supplements would be
legal, with or without a prescription, on the VMG list. If enough
people do not take action, we can expect to watch nutritional
supplement manufacturers and, thus health food stores, to go out of
business, in a domino effect. The only player left standing would be
Big Pharma.
Therapeutic grade vitamins, minerals, and amino acids would be
eliminated from the marketplace (although a few low-dose supplements
would be allowed by Codex, as a symbolic measure to avoid suspicion
about their ulterior motive).
Natural health professionals would lose the tools of their trade
(nutritional supplements) and health conscious people would be unable
to choose natural health options for health promotion and disease
treatment.
And that is, in a nutshell, how Codex Alimentarius is poised to make
Natural and Nutritional Medicine (NNM) disappear from the legal health
world and go underground. Who benefits? Big Pharma.
It would take a few years for the above scenarios to be feasible
(Codex Alimentarius is meant to go into full global effect by 2010).
The slower the process takes, the less alarmed people will be. That’s
probably the logic of the architects of Codex Alimentarius.
5) Serves Economic Interests of Sickness Industries Through WTO and
Napoleonic Code
More and more people are turning to natural health products globally.
The “wellness” trend is a major trend in today’s society. The more
natural health products people use, the fewer drugs they buy. The
pharmaceutical industry, which is part of the “Sickness Industry”,
fears the inevitable shift toward natural health care.
Instead of accepting the will of the people and rethinking the future
of the pharmaceutical industry, the industry has decided upon an
unethical course of action: the use of deception and deceit to
eliminate natural health products completely.
Codex Alimentarius is a shrewd vehicle for protecting the
pharmaceutical industry from the loss of income it stands to suffer
due to the inevitable growth of natural healthcare.
Codex Alimentarius is the resistance of the dinosaurs to
inevitability: the burgeoning desire of humanity for a healthier,
saner, and more sustainable way of life.
The World Trade Organization (WTO) intends to force Codex Alimentarius
upon the nations of the world, including the U.S. This would be done
under the threat of massive economic sanctions if WTO-countries do not
comply with Codex Alimentarius.
Furthermore, Codex is based in the Napoleonic Code, not Common Law.
That means that under Codex Alimentarius, anything not explicitly
permitted is forbidden. Under Common Law, we hold that anything not
explicitly forbidden is permitted. The difference is the difference
between health freedom and health tyranny. Codex Alimentarius would be
able to ban supplements by default.
6) DSHEA Protects America From Codex Alimentarius
The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA, 1994), an
American law classifying our supplements and herbs as foods (which can
have no upper limit set on their use), was passed by unanimous
Congressional consent following massive grass-roots support organized
by health food stores. Millions of American activists told Congress,
in no uncertain terms:
“Protect nutritional supplements as foods or we will remove you from office”.
Congress listened and carried out the will of the people.
DSHEA appropriately classifies nutritional supplements as foods which
can have no upper limits set on their use. DSHEA recognizes that
people use nutrients safely to deal with their individually differing
needs for nutrients. The concept of biochemical individuality means
that people have different needs for nutrients at different times. Are
nutrients toxins? No, they are not toxins. They are substances
essential to prevent, treat and cure any chronic condition, in
differing doses at different times in different people.
DSHEA protects the US from Codex Alimentarius’ deadly Vitamin and
Mineral Guideline. We must reach our Congressional members, educate
them about the facts on Codex Alimentarius and direct them to vote
against anything that would threaten DSHEA.
Congress holds the keys to our health freedom. And it is their job to
listen to us. Let’s not allow cynicism to tell us otherwise. We did it
for DSHEA in 1994. We can do it again this year.
7) Your Action is Needed Now!
DSHEA is under significant legislative attack right now. Your
letter-writing is crucial: if the members of Congress know that voting
against health freedom means losing their jobs come election time,
they will listen. Our job is to make sure they get the message loud
and clear. Take action via our 3 easy steps and send personalized
emails to Congress right now.
After taking action on HealthFreedomUSA.org, consider getting together
with others in your area and visit your Congressional members in their
home offices. If we wait, we lose our health freedoms. Once we
“HARMonize” with Codex, by the way, we no longer have the right, while
we belong to the WTO, to repeal or change that “HARMonization”!
Conclusion
The objective of the pro-Codex Alimentarius multi nationals is to
“boil the frog slowly” so that we do not wake up to it in time to
avoid Codex.
Once we have “HARMonize” to Codex Alimentarius, as long as we are in
the WTO, we cannot amend or change what we’ve been “HARMonize” to.
Codex Alimentarius will go into global implementation by December 31,
2009, unless We, the People, avert it. We must act now because right
now, with $758 Million spent on declared Congressional lobbying by Big
Pharma last year, there are members of Congress who are trying to
overturn DSHEA and allow Pharma-friendly free reign for Codex. If
protective laws like DSHEA are destroyed, the sanctioning power of the
autocratic WTO kicks in, and it will be impossible to get out from
under Codex Alimentarius. We can protect our access to high potency
nutrients and stave off an adulterated food supply only by putting
pressure on Congress.
If you would like to take action to try and stop Codex Alimentarius
<please click here (USA)>, If you would like more in-depth information
about Codex Alimentarius <please click here>
If you would like to take action to try and stop Codex Alimentarius
you can sign a petition to Gordon Brown <please click here (UK)> ~
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Vitamins/ ~ Deadline to sign the
petition = 5th September 2009
If you would like more in-depth information about Codex Alimentarius
<please click here>
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=157
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=161
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=183
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=160
http://www.therapure.com/codex.htm
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Vitamins/
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhApQ3QkG0Q&feature=related
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5266884912495233634
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2D4-noTiCg
http://www.naturalnews.com/026731_CODEX_food_health.html
http://www.anhcampaign.org/campaigns/codex
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Alimentarius
Stop Codex Alimentarius and Protect Health Freedom!
Unless stated otherwise everything in this note is © 2009 by Natural
Solutions Foundation
The Natural Solutions Foundation is a non-profit organization founded
to protect and promote health freedom in the USA.
http://www.blacklistednews.com/?news_id=5768
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Alimentarius
The Codex Alimentarius (Latin for "food code" or "food book") is a
collection of internationally recognized standards, codes of practice,
guidelines and other recommendations relating to foods, food
production and food safety. Its name derives from the Codex
Alimentarius Austriacus.[1] Its texts are developed and maintained by
the Codex Alimentarius Commission, a body that was established in 1963
by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
and the World Health Organization (WHO). The Commission's main aims
are stated as being to protect the health of consumers and ensure fair
practices in the international food trade. The Codex Alimentarius is
recognized by the World Trade Organization as an international
reference point for the resolution of disputes concerning food safety
and consumer protection.[2][3]
Scope
The Codex Alimentarius officially covers all foods, whether processed,
semi-processed or raw, but far more attention has been given to foods
that are marketed directly to consumers. In addition to standards for
specific foods, the Codex Alimentarius contains general standards
covering matters such as food labeling, food hygiene, food additives
and pesticideresidues, and procedures for assessing the safety of
foods derived from modern biotechnology. It also contains guidelines
for the management of official (i.e., governmental) import and export
inspection and certification systems for foods.
The Codex Alimentarius is published in Arabic, Chinese, English,
French and Spanish. Not all texts are available in all languages.
   * Food labelling (general standard, guidelines on nutrition
labelling, guidelines on labelling claims)
   * Food additives (general standard including authorized uses,
specifications for food grade chemicals)
   * Contaminants in foods (general standard, tolerances for specific
contaminants including radionuclides, aflatoxins and other mycotoxins)
   * Pesticide and veterinary chemical residues in foods (maximum
residue limits)
   * Risk assessment procedures for determining the safety of foods
derived from biotechnology (DNA-modified plants, DNA-modified
micro-organisms, allergens)
   * Food hygiene (general principles, codes of hygienic practice in
specific industries or food handling establishments, guidelines for
the use of the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point or “HACCP”
system)
   * Methods of analysis and sampling
[edit]Specific standards
   * Meat products (fresh, frozen, processed meats and poultry)
   * Fish and fishery products (marine, fresh water and aquaculture)
   * Milk and milk products
   * Foods for special dietary uses (including infant formulae and baby foods)
   * Fresh and processed vegetables, fruits, and fruit juices
   * Cereals and derived products, dried legumes
   * Fats, oils and derived products such as margarine
   * Miscellaneous food products (chocolate, sugar, honey, mineral water)
Controversy
The controversy over the Codex Alimentarius relates to a perception
that it is a mandatory standard for food - including vitamin and
mineral supplement - safety. Supporters of the Codex Alimentarius say
that it is a voluntary reference standard for food and that there is
no obligation on countries to adopt Codex standards as a member of
either Codex or any other international trade organization. From the
point of view of its opponents, however, one of the main causes of
concern is that the Codex Alimentarius is recognized by the World
Trade Organization as an international reference standard for the
resolution of disputes concerning food safety and consumer
protection.[2][3] Proponents argue that the use of Codex Alimentarius
during international disputes does not exclude the use of other
references or scientific studies as evidence of food safety and
consumer protection.
It is reported that in 1996 the German delegation put forward a
proposal that no herb, vitamin or mineral should be sold for
preventive or therapeutic reasons, and that supplements should be
reclassified as drugs.[4] The proposal was agreed, but protests halted
its implementation.[4] The 28th Session of the Codex Alimentarius
Commission was subsequently held July 4 - July 9, 2005.[5] Among the
many issues discussed were the "Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral
Food Supplements"[6], which were adopted during the meeting as new
global safety guidelines.[7] This text has been the subject of
considerable controversy, in part because many member countries may
choose to regulate dietary supplements as therapeutic goods or
pharmaceuticals or by some other category. The text does not seek to
ban supplements, but subjects them to labeling and packaging
requirements, sets criteria for the setting of maximum and minimum
dosage levels, and requires that safety and efficacy are considered
when determining ingredient sources. The United Nations' Food and
Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO)
have stated that the guidelines are "to stop consumers overdosing on
vitamin and mineral food supplements." The Codex Alimentarius
Commission (CAC) has said that the guidelines call "for labelling that
contains information on maximum consumption levels of vitamin and
mineral food supplements." The WHO has also said that the Guidelines
"ensure that consumers receive beneficial health effects from vitamins
and minerals." [8]
Similarities have been noted between the EU's Food Supplements
Directive and the Codex Alimentarius Guidelines for Vitamin and
Mineral Supplements.[9]
Texas Republican Rep. Ron Paul has said that the Central American Free
Trade Agreement "increases the possibility that Codex regulations will
be imposed on the American public." [10]
Additional controversy has been expressed by proponents of
ecologically and socially sustainable agriculture and food systems,
such as the Slow Food movement[11], who view the Codex Alimentarius as
antithetical to this goal. According to the Manifesto on the Future of
Food, the Codex Alimentarius has "codified policies designed to serve
the interest of global agribusiness above all others, while actively
undermining the rights of farmers and consumers".[12]
See also
   * Codex Alimentarius Austriacus
   * Food Chemicals Codex
   * E number
References
  1. ^ Codex Alimentarius: how it all began Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations website. Accessed 1 January 2009.
  2. ^ a b Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary
Measures World Trade Organization. Accessed 3 September 2008.
  3. ^ a b Understanding the Codex Alimentarius Preface. Third
Edition. Published in 2006 by the World Health Organization and the
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Accessed 3
September 2008.
  4. ^ a b 'Health supplements: R.I.P.'. The Guardian newspaper, UK.
Published 14 September 2002. Accessed 2 August 2008
  5. ^ Codex Alimentarius Commission 28th Session, FAO Headquarters,
Rome, Italy, 4-9 July, 2005. Official report.
  6. ^ Codex Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral Food Supplements
  7. ^ UN commission adopts safety guidelines for vitamin and food
supplements United Nations News Centre. Published 11 July 2005.
Accessed 1 January 2009
  8. ^ UN commission adopts safety guidelines for vitamin and food
supplements United Nations News Centre. Published 11 July 2005.
Accessed 26 March 2009
  9. ^ Nil by mouth. The Observer newspaper, UK. Published 29
February 2004. Accessed 1 January 2009
 10. ^ 'The vitamin police', by ALAN BOCK, Sr. editorial writer, The
Orange County Register. Published 14 August 2005. Accessed 2 September
2008.
 11. ^ http://www.slowfood.com/about_us/eng/campaigns.lasso
 12. ^ The International Commission on the Future of Food and
Agriculture (July 15, 2003). "Manifesto on the Future of Food".
   * Codex Alimentarius Commission - official website
   * 'Understanding the Codex Alimentarius' Published in 2005 by the
World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization of
the United Nations. Accessed 4 May 2007.
   * "Authority and Legitimacy in Global Governance: Deliberation,
Institutional Differentiation, and the Codex Alimentarius" Michael
Livermore, 81 NYU Law Review 766 (2006)
The Holocaust
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust
Victims of the Holocaust.
Ghettos were established in Europe in which Jews were confined before
being shipped to extermination camps.
The Holocaust (from Greek ????a?st?? [holókaustos]: hólos, "whole"
andkaustós, "burnt"[1]), also known as The Shoah (Hebrew: ?????,
Romanized ha'shoah; Yiddish: ?????, Romanized churben or hurban[2]) is
the term generally used to describe the genocide of approximately six
million European Jews during World War II, a program of systematic
state-sponsored extermination by Nazi Germany.[3]
Some scholars maintain that the definition of the Holocaust should
also include the Nazis' systematic murder of millions of people in
other groups, including ethnic Poles, Romani, Soviet civilians, Soviet
prisoners of war,people with disabilities, homosexuals, Jehovah's
Witnesses, and otherpolitical and religious opponents.[4] By this
definition, the total number ofHolocaust victims would be between 11
million and 17 million people.[5]
The persecution and genocide were carried out in stages. Legislation
to remove the Jews from civil society was enacted years before the
outbreak of World War II. Concentration camps were established in
which inmates were used as slave labor until they died of exhaustion
or disease. Where the Third Reichconquered new territory in eastern
Europe, specialized units called Einsatzgruppen murdered Jews and
political opponents in mass shootings. Jews and Romani were confined
in overcrowded ghettos before being transported by freight train
toextermination camps where, if they survived the journey, the
majority of them were killed in gas chambers. Every arm ofNazi
Germany's bureaucracy was involved in the logistics of the mass
murder, turning the country into what one Holocaust scholar has called
"a genocidal state".[6]
Wars manipulated & financed on both sides by the Rothschilds &
Associates at great
profit to them who ended up each time there was a war with most of
country's Gold
Reserve's in payment for munitions and weapons to U.S. industrial
munitions and weaponry companies owned and financed by powerful
Rothschild Banking Family using German Zionist Jewish American
partners as fronts for them in the U.S constantly bankrupted
Britain-USA-Germany etc.
The Second World War had bankrupted Britain, Germany and the USA but
made the Rothschild Family a fortune
During the 1939–1942 period, the UK depleted much of its gold stock in
purchases of munitions and weaponry on a "cash and carry" basis from
U.S.Industrial munitions and weaponry companies owned and financed by
powerful Rothschild Banking Family using German Zionist Jewish
American partners as fronts for them in the U.S. One of those
companies was Beyer (formerly IG Farben), which later became known as
Beyer which also produced the gas chambers Zyklon B,  the steel, other
chemicals  and the rail road line,  for the German Nazi Death Camps,
munitions, other chemicals, and all kinds of stuff. The president of
Beyer (formerly IG Farben) Fritz ter Meer, the senior manager at IB
Farben, was convicted of crimes against Humanity on the basis of mass
murder, slavery and other crimes on 29th July, 1948. Although he
co-operated with SS and the Final Solution, Fritz ter Meer was
sentenced to 7 years only in War Criminal Prison, but only served
about three years in prison
John Maynard Keynes, who had argued against such a gold standard,
proposed to put the power to print money in the hands of the privately
owned Bank of England.
1971, the U.S. government again printed more dollars (a 10% increase)
and then sent them overseas, to pay for the nation's military spending
and private investments. In the first six months of 1971, $22 billion
dollars in assets left the U.S
Because of the excess printed dollars, and the negative U.S. trade
balance, other nations began demanding fulfillment of America’s
“promise to pay” - that is, the redemption of their dollars for gold.
Switzerland redeemed $50 million of paper for gold in July.France, in
particular, repeatedly made aggressive demands, and acquired $191
million in gold, further depleting the gold reserves of the U.S.[1] On
5 August 1971, Congress released a report recommending devaluation of
the dollar, in an effort to protect the dollar against foreign
price-gougers. Still, on 9 August 1971, as the dollar dropped in value
against European currencies, Switzerland withdrew the Swiss franc from
the Bretton Woods system.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_standard
During the 1939–1942 period, the UK depleted much of its gold stock in
purchases of munitions and weaponry on a "cash and carry" basis from
the U.S. and other nations.[citation needed] This depletion of the
UK's reserve convinced Winston Churchill of the impracticality of
returning to a pre-war style gold standard. To put it simply the war
had bankrupted Britain. John Maynard Keynes, who had argued against
such a gold standard, proposed to put the power to print money in the
hands of the privately owned Bank of England. Keynes, in warning about
the menaces of inflation, said "By a continuous process of inflation,
governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part
of the wealth of their citizens. By this method, they not only
confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and while the process
impoverishes many, it actually enriches some". Quite possibly because
of this, the 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement established the
International Monetary Fund and an international monetary system based
on convertibility of the various national currencies into a U.S.
dollar that was in turn convertible into gold. It also prevented
countries from manipulating their currency's value to gain an edge in
international trade.

To stabilize the economy and combat runaway inflation, on August 15,
1971, President Nixon imposed a 90-day wage and price freeze, a 10
percent import surcharge, and, most importantly, “closed the gold
window”, ending convertibility between US dollars and gold. The
President and fifteen advisors made that decision without consulting
the members of the international monetary system, so the international
community informally named it the Nixon shock. Given the importance of
the announcement — and its impact upon foreign currencies —
presidential advisors recalled that they spent more time deciding when
to publicly announce the controversial plan, than they spent creating
the plan.He was advised that the practical decision was to make an
announcement before the stock markets opened on Monday (and just when
Asian markets also were opening trading for the day). On August 15,
1971, that speech and the price-control plans proved very popular and
raised the public's spirit. The President was credited with finally
rescuing the American public from price-gougers, and from a
foreign-caused exchange crisis.  By December 1971, the import
surcharge was dropped, as part of a general revaluation of the major
currencies, which thereafter were allowed 2.25% devaluations from the
agreed exchange rate. By March 1976, the world’s major currencies were
floating — in other words, the currency exchange rates no longer were
governments' principal means of administering monetary policy.

Analysts of the post-2007 financial crisis, such as David McNally
(2009)  cite the end of the Bretton Woods dollar-gold convertibility
as the modern source of monetary volatility, and consequent
unregulated financialization. That volatility necessitated the rise of
risk-hedging financial instruments, such as derivatives (including
Credit Default Swaps). Thus as the value of the dollar was no longer
based on gold, it became based instead on projected future value. The
US economy and its firms become financialized (dependent on
interest-paying financial transactions) to accommodate and take
advantage of the risk inherent in the future value of the dollar as
the basis for present value. Further, financialized firms and
investors gained profits from speculating on that risk. Especially
after the 1997 East Asian overaccumulation crisis necessitated
loosening credit in the US so that working-class Americans could prop
up global demand, working-class debt was packaged by banks and hedge
funds and sold to themselves (banks and hedge funds), as well as to
pension funds, investors, and financialized corporations. During Alan
Greenspan’s tenure as president of the Federal Reserve (1987-2005)
alone, private and public debt in the US quadrupled to $43 trillion.
When the bubble burst in 2007, capital fled the US. Private capital
flows were reduced by $1.1 trillion in the third quarter of 2007.
There remain continued problems with valuing assets in the US,
especially given public and private debt, the unabated diminishment of
American working class purchasing power, and ongoing military
expenditure. 40 years after the Nixon Shock, analysts predict the rise
of competition among currency blocs for greater control of financial
markets and global monetary privileges.
Beyer (formerly IG Farben) making and using Zyclon B Gas and Dildren
in FrankfurtThis was all Rothschild money

World News Shock USAWeeklyNews Exclusive

Major Interntaional Industrial Companies, Banking Groups, powerful
banking and business families and media owners and controllers which
include Bayer, IG Farben, The Rockerfeller Family, The Rothchild
Family, Rupert Murdoch and his media companies News Corporation and
News International, Conrad Black, Fritz Teer Meer, have secretly
played their part in helping to create the Codex Alimentarius
Commission in 1963 and its mummy and daddy organisations the World
Health Organisation (WHO)and the Food and Agriculture Organisation of
the Unitd Namtions (FAO)  as world wide bodies rules and regulations
that can override an individual country's rules and regulations  on
food, nutrients, minerals and herbs consumer protection code labelling
protection.  scam to mass murder over 3 million people on planet earth
through various methods including starvation of nutrients in their
food and increasing levels of terrifyingly dangerous poisoness
pesticides and bovine growth hormones in all types of food including
fruit vegetables, seeds, net, fish, pountry, lamb, pig, cows, etc. to
completely control all food production, coding, labelling,
distribution etc.

The British Prime Minister Lloyd George claimed, in 1909, that Lord
Nathan Rothschild was the most powerful man in Britain.   By the end
of the century, the family owned, or had built, at the lowest
estimates, over 41 palaces, of a scale and luxury perhaps unparalleled
even by the richest Royal families. In 1816, four of the brothers were
each elevated to the hereditary nobility by Austrian EmperorFrancis I;
Nathan was elevated in 1818. All of them were granted the Austrian
title of baron orFreiherr on 29 September 1822. As such, some members
of the family used "de" or "von" Rothschild to acknowledge the grant
of nobility. In 1885, Nathan Mayer Rothschild II (1840–1915) of the
London branch of the family, was granted the hereditary peerage title
Baron Rothschild in the Peerage of the United Kingdom.Many Rothschilds
were and are supporters of the State of Israel, although other members
of the family opposed the creation of the state.[21] Lord Victor
Rothschild was against granting asylum or even help to Jewish refugees
during the Holocaust.[22] However, Baron Edmond James de Rothschild
was a patron of the first settlement in Palestine atRishon-LeZion, and
bought from Ottoman landlords many parts of the land which now makes
up present-day Israel. In 1917 Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild
was the addressee of the Balfour Declaration, which committed the
British government to the establishment in Palestine of a national
home for the Jewish people.

James A. de Rothschild financed the Knesset building as a gift to the
State of Israel.

The Supreme Court of Israel building was donated to Israel by Dorothy
de Rothschild.[23] Outside the President's Chamber is displayed the
letter Mrs Rothschild wrote to Prime Minister Shimon Peres expressing
her intention to donate a new building for the Supreme Court.[24]

Rothschild family banking businesses pioneered international high
finance during the industrialisation of Europe and were instrumental
in supporting railway systems across the world and in complex
government financing for projects such as the Suez Canal. The family
bought up a large proportion of the property inMayfair, London. Major
businesses directly founded by Rothschild family capital include
Alliance Assurance (1824) (now Royal & SunAlliance); Chemin de Fer du
Nord (1845); Rio Tinto Group (1873); Société Le Nickel (1880) (now
Eramet); and Imétal (1962) (now Imerys). The Rothschilds financed
Cecil Rhodes on his expeditions in Africa, the founding of De Beers
and the creation of the colony of Rhodesia.

The same people and companies behind the Nazi German Holocaust and
produced the ZyklonB gas chambers, steel, other chemicals, munitions
for the death camps where they mass murdered  over 10 million Jews and
Freemasons are behind the Codex Alimentarius Commission food,
nutrients, minerals and herbs consumer protection code labelling
protection scam to mass murder over 3 million people on planet
earth......Click here to read the full story
http://www.blacklistednews.com/?news_id=5768
http://www.codexcorp.com/
CODEX CORP:  Specialising in Corrections and Healthcare, it may be an
unusual combination but it works for us, our partners and customers
who want to keep a close control and watch on the use of health care
and nutritional products in the community and with our unique and far
reaching security and monitoring systems we will be able to tell our
customers instantly if anyone in the world is using nutrients and
minerals that are not Codex approved  and compliant, and have them
quickly detained and punished for not complying with Codex approved
and compliant products. With Codex we are proud to say that no one
will escape detection. Codex Corporation and its founders have over
100 years experience in this business including the management and
design of the concentration camps in Germany. Codex Corporation was
originally the multi billion  International Giant I G Farben.
A quick background on our founding company I G Farben and its
directors and managers will help convince you that as far as security,
nutrient and health care management, people management, corrections
management, Codex ( Formerly IG Farben) is the company you should
chose for any issues in Corrections and Heathcare Management. Codex
and its security management has the ability to make sure there is no
health freedom. not just in the USA but all over the world... and
Codex has the ability to make sure anyone that tries to think for a
minute they can get way with trying to have health freedom, will
quickly be caught, detained and punished by Codex's unique and far
reaching security and monitoring systems...The Codex Moto
is
"None will escape detection and punishment of the unauthorised use of
nutrients with Codex on the job....just look at out success record in
designing and managing the concentration camp in Germany....our
success record at Codex Corporation, formerly IG Farben in people,
healthcare and corrections management speaks for itself"
Codex Corporation's, formerly IG Farben's 100 year History in People,
Healthcare and Corrections Management
provided from Codex Alimentarius Speach by Dr Rimal Laibox MD of the
Natural Solutions Fioundation, Produced by EON the Ecological Options
Network for Bauman College in cooperation with the Natural Solutions
Foundation and the National Association of Nutrition Professionals
(NANP) 2005 www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
Dr Rimal Laibox is an experienced healthcare professional and has
studies Codex Corporation, formerly IG Farben's progess ov erthe last
decade to become  the leaders in People, Healthcare and Corrections
Management in the United States.
Codex and Nutricide
" Let me tell you about Codex Alimentarius, let me define it for you,
let me help you understand the enemy..and let me assure you that
absolutely nothing that I am going to tell you, is exagerated, is
interperlated, or is imagined. Every thing I am going to tell you is
documented. A great deal of it is documented on my website,
whichwww.HealthFreedomUSA.org. Let me back up and tell you that I have
been watching Codex come toward us for about the last decade. ,,, and
I have been watching the vote sin congress, which God help us is our
bastion of support and protection against Codex and I will explain why
that is. I have been watching the votes to protect our health freedom
dwindle, until finally in the 109th Congress, without a good deal of
activity, we didn't have the votes to protect us. I have been watching
Codex excellerate and I have been watching it expand, and I have been
getting more and more troubled. Let me give you a brief run down of
Codex then. After the second world war, the Nuremberg Tribunals were
held in which people who had committed crimes against humanity were
judged by the world community in a court run by the United States and
Britain...  and they were sentenced to terms in prison if they were
found guilty of crimes against humanity. In 1948 some of the people
who were found guilty of crimes against humanity on the basis of mass
murder, slavery and other crimes were the president and 24 board
members and executives  of a hugh industrial megalith called IG
Farben. Amazingly enough however, by 1951 all of them had already been
released, and and continuing to consult with German Corporations IG
Farben produced the gas used in the gas chambers Zyklon B, they
produced the steel for the death camps and the rail road line, they
produced the munitions, they produced chemicals, they produced all
kinds of stuff. The Nuremberg Tribunal disolved IG Farben into
companies such as  into BASF - Hoechst - Bayer They produced
pharmaceuticals.. a big big pharacuticals company.  So the president
of IG Farben Fritz ter Meer, the senior manager at IB Farben, was
convicted of crimes against Humanity on the basis of mass murder,
slavery and other crimes on 29th July, 1948. Although he co-operated
with SS and the Final Solution, Fritz ter Meer was sentenced to 7
years only in War Criminal Prison, but only served about three years
in prison, no more someone that bounces a business cheque for say
$1,000 and is charged for fraud in the $1,000 bounced cheque for it
not being honoured on presentation. Someone steals an apple can get 3
years in prison also, or if he or she stole the apple as a servant
they can receive 7 years in prison,
Now Fritz ter Meer is sort of an artistic fellow and he was the one
responsible for the slogan that people saw as they entered Autswitz,
usually for the last time, "Work Brings Freedom". Fritz ter Meer was a
creative sort of fellow. Fritz ter Meer was responsible for the slogan
that people saw as they entered Auschwitz-, usually for the last time,
 " Work brings  Freedom....a creative sort of fellow.
You will notice that the institutions that Fritz ter Meer worked for
an/or had shareholdings in as listed by Wikepedia are
Institutions IG Farben, Bayer, Codex Alimentarius
The Bayer executive Fritz ter Meer, sentenced to seven years in prison
by the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, was made head of the supervisory
board of Bayer in 1956, after his release.
Fritz ter Meer ( July 4 1884 – October 27 1967 ) was a German chemist.
He was the son of Edmund ter Meer the founder of a chemical company
that later became part of Bayer. Fritz ter Meer also worked for Bayer
and later IG Farben. He was involved in the planning of Monowitz
concentration camp, a satellite camp of KZ Auschwitz. He was sentenced
to seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948. After he was
released in 1951 he became supervisory board chairman
(Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He retired in 1961.
The Bayer company then became part of IG Farben, a conglomerate of
German chemical industries that formed a part of the financial core of
the German Nazi regime. IG Farben owned 42.5% of the company that
manufactured Zyklon B,[2] a chemical used in the gas chambers of
Auschwitz and other extermination camps. During World War II, the
company also extensively used slave labor in factories attached to
large slave labor camps, notably the sub-camps of the Mauthausen-Gusen
concentration camp[3]. When the Allies split IG Farben into several
pieces after World War II for involvement in organized Nazi war
crimes, Bayer re-appeared as an individual business. The Bayer
executive Fritz ter Meer, sentenced to seven years in prison by the
Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, was made head of the supervisory board
of Bayer in 1956, after his release.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_ter_Meer
Fritz ter Meer
undefined
Fritz ter Meer
Born June 4, 1884
Uerdingen, Germany
Died October 27, 1967 (aged 83)
Leverkusen, Germany
Nationality German
Institutions IG Farben, Bayer, Codex Alimentarius
Fritz ter Meer ( July 4 1884 – October 27 1967 ) was a German chemist.
He was the son of Edmund ter Meer the founder of a chemical company
that later became part of Bayer. Fritz ter Meer also worked for Bayer
and later IG Farben. He was involved in the planning of Monowitz
concentration camp, a satellite camp of KZ Auschwitz. He was sentenced
to seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948. After he was
released in 1951 he became supervisory board chairman
(Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He retired in 1961.
   * Heine, Jens Ulrich (1990). Verstand und Schicksal. Die Männer
der I.G. Farbenindustrie A.G. (1925-1945). Weinheim; New York:
VCH.ISBN 978-3527281442.
   * Codex Alimentarius Commission [1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_ter_Meer
Edmund ter Meer ( 1852 – November 5, 1931) was a German chemist who
discovered the ter Meer reaction and founded in 1877 the ter Meer dye
company in Uerdingen. After the fusion with the aniline factory of
Julius Weiler the Weiler-ter Meer company was formed. This company
later became part of the Bayer company. His son Fritz ter Meer also
became a chemist associated to the Bayer company.
Edmund ter Meer
Born 1852
Died  November 5, 1931 (aged 79)
Nationality German
Institutions Bayer
Known for ter Meer reaction
References
   * Max Bodenstein, H. Leuchs (1931). "Sitzung vom 16. November
1931". Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft 64 (11):
A211–A212. doi:10.1002/cber.19310641139.*
   * ter Meer Prize University Bonn
   * "Ter Meer family." Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online
   * Uerdingen industrial area history
So Fritz ter Meer was sitting in jail and he said "well, that didn't
work..what else can we do?   I've got it food..he who controls food
controls ....the world..."  Fritz ter Meer  got out of jail he went to
his  UN buddies and said "Have I got an idea for you..if we take over
food world wide..we have power world wide, and his UN buddies said.
"cool idea". So they created a Trade Commission. That's a very
powerful set of words... A Trade Commission....called the Codex
Alimentarius Commission
It is not a Public Health Commission..it is not a Consumer Protection
Commission....it is a Trade Commission. Trade is about what? Money!!
Trade is about Business!! Trade is about Profit!! Well they said in
1962 we're going to work towards total, global implimentation of Codex
Alimentarius on December 31st, 2009. Long Term.... and they set up a
bunch of committees.. committees on fish and fishery...fats and oil...
fruits and vegetables... ground nuts...nutritian  for special diatary
uses and so on. There are currently about 27 Codex committees, they
are regional organisations, there are task forces and so anf so on. So
it's ahugh beaurocratic mostrosety.it's emence. Codex has promogated
well over 4,000 guidelines, standards and regulations on
everything...everything which can legally be put into your mouth, with
the excpetion of Pharmaceuticals. they are not part of Codex. That is
an importand point. Now Codex standards have no legal weight
whatsoever. Zero. So who cares about them..their just standards...so
we are talking about an industry setting regulation organisation, but
if it has no legal standing .. who cares? Right!! Here's the history
of Codex Alimentarius before 1962.
Please note here that Fritz ter Meer  was sentenced to seven years
prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948 having been found guilty of
crimes against humanity on the basis of mass murder, slavery and other
crimes . After he was released in 1951 he became supervisory board
chairman (Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He officiialy
retired as supervisory board chairman of Bayer AG in 1961 so he could
behind the scene concentrate of working with his UN buddies on
developing his idea of  setting up a syatem that will control the
whoole world's food supply under the code name Codex Alimentarius. It
would not look good publicly for Fritz ter Meer  who was sentenced to
only seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948 having been
found guilty of crimes against humanity on the basis of mass murder,
slavery and other crimes, and only served about three years of his
sentence because of his powerful UN buddies, to be seen to be publicly
be involved with Codex Alimentarius. Here's the history of Codex
Alimentarius before 1962. The Austian Hungarian Empire said we need
rules by which the courts can rule on cases involving food.o we'll
have regulations and rules that the courts will enforce.... that's how
they get their way. That was called the Codex Alimentarius and  was
put into place around 1893 and lasted until the end of the Austrian
Hungarian Empire in the first world war. So the idea was there in the
Germanic tradition. We need rules..lots of rules...lots a
nd lots and lots of rules..we need a lot of rules... let's have rules
for everything to do with food. So it was a natural extention for the
German Industrialists to say we'll go back to the good old days of
Codex Alimentarius back  when we had them in Austrian Hungarian
Empire. Cool. So they started promilgating their rules and regulations
and they were voluntary. They were sort of guidlines. Now Codex
Alimentarius Commission is administered by the World Health
Oganisation (WHO) and the Food and Aricultural Organisation (FAO)  and
they fund Codex and they run it at the request of the United Nations
(UN). So the're mummy and daddy to Codex Alimentarius.  And that's
very interesting because they're supposed to be about health and food
world wide. Some conflicts of interest that we'll talk about. So
Codex started promilgating regulations and rules, and the way that's
done is that the committees work up a rule, a standard, a guideline,
or regulation an dthey get it to what's called a step 8 which is the
final step in their administrative process... and then it's presented
to the Codex Alimentarius Commission for ratification, like the
vitamin and mineral guidline was presented to the Codex Alimentarius
Commission on July 4th this past summer (2005). It was ratified... it
was approved by consensus...and it is now...despite the propaganda
that your going to hear if you every hear about it in the media... it
is now mandatory on any member country and the WTO, the World Trade
Organisation. Well what in the world do they have to do with it? And
the answer is everything. The World Trade Organisation you see
accepted Codex when the world organisation was formed in 1994. They
said, "well how are we going to decide trade disputes around food if
we don't have a set of rules. I know..we'll accept the Codex
Alimentarius rules and all the members of the WTO will...willl world
wide...get ready for an Orwellian Term will harmonise with are
standards, with the codex standards.. I suggest you capitalise the
first four letters in your mind ...HARM... onise ... everybody is
supposed to .HARM... onise... with Codex....   and when they HARM...
onise with Codex, then if the get pulled into the WTO Dispute
Resolution Process they have a chance of winning because here's the
kicker... are you ready for this one ...  if two countries go into the
World Trade Organisation Dispute Resolution Process  and one of then
is Codex compliant, and one of them is not Codex Compliant.. the one
that is Codex Compliant automaticlly wins regardless of the merit of
the case.  People are using Codex Compliant in a much bigger economic
battle. So every couunty in the world is racing to do what?   Become
Codex Compliant. So in the United States...the situation is OK ..how
do we become Codex compliant when we have laws that protect us. You
have to remember that Codex does not serve consumer well being. Codex
does not serve what I call the five Bigs...Big Pharma Big Chema Big
Biotechna Big AgriBiz and Bid Medica ,,,little me and little you are
not served by Codex, in the least, so before we go forward and talk
about the rest of  what has to happen, let's ask what Codex does?
You probably all know about the vitamin and mineral guidline that was
ratified on July 4th ( 2005). You may not kow that although it is said
that CODEX regulations guidlines and standards that have been ratified
are volantary....That Are Not Voluntary...That is known as a lie!!!
They are mandatory..but  thye ar enot fully mandatory until December,
31st 2009. They're sort of kinda a little bit mandatory now. and
they're totally mandatory then. So what does Codex do? Why do I care
enough about Codex to close my practice and stop treating patients who
came to me from around the world..to help them regain their health and
be radiantly well with non toxic means which is a very satisfying
thing to do.. I love it...it also provided me with an income...  that
was nice. OK...;why am I concerned enough, let's talk about the
mineral and vitamin guidline first. In 1994 DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments
Health and Education Act was passed which classifies nutrient and
herbs as foods. As foods you can set no upper limit on them. You
cannot set an upper limit on lettuce...lamb or  roodibaggers.. and
similarily you cannot set an upper limit in vitamin C.. echanasia...
ginko bi loba ... vitamin D ...    to nutrients is freely given to
us.. We are allowed to have any nutients we want because.... this is a
very important point... under common law ...  What's not forbidden is
permitted.... Codex on the other hand  ... is a Napoleonic Code
...What's not permitted is forbidden law system... under Napoleonic
Code ...anything not permitted is forbidden ...  that's called a
positive list .... so vitamins and nutrients and minerals ... in 1994
we passed DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act was
passed which classifies nutrient and herbs as foods... we can have as
much of them as we want thatis our business... in 1994 Codex with no
notice here in this country whatsoever.. prepared nutrents ... put on
you intellectual seatbelts...declared nutrients to be toxins. they're
poisens ... dangerous Industrial poisens ... AS POISENS ... WE HAVE TO
BE PROTECTED FROM THEM ...how  do you protect someone from poisens ...
you use toxicology ... you use a science called risk assessment ..lt's
take a primer on risk assessment  .. first you take the substance
that's dangerous and feed it to animals, and the dosage that kills 50%
of them ..that's called the LD 50 ... and you exstrapulate what the LD
50 for human being might be.,,then you go down to the other end of the
dosage range ...and you start feeding ittie bittie tiny bits of it ..
 to test animals ... and you come up with the largest possible dose
...the maximum  permissable upper limit  ... that can be fed to an
animal before a discernable impact  is shown ..OK ... no discernable
impact .... then you divide that by 100 ... that's how they do it in
risk assessment ... and now you've got a safety margin ...  so you
have one 100th of the dose that can be given with no discernable
impact ...   OK nutrients! Under Codex!!!    Not only are limited to
those nutriants on the positive list ...and  we  anticipate there will
be 18 of them .. and they do not include.  .  CoQ10  Glucosamine ...
cundroyton sulfate ...thye do include floride ... which to my
knowledge as a Physician has absolutely no biological benefit
whatsoever. ... but it does make people complasent ... floride was
first used in the Goolog  ...because it was discovered that prisoners
who were fed floridated water ...  were complasent ...  and you could
do anything you wanted to them ...  they were easy  to manage ... so
you have 18 nutrients  ... you have ittie bittie tiny winy doses ...
that are determined scientifically to have no effect ...  on any human
being  now in this country we have a problem ... we have ...DSHEA
-Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act ... we have to get rid of
DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act  in order to  HARM
...on..ise ... with Codex... that part of Codex anyway .... so how do
we get rid of DSHEA ...  we attack it legislatively of course .. and
...  there are five.. count them.. five currently before Congress ...
designed to overturn ..gut ... invalidate .. and otherwise get rid of
DSHEA ...  because once DSHEA is gone we can HARM...on..ise with the
vitamin and mineral guideline   ...  so what we are talking about is
....  waking up one morning to find that high potency therapudicly
effective clinicly significant nutrients are illegal ....
(Codex want to make nutients illegal ) in the way that Heroin is
illegal ..not available with a prescription ... Illegal ...  If these
nutrients have any impact on  the Human body ...  they are illegal ...
that's just the vitamin and mineral guidline ... let's talk about milk
.... we have    recombinant bovine  growth hormone and now we can
choose milk with it and milk without it ... butter with it or butter
without it ..right ...not under Codex ... because under Codex ...
every dairy cow ...  on the planet must be treated with Monsanto's
recombinant bovine hormone.... furthermore ..under Codex ... every
animal used for food on the planent whether it has fins, feet or
feathers ... every animal on the planet must be treated with sub
clinical antibiotics and and must be treated with exogenous growth
hormones ... Codex requires (mandates) that all food be irradiated
unless it's eaten locally and raw. including organic food of course
... so is it organic afterwards... well of course the organic
standards are incredibly low ...the organic  standards allow a farmer
to use vetinary drugs including exogenous growth hormone, anti biotics
etc ....on animals and then at his whim, reclassify them as organic
...  but farmers are our friends  and they would never do
that...right!!!  Right!!  Codex sets limits for the dangerous
industrial chemicals that you can have in your food..and the limits
are increditbly high ... go to Codex Alimentarius Commission ... look
at the toxins and vetinary  Chemicals  and the levels that are set.,,
they are terrifying ot me ..Terrifying ... the names of the Chemicals
that are permitted and the amounts of the chemicals that are permitted
are terrifying to me ...Why am I terrified?  Well perhaps I am just a
cowardly person ...it's possible... think about this.. in 2001,
"The levels that are permitted, developed and maintained by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission, by the are incredibly high in toxins and the
levels that are set the names and amounts of the chemicals are
terrifying..." states Dr Rimal Laibox MD a director of the National
Association of Nutrition Professionals (NANP)
In 2001, 176 Countries including the USA got together and stated that
there were 12 really bad dangerous organic chemicals  Chemicals.
They're called "Pops".,,"Persistent Organic Pollutants. There are a
lot of them, but there are 12 that are so bad that, nobody could
disagree that those 12 Pops had to be banned worldwide.Nine of the 12
worst organic Chemicals known are pesticides...not
surprisingly..because they kill things..and of course we have many
processes and enzime systems that are very much like insects and other
pests so, they are not too good for us..but Codex has different
ideas...Codex has brought back 7 of the 9 forbidden POPS, that 176
countries  banned
worldwide,,,Dieldrin..Aldrin...hexaclorabenzine...etc..and the food
that is imported from other countries that contains these substances
can not be stopped at our borders..because otherwise it would be God
Forbid, a Trade Violation...that's how Codex works..Codex, according
to the World Trade Organisation  (WTO) and the Food and Agricultural
Organisation's (FAO) joint projections..now I didn't  make this
up...please if you have unfastened you're Intellectual Seat
Belts...put them back on again...if you do the numbers in the WHO- FAO
projections in their report headed Diet Nutrition and Prevention of
Chronic Diseases..that just the vitamin and mineral guideline
alone...when it goes into global implimentation..on December 31st,
2009...will result in a minimum of 3 billion (that's B... Bad... Big
Billion) deaths - onee billion through simple starvation..those folks
who die ar not particularily economicly successful from the point of
view of the Corporations..when you're starving to death, how much good
can you do, when the issue is that how much can you buy.. not a lot..
forget them..but Hah..but the next  two billion...they will die from
the preventable diseases (two billion people will die from diseases of
under nutrition)..of under nutrition// cancer.. the single most
profitable condition known to human kind..Cardiovacular Disease..a
good second...diabetis...pritty good producer of income...and a whole
host of other preventable diseases. Who will die? Who Knows? Who Will
Live? Probably those people who are wealthy enough and powerful enough
to have their own pushers of clean food and nutriants..that's who will
live!!!  You and I? ..probably not...our children? probably not...our
grand children?...probably not!!! So we're talking about food
regulations that are in fact are the legalisation of the mandated
toxicity and under nutrition..It will become illegal..if there is a
famine...where ever there is a famine...to ship high nutriant density
biscuits to that country.. and it will be illegal to distribute
them...that's what we're talking about!!! Codex is Big and It's
Bad..but it's not invunerable. So the point is...that we have to
protect ourselves, and I believe we have to regain global leadership,
which we have lost. surrendered..squandered..ah..sold..we have
sold..just joining the World Trade Organisation (WTO), surended our
sovereinghty...however as it just happens I have a team of
Constitutional Lawyers..looking at the following question...Are we
members of the WTO? Cause if you remember from High School Civics..the
way you get a treaty to be a real treaty..is to have it ratified by a
two thirds majority of the Senate...and the way we got into the WTO
was, they passed a law allowing Bill Clinton to fast track us into the
WTO. "That's Not A Treaty"...the USA is not legally not a member of
the WTO..now that's a piece of the battle...Someone says from the
audience.."you will have to tell George Bush.." we will tell George
Bush , but George Bush will not be relevant when we do tell
him..ah..so that's a piece of it, but that's not going to save our
lives right now because..do you know..picture in your mind...a wasp or
a bee trap..where the insect voluntarily goes down the funnel and then
can't get up out of the trap again..that's Codex..a regular law can be
over turned..it can be repealed...it can be corrected..by  another
piece of legislation..but once we become Codex Compliant...in any
area...as long as we are members of the WTO..it can never be
repealed...because we have lost the sovereignty to become un_codex
compliant as long as we are in the WTO, so it's like going down that
funnel and not being able to get back out of it. So it's very
important that we make sure that we do not become codex
compliant...but we will be hit with all those big trade sanctions from
the countries that are codex compliant.. so that the country will be
destroyed economically..right..no remember surprise..one of the
principles of war...remember mass..where you take your strength
against the enemies weekness andweek points. Well here's what we've
done.  We have a team of lawyers, who have spent hundreds of hours
with us pro bono..these are good guy lawyers...these two gentlemen and
we have spent hundreds of hours studying Codex, understanding it's
weekness..it's weeknesses..a lot of weeknesses.. and constructing a
strategy..which 'will take the succer down'....It will take it
down...but I need you...you are people that other people come to about
safe healthy food..and nutrients...
National Association of Nutritrional Professionals NANP 2005
Conference..you are ready made disenimation points..you are the
thousand million.... hundred million points of light. Here's what is
happening. Every country in the world has to be Codex compliant in
order not to get hit by WTO trade sanctions, as I told you of their
members of Codex and the WTO..and there are a few countries that are
not, but I can guarantee you they are not of any major significance.
So. the question is...What is Codex Compliance mean?
Well, most people in most countries..most legislators believe that
they have to adopt  as their national standard on that particular
subject...what Codex ratified. But that's not the case, any more than
we're in the WTO. That's not the case either. What this means is that
the format..the issues and the subjects..covered by a Codex
Guideline...Standard or Regulation..have to be addressed in the
country's guideline standard or regulation on the same topic. So what
we have done is create the first of many alternative Codex guidelines.
You can go to our website www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and you will see a
little button on the upper right handside that says sign this citzen's
partition. Now to briefly digress the citizen's partition is not like
a grocery store partition that you sign and bring to somebody and say
'I have 200,000 signatures and they dump it in the waist basket,
because it is in their mind, it is one signature that you and your
friends wrote 200,000 names. No...it is a legal challenge to the
policy of the United States Government on Codex. It's called a
citizen's partition. It's a legal challenge..We're suing the United
States Government..saying what you're doing is illegal folks...let us
tell you how..we want hearings of fact...we want redress..we want
correction..if we get what we want...that's dandy...if we don't get
what we want we have gone through a process..exhausting administrative
remedies.. we have made the case ripe for court.
So OK, I need you and everybody you know, to sign this citizen's
partition..stating this is a bad policy on mass..and you do this on
the web..and you will see the instructions and we present the
thousands and thousands of pages that we print out that have people's
signatures to the US Codex Office and to the FDA (Federal Drug
Administration) and they don't like that at all..but that's OK.
However, this time..this is the second amendment of the citizen's
partition that we're asking you to sign. This time the revised vitamin
and mineral guideline is part of it. It is part of the law suit saying
this needs to be US Policy. The more voices that say..this is what I
want...and you work for me..Mr and Mrs beaureaucrat and Mr and Mrs
congressman and Mr and Mrs Senator. The more voices the more weight.
So step number one is read and sign the citizen's partition. Step
number two diseminate the information..the weblink. put it out in your
office. get your patients...your friends and neighbours..your
suppliers..to sign the citizens partition and your suppliers..the
companies you use, are going to tell you that you're out of your
minds...they will tell you that Codex is not a problem..and they will
tell you..anyone here have a dog..OK...dog owners know that you ask a
dog to heal..sit down...stay..that's Codex in this country and
worldwide, because the more people that are in Codex comma, the less
trouble they have getting this through...anyone here of the NNFA.the
National Nutrition Foods Association..everybody's heard of the NNFA.
Did you know that the members of the NNFA and not just health foods
stores and manufacturers..but include companies with names you may
have heard...Pfizer ...Merck...Monsanto...Bayer...BASF..Archer Daniels
Midland..Glaxo....Aires..ClyneW elcome ..... you get the
idea..why?..because after DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and
Education Act was passed, and the nutriant business virgined..the
Pharmaceuticals, folks, who are not dumb, said there is gold in them
there pills..and they brought the means of production of many many
many companies.. and they brought the companies themselves..so there
in the nutrient business. What better way to kill the nutrient
business, which is not nearly as profitable as the toxic chemical drug
business, than to take it over. It works everytime..right!!
CRN...anybody here know about CRN..Council for Responsable Nutritian.
Same members...they have lots of multi level marketing
companies...same members..OK..and their serving their members needs.
CRN are saying....Yeh...Codex is coming..Codex is going to protect us
from those dangerous vitamins and minerals and herbs and CRN is saying
it's fine...go to sleep lulaby and goodnight..and everything is
fine...and they use a report that they commissoned at a reputed cost
of $800,000..a report prepared by Sydley Austin Brown and Rute..a law
firm in Washington...wrote a report for them..and it said
lullaby...and goodnight everything is fine..it won't have an impact on
the United States..everything is fine..Sydley Austin Brown and Rute
has one major client..who's name you might know..Merk. Now it's
entirely possible that the NNFA just did a spectacular bad job of due
dilligence..or not..anyway...the report says everything is
fine..everything is dandy.there will be no problem..we've got DSHEA
-Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act Yeh, sure we do. Now lets
talk about Australia...remember five laws before congress to over turn
DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act
and you can write to congress on the website...Now congress uses the
multiplier of 13,000 to one...every email, fa,x phone
call...letter..don't write letters...they get decontaminated, they
never get to congress...every email, fax and phone call..counts as
13,000 constituants opinions..they figure that if you write a letter
or send an email there are 12,999 lazy who can't bother to get to the
computer terminal to do the same thing, but they feel the way you do.
interesting..that's power my friends...that's power..that's 13,000 to
one. Suppose we have a million people...suppose we have 10 million
people..supposed we have 100 million people...saying,,  Don't You
Dare!!!  Now congress has one rule...above all others.. anybody know
what it is? Get Re-elected! That's the primary rule, the prime
directive is to get re-elected. Now DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health
and Education Act was passed you may remember by  unaminous
congressional consent. Was that because one morning all members of
Congress woke up and said..."I See The Light..
Nutriants Are Better Than Drugs!! "... They said, oh, If I don't go
along with this..I'll never be re-elected to anything.....remember
critical mass...remember we were out on the streets and we were up on
our hind legs and we were making noise and we were rallying...and
rallying and we were writing letters and we said....Don't You Dare To
Take Away My Health Freedom!!! Remember?   Expect that we got fat dumb
and lazy and stopped protecting ourselves ...and we're in the same
place again.... exept that it's all food instead of just nutriants.
So! Thats point number One. Use the freedom mouse..ride the freedom
mouse. We've made it as easy as possible in the site...Sign up, for
the emails. I will never sell your information to anyone. I promise
you. Plus I will never rent it, I will never share it, you'll only get
an email from me, and we need you to know what's going on. So I''ll
send you email blasts. I'll send you things that you can do... or not.
It is your choice.. Get everybody you know..informed....now what else
can you do? Now we're going to write a series of alternative
guidelines. Everything bad in codes will have an alternative guideline
that turns it into a pro health guideline. What have we done with the
vitamin and mineral guideline?  You can see that because we have a
marked up copy that has their guideline crossed out and ours written
in on the website..It's right there. What we've done is turn it into a
guideline that mandates "bio-chemicaly individually determined optimal
health" and it's still Codex compliant...So we said..OK. now we need
congress to adopt this, and we need other countries in the world to
adopt this, so, Burt and I went to Washington DC and we met Daniel
Rorobocker from Orange County, who said to us, he's a
representative.... he said "I believe in pesticides...  " I went Oh..
He said I believe in GMO's I went Oh... He said " I believe in
Iradiation of food"  I went OH... But he said..."I believe in your
right to eat foods that have not been processed that way more than I
believe in those technologies... I will take this one on..." We said.
" OH that's really nice.." He said now..."We need a coaition..."  So
we went across the isle ....across the office building to see Peter
Defozio's staff from Oregan who would was a Liberal Democrat., whereas
 Rorobocker is a Libritarian Republican, and Defazio's on board and we
have large numbers of others who actually has never heard of Codex.
before we told them about it. Never heard of Codex ...we have called
every health legislative aid on congress.  What's you're
Congressmans's position on Codex?  and they've said "Wah????"...We
have spoken to the trade legislative assistants and asked. What's you
congressman's position on Codex?  Congress and trade legislative's
assistants and staff are not informed on Codex   ... and they all
said.. Wah Wah.. They don't know.  We had a congressional briefing set
up on the 20th of September, I was going to address Congress...and
tell them about it.. I thought that that was cool...10 days before it
became a briefing on something else.  Another Freedom Click ... you
need to write to Congress on the site and tell them that they need a
Congressional Briefing, by God and tell them you want me to brief
them. They don't know about Codex ..they've never heard of it any more
than the general public has heard of  Codex.... Gee How did that
happen?.. Who knows? Every negative part of Codex can be over turned
by guideline, a regulation or a standard, that is positive, So we need
your help because the United States leadership in this guideline and
all the positive guidelines that is to follow is what is going to
literally follow, is what is going to save the population of  the
planet earth and save your jobs and your children and your families
and mine. Thank you!!
Speach by Dr Rimal Laibox MD a director of the the National
Association of Nutrition Professionals (NANP) Produced by EON the
Ecological Options Network for Bauman College in cooperation with the
Natural Solutions Foundation and the National Association of Nutrition
Professionals (NANP) 2005
http://www.blacklistednews.com/?news_id=5768
http://www.codexcorp.com/
CODEX CORP:  Specialising in Corrections and Healthcare, it may be an
unusual combination but it works for us, our partners and customers
who want to keep a close control and watch on the use of health care
and nutritional products in the community and with our unique and far
reaching security and monitoring systems we will be able to tell our
customers instantly if anyone in the world is using nutrients and
minerals that are not Codex approved  and compliant, and have them
quickly detained and punished for not complying with Codex approved
and compliant products. With Codex we are proud to say that no one
will escape detection. Codex Corporation and its founders have over
100 years experience in this business including the management and
design of the concentration camps in Germany. Codex Corporation was
originally the multi billion  International Giant I G Farben.
A quick background on our founding company I G Farben and its
directors and managers will help convince you that as far as security,
nutrient and health care management, people management, corrections
management, Codex ( Formerly IG Farben) is the company you should
chose for any issues in Corrections and Heathcare Management. Codex
and its security management has the ability to make sure there is no
health freedom. not just in the USA but all over the world... and
Codex has the ability to make sure anyone that tries to think for a
minute they can get way with trying to have health freedom, will
quickly be caught, detained and punished by Codex's unique and far
reaching security and monitoring systems...The Codex Moto
is
"None will escape detection and punishment of the unauthorised use of
nutrients with Codex on the job....just look at out success record in
designing and managing the concentration camp in Germany....our
success record at Codex Corporation, formerly IG Farben in people,
healthcare and corrections management speaks for itself"
Codex Corporation's, formerly IG Farben's 100 year History in People,
Healthcare and Corrections Management
provided from Codex Alimentarius Speach by Dr Rimal Laibox MD of the
Natural Solutions Fioundation, Produced by EON the Ecological Options
Network for Bauman College in cooperation with the Natural Solutions
Foundation and the National Association of Nutrition Professionals
(NANP) 2005 www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
Dr Rimal Laibox is an experienced healthcare professional and has
studies Codex Corporation, formerly IG Farben's progess ov erthe last
decade to become  the leaders in People, Healthcare and Corrections
Management in the United States.
Codex and Nutricide
" Let me tell you about Codex Alimentarius, let me define it for you,
let me help you understand the enemy..and let me assure you that
absolutely nothing that I am going to tell you, is exagerated, is
interperlated, or is imagined. Every thing I am going to tell you is
documented. A great deal of it is documented on my website,
whichwww.HealthFreedomUSA.org. Let me back up and tell you that I have
been watching Codex come toward us for about the last decade. ,,, and
I have been watching the vote sin congress, which God help us is our
bastion of support and protection against Codex and I will explain why
that is. I have been watching the votes to protect our health freedom
dwindle, until finally in the 109th Congress, without a good deal of
activity, we didn't have the votes to protect us. I have been watching
Codex excellerate and I have been watching it expand, and I have been
getting more and more troubled. Let me give you a brief run down of
Codex then. After the second world war, the Nuremberg Tribunals were
held in which people who had committed crimes against humanity were
judged by the world community in a court run by the United States and
Britain...  and they were sentenced to terms in prison if they were
found guilty of crimes against humanity. In 1948 some of the people
who were found guilty of crimes against humanity on the basis of mass
murder, slavery and other crimes were the president and 24 board
members and executives  of a hugh industrial megalith called IG
Farben. Amazingly enough however, by 1951 all of them had already been
released, and and continuing to consult with German Corporations IG
Farben produced the gas used in the gas chambers Zyklon B, they
produced the steel for the death camps and the rail road line, they
produced the munitions, they produced chemicals, they produced all
kinds of stuff. The Nuremberg Tribunal disolved IG Farben into
companies such as  into BASF - Hoechst - Bayer They produced
pharmaceuticals.. a big big pharacuticals company.  So the president
of IG Farben Fritz ter Meer, the senior manager at IB Farben, was
convicted of crimes against Humanity on the basis of mass murder,
slavery and other crimes on 29th July, 1948. Although he co-operated
with SS and the Final Solution, Fritz ter Meer was sentenced to 7
years only in War Criminal Prison, but only served about three years
in prison, no more someone that bounces a business cheque for say
$1,000 and is charged for fraud in the $1,000 bounced cheque for it
not being honoured on presentation. Someone steals an apple can get 3
years in prison also, or if he or she stole the apple as a servant
they can receive 7 years in prison,
Now Fritz ter Meer is sort of an artistic fellow and he was the one
responsible for the slogan that people saw as they entered Autswitz,
usually for the last time, "Work Brings Freedom". Fritz ter Meer was a
creative sort of fellow. Fritz ter Meer was responsible for the slogan
that people saw as they entered Auschwitz-, usually for the last time,
 " Work brings  Freedom....a creative sort of fellow.
You will notice that the institutions that Fritz ter Meer worked for
an/or had shareholdings in as listed by Wikepedia are
Institutions IG Farben, Bayer, Codex Alimentarius
The Bayer executive Fritz ter Meer, sentenced to seven years in prison
by the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, was made head of the supervisory
board of Bayer in 1956, after his release.
Fritz ter Meer ( July 4 1884 – October 27 1967 ) was a German chemist.
He was the son of Edmund ter Meer the founder of a chemical company
that later became part of Bayer. Fritz ter Meer also worked for Bayer
and later IG Farben. He was involved in the planning of Monowitz
concentration camp, a satellite camp of KZ Auschwitz. He was sentenced
to seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948. After he was
released in 1951 he became supervisory board chairman
(Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He retired in 1961.
The Bayer company then became part of IG Farben, a conglomerate of
German chemical industries that formed a part of the financial core of
the German Nazi regime. IG Farben owned 42.5% of the company that
manufactured Zyklon B,[2] a chemical used in the gas chambers of
Auschwitz and other extermination camps. During World War II, the
company also extensively used slave labor in factories attached to
large slave labor camps, notably the sub-camps of the Mauthausen-Gusen
concentration camp[3]. When the Allies split IG Farben into several
pieces after World War II for involvement in organized Nazi war
crimes, Bayer re-appeared as an individual business. The Bayer
executive Fritz ter Meer, sentenced to seven years in prison by the
Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, was made head of the supervisory board
of Bayer in 1956, after his release.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_ter_Meer
Fritz ter Meer
undefined
Fritz ter Meer
Born June 4, 1884
Uerdingen, Germany
Died October 27, 1967 (aged 83)
Leverkusen, Germany
Nationality German
Institutions IG Farben, Bayer, Codex Alimentarius
Fritz ter Meer ( July 4 1884 – October 27 1967 ) was a German chemist.
He was the son of Edmund ter Meer the founder of a chemical company
that later became part of Bayer. Fritz ter Meer also worked for Bayer
and later IG Farben. He was involved in the planning of Monowitz
concentration camp, a satellite camp of KZ Auschwitz. He was sentenced
to seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948. After he was
released in 1951 he became supervisory board chairman
(Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He retired in 1961.
   * Heine, Jens Ulrich (1990). Verstand und Schicksal. Die Männer
der I.G. Farbenindustrie A.G. (1925-1945). Weinheim; New York:
VCH.ISBN 978-3527281442.
   * Codex Alimentarius Commission [1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_ter_Meer
Edmund ter Meer ( 1852 – November 5, 1931) was a German chemist who
discovered the ter Meer reaction and founded in 1877 the ter Meer dye
company in Uerdingen. After the fusion with the aniline factory of
Julius Weiler the Weiler-ter Meer company was formed. This company
later became part of the Bayer company. His son Fritz ter Meer also
became a chemist associated to the Bayer company.
Edmund ter Meer
Born 1852
Died  November 5, 1931 (aged 79)
Nationality German
Institutions Bayer
Known for ter Meer reaction
References
   * Max Bodenstein, H. Leuchs (1931). "Sitzung vom 16. November
1931". Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft 64 (11):
A211–A212. doi:10.1002/cber.19310641139.*
   * ter Meer Prize University Bonn
   * "Ter Meer family." Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online
   * Uerdingen industrial area history
So Fritz ter Meer was sitting in jail and he said "well, that didn't
work..what else can we do?   I've got it food..he who controls food
controls ....the world..."  Fritz ter Meer  got out of jail he went to
his  UN buddies and said "Have I got an idea for you..if we take over
food world wide..we have power world wide, and his UN buddies said.
"cool idea". So they created a Trade Commission. That's a very
powerful set of words... A Trade Commission....called the Codex
Alimentarius Commission
It is not a Public Health Commission..it is not a Consumer Protection
Commission....it is a Trade Commission. Trade is about what? Money!!
Trade is about Business!! Trade is about Profit!! Well they said in
1962 we're going to work towards total, global implimentation of Codex
Alimentarius on December 31st, 2009. Long Term.... and they set up a
bunch of committees.. committees on fish and fishery...fats and oil...
fruits and vegetables... ground nuts...nutritian  for special diatary
uses and so on. There are currently about 27 Codex committees, they
are regional organisations, there are task forces and so anf so on. So
it's ahugh beaurocratic mostrosety.it's emence. Codex has promogated
well over 4,000 guidelines, standards and regulations on
everything...everything which can legally be put into your mouth, with
the excpetion of Pharmaceuticals. they are not part of Codex. That is
an importand point. Now Codex standards have no legal weight
whatsoever. Zero. So who cares about them..their just standards...so
we are talking about an industry setting regulation organisation, but
if it has no legal standing .. who cares? Right!! Here's the history
of Codex Alimentarius before 1962.
Please note here that Fritz ter Meer  was sentenced to seven years
prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948 having been found guilty of
crimes against humanity on the basis of mass murder, slavery and other
crimes . After he was released in 1951 he became supervisory board
chairman (Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He officiialy
retired as supervisory board chairman of Bayer AG in 1961 so he could
behind the scene concentrate of working with his UN buddies on
developing his idea of  setting up a syatem that will control the
whoole world's food supply under the code name Codex Alimentarius. It
would not look good publicly for Fritz ter Meer  who was sentenced to
only seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948 having been
found guilty of crimes against humanity on the basis of mass murder,
slavery and other crimes, and only served about three years of his
sentence because of his powerful UN buddies, to be seen to be publicly
be involved with Codex Alimentarius. Here's the history of Codex
Alimentarius before 1962. The Austian Hungarian Empire said we need
rules by which the courts can rule on cases involving food.o we'll
have regulations and rules that the courts will enforce.... that's how
they get their way. That was called the Codex Alimentarius and  was
put into place around 1893 and lasted until the end of the Austrian
Hungarian Empire in the first world war. So the idea was there in the
Germanic tradition. We need rules..lots of rules...lots a
nd lots and lots of rules..we need a lot of rules... let's have rules
for everything to do with food. So it was a natural extention for the
German Industrialists to say we'll go back to the good old days of
Codex Alimentarius back  when we had them in Austrian Hungarian
Empire. Cool. So they started promilgating their rules and regulations
and they were voluntary. They were sort of guidlines. Now Codex
Alimentarius Commission is administered by the World Health
Oganisation (WHO) and the Food and Aricultural Organisation (FAO)  and
they fund Codex and they run it at the request of the United Nations
(UN). So the're mummy and daddy to Codex Alimentarius.  And that's
very interesting because they're supposed to be about health and food
world wide. Some conflicts of interest that we'll talk about. So
Codex started promilgating regulations and rules, and the way that's
done is that the committees work up a rule, a standard, a guideline,
or regulation an dthey get it to what's called a step 8 which is the
final step in their administrative process... and then it's presented
to the Codex Alimentarius Commission for ratification, like the
vitamin and mineral guidline was presented to the Codex Alimentarius
Commission on July 4th this past summer (2005). It was ratified... it
was approved by consensus...and it is now...despite the propaganda
that your going to hear if you every hear about it in the media... it
is now mandatory on any member country and the WTO, the World Trade
Organisation. Well what in the world do they have to do with it? And
the answer is everything. The World Trade Organisation you see
accepted Codex when the world organisation was formed in 1994. They
said, "well how are we going to decide trade disputes around food if
we don't have a set of rules. I know..we'll accept the Codex
Alimentarius rules and all the members of the WTO will...willl world
wide...get ready for an Orwellian Term will harmonise with are
standards, with the codex standards.. I suggest you capitalise the
first four letters in your mind ...HARM... onise ... everybody is
supposed to .HARM... onise... with Codex....   and when they HARM...
onise with Codex, then if the get pulled into the WTO Dispute
Resolution Process they have a chance of winning because here's the
kicker... are you ready for this one ...  if two countries go into the
World Trade Organisation Dispute Resolution Process  and one of then
is Codex compliant, and one of them is not Codex Compliant.. the one
that is Codex Compliant automaticlly wins regardless of the merit of
the case.  People are using Codex Compliant in a much bigger economic
battle. So every couunty in the world is racing to do what?   Become
Codex Compliant. So in the United States...the situation is OK ..how
do we become Codex compliant when we have laws that protect us. You
have to remember that Codex does not serve consumer well being. Codex
does not serve what I call the five Bigs...Big Pharma Big Chema Big
Biotechna Big AgriBiz and Bid Medica ,,,little me and little you are
not served by Codex, in the least, so before we go forward and talk
about the rest of  what has to happen, let's ask what Codex does?
You probably all know about the vitamin and mineral guidline that was
ratified on July 4th ( 2005). You may not kow that although it is said
that CODEX regulations guidlines and standards that have been ratified
are volantary....That Are Not Voluntary...That is known as a lie!!!
They are mandatory..but  thye ar enot fully mandatory until December,
31st 2009. They're sort of kinda a little bit mandatory now. and
they're totally mandatory then. So what does Codex do? Why do I care
enough about Codex to close my practice and stop treating patients who
came to me from around the world..to help them regain their health and
be radiantly well with non toxic means which is a very satisfying
thing to do.. I love it...it also provided me with an income...  that
was nice. OK...;why am I concerned enough, let's talk about the
mineral and vitamin guidline first. In 1994 DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments
Health and Education Act was passed which classifies nutrient and
herbs as foods. As foods you can set no upper limit on them. You
cannot set an upper limit on lettuce...lamb or  roodibaggers.. and
similarily you cannot set an upper limit in vitamin C.. echanasia...
ginko bi loba ... vitamin D ...    to nutrients is freely given to
us.. We are allowed to have any nutients we want because.... this is a
very important point... under common law ...  What's not forbidden is
permitted.... Codex on the other hand  ... is a Napoleonic Code
...What's not permitted is forbidden law system... under Napoleonic
Code ...anything not permitted is forbidden ...  that's called a
positive list .... so vitamins and nutrients and minerals ... in 1994
we passed DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act was
passed which classifies nutrient and herbs as foods... we can have as
much of them as we want thatis our business... in 1994 Codex with no
notice here in this country whatsoever.. prepared nutrents ... put on
you intellectual seatbelts...declared nutrients to be toxins. they're
poisens ... dangerous Industrail poisens ... AS POISENS ... WE HAVE OT
BE PROTECTED FROM THEM ...how  do you protect someone form poisens ...
you use toxicology ... you use a science called risk assessment ..lt's
take a primeron risk assessment  .. first you take the substance thats
dangerous and feed it to animals and the dosage that kills 50% of them
..that's called the LD 50 ... and you exstrapulate what the LD 50 for
human being might be.,,then you go down to the other end of the dosage
range ...and you start feeding ittie bittie tiny bits of it ..   to
test animals ... and you come up with the largest possible dose
...the maximum  permissable upper limit  ... that can be fed ot an
animal before a discernable impact  is shown ..OK ... no discernable
impact .... then you divide that by 100 ... that's how they do it in
risk assessment ... and now you've got a safety margin ...  so you
have one 100th of the dose that can be given with no discernable
impact ...   OK nutrients! Under Codex!!!    Not only are limited ot
those nutriants on the positive list ...and  we  anticipate there will
be 18 of them .. and they do not include.  .  CoQ10  Glucosamine ...
cundroyton sulfate ...thye do include floride ... which to my
knowledge as a Physician has absolutely no biological benefit
whatsoever. ... but it does make people complasent ... floride was
first used in the Goolog  ...because it was discovered that prisoners
who were fed floridated water ...  were complasent ...  and you could
do anything you wanted to them ...  thye were easy  to manage ... so
you have 18 nutrients  ... you have ittie bittie tiny winy doses ...
that are determined scientifically to have no effect ...  on any human
being  now in this country we have a problem ... we have ...DSHEA
-Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act ... we have to get rid of
DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act  in order to  HARM
...on..ise ... with Codex... that part of Codex anyway .... so how do
we get rid of DSHEA ...  we attack it legislatively of course .. and
...  there are five.. count them.. five currently before Congress ...
designed to overturn ..gut ... invalidate .. and otherwise get rid of
DSHEA ...  because once DSHEA is gone we can HARM...on..ise with the
vitamin and mineral guideline   ...  so what we are talking about is
....  waking up one morning to find that high potency therapudiclly
effective clinicly significant nutrients are illegal ....
(Codex want to make nutients illegal ) in the way that Heroin is
illegal ..not available with a prescription ... Illegal ...  If these
nutrients have any impact on  the Human body ...  they are illegal ...
that's just the vitamin and mineral guidline ... let's talk about milk
.... we have    recombinant bovine  growth hormone and now we can
choose milk with it and milk without it ... butter with it or butter
without it ..right ...not under Codex ... because under Codex ...
every dairy cow ...  on the planet must be treated with Monsanto's
recombinant bovine hormone.... furthermore ..under Codex ... every
animal used for food on the planent whether it has fins, feet or
feathers ... every animal on the planet must be treated with sub
clinical antibiotics and and must be treated with exogenous growth
hormones ... Codex requires (mandates) that all food be irradiated
unless it's eaten locally and raw. including organic food of course
... so is it organis afterwards... well of course the organic
standards are incredibly low ...the organic  standards allow a farmer
to use vetinary drugs including exogenous growth hormone, anti biotics
etc ....on animals and then at his whim, reclassify them as organic
...  but farmers are our friends  and they would never do
that...right!!!  Right!!  Codex sets limits for the dangerous
industrial chemicals that you can have in your food..and the limits
are increditbly high ... go to Codex Alimentarius Commission ... look
at the toxins and vetinary  Chemicals  and the levels that are set.,,
they are terrifying ot me ..Terrifying ... the names of the Chemicals
that are permitted and the amounts of the chemicals that are permitted
are terrifying to me ...Why am I terrified?  Well perhaps I am just a
cowardly person ...it's possible... think about this.. in 2001,
"The levels that are permitted, developed and maintained by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission, by the are incredibly high in toxins and the
levels that are set the names and amounts of the chemicals are
terrifying..." states Dr Rimal Laibox MD a director of the National
Association of Nutrition Professionals (NANP)
In 2001, 176 Countries including the USA got together and stated that
there were 12 really bad dangerous organic chemicals  Chemicals.
They're called "Pops".,,"Persistent Organic Pollutants. There are a
lot of them, but there are 12 that are so bad that, nobody could
disagree that those 12 Pops had to be banned worldwide.Nine of the 12
worst organic Chemicals known are pesticides...not
surprisingly..because they kill things..and of course we have many
processes and enzime systems that are very much like insects and other
pests so, they are not too good for us..but Codex has different
ideas...Codex has brought back 7 of the 9 forbidden POPS, that 176
countries  banned
worldwide,,,Dieldrin..Aldrin...hexaclorabenzine...etc..and the food
that is imported from other countries that contains these substances
can not be stopped at our borders..because otherwise it would be God
Forbid, a Trade Violation...that's how Codex works..Codex, according
to the World Trade Organisation  (WTO) and the Food and Agricultural
Organisation's (FAO) joint projections..now i didn't  make this
up...please if you have unfastened you're Intellectual Seat
Belts...put them back on again...if you do the numbers in the who FAO
projections in their report headed Diet Nutrition and prevention of
Chronic Diseases..that just the vitamin and mineral guideline
alone...when it goes into global implimentation..on December 31st,
2009...will result in a minimum of 3 billion (that's B... Bad... Big
Billion) deaths - one billion through simple starvation..those folks
who die ar not particularily economicly successful from the point of
view of the Corporations..when you're starving to death, how much good
can you do, when the issue is that how much can you buy.. not a lot..
forget them..but Hah..but the next  two billion...they will die from
the preventable diseases (two billion people will die from diseases of
under nutrition)..of under nutrition// cancer.. the single most
profitable condition know to human kind..CardiovacularDisease..a good
second...diabetis...pritty good producer of income...and a whole host
of other preventable diseases. Who will die? Who Knows? Who Will Live?
Probably those people who are wealthy enough and powerful enough to
have their own pushers of clean food and nutriants..that's who will
live!!!  You and I? ..probably not...our children? probably not...our
grand children?...probably not!!! So we're talking about food
regulations that are in fact are the legalisation of the mandated
toxicity and under nutrition..It will become illegal..if there is a
famine...whereecer there is a famine...to ship high nutriant density
biscuits to that country.. and it will be illegal to distribute
them...that's what we're talking about!!! Codex is Big and It's
Bad..but it's not invunerable. So the point is...that we have to
protect ourselves, and I believe we have to regain global leadership,
which we have lost. surrendered..squandered..ah..sold..we have
sold..just joining the World Trade Organisation (WTO), surended our
sovereinghty...however as it just happens I have a team of
Constitutional Lawyers..looking at the following question...Are we
members of the WTO? Cause if you remember form High School
Civics..they way you get a treaty to be a real treaty..is ot have it
ratified by a two thirds majority of the Senate...and the way we got
into the WTO was, they passed a law allowing Bill Clinton to fast
track us into the WTO. "That's Not A Treaty"...the USA is not legally
not a member of the WTO..now that's a piece of the battle...Someone
says from the audience.."you will have to tell George.." we will tell
George Bush , but George Bush will not be relevant when we do tell
him..ah..so that's a piece of it, but  that's not going to save our
lives right now because..do you know..picture in your mind...a wasp or
a bee trap..were ot insect voluntarily goes down the funnel and then
can't get up out of the trap again..that's Codex..a regular law can be
over turned..it can be repealed...it can be corrected..by  another
piece of legislation..but once we become Codex Compliant...in nay
area...as long as we are members of the WTO..it can never be
repealed...because we have lost the sovereignty to become un_codex
compliant as long as we are in the WTO, so it's like going down that
funnel and not being able to get back out of it. So it's very
important that we make sure that we do not become codex
compliant...but we will be hit with all those bis trade sanctions from
the countries that are codex compliant,, so that the country will be
destroyed economically..right..no remember surprise..one of the
principles of war...remember mass..where you take your strength
against the enemies weekness ads week points. Well here's what we've
done.  We have a team of lawyers, who have spent hundreds of hours
with us pro bono..these are good guy lawyers...these two gentlemen and
we have spent hundreds of hours studying Codex, understanding it's
weekness..it's weeknesses..a lot of weeknesses.. and constructing a
strategy..which 'will take the succer down'....It will take it
down...but I need you...you are people that other people come to about
safe healthy food..and nutrients...
National Association of Nutritrional Professionals NANP 2005
Conference..you are ready made disenimation points..you are the
thousand million.... hundred million points of light. Here's what is
happening/ Every country in the world has ot be Codex compliant in
order not to get hit by WTO trade sanctions, as I told you of their
members of Codex and the WTO..and there are a few countries that are
not, but I can guarantee you they are not of any major significance.
So. the question is...What is Codex Compliance mean?
Well, most people in most countries..most legislators believe that
they have to adopt  as their national standard on that particular
subject...what Codex ratified. But that's not the case, any more than
we're in the WTO. That's not the case either. What is means is that
the format..the issues and the subjects..covered by a Codex
Guideline...Standard or Regulation..have to be addressed in the
country's guideline standard or regulation on the same topic. So what
we have done is create the first of many alternative Codex guidelines.
You can go to our website www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and you will see a
little button on the upper right handside that says sign this citzen's
partition. Now to briefly digress the citizen's partition is not like
a grocery store partition that you sign and bring to somebody and say
'I have 200,000 signatures and they dump it in the waist basket,
because it is in their mind, it is one signature that you and your
friends wrote 200,000 names. No...it is a legal challenge to the
policy of the United States Government on Codex. It's called a
citizen's partition. It's a legal challenge..We're suing the United
States Government..saying what you're doing is illegal folks...let us
tell you how..we want hearings of fact...we want redress..we want
correction..if we get what we want//that's dandy...if we don't get
what we want we have gone through a process..exhausting administrative
remedies.. we have made the case ripe for court.
So Ok, I need you and everybody you know, to sign this citizen's
partition..sating this is a bad policy on mass..and you do this on the
web..and you will see the instructions and we present the thousands
and thousands of pages that we print out that have people's signatures
to the US Codex Office and to the FDA (Federal Drug Administration)
and they don't like that at all..but that's OK. However, this
time..this is the second amendment of the citizen's partition that
we're asking you to sign. This time the revised vitamin and mineral
guideline is part of it. It is part of the law suit saying this needs
to be US Policy. The more voices that say..this is what I want...and
you work for me..mr and mrs beaureaucrat and mr and mrs congressman
and mr and mrs senator. The more voices the more weight. So step
number one is read and sign the citizen's partition. Step number two
diseminate the information..the weblink. put it out in your office.
get your patients...your friends and neighbours..your suppliers..to
sign the citizens partition and your suppliers..the companies you
use,, are going to tell you that you're out of your minds...they will
tell you that Codex is not a problem..and the will tell you..anyone
here have a dog..OK...dog owners know that you ask a dog to heal..sit
down...stay..that's codex in this country and worldwide, because the
more people that are in Codex comma, the less trouble they have
getting this through...any here of the NNFA.the National Nutrition
Foods Association..everybody's heard of the NNFA. Did you know that
the members of the NNFA and not just health foods stores and
manufacturers..but include companies with names you may have
heard...Pfizer ...Merck...Monsanto...Bayer...BASF..Archer Daniels
Midland..Glaxo....Aires..clyne welcome you get the idea..why?..because
after Tochet was passed and the nutriant business virgined..the
pharasutical folks who are not dumb, said there is gold in them there
pills..and they brought the means of production of many many many
companies.. and they brought the companies themselves..so there in the
nutriant business. What better way to kill the nutriant business,
which is not nearly as profitable as the toxic chemical drug business,
than to take it over. It works everytime..right!! CRN...anybody here
know about CRN..Council for Responsablr Nutritian.  Same
members...they hav lots of multi level marketing companies...same
members..OK..and their serving their members needs. CRN are
saying,,,Yeh...Codex is coming..Codex is going to protect us from
those dangerous vitamins and minerals and herbs and CRN is saying it's
fine...go to sleep lulaby and goodnight..and everything is fine...and
they use a report that they commissoned at a reputed cost of
$800,000..a report prepared by Sydley Austin Brown and Rute..a law
firm in Washington...wrote a report for them..and it said
lullaby...and goodnight everything is fine..it won't have an impact on
the United States..everything is fine..Sydley Austin Brown and Rute
has one major client..who's name you might know..Merk. Now it's
entirely possible that the NNFA just did a spectacular bad job of due
dilligence..or not..anyway...the report says everything is
fine..everything is dandy.there will be no problem..we'ver got dishet(
Touchet?) Yeh, sure we do. Now lets talk about Australia...remember
five laws befofore congress overturned dishet (?)
and you can write to congress on the website...Now congress uses the
multiplier of 13,000 to one...every email fax phone
call...letter..don't write letters...they get decontaminated, they
never get to congress...every email. fax and phone call..counts as
13,000 constituants opinions..they figure that if you write a letter
or send an email there are 12,999 lazy who can't bother to get to the
computer terminal to do the same thing, but they feel the way you do.
interesting..that's power my friends...that's power..that's 13,000 to
one. Suppose we have a million people...suppose we have 10 million
people..supposed we have 100 million people...saying,,  Don't You
Dare!!!  Now congress has one rule...above all others.. anybody know
what it is? Gte Re-elected! That's the primary rule,, the prime
directive is to get re-elected. No w touchet was passed you may
remember by  unaminous congressional consent. Was that because one
morning all members of Congress woke up and said..."I See Th Light..
Nutriants Are Better Than Drugs!! "... They said, oh, If I don't go
along with this..I'll never be re-elected to anything.....remember
critical mass...remember we were out on the streets and we were up on
our hind legs and we were making noise and we were rallying...and
rallying and we were writing letters and we said....Don't You Dare To
Take Away My Health Freedom!!! Remember?   Expect that we got fat dumb
and lazy and stopped protecting ourselves ...and we're in the same
place again.... exept that it's all food instead of just nutriants.
So! Thats point number One. Use the freedom mouse..ride the freedom
mouse. We've made it as easy as possible in the site...Sign up, for
the emails. I will never sell your information to anyone. I promise
you. Plus I will never rent it, I will never share it, you'll only get
an email from me, and wee need you to know what's going on. So I''ll
send you email blasts. I'll send you things that you can do... or not.
It is your choice.. Gte everybody you know..informed....now what else
can you do? Now we're going to write a series of alternative
guidelines. Everything bad in codes will have am alternative guideline
that turns it into a pro health guideline. What have wee done with the
vitamin and mineral guideline?  You can see that because we have a
mark up copy that has their guideline crossed out and ours written in
on the website..It's right there. What we've done is turn it into a
guideline that mandates "bio-chemicaly individually determined optimal
health" and it;s still Codex compliant...So we said..OK. now we need
congress to adopt this, and we need other countries in the world to
adopt this, so, Burt and I went to Washington DC and we met Daniel
Rorobocker from Orange County, who said to us, he's a
representative.... he said "I believe in pesticides...  " I went Oh..
He said I believe in GMO's I went Oh... He said " I believe in
Iradiation of food"  I went OH... "But he said...I believe in your
right to eat foods that have not been processed that way more than I
believe in those technologies... I will take this one..." We said. "
OH that's really nice.." He said now..."We need a coilition..."  So we
wnet across the ilse across he office building to see Peter Defozio's
staff from Oregan who would was a Liberal Democrat., whereas
Rorobocker is a Libritarian Republican, and Defazio's on board and we
have large numbers of others who actually has never heard of Codex.
before we told them about it. Never heard of Codex,,,we have called
ever health legislative aid on congress.  what's you're Congressmans's
position on Codex?  and they've said "Wah????"...We have spoken to the
trade legislative assistants and asked. What's you congressman's
position on Codex?  Congress and trade legislative's assistants and
staff are not informed on Codex   ... and they all said.. Wah Wah..
They don't know.  We had a congressional briefing set up on the 20th
of September, I was going to address Congress...and tell them about
it.. I thought that that was cool...10 days before it became a
briefing on something else.  Another Freedom Click ... you need to
write to Congress on the site and tell them that they need a
Congressional Briefing, by God and tell them you want me to brief
them. They don't know about Codex ..they've never heard of it any more
than the general public has heard of  Codex Gee How did that happen..
who knows? Every negative part of Codex can be over turned by
guideline, a regulation or a standard, that is positive, So we need
your help because the United States leadership in this guideline and
all the positive guidelines that is to follow is what is going to
literally follow is what is going to save the population of  the
planet earth and save your jobs and your children and your families
and mine. Thank you!!
Speach by Dr Rimal Laibox MD a director of the the National
Association of Nutrition Professionals (NANP) Produced by EON the
Ecological Options Network for Bauman College in cooperation with the
Natural Solutions Foundation and the National Association of Nutrition
Professionals (NANP) 2005
Codex Alimentarius summarized in 7 pointsPublished on 09-30-2009
Codex Alimentarius is scheduled for full global implementation on
December 31st, 2009, and not a word has been spoken in main stream
media about this threat to humanity.
The principle of self medication with herbal/vitamin/mineral food
supplements would be restricted to ‘prescription only’ status, if the
Codex Alimentarius is applied in the UK and elsewhere, particularly
the USA.
(UK only) Since the NHS priorities are ill health diagnosis and
treatment, the good health preservation that supplements provide will
be inaccessible to the majority of our population and the cost to the
NHS will increase.
According to the projections based on figures from the World Health
Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), a
minimum of 3 billion people will die from the Codex mandated vitamin
and mineral guidelines alone.
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Vitamins/
Deadline to sign the petition = 5th September 2009
Codex in Depth: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=161
Codex Alimentarius (World Food Code)
Summarized in 7 points
1) Started in 1962 by UN, Imposed by WTO Sanctions
Codex Alimentarius was created in 1962 as a trade Commission by the UN
to control the international trade of food. Its initial intentions may
have been altruistic but it has been taken over by corporate
interests, most notably the pharmaceutical, pesticide, biotechnology
and chemical industries.
Codex Alimentarius is backed up by the crippling trade sanctions of
the World Trade Organization (WTO). Any non Codex-compliant nation
would face huge economic punishment since they would automatically
lose in any food-trade dispute with a Codex compliant country.
2) “Nutrients are Toxins” Is Junk Science
Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) has two committees which impact nutrition.
One of them, the “Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special
Dietary Uses” (CCNFSDU), is chaired by Dr. Rolf Grossklaus, a
physician who believes that nutrition has no role in health. This is
the “top-guy” for Codex nutritional policy, and he has stated that
“nutrition is not relevant to health”.
As unbelievable as it may sound, Dr. Grossklaus actually declared
nutrients to be toxins in 1994 and instituted the use of toxicology
(Risk Assessment) to prevent nutrients from having any impact on
humans who take supplements! It is worth mentioning that Dr.
Grossklaus happens to own the Risk Assessment company advising CCNFSDU
and Codex on this issue. This company makes money when its toxicology
services are used for the “assessment” of nutrients. Here in the U.S.
we call that a “conflict of interest”.
Codex is made up of thousands of standards and guidelines. One of
them, the Vitamin and Mineral Guideline (VMG), is designed to permit
only ultra low doses of vitamins and minerals (and make clinically
effective nutrients illegal). How can the VMG restrict dosages of
vitamins and minerals? By using Risk Assessment (toxicology) to assess
nutrients.
While Risk Assessment is a legitimate science (it is a branch of
toxicology), it is the wrong science for assessing nutrients! In fact,
in this context, it is actually junk science. Biochemistry, the
science of life processes, is the correct science for assessing
nutrients. Codex Alimentarius treats nutrients as toxins, which is
literally insane.
Nutrients are not toxins – they are essential for life.
undefined
No matter what Codex Alimentarius officials say to convince you that
Risk Assessment is a “science-based” approach to nutrients, it is not.
And it is worth repeating that Dr. Grossklaus, the head of Codex
Alimentarius, owns the Risk Assessment company advising CCNFSDU and
Codex on the “benefit” of using Risk Assessment to assess nutrients.
3) Not Consumer Protection – That’s Propaganda
Contrary to the propaganda, Codex Alimentarius has nothing to do with
consumer protection. Nothing! Codex is about the economic ambitions of
multi-national corporations, in particular, the pharmaceutical
industry.
Using their multi billion-dollar marketing budgets, these industries
have launched a massive media propaganda campaign to paint Codex
Alimentarius as a benevolent tool of “consumer protection”, as well as
to negatively taint the image of natural health options and mislead
people to fear them as “dangerous”, so they will take drugs (which
really are dangerous). Natural health products and options have an
amazing safety record and are remarkably effective, especially when
compared to pharmaceutical drugs.
Unfortunately, one-time defenders of health freedom such as National
Nutritional Foods Association (NNFA) and Council for Responsible
Nutrition (CRN) have joined the propaganda bandwagon and are spreading
false information saying that Codex Alimentarius is either “harmless”
or benevolent “consumer protection”. Neither is true.
The membership of these one-time defenders of health freedom has
become permeated by people from the pharmaceutical industry (for
example, CRN counts as its members corporations such as Monsanto® and
Bayer®).
4) Codex: Serious Threat to Health and Health Freedom
If Codex Alimentarius is implemented in the United States of America,
therapeutic dosages of vitamins and minerals (and all other nutrients
soon to follow) will become unavailable because they will literally
become illegal.
Here’s how it would work, in a nut-shell:
Due to the junk science use of Risk Assessment (toxicology) to assess
supposedly toxic nutrients, a false belief is being engineered saying
that “nutritional supplements are dangerous to people’s health”.
Using this false belief generates calls to “protect” people from these
“toxic” nutrients. After the calls come the bills to set ultra low
permissible dosages (remember, nutrients are deemed “dangerous toxins”
under this false belief). If enough of us and our Congressional
delegates buy this nonsense, we and Congress would blindly comply with
Codex Alimentarius’ VMG. And blind compliance is what the industries
behind Codex Alimentarius intend.
Blind compliance goes hand-in-hand with lack of activism. This lack of
activism allows our protective laws, classifying nutrients as foods
with no upper limits (such as DSHEA), to be easily repealed and
replaced with draconian laws to classify nutrients as toxins. And
“harmonization” with the pro-illness, pro-pharmaceutical industry
Vitamin and Mineral Guideline is there to fill the void.
Only intentionally ineffective, ultra low dose supplements would be
legal, with or without a prescription, on the VMG list. If enough
people do not take action, we can expect to watch nutritional
supplement manufacturers and, thus health food stores, to go out of
business, in a domino effect. The only player left standing would be
Big Pharma.
Therapeutic grade vitamins, minerals, and amino acids would be
eliminated from the marketplace (although a few low-dose supplements
would be allowed by Codex, as a symbolic measure to avoid suspicion
about their ulterior motive).
Natural health professionals would lose the tools of their trade
(nutritional supplements) and health conscious people would be unable
to choose natural health options for health promotion and disease
treatment.
And that is, in a nutshell, how Codex Alimentarius is poised to make
Natural and Nutritional Medicine (NNM) disappear from the legal health
world and go underground. Who benefits? Big Pharma.
It would take a few years for the above scenarios to be feasible
(Codex Alimentarius is meant to go into full global effect by 2010).
The slower the process takes, the less alarmed people will be. That’s
probably the logic of the architects of Codex Alimentarius.
5) Serves Economic Interests of Sickness Industries Through WTO and
Napoleonic Code
More and more people are turning to natural health products globally.
The “wellness” trend is a major trend in today’s society. The more
natural health products people use, the fewer drugs they buy. The
pharmaceutical industry, which is part of the “Sickness Industry”,
fears the inevitable shift toward natural health care.
Instead of accepting the will of the people and rethinking the future
of the pharmaceutical industry, the industry has decided upon an
unethical course of action: the use of deception and deceit to
eliminate natural health products completely.
Codex Alimentarius is a shrewd vehicle for protecting the
pharmaceutical industry from the loss of income it stands to suffer
due to the inevitable growth of natural healthcare.
Codex Alimentarius is the resistance of the dinosaurs to
inevitability: the burgeoning desire of humanity for a healthier,
saner, and more sustainable way of life.
The World Trade Organization (WTO) intends to force Codex Alimentarius
upon the nations of the world, including the U.S. This would be done
under the threat of massive economic sanctions if WTO-countries do not
comply with Codex Alimentarius.
Furthermore, Codex is based in the Napoleonic Code, not Common Law.
That means that under Codex Alimentarius, anything not explicitly
permitted is forbidden. Under Common Law, we hold that anything not
explicitly forbidden is permitted. The difference is the difference
between health freedom and health tyranny. Codex Alimentarius would be
able to ban supplements by default.
6) DSHEA Protects America From Codex Alimentarius
The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA, 1994), an
American law classifying our supplements and herbs as foods (which can
have no upper limit set on their use), was passed by unanimous
Congressional consent following massive grass-roots support organized
by health food stores. Millions of American activists told Congress,
in no uncertain terms:
“Protect nutritional supplements as foods or we will remove you from office”.
Congress listened and carried out the will of the people.
DSHEA appropriately classifies nutritional supplements as foods which
can have no upper limits set on their use. DSHEA recognizes that
people use nutrients safely to deal with their individually differing
needs for nutrients. The concept of biochemical individuality means
that people have different needs for nutrients at different times. Are
nutrients toxins? No, they are not toxins. They are substances
essential to prevent, treat and cure any chronic condition, in
differing doses at different times in different people.
DSHEA protects the US from Codex Alimentarius’ deadly Vitamin and
Mineral Guideline. We must reach our Congressional members, educate
them about the facts on Codex Alimentarius and direct them to vote
against anything that would threaten DSHEA.
Congress holds the keys to our health freedom. And it is their job to
listen to us. Let’s not allow cynicism to tell us otherwise. We did it
for DSHEA in 1994. We can do it again this year.
7) Your Action is Needed Now!
DSHEA is under significant legislative attack right now. Your
letter-writing is crucial: if the members of Congress know that voting
against health freedom means losing their jobs come election time,
they will listen. Our job is to make sure they get the message loud
and clear. Take action via our 3 easy steps and send personalized
emails to Congress right now.
After taking action on HealthFreedomUSA.org, consider getting together
with others in your area and visit your Congressional members in their
home offices. If we wait, we lose our health freedoms. Once we
“HARMonize” with Codex, by the way, we no longer have the right, while
we belong to the WTO, to repeal or change that “HARMonization”!
Conclusion
The objective of the pro-Codex Alimentarius multi nationals is to
“boil the frog slowly” so that we do not wake up to it in time to
avoid Codex.
Once we have “HARMonize” to Codex Alimentarius, as long as we are in
the WTO, we cannot amend or change what we’ve been “HARMonize” to.
Codex Alimentarius will go into global implementation by December 31,
2009, unless We, the People, avert it. We must act now because right
now, with $758 Million spent on declared Congressional lobbying by Big
Pharma last year, there are members of Congress who are trying to
overturn DSHEA and allow Pharma-friendly free reign for Codex. If
protective laws like DSHEA are destroyed, the sanctioning power of the
autocratic WTO kicks in, and it will be impossible to get out from
under Codex Alimentarius. We can protect our access to high potency
nutrients and stave off an adulterated food supply only by putting
pressure on Congress.
If you would like to take action to try and stop Codex Alimentarius
<please click here (USA)>, If you would like more in-depth information
about Codex Alimentarius <please click here>
If you would like to take action to try and stop Codex Alimentarius
you can sign a petition to Gordon Brown <please click here (UK)> ~
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Vitamins/ ~ Deadline to sign the
petition = 5th September 2009
If you would like more in-depth information about Codex Alimentarius
<please click here>
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=157
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=161
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=183
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=160
http://www.therapure.com/codex.htm
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Vitamins/
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhApQ3QkG0Q&feature=related
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5266884912495233634
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2D4-noTiCg
http://www.naturalnews.com/026731_CODEX_food_health.html
http://www.anhcampaign.org/campaigns/codex
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Alimentarius
Stop Codex Alimentarius and Protect Health Freedom!
Unless stated otherwise everything in this note is © 2009 by Natural
Solutions Foundation
The Natural Solutions Foundation is a non-profit organization founded
to protect and promote health freedom in the USA.
Outide links are not covered by this © (rights of content creators respected).
http://www.blacklistednews.com/?news_id=5768
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Alimentarius
The Codex Alimentarius (Latin for "food code" or "food book") is a
collection of internationally recognized standards, codes of practice,
guidelines and other recommendations relating to foods, food
production and food safety. Its name derives from the Codex
Alimentarius Austriacus.[1] Its texts are developed and maintained by
the Codex Alimentarius Commission, a body that was established in 1963
by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
and the World Health Organization (WHO). The Commission's main aims
are stated as being to protect the health of consumers and ensure fair
practices in the international food trade. The Codex Alimentarius is
recognized by the World Trade Organization as an international
reference point for the resolution of disputes concerning food safety
and consumer protection.[2][3]
Scope
The Codex Alimentarius officially covers all foods, whether processed,
semi-processed or raw, but far more attention has been given to foods
that are marketed directly to consumers. In addition to standards for
specific foods, the Codex Alimentarius contains general standards
covering matters such as food labeling, food hygiene, food additives
and pesticideresidues, and procedures for assessing the safety of
foods derived from modern biotechnology. It also contains guidelines
for the management of official (i.e., governmental) import and export
inspection and certification systems for foods.
The Codex Alimentarius is published in Arabic, Chinese, English,
French and Spanish. Not all texts are available in all languages.
   * Food labelling (general standard, guidelines on nutrition
labelling, guidelines on labelling claims)
   * Food additives (general standard including authorized uses,
specifications for food grade chemicals)
   * Contaminants in foods (general standard, tolerances for specific
contaminants including radionuclides, aflatoxins and other mycotoxins)
   * Pesticide and veterinary chemical residues in foods (maximum
residue limits)
   * Risk assessment procedures for determining the safety of foods
derived from biotechnology (DNA-modified plants, DNA-modified
micro-organisms, allergens)
   * Food hygiene (general principles, codes of hygienic practice in
specific industries or food handling establishments, guidelines for
the use of the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point or “HACCP”
system)
   * Methods of analysis and sampling
[edit]Specific standards
   * Meat products (fresh, frozen, processed meats and poultry)
   * Fish and fishery products (marine, fresh water and aquaculture)
   * Milk and milk products
   * Foods for special dietary uses (including infant formulae and baby foods)
   * Fresh and processed vegetables, fruits, and fruit juices
   * Cereals and derived products, dried legumes
   * Fats, oils and derived products such as margarine
   * Miscellaneous food products (chocolate, sugar, honey, mineral water)
Controversy
The controversy over the Codex Alimentarius relates to a perception
that it is a mandatory standard for food - including vitamin and
mineral supplement - safety. Supporters of the Codex Alimentarius say
that it is a voluntary reference standard for food and that there is
no obligation on countries to adopt Codex standards as a member of
either Codex or any other international trade organization. From the
point of view of its opponents, however, one of the main causes of
concern is that the Codex Alimentarius is recognized by the World
Trade Organization as an international reference standard for the
resolution of disputes concerning food safety and consumer
protection.[2][3] Proponents argue that the use of Codex Alimentarius
during international disputes does not exclude the use of other
references or scientific studies as evidence of food safety and
consumer protection.
It is reported that in 1996 the German delegation put forward a
proposal that no herb, vitamin or mineral should be sold for
preventive or therapeutic reasons, and that supplements should be
reclassified as drugs.[4] The proposal was agreed, but protests halted
its implementation.[4] The 28th Session of the Codex Alimentarius
Commission was subsequently held July 4 - July 9, 2005.[5] Among the
many issues discussed were the "Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral
Food Supplements"[6], which were adopted during the meeting as new
global safety guidelines.[7] This text has been the subject of
considerable controversy, in part because many member countries may
choose to regulate dietary supplements as therapeutic goods or
pharmaceuticals or by some other category. The text does not seek to
ban supplements, but subjects them to labeling and packaging
requirements, sets criteria for the setting of maximum and minimum
dosage levels, and requires that safety and efficacy are considered
when determining ingredient sources. The United Nations' Food and
Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO)
have stated that the guidelines are "to stop consumers overdosing on
vitamin and mineral food supplements." The Codex Alimentarius
Commission (CAC) has said that the guidelines call "for labelling that
contains information on maximum consumption levels of vitamin and
mineral food supplements." The WHO has also said that the Guidelines
"ensure that consumers receive beneficial health effects from vitamins
and minerals." [8]
Similarities have been noted between the EU's Food Supplements
Directive and the Codex Alimentarius Guidelines for Vitamin and
Mineral Supplements.[9]
Texas Republican Rep. Ron Paul has said that the Central American Free
Trade Agreement "increases the possibility that Codex regulations will
be imposed on the American public." [10]
Additional controversy has been expressed by proponents of
ecologically and socially sustainable agriculture and food systems,
such as the Slow Food movement[11], who view the Codex Alimentarius as
antithetical to this goal. According to the Manifesto on the Future of
Food, the Codex Alimentarius has "codified policies designed to serve
the interest of global agribusiness above all others, while actively
undermining the rights of farmers and consumers".[12]
See also
   * Codex Alimentarius Austriacus
   * Food Chemicals Codex
   * E number
References
  1. ^ Codex Alimentarius: how it all began Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations website. Accessed 1 January 2009.
  2. ^ a b Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary
Measures World Trade Organization. Accessed 3 September 2008.
  3. ^ a b Understanding the Codex Alimentarius Preface. Third
Edition. Published in 2006 by the World Health Organization and the
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Accessed 3
September 2008.
  4. ^ a b 'Health supplements: R.I.P.'. The Guardian newspaper, UK.
Published 14 September 2002. Accessed 2 August 2008
  5. ^ Codex Alimentarius Commission 28th Session, FAO Headquarters,
Rome, Italy, 4-9 July, 2005. Official report.
  6. ^ Codex Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral Food Supplements
  7. ^ UN commission adopts safety guidelines for vitamin and food
supplements United Nations News Centre. Published 11 July 2005.
Accessed 1 January 2009
  8. ^ UN commission adopts safety guidelines for vitamin and food
supplements United Nations News Centre. Published 11 July 2005.
Accessed 26 March 2009
  9. ^ Nil by mouth. The Observer newspaper, UK. Published 29
February 2004. Accessed 1 January 2009
 10. ^ 'The vitamin police', by ALAN BOCK, Sr. editorial writer, The
Orange County Register. Published 14 August 2005. Accessed 2 September
2008.
 11. ^ http://www.slowfood.com/about_us/eng/campaigns.lasso
 12. ^ The International Commission on the Future of Food and
Agriculture (July 15, 2003). "Manifesto on the Future of Food".
   * Codex Alimentarius Commission - official website
   * 'Understanding the Codex Alimentarius' Published in 2005 by the
World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization of
the United Nations. Accessed 4 May 2007.
   * "Authority and Legitimacy in Global Governance: Deliberation,
Institutional Differentiation, and the Codex Alimentarius" Michael
Livermore, 81 NYU Law Review 766 (2006)
The Holocaust
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust
Victims of the Holocaust.
Ghettos were established in Europe in which Jews were confined before
being shipped to extermination camps.
The Holocaust (from Greek ????a?st?? [holókaustos]: hólos, "whole"
andkaustós, "burnt"[1]), also known as The Shoah (Hebrew: ?????,
Romanized ha'shoah; Yiddish: ?????, Romanized churben or hurban[2]) is
the term generally used to describe the genocide of approximately six
million European Jews during World War II, a program of systematic
state-sponsored extermination by Nazi Germany.[3]
Some scholars maintain that the definition of the Holocaust should
also include the Nazis' systematic murder of millions of people in
other groups, including ethnic Poles, Romani, Soviet civilians, Soviet
prisoners of war,people with disabilities, homosexuals, Jehovah's
Witnesses, and otherpolitical and religious opponents.[4] By this
definition, the total number ofHolocaust victims would be between 11
million and 17 million people.[5]
The persecution and genocide were carried out in stages. Legislation
to remove the Jews from civil society was enacted years before the
outbreak of World War II. Concentration camps were established in
which inmates were used as slave labor until they died of exhaustion
or disease. Where the Third Reichconquered new territory in eastern
Europe, specialized units called Einsatzgruppen murdered Jews and
political opponents in mass shootings. Jews and Romani were confined
in overcrowded ghettos before being transported by freight train
toextermination camps where, if they survived the journey, the
majority of them were killed in gas chambers. Every arm ofNazi
Germany's bureaucracy was involved in the logistics of the mass
murder, turning the country into what one Holocaust scholar has called
"a genocidal state".[6]


Assanation  fo JFK The State of the Evidence, The Evidence of the
State  by Edward Jay Epstein
http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/archived/state.htm

Evidence, by its very nature, can be controverted. If it could not be,
it would not be evidence but an act of faith. Any document can be a
forgery, any witness can give false testimony, and any object can be
either fabricated or misidentified. Nevertheless, some evidence is
better than other evidence. And when the best evidence is examined,
tested and placed in the proper context, it provides the best way we
have to establish the facts.
In the case of the assassination of President Kennedy, the central
facts have been investigated and re-investigated for nearly three
decades. The evidence-testers have included the FBI, the Treasury
Department, the Warren Commission, the Rockefeller Commission, the
House Select Committee on Assassination, the Department of Justice,
independent coroners and forensic experts, and assassination
researchers. Consider, for example, the much disputed autopsy findings
of President Kennedy. Although the autopsy examination itself was
badly handled by the Navy, and insufficiently probed by the Warren
Commission, many of the problems were resolved the re-examination of
the X-rays and photographs of the President's body by the panel of
nine independent pathologists (including one Warren Commission critic)
appointed by the House Select Committee. These findings, not those in
the Warren Commission (or my criticisms of the original process in
Inquest) constitute the best evidence.Since as imperfect as the
process has been, it has resulted in filling in much of the reality of
what happened on November 22nd, 1963. I believe that the seven
following questions now can be answered-- or at least narrowed down to
finite possibilities.1. Where did the bullets come from that hit
President Kennedy and Governor Connally?The best available evidence on
the nature of the discernible wounds inflicted on Kennedy is, first,
the photographs and X-Rays of the President taken during the autopsy
at Bethesda Naval Hospital and, second, the fibers of the President's
clothing.Although the photographs and X-Rays were not examined by the
Warren Commission or its staff, leading to considerable doubt as to
the validity of the Commission's conclusions, they were subsequently
examined ,first, by a panel of three pathologists and a radiologist
appointed by Attorney General Ramsey Clark in 1981, and then more
thoroughly in 1976 by the nine man panel appointed by the House Select
Committee. The members of this latter panel had between them
experience in performing over 100,000 autopsies. The House Select
Committee, moreover, established the authenticity of these photographs
by having forensic dentists compare them with Kennedy's pre-mortem
dental records and medical X-rays.All these pathologists agreed,
without any dissent, that all the detectable wounds in the photographs
and X-rays of President Kennedy had been caused by bullets fired from
behind and above him, confirming the conclusions of the doctors who
had performed the autopsy itself as well as those of the FBI and the
Warren Commission. They also agreed unanimously from a reconstruction
of the medical evidence that Governor Connally's multiple wounds had
been caused by a bullet fired from the same direction. The path of the
first bullet to hit the President was further established by the
President's shirt and jacket fibers. The FBI analysis, as well as the
re-analysis, showed that they were pushed inward, not outward, by the
projectile which could only have happened if the President was shot
from behind.The path of the bullet that hit Governor Connally was also
confirmed by Governor Connally's testimony that he was certain he was
hit from behind.The panel also unanimously concluded from the X-Rays
that the fatal bullet had entered the rear of the President's head
near the cowlick area and exited from the right front. None of the
nine pathologist, including Warren Commission critic Dr. Cyril Wecht,
were able to find any medical evidence that this massive wound was
caused by a bullet fired from in front or side of the President's car.
To be sure, a frame-by-frame analysis of the film of the assassination
made by Abraham Zapruder shows President Kennedy's head at the time of
impact moving backwards, not forward as might be expected. But this is
not the evidence it seems to be because, depending on the neurological
reactions to such a wound, the head can snap in any direction after
being shot. Wound ballistic experts demonstrated this counterintuitive
point to the House Select Committee through a filmed experiment that
clearly showed that, when hit with a rifle bullet from the rear, the
head could move either backward or forward. So there is not
necessarily a relationship between the direction that the head moves
and the direction from which the bullet strikes the head.By tracing
the trajectory of the bullets from the path of the wounds, an analyst
from the National Aeronautic and Space Administration was able to plot
all three shots to their source the upper floors of the southeast face
of the Texas Book Depository. This was the same building that five
witnesses --Howard Brennan, Amos Lee Euins, Carolyn Walther, Arnold
Rowland and Barbara Rowland-- claimed to have seen a rifle protruding
from a South-eastern window at about the time of the assassination
(Brennan told police he actually saw the rifle being fired and
reloaded before the suspect was apprehended). While it is possible
that numerous other shots may have been fired from other locations and
directions and missed their target, we know from the best evidence,
the autopsy photographs, that the shots that caused all the
discernible wounds came from the a high window on the south eastern
side of the Texas Book Depository.2. Did the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle
found by police on the sixth floor of the Texas Depository fire these
shots?The best evidence for identifying the assassination weapon is
the two bullet fragments found in the President's car and the nearly
whole bullet found in a stretcher in Parkland Hospital in Dallas. In
1964, FBI experts ballistically matched this bullet and fragments to
the rifle barrel of the Mannlicher-Carcano by microscopically
comparing of the markings in the barrel with those found on the bullet
and fragments. A firearms panel of independent experts appointed by
the House Select Committee re-examined this evidence in 1977 and
re-confirmed that the bullet and fragments had come from that
Mannlicher Carcano rifle.In addition, the House Select Committee
employed a very advanced form of neutron activation analysis to match
the recovered bullet and fragments to the ammunition used in the
Mannlicher Carcano. In this technique, traces from the ballistic
evidence are bombarded by neutrons in a nuclear reactor so that the
precise composition of elements-- antimony, silver, and copper-- can
be measured by their emissions on a gamma-ray spectrometer to an
accuracy of one-billionth of a gram. The composition of traces from
the bullet and fragments were thus compared to that of the unfired
bullet found in the chamber of the Mannlicher-Carcano and found to
exactly match. This analysis convincingly showed that all the
ballistic material that was recovered, and could be tested, came from
two bullets, and both bullets identically matched in their composition
the ammunition for the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle.Although questions can
be raised about the general accuracy of the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle
found in the depository, there can be no doubt that the particular
weapon can be fired with deadly accuracy at a target 100 yards away--
the distance from the depository to the President's car. After the
assassination three different FBI agents fired this exact rifle and
scored bull's-eyes two out of three times.
Although the suspicion has been raised that the Mannlicher-Carcano
rifle was "framed" as the murder weapon by a conspirator who planted
the nearly-intact bullet on a stretcher in Parkland Hospital, it lacks
any reasonable persuasiveness because i) the conspirator would have no
certainty that he could recover from the hospital, car, autopsy and
crime scene the "real" bullets that presumably would not match the
Mannlicher-Carcano; ii) the fragments found in the car and Governor
Connally's wrist match the Mannlicher-Carcano ammunition; iii) it
would be pointless to frame the Mannlicher-Carcano, which the
conspirators would have had to have in their possession anyway to
leave at the murder site, since it was a weapon perfectly capable of
hitting its target. So why not use it?We thus know that the Mannlicher
Carcano found in the depository fired at least two of the shots at the
President's motorcade.3. How many snipers fired at the President's
motorcade?The best evidence of the sequence of events remains the
ten-second long film taken by Zapruder. It fixes the earliest time
Kennedy could have been first hit in the back, the latest time
Connally was wounded, and the exact moment the President was shot in
the head. From an analysis of this film, the Warren Commission staff
determined that the interval between the time Kennedy and Connally
were first shot was not long enough for a single rifleman to have
fired two shots: therefore either both men were hit by the same
bullet, or there had to be two riflemen. This conclusion was confirmed
by the more sophisticated photographic analysis of the House Select
Committee's photographic evidence panel and of independent
researchers.Despite the crucial implications of this photographic
evidence, the issue of whether Kennedy and Connally were hit by the
same or separate bullets has not been satisfactorily resolved. The FBI
concluded it was separate shots, the Warren Commission begged the
question as "not relevant" and the House Select Committee, which went
most thoroughly into this evidence, was unable to reach a definitive
conclusion because members of its 9-doctor panel irreconcilably
disagreed. Eight doctors believed it was possible, though not
necessarily probable. that the bullet recovered had caused both
Kennedy's back wound and Connally's, multiple wounds; one doctor,
however, Cyril Wecht concluded from the photographic and medical
evidence that it was absolutely impossible for those wounds to have
been caused by a single bullet. Since Wecht marshals considerable
evidence to support his view (as will be recalled from Epilogue I), we
are left with two possible scenarios.A. The Single Bullet ScenarioOne
rifleman fired three bullets from the Mannlicher Carcano in the
depository. The first bullet missed the motorcade entirely and
incidentally wounded a bystander, James Teague. The second bullet hit
Kennedy and Connally and was recovered from Connally's stretcher.
About three seconds later, the rifleman fired a third bullet which
killed Kennedy, abandoned his rifle, and fled the depository.B. The
Separate Shot ScenarioOne rifleman fired the first shot that hit
Kennedy in the back from an unidentified rifle. The bullet exited the
car and was not recovered. He then fired a second shot that went
astray and nicked bystander Teague. About one second after the first
rifleman fired, a second rifleman, using the Mannlicher Carcano, hit
Connally; and, with his second shot, hit Kennedy in the head. While
the first rifleman left the depository with his rifle and shell
casings, the second rifleman left his behind.Both scenarios are
consistent with the testimony of eyewitnesses-- one of whom saw a
second person near the sniper's windows-- and the fingerprints found
on the boxes arranged at the site. So we can conclude that either one
or two riflemen participated in the assassination and that the one
with the Mannlicher Carcano killed Kennedy.4. Whose Mannlicher-Carcano
was it?The best evidence that identifies the ownership of the murder
weapon is the handwriting of the person who ordered the rifle under
the name "A. Hidell" from a mail order house in Chicago in March 1963
and rented the post office box in Dallas to which it was shipped.It
was Lee Harvey Oswald.FBI and Treasury Department experts determined
in 1964 that Lee Harvey Oswald had signed the name "A. Hidell" on both
the purchase order for the rifle and the post box application. A half
dozen other documents found in his possession, that Oswald used the
alias "Hidell". The House Select Committee panel of questioned
document experts, after re-examining the signatures, unequivocally
agreed. So Oswald had ordered the murder weapon-- and it had been
shipped to his post office box from Chicago on March
20,1963.PossessionMarina Oswald confirmed that Oswald had received the
rifle in late March, and four other witnesses--George De
Mohrenschildt, Jeanne De Mohrenschildt, Alexander Taylor and Gary
Taylor-- saw that Oswald had a rifle in either late March or Early
April.The best evidence of Oswald's actual possession of the
Mannlicher- Carcano, however, is the much disputed photographs of
Oswald holding the rifle in his hand that Marina Oswald said she took
on Sunday, March 31, 1963 in the backyard of their house in Dallas.
Oswald claimed after his arrest that the photograph had been faked by
superimposing his head on the rifleman's body but this theory is
contradicted by three pieces of evidence established by the House
Select Committee. First, De Mohrenschildt produced in 1976 an
inscribed copy of the backyard photograph which Oswald had given him
in April 1963. The Committee's questioned document panel authenticated
the signature-- which meant that Oswald had signed (and dated) the
photograph he later claimed was faked. Second, by examining the
negative with enhanced analytic techniques, the Committee' panel of
photographic experts found a unique random pattern of wear on the
rifle in the photograph which corresponded exactly to one on the
Mannlicher-Carcano Oswald had purchased. Since the experts agreed this
could not be faked, the rifle in the photograph had to be Oswald's.
Third, by microscopically examining the scratch marks that Oswald's
Imperial Reflex camera distributed on all negatives pulled through it,
which are the equivalent of camera fingerprints, the panel established
unequivocally that the backyard photographs could only have been taken
by Oswald's camera, just as Marina had testified. Moreover, using
digital processing analysis and stereo optic viewing techniques that
did not exist in 1963, the panel concluded there was no signs of
having been faked. Even two experts who had previously disputed the
authenticity of the photographs (using copies, rather than the
original) now agreed that the photograph was genuine. In light of this
evidence, there can be no serious doubt that Oswald possessed the
murder weapon at the end of March 1963.
UseMarina Oswald testified to the Warren Commission that when Oswald
left their house on April 10,1963, he left her dramatic instructions
in Russian about what she should if he were arrested, killed or had to
go into hiding, and when he returned late that evening, he explained
to her that he had just attempted to kill General Edwin Walker with
his rifle. Her testimony is corroborated by three elements of
evidence.First, the Russian handwriting in the note has been
unequivocally identified as that of Oswald by the questioned documents
experts of both the Warren Commission and the House Select Committee.
The note, which contains details that date it, confirms that Oswald
expected to be killed, arrested or a fugitive the week of April 10th
1963.Second, photographs of Walker's house taken from the position
were the sniper fired at Walker were found among Oswald's possessions
after the Kennedy assassination. Photographic experts established
these photographs were taken with Oswald's imperial reflex camera. By
referring to construction work in the background, the FBI was able to
determine that the photographs were taken on March 9th or 10th (which
was just about the date Oswald ordered the Mannlicher Carcano). Such
photographs show that Oswald had reconnoitered Walker's house.Third,
the previously-discussed Neutron Activation Analysis done in 1977
exactly matched the metallic elements found in the bullet that was
recovered in Walker's home to the batch of Mannlicher-Carcano
ammunition used in Oswald's rifle in the assassination of Kennedy.So
we know the murder weapon was purchased, delivered and shown off in an
inscribed photograph, and used in a prior attempted assassination by
Oswald. 5. Was Oswald at the sniper's window on the sixth floor of the
depository where the murder weapon was found.The best evidence here is
three palm prints (which are as uniquely identifiable as fingerprints)
found on the boxes stacked in front of the window to support the rifle
and the nearby paper sack which was long enough to accommodate the
Mannlicher Carcano. FBI experts matched them to Oswald hands. ( A
fourth palm print, found on one box, belonged to an unidentified
individual). The House Select Committee's fingerprint panel
unanimously confirmed this evidence. Since the "freshness" of palm
prints is of limited duration, it was further determined that Oswald
had handled those boxes and paper sack either the day of the
assassination or the preceding day. Moreover, two witnesses testified
he carried the paper sack into the depository that morning. So we know
Oswald arranged the boxes used by the sniper and handled the paper
sack within 24 hours of the assassination and, if the witnesses are
correct, brought the sack to the sniper's window the morning of the
assassination.6. Was Oswald framed?Whereas there is no doubt that
Oswald's rifle was used to shoot President Kennedy, the possibility
exists it was used by another party to frame Oswald. If Oswald was
totally innocent, his activities after the assassination would reflect
his lack of knowledge and involvement in the event. Instead, the
evidence is persuasive that he fled the building after the
assassination, changed his clothing, armed himself, fatally shot a
policeman resisted arrest by attempting to shoot another policeman,
and, after his arrest, lied repeatedly to his interrogators about
owning the rifle, appearing in the backyard photograph with the rifle,
and using the alias "Hidell" (which he purchased both the rifle and
pistol).The best evidence that he shot the policeman, J.D. Tippit, is
that the cartridge cases found at the murder scene matched the firing
pin of the revolver taken out of Oswald's hand when he was arrested.
The FBI determined no all other weapon could have ejected these
cartridges-- and these conclusions were reaffirmed by the Select
Committee's firearms panel. Oswald admission that he had decided only
on the spur of the moment to fetch this weapon effectively rules out
the possibility he was framed since no one but Oswald could have known
he would be carrying it.In addition, five witnesses identified Oswald
from the police line up as either the person who shot Tippit or the
person who fled from the scene with a gun in hand. The House Select
Committee produced an additional witness who testified he saw Oswald
stand over the downed policeman and fire a bullet into his head.His
post-arrest actions, especially his mendacity in consistently denying
ownership of the rifle to representatives of the FBI, Secret Service,
Post Office, and district attorney, further indicate consciousness of
guilt about owning the rifle. This would not be consistent with the
behavior of a framed and innocent man -- who believed his rifle was
still wrapped in a blanket in a friend's garage.While none of this
evidence is unimpeachable-- no evidence is-- and none of it proves
that Oswald was the only person involved in the shooting of Kennedy,
Tippit or General Walker, it convinces me that he was involved in the
assassination.The Conspiracy QuestionOne question, perhaps the only
one that still matters, cannot be answered by the state's evidence:
was Oswald part of a conspiracy? As we have seen, the
re-investigations of the assassination have left unresolved the issue
of whether or two shooters were involved but, even if they had
definitively established, as the Warren Commission attempted to do,
that a lone gunman had fired all the shots on November 22nd 1963, it
would not logically diminish the possibility that the assassination
resulted from a conspiracy.Conspiracies do not necessarily require
more than one rifleman to accomplish their purpose. In many cases,
such as the highly-sophisticated Rightist conspiracy in France to
assassinate President Charles De Gaulle, a single "Jackal" rifleman
was employed. One accurate rifleman might be preferable to a
conspiracy when it is expected that the intended victim could be
protected by his bodyguard immediately after the first shot is fired,
because each additional snipers would increase the chances of
detection, both before and after the act, but not necessarily increase
the probability of success. Moreover, if multiple gunmen are captured
(or killed), it would be difficult to divert the investigation away
from the conspiracy, whereas a lone gunman, especially if killed
himself, can be dismissed as a lone lunatic.The larger issue then is:
was Oswald, whether firing alone or in tandem, acting at the behest of
others.Oswald was not, to be sure, the sort of well-adjusted
individual with whom most people would want to associate. He was
wantonly self-destructive (e.g. his suicide attempt in Moscow);
militantly hostile towards symbols of authority (e.g. the threat he
made to blow up the FBI headquarters in Dallas); contemptuous of legal
restraints (e.g. his plan to hijack an airliner to get to Cuba) and
homicidal (e.g. his brutal murder of Tippit). As early as 1960, he
expressed a cold-blooded willingness to commit political murder in a
letter he presciently wrote his brother from Moscow: "What I say now I
do not say lightly or unknowingly ... I would kill any American who
put a uniform on in defense of the American Government, Any American".
The one position that such unrestrained aggression would not exclude a
person for employment would be a political assassin.In this context,
the bullet Oswald coolly fired at General Walker was, whether he meant
it to be or not, an advertisement of his willingness to kill or be
killed for a political cause. Less than a week before he went out to
assassinate Walker he distributed an inscribed photograph of himself
to De Mohrenschildt (and perhaps others). It showed him dressed in
black, armed to kill with a rifle and telescopic sight, and holding in
his hand the radical newspaper, The Militant. When he went to Mexico
to offer himself to the Cubans, he brought with him the tell-tale
photographs of Walker's house to establish his bona fides as a
revolutionary. Was his have gun, will kill message picked up of any
antennae that summer? Just as De Mohrenschildt and Marina learned of
his assassination attempt, so may have others in pro-Castro,
anti-Castro and other fringe groups he was active with in the summer
of 1963 (not to mention the various intelligence and police agencies
monitoring his movements).There couldn't be that many potential
assassins hanging around the militant peripheries of the Cold War with
Oswald's perverse virtues: a convenient defector background, military
training, complete disregard for human life, including his own, and
possession of a rifle he was more than ready to use. Here was as
assassin awaiting a mission. Did anyone pick him up as a shooter-- or,
lacking a sponsor but finding an opportunity, did he act alone?

http://karws.gso.uri.edu/jfk/conspiracy_theories/Primer/Primer_of_assassination_theories.html

A Primer of Assassination Theories
The whole spectrum of doubt, from the Warren commissioners to Ousman Ba
Esquire, December 1966, pp. 205 ff.
HOW IT HAPPENED

1. SINGLE-BULLET THEORY

Proponents: A 4-3 majority of the Warren Commission (see chart). And
most Commission lawyers, notably Arlen Specter, who developed the
theory in March, 1964, and Norman Redlich, who advocated it as the
only alternative to a two-assassin theory.

Thesis: The first bullet wounded both Kennedy and Connally. A second
bullet hit Kennedy in the head and killed him. Another bullet missed
the car entirely and was never found.

Selling Point: This is the only theory that explains the assassination
in terms of a single assassin. Why? Because films of the assassination
show that a maximum of only 1.8 seconds could have elapsed between the
earliest point at which Kennedy was first hit and the latest point at
which Connally was first hit. Since the bolt of the murder rifle
cannot be operated in less than 2.3 seconds, it could not possibly
have been fired twice during the time in which both men were hit.
Either both men were hit by the same bullet or there were two
assassins.

undefined

This precise bullet path is essential to the Commission's theory
that the first bullet went through Kennedy and then hit
 Connally (Exhibit 385). Any slight difference would
rule this out and thereby suggest a second assassin.

Drawback No. 1: The single-bullet theory is tenable if and only if the
three F.B.I. reports (November 26, December 9 and January 13) are
completely wrong on their statements of the autopsy. Why? Because
these three reports all state that the first bullet did not go
completely through Kennedy and therefore it could not have gone on to
hit Connally, who was seated in front of Kennedy.

Retorts: 1. The Incompetent F.B.I. J. Lee Rankin, at the time the
Commission’s general counsel, and Norman Redlich, his deputy, have
said—after the December 13 F.B.I. Summary Report was published in
Inquest—that the “so-called F.B.I. Summary Report” (which the
Commission considered of “principal importance”) was “evaluated and
discarded” during the inquiry. Redlich further said “the Commission
study used the actual (November 26) reports of the F.B.I.
investigative agents, not just the summary.” (However, the actual
report, just recently found in the National Archives, corroborates the
Summary Report.)

2. Time magazine proposes that the F.B.I. was completely wrong on all
reports and has long since publicly admitted these errors. (However,
the F.B.I. told The Washington Post that its Summary Report was
accurate as of when it was prepared, implying the doctors later may
have changed their opinion. The F.B.I. declined comment to The New
York Times in June, 1966, on the question of whether or not its
reports were erroneous. Even to Commission champion Fletcher Knebel,
the F.B.I. would only admit that it was possible that their initial
reports did not reflect a subsequent decision by the doctors.)

3. The Commission’s Post-Report, reported by Fletcher Knebel, holds
that the day after the autopsy, on receiving further information about
the throat wound from the Dallas doctors, the autopsy doctors reached
the conclusions that the bullet exited from Kennedy’s throat. Aside
from the fact that this theory contradicts the version of the autopsy
given in The Warren Report, it still leaves unresolved the problem of
the bullet wound “below the shoulder” (reported by the F.B.I.), that
later apparently moved up to the back of the neck.

Drawback No. 2: Photographs of the President’s shirt and jacket
support the F.B.I. report that the first bullet struck Kennedy below
the shoulder. If the bullet fired from above did enter below the
shoulder it is highly unlikely that it exited through the throat.

Retorts: 1. The Creeping Shirt. Norman Redlich has suggested (after
the F.B.I. photographs were published in Inquest) that the President’s
shirt somehow rose up a few inches so that the bullet hole in the
shirt coincided with a hole in the rear of the neck. Experimentation
indicates, however, that raising the shirt over the collar line
entails doubling it up, which would produce two holes in the back of
the shirt.

undefinedundefined

Exhibits 59 and 60 indicate that the bullet entered lower than the
Commission said it had.

2. Newsweek magazine suggests that Kennedy may have been bent over so
far that his shoulder was higher than his throat. But the films of the
assassination show that Kennedy was sitting erect, and his back brace,
according to the Warren Report “tended to make him sit up straight.”

undefined

.

This photograph of the F.B.I. restaging, which appeared in several editions
of the Warren Report, not only contradicts the Commission's placement
of the bullet path but shows that if the bullet entered where the hole in the
jacket is, and then went on to hit Connally, it would have come out
Kennedy's chest, not his throat. And Kennedy had no chest wounds

Drawback No. 3: Governor Connally says it is in conceivable that he
could have been struck by the same bullet that hit Kennedy. He
remembers that after hearing the first shot he turned to his right but
could not see the President. He then began to turn to his left, and
was hit. His story is corroborated by Mrs. Connally.

Retort: Connally was confused. The Commission brushed aside Governor
Connally’s testimony (and his wife’s) by declaring that in view of the
circumstances he could hardly be expected to recall clearly what
happened.

2. F.B.I. THEORY

Proponents: The F.B.I.

Thesis: 1. The first bullet hit Kennedy below the shoulder and
penetrated “only a distance of a finger length.” This bullet was
“expelled” onto the President’s stretcher when the Dallas doctors
applied external heart massage. 2. The second bullet struck Connally.
3. The third bullet entered Kennedy’s head and fragmentized. (The
impact of the shot sent a tiny fragment of bone through Kennedy’s
throat, causing a small throat wound.) All shots came from the Book
Depository.

undefined

Exhibit No. 397, the autopsy sketch drawn by Dr. Humes, shows
a bullet wound lower than the Commission's Exhibit 385 does.

Selling Points: 1. An entry wound below the shoulder would explain the
shirt and jacket holes being about six inches below the top of the
collar. It would also serve to explain the autopsy sketch showing a
wound well below the collar line. And it would explain the Secret
Service testimony that it was six inches below the collar.

2. The supposition that the bullet also fell out of Kennedy’s back
accounts for the bullet found on the stretcher. (See Planted-Bullet
Theory.)

3. The tiny bone fragment accounts for the small throat wound. Also, a
bone fragment would explain the absence of metallic traces on the
holes in the front of the shirt.

Drawback No. 1: The F.B.I. Theory, by positing that Kennedy and
Connally were hit by separate bullets, leads to a two-assassin theory.
As one Commission lawyer bluntly put it: “To say that they were hit by
separate bullets is synonymous with saying that there were two
assassins.”

Drawback No. 2: The Fourth Bullet. Late in the investigation, it was
discovered that a bystander, James Tague, had been wounded by one of
the shots. The F.B.I. Theory holds that all three shots hit inside the
President’s car. Yet it was unlikely that Tague was wounded by any of
these shots since he was standing about 260 feet away at the time of
the fusillade. This raises the possibility that Tague was wounded by a
fragment from a fourth bullet. But only three shells were found in the
Book Depository.

Drawback No. 3: If the F.B.I autopsy report is accurate, then the
Commission’s autopsy findings had to be purposely falsified. The
implications of this are almost too disturbing to imagine. Yet, the
fact that the autopsy surgeon, Commander Humes, burned “certain
preliminary notes” has given rise to the theory that the “preliminary
notes” actually contained the earlier version of the autopsy referred
to by the F.B.I. This question is unresolved.

One of the main stimuli for theories that shots came from someplace
other than the Book Depository is an amateur eight-millimeter film of
the assassination taken by Abraham Zapruder. In ten seconds of color
film, virtually the entire sequence of events is recorded. The
Zapruder film shows the motorcade proceeding down Elm Street with the
President smiling and waving, then suddenly he reaches for his throat,
apparently hit. About a second later Connally grimaces with pain and
begins toppling over. A few seconds elapse, then a bullet visibly
strikes the President’s head. From the film. the Commission judged
that the President was first hit between film frame 210 and 225, and
the fatal head shot occurred on film frame 313. By determining the
shutter speed of the camera (18.3 frames per second), the Commission
ascertained: 1) a maximum of 5.6 seconds elapsed from the first to the
final shot; and 2) no more than 1.8 seconds elapsed between the time
Kennedy and Connally were first hit. This time bind led directly to
the Commission’s Single-Bullet Theory (see above). The Zapruder film
also led to four other interesting theories.

3. HEAD MOVEMENT THEORY

Proponent: Vincent Salandria, a Philadelphia lawyer.

Using two slide projectors, and superimposing frame 316 over frame
313, Salandria finds that after the fatal head shot, Kennedy’s head
moves sharply backward and to the left, a direction inconsistent with
shots from the Depository. Salandria extrapolated the trajectory from
the direction in which the head moves and concludes that the shot came
from behind the picket fence or the arcade on the grassy knoll.
Salandria also suspects that, because of the massive devastation, this
second wound, unlike the first, may have been caused by a dumdum
bullet—which couldn’t have come from Oswald’s rifle.

undefined

4. EARLY HIT THEORY

A group of California theorists has used the Zapruder film to show
that the first shot hit Kennedy between film frames 190 and 210. If
true, this would be significant because the Commission established
that during this interval the line of sight from the sixth-floor
window in the Depository was obstructed by the foliage of an oak tree;
therefore the shot must have come from elsewhere.

Harold Weisberg also uses the Zapruder film to prove the Early-Hit
Theory. Since Zapruder testified that he saw Kennedy hit, and
Zapruder’s view was blocked by a traffic sign between film frames 205
and 225 (by which time Kennedy had already been hit), Weisberg
concludes that Kennedy was hit before film frame 205.

5. MISSING-FRAME THEORY

The fact that film frames 208 through 211 have been deleted from the
black-and-white frame-by-frame photographs published by the Warren
Commission (Exhibit 885) and from the color slides of the Zapruder
film at the National Archives—and the fact that frames 207 and 212
show obvious splice marks—has led a number of theorists to suspect
that Kennedy was shot during that interval and that the four missing
film frames were suppressed deliberately.

Drawback: Life magazine owns the original film and according to those
who have seen it, the film is complete, no frames are missing, and
Kennedy does not appear to have been hit in the sequence. The
Archive’s frames may just have been damaged innocently.

6. TRAFFIC SIGN THEORY

David Lifton, a U.C.L.A. graduate student, claims that he can detect
stress marks coming from the traffic sign starting at frame 212 and
continuing until frame 221. He interprets these as shock waves caused
by a bullet hitting the sign. This shot, he figures, could not have
been the same one that Oswald is supposed to have fired because of the
timing. And strangely, right after the assassination the sign was
removed.

7. ENTRY WOUND THEORY

Proponents: Mark Lane, Thomas Buchanan, Joachim Joesten, et. al.

Thesis: Early statements were made by Dallas doctors suggesting that
the throat wound was made by a bullet entering the throat. Since films
of the assassination firmly establish that the President’s car was
past the Book Depository when he was shot, a bullet entering the
throat must have come from a point well in front of the Depository.
“In front” was at first interpreted to mean the railroad overpass;
however, when the Commission showed that a bullet did not in fact pass
through the limousine’s windshield, as was believed by the proponents
of this theory, “in front” was then interpreted to mean the grassy
knoll. Mark Lane states in his latest version that Kennedy was
directly facing the knoll when he was shot in the throat, although
none of the films indicates this to be the case.

undefined

Selling point: The entry-wound theory explains the Dallas doctors’
early statements and the relatively small diameter of the wound,
although the doctors later testified that under certain conditions an
exit wound would have the same appearance as an entry wound.

Drawback: The entry-wound theory does not explain what finally
happened to the bullet that entered the throat. Since no exit wound
was found in the President’s back (and no bullet was in the
President’s body), the entry-wound theory depends on the assumption
that the autopsy and other evidence was changed.

8. OVER THE FENCE THEORY

Proponents: Maurice Schonfeld, U.P.I., Jack Fox, U.P.I., Burt
Reinhardt, U.P.I. In the United Press-International film library, a
New York hobbyist found an eight-millimeter color film of the
assassination made by Orville Nix. One of the frames of the Nix film
particularly interested him because it showed an object behind the
wall on the grassy knoll. He then employed a film specialist to blow
the frame up, and it became clear that the object was in fact a
vehicle. On the roof of the vehicle, he discerned a man aiming what
appeared to be a rifle at the President’s car. He immediately took his
photograph to Dallas and asked eyewitnesses about it.

U.P.I. editors, apparently impressed with the photograph, sent
reporter Jack Fox to Dallas to interview witnesses to the
assassination.

Lee E. Bowers, Jr. told him that the photograph was “exactly what I
saw.” S. M. Holland, who was standing on the overpass and had one of
the best views of any eyewitness, told Fox there were four shots:
“…the first came from the book building and hit the President. The
second came from the same place and hit Governor John Connally….The
third shot came from behind the picket fence to the north of Elm
Street. There was a puff of smoke under the trees like someone had
thrown out a Chinese firecracker and a report entirely different from
the one which was fired from the book building…”

According to Holland, the fourth shot came from the Book Depository.
When Holland reached the fence he found a station wagon and a sedan.
On the bumper of the station wagon there were two muddy marks “as if
someone had stood there to look over the fence.” At least seven other
witnesses on the overpass saw smoke rising from the same area, and
many other witnesses thought the shots came from behind the picket
fence. One Dallas policeman, J. M. Smith, even claimed to have “caught
the smell of gunpowder” behind the wooden fence.

The Nix-U.P.I. film and partial blowup.

9. EYEWITNESS THEORIES

Eyewitness accounts of the assassination are perhaps the most popular
source of two-assassin theories—virtually any armchair student of the
assassination, given the Report’s twenty-six volumes of testimony, can
develop an interesting theory as to where the shots came from. Right
after the twenty-six volumes were made public, Harold Feldman, a
writer on the psychology of assassins, counted up the various sources
of shots reported by 121 eyewitnesses. His tally revealed that 38 gave
“no clear opinion,” 32 thought the shots came from the Book
Depository, and 51 though the shots came from the grassy knoll area.
Largely on the basis of this analysis, Feldman advanced the theory
that there were two assassins: one on the grassy knoll and one in the
Book Depository.

Drawback: Eyewitness recollections often conflict: which means that
somebody has to be wrong.
WHO DID IT?

The following six theories name Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone assassin.

10. UNDERGROUND MAN THEORY

Proponent: The Warren Commission. The Commission did not reach a final
conclusion as to why Oswald killed President Kennedy. Instead, it
listed five “factors” (which, a Commission lawyer said, read like
clichés from a TV soap opera). They were:

   hostility to his environment;

   failure to establish “meaningful relationships”;

   desire for a place in history;

   a commitment to Marxism and communism (a “factor” inserted at the
insistence of Commissioner Gerald Ford);

   a capacity to act decisively without regard to the consequences.

According to this theory, Oswald had no motive; he acted out of blind
resentment.

11. MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE THEORY

Proponents: Some Commission lawyers and members of the C.I.A.

Since Oswald spent considerable time in a Soviet hospital, a few
Commission lawyers entertained the theory that Oswald might have been
brainwashed and conditioned as a “sleeper” assassin; then he went
haywire (i.e., he was accidentally turned on). The Commission decided
to send a letter to the C.I.A. requesting information on the “present
status of Soviet ‘mind-conditioning’ techniques.” A few weeks later, a
C.I.A. agent replied that this possibility was still “a main school of
thought” at the C.I.A. on the assassination, and although such
techniques were still in a relatively primitive stage, this form of
conditioning could be induced by drugs. The theory, however, was not
further developed.

12. DOMESTIC QUARREL THEORY

Proponent: Representative Gerald Ford.

Commissioner Gerald Ford, in his book, Portrait of the Assassin,
suggests that Oswald was still hedging on the eve of the assassination
when he returned home to see his wife, Marina. She spurned him. Oswald
then went to the garage. He got his rifle.

13. HORRIBLE ACCIDENT THEORY

Proponent: Marina Oswald.

In her final testimony before the Commission, Marina Oswald advanced
her own theory of Lee’s motive. She said she believed her husband was
actually trying to shoot Governor John Connally, and missed, and by a
horrible accident he killed the President.

14. OEDIPAL THEORY

Proponent: Dr. Renatus Hartogs, coauthor of The Two Assassins.

Dr. Hartogs, a psychiatrist who evaluated Oswald as a
thirteen-year-old boy, has recently advanced a theory explaining the
assassination in terms of Oswald’s repressed lust for his mother.
Hartogs observes that Oswald slept in his mother’s bed long after he
should have had a bed of his own, and suggests that inner guilt
feelings may have led him to kill President Kennedy. Dr. Hartogs finds
it significant that Oswald shot at both Kennedy and Tippit three
times, since the number “three” in psychoanalytic thinking symbolizes
the masculine genitals. However, Sylvia Meagher points out in her
review of Hartogs’ book that Tippit was shot four times.

15. KILLER-INSTINCT THEORY

Proponent: John J. McCloy.

In a secret colloquium between the Commission and three psychiatrists,
Commissioner McCloy advanced the “killer-instinct” theory. He noted
that Oswald had killed two men and had attempted to shoot at least
three others (Governor Connally, General Walker, and the police
officer who tried to arrest him). McCloy reasoned that this indicated
a pattern of innate violence. By the time the report was written,
however, McCloy’s hypothesis seems to have been lost in the shuffle.

The following four theories are based on the belief that Oswald was
innocent, that he was framed for both the Kennedy assassination and
murder of officer J. D. Tippit by the real conspirators who planted
evidence against him before and after the assassination. The logic of
these theories inevitably leads to a high-level conspiracy involving
law-enforcement agencies. For example, to believe that Oswald did not
kill Tippit, it is necessary to assume: a) shells from Oswald’s
revolver were planted at the scene by the real murderers; b) the
revolver then was planted on Oswald by the Dallas police (the plot
obviously could not have depended on Oswald going home and
conveniently fetching his pistol; and c) Oswald’s admission that he
had his revolver with him when arrested was fabricated.

16. PLANTED-RIFLE THEORY

Proponent: Mark Lane.

Thesis: A 7.65 caliber German Mauser was found in the Book Depository,
and later Oswald’s 6.5 caliber Italian Mannlicher-Carcano rifle was
substituted for it. This theory is based on testimony (and an
affidavit) indicating that the three Dallas law officers first
described the rifle as a Mauser. The problem with this theory is that
the bullet fragments found in the President’s car ballistically match
Oswald’s Carcano, proving that it was employed in the assassination
(no matter where or when it was found).

17. PLANTED-BULLET THEORY

Proponents: Professor Richard H. Popkin, Professor Josiah Thompson,
Sylvia Meagher, Vincent Salandria, Léo Sauvage, Harold Weisberg, Mark
Lane and Ray Marcus.

Thesis: A bullet, which the Warren Report states was found on
Connally’s stretcher, was fired from Oswald’s rifle sometime prior to
the assassination. Then, after the assassination, it was planted on a
stretcher in the Dallas hospital where Kennedy and Connally were
treated, thereby framing Oswald.

This theory is based on the fact that evidence developed by the
Commission precluded both Kennedy’s and Connally’s stretchers as
possible sources for the stretcher bullet. The Commission’s autopsy
report stated that the bullet exited Kennedy, therefore it could not
have come from his stretcher. And Drs. Finck, Humes, and Shaw
testified that more fragments were found in Connally’s wrist than were
missing from the bullet, thus ruling out Connally’s stretcher as a
source for the bullet. Furthermore, in missing tapes of the doctors’
press conference, which was held after the stretcher bullet was found,
Dr. Shaw supposedly says that a nearly whole bullet was lodged in
Connally’s thigh. The theorists thus deduce that the bullet must have
been planted on the stretcher. The fact that no blood or other organic
material was found on the bullet reinforces their argument. Professor
Thompson further points out that the only bullet similar in appearance
to the stretcher bullet was obtained by firing Oswald’s rifle into a
long tube of cotton. He believes that this test indicated that the
stretcher bullet was probably obtained by firing the bullet into
cotton.

The Commission claims this bullet pierced Kennedy's neck and
Connally's shoulder, ribs, wrist and thigh. Theorists say it's a fake.

The Commission claims this bullet pierced Kennedy’s neck and
Connally’s shoulder, ribs, wrist and thigh. Theorists say it’s a fake.

18. OSWALD IMPERSONATOR THEORY

Proponents: Léo Sauvage, Harold Weisberg, Sylvia Meagher, (See also
Popkin’s Two-Oswald Theory).

Thesis: Before the assassination, someone impersonating Oswald planted
clues that would incriminate Oswald in the assassination. According to
this theory, the impersonator made himself conspicuous at a nearby
rifle range, brought a gun into a neighborhood gunsmith, cashed large
checks, and acted suspiciously. The impersonator probably took part in
the assassination.

undefined

Who is this man? A C.I.A. report on Lee Harvey Oswald arrived at the
F.B.I. field office in Dallas they day of the assassination. It
revealed that Oswald had visited the Cuban Embassy in Mexico City on
September 27, 1963, and included a photograph taken by a secret C.I.A.
camera of the man identified as Oswald leaving the Embassy. After the
assassination, a problem developed; the man in the C.I.A. photograph
was not Oswald! Oswald’s mother added to the confusion by claiming the
man in the photograph was Jack Ruby. (Obviously, it isn’t.) Commission
lawyers, attempting to find out if the man in the photograph was
associated with Oswald or impersonating him, were never able to
identify the mystery man. All the C.I.A. would say was that it was a
“mix-up.”

19. FALL-GUY THEORY

Proponent: Joachim Joesten

Thesis: That the assassination was the work of a conspiracy involving
some officers of the C.I.A. and the F.B.I. as well as some Army
figures and some reactionary oil millionaires. The conspirators used
Oswald as a “fall guy, a red herring, to draw attention while the
murderers escaped.” The F.B.I. for reasons of its own, completed the
frame of Oswald and covered up evidence of the real conspirators.

The next three theories explain how the second assassin escaped from
the grassy knoll.

20. BOGUS SECRET-SERVICE MAN THEORY

Proponent: Sylvia Meagher.

Dallas policeman J. M. Smith ran to the parking lot behind the grassy
knoll immediately after the assassination. He suddenly encountered a
stranger and pulled his gun. The stranger identified himself as a
Secret Service agent and showed Smith his credentials (although Smith
later could not recall his name). Smith’s account is corroborated to
some degree by two other law officers—Deputy Constable Weitzman and
Sergeant Harkness.

Sylvia Meagher, an independent researcher, made a meticulous check of
Secret Service records and found that no Secret Service agent was on
or near the knoll area at the time that Smith encountered the “agent.”
Mrs. Meagher suggests that the assassin may have escaped by using fake
Secret Service credentials.

21. TRUNK THEORY

Proponents: S. M. Holland, Richard H. Popkin.

Soon after the shots were fired, S. M. Holland rushed to the picket
fence behind the knoll (where he thought he saw smoke) and found a
station wagon and a sedan parked near the fence (see Over the Fence
Theory). Muddy footprints led from the bumper of the station wagon to
the sedan and then mysteriously ended. Holland said: “I’ve often
wondered if a man could have climbed into the trunk of that car and
pulled the lid shut on himself, then someone else have driven it away
later.” Other theorists, like Professor Popkin, have thought it more
likely that the knoll assassin simply hid the rifle in the car, then
fled on foot.

22. STORM DRAIN THEORY

Proponent: Lillian Castellano.

Mrs. Castellano, a California accountant, located what appeared to be
a storm drain in a photograph of the grassy knoll taken at the time of
the assassination. However, it could not be located in later
photographs of the grassy knoll. Through a contact in Dallas, Mrs.
Castellano obtained a chart of the sewer and drainage system
surrounding the grassy knoll. Apparently, the drain was filled in
after the assassination. Mrs. Castellano suspected that it could have
been part of an escape system.

23. OSWALD AS F.B.I. INFORMER

According to Secret Service report 767, Alonzo Hudkins, a Houston
reporter, told the Secret Service that he had heard from Chief Allan
Sweatt of the Dallas sheriff’s office that Lee Harvey Oswald “was
being paid two hundred dollars per month by the F.B.I. in connection
with their subversive investigation” and that “Oswald had informant
number S-172.” The Commission never called Hudkins or Sweatt to
testify.

There are a number of other interesting circumstances surrounding
Oswald’s possible relationship with the F.B.I.

   Warren De Brueys, an F.B.I. agent who covered both the New Orleans
and Dallas beat, asked Carlos Bringuier to furnish the F.B.I.
information about the activities of his Anti-Castro group. When
Bringuier refused, De Brueys threatened to send an under-cover agent
to infiltrate the group.
   Later, Lee Harvey Oswald came to New Orleans from Dallas and tried
to infiltrate Bringuier’s group by pretending he was an
Anti-Castroite. Bringuier, at first, did not think this was a
coincidence.

   When Oswald was arrested for fighting with Bringuier, he asked to
see an F.B.I. agent. An F.B.I. agent visited him in jail and
questioned him about the activities of the Fair Play for Cuba
Committee.

   Oswald’s address book contained the address and license plate
number of Dallas F.B.I. agent James Hosty. It was later deleted from
the police list of Oswald’s addresses.

Drawback: J. Edgar Hoover categorically denied that Oswald had any
connection with the F.B.I. and offered the F.B.I.’s file on Oswald to
the Commission. (The Chief Justice refused it, however, on the grounds
that it might contain secret information.)

24. OSWALD AS SECRET AGENT

Proponents: Mrs. Marguerite Oswald and Norman Mailer.

Mrs. Oswald suggested long before the assassination, and is still of
the belief, that her son was a C.I.A. agent. His trip to Russia was a
C.I.A. mission, and so were his later activities. If Oswald was
involved in the assassination, Mrs. Oswald suggests, “Now it could
have been that my son and the Secret Service were all involved in a
mercy killing,” explaining, “If he [Kennedy] was dying of an incurable
disease, this would be for the security of our country.”

Norman Mailer, on the other hand, believes that it is quite possible
Oswald was an undercover agent for not one, but a number of espionage
services (who “tend to collect the same particular small agents in
common”).

Mailer wrote in Book Week: “It was all but a comedy of the most
horrible sort, but when Kennedy was assassinated, the espionage
services of half the world may have discovered in the next hour that
one little fellow in Dallas was…a secret, useless little undercover
agent who was on their private lists; what nightmares must have
ensued.” Oswald was then liquidated by one of his employer-agencies.
According to Mailer’s scenario, we hear an Ivy League voice cry out in
some unknown council-of-war room: “Well, can’t something be done,
can’t we do something about this man?”, and a little later a phone
call made and another, and finally a voice saying to our friend Ruby,
“Jack, I got good news. There’s a little job…”

25. TWO OSWALDS THEORY

Proponent: Richard H. Popkin.

Thesis: Professor Popkin (Chairman, Philosophy Department, University
of California at San Diego) has advanced a rather ingenious theory to
explain certain discrepancies in the Commission’s findings. Certain
witnesses claim to have encountered Oswald prior to November 22 in
places where he could not possibly have been. To explain these
anomalies, Popkin suggests that there were actually “two Oswalds”; the
second “Oswald” closely resembled the real Oswald. The real Oswald’s
role was to be a decoy—that is, he would lead the police astray by
becoming the prime suspect. The escape of the second Oswald, who
actually fired the shots from the Depository, was thus facilitated.
When Oswald’s trial came up, he would undoubtedly produce a surprise
alibi, and the evidence would be so confused by the second Oswald’s
pre-assassination maneuvers that the Oswald-on-trial would be
acquitted. What went wrong, however—and here the theory becomes a mite
complicated—was that the real Oswald met Officer Tippit, who knew the
second Oswald, and waved him down. In the ensuing confusion, Oswald
panicked and shot Tippit.

This theory differs from the Oswald Impersonator Theory in one
important way: here, the real Oswald is guilty.

Drawback: The sightings of this “second Oswald” all occurred before it
was even known that Kennedy would be coming to Dallas. Thus it seems
unlikely that a carefully deceptive plot cold have been underway.

Retort: Oswald and his double were only one of many pairs of assassins
being set up all over the country on a contingency basis, should the
opportunity for action arise.

26. POST-ASSASSINATION DOMINO THEORY

Proponents: Penn Jones Jr. and Mark Lane.

Penn Jones, the editor of the Midlothian, Texas, Mirror, notes that a
number of key witnesses have died under “clouded circumstances” since
the assassination and he suggests the theory that people who know too
much about the assassination are being silenced.

For example, Jones cites a meeting at Ruby’s apartment at which two
newspaper reporters, Bill Hunter and Jim Koethe, were present. Bill
Hunter was later killed by the “accidental discharge” of a policeman’s
revolver in a police station in Long Beach, California. Jim Koethe was
killed by a “karate chop” in his Dallas apartment. The murder is still
unsolved. Ruby’s lawyer, Tom Howard, also attended the meeting. He
later died of a “heart attack” (Jones notes “no autopsy was
performed”). Jones suggests that some important information was
divulged at the meeting, and those who heard the information had to be
disposed of.

Moreover, Jones’s paper has maintained a death-count on other relevant
individuals.

   Hank Killam, whose wife was a waitress at Ruby’s nightclub and
whose friend lived in Oswald’s rooming house, was found on a Florida
street with his throat cut.

   Dorothy Kilgallen, the only journalist who was granted a private
interview with Ruby, died. Jones points out (erroneously) that her
death occurred on the night of the “strange” Northeast Power Blackout.
(Jones missed the connection that the announcer of What’s My Line,
John Daly, is the Chief Justice’s son-in-law.)

   William Whaley, the cabdriver who took Oswald home after the
assassination and possibly talked to him, died in a car crash—the
first cabdriver to be killed on duty in Dallas since 1937.

   Karen Bennett Carlin, another performer at Ruby’s club and the
last person to talk to Ruby before he shot Oswald, died of gunshot
wounds in Houston, according to Penn Jones. This seems quite strange
since she testified to a Commission lawyer after the reported date of
her death.

   Earlene Roberts, the housekeeper at Oswald’s rooming house who
claimed she saw a police car stop in front of the house about ten
minutes before Oswald encountered Tippit, also died.

Mark Lane adds the case of Warren Reynolds, a witness to the Tippit
shooting, who was shot through the head (but survived); Nancy Money, a
former stripper in Ruby’s nightclub who also provided an alibi for the
man accused of shooting Reynolds, hanged herself in the Dallas jail;
and Lee E. Bowers, Jr., a bystander who saw a car making a getaway
from the grassy knoll, was killed in a car accident to which there
were no witnesses.

27. RACIST THEORY

Proponents: Léo Sauvage, Hans Habe (author of The Wounded Land).

Sauvage, an American correspondent for Figaro, suggests the theory
that Kennedy could have been killed by a conspiracy of Southern
racists to prevent him from carrying out his civil-rights program. To
turn blame away from themselves and onto Leftists, they methodically
framed Oswald (by impersonating him and by planting evidence against
him). Oswald’s murder, however, was not part of the racist conspiracy,
but a separate plot instigated by the Dallas police to prevent a trial
in which he might be acquitted of the crime

28. CUI BONO THEORY

Proponents: Izvestia, Trud, Joachim Joesten, Barbara Garson, Don B.
Reynolds, Jack Ruby and others.

Thesis: Although not one shred of hard evidence has been uncovered to
prove them right, many people have taken the “Who benefited?” line of
pursuit and point an accusing finger at Lyndon Johnson.

The Soviet Government newspaper Izvestia, after condemning The Warren
Report as slanderous to Russia, hinted by sly innuendo that President
Johnson may have been implicated in the assassination. They cite the
soon-to-be published works of Joachim Joesten (seven volumes to be
sold by subscription for $200) which argues that Johnson has been
covering up. The next day, Trud, the trade-union paper, made the
accusations more forcefully.

Californian Barbara Garson has written a satire, based on Macbeth,
called Macbird in which L.B.J. and Lady Bird take the parts of Macbeth
and Lady Macbeth in the murder of J.F.K. and Adlai Stevenson (the Egg
of Head).

In January of 1964 the Warren Commission learned that Don B. Reynolds,
insurance agent and close associate of Bobby Baker, had been heard to
say that the F.B.I. knew that Johnson was behind the assassination.
When interviewed by the F.B.I., he denied this. But he did recount an
incident during the swearing in of Kennedy in which Bobby Baker said
words to the effect that the s.o.b. would never live out his term and
that he would die a violent death. Reynolds also vaguely suggested
that Governor Connally may have called long distance from Washington
to Lee Oswald who was staying in a Dallas Y.M.C.A. He had no proof.

A number of letters allegedly written by Jack Ruby and smuggled out of
jail were auctioned off by New York autograph dealer Charles Hamilton.
Penn Jones, Jr. bought one and published part of it.

"I walked into a trap the moment I walked down the ramp Sunday
morning. This was the spot where they could frame the Jew, and that
way all of his people will be blamed as being Communists, this is what
they were waiting for. They alone had planned the killing, by they I
mean Johnson and others.”

“…read the book Texas Looks at Lyndon and you may learn quite a bit
about Johnson and how he fooled everyone.”

Drawback: In a letter to J. Lee Rankin, J. Edgar Hoover wrote, “I have
not received any information to implicate President Johnson or
Governor Connally in the assassination.”

29. DALLAS OLIGARCHY THEORY

Proponent: Thomas Buchanan.

According to Buchanan’s theory, “Mr. X,” a right-wing Texas oil
millionaire, had to eliminate Kennedy and Khrushchev to gain world
domination of the oil market. He decided to assassinate Kennedy in
such as way that Khrushchev would be discredited. Oswald was to be
framed as the assassin, then executed by Tippit. With Oswald dead, the
Soviet Union would be blamed for the assassination. Oswald, however,
outdrew Tippit and was captured alive later. The conspirators then
induced Ruby to kill Oswald as a means of silencing him for good.
Aside from Mr. X, Buchanan names the following “additional
conspirators”:

   The assassin on the bridge. (He hints this was Ruby.)

   A second assassin in the Depository who was wearing a police uniform.

   A police officer involved in Oswald’s arrest (who was, next to Mr.
X, the key conspirator).

   Tippit.

   Oswald.

   One of the policemen who missed Oswald as he left the building.

30. CUBA-FRAMED THEORY

Proponent: Fidel Castro.

About a week after the assassination, Castro suggested that the
conspirators intended that Cuba be blamed for the assassination.
According to this theory, Oswald may have been one of the riflemen,
but his prime role in the conspiracy was to ghost a trail that would
lead directly to Cuba. Thus, a few months before the assassination,
Oswald set up a phony Fair Play for Cuba Committee in New Orleans and
Dallas, engaged in “brawls” with anti-Castro Cubans, and identified
himself with Castro and Cuba on radio programs. Then he went to Mexico
where he tried to obtain a Cuban visa. (Castro notes that Oswald had
no reason to go to Cuba. If Oswald wanted to go to Russia, as he
claimed, it was shorter and easier to go via Europe.)

After the assassination, the plan called for Oswald to disappear.
Evidence planted at the scene would identify Oswald as the assassin,
and Oswald’s pre-assassination activities and other planted clues
would lead to the conclusion that Oswald had fled to Cuba. This, in
turn, might serve as a pretext for an American invasion of Cuba.

There is some later evidence which fits in very neatly with the Castro thesis.

   On September 26, just before Oswald’s trip to the Cuban Embassy in
Mexico, Mrs. Sylvia Odio, a Cuban Refugee leader, claims that three
men visited her in Dallas. Two were Latins, possibly Cubans, the third
was American. The American was called “Leon Oswald.” After the
assassination Mrs. Odio as well as her sister definitely identified
this man as Lee Harvey Oswald. The three men said that they had just
come from New Orleans (the Commission established Oswald left New
Orleans about September 25) and were about to take a trip. They wanted
backing for some violent anti-Castro activities, but Mrs. Odio
suspected that they might in fact be Castro agents. The next day one
of the Latins called Mrs. Odio and told her that Oswald was “kind of
nuts” and that he had said Kennedy should have been assassinated after
the Bay of Pigs, and that “it is so easy to do it.” Thus, Oswald
established himself as a potential assassin traveling with two Cubans.

   Two days before the assassination, three people spoke to Wayne
January, manager of Red Bird airport in Dallas, about renting a plane.
They told him they wanted to be flown to Yucatán Peninsula on November
22. After the assassination, January told the F.B.I. that one of the
three persons was Oswald. January later said that he suspected the
threesome might want to hijack his plane and go to Cuba, and thus
decided not to rent them the plane.

   Shortly after the assassination, there were literally dozens of
allegations and “tips” that Oswald was closely connected with the
Cubans. For example, one Latin American free-lance intelligence agent
claimed that he saw Oswald receive $6,500 for the purpose of
assassinating Kennedy. (The Commission found these allegations to be
false.) However, if Oswald escaped and disappeared, these tips might
very well have fed suspicion that Oswald was in Cuba.

31. CRYSTAL BALL THEORY

Proponent: Jeane Dixon.

In December, 1963, prophetess Jeane Dixon “got psychically” an inside
line on the assassination. “As I interpret my symbols,” she wrote,
“Fidel Castro believed that President Kennedy and Premier Khrushchev
had gotten together on a plan to eliminate him and replace him with
someone more acceptable to the United States and the U.N. Castro, in
his conniving way, therefore arranged for the assassination of John F.
Kennedy. Lee Harvey Oswald was the triggerman, but there were other
people involved in the plot.”

32. MAFIA THEORY

Proponent: Sergei Groussard.

In a series of articles in L’Aurore, Groussard offers the theory that
Kennedy was assassinated in order to forestall a planned crackdown on
organized crime. The “Al Capone gang” in Chicago ordered Ruby to set
up the assassination. Ruby then sent Oswald (who was in his debt) to
Mexico to visit the underworld’s own plastic surgery clinic and other
escape facilities; and Oswald agreed to be the rifleman. Tippit was
supposed to drive Oswald out of Dallas, but when he learned that
Oswald was the assassin he tried to arrest him and Oswald killed him.
Ruby then had to finish the job personally.

33. JUNTA THEORY

Proponent: M. S. Arnoni.

The editor of The Minority of One envisions a “titanic power struggle”
in the U.S. Government. He postulates that the insurrectionist forces
included the C.I.A., the Air Force, relevant defense contractors, and
a number of congressmen and that the Junta’s leaders were high-ranking
Air Force and Navy officers. The object was to deliver the U.S. into
the hands of a “military-industrial cabal.”

Because President Kennedy attempted to oppose the Junta, he had to be
eliminated. His fate was sealed when he signed the Nuclear Test Ban
Treaty in 1963—which he, according to this theory, “signed in his own
blood.”

34. RED EXECUTION THEORY

Proponent: Revilo P. Oliver.

Professor Oliver, in an article for the John Birch Society magazine,
advanced the theory that Moscow ordered Oswald to assassinate Kennedy.
It seems that Kennedy was threatening to desert the Communists and
“turn American.” But the President’s aides persuaded him to go to
Dallas where he was “executed.”

Although the assassin’s accomplices escaped, Oswald himself was
apprehended by dint of the heroic action of J. D. Tippit, and so it
became necessary that “Jakob Rubenstein” eliminate Oswald.

35. EVIL-FORCES THEORY

Proponent: Ousman Ba, Foreign Minister of Mali.

Ba charged in the United Nations Security Council that “Kennedy’s
assassination, the murder of Patrice Lumumba and Dag Hammarskjóld’s
death were all the work of forces that were behind the recent
U.S.-Belgian rescue operation in the Congo.” Ba did not elaborate.

Ahead to Second Primer of Assassination Theories

http://karws.gso.uri.edu/jfk/conspiracy_theories/Second_Primer/Second_primer.html

A Second Primer of Assassination Theories

Esquire, May 1967, pp. 104 ff.

Last December we thought we had offered you the complete works of the
assassination buffs. The opus grows: here are twenty-five new entries

As reported in last December’s Esquire, the Warren Commission’s
crucial Single-Bullet Theory (hereafter, the S.B.T.) seemed to be in
real trouble. This theory posits that President Kennedy and Governor
Connally both were first hit by the same bullet—a crucial assumption
because the Commission established that there was not enough time for
the murder rifle to be fired twice within the interval that both men
were first hit (1.8 seconds or less). In short, either the S.B.T.
stands, or a Two-Assassin Theory emerges.

Trouble first developed for the S.B.T. with the publication of
previously classified F.B.I. reports by Edward Jay Epstein’s Inquest,
which flatly contradicted the Commission’s autopsy statement that the
first bullet passed clean through President Kennedy and exited his
throat. The F.B.I. reports instead stated that the autopsy showed that
the bullet in question did not exit from the President’s throat, a
fact which would make it impossible for this bullet to continue on to
hit Governor Connally and thus would rule out the S.B.T. Next, Life
magazine enlarged its 8mm amateur film of the assassination frame by
frame, and, on the basis of this new evidence, concluded that Connally
and Kennedy may indeed have been hit by separate bullets. Governor
Connally also viewed the Life film frame by frame and stated
categorically that he was hit by a separate bullet. The most unkind
cut of all came when Governor Connally called a press conference for
the express purpose of defending the Commission, then inadvertently
mentioned that he still had a fragment of the bullet in his thigh.
Alas, that fact alone would invalidate the S.B.T. because the bullet
that is supposed to have wounded both men was found virtually intact.
Finally, Senator Richard Russell, member of the Commission who now
claims the dubious distinction of having been the only member “who
bucked the Report,” stated that “from the outset” he never really
believed in the S.B.T. Then Commissioner Hale Boggs followed suit
during a Face the Nation interview by expressing his own doubts about
the faltering S.B.T. But even as Commission members began deserting
the sinking S.B.T., a number of last-ditch theories were proposed by
the defenders of the Commission.

undefined

1. THE SECOND-THOUGHT AUTOPSY REPORT

Proponents: Arlen Specter and other Commission lawyers.

Thesis: Arlen Specter, a key investigator for the Commission and
principal author of the S.B.T., has attempted to explain the
contradiction between the F.B.I. Summary Reports and the Commission’s
autopsy report in terms of two different autopsy conclusions. In the
one and only autopsy examination conducted on the night of the
assassination at Bethesda Hospital, the doctors arrived at the
“tentative” conclusion that the bullet which struck President Kennedy
in the back penetrated only a short distance, then fell out through
the point of entrance when the Dallas doctors applied external heart
massage. The next day, however, the autopsy doctors found out about
the throat wound (which was obscured by the tracheotomy operation) and
changed their conclusion, now deciding that the bullet went completely
through the neck. This conclusion was reached without benefit of
having the corpse before them (or the autopsy and X-ray photographs).
Then, according to Specter’s theory, Commander Humes incinerated his
original autopsy report in his recreation-room fireplace, and drew up
a new autopsy report stating that the bullet exited the President’s
throat. The F.B.I. was not shown the new report and reiterated the old
conclusion in their summary reports.

Drawback: Specter’s theory contradicts The Warren Report’s description
of the autopsy, which he himself wrote in 1964. In The Warren Report
(pp. 88-89), Specter states that, during the autopsy, doctors rejected
the possibility that the bullet penetrated only a short distance, and
that the evidence from Dallas of a throat wound “confirmed” this
conclusion. Thus, whereas The Warren Report states that there was only
and only one conclusion of the autopsy reached during the examination,
the autopsy conclusion was changed (not confirmed) the next day by
evidence from Dallas, and thus there were two autopsy conclusions. The
question remains: Which one of these conflicting statements is true?

2. THE HOOVER HEGELIAN THEORY

Proponent: J. Edgar Hoover.

Thesis: Although the F.B.I. Supplementary Report of January 13, 1964,
states that the bullet that struck President Kennedy in the back
penetrated “to a distance of less than a finger length,” and the
Commission’s autopsy report states that this same bullet passed clean
through the neck and exited the throat, J. Edgar Hoover finds that
there is no “conflict” between the two statements of the autopsy, only
a “difference in the information reported.” Hoover further claims that
the F.B.I. of course knew that the bullet passed clean through the
President’s neck at the same time that the reported the bullet
penetrated only a finger’s length into his back. Since they also knew
that the Commission knew the true contents of the autopsy report,
there was no reason, Hoover insists, to make a false statement of the
autopsy results. Moreover he dialectically explains that although the
F.B.I. report flatly stated that the bullet did not pass through the
President’s body, the F.B.I. itself helpfully pointed to weaknesses in
its own theory by stating that there was a hole in the President’s
shirt caused by an exiting projectile.

Drawback: Thesis plus antithesis doesn’t equal J. Edgar’s synthesis.
Aside from the fact that the F.B.I. Supplementary Reports were
prepared initially for public release and not for the Warren
Commission, a major problem in Hoover’s explanation is that the F.B.I.
told The Washington Post on December 18, 1963, that the hole in the
shirt was caused by a fragment from the third shot which exploded
against the President’s head (not from the first shot). Therefore, the
F.B.I. report of the shirt hole does not “clearly” indicate that the
autopsy doctors’ early observation “that the bullet penetrated only a
short distance into the Presidents head probably was in error,” as
Hoover postulates.

3. VIEW FROM THE BRIDGE THEORY

Proponent: Lawrence Schiller, a photographer and producer of Capitol
Records album, The Controversy, on the assassination.

Thesis: A number of critics assume that shots came from the knoll
because a number of witnesses state they saw smoke coming from the
knoll area. The most celebrated puff-of-smoke witness is S. M.
Holland. Schiller brought Holland back to the exact spot where he said
he was standing, placed a camera level with his shoulder, aimed it at
the spot where Holland said he saw the puff of smoke, and snapped a
photograph. The photograph shows that directly behind and slightly
higher than the spot where Holland claims the smoke came from is the
sixth-floor window of the Texas School Book Depository. Thus, Schiller
suggests, “Maybe both Holland and the Warren Commission are right: the
shots came from the Book Depository but from Holland’s perspective the
smoke and the report of a gun appeared to come from the knoll.”

S. M. Holland (shown on the overpass where he stood November 22, 1963)
saw smoke under the tree directly above his right thumb.

Drawback: Holland, whose depth perception is normal, was just possibly
able to distinguish the knoll, 180 feet away, from the Book
Depository, which was 120 feet beyond that. Also, Schiller’s analysis
is destroyed completely in view of the fact that witnesses at other
points also thought the shots came from the knoll: the policeman who
ran up it, Abraham Zapruder, and others.

4. THE NOBLE LIE THEORY

Proponents: Drew Pearson, Henri Nannen (editor of Der Stern), and
Jacob Cohen (former instructor at Brandeis summer school and author of
Honest Verdict).

Thesis: Drew Pearson quotes Der Stern’s explanation that the original
autopsy report was suppressed “on the grounds that President Kennedy
was suffering from Addison’s disease” and “his family did not want it
known.” Why? Because “politically Kennedy’s illness could become
dangerous. Addison’s illness—it sounds sinister.” Thus, according to
this theory, the Kennedys withheld the autopsy report and “hid the
X-rays, even from the Warren Commission.” And “this would also explain
the lack of a date on the Warren Commission autopsy report” which was
changed “so that it contained no mention of the President’s illness,”
as well as why the autopsy surgeon burned the original autopsy report
(“otherwise hundreds of people would have been faced with lying under
oath, which would have been deplorable”).

Drawback: The fact that Kennedy had Addison’s desease was in the
Warren Report (as well as in Sorenson’s biography of Kennedy), so why
delete it from the autopsy report? And the Commission files show that
Attorney General Robert Kennedy explicitly gave his approval to the
Commission to look at the autopsy photographs and X-rays.

5. MANCHESTER THEORY

Proponent: William Manchester.

Thesis: In his sometime authorized account, author Manchester
recognizes that there was hardly enough time for Oswald to have fired
three shots. He therefore proposes that only two shots were fired: the
first hitting Kennedy in the back and then going on to cause all of
Connally’s wounds, the second inflicting Kennedy’s fatal head wound.
According to this theory, Oswald left an extra cartridge case at the
scene [from the Walker shooting?] and the some hundred witnesses who
thought they heard three or more shots actually heard only two and
echoes.

Drawback: More than a hundred witnesses heard more than two shots, and
a number of witnesses claim that they saw a bullet miss and hit the
pavement. Finally, one man, James Tague, was wounded by a fragment
from a bullet. As he was standing 260 feet from the President’s car at
the time of the head shot, it does not seem likely that he was wounded
by a fragment from that bullet.

Gaining wobbly support from the preceding sources, the S.B.T. runs
into stiff competition from most of the following theories.

6. CONNALLY’S SMALL-DETAIL THEORY

Proponent: John B. Connally, Governor of Texas.

Thesis: Immediately after he single-handedly demolished the S.B.T. in
Life, creating a nationwide outcry to reopen investigation, Connally
called a press conference in Texas. He said that although he was not
hit by the same bullet which hit Kennedy, it was only a small
“detail,” and he advised everyone to have faith in the Warren
Commission because they were all patriotic men.

Drawback: None.

7. RUSSELL LONG THEORY

Proponent: Senator Russell Long.

Thesis: The whole controversy over the S.B.T. was made to appear a bit
irrelevant when Senator Long told the A.P. that he didn’t doubt Oswald
played a part in the assassination. “But,” he added, “whoever fired
that second shot was a lot better shot than Oswald.”

8. SHOT-THROUGH-THE-TREE THEORY

Proponent: Alexander M. Bickel.

Thesis: Professor Bickel, writing in Commentary, finds that although
the S.B.T. is untenable, the single-assassin theory can be rescued by
constructing an alternate hypothesis to explain the first two shots.
The Commission concluded that the first shot could not have come
before the 210th frame (photo A) on the Zapruder film because before
that point an oak tree blocked the assassin’s line of sight. Bickel
has found, however, that on frames 185-186 on the Zapruder film there
was a “break” or window in the foliage of the tree (photo B). Bickel
thus suggests that Oswald might have fired through the foliage at this
point, which would have left sufficient time to operate the bolt and
fire again at frame 232 to wound Connally, then fire the fatal head
shot at film frame 313. According to this theory, the first bullet
lodged in the President’s back and was later expelled on his stretcher
at Parkland Hospital in Dallas, accounting for its pristine condition.
The second bullet wounded Connally and fragmentized, accounting for
the two fragments found in the front seat of the Presidential
limousine, and the final shot disintegrated when it struck the
President’s head, sending a minute fragment out through the throat and
accounting for the throat wound.

undefined

Drawback: Although Professor Bickel’s theory is certainly a possible
alternative to The Warren Report, it still leaves a few unsolved
problems. First, the opening in the tree gave the assassin a view of
the car for no more than a tenth of a second. It seems improbable that
a rifleman could aim, squeeze the tiger, and fire off an accurate shot
in this brief interval. Second, this theory means that the President
was hit in frame 186 but did not react until frame 225—a two-second
delayed reaction. Finally, the theory fails to account for the shot
that went astray and hit a bystander (although conceivably Oswald had
time to fire a fourth shot, but then why were only three cartridge
cases found?).

9. THE STEROID THEORY

Proponent: Ellen Leopold, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Thesis: President Kennedy may indeed have had a two-second delayed
reaction to the first shot “if he was on steroids.” Not infrequently,
Miss Leopold points out, sufferers of Addison’s disease are put on
steroids because they tend to suppress reactions of the adrenal
glands. This theory lends unexpected support to Professor Bickel’s
Shot-Through-The-Tree Theory and also to the Early-Hit Theory (which
posits a shot before the tree, as reported in Esquire for December,
1966).

Drawback: The Warren Commission, possibly for reasons pointed out by
Drew Pearson, never determined whether or not Kennedy was on steroids.
Until this question is settled, the Steroid Theory will be academic.

10. RIDDLE-NEWTON THEORY

Proponent: R. A. J. Riddle, member of the Brain Research Institute and
former Professor of physics at U.C.L.A.

Thesis: Dr. Riddle finds a discrepancy between the Warren Report and
Newton’s second law of motion—i.e. that an object struck by a
projectile will be given the same direction as that of the projectile.
Because the film of the assassination shows that the general direction
of motion of Kennedy is backward and to the left (viz. Vincent
Salandria’s “Head Movement Theory,” Esquire, December, 1966) and
because there is no evidence of a sudden acceleration of the car and
on the assumption that a neuromuscular reaction can be ruled out as
the cause for President Kennedy’s sudden violent backward motion, Dr.
Riddle believes that the projectile must have come from in front of
the President. His computations add weight to Vincent Salandria’s
“Head Movement Theory.”

Drawback: Are Newton’s laws sound if they contradict the Warren Commission?

11. DOUBLE HEAD-SHOT THEORY

Proponents: Professor Josiah Thompson and Ray Marcus, independently.

Thesis: The “third” shot, which caused Kennedy’s fatal head wound, was
actually two nearly simultaneous shots, one coming from the rear and
another from the right front.

This theory takes Vincent Salandria’s “Head Movement Theory” and
Riddle’s computations one step further. In a forthcoming book,
Thompson uses precise scientific studies made of the Zapruder film
frames and close analysis of the medical evidence to show that the
damage was inflicted by two bullets, not one. Also, he cites ear- and
eyewitness reports which back up his claim that the third shot was
really a third and fourth.

12. MARK LANE’S FRENCH FIVE-SHOT THEORY

Proponent: Mark Lane.

Thesis: In the French edition of his Rush to Judgment, Lane first
proposed a theory which was later appended to his paperback edition of
Rush to Judgment. In his original French version bullet “une” strikes
President Kennedy from the back. Bullet “deux” strikes Kennedy in the
throat. Bullet “trois” hit Governor Connally. Bullet “quatre” misses
and wounds the bystander James Tague. And bullet “cinq” fired from the
grassy knoll hits Kennedy in the head. Since one shot came from behind
the President (bullet no. 1), one shot came from in front of the
President (bullet. No. 2)—he was facing straight ahead when hit in the
throat—and one shot (bullet No. 5) came from the right (the knoll),
there must have been at least “trois” assassins firing from different
directions.

Drawbacks: If a bullet hit President Kennedy from in front, as Lane
suggests, where did it go? There are no exit wounds that could account
for a bullet entering through the throat. Then too, if the bullet
entered the head from the rear, as the autopsy shows, it could not
have entered from the right front, as Lane claims.

13. DAL-TEX THEORY

Proponent: Harold Weisberg (Whitewash series).

Thesis: Some of the shots may have come from the Dal-Tex Building
across the street from the Texas School Book Depository. In Whitewash
II, a sequel to his first book, Weisberg enlarges an A.P. photo of the
motorcade (A and B) and claims to see “a man in seeming distress” on a
fire escape (arrow) on the side of the Dal-Tex Building and “an
arm-like object projecting from the open second-story window”
(circle).

undefined

This theory receives some corroboration from a photograph that
appeared in The Saturday Evening Post on December 14, 1963 (C). It
purportedly showed the assassin’s line of sight through the cross
hairs of a telescopic lens. What the Post did not notice is that the
corner of the Texas School Book Depository is visible in the right
edge of the photo. Their photographer was shooting from the Dal-Tex
Building, not having been able to gain entrance into the Depository.
And strangely enough, according to Weisberg, the established bullet
trajectories still bear him out.

A tantalizing note adds intrigue to the theory: a man was arrested in
the Dal-Tex Building shortly after the assassination, allegedly for
having no business being there.

14. THE 24 FRAMES-PER-SECOND THEORY

Proponent: Harold Weisberg.

Thesis: The Commission’s conclusion that all three shots were fired in
5.6 seconds is based on the assumption that Abraham Zapruder’s camera
was operating at a speed of 18.3 frames per second. The 103 frames
that elapsed between frame 210 (the earliest point the Commission says
the first shot could have been fired) and frame 313 (the point at
which the third shot struck Kennedy’s head), divided by the speed of
the camera (18.3 frames per second), yields the 5.6-seconds time that
the assassin had to fire in. Weisberg has found, however, an F.B.I.
report in the National Archives in which Abe Zapruder claimed that his
camera was set to operate at twenty-four frames per second, not 18.3.
This would mean that the entire assassination occurred in less than
4.3 seconds (103 frames divided by 24), which is less time than the
murder weapon could be fired twice.

Drawback: The F.B.I. established the film speed of the camera by
filming the sweep second hand of a clock, and the camera’s
manufacturer recently confirmed that the camera speed was less than a
tenth of a frame from the figure reported by the F.B.I.

15. INDUCED CANCER THEORY

Proponents: Jack Ruby, Mark Lane, Penn Jones, Jr., Norman Mailer, and
an unidentified Russian newspaper.

Thesis: That Jack Ruby’s death was planned and brought about by
members of a conspiracy whose prior business had been the murders of
President Kennedy, Patrolman J. D. Tippit and, possibly, Lee Harvey
Oswald.

According to an Associated Press story by Bernard Gavzer (datelined
Dallas, January 3, 1967), Ruby had expressed the belief that mustard
gas had been seeped into his cell and that he was injected with
cancer.

The Dallas Times Herald states in an editorial that “the Communist
Russian press has accused the city of Dallas of being
“‘Co-Conspirators’ who…might have deliberately injected cancer cells
into the veins of Ruby.” This theory might in turn stem from such
statements as the one uttered by Mark Lane after a screening of his
movie, Rush to Judgment. Before a celebrity-packed audience he mused,
“Isn’t it strange that Ruby’s sniffles went from a cold to pneumonia
to cancer in twenty-four hours?”

Ditto Penn Jones, whose assassination-connected death count is now at
twenty (before ruby: the motorcycle death of James Worrell, who
allegedly saw somebody run out of the back door of the Texas School
Book Depository). Jones, of course, finds Ruby’s death “very
suspicious.”

In a rambling, emotional obituary entitled A Requiem for the Rube,
Norman Mailer offers his own interpretation of Ruby’s death and the
significance thereof. “Jack Ruby added a point to the general median
cancer potential by bugging the hope we could find one answer via Lee
Harvey Oswald. In turn, us, Great American Pure Breed Public, in for
feed, gave him his cans back. He died of cancer this morning, told us
the way. We do not know the cure, but son, now we know the way. We
know how to give cancer now…”

16. TWO-MEN IN-A-WINDOW THEORY

Proponent: Mrs. Eric Walther.

Thesis: A few weeks after the assassination, Mrs. Walther stated in an
F.B.I. report that she saw a rifleman in one window of the Texas
School Book Depository, and next to the man with the rifle was another
man in a brown suit coat. Mrs. Walther was unable to see whether or
not the second man had a rifle. A second rifleman of course would
explain how Governor Connally and President Kennedy were both hit less
than two seconds apart. The Commission never evaluated Mrs. Walther’s
statement.

Drawback: The window next to Oswald’s was closed during the assassination.

Retort: The second man may only have been a lookout.

17. DOCTORED PHOTOGRAPH THEORY

Proponents: Mark Lane, Harold Weisberg, David Lifton, et al.

Thesis: The photographs showing Oswald with the Kennedy and Tippit
murder weapons are clever paste-ups of Oswald’s head on another man’s
body.

When the Dallas police found the two photographs they were certain
they had positive evidence linking Oswald with the weapons. Life
magazine ran one of the pictures on its cover. Newsweek and The New
York Times also printed the picture.

Confusion reigned shortly. Careful observers had noticed that all
three publications had retouched the rifle and the pistol, but each
did it in different ways. Their editors were forced to write
humiliating letters to the Warren Commission admitting their
alterations, but in essence none had falsified the photographs. Those
accusations were to come later.

Mark Lane and Harold Weisberg noticed that the shadow under Oswald’s
nose seemed to be inconsistent with the other shadows in the picture.
Both the F.B.I. and the Dallas police rushed to prove such a
photograph was possible, but only succeeding in adding a touch of
Dogberry humor. The Dallas police shot a picture of a plainclothesman
on the scene, but on a cloudy day. The F.B.I. posed an agent on a roof
in bright sunlight, but the photograph they sent to the Commission had
the head cut off.

undefined
18. FALSE KNOLL THEORY

Proponent: David Lifton, a U.C.L.A. engineering graduate student and
coauthor of the three-assassins article in Ramparts which introduced
Riddle’s analysis. (See No. 11.)

Thesis: On the day of the assassination, three types of camouflage
were employed by conspirators positioned beneath, on, and above the
grassy knoll. Lifton reached this hypothesis after minute study of
photographs of the area during and after the assassination. It answers
the question why, despite the fact that eyewitness reports and the
Head Movement Theory indicate shots came from the grassy knoll,
nothing at all was found there immediately afterward.

Underground camouflage: Lifton suggests that prior to the
assassination, the grassy knoll was excavated from beneath and a
system of tunnels and bunkers was built into it. Peepholes covered by
grass-mesh camouflage were placed on the sloping surface of the knoll.
Subterranean nooks would explain the statement of witness Garland
Slack: “I have heard this same sort of sound when a shot had come from
within a cave…” Lifton goes further to suggest that the puff of smoke
seen by some people on the grassy knoll may have been the exhaust from
a gas engine incorporated within the camouflage mechanization.

Surface camouflage: Lifton finds alterations (“bulges”) in the wall
and the hedgerow on the grassy knoll, netting in the bushes and faint
images of heads. Borrowing support from deputy Constable Weitzman who
ran toward the wall and who said, “I scaled the wall and, apparently,
my hands grabbed steam pipes. I burned them,” Lifton points out that
there are no steam pipes atop the wall. This might, he says, be an
indication that things may have been altered for that day. Weitzman
also says a witness told him that he saw somebody throw something
through a bush.

Elevated camouflage: Because a comparison of certain photographs taken
during the assassination with others taken afterward indicates that
some tree structures had been altered on the knoll, and because he
sees images up in the trees in assassination photos, Lifton believes
there was some camouflage in the trees. Eyewitnesses S. M. Holland,
Austin Miller and Frank Reilly all state that shots seemed to have
come out of the trees.

Drawbacks: As even Lifton admits, the photo enlargements are of
extremely grainy quality (they could not be reproduced properly here)
and interpretations of them are questionable at best.

19. BLUNDERBUSS THEORY

Proponents: Mark Lane and Harold Weisberg.

Thesis: At least five witnesses saw a puff of smoke during the
assassination. Commission lawyers didn’t investigate because they
believed no modern weapon would emit puffs of smoke conforming to the
witnesses’ descriptions. (Some of the witnesses, when queried, guessed
the smoke came from a motorcycle or steam pipe.)

Since Commission lawyers were willing to accept the fact that Oswald
used “an antiquated rifle and twenty-year-old ammunition,” as Mark
Lane frequently points out on TV, why preclude the possibility that
the second assassin used even a more antiquated weapon?

20. MAKING OF THE PRESIDENT

Proponent: Vincent Salandria, a Philadelphia lawyer.

Thesis: Mr. Salandria finds a curious passage in Theodore H. White’s
The Making of the President, 1964. “On the flight [back to Washington
aboard Air Force One] the party learned that there was no conspiracy;
learned of the identity of Oswald and his arrest.” Salandria posits
that this announcement was deliberately misleading and may have been
the first sign of a conspiracy cover-up. The theory, obviously, would
have to implicate strategically powerful individuals. The argument is
as follows: Johnson’s party landed in Washington at 4:58 p.m. Dallas
time. But at this point, Oswald had not been charged with the
assassination. He had not yet been identified by any eyewitnesses in
the Tippit killing, much less the assassination. The rifle found in
the Depository had not yet been traced. The photographs of Oswald
holding a rifle and wearing a revolver in his holster were not
discovered until the next afternoon. No fingerprints were taken from
him for comparison purposes until sometime after six p.m. The fiber on
the rifle was not examined until Saturday morning. The brown-paper bag
had not been linked to him. Marina Oswald had not yet been questioned.
In short, none of the evidence itemized in the table of contents of
The Warren Report under Chapter IV, “The Assassin,” was known to the
Dallas police at the time. As to the statement that there was “no
conspiracy,” Salandria believes that the announcement was suspiciously
premature. At 4:58 p.m. it was understood that the shots had come from
the front, yet the suspect Oswald was positioned behind the President.
District Attorney Henry M. Wade told the Warren Commission that
discussions relating to a conspiracy charge were carried on by
telephone between his office and Washington until late that night. As
far as Wade could remember, these included calls from the White House,
the F.B.I. and the State Department. The general drift of the calls
seemed to be to discourage any conspiracy charge. Salandria finds this
disturbing. During Commission hearings, Congressman Gerald Ford told
Secretary of State Dean Rusk that a comment he made the day after the
assassination indicating that no foreign power was involved seemed a
bit hasty. Said Ford, “You really didn’t have much time to evaluate
all of the evidence.” Ford was concerned about who in the State
Department might have made telephone calls to Texas urging that no
charge of conspiracy be alleged.

Drawback: As yet the precise text of the announcement on the plane is
not known, nor is its origin. Theodore White refuses to comment except
to say that the plane was in constant touch with the White House, and
messages were relayed through a Signal Corps center in the Midwest.
But the announcement may have been based, innocently, on the lack of
any indication that there was a conspiracy afoot.

21. THE I-MURDER THEORY

Proponent: Malcom Muggeridge.

Thesis: According to this theory, Oswald “kills Kennedy for
Intelligence’s own sake; the perfect I-murder.” Presume that Oswald
was at least a double agent, recruited first by Soviet Intelligence
during his stay in Minsk, then turned around by the F.B.I., and
“finally reduced to a condition of bemusedness and lost identity which
led him, in a trance-like state, to murder the President, as van der
Lubbe, in a similarly trance-like state, set fire to the Reichstag.”
His shooting at Walker, Pro- and Anti-Cuban activities, etc. were all
done as a cover, in the hope he would lead the F.B.I. to the Soviet
contact. This bizarre game caused Oswald to lose touch with reality,
and, not knowing who he was working for or why, he shot Kennedy. To
avoid undue embarrassment, he had to be shot, and Jack Ruby was
standing by.

22. THE SUGAR THEORY

Proponent: J. I. Rodale, editor of Prevention and Organic Gardening and Farming.

Thesis: Oswald was seen minutes after the assassination with a Coke
bottle in his hand. This fact leads health-crusader J. I. Rodale to
suggest “Oswald was not responsible for this action: his brain was
confused because he was a sugar drunkard. So what is called for now is
a full-scale investigation of sugar consumption and crime.”

The Curb Exchange. James Tague, who was standing on the curb along the
south side of Main Street near the overpass, was struck sharply on the
cheek at the time of the shooting. Police officers investigated
immediately and said they found a “fresh chip in the curb” near where
he was standing. A photograph was taken of the chip in the curb the
next morning (photo A).

Eight months later (July, 1964) the photographer and two F.B.I. men
returned to the site to make measurements, but could not find the
chip. The F.B.I. men hypothesized that in the interim “there [had]
been numerous rains that could have possibly washed away such a mark
and also…the area is cleaned by a street-cleaning machine about one a
week, which would also wash away such a mark.” A month after that, J.
Edgar Hoover wrote the Commission that the F.B.I. had cut out the
section of curb with the mark (a photo of which he enclosed, B), and
that indeed the mark was the same as that in the original photograph!
This internal F.B.I. contradiction was discovered by Raymond Marcus,
who also claims that the curb cutout doesn’t have any mark at all.

23. THE WASHING-MACHINE THEORY : Proponent: George de Mohrenschildt.

Thesis: Marina Oswald, on the eve of the assassination, told her
husband that they couldn’t live together “unless he would equip the
apartment with a washing machine.” This demand caused a bitter
argument which evoked in Oswald “the wish to strike and hurt someone.”

Drawback: According to the Warren Commission, Oswald had the materials
for making the paper bag for his rifle before he visited with his
wife. Anyhow, as the Warren Report notes, they had lived near a
Laundromat.

24. KENNEDY LIVES THEORY

Proponent: George Thomson, a Los Angeles swimming-pool engineer and writer.

Thesis: Thomson, in monographs and tapes which have been underground
best sellers (reportedly 42,000 sold to date), advances the theory
that Tippit was substituted for Kennedy in the Presidential limousine,
and consequently it was Tippit not Kennedy who was shot. (Kennedy,
years after, was the secret guest of honor at Truman Capote’s
celebrated party.) This explains the illegal removal of Kennedy’s body
from Dallas by his close cohorts, the missing X-ray and autopsy
photographs, and subsequent confusion in reporting medical facts. The
Kennedy controversy, for Thomson, revolves around the question of
where Kennedy is today.

25. THE “WHAT HAVE WE HERE!” THEORY

Proponent: T. N. Tastmona.

Thesis: In a privately-printed 200-page volume called It Is As If:
($20), Mr. Tastmona (“American born of American-born parents)
scrutinizes the details of the assassination and the text of The
Warren Report, finding bizarre parallels with the life of Benjamin
Franklin, Sherlock Holmes, Mormon doctrine and American history. One
example, among many, is cited here as an extreme example of
assassination theorizing. In the Chronology index of The Autobiography
of Benjamin Franklin, Tastmona finds mention of Arthur Lee, an
American commissioner accompanying Franklin to France. Three pages
later he finds a reference to Richard Oswald, Chief British
negotiator. “The names ‘Lee’ and ‘Oswald’ sounded a responsive chord.
Lee Oswald!—assassin of President Kennedy. Could some sort of historic
parallel be coming to light? Could a Harvey be involved in these
diplomatic deals?” Sure enough, on the next page of the Franklin
autobiography Tastmona finds David Hartley, a British envoy.
“Hartley!—a close approximation of ‘Harvey’… “‘Hartley’ differs from
‘Harvey’ by two letters. Perceive a composite form—Har TLV ey. What
have we here! TLV equals a better approximation for ‘television’ that
even plain TV. Lee Oswald was shot by Jack Ruby in full view of a
national television audience.…It is as if this television crime had
somehow been arranged to expound the disparity existing between the
names Hartley and Harvey.” Tastmona goes on to reveal that David
Hartley was really David Hartley Junior, or Jr., and “it was Jack Ruby
with initials J. R. who by this brutal system of criminal cryptology
painstakingly identified the Hartley of scholarly historical allusion
to be J R. or Junior. “While in Russia, Lee Oswald kept what he called
a ‘Historic Diary.’ He affected interest in his place in history. This
attitude must be considered as part of a pre-instructed clue system,
hinting the historical parallels just adduced.”

 Back to First Primer of Assassination Theories

http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/archived/warrenreport.htm

Who's Afraid of the Warren Report? by Edward Jay Epstein (With
annotations by K. A. Rahn) Esquire, December 1966

The Warren Commission was supposed to end all doubts about the
assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Tragically, it hasn’t. The
distinguished members of the Commission never intended that their
Report should become the basis for an amateur detective game. Yet this
is precisely what is happening. A growing number of people are
spending their leisure hours scouring the Commission’s Report and the
twenty-six volumes of testimony and exhibits for possible clues to a
conspiracy. Others, using high-powered magnifying glasses and infrared
lights, are scrutinizing photographs of the assassination scene,
hoping to find snipers concealed in the shrubbery. Still others are
combing the National Archives on the hunch that they will locate
something relevant in the three hundred cubic feet of documents that
the Commission deemed irrelevant. Since the National Archives will
provide microfilm copies of any nonclassified document in the
assassination file at five cents a page, including F.B.I. and Secret
Service investigative reports, a syndicate of private researchers is
planning to buy all the available documents. Presumably they will then
subdivide the 20,000 or so pages into areas (e.g., Ruby, Oswald,
eyewitnesses, etc.) , and attempt a more definitive study than the
Commission itself conducted.1 Elizabeth Hardwick, a literary critic of
considerable stature, is considering joining the syndicate for another
purpose. She believes it might contain the American comédie humaine.
Meanwhile, more active private investigators are tracking down leads
in Dallas and re-interviewing star witnesses. A few are keeping the
death count2 on those who have been even remotely connected with the
case. And there is a burgeoning grapevine through which assassination
news is rapidly disseminated. As soon as a new discovery is made,
assassination buffs across the country are alerted by a telephonic
chain letter.This phenomenon would not be particularly disturbing if
the players were merely kooks. However, most of them are not.
Assassination buffs apparently are serious people—professionals,
students, housewives, etc.—bent on solving what they consider to be an
unsolved mystery. Perhaps this is all part of the American folklore
tradition of amateurs stepping in and solving cases that baffle the
police. Already amateurs have made some constructive contributions to
the case. Mrs. Sylvia Meagher, a U.N. careerist, has completely
indexed the  twenty-six volumes of testimony, a feat the Commission
never had time to accomplish. Mr. and Mrs. George Nash, sociologists,
found three new witnesses to the Tippit murder by following a tip
given to them by a Dallas undertaker. Vincent Salandria, a
Philadelphia lawyer, has charted the precise movements of the
President’s head after the bullet’s impact by superimposing on each
other the individual frames of the film of the assassination taken by
a bystander.3 And Paul Hoch, a Berkeley graduate student, has
unearthed some extremely important documents in the National Archives,
including the original F.B.I. report on the autopsy. The man who has
undoubtedly done the most to propagate the assassination cult is Mark
Lane, thirty-nine-year-old attorney and sometime New York State
Assemblyman. Lane began lecturing in coffeehouses, them stumped the
college circuit, and is currently promoting both a book and a
two-and-a-half-hour documentary film on the assassination. Above all,
the Warren Commission itself shares at least part of the
responsibility for the game. The Commission was obliged to publish all
twenty-six volumes of data, although Commissioner Allen Dulles saw no
point in doing so. “Nobody reads,” he said. “Don’t believe people read
in this country. There will be few professors who will read the
record.” Making the record public, however, is The American Way.
Indeed, the number of people who have bothered to read the record has
been small (less than a thousand sets of the twenty-six volumes have
been sold to date). But they have been an inquisitive group, often
ingenious. With their help, the public record has spawned a school of
theories that have been swimming in the eddies of the public press,
lately with increasing dizziness. Many of the theories, it is true,
depend on fragments of evidence which, although clear enough, are
palpably irrelevant (i.e., the death of several peripheral witnesses
since the assassination). But they are no more irrelevant than many of
the Report’s own meticulous entries (i.e., in July of 1962 Oswald
spent $3.87 for a subscription to Time). Assassination buffs have
seized, perhaps too eagerly, on discrepancies in the testimony of
witnesses who were understandably shaken and confused. But in this
they are no more at fault than the Commission, which appeared to
accept testimony, even though it may have been ambiguous, so long as
it aided its predisposition to prove Oswald the lone assassin. While
the Commission was obviously intent on proving there was no
conspiracy, selecting testimony and evidence for their Report that
particularly suited them, the assassination buffs have responded by
being suspicious of everything in which the Commission put credence.
Throughout the case, where an omission or a contradiction seems best
explained as simple human error, the private theorists loudly claim
intentional deceit on the part of the Dallas police, the F.B.I., the
witnesses, and the Commission itself.  Most of these accusations would
be difficult to prove without further evidence, and thus for the time
being they are rendered moot. But from the mass of such charges there
has emerged one flagrant contradiction in the Report which can be
proved or disproved very easily. More important, it is a crucial
contradiction upon which all of the other leading theories depend.

  This contradiction involves the one and only autopsy conducted on
the President at the Bethesda (Maryland) Naval Medical Center on the
night of the assassination. The report of the autopsy findings,
published by the Commission, virtually precluded the possibility of a
second assassin. First, it shows that both bullets that hit the
President came from behind and the general direction of the Texas
School Book Depository (where Oswald was at the time). This finding of
course would cut the ground out from under early theories that the
shots came from a point in front of the motorcade. Mark Lane’s theory
that the throat wound was an entrance wound, Thomas Buchanan’s theory
that the shots came from the triple overpass, and the many theories
based on eyewitness testimony that the shots came from the grassy
knoll would all be rendered invalid by the autopsy findings.  Second,
the autopsy report states that the first bullet hit the President in
the back of the neck and then exited through his throat. This led the
Commission to believe that the same bullet that exited from Kennedy’s
neck proceeded to wound Connally, who was seated directly in front of
the President. This finding would explain the split-second time lapse
between the first two shots. An amateur film of the assassination
shows that both Kennedy and Connally were hit no more than 1.8 seconds
apart. Yet, the bolt of the murder rifle cannot be operated in less
than 2.3 seconds. In other words, both men were shot in less time than
the rifle could be fired twice. And this fact has given rise to a
number of two-assassin theories. But if both men were hit by the same
bullet, as the autopsy report suggests, the time problem is resolved,
and there is only one assassin  Finally, if in fact Connally and
Kennedy were hit by the same bullet, it can be deduced that all the
bullet fragments found in the President’s car came from the rifle of
Lee Harvey Oswald. Since the autopsy findings indicate that only two
bullets hit Kennedy, and one bullet was found virtually intact
(raising some other problems), all the fragments must have come from
the other bullet. Since some of these fragments matched Oswald’s
rifle, the other fragments which were too deformed to be ballistically
identified also must have come from Oswald’s rifle. The autopsy report
thus leaves little ground for the two-assassin theories.  But the
Commission’s account of the autopsy is not the only one. Two F.B.I.
Summary Reports that were not published by the Commission give an
alarmingly different version of the autopsy findings. After the F.B.I.
Reports were published in my book Inquest, Norman Redlich, a former
Commission lawyer, told the New York Times that these Summary Reports
had to be deemed erroneous and instead the Commission relied on the
original F.B.I. report of the autopsy (known as the Sibert-O’Neill
report), prepared by the two F.B.I. agents who were present at the
autopsy. This heretofore unpublished F.B.I. report was only recently
made available to me. It gives a detailed description of the autopsy:
“Upon completion of X-rays and photographs, the first incision was
made at 8:15 p.m.” The F.B.I. Report then states that Commander J. J.
Humes, the chief autopsy surgeon, made a detailed examination of the
head wound to determine the exact path of the bullet. Only later, in
“the latter stages of autopsy,” did Commander Humes discover the wound
in the President’s back. It was, according to the F.B.I. Report,
“below the shoulders.” In probing the wound, Humes found that the
bullet had barely penetrated the skin “inasmuch as the end of the
opening could be felt with the finger.” The autopsy surgeons were
puzzled. The bullet hole was only a few inches deep, yet there was no
bullet to account for it. The doctors then learned that a bullet had
been found on a stretcher in the Dallas hospital where President
Kennedy was first treated, and Commander Humes concluded: “The pattern
was clear that one bullet entered the President’s back and worked its
way out of the body during external cardiac massage.” The autopsy
examination ended about eleven p.m.

   Ten months later, The Warren Report described autopsy findings
entirely different form those reported by the F.B.I. Now, in the
Report, there was no wound “below the shoulders.” Instead, there was a
wound in the back of the neck. Rather than barely penetrating the
skin, the bullet had gone clean through the neck and exited through
the throat. The Warren Report states these conclusions were reached
during the autopsy, the same autopsy that the F.B.I. report described.
How can two such accounts, diametrically opposed to each other, be
reconciled?  Former Commission lawyers have recently explained that at
the time of the autopsy the doctors were not aware of the wound in the
President’s throat. The outlines of this wound had been obliterated by
a tracheotomy performed earlier in the day in Dallas. Learning of the
throat wound the next day, the autopsy doctors changed their opinion
and deduced that the bullet exited through the throat. This would seem
to explain why a bullet that was first thought to have penetrated the
back only a distance of a few inches was later thought to have passed
entirely through the body. But it begs the question of how a wound
below the shoulder became a wound in the back of the neck. Obviously,
no amount of information about the throat wound could alter the
location of the back wound. And this is the crucial contradiction.
Of course, the contradiction might be dismissed (as Time magazine
dismisses it) simply as an F.B.I. error. But the fact is that other
evidence seems to corroborate the F.B.I. version. A diagram of the
President’s body, prepared by Commander Humes4 during the autopsy,
very clearly shows the wound to be below the shoulder. The other
autopsy surgeon, Lieutenant Colonel Pierre Finck, was quoted by a
secret Service agent as saying: “There are no lanes for an outlet in
this man’s shoulder.” Another Secret Service agent, who was called in
after the autopsy for the express purpose of viewing the President’s
body, later testified that he observed the back wound to be “about six
inches below the neckline.” F.B.I. photographs taken of the
President’s shirt and jacket (which were never published by the
Commission) show the bullet hole to be about six inches below the top
of the collar of both shirt and jacket, a position which corresponds
with the F.B.I.’s assertion of a wound “below the shoulders.”
Perhaps all this evidence of a wound below the shoulder is only a
strange series of random coincidences. But so long as these other
discrepancies stand, the contradiction cannot be discounted merely as
an “F.B.I. error.”   Nor can it be dismissed as irrelevant. It is
true, as former Commission lawyers now point out, that an
investigation as complex as the Kennedy assassination is bound to have
a few “loose ends.” But the contradiction between the F.B.I. and
Commission account of the autopsy findings is more than just a “loose
end.” It is crucial to the question of whether or not Oswald acted
alone.5 For if the bullet did hit the President below the shoulders,
it could not have exited through the throat and continued on to wound
Governor Connally. This is because the bullet was traveling downward
and was undeflected. If the F.B.I. report is accurate, President
Kennedy and Governor Connally were hit by two different bullets which,
in turn, gives grounds for theories of a second assassin.

   Perhaps this is why the publication of the F.B.I. Summary Reports
and photographs in my book precipitated a good deal of debate and
wrangling over the contradiction in the autopsy findings. In Look
magazine, Fletcher Knebel attempted to prove that the F.B.I. did not
receive a copy of the official autopsy findings until after its
Summary Reports were published. He stated that Treasury Department
records show that the Secret Service sent the autopsy report to the
F.B.I. on December 23, 1963. However, Professor Richard Popkin
countered in The New York Review of Books that Knebel inadvertently
had proved that the F.B.I. did have the final autopsy report in hand
when its final summary report was prepared on January 13, 1964 (a fact
Knebel apparently missed).6 Newsweek suggested that Kennedy “might
have been bent forward enough” to place the back wound higher than the
throat wound. But Life’s film of the assassination indicated that the
President was seated erect at the time of the shot. And Philadelphia
District Attorney Arlen Specter, a former Commission lawyer, attempted
to demonstrate to the Greater Philadelphia Magazine7 how a shirt could
rise high enough on the neck to that a bullet hole about six inches
below the top of the collar would be consistent with a neck wound. The
interviewer was not, however, fully convinced since it appeared that
this feat would require doubling over a portion of the shirt—and there
was only one bullet hole in the back of the President’s shirt.
Throughout the debate, the F.B.I. has remained coyly ambiguous. It
told The Washington Post that its December 9 Summary Report was “based
on the medical evidence at that time.” But it told the Los Angeles
Times that the F.B.I. report was wrong when it said that there was “no
point of exit” for the bullet, explaining “F.B.I. agents were not
doctors, but merely quoting doctors.” To the New York Times and other
papers, the F.B.I. declined comment.    The great irony of the
controversy is that it can be settled decisively by available evidence
that neither the Commission nor its critics have seen. Color
photographs, taken during the autopsy, would show exactly where the
bullet entered the President’s back, whether it was below the
shoulders, as F.B.I. reports claim, or in the back of the neck, as the
Commission’s autopsy report claims. After the autopsy, these
photographs were turned over undeveloped to the Protective Research
Section of the Secret Service. What happened to the photographs after
this is not definitely known: some Commission lawyers believe they
were given to the Kennedy family, others believe that they remained
with the Secret Service or White House. In any case, the Commission
never received either the autopsy photographs or X-rays. Not that the
Commission lawyers did not try to obtain them: Arlen Specter
reportedly was on the verge of tears when he found out that they were
not to be requested by the chairman     The whereabouts of these
photographs and X-rays has remained a mystery. Newsweek recently
reported that a two-month inquiry by its staff “failed to turn up a
single government official who can, or will, give a simple answer to
the question: ‘Where are the Kennedy autopsy pictures?’”    Moreover,
it is not known whether the autopsy photographs were ever developed.
Undeveloped color film tends to lose detail and decompose in about
five years. Three years have already elapsed. If the photographs fade
or are somehow accidentally destroyed, the opportunity to resolve the
contradiction will be lost forever. What is ascertainable today may
become a moot point in the near future.   What is to be done? The
Commission’s investigation of the assassination of President Kennedy
cannot be considered complete so long as the contradiction in the
autopsy findings remains unresolved. By viewing the photographs, the
contradiction can be resolved once and for all time. If they show the
wound to be in the back of the neck, then there can be no further
doubt as to the accuracy and authenticity of the autopsy report.
Theories of a second assassin, evolving out of the contradiction,
would be quashed. And virtually all of the speculation would be
reduced, at least among thinking people, to groundless banter.   There
is another possibility. The photographs might show the bullet wound to
be below the shoulders. If this were the case, the Commission (or any
other fact-finding body) would have very serious unfinished business
to attend to.8  Already, the conspiracy theories are proliferating at
an alarming rate. As the following Primer shows, doubts about the
authenticity of the autopsy report are at the root of all the
two-assassin theories. The assumption, either explicit or implicit,
that the autopsy report was changed makes tenable the theories that
hold that a shot came from the front of the President’s car. This in
turn leads to theories of suppressed and planted evidence, which
implicates the authorities and other important figures in the
conspiracy. Finally, there come theories speculating on the forces
behind the conspiracy to kill Kennedy, some of which go so far as to
accuse those with power to suppress evidence.

Annotations by K. Rahn
1.  This syndicate never materialized.
2. Refers mainly to the death count of Penn Jones, Jr., newspaper
editor of Midlothian, Texas.
3. The film, of course, was the famous Zapruder film. The
superposition of frames by Vincent Salandria revealed the backward
movement of the head and body. But the frames that Salandria chose
missed the more important forward snap from a couple frames earlier.
This seriously misled Salandria and may have set the tone for
misleading nearly the entire research community.
4. It was actually prepared by Dr. Boswell.
5. Actually, it is not crucial to the question of one assassin versus
two. The basic argument from the number of entrance and exit wounds in
the body, plus the lack of a bullet in the body, is far stronger.
6. The FBI may have had the official autopsy report on hand but not used it.
7. The reporter was Gaeton Fonzi, later a staff investigator for the
HSCA. For the full text of this article by Fonzi, click here.
8. The autopsy photographs are now available via a set that was stolen
and reproduced for the public. Ironically, Kennedy's back has enough
blood spots still on it that it is very hard to determine where the
wound is. Dr. Robert Artwohl, one of the few to have viewed the
original photos, says that the wound is significantly less than six
inches below the top of the collar.

http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/archived/oswald.htm

Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald WALL STREET JOURNAL November 22, 1983 by
Edward Jay Epstein

The endless tangle of questions about bullets, trajectories, wounds,
time sequences and inconsistent testimony that has surrounded the
assassination of President John F. Kennedy and has obsessively
fascinated, if not entirely blinded, a generation of assassination
buffs-probably never will be resolved.

Within this morass of facts. however, there is a central actor, Lee
Harvey Oswald. His rifle, which fired the fatal bullet into the
president, was found in the sniper's nest, His cartridge cases were
also found near the body of a murdered policeman on the route his
flight. He was captured resisting arrest with the loaded murder
revolver in his hand. In light of this overwhelming evidence, the
issue that ought to have concerned Americans was not Oswald's
technical guilt but his dangerous liaisons abroad. Only eight weeks
before the assassination he had excited FBI and CIA interest in his
activities by renewing his contacts with Cuban and Soviet intelligence
officers in Mexico City. Although these foreign connections remained
of great concern to the two U S. intellige agencies, they were
considered too sensitive to be aired, publicly in the emotional
aftermath of the president's slaying. Oswald was not a "loner- in the
conventional sense. Ever since he was handed a pamphlet about the
Rosenberg prosecution at the age of 15, he had sought out affiliations
with political organizations, front groups and foreign nations that
opposed the policies of the U.S. When
he was 16. he wrote the Socialist Party "I am a Marxist and have been
studying Socialist Principles for well over five years" and he
requested information about joining their "Youth League-." He also
attempted to persuade a friend to join the youth auxiliary of the
Communist
Party. He subsequently made membership inquiries to such organizations
as the Socialist Workers Party, the Socialist Labor Party, The Gus
Hall-Benjamin Davis Defense Committee, the Daily Worker, The Fair Play
for Cuba Committee and the Communist Party, USA— correspondence that
brought him under surveillance by the FBI,  While still in the early
stages of his flirtation with political causes, 0swald joined the
Marine Corps . In October 1959, after a two-year stint as a radar
operator, Oswald became the first Marine to defect to the Soviet
Union, In Moscow, he delivered a letter stating. "I affirm that my
allegiance is to the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics." Not only
did he publically renounce his American citizenship but he told the
U.S. consul that he intended to turn over to the Soviet Union military
secrets that he had acquired while serving in the Marines, adding that
he had data of "Special interest" to the Russians. Since he indeed had
exposure to military secrets such as the U-2 spy piane and radar
identitification system, and since he may have collected data while on
active duty, his defection had serious espionage implications.
Oswald thus had compromised all the secret data he had come in contact
with in the Marines. He had also through this act put himself in the
hands of his hosts.He was now completely dependent on the Soviets for
financial support, legal status and protection. Before disappearing
into the Soviet hinterland for a year, Oswald spelled out his
operational creed in a long letter to his brother. From Moscow, he
wrote presciently of his willingness to commit murder for a political
cause: "I want you to understand what I say now, I do not say lightly,
or unknowingly, since I've been in the military .... In the event of
war I would kill any American who put a uniform on in defense of the
American Government --", and then ominously added for emphasis, " Any
American." Although his letter was routinely intercepted by the CIA
and microfilmed, no discernable attention was paid to the threat
contained in it . When Oswald returned from the Soviet Union in June
1962 (with a little help from a State Department eager to demonstrate
that it could win back a defector from the Soviets), joined by a
Russian wife, he retained his militant convictions. In Dallas, where
he settled, he purchased a rifle with telescopic sights and a revolver
from a mail-order house under a false name. He also lectured his more
liberal acquaintances on the need for violent action rather than mere
words. General Edwin A. Walker, an extreme conservative, who had been
active in Dallas organizing anti-Castro guerrillas became in the
Spring of 1963 a particular focus of Oswald's attention. He repeatedly
suggested to a German geologist, Volkmar Schmidt, and other friends,
that General walker should be treated like a "murderer at large". He
did not stop at fierce words. For weeks, he methodically stalked
Walker's movements, photographing his residence from several angles.
He then had his wife photograph him, dressed entirely in black, with
his revolver strapped on a holster on his hip, his sniper's rifle in
his right hand, and two newspapers --~The Worker~ and the~Militant~ --
in his left hand. He made three copies of the photograph-- one of
which he inscribed, dated "5--IV-63" and sent to a Dallas
acquaintance, George De Mohrenschildt. He then left with his rifle
wrapped in a raincoat, telling his wife he was off to "target
practice", but his target, General Walker, was out of town that night.
Five nights later, Oswald returned to Walker's house, and fired a shot
at him that missed his head by inches, demonstrating that he had the
capacity as well as the willingness to kill "Any American". After the
failed assassination, Oswald went to New Orleans, where he became the
organizer for the Fair Play for Cuba Committee. Aside from printing
leaflets, staging demonstrations, getting arrested and appearing on
local radio talk shows in support of Castro that summer, Oswald
attempted to personally infiltrate an anti-Castro group that was
organizing sabotage raids against Cuba. He explained to friends that
he could figure out his "anti-imperialist" policy by "reading between
the lines" of the Militant and other such publications. In August, he
wrote the central committee of the Communist Party USA asking "Whether
in your opinion, I can compete with anti-progressive forces above
ground, or whether I should always remain in the background,i.e.
underground". During this hot summer, while Oswald spent evenings
practicing sighting his rifle in his backyard, the Militant raged on
about the Kennedy Administration's "terrorist bandit" attacks on Cuba.
And as the semi-secret war against Castro escalated, Oswald expressed
increasing interest in reaching Cuba. Oswald told his wife he planned
to hijack an airliner to Havana, suggesting, as the summer progressed,
that he might even earn a position in Castro's government. On
September 9th, in a report that appeared on the front page of the New
Orleans Times-Picayune, Castro himself warned that if American leaders
continued "aiding plans to eliminate Cuban leaders ... they themselves
will not be safe". The implication of this threat was not lost on
Oswald. Telling his wife that they might never meet again, he left New
Orleans two weeks later headed for the Cuban Embassy in Mexico City.
To convince the Cubans of his bona fides-- and seriousness-- he had
prepared a dossier on himself, which included a 10 page resume,
outlining his revolutionary activities, newspaper clippings about his
defection to the Soviet Union, propaganda material he had printed,
documents he had stolen from a printing company engaged in classified
map reproduction for the U.S Army, his correspondence with the Fair
Play for Cuba Committee executives and photographs linking him to the
Walker shooting. Oswald applied for a visa at the Cuban Embassy on the
morning of September 27th 1963. He said that he wanted to stop in
Havana en route to the Soviet Union. On the application the consular
office who interviewed him, noted: "The applicant states that he is a
member of the American Communist Party and Secretary in New Orleans of
the Fair Play for Cuba Committee." Despite such recommendations,
Oswald was told that he needed a Soviet visa before the Cuban visa
could be issued. He argued over this requisite with the Cuban counsel,
Eusebio Azque, in front of witnesses, and reportedly made wild claims
about services he might perform for the Cuban cause. During the next
five days, he traveled back and forth between the Soviet and Cuban
embassies attempting to straighten out the difficulty. When he
telephoned from the Cuban embassy to arrange an appointment at the
Soviet Embassy with an officer called Valery Vladimirovich Kostikov,
he set off alarm bells at the CIA, which had been surreptitiously
monitoring the phone line. Kostikov was a KGB officer who had been
under close surveillance in Mexico by the FBI ( and who,in 1971, was
identified by a KGB defector in London as the head of sabotage
operations in Mexico). By the time the CIA had identified Oswald, and
notified the FBI, he had left Mexico.

When he returned to Dallas that October, Oswald assumed a different
identity--"O.H.Lee-- and, separating himself from his family, he moved
to a rooming house. He also forbade his wife from divulging his
whereabouts. He then got a job at the Texas Book Depository, which
overlooked the convergence of the three main streets into central
Dallas. On October 18th, Oswald's visa was approved by the Cuban
Foreign Ministry (despite the fact that he had not officially received
a Soviet visa,as required.) Three weeks later, he wrote another letter
to the Soviet Embassy, referring to his meeting with Kostikov in
Mexico, and adding cryptically: "Had I been able to reach the Soviet
Embassy in Havana as planned, the embassy there would have had time to
complete our business."
FBI counterintelligence, which had intercepted this letter in
Washington, and evidently was interested in Oswald's "business" in
Havana, urgently requested its field agents in Dallas to locate him.
An FBI agent, James Hosty, rushed over to the home where Oswald's
family was living, and questioned his wife, but he did not find him
Oswald until November 22nd, when he had been arrested for the murder
of a Dallas policeman and President Kennedy. In the final analysis,
the Warren Commission turned out to be right: Oswald was the assassin.
He had brought his rifle to work on November 22nd, carefully prepared
a concealed sniper's position at a sixth floor window, and, waiting in
ambush for almost an hour, shot the President as the motorcade passed
below. The possibility that he had assistance-- for example, someone
setting off a firecracker as a diversion-- can never be precluded. But
the real question is not how but why Oswald assassinated the
President. The most obvious motive was provided by Oswald himself in
his letter from Moscow: To kill any American who put on a uniform
against his cause. He openly subscribed to the terrorist creed that a
man with a rifle could change history; and, as far as Oswald was
concerned, President Kennedy and General Walker were both actively
working to destroy his avowed hero-- Castro.
Whether Oswald , given his clear disposition towards killing an
American leader, was prodded or otherwise induced into committing the
assassination was the question that vexed American intelligence after
the shooting. Oswald had disappeared in the Soviet Union for more than
a year, without yielding a trace of what, if any, training and
indoctrination he had undergone. The only record of this missing year
was a "diary" he brought out with him, which had in fact been written
in two days presumably to provide him with a consistent cover story or
legend. His five days with the Cubans in Mexico City were also a blank
-- although friendly sources within the Cuban Embassy indicated that
he was pressured to prove his loyalty and worth. Although the Cuban
government insisted, through both official and intelligence channels,
that Oswald was presumed crazy and dismissed as such by the embassy
staff, it left unanswered the disturbing question of why a visa was
approved for Oswald-- after the report was received from the embassy.
Among the eleven questions prepared by the CIA for Mexican
interrogators was one that expressed its direct concern: "Was the
assassination of of President Kennedy planned by Fidel Castro ... and
were the final details worked out inside the Cuban Embassy". In
Dallas, before Mexican investigators could question their sources,
Oswald was shot dead, and with his death ended the hope of unraveling
his motive.




The Big Picture ? "The end goal is to get everybody chipped, to
control the whole society, to have the bankers and the elite people
control the world."Nick Rockefeller quoted by Aaron Russo in this
interview.

It's not about more power, it's not about more money, it's about the
survival of the elite pyramid

Several years ago, after his popular video Mad As Hell was released
and he began his campaign to become Governor of Nevada, Russo was
noticed by Rockefeller and introduced to him by a female attorney.
Seeing Russo's passion and ability to affect change, Rockefeller set
about on a subtle mission to recruit Russo into the elite's CFR
(Council of Foreign Relation) organization. Aaron Russo, the famous
Film Maker of Trading Places starring Eddy Murphy, also made a film
called "America: Freedom To Fascism". The motive behind this latter is
surely linked to Nick (Nicholas) Rockefeller revelation about the
ultimate aim of the Elites New World Order.

As Russo refused to join them, Rockefeller coldly questioned why Russo
cared about the "serfs"

Russo rejected the invitation, saying he had no interest in "enslaving
the people" to which Rockefeller coldly questioned why he cared about
the "serfs." "I used to say to him what's the point of all this,"
states Russo, "you have all the money in the world you need, you have
all the power you need, what's the point, what's the end goal?" to
which Rockefeller replied (paraphrasing), "The end goal is to get
everybody chipped, to control the whole society, to have the bankers
and the elite people control the world."Rockefeller even assured Russo
that if he joined the elite his chip would be specially marked so as
to avoid undue inspection by the authorities.

Other themes are 9/11, agenda behind feminism the Rockefeller
Foundation has helped promoted with CIA and depopulation of the world
by 50%.
The Big Picture ?
Latest hubs on human microchips

   VeriChip: A Precursor of 666?

   It all seems rather harmless and it serves a real purpose-having a
small microchip implanted just under your skin that can be scanned for
ID or medical record information. The chip called, VeriChip, is
just... - 5 weeks ago
   Truth in the bible? Truth in god?

   Religion is the most confusing subject i can think of. The first
thing that comes to my mind when i think religion is divination of
labels like Christian, Hindu, Catholic. etcIsn't religion supposed
to... - 5 weeks ago
   BeatTheChip

   FROM BORDC http://www.constitutioncampaign.org/blog/?p=291 Since
the passage of the PATRIOT Act, Â pervasive citizen surveillance and
data collection have been combined as part of an ambitious effort
to... - 2 months ago
   As Above So Below

   An Egyptian legend, tells us about the Emerald Tablet, written by
the thrice great Hermes Trimegistus. In the tablet, Hermes
Trismegistus, discuss about the process of creation and summarized in
the quotation... - 2 months ago
   Embedded Systems: Choosing the right development board

   Have you ever been in the situation where you don't know which dev
board you need to buy? As an engineer I find it quite difficult to
choose which board is right form my needs. Some FPGA boards have way
too... - 3 months ago
   Pic chip - how to make a traffic light

   Here is a way of making a set of traffic lights using a 16f84
micro controller from Microchip. It is fairly simple, all you have to
do is wire up the microcontroller with a pair of red, green and yellow
leds.... - 3 months ago
   A SHORT TAIL ABOUT A DOG

   A short story about a small pet. Several weeks back, as I was
trudging home from a particularly engaging meeting, I had the distinct
feeling that I was being followed. It had been a long day and it was
nigh on the twilight hours. Each... -4 months ago
   Microchipping Your Pet - Unforeseen danger you need to know about!

   Microchipping your pet is the best way to ensure that you are
reunited with your loved one â so what is the problem? The problem is,
there are some unforeseen errors with the process you must know about
in order to ensure your pet is protected... - 4 months ago

http://hubpages.com/hub/Federal_Reserve_Act Federal Reserve Act: the
most Influential Act in US/World History since the Constitution72

By thecounterpunch

"In his final Senate years, Aldrich chaired the National Monetary
Commission. His Aldrich Plan, providing for flexible cash reserves,
was the forerunner of the Federal Reserve System."

-- Senate.gov

"This Act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth... The worst
legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and
currency Bill."

-- Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr (father of famous aviator), Congressman in
his book Banking and Currency and The Money Trust, 1913

"The Congress shall have Power... To coin Money, regulate the Value
thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and
Measures [see on the origin of the Gold Standard] ..."-- Article One,
Section Eight of the U.S. Constitution

"The name of Central Bank is carefully avoided, but the ‘Federal
Reserve Association’, the name given to the proposed central
organization, is endowed with the usual powers and responsibilities of
a European Central Bank."

-- Nation Magazine, January 19, 1911

The Federal Reserve Act was proposed in 1908 by Nelson Aldrich - whose
unique daughter married unique Rockefeller's son - in
theAldrich-Vreeland Act after the Panic of 1907.The Act created the
"Federal Reserve System" which transferred control of the money supply
from Congress [see above Article One, Section Eight of the U.S.
Constitution] to the banking system. Though the Treasury still coins
and prints our money under the authority of Congress, neither the
Treasurynor the Congress has the slightest thing to do with its issue
or regulating the value thereof. The Act was signed by President
Woodrow Wilson - under the influence of Colonel House - founder of the
CFR (controlled byRockefeller) - on December 23, 1913 during the night
(see timeline below) eighty years after President Jacksonrepelled the
charter of the Second Bank Of United States.
The Incredible Timeline

The Federal Reserve Act was scheduled during the unlikely hours of
1.30 am to 4.30 am - were most members probably sleeping ? - on Monday
22 December 1913, at which 20 to 40 substantial differences in the
House and Senate versions were supposedly described, deliberated upon,
debated, reconciled and voted upon in a near-miraculous
four-and-a-half to nine minutes per item, at that late hour. At 4.30
am, a prepared report of this Committee was handed to the printers.
Senator Bristow of Kansas, the Republican leader, stated on the
Congressional Record that the Conference Committee had met without
notifying them, and that Republicans were not present and were given
no opportunity either to read or sign the Conference Committee report.
The Conference report is normally read on the Senate floor. The
Republicans did not even see the report. Some senators stated on the
floor of the Senate that they had no knowledge of the contents of the
Bill. At 6.02 PM on 23 December, when many members had already left
the Capital for the Christmas holiday, the very same day that the Bill
was hurried through the House and Senate, President Woodrow Wilson
signed the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 into law.

Mike Mathiesen  says: 2 years ago This one of the many ways they have
watered down the Constitution and our rights over the years. There are
more going on today.

J D Murrah  says: 2 years ago Colonel House did a lot of damage to the
Constitution through Wilson. His influence allowed massive
centralization to occur in Washington. The only person who managed
doing more damage to the Constitution was Lincoln. I heard a new
saying the other day that the Federal Reserve is neither Federal nor
does it have a Reserve. Jeffrey Murrah, author Texans Always Move
Them: A True History of Texas.

DNKStore  says: 15 months ago We still live today under the influence
of actions taken by venal corrupt men taken nearly 100 years ago.
Nothing has changed much in this regard.

Socio-Image  says: 10 months ago Do you know if there was some process
that is on the record of the Republicans or whoever did not like the
bill, after it passed, took action to try and declare it as
unconstitutional and have it thrown out? Certainly it would seem
logical especially if they pushed the bill in the early morning hours
before Christmas.

James Jesse Emery St. Louis  says: 7 months ago: Hey Guys Did you know
these same men now operate 130 Central Banks in 130 Different
Sovereign Nations The EU is their Conquest of Consent, no more habeus
corpus in europe, Corpus Jurus, Judgement by the State, by The Court
it's self, Double Joepardy is a thing of the past in the European
Union, The North American union (Yes, that's, Mexico, Canada and The
United States Merging their Economies and infrastructure) Is the Next
Step in Their Plan, Their Plan is this Fraudulent, Manipulative, Self
Destructive, Monetary-Communism via Central Banking, issuance of the
currency, but on a global scale, The INTERNATIONAL Monetary (MONEY)
Fund, The WORLD Health Organization, the WORLD Trade Organization and
the WORLD BANK. we are fucked because the rothschilds are fucking
satanists, they financed hitler's rise to power because he was harshly
prejudiced, and would accomplish their goals for them, goals such as
mass genocide, They financed Mao, who slaughtered 60 Million, because
they are fucking satanists, and want no more than 500 Million People
to "Burden" the Earth The Money Changers express their goals openly in
the Georgia Guidestones, They are Raping third world countries of
their resources, and spinning the world on it's head upside down
drowing in debt 6 inches deep, and made of written agreements our own
politicians signed, They are going to outlaw nutrients with codex
alimentarius (not GNC Prodoucts, nutrients in our food) and neglect
the world, legislated famine in the Name of the Earth, the
environment, NCMR, you're ideas are not you're own "You Won't See this
in the News" Rick and Dick abc cnn msnbc viacom NbC bbc npr pbs and
everyone else didn't tell you about this, secret history, and current
events, the banker will venture elsewhere, and profiteer (See what he
Can BUY, to Make More MONEY) The Banker invested in industry, wartime
industry, and he invested in public awareness,in general knowledge, in
ideals, when he bought the newspapers, when he bought the Radio
stations and the television broadcasters, the Networks, and then, He
Proceeded to Buy, our Senators and representatives, and now he has
bought us barack, bush, cheney, clinton, rumsfeld, Kissinger, Woodrow
Wilson, Nixon, Greenspan, FDR, Ben Bernanke, Jay Rockefeller and many
others, forging our future economically through the issuance and
manipulation of the currency and it's value the other part of that
qute is "This Act Legalizes the INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT of the Monetary
(MONEY) Power." that was a hundred fucking years ago, nobody believes
this shit because it's not feasible that our ideas are manipulated
along with the economy to perpetuate debt to the men that killed
kennedy, lincoln, bobby kennedy and bobby kennedy jr. Taft was killed
for saying something about the monetary power two weeks after being
elected, and americans are all kept ignorant of the history of these
tycoons, manipulating governments through the issuance of the currency
all the way back to the dark ages to Egypt and Ceaser, the world is
kept ignorant to the true state of technology, and the possibilities
of modern science.

MikeNV  says: 2 months ago American People are uneducated and unaware.
I am amazed that an issue so important to the freedom and prosperity
of our country, and the world for that matter gets absolutely no
press. It's unfortunate but the average American is an idiot. They
play the party politics game continuing to vote for politicians who
perpetuate the fraud. People vote for candidates not on issues of
relevance but on issues of emotion that are created in the media each
election year. All the talk about the economy is laughable. People
like Fed Chairman Bernanke perpetuating the lie with a straight face.
I don't know how an issue so important can not make it to the
mainstream - other than to say that the wealthy bankers own the media
and continue to buy politicians so it can not.

I wish I could vote your hub up to 100. But I can only press the button once.

http://hubpages.com/hub/Nelson_Aldrich

Nelson Aldrich: the Rockefeller's Middle Man who crafted the Income
Tax and the Central Federal Reserve System
69  By thecounterpunch

"There are two distinct classes of men...those who pay taxes and those
who receive and live upon taxes." -- Thomas Paine (1737–1809),
pamphleteer and revolutionary

"You know, gentlemen, that I do not owe any personal income tax. But
nevertheless, I send a small check, now and then, to the Internal
Revenue Service out of the kindness of my heart." -- David Rockefeller
(1915-), before a Congressional Committee

"In his final Senate years, Aldrich chaired the National Monetary
Commission. His Aldrich Plan, providing for flexible cash reserves,
was the forerunner of the Federal Reserve System."

-- Senate.gov

Aldrich introduced established an income tax, although he had declared
a similar measure "communistic" a decade earlier

Born in Rhode Island, Nelson Aldrich (1841–1915) was a direct
descendant of Rhode Island founder, Roger Williams. He had directed
the Finance Committee and was tightly linked to Rockefeller as his
only daughter married the only son ofJohn D. Rockefeller (Nelson
Aldrich Rockefeller is his grandson and his son Winthrop Aldrich's
will become chairmanship of the Chase National Bank - Rockefeller's
Bank). In 1909, Aldrich introduced a constitutional amendment to
establish an income tax, although he had declared a similar measure
"communistic" a decade earlier. In 1908 he became the chief sponsor of
the Aldrich-Vreeland Act which created the National Monetary
Commission, later to become the Federal Reserve in 1913. Aldrich
became wealthy with investments in street railroads, sugar, rubber and
banking. In 1906 Aldrich and other American financiers invested
heavily in mines and rubber in the Belgian Congo. They supported
Belgium's King Leopold II, who was alleged to have imposed slave labor
conditions in the colony.

TAGS

   business
   finance
   education
   politics
   history
   bank
   tax
   federal reserve
   income tax
   elite
   ron paul
   fed
   central bank
   banking system
   rockefeller
   chase manhattan bank
   financial history
   rockfeller
   aldrich

http://hubpages.com/hub/Astonishing_Interview_with_Aaron_Russo_who_met_with_Nick_Rockefeller

Astounding Interview of Aaron Russo about Nicholas Rockefeller who
asked him to join the CFR
69

Conspiracy Video's
Illuminati, New World Order, Occult, Freemasonry, New Age
Short Breaks
UK holidays & short breaks at Center Parcs. Book online!

"The end goal is to get everybody chipped, to control the whole
society, to have the bankers and the elite people control the world."

- Nick Rockefeller quoted by Aaron Russo in this interview.

   Protest against youtube who has erased the Video Speech of Dick
Cheney about the CFR
   It was only a 1 min Video of a PUBLIC SPEECH and youtube pretends
it violates their TOS. Does youtube participate in the coverup about
the CFR ?

It's not about more power, it's not about more money, it's about the
survival of the elite pyramid

Several years ago, after his popular video Mad As Hell was released
and he began his campaign to become Governor of Nevada, Russo was
noticed by Rockefeller and introduced to him by a female attorney.
Seeing Russo's passion and ability to affect change, Rockefeller set
about on a subtle mission to recruit Russo into the elite's CFR
(Council of Foreign Relation) organization.

Aaron Russo, the famous Film Maker of Trading Places starring Eddy
Murphy, also made a film called "America: Freedom To Fascism". The
motive behind this latter is surely linked to Nick (Nicholas)
Rockefeller revelation about the ultimate aim of the Elites New World
Order.
As Russo refused to join them, Rockefeller coldly questioned why Russo
cared about the "serfs"

Russo rejected the invitation, saying he had no interest in "enslaving
the people" to which Rockefeller coldly questioned why he cared about
the "serfs."

"I used to say to him what's the point of all this," states Russo,
"you have all the money in the world you need, you have all the power
you need, what's the point, what's the end goal?" to which Rockefeller
replied (paraphrasing), "The end goal is to get everybody chipped, to
control the whole society, to have the bankers and the elite people
control the world."

Rockefeller even assured Russo that if he joined the elite his chip
would be specially marked so as to avoid undue inspection by the
authorities.

Other themes are 9/11, agenda behind feminism the Rockefeller
Foundation has helped promoted with CIA and depopulation of the world
by 50%.
The Big Picture ?
Aaron and Nick were friends ...until the Revelation about Microchips
... until the Revelation about Microchips.


TAGS

   business
   finance
   education
   politics
   kids
   freedom
   woman
   interview
   democracy
   secret
   socialism
   capitalism
   revelation
   privacy
   communism
   feminism
   liberty
   big brother
   globalization
   propaganda
   cia
   911
   elite
   ron paul
   population
   venezuela
   fascism
   1984
   feminist
   war on terror
   rfid
   rockefeller
   overpopulation
   microchip
   chavez
   cfr
   aaron russo
   irak
   neo-nazism
   best of thecounterpunch
   formal socialism
   malthusianism




http://hubpages.com/hub/The_Bilderberg_Group

The Bilderberg Group - no more a secret in mass Medias - 64 By thecounterpunch
Cities of the UnderworldUnveil the Hidden World Beneath Major Cities.
Videos at HISTORY Freemasony Warning: Do Not Join The Freemasons Until
You've Seen This...
BBC - Bilderberg's head Viscount Davignon

In 1974, U.S. Senator James Buckley wrote: "I don't subscribe to the
theory that there exists an organization of international bankers
called the Bilderbergers." Bilderberg Group, so called because of
their first meeting in May 1954 at the Bilderberg Hotel, was kept in
secrecy for several dozens of years. Today they prefer not to hide any
more at least on European medias like the BBC (for example through
their article "Inside the secretive Bilderberg Group"). Prince
Bernhard, the Dutch aristocrat, former member of the honorary German
Reiter SS Corps, founded the group and chaired meetings for more than
30 years. Over the years the group became a model for transnational
diplomacy, lending support to European integration and oil company
policies. Its steering committee was virtually a who's who of
international finance; David Rockefeller, Gabriel Hauge
(Manufacturer's Hanover Trust), Emilio Collado (Standard Oil, later
Exxon) international lawyers such as Arthur Dean and George Ball. All
U.S. steering committee members were also members of the Council on
Foreign Relations (CFR), Rockefeller's organization (founded by
Colonel House), which has dominated US foreign policy planning since
World War II. Take George Ball, for example. A long-time CFR member,
director of the Trilateral Commission (founded by Brzezinski for David
Rockefeller - lifetime member), Undersecretary of State, and lawyer
with Lehman Brothers. Or Arthur Dean. CFR member, partner in Sullivan
and Cromwell law firm, whose partners included John Foster and Allen
Dulles. Before World War II Sullivan and Cromwell worked with German
chemical and steel monopolies. By the time the Bilderbergers began to
meet, attorney Allen Dulles had become CIA director. Is Bilderberg
goal the same as described by Caroll Quigley, Bill Clinton's mentor,
in his book "Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time" ?

"The powers of financial capitalism had far-reaching aim, nothing less
than to create a world system of financial control in private hands
able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy
of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a
feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in
concert." Carroll Quigley, Bill Clinton's mentor
Globalization: Astounding Interview of Aaron Russo about Nicholas
Rockefeller who asked him to join the CFR
Globalization: Maurice Allais, French Economics Nobel Prize for the
"theory of markets and efficient utilization of ressources"
Links

   BBC - Inside the secretive Bilderberg Group
   The World Bank, GATT and Free Trade by Noam Chomsky
   Novus Ordo Seclorum or New World Order

       THE HISTORY CHANNEL HISTORYS MYSTERIES SECRET SOCIETIES
Current Bid: $2.96
Conspiracy Theories and Secret Societies For Dummies    Conspiracy
Theories and Secret Societies For Dummies
Current Bid: $13.77
Secret Societies DVD Illuminati Bohemian Club   Secret Societies DVD
Illuminati Bohemian Club
Current Bid: $11.95
Secret Societies - History Channel DVD Skull & Bones    Secret Societies
- History Channel DVD Skull & Bones
Current Bid: $4.99
Comments William F. Torpey  says: 2 years ago : Fascinating stuff,
counterpunch. The wealthy and powerful don't need a secret conspiracy;
they've had an open conspiracy for decades (and much longer.) These
people deal with each other in business, attend all the same dinners
and luncheons, belong to the same exclusive golf courses, gather in
the same backroom political circles, etc. Just as the average guys
meet at the public golf courses and fraternal organizations etc. The
wealthy feel they are doing the world a favor by making all the big
decisions. It's a little bit like the old slave owners who would brag
about how well they treated their slaves, often refusing to believe
their slaves would even want to be free and fend for themselves.
Obviously, the world is headed in the wrong direction, and if
something isn't done about it, well.
BBC - Bilderberg's head Viscount Davignon
He plays down the group's role in setting the international agenda
He plays down the group's role in setting the international agenda
http://hubpages.com/hub/Tragedy_and_Hope Tragedy and Hope: A History
of the World in Our Time by Carroll Quigley (Bill Clinton's mentor) -
75 By thecounterpunch
Summary "The powers of financial capitalism had far-reaching aim,
nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in
private hands able to dominate the political system of each country
and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be
controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world
acting in concert." -- Carroll Quigley, Bill Clinton's mentor
Read before

   H.G. Wells on "a scientific investigation of the origins of the
Banking System"
   "... there remains a residuum of original and intelligent people,
who do realize that banking plays a very important and interesting
part in the world's affairs... Their enquiries carry them inevitably
outside the bankers' habitual field ..."
   Home-School.Com: an astonishing interview with John Taylor Gatto
   "When Bill Clinton was nominated by the Democratic Party for the
presidency in 1991, the New York Times printed his acceptance speech
for the nomination. The speech ended with the tribute to a college
professor who had been Clinton's mentor"
   Amazing: Youtube has erased the Dick Cheney video speech
   "it's good to be back at the Council on Foreign Relations
[Rockefeller's organization]. As Pete mentioned, I have been a member
for a long time, and was actually Director for some period of time. I
never mentioned that when I was campaigning ..."
   David Rockefeller proud to be an Internationalist and "Conspirator
in Chief" of the Global Empire
   "Some believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the
best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me
as 'internationalists' ... If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I
am proud of it."
   Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
   Economic hit men are highly paid professionals who cheat countries
around the globe out of trillions of dollars. They funnel money from
the World Bank, U.S. Agency for International Development, for a few
wealthy families who control the planet.
   Astounding Interview of Aaron Russo about Nicholas Rockefeller who
asked him to join the CFR
   "The end goal is to get everybody chipped, to control the whole
society, to have the bankers and the elite people control the world."

Excerpt

“There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international
Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the
radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network,
which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to
cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently
does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have
studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the
early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no
aversion to it or to most of its aims [theCounterpunch: not any more
see Home-School.Com: an astonishing interview with John Taylor Gatto]
and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its
instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few
of its policies (notably to its belief that England was an Atlantic
rather than a European Power and must be allied, or even federated,
with the United States and must remain isolated from Europe), but in
general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain
unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be
known.” “The Rhodes Scholarships, established by the terms of Cecil
Rhodes's seventh will, are known to everyone. What is not so widely
known is that Rhodes in five previous wills left his fortune to form a
secret society, which was to devote itself to the preservation and
expansion of the British Empire. And what does not seem to be known to
anyone is that this secret society was created by Rhodes and his
principal trustee, Lord Milner, and continues to exist to this day. To
be sure, this secret society is not a childish thing like the Ku Klux
Klan, and it does not have any secret robes, secret handclasps, or
secret passwords. It does not need any of these, since its members
know each other intimately. It probably has no oaths of secrecy nor
any formal procedure of initiation. It does, however, exist and holds
secret meetings, over which the senior member present presides. At
various times since 1891, these meetings have been presided over by
Rhodes, Lord Milner, Lord Selborne, Sir Patrick Duncan, Field Marshal
Jan Smuts, Lord Lothian, and Lord Brand. They have been held in all
the British Dominions, starting in South Africa about 1903; in various
places in London, chiefly Piccadilly; at various colleges at Oxford,
chiefly All Souls; and at many English country houses such as Tring
Park, Blickling Hall, Cliveden, and others.” “No country that values
its safety should allow what the Milner group accomplished in Britain,
that is, that a small number of men should be able to wield such power
in administration and politics, should be given almost complete
control over the publication of the documents relating to their
actions, should be able to exercise such influence over the avenues of
information that create public opinion, and should be able to
monopolize so completely the writing and teaching of the history of
their own period.” “The powers of financial capitalism had
far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of
financial control in private hands able to dominate the political
system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This
system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central
banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at
in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to
be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a
private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which
were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to
dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to
manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic
activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by
subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”
Links BIS - Bank of International Settlement: the Mother of all Central Banks

   John Kenneth Galbraith on the Central Federal Reserve Bank
   Milton Friedman on the Central Federal Reserve Bank

http://hubpages.com/hub/BIS_-_Bank_of_International_Settlement

undefined
BIS - Bank of International Settlement: the Mother of all Central Banks
59
Free Offshore Banking And 0% Entry Fees. No Time Limit.
Open An Offshore Account
Banking
Get a Business Checking Account & Check Card That Save You Money
The BIS was originally established in May 1930 by bankers and
diplomats of Europe and the United States to collect and disburse
Germany's World War I reparation payments (hence its name). It was
truly an extraordinary arrangement. Although the BIS was organized as
a commercial bank with publicly held shares, its immunity from
government interference, and even taxation, in both peace and war was
guaranteed by an international treaty signed in The Hague in 1930.
Although all its depositors are central banks, the BIS has made a
profit on every transaction. And because it has been highly
profitable, it has required no subsidy or aid from any government.

Since it also provided, in Basel, a safe and convenient repository for
the gold holdings of the European central banks, it quickly evolved
into the bank for central banks. As the world depression deepened in
the Thirties and- financial panics flared up in Austria, Hungary,
Yugoslavia, and Germany, the governors in charge of the key central
banks feared that the entire global financial system would collapse
unless they could closely coordinate their rescue efforts. The obvious
meeting spot for this desperately needed coordination was the BIS,
where they regularly went anyway to arrange gold swaps and war-damage
settlements. Even though an isolationist Congress officially refused
to allow the U.S. Federal Reserve to participate in the BIS, or to
accept shares in it (which were instead held in trust by the First
National City Bank [owned by William Rockefeller]), the chairman of
the Fed quietly slipped over to Basel for important meetings. World
monetary policy was evidently too important to leave to national
politicians. During World War 11, when the nations, if not their
central banks, were belligerents, the BIS continued operating in
Basel, though the monthly meetings were temporarily suspended. In
1944, following Czech accusations that the BIS was laundering gold
that the Nazis had stolen from occupied Europe, the American
government backed a resolution at the Bretton Woods Conference calling
for the liquidation of the BIS. The naive idea was that the settlement
and monetary-clearing functions it provided could be taken over by the
new International Monetary Fund. What could not be replaced, however,
was what existed behind the mask of an international clearing house: a
supranational organization for setting and implementing global
monetary strategy, which could not be accomplished by a democratic,
United Nations-like international agency. The central bankers, not
about to let their club be taken from them, quietly snuffed out the
American resolution. After World War 11, the BIS reemerged as the main
clearing house for European currencies and, behind the scenes, the
favored meeting place of central bankers. When the dollar came under
attack in the 1960s, massive swaps of money and gold were arranged at
the BIS for the defense of the American currency. It was undeniably
ironic that, as the president of the BIS observed, "the United States,
which had wanted to kill the BIS, suddenly finds it indispensable." In
any case, the Fed has become a leading member of the club, with either
Chairman Paul Volcker or Governor Henry Wallich attending every "Basel
weekend." Originally, the central bankers sought complete anonymity
for their activities. Their headquarters were in an abandoned six
story hotel, the Grand et Savoy Hotel Universe, with an annex above
the adjacent Frey's Chocolate Shop. There purposely was no sign over
the door identifying the BIS, so visiting central bankers and gold
dealers used Frey's, which is across the street from the railroad
station, as a convenient landmark. It was in the wood-paneled rooms
above the shop and the hotel that decisions were reached to devalue or
defend currencies, to fix the price of gold, to regulate offshore
banking, and to raise or lower short-term interest rates. And though
they shaped "a new world economic order" through these deliberations,
according to Guido Carli, the governor of the Italian central bank,,
the public, even in Basel, remained almost totally unaware of the club
and its activities. In May 1977, however, the BIS gave up its
anonymity, against the better judgment of some of its members, in
exchange for more efficient headquarters. The new building, an
eighteen story-high circular skyscraper that rises over the medieval
city like some misplaced nuclear reactor, quickly became known as the
"Tower of Basel" and began attracting attention from tourists. "That
was the last thing we wanted," Dr. Fritz Leutwiler, its president told
me, when I interviewed him in 1983. "If it had been up to me, it never
would have been built." While we talked, he kept his eyes glued to the
Reuters screen in his office, which signaled currency fluctuations
around the globe.

Bank Jobs
Bank Jobs, Vacancies & Salary News in Banking & Financial
Markets.www.eFinancialCareers.co.uk
Links and other Related Articles

   Source: The Money Club by Journalist Edward J. Epstein
   [BBC History Video Channel] Banking with Hitler during World War
II: not only the Swiss Banks .

These related pages might interest you instead ...

   The Most Famous Shipwrecks in American History
   Celebrating Christmas in Distant Jungles During World War II
   Top 5 Action World War II Movies
   Polish Poetry of World War II (Part 3)
   Polish Poetry of World War II (Part 2)
   Polish Poetry of World War II (Part 4)

Bilderberg's head Viscount Davignon plays down the group's role in
setting the international agenda
Bill Clinton was featured at a Bilderberg meeting while he was
governor of Arkansas

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4290944.stm
" There need to be places where these people can think about the main
challenges ahead, co-ordinate where policies should be going, and find
out where there could be a consensus ".....Professor Kees van der Pijl
" Business influences society and politics influences society - that's
purely common sense ..." Will Hutton Economist who has attended a
Builderberg meeting.Will Hutton, an economic analyst and former
newspaper editor who attended a Bilderberg meeting in 1997, says
people take part in these networks in order to influence the way the
world works, to create what he calls "the international common sense"
about policy.
Inside the secretive Bilderberg Group
How much influence do private networks of the rich and powerful have
on government policies and international relations? One group, the
Bilderberg, has often attracted speculation that it forms a shadowy
global government. As part of the BBC's Who Runs Your World? series,
Bill Hayton tries to find out more.

The chairman of the secretive - he prefers the word private -
Bilderberg Group is 73-year-old Viscount Etienne Davignon, corporate
director and former European Commissioner. In his office, on a private
floor above the Brussels office of the Suez conglomerate lined with
political cartoons of himself, he told me what he thought of
allegations that Bilderberg is a global conspiracy secretly ruling the
world. "It is unavoidable and it doesn't matter," he says. "There will
always be people who believe in conspiracies but things happen in a
much more incoherent fashion."

Lack of publicity

In an extremely rare interview, he played down the importance of
Bilderberg in setting the international agenda. "What can come out of
our meetings is that it is wrong not to try to deal with a problem.
But a real consensus, an action plan containing points 1, 2 and 3? The
answer is no. People are much too sensible to believe they can do
that.  Every year since 1954, a small network of rich and powerful
people have held a discussion meeting about the state of the
trans-Atlantic alliance and the problems facing Europe and the US.
Organised by a steering committee of two people from each of about 18
countries, the Bilderberg Group (named after the Dutch hotel in which
it held its first meeting) brings together about 120 leading business
people and politicians. At this year's meeting in Germany, the
audience included the heads of the World Bank and European Central
Bank, Chairmen or Chief Executives from Nokia, BP, Unilever,
DaimlerChrysler and Pepsi - among other multi-national corporations,
editors from five major newspapers, members of parliament, ministers,
European commissioners, the crown prince of Belgium and the queen of
the Netherlands. "I don't think (we are) a global ruling class because
I don't think a global ruling class exists. I simply think it's people
who have influence interested to speak to other people who have
influence," Viscount Davignon says.  "Bilderberg does not try to reach
conclusions - it does not try to say 'what we should do'. Everyone
goes away with their own feeling and that allows the debate to be
completely open, quite frank - and to see what the differences are.
"Business influences society and politics influences society - that's
purely common sense. It's not that business contests the right of
democratically-elected leaders to lead". For Bilderberg's critics the
fact that there is almost no publicity about the annual meetings is
proof that they are up to no good. Jim Tucker, editor of a right-wing
newspaper, the American Free Press for example, alleges they organise
wars and elect and depose political leaders. He describes the group as
simply 'evil'. So where does the truth lie? Professor Kees van der
Pijl of Sussex University in Britain says such private networks of
corporate and political leaders play an informal but crucial role in
the modern world. "There need to be places where these people can
think about the main challenges ahead, co-ordinate where policies
should be going, and find out where there could be a consensus."

'Common sense'

Will Hutton, an economic analyst and former newspaper editor who
attended a Bilderberg meeting in 1997, says people take part in these
networks in order to influence the way the world works, to create what
he calls "the international common sense" about policy.  "On every
issue that might influence your business you will hear at first-hand
the people who are actually making those decisions and you will play a
part in helping them to make those decisions and formulating the
common sense," he says. And that "common sense" is one which supports
the interests of Bilderberg's main participants - in particular free
trade. Viscount Davignon says that at the annual meetings,
"automatically around the table you have internationalists" - people
who support the work of the World Trade Organisation, trans-Atlantic
co-operation and European integration.

Bilderberg meetings often feature future political leaders shortly
before they become household names. Bill Clinton went in 1991 while
still governor of Arkansas, Tony Blair was there two years later while
still an opposition MP. All the recent presidents of the European
Commission attended Bilderberg meetings before they were appointed.

'Secret Government'

This has led to accusations that the group pushes its favoured
politicians into high office. But Viscount Davignon says his steering
committee are simply excellent talent spotters. The steering committee
"does its best assessment of who are the bright new boys or girls in
the beginning phase of their career who would like to get known."
"It's not a total accident, but it's not a forecast and if they go
places it's not because of Bilderberg, it's because of themselves,"
Viscount Davignon says. But its critics say Bilderberg's selection
process gives an extra boost to aspiring politicians whose views are
friendly to big business. None of this, however, is easy to prove - or
disprove. Observers like Will Hutton argue that such private networks
have both good and bad sides. They are unaccountable to voters but, at
the same time, they do keep the international system functioning. And
there are limits to their power - a point which Bilderberg chairman
was keen to stress, "When people say this is a secret government of
the world I say that if we were a secret government of the world we
should be bloody ashamed of ourselves." Informal and private networks
like Bilderberg have helped to oil the wheels of global politics and
globalisation for the past half a century. In the eyes of critics they
have undermined democracy, but their supporters believe they are
crucial to modern democracy's success. And so long as business and
politics remain mutually dependent, they will continue to thrive.



http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/archived/moneyclub.htm

Ruling The World of Money HARPER'S November 1983 by Edward Jay
Epsteinhttp://www.edwardjayepstein.com/archived/moneyclub.htm

Ten times a year— once a mouth except in August and October— a small
elite of well dressed men arrives in Basel, Switzerland. Carrying
overnight bags and attache cases, they discreetly check into the Euler
Hotel, across from the railroad station. They have come to this sleepy
city from places as disparate as Tokyo, London, and Washington, D.C.,
for the regular meeting of the most exclusive, secretive, and powerful
supranational club in the world. Each of the dozen or so visiting
members has his own office at the club, with secure telephone lines to
his home country. The members are fully serviced by a permanent staff
of about 300, including chauffeurs, chefs, guards, messengers,
translators, stenographers, secretaries, and researchers. Also at
their disposal are a brilliant research unit and an ultramodern
computer, as well as a secluded country club with tennis courts and a
swimming pool, a few kilometers outside Basel. The membership of this
club is restricted to a handful of powerful men who determine daily
the interest rate, the availability of credit, and the money supply of
the banks in their own countries. They include the governors of the
U.S. Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the Bank of Japan, the
Swiss National Bank, and the German Bundesbank. The club controls a
bank with a $40 billion kitty in cash, government securities, and gold
that constitutes about one tenth of the world's available foreign
exchange. The profits earned just from renting out its hoard of gold
(second only to that of Fort Knox in value) are more than sufficient
to pay for the expenses of the entire organization. And the unabashed
purpose of its elite monthly meetings is to coordinate and, if
possible, to control all monetary activities in the industrialized
world. The place where this club meets in Basel is a unique financial
institution called the Bank for International Settlements-or more
simply, and appropriately, the BIS (pronounced "biz" in German).THE
BIS was originally established in May 1930 by bankers and diplomats of
Europe and the United States to collect and disburse Germany's World
War I reparation payments (hence its name). It was truly an
extraordinary arrangement. Although the BIS was organized as a
commercial bank with publicly held shares, its immunity from
government interference, and even taxation, in both peace and war was
guaranteed by an international treaty signed in The Hague in 1930.
Although all its depositors are central banks, the BIS has made a
profit on every transaction. And because it has been highly
profitable, it has required no subsidy or aid from any
government.Since it also provided, in Basel, a safe and convenient
repository for the gold holdings of the European central banks, it
quickly evolved into the bank for central banks. As the world
depression deepened in the Thirties and- financial panics flared up in
Austria, Hungary, Yugoslavia, and Germany, the governors in charge of
the key central banks feared that the entire global financial system
would collapse unless they could closely coordinate their rescue
efforts. The obvious meeting spot for this desperately needed
coordination was the BIS, where they regularly went anyway to arrange
gold swaps and war-damage settlements.Even though an isolationist
Congress officially refused to allow the U.S. Federal Reserve to
participate in the BIS, or to accept shares in it (which were instead
held in trust by the First National City Bank), the chairman of the
Fed quietly slipped over to Basel for important meetings. World
monetary policy was evidently too important to leave to national
politicians. During World War 11, when the nations, if not their
central banks, were belligerents, the BIS continued operating in
Basel, though the monthly meetings were temporarily suspended. In
1944, following Czech accusations that the BIS was laundering gold
that the Nazis had stolen from occupied Europe, the American
government backed a resolution at the Bretton Woods Conference calling
for the liquidation of the BIS. The naive idea was that the settlement
and monetary-clearing functions it provided could be taken over by the
new International Monetary Fund.What could not be replaced, however,
was what existed behind the mask of an international clearing house: a
supranational organization for setting and implementing global
monetary strategy, which could not be accomplished by a democratic,
United Nations-like international agency. The central bankers, not
about to let their club be taken from them, quietly snuffed out the
American resolution.After World War 11, the BIS reemerged as the main
clearing house for European currencies and, behind the scenes, the
favored meeting place of central bankers. When the dollar came under
attack in the 1960s, massive swaps of money and gold were arranged at
the BIS for the defense of the American currency. It was undeniably
ironic that, as the president of the BIS observed, "the United States,
which had wanted to kill the BIS, suddenly finds it indispensable." In
any case, the Fed has become a leading member of the club, with either
Chairman Paul Volcker or Governor Henry Wallich attending every "Basel
weekend."Originally, the central bankers sought complete anonymity for
their activities. Their headquarters were in an abandoned six story
hotel, the Grand et Savoy Hotel Universe, with an annex above the
adjacent Frey's Chocolate Shop. There purposely was no sign over the
door identifying the BIS, so visiting central bankers and gold dealers
used Frey's, which is across the street from the railroad station, as
a convenient landmark. It was in the wood-paneled rooms above the shop
and the hotel that decisions were reached to devalue or defend
currencies, to fix the price of gold, to regulate offshore banking,
and to raise or lower short-term interest rates. And though they
shaped "a new world economic order" through these deliberations,
according to Guido Carli, the governor of the Italian central bank,,
the public, even in Basel, remained almost totally unaware of the club
and its activities.In May 1977, however, the BIS gave up its
anonymity, against the better judgment of some of its members, in
exchange for more efficient headquarters. The new building, an
eighteen story-high circular skyscraper that rises over the medieval
city like some misplaced nuclear reactor, quickly became known as the
"Tower of Basel" and began attracting attention from tourists. "That
was the last thing we wanted," Dr. Fritz Leutwiler, its president told
me, when I interviewed him in 1983. "If it had been up to me, it never
would have been built." While we talked, he kept his eyes glued to the
Reuters screen in his office, which signaled currency fluctuations
around the globe.Despite its irksome visibility, the new headquarters
does have the advantages of luxurious space and Swiss efficiency. The
building is completely air-conditioned and self-contained, with its
own nuclear-bomb shelter in the sub-basement, a triply redundant
fire-extinguishing system (so outside firemen never have to be called
in), a private hospital, and some twenty miles of subterranean
archives. "We try to provide a complete clubhouse for central bankers
... a home away from home," said Gunther Schleiminger, the
supercompetent general manager, as he arranged a rare tour of the
headquarters for me. The top floor, with a panoramic view of three
countries, Germany, France, and Switzerland, is a deluxe restaurant,
used only to serve the members a buffet dinner when they arrive on
Sunday evenings to begin the "Basel weekends." Aside from those ten
occasions, this floor remains ghostly empty.On the floor below,
Schleiminger and his small staff sit in spacious offices,
administering the day-today details of the BIS and monitoring
activities on lower floors as if they were running an out-of-season
hotel. The next three floors down are suites of offices reserved for
the central bankers. All are decorated in three colors— beige, brown,
and tan— and each has a similar modernistic lithograph over the desk.
Each office also has coded speed-dial telephones that at a push of a
button directly connect the club members to their offices in their
central banks back home. The completely deserted corridors and empty
offices, with nameplates on the doors and freshly sharpened pencils in
cups and neat stacks of incoming papers on the desks, are again
reminiscent of a ghost town. When the members arrive for their
forthcoming meeting in November, there will be a remarkable
transformation, according to Schleiminger, with multilingual
receptionists and secretaries at every desk, and constant meetings and
briefings.On the lower floors are the BIS computer, which is directly
linked to the computers of the member central banks and provides
instantaneous access to data about the global monetary situation, and
the actual bank, where eighteen traders, mainly from England and
Switzerland, continually roll over short" term loans on the Eurodollar
markets and guard against foreign-exchange losses (by simultaneously
selling the currency in which the loan is due). On yet another floor,
gold traders are constantly on the telephone arranging loans of the
bank's gold to international arbitragers, thus allowing central banks
to make interest on gold deposits.Occasionally there is an
extraordinary situation, such as the decision to sell gold for the
Soviet Union, which requires a decision from the "governors," as the
BIS staff calls the central bankers. But most of the banking is
routine, computerized, and riskless. Indeed, the BIS is prohibited by
its statutes from making anything but short-term loans. Most are for
thirty days or less that are government guaranteed or backed with gold
deposited at the BIS. The profits the BIS receives for essentially
turning over the billions of dollars deposited by the central banks
amounted to $162 million last year.As skilled as the BIS may be at all
this, the central banks themselves have highly competent staffs
capable of investing their deposits. The German Bundesbank, for
example, has a superb international trading department and 15,000
employees— at least twenty times as many as the BIS staff. Why then do
the Bundesbank and the other central banks transfer some $40 billion
of deposits to the BIS and thereby permit it to make such a profit?One
answer is of course secrecy. By commingling part of their reserves in
what amounts to a gigantic mutual fund of short term investments, the
central banks created' a convenient screen behind which they can hide
their own deposits and withdrawals in financial centers around the
world. And the central banks are apparently willing to pay a high fee
to use the cloak of the BIS.There is, however, another reason why the
central banks regularly transfer deposits to the BIS: they want to
provide it with a large enough profit to support the other services it
provides. Despite its name, the BIS is far more than a bank. From the
outside, it seems to be a small, technical organization. Just
eighty-six of its 298 employees are ranked as professional staff. But
the BIS is not a monolithic institution: artfully concealed within the
shell of an international bank, like a series of Chinese boxes one
inside another, are the real groups and services the central bankers
need-and pay to support.The first box inside the bank is the board of
directors, drawn from the eight European central banks (England,
Switzerland, Germany, Italy, France, Belgium, Sweden, and the
Netherlands), which meets on the Tuesday morning of each "Basel
weekend." The board also meets twice a year in Basel with the central
banks of other nations. It provides a formal apparatus for dealing
with European governments and international bureaucracies like the IMF
or the European Economic Community (the Common Market). The board
defines the rules and territories of the central banks with the goal
of preventing governments from meddling in their purview. For example,
a few years ago, when the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development in Paris appointed a low-level committee to study the
adequacy of bank reserves, the central bankers regarded it as poaching
on their monetary turf and turned to the BIS board for assistance. The
board then arranged for a high-level committee, under the head of
Banking Supervision at the Bank of England, to preempt the issue. The
OECD got the message and abandoned its effort.To deal with the world
at large, there is another Chinese box called the Group of Ten, or
simply the "G-10." It actually has eleven full-time members,
representing the eight European central banks, the U.S. Fed, the Bank
of Canada, and the Bank of Japan. It also has one unofficial member:
the governor of the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority. This powerful
group, which controls most of the transferable money in the world,
meets for long sessions on the Monday afternoon of the "Basel
weekend." It is here that broader policy issues, such as interest
rates, money-supply growth, economic stimulation (or suppression), and
currency rates are discussed-if not always resolved.Directly under the
G-10, and catering to all its special needs, is a small unit called
the "Monetary and Economic Development Department," which is, in
effect, its private think tank. The head of this unit, the Belgian
economist Alexandre Larnfalussy, sits in on all the G-10 meetings,
then assigns the appropriate research and analysis to the half dozen
economists on his staff. This unit also produces the occasional
blue-bound "economic papers" that provide central bankers from
Singapore to Rio de Janeiro, even though they are not BIS members,
with a convenient party line. For example, a recent paper called
"Rules versus Discretion: An Essay on Monetary Policy in an
Inflationary Environment," politely defused the Milton Friedmanesque
dogma and suggested a more pragmatic form of monetarism. And last May,
just before the Williamsburg summit conference, the unit released a
blue book on currency intervention by central banks that laid down the
boundaries and circumstances for such actions. When there are internal
disagreements, these blue books can express positions sharply contrary
to those held by some BIS members, but generally they reflect a
consensus of the G-10.Over A bratwurst-and-beer lunch on the top floor
of the Bundesbank, which is located in a huge concrete building
(called "the bunker") outside of Frankfurt, Karl Otto Pohl, its
president and a ranking governor of the BIS, complained to me in 1983
about the repetitiousness of the meetings during the "Basel weekend."
"First, there is the meeting on the Gold Pool, then, after lunch, the
same faces show up at the G-10, and the next day there is the board
which excludes the U.S., Japan, and Canada, and the European Community
meeting which excludes Sweden and Switzerland." He concluded: "They
are long and strenuous-and they are not where the real business gets
done." This occurs, as Pohl explained over our leisurely lunch, at
still another level of the BIS: "a sort of inner club."

The inner club is made up of the half dozen or so powerful central
bankers who find themselves more or less in the same monetary boat:
along with Pohl are Volcker and Wallich from the Fed, Leutwiler from
the Swiss National Bank, Lamberto Dini of the Bank of Italy, Haruo
Mayekawa of the Bank of Japan, and the retired governor of the Bank of
England, Lord Gordon Richardson (who had presided over the G-10
meetings for the past ten years). They are all comfortable speaking
English; indeed, Pohl recounted how he has found himself using English
with Leutwiler, though both are of course native German-speakers. And
they all speak the same language when it comes to governments, having
shared similar experiences. Pohl and Volcker were both under
secretaries of their respective treasuries; they worked closely with
each other, and with Lord Richardson, in the futile attempts to defend
the dollar and the pound in the 1960s. Dini was at the IMF in
Washington, dealing with many of the same problems. Pohl had worked
closely with Leutwiler in neighboring Switzerland for two decades.
"Some of us are very old friends," Pohl said. Far more important,
these men all share the same set of well-articulated values 'about
money.The prime value, which also seems to demarcate the inner club
from the rest of the BIS members, is the firm belief that central
banks should act independently of their home governments. This is an
easy position for Leutwiler to hold, since the Swiss National Bank is
privately owned (the only central bank that is not government owned)
and completely autonomous. ("I don't think many people know the name
of the president of Switzerland-even in Switzerland," Pohl joked, "but
everyone in Europe has heard of Leutwiler.") Almost as independent is
the Bundesbank; as its president, Pohl is not required to consult with
government officials or to answer the questions of Parliament-even
about such critical issues as raising interest rates. He even refuses
to fly to Basel in a government plane, preferring instead to drive in
his Mercedes limousine.The Fed is only a shade less independent than
the Bundesbank: Volcker is expected to make periodic visits to
Congress and at least to take calls from the White House-but he need
not follow their counsel. While in theory the Bank of Italy is under
government control, in practice it is an elite institution that acts
autonomously and often resists the government. (In 1979, its then
governor, Paolo Baffi, was threatened with arrest, but the inner club,
using unofficial channels, rallied to his support.) Although the exact
relationship between the Bank of Japan and the Japanese government
purposely remains inscrutable, even to the BIS governors, its
chairman, Mayekawa, at least espouses the principle of autonomy.
Finally, though the Bank of England is under the thumb of the British
government, Lord Richardson was accepted by the inner club because of
his personal adherence to this defining principle. But his successor,
Robin Leigh-Pemberton, lacking the years of business and personal
contact, probably won't be admitted to the inner circle.In any case,
the line is drawn at the Bank of England. The Bank of France is seen
as a puppet of the French government; to a lesser degree, the
remaining European banks are also perceived by the inner club as
extensions of their respective governments, and thus remain on the
outside.A second and closely related belief of the inner club is that
politicians should not be trusted to decide the fate of the
international monetary system. When Leutwiler became president of the
BIS in 1982, he insisted that no government official be allowed to
visit during a "Basel weekend." He recalled that in 1968, U.S.
Treasury undersecretary Fred Deming had been in Basel and stopped in
at the bank. "When word got around that an American Treasury official
was at the BIS," Leutwiler said, "bullion traders, speculating that
the U.S. was about to sell its gold, began a panic in the market."
Except for the annual meeting in June (called "the Jamboree" by the
staff ), when the ground floor of the BIS headquarters is open to
official visitors, Leutwiler has tried to enforce his rule strictly.
"To be frank," he I have no use for politicians. They lack the
judgment of central bankers." This effectively sums up the common
antipathy of the inner club toward "government muddling," as Pohl puts
it.The inner-club members also share a strong preference for
pragmatism and flexibility over any ideology, whether that of Lord
Keynes or Milton Friedman. Rather than resorting to rhetoric and
invoking principles, the inner club seeks any remedy that will relieve
a crisis. For example, earlier this year, when Brazil failed to pay
back on time a BIS loan that was guaranteed by the central banks, the
inner club quietly decided to extend the deadline instead of
collecting the money from the guarantors. "We are constantly engaged
in a balancing act-without a safety net," Leutwiler explained.THE
FINAL and by far the most important belief of the inner club is the
conviction that when the bell tolls for any single central bank, it
tolls for them all. When Mexico faced bankruptcy in the early
eighties. The issue for the inner club was not the welfare of that
country but, as Dini put it, "the stability of the entire banking
system." For months Mexico had been borrowing overnight funds from the
interbank market in New York-as every bank recognized by the Fed is
permitted to do-to pay the interest on its $80 billion external debt.
Each night it had to borrow more money to repay the interest on the
previous night's transactions, and, according to Dini, by August
Mexico had borrowed nearly one quarter of all the "Fed Funds," as
these overnight loans between banks are called.The Fed was caught in a
dilemma: if it suddenly stepped in and forbade Mexico from further
using the interbank market, Mexico would be unable to repay its
enormous debt the next day, and 25 percent of the entire banking
system's ready funds might be frozen. But if the Fed permitted Mexico
to continue borrowing in New York, in a matter of months it would suck
in most of the interbank funds, forcing the Fed to expand drastically
the supply of money.It was clearly an emergency for the inner club.
After speaking to Miguel Mancera, director of the Banco de Mexico,
Volcker immediately called Leutwiler, who was vacationing in the Swiss
mountain village of Grison. Leutwiler realized that the entire system
was confronted by a financial time bomb: even though the IMF was
prepared to extend $4.5 billion to Mexico to relieve the pressure on
its long-term debt, it would require months of paperwork to get
approval for the loan. And Mexico needed an immediate 1.85 billion
dollar loan to get out of the interbank market, which Mancera had
agreed to do. But in less than forty eight hours, Leutwiler had called
the members of the inner club and arranged the temporary bridging
loan.While this $1.85 billion appeared in the financial press to have
come from the BIS, virtually all the funds came from the central banks
in the inner club. Half came directly from the United States -$600
million from the Treasury's exchange-equalization fund and $325
million from the Fed's coffers; the remaining $925 million mainly from
deposits of the Bundesbank, Swiss National Bank, Bank of England, Bank
of Italy, and Bank of Japan, deposits that were specifically
guaranteed by these central banks, though advanced pro forma by the
BIS (with a token amount advanced by the BIS itself against the
collateral of Mexican gold). The BIS undertook virtually no risk in
this rescue operation; it merely provided a convenient cloak for the
inner club. Otherwise, its members, especially Volcker, would have had
to take the political heat individually for what appeared to be the
rescue of an underdeveloped country. In fact, they were true to their
paramount values: rescuing the banking system itself.Inner club
members publicly pay lip service to the ideal of preserving the
character of the BIS and not turning it into a lender of last resort
for the world at large. Privately, however, they will undoubtedly
continue their maneuvers to protect the banking system at whatever
point in the world it seems most vulnerable. After all, it is
ultimately the central banks' money at risk, not the BIS's. And the
inner club will also keep using the BIS as its public mask, and pay
the requisite price for the disguise.

http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/archived/moneyclub.htmhttp://www.edwardjayepstein.com/current.htm

This is a totally commerce-free site. No charges, no advertising.
The webmistress cannot be reached

Quention of the day Who Set The Reichstag On Fire-- And Brought Hitler To Power?

Archive: http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/archive.htm

HOLLYWOOD LOGIC

MURDER

MAMMON

WALL STREETCONFIDENTIAL

Hollywood Economist

WAR OF THE MOLES

ILLUSION

EXTREME ENTERTAINMENT

CYBERBOOKS

NY TIMES EXCLUSIVES


Rothschild International Banking Family who are Russian Khazars who
were originally  from a country called Khazaria, which occupied the
land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea which is now
predominantly occupied by Georgia and associates which also
includesmembers of the Royal Families of Europe, and the following
family names:  Astor; Bundy; Collins; duPont; Freeman; Kennedy;
Morgan;  Sachs, Oppenheimer; Rockefeller; Sassoon; Schiff; Taft; and
Van Duyn.are responsible for over 3 billion mass murders in the last
250 years through their manipulation, finance and control of wars and
conflicts, starvation, malnutrition, slavery, famine, holocausts,
genocide,  ethnic cleansing, disease and other methods are set to be
indited in the International Court of Justice as the biggest war
criminal the world has ever known after 30 years on investigations
have been complete by a special investigation team funded by the real
Jewish business people whose families were murdered in Death Camps by
poisons originally designed to kill insects made and produced in
factories belonging to these evil criminally insane Mass Murderers
Rothschild Banking Family Friends and business associates murderess
control of over three billion deaths on the planet earth for over 250
years. These people control the central banks in most major countries
around the world which includes The USA Federal Reserve Bank, the Bank
of England, the Federal Reserve Bank of Australia, the Federal Reserve
Bank of New Zealand, the Canadian Federal Reserve Bank and many more.
In fact there is only about six large countries they do not control
the central banks of which includes Iran. That is of the many reasons
why they are determined to make war against Iran which will be the
third world war, which will be used to create chaos and fear by
everyone in the world so that everyone willing agrees to their One
World Order plan with One Government, One Army and One Bank to control
the world with everyone on the world will willingly have Micro Chips
implanted in them which will track their every move  on the planet and
have all their personal information and money on  these RDIF Radio
Tracking Chips. In anyone wants to complain about the way the world is
run by these powerful elite, then they will simply just term off their
chip and they will not be able to buy food, obtain transport, get into
their house, or do anything else as the whole of society will be based
around the use of these micro chips. They have already named this "The
Brave New World" which one of their paid authors Arthur Huxley stated
in in book.
Rothschild Banking Family Friends and business associates murderess
control on the planet earth for over 200 years.
These evil, criminally insane Russian Khazars who were originally
from a country called Khazaria, which occupied the land locked between
the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea which is now predominantly occupied
by Georgia, and are fraudulent pretending to be Jews (which they are
not real or genuine Jews at all), so they can fraudulently claim
control of Palestine and Israel for themselves have been responsible
for the manipulation, and have taken over London and Britain, as their
head financial office, Washington and the USA as their main Military
office, and the Vatican City as the religious and spiritual office,
using each county's armies they control central banks in as their own
personal armies to fight what are really "bankers wars", not real
countries wars for power, money, gold, oil, land ownership and control
and control and ownership of all the natural resources on the on
planet earth, control, financing, execution and masterminding the
deaths of over one billion people on plant earth since the 1700's be
methods for having the shot, blown up, starved to death, manipulated
diseases  and convincing them that they should kill each other over
disputes over money, religion, land, power, oil, gold, and racial
hatred and any other possible way of getting people to fighteach other
and/or paying people to fight and kill each other, all for the purpose
of profit, greed and power, with the long term aim of obtaining
control and/or ownership of  all  the world's money, gold, silver,
oil, uranium and other precious metals and natural resources, the
world's food supply, the world's land and seas and rivers, with the
long term aim of becoming the sole rulers of a one World Government
and Powerbase, which has one World Bank and One World Army. In a world
were the whole world in run by one big computer monitored by a
satellite and every man women and child have a RIDF radio controlled
Mirco Chip implanted into the that monitors every move, action and
transaction they make with every part of society's activities being
fully dependant on on this micro chip being active, and all money on
these chips, everyone' ID and all their personal information will be
on these chips and if at anytime anyone dares to protest of what the
One World Government are doing tot he people on earth or violate what
the controllers of the One World Government want, they will simply
just turn off their chip. It will also be a world where the One World
Government will control the supply, production, coding, labelling and
licensing of all food, herbs, plants, animals, birds, fish, nuts,
fruits, vegetables etc under their One World Controlled Codex
Alimentarious Commission, their United Nations World Trade
Organisation (WHO), their United Nations and their Food and
Agricultural Organisation (FAO) so that all intake, production and
manufacture, licensing and labelling off food, herbs and nutrients
will be controlled by them and only foods, herbs and nutrients that
are listed on their approved list and the the nutrients and pesticide
levels approved by them are allowed to be consumed on earth with the
overall effect that over 3 billion people will die of starvation,
malnutrition and disease through low levels of healthy and naturally
nutritious nutrients, vitamins and minerals in the food and high
levels of dangerous toxic chemicals and pesticides, growth hormones
and geneticly engineered ingredients in the food for the general
population, with only the very elite at the top of their Illuminati
organisation and their families being able to purchase and grow
healthy and natural food where they will have a proper balanced
nutrients, vitamins and minerals.
http://www.coverups.com/jfk/who.htm
Who Killed Kennedy And Why? - Coverups.com
In reality
In reality it does not matter who one believes was the actual physical
killer or killers that shot President John F Kennedy, what matters
moire is who were the motivators and organisers of his assassination
and who had most to gain from his untimely death. When one analyses
all the recorded public and private information there leaves little
doubt that  President John F Kennedy was murdered for and on behalf of
the same group of people, the International Banking families,
businessmen and industrialists all working for and/or in partnership
with the infamous international Russian Tsar Rothschild Banking
Family,
{Note:The Rothschilds have been in control of the world for a very
long time, their tentacles reaching into many aspects of our daily
lives, as is documented in the following timeline.  However, before
you jump to the timeline, please read this invaluable introduction
which will tell you who the Rothschilds are as oppose to who they
claim to be.
The Rothschilds claim that they are Jewish, when in fact they are
Khazars.  They are from a country called Khazaria, which occupied the
land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea which is now
predominantly occupied by Georgia.  The reason the Rothschilds claim
to be Jewish is that the Khazars under the instruction of the King,
converted to the Jewish faith in 740 A.D., but of course that did not
include converting their Asiatic Mongolian genes to the genes of the
Jewish people.
You will find that approximately 90% of people in the world today who
call themselves Jews are actually Khazars, or as they like to be
known, Ashkenazi Jews.  These people knowingly lie to the world with
their claims that the land of Israel is theirs by birthright, when in
actual fact their real homeland is over 800 miles away in Georgia.
So, next time you hear an Israeli Prime Minister bleating about the
so-called persecution of the Jews, consider this, every Prime Minister
of Israel has been an Ashkenazi Jew.  Therefore when all these Prime
Ministers have curried favour with the West for their re-establishment
of a Jewish homeland, they have knowingly and deliberately lied to
you, as they were never from that region, and they well know it,
because it is they who call themselves Ashkenazi Jews.
The Book of Revelation, Chapter 2, Verse 9, states the following which
would appear to be about these Ashkenazi Jews:
"I know thy works, and tribulation and poverty, (but thou art rich)
and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not,
butare the synagogue of Satan."
The most wealthy bloodline in the world bar none and the leader of the
Ashkenazi Jews in the world today is the Rothschild family.  As you
will see in the timeline, the Rothschilds have obtained this position
through lies, manipulation and murder.  Their bloodline also extends
into the Royal Families of Europe, and the following family names:
Astor; Bundy; Collins; duPont; Freeman; Kennedy; Morgan; Oppenheimer;
Rockefeller; Sassoon; Schiff; Taft; and Van Duyn.
However, these are not the only bloodlines to worry about.  You are
probably aware of the centuries old pratice undertaken by many
Ashkenazi Jews whereby they would change their name, in order for them
to appear part of the dominant race of the country in which they
lived, so as they could obtain influential positions in that country,
which they would then exploit to serve their real masters elsewhere.
There is plenty of evidence to prove the Rothschilds continue that
deceptive tradition.
Furthermore the Rothschilds are known to sire many children secretly
that they can put into positions of power when required.  This started
with the very first man who took the name Rothschild, who had a secret
sixth son.  Finally, remember the world is a diverse place, I could if
I wanted change my name to Rothschild, or any of the names listed
above, and that would not make me part of this family anymore than
converting to Judaism in 740 A.D. will make these Ashkenazis Jewish.
Ashkenazi Jew, David Ben-Gurion, one of the father founders of Israel
and its first Prime Minister, candidly describes Zionist aims in his
diary (21 May 1948) as follows, “The Achilles heel of the Arab
coalition is the Lebanon. Muslim supremacy in this country is
artificial and can easily be overthrown. A Christian State ought to be
set up there, with its southern frontier on the river Litani. We would
sign a treaty of alliance with this State. Thus when we have broken
the strength of the Arab Legion and bombed Amman, we could wipe out
Trans-Jordan, after that Syria would fall. And if Egypt still dared to
make war on us, we would bomb Port Said, Alexandria and Cairo.
We should thus end the war and would have but paid to Egypt, Assyria
and Chaldea on behalf of our ancestors.”
1949:  On October 1, Mao Tse Tsung declares the founding of the
People's Republic Of China in Tiananmen Square, Beijing.  He is funded
by Rothschild created Communism in Russia and also the following
Rothschild agents:  Solomon Adler, a former United States Treasury
official who was a Soviet Spy; Israel Epstein, the son of a Jewish
Bolshevik imprisoned by the Tsar in Russia for trying to forment a
revolution there; and Frank Coe, a leading official of the Rothschild
owned IMF.
1950: Israel passes their law of return, guaranteeing every Jew
worldwide the right to dwell in the state of Israel, however the
Palestinians even though they had lived there for 1300 years, were
denied that right.
John Davitt, former chief of the Justice Department's internal
security section notes that the Israeli intelligence service is the
second most active in the United States after the Soviets and of
course both Israel and the Soviet Union are run by an Ashkenazi Jewish
leadership.
1951: On 1 April the Israeli Secret Intelligence Agency the Mossad,
which will go on to terrorize the world, is formed. The motto of the
Mossad is probably the most disgusting secret service motto in the
world, it is,
"By Way Of Deception,  Thou Shalt Do War."
1953: N. M. Rothschild & Sons found the British Newfoundland
Corporation Limited to develop 60,000 square miles of land in
Newfoundland, Canada, which comprised a power station to harness the
power of the Hamilton (later renamed Churchill) Falls. At the time
this was the largest construction project ever to be undertaken by a
private company.
1954: "The Lavon Affair."  Israeli agents recruit Egyptian citizens of
Jewish descent to bomb Western targets in Egypt, and plant evidence to
frame Arabs, in an apparent attempt to upset American/Egyptian
relations. Israeli defense minister, Ashkenazi Jew, Pinhas Lavon is
eventually removed from office, though many think real responsibility
lay with David Ben-Gurion.
A hidden microphone planted by the Israelis is discovered in the
Office of the US Ambassador in Tel Aviv.
1955: Edmond de Rothschild founds Compagnie Financiere, Paris.
1956: Telephone taps are found connected to two telephones in the
residence of the US military attaché in Tel Aviv.
1957: James de Rothschild dies and it is reported (by the Rothschild
owned media) that he bequeaths a large sum of money to the state of
Israel to pay for the construction of their parliament building, the
Knesset. He states that the Knesset should be, "a symbol, in the eyes
of all men, of the permanence of the State of Israel." On page 219 of
his book, "Tales of the British Aristocracy," L.G. Pine, the Editor of
Burke’s Peerage, states that the Jews, "have made themselves so
closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are
unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual. So closely linked are the
Jews and the lords that a blow against the Jews in this country would
not be possible without injuring the aristocracy also." Maurice de
Rothschild dies in Paris.
1962: de Rothschild Frères establishes Imétal as an umbrella company
for all their mineral mining interests.
Frederic Morton publishes his book, The Rothschilds, in which he states,
"Though they control scores of industrial, commercial, mining and
tourist corporations, not one bears the name Rothschild. Being private
partnerships, the family houses never need to, and never do, publish a
single public balance sheet, or any other report of their financial
condition." This attitude reveals the true aim of the Rothschilds, to
eliminate all competition and create their own worldwide monopoly.
1963: On June 4th President John F. Kennedy (the 35th President of the
United States 1961 – 1963) signs Executive Order 11110 which returned
to the U.S. government the power to issue currency, without going
through the Rosthchilds owned Federal Reserve. Less than 6 months
later on November 22nd , president Kennedy is assassinated by the
Rothschilds for the same reason as they assassinated President Abraham
Lincoln in 1865, he wanted to print American money for the American
people, as oppose to for the benefit of a money grabbing war mongering
foreign elite.
Another, and probably the primary, reason for Kennedy's assassination
is however, the fact that he made it quite clear to Israeli Prime
Minister, David Ben-Gurion, that under no circumstances would he agree
to Israel becoming a nuclear state.  The Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz on
February 5, 1999, in a review of, Avner Cohen's book, "Israel and the
Bomb," states the following,
"The murder of American President John F. Kennedy brought to an abrupt
end the massive pressure being applied by the U.S. administration on
the government of Israel to discontinue the nuclear program...The book
implied that, had Kennedy remained alive, it is doubtful whether
Israel would today have a nuclear option."
Edmond de Rothschild establishes La Compagnie Financière Edmond de
Rothschild (LCF), in Switzerland as a venture capital house. This
later develops into an investment bank and asset management company
with many affiliates. He also marries his wife Nadine and they have a
son, Benjamin de Rothschild.
1965: Israel illegally obtains enriched uranium from NUMEC (Nuclear
Materials and Equipment Corporation).
1967: The treatment of the Palestinians by the Zionist Jews, finally
ignites enough anger in the Arab world for Egypt, Jordan and Syria to
mobilise on Israel's borders.  All of these three countries are
suddenly attacked by Israel and as a result the Sinai which included
Gaza was stolen from Egypt, and the West Bank and the Jordan River
stolen from Jordan.
As a result of this, on June 8, the Israelis launch an attack on the
USS Liberty with Israeli aircraft and motor torpedo boats, in an
effort to blame it on Egypt, to bring America into the war on their
side, and of course follow to the letter, their Mossad motto, "By Way
Of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War."As a result of their attack, 34
American servicemen were killed and 174 wounded.  Israel lies as
usual, claiming it mistook this warship that was flying a large United
States flag, for an ancient out-of-service Egyptian horse carrier El
Quseir, that was 180 feet shorter.  They also claim the ship was in
the war zone, when it was actually in international waters, far from
any fighting.  The Israeli's attack on this warship lasts for 75
minutes during which time they shoot up one of the United States
flags, resulting in the sailors desperately raising another one. In
the aftermath of this attack, the American sailors who survived are
warned by the United States military not to discuss the matter with
anyone due to, "national security."  This story gets no prominence in
the Rothschild controlled mainstream media and as usual Israel is in
no way even rebuked for their crimes by their subservient country of
America.
1913: Jacob Schiff sets up the Anti Defamation League (ADL) in the
United States.  This organisation is formed to slander anyone who
questions or challenges the Rothschild global conspiracy as,
"anti-semitic."
1914:  The start of World War I.  In this war, the German Rothschilds
loan money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds loan money to the
British, and the French Rothschilds loan money to the French.
Futhermore, the Rothschilds have control of the three European news
agencies, Wolff (est. 1849) in Germany, Reuters (est. 1851) in
England, and Havas (est. 1835) in France.
The Rothschilds use Wolff to manipulate the German people into a
fervour for war. From around this time, the Rothschilds are rarely
reported in the media, because they own the media.
1914:  The start of World War I.  In this war, the German Rothschilds
loan money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds loan money to the
British, and the French Rothschilds loan money to the French.
Futhermore, the Rothschilds have control of the three European news
agencies, Wolff (est. 1849) in Germany, Reuters (est. 1851) in
England, and Havas (est. 1835) in France.
The Rothschilds use Wolff to manipulate the German people into a
fervour for war. From around this time, the Rothschilds are rarely
reported in the media, because they own the media.
1916:  On June 4, Ashkenazi Jew, Louis Dembitz Brandeis is appointed
to the Supreme Court of the United States by President Wilson as per
his agreed blackmail payment to Samuel Untermyer some three years
earlier.  Justice Brandeis is also the elected leader of the Executive
Committee for Zionist Affairs, a position he has held since 1914.
The middle of World War II.  Germany were winning the war as they were
being financed by the Rothschilds to a greater extent than France,
Italy and England, because Rothschilds, did not want to support the
Tsar in Russia, and of course Russia was on the same side as France,
Italy and England.
Then a significant event occurred.  Germany, although they were
winning the war and not one foreign soldier had set foot on their
soil, offered armistice to Britain with no requirement of reparations.
 The Rothschilds were anxious to make sure this didn't happen as they
were expecting to make far more money off this war, so they played
another card they had up their sleeve.
Whilst the British were considering Germany's offer, Rothschild agent
Louis Brandeis sends a Zionist delegation from America to Britain to
promise to bring America into the war on the side of the British,
provided the British agree to give the land of Palestine to the
Rothschilds.
The Rothschilds wanted Palestine for the following reason.  They had
great business interests in the far east and desired their own state
in that area along with their own military which they could use as an
aggressor to any state that threatened those interests.
The British subsequently agree to the deal for Palestine and the
Zionists in London contact their counterparts in America and inform
them of this fact.  Suddenly all the major newspapers in America that
up to that point had been pro-German turned on Germany running
propaganda pieces such as:  German soldiers were killing Red Cross
Nurses; German soldiers were cutting off babies hands, etc, in order
to manipulate the American public against the Germans. This same year,
President Woodrow Wilson, ran a re-election campaign under the slogan,
"Re-Elect The Man Who Will Keep Your Sons Out Of The War." On December
12, Germany and her allies offer peace terms to end the war.
1917:  The Rothschilds order the execution by the Bolsheviks they
control, of Tsar Nicholas II and his entire family in Russia, even
though the Tsar had already abdicated on March 2.  This is both to get
control of the country and an act of revenge for Tsar Alexander I
blocking their world government plan in 1815 at the Congress Of
Vienna, and Tsar Alexander II siding with President Abraham Lincoln in
1864.
It is extremely important for them to slaughter the entire family
including women and children in order to make good on the promise to
do so made by Nathan Mayer Rothschild in 1815.  It is designed to show
the world what happens if you ever attempt to cross the Rothschilds.
As a result of Germany's offer of peace the Rothschild war machine
goes into overdrive in America, spreading propaganda which leads to
President Wilson under the instructions of American Zionist leader and
Supreme Court Justice, Louis Dembitz Brandeis, reneging on his promise
to the electorate and taking America into the first world war on April
6.
As per the Rothschild Zionist promise to the British, to take America
into the war, they decide they want something in writing from the
British to prove that they will uphold their side of the bargain.  The
British Foreign Secretary, Arthur James Balfour therefore drafts a
letter which is commonly known as the, "Balfour Declaration," which is
reprinted below.
Foreign Office
November 2nd, 1917
Dear Lord Rothschild, I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on
behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of
sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to,
and approved by, the Cabinet. His Majesty's Government view with
favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the
Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the
achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing
shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of
existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and
political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. I should be
grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the
Zionist Federation.
Yours sincerely, Arthur James Balfour
The Rothschilds order the execution by the Bolsheviks they control, of
Tsar Nicholas II and his entire family in Russia, even though the Tsar
had already abdicated on March 2.  This is both to get control of the
country and an act of revenge for Tsar Alexander I blocking their
world government plan in 1815 at the Congress Of Vienna, and Tsar
Alexander II siding with President Abraham Lincoln in 1864. It is
extremely important for them to slaughter the entire family including
women and children in order to make good on the promise to do so made
by Nathan Mayer Rothschild in 1815.  It is designed to show the world
what happens if you ever attempt to cross the Rothschilds.
1962: de Rothschild Frères establishes Imétal as an umbrella company
for all their mineral mining interests.
Frederic Morton publishes his book, The Rothschilds, in which he states,
"Though they control scores of industrial, commercial, mining and
tourist corporations, not one bears the name Rothschild. Being private
partnerships, the family houses never need to, and never do, publish a
single public balance sheet, or any other report of their financial
condition."
This attitude reveals the true aim of the Rothschilds, to eliminate
all competition and create their own worldwide monopoly.
1963: On June 4th President John F. Kennedy (the 35th President of the
United States 1961 – 1963) signs Executive Order 11110 which returned
to the U.S. government the power to issue currency, without going
through the Rosthchilds owned Federal Reserve.
Less than 6 months later on November 22nd , president Kennedy is
assassinated by the Rothschilds for the same reason as they
assassinated President Abraham Lincoln in 1865, he wanted to print
American money for the American people, as oppose to for the benefit
of a money grabbing war mongering foreign elite.
}
who is said to personally own and/or control over half of the whole
world's wealth, natural energy and food resources, commodities like
gold and silver reserves and the whole of the world's money supply and
central banks that control that money supply with only a few countries
in the world left they do not control the money supply of being
associated and related families, International  and organisations that
organised the assassination of
1. USA President Abraham Lincoln in 1865; Lincoln (1809–1865) was shot
on the evening of April 14, 1865, as he sat in the presidential box at
Ford's Theatre in Washington, D.C., watching a performance of the play
Our American Cousin. The assassin was actor John Wilkes Booth
(1838–1865). After shooting Lincoln, Booth jumped onto the stage,
falling and breaking a leg. Wilkes limped away, calling out, "Sic
semper tyrannis" (a Latin phrase meaning "Thus always to tyrants")....
2. USA President James Garfield in 1881;
3. USA President William McKinley in 1901;
Note: 1913: Jacob Schiff sets up the Anti Defamation League (ADL) in
the United States.  This organisation is formed to slander anyone who
questions or
challenges the Rothschild global conspiracy as, "anti-semitic."
4. The assassination on 28 June 1914 of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of
Austria, the heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary,
   is seen as the immediate trigger of the 1st World War;
5. 1914:  The start of World War I.  In this war, the German
Rothschilds loan money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds loan
money to the British, and the French
Rothschilds loan money to the French. Futhermore, the Rothschilds have
control of the three European news agencies, Wolff (est. 1849) in
Germany, Reuters (est.
1851) in England, and Havas (est. 1835) in France.  The Rothschilds
use Wolff to manipulate the German people into a fervour for war. From
around this time, the
Rothschilds are rarely reported in the media, because  they own the
media. World War I was a military conflict that lasted from 1914 to
1918 and involved most of the
world's great powers, assembled in two opposing alliances: the Allies
(centred around the Triple Entente) against the Central Powers.

More than 70 million military personnel, including 60 million
Europeans, were mobilised in one of the largest wars in history. More
than 15 million people were killed,
making it one of the deadliest conflicts in history.This war
(abbreviated as WW-I, WWI, or WW1) is also known as the First World
War, the Great War, the
World War (prior to the outbreak of theSecond World War), and the War
to End All Wars. The assassination on 28 June 1914 of Archduke Franz
Ferdinand of Austria, the heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary, is
seen as the immediate trigger of the war, though long-term causes,
such as imperialistic foreign policy, played a major role. Ferdinand's
assassination at the hands of Serbian nationalist Gavrilo Princip
resulted in demands against the Kingdom of Serbia. Several alliances
that had been formed over the past decades were invoked, so within
weeks the major powers were at war; with all having colonies, the
conflict soon spread around the world. The conflict opened with the
German invasion of Belgium, Luxembourg and France; the
Austro-Hungarian invasion of Serbia and a Russian attack against
Prussia. After the German march on Paris was brought to a halt, the
Western Front settled into a static battle of attrition with a trench
line that changed little until 1917. In the East, the Russian army
successfully fought against the Austro-Hungarian forces but were
forced back by the German army. Additional fronts opened with the
Ottoman Empire joining the war in 1914, Italy in 1915 and Romania in
1916. Imperial Russia left the war in 1917. After a 1918 German
offensive along the western front, American forces entered the
trenches and the German armies were driven back in a series of
successfully allied offensives. Germany surrendered on Armistice Day,
November 11, 1918. By the war's end, four major imperial powers—the
German, Russian, Austro-Hungarianand Ottoman Empires—had been
militarily and politically defeated, with the last two ceasing to
exist. The revolutionised Soviet Union emerged from the Russian
Empire, while the map of central Europe was completely redrawn into
numerous smaller states.[8]The League of Nations was formed in the
hope of preventing another such conflict. The European nationalism
spawned by the war, the repercussions of Germany's defeat, and of the
Treaty of Versailles would eventually lead to the beginning of World
War II in 1939.
6. In 1917 the Rothschilds order the execution by the Bolsheviks they
control, of Tsar Nicholas II and his entire family in Russia, even
though the Tsar had already abdicated on March 2.  This is both to get
control of the country and an act of revenge for Tsar Alexander I
blocking their world government plan in 1815 at the Congress Of
Vienna, and Tsar Alexander II siding with President Abraham Lincoln in
1864. It is extremely important for them to slaughter the entire
family including women and children in order to make good on the
promise to do so made by Nathan Mayer Rothschild in 1815.  It is
designed to show the world what happens if you ever attempt to cross
the Rothschilds.
7. Assassination attempt on the life of USA President Franklin D,
Roosevelt in 1933.
8. The Rothschilds Banking Group and partners manipulate and finance
all sides of the Second World war causing million of people form both
sides to kill each other
and great profit and satisfaction to the Rothschilds and their
partners and also  in furtherance of their aim to have a One World
Government by the year 2012
.The Second World War, World War II, or the Second World War (often
abbreviated WWII or WW2), was a global military conflict between 1939
and 1945, which involved most of the world's nations, including all
great powers, organised into two opposing military alliances: the
Allies and the Axis. The war involved the mobilisation of over 100
million military personnel, making it the most widespread war in
history. In a state of "total war," the major participants placed
their entire economic, industrial, and scientific capabilities at the
service of the war effort, erasing the distinction between civilian
and military resources. Over seventy million people, the majority
civilians, were killed, making itthe deadliest conflict in human
history. The start of the war is generally held to be September 1,
1939, with the invasion of Poland by Nazi Germany and subsequent
declarations of war on Germany by most of the countries in the British
Empire and Commonwealth, and by France. Many countries were already at
war before this date, such as Ethiopia and Italy in theSecond
Italo-Abyssinian War and China and Japan in the Second Sino-Japanese
War. Many who were not initially involved joined the war later, as a
result of events such as the German invasion of the Soviet Union, the
Japanese attacks on Pearl Harbor and British colonies, and subsequent
declarations of war on Japan by theUnited States, the Netherlands,
and British Commonwealth. In 1945, the war ended in a victory for the
Allies. The Soviet Union and the United States subsequently emerged as
the world's superpowers, setting the stage for the Cold War which
lasted for the next 46 years. The United Nations (financed organised
and controlled by Rothschild and partner's money and influence as a
for runner towards  the concept of their long term aim of a one world
government) was formed in the hope of preventing another world
conflict. The acceptance of the principle of self-determination
accelerated decolonization movements in Asia and Africa, whileWestern
Europe itself began moving toward integration. The start of the war is
generally held to be September 1, 1939 with the German invasion of
Poland; Britain and France declared war on Germany two days later.
Other dates for the beginning of war include the Japanese invasion of
Manchuria on September 13, 1931; the start of the Second Sino-Japanese
War on July 7, 1937; or one of several other events.
Others follow A. J. P. Taylor, who holds that there was a simultaneous
Sino-Japanese War in East Asia, and a Second European War in Europe
and her colonies. The two wars merged in 1941, becoming a single
global conflict, at which point the war continued until 1945. This
article uses the conventional dating. The exact date of the war's end
is not universally agreed upon. It has been suggested that the war
ended at the armistice of August 14, 1945 (V-J Day), rather than the
formal surrender of Japan (September 2, 1945); in some European
histories, it ended on V-E Day (May 8, 1945). The Treaty of Peace with
Japan was not signed until 1951. A variety of events led to the
escalation of hostilities between the Axis and Allied powers prior to
the start of the war. In the aftermath of World War I, a defeated
Germany signed the Treaty of Versailles.  This caused Germany to lose
around 13 percent of its territory, stripped it of its colonies,
prohibited German annexation of other states, imposed massive
reparations and limited the size and makeup of Germany's armed forces.
The Russian Civil War led to the creation of the Soviet Union. After
Lenin's death, Stalin seized power in the USSR and repudiated the New
Economic Policy favoring the Five Year Plans instead. In Italy, Benito
Mussolini seized power as a fascist dictator promising to create a
"New Roman Empire."
The Kuomintang (KMT) party in China launched a unification campaign
against regional warlords and nominally unified China in the
mid-1920s, but was soon embroiled in a civil war against its former
Chinese communist allies. In 1931, an increasingly militaristic
Japanese Empire, which had long sought influence in China as the first
step of its right to rule Asia, used the Mukden Incident as
justification to invade Manchuria and anex two Chinese provinces. The
two nations then fought several small conflicts, in Shanghai, Rehe and
Hebei, until the Tanggu Truce in 1933. Thereafter, Chinese volunteer
forces continued the resistance to Japanese aggression in Manchuria,
and Chahar and Suiyuan. Rothschild's International  Banking Group and
partners backed  A variety of events led to the escalation of
hostilities between the Axis and Allied powers prior to the start of
the war. In the aftermath of World War I, a defeated Germany signed
the Treaty of Versailles. This caused Germany to lose around 13
percent of its territory, stripped it of its colonies, prohibited
German annexation of other states, imposed massive reparations and
limited the size and makeup of Germany's armed forces.  The Russian
Civil War led to the creation of the Soviet Union. After Lenin's
death, Stalin seized power in the USSR and repudiated the New Economic
Policy favoring the Five Year Plans instead. In Italy, Benito
Mussolini seized power as a fascist dictator promising to create a
"New Roman Empire."
The Kuomintang (KMT) party in China launched a unification campaign
against regional warlords and nominally unified China in the
mid-1920s, but was soon embroiled in a
civil war against its former Chinese communist allies.  In 1931, an
increasingly militaristic Japanese Empire, which had long sought
influence in China
 as the first step of its right to rule Asia, used the Mukden Incident
as justification to invade Manchuria and anex two Chinese provinces.
The two nations then fought several small conflicts, in Shanghai, Rehe
and Hebei, until the Tanggu Truce in 1933. Thereafter, Chinese
volunteer forces continued the
resistance to Japanese aggression in Manchuria, and Chahar and Suiyuan.
Estimates for the total casualties of the war vary, due to the fact
that many deaths went unrecorded. However, most suggest that some 60
million people died in the war, including about 20 million soldiers
and 40 million civilians.[253][254][255]Many civilians died because of
disease, starvation, massacres,bombing and deliberate genocide. The
Soviet Union lost around 27 million people during the war, almost half
of all World War II deaths.
Of the total deaths in World War II, approximately 85 percent were on
the Allied side (mostly Soviet and Chinese) and 15 percent were on the
Axis side. One estimate is that 12 million civilians died in Nazi
concentration camps,  1.5 million by bombs, 7 million in Europe from
other causes, and 7.5 million in China from other causes.
Many of these deaths were a result of genocidal actions committed in
Axis-occupied territories and other war crimescommitted by German as
well as Japanese forces. The most notorious of German atrocities was
The Holocaust, the systematic genocide of Jewsin territories
controlled by Germany and its allies.
The Nazis also targeted other groups, including the Roma (targeted in
the Porajmos), Slavs, and gay men, exterminating an estimated five
million additional people. The targets of the Axis-aligned Croatian
Ustaše regime were mostly Serbs.
The best-known Japanese atrocity is the Nanking Massacre, in which
several hundred thousand Chinese civilians were raped and murdered.
The Japanese military murdered from nearly 3 million to over 10
million civilians, mostly Chinese. Mitsuyoshi Himeta reported 2.7
million casualties occurred during the Sanko Sakusen. General Yasuji
Okamura implemented the policy in Heipei and Shantung.
Limited Axis usage of biological and chemical weapons is also known.
The Italians used mustard gas during their conquest of Abyssinia,
while the Japanese Imperial Army used a variety of such weapons during
their invasion and occupation of China  and in early conflicts against
the Soviets. Both the Germans and Japanese tested such weapons against
civilians and, in some cases, on prisoners of war.
While many of the Axis's acts were brought to trial in the world's
first international tribunals, incidents caused by the Allies were
not. Examples of such Allied actions include population transfer in
the Soviet Union, the Soviet forced labour camps (Gulag), Japanese
American internment in the United States, the Operation Keelhaul,
expulsion of Germans after World War II, mass rape of German women by
Soviet Red Army, the Soviet massacre of Polish citizens and the
mass-bombing of civilian areas in enemy territory, including Tokyo and
most notably atDresden. Large numbers of famine deaths can also be
partially attributed to the war, such as the Bengal famine of 1943 and
the Vietnamese famine of 1944–45.
Concentration camps and slave work
Further information: The Holocaust, Consequences of German Nazism,
Japanese war crimes, and Allied war crimes during World War II
The Nazis were responsible for The Holocaust, the killing of
approximately six million Jews (overwhelmingly Ashkenazim), as well as
two millionethnic Poles and four million others who were deemed
"unworthy of life" (including the disabled and mentally ill, Soviet
POWs, homosexuals,Freemasons, Jehovah's Witnesses, and the Roma) as
part of a programme of deliberate extermination. About 12 million,
most of whom were Eastern Europeans, were employed in the German war
economy as forced labor in Germany during World War II. In addition to
Nazi concentration camps, the Soviet gulags, or labor camps, led to
the death of citizens of occupied countries such as Poland, Lithuania,
Latvia, and Estonia, as well as German prisoners of war(POWs) and even
Soviet citizens who had been or were thought to be supporters of the
Nazis. Sixty percent of Soviet POWs of the Germans died during the
war. Richard Overy gives the number of 5.7 million Soviet POWs. Of
those, 57 percent died or were killed, a total of 3.6 million.  Some
of the survivors on their return to the USSR were treated as traitors.
(See Order No. 270)
Japanese prisoner-of-war camps, many of which were used as labour
camps, also had high death rates. TheInternational Military Tribunal
for the Far East found the death rate of Western prisoners was 27.1
percent (for American POWs, 37 percent), seven times that of POWs
under the Germans and Italians[280] The death rate among Chinese POWs
was much larger; a directive ratified on August 5, 1937 by Hirohito
declared that the Chinese were no longer protected under international
law.[281] While 37,583 prisoners from the UK, 28,500 from the
Netherlands and 14,473 from United States were released after the
surrender of Japan, the number for the Chinese was only 56.
According to a joint study of historians featuring Zhifen Ju, Mark
Peattie, Toru Kubo, and Mitsuyoshi Himeta, more than 10 million
Chinese were mobilized by the Japanese army and enslaved by the East
Asia Development Board for slave labor in Manchukuo and north
China.The U.S. Library of Congress estimates that in Java, between 4
and 10 million romusha (Japanese: "manual laborers"), were forced to
work by the Japanese military. About 270,000 of these Javanese
laborers were sent to other Japanese-held areas in South East Asia,
and only 52,000 were repatriated to Java. On February 19, 1942
Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066, interning thousands of
Japanese, Italians,German Americans, and some emigrants from Hawaii
who fled after the bombing of Pearl Harbor for the duration of the
war. The U.S. and Canadian
governments interned 150,000 Japanese-Americans,  as well as nearly
11,000 German and Italian residents of the U.S. Allied use of
involuntary labor occurred mainly in
the east, such as in Poland,  but more than a million were also put to
work in the west. In Hungary's case, Hungarians were forced to work
for the Soviet Union until 1955.
9. Assassination attempt on the life of USA President  Harry S Truman in 1950.
10. USA President John F. Kennedy in 1963; 1963: On June 4th President
John F. Kennedy (the 35th President of the United States 1961 – 1963)
signs Executive Order 11110 which returned to the U.S. government the
power to issue currency, without going through the Rosthchilds owned
Federal Reserve. Less than 6 months later on November 22nd , president
Kennedy is assassinated by the Rothschilds for the same reason as they
assassinated President Abraham Lincoln in 1865, he wanted to print
American money for the American people, as oppose to for the benefit
of a money grabbing war mongering foreign elite.
11. John K Kennedy's brother Robert Robert F. Kennedy, in June 5,
1968, a United States Senator  during celebrations of his successful
campaign in the California primary elections while seeking the
Democratic nomination for President of the United States. by an
assassin who was a twenty-four year old Palestinian immigrant named
Sirhan Sirhan, who remains incarcerated for this crime as of 2010. As
with the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, Robert Kennedy's
brother, in 1963, the senator's death has been the subject of
widespread analysis. Some individuals involved in the original
investigation and some researchers have suggested alternative
scenarios for the crime, or have argued that there are serious
problems with the official case.
 The assassination of Robert F. Kennedy, a United States Senator and
brother of assassinated President John F. Kennedy, took place shortly
after midnight on June 5, 1968 in Los Angeles, California. Robert F.
Kennedy was killed during celebrations of his successful campaign in
the California primary elections while seeking the Democratic
nomination for President of the United States. The assassin was a
twenty-four year old Palestinian immigrant named Sirhan Sirhan, who
remains incarcerated for this crime as of 2010. The shooting was
recorded on audio tape by a freelance newspaper reporter, and the
aftermath was captured on film. Kennedy's body lay in repose at St.
Patrick's Cathedral in New York for two days before a funeral mass was
held on June 8. His body was interred near his brother John at
Arlington National Cemetery. His death prompted the protection of
presidential candidates by the United States Secret Service. Hubert
Humphrey went on to win the Democratic nomination for the presidency,
but ultimately lost the election to Richard Nixon. As with his
brother's death, Robert Kennedy's assassination and the circumstances
surrounding it have spawned a variety of conspiracy theories,
particularly in relation to the existence of a supposed second gunman.
CIA involvement In November 2006, the BBC's Newsnight program
presented research by filmmaker Shane O'Sullivan alleging that several
CIA officers were present on the night of the assassination.[47] Three
men who appear in films and photographs from the night of the
assassination were positively identified by former colleagues and
associates as former senior CIA officers who had worked together in
1963 at JMWAVE, the CIA's main anti-Castro station based in Miami.
They were JMWAVE Chief of Operations David Morales, Chief of Maritime
Operations Gordon Campbell and Chief of Psychological Warfare
Operations George Joannides.  The program featured an interview with
Morales's former attorney Robert Walton, who quoted him as having
said, "I was in Dallas when we got the son of a bitch and I was in Los
Angeles when we got the little bastard".  O'Sullivan reported that the
CIA declined to comment on the officers in question. It was also
alleged that Morales was known for his deep anger toward the Kennedys
for what he saw as their betrayal during the Bay of Pigs Invasion.
After further investigation, O'Sullivan produced the feature
documentary, RFK Must Die. The film casts doubt on the earlier
identifications and ultimately reveals that the man previously
identified as Gordon Campbell may, in fact, have been Michael D.
Roman, a now-deceased Bulova Watch Company employee, who was at the
Ambassador Hotel for a company convention.[
Second gunman The location of Kennedy's wounds suggested that his
assailant had stood behind him, but some witnesses said that Sirhan
faced west as Kennedy moved through the pantry facing east. This has
led to the suggestion that a second gunman actually fired the fatal
shot, a possibility supported by coroner Thomas Noguchi. Other
witnesses, though, said that as Sirhan approached, Kennedy was turning
to his left shaking hands, facing north and so exposing his right
side. As recently as 2008, eyewitness John Pilger asserted his belief
that there must have been a second gunman. During a re-examination of
the case in 1975, the U.S. Supreme Court ordered expert examination of
the possibility of a second gun having been used, and the conclusion
of the experts was that there was little or no evidence to support
this theory. In 2007, analysis of an audio recording of the shooting
made by freelance reporter Stanislaw Pruszynski appeared to indicate,
according to forensic expert Philip van Praag, that thirteen shots
were fired, even though Sirhan's gun held only eight rounds. While
this would strongly indicate a second gunman, independent analysis by
other experts indicated that there are only eight shots recorded on
the tape.
12 . The assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. in April 1968
13. Two assassination attempts on the life of USA President Gerald R,
Ford bot in 1975 .
14. Attempted assassination of President Ronald Regan in 1981. The
movtivation for the Assassination attempt on President Ronald Regan
can be understood by the following information.  Prior to to the
election Ronald Regan had publicly stated that if he was elected he
was going to hold an inquiry into powerful secret societies.groups and
organisation like the Freemasons, the Klu Klux Klan, The Illuminati,
the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, the
Trilaterial  Commission and was definitely not going to have George
Bush Senior (HTW Bush)  involved in his campagn or as running mate for
vice president if he was the presidential election. Goerge Bush had
been incontrol of teh CIq and was known as being invlved with billions
of collars of drug dealing using thr CIA as a front for such drug
dealling as well as being 25% owner of some of the biggest arms ans
munician manufacturing companies in the world with his other partners
including the Rothschild International Banking Family and their other
assoicates such as the bllod line of Royal Families of Europe, and the
following family names:  Astor; Bundy; Collins; duPont; Freeman;
Kennedy; Morgan; Oppenheimer; Rockefeller; Sassoon; Schiff; Taft; and
Van Duyn who calls themselvesAshkenazi Jews have obtained theit
powerful ajd rich positions in ther world  through lies, manipulation
and murder.  Then all of a sudden just before the USPresidential
election Ronald Reagan announced George Bush as his running mate in
the presidential Elections. Goerge Bush wanted  to be US president of
behalf  of the drug, war lords and arms dealing and manufacturing
partners but not confident at that poin ton time of winning the US
Presidential Election Race. So he and his partners felt it would eb
better for him to be the vice president under Ronald Regan aznd have
him assassinated by a  CIA operative , which would mean George Bush
Senior would have automicly become US President a few years earlier
than he did. If the bullet had been an inch or two either way when it
hit President Ronald Regan, then the assassination attempt would have
been successful and George Busg Senior would have been president by
default being vice president. Either way the attempt obviously
frightened the life out of President Ronald Regan and after the he
certainly did not have any investigation into the powerful secret
societies  and organisations as he had promised before the election,
and if fact when and quickly joined the Freemason and Illuninati who
made him an honourary member.
The Reagan assassination attempt occurred on Monday, March 30, 1981,
just 69 days into the presidency of Ronald Reagan. While leaving a
speaking engagement at the Washington Hilton Hotel in Washington,
D.C., President Reagan and three others were shot and wounded by John
Hinckley, Jr.. Reagan suffered a punctured lung, but prompt medical
attention allowed him to recover quickly.
Reagan was the first serving United States president to survive being
shot in an assassination attempt. No formal invocation of presidential
succession took place, although a controversial statement by Secretary
of State Alexander Haig that he was "in control here" marked a short
period during which Vice President George H. W. Bush was physically
absent, flying back to Washington, D.C. aboard Air Force Two from a
speech in Fort Worth, Texas. Hinckley was found not guilty by reason
of insanity and has remained confined to a psychiatric facility where
he can live a very comfortable life protected by the US Government and
the Rothschild International Bakling Group. The false publicly stayed
motivation behind Hinckley's attack was an obsession with actress
Jodie Foster due to erotomania. While living in Hollywood in the late
1970s, he saw the film Taxi Driver at least 15 times, apparently
identifying strongly with Travis Bickle, the lead character.The arc of
the story involves Bickle's attempts to protect a 12-year-old child
prostitute, played by Foster; toward the end of the film, Bickle
attempts to assassinate a United States Senator who is running for
president. Over the following years, Hinckley trailed Foster around
the country, going so far as to enroll in a writing course at Yale
University in 1980 when he learned that she was a student there after
reading an article in People magazine. He wrote numerous letters and
notes to her in late 1980. He called her twice and refused to give up
when she indicated that she was not interested in him.Convinced that
by becoming a national figure he would be Foster's equal, Hinckley
began to stalk then-President Jimmy Carter — his decision to target
presidents was also likely inspired by Taxi Driver. He wrote three or
four more notes to her in early March 1981. Foster gave these notes to
her dean, who gave them to the Yale police department, which sought to
track Hinckley down but failed.
15.. On July 16, 1999, John F. Kennedy, Jr. who was about to run for
New York Senator against Hilliary Clinton ( along with her husband
President Bill Clinton were Rothschild agents and fiancialy back and
support by the Rothschild Banking Group and associates who could not
rist John F.Kennedy winning Senator of New York against Hillary
Clinton, as Hillary Clinton was ear marked to run for the President of
the USA in the future as another Rothschild controlled USA President
)was killed when the Piper Saratoga light aircraft he was piloting
crashed into the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Martha's Vineyard,
Massachusetts. His wife, Carolyn Jeanne Bessette, and sister-in-law,
Lauren Gail Bessette, were also killed. The flight originated from
Essex County Airport (CDW) in Fairfield Township, Essex County, New
Jersey. The intended flight path was along the coastline of
Connecticut and across Rhode Island Sound to Martha's Vineyard Airport
(MVY). The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) reported its
conclusion on July 6, 2000, stated that the crash was caused by
Kennedy's failure to maintain control of his airplane during a descent
over water at night, which was a result of spatial disorientation.
The NTSB and other aviation professionals have also cited additional
interrelated factors that may have contributed to the crash.
16. Since the end of the Second World War, The Rothschild
International Banking Group and partners who have had since the 1700's
had effective ownership and control of London Britain through London
City, the USA through ownership and control of Washington City and the
Catholic Church through control and ownership of Vatican City,
manipulated Rothschild controlled USA Presidents and British Prime
Ministers and loaned money to the USA and Britain to start and
maintain over 200 50 official and unofficial, internal and
external,wars and disputes lending money to every side of every war by
instructing their presidents and prime ministers, who that put in
power and control, to use the country's official armies from various
countries to fight each other for various manipulated and contrived
reasons, and paying  rebels and militia to create uprising uprisings,
ethnic cleansing. gencide, religeous arguments and racial hatred
arguments etc in various counties around the world causing the death
of over 1 billion people with the Rothschild Banking Family and
Associates making Trillions of Dollars in cash, gold and silver, land,
oil, minerals, art and resources grabs form each war and conflict.
There have been over one billion deaths in such wars and conflicts
since the second would war, alone and added to the over 1 billion
deaths as a result of the first and second world wars that accounts
for over 2 billion deaths caused in various ways by the Russian
Khazars, Rothschild International Banking Family from a country called
Khazaria, which occupied the land locked between the Black Sea and the
Caspian Sea which is now predominantly occupied by Georgia.  The
reason the Rothschilds claim to be Jewish is that the Khazars under
the instruction of the King, converted to the Jewish faith in 740
A.D., but of course that did not include converting their Asiatic
Mongolian genes to the genes of the Jewish people.
Paul Bellany in his book called Civil Wars of the World: Major
conflicts since World War Two, states that there have been the
following numbers of region conflicts:
Asian Conflicts-27
European Conflicts - 39
Latin American Conflicts 49
Middle Eastern and North American Conflicts - 59
Sub - Saharan African Conflicts - 69
which he has stated have included:
Afghanistan (1978-1992), however since his book was published the
Rothschild International Banking Group and associates manipulated,
after Soviet troops withdrew in 1989, the Kabul government fell to the
mujahideen in 1992. In the years that followed, various factions of
the mujahedeen fought each other for control. In 1996 the Taliban, an
Islamic fundamentalist movement formed in 1994, captured the capital
Kabul and subsequently overran approximately 90% of the country,
leaving only a small corner in the northeast under control of the
Northern Alliance.
Although members of the international community, including the United
States, initially viewed the Taliban as a potential source of
stability for the war-ravaged country, their tolerance for hosting
Islamic extremists combined with their reluctance to negotiate with
their enemies soon soured this. In 1996, Osama bin Laden and his
Al-Qaeda organization began using Taliban-controlled Afghanistan as a
base of operations. Under the Taliban, al-Qaeda was able to use
Afghanistan as a place to train and indoctrinate fighters, import
weapons, coordinate with other jihadists, and plot terrorist actions.
While Al-Qaeda maintained its own establishments in Afghanistan, it
also supported training camps belonging to other organisations. 10,000
to 20,000 people passed through these facilities before 9/11, most of
whom were sent to fight for the Taliban against the Northern Alliance
but a smaller number were inducted into al-Qaeda.
After the August 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings were linked to bin Laden
President Bill Clinton ordered missile strikes on militant training
camps in Afghanistan. U.S. officials pressed the Taliban to surrender
bin Laden, and the international community imposed sanctions of the
Taliban in 1999 calling for bin Laden to be surrendered to U.S.
custody. The Taliban repeatedly rebuffed the demands, however.
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Special Activities Division
paramilitary teams were active in Afghanistan in the 1990s in
clandestine operations to locate and kill or capture Osama Bin Laden.
These teams planned several operations, but did not receive the order
to execute from President Bill Clinton. These efforts did however
build many of the relationships that would prove essential in the 2001
U.S. Invasion of Afghanistan.
A formal National Security Presidential Directive submitted on
September 9, 2001, had outlined essentially the same war plan that the
White House, the CIA and the Pentagon put into action after the
September 11 attacks. The plan dealt with all aspects of a war against
al-Qaeda, ranging from diplomatic initiatives to military operations
in Afghanistan, including outlines to persuade Afghanistan’s Taliban
government to turn bin Laden over to the United States, with
provisions to use military force if it refused.
One day before the September 11, 2001 attacks, the Bush administration
agreed on a plan to oust the Taliban regime in Afghanistan by force if
it refused to hand over Osama bin Laden. At that September 10 meeting
of theBush administration's top national security officials it was
agreed that the Taliban would be presented with a final ultimatum to
hand over bin Laden. Failing that, covert military aid would be
channelled by the U.S. to anti-Taliban groups. If both those options
failed, "the deputies agreed that the United States would seek to
overthrow the Taliban regime through more direct action." The BBC News
reported that Niaz Naik, a former Foreign Secretary of Pakistan,
claimed that he had been told by senior American officials in mid-July
2001 that military action against Afghanistan would begin by the
middle of October at the latest. The message was conveyed during a
meeting on Afghanistan between senior U.S., Russian, Iranian, and
Pakistani diplomats. The meeting was the third in a series of meetings
on Afghanistan, with the previous meeting having been held in March
2001. During the July 2001 meeting, Naik was told that Washington
would launch its military operation from bases in Tajikistan – where
American advisers were already in place – and that the wider objective
was to topple the Taliban regime and install another government in
place.
The Rothschild International Banking Group and associates then went on
to manipulate. plan and finance
through their planed and funded attack on the world trade centre in
New York on the 11th September, 2001, as admitted by Nicholas
Rockefeller to Film maker and previous politician Arron Russ, USA to
re-ignited a new war Afghanistan  in 2001 fighting a make believe war
on terror created by the International Rothschild, Rockefeller Banking
and Business Group that has resulted in millions of deaths of soldiers
on both sides of the dispute as well a millions of innocent men women
and children. As Nicholas Rockefeller said to Aaron Russo, they will
be financing the USA and UK armies from loans by them, looking in
caves for people like Osama Ben Laden and other so called terrorists
that do not actually exist. Nicholas Rockefeller admitted the war on
terror was a make believe enemy that they will never find, just as an
excuse to have more internal and external wars and conflicts and as an
excuse to keep taking more and more of peoples liberties away.
The War in Afghanistan is an ongoing coalition conflict which began on
October 7, 2001 , as theUS military's Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF)
that was launched, along with a number of coalition allies, in
response to both the September 11, 2001 attacks on the US, and as a
result of other issues that had existed before the attacks. The UK
has, since 2002, led its own military operation, Operation Herrick, as
part of the same war in Afghanistan.
The character of the war evolved from a violent struggle against
Al-Qaeda and its Taliban supporters to a complex counterinsurgency
effort.
The first phase of the war was the aftermath of the terrorist attacks
of September 11, 2001, when the United States launched Operation
Enduring Freedom, to annihilate the safe haven to Al-Qaeda and its use
of the Afghan territory as a base of operations for terrorist
activities.
In that first phase, U.S. and coalition forces, working with the
Afghan opposition forces of the Northern Alliance, quickly ousted the
Taliban regime. During the following Karzai administration, the
character of the war shifted to an effort aimed at smothering
insurgency, in which the insurgents preferred not to directly confront
the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) troops, but blended
into the local population and mainly used improvised explosive devices
(IEDs) and suicide bombings.
The stated aim of the invasion was to find Osama bin Laden and other
high-ranking Al-Qaeda members to be put on trial, to destroy the whole
organization of Al-Qaeda, and to remove the Taliban regime which
supported and gave safe harbor to Al-Qaeda. The Bush administration
stated that, as policy, it would not distinguish between terrorist
organizations and nations or governments that harbor them. The United
Nationsdid not authorize the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan.
The second operation is the International Security Assistance Force
(ISAF), which was established by the UN Security Council at the end of
December 2001 to secure Kabul and the surrounding areas. NATOassumed
control of ISAF in 2003. By July 23, 2009, ISAF had around 64,500
troops from 42 countries, with NATO members providing the core of the
force. The NATO commitment is particularly important to the United
States because it gives international legitimacy to the war. The
United States has approximately 29,950 troops in ISAF.
The US and UK led the aerial bombing, in support of ground forces
supplied primarily by the Afghan Northern Alliance. In 2002, American,
British andCanadian infantry were committed, along with special forces
from several allied nations, including Australia. Later, NATO troops
were added.
The initial attack removed the Taliban from power, but Taliban forces
have since regained some strength. Since 2006, Afghanistan has seen
threats to its stability from increased Taliban-ledinsurgent activity,
record-high levels of illegal drug production,  and a fragile
government with limited control outside of Kabul.
By the end of 2008, the Taliban had severed any remaining ties with
al-Qaeda. According to senior U.S. military intelligence officials,
there are fewer than 100 members of Al-Qaeda remaining in Afghanistan.
On December 1, 2009, U.S. President Barack Obamaannounced that he
would escalate U.S. military involvement by deploying an additional
30,000 soldiers over a period of six months. He also proposed to begin
troop withdrawals 18 months from that date. The following day, the
American commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal,
cautioned that the timeline was flexible and “is not an absolute”and
Defense SecretaryRobert Gates, when asked by a member of the Senate
Armed Services Committee if it is possible that no soldiers would be
withdrawn in July 2011, responded, "The president, as commander in
chief, always has the option to adjust his decisions."
The History of Iraq Wars
that the Rothschild and Associates International Banking group funded
all all sides and maniplulated and panned them and again made
trillionbs of dollar from them in interest payments fornt he various
countries they lent moeny to to fund their sides of the war plas the
profits form their companies providing arms, municians and othe
rmaterials and supplies for the trops and armies fighting these wars
for the various sides of the wars
Iraq, as we know it today, did not exist prior to World War One.
Iraq, known in Classical Antiquity as Mesopotamia, was home to some of
the oldest civilizations in the world,  with a cultural history of
over 10,000 years,  hence its common epithet, the Cradle of
Civilization. Mesopotamia, as part of the larger Fertile Crescent, was
a significant part of the Ancient Near East throughout the Bronze Age
and the Iron Age. Successively ruled by the Assyrian, Medo-Persian,
Seleucid and Parthian empires during the Iron Age and Classical
Antiquity, Iraq was conquered by the Rashidun Caliphate and became a
center of the Islamic Golden Age during the medieval Abbasid
Caliphate. After a series of invasions and conquest by the Mongols and
Turkmens, Iraq fell under Ottoman rule in the 16th century,
intermittently falling under Mamluk and Safavid control.
Ottoman rule ended with World War I, and Iraq came to be administered
by the British Empire until the establishment of the Kingdom of Iraq
in 1932. The Republic of Iraq was established in 1958 following a coup
d'etat. The Republic was controlled by Saddam Hussein from 1979 to
2003, into which period falls the Iran-Iraq war and the First Gulf
War. Saddam Hussein was deposed in 2003 following the US-led invasion
of the country. After the invasion, the situation deteriorated and
from 2007 Iraq has been in or on the brink of a state of civil war.
For several hundred years prior to the First World War, the mostly
Arab region known as Mesopotamia lay within the Turkish Ottoman
Empire. During that war, the British invaded Ottoman Mesopotamia,
finally conquering the area. The peace treaty that ended Turkey's part
in World War One, caused the Turks to give up control of Mesopotamia,
which became known by the older name, Iraq. The new Iraq was under
British control at first, a fact which caused a great deal of unrest.
The current borders of Iraq and most Middle Eastern nations, such as
Syria and Palestine/Israel, were drawn by the conquering Europeans,
often with little regard to the preferences of the people who were to
live in these newly created nations.
Thus, Iraq became a nation with three large demographic groups; the
Sunni Kurds in the north, the Sunni (Sunna) Arabs in the middle of the
country, and the Shiite (Shia) Arabs in the south. The Kurds wanted a
nation of their own, as did the Kurds living in neighboring Turkey and
Iran. Though the British eventually granted full independence to Iraq,
it was not without much bloodshed and hard feelings in Iraq about the
long occupation.
Below is a list, with some details, on the wars and conflicts of Iraq.
World War One—1914-1918 -Also known as the Great War, this conflict
brought about the end of the Turkish Ottoman Empire, which aligned
itself with the German-led Central Powers. The Turks fought largely
against the British Empire forces mostly in Ottoman Palestine, and
Ottoman Mesopotamia, and the Russian Empire in the Caucasus region and
neighboring Iran. In November, 1914, British forces landed at Basra,
in what is now southern Iraq. Despite a serious British defeat at
al-Kut in 1916, Baghdad fell to the British army in March, 1917. By
November, 1918, the British had gained control over most of the
Ottoman vilayets (provinces) that formed Iraq.
The Great Iraqi Revolution (known in Iraq as Ath Thawra al Iraqiyya al
Kubra and by the British as the Arab Revolt of 1920)—May 1920-Feb.
1921-Rebellion by Iraqi Arabs against the rule of the British Mandate.
 The rebellion was suppressed by the British military. This can be
considered the First Anglo-Iraqi War.
The immediate causes of this conflict arose out of the results of the
British conquest of the Mesopotamian region from the Ottoman Turks
during World War I. Following that war, the British established, with
League of Nations approval, a colonial-style Mandate over the region
now named “Iraq.” Many Iraqi nationalists, who believed independence
would result from the ejection of the Turks, were severely
disappointed with the establishment of the British Mandate. Other,
related events and issues also inflamed Iraqi Arab opinion against the
British. The Mandate government almost completely excluded Iraqis, as
the British imported experienced civil servants from India (also ruled
by Britain) to help administer the country. In northern Iraq, the
British allowed thousands of Christian refugees escaping persecution
in Turkey, to settle in mostly Muslim Iraq.
Kurdish Revolt—1922-1924 -Rebellion by Iraqi Kurds against the British
Mandate. Kurdish tribesmen, led by Sheik Mahmud, a powerful Kurdish
leader, attempted to establish an independent Kurdish nation. British
forces, primarily using airpower, suppressed the rebellion.  This
turned out to be the first of many Kurdish rebellions against the
British Mandate and later, against the Iraqi government.  As with many
of the later Kurdish uprisings, the rebels were put down with some aid
from rival Kurds.
It should be noted that many similar and often related Kurdish
uprisings took place in neighboring Turkey and Iran.  Government
forces always succeeded in defeating the rebels in Iraq, Turkey and
Iran. Though Kurds in Iraq and Iran did enjoy some successes, they
almost always came with the aid of foreign nations.  When the foreign
aid eventually is withdrawn, the Kurds’ success, historically, also
fades away.
Assyrian “Revolt” and Massacre-- August, 1933-- The Iraqi military,
using a supposed revolt as an excuse, massacre at least 600 Iraqi
Assyrian Christians.
Shia Tribal Revolt-1935-Shiite uprising against the Iraqi government.
Anglo-Iraqi War of 1941 (Rashid Ali Coup)--During World War Two, Iraqi
politician Rashid Ali seized power in Iraq and aligned himself with
the German-led Axis Powers. British forces invaded Iraq and quickly
defeated the Iraqi military.
Kurdish Revolt—1943 (July to October)-Rebellion suppressed by the
Iraqi Army and the British RAF.  Led by Mullah Mustafa Barzani.
Kurdish Revolt--1945 (August 10 to October)-Rebellion suppressed by
the Iraqi Army and the British RAF.  Led by Mullah Mustafa Barzani,
who escaped into Iran after breaking through an Iraqi Army force. Once
in Iran, Mustafa Barzani and his forces joined the army of the new
“Mahabad Republic,” the first independent, though in this case,
(short-lived) Kurdish state.  After Mahabad’s crushing by the Iranian
Army, Barzani led his forces back into Iraq on April 28, 1947.
Kurdish Campaign —1947 (May 27 to June 15)- After returning to Iraq
from the failed Mahabad Republic, Iraqi government actions (arrests,
executions, etc.) caused Mustafa Barzani and 496 followers to begin a
fighting retreat from the Barzan region in northern Iraq through
Turkey and into Iran in an attempt to reach the Soviet Union. They
reached the U.S.S.R. on June 15, 1947, followed by the Iranian Army.
(O’Ballance, 1973).
al-Wathbah Uprising- (Jan. to May, 1948) -- Anti government uprising
led by Iraqi leftists. This revolt was sparked by the Treaty of
Portsmouth, in which Iraq agreed to let Britain keep military bases in
Iraq and maintain continued influence in Iraqi foreign affairs. The
imposition of martial law in May, 1948 allowed the government to crush
the rebellion, just in time for the Iraqi army to travel to Palestine
for the First Arab-Israeli War.
First Arab-Israeli War -1948-1949-Israel declared independence from
the British Mandate Authority on May 1, 1948, and is subsequently
invaded by the armies of Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Transjordan, Iraq, and
Saudi Arabia. This is actually a continuation of the violence between
Jewish (Israeli) militias and Palestinian Arab militias in the leadup
to the British withdrawal. The war concludes on July 20, 1949 with the
last Israeli armistice with the Arab nations. A legal state of war
continued to exist, despite the temporary end of conventional combat.
A legal state of war between Iraq and Israel continues to this day.
Army Revolt/Coup- July 14, 1958--Brigadier General Abdul Karim el
Qassim overthrows the royal government of King Faisal II. Both the
king and Prime Minister Nouri al Said are killed. Qassim soon withdrew
Iraq from the pro-Western Baghdad Pact and established friendly
relations with the Soviet Union.
Mosul Revolt--March, 1959--Pro-Qassim communist militia , called the
People's Resistance Force, violently suppressed an anti-Qassim Sunni
Army faction made up mostly of junior officers.
Kirkuk Violence-1959--Pro-Qassim(pro-Communist) Kurds and People's
Resistance Force killed ethnic Turkomen in Kirkuk .
Kurdish Revolt—1961-1970 –After a period of relative calm, Iraqi
government promises of Kurdish autonomy, or self-rule, went
unfulfilled, sparking discontent and eventual rebellion among the
Kurds in 1961.  Mullah Mustafa Barzani is again a leader of the
Kurdish forces.  Beginning in 1963, Syrian Army and Air Force units
aid the Iraqi military in fighting against the Kurds.  A cease-fire in
1964, lasting until April of  1965, can be seen as a dividing point
between two separate conflicts, though this web site interprets this
rebellion as one continuous conflict.  This prolonged period of
Kurdish-Iraqi fighting ends in 1970 with a cease-fire and a government
guarantee of Kurdish autonomy.
Six-Day War (3rd Arab-Israeli War) 1967--Israel launched a pre-emptive
attack on Egypt, Jordan, and Syria, fearing they were preparing to
launch their own attack. The Israeli air force also attacked Iraqi
airfields. Iraq sent ground forces to support the Jordanians and the
Syrians.
Ramadan (Yom Kipper) War -1973-1974 -Egypt and Syria launched a
surprise attack on Israel during the Jewish Yom Kippur holiday. The
attack also fell on the Muslim holiday of Ramadan. Iraq sent army and
air forces to support Syria.
Kurdish Revolt -March, 1974 -–In March, 1974, Kurdish rebels led by
Mullah Mustafa Barzani (having survived an assassination attempt)
rebelled against the government.  The Kurds felt that the government
was not living up to the agreement which ended the previous revolt.
The Iraqi Kurds were supported by the Shah (King) of neighboring Iran,
who sought to put pressure on the Iraqi government over a border
dispute.  The Kurds were also assisted by the American Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA), who opposed the Iraqi government due to its
friendly relations with the Soviet Union.  After an agreement between
the Shah of Iran and Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein in 1975, (which
temporarily settled the border dispute until the Iran-Iraq War began
in 1980), the Kurds collapsed under intense Iraqi military pressure.
The CIA, allied to the Shah, also suspended aid.  Kurds cite this
betrayal by two key allies as evidence supporting their future
distrust of American attempts to incite them to fight Saddam Hussein’s
forces in the 1990s and in the early years of the 21st Century.
Intra-Kurdish warfare 1978-1979 --In 1975, Jalal Talabani formed the
Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK)-urban-based and leftist) in
opposition the Barzani-led Kurdish Democratic Party (KDP).
Shia unrest in Karbala -February, 1979--Suppressed by the Saddam
regime. Under Saddam Hussein, the Shiites (Shia) were a persecuted
religious group, both despite the fact, and because of, their
numerical majority in the country.
The First Persian Gulf War (also known as the Iran-Iraq War)—1980-1988
- In 1975, Iraq and Iran came to an agreement on the disputed Shatt
al-Arab waterway which provides Iraq’s only outlet to the sea.  In
exchange for Iran stopping support for Kurdish rebels, Iraq agreed to
share the Shatt al-Arab with Iran.  This and other disputes over their
common border, plus the belief that the 1979 revolution had weakened
Iran, led Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein to launch  an invasion of Iran
on September 22, 1980.  After initial successes, the Iraqi army ground
to a halt and soon retreated under repeated assaults by the
numerically larger Iranian Army and Revolutionary Guards.  After the
Iranians pushed the war into Iraq, Saddam’s forces began using
chemical weapons.  By 1988, both nations faced exhaustion and, after
nearly a million casualties between them, agreed to end the conflict.
Osiraq Reactor Raid—June 7, 1981 –Fearing the consequences of a
successful Iraqi nuclear weapons program, Israel launched a
pre-emptive air strike on the Osiraq nuclear reactor (under
construction) in June, 1981.  One of the pilots (the youngest) in that
raid was Ilan Ramon, who later became Israel’s first astronaut, and
who died in the Space Shuttle Columbia tragedy on February 1, 2003.
Kurdish Revolt—1983-1988 –During the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), Iraqi
Kurds, aided by Iran, fought against Iraqi government forces. In 1987
and 1988, the Iraqi military used chemical weapons to kill thousands
of Kurds (including many civilians) in a successful effort to break
the back of the resistance.
Iraq-Kuwait Relations
1961- Iraq threatens Kuwait, claiming that it belonged to Iraq because
of old Ottoman territorial claims. The British supported Kuwait by
sending military forces to Kuwait. Saddam Hussein used similar excuses
for his 1991 invasion of Kuwait.
1973 (March)- Iraq occupies as Samitah, a border post on Kuwait-Iraq
border. Dispute began when Iraq demanded the right to occupy the
Kuwaiti islands of Bubiyan and Warbah. Saudi and the Arab League
convinced Iraq to withdraw.
The Second Persian Gulf War (known in the U.S. as “Operation Desert
Storm”—Aug. 2, 1990-Feb. 1991 – On August 2, 1990, Iraqi forces
invaded and quickly conquered the small, oil-rich emirate of Kuwait.
Almost immediately, an international coalition of nations gathered a
powerful military force under the authority of the United Nations and
the leadership of the United States, first to defend the United
States, first to defend the oil-rich kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and
secondly, to force Iraq to withdraw from occupied Kuwait. From the
beginning of the crisis, the United Kingdom, led by Prime Minister
Margaret Thatcher, worked very closely with the U.S. in assuming a
determined posture against Saddam Hussein's territorial ambition.
Kurdish Revolt—1991 –Encouraged by the stunning defeat of Saddam’s
forces in Kuwait and spurred by appeals by President George H. W. Bush
of the U.S., Kurds rose up against the Iraqi government  With the bulk
of his elite forces having escaped from the fighting in Kuwait and
southern Iraq, Saddam was able to quell the revolt, causing hundreds
of thousands of Kurdish refugees to flee into neighboring Turkey and
Iran to escape.
Shiite Revolt—1991 – Encouraged by the stunning defeat of Saddam’s
forces in Kuwait and spurred by appeals by President George H. W. Bush
of the U.S., the Shiites of southern Iraq rose up against the Iraqi
government, only to be crushed by Saddam’s forces. Sporadic guerrilla
resistance continued, with the bulk of the Shiite fighting forces
seeking refuge in neighboring Shiite Iran.
The "No-Fly Zone War" --1991-2003--Following the cease-fire ending the
Gulf War, the Allies, (U.S., U.K., and France) had the right to
conduct air patrols over parts of Iraq to ensure Iraqi compliance with
the cease-fire terms. France soon left the Coalition, but U.S. and
British planes continued to patrol Iraqi skies, often drawing
anti-aircraft fire from the ground. Several major bombing campaigns
were launched to punish the Baghdad regime. This conflict officially
ended when the Third Gulf War began in March, 2003.
Intra-Kurdish warfare --1996 – Combat between various Kurdish militias.
The Third Persian Gulf War (known in the U.S. as “Operation Iraqi
Freedom”)—March 19, 2003- Present– The current war can be seen in at
least two distinct phases: The Invasion and the Occupation. Though
Saddam's regime fell fairly quickly, the insurgency was able to gain
strength in large part because the U.S. and Coalition leadership was
slow to recognize that they had a nascent guerrilla movement
underfoot. Though the Iraqi people have voted, and now have an elected
government (featuring a Kurdish president!), the situation is now
changing from a war against the occupier, to becoming more of a civil
war among Iraqis.
The Gulf War ended on April 11, 1991 with a cease-fire negotiated
between the US, its allies and Iraq.  The U.S. and its allies
maintained a policy of “containment” towards Iraq. This policy
involved numerous economic sanctions by the UN Security Council, US
and UK enforcement of Iraqi no-fly zones declared by the US and the UK
to protect Kurds in Iraqi Kurdistan and Shias in the south, and
ongoing inspections to prevent Iraqi development of chemical,
biological, and nuclear weapons. Iraqi military helicopters and planes
regularly contested the no-fly zones.
In October 1998, removing the Hussein regime became official US
foreign policy with enactment of the "Iraq Liberation Act." Enacted
following the expulsion of UN weapons inspectors the preceding August
after some had been caught spying for the US, the act provided $97
million for Iraqi "democratic opposition organizations" to "establish
a program to support a transition to democracy in Iraq." This
legislation contrasted with the terms set out in United Nations
Security Council Resolution 687, which focused on weapons and weapons
programs and made no mention of regime change.  One month after the
passage of the “Iraq Liberation Act,” the US and UK launched a
bombardment campaign of Iraq called Operation Desert Fox. The
campaign’s express rationale was to hamper the Hussein government’s
ability to produce chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, but US
intelligence personnel also hoped it would help weaken Hussein’s grip
on power.
With the election of George W. Bush as US President in 2000, the US
moved towards a more aggressive policy toward Iraq. The United States
Republican Party's campaign platform in the US presidential election,
2000 called for "full implementation" of the Iraq Liberation Act and
removal of Hussein, and key Bush advisors, including Vice President
Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, and Rumsfeld’s Deputy
Paul Wolfowitz, had long desired to invade Iraq. After leaving the
George W. Bush administration, former US Treasury Secretary Paul
O'Neill said that an attack on Iraq had been planned since Bush's
inauguration, and that the first United States National Security
Council meeting involved discussion of an invasion. O'Neill later
backtracked, saying that these discussions were part of a continuation
of foreign policy first put into place by the Clinton administration.
Despite the Bush administration's stated interest in liberating Iraq,
little formal movement towards an invasion occurred until the
September 11, 2001 attacks. For example, the administration prepared
Operation Desert Badger to respond aggressively if any US Air Force
pilot was shot down while flying over Iraq, but this didn't happen.
According to aides who were with Rumsfeld in the National Military
Command Center on September 11, Rumsfeld asked for: "best info fast.
Judge whether good enough hit Saddam Hussein at same time. Not only
Osama bin Laden." The rationale for invading Iraq as a response to
9/11 has been widely questioned, as there was no cooperation between
Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda.
Shortly after September 11, 2001 (on September 20), President Bush
addressed a joint session of the US Congress (which was simulcast live
to the world), and announced his new "War on Terrorism". This
announcement was accompanied by the doctrine of 'pre-emptive' military
action, later termed the Bush Doctrine. Some Bush advisers favored an
immediate invasion of Iraq, while others advocated building an
international coalition and obtaining United Nations authorization.
Bush eventually decided to seek UN authorization, while still
reserving the option of invading without it.
Preparations for war
See also: Public relations preparations for 2003 invasion of Iraq
While there had been some earlier talk of action against Iraq, the
Bush administration waited until September 2002 to call for action,
with White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card saying, "From a marketing
point of view, you don't introduce new products in August."[38] Bush
began formally making his case to the international community for an
invasion of Iraq in his September 12, 2002 address to the UN Security
Council. Key US allies in NATO, such as the United Kingdom, agreed
with the US actions, while France and Germany were critical of plans
to invade Iraq, arguing instead for continued diplomacy and weapons
inspections. After considerable debate, the UN Security Council
adopted a compromise resolution, UN Security Council Resolution 1441,
which authorized the resumption of weapons inspections and promised
"serious consequences" for noncompliance. Security Council members
France and Russia made clear that they did not consider these
consequences to include the use of force to overthrow the Iraqi
government. Both the US ambassador to the UN, John Negroponte, and the
UK ambassador Jeremy Greenstock publicly confirmed this reading of the
resolution, assuring that Resolution 1441 provided no "automaticity"
or "hidden triggers" for an invasion without further consultation of
the Security Council.
Resolution 1441 gave Iraq "a final opportunity to comply with its
disarmament obligations" and set up inspections by the United Nations
Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) and the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Hussein accepted the
resolution on November 13 and inspectors returned to Iraq under the
direction of UNMOVIC chairman Hans Blix and IAEA Director General
Mohamed ElBaradei. As of February 2003, the IAEA "found no evidence or
plausible indication of the revival of a nuclear weapons programme in
Iraq"; the IAEA concluded that certain items which could have been
used in nuclear enrichment centrifuges, such as aluminum tubes, were
in fact intended for other uses. UNMOVIC "did not find evidence of the
continuation or resumption of programmes of weapons of mass
destruction" or significant quantities of proscribed items. UNMOVIC
did supervise the destruction of a small number of empty chemical
rocket warheads, 50 liters of mustard gas that had been declared by
Iraq and sealed by UNSCOM in 1998, and laboratory quantities of a
mustard gas precursor, along with about 50 Al-Samoud missiles of a
design that Iraq claimed did not exceed the permitted 150 km range,
but which had travelled up to 183 km in tests. Shortly before the
invasion, UNMOVIC stated that it would take "months" to verify Iraqi
compliance with resolution 1441.
In October 2002 the US Congress passed a "Joint Resolution to
Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq". The
resolution authorized the President to "use any means necessary"
against Iraq, Americans polled in January 2003 widely favored further
diplomacy over an invasion. Later that year, however, Americans began
to agree with Bush's plan. The US government engaged in an elaborate
domestic public relations campaign to market the war to its citizens.
Americans overwhelmingly believed Hussein did have weapons of mass
destruction: 85% said so, even though the inspectors had not uncovered
those weapons. Of those who thought Iraq had weapons sequestered
somewhere, about half responded that said weapons would not be found
in combat. By February 2003, 74% of Americans supported taking
military action to remove Hussein from power.
The Central Intelligence Agency's Special Activities Division (SAD)
teams were the first US forces to enter Iraq, in July 2002, before the
main invasion. Once on the ground, they prepared for the subsequent
arrival of US Army Special Forces to organize the Kurdish Peshmerga.
This joint team (called the Northern Iraq Liaison Element (NILE))
combined to defeat Ansar al-Islam, a group with ties to al Qaeda, in
Iraqi Kurdistan. This battle was for control of the territory that was
occupied by Ansar al-Islam and took place before the invasion. It was
carried out by Paramilitary Operations Officers from SAD and the
Army's 10th Special Forces Group. This battle resulted in the defeat
of Ansar and the capture of a chemical weapons facility at Sargat.
Sargat was the only facility of its type discovered in the Iraq war.
SAD teams also conducted missions behind enemy lines to identify
leadership targets. These missions led to the initial air strikes
against Hussein and his generals. Although the strike against Hussein
was unsuccessful in killing him, it effectively ended his ability to
command and control his forces. Strikes against Iraq's generals were
more successful and significantly degraded the Iraqi command's ability
to react to, and maneuver against the US-led invasion force. SAD
operations officers were also successful in convincing key Iraqi Army
officers into surrendering their units once the fighting started.
NATO member Turkey refused to allow the US army across its territory
into northern Iraq. Therefore, joint SAD and Army Special forces teams
and the Pershmerga were the entire Northern force against the Iraqi
army. They managed to keep the northern divisions in place rather than
allowing them to aid their colleagues against the US led coalition
force coming from the south. Four of these CIA officers were awarded
the Intelligence Star for their actions.
In February 2003, US Secretary of State Colin Powell addressed the
United Nations General Assembly, continuing US efforts to gain UN
authorization for an invasion. Powell presented evidence alleging that
Iraq was actively producing chemical and biological weapons and had
ties to al-Qaeda As a follow-up to Powell’s presentation, the United
States, United Kingdom, Poland, Italy, Australia, Denmark, Japan, and
Spain proposed a resolution authorizing the use of force in Iraq, but
NATO members like Canada, France, and Germany, together with Russia,
strongly urged continued diplomacy. Facing a losing vote as well as a
likely veto from France and Russia, the US, UK, Spain, Poland,
Denmark, Italy, Japan, and Australia eventually withdrew their
resolution.
 The 2003 invasion of Iraq, (from March 20 to May 1, 2003) was led by
the United States, alongside the United Kingdom and smaller
contingents from Australia, Denmark, Poland and Spain. Four countries
participated with troops during the initial invasion phase, which
lasted from March 20 to May 1. These were the United States (248,000),
United Kingdom (45,000), Australia (2,000), and Poland (194). 36 other
countries were involved in its aftermath. The invasion marked the
beginning of the current Iraq War. In preparation for the invasion,
100,000 US troops were assembled in Kuwait by February 18.  The United
States supplied the vast majority of the invading forces, but also
received support from Kurdish irregulars in Iraqi Kurdistan.
According to then President of the United States, George W. Bush and
then Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Tony Blair, the reasons for
the invasion were "to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction
(WMD), to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free the
Iraqi people."  According to Blair, the trigger was Iraq's failure to
take a "final opportunity" to disarm itself of nuclear, chemical, and
biological weapons that US and British officials called an immediate
and intolerable threat to world peace. Although some remnants of
pre-1991 production were found after the end of the war, US government
spokespeople confirmed that these were not the weapons for which the
US went to war. In 2005, the Central Intelligence Agency released a
report saying that no weapons of mass destruction had been found in
Iraq.
In a January 2003 CBS poll 64% of US nationals had approved of
military action against Iraq, however 63% wanted President Bush to
find a diplomatic solution rather than go to war, and 62% believed the
threat of terrorism directed against the US would increase due to war.
 The invasion of Iraq was strongly opposed by some traditional US
allies, including the governments of France, Germany, New Zealand, and
Canada.  Their leaders argued that there was no evidence of weapons of
mass destruction in Iraq and that invading the country was not
justified in the context of UNMOVIC's February 12, 2003 report. On
February 15, 2003, a month before the invasion, there were worldwide
protests against the Iraq war, including a rally of three million
people in Rome, which is listed in the Guinness Book of Records as the
largest ever anti-war rally. According to the French academic
Dominique Reynié, between January 3 and April 12, 2003, 36 million
people across the globe took part in almost 3,000 protests against the
Iraq war.
The invasion was preceded by an air strike on the Iraqi Presidential
Palace on 19 March 2003. The following day coalition forces launched
an incursion into Basra Province from their massing point near the
Iraqi-Kuwaiti border. While commandos launched an amphibious assault
from the Persian Gulf to secure Basra and the surrounding petroleum
fields, the main invasion army moved into southern Iraq, occupying the
region and engaging in the Battle of Nasiriyah on 23 March. Massive
air strikes across the country and against Iraqi command and control
threw the defending army into chaos and prevented an effective
resistance. On 26 March the 173rd Airborne Brigade was airdropped near
the northern city of Kirkuk where they joined forces with Kurdish
rebels and fought several actions against the Iraqi army to secure the
northern part of the country.
The main body of coalition forces continued their drive into the heart
of Iraq and met with little resistance. Most of the Iraqi military was
quickly defeated and Baghdad was occupied on 9 April. Other operations
occurred against pockets of the Iraqi army including the capture and
occupation of Kirkuk on April 10, and the attack and capture of Tikrit
on 15 April. Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and the central leadership
went into hiding as the coalition forces completed the occupation of
the country. On 1 May an end of major combat operations was declared,
ending the invasion period and beginning the military occupation
period.
SOURCES
Iraq: A Country Study Helen Chapin Metz, Federal Research Division,
Library of Congress. 1990, U.S. Government Printing Office.
firstworldwar.com--capture of Basra
Uprisings and betrayals: a brief history of the left in Iraq--By Felix
Zorba and Roberto Sarti --
Alergia War (1992 onwards),
Angola (1992-2002)
Azerbaijan and Magorno-Karabakh Republic (1992-1994)
Bangladesh (1972-1997)
Bisnia and Herzegovina (1992-1995)
Burundi (1972)
Cambodia (1970-1075 and 1979-1991)
Chad (1966-1979)
China (1946-1949
Columbia (1978 0nwards)
Democratic Republic of the Congo (1996-1997 and 1998 onwards)
El Salvador (197901992)
Ethiopia (1976-1985)
Greece (1944-1949)
Guatemala (1974-1994)
India (1946-1949)
Indonesia (1975-199)
Korea (1950-1953)
Lebanon (1975-1978)
Mozambique (1979-1992)
Myanmar/Burma ( 1968-1995)
Nicaragua (1978-1979 and 1980-1989)
Nieria ( 1967-1970)
Pakistan (1971)
Peru ( 1980-1996)
The Philippines ( 1972-1996)
Russia (1994-1996)
Somolia ( 1988-1991 and 1992 onwards)
South Africa ( 1976-1994)
Sri Lanka ( 1972 onwards)
Sudan (1983-2005)
Tajikistan (1992-1997)
Turkey (1984-1999 and 2004 onwards)
Uganda (1986 onwards)
Yemen ( 1962 -1970)
Zimbabwe ( 1972-1979)
Lincoln (1809–1865) was shot on the evening of April 14, 1865, as he
sat in the presidential box at Ford's Theatre in Washington, D.C.,
watching a performance of the play Our American Cousin. The assassin
was actor John Wilkes Booth (1838–1865). After shooting Lincoln, Booth
jumped onto the stage, falling and breaking a leg. Wilkes limped away,
calling out, "Sic semper tyrannis" (a Latin phrase meaning "Thus
always to tyrants")....
Public interest in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy has
never died down. People around the world want to know who killed the
president and why and how he died. They also want to know what the
killer's hidden motives might have been, and whether he had acted
alone. Their insistent questions led to the formation of the House
Select Committee on Assassinations, a congressional group.
In 1978, the House Select Committee came to a conclusion that many
un-official investigators had already reached: that the president's
slaying was the result of a conspiracy. As we have already seen, a
conspiracy means that two or more persons were involved in a criminal
act.
Until that time, the Warren Commissioned Report, originally released
in September 1964, was the only official one. The report stated that a
solitary gunman named Lee Harvey Oswald was responsible. Working
alone, he shot and killed the president. Oswald was soon captured and
held by the Dallas, Texas, police for two days. Then Oswald himself
was slain as he was being transferred from one jail to another.
Oswald's slayer was Jack Ruby.
The Warren Commission decided that Ruby acted for twisted emotional
reasons and that he, too, acted alone. There was no conspiracy
involved in either case. So said the Warren Commission.
The House Select Committee's declaration of conspiracy inspired a rash
of books and at least two movies, as well as several TV programs. New
ones keep popping up, well into the 1990's. Each book and movie has
asserted that its analysis is the only foolproof one. As yet, however,
none of these has been accepted as offering all the right answers.
Let's look at some of these accumulated ideas and theories, and
perhaps come to some conclusions of our own. Bear in mind that some of
these assertions and accusations sound highly believable. But
remember, too, that no charges have been filed against anyone, and no
arrests have been made. Will there be any in the future, you ask?
Perhaps so; perhaps not.
The JFK assassination data can be divided into three groups:

1. The Method, or Means: How was the president killed?
2. The Motives: Why was he killed?
3. The Men Involved: Who killed him?
1. THE METHOD OR MEANS:

The president was riding in his open limousine, his back to the Texas
School Book Depository, where, on the sixth floor, Oswald was said to
have been perched. His rifle, propped up by book cartons, was aimed
directly at the back of the president's head.
Ahead and to the right of the president's motorcade was the grassy
knoll. There many spectators stood, ready to cheer the president as he
passed by. Among them, another gunman may have been waiting for HIS
chance to fire.
Oswald was accused of firing several shots from his position in the
Texas School Book Depository. Two of these struck the president in the
back of the head. But a third shot is said to have entered the
president's throat, just above his Adam's apple, and emerged through
the back of his neck.
Did this third shot actually go from the front of his neck to the
back? Doctor's at Parkland Hospital in Dallas, where the dying
president was taken, and doctors at the Bethesda Naval Hospital, where
the dead president was AGAIN examined, disagree. The Parkland groups
say there was an entry wound in his throat. The Bethesda group, on the
other hand, says there was an EXIT wound in his throat.
Many spectators standing on the grassy knoll at the time of the
slaying reported hearing at least one rifle shot fired from nearby.
They also reported seeing as many as four men hurrying away from the
back of the knoll as soon as the shots were fired. The Warren
investigators quizzed several of these witnesses but came to no
conclusion.
Oswald may have indeed fired the shots that killed the president, but
there is no clear-cut evidence that he ALONE did so. Nor was he even
definitely linked with the sixth-floor window from where the shots
were fired. Only minutes after the shooting, he was drinking a
Coca-Cola. Could he have left the firing site and composed himself so
quickly? Here's another factor to consider: firing a cheap rifle, as
Oswald did, should have left a powder burn on his cheek. After Oswald
was arrested, his cheek was examined: no such powder burn was found!
After Oswald's death, his palm print was found on his rifle butt,
indicating that it was he who did the shooting. Some investigators
charge, however, that a palm print could have been transferred from
his hand to the rifle butt after Oswald's. This could have been one of
many illegal efforts to tie Oswald to the crime.
2. THE MOTIVES:

Why was President Kennedy assassinated? Many reasonable speculations
have been offered. None, however, has been positively proven.
One set of theories says that it was the president's plans for Vietnam
that prompted his murder. By 1963 (the assassination year), the United
States was becoming more and more involved in the Vietnam war. The
U.S. had already sent supplies, arms, and several thousand "advisers"
and "instructors."
But the president wanted to go no further in aiding South Vietnam. He
was ready to stop sending aid, even though South Vietnam claimed to
have a democratic government and an army eager to wage war against
North Vietnam. The president said that Vietnam was too far away from
the United States, that South Vietnam's claim to democracy was false,
and that the U.S. had no business sending American troops to fight in
what was really a local war.
So, the theory goes, the president was killed by those who wanted the
United States to become actively involved in the Vietnam war. Another
theory holds that Kennedy was killed because he failed to help the
Cuban exiles in their 1961 attempt to invade Cuba and overthrow the
Communist government of Fidel Castro. And still another theory claims
that, because he did not destroy Cuba in the Cuban missile crisis of
1962, he angered anti-Castro factions and so was slain. Another theory
involves the president's relationship with his brother when Robert
Kennedy was attorney general. Robert was a relentless foe of organized
crime. The only way to stop the attorney general was to kill the
president. That's what some investigators think. They accuse the Mafia
Leaders and Jimmy Hoffa, the Teamster Union chief. Mind you, we are
talking theory. No real proof exists.
THE MEN INVOLVED: The movie "JFK" was first shown in December, 1991,
and will probably continue to be shown in theaters, on TV, and on
videocassettes for years to come. "JFK" 's screen credits acknowledge
the help of two books: Jim Garrison's "On the Trail of the Assassins"
and Jim Marr's "Crossfire: The Plot That Killed Kennedy."
The Garrison book is the partial autobiography of this former New
Orleans district attorney. It is mainly about his struggle to convict
a man named Clay Shaw for involvement in the Kennedy slaying. The book
also tells of Shaw's friendship with Oswald during the summer of '63
in New Orleans, AKA the Big Easy. Garrison argues that Shaw's
connection with Oswald makes him part of the Kennedy slaying.
Garrison's book ends with the not-guilty verdict that freed Clay Shaw.
"On the Trail of the Assassins" is a true-to-life story, perhaps
over-dramatized a bit when Garrison puts made-up words in his
character's mouths. Marr's book is factual, without a story line as in
the Garrison book. It gathers up the accounts of many investigators,
but comes to no final conclusions.
The movie "JFK" is something else again. It follows the story line of
the Garrison book---up to a point, that is. The stunning conclusion
abandons the cautious approach of the Garrison and Marrs books.
Instead, it puts a direct, sweeping accusation in the mouth of a
fictitious character known only as "X."
X proclaims that the conspiracy to kill JFK extends right up the
highest levels of the U.S. government---to the Pentagon, to the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, to the FBI and the CIA, and to the White House
itself.
The movie's director, producer, and writer are all one man: Oliver
Stone. He is responsible for all these statements, and more. He goes
on to tie in the military with American industry in a
military/industrial alliance.
It should be noted that Stone does not name names, He only says that
certain high-ranking men in these organizations were responsible for
the death of the president. They wanted JFK killed because he was a
threat to their plans.
Stone further claims that American Industry wanted the Vietnam war to
continue for reasons of greed: the more war, the higher industrial
profits.
X's charge of conspiracy reaches up into the White House. Although X
does not directly accuse by name the president who followed JFK into
office, there can be no doubt that he meant President Lyndon B.
Johnson, in office from 1963 to 1969. Johnson was Kennedy's vice
president. Before that, he was the U.S. Senate's Majority Leader. He
ran the Senate with an iron hand.
Kennedy had chosen Johnson as his running mate because Johnson could
produce a winning number of votes. Johnson expected to take an active
role in the Kennedy government. After entering office in 1961,
however, he was largely ignored. His duties were mostly confined to
cutting the ribbon when a new bridge or park was dedicated.
And Johnson was losing many of his once-loyal Texas followers. He sat
silent, biding his time. That time came, his accusers say, when the
president rode in the open limousine down a Dallas street, Johnson,
his enemies claim, engineered the whole assassination program.
These are extremely serious charges, but they cannot be proven.
Investigators have not been able to definitively link LBJ to the
killing of JFK. There is no question that Johnson was an ambitious,
powerful politician. Author Craig Zirbel, in his book "The Texas
Connection," attempts to prove Johnson's guilt by eliminating all
other suspects. Eventually, only Johnson is left. Therefore, he must
be guilty, according to Zirbel.
As for Jack Ruby, Oswald's killer, new facts have come to life. Over
the years it has been shown that he was a close associate of many
criminals. They would have liked to see the president and his brother
killed so that their illegal and unlawful activities could expand. But
Ruby died, as we know, before he could tell his story.
http://www.coverups.com/jfk/who.htm

Who Killed Kennedy And Why? - Coverups.com

In reality

In reality it does not matter who one believes was the actual physical
killer or killers that shot President John F Kennedy, what matters
moire is who were the motivators and organisers of his assassination
and who had most to gain from his untimely death. When one analyses
all the recorded public and private information there leaves little
doubt that  President John F Kennedy was murdered for and on behalf of
the same group of people, the International Banking families,
businessmen and industrialists all working for and/or in partnership
with the infamous international Russian Tsar Rothschild Banking
Family,

{Note:The Rothschilds have been in control of the world for a very
long time, their tentacles reaching into many aspects of our daily
lives, as is documented in the following timeline.  However, before
you jump to the timeline, please read this invaluable introduction
which will tell you who the Rothschilds are as oppose to who they
claim to be.

The Rothschilds claim that they are Jewish, when in fact they are
Khazars.  They are from a country called Khazaria, which occupied the
land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea which is now
predominantly occupied by Georgia.  The reason the Rothschilds claim
to be Jewish is that the Khazars under the instruction of the King,
converted to the Jewish faith in 740 A.D., but of course that did not
include converting their Asiatic Mongolian genes to the genes of the
Jewish people.

You will find that approximately 90% of people in the world today who
call themselves Jews are actually Khazars, or as they like to be
known, Ashkenazi Jews.  These people knowingly lie to the world with
their claims that the land of Israel is theirs by birthright, when in
actual fact their real homeland is over 800 miles away in Georgia.

So, next time you hear an Israeli Prime Minister bleating about the
so-called persecution of the Jews, consider this, every Prime Minister
of Israel has been an Ashkenazi Jew.  Therefore when all these Prime
Ministers have curried favour with the West for their re-establishment
of a Jewish homeland, they have knowingly and deliberately lied to
you, as they were never from that region, and they well know it,
because it is they who call themselves Ashkenazi Jews.

The Book of Revelation, Chapter 2, Verse 9, states the following which
would appear to be about these Ashkenazi Jews:

   "I know thy works, and tribulation and poverty, (but thou art
rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and
are not, butare the synagogue of Satan."

The most wealthy bloodline in the world bar none and the leader of the
Ashkenazi Jews in the world today is the Rothschild family.  As you
will see in the timeline, the Rothschilds have obtained this position
through lies, manipulation and murder.  Their bloodline also extends
into the Royal Families of Europe, and the following family names:
Astor; Bundy; Collins; duPont; Freeman; Kennedy; Morgan; Oppenheimer;
Rockefeller; Sassoon; Schiff; Taft; and Van Duyn.

However, these are not the only bloodlines to worry about.  You are
probably aware of the centuries old pratice undertaken by many
Ashkenazi Jews whereby they would change their name, in order for them
to appear part of the dominant race of the country in which they
lived, so as they could obtain influential positions in that country,
which they would then exploit to serve their real masters elsewhere.
There is plenty of evidence to prove the Rothschilds continue that
deceptive tradition.

Furthermore the Rothschilds are known to sire many children secretly
that they can put into positions of power when required.  This started
with the very first man who took the name Rothschild, who had a secret
sixth son.  Finally, remember the world is a diverse place, I could if
I wanted change my name to Rothschild, or any of the names listed
above, and that would not make me part of this family anymore than
converting to Judaism in 740 A.D. will make these Ashkenazis Jewish.

Ashkenazi Jew, David Ben-Gurion, one of the father founders of Israel
and its first Prime Minister, candidly describes Zionist aims in his
diary (21 May 1948) as follows, “The Achilles heel of the Arab
coalition is the Lebanon. Muslim supremacy in this country is
artificial and can easily be overthrown. A Christian State ought to be
set up there, with its southern frontier on the river Litani. We would
sign a treaty of alliance with this State. Thus when we have broken
the strength of the Arab Legion and bombed Amman, we could wipe out
Trans-Jordan, after that Syria would fall. And if Egypt still dared to
make war on us, we would bomb Port Said, Alexandria and Cairo.

We should thus end the war and would have but paid to Egypt, Assyria
and Chaldea on behalf of our ancestors.”

1949:  On October 1, Mao Tse Tsung declares the founding of the
People's Republic Of China in Tiananmen Square, Beijing.  He is funded
by Rothschild created Communism in Russia and also the following
Rothschild agents:  Solomon Adler, a former United States Treasury
official who was a Soviet Spy; Israel Epstein, the son of a Jewish
Bolshevik imprisoned by the Tsar in Russia for trying to forment a
revolution there; and Frank Coe, a leading official of the Rothschild
owned IMF.

1950: Israel passes their law of return, guaranteeing every Jew
worldwide the right to dwell in the state of Israel, however the
Palestinians even though they had lived there for 1300 years, were
denied that right.

John Davitt, former chief of the Justice Department's internal
security section notes that the Israeli intelligence service is the
second most active in the United States after the Soviets and of
course both Israel and the Soviet Union are run by an Ashkenazi Jewish
leadership.

1951: On 1 April the Israeli Secret Intelligence Agency the Mossad,
which will go on to terrorize the world, is formed. The motto of the
Mossad is probably the most disgusting secret service motto in the
world, it is,

"By Way Of Deception,  Thou Shalt Do War."

1953: N. M. Rothschild & Sons found the British Newfoundland
Corporation Limited to develop 60,000 square miles of land in
Newfoundland, Canada, which comprised a power station to harness the
power of the Hamilton (later renamed Churchill) Falls. At the time
this was the largest construction project ever to be undertaken by a
private company.

1954: "The Lavon Affair."  Israeli agents recruit Egyptian citizens of
Jewish descent to bomb Western targets in Egypt, and plant evidence to
frame Arabs, in an apparent attempt to upset American/Egyptian
relations. Israeli defense minister, Ashkenazi Jew, Pinhas Lavon is
eventually removed from office, though many think real responsibility
lay with David Ben-Gurion.

A hidden microphone planted by the Israelis is discovered in the
Office of the US Ambassador in Tel Aviv.

1955: Edmond de Rothschild founds Compagnie Financiere, Paris.

1956: Telephone taps are found connected to two telephones in the
residence of the US military attaché in Tel Aviv.

1957: James de Rothschild dies and it is reported (by the Rothschild
owned media) that he bequeaths a large sum of money to the state of
Israel to pay for the construction of their parliament building, the
Knesset. He states that the Knesset should be, "a symbol, in the eyes
of all men, of the permanence of the State of Israel." On page 219 of
his book, "Tales of the British Aristocracy," L.G. Pine, the Editor of
Burke’s Peerage, states that the Jews, "have made themselves so
closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are
unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual. So closely linked are the
Jews and the lords that a blow against the Jews in this country would
not be possible without injuring the aristocracy also." Maurice de
Rothschild dies in Paris.

1962: de Rothschild Frères establishes Imétal as an umbrella company
for all their mineral mining interests.

Frederic Morton publishes his book, The Rothschilds, in which he states,

"Though they control scores of industrial, commercial, mining and
tourist corporations, not one bears the name Rothschild. Being private
partnerships, the family houses never need to, and never do, publish a
single public balance sheet, or any other report of their financial
condition." This attitude reveals the true aim of the Rothschilds, to
eliminate all competition and create their own worldwide monopoly.

1963: On June 4th President John F. Kennedy (the 35th President of the
United States 1961 – 1963) signs Executive Order 11110 which returned
to the U.S. government the power to issue currency, without going
through the Rosthchilds owned Federal Reserve. Less than 6 months
later on November 22nd , president Kennedy is assassinated by the
Rothschilds for the same reason as they assassinated President Abraham
Lincoln in 1865, he wanted to print American money for the American
people, as oppose to for the benefit of a money grabbing war mongering
foreign elite.

Another, and probably the primary, reason for Kennedy's assassination
is however, the fact that he made it quite clear to Israeli Prime
Minister, David Ben-Gurion, that under no circumstances would he agree
to Israel becoming a nuclear state.  The Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz on
February 5, 1999, in a review of, Avner Cohen's book, "Israel and the
Bomb," states the following,

"The murder of American President John F. Kennedy brought to an abrupt
end the massive pressure being applied by the U.S. administration on
the government of Israel to discontinue the nuclear program...The book
implied that, had Kennedy remained alive, it is doubtful whether
Israel would today have a nuclear option."

Edmond de Rothschild establishes La Compagnie Financière Edmond de
Rothschild (LCF), in Switzerland as a venture capital house. This
later develops into an investment bank and asset management company
with many affiliates. He also marries his wife Nadine and they have a
son, Benjamin de Rothschild.

1965: Israel illegally obtains enriched uranium from NUMEC (Nuclear
Materials and Equipment Corporation).

1967: The treatment of the Palestinians by the Zionist Jews, finally
ignites enough anger in the Arab world for Egypt, Jordan and Syria to
mobilise on Israel's borders.  All of these three countries are
suddenly attacked by Israel and as a result the Sinai which included
Gaza was stolen from Egypt, and the West Bank and the Jordan River
stolen from Jordan.

As a result of this, on June 8, the Israelis launch an attack on the
USS Liberty with Israeli aircraft and motor torpedo boats, in an
effort to blame it on Egypt, to bring America into the war on their
side, and of course follow to the letter, their Mossad motto, "By Way
Of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War."As a result of their attack, 34
American servicemen were killed and 174 wounded.  Israel lies as
usual, claiming it mistook this warship that was flying a large United
States flag, for an ancient out-of-service Egyptian horse carrier El
Quseir, that was 180 feet shorter.  They also claim the ship was in
the war zone, when it was actually in international waters, far from
any fighting.  The Israeli's attack on this warship lasts for 75
minutes during which time they shoot up one of the United States
flags, resulting in the sailors desperately raising another one. In
the aftermath of this attack, the American sailors who survived are
warned by the United States military not to discuss the matter with
anyone due to, "national security."  This story gets no prominence in
the Rothschild controlled mainstream media and as usual Israel is in
no way even rebuked for their crimes by their subservient country of
America.

1913: Jacob Schiff sets up the Anti Defamation League (ADL) in the
United States.  This organisation is formed to slander anyone who
questions or challenges the Rothschild global conspiracy as,
"anti-semitic."

1914:  The start of World War I.  In this war, the German Rothschilds
loan money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds loan money to the
British, and the French Rothschilds loan money to the French.
Futhermore, the Rothschilds have control of the three European news
agencies, Wolff (est. 1849) in Germany, Reuters (est. 1851) in
England, and Havas (est. 1835) in France.

The Rothschilds use Wolff to manipulate the German people into a
fervour for war. From around this time, the Rothschilds are rarely
reported in the media, because they own the media.

1914:  The start of World War I.  In this war, the German Rothschil

Sweden reflects on Anna Lindh's death


Published: 11 Sep 08 10:52 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation

On the fifth anniversary of the assassination of foreign minister Anna Lindh, Sweden is reflecting more on the legacy of her work in politics than the tragic circumstances surrounding her death.

Lindh’s name lives on in a number of foundations, research programmes, and awards.

“She’s very much alive in the party; at the same time there’s been a very long period of mourning,” Social Democratic Party Secretary Marita Ulvskog told the TT news agency.

“But we’re beginning to reach a point where what she said and did is being utilized.”

On the Social Democrats’ website it is possible to order the 'Palme-package', created in memory of assassinated Prime Minister Olof Palme. For the last year a Lindh-package has also been available.

The Lindh-package offers membership in the party, a book, a picture of Anna Lindh, a report from the annual Anna Lindh seminars, a newsletter, and the party’s international programme.

It’s meant to provide a portrait of the person and her career, tracking her development from the Social Democratic youth organization (SSU) in Enköping to the position of Deputy Mayor of Stockholm and high level ministerial posts. She was also regarded as an insprirational figure for younger politicians.

Neither Ulvskog nor the party's press secretary could say however whether there had been much demand for the package named after the woman who had been tipped to take over as party leader after Göran Persson.

Her memory is also carried on by the Anna Lindh Memorial Fund, which awards annual prizes for remarkable contributions to human rights. The Fund has also helped compile an archive of speeches and articles penned by the former foreign minister.

To coincide with the anniversary of her death, the Fund has organized a seminar focusing on the 2001 Macedonia crisis, where Lindh is considered to have played an important role in hindering the outbreak of a new Balkan War.

The politician's legacy is also evident in Alexandria in Egypt, where the Anna Lindh Foundation is based.

The foundation was set up after her death and has little to do with Lindh other than in name, according to retired ambassador Lars Bjarme.

"But the foundation works with something in which she was very interested: a dialogue between Europe and countries in the Middle East," he said.

TT/The Local (news@thelocal.se/08 656 6518)

http://www.thelocal.se/29724/20101020/

Anna Lindh's care to be reviewed: agency

Published: 20 Oct 10 13:48 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation
Updated: 20 Oct 10 17:30 CET

Sweden's National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen) will review the care former foreign minister Anna Lindh received after she was stabbed in central Stockholm in September 2003.

"The National Board of Health and Welfare will probe the care of former foreign minister Anna Lindh," the board said in a statement.

It pointed out that it did not normally re-examine cases older than two years, but that it would make an exception due to the huge public interest in the case.

"The case is of great public interest and has to do with how care worked in a situation where the foreign minister was the victim of an attack," board general director Lars-Erik Holm said in the statement.

"I have turned to the other general directors of corresponding authorities in the Nordic countries to get their help in appointing experts," he added.

Stockholm's Karolinska University Hospital last month requested that the board analyse Lindh's treatment, saying it wanted an independent review after commercial broadcast TV4 charged in a news programme that she may have been saved with better care.

Hospital spokesman Klas Österman insisted at the time, "We have not seen any signs, then or now, to indicate that we made any mistakes."

Lindh was stabbed repeatedly in the arms, chest and abdomen by a man with a history of psychiatric problems as she shopped at the upmarket NK department store in Stockholm without a bodyguard on September 10th, 2003. She died of massive internal bleeding some 13 hours later in the early hours of September 11th.

The board's decision comes three days after the broadcast of TV4's "Cold Facts" (Kalla Fakta) programme on Lindh's treatment.

The half-hour show featured a detailed presentation of the treatment she received from the moment she arrived at the hospital, through an eight-hour operation during which she received up to 50 litres of blood, until she was pronounced dead at 5.29am on September 11th.

An unnamed Swedish expert, whose face was blurred onscreen, said the hospital could have used better methods to stop the minister's bleeding from the abdomen, notably by using the so-called "damage control" operation method.

The programme also interviewed Dr. Donald Trunkey, an expert trauma surgeon at Oregon's Health and Science University, who described the rush to operate Lindh without first slowing the bleeding "futile."

"In the United States, if somebody did that in my hospital, I would call [such an eight-hour operation] foolhardy. I mean, you are not going to win," he said, adding the lengthy operation may have worsend her condition.

"I would have classified her as a preventable death," he said.

Eva Franchell, who was shopping with Lindh when she was attacked, said she was pleased an investigation would be launched.

"It opens up old wounds, of course, but I feel the rumours that have been spread around have been very unpleasant. That is why I think it is good that this can all be ended," she told the TT news agency.

Lindh's killer Mijailo Mijailovic, now 32, is serving a life sentence for the murder.

The killing of the 46-year-old mother of two young boys sent a shock wave around Sweden, bringing back painful memories of the still-unsolved 1986 assassination of prime minister Olof Palme.

TT/AFP/The Local (news@thelocal.se)

http://www.thelocal.se/29318/20100929/

http://www.thelocal.se/29318/20100929/

Hospital demands probe of Anna Lindh's care

Published: 29 Sep 10 12:39 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation

Karolinska University Hospital has requested an inquiry into the care it gave former foreign minister Anna Lindh after her fatal stabbing in September 2003.

The hospital wants Sweden's National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen) to review the treatment Lindh received at the hospital after she was stabbed in a Stockholm department store.

Lindh died on the operating table at Karolinska's facilities in Solna, north of Stockolm.

The hospital has reviewed charts detailing Lindh's treatment and doesn't believe that any mistakes were made, but nevertheless has requested that the health board conduct an independent investigation.

The reason behind the request is a forthcoming television broadcast produced by Sweden's TV4 which, according to Karolinska, asserts that Lindh didn't receive proper care at the hospital.

"Because the episode has such great national and historic significance, it's important to prevent the spread of rumours surrounding this matter. We believe it's appropriate that the National Board of Health and Welfare carry out an investigation into the care of Anna Lindh," wrote Karolinska University Hospital in its petition, which arrived on Wednesday at the agency's regional oversight division in Stockholm.

Lindh was attacked and stabbed while shopping in the upscale NK department store in central Stockholm around 4pm local time on September 10th, 2003.

She remained conscious following the attack, with initial reports indicating she had been cut in the arm and that she wasn't seriously injured.

She was taken to Karolinska, where she was placed on an operating table so doctors could attend to her wounds.

Lindh died at 5.29am the following morning following massive blood loss caused by internal bleeding.

The knife had sliced through a number of important blood vessels in her mid-section, including the portal vein and the aorta. Lindh's liver had also been damaged.

Two weeks later, on September 24th, 24-year-old Mijailo Mijailovic was arrested for the stabbing. The Supreme Court sentenced him to life in prison for Lindh's murder on December 2nd, 2004.

Among the evidence cited during the trial were images from surveillance cameras in NK, as well as his DNA.

Karolinska Chief Medical Officer Stefan Engqvist said that the information, which the hospital attributes to the TV4 investigative news programme Kalla Fakta, is hard to address publicly, in part because he doesn't really know what the criticism is based on and in part because the hospital doesn't release information from Lindh's file.

"Our position becomes a bit awkward in this situation. We have tough regulations about confidentiality and laws on secrecy that we can't break," he told the TT news agency.

He said that Sweden's emergency trauma care has evolved since 2003, but that according to procedures commonly used at the time, the hospital reacted in the best possible way in the operating room and that everyone involved did everything they could to save the foreign minister's life.

"We've gone through all the documentation ourselves and haven't found anything wrong and nothing that would warrant a report according to Lex Maria," said Engqvist, referencing Sweden's Lex Maria laws, the informal name used to refer to regulations governing the reporting of injuries or incidents in the Swedish health care system.

"But we would also gladly have an independent investigation and for that we turn to the National Board of health and Welfare. We want to avoid the spreading of rumours."

TT/The Local (news@thelocal.se/08 656 6518)

http://www.thelocal.se/28404/20100816/

Security beefed up for Sahlin due to threats

Published: 16 Aug 10 15:53 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation

security" class="nodec">Security for Social Democratic leader Mona Sahlin has been tightened due to serious threats against her just over a month before elections, Swedish media reported on Monday.

According to the tabloid Expressen, security for the prime ministerial candidate has gradually increased after a "barrage of threatening emails and letters to Mona Sahlin's office in parliament."

"The threat level has changed," an unnamed police source told the paper.

When contacted by AFP, a spokesman for the Swedish security police, which handles security for high-profile politicians, refused to comment on the
information.

On Sunday, when Sahlin held a large campaign rally in Stockholm ahead of the upcoming September 19th election, four bodyguards wearing bulletproof vests were at her side the entire time, according to Expressen.

The 53-year-old career politician has received numerous threats in the past, the paper added. After a scandal dubbed the Toblerone Affair over her use of a party credit card to buy chocolate and other items in 1995, Sahlin was for a time forced to work in a bulletproof room.

In 2004, during a visit to the central Swedish town of Norrköping, a man walked up to her and asked if she was Mona Sahlin before punching her.

Sweden has been traumatised by two political assassinations in recent
decades. Prime Minister Olof Palme was shot on a Stockholm street in 1986, while foreign minister Anna Lindh was stabbed to death in an upscale department store in the heart of the capital in 2003.

Like Sahlin, both Palme and Lindh were Social Democrats. Neither of them had bodyguards with them at the time they were killed.

AFP/The Local (news@thelocal.se)

http://www.thelocal.se/30974/20101221/

US 'pressured' Sweden on Afghanistan

US 'pressured' Sweden on Afghanistan

Published: 21 Dec 10 10:53 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation

Sweden was pressured by the United States to increase its commitment in Afghanistan, documents released by WikiLeaks reveal.

The documents were sent from the US embassy in Stockholm, according to a report in the Dagens Nyheter (DN) daily.

The information was dated July 2009 and details that September was considered to be the best month to exercise pressure as the Swedish foreign and defence ministries would then be busy with bills to be submitted to parliament.

The documents detail the opinion that once the parliamentary bills were submitted it would be more difficult to influence the Swedish force in Afghanistan.

A further plan was for the Swedish defence minister Sten Tolgfors to be flattered and thanked for Sweden's growing commitment in Afghanistan during a meeting in Washington on July 20th 2009.

Furthermore the documents show that a senior official at the Sweden defence ministry has forwarded advice on how the United States could influence Sweden's power-brokers to deploy more resources to Afghanistan.

The official told DN that he discussed the matter at the US embassy in Stockholm.

In the months following the attempts to influence Sweden's Afghanistan commitment, the country has dramatically increased its expenditure.

The Swedish share of the cost for the International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) will amount to more than 1.5 billion kronor ($220 million) in 2010, an increase of almost 50 percent on 2009.

Sweden first deployed troops in Afghanistan in the beginning of 2002 and now has around 500 troops based near the northern city of Mazar-i-Sharif.

In December the parliament passed a government bill to extend the military mission in the war-torn country until the end of 2011, allowing for the deployment of up to 855 people.

The bill required a compromise between the governing minority centre-right Alliance and the opposition Social Democrats and Greens, and came barely a week after a suicide bomber cited Sweden's troop presence in Afghanistan in a message sent shortly before he blew himself up near a crowded pedestrian street in central Stockholm.

TT/The Local/pvs (news@thelocal.se)

http://www.thelocal.se/30970/20101220/

Sweden's Alliance parties gain majority in new poll

Sweden's Alliance parties gain majority in new poll

Published: 20 Dec 10 16:23 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation

A new poll has revealed that if an election were held now, the ruling Alliance would gain a majority in Sweden's parliament, the Riksdag, while support for Sweden's Social Democratic Party continues to slide.

The latest opinion survey conducted by United Minds and Cints in collaboration with newspaper Aftonbladet shows that both the ruling Moderates and Liberal Party have increased their levels of support.

Separately, support for the Centre and Christian Democratic Parties has fallen below the levels they registered for the general election on September 19th. However, the Christian Democrats, the smallest party in the Riksdag, would clear the 4 percent threshhold to remain in parliament.

Meanwhile, the Social Democrats continue to lose support from voters.

"If it were close to an election, it would be more problematic, but I think people understand that there is not an election now and that much can happen," United Minds' opinion director Carl Melin told Aftonbladet.

While support for the Social Democrats and Left Party continue to fall, the Green Party continues to gain more support. Support for the far-right Sweden Democrats also outpaces the party's election result in the fall.

The Moderates currently have 31.7 percent support, up 0.7 percentage points from November. The Liberal Party stands at 7.5 percent, 0.5 percentage points ahead of last month.

However, the Centre Party and Christian Democrats are at 5.5 percent and 4.8 respectively, down 0.8 and 0.1 percentage points respectively.

Together, the Alliance has 49.5 percent, up 0.3 percentage points from November, compared with 42.2 percent for the Red-Green parties, whose support fell 1.2 percentage points.

Among then, support for the Social Democrats slipped 1.5 percentage points to 27.6 percent and 0.6 percentage points to 5.2 percent for the Left Party.

However, backing for the Green Party grew 0.9 percentage points in December to 9.4 percent from the previous month. Support for the Sweden Democrats also rose 0.9 percentage points to 6.9 percent this month.

Support for other parties increased 0.1 percentage points to 1.4 percent.

United Minds interviewed 1,148 respondents over the age of 18 from November 23rd to Sunday, asking them, "How would you vote if there were a Riksdag election today?"

Vivian Tse (news@thelocal.se)

http://www.thelocal.se/30880/20101216/

http://www.thelocal.se/30880/20101216/

Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt on a Kabul street

Sweden votes to extend Afghanistan mission

Published: 16 Dec 10 08:27 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation

Swedish lawmakers in the country's parliament, the Riksdag, voted on Wednesday to extend the country's military mission in Afghanistan until the end of 2011.

"Sweden will make an armed force of up to 855 people available to the international security force in Afghanistan until the end of 2011," they said in a statement, adding that the troop level would likely remain at the present level of 500 soldiers.

The vote came a month after Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt, whose centre-right coalition came up two seats short of a house majority in general elections in September, secured a deal with the opposition Social Democrats and the Greens.

The Social Democrats and Greens, in a since-dissolved coalition with the formerly communist Left Party, had campaigned ahead of the elections on demanding a withdrawal of Swedish troops from Afghanistan.

However, the two left-wing parties shifted their position after the far-right Sweden Democrats were voted into parliament for the first time and handed the role of kingmaker.

The two parties agreed to a broad proposal, aiming to pull all Swedish combat troops out of Afghanistan between 2012 and 2014, while maintaining a largely civilian support presence after that.

The far-right Sweden Democrats and the Left Party, which have both want Swedish forces brought home sooner, opposed the motion to extend the mandate next year, but it passed easily nonetheless, with 290 votes in favour, 20 opposed and 19 abstaining.

Sweden is officially neutral and not a member of NATO and the question of how long its troops should take part in the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan is a sensitive one.

In October, the Scandinavian country lost its fifth soldier since it first deployed troops in Afghanistan near the northern Afghan city of Mazar-i-Sharif, at the beginning of 2002.

The parliament vote also came less than a week after a suicide bomber railed against Sweden's troop presence in Afghanistan in a message sent shortly before he blew himself up near a crowded pedestrian street in central Stockholm, narrowly missing wreaking carnage among Christmas shoppers.

AFP/The Local (news@thelocal.se)







http://www.thelocal.se/tag/Anna_Lindh

Anna_lindh

The following articles have been tagged with "Anna_lindh":

Swedish diplomat: new WikiLeaks 'regrettable'

Politics: 29 Nov 10
Over 800 secret American documents about relations with Sweden have been released by WikiLeaks, according to Swedish media reports. READ »

Sweden knew of US surveillance: report

National: 19 Nov 10
Sweden’s former Social Democratic government was informed in 2002 about a surveillance programme run by the US embassy in Stockholm, secret documents reveal. READ »

Anna Lindh's care to be reviewed: agency

National: 20 Oct 10
Sweden's National Board of Health and Welfare will review the care former foreign minister Anna Lindh received after she was stabbed in central Stockholm in September 2003. READ »

Hospital demands probe of Anna Lindh's care

National: 29 Sep 10
Karolinska University Hospital has requested an inquiry into the care it gave former foreign minister Anna Lindh after her fatal stabbing in September 2003. READ »

Sahlin and Reinfeldt enter final sprint for lasting political glory

Politics: 18 Sep 10
With polls set to open in 24 hours rivals Fredrik Reinfeldt and Mona Sahlin are both looking for an electoral victory to cement their leadership status after long political comebacks. READ »

Security beefed up for Sahlin due to threats

Politics: 16 Aug 10
Security for Social Democratic leader Mona Sahlin has been tightened due to serious threats against her just over a month before elections, Swedish media reported on Monday. READ »

Obama meeting will be Svanberg's toughest test

National: 14 Jun 10
BP’s problems are proving to be the toughest test yet in the career of Swedish business’s golden boy Carl-Henric Svanberg, writes James Savage. READ »

Anna Lindh memorial inaugurated in Stockholm

Politics: 5 May 10
A memorial square to Anna Lindh, the former Swedish foreign minister murdered in 2003, was inaugurated in Stockholm on Tuesday near where she made her final public appearance. READ »

Anna Lindh widower Bo Holmberg dies

Politics: 12 Feb 10
Bo Holmberg, the husband of assassinated Swedish foreign minister Anna Lindh, has died aged 67. READ »

Reinfeldt seeks answers on Russian dumping

National: 5 Feb 10
Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt has asked for an explanation from the previous Social Democrat government over Russia's release of toxic waste into Swedish waters in the Baltic Sea. READ »

Newspaper cleared of defaming ex-Lindh murder suspect

Society: 4 Feb 10
Southern Swedish newspaper Sydsvenskan has been cleared of libel charges after being sued by the initial suspect in the murder of Swedish foreign minister Anna Lindh in 2002. READ »

Russian nuclear waste dumped off Sweden

National: 4 Feb 10
The Russian military is suspected of having dumped chemical weapons and radioactive waste off the Swedish island of Gotland in the beginning of the 1990s. READ »

Lindh murder suspect sues newspaper for defamation

National: 3 Feb 10
A libel case involving Swedish newspaper Sydsvenskan and the initial suspect in the murder of Swedish foreign minister Anna Lindh in 2002 opened in a Malmö court on Wednesday. READ »

Swine flu named year's top Swedish news story

National: 30 Dec 09
Swine flu beat out both the June death of Michael Jackson and the Stockholm helicopter heist in September as the top Swedish news story of 2009, according to a new study. READ »

Almedalen — Swedish openness galore

Analysis & Opinion: 7 Jul 09
Anyone who doubts that Sweden is a country characterised by openness and informality should visit Visby during the first week of July, writes Olle Wästberg, Director-General of the Swedish Institute. READ »

Call for probe into Sweden-CIA terror links

Politics: 8 May 09
Two prominent Left Party politicians are calling for Sweden to set up an independent truth commission to look into how Sweden cooperated with the United States during the war on terror. READ »

Bodström reported over CIA terror deportations

National: 19 Jan 09
Former justice minister Thomas Bodström and former prime minister Göran Persson have been reported to the Riksdag's constitutional committee after new details emerged over the expulsion of two terror suspects from Sweden to Egypt in 2001. READ »

Sweden pressured in 2001 terror case: report

National: 19 Jan 09
Fresh details have surfaced about the deportation of two terror suspects from Sweden to Egypt in December 2001, including allegations of US pressure and the role of former foreign minister Anna Lindh, following the release a new book on Monday. READ »

Ex-policeman: Lindh murder investigation 'full of mistakes'

National: 10 Nov 08
The investigation into the assassination of Foreign Minister Anna Lindh in 2003 was just as poorly handled in the first 24 hours as the Olof Palme investigation in 1986, according to a former police chief. READ »

'Meat mountain' ex-minister slams Swedish security service

Politics: 22 Oct 08
Sweden's former Finance Minister Pär Nuder has criticized the country's security service over its failure to protect assassinated Foreign Minister Anna Lindh. READ »

Sweden reflects on Anna Lindh's death

Politics: 11 Sep 08
On the fifth anniversary of the assassination of foreign minister Anna Lindh, Sweden is reflecting more on the legacy of her work in politics than the tragic circumstances surrounding her death. READ »

Getting away with murder? Papers debate Rödeby verdict

Analysis & Opinion: 9 May 08
James Savage looks how Sweden's papers reacted to a controversial acquittal in the case of a man who shot a teenage boy dead in southern Sweden last year. READ »

China, Reinfeldt, and the Olympics: a real mouthful

Analysis & Opinion: 15 Apr 08
Social democratic newspaper editor Eric Sundström hopes Fredrik Reinfeldt at least says something about human rights and the Olympics during the Prime Minister’s visit to China. READ »

Karolinska Hospital slammed for lax patient secrecy

Society: 18 Nov 07
Poor security procedures at one of Sweden's top teaching hospitals have led to insufficient control over who accesses patients' medical records. READ »

Persson reflects on election defeat in new book

Politics: 23 Oct 07
Göran Persson has written a book about his ten years as Sweden's prime minister. In it, he explains how he could have won the election if he had only ignored the advice of his finance minister. READ »

Knife man entered employment ministry

National: 29 Sep 07
A man carrying a large hunting knife succeeded in entering the Ministry for Employment before being arrested later in central Stockholm, it has been revealed. READ »

Expressen fights former Lindh murder suspect over libel claim

National: 27 Jul 07
Swedish tabloid Expressen is to continue fighting a lawsuit brought against them by the man first suspected of murdering foreign minister Anna Lindh in 2003. "What they did must be a world record for slander," says the man's lawyer. READ »

Mijailovic wants to stay in Sweden

National: 14 May 07
Mijailo Mijailovic, the man who murdered Swedish foreign minister Anna Lindh, has decided to give up on the idea of a transfer to a Serbian prison. "He's in a catch 22 situation," says his lawyer. READ »

Mijailovic must stay in Swedish jail

National: 6 Feb 07
Mijailo Mijailovic, the man who murdered Swedish foreign minister Anna Lindh, has had his application to serve his sentence in his parents' homeland of Serbia refused by authorities in Stockholm. READ »

Borg in plane controversy

Politics: 2 Feb 07
Anders Borg has come in for criticism for requesting the government plane to land at the airport nearest his home. "Common practice," says his press secretary. READ »

Lindh killer faces uncertain future

National: 20 Jan 07
Mijailo Mijailovic wants to serve his sentence for the murder of Anna Lindh in Serbia. But Swedish authorities will not permit a transfer until Serbia decides on the length of his sentence. READ »

Freivalds makes millions from apartment

Politics: 13 Jan 07
It was the apartment that caused her resignation as justice minister, after she bought it in contravention of government policy. But Laila Freivalds can comfort herself with a profit of 5 million kronor. READ »

'Sahlin will lead Social Democrats'

Analysis & Opinion: 4 Jan 07
Sweden's Social Democrats are looking for a new leader and Mona Sahlin seems to be the front runner. The Local asked political expert Stig-Björn Ljunggren to help us size up the contenders. READ »

Freivalds cashes in on controversial flat

National: 3 Jan 07
Laila Freivalds was forced to step down as justice minister in 2000 when her property dealings ran counter to government policy. Now its payback time. READ »

Tougher rules for criminal psychiatric patients

Society: 3 Jan 07
People convicted of crimes and sentenced to psychiatric care could face tougher restrictions when released, says Sweden's justice minister Beatrice Ask, who wants to make sure patients are followed up. READ »

Mijailovic accused of beating fellow prisoner

National: 1 Nov 06
Anna Lindh's killer Mijailo Mijailovic has admitted beating a sleeping fellow prisoner over the head with a metal object ripped from a radiator. But, he claims, he did so because he feared for his life. READ »

Lindh killer 'should not go to Serbia'

Politics: 29 Sep 06
A senior Liberal has called for Mijailo Mijailovic, who killed Swedish foreign minister Anna Lindh, to be denied his wish to serve out his sentence in Serbia. READ »

Israeli officials "dance a jig" over Alliance win

National: 22 Sep 06
Sweden's change of government is reported to have caused delight in the Israeli government, which saw the Social Democrats as extra-critical of the Jewish state. But a Green MP says things won't change much. READ »

Ministers pay tribute to murdered Lindh

Politics: 11 Sep 06
Three years after Sweden's foreign minister Anna Lindh was murdered in a Stockholm department store, ministers pay their tributes at her grave. READ »

Harvard launches Anna Lindh professor

Politics: 30 Aug 06
Harvard University has created a new professorship in memory of Anna Lindh, Sweden's murdered foreign minister. The post will be dedicated to global leadership and public policy, the university says. READ »

Lindh killer could serve sentence in Serbia

National: 22 Aug 06
Serbia has indicated that the man who murdered Swedish foreign minister Anna Lindh in 2003 could serve his prison sentence in a Serbian jail. Now it's up to the Swedish governement. READ »

Lindh killer charged with assault

National: 3 Aug 06
The man who murdered Swedish foreign minister Anna Lindh in 2003 has been charged with assaulting a patient at a psychiatric asylum. READ »

Shots fired in NK

National: 29 Jun 06
Two men have been arrested after shots were fired during the attempted robbery of a jewellery department at the NK store in Stockholm on Thursday. Police say that no injuries have been reported. READ »

King reaches 60 secure on his throne

Lifestyle: 27 Apr 06
This weekend will see King Carl XVI Gustaf feted by foreign royalty, parliamentarians and thousands of his people. As he celebrates his 60th birthday, Sweden's king can satisfy himself with approval ratings that would make a politician green with envy. READ »

Analysis: Why Freivalds had to go

Analysis & Opinion: 21 Mar 06
After a year of unrelenting criticism over her handling of the tsunami disaster and latterly of the Muhammad cartoons, Persson had little choice but to accept Laila Freivalds' resignation. READ »

Olof Palme: the controversy lives on

Lifestyle: 27 Feb 06
It is twenty years since Sweden was shaken by the murder of one of its most controversial politicians. But what impact does the radical, campaigning prime minister Olof Palme have on modern Sweden? READ »

Schyman receives death threats

Politics: 14 Feb 06
A note on the door of a cinema where leading feminist Gudrun Schyman was giving a lecture raises fears for her safety. "I see it as a death threat," says Schyman. READ »

"Brawl" leads to SD youth chief arrest

Politics: 29 Jan 06
The head of the Social Democrats' youth movement, Anna Sjödin, is accused of assualting a doorman in a bar in Stockholm. She was held overnight by police before being released. READ »

Bodström gets bodyguards after threat

National: 28 Jan 06
Thomas Bodström and his family have been given round-the-clock security after "informants in the underworld" told police there was a threat against Sweden's justice minister, it has been reported. READ »

Patient secrecy to be ignored for security police

Society: 19 Oct 05
Details about psychiatric patients are even kept from the prying eyes of Sweden's security police, Säpo. But not for long, perhaps - Säpo needs more power to combat the threat to ministers and royalty, says the government. READ »

Back to prison for Lindh killer

National: 8 Oct 05
Mijailo Mijailovic, who last year was found guilty of murdering Sweden's former foreign minister Anna Lindh, is to be transferred out of psychiatric care and back into Stockholm's maximum security prison, Kumla. READ »

Lindh killer attacks fellow patient

National: 21 Sep 05
Mijailo Mijailovic, who murdered Sweden's former foreign minister Anna Lindh in 2003, has brutally attacked another inmate at the secure psychiatric clinic in Sundsvall where he is being treated. READ »

Mijailovic transferred to asylum

National: 11 Sep 05
SEE ALSO: SIX PEOPLE WERE ARRESTED FOR LINDH MURDER
Mijailo Mijailovic, who killed Swedish foreign minister Anna Lindh exactly 2 years ago, has been moved to a psychiatric unit. A doctor decided he was unwell and needed help, the asylum says. READ »

Six people were arrested for Lindh murder

Smörgåsbord: 9 Sep 05
The man in charge of the investigation into Anna Lindh's killing says that six men were arrested over the murder. Until now, only two arrests had been revealed to the public. READ »

Stockholm Syndrome: Rush hour madness

Analysis & Opinion: 8 Sep 05
Our Stockholm Syndrome correspondent has a close call on one of the city's blue buses and finds out that Swedes on public transport have a more immediate fear than terrorism. READ »

Foreign prisoners reject Swedish hospitality

Society: 12 Aug 05
Swedish prisons may be considered plush by many, but an increasing number of prisoners with foreign backgrounds are trying to get moved abroad. Going back to the Netherlands is popular among people convicted of drugs offences. READ »

La Suède: le meilleur pays au monde?

Business & Money: 29 May 05
Un nouveau sondage international effectué auprès de personnes originaires de 10 pays montre que si elles avaient le choix, c’est en Suède qu’elles préféreraient vivre et travailler! Pourtant la Suède n’est pas épargnée par les troubles de toutes natures et comme partout s’ensuit une recherche des personnes responsables... READ »

Comment: Swedish Television cheapens the feminism debate

Lifestyle: 27 May 05
SVT's controversial TV programme on 'extreme feminism' has provoked a week of fierce media debate, with the chairwoman of ROKS, the national women's refuge organisation, portrayed as a man-hating loon. But how much of that was down to selective editing? READ »

Egypt deportations: Säpo blames Lindh

National: 24 May 05
A government committee set up to investigate the controversial deportation of two Egyptians accused of terrorist offences is told by Säpo, Sweden's security police, that Anna Lindh gave them the go-ahead to use American help. READ »

Knifeman stabs three on Stockholm underground

National: 24 May 05
Three people are injured as a man, thought to be suffering from psychological problems, runs amok on a rush hour underground train. READ »

Nuder accused of SSU membership fraud

Politics: 20 Apr 05
Now it's Pär Nuder's turn in the firing line, as a paper reveals that the finance minister cooked the books to boost public subsidies to the young Social Democrats in the 1980s. Nuder, reported to be Göran Persson's favoured successor, boosted his career by inflating member figures, it is alleged. READ »

Life sentence for 1989 double murderer

National: 6 Apr 05
Against the media's expectations and the experts' recommendations, Ulf Olsson is sentenced to life imprisonment for the rape and murder of 10 year old Helén Nilsson and 26 year old Jannica Ekblad in 1989. READ »

Security police demand new stalker law

National: 15 Mar 05
The threat to famous people in Sweden posed by stalkers is worse than previously thought. That is the conclusion of a survey carried out by Säpo, the security police, and now they have proposed tougher laws to deal with the problem. READ »

Psychiatric care: Milton slams government

Science & Technology: 14 Mar 05
In the last two years the number of people murdered by mental health patients has become an embarrassment to Sweden. Now, the man appointed by the government to overhaul the system tells The Local that the main obstacle to progress is the politicians themselves. READ »

Reinfeldt most popular party leader

Politics: 20 Feb 05
Of all the main party leaders, the Swedish public has the greatest confidence in the Moderates' Fredrik Reinfeldt. But prime minister Göran Persson is less popular now than at any time since September 2000. READ »

Increased security for Swedish foreign minister

Politics: 27 Jan 05
Laila Freivalds gets round-the-clock protection from the security police as, following the government's handling of the tsunami catastrophe, she remains the focus of public fury - and a Magnus Uggla song. READ »

Persson: Lindh didn?t know about CIA

Politics: 23 Dec 04
Anna Lindh had no idea about plans for American authorities to deport two Egyptians from Sweden, says the prime minister. READ »

Lindh "authorised Egyptians' deportation"

Politics: 14 Dec 04
A police officer tells a hearing that former foreign minister Anna Lindh approved an operation for the CIA to deport two Egyptians back to their homeland. The pair are alleged to have been tortured on their return. READ »

Swedish Supreme Court jails Mijailovic for life

National: 2 Dec 04
It's the end of the legal line for the man who killed foreign minister Anna Lindh in September 2003, as Sweden's top court reverses the Appeal Court's decision and puts Mijailo Mijailovic in prison for life. READ »

Anna Lindh murder: the definitive guide

National: 12 Nov 04
This page has moved. The collection of articles about the aftermath of the murder of Anna Lindh is now here. READ »

Swedish army to ditch 1,000 officers

National: 11 Nov 04
As the army announces that 1,000 officers are to lose their jobs, the security police begin to recruit 50 new bodyguards. A military background and officer training might look pretty good on an applicant’s CV. READ »

Mijailovic "could walk free"

National: 11 Nov 04
"Mijailo Mijailovic was psychologically ill when he killed Anna Lindh, therefore he can't be sentenced to prison. But now he's better, so he can't be given secure psychiatric treatment either." Hmmm. READ »

Open up mental health system to avert crisis

Science & Technology: 11 Nov 04
In the week that the Supreme Court reviews the sentence on Anna Lindh's killer, Lysanne Sizoo points out where the Swedish mental health system is breaking down - and offers a creative solution. READ »

Police hunt Linköping double killer

National: 20 Oct 04
Linköping is shocked - and afraid - as police hunt the man who killed an eight year old boy and a 56 year old woman on a street in the centre of town on Tuesday morning. READ »

Knifeman gatecrashes Moderate party

Politics: 19 Oct 04
Keen to pick up supporters wherever they can, it seems the Moderates will let anyone into their party - even if he's armed with a huge hunting knife. Security? What security? READ »

Mijailovic changes lawyer for appeal

National: 14 Oct 04
A bad week for Sweden's 'celebrity lawyer' Peter Althin - ditched by Anna Lindh's murderer for not visiting enough and upbraided by the Lawyers Association for a conflict of interest in representing three of the Hall Prison escapees. READ »

"Suicidal" Mijailovic gives up Swedish passport

National: 21 Sep 04
Anna Lindh's murderer is no longer a Swedish citizen, it emerges after he is taken to hospital suffering from psychiatric problems. And now a move to Serbia could be on the cards, just as another notorious killer considers coming to Sweden. READ »

Supreme Court reopens Lindh murder case

National: 15 Sep 04
First he was sentenced to life imprisonment, then to psychiatric care. Now Mijailo Mijailovic could be facing life again for killing Anna Lindh in Stockholm last year. READ »

All's fair in love and Swedish politics

Politics: 6 Aug 04
A new pair of scandals for the government this week. One black sheep returns to the ministerial fold after her business fails and Bosse Ringholm forgets to collect some taxes - from the football club where he is the chairman. READ »

Guantanamo Swede seeks damages

National: 23 Jul 04
Mehdi Ghezali speaks out against his American captors and the Swedish government, defends his actions in 2001 - and wants some cash. READ »

Treason under the sun?

National: 23 Jul 04
The royal family's holiday on Öland was disturbed by intruders, said Expressen. No it wasn't, said the palace spokeswoman. Either way, the family has upped the security this year. READ »

Lindh killer escapes jail

National: 9 Jul 04
Mijail Mijailovic is judged by the appeal court to be "seriously disturbed" and will be held in a secure psychiatric hospital instead of prison. READ »

Lindh killer mentally disturbed

National: 2 Jul 04
Doctors agree that Mijail Mijailovic is mentally disturbed - but the appeal court must decide if that means a secure hospital instead of prison. READ »

Knutby - from tragedy to comedy

National: 24 Jun 04
The trial is taking a four week break but you can't keep a good story down. The mystery buyer of the pastor's house is revealed and his mistress strikes gold while the congregation finally starts singing from the same hymn sheet. READ »

Police caught in child porn bust

National: 28 May 04
Paedophilia, corruption, weapons and drugs smuggling - you just can't trust the police these days. READ »

Knutby goes public

National: 14 May 04
After weeks of leaks surely everything that could be said about Knutby has been said? You ain't seen nothin' yet. READ »

Feminists crash May Day parties

Politics: 7 May 04
Police floored rioters, but will proposals for an all-female political party hit the established parties where it hurts? READ »

Minister assaulted

Politics: 23 Apr 04
A female politician, no security, an unknown assailant - we've been here before. READ »

Mijailovic appeals against life sentence

National: 16 Apr 04
Anna Lindh's murderer wants the verdict reduced to manslaughter while her family is seeking increased compensation. READ »



USA WikiLeaks Embassy Cables _From The Guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/the-us-embassy-cables
Anna Nicole Smith US embassy cables

How Anna Nicole charmed Bahamas

Island was intoxicated by antics of former model, whose death revitalised media and led to government scrutiny

Julian Assange defends decision not to face questioning in Sweden

julian assange close up WikiLeaks founder says he is not obliged to return to be questioned over sexual assault allegations

US embassy in London

The key points at a glance

There are no fewer than 251,287 cables from more than 250 US embassies around the world, obtained by WikiLeaks. We present a day-by-day guide to the revelations from the US embassy cables both from the Guardian and its international media partners in the story

All the Guardian's embassy cables stories

Assange reported to have sold memoirs

Julian Assange

WikiLeaks founder expected to publish book in March, through UK publishers Canongate


Wikileaks page Audio (39min 01sec)

Latest news

Latest on the Julian Assange case

Key points: day by day

Latest comment

You ask, we search

About the cables

Latest on the Julian Assange case

Key points: day by day

Latest comment

You ask, we search

About the cables

Datablog






Sweden reflects on Anna Lindh's death


Published: 11 Sep 08 10:52 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation

On the fifth anniversary of the assassination of foreign minister Anna Lindh, Sweden is reflecting more on the legacy of her work in politics than the tragic circumstances surrounding her death.

Lindh’s name lives on in a number of foundations, research programmes, and awards.

“She’s very much alive in the party; at the same time there’s been a very long period of mourning,” Social Democratic Party Secretary Marita Ulvskog told the TT news agency.

“But we’re beginning to reach a point where what she said and did is being utilized.”

On the Social Democrats’ website it is possible to order the 'Palme-package', created in memory of assassinated Prime Minister Olof Palme. For the last year a Lindh-package has also been available.

The Lindh-package offers membership in the party, a book, a picture of Anna Lindh, a report from the annual Anna Lindh seminars, a newsletter, and the party’s international programme.

It’s meant to provide a portrait of the person and her career, tracking her development from the Social Democratic youth organization (SSU) in Enköping to the position of Deputy Mayor of Stockholm and high level ministerial posts. She was also regarded as an insprirational figure for younger politicians.

Neither Ulvskog nor the party's press secretary could say however whether there had been much demand for the package named after the woman who had been tipped to take over as party leader after Göran Persson.

Her memory is also carried on by the Anna Lindh Memorial Fund, which awards annual prizes for remarkable contributions to human rights. The Fund has also helped compile an archive of speeches and articles penned by the former foreign minister.

To coincide with the anniversary of her death, the Fund has organized a seminar focusing on the 2001 Macedonia crisis, where Lindh is considered to have played an important role in hindering the outbreak of a new Balkan War.

The politician's legacy is also evident in Alexandria in Egypt, where the Anna Lindh Foundation is based.

The foundation was set up after her death and has little to do with Lindh other than in name, according to retired ambassador Lars Bjarme.

"But the foundation works with something in which she was very interested: a dialogue between Europe and countries in the Middle East," he said.

TT/The Local (news@thelocal.se/08 656 6518)

http://www.thelocal.se/29724/20101020/

Anna Lindh's care to be reviewed: agency

Published: 20 Oct 10 13:48 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation
Updated: 20 Oct 10 17:30 CET

Sweden's National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen) will review the care former foreign minister Anna Lindh received after she was stabbed in central Stockholm in September 2003.

"The National Board of Health and Welfare will probe the care of former foreign minister Anna Lindh," the board said in a statement.

It pointed out that it did not normally re-examine cases older than two years, but that it would make an exception due to the huge public interest in the case.

"The case is of great public interest and has to do with how care worked in a situation where the foreign minister was the victim of an attack," board general director Lars-Erik Holm said in the statement.

"I have turned to the other general directors of corresponding authorities in the Nordic countries to get their help in appointing experts," he added.

Stockholm's Karolinska University Hospital last month requested that the board analyse Lindh's treatment, saying it wanted an independent review after commercial broadcast TV4 charged in a news programme that she may have been saved with better care.

Hospital spokesman Klas Österman insisted at the time, "We have not seen any signs, then or now, to indicate that we made any mistakes."

Lindh was stabbed repeatedly in the arms, chest and abdomen by a man with a history of psychiatric problems as she shopped at the upmarket NK department store in Stockholm without a bodyguard on September 10th, 2003. She died of massive internal bleeding some 13 hours later in the early hours of September 11th.

The board's decision comes three days after the broadcast of TV4's "Cold Facts" (Kalla Fakta) programme on Lindh's treatment.

The half-hour show featured a detailed presentation of the treatment she received from the moment she arrived at the hospital, through an eight-hour operation during which she received up to 50 litres of blood, until she was pronounced dead at 5.29am on September 11th.

An unnamed Swedish expert, whose face was blurred onscreen, said the hospital could have used better methods to stop the minister's bleeding from the abdomen, notably by using the so-called "damage control" operation method.

The programme also interviewed Dr. Donald Trunkey, an expert trauma surgeon at Oregon's Health and Science University, who described the rush to operate Lindh without first slowing the bleeding "futile."

"In the United States, if somebody did that in my hospital, I would call [such an eight-hour operation] foolhardy. I mean, you are not going to win," he said, adding the lengthy operation may have worsend her condition.

"I would have classified her as a preventable death," he said.

Eva Franchell, who was shopping with Lindh when she was attacked, said she was pleased an investigation would be launched.

"It opens up old wounds, of course, but I feel the rumours that have been spread around have been very unpleasant. That is why I think it is good that this can all be ended," she told the TT news agency.

Lindh's killer Mijailo Mijailovic, now 32, is serving a life sentence for the murder.

The killing of the 46-year-old mother of two young boys sent a shock wave around Sweden, bringing back painful memories of the still-unsolved 1986 assassination of prime minister Olof Palme.

TT/AFP/The Local (news@thelocal.se)

http://www.thelocal.se/29318/20100929/

http://www.thelocal.se/29318/20100929/

Hospital demands probe of Anna Lindh's care

Published: 29 Sep 10 12:39 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation

Karolinska University Hospital has requested an inquiry into the care it gave former foreign minister Anna Lindh after her fatal stabbing in September 2003.

The hospital wants Sweden's National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen) to review the treatment Lindh received at the hospital after she was stabbed in a Stockholm department store.

Lindh died on the operating table at Karolinska's facilities in Solna, north of Stockolm.

The hospital has reviewed charts detailing Lindh's treatment and doesn't believe that any mistakes were made, but nevertheless has requested that the health board conduct an independent investigation.

The reason behind the request is a forthcoming television broadcast produced by Sweden's TV4 which, according to Karolinska, asserts that Lindh didn't receive proper care at the hospital.

"Because the episode has such great national and historic significance, it's important to prevent the spread of rumours surrounding this matter. We believe it's appropriate that the National Board of Health and Welfare carry out an investigation into the care of Anna Lindh," wrote Karolinska University Hospital in its petition, which arrived on Wednesday at the agency's regional oversight division in Stockholm.

Lindh was attacked and stabbed while shopping in the upscale NK department store in central Stockholm around 4pm local time on September 10th, 2003.

She remained conscious following the attack, with initial reports indicating she had been cut in the arm and that she wasn't seriously injured.

She was taken to Karolinska, where she was placed on an operating table so doctors could attend to her wounds.

Lindh died at 5.29am the following morning following massive blood loss caused by internal bleeding.

The knife had sliced through a number of important blood vessels in her mid-section, including the portal vein and the aorta. Lindh's liver had also been damaged.

Two weeks later, on September 24th, 24-year-old Mijailo Mijailovic was arrested for the stabbing. The Supreme Court sentenced him to life in prison for Lindh's murder on December 2nd, 2004.

Among the evidence cited during the trial were images from surveillance cameras in NK, as well as his DNA.

Karolinska Chief Medical Officer Stefan Engqvist said that the information, which the hospital attributes to the TV4 investigative news programme Kalla Fakta, is hard to address publicly, in part because he doesn't really know what the criticism is based on and in part because the hospital doesn't release information from Lindh's file.

"Our position becomes a bit awkward in this situation. We have tough regulations about confidentiality and laws on secrecy that we can't break," he told the TT news agency.

He said that Sweden's emergency trauma care has evolved since 2003, but that according to procedures commonly used at the time, the hospital reacted in the best possible way in the operating room and that everyone involved did everything they could to save the foreign minister's life.

"We've gone through all the documentation ourselves and haven't found anything wrong and nothing that would warrant a report according to Lex Maria," said Engqvist, referencing Sweden's Lex Maria laws, the informal name used to refer to regulations governing the reporting of injuries or incidents in the Swedish health care system.

"But we would also gladly have an independent investigation and for that we turn to the National Board of health and Welfare. We want to avoid the spreading of rumours."

TT/The Local (news@thelocal.se/08 656 6518)

http://www.thelocal.se/28404/20100816/

Security beefed up for Sahlin due to threats

Published: 16 Aug 10 15:53 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation

security" class="nodec">Security for Social Democratic leader Mona Sahlin has been tightened due to serious threats against her just over a month before elections, Swedish media reported on Monday.

According to the tabloid Expressen, security for the prime ministerial candidate has gradually increased after a "barrage of threatening emails and letters to Mona Sahlin's office in parliament."

"The threat level has changed," an unnamed police source told the paper.

When contacted by AFP, a spokesman for the Swedish security police, which handles security for high-profile politicians, refused to comment on the
information.

On Sunday, when Sahlin held a large campaign rally in Stockholm ahead of the upcoming September 19th election, four bodyguards wearing bulletproof vests were at her side the entire time, according to Expressen.

The 53-year-old career politician has received numerous threats in the past, the paper added. After a scandal dubbed the Toblerone Affair over her use of a party credit card to buy chocolate and other items in 1995, Sahlin was for a time forced to work in a bulletproof room.

In 2004, during a visit to the central Swedish town of Norrköping, a man walked up to her and asked if she was Mona Sahlin before punching her.

Sweden has been traumatised by two political assassinations in recent
decades. Prime Minister Olof Palme was shot on a Stockholm street in 1986, while foreign minister Anna Lindh was stabbed to death in an upscale department store in the heart of the capital in 2003.

Like Sahlin, both Palme and Lindh were Social Democrats. Neither of them had bodyguards with them at the time they were killed.

AFP/The Local (news@thelocal.se)

http://www.thelocal.se/30974/20101221/

US 'pressured' Sweden on Afghanistan

US 'pressured' Sweden on Afghanistan

Published: 21 Dec 10 10:53 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation

Sweden was pressured by the United States to increase its commitment in Afghanistan, documents released by WikiLeaks reveal.

The documents were sent from the US embassy in Stockholm, according to a report in the Dagens Nyheter (DN) daily.

The information was dated July 2009 and details that September was considered to be the best month to exercise pressure as the Swedish foreign and defence ministries would then be busy with bills to be submitted to parliament.

The documents detail the opinion that once the parliamentary bills were submitted it would be more difficult to influence the Swedish force in Afghanistan.

A further plan was for the Swedish defence minister Sten Tolgfors to be flattered and thanked for Sweden's growing commitment in Afghanistan during a meeting in Washington on July 20th 2009.

Furthermore the documents show that a senior official at the Sweden defence ministry has forwarded advice on how the United States could influence Sweden's power-brokers to deploy more resources to Afghanistan.

The official told DN that he discussed the matter at the US embassy in Stockholm.

In the months following the attempts to influence Sweden's Afghanistan commitment, the country has dramatically increased its expenditure.

The Swedish share of the cost for the International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) will amount to more than 1.5 billion kronor ($220 million) in 2010, an increase of almost 50 percent on 2009.

Sweden first deployed troops in Afghanistan in the beginning of 2002 and now has around 500 troops based near the northern city of Mazar-i-Sharif.

In December the parliament passed a government bill to extend the military mission in the war-torn country until the end of 2011, allowing for the deployment of up to 855 people.

The bill required a compromise between the governing minority centre-right Alliance and the opposition Social Democrats and Greens, and came barely a week after a suicide bomber cited Sweden's troop presence in Afghanistan in a message sent shortly before he blew himself up near a crowded pedestrian street in central Stockholm.

TT/The Local/pvs (news@thelocal.se)

http://www.thelocal.se/30970/20101220/

Sweden's Alliance parties gain majority in new poll

Sweden's Alliance parties gain majority in new poll

Published: 20 Dec 10 16:23 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation

A new poll has revealed that if an election were held now, the ruling Alliance would gain a majority in Sweden's parliament, the Riksdag, while support for Sweden's Social Democratic Party continues to slide.

The latest opinion survey conducted by United Minds and Cints in collaboration with newspaper Aftonbladet shows that both the ruling Moderates and Liberal Party have increased their levels of support.

Separately, support for the Centre and Christian Democratic Parties has fallen below the levels they registered for the general election on September 19th. However, the Christian Democrats, the smallest party in the Riksdag, would clear the 4 percent threshhold to remain in parliament.

Meanwhile, the Social Democrats continue to lose support from voters.

"If it were close to an election, it would be more problematic, but I think people understand that there is not an election now and that much can happen," United Minds' opinion director Carl Melin told Aftonbladet.

While support for the Social Democrats and Left Party continue to fall, the Green Party continues to gain more support. Support for the far-right Sweden Democrats also outpaces the party's election result in the fall.

The Moderates currently have 31.7 percent support, up 0.7 percentage points from November. The Liberal Party stands at 7.5 percent, 0.5 percentage points ahead of last month.

However, the Centre Party and Christian Democrats are at 5.5 percent and 4.8 respectively, down 0.8 and 0.1 percentage points respectively.

Together, the Alliance has 49.5 percent, up 0.3 percentage points from November, compared with 42.2 percent for the Red-Green parties, whose support fell 1.2 percentage points.

Among then, support for the Social Democrats slipped 1.5 percentage points to 27.6 percent and 0.6 percentage points to 5.2 percent for the Left Party.

However, backing for the Green Party grew 0.9 percentage points in December to 9.4 percent from the previous month. Support for the Sweden Democrats also rose 0.9 percentage points to 6.9 percent this month.

Support for other parties increased 0.1 percentage points to 1.4 percent.

United Minds interviewed 1,148 respondents over the age of 18 from November 23rd to Sunday, asking them, "How would you vote if there were a Riksdag election today?"

Vivian Tse (news@thelocal.se)

http://www.thelocal.se/30880/20101216/

http://www.thelocal.se/30880/20101216/

Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt on a Kabul street

Sweden votes to extend Afghanistan mission

Published: 16 Dec 10 08:27 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation

Swedish lawmakers in the country's parliament, the Riksdag, voted on Wednesday to extend the country's military mission in Afghanistan until the end of 2011.

"Sweden will make an armed force of up to 855 people available to the international security force in Afghanistan until the end of 2011," they said in a statement, adding that the troop level would likely remain at the present level of 500 soldiers.

The vote came a month after Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt, whose centre-right coalition came up two seats short of a house majority in general elections in September, secured a deal with the opposition Social Democrats and the Greens.

The Social Democrats and Greens, in a since-dissolved coalition with the formerly communist Left Party, had campaigned ahead of the elections on demanding a withdrawal of Swedish troops from Afghanistan.

However, the two left-wing parties shifted their position after the far-right Sweden Democrats were voted into parliament for the first time and handed the role of kingmaker.

The two parties agreed to a broad proposal, aiming to pull all Swedish combat troops out of Afghanistan between 2012 and 2014, while maintaining a largely civilian support presence after that.

The far-right Sweden Democrats and the Left Party, which have both want Swedish forces brought home sooner, opposed the motion to extend the mandate next year, but it passed easily nonetheless, with 290 votes in favour, 20 opposed and 19 abstaining.

Sweden is officially neutral and not a member of NATO and the question of how long its troops should take part in the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan is a sensitive one.

In October, the Scandinavian country lost its fifth soldier since it first deployed troops in Afghanistan near the northern Afghan city of Mazar-i-Sharif, at the beginning of 2002.

The parliament vote also came less than a week after a suicide bomber railed against Sweden's troop presence in Afghanistan in a message sent shortly before he blew himself up near a crowded pedestrian street in central Stockholm, narrowly missing wreaking carnage among Christmas shoppers.

AFP/The Local (news@thelocal.se)







http://www.thelocal.se/tag/Anna_Lindh

Anna_lindh

The following articles have been tagged with "Anna_lindh":

Swedish diplomat: new WikiLeaks 'regrettable'

Politics: 29 Nov 10
Over 800 secret American documents about relations with Sweden have been released by WikiLeaks, according to Swedish media reports. READ »

Sweden knew of US surveillance: report

National: 19 Nov 10
Sweden’s former Social Democratic government was informed in 2002 about a surveillance programme run by the US embassy in Stockholm, secret documents reveal. READ »

Anna Lindh's care to be reviewed: agency

National: 20 Oct 10
Sweden's National Board of Health and Welfare will review the care former foreign minister Anna Lindh received after she was stabbed in central Stockholm in September 2003. READ »

Hospital demands probe of Anna Lindh's care

National: 29 Sep 10
Karolinska University Hospital has requested an inquiry into the care it gave former foreign minister Anna Lindh after her fatal stabbing in September 2003. READ »

Sahlin and Reinfeldt enter final sprint for lasting political glory

Politics: 18 Sep 10
With polls set to open in 24 hours rivals Fredrik Reinfeldt and Mona Sahlin are both looking for an electoral victory to cement their leadership status after long political comebacks. READ »

Security beefed up for Sahlin due to threats

Politics: 16 Aug 10
Security for Social Democratic leader Mona Sahlin has been tightened due to serious threats against her just over a month before elections, Swedish media reported on Monday. READ »

Obama meeting will be Svanberg's toughest test

National: 14 Jun 10
BP’s problems are proving to be the toughest test yet in the career of Swedish business’s golden boy Carl-Henric Svanberg, writes James Savage. READ »

Anna Lindh memorial inaugurated in Stockholm

Politics: 5 May 10
A memorial square to Anna Lindh, the former Swedish foreign minister murdered in 2003, was inaugurated in Stockholm on Tuesday near where she made her final public appearance. READ »

Anna Lindh widower Bo Holmberg dies

Politics: 12 Feb 10
Bo Holmberg, the husband of assassinated Swedish foreign minister Anna Lindh, has died aged 67. READ »

Reinfeldt seeks answers on Russian dumping

National: 5 Feb 10
Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt has asked for an explanation from the previous Social Democrat government over Russia's release of toxic waste into Swedish waters in the Baltic Sea. READ »

Newspaper cleared of defaming ex-Lindh murder suspect

Society: 4 Feb 10
Southern Swedish newspaper Sydsvenskan has been cleared of libel charges after being sued by the initial suspect in the murder of Swedish foreign minister Anna Lindh in 2002. READ »

Russian nuclear waste dumped off Sweden

National: 4 Feb 10
The Russian military is suspected of having dumped chemical weapons and radioactive waste off the Swedish island of Gotland in the beginning of the 1990s. READ »

Lindh murder suspect sues newspaper for defamation

National: 3 Feb 10
A libel case involving Swedish newspaper Sydsvenskan and the initial suspect in the murder of Swedish foreign minister Anna Lindh in 2002 opened in a Malmö court on Wednesday. READ »

Swine flu named year's top Swedish news story

National: 30 Dec 09
Swine flu beat out both the June death of Michael Jackson and the Stockholm helicopter heist in September as the top Swedish news story of 2009, according to a new study. READ »

Almedalen — Swedish openness galore

Analysis & Opinion: 7 Jul 09
Anyone who doubts that Sweden is a country characterised by openness and informality should visit Visby during the first week of July, writes Olle Wästberg, Director-General of the Swedish Institute. READ »

Call for probe into Sweden-CIA terror links

Politics: 8 May 09
Two prominent Left Party politicians are calling for Sweden to set up an independent truth commission to look into how Sweden cooperated with the United States during the war on terror. READ »

Bodström reported over CIA terror deportations

National: 19 Jan 09
Former justice minister Thomas Bodström and former prime minister Göran Persson have been reported to the Riksdag's constitutional committee after new details emerged over the expulsion of two terror suspects from Sweden to Egypt in 2001. READ »

Sweden pressured in 2001 terror case: report

National: 19 Jan 09
Fresh details have surfaced about the deportation of two terror suspects from Sweden to Egypt in December 2001, including allegations of US pressure and the role of former foreign minister Anna Lindh, following the release a new book on Monday. READ »

Ex-policeman: Lindh murder investigation 'full of mistakes'

National: 10 Nov 08
The investigation into the assassination of Foreign Minister Anna Lindh in 2003 was just as poorly handled in the first 24 hours as the Olof Palme investigation in 1986, according to a former police chief. READ »

'Meat mountain' ex-minister slams Swedish security service

Politics: 22 Oct 08
Sweden's former Finance Minister Pär Nuder has criticized the country's security service over its failure to protect assassinated Foreign Minister Anna Lindh. READ »

Sweden reflects on Anna Lindh's death

Politics: 11 Sep 08
On the fifth anniversary of the assassination of foreign minister Anna Lindh, Sweden is reflecting more on the legacy of her work in politics than the tragic circumstances surrounding her death. READ »

Getting away with murder? Papers debate Rödeby verdict

Analysis & Opinion: 9 May 08
James Savage looks how Sweden's papers reacted to a controversial acquittal in the case of a man who shot a teenage boy dead in southern Sweden last year. READ »

China, Reinfeldt, and the Olympics: a real mouthful

Analysis & Opinion: 15 Apr 08
Social democratic newspaper editor Eric Sundström hopes Fredrik Reinfeldt at least says something about human rights and the Olympics during the Prime Minister’s visit to China. READ »

Karolinska Hospital slammed for lax patient secrecy

Society: 18 Nov 07
Poor security procedures at one of Sweden's top teaching hospitals have led to insufficient control over who accesses patients' medical records. READ »

Persson reflects on election defeat in new book

Politics: 23 Oct 07
Göran Persson has written a book about his ten years as Sweden's prime minister. In it, he explains how he could have won the election if he had only ignored the advice of his finance minister. READ »

Knife man entered employment ministry

National: 29 Sep 07
A man carrying a large hunting knife succeeded in entering the Ministry for Employment before being arrested later in central Stockholm, it has been revealed. READ »

Expressen fights former Lindh murder suspect over libel claim

National: 27 Jul 07
Swedish tabloid Expressen is to continue fighting a lawsuit brought against them by the man first suspected of murdering foreign minister Anna Lindh in 2003. "What they did must be a world record for slander," says the man's lawyer. READ »

Mijailovic wants to stay in Sweden

National: 14 May 07
Mijailo Mijailovic, the man who murdered Swedish foreign minister Anna Lindh, has decided to give up on the idea of a transfer to a Serbian prison. "He's in a catch 22 situation," says his lawyer. READ »

Mijailovic must stay in Swedish jail

National: 6 Feb 07
Mijailo Mijailovic, the man who murdered Swedish foreign minister Anna Lindh, has had his application to serve his sentence in his parents' homeland of Serbia refused by authorities in Stockholm. READ »

Borg in plane controversy

Politics: 2 Feb 07
Anders Borg has come in for criticism for requesting the government plane to land at the airport nearest his home. "Common practice," says his press secretary. READ »

Lindh killer faces uncertain future

National: 20 Jan 07
Mijailo Mijailovic wants to serve his sentence for the murder of Anna Lindh in Serbia. But Swedish authorities will not permit a transfer until Serbia decides on the length of his sentence. READ »

Freivalds makes millions from apartment

Politics: 13 Jan 07
It was the apartment that caused her resignation as justice minister, after she bought it in contravention of government policy. But Laila Freivalds can comfort herself with a profit of 5 million kronor. READ »

'Sahlin will lead Social Democrats'

Analysis & Opinion: 4 Jan 07
Sweden's Social Democrats are looking for a new leader and Mona Sahlin seems to be the front runner. The Local asked political expert Stig-Björn Ljunggren to help us size up the contenders. READ »

Freivalds cashes in on controversial flat

National: 3 Jan 07
Laila Freivalds was forced to step down as justice minister in 2000 when her property dealings ran counter to government policy. Now its payback time. READ »

Tougher rules for criminal psychiatric patients

Society: 3 Jan 07
People convicted of crimes and sentenced to psychiatric care could face tougher restrictions when released, says Sweden's justice minister Beatrice Ask, who wants to make sure patients are followed up. READ »

Mijailovic accused of beating fellow prisoner

National: 1 Nov 06
Anna Lindh's killer Mijailo Mijailovic has admitted beating a sleeping fellow prisoner over the head with a metal object ripped from a radiator. But, he claims, he did so because he feared for his life. READ »

Lindh killer 'should not go to Serbia'

Politics: 29 Sep 06
A senior Liberal has called for Mijailo Mijailovic, who killed Swedish foreign minister Anna Lindh, to be denied his wish to serve out his sentence in Serbia. READ »

Israeli officials "dance a jig" over Alliance win

National: 22 Sep 06
Sweden's change of government is reported to have caused delight in the Israeli government, which saw the Social Democrats as extra-critical of the Jewish state. But a Green MP says things won't change much. READ »

Ministers pay tribute to murdered Lindh

Politics: 11 Sep 06
Three years after Sweden's foreign minister Anna Lindh was murdered in a Stockholm department store, ministers pay their tributes at her grave. READ »

Harvard launches Anna Lindh professor

Politics: 30 Aug 06
Harvard University has created a new professorship in memory of Anna Lindh, Sweden's murdered foreign minister. The post will be dedicated to global leadership and public policy, the university says. READ »

Lindh killer could serve sentence in Serbia

National: 22 Aug 06
Serbia has indicated that the man who murdered Swedish foreign minister Anna Lindh in 2003 could serve his prison sentence in a Serbian jail. Now it's up to the Swedish governement. READ »

Lindh killer charged with assault

National: 3 Aug 06
The man who murdered Swedish foreign minister Anna Lindh in 2003 has been charged with assaulting a patient at a psychiatric asylum. READ »

Shots fired in NK

National: 29 Jun 06
Two men have been arrested after shots were fired during the attempted robbery of a jewellery department at the NK store in Stockholm on Thursday. Police say that no injuries have been reported. READ »

King reaches 60 secure on his throne

Lifestyle: 27 Apr 06
This weekend will see King Carl XVI Gustaf feted by foreign royalty, parliamentarians and thousands of his people. As he celebrates his 60th birthday, Sweden's king can satisfy himself with approval ratings that would make a politician green with envy. READ »

Analysis: Why Freivalds had to go

Analysis & Opinion: 21 Mar 06
After a year of unrelenting criticism over her handling of the tsunami disaster and latterly of the Muhammad cartoons, Persson had little choice but to accept Laila Freivalds' resignation. READ »

Olof Palme: the controversy lives on

Lifestyle: 27 Feb 06
It is twenty years since Sweden was shaken by the murder of one of its most controversial politicians. But what impact does the radical, campaigning prime minister Olof Palme have on modern Sweden? READ »

Schyman receives death threats

Politics: 14 Feb 06
A note on the door of a cinema where leading feminist Gudrun Schyman was giving a lecture raises fears for her safety. "I see it as a death threat," says Schyman. READ »

"Brawl" leads to SD youth chief arrest

Politics: 29 Jan 06
The head of the Social Democrats' youth movement, Anna Sjödin, is accused of assualting a doorman in a bar in Stockholm. She was held overnight by police before being released. READ »

Bodström gets bodyguards after threat

National: 28 Jan 06
Thomas Bodström and his family have been given round-the-clock security after "informants in the underworld" told police there was a threat against Sweden's justice minister, it has been reported. READ »

Patient secrecy to be ignored for security police

Society: 19 Oct 05
Details about psychiatric patients are even kept from the prying eyes of Sweden's security police, Säpo. But not for long, perhaps - Säpo needs more power to combat the threat to ministers and royalty, says the government. READ »

Back to prison for Lindh killer

National: 8 Oct 05
Mijailo Mijailovic, who last year was found guilty of murdering Sweden's former foreign minister Anna Lindh, is to be transferred out of psychiatric care and back into Stockholm's maximum security prison, Kumla. READ »

Lindh killer attacks fellow patient

National: 21 Sep 05
Mijailo Mijailovic, who murdered Sweden's former foreign minister Anna Lindh in 2003, has brutally attacked another inmate at the secure psychiatric clinic in Sundsvall where he is being treated. READ »

Mijailovic transferred to asylum

National: 11 Sep 05
SEE ALSO: SIX PEOPLE WERE ARRESTED FOR LINDH MURDER
Mijailo Mijailovic, who killed Swedish foreign minister Anna Lindh exactly 2 years ago, has been moved to a psychiatric unit. A doctor decided he was unwell and needed help, the asylum says. READ »

Six people were arrested for Lindh murder

Smörgåsbord: 9 Sep 05
The man in charge of the investigation into Anna Lindh's killing says that six men were arrested over the murder. Until now, only two arrests had been revealed to the public. READ »

Stockholm Syndrome: Rush hour madness

Analysis & Opinion: 8 Sep 05
Our Stockholm Syndrome correspondent has a close call on one of the city's blue buses and finds out that Swedes on public transport have a more immediate fear than terrorism. READ »

Foreign prisoners reject Swedish hospitality

Society: 12 Aug 05
Swedish prisons may be considered plush by many, but an increasing number of prisoners with foreign backgrounds are trying to get moved abroad. Going back to the Netherlands is popular among people convicted of drugs offences. READ »

La Suède: le meilleur pays au monde?

Business & Money: 29 May 05
Un nouveau sondage international effectué auprès de personnes originaires de 10 pays montre que si elles avaient le choix, c’est en Suède qu’elles préféreraient vivre et travailler! Pourtant la Suède n’est pas épargnée par les troubles de toutes natures et comme partout s’ensuit une recherche des personnes responsables... READ »

Comment: Swedish Television cheapens the feminism debate

Lifestyle: 27 May 05
SVT's controversial TV programme on 'extreme feminism' has provoked a week of fierce media debate, with the chairwoman of ROKS, the national women's refuge organisation, portrayed as a man-hating loon. But how much of that was down to selective editing? READ »

Egypt deportations: Säpo blames Lindh

National: 24 May 05
A government committee set up to investigate the controversial deportation of two Egyptians accused of terrorist offences is told by Säpo, Sweden's security police, that Anna Lindh gave them the go-ahead to use American help. READ »

Knifeman stabs three on Stockholm underground

National: 24 May 05
Three people are injured as a man, thought to be suffering from psychological problems, runs amok on a rush hour underground train. READ »

Nuder accused of SSU membership fraud

Politics: 20 Apr 05
Now it's Pär Nuder's turn in the firing line, as a paper reveals that the finance minister cooked the books to boost public subsidies to the young Social Democrats in the 1980s. Nuder, reported to be Göran Persson's favoured successor, boosted his career by inflating member figures, it is alleged. READ »

Life sentence for 1989 double murderer

National: 6 Apr 05
Against the media's expectations and the experts' recommendations, Ulf Olsson is sentenced to life imprisonment for the rape and murder of 10 year old Helén Nilsson and 26 year old Jannica Ekblad in 1989. READ »

Security police demand new stalker law

National: 15 Mar 05
The threat to famous people in Sweden posed by stalkers is worse than previously thought. That is the conclusion of a survey carried out by Säpo, the security police, and now they have proposed tougher laws to deal with the problem. READ »

Psychiatric care: Milton slams government

Science & Technology: 14 Mar 05
In the last two years the number of people murdered by mental health patients has become an embarrassment to Sweden. Now, the man appointed by the government to overhaul the system tells The Local that the main obstacle to progress is the politicians themselves. READ »

Reinfeldt most popular party leader

Politics: 20 Feb 05
Of all the main party leaders, the Swedish public has the greatest confidence in the Moderates' Fredrik Reinfeldt. But prime minister Göran Persson is less popular now than at any time since September 2000. READ »

Increased security for Swedish foreign minister

Politics: 27 Jan 05
Laila Freivalds gets round-the-clock protection from the security police as, following the government's handling of the tsunami catastrophe, she remains the focus of public fury - and a Magnus Uggla song. READ »

Persson: Lindh didn?t know about CIA

Politics: 23 Dec 04
Anna Lindh had no idea about plans for American authorities to deport two Egyptians from Sweden, says the prime minister. READ »

Lindh "authorised Egyptians' deportation"

Politics: 14 Dec 04
A police officer tells a hearing that former foreign minister Anna Lindh approved an operation for the CIA to deport two Egyptians back to their homeland. The pair are alleged to have been tortured on their return. READ »

Swedish Supreme Court jails Mijailovic for life

National: 2 Dec 04
It's the end of the legal line for the man who killed foreign minister Anna Lindh in September 2003, as Sweden's top court reverses the Appeal Court's decision and puts Mijailo Mijailovic in prison for life. READ »

Anna Lindh murder: the definitive guide

National: 12 Nov 04
This page has moved. The collection of articles about the aftermath of the murder of Anna Lindh is now here. READ »

Swedish army to ditch 1,000 officers

National: 11 Nov 04
As the army announces that 1,000 officers are to lose their jobs, the security police begin to recruit 50 new bodyguards. A military background and officer training might look pretty good on an applicant’s CV. READ »

Mijailovic "could walk free"

National: 11 Nov 04
"Mijailo Mijailovic was psychologically ill when he killed Anna Lindh, therefore he can't be sentenced to prison. But now he's better, so he can't be given secure psychiatric treatment either." Hmmm. READ »

Open up mental health system to avert crisis

Science & Technology: 11 Nov 04
In the week that the Supreme Court reviews the sentence on Anna Lindh's killer, Lysanne Sizoo points out where the Swedish mental health system is breaking down - and offers a creative solution. READ »

Police hunt Linköping double killer

National: 20 Oct 04
Linköping is shocked - and afraid - as police hunt the man who killed an eight year old boy and a 56 year old woman on a street in the centre of town on Tuesday morning. READ »

Knifeman gatecrashes Moderate party

Politics: 19 Oct 04
Keen to pick up supporters wherever they can, it seems the Moderates will let anyone into their party - even if he's armed with a huge hunting knife. Security? What security? READ »

Mijailovic changes lawyer for appeal

National: 14 Oct 04
A bad week for Sweden's 'celebrity lawyer' Peter Althin - ditched by Anna Lindh's murderer for not visiting enough and upbraided by the Lawyers Association for a conflict of interest in representing three of the Hall Prison escapees. READ »

"Suicidal" Mijailovic gives up Swedish passport

National: 21 Sep 04
Anna Lindh's murderer is no longer a Swedish citizen, it emerges after he is taken to hospital suffering from psychiatric problems. And now a move to Serbia could be on the cards, just as another notorious killer considers coming to Sweden. READ »

Supreme Court reopens Lindh murder case

National: 15 Sep 04
First he was sentenced to life imprisonment, then to psychiatric care. Now Mijailo Mijailovic could be facing life again for killing Anna Lindh in Stockholm last year. READ »

All's fair in love and Swedish politics

Politics: 6 Aug 04
A new pair of scandals for the government this week. One black sheep returns to the ministerial fold after her business fails and Bosse Ringholm forgets to collect some taxes - from the football club where he is the chairman. READ »

Guantanamo Swede seeks damages

National: 23 Jul 04
Mehdi Ghezali speaks out against his American captors and the Swedish government, defends his actions in 2001 - and wants some cash. READ »

Treason under the sun?

National: 23 Jul 04
The royal family's holiday on Öland was disturbed by intruders, said Expressen. No it wasn't, said the palace spokeswoman. Either way, the family has upped the security this year. READ »

Lindh killer escapes jail

National: 9 Jul 04
Mijail Mijailovic is judged by the appeal court to be "seriously disturbed" and will be held in a secure psychiatric hospital instead of prison. READ »

Lindh killer mentally disturbed

National: 2 Jul 04
Doctors agree that Mijail Mijailovic is mentally disturbed - but the appeal court must decide if that means a secure hospital instead of prison. READ »

Knutby - from tragedy to comedy

National: 24 Jun 04
The trial is taking a four week break but you can't keep a good story down. The mystery buyer of the pastor's house is revealed and his mistress strikes gold while the congregation finally starts singing from the same hymn sheet. READ »

Police caught in child porn bust

National: 28 May 04
Paedophilia, corruption, weapons and drugs smuggling - you just can't trust the police these days. READ »

Knutby goes public

National: 14 May 04
After weeks of leaks surely everything that could be said about Knutby has been said? You ain't seen nothin' yet. READ »

Feminists crash May Day parties

Politics: 7 May 04
Police floored rioters, but will proposals for an all-female political party hit the established parties where it hurts? READ »

Minister assaulted

Politics: 23 Apr 04
A female politician, no security, an unknown assailant - we've been here before. READ »

Mijailovic appeals against life sentence

National: 16 Apr 04
Anna Lindh's murderer wants the verdict reduced to manslaughter while her family is seeking increased compensation. READ »





 1914:  The start of World War I.  In this war, the German
Rothschilds loan money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds loan
money to the British, and the French Rothschilds loan money to the
French.

   Futhermore, the Rothschilds have control of the three European
news agencies, Wolff (est. 1849) in Germany, Reuters (est. 1851) in
England, and Havas (est. 1835) in France.

   The Rothschilds use Wolff to manipulate the German people into a
fervour for war. From around this time, the Rothschilds are rarely
reported in the media, because they own the media.

   1916:  On June 4, Ashkenazi Jew, Louis Dembitz Brandeis is
appointed to the Supreme Court of the United States by President
Wilson as per his agreed blackmail payment to Samuel Untermyer some
three years earlier.  Justice Brandeis is also the elected leader of
the Executive Committee for Zionist Affairs, a position he has held
since 1914.

   The middle of World War II.  Germany were winning the war as they
were being financed by the Rothschilds to a greater extent than
France, Italy and England, because Rothschilds, did not want to
support the Tsar in Russia, and of course Russia was on the same side
as France, Italy and England.

   Then a significant event occurred.  Germany, although they were
winning the war and not one foreign soldier had set foot on their
soil, offered armistice to Britain with no requirement of reparations.
 The Rothschilds were anxious to make sure this didn't happen as they
were expecting to make far more money off this war, so they played
another card they had up their sleeve.

   Whilst the British were considering Germany's offer, Rothschild
agent Louis Brandeis sends a Zionist delegation from America to
Britain to promise to bring America into the war on the side of the
British, provided the British agree to give the land of Palestine to
the Rothschilds.

   The Rothschilds wanted Palestine for the following reason.  They
had great business interests in the far east and desired their own
state in that area along with their own military which they could use
as an aggressor to any state that threatened those interests.

   The British subsequently agree to the deal for Palestine and the
Zionists in London contact their counterparts in America and inform
them of this fact.  Suddenly all the major newspapers in America that
up to that point had been pro-German turned on Germany running
propaganda pieces such as:  German soldiers were killing Red Cross
Nurses; German soldiers were cutting off babies hands, etc, in order
to manipulate the American public against the Germans.

   This same year, President Woodrow Wilson, ran a re-election
campaign under the slogan, "Re-Elect The Man Who Will Keep Your Sons
Out Of The War."

   On December 12, Germany and her allies offer peace terms to end the war.

   1917:  As a result of Germany's offer of peace the Rothschild war
machine goes into overdrive in America, spreading propaganda which
leads to President Wilson under the instructions of American Zionist
leader and Supreme Court Justice, Louis Dembitz Brandeis, reneging on
his promise to the electorate and taking America into the first world
war on April 6.

   As per the Rothschild Zionist promise to the British, to take
America into the war, they decide they want something in writing from
the British to prove that they will uphold their side of the bargain.
The British Foreign Secretary, Arthur James Balfour therefore drafts a
letter which is commonly known as the, "Balfour Declaration," which is
reprinted below.

       Foreign Office

       November 2nd, 1917

       Dear Lord Rothschild,

       I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His
Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with
Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved
by, the Cabinet.

       His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in
Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their
best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being
clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the
civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in
Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any
other country.

       I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to
the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

       Yours sincerely,

       Arthur James Balfour

   The Rothschilds order the execution by the Bolsheviks they
control, of Tsar Nicholas II and his entire family in Russia, even
though the Tsar had already abdicated on March 2.  This is both to get
control of the country and an act of revenge for Tsar Alexander I
blocking their world government plan in 1815 at the Congress Of
Vienna, and Tsar Alexander II siding with President Abraham Lincoln in
1864.

   It is extremely important for them to slaughter the entire family
including women and children in order to make good on the promise to
do so made by Nathan Mayer Rothschild in 1815.  It is designed to show
the world what happens if you ever attempt to cross the Rothschilds.

   U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway informs Congress that J. P. Morgan
is a Rothschild front and has taken control of the American media
industry.  He states,

       "In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel,
shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations,
got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them
to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and
sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily
press...

       ...They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of
25 of the greatest papers...An agreement was reached.  The policy of
the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month, an editor was
furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information
regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial
policies, and other things of national and international nature
considered vital to the interests of the purchasers."

   1919:  In January, Ashkenazi Jews, Karl Liebknecht and Rosa
Luxemburg, are killed as they attempt to lead another Rothschild
funded Communist coup, this time in Berlin, Germany.

   The Versailles peace conference is held to decide reparations that
the Germans need to pay to the victors following the end of the first
world war.  A delegation of 117 Zionists headed up by Ashkenazi Jew,
Bernard Baruch, bring up the subject of the promise of Palestine for
them.  At this point the Germans realised why America had turned on
them and under whose influence, the Rothschilds.

   The Germans, naturally, felt they had been betrayed by the
Zionists.  This is because, at the time the Rothschilds made their
deal with Britain for Palestine, in exchange for bringing America into
the war, Germany was the most friendly country in the world towards
the Jews, indeed the German Emancipation Edict of 1822 guaranteed Jews
in Germany all civil rights enjoyed by Germans.

   Also, Germany was the only country in Europe which did not place
restrictions on Jews, even giving them refuge when they had to flee
from Russia after their first attempted Communist coup failed there in
1905.

   Nevertheless, the Rothschilds had held up their side of the
bargain to spill the blood of millions of innocents and as a result,
Palestine is confirmed as a Jewish homeland, and whilst its handover
to the Rothschilds takes place it is to remain under the control of
Britain as the Rothschilds control Britain.  At that time less than
one percent of the population of Palestine was Jewish.  Interestingly,
the host of the Versailles peace conference is its boss, Baron Edmond
de Rothschild.

   The Versailles peace conference is also used as an attempt by the
Rothschilds to set up a world government under the pretext of ending
all wars (which they create).  This was called the, "League of
Nations."  Fortunately not enough countries accepted it and so it soon
died.

   On March 29th The Times of London reports on the Bolsheviks in Russia,

       "One of the curious features of the Bolshevist movement is the
high percentage of non Russian elements among its leaders. Of the
twenty or thirty commissaries, or leaders, who provide the central
machinery of the Bolshevist movement, not less than 75% were Jews."

   It is reported that the Rothschilds were angry with the Russians
because they were not prepared to allow them to form a central bank
within their nation.  They therefore gathered groups of Jewish spies
and sent them into Russia to drum up a revolution for the benefit of
the common man, which was actually a takeover of Russia by a
Rothschild controlled satanic elite.

   These Jewish spies were, in age old deceptive Ashkenazi tradition,
given Russian names, for example Trotsky was a member of the first
group and his original name was Bronstein. These groups were sent to
areas throughout Russia to incite riots and rebellion.

   The Jewish Post International Edition, week ending January 24th
1991, confirms Vladimir Lenin was Jewish. Lenin is also on record as
having stated,

       “The establishment of a central bank is 90% of communizing a nation.”

   These Jewish, Rothschild funded Bolsheviks would go on in the
course of history to slaughter 60 million Christians and Non-Jews in
Soviet controlled territory. Indeed the author Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
in his work, “Gulag Archipelago, Vol 2,” affirms that Zionist Jews
created and administered the organized Soviet concentration camp
system in which these tens of millions of Christians and Non-Jews
died.

   On page 79 of this book he even names the administrators of this
the greatest killing machine in the history of the world. They are
Aron Solts, Yakov Rappoport, Lazar Kogan, Matvei Berman, Genrikh
Yagoda, and Naftaly Frenkel. All six are Zionist Jews. In 1970
Solzhenitsyn would be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for literature.

   N. M. Rothschild & Sons’ are given a permanent role to fix the
world’s daily gold price. This takes place in the City of London
offices, daily at 1100 hours, in the same room until 2004.

   1920: Winston Churchill (whose mother, Jenny (Jacobson) Jerome,
was Jewish – meaning he is Jewish under Ashkenazi law as he was born
of a Jewish mother) writes in an article in the Illustrated Sunday
Herald, dated February 8th,

       "From the days of Illuminati leader Weishaupt, to those of
Karl Marx, to those of Trotsky, this worldwide conspiracy has been
steadily growing.

       And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from
the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America, have gripped
the Russian people by the hair of their heads and become the
undisputed masters of that enormous empire."

   1921:  Under the orders of Jacob Schiff the Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR) is founded by Ashkenazi Jews, Bernard Baruch and
Colonel Edward Mandell House.  Schiff gave his orders prior to his
death in 1920, as he knew an organisation in America needed to be set
up to select politicians to carry on the Rothschild conspiracy,and the
formation of the CFR was actually agreed in a meeting on May 30, 1919
at the Hotel Majestic in Paris, France.

   The CFR membership at the start was approximately 1000 people in
the United States.  This membership included the heads of virtually
every industrial empire in America, all the American based
international bankers, and the heads of all their tax free
foundations.  In essence all those people who would provide the
capital required for anyone who wished to run for Congress, the Senate
or the Presidency.

   The first job of the CFR was to gain control of the press.  This
task was given to John D. Rockefeller who set up a number of national
news magazines such as Life, and Time.  He financed Samuel Newhouse to
buy up and establish a chain of newspapers all across the country, and
Eugene Meyer also who would go on to buy up many publications such as
the Washington Post, Newsweek, ant The Weekly Magazine.

   The CFR also needed to gate control of radio, television and the
motion picture industry.  This task was split amongst the
international bankers from, Kuhn Loeb, Goldman Sachs, the Warburgs,
and the Lehmanns.

   1925:  This year's Jewish Encyclopaedia, states of the existence
of Ashkenazi Jews (who represent approximately 90% of so-called world
Jewry), with the startling admission that the so called enemy of the
Jews, Esau (also known as Edom, see Genesis 36:1), now actually
represents the Jewish race, when on page 42 of Volume V it is stated,

       "Edom is in modern Jewry."

   So what they're basically saying is that these Ashkenazi Jews, who
represent 90% of the so-called Jewish population, are actually
gentiles or goyim themselves.

   1926: N. M. Rothschild & Sons refinance the Underground Electric
Railways Company of London Ltd which has a controlling interest in the
entire London Underground transport system.

   Maurice de Rothschild has a son, Edmond de Rothschild.

   1929:  The Rothschilds crash the United States economy by
contracting the money supply.

   1930:  The first Rothschild world bank, the, "Bank for
International Settlements (BIS)," is established in Basle,
Switzerland.  The same place as where 33 years earlier the first ever
World Zionist Congress was held.

   1933: On January 30, Adolf Hitler becomes Chancellor of Germany.
He drives Jews, many of which were Communist out of Governmental
positions within Germany.  As a result of this, in July, the Jews hold
a World Conference in Amsterdam during which they demand that Hitler
re-instate every Jew back to his former position.

   Hitler refuses and as a result of this, Samuel Untermyer, the
Ashkenazi Jew who blackmailed President Wilson,and is now the head of
the American delegation and the president of the whole conference,
returns to the United States, and makes a speech on radio which was
transcribed in the From the New York Times, Monday, August 7, 1933.
In the speech he made the following statements,

       "...the Jews are the aristocrats of the world...Our campaign
is...the economic boycott against all German goods, shipping and
services...What we are proposing...is to prosecute a purely defensive
economic boycott that will undermine the Hitler regime and bring the
German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on
which their very existence depends...

       ...Each of you, Jew and Gentile alike...must refuse to deal
with any merchant or shopkeeper who sells any German-made goods or who
patronizes German ships or shipping."

   As two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and
could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported, if
Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would
starve, as there would be not enough food for more than one third of
the population.

   As a result of this boycott, Jews throughout America, would
protest outside and damage any stores in which they found any products
with, "Made in Germany," printed on them, causing stores to have to
dump these products or risk bankruptcy.

   Once the effects of this boycott began to be felt in Germany, the
Germans, who had demonstrated no violence towards the Jews up to this
point, simply began boycotting Jewish stores in the same way the Jews
had done to stores selling German products in America.

   Rothschild financed IBM, supply machines to the Nazis which
produce punch cards to help organize and manage the initial
identification and social expulsion of Jews, the confiscation of their
property and their extermination.

   On November 16, President Roosevelt recognizes the Zionist regime
of Stalin in Russia without consultation with Congress even as 8,000
Ukrainians march in protest in New York.

   Also this year, President Roosevelt, born of a Jewish mother,
therefore satisfying Ashkenazi rules of being Jewish, orders the
all-seeing eye to be placed upon all new dollar bills along with the
motto, "Novus Ordo Seclorum."  This is latin for, "A New Order of the
Ages."

   1934: Swiss banking secrecy laws are reformed and it becomes an
offence resulting in imprisonment for any bank employee to violate
bank secrecy. This is all in preparation for the Rothschild engineered
Second World War in which as usual they will fund both sides.

   Edmond de Rothschild dies.

   1936:  With regard to the increase in anti-semitism in Germany,
Samuel Landman (at the time, secretary to the World Zionist
Organisation), in his 1936 book, Great Britain, The Jews, and
Palestine states the following of the United States entry into World
War 1,

       "The fact that it was Jewish help that brought USA into the
War on the side of the Allies has rankled ever since in German –
especially Nazi – minds, and has contributed in no small measure to
the prominence which anti-Semitism occupies in the Nazi programme."

   1938: On 7th November, a Jew, Herschel Grynszpan, assassinated
Ernst vom Rath, a minor official at the German Embassy in Paris.  As a
result of this German hostility towards Jews in Germany started to
turn violent.

   The Rothschilds Austrian banking house in Vienna, S. M. von
Rothschild und Söhne, closes following the Nazi occupation of Austria.

   1939: I.G. Farben the leading producer of chemicals in the world
and largest German producer of steel dramatically increases its
production. This increased production is almost exclusively used to
arm Germany for the Second World War.  This company was controlled by
the Rothschilds and would go on to use Jews and other disaffected
peoples as slave labour in the concentration camps. I.G. Farben also
created the lethal Zyklon B gas that was used to exterminate the Jews.

   On 1 September, the Second world war starts when Germany invades
Poland.  This was because the German leadership were a Christian
leadership, who understood that Soviet Russia was led by Rothschild
funded Communists, and they feared that as the Soviet Union grew in
strength, these Jewish Communists would invade and wipe all the
Christians off the map.

   1940: Hansjurgen Koehler in his book, "Inside The Gestapo," states
the following, of Maria Anna Schicklgruber, Adolf Hitler's
grandmother,

       "A little servant girl…….came to Vienna and became a domestic
servant…….at the Rothschild mansion…….and Hitler’s unknown grandfather
must be probably looked for in this magnificent house."

   This is backed up by Walter Langer in his book, "The Mind Of
Hitler," in which he states,

       "Adolf’s father, Alois Hitler, was the illegitimate son of
Maria Anna Schicklgruber…….Maria Anna Schicklgruber was living in
Vienna at the time she conceived. At that time she was employed as a
servant in the home of Baron Rothschild. As soon as the family
discovered her pregnancy she was sent back home…….where Alois was
born."

   On the surface, it would appear Hitler was unlikely to be a
Rothschild, but then again, when you discover the benefits that the
Rothschilds got out of this war, both financially and politically, a
Rothschild connection does not appear as outlandish as it may
initially seem.

   1941:  President Roosevelt takes America into the second world war
by refusing to sell Japan any more steel scrap or oil. Japan was in
the midst of a war against China and without that scrap steel and oil,
Japan would be unable to continue that war. Japan was totally
dependent upon the United States for both steel scrap and oil.
Roosevelt knew this action would provoke the Japanese to attack
America, which they subsequently did at Pearl Harbor.

   1942: Prescott Bush, father of future American Presidents’ George
Herbert Walker and George W, has his company seized under the,
“Trading With The Enemy,” Act. He was funding Hitler from America,
whilst American soldiers were being killed by German soldiers.

   Jews are also being slaughtered by these same soldiers.
Interestingly the ADL never criticizes any of the Bushes for this.

   1943: February 18th, Zionist, Izaak Greenbaum, head of the Jewish
Agency Rescue Committee, in a speech to the Zionist Executive Council
states,

       “If I am asked, could you give from the UJA (United Jewish
Appeal) monies to rescue Jews, I say, no and I say again no!”

   He would go onto state,

       “One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Poland!”

   This is not a surprise, the whole idea of Zionist support for the
slaughter of innocent Jews was to scare the survivors into believing
that their only place of safety was Israel.  How else do you think the
Zionists could ensure Jews leave the beautiful European cities in
which they live, in order to settle in a desert!

   1944:  On 6 November Lord Moyne, British Minister Resident in the
Middle East was assassinated in Cairo by two members of the Jewish
terrorist group, the Stern Gang, led by future Prime Minister of
Israel, Yitzhak Shamir.  He is also responsible for  an assassination
attempt against Harold MacMichael, the High Commissioner of the
British Mandate of Palestine, this same year.

   Interestingly he also masterminds another successful assassination
this year against the United Nations representative in the Middle
East, Count Folke Bernadotte who, although he had secured the release
of 21,000 prisoners from German camps during World War II, was seen by
Yitzak Shamir and his terrorist collaborators as an anti-Zionist.

   In Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, two further Rothschild world
banks are created.  The International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the
World Bank.

   1945: The end of the Second World War. It is reported that I.G.
Farben plants were specifically not targeted in the bombing raids on
Germany. Interestingly at the end of the war, they were found to have
only sustained 15% damage.

   The tribunals held at the end of the Second World War, to
investigate Nazi War Crimes, censored any materials recording Western
assistance to Hitler.

   The Rothschilds take a giant step towards their goal of world
domination when the second, "League of Nations," called the, "United
Nations," was approved this year.

   1946:  On July 22 the future Prime Minister of Israel, Ashkenazi
Jew, David Ben-Gurion, orders another future Prime Minister of Israel,
Ashkenazi Jew, Menachem Begin, to carry out a terrorist attack on the
King David Hotel in Palestine, to try and drive out the British.  As a
result of this 91 people were killed, most of them civilians: 28
British, 41 Arabs, 17 Jews, and 5 others.  Around 45 people are
injured.

   Menachem Begin went on to proudly proclaimed himself as, "the
father of modern terrorism."  Just to put the gravity of the attack on
the King David Hotel into perspective, it was at the time the biggest
death toll as a result of single terrorist action ever and was only
surpassed over forty years later by the Bombing of Pan Am flight 103
over Lockerbie.

   1947: The British who prior to World War 2 declared that there
would be no more immigration of Jews to Palestine in order to protect
the Palestinians from their acts of terror against both them and
British soldiers, transfer control of Palestine to the United Nations.
 The United Nations resolve to have Palestine partitioned into two
states, one zionist and one arab, with Jerusalem to remain as an
international zone to be enjoyed by all religious faiths.

   This transfer was scheduled to take place on May 15, 1948.  The
United Nations had no right to give Arab property to anyone, as indeed
even thought the Jews owned 6% of Palestine at that time, resolution
181 granted the Jews 57% of the land leaving the Arabs who at that
time had 94% with only 43%.

   Information collected by the ADL in its spy operations on US
citizens is used by the House Select Committee on Unamerican
Activities. Subcommittee Chair Clare Hoffman dismisses the ADL’s
reports on suspected communists as "hearsay."

   1948: In the Spring of this year, the Rothschilds bribe President
Harry S. Truman (33rd President of the United States 1945 – 1953) to
recognise Israel (Rothschild owned Zionist not Jewish territory) as a
sovereign state with $2,000,000 which they give to him on his campaign
train.

   They then declare Israel to be a sovereign Jewish state in
Palestine and within half an hour President Truman declared the United
States to be the first foreign nation to recognise it.

   The Flag of Israel is unveiled. Despite tremendous opposition the
emblem on the flag is a blue coloured version of the Rothschild, "Red
Hexagram or Sign."

   This angers many Jews who realise this Hexagram was used in the
ancient mystery religions as the symbol of, "Moloch," (described as a
demon of unwilling sacrifice and is also interestingly the name of the
stone owl the elite worship at Bohemian Grove), and, "Astaroth,"
(described as the Lord Treasurer of Hell).

   The Hexagram was also used to represent Saturn, which has been
identified as the esoteric name for, "Satan." This indicates that
anyone killed in the name of Israel is actually a sacrifice to Satan.
These dissenting Jews believe the, "Menorah," the oldest Jewish symbol
should be used and pointed out that the Hexagram is not even a Jewish
symbol, but of course as the Rothschild Zionists use it that is what
ends up on the Rothschild, I mean Zionist, I mean Israeli flag.

   In the early hours of April 19, 132 Jewish terrorists from the
Irgun gang, led by future Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, and
the Stern gang, led by future Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir,
brutally massacre 200 men, women and children as they are sleeping
peacefully in the Arab village of Deir Yassin.

   Following the United Nations transfer of Palestine to an
independent Jewish state and an independent Arab state on May 15, the
Israelis launched a military assault on the Arabs with blaring
loudspeakers on their trucks informing the Arabs that if they did not
flee immediately, they would be slaughtered.

   800,000 Arabs with the recent memory of the Deir Yassin massacre
at the forefront of their minds, fled in panic.  They asked for help
from nighbouring Arab states, but those states did not get involved as
they were no match for the Israelis whose up to date military hardware
had been supplied by the Jewish Stalinist regime in Russia.  Following
this assault, the Jews now controlled 78% of the former Palestine as
oppose to the 57% that had been given to them illegally by the United
Nations.

   The Palestinians, many of them Christians, were never paid
compensation for their homes, property and businesses stolen from them
during this illegal Jewish assault, and these people ended up in slum
refugee cities of tents. Futhermore at least half of the Palestinians
in their hurry to flee, left their birth certificates behind.  The
State of Israel then passed a law that only those who could prove
citizenship were allowed to return to Israel, thus meaning these
400,000 Palestinians could not return and lost all their property they
had left there.

   Ashkenazi Jew, David Ben-Gurion, one of the father founders of
Israel and its first Prime Minister, candidly describes Zionist aims
in his diary (21 May 1948) as follows,

       “The Achilles heel of the Arab coalition is the Lebanon.
Muslim supremacy in this country is artificial and can easily be
overthrown. A Christian State ought to be set up there, with its
southern frontier on the river Litani.

       We would sign a treaty of alliance with this State. Thus when
we have broken the strength of the Arab Legion and bombed Amman, we
could wipe out Trans-Jordan, after that Syria would fall. And if Egypt
still dared to make war on us, we would bomb Port Said, Alexandria and
Cairo.

       We should thus end the war and would have but paid to Egypt,
Assyria and Chaldea on behalf of our ancestors.”

   1949:  On October 1, Mao Tse Tsung declares the founding of the
People's Republic Of China in Tiananmen Square, Beijing.  He is funded
by Rothschild created Communism in Russia and also the following
Rothschild agents:  Solomon Adler, a former United States Treasury
official who was a Soviet Spy; Israel Epstein, the son of a Jewish
Bolshevik imprisoned by the Tsar in Russia for trying to forment a
revolution there; and Frank Coe, a leading official of the Rothschild
owned IMF.

   1950: Israel passes their law of return, guaranteeing every Jew
worldwide the right to dwell in the state of Israel, however the
Palestinians even though they had lived there for 1300 years, were
denied that right.

   John Davitt, former chief of the Justice Department's internal
security section notes that the Israeli intelligence service is the
second most active in the United States after the Soviets and of
course both Israel and the Soviet Union are run by an Ashkenazi Jewish
leadership.

   1951: On 1 April the Israeli Secret Intelligence Agency the
Mossad, which will go on to terrorize the world, is formed. The motto
of the Mossad is probably the most disgusting secret service motto in
the world, it is,

   "By Way Of Deception,
     Thou Shalt Do War."

   1953: N. M. Rothschild & Sons found the British Newfoundland
Corporation Limited to develop 60,000 square miles of land in
Newfoundland, Canada, which comprised a power station to harness the
power of the Hamilton (later renamed Churchill) Falls. At the time
this was the largest construction project ever to be undertaken by a
private company.

   1954: "The Lavon Affair."  Israeli agents recruit Egyptian
citizens of Jewish descent to bomb Western targets in Egypt, and plant
evidence to frame Arabs, in an apparent attempt to upset
American/Egyptian relations. Israeli defense minister, Ashkenazi Jew,
Pinhas Lavon is eventually removed from office, though many think real
responsibility lay with David Ben-Gurion.

   A hidden microphone planted by the Israelis is discovered in the
Office of the US Ambassador in Tel Aviv.

   1955: Edmond de Rothschild founds Compagnie Financiere, Paris.

   1956: Telephone taps are found connected to two telephones in the
residence of the US military attaché in Tel Aviv.

   1957: James de Rothschild dies and it is reported (by the
Rothschild owned media) that he bequeaths a large sum of money to the
state of Israel to pay for the construction of their parliament
building, the Knesset. He states that the Knesset should be,

       "a symbol, in the eyes of all men, of the permanence of the
State of Israel."

   On page 219 of his book, "Tales of the British Aristocracy," L.G.
Pine, the Editor of Burke’s Peerage, states that the Jews,

       "have made themselves so closely connected with the British
peerage that the two classes are unlikely to suffer loss which is not
mutual. So closely linked are the Jews and the lords that a blow
against the Jews in this country would not be possible without
injuring the aristocracy also."

   Maurice de Rothschild dies in Paris.

   1962: de Rothschild Frères establishes Imétal as an umbrella
company for all their mineral mining interests.

   Frederic Morton publishes his book, The Rothschilds, in which he states,

       "Though they control scores of industrial, commercial, mining
and tourist corporations, not one bears the name Rothschild. Being
private partnerships, the family houses never need to, and never do,
publish a single public balance sheet, or any other report of their
financial condition."

   This attitude reveals the true aim of the Rothschilds, to
eliminate all competition and create their own worldwide monopoly.

   1963: On June 4th President John F. Kennedy (the 35th President of
the United States 1961 – 1963) signs Executive Order 11110 which
returned to the U.S. government the power to issue currency, without
going through the Rosthchilds owned Federal Reserve.

   Less than 6 months later on November 22nd , president Kennedy is
assassinated by the Rothschilds for the same reason as they
assassinated President Abraham Lincoln in 1865, he wanted to print
American money for the American people, as oppose to for the benefit
of a money grabbing war mongering foreign elite.

   This Executive Order 11110, is rescinded by President Lyndon
Baines Johnson (the 36th President of the United States 1963 to 1969)
on Air Force One from Dallas to Washington, the same day as President
Kennedy was assassinated.

   Another, and probably the primary, reason for Kennedy's
assassination is however, the fact that he made it quite clear to
Israeli Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion, that under no circumstances
would he agree to Israel becoming a nuclear state.  The Israeli
newspaper Ha'aretz on February 5, 1999, in a review of, Avner Cohen's
book, "Israel and the Bomb," states the following,

       "The murder of American President John F. Kennedy brought to
an abrupt end the massive pressure being applied by the U.S.
administration on the government of Israel to discontinue the nuclear
program...The book implied that, had Kennedy remained alive, it is
doubtful whether Israel would today have a nuclear option."

   Edmond de Rothschild establishes La Compagnie Financière Edmond de
Rothschild (LCF), in Switzerland as a venture capital house. This
later develops into an investment bank and asset management company
with many affiliates. He also marries his wife Nadine and they have a
son, Benjamin de Rothschild.

   1965: Israel illegally obtains enriched uranium from NUMEC
(Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation).

   1967: The treatment of the Palestinians by the Zionist Jews,
finally ignites enough anger in the Arab world for Egypt, Jordan and
Syria to mobilise on Israel's borders.  All of these three countries
are suddenly attacked by Israel and as a result the Sinai which
included Gaza was stolen from Egypt, and the West Bank and the Jordan
River stolen from Jordan.

   As a result of this, on June 8, the Israelis launch an attack on
the USS Liberty with Israeli aircraft and motor torpedo boats, in an
effort to blame it on Egypt, to bring America into the war on their
side, and of course follow to the letter, their Mossad motto,

   "By Way Of Deception,
   Thou Shalt Do War."

   As a result of their attack, 34 American servicemen were killed
and 174 wounded.  Israel lies as usual, claiming it mistook this
warship that was flying a large United States flag, for an ancient
out-of-service Egyptian horse carrier El Quseir, that was 180 feet
shorter.  They also claim the ship was in the war zone, when it was
actually in international waters, far from any fighting.  The
Israeli's attack on this warship lasts for 75 minutes during which
time they shoot up one of the United States flags, resulting in the
sailors desperately raising another one.

   In the aftermath of this attack, the American sailors who survived
are warned by the United States military not to discuss the matter
with anyone due to, "national security."  This story gets no
prominence in the Rothschild controlled mainstream media and as usual
Israel is in no way even rebuked for their crimes by their subservient
country of America.

   The following day, June 9th, Israel illegally occupies the Golan
Heights which it seizes from Syria. This area goes on to provide
Israel with one third of its fresh water.

   Israeli General Matityahu Peled, is quoted in Ha'aretz (19 March
1972) with the following statement,

       "The thesis that the danger of genocide was hanging over us in
June 1967 and that Israel was fighting for its physical existence is
only bluff, which was born and developed after the war."  Another
sickening and deceptive statement but again at least he's consistent
with the Mossad motto, "By Way Of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War."

   de Rothschild Frères is renamed Banque Rothschild.

   1968: Noémie Halphen, wife of Maurice de Rothschild dies.

   1970: While working for Senator Henry “Scoop” Jackson, Ashkenazi
Jew, Richard Perle is caught by the FBI giving classified information
to Israel. Nothing is done.

   British Prime Minister Edward Heath makes Lord Victor Rothschild
the head of his policy unit. Whilst he is in that role Britain enters
the European Community.

   1973: In his book, None Dare Call It Conspiracy, Gary Allen states,

       "One major reason for the historical blackout on the role of
the international bankers in political history is the Rothschilds were
Jewish…

       ….The Jewish members of the conspiracy have used an
organisation called The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as an instrument
to try and convince everyone that any mention of the Rothschilds and
their allies is an attack on all Jews.

       In this way they have stifled almost all honest scholarship on
international bankers and made the subject taboo within universities.

       Any individual or book exploring this subject is immediately
attacked by hundreds of ADL communities all over the country. The ADL
has never let the truth or logic interfere with its highly
professional smear jobs…

       ….Actually, nobody has a right to be more angry at the
Rothschild clique than their fellow Jews…

       ….The Rothschild empire helped finance Adolf Hitler."”

   George J. Laurer an employee of the Rothschilds controlled IBM,
invents the UPC (Universal Product Code) barcode which will eventually
be placed upon every item traded worldwide and bear the number, 666.
The Book of Revelation, Chapter 13, Verse 17 through 18, states the
following in relation to this number,

       "And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark,
or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

       Here is wisdom.  Let him that hath understanding count the
number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is
Six hundred threescore and six."

   The whole Satanic aims of the Rothschilds are now in full view of
the world, everything bought or sold carries the mark of the beast,
666.

   N. M. Rothschild & Sons British Newfoundland Corporation,
Churchill Falls project in Newfoundland, Canada, is completed.

   N. M. Rothschild & Sons also create a new asset management part of
the company which traded worldwide. This eventually became, Rothschild
Private Management Limited.

   Edmond de Rothschild, a great-grandson of Jacob (James) Mayer
Rothschild, bought the cru bourgeois estate of Château Clarke in
Bordeaux.

   1976:  Ashkenazi Jew, Harold Rosenthal, aide to Ashkenazi Jew,
Senator Jacob Javits, states,

       "Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer."

   1978: Ashkenazi Jew, Stephen Bryen, then a Senate Foreign
Relations Committee staffer, is overheard in a Washington D.C. hotel
offering confidential documents to top Israeli military officials.

   Bryen obtains a lawyer, Nathan Lewin, and the case heads for the
grand jury, but is mysteriously dropped. Bryen later goes to work for
Richard Perle.

   1979: The Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty in 1979 was underwritten
by United States aid which pledged $3 billion annually to Israel from
the United States taxpayer (not even a drop in the ocean when you
consider the amount they make off the Federal Reserve).

   Shin Bet (the Israeli internal security agency) tries to penetrate
the US Consulate General in Jerusalem through a “Honey Trap”, using a
clerical employee who was having an affair with a Jerusalem girl.

   Baron and Baroness Phillipi de Rothschild in a joint venture with
Robert Mondavi, begin the construction of a pyramid in Napa Valley,
California, where the leader/founder of the Church Of Satan, Ashkenazi
Jew, Anton LaVey, was based. This is known as Opus 1 (which means, the
first work), and the front for this temple is that it is a winery.

   1980: The global phenomenon of privatisation starts. The
Rothschilds are behind this from the very beginning in order to seize
control of all publicly owned assets worldwide.

   1981: Banque Rothschild is nationalised by the French government.
The new bank is called, Compagnie Européenne de Banque. The
Rothschilds subsequently set up a successor to this French bank,
Rothschild & Cie Banque (RCB), which goes on to become a leading
French investment house.

   1982:  From September 16 to 18, future Prime Minister of Israel
and then Defence Minister, Ashkenazi Jew, Ariel Sharon, orchestrates
Israel's invasion of Lebanon, which provided ariel lighting in order
to facilitate the killing of between 1000 and 2000 men, women and
children in the Sabra and Shatila massacres.

   1985: Eustace Mullins publishes, "Who Owns The TV Networks," in
which he reveals the Rothschilds have control of all three major U.S.
Networks, which are: NBC; CBS; and ABC.

   The New York Times reports the FBI is aware of at least a dozen
incidents in which American officials transferred classified
information to the Israelis, quoting (former Assistant Director of the
F.B.I.) Raymond Wannal. The Justice Department does not prosecute.

   Richard Smyth, the owner of MILCO, is indicted on charges of
smuggling nuclear timing devices to Israel.

   N. M. Rothschild & Sons advise the British government on the
privatisation of British Gas. They subsequently advise the British
government on virtually all of their other privatisations of state
owned assets including: British Steel; British Coal; all the British
regional electricity boards; and all the British regional water
boards.

   A British MP heavily involved in these privatisations is future
Chancellor of the Exchequer, Norman Lamont, a former Rothschild
banker.

   1986: Mordechai Vanunu a technician at Dimona, Israel's nuclear
installation, from 1976 to 1985, discovers that the plant was secretly
producing nuclear weapons.

   His conscience made him speak out and in 1986 he provided the
London Sunday Times with the facts and photos they used to tell the
world about Israel's nuclear weapons programme.

   His evidence showed that Israel had stockpiled up to 200 nuclear
warheads, with no debate or authorisation from it own citizens. On
30th September 1986, Vanunu was lured from London to Rome. There he
was kidnapped, drugged and shipped to Israel.

   After a secret trial he was sentenced to 18 years for, "treason,"
and, "espionage," (something Israel are very familiar with) though he
had received no payment and had communicated with no foreign power.

   He goes on to be held in complete isolation for 11 years, only
allowed occasional visits from his family, lawyer and a priest,
conducted through a metal screen. Although he completes his sentence,
the Israeli government continues to hold him against his will.

   1987: Edmond de Rothschild creates the World Conservation Bank
which is designed to transfer debts from third world countries to this
bank and in return those countries would give land to this bank. This
is designed so the Rothschilds can gain control of the third world
which represents 30% of the land surface of the Earth.

   On April 24 the Wall Street Journal reveals the, "Role of Israel
in Iran-Contra Scandal Won't be Explored in Detail by Panels."

   1988: The ADL initiate a nationwide competition for law students
to draft anti-hate legislation for minority groups.  That competition
is won by a man named, Joseph Ribakoff, whose thesis proposes that not
only must hate motivated violence be banned, but also any words which
stimulate: supiscion; friction; hate; and possible violence, these
must also be criminalised.

   This ADL prize-winning paper suggests that not only should
state-agencies monitor and restrict free speech in general, but they
should also censor all films that criticize identifiable groups.
Furthermore, even if the person making the statement can justify it,
for example Christians criticizing homosexuality because the bible
expressly forbids it, Ribakoff asserts that the truth is to be no
defence in court.

   The only proof a court will need in order to secure a conviction
of hate speech is that something has been said, and a minority group
or member of such group has felt emotionally damaged as a result of
such criticism.  Therefore, under these proposals which the ADL will
have forced into law all over the world less than 15 years later,
Jesus Christ would have been arrested as a hate criminal.

   This law is designed to protect the Rothschild conspiracy from
being revealed in that if you criticize the Rothschilds criminal
cabal, you will be targeted as anti-semitic, and thus risk
imprisonment.

   Philippe de Rothschild dies.

   1989: Many of the satellite states in Eastern Europe, through the
influence of Glasnost, become more open in their demands of freedom
from Communist governance in their Republics.

   Many revolutions happen in 1989, most of them involving the
overthrow of their respective Communist governments and the
replacement of them with Republics.

   Thus, the hold the Communists had over Eastern Europe (the Iron
Curtain) becomes very weak. Eventually, as a result of Perestroika and
Glasnost, Communism collapses, not only in the Soviet Union but also
in Eastern Europe.

   In Russia, Boris Yeltsin (whose wife is the daughter of Joseph
Stalin’s marriage to Rosa Kaganovich) and the Republican government
takes steps to end the power of the Communist party by suspending and
banning the party and seizing all their property.

   This symbolised the fall of Communism in Russia, and resulted in
the start of a mass exodus of 700,000 Jews from the former Soviet
Union to Israel.

   In the Israeli Journal, Hotam (24 November 1989), there is a
report of a speech that then Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister,
Ashkenazi Jew, Binyamin Netanyahu, gave to students at Bar Ilan
University in which he states,

       "Israel should have exploited the repression of the
demonstrations in China, when world attention focused on that country,
to carry out mass expulsions among the Arabs of the territories."

   The London and Paris Rothschilds announce the launch of a new
subsidiary, Rothschild GmbH, in Frankfurt, Germany.

   1991:  Following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait on August 2, 1990,
on January 16 of this year the United States and Britain began an
aerial bombing campaign of targets within Iraq.  On 24 February the
ground campaign commenced which was to last 100 hours until on
February 28 when a horrendous war crime occurred.

   This crime was the slaughter of 150,000 Iraqi troops with fuel air
bombs.  These Iraqis were fleeing on a crowded highway from Kuwait to
Basra.  President George Herbert Walker Bush ordered United States
military aircraft and ground units to kill these surrendering troops,
they were then bulldozed into mass unmarked graves in the desert, some
still alive.

   President Bush then ordered a cessation of hostilities.  What was
the significance of this slaughter and President Bush declaring the
war over on this day?  Well it was the day the, "Day of Purim," fell
on this year.  This the day the Jews celebrate their victory over
Ancient Babylon, now based within the borders of Iraq and a day when
the Jews are encouraged to get bloody revenge against their perceived
enemies.

   At the Bilderberg Conference on June 6 to 9 of this year, in
Baden-Baden, Germany, David Rockefeller (a Rothschild) made the
following statement,

       "We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times,
Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have
attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for
almost 40 years.  It would have been impossible for us to develop our
plan for the world, if we had been subjected to the lights of
publicity during those years.

       But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march
towards a world government.  The super-national sovereignty of an
intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the
national auto-determination practised in past centuries."

   1992: In March, former Federal Reserve Board Chairman, Paul A.
Volker became Chairman of the European banking firm, J. Rothschild,
Wolfensohn and Co.

   Stephen Bryen, caught offering confidential documents to Israel in
1978, is serving on board of the pro-Israeli Jewish Institute for
National Security Affairs while continuing as a paid consultant, with
security clearance, on exports of sensitive US technology.

   “The Samson Option,” by Seymour M. Hersh reports,

       “Illicitly obtained intelligence was flying so voluminously
from LAKAM (a secret Israeli intelligence unit, a Hebrew acronym for
Scientific Liaison Bureau) into Israeli intelligence that a special
code name, JUMBO, was added to the security markings already on the
documents. There were strict orders, Ari Ben-Menashe recalled,
“Anything marked JUMBO was not supposed to be discussed with your
American counterparts.”

   The Wall Street Journal reports that Israeli agents apparently
tried to steal Recon Optical Inc's top-secret airborne spy-camera
system.

   On September 16th Britain’s pound collapses when currency
speculators led by Rothschild agent, Ashkenazi Jew, George Soros,
borrow pounds and sell them for Deutsche Marks, in the expectation of
being able to repay the loan in devalued currency and to pocket the
difference.

   This results in the British Chancellor of the Exchequer, Norman
Lamont, announcing a rise in interest rates of 5% in one day and as a
result drives Britain into a recession which lasts many years as large
numbers of businesses fail and the housing market crashes.

   This is right on cue for the Rothschilds, after they had
privatised Britain’s state owned assets during the 1980’s, driven the
share price up, and then collapsed the markets so they could buy them
up for pennies on the pound, a carbon copy of what Nathan Mayer
Rothschild did to the British economy 180 years before, in 1812.

   It cannot be overstated that the Chancellor of the Exchequer at
that time, Norman Lamont, prior to becoming a MP, was a Merchant
Banker with N. M. Rothschild and Sons, who he joined after reading
Economics at Cambridge.

   1993: Norman Lamont leaves the British government to return to N.
M. Rothschild and Sons as a director, after his mission to collapse
the British economy to profit the Rothschilds is accomplished.

   Former Congressman, Paul Findley publishes his seminal book,
Deliberate Deceptions: Facing the Facts About the U.S. Israeli
Relationship.

   In this book he lists the 65 United Nations Member Resolutions
against Israel from the period 1955 to 1992, and the 30 United States
vetoes on Israel’s behalf which if not made would have seen Israel
have 95 resolutions against them at this point.

   No matter, even with Israel’s puppet the United States helping
them terrorise others, the 65 Resolutions passed against Israel are
more than all the Resolutions passed against all other countries
combined.

   Not that Israel care too much about the views of the United
Nations when you consider that less than two weeks after Israel’s
attack on the USS Liberty (an attack designed to sink the Liberty and
blame it on Egypt prompting the USA into a war with Egypt on behalf of
Israeli Lies, remember the Mossad motto, “By Way Of Deception, Thou
Shalt Do War”), the Israeli Foreign Minister, Aba Eban, stated of the
United Nations,

       "If the General Assembly were to vote by 121 votes to 1 in
favor of, "Israel," returning to the armistice lines (pre June 1967
borders), "Israel," would refuse to comply with the decision," New
York Times – 19 June 1967.

   The ADL is caught operating a massive spying operation on critics
of Israel, Arab-Americans, the San Francisco Labor Council, ILWU Local
10, Oakland Educational Association, NAACP, Irish Northern Aid,
International Indian Treaty Council, the Asian Law Caucus and the San
Francisco Police.

   Data collected was sent to Israel and in some cases to South
Africa. Pressure from Jewish organizations forces the city to drop the
criminal case, but the ADL settles a civil lawsuit for an undisclosed
sum of cash.

   1995: Former atomic energy scientist, Dr Kitty Little claims the
Rothschilds now control 80% of the world’s uranium supplies giving
them a monopoly over nuclear power.

   The Defense Investigative Service circulates a memo warning US
military contractors that,

       "Israel aggressively collects (US) military and industrial technology."

   The report stated that Israel obtains information using,

       "ethnic targeting, financial aggrandizement, and
identification and exploitation of individual frailties," of US
citizens.

   1996: A General Accounting Office report, "Defense Industrial
Security: Weaknesses in US Security Arrangements With Foreign-Owned
Defense Contractors," found that according to intelligence sources,
"Country A," (identified by intelligence sources as Israel, Washington
Times, 22 February 1996),

       "conducts the most aggressive espionage operation against the
United States of any US ally."
       A pdf file of the report is here:
       www.gao.gov/archive/1996/ns96064.pdf

       An unformated text version is here:
       http://fas.org/man/gao/gao9664.htm


   The Jerusalem Post (30 August 1996) quoted the report,

       "“Classified military information and sensitive military
technologies are high-priority targets for the intelligence agencies
of this country."

   The report described, "An espionage operation run by the
intelligence organization responsible for collecting scientific and
technologic information for (Israel) paid a US government employee to
obtain US classified military intelligence documents."

   The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (Shawn L. Twing,
April 1996) noted that this was,

       "a reference to the 1985 arrest of Jonathan Pollard, a
civilian US naval intelligence analyst who provided Israel's LAKAM
espionage agency an estimated 800,000 pages of classified US
intelligence information."
       www.washington-report.org/backissues/0496/9604014.htm

   The GAO report also noted that, "Several citizens of (Israel) were
caught in the United States stealing sensitive technology used in
manufacturing artillery gun tubes."

   An Office of Naval Intelligence document, "Worldwide Challenges to
Naval Strike Warfare" reported that,

       "US technology has been acquired (by China) through Israel in
the form of the Lavi fighter and possibly SAM (surface-to-air) missile

   Ben-Gurion: The Armed Prophet - Michael Bar-Zohar - 1967

   The Hidden Tyranny - Benjamin Freedman - 1971

   None Dare Call It Conspiracy - Gary Allen - 1972

   The Gulag Archipelago, Vol. 2, Parts 3 and 4 - Aleksandr
Solzhenitsyn - First English translation published 1975.

   Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler - Anthony C. Sutton - 1976

   The Rosenthal Document - Walter White, Jr. - 1978

   Two Rothschilds And The Land Of Israel - Simon Schama - 1978

   The Six Pointed Star - Dr O. J. Graham - 1984

   The Last Days In America - Bob Fraley - 1984

   Who Owns The TV Networks - Eustace Mullins - 1985

   The Samson Option: Israel's Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign
Policy - Seymour M. Hersh - 1991

   A History of the Jews in America - Howard M. Sachar - 1992

   Deliberate Deceptions: Facing the Facts About the U.S. Israeli
Relationship - Paul Findley - 1993

   Descent Into Slavery - Des Griffin - 1994

   Bloodlines Of The Illuminati - Fritz Springmeier - 1995

   Jewish History, Jewish Religion - Israel Shahak - 1994

   Satan Speaks - Anton Szandor LaVey - 1998

   The Elite Serial Killers of Lincoln, JFK, RFK & MLK - Robert
Gaylon Ross - 2001

   Never Again?  The Threat Of The New Anti-Semitism - Abraham H. Foxman - 2004

   The Elite Don’t Dare Let Us Tell The People - Robert Gaylon Ross - 2004

   Codex Magica - Texe Marrs - 2005


The same people and companies behind the Nazi German Holocaust and
produced the ZyklonB gas chambers, steel, other chemicals, munitions
for the death camps where they mass murdered  over 10 million Jews and
Freemasons are behind the Codex Alimentarius Commission food,
nutrients, minerals and herbs consumer protection code labelling
protection scam to mass murder over 3 million people on planet
earth......Click here to read the full story

Major Interntaional Industrial Companies, Banking Groups, powerful
banking and business families and media owners and controllers which
include Bayer, IG Farben, The Rockerfeller Family, The Rothchild
Family, Rupert Murdoch and his media companies News Corporation and
News International, Conrad Black, Fritz Teer Meer, have secretly
played their part in helping to create the Codex Alimentarius
Commission in 1963 and its mummy and daddy organisations the World
Health Organisation (WHO)and the Food and Agriculture Organisation of
the Unitd Namtions (FAO)  as world wide bodies rules and regulations
that can override an individual country's rules and regulations  on
food, nutrients, minerals and herbs consumer protection code labelling
protection.  scam to mass murder over 3 million people on planet earth
through various methods including starvation of nutrients in their
food and increasing levels of terrifyingly dangerous poisoness
pesticides and bovine growth hormones in all types of food including
fruit vegetables, seeds, net, fish, pountry, lamb, pig, cows, etc. to
completely control all food production, coding, labelling,
distribution etc.

The British Prime Minister Lloyd George claimed, in 1909, that Lord
Nathan Rothschild was the most powerful man in Britain.   By the end
of the century, the family owned, or had built, at the lowest
estimates, over 41 palaces, of a scale and luxury perhaps unparalleled
even by the richest Royal families. In 1816, four of the brothers were
each elevated to the hereditary nobility by Austrian EmperorFrancis I;
Nathan was elevated in 1818. All of them were granted the Austrian
title of baron orFreiherr on 29 September 1822. As such, some members
of the family used "de" or "von" Rothschild to acknowledge the grant
of nobility. In 1885, Nathan Mayer Rothschild II (1840–1915) of the
London branch of the family, was granted the hereditary peerage title
Baron Rothschild in the Peerage of the United Kingdom.Many Rothschilds
were and are supporters of the State of Israel, although other members
of the family opposed the creation of the state.[21] Lord Victor
Rothschild was against granting asylum or even help to Jewish refugees
during the Holocaust.[22] However, Baron Edmond James de Rothschild
was a patron of the first settlement in Palestine atRishon-LeZion, and
bought from Ottoman landlords many parts of the land which now makes
up present-day Israel. In 1917 Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild
was the addressee of the Balfour Declaration, which committed the
British government to the establishment in Palestine of a national
home for the Jewish people.

James A. de Rothschild financed the Knesset building as a gift to the
State of Israel.

The Supreme Court of Israel building was donated to Israel by Dorothy
de Rothschild.[23] Outside the President's Chamber is displayed the
letter Mrs Rothschild wrote to Prime Minister Shimon Peres expressing
her intention to donate a new building for the Supreme Court.[24]

Rothschild family banking businesses pioneered international high
finance during the industrialisation of Europe and were instrumental
in supporting railway systems across the world and in complex
government financing for projects such as the Suez Canal. The family
bought up a large proportion of the property inMayfair, London. Major
businesses directly founded by Rothschild family capital include
Alliance Assurance (1824) (now Royal & SunAlliance); Chemin de Fer du
Nord (1845); Rio Tinto Group (1873); Société Le Nickel (1880) (now
Eramet); and Imétal (1962) (now Imerys). The Rothschilds financed
Cecil Rhodes on his expeditions in Africa, the founding of De Beers
and the creation of the colony of Rhodesia.
http://www.blacklistednews.com/?news_id=5768
http://www.codexcorp.com/
CODEX CORP:  Specialising in Corrections and Healthcare, it may be an
unusual combination but it works for us, our partners and customers
who want to keep a close control and watch on the use of health care
and nutritional products in the community and with our unique and far
reaching security and monitoring systems we will be able to tell our
customers instantly if anyone in the world is using nutrients and
minerals that are not Codex approved  and compliant, and have them
quickly detained and punished for not complying with Codex approved
and compliant products. With Codex we are proud to say that no one
will escape detection. Codex Corporation and its founders have over
100 years experience in this business including the management and
design of the concentration camps in Germany. Codex Corporation was
originally the multi billion  International Giant I G Farben.
A quick background on our founding company I G Farben and its
directors and managers will help convince you that as far as security,
nutrient and health care management, people management, corrections
management, Codex ( Formerly IG Farben) is the company you should
chose for any issues in Corrections and Heathcare Management. Codex
and its security management has the ability to make sure there is no
health freedom. not just in the USA but all over the world... and
Codex has the ability to make sure anyone that tries to think for a
minute they can get way with trying to have health freedom, will
quickly be caught, detained and punished by Codex's unique and far
reaching security and monitoring systems...The Codex Moto
is
"None will escape detection and punishment of the unauthorised use of
nutrients with Codex on the job....just look at out success record in
designing and managing the concentration camp in Germany....our
success record at Codex Corporation, formerly IG Farben in people,
healthcare and corrections management speaks for itself"
Codex Corporation's, formerly IG Farben's 100 year History in People,
Healthcare and Corrections Management
provided from Codex Alimentarius Speach by Dr Rimal Laibox MD of the
Natural Solutions Fioundation, Produced by EON the Ecological Options
Network for Bauman College in cooperation with the Natural Solutions
Foundation and the National Association of Nutrition Professionals
(NANP) 2005 www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
Dr Rimal Laibox is an experienced healthcare professional and has
studies Codex Corporation, formerly IG Farben's progess ov erthe last
decade to become  the leaders in People, Healthcare and Corrections
Management in the United States.
Codex and Nutricide
" Let me tell you about Codex Alimentarius, let me define it for you,
let me help you understand the enemy..and let me assure you that
absolutely nothing that I am going to tell you, is exagerated, is
interperlated, or is imagined. Every thing I am going to tell you is
documented. A great deal of it is documented on my website,
whichwww.HealthFreedomUSA.org. Let me back up and tell you that I have
been watching Codex come toward us for about the last decade. ,,, and
I have been watching the vote sin congress, which God help us is our
bastion of support and protection against Codex and I will explain why
that is. I have been watching the votes to protect our health freedom
dwindle, until finally in the 109th Congress, without a good deal of
activity, we didn't have the votes to protect us. I have been watching
Codex excellerate and I have been watching it expand, and I have been
getting more and more troubled. Let me give you a brief run down of
Codex then. After the second world war, the Nuremberg Tribunals were
held in which people who had committed crimes against humanity were
judged by the world community in a court run by the United States and
Britain...  and they were sentenced to terms in prison if they were
found guilty of crimes against humanity. In 1948 some of the people
who were found guilty of crimes against humanity on the basis of mass
murder, slavery and other crimes were the president and 24 board
members and executives  of a hugh industrial megalith called IG
Farben. Amazingly enough however, by 1951 all of them had already been
released, and and continuing to consult with German Corporations IG
Farben produced the gas used in the gas chambers Zyklon B, they
produced the steel for the death camps and the rail road line, they
produced the munitions, they produced chemicals, they produced all
kinds of stuff. The Nuremberg Tribunal disolved IG Farben into
companies such as  into BASF - Hoechst - Bayer They produced
pharmaceuticals.. a big big pharacuticals company.  So the president
of IG Farben Fritz ter Meer, the senior manager at IB Farben, was
convicted of crimes against Humanity on the basis of mass murder,
slavery and other crimes on 29th July, 1948. Although he co-operated
with SS and the Final Solution, Fritz ter Meer was sentenced to 7
years only in War Criminal Prison, but only served about three years
in prison, no more someone that bounces a business cheque for say
$1,000 and is charged for fraud in the $1,000 bounced cheque for it
not being honoured on presentation. Someone steals an apple can get 3
years in prison also, or if he or she stole the apple as a servant
they can receive 7 years in prison,
Now Fritz ter Meer is sort of an artistic fellow and he was the one
responsible for the slogan that people saw as they entered Autswitz,
usually for the last time, "Work Brings Freedom". Fritz ter Meer was a
creative sort of fellow. Fritz ter Meer was responsible for the slogan
that people saw as they entered Auschwitz-, usually for the last time,
 " Work brings  Freedom....a creative sort of fellow.
You will notice that the institutions that Fritz ter Meer worked for
an/or had shareholdings in as listed by Wikepedia are
Institutions IG Farben, Bayer, Codex Alimentarius
The Bayer executive Fritz ter Meer, sentenced to seven years in prison
by the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, was made head of the supervisory
board of Bayer in 1956, after his release.
Fritz ter Meer ( July 4 1884 – October 27 1967 ) was a German chemist.
He was the son of Edmund ter Meer the founder of a chemical company
that later became part of Bayer. Fritz ter Meer also worked for Bayer
and later IG Farben. He was involved in the planning of Monowitz
concentration camp, a satellite camp of KZ Auschwitz. He was sentenced
to seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948. After he was
released in 1951 he became supervisory board chairman
(Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He retired in 1961.
The Bayer company then became part of IG Farben, a conglomerate of
German chemical industries that formed a part of the financial core of
the German Nazi regime. IG Farben owned 42.5% of the company that
manufactured Zyklon B,[2] a chemical used in the gas chambers of
Auschwitz and other extermination camps. During World War II, the
company also extensively used slave labor in factories attached to
large slave labor camps, notably the sub-camps of the Mauthausen-Gusen
concentration camp[3]. When the Allies split IG Farben into several
pieces after World War II for involvement in organized Nazi war
crimes, Bayer re-appeared as an individual business. The Bayer
executive Fritz ter Meer, sentenced to seven years in prison by the
Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, was made head of the supervisory board
of Bayer in 1956, after his release.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_ter_Meer
Fritz ter Meer
undefined
Fritz ter Meer
Born June 4, 1884
Uerdingen, Germany
Died October 27, 1967 (aged 83)
Leverkusen, Germany
Nationality German
Institutions IG Farben, Bayer, Codex Alimentarius
Fritz ter Meer ( July 4 1884 – October 27 1967 ) was a German chemist.
He was the son of Edmund ter Meer the founder of a chemical company
that later became part of Bayer. Fritz ter Meer also worked for Bayer
and later IG Farben. He was involved in the planning of Monowitz
concentration camp, a satellite camp of KZ Auschwitz. He was sentenced
to seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948. After he was
released in 1951 he became supervisory board chairman
(Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He retired in 1961.
   * Heine, Jens Ulrich (1990). Verstand und Schicksal. Die Männer
der I.G. Farbenindustrie A.G. (1925-1945). Weinheim; New York:
VCH.ISBN 978-3527281442.
   * Codex Alimentarius Commission [1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_ter_Meer
Edmund ter Meer ( 1852 – November 5, 1931) was a German chemist who
discovered the ter Meer reaction and founded in 1877 the ter Meer dye
company in Uerdingen. After the fusion with the aniline factory of
Julius Weiler the Weiler-ter Meer company was formed. This company
later became part of the Bayer company. His son Fritz ter Meer also
became a chemist associated to the Bayer company.
Edmund ter Meer
Born 1852
Died  November 5, 1931 (aged 79)
Nationality German
Institutions Bayer
Known for ter Meer reaction
References
   * Max Bodenstein, H. Leuchs (1931). "Sitzung vom 16. November
1931". Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft 64 (11):
A211–A212. doi:10.1002/cber.19310641139.*
   * ter Meer Prize University Bonn
   * "Ter Meer family." Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online
   * Uerdingen industrial area history
So Fritz ter Meer was sitting in jail and he said "well, that didn't
work..what else can we do?   I've got it food..he who controls food
controls ....the world..."  Fritz ter Meer  got out of jail he went to
his  UN buddies and said "Have I got an idea for you..if we take over
food world wide..we have power world wide, and his UN buddies said.
"cool idea". So they created a Trade Commission. That's a very
powerful set of words... A Trade Commission....called the Codex
Alimentarius Commission
It is not a Public Health Commission..it is not a Consumer Protection
Commission....it is a Trade Commission. Trade is about what? Money!!
Trade is about Business!! Trade is about Profit!! Well they said in
1962 we're going to work towards total, global implimentation of Codex
Alimentarius on December 31st, 2009. Long Term.... and they set up a
bunch of committees.. committees on fish and fishery...fats and oil...
fruits and vegetables... ground nuts...nutritian  for special diatary
uses and so on. There are currently about 27 Codex committees, they
are regional organisations, there are task forces and so anf so on. So
it's ahugh beaurocratic mostrosety.it's emence. Codex has promogated
well over 4,000 guidelines, standards and regulations on
everything...everything which can legally be put into your mouth, with
the excpetion of Pharmaceuticals. they are not part of Codex. That is
an importand point. Now Codex standards have no legal weight
whatsoever. Zero. So who cares about them..their just standards...so
we are talking about an industry setting regulation organisation, but
if it has no legal standing .. who cares? Right!! Here's the history
of Codex Alimentarius before 1962.
Please note here that Fritz ter Meer  was sentenced to seven years
prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948 having been found guilty of
crimes against humanity on the basis of mass murder, slavery and other
crimes . After he was released in 1951 he became supervisory board
chairman (Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He officiialy
retired as supervisory board chairman of Bayer AG in 1961 so he could
behind the scene concentrate of working with his UN buddies on
developing his idea of  setting up a syatem that will control the
whoole world's food supply under the code name Codex Alimentarius. It
would not look good publicly for Fritz ter Meer  who was sentenced to
only seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948 having been
found guilty of crimes against humanity on the basis of mass murder,
slavery and other crimes, and only served about three years of his
sentence because of his powerful UN buddies, to be seen to be publicly
be involved with Codex Alimentarius. Here's the history of Codex
Alimentarius before 1962. The Austian Hungarian Empire said we need
rules by which the courts can rule on cases involving food.o we'll
have regulations and rules that the courts will enforce.... that's how
they get their way. That was called the Codex Alimentarius and  was
put into place around 1893 and lasted until the end of the Austrian
Hungarian Empire in the first world war. So the idea was there in the
Germanic tradition. We need rules..lots of rules...lots a
nd lots and lots of rules..we need a lot of rules... let's have rules
for everything to do with food. So it was a natural extention for the
German Industrialists to say we'll go back to the good old days of
Codex Alimentarius back  when we had them in Austrian Hungarian
Empire. Cool. So they started promilgating their rules and regulations
and they were voluntary. They were sort of guidlines. Now Codex
Alimentarius Commission is administered by the World Health
Oganisation (WHO) and the Food and Aricultural Organisation (FAO)  and
they fund Codex and they run it at the request of the United Nations
(UN). So the're mummy and daddy to Codex Alimentarius.  And that's
very interesting because they're supposed to be about health and food
world wide. Some conflicts of interest that we'll talk about. So
Codex started promilgating regulations and rules, and the way that's
done is that the committees work up a rule, a standard, a guideline,
or regulation an dthey get it to what's called a step 8 which is the
final step in their administrative process... and then it's presented
to the Codex Alimentarius Commission for ratification, like the
vitamin and mineral guidline was presented to the Codex Alimentarius
Commission on July 4th this past summer (2005). It was ratified... it
was approved by consensus...and it is now...despite the propaganda
that your going to hear if you every hear about it in the media... it
is now mandatory on any member country and the WTO, the World Trade
Organisation. Well what in the world do they have to do with it? And
the answer is everything. The World Trade Organisation you see
accepted Codex when the world organisation was formed in 1994. They
said, "well how are we going to decide trade disputes around food if
we don't have a set of rules. I know..we'll accept the Codex
Alimentarius rules and all the members of the WTO will...willl world
wide...get ready for an Orwellian Term will harmonise with are
standards, with the codex standards.. I suggest you capitalise the
first four letters in your mind ...HARM... onise ... everybody is
supposed to .HARM... onise... with Codex....   and when they HARM...
onise with Codex, then if the get pulled into the WTO Dispute
Resolution Process they have a chance of winning because here's the
kicker... are you ready for this one ...  if two countries go into the
World Trade Organisation Dispute Resolution Process  and one of then
is Codex compliant, and one of them is not Codex Compliant.. the one
that is Codex Compliant automaticlly wins regardless of the merit of
the case.  People are using Codex Compliant in a much bigger economic
battle. So every couunty in the world is racing to do what?   Become
Codex Compliant. So in the United States...the situation is OK ..how
do we become Codex compliant when we have laws that protect us. You
have to remember that Codex does not serve consumer well being. Codex
does not serve what I call the five Bigs...Big Pharma Big Chema Big
Biotechna Big AgriBiz and Bid Medica ,,,little me and little you are
not served by Codex, in the least, so before we go forward and talk
about the rest of  what has to happen, let's ask what Codex does?
You probably all know about the vitamin and mineral guidline that was
ratified on July 4th ( 2005). You may not kow that although it is said
that CODEX regulations guidlines and standards that have been ratified
are volantary....That Are Not Voluntary...That is known as a lie!!!
They are mandatory..but  thye ar enot fully mandatory until December,
31st 2009. They're sort of kinda a little bit mandatory now. and
they're totally mandatory then. So what does Codex do? Why do I care
enough about Codex to close my practice and stop treating patients who
came to me from around the world..to help them regain their health and
be radiantly well with non toxic means which is a very satisfying
thing to do.. I love it...it also provided me with an income...  that
was nice. OK...;why am I concerned enough, let's talk about the
mineral and vitamin guidline first. In 1994 DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments
Health and Education Act was passed which classifies nutrient and
herbs as foods. As foods you can set no upper limit on them. You
cannot set an upper limit on lettuce...lamb or  roodibaggers.. and
similarily you cannot set an upper limit in vitamin C.. echanasia...
ginko bi loba ... vitamin D ...    to nutrients is freely given to
us.. We are allowed to have any nutients we want because.... this is a
very important point... under common law ...  What's not forbidden is
permitted.... Codex on the other hand  ... is a Napoleonic Code
...What's not permitted is forbidden law system... under Napoleonic
Code ...anything not permitted is forbidden ...  that's called a
positive list .... so vitamins and nutrients and minerals ... in 1994
we passed DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act was
passed which classifies nutrient and herbs as foods... we can have as
much of them as we want thatis our business... in 1994 Codex with no
notice here in this country whatsoever.. prepared nutrents ... put on
you intellectual seatbelts...declared nutrients to be toxins. they're
poisens ... dangerous Industrial poisens ... AS POISENS ... WE HAVE TO
BE PROTECTED FROM THEM ...how  do you protect someone from poisens ...
you use toxicology ... you use a science called risk assessment ..lt's
take a primer on risk assessment  .. first you take the substance
that's dangerous and feed it to animals, and the dosage that kills 50%
of them ..that's called the LD 50 ... and you exstrapulate what the LD
50 for human being might be.,,then you go down to the other end of the
dosage range ...and you start feeding ittie bittie tiny bits of it ..
 to test animals ... and you come up with the largest possible dose
...the maximum  permissable upper limit  ... that can be fed to an
animal before a discernable impact  is shown ..OK ... no discernable
impact .... then you divide that by 100 ... that's how they do it in
risk assessment ... and now you've got a safety margin ...  so you
have one 100th of the dose that can be given with no discernable
impact ...   OK nutrients! Under Codex!!!    Not only are limited to
those nutriants on the positive list ...and  we  anticipate there will
be 18 of them .. and they do not include.  .  CoQ10  Glucosamine ...
cundroyton sulfate ...thye do include floride ... which to my
knowledge as a Physician has absolutely no biological benefit
whatsoever. ... but it does make people complasent ... floride was
first used in the Goolog  ...because it was discovered that prisoners
who were fed floridated water ...  were complasent ...  and you could
do anything you wanted to them ...  they were easy  to manage ... so
you have 18 nutrients  ... you have ittie bittie tiny winy doses ...
that are determined scientifically to have no effect ...  on any human
being  now in this country we have a problem ... we have ...DSHEA
-Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act ... we have to get rid of
DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act  in order to  HARM
...on..ise ... with Codex... that part of Codex anyway .... so how do
we get rid of DSHEA ...  we attack it legislatively of course .. and
...  there are five.. count them.. five currently before Congress ...
designed to overturn ..gut ... invalidate .. and otherwise get rid of
DSHEA ...  because once DSHEA is gone we can HARM...on..ise with the
vitamin and mineral guideline   ...  so what we are talking about is
....  waking up one morning to find that high potency therapudicly
effective clinicly significant nutrients are illegal ....
(Codex want to make nutients illegal ) in the way that Heroin is
illegal ..not available with a prescription ... Illegal ...  If these
nutrients have any impact on  the Human body ...  they are illegal ...
that's just the vitamin and mineral guidline ... let's talk about milk
.... we have    recombinant bovine  growth hormone and now we can
choose milk with it and milk without it ... butter with it or butter
without it ..right ...not under Codex ... because under Codex ...
every dairy cow ...  on the planet must be treated with Monsanto's
recombinant bovine hormone.... furthermore ..under Codex ... every
animal used for food on the planent whether it has fins, feet or
feathers ... every animal on the planet must be treated with sub
clinical antibiotics and and must be treated with exogenous growth
hormones ... Codex requires (mandates) that all food be irradiated
unless it's eaten locally and raw. including organic food of course
... so is it organic afterwards... well of course the organic
standards are incredibly low ...the organic  standards allow a farmer
to use vetinary drugs including exogenous growth hormone, anti biotics
etc ....on animals and then at his whim, reclassify them as organic
...  but farmers are our friends  and they would never do
that...right!!!  Right!!  Codex sets limits for the dangerous
industrial chemicals that you can have in your food..and the limits
are increditbly high ... go to Codex Alimentarius Commission ... look
at the toxins and vetinary  Chemicals  and the levels that are set.,,
they are terrifying ot me ..Terrifying ... the names of the Chemicals
that are permitted and the amounts of the chemicals that are permitted
are terrifying to me ...Why am I terrified?  Well perhaps I am just a
cowardly person ...it's possible... think about this.. in 2001,
"The levels that are permitted, developed and maintained by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission, by the are incredibly high in toxins and the
levels that are set the names and amounts of the chemicals are
terrifying..." states Dr Rimal Laibox MD a director of the National
Association of Nutrition Professionals (NANP)
In 2001, 176 Countries including the USA got together and stated that
there were 12 really bad dangerous organic chemicals  Chemicals.
They're called "Pops".,,"Persistent Organic Pollutants. There are a
lot of them, but there are 12 that are so bad that, nobody could
disagree that those 12 Pops had to be banned worldwide.Nine of the 12
worst organic Chemicals known are pesticides...not
surprisingly..because they kill things..and of course we have many
processes and enzime systems that are very much like insects and other
pests so, they are not too good for us..but Codex has different
ideas...Codex has brought back 7 of the 9 forbidden POPS, that 176
countries  banned
worldwide,,,Dieldrin..Aldrin...hexaclorabenzine...etc..and the food
that is imported from other countries that contains these substances
can not be stopped at our borders..because otherwise it would be God
Forbid, a Trade Violation...that's how Codex works..Codex, according
to the World Trade Organisation  (WTO) and the Food and Agricultural
Organisation's (FAO) joint projections..now I didn't  make this
up...please if you have unfastened you're Intellectual Seat
Belts...put them back on again...if you do the numbers in the WHO- FAO
projections in their report headed Diet Nutrition and Prevention of
Chronic Diseases..that just the vitamin and mineral guideline
alone...when it goes into global implimentation..on December 31st,
2009...will result in a minimum of 3 billion (that's B... Bad... Big
Billion) deaths - onee billion through simple starvation..those folks
who die ar not particularily economicly successful from the point of
view of the Corporations..when you're starving to death, how much good
can you do, when the issue is that how much can you buy.. not a lot..
forget them..but Hah..but the next  two billion...they will die from
the preventable diseases (two billion people will die from diseases of
under nutrition)..of under nutrition// cancer.. the single most
profitable condition known to human kind..Cardiovacular Disease..a
good second...diabetis...pritty good producer of income...and a whole
host of other preventable diseases. Who will die? Who Knows? Who Will
Live? Probably those people who are wealthy enough and powerful enough
to have their own pushers of clean food and nutriants..that's who will
live!!!  You and I? ..probably not...our children? probably not...our
grand children?...probably not!!! So we're talking about food
regulations that are in fact are the legalisation of the mandated
toxicity and under nutrition..It will become illegal..if there is a
famine...where ever there is a famine...to ship high nutriant density
biscuits to that country.. and it will be illegal to distribute
them...that's what we're talking about!!! Codex is Big and It's
Bad..but it's not invunerable. So the point is...that we have to
protect ourselves, and I believe we have to regain global leadership,
which we have lost. surrendered..squandered..ah..sold..we have
sold..just joining the World Trade Organisation (WTO), surended our
sovereinghty...however as it just happens I have a team of
Constitutional Lawyers..looking at the following question...Are we
members of the WTO? Cause if you remember from High School Civics..the
way you get a treaty to be a real treaty..is to have it ratified by a
two thirds majority of the Senate...and the way we got into the WTO
was, they passed a law allowing Bill Clinton to fast track us into the
WTO. "That's Not A Treaty"...the USA is not legally not a member of
the WTO..now that's a piece of the battle...Someone says from the
audience.."you will have to tell George Bush.." we will tell George
Bush , but George Bush will not be relevant when we do tell
him..ah..so that's a piece of it, but that's not going to save our
lives right now because..do you know..picture in your mind...a wasp or
a bee trap..where the insect voluntarily goes down the funnel and then
can't get up out of the trap again..that's Codex..a regular law can be
over turned..it can be repealed...it can be corrected..by  another
piece of legislation..but once we become Codex Compliant...in any
area...as long as we are members of the WTO..it can never be
repealed...because we have lost the sovereignty to become un_codex
compliant as long as we are in the WTO, so it's like going down that
funnel and not being able to get back out of it. So it's very
important that we make sure that we do not become codex
compliant...but we will be hit with all those big trade sanctions from
the countries that are codex compliant.. so that the country will be
destroyed economically..right..no remember surprise..one of the
principles of war...remember mass..where you take your strength
against the enemies weekness andweek points. Well here's what we've
done.  We have a team of lawyers, who have spent hundreds of hours
with us pro bono..these are good guy lawyers...these two gentlemen and
we have spent hundreds of hours studying Codex, understanding it's
weekness..it's weeknesses..a lot of weeknesses.. and constructing a
strategy..which 'will take the succer down'....It will take it
down...but I need you...you are people that other people come to about
safe healthy food..and nutrients...
National Association of Nutritrional Professionals NANP 2005
Conference..you are ready made disenimation points..you are the
thousand million.... hundred million points of light. Here's what is
happening. Every country in the world has to be Codex compliant in
order not to get hit by WTO trade sanctions, as I told you of their
members of Codex and the WTO..and there are a few countries that are
not, but I can guarantee you they are not of any major significance.
So. the question is...What is Codex Compliance mean?
Well, most people in most countries..most legislators believe that
they have to adopt  as their national standard on that particular
subject...what Codex ratified. But that's not the case, any more than
we're in the WTO. That's not the case either. What this means is that
the format..the issues and the subjects..covered by a Codex
Guideline...Standard or Regulation..have to be addressed in the
country's guideline standard or regulation on the same topic. So what
we have done is create the first of many alternative Codex guidelines.
You can go to our website www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and you will see a
little button on the upper right handside that says sign this citzen's
partition. Now to briefly digress the citizen's partition is not like
a grocery store partition that you sign and bring to somebody and say
'I have 200,000 signatures and they dump it in the waist basket,
because it is in their mind, it is one signature that you and your
friends wrote 200,000 names. No...it is a legal challenge to the
policy of the United States Government on Codex. It's called a
citizen's partition. It's a legal challenge..We're suing the United
States Government..saying what you're doing is illegal folks...let us
tell you how..we want hearings of fact...we want redress..we want
correction..if we get what we want...that's dandy...if we don't get
what we want we have gone through a process..exhausting administrative
remedies.. we have made the case ripe for court.
So OK, I need you and everybody you know, to sign this citizen's
partition..stating this is a bad policy on mass..and you do this on
the web..and you will see the instructions and we present the
thousands and thousands of pages that we print out that have people's
signatures to the US Codex Office and to the FDA (Federal Drug
Administration) and they don't like that at all..but that's OK.
However, this time..this is the second amendment of the citizen's
partition that we're asking you to sign. This time the revised vitamin
and mineral guideline is part of it. It is part of the law suit saying
this needs to be US Policy. The more voices that say..this is what I
want...and you work for me..Mr and Mrs beaureaucrat and Mr and Mrs
congressman and Mr and Mrs Senator. The more voices the more weight.
So step number one is read and sign the citizen's partition. Step
number two diseminate the information..the weblink. put it out in your
office. get your patients...your friends and neighbours..your
suppliers..to sign the citizens partition and your suppliers..the
companies you use, are going to tell you that you're out of your
minds...they will tell you that Codex is not a problem..and they will
tell you..anyone here have a dog..OK...dog owners know that you ask a
dog to heal..sit down...stay..that's Codex in this country and
worldwide, because the more people that are in Codex comma, the less
trouble they have getting this through...anyone here of the NNFA.the
National Nutrition Foods Association..everybody's heard of the NNFA.
Did you know that the members of the NNFA and not just health foods
stores and manufacturers..but include companies with names you may
have heard...Pfizer ...Merck...Monsanto...Bayer...BASF..Archer Daniels
Midland..Glaxo....Aires..ClyneW elcome ..... you get the
idea..why?..because after DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and
Education Act was passed, and the nutriant business virgined..the
Pharmaceuticals, folks, who are not dumb, said there is gold in them
there pills..and they brought the means of production of many many
many companies.. and they brought the companies themselves..so there
in the nutrient business. What better way to kill the nutrient
business, which is not nearly as profitable as the toxic chemical drug
business, than to take it over. It works everytime..right!!
CRN...anybody here know about CRN..Council for Responsable Nutritian.
Same members...they have lots of multi level marketing
companies...same members..OK..and their serving their members needs.
CRN are saying....Yeh...Codex is coming..Codex is going to protect us
from those dangerous vitamins and minerals and herbs and CRN is saying
it's fine...go to sleep lulaby and goodnight..and everything is
fine...and they use a report that they commissoned at a reputed cost
of $800,000..a report prepared by Sydley Austin Brown and Rute..a law
firm in Washington...wrote a report for them..and it said
lullaby...and goodnight everything is fine..it won't have an impact on
the United States..everything is fine..Sydley Austin Brown and Rute
has one major client..who's name you might know..Merk. Now it's
entirely possible that the NNFA just did a spectacular bad job of due
dilligence..or not..anyway...the report says everything is
fine..everything is dandy.there will be no problem..we've got DSHEA
-Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act Yeh, sure we do. Now lets
talk about Australia...remember five laws before congress to over turn
DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act
and you can write to congress on the website...Now congress uses the
multiplier of 13,000 to one...every email, fa,x phone
call...letter..don't write letters...they get decontaminated, they
never get to congress...every email, fax and phone call..counts as
13,000 constituants opinions..they figure that if you write a letter
or send an email there are 12,999 lazy who can't bother to get to the
computer terminal to do the same thing, but they feel the way you do.
interesting..that's power my friends...that's power..that's 13,000 to
one. Suppose we have a million people...suppose we have 10 million
people..supposed we have 100 million people...saying,,  Don't You
Dare!!!  Now congress has one rule...above all others.. anybody know
what it is? Get Re-elected! That's the primary rule, the prime
directive is to get re-elected. Now DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health
and Education Act was passed you may remember by  unaminous
congressional consent. Was that because one morning all members of
Congress woke up and said..."I See The Light..
Nutriants Are Better Than Drugs!! "... They said, oh, If I don't go
along with this..I'll never be re-elected to anything.....remember
critical mass...remember we were out on the streets and we were up on
our hind legs and we were making noise and we were rallying...and
rallying and we were writing letters and we said....Don't You Dare To
Take Away My Health Freedom!!! Remember?   Expect that we got fat dumb
and lazy and stopped protecting ourselves ...and we're in the same
place again.... exept that it's all food instead of just nutriants.
So! Thats point number One. Use the freedom mouse..ride the freedom
mouse. We've made it as easy as possible in the site...Sign up, for
the emails. I will never sell your information to anyone. I promise
you. Plus I will never rent it, I will never share it, you'll only get
an email from me, and we need you to know what's going on. So I''ll
send you email blasts. I'll send you things that you can do... or not.
It is your choice.. Get everybody you know..informed....now what else
can you do? Now we're going to write a series of alternative
guidelines. Everything bad in codes will have an alternative guideline
that turns it into a pro health guideline. What have we done with the
vitamin and mineral guideline?  You can see that because we have a
marked up copy that has their guideline crossed out and ours written
in on the website..It's right there. What we've done is turn it into a
guideline that mandates "bio-chemicaly individually determined optimal
health" and it's still Codex compliant...So we said..OK. now we need
congress to adopt this, and we need other countries in the world to
adopt this, so, Burt and I went to Washington DC and we met Daniel
Rorobocker from Orange County, who said to us, he's a
representative.... he said "I believe in pesticides...  " I went Oh..
He said I believe in GMO's I went Oh... He said " I believe in
Iradiation of food"  I went OH... But he said..."I believe in your
right to eat foods that have not been processed that way more than I
believe in those technologies... I will take this one on..." We said.
" OH that's really nice.." He said now..."We need a coaition..."  So
we went across the isle ....across the office building to see Peter
Defozio's staff from Oregan who would was a Liberal Democrat., whereas
 Rorobocker is a Libritarian Republican, and Defazio's on board and we
have large numbers of others who actually has never heard of Codex.
before we told them about it. Never heard of Codex ...we have called
every health legislative aid on congress.  What's you're
Congressmans's position on Codex?  and they've said "Wah????"...We
have spoken to the trade legislative assistants and asked. What's you
congressman's position on Codex?  Congress and trade legislative's
assistants and staff are not informed on Codex   ... and they all
said.. Wah Wah.. They don't know.  We had a congressional briefing set
up on the 20th of September, I was going to address Congress...and
tell them about it.. I thought that that was cool...10 days before it
became a briefing on something else.  Another Freedom Click ... you
need to write to Congress on the site and tell them that they need a
Congressional Briefing, by God and tell them you want me to brief
them. They don't know about Codex ..they've never heard of it any more
than the general public has heard of  Codex.... Gee How did that
happen?.. Who knows? Every negative part of Codex can be over turned
by guideline, a regulation or a standard, that is positive, So we need
your help because the United States leadership in this guideline and
all the positive guidelines that is to follow is what is going to
literally follow, is what is going to save the population of  the
planet earth and save your jobs and your children and your families
and mine. Thank you!!
Speach by Dr Rimal Laibox MD a director of the the National
Association of Nutrition Professionals (NANP) Produced by EON the
Ecological Options Network for Bauman College in cooperation with the
Natural Solutions Foundation and the National Association of Nutrition
Professionals (NANP) 2005
http://www.blacklistednews.com/?news_id=5768
http://www.codexcorp.com/





Speach by Dr Rimal Laibox MD a director of the the National
Association of Nutrition Professionals (NANP) Produced by EON the
Ecological Options Network for Bauman College in cooperation with the
Natural Solutions Foundation and the National Association of Nutrition
Professionals (NANP) 2005
http://www.blacklistednews.com/?news_id=5768
http://www.codexcorp.com/
CODEX CORP:  Specialising in Corrections and Healthcare, it may be an
unusual combination but it works for us, our partners and customers
who want to keep a close control and watch on the use of health care
and nutritional products in the community and with our unique and far
reaching security and monitoring systems we will be able to tell our
customers instantly if anyone in the world is using nutrients and
minerals that are not Codex approved  and compliant, and have them
quickly detained and punished for not complying with Codex approved
and compliant products. With Codex we are proud to say that no one
will escape detection. Codex Corporation and its founders have over
100 years experience in this business including the management and
design of the concentration camps in Germany. Codex Corporation was
originally the multi billion  International Giant I G Farben.
A quick background on our founding company I G Farben and its
directors and managers will help convince you that as far as security,
nutrient and health care management, people management, corrections
management, Codex ( Formerly IG Farben) is the company you should
chose for any issues in Corrections and Heathcare Management. Codex
and its security management has the ability to make sure there is no
health freedom. not just in the USA but all over the world... and
Codex has the ability to make sure anyone that tries to think for a
minute they can get way with trying to have health freedom, will
quickly be caught, detained and punished by Codex's unique and far
reaching security and monitoring systems...The Codex Moto
is
"None will escape detection and punishment of the unauthorised use of
nutrients with Codex on the job....just look at out success record in
designing and managing the concentration camp in Germany....our
success record at Codex Corporation, formerly IG Farben in people,
healthcare and corrections management speaks for itself"
Codex Corporation's, formerly IG Farben's 100 year History in People,
Healthcare and Corrections Management
provided from Codex Alimentarius Speach by Dr Rimal Laibox MD of the
Natural Solutions Fioundation, Produced by EON the Ecological Options
Network for Bauman College in cooperation with the Natural Solutions
Foundation and the National Association of Nutrition Professionals
(NANP) 2005 www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
Dr Rimal Laibox is an experienced healthcare professional and has
studies Codex Corporation, formerly IG Farben's progess ov erthe last
decade to become  the leaders in People, Healthcare and Corrections
Management in the United States.
Codex and Nutricide
" Let me tell you about Codex Alimentarius, let me define it for you,
let me help you understand the enemy..and let me assure you that
absolutely nothing that I am going to tell you, is exagerated, is
interperlated, or is imagined. Every thing I am going to tell you is
documented. A great deal of it is documented on my website,
whichwww.HealthFreedomUSA.org. Let me back up and tell you that I have
been watching Codex come toward us for about the last decade. ,,, and
I have been watching the vote sin congress, which God help us is our
bastion of support and protection against Codex and I will explain why
that is. I have been watching the votes to protect our health freedom
dwindle, until finally in the 109th Congress, without a good deal of
activity, we didn't have the votes to protect us. I have been watching
Codex excellerate and I have been watching it expand, and I have been
getting more and more troubled. Let me give you a brief run down of
Codex then. After the second world war, the Nuremberg Tribunals were
held in which people who had committed crimes against humanity were
judged by the world community in a court run by the United States and
Britain...  and they were sentenced to terms in prison if they were
found guilty of crimes against humanity. In 1948 some of the people
who were found guilty of crimes against humanity on the basis of mass
murder, slavery and other crimes were the president and 24 board
members and executives  of a hugh industrial megalith called IG
Farben. Amazingly enough however, by 1951 all of them had already been
released, and and continuing to consult with German Corporations IG
Farben produced the gas used in the gas chambers Zyklon B, they
produced the steel for the death camps and the rail road line, they
produced the munitions, they produced chemicals, they produced all
kinds of stuff. The Nuremberg Tribunal disolved IG Farben into
companies such as  into BASF - Hoechst - Bayer They produced
pharmaceuticals.. a big big pharacuticals company.  So the president
of IG Farben Fritz ter Meer, the senior manager at IB Farben, was
convicted of crimes against Humanity on the basis of mass murder,
slavery and other crimes on 29th July, 1948. Although he co-operated
with SS and the Final Solution, Fritz ter Meer was sentenced to 7
years only in War Criminal Prison, but only served about three years
in prison, no more someone that bounces a business cheque for say
$1,000 and is charged for fraud in the $1,000 bounced cheque for it
not being honoured on presentation. Someone steals an apple can get 3
years in prison also, or if he or she stole the apple as a servant
they can receive 7 years in prison,
Now Fritz ter Meer is sort of an artistic fellow and he was the one
responsible for the slogan that people saw as they entered Autswitz,
usually for the last time, "Work Brings Freedom". Fritz ter Meer was a
creative sort of fellow. Fritz ter Meer was responsible for the slogan
that people saw as they entered Auschwitz-, usually for the last time,
 " Work brings  Freedom....a creative sort of fellow.
You will notice that the institutions that Fritz ter Meer worked for
an/or had shareholdings in as listed by Wikepedia are
Institutions IG Farben, Bayer, Codex Alimentarius
The Bayer executive Fritz ter Meer, sentenced to seven years in prison
by the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, was made head of the supervisory
board of Bayer in 1956, after his release.
Fritz ter Meer ( July 4 1884 – October 27 1967 ) was a German chemist.
He was the son of Edmund ter Meer the founder of a chemical company
that later became part of Bayer. Fritz ter Meer also worked for Bayer
and later IG Farben. He was involved in the planning of Monowitz
concentration camp, a satellite camp of KZ Auschwitz. He was sentenced
to seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948. After he was
released in 1951 he became supervisory board chairman
(Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He retired in 1961.
The Bayer company then became part of IG Farben, a conglomerate of
German chemical industries that formed a part of the financial core of
the German Nazi regime. IG Farben owned 42.5% of the company that
manufactured Zyklon B,[2] a chemical used in the gas chambers of
Auschwitz and other extermination camps. During World War II, the
company also extensively used slave labor in factories attached to
large slave labor camps, notably the sub-camps of the Mauthausen-Gusen
concentration camp[3]. When the Allies split IG Farben into several
pieces after World War II for involvement in organized Nazi war
crimes, Bayer re-appeared as an individual business. The Bayer
executive Fritz ter Meer, sentenced to seven years in prison by the
Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, was made head of the supervisory board
of Bayer in 1956, after his release.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_ter_Meer
Fritz ter Meer
undefined
Fritz ter Meer
Born June 4, 1884
Uerdingen, Germany
Died October 27, 1967 (aged 83)
Leverkusen, Germany
Nationality German
Institutions IG Farben, Bayer, Codex Alimentarius
Fritz ter Meer ( July 4 1884 – October 27 1967 ) was a German chemist.
He was the son of Edmund ter Meer the founder of a chemical company
that later became part of Bayer. Fritz ter Meer also worked for Bayer
and later IG Farben. He was involved in the planning of Monowitz
concentration camp, a satellite camp of KZ Auschwitz. He was sentenced
to seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948. After he was
released in 1951 he became supervisory board chairman
(Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He retired in 1961.
   * Heine, Jens Ulrich (1990). Verstand und Schicksal. Die Männer
der I.G. Farbenindustrie A.G. (1925-1945). Weinheim; New York:
VCH.ISBN 978-3527281442.
   * Codex Alimentarius Commission [1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_ter_Meer
Edmund ter Meer ( 1852 – November 5, 1931) was a German chemist who
discovered the ter Meer reaction and founded in 1877 the ter Meer dye
company in Uerdingen. After the fusion with the aniline factory of
Julius Weiler the Weiler-ter Meer company was formed. This company
later became part of the Bayer company. His son Fritz ter Meer also
became a chemist associated to the Bayer company.
Edmund ter Meer
Born 1852
Died  November 5, 1931 (aged 79)
Nationality German
Institutions Bayer
Known for ter Meer reaction
References
   * Max Bodenstein, H. Leuchs (1931). "Sitzung vom 16. November
1931". Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft 64 (11):
A211–A212. doi:10.1002/cber.19310641139.*
   * ter Meer Prize University Bonn
   * "Ter Meer family." Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online
   * Uerdingen industrial area history
So Fritz ter Meer was sitting in jail and he said "well, that didn't
work..what else can we do?   I've got it food..he who controls food
controls ....the world..."  Fritz ter Meer  got out of jail he went to
his  UN buddies and said "Have I got an idea for you..if we take over
food world wide..we have power world wide, and his UN buddies said.
"cool idea". So they created a Trade Commission. That's a very
powerful set of words... A Trade Commission....called the Codex
Alimentarius Commission
It is not a Public Health Commission..it is not a Consumer Protection
Commission....it is a Trade Commission. Trade is about what? Money!!
Trade is about Business!! Trade is about Profit!! Well they said in
1962 we're going to work towards total, global implimentation of Codex
Alimentarius on December 31st, 2009. Long Term.... and they set up a
bunch of committees.. committees on fish and fishery...fats and oil...
fruits and vegetables... ground nuts...nutritian  for special diatary
uses and so on. There are currently about 27 Codex committees, they
are regional organisations, there are task forces and so anf so on. So
it's ahugh beaurocratic mostrosety.it's emence. Codex has promogated
well over 4,000 guidelines, standards and regulations on
everything...everything which can legally be put into your mouth, with
the excpetion of Pharmaceuticals. they are not part of Codex. That is
an importand point. Now Codex standards have no legal weight
whatsoever. Zero. So who cares about them..their just standards...so
we are talking about an industry setting regulation organisation, but
if it has no legal standing .. who cares? Right!! Here's the history
of Codex Alimentarius before 1962.
Please note here that Fritz ter Meer  was sentenced to seven years
prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948 having been found guilty of
crimes against humanity on the basis of mass murder, slavery and other
crimes . After he was released in 1951 he became supervisory board
chairman (Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He officiialy
retired as supervisory board chairman of Bayer AG in 1961 so he could
behind the scene concentrate of working with his UN buddies on
developing his idea of  setting up a syatem that will control the
whoole world's food supply under the code name Codex Alimentarius. It
would not look good publicly for Fritz ter Meer  who was sentenced to
only seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948 having been
found guilty of crimes against humanity on the basis of mass murder,
slavery and other crimes, and only served about three years of his
sentence because of his powerful UN buddies, to be seen to be publicly
be involved with Codex Alimentarius. Here's the history of Codex
Alimentarius before 1962. The Austian Hungarian Empire said we need
rules by which the courts can rule on cases involving food.o we'll
have regulations and rules that the courts will enforce.... that's how
they get their way. That was called the Codex Alimentarius and  was
put into place around 1893 and lasted until the end of the Austrian
Hungarian Empire in the first world war. So the idea was there in the
Germanic tradition. We need rules..lots of rules...lots a
nd lots and lots of rules..we need a lot of rules... let's have rules
for everything to do with food. So it was a natural extention for the
German Industrialists to say we'll go back to the good old days of
Codex Alimentarius back  when we had them in Austrian Hungarian
Empire. Cool. So they started promilgating their rules and regulations
and they were voluntary. They were sort of guidlines. Now Codex
Alimentarius Commission is administered by the World Health
Oganisation (WHO) and the Food and Aricultural Organisation (FAO)  and
they fund Codex and they run it at the request of the United Nations
(UN). So the're mummy and daddy to Codex Alimentarius.  And that's
very interesting because they're supposed to be about health and food
world wide. Some conflicts of interest that we'll talk about. So
Codex started promilgating regulations and rules, and the way that's
done is that the committees work up a rule, a standard, a guideline,
or regulation an dthey get it to what's called a step 8 which is the
final step in their administrative process... and then it's presented
to the Codex Alimentarius Commission for ratification, like the
vitamin and mineral guidline was presented to the Codex Alimentarius
Commission on July 4th this past summer (2005). It was ratified... it
was approved by consensus...and it is now...despite the propaganda
that your going to hear if you every hear about it in the media... it
is now mandatory on any member country and the WTO, the World Trade
Organisation. Well what in the world do they have to do with it? And
the answer is everything. The World Trade Organisation you see
accepted Codex when the world organisation was formed in 1994. They
said, "well how are we going to decide trade disputes around food if
we don't have a set of rules. I know..we'll accept the Codex
Alimentarius rules and all the members of the WTO will...willl world
wide...get ready for an Orwellian Term will harmonise with are
standards, with the codex standards.. I suggest you capitalise the
first four letters in your mind ...HARM... onise ... everybody is
supposed to .HARM... onise... with Codex....   and when they HARM...
onise with Codex, then if the get pulled into the WTO Dispute
Resolution Process they have a chance of winning because here's the
kicker... are you ready for this one ...  if two countries go into the
World Trade Organisation Dispute Resolution Process  and one of then
is Codex compliant, and one of them is not Codex Compliant.. the one
that is Codex Compliant automaticlly wins regardless of the merit of
the case.  People are using Codex Compliant in a much bigger economic
battle. So every couunty in the world is racing to do what?   Become
Codex Compliant. So in the United States...the situation is OK ..how
do we become Codex compliant when we have laws that protect us. You
have to remember that Codex does not serve consumer well being. Codex
does not serve what I call the five Bigs...Big Pharma Big Chema Big
Biotechna Big AgriBiz and Bid Medica ,,,little me and little you are
not served by Codex, in the least, so before we go forward and talk
about the rest of  what has to happen, let's ask what Codex does?
You probably all know about the vitamin and mineral guidline that was
ratified on July 4th ( 2005). You may not kow that although it is said
that CODEX regulations guidlines and standards that have been ratified
are volantary....That Are Not Voluntary...That is known as a lie!!!
They are mandatory..but  thye ar enot fully mandatory until December,
31st 2009. They're sort of kinda a little bit mandatory now. and
they're totally mandatory then. So what does Codex do? Why do I care
enough about Codex to close my practice and stop treating patients who
came to me from around the world..to help them regain their health and
be radiantly well with non toxic means which is a very satisfying
thing to do.. I love it...it also provided me with an income...  that
was nice. OK...;why am I concerned enough, let's talk about the
mineral and vitamin guidline first. In 1994 DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments
Health and Education Act was passed which classifies nutrient and
herbs as foods. As foods you can set no upper limit on them. You
cannot set an upper limit on lettuce...lamb or  roodibaggers.. and
similarily you cannot set an upper limit in vitamin C.. echanasia...
ginko bi loba ... vitamin D ...    to nutrients is freely given to
us.. We are allowed to have any nutients we want because.... this is a
very important point... under common law ...  What's not forbidden is
permitted.... Codex on the other hand  ... is a Napoleonic Code
...What's not permitted is forbidden law system... under Napoleonic
Code ...anything not permitted is forbidden ...  that's called a
positive list .... so vitamins and nutrients and minerals ... in 1994
we passed DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act was
passed which classifies nutrient and herbs as foods... we can have as
much of them as we want thatis our business... in 1994 Codex with no
notice here in this country whatsoever.. prepared nutrents ... put on
you intellectual seatbelts...declared nutrients to be toxins. they're
poisens ... dangerous Industrail poisens ... AS POISENS ... WE HAVE OT
BE PROTECTED FROM THEM ...how  do you protect someone form poisens ...
you use toxicology ... you use a science called risk assessment ..lt's
take a primeron risk assessment  .. first you take the substance thats
dangerous and feed it to animals and the dosage that kills 50% of them
..that's called the LD 50 ... and you exstrapulate what the LD 50 for
human being might be.,,then you go down to the other end of the dosage
range ...and you start feeding ittie bittie tiny bits of it ..   to
test animals ... and you come up with the largest possible dose
...the maximum  permissable upper limit  ... that can be fed ot an
animal before a discernable impact  is shown ..OK ... no discernable
impact .... then you divide that by 100 ... that's how they do it in
risk assessment ... and now you've got a safety margin ...  so you
have one 100th of the dose that can be given with no discernable
impact ...   OK nutrients! Under Codex!!!    Not only are limited ot
those nutriants on the positive list ...and  we  anticipate there will
be 18 of them .. and they do not include.  .  CoQ10  Glucosamine ...
cundroyton sulfate ...thye do include floride ... which to my
knowledge as a Physician has absolutely no biological benefit
whatsoever. ... but it does make people complasent ... floride was
first used in the Goolog  ...because it was discovered that prisoners
who were fed floridated water ...  were complasent ...  and you could
do anything you wanted to them ...  thye were easy  to manage ... so
you have 18 nutrients  ... you have ittie bittie tiny winy doses ...
that are determined scientifically to have no effect ...  on any human
being  now in this country we have a problem ... we have ...DSHEA
-Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act ... we have to get rid of
DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act  in order to  HARM
...on..ise ... with Codex... that part of Codex anyway .... so how do
we get rid of DSHEA ...  we attack it legislatively of course .. and
...  there are five.. count them.. five currently before Congress ...
designed to overturn ..gut ... invalidate .. and otherwise get rid of
DSHEA ...  because once DSHEA is gone we can HARM...on..ise with the
vitamin and mineral guideline   ...  so what we are talking about is
....  waking up one morning to find that high potency therapudiclly
effective clinicly significant nutrients are illegal ....
(Codex want to make nutients illegal ) in the way that Heroin is
illegal ..not available with a prescription ... Illegal ...  If these
nutrients have any impact on  the Human body ...  they are illegal ...
that's just the vitamin and mineral guidline ... let's talk about milk
.... we have    recombinant bovine  growth hormone and now we can
choose milk with it and milk without it ... butter with it or butter
without it ..right ...not under Codex ... because under Codex ...
every dairy cow ...  on the planet must be treated with Monsanto's
recombinant bovine hormone.... furthermore ..under Codex ... every
animal used for food on the planent whether it has fins, feet or
feathers ... every animal on the planet must be treated with sub
clinical antibiotics and and must be treated with exogenous growth
hormones ... Codex requires (mandates) that all food be irradiated
unless it's eaten locally and raw. including organic food of course
... so is it organis afterwards... well of course the organic
standards are incredibly low ...the organic  standards allow a farmer
to use vetinary drugs including exogenous growth hormone, anti biotics
etc ....on animals and then at his whim, reclassify them as organic
...  but farmers are our friends  and they would never do
that...right!!!  Right!!  Codex sets limits for the dangerous
industrial chemicals that you can have in your food..and the limits
are increditbly high ... go to Codex Alimentarius Commission ... look
at the toxins and vetinary  Chemicals  and the levels that are set.,,
they are terrifying ot me ..Terrifying ... the names of the Chemicals
that are permitted and the amounts of the chemicals that are permitted
are terrifying to me ...Why am I terrified?  Well perhaps I am just a
cowardly person ...it's possible... think about this.. in 2001,
"The levels that are permitted, developed and maintained by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission, by the are incredibly high in toxins and the
levels that are set the names and amounts of the chemicals are
terrifying..." states Dr Rimal Laibox MD a director of the National
Association of Nutrition Professionals (NANP)
In 2001, 176 Countries including the USA got together and stated that
there were 12 really bad dangerous organic chemicals  Chemicals.
They're called "Pops".,,"Persistent Organic Pollutants. There are a
lot of them, but there are 12 that are so bad that, nobody could
disagree that those 12 Pops had to be banned worldwide.Nine of the 12
worst organic Chemicals known are pesticides...not
surprisingly..because they kill things..and of course we have many
processes and enzime systems that are very much like insects and other
pests so, they are not too good for us..but Codex has different
ideas...Codex has brought back 7 of the 9 forbidden POPS, that 176
countries  banned
worldwide,,,Dieldrin..Aldrin...hexaclorabenzine...etc..and the food
that is imported from other countries that contains these substances
can not be stopped at our borders..because otherwise it would be God
Forbid, a Trade Violation...that's how Codex works..Codex, according
to the World Trade Organisation  (WTO) and the Food and Agricultural
Organisation's (FAO) joint projections..now i didn't  make this
up...please if you have unfastened you're Intellectual Seat
Belts...put them back on again...if you do the numbers in the who FAO
projections in their report headed Diet Nutrition and prevention of
Chronic Diseases..that just the vitamin and mineral guideline
alone...when it goes into global implimentation..on December 31st,
2009...will result in a minimum of 3 billion (that's B... Bad... Big
Billion) deaths - one billion through simple starvation..those folks
who die ar not particularily economicly successful from the point of
view of the Corporations..when you're starving to death, how much good
can you do, when the issue is that how much can you buy.. not a lot..
forget them..but Hah..but the next  two billion...they will die from
the preventable diseases (two billion people will die from diseases of
under nutrition)..of under nutrition// cancer.. the single most
profitable condition know to human kind..CardiovacularDisease..a good
second...diabetis...pritty good producer of income...and a whole host
of other preventable diseases. Who will die? Who Knows? Who Will Live?
Probably those people who are wealthy enough and powerful enough to
have their own pushers of clean food and nutriants..that's who will
live!!!  You and I? ..probably not...our children? probably not...our
grand children?...probably not!!! So we're talking about food
regulations that are in fact are the legalisation of the mandated
toxicity and under nutrition..It will become illegal..if there is a
famine...whereecer there is a famine...to ship high nutriant density
biscuits to that country.. and it will be illegal to distribute
them...that's what we're talking about!!! Codex is Big and It's
Bad..but it's not invunerable. So the point is...that we have to
protect ourselves, and I believe we have to regain global leadership,
which we have lost. surrendered..squandered..ah..sold..we have
sold..just joining the World Trade Organisation (WTO), surended our
sovereinghty...however as it just happens I have a team of
Constitutional Lawyers..looking at the following question...Are we
members of the WTO? Cause if you remember form High School
Civics..they way you get a treaty to be a real treaty..is ot have it
ratified by a two thirds majority of the Senate...and the way we got
into the WTO was, they passed a law allowing Bill Clinton to fast
track us into the WTO. "That's Not A Treaty"...the USA is not legally
not a member of the WTO..now that's a piece of the battle...Someone
says from the audience.."you will have to tell George.." we will tell
George Bush , but George Bush will not be relevant when we do tell
him..ah..so that's a piece of it, but  that's not going to save our
lives right now because..do you know..picture in your mind...a wasp or
a bee trap..were ot insect voluntarily goes down the funnel and then
can't get up out of the trap again..that's Codex..a regular law can be
over turned..it can be repealed...it can be corrected..by  another
piece of legislation..but once we become Codex Compliant...in nay
area...as long as we are members of the WTO..it can never be
repealed...because we have lost the sovereignty to become un_codex
compliant as long as we are in the WTO, so it's like going down that
funnel and not being able to get back out of it. So it's very
important that we make sure that we do not become codex
compliant...but we will be hit with all those bis trade sanctions from
the countries that are codex compliant,, so that the country will be
destroyed economically..right..no remember surprise..one of the
principles of war...remember mass..where you take your strength
against the enemies weekness ads week points. Well here's what we've
done.  We have a team of lawyers, who have spent hundreds of hours
with us pro bono..these are good guy lawyers...these two gentlemen and
we have spent hundreds of hours studying Codex, understanding it's
weekness..it's weeknesses..a lot of weeknesses.. and constructing a
strategy..which 'will take the succer down'....It will take it
down...but I need you...you are people that other people come to about
safe healthy food..and nutrients...
National Association of Nutritrional Professionals NANP 2005
Conference..you are ready made disenimation points..you are the
thousand million.... hundred million points of light. Here's what is
happening/ Every country in the world has ot be Codex compliant in
order not to get hit by WTO trade sanctions, as I told you of their
members of Codex and the WTO..and there are a few countries that are
not, but I can guarantee you they are not of any major significance.
So. the question is...What is Codex Compliance mean?
Well, most people in most countries..most legislators believe that
they have to adopt  as their national standard on that particular
subject...what Codex ratified. But that's not the case, any more than
we're in the WTO. That's not the case either. What is means is that
the format..the issues and the subjects..covered by a Codex
Guideline...Standard or Regulation..have to be addressed in the
country's guideline standard or regulation on the same topic. So what
we have done is create the first of many alternative Codex guidelines.
You can go to our website www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and you will see a
little button on the upper right handside that says sign this citzen's
partition. Now to briefly digress the citizen's partition is not like
a grocery store partition that you sign and bring to somebody and say
'I have 200,000 signatures and they dump it in the waist basket,
because it is in their mind, it is one signature that you and your
friends wrote 200,000 names. No...it is a legal challenge to the
policy of the United States Government on Codex. It's called a
citizen's partition. It's a legal challenge..We're suing the United
States Government..saying what you're doing is illegal folks...let us
tell you how..we want hearings of fact...we want redress..we want
correction..if we get what we want//that's dandy...if we don't get
what we want we have gone through a process..exhausting administrative
remedies.. we have made the case ripe for court.
So Ok, I need you and everybody you know, to sign this citizen's
partition..sating this is a bad policy on mass..and you do this on the
web..and you will see the instructions and we present the thousands
and thousands of pages that we print out that have people's signatures
to the US Codex Office and to the FDA (Federal Drug Administration)
and they don't like that at all..but that's OK. However, this
time..this is the second amendment of the citizen's partition that
we're asking you to sign. This time the revised vitamin and mineral
guideline is part of it. It is part of the law suit saying this needs
to be US Policy. The more voices that say..this is what I want...and
you work for me..mr and mrs beaureaucrat and mr and mrs congressman
and mr and mrs senator. The more voices the more weight. So step
number one is read and sign the citizen's partition. Step number two
diseminate the information..the weblink. put it out in your office.
get your patients...your friends and neighbours..your suppliers..to
sign the citizens partition and your suppliers..the companies you
use,, are going to tell you that you're out of your minds...they will
tell you that Codex is not a problem..and the will tell you..anyone
here have a dog..OK...dog owners know that you ask a dog to heal..sit
down...stay..that's codex in this country and worldwide, because the
more people that are in Codex comma, the less trouble they have
getting this through...any here of the NNFA.the National Nutrition
Foods Association..everybody's heard of the NNFA. Did you know that
the members of the NNFA and not just health foods stores and
manufacturers..but include companies with names you may have
heard...Pfizer ...Merck...Monsanto...Bayer...BASF..Archer Daniels
Midland..Glaxo....Aires..clyne welcome you get the idea..why?..because
after Tochet was passed and the nutriant business virgined..the
pharasutical folks who are not dumb, said there is gold in them there
pills..and they brought the means of production of many many many
companies.. and they brought the companies themselves..so there in the
nutriant business. What better way to kill the nutriant business,
which is not nearly as profitable as the toxic chemical drug business,
than to take it over. It works everytime..right!! CRN...anybody here
know about CRN..Council for Responsablr Nutritian.  Same
members...they hav lots of multi level marketing companies...same
members..OK..and their serving their members needs. CRN are
saying,,,Yeh...Codex is coming..Codex is going to protect us from
those dangerous vitamins and minerals and herbs and CRN is saying it's
fine...go to sleep lulaby and goodnight..and everything is fine...and
they use a report that they commissoned at a reputed cost of
$800,000..a report prepared by Sydley Austin Brown and Rute..a law
firm in Washington...wrote a report for them..and it said
lullaby...and goodnight everything is fine..it won't have an impact on
the United States..everything is fine..Sydley Austin Brown and Rute
has one major client..who's name you might know..Merk. Now it's
entirely possible that the NNFA just did a spectacular bad job of due
dilligence..or not..anyway...the report says everything is
fine..everything is dandy.there will be no problem..we'ver got dishet(
Touchet?) Yeh, sure we do. Now lets talk about Australia...remember
five laws befofore congress overturned dishet (?)
and you can write to congress on the website...Now congress uses the
multiplier of 13,000 to one...every email fax phone
call...letter..don't write letters...they get decontaminated, they
never get to congress...every email. fax and phone call..counts as
13,000 constituants opinions..they figure that if you write a letter
or send an email there are 12,999 lazy who can't bother to get to the
computer terminal to do the same thing, but they feel the way you do.
interesting..that's power my friends...that's power..that's 13,000 to
one. Suppose we have a million people...suppose we have 10 million
people..supposed we have 100 million people...saying,,  Don't You
Dare!!!  Now congress has one rule...above all others.. anybody know
what it is? Gte Re-elected! That's the primary rule,, the prime
directive is to get re-elected. No w touchet was passed you may
remember by  unaminous congressional consent. Was that because one
morning all members of Congress woke up and said..."I See Th Light..
Nutriants Are Better Than Drugs!! "... They said, oh, If I don't go
along with this..I'll never be re-elected to anything.....remember
critical mass...remember we were out on the streets and we were up on
our hind legs and we were making noise and we were rallying...and
rallying and we were writing letters and we said....Don't You Dare To
Take Away My Health Freedom!!! Remember?   Expect that we got fat dumb
and lazy and stopped protecting ourselves ...and we're in the same
place again.... exept that it's all food instead of just nutriants.
So! Thats point number One. Use the freedom mouse..ride the freedom
mouse. We've made it as easy as possible in the site...Sign up, for
the emails. I will never sell your information to anyone. I promise
you. Plus I will never rent it, I will never share it, you'll only get
an email from me, and wee need you to know what's going on. So I''ll
send you email blasts. I'll send you things that you can do... or not.
It is your choice.. Gte everybody you know..informed....now what else
can you do? Now we're going to write a series of alternative
guidelines. Everything bad in codes will have am alternative guideline
that turns it into a pro health guideline. What have wee done with the
vitamin and mineral guideline?  You can see that because we have a
mark up copy that has their guideline crossed out and ours written in
on the website..It's right there. What we've done is turn it into a
guideline that mandates "bio-chemicaly individually determined optimal
health" and it;s still Codex compliant...So we said..OK. now we need
congress to adopt this, and we need other countries in the world to
adopt this, so, Burt and I went to Washington DC and we met Daniel
Rorobocker from Orange County, who said to us, he's a
representative.... he said "I believe in pesticides...  " I went Oh..
He said I believe in GMO's I went Oh... He said " I believe in
Iradiation of food"  I went OH... "But he said...I believe in your
right to eat foods that have not been processed that way more than I
believe in those technologies... I will take this one..." We said. "
OH that's really nice.." He said now..."We need a coilition..."  So we
wnet across the ilse across he office building to see Peter Defozio's
staff from Oregan who would was a Liberal Democrat., whereas
Rorobocker is a Libritarian Republican, and Defazio's on board and we
have large numbers of others who actually has never heard of Codex.
before we told them about it. Never heard of Codex,,,we have called
ever health legislative aid on congress.  what's you're Congressmans's
position on Codex?  and they've said "Wah????"...We have spoken to the
trade legislative assistants and asked. What's you congressman's
position on Codex?  Congress and trade legislative's assistants and
staff are not informed on Codex   ... and they all said.. Wah Wah..
They don't know.  We had a congressional briefing set up on the 20th
of September, I was going to address Congress...and tell them about
it.. I thought that that was cool...10 days before it became a
briefing on something else.  Another Freedom Click ... you need to
write to Congress on the site and tell them that they need a
Congressional Briefing, by God and tell them you want me to brief
them. They don't know about Codex ..they've never heard of it any more
than the general public has heard of  Codex Gee How did that happen..
who knows? Every negative part of Codex can be over turned by
guideline, a regulation or a standard, that is positive, So we need
your help because the United States leadership in this guideline and
all the positive guidelines that is to follow is what is going to
literally follow is what is going to save the population of  the
planet earth and save your jobs and your children and your families
and mine. Thank you!!
Speach by Dr Rimal Laibox MD a director of the the National
Association of Nutrition Professionals (NANP) Produced by EON the
Ecological Options Network for Bauman College in cooperation with the
Natural Solutions Foundation and the National Association of Nutrition
Professionals (NANP) 2005
Codex Alimentarius summarized in 7 pointsPublished on 09-30-2009
Codex Alimentarius is scheduled for full global implementation on
December 31st, 2009, and not a word has been spoken in main stream
media about this threat to humanity.
The principle of self medication with herbal/vitamin/mineral food
supplements would be restricted to ‘prescription only’ status, if the
Codex Alimentarius is applied in the UK and elsewhere, particularly
the USA.
(UK only) Since the NHS priorities are ill health diagnosis and
treatment, the good health preservation that supplements provide will
be inaccessible to the majority of our population and the cost to the
NHS will increase.
According to the projections based on figures from the World Health
Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), a
minimum of 3 billion people will die from the Codex mandated vitamin
and mineral guidelines alone.
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Vitamins/
Deadline to sign the petition = 5th September 2009
Codex in Depth: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=161
Codex Alimentarius (World Food Code)
Summarized in 7 points
1) Started in 1962 by UN, Imposed by WTO Sanctions
Codex Alimentarius was created in 1962 as a trade Commission by the UN
to control the international trade of food. Its initial intentions may
have been altruistic but it has been taken over by corporate
interests, most notably the pharmaceutical, pesticide, biotechnology
and chemical industries.
Codex Alimentarius is backed up by the crippling trade sanctions of
the World Trade Organization (WTO). Any non Codex-compliant nation
would face huge economic punishment since they would automatically
lose in any food-trade dispute with a Codex compliant country.
2) “Nutrients are Toxins” Is Junk Science
Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) has two committees which impact nutrition.
One of them, the “Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special
Dietary Uses” (CCNFSDU), is chaired by Dr. Rolf Grossklaus, a
physician who believes that nutrition has no role in health. This is
the “top-guy” for Codex nutritional policy, and he has stated that
“nutrition is not relevant to health”.
As unbelievable as it may sound, Dr. Grossklaus actually declared
nutrients to be toxins in 1994 and instituted the use of toxicology
(Risk Assessment) to prevent nutrients from having any impact on
humans who take supplements! It is worth mentioning that Dr.
Grossklaus happens to own the Risk Assessment company advising CCNFSDU
and Codex on this issue. This company makes money when its toxicology
services are used for the “assessment” of nutrients. Here in the U.S.
we call that a “conflict of interest”.
Codex is made up of thousands of standards and guidelines. One of
them, the Vitamin and Mineral Guideline (VMG), is designed to permit
only ultra low doses of vitamins and minerals (and make clinically
effective nutrients illegal). How can the VMG restrict dosages of
vitamins and minerals? By using Risk Assessment (toxicology) to assess
nutrients.
While Risk Assessment is a legitimate science (it is a branch of
toxicology), it is the wrong science for assessing nutrients! In fact,
in this context, it is actually junk science. Biochemistry, the
science of life processes, is the correct science for assessing
nutrients. Codex Alimentarius treats nutrients as toxins, which is
literally insane.
Nutrients are not toxins – they are essential for life.
undefined
No matter what Codex Alimentarius officials say to convince you that
Risk Assessment is a “science-based” approach to nutrients, it is not.
And it is worth repeating that Dr. Grossklaus, the head of Codex
Alimentarius, owns the Risk Assessment company advising CCNFSDU and
Codex on the “benefit” of using Risk Assessment to assess nutrients.
3) Not Consumer Protection – That’s Propaganda
Contrary to the propaganda, Codex Alimentarius has nothing to do with
consumer protection. Nothing! Codex is about the economic ambitions of
multi-national corporations, in particular, the pharmaceutical
industry.
Using their multi billion-dollar marketing budgets, these industries
have launched a massive media propaganda campaign to paint Codex
Alimentarius as a benevolent tool of “consumer protection”, as well as
to negatively taint the image of natural health options and mislead
people to fear them as “dangerous”, so they will take drugs (which
really are dangerous). Natural health products and options have an
amazing safety record and are remarkably effective, especially when
compared to pharmaceutical drugs.
Unfortunately, one-time defenders of health freedom such as National
Nutritional Foods Association (NNFA) and Council for Responsible
Nutrition (CRN) have joined the propaganda bandwagon and are spreading
false information saying that Codex Alimentarius is either “harmless”
or benevolent “consumer protection”. Neither is true.
The membership of these one-time defenders of health freedom has
become permeated by people from the pharmaceutical industry (for
example, CRN counts as its members corporations such as Monsanto® and
Bayer®).
4) Codex: Serious Threat to Health and Health Freedom
If Codex Alimentarius is implemented in the United States of America,
therapeutic dosages of vitamins and minerals (and all other nutrients
soon to follow) will become unavailable because they will literally
become illegal.
Here’s how it would work, in a nut-shell:
Due to the junk science use of Risk Assessment (toxicology) to assess
supposedly toxic nutrients, a false belief is being engineered saying
that “nutritional supplements are dangerous to people’s health”.
Using this false belief generates calls to “protect” people from these
“toxic” nutrients. After the calls come the bills to set ultra low
permissible dosages (remember, nutrients are deemed “dangerous toxins”
under this false belief). If enough of us and our Congressional
delegates buy this nonsense, we and Congress would blindly comply with
Codex Alimentarius’ VMG. And blind compliance is what the industries
behind Codex Alimentarius intend.
Blind compliance goes hand-in-hand with lack of activism. This lack of
activism allows our protective laws, classifying nutrients as foods
with no upper limits (such as DSHEA), to be easily repealed and
replaced with draconian laws to classify nutrients as toxins. And
“harmonization” with the pro-illness, pro-pharmaceutical industry
Vitamin and Mineral Guideline is there to fill the void.
Only intentionally ineffective, ultra low dose supplements would be
legal, with or without a prescription, on the VMG list. If enough
people do not take action, we can expect to watch nutritional
supplement manufacturers and, thus health food stores, to go out of
business, in a domino effect. The only player left standing would be
Big Pharma.
Therapeutic grade vitamins, minerals, and amino acids would be
eliminated from the marketplace (although a few low-dose supplements
would be allowed by Codex, as a symbolic measure to avoid suspicion
about their ulterior motive).
Natural health professionals would lose the tools of their trade
(nutritional supplements) and health conscious people would be unable
to choose natural health options for health promotion and disease
treatment.
And that is, in a nutshell, how Codex Alimentarius is poised to make
Natural and Nutritional Medicine (NNM) disappear from the legal health
world and go underground. Who benefits? Big Pharma.
It would take a few years for the above scenarios to be feasible
(Codex Alimentarius is meant to go into full global effect by 2010).
The slower the process takes, the less alarmed people will be. That’s
probably the logic of the architects of Codex Alimentarius.
5) Serves Economic Interests of Sickness Industries Through WTO and
Napoleonic Code
More and more people are turning to natural health products globally.
The “wellness” trend is a major trend in today’s society. The more
natural health products people use, the fewer drugs they buy. The
pharmaceutical industry, which is part of the “Sickness Industry”,
fears the inevitable shift toward natural health care.
Instead of accepting the will of the people and rethinking the future
of the pharmaceutical industry, the industry has decided upon an
unethical course of action: the use of deception and deceit to
eliminate natural health products completely.
Codex Alimentarius is a shrewd vehicle for protecting the
pharmaceutical industry from the loss of income it stands to suffer
due to the inevitable growth of natural healthcare.
Codex Alimentarius is the resistance of the dinosaurs to
inevitability: the burgeoning desire of humanity for a healthier,
saner, and more sustainable way of life.
The World Trade Organization (WTO) intends to force Codex Alimentarius
upon the nations of the world, including the U.S. This would be done
under the threat of massive economic sanctions if WTO-countries do not
comply with Codex Alimentarius.
Furthermore, Codex is based in the Napoleonic Code, not Common Law.
That means that under Codex Alimentarius, anything not explicitly
permitted is forbidden. Under Common Law, we hold that anything not
explicitly forbidden is permitted. The difference is the difference
between health freedom and health tyranny. Codex Alimentarius would be
able to ban supplements by default.
6) DSHEA Protects America From Codex Alimentarius
The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA, 1994), an
American law classifying our supplements and herbs as foods (which can
have no upper limit set on their use), was passed by unanimous
Congressional consent following massive grass-roots support organized
by health food stores. Millions of American activists told Congress,
in no uncertain terms:
“Protect nutritional supplements as foods or we will remove you from office”.
Congress listened and carried out the will of the people.
DSHEA appropriately classifies nutritional supplements as foods which
can have no upper limits set on their use. DSHEA recognizes that
people use nutrients safely to deal with their individually differing
needs for nutrients. The concept of biochemical individuality means
that people have different needs for nutrients at different times. Are
nutrients toxins? No, they are not toxins. They are substances
essential to prevent, treat and cure any chronic condition, in
differing doses at different times in different people.
DSHEA protects the US from Codex Alimentarius’ deadly Vitamin and
Mineral Guideline. We must reach our Congressional members, educate
them about the facts on Codex Alimentarius and direct them to vote
against anything that would threaten DSHEA.
Congress holds the keys to our health freedom. And it is their job to
listen to us. Let’s not allow cynicism to tell us otherwise. We did it
for DSHEA in 1994. We can do it again this year.
7) Your Action is Needed Now!
DSHEA is under significant legislative attack right now. Your
letter-writing is crucial: if the members of Congress know that voting
against health freedom means losing their jobs come election time,
they will listen. Our job is to make sure they get the message loud
and clear. Take action via our 3 easy steps and send personalized
emails to Congress right now.
After taking action on HealthFreedomUSA.org, consider getting together
with others in your area and visit your Congressional members in their
home offices. If we wait, we lose our health freedoms. Once we
“HARMonize” with Codex, by the way, we no longer have the right, while
we belong to the WTO, to repeal or change that “HARMonization”!
Conclusion
The objective of the pro-Codex Alimentarius multi nationals is to
“boil the frog slowly” so that we do not wake up to it in time to
avoid Codex.
Once we have “HARMonize” to Codex Alimentarius, as long as we are in
the WTO, we cannot amend or change what we’ve been “HARMonize” to.
Codex Alimentarius will go into global implementation by December 31,
2009, unless We, the People, avert it. We must act now because right
now, with $758 Million spent on declared Congressional lobbying by Big
Pharma last year, there are members of Congress who are trying to
overturn DSHEA and allow Pharma-friendly free reign for Codex. If
protective laws like DSHEA are destroyed, the sanctioning power of the
autocratic WTO kicks in, and it will be impossible to get out from
under Codex Alimentarius. We can protect our access to high potency
nutrients and stave off an adulterated food supply only by putting
pressure on Congress.
If you would like to take action to try and stop Codex Alimentarius
<please click here (USA)>, If you would like more in-depth information
about Codex Alimentarius <please click here>
If you would like to take action to try and stop Codex Alimentarius
you can sign a petition to Gordon Brown <please click here (UK)> ~
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Vitamins/ ~ Deadline to sign the
petition = 5th September 2009
If you would like more in-depth information about Codex Alimentarius
<please click here>
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=157
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=161
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=183
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=160
http://www.therapure.com/codex.htm
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Vitamins/
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhApQ3QkG0Q&feature=related
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5266884912495233634
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2D4-noTiCg
http://www.naturalnews.com/026731_CODEX_food_health.html
http://www.anhcampaign.org/campaigns/codex
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Alimentarius
Stop Codex Alimentarius and Protect Health Freedom!
Unless stated otherwise everything in this note is © 2009 by Natural
Solutions Foundation
The Natural Solutions Foundation is a non-profit organization founded
to protect and promote health freedom in the USA.
http://www.blacklistednews.com/?news_id=5768
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Alimentarius
The Codex Alimentarius (Latin for "food code" or "food book") is a
collection of internationally recognized standards, codes of practice,
guidelines and other recommendations relating to foods, food
production and food safety. Its name derives from the Codex
Alimentarius Austriacus.[1] Its texts are developed and maintained by
the Codex Alimentarius Commission, a body that was established in 1963
by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
and the World Health Organization (WHO). The Commission's main aims
are stated as being to protect the health of consumers and ensure fair
practices in the international food trade. The Codex Alimentarius is
recognized by the World Trade Organization as an international
reference point for the resolution of disputes concerning food safety
and consumer protection.[2][3]
Scope
The Codex Alimentarius officially covers all foods, whether processed,
semi-processed or raw, but far more attention has been given to foods
that are marketed directly to consumers. In addition to standards for
specific foods, the Codex Alimentarius contains general standards
covering matters such as food labeling, food hygiene, food additives
and pesticideresidues, and procedures for assessing the safety of
foods derived from modern biotechnology. It also contains guidelines
for the management of official (i.e., governmental) import and export
inspection and certification systems for foods.
The Codex Alimentarius is published in Arabic, Chinese, English,
French and Spanish. Not all texts are available in all languages.
   * Food labelling (general standard, guidelines on nutrition
labelling, guidelines on labelling claims)
   * Food additives (general standard including authorized uses,
specifications for food grade chemicals)
   * Contaminants in foods (general standard, tolerances for specific
contaminants including radionuclides, aflatoxins and other mycotoxins)
   * Pesticide and veterinary chemical residues in foods (maximum
residue limits)
   * Risk assessment procedures for determining the safety of foods
derived from biotechnology (DNA-modified plants, DNA-modified
micro-organisms, allergens)
   * Food hygiene (general principles, codes of hygienic practice in
specific industries or food handling establishments, guidelines for
the use of the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point or “HACCP”
system)
   * Methods of analysis and sampling
[edit]Specific standards
   * Meat products (fresh, frozen, processed meats and poultry)
   * Fish and fishery products (marine, fresh water and aquaculture)
   * Milk and milk products
   * Foods for special dietary uses (including infant formulae and baby foods)
   * Fresh and processed vegetables, fruits, and fruit juices
   * Cereals and derived products, dried legumes
   * Fats, oils and derived products such as margarine
   * Miscellaneous food products (chocolate, sugar, honey, mineral water)
Controversy
The controversy over the Codex Alimentarius relates to a perception
that it is a mandatory standard for food - including vitamin and
mineral supplement - safety. Supporters of the Codex Alimentarius say
that it is a voluntary reference standard for food and that there is
no obligation on countries to adopt Codex standards as a member of
either Codex or any other international trade organization. From the
point of view of its opponents, however, one of the main causes of
concern is that the Codex Alimentarius is recognized by the World
Trade Organization as an international reference standard for the
resolution of disputes concerning food safety and consumer
protection.[2][3] Proponents argue that the use of Codex Alimentarius
during international disputes does not exclude the use of other
references or scientific studies as evidence of food safety and
consumer protection.
It is reported that in 1996 the German delegation put forward a
proposal that no herb, vitamin or mineral should be sold for
preventive or therapeutic reasons, and that supplements should be
reclassified as drugs.[4] The proposal was agreed, but protests halted
its implementation.[4] The 28th Session of the Codex Alimentarius
Commission was subsequently held July 4 - July 9, 2005.[5] Among the
many issues discussed were the "Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral
Food Supplements"[6], which were adopted during the meeting as new
global safety guidelines.[7] This text has been the subject of
considerable controversy, in part because many member countries may
choose to regulate dietary supplements as therapeutic goods or
pharmaceuticals or by some other category. The text does not seek to
ban supplements, but subjects them to labeling and packaging
requirements, sets criteria for the setting of maximum and minimum
dosage levels, and requires that safety and efficacy are considered
when determining ingredient sources. The United Nations' Food and
Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO)
have stated that the guidelines are "to stop consumers overdosing on
vitamin and mineral food supplements." The Codex Alimentarius
Commission (CAC) has said that the guidelines call "for labelling that
contains information on maximum consumption levels of vitamin and
mineral food supplements." The WHO has also said that the Guidelines
"ensure that consumers receive beneficial health effects from vitamins
and minerals." [8]
Similarities have been noted between the EU's Food Supplements
Directive and the Codex Alimentarius Guidelines for Vitamin and
Mineral Supplements.[9]
Texas Republican Rep. Ron Paul has said that the Central American Free
Trade Agreement "increases the possibility that Codex regulations will
be imposed on the American public." [10]
Additional controversy has been expressed by proponents of
ecologically and socially sustainable agriculture and food systems,
such as the Slow Food movement[11], who view the Codex Alimentarius as
antithetical to this goal. According to the Manifesto on the Future of
Food, the Codex Alimentarius has "codified policies designed to serve
the interest of global agribusiness above all others, while actively
undermining the rights of farmers and consumers".[12]
See also
   * Codex Alimentarius Austriacus
   * Food Chemicals Codex
   * E number
References
  1. ^ Codex Alimentarius: how it all began Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations website. Accessed 1 January 2009.
  2. ^ a b Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary
Measures World Trade Organization. Accessed 3 September 2008.
  3. ^ a b Understanding the Codex Alimentarius Preface. Third
Edition. Published in 2006 by the World Health Organization and the
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Accessed 3
September 2008.
  4. ^ a b 'Health supplements: R.I.P.'. The Guardian newspaper, UK.
Published 14 September 2002. Accessed 2 August 2008
  5. ^ Codex Alimentarius Commission 28th Session, FAO Headquarters,
Rome, Italy, 4-9 July, 2005. Official report.
  6. ^ Codex Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral Food Supplements
  7. ^ UN commission adopts safety guidelines for vitamin and food
supplements United Nations News Centre. Published 11 July 2005.
Accessed 1 January 2009
  8. ^ UN commission adopts safety guidelines for vitamin and food
supplements United Nations News Centre. Published 11 July 2005.
Accessed 26 March 2009
  9. ^ Nil by mouth. The Observer newspaper, UK. Published 29
February 2004. Accessed 1 January 2009
 10. ^ 'The vitamin police', by ALAN BOCK, Sr. editorial writer, The
Orange County Register. Published 14 August 2005. Accessed 2 September
2008.
 11. ^ http://www.slowfood.com/about_us/eng/campaigns.lasso
 12. ^ The International Commission on the Future of Food and
Agriculture (July 15, 2003). "Manifesto on the Future of Food".
   * Codex Alimentarius Commission - official website
   * 'Understanding the Codex Alimentarius' Published in 2005 by the
World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization of
the United Nations. Accessed 4 May 2007.
   * "Authority and Legitimacy in Global Governance: Deliberation,
Institutional Differentiation, and the Codex Alimentarius" Michael
Livermore, 81 NYU Law Review 766 (2006)


The Holocaust
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust
Victims of the Holocaust.

Ghettos were established in Europe in which Jews were confined before
being shipped to extermination camps.
The Holocaust (from Greek ????a?st?? [holókaustos]: hólos, "whole"
andkaustós, "burnt"[1]), also known as The Shoah (Hebrew: ?????,
Romanized ha'shoah; Yiddish: ?????, Romanized churben or hurban[2]) is
the term generally used to describe the genocide of approximately six
million European Jews during World War II, a program of systematic
state-sponsored extermination by Nazi Germany.[3]
Some scholars maintain that the definition of the Holocaust should
also include the Nazis' systematic murder of millions of people in
other groups, including ethnic Poles, Romani, Soviet civilians, Soviet
prisoners of war,people with disabilities, homosexuals, Jehovah's
Witnesses, and otherpolitical and religious opponents.[4] By this
definition, the total number ofHolocaust victims would be between 11
million and 17 million people.[5]
The persecution and genocide were carried out in stages. Legislation
to remove the Jews from civil society was enacted years before the
outbreak of World War II. Concentration camps were established in
which inmates were used as slave labor until they died of exhaustion
or disease. Where the Third Reichconquered new territory in eastern
Europe, specialized units called Einsatzgruppen murdered Jews and
political opponents in mass shootings. Jews and Romani were confined
in overcrowded ghettos before being transported by freight train
toextermination camps where, if they survived the journey, the
majority of them were killed in gas chambers. Every arm ofNazi
Germany's bureaucracy was involved in the logistics of the mass
murder, turning the country into what one Holocaust scholar has called
"a genocidal state".[6]
Wars manipulated & financed on both sides by the Rothschilds &
Associates at great
profit to them who ended up each time there was a war with most of
country's Gold
Reserve's in payment for munitions and weapons to U.S. industrial
munitions and weaponry companies owned and financed by powerful
Rothschild Banking Family using German Zionist Jewish American
partners as fronts for them in the U.S constantly bankrupted
Britain-USA-Germany etc.
The Second World War had bankrupted Britain, Germany and the USA but
made the Rothschild Family a fortune
During the 1939–1942 period, the UK depleted much of its gold stock in
purchases of munitions and weaponry on a "cash and carry" basis from
U.S.Industrial munitions and weaponry companies owned and financed by
powerful Rothschild Banking Family using German Zionist Jewish
American partners as fronts for them in the U.S. One of those
companies was Beyer (formerly IG Farben), which later became known as
Beyer which also produced the gas chambers Zyklon B,  the steel, other
chemicals  and the rail road line,  for the German Nazi Death Camps,
munitions, other chemicals, and all kinds of stuff. The president of
Beyer (formerly IG Farben) Fritz ter Meer, the senior manager at IB
Farben, was convicted of crimes against Humanity on the basis of mass
murder, slavery and other crimes on 29th July, 1948. Although he
co-operated with SS and the Final Solution, Fritz ter Meer was
sentenced to 7 years only in War Criminal Prison, but only served
about three years in prison
John Maynard Keynes, who had argued against such a gold standard,
proposed to put the power to print money in the hands of the privately
owned Bank of England.
1971, the U.S. government again printed more dollars (a 10% increase)
and then sent them overseas, to pay for the nation's military spending
and private investments. In the first six months of 1971, $22 billion
dollars in assets left the U.S
Because of the excess printed dollars, and the negative U.S. trade
balance, other nations began demanding fulfillment of America’s
“promise to pay” - that is, the redemption of their dollars for gold.
Switzerland redeemed $50 million of paper for gold in July.France, in
particular, repeatedly made aggressive demands, and acquired $191
million in gold, further depleting the gold reserves of the U.S.[1] On
5 August 1971, Congress released a report recommending devaluation of
the dollar, in an effort to protect the dollar against foreign
price-gougers. Still, on 9 August 1971, as the dollar dropped in value
against European currencies, Switzerland withdrew the Swiss franc from
the Bretton Woods system.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_standard
During the 1939–1942 period, the UK depleted much of its gold stock in
purchases of munitions and weaponry on a "cash and carry" basis from
the U.S. and other nations.[citation needed] This depletion of the
UK's reserve convinced Winston Churchill of the impracticality of
returning to a pre-war style gold standard. To put it simply the war
had bankrupted Britain. John Maynard Keynes, who had argued against
such a gold standard, proposed to put the power to print money in the
hands of the privately owned Bank of England. Keynes, in warning about
the menaces of inflation, said "By a continuous process of inflation,
governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part
of the wealth of their citizens. By this method, they not only
confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and while the process
impoverishes many, it actually enriches some". Quite possibly because
of this, the 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement established the
International Monetary Fund and an international monetary system based
on convertibility of the various national currencies into a U.S.
dollar that was in turn convertible into gold. It also prevented
countries from manipulating their currency's value to gain an edge in
international trade.

To stabilize the economy and combat runaway inflation, on August 15,
1971, President Nixon imposed a 90-day wage and price freeze, a 10
percent import surcharge, and, most importantly, “closed the gold
window”, ending convertibility between US dollars and gold. The
President and fifteen advisors made that decision without consulting
the members of the international monetary system, so the international
community informally named it the Nixon shock. Given the importance of
the announcement — and its impact upon foreign currencies —
presidential advisors recalled that they spent more time deciding when
to publicly announce the controversial plan, than they spent creating
the plan.He was advised that the practical decision was to make an
announcement before the stock markets opened on Monday (and just when
Asian markets also were opening trading for the day). On August 15,
1971, that speech and the price-control plans proved very popular and
raised the public's spirit. The President was credited with finally
rescuing the American public from price-gougers, and from a
foreign-caused exchange crisis.  By December 1971, the import
surcharge was dropped, as part of a general revaluation of the major
currencies, which thereafter were allowed 2.25% devaluations from the
agreed exchange rate. By March 1976, the world’s major currencies were
floating — in other words, the currency exchange rates no longer were
governments' principal means of administering monetary policy.

Analysts of the post-2007 financial crisis, such as David McNally
(2009)  cite the end of the Bretton Woods dollar-gold convertibility
as the modern source of monetary volatility, and consequent
unregulated financialization. That volatility necessitated the rise of
risk-hedging financial instruments, such as derivatives (including
Credit Default Swaps). Thus as the value of the dollar was no longer
based on gold, it became based instead on projected future value. The
US economy and its firms become financialized (dependent on
interest-paying financial transactions) to accommodate and take
advantage of the risk inherent in the future value of the dollar as
the basis for present value. Further, financialized firms and
investors gained profits from speculating on that risk. Especially
after the 1997 East Asian overaccumulation crisis necessitated
loosening credit in the US so that working-class Americans could prop
up global demand, working-class debt was packaged by banks and hedge
funds and sold to themselves (banks and hedge funds), as well as to
pension funds, investors, and financialized corporations. During Alan
Greenspan’s tenure as president of the Federal Reserve (1987-2005)
alone, private and public debt in the US quadrupled to $43 trillion.
When the bubble burst in 2007, capital fled the US. Private capital
flows were reduced by $1.1 trillion in the third quarter of 2007.
There remain continued problems with valuing assets in the US,
especially given public and private debt, the unabated diminishment of
American working class purchasing power, and ongoing military
expenditure. 40 years after the Nixon Shock, analysts predict the rise
of competition among currency blocs for greater control of financial
markets and global monetary privileges.
Beyer (formerly IG Farben) making and using Zyclon B Gas and Dildren
in FrankfurtThis was all Rothschild money

World News Shock USAWeeklyNews Exclusive

Major Interntaional Industrial Companies, Banking Groups, powerful
banking and business families and media owners and controllers which
include Bayer, IG Farben, The Rockerfeller Family, The Rothchild
Family, Rupert Murdoch and his media companies News Corporation and
News International, Conrad Black, Fritz Teer Meer, have secretly
played their part in helping to create the Codex Alimentarius
Commission in 1963 and its mummy and daddy organisations the World
Health Organisation (WHO)and the Food and Agriculture Organisation of
the Unitd Namtions (FAO)  as world wide bodies rules and regulations
that can override an individual country's rules and regulations  on
food, nutrients, minerals and herbs consumer protection code labelling
protection.  scam to mass murder over 3 million people on planet earth
through various methods including starvation of nutrients in their
food and increasing levels of terrifyingly dangerous poisoness
pesticides and bovine growth hormones in all types of food including
fruit vegetables, seeds, net, fish, pountry, lamb, pig, cows, etc. to
completely control all food production, coding, labelling,
distribution etc.

The British Prime Minister Lloyd George claimed, in 1909, that Lord
Nathan Rothschild was the most powerful man in Britain.   By the end
of the century, the family owned, or had built, at the lowest
estimates, over 41 palaces, of a scale and luxury perhaps unparalleled
even by the richest Royal families. In 1816, four of the brothers were
each elevated to the hereditary nobility by Austrian EmperorFrancis I;
Nathan was elevated in 1818. All of them were granted the Austrian
title of baron orFreiherr on 29 September 1822. As such, some members
of the family used "de" or "von" Rothschild to acknowledge the grant
of nobility. In 1885, Nathan Mayer Rothschild II (1840–1915) of the
London branch of the family, was granted the hereditary peerage title
Baron Rothschild in the Peerage of the United Kingdom.Many Rothschilds
were and are supporters of the State of Israel, although other members
of the family opposed the creation of the state.[21] Lord Victor
Rothschild was against granting asylum or even help to Jewish refugees
during the Holocaust.[22] However, Baron Edmond James de Rothschild
was a patron of the first settlement in Palestine atRishon-LeZion, and
bought from Ottoman landlords many parts of the land which now makes
up present-day Israel. In 1917 Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild
was the addressee of the Balfour Declaration, which committed the
British government to the establishment in Palestine of a national
home for the Jewish people.

James A. de Rothschild financed the Knesset building as a gift to the
State of Israel.

The Supreme Court of Israel building was donated to Israel by Dorothy
de Rothschild.[23] Outside the President's Chamber is displayed the
letter Mrs Rothschild wrote to Prime Minister Shimon Peres expressing
her intention to donate a new building for the Supreme Court.[24]

Rothschild family banking businesses pioneered international high
finance during the industrialisation of Europe and were instrumental
in supporting railway systems across the world and in complex
government financing for projects such as the Suez Canal. The family
bought up a large proportion of the property inMayfair, London. Major
businesses directly founded by Rothschild family capital include
Alliance Assurance (1824) (now Royal & SunAlliance); Chemin de Fer du
Nord (1845); Rio Tinto Group (1873); Société Le Nickel (1880) (now
Eramet); and Imétal (1962) (now Imerys). The Rothschilds financed
Cecil Rhodes on his expeditions in Africa, the founding of De Beers
and the creation of the colony of Rhodesia.

The same people and companies behind the Nazi German Holocaust and
produced the ZyklonB gas chambers, steel, other chemicals, munitions
for the death camps where they mass murdered  over 10 million Jews and
Freemasons are behind the Codex Alimentarius Commission food,
nutrients, minerals and herbs consumer protection code labelling
protection scam to mass murder over 3 million people on planet
earth......Click here to read the full story
http://www.blacklistednews.com/?news_id=5768
http://www.codexcorp.com/
CODEX CORP:  Specialising in Corrections and Healthcare, it may be an
unusual combination but it works for us, our partners and customers
who want to keep a close control and watch on the use of health care
and nutritional products in the community and with our unique and far
reaching security and monitoring systems we will be able to tell our
customers instantly if anyone in the world is using nutrients and
minerals that are not Codex approved  and compliant, and have them
quickly detained and punished for not complying with Codex approved
and compliant products. With Codex we are proud to say that no one
will escape detection. Codex Corporation and its founders have over
100 years experience in this business including the management and
design of the concentration camps in Germany. Codex Corporation was
originally the multi billion  International Giant I G Farben.
A quick background on our founding company I G Farben and its
directors and managers will help convince you that as far as security,
nutrient and health care management, people management, corrections
management, Codex ( Formerly IG Farben) is the company you should
chose for any issues in Corrections and Heathcare Management. Codex
and its security management has the ability to make sure there is no
health freedom. not just in the USA but all over the world... and
Codex has the ability to make sure anyone that tries to think for a
minute they can get way with trying to have health freedom, will
quickly be caught, detained and punished by Codex's unique and far
reaching security and monitoring systems...The Codex Moto
is
"None will escape detection and punishment of the unauthorised use of
nutrients with Codex on the job....just look at out success record in
designing and managing the concentration camp in Germany....our
success record at Codex Corporation, formerly IG Farben in people,
healthcare and corrections management speaks for itself"
Codex Corporation's, formerly IG Farben's 100 year History in People,
Healthcare and Corrections Management
provided from Codex Alimentarius Speach by Dr Rimal Laibox MD of the
Natural Solutions Fioundation, Produced by EON the Ecological Options
Network for Bauman College in cooperation with the Natural Solutions
Foundation and the National Association of Nutrition Professionals
(NANP) 2005 www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
Dr Rimal Laibox is an experienced healthcare professional and has
studies Codex Corporation, formerly IG Farben's progess ov erthe last
decade to become  the leaders in People, Healthcare and Corrections
Management in the United States.
Codex and Nutricide
" Let me tell you about Codex Alimentarius, let me define it for you,
let me help you understand the enemy..and let me assure you that
absolutely nothing that I am going to tell you, is exagerated, is
interperlated, or is imagined. Every thing I am going to tell you is
documented. A great deal of it is documented on my website,
whichwww.HealthFreedomUSA.org. Let me back up and tell you that I have
been watching Codex come toward us for about the last decade. ,,, and
I have been watching the vote sin congress, which God help us is our
bastion of support and protection against Codex and I will explain why
that is. I have been watching the votes to protect our health freedom
dwindle, until finally in the 109th Congress, without a good deal of
activity, we didn't have the votes to protect us. I have been watching
Codex excellerate and I have been watching it expand, and I have been
getting more and more troubled. Let me give you a brief run down of
Codex then. After the second world war, the Nuremberg Tribunals were
held in which people who had committed crimes against humanity were
judged by the world community in a court run by the United States and
Britain...  and they were sentenced to terms in prison if they were
found guilty of crimes against humanity. In 1948 some of the people
who were found guilty of crimes against humanity on the basis of mass
murder, slavery and other crimes were the president and 24 board
members and executives  of a hugh industrial megalith called IG
Farben. Amazingly enough however, by 1951 all of them had already been
released, and and continuing to consult with German Corporations IG
Farben produced the gas used in the gas chambers Zyklon B, they
produced the steel for the death camps and the rail road line, they
produced the munitions, they produced chemicals, they produced all
kinds of stuff. The Nuremberg Tribunal disolved IG Farben into
companies such as  into BASF - Hoechst - Bayer They produced
pharmaceuticals.. a big big pharacuticals company.  So the president
of IG Farben Fritz ter Meer, the senior manager at IB Farben, was
convicted of crimes against Humanity on the basis of mass murder,
slavery and other crimes on 29th July, 1948. Although he co-operated
with SS and the Final Solution, Fritz ter Meer was sentenced to 7
years only in War Criminal Prison, but only served about three years
in prison, no more someone that bounces a business cheque for say
$1,000 and is charged for fraud in the $1,000 bounced cheque for it
not being honoured on presentation. Someone steals an apple can get 3
years in prison also, or if he or she stole the apple as a servant
they can receive 7 years in prison,
Now Fritz ter Meer is sort of an artistic fellow and he was the one
responsible for the slogan that people saw as they entered Autswitz,
usually for the last time, "Work Brings Freedom". Fritz ter Meer was a
creative sort of fellow. Fritz ter Meer was responsible for the slogan
that people saw as they entered Auschwitz-, usually for the last time,
 " Work brings  Freedom....a creative sort of fellow.
You will notice that the institutions that Fritz ter Meer worked for
an/or had shareholdings in as listed by Wikepedia are
Institutions IG Farben, Bayer, Codex Alimentarius
The Bayer executive Fritz ter Meer, sentenced to seven years in prison
by the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, was made head of the supervisory
board of Bayer in 1956, after his release.
Fritz ter Meer ( July 4 1884 – October 27 1967 ) was a German chemist.
He was the son of Edmund ter Meer the founder of a chemical company
that later became part of Bayer. Fritz ter Meer also worked for Bayer
and later IG Farben. He was involved in the planning of Monowitz
concentration camp, a satellite camp of KZ Auschwitz. He was sentenced
to seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948. After he was
released in 1951 he became supervisory board chairman
(Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He retired in 1961.
The Bayer company then became part of IG Farben, a conglomerate of
German chemical industries that formed a part of the financial core of
the German Nazi regime. IG Farben owned 42.5% of the company that
manufactured Zyklon B,[2] a chemical used in the gas chambers of
Auschwitz and other extermination camps. During World War II, the
company also extensively used slave labor in factories attached to
large slave labor camps, notably the sub-camps of the Mauthausen-Gusen
concentration camp[3]. When the Allies split IG Farben into several
pieces after World War II for involvement in organized Nazi war
crimes, Bayer re-appeared as an individual business. The Bayer
executive Fritz ter Meer, sentenced to seven years in prison by the
Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, was made head of the supervisory board
of Bayer in 1956, after his release.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_ter_Meer
Fritz ter Meer
undefined
Fritz ter Meer
Born June 4, 1884
Uerdingen, Germany
Died October 27, 1967 (aged 83)
Leverkusen, Germany
Nationality German
Institutions IG Farben, Bayer, Codex Alimentarius
Fritz ter Meer ( July 4 1884 – October 27 1967 ) was a German chemist.
He was the son of Edmund ter Meer the founder of a chemical company
that later became part of Bayer. Fritz ter Meer also worked for Bayer
and later IG Farben. He was involved in the planning of Monowitz
concentration camp, a satellite camp of KZ Auschwitz. He was sentenced
to seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948. After he was
released in 1951 he became supervisory board chairman
(Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He retired in 1961.
   * Heine, Jens Ulrich (1990). Verstand und Schicksal. Die Männer
der I.G. Farbenindustrie A.G. (1925-1945). Weinheim; New York:
VCH.ISBN 978-3527281442.
   * Codex Alimentarius Commission [1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_ter_Meer
Edmund ter Meer ( 1852 – November 5, 1931) was a German chemist who
discovered the ter Meer reaction and founded in 1877 the ter Meer dye
company in Uerdingen. After the fusion with the aniline factory of
Julius Weiler the Weiler-ter Meer company was formed. This company
later became part of the Bayer company. His son Fritz ter Meer also
became a chemist associated to the Bayer company.
Edmund ter Meer
Born 1852
Died  November 5, 1931 (aged 79)
Nationality German
Institutions Bayer
Known for ter Meer reaction
References
   * Max Bodenstein, H. Leuchs (1931). "Sitzung vom 16. November
1931". Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft 64 (11):
A211–A212. doi:10.1002/cber.19310641139.*
   * ter Meer Prize University Bonn
   * "Ter Meer family." Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online
   * Uerdingen industrial area history
So Fritz ter Meer was sitting in jail and he said "well, that didn't
work..what else can we do?   I've got it food..he who controls food
controls ....the world..."  Fritz ter Meer  got out of jail he went to
his  UN buddies and said "Have I got an idea for you..if we take over
food world wide..we have power world wide, and his UN buddies said.
"cool idea". So they created a Trade Commission. That's a very
powerful set of words... A Trade Commission....called the Codex
Alimentarius Commission
It is not a Public Health Commission..it is not a Consumer Protection
Commission....it is a Trade Commission. Trade is about what? Money!!
Trade is about Business!! Trade is about Profit!! Well they said in
1962 we're going to work towards total, global implimentation of Codex
Alimentarius on December 31st, 2009. Long Term.... and they set up a
bunch of committees.. committees on fish and fishery...fats and oil...
fruits and vegetables... ground nuts...nutritian  for special diatary
uses and so on. There are currently about 27 Codex committees, they
are regional organisations, there are task forces and so anf so on. So
it's ahugh beaurocratic mostrosety.it's emence. Codex has promogated
well over 4,000 guidelines, standards and regulations on
everything...everything which can legally be put into your mouth, with
the excpetion of Pharmaceuticals. they are not part of Codex. That is
an importand point. Now Codex standards have no legal weight
whatsoever. Zero. So who cares about them..their just standards...so
we are talking about an industry setting regulation organisation, but
if it has no legal standing .. who cares? Right!! Here's the history
of Codex Alimentarius before 1962.
Please note here that Fritz ter Meer  was sentenced to seven years
prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948 having been found guilty of
crimes against humanity on the basis of mass murder, slavery and other
crimes . After he was released in 1951 he became supervisory board
chairman (Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He officiialy
retired as supervisory board chairman of Bayer AG in 1961 so he could
behind the scene concentrate of working with his UN buddies on
developing his idea of  setting up a syatem that will control the
whoole world's food supply under the code name Codex Alimentarius. It
would not look good publicly for Fritz ter Meer  who was sentenced to
only seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948 having been
found guilty of crimes against humanity on the basis of mass murder,
slavery and other crimes, and only served about three years of his
sentence because of his powerful UN buddies, to be seen to be publicly
be involved with Codex Alimentarius. Here's the history of Codex
Alimentarius before 1962. The Austian Hungarian Empire said we need
rules by which the courts can rule on cases involving food.o we'll
have regulations and rules that the courts will enforce.... that's how
they get their way. That was called the Codex Alimentarius and  was
put into place around 1893 and lasted until the end of the Austrian
Hungarian Empire in the first world war. So the idea was there in the
Germanic tradition. We need rules..lots of rules...lots a
nd lots and lots of rules..we need a lot of rules... let's have rules
for everything to do with food. So it was a natural extention for the
German Industrialists to say we'll go back to the good old days of
Codex Alimentarius back  when we had them in Austrian Hungarian
Empire. Cool. So they started promilgating their rules and regulations
and they were voluntary. They were sort of guidlines. Now Codex
Alimentarius Commission is administered by the World Health
Oganisation (WHO) and the Food and Aricultural Organisation (FAO)  and
they fund Codex and they run it at the request of the United Nations
(UN). So the're mummy and daddy to Codex Alimentarius.  And that's
very interesting because they're supposed to be about health and food
world wide. Some conflicts of interest that we'll talk about. So
Codex started promilgating regulations and rules, and the way that's
done is that the committees work up a rule, a standard, a guideline,
or regulation an dthey get it to what's called a step 8 which is the
final step in their administrative process... and then it's presented
to the Codex Alimentarius Commission for ratification, like the
vitamin and mineral guidline was presented to the Codex Alimentarius
Commission on July 4th this past summer (2005). It was ratified... it
was approved by consensus...and it is now...despite the propaganda
that your going to hear if you every hear about it in the media... it
is now mandatory on any member country and the WTO, the World Trade
Organisation. Well what in the world do they have to do with it? And
the answer is everything. The World Trade Organisation you see
accepted Codex when the world organisation was formed in 1994. They
said, "well how are we going to decide trade disputes around food if
we don't have a set of rules. I know..we'll accept the Codex
Alimentarius rules and all the members of the WTO will...willl world
wide...get ready for an Orwellian Term will harmonise with are
standards, with the codex standards.. I suggest you capitalise the
first four letters in your mind ...HARM... onise ... everybody is
supposed to .HARM... onise... with Codex....   and when they HARM...
onise with Codex, then if the get pulled into the WTO Dispute
Resolution Process they have a chance of winning because here's the
kicker... are you ready for this one ...  if two countries go into the
World Trade Organisation Dispute Resolution Process  and one of then
is Codex compliant, and one of them is not Codex Compliant.. the one
that is Codex Compliant automaticlly wins regardless of the merit of
the case.  People are using Codex Compliant in a much bigger economic
battle. So every couunty in the world is racing to do what?   Become
Codex Compliant. So in the United States...the situation is OK ..how
do we become Codex compliant when we have laws that protect us. You
have to remember that Codex does not serve consumer well being. Codex
does not serve what I call the five Bigs...Big Pharma Big Chema Big
Biotechna Big AgriBiz and Bid Medica ,,,little me and little you are
not served by Codex, in the least, so before we go forward and talk
about the rest of  what has to happen, let's ask what Codex does?
You probably all know about the vitamin and mineral guidline that was
ratified on July 4th ( 2005). You may not kow that although it is said
that CODEX regulations guidlines and standards that have been ratified
are volantary....That Are Not Voluntary...That is known as a lie!!!
They are mandatory..but  thye ar enot fully mandatory until December,
31st 2009. They're sort of kinda a little bit mandatory now. and
they're totally mandatory then. So what does Codex do? Why do I care
enough about Codex to close my practice and stop treating patients who
came to me from around the world..to help them regain their health and
be radiantly well with non toxic means which is a very satisfying
thing to do.. I love it...it also provided me with an income...  that
was nice. OK...;why am I concerned enough, let's talk about the
mineral and vitamin guidline first. In 1994 DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments
Health and Education Act was passed which classifies nutrient and
herbs as foods. As foods you can set no upper limit on them. You
cannot set an upper limit on lettuce...lamb or  roodibaggers.. and
similarily you cannot set an upper limit in vitamin C.. echanasia...
ginko bi loba ... vitamin D ...    to nutrients is freely given to
us.. We are allowed to have any nutients we want because.... this is a
very important point... under common law ...  What's not forbidden is
permitted.... Codex on the other hand  ... is a Napoleonic Code
...What's not permitted is forbidden law system... under Napoleonic
Code ...anything not permitted is forbidden ...  that's called a
positive list .... so vitamins and nutrients and minerals ... in 1994
we passed DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act was
passed which classifies nutrient and herbs as foods... we can have as
much of them as we want thatis our business... in 1994 Codex with no
notice here in this country whatsoever.. prepared nutrents ... put on
you intellectual seatbelts...declared nutrients to be toxins. they're
poisens ... dangerous Industrial poisens ... AS POISENS ... WE HAVE TO
BE PROTECTED FROM THEM ...how  do you protect someone from poisens ...
you use toxicology ... you use a science called risk assessment ..lt's
take a primer on risk assessment  .. first you take the substance
that's dangerous and feed it to animals, and the dosage that kills 50%
of them ..that's called the LD 50 ... and you exstrapulate what the LD
50 for human being might be.,,then you go down to the other end of the
dosage range ...and you start feeding ittie bittie tiny bits of it ..
 to test animals ... and you come up with the largest possible dose
...the maximum  permissable upper limit  ... that can be fed to an
animal before a discernable impact  is shown ..OK ... no discernable
impact .... then you divide that by 100 ... that's how they do it in
risk assessment ... and now you've got a safety margin ...  so you
have one 100th of the dose that can be given with no discernable
impact ...   OK nutrients! Under Codex!!!    Not only are limited to
those nutriants on the positive list ...and  we  anticipate there will
be 18 of them .. and they do not include.  .  CoQ10  Glucosamine ...
cundroyton sulfate ...thye do include floride ... which to my
knowledge as a Physician has absolutely no biological benefit
whatsoever. ... but it does make people complasent ... floride was
first used in the Goolog  ...because it was discovered that prisoners
who were fed floridated water ...  were complasent ...  and you could
do anything you wanted to them ...  they were easy  to manage ... so
you have 18 nutrients  ... you have ittie bittie tiny winy doses ...
that are determined scientifically to have no effect ...  on any human
being  now in this country we have a problem ... we have ...DSHEA
-Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act ... we have to get rid of
DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act  in order to  HARM
...on..ise ... with Codex... that part of Codex anyway .... so how do
we get rid of DSHEA ...  we attack it legislatively of course .. and
...  there are five.. count them.. five currently before Congress ...
designed to overturn ..gut ... invalidate .. and otherwise get rid of
DSHEA ...  because once DSHEA is gone we can HARM...on..ise with the
vitamin and mineral guideline   ...  so what we are talking about is
....  waking up one morning to find that high potency therapudicly
effective clinicly significant nutrients are illegal ....
(Codex want to make nutients illegal ) in the way that Heroin is
illegal ..not available with a prescription ... Illegal ...  If these
nutrients have any impact on  the Human body ...  they are illegal ...
that's just the vitamin and mineral guidline ... let's talk about milk
.... we have    recombinant bovine  growth hormone and now we can
choose milk with it and milk without it ... butter with it or butter
without it ..right ...not under Codex ... because under Codex ...
every dairy cow ...  on the planet must be treated with Monsanto's
recombinant bovine hormone.... furthermore ..under Codex ... every
animal used for food on the planent whether it has fins, feet or
feathers ... every animal on the planet must be treated with sub
clinical antibiotics and and must be treated with exogenous growth
hormones ... Codex requires (mandates) that all food be irradiated
unless it's eaten locally and raw. including organic food of course
... so is it organic afterwards... well of course the organic
standards are incredibly low ...the organic  standards allow a farmer
to use vetinary drugs including exogenous growth hormone, anti biotics
etc ....on animals and then at his whim, reclassify them as organic
...  but farmers are our friends  and they would never do
that...right!!!  Right!!  Codex sets limits for the dangerous
industrial chemicals that you can have in your food..and the limits
are increditbly high ... go to Codex Alimentarius Commission ... look
at the toxins and vetinary  Chemicals  and the levels that are set.,,
they are terrifying ot me ..Terrifying ... the names of the Chemicals
that are permitted and the amounts of the chemicals that are permitted
are terrifying to me ...Why am I terrified?  Well perhaps I am just a
cowardly person ...it's possible... think about this.. in 2001,
"The levels that are permitted, developed and maintained by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission, by the are incredibly high in toxins and the
levels that are set the names and amounts of the chemicals are
terrifying..." states Dr Rimal Laibox MD a director of the National
Association of Nutrition Professionals (NANP)
In 2001, 176 Countries including the USA got together and stated that
there were 12 really bad dangerous organic chemicals  Chemicals.
They're called "Pops".,,"Persistent Organic Pollutants. There are a
lot of them, but there are 12 that are so bad that, nobody could
disagree that those 12 Pops had to be banned worldwide.Nine of the 12
worst organic Chemicals known are pesticides...not
surprisingly..because they kill things..and of course we have many
processes and enzime systems that are very much like insects and other
pests so, they are not too good for us..but Codex has different
ideas...Codex has brought back 7 of the 9 forbidden POPS, that 176
countries  banned
worldwide,,,Dieldrin..Aldrin...hexaclorabenzine...etc..and the food
that is imported from other countries that contains these substances
can not be stopped at our borders..because otherwise it would be God
Forbid, a Trade Violation...that's how Codex works..Codex, according
to the World Trade Organisation  (WTO) and the Food and Agricultural
Organisation's (FAO) joint projections..now I didn't  make this
up...please if you have unfastened you're Intellectual Seat
Belts...put them back on again...if you do the numbers in the WHO- FAO
projections in their report headed Diet Nutrition and Prevention of
Chronic Diseases..that just the vitamin and mineral guideline
alone...when it goes into global implimentation..on December 31st,
2009...will result in a minimum of 3 billion (that's B... Bad... Big
Billion) deaths - onee billion through simple starvation..those folks
who die ar not particularily economicly successful from the point of
view of the Corporations..when you're starving to death, how much good
can you do, when the issue is that how much can you buy.. not a lot..
forget them..but Hah..but the next  two billion...they will die from
the preventable diseases (two billion people will die from diseases of
under nutrition)..of under nutrition// cancer.. the single most
profitable condition known to human kind..Cardiovacular Disease..a
good second...diabetis...pritty good producer of income...and a whole
host of other preventable diseases. Who will die? Who Knows? Who Will
Live? Probably those people who are wealthy enough and powerful enough
to have their own pushers of clean food and nutriants..that's who will
live!!!  You and I? ..probably not...our children? probably not...our
grand children?...probably not!!! So we're talking about food
regulations that are in fact are the legalisation of the mandated
toxicity and under nutrition..It will become illegal..if there is a
famine...where ever there is a famine...to ship high nutriant density
biscuits to that country.. and it will be illegal to distribute
them...that's what we're talking about!!! Codex is Big and It's
Bad..but it's not invunerable. So the point is...that we have to
protect ourselves, and I believe we have to regain global leadership,
which we have lost. surrendered..squandered..ah..sold..we have
sold..just joining the World Trade Organisation (WTO), surended our
sovereinghty...however as it just happens I have a team of
Constitutional Lawyers..looking at the following question...Are we
members of the WTO? Cause if you remember from High School Civics..the
way you get a treaty to be a real treaty..is to have it ratified by a
two thirds majority of the Senate...and the way we got into the WTO
was, they passed a law allowing Bill Clinton to fast track us into the
WTO. "That's Not A Treaty"...the USA is not legally not a member of
the WTO..now that's a piece of the battle...Someone says from the
audience.."you will have to tell George Bush.." we will tell George
Bush , but George Bush will not be relevant when we do tell
him..ah..so that's a piece of it, but that's not going to save our
lives right now because..do you know..picture in your mind...a wasp or
a bee trap..where the insect voluntarily goes down the funnel and then
can't get up out of the trap again..that's Codex..a regular law can be
over turned..it can be repealed...it can be corrected..by  another
piece of legislation..but once we become Codex Compliant...in any
area...as long as we are members of the WTO..it can never be
repealed...because we have lost the sovereignty to become un_codex
compliant as long as we are in the WTO, so it's like going down that
funnel and not being able to get back out of it. So it's very
important that we make sure that we do not become codex
compliant...but we will be hit with all those big trade sanctions from
the countries that are codex compliant.. so that the country will be
destroyed economically..right..no remember surprise..one of the
principles of war...remember mass..where you take your strength
against the enemies weekness andweek points. Well here's what we've
done.  We have a team of lawyers, who have spent hundreds of hours
with us pro bono..these are good guy lawyers...these two gentlemen and
we have spent hundreds of hours studying Codex, understanding it's
weekness..it's weeknesses..a lot of weeknesses.. and constructing a
strategy..which 'will take the succer down'....It will take it
down...but I need you...you are people that other people come to about
safe healthy food..and nutrients...
National Association of Nutritrional Professionals NANP 2005
Conference..you are ready made disenimation points..you are the
thousand million.... hundred million points of light. Here's what is
happening. Every country in the world has to be Codex compliant in
order not to get hit by WTO trade sanctions, as I told you of their
members of Codex and the WTO..and there are a few countries that are
not, but I can guarantee you they are not of any major significance.
So. the question is...What is Codex Compliance mean?
Well, most people in most countries..most legislators believe that
they have to adopt  as their national standard on that particular
subject...what Codex ratified. But that's not the case, any more than
we're in the WTO. That's not the case either. What this means is that
the format..the issues and the subjects..covered by a Codex
Guideline...Standard or Regulation..have to be addressed in the
country's guideline standard or regulation on the same topic. So what
we have done is create the first of many alternative Codex guidelines.
You can go to our website www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and you will see a
little button on the upper right handside that says sign this citzen's
partition. Now to briefly digress the citizen's partition is not like
a grocery store partition that you sign and bring to somebody and say
'I have 200,000 signatures and they dump it in the waist basket,
because it is in their mind, it is one signature that you and your
friends wrote 200,000 names. No...it is a legal challenge to the
policy of the United States Government on Codex. It's called a
citizen's partition. It's a legal challenge..We're suing the United
States Government..saying what you're doing is illegal folks...let us
tell you how..we want hearings of fact...we want redress..we want
correction..if we get what we want...that's dandy...if we don't get
what we want we have gone through a process..exhausting administrative
remedies.. we have made the case ripe for court.
So OK, I need you and everybody you know, to sign this citizen's
partition..stating this is a bad policy on mass..and you do this on
the web..and you will see the instructions and we present the
thousands and thousands of pages that we print out that have people's
signatures to the US Codex Office and to the FDA (Federal Drug
Administration) and they don't like that at all..but that's OK.
However, this time..this is the second amendment of the citizen's
partition that we're asking you to sign. This time the revised vitamin
and mineral guideline is part of it. It is part of the law suit saying
this needs to be US Policy. The more voices that say..this is what I
want...and you work for me..Mr and Mrs beaureaucrat and Mr and Mrs
congressman and Mr and Mrs Senator. The more voices the more weight.
So step number one is read and sign the citizen's partition. Step
number two diseminate the information..the weblink. put it out in your
office. get your patients...your friends and neighbours..your
suppliers..to sign the citizens partition and your suppliers..the
companies you use, are going to tell you that you're out of your
minds...they will tell you that Codex is not a problem..and they will
tell you..anyone here have a dog..OK...dog owners know that you ask a
dog to heal..sit down...stay..that's Codex in this country and
worldwide, because the more people that are in Codex comma, the less
trouble they have getting this through...anyone here of the NNFA.the
National Nutrition Foods Association..everybody's heard of the NNFA.
Did you know that the members of the NNFA and not just health foods
stores and manufacturers..but include companies with names you may
have heard...Pfizer ...Merck...Monsanto...Bayer...BASF..Archer Daniels
Midland..Glaxo....Aires..ClyneW elcome ..... you get the
idea..why?..because after DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and
Education Act was passed, and the nutriant business virgined..the
Pharmaceuticals, folks, who are not dumb, said there is gold in them
there pills..and they brought the means of production of many many
many companies.. and they brought the companies themselves..so there
in the nutrient business. What better way to kill the nutrient
business, which is not nearly as profitable as the toxic chemical drug
business, than to take it over. It works everytime..right!!
CRN...anybody here know about CRN..Council for Responsable Nutritian.
Same members...they have lots of multi level marketing
companies...same members..OK..and their serving their members needs.
CRN are saying....Yeh...Codex is coming..Codex is going to protect us
from those dangerous vitamins and minerals and herbs and CRN is saying
it's fine...go to sleep lulaby and goodnight..and everything is
fine...and they use a report that they commissoned at a reputed cost
of $800,000..a report prepared by Sydley Austin Brown and Rute..a law
firm in Washington...wrote a report for them..and it said
lullaby...and goodnight everything is fine..it won't have an impact on
the United States..everything is fine..Sydley Austin Brown and Rute
has one major client..who's name you might know..Merk. Now it's
entirely possible that the NNFA just did a spectacular bad job of due
dilligence..or not..anyway...the report says everything is
fine..everything is dandy.there will be no problem..we've got DSHEA
-Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act Yeh, sure we do. Now lets
talk about Australia...remember five laws before congress to over turn
DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act
and you can write to congress on the website...Now congress uses the
multiplier of 13,000 to one...every email, fa,x phone
call...letter..don't write letters...they get decontaminated, they
never get to congress...every email, fax and phone call..counts as
13,000 constituants opinions..they figure that if you write a letter
or send an email there are 12,999 lazy who can't bother to get to the
computer terminal to do the same thing, but they feel the way you do.
interesting..that's power my friends...that's power..that's 13,000 to
one. Suppose we have a million people...suppose we have 10 million
people..supposed we have 100 million people...saying,,  Don't You
Dare!!!  Now congress has one rule...above all others.. anybody know
what it is? Get Re-elected! That's the primary rule, the prime
directive is to get re-elected. Now DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health
and Education Act was passed you may remember by  unaminous
congressional consent. Was that because one morning all members of
Congress woke up and said..."I See The Light..
Nutriants Are Better Than Drugs!! "... They said, oh, If I don't go
along with this..I'll never be re-elected to anything.....remember
critical mass...remember we were out on the streets and we were up on
our hind legs and we were making noise and we were rallying...and
rallying and we were writing letters and we said....Don't You Dare To
Take Away My Health Freedom!!! Remember?   Expect that we got fat dumb
and lazy and stopped protecting ourselves ...and we're in the same
place again.... exept that it's all food instead of just nutriants.
So! Thats point number One. Use the freedom mouse..ride the freedom
mouse. We've made it as easy as possible in the site...Sign up, for
the emails. I will never sell your information to anyone. I promise
you. Plus I will never rent it, I will never share it, you'll only get
an email from me, and we need you to know what's going on. So I''ll
send you email blasts. I'll send you things that you can do... or not.
It is your choice.. Get everybody you know..informed....now what else
can you do? Now we're going to write a series of alternative
guidelines. Everything bad in codes will have an alternative guideline
that turns it into a pro health guideline. What have we done with the
vitamin and mineral guideline?  You can see that because we have a
marked up copy that has their guideline crossed out and ours written
in on the website..It's right there. What we've done is turn it into a
guideline that mandates "bio-chemicaly individually determined optimal
health" and it's still Codex compliant...So we said..OK. now we need
congress to adopt this, and we need other countries in the world to
adopt this, so, Burt and I went to Washington DC and we met Daniel
Rorobocker from Orange County, who said to us, he's a
representative.... he said "I believe in pesticides...  " I went Oh..
He said I believe in GMO's I went Oh... He said " I believe in
Iradiation of food"  I went OH... But he said..."I believe in your
right to eat foods that have not been processed that way more than I
believe in those technologies... I will take this one on..." We said.
" OH that's really nice.." He said now..."We need a coaition..."  So
we went across the isle ....across the office building to see Peter
Defozio's staff from Oregan who would was a Liberal Democrat., whereas
 Rorobocker is a Libritarian Republican, and Defazio's on board and we
have large numbers of others who actually has never heard of Codex.
before we told them about it. Never heard of Codex ...we have called
every health legislative aid on congress.  What's you're
Congressmans's position on Codex?  and they've said "Wah????"...We
have spoken to the trade legislative assistants and asked. What's you
congressman's position on Codex?  Congress and trade legislative's
assistants and staff are not informed on Codex   ... and they all
said.. Wah Wah.. They don't know.  We had a congressional briefing set
up on the 20th of September, I was going to address Congress...and
tell them about it.. I thought that that was cool...10 days before it
became a briefing on something else.  Another Freedom Click ... you
need to write to Congress on the site and tell them that they need a
Congressional Briefing, by God and tell them you want me to brief
them. They don't know about Codex ..they've never heard of it any more
than the general public has heard of  Codex.... Gee How did that
happen?.. Who knows? Every negative part of Codex can be over turned
by guideline, a regulation or a standard, that is positive, So we need
your help because the United States leadership in this guideline and
all the positive guidelines that is to follow is what is going to
literally follow, is what is going to save the population of  the
planet earth and save your jobs and your children and your families
and mine. Thank you!!
Speach by Dr Rimal Laibox MD a director of the the National
Association of Nutrition Professionals (NANP) Produced by EON the
Ecological Options Network for Bauman College in cooperation with the
Natural Solutions Foundation and the National Association of Nutrition
Professionals (NANP) 2005
http://www.blacklistednews.com/?news_id=5768
http://www.codexcorp.com/
CODEX CORP:  Specialising in Corrections and Healthcare, it may be an
unusual combination but it works for us, our partners and customers
who want to keep a close control and watch on the use of health care
and nutritional products in the community and with our unique and far
reaching security and monitoring systems we will be able to tell our
customers instantly if anyone in the world is using nutrients and
minerals that are not Codex approved  and compliant, and have them
quickly detained and punished for not complying with Codex approved
and compliant products. With Codex we are proud to say that no one
will escape detection. Codex Corporation and its founders have over
100 years experience in this business including the management and
design of the concentration camps in Germany. Codex Corporation was
originally the multi billion  International Giant I G Farben.
A quick background on our founding company I G Farben and its
directors and managers will help convince you that as far as security,
nutrient and health care management, people management, corrections
management, Codex ( Formerly IG Farben) is the company you should
chose for any issues in Corrections and Heathcare Management. Codex
and its security management has the ability to make sure there is no
health freedom. not just in the USA but all over the world... and
Codex has the ability to make sure anyone that tries to think for a
minute they can get way with trying to have health freedom, will
quickly be caught, detained and punished by Codex's unique and far
reaching security and monitoring systems...The Codex Moto
is
"None will escape detection and punishment of the unauthorised use of
nutrients with Codex on the job....just look at out success record in
designing and managing the concentration camp in Germany....our
success record at Codex Corporation, formerly IG Farben in people,
healthcare and corrections management speaks for itself"
Codex Corporation's, formerly IG Farben's 100 year History in People,
Healthcare and Corrections Management
provided from Codex Alimentarius Speach by Dr Rimal Laibox MD of the
Natural Solutions Fioundation, Produced by EON the Ecological Options
Network for Bauman College in cooperation with the Natural Solutions
Foundation and the National Association of Nutrition Professionals
(NANP) 2005 www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
Dr Rimal Laibox is an experienced healthcare professional and has
studies Codex Corporation, formerly IG Farben's progess ov erthe last
decade to become  the leaders in People, Healthcare and Corrections
Management in the United States.
Codex and Nutricide
" Let me tell you about Codex Alimentarius, let me define it for you,
let me help you understand the enemy..and let me assure you that
absolutely nothing that I am going to tell you, is exagerated, is
interperlated, or is imagined. Every thing I am going to tell you is
documented. A great deal of it is documented on my website,
whichwww.HealthFreedomUSA.org. Let me back up and tell you that I have
been watching Codex come toward us for about the last decade. ,,, and
I have been watching the vote sin congress, which God help us is our
bastion of support and protection against Codex and I will explain why
that is. I have been watching the votes to protect our health freedom
dwindle, until finally in the 109th Congress, without a good deal of
activity, we didn't have the votes to protect us. I have been watching
Codex excellerate and I have been watching it expand, and I have been
getting more and more troubled. Let me give you a brief run down of
Codex then. After the second world war, the Nuremberg Tribunals were
held in which people who had committed crimes against humanity were
judged by the world community in a court run by the United States and
Britain...  and they were sentenced to terms in prison if they were
found guilty of crimes against humanity. In 1948 some of the people
who were found guilty of crimes against humanity on the basis of mass
murder, slavery and other crimes were the president and 24 board
members and executives  of a hugh industrial megalith called IG
Farben. Amazingly enough however, by 1951 all of them had already been
released, and and continuing to consult with German Corporations IG
Farben produced the gas used in the gas chambers Zyklon B, they
produced the steel for the death camps and the rail road line, they
produced the munitions, they produced chemicals, they produced all
kinds of stuff. The Nuremberg Tribunal disolved IG Farben into
companies such as  into BASF - Hoechst - Bayer They produced
pharmaceuticals.. a big big pharacuticals company.  So the president
of IG Farben Fritz ter Meer, the senior manager at IB Farben, was
convicted of crimes against Humanity on the basis of mass murder,
slavery and other crimes on 29th July, 1948. Although he co-operated
with SS and the Final Solution, Fritz ter Meer was sentenced to 7
years only in War Criminal Prison, but only served about three years
in prison, no more someone that bounces a business cheque for say
$1,000 and is charged for fraud in the $1,000 bounced cheque for it
not being honoured on presentation. Someone steals an apple can get 3
years in prison also, or if he or she stole the apple as a servant
they can receive 7 years in prison,
Now Fritz ter Meer is sort of an artistic fellow and he was the one
responsible for the slogan that people saw as they entered Autswitz,
usually for the last time, "Work Brings Freedom". Fritz ter Meer was a
creative sort of fellow. Fritz ter Meer was responsible for the slogan
that people saw as they entered Auschwitz-, usually for the last time,
 " Work brings  Freedom....a creative sort of fellow.
You will notice that the institutions that Fritz ter Meer worked for
an/or had shareholdings in as listed by Wikepedia are
Institutions IG Farben, Bayer, Codex Alimentarius
The Bayer executive Fritz ter Meer, sentenced to seven years in prison
by the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, was made head of the supervisory
board of Bayer in 1956, after his release.
Fritz ter Meer ( July 4 1884 – October 27 1967 ) was a German chemist.
He was the son of Edmund ter Meer the founder of a chemical company
that later became part of Bayer. Fritz ter Meer also worked for Bayer
and later IG Farben. He was involved in the planning of Monowitz
concentration camp, a satellite camp of KZ Auschwitz. He was sentenced
to seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948. After he was
released in 1951 he became supervisory board chairman
(Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He retired in 1961.
The Bayer company then became part of IG Farben, a conglomerate of
German chemical industries that formed a part of the financial core of
the German Nazi regime. IG Farben owned 42.5% of the company that
manufactured Zyklon B,[2] a chemical used in the gas chambers of
Auschwitz and other extermination camps. During World War II, the
company also extensively used slave labor in factories attached to
large slave labor camps, notably the sub-camps of the Mauthausen-Gusen
concentration camp[3]. When the Allies split IG Farben into several
pieces after World War II for involvement in organized Nazi war
crimes, Bayer re-appeared as an individual business. The Bayer
executive Fritz ter Meer, sentenced to seven years in prison by the
Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, was made head of the supervisory board
of Bayer in 1956, after his release.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_ter_Meer
Fritz ter Meer
undefined
Fritz ter Meer
Born June 4, 1884
Uerdingen, Germany
Died October 27, 1967 (aged 83)
Leverkusen, Germany
Nationality German
Institutions IG Farben, Bayer, Codex Alimentarius
Fritz ter Meer ( July 4 1884 – October 27 1967 ) was a German chemist.
He was the son of Edmund ter Meer the founder of a chemical company
that later became part of Bayer. Fritz ter Meer also worked for Bayer
and later IG Farben. He was involved in the planning of Monowitz
concentration camp, a satellite camp of KZ Auschwitz. He was sentenced
to seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948. After he was
released in 1951 he became supervisory board chairman
(Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He retired in 1961.
   * Heine, Jens Ulrich (1990). Verstand und Schicksal. Die Männer
der I.G. Farbenindustrie A.G. (1925-1945). Weinheim; New York:
VCH.ISBN 978-3527281442.
   * Codex Alimentarius Commission [1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_ter_Meer
Edmund ter Meer ( 1852 – November 5, 1931) was a German chemist who
discovered the ter Meer reaction and founded in 1877 the ter Meer dye
company in Uerdingen. After the fusion with the aniline factory of
Julius Weiler the Weiler-ter Meer company was formed. This company
later became part of the Bayer company. His son Fritz ter Meer also
became a chemist associated to the Bayer company.
Edmund ter Meer
Born 1852
Died  November 5, 1931 (aged 79)
Nationality German
Institutions Bayer
Known for ter Meer reaction
References
   * Max Bodenstein, H. Leuchs (1931). "Sitzung vom 16. November
1931". Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft 64 (11):
A211–A212. doi:10.1002/cber.19310641139.*
   * ter Meer Prize University Bonn
   * "Ter Meer family." Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online
   * Uerdingen industrial area history
So Fritz ter Meer was sitting in jail and he said "well, that didn't
work..what else can we do?   I've got it food..he who controls food
controls ....the world..."  Fritz ter Meer  got out of jail he went to
his  UN buddies and said "Have I got an idea for you..if we take over
food world wide..we have power world wide, and his UN buddies said.
"cool idea". So they created a Trade Commission. That's a very
powerful set of words... A Trade Commission....called the Codex
Alimentarius Commission
It is not a Public Health Commission..it is not a Consumer Protection
Commission....it is a Trade Commission. Trade is about what? Money!!
Trade is about Business!! Trade is about Profit!! Well they said in
1962 we're going to work towards total, global implimentation of Codex
Alimentarius on December 31st, 2009. Long Term.... and they set up a
bunch of committees.. committees on fish and fishery...fats and oil...
fruits and vegetables... ground nuts...nutritian  for special diatary
uses and so on. There are currently about 27 Codex committees, they
are regional organisations, there are task forces and so anf so on. So
it's ahugh beaurocratic mostrosety.it's emence. Codex has promogated
well over 4,000 guidelines, standards and regulations on
everything...everything which can legally be put into your mouth, with
the excpetion of Pharmaceuticals. they are not part of Codex. That is
an importand point. Now Codex standards have no legal weight
whatsoever. Zero. So who cares about them..their just standards...so
we are talking about an industry setting regulation organisation, but
if it has no legal standing .. who cares? Right!! Here's the history
of Codex Alimentarius before 1962.
Please note here that Fritz ter Meer  was sentenced to seven years
prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948 having been found guilty of
crimes against humanity on the basis of mass murder, slavery and other
crimes . After he was released in 1951 he became supervisory board
chairman (Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender) of the Bayer AG. He officiialy
retired as supervisory board chairman of Bayer AG in 1961 so he could
behind the scene concentrate of working with his UN buddies on
developing his idea of  setting up a syatem that will control the
whoole world's food supply under the code name Codex Alimentarius. It
would not look good publicly for Fritz ter Meer  who was sentenced to
only seven years prison by the Nuremberg Trials in 1948 having been
found guilty of crimes against humanity on the basis of mass murder,
slavery and other crimes, and only served about three years of his
sentence because of his powerful UN buddies, to be seen to be publicly
be involved with Codex Alimentarius. Here's the history of Codex
Alimentarius before 1962. The Austian Hungarian Empire said we need
rules by which the courts can rule on cases involving food.o we'll
have regulations and rules that the courts will enforce.... that's how
they get their way. That was called the Codex Alimentarius and  was
put into place around 1893 and lasted until the end of the Austrian
Hungarian Empire in the first world war. So the idea was there in the
Germanic tradition. We need rules..lots of rules...lots a
nd lots and lots of rules..we need a lot of rules... let's have rules
for everything to do with food. So it was a natural extention for the
German Industrialists to say we'll go back to the good old days of
Codex Alimentarius back  when we had them in Austrian Hungarian
Empire. Cool. So they started promilgating their rules and regulations
and they were voluntary. They were sort of guidlines. Now Codex
Alimentarius Commission is administered by the World Health
Oganisation (WHO) and the Food and Aricultural Organisation (FAO)  and
they fund Codex and they run it at the request of the United Nations
(UN). So the're mummy and daddy to Codex Alimentarius.  And that's
very interesting because they're supposed to be about health and food
world wide. Some conflicts of interest that we'll talk about. So
Codex started promilgating regulations and rules, and the way that's
done is that the committees work up a rule, a standard, a guideline,
or regulation an dthey get it to what's called a step 8 which is the
final step in their administrative process... and then it's presented
to the Codex Alimentarius Commission for ratification, like the
vitamin and mineral guidline was presented to the Codex Alimentarius
Commission on July 4th this past summer (2005). It was ratified... it
was approved by consensus...and it is now...despite the propaganda
that your going to hear if you every hear about it in the media... it
is now mandatory on any member country and the WTO, the World Trade
Organisation. Well what in the world do they have to do with it? And
the answer is everything. The World Trade Organisation you see
accepted Codex when the world organisation was formed in 1994. They
said, "well how are we going to decide trade disputes around food if
we don't have a set of rules. I know..we'll accept the Codex
Alimentarius rules and all the members of the WTO will...willl world
wide...get ready for an Orwellian Term will harmonise with are
standards, with the codex standards.. I suggest you capitalise the
first four letters in your mind ...HARM... onise ... everybody is
supposed to .HARM... onise... with Codex....   and when they HARM...
onise with Codex, then if the get pulled into the WTO Dispute
Resolution Process they have a chance of winning because here's the
kicker... are you ready for this one ...  if two countries go into the
World Trade Organisation Dispute Resolution Process  and one of then
is Codex compliant, and one of them is not Codex Compliant.. the one
that is Codex Compliant automaticlly wins regardless of the merit of
the case.  People are using Codex Compliant in a much bigger economic
battle. So every couunty in the world is racing to do what?   Become
Codex Compliant. So in the United States...the situation is OK ..how
do we become Codex compliant when we have laws that protect us. You
have to remember that Codex does not serve consumer well being. Codex
does not serve what I call the five Bigs...Big Pharma Big Chema Big
Biotechna Big AgriBiz and Bid Medica ,,,little me and little you are
not served by Codex, in the least, so before we go forward and talk
about the rest of  what has to happen, let's ask what Codex does?
You probably all know about the vitamin and mineral guidline that was
ratified on July 4th ( 2005). You may not kow that although it is said
that CODEX regulations guidlines and standards that have been ratified
are volantary....That Are Not Voluntary...That is known as a lie!!!
They are mandatory..but  thye ar enot fully mandatory until December,
31st 2009. They're sort of kinda a little bit mandatory now. and
they're totally mandatory then. So what does Codex do? Why do I care
enough about Codex to close my practice and stop treating patients who
came to me from around the world..to help them regain their health and
be radiantly well with non toxic means which is a very satisfying
thing to do.. I love it...it also provided me with an income...  that
was nice. OK...;why am I concerned enough, let's talk about the
mineral and vitamin guidline first. In 1994 DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments
Health and Education Act was passed which classifies nutrient and
herbs as foods. As foods you can set no upper limit on them. You
cannot set an upper limit on lettuce...lamb or  roodibaggers.. and
similarily you cannot set an upper limit in vitamin C.. echanasia...
ginko bi loba ... vitamin D ...    to nutrients is freely given to
us.. We are allowed to have any nutients we want because.... this is a
very important point... under common law ...  What's not forbidden is
permitted.... Codex on the other hand  ... is a Napoleonic Code
...What's not permitted is forbidden law system... under Napoleonic
Code ...anything not permitted is forbidden ...  that's called a
positive list .... so vitamins and nutrients and minerals ... in 1994
we passed DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act was
passed which classifies nutrient and herbs as foods... we can have as
much of them as we want thatis our business... in 1994 Codex with no
notice here in this country whatsoever.. prepared nutrents ... put on
you intellectual seatbelts...declared nutrients to be toxins. they're
poisens ... dangerous Industrail poisens ... AS POISENS ... WE HAVE OT
BE PROTECTED FROM THEM ...how  do you protect someone form poisens ...
you use toxicology ... you use a science called risk assessment ..lt's
take a primeron risk assessment  .. first you take the substance thats
dangerous and feed it to animals and the dosage that kills 50% of them
..that's called the LD 50 ... and you exstrapulate what the LD 50 for
human being might be.,,then you go down to the other end of the dosage
range ...and you start feeding ittie bittie tiny bits of it ..   to
test animals ... and you come up with the largest possible dose
...the maximum  permissable upper limit  ... that can be fed ot an
animal before a discernable impact  is shown ..OK ... no discernable
impact .... then you divide that by 100 ... that's how they do it in
risk assessment ... and now you've got a safety margin ...  so you
have one 100th of the dose that can be given with no discernable
impact ...   OK nutrients! Under Codex!!!    Not only are limited ot
those nutriants on the positive list ...and  we  anticipate there will
be 18 of them .. and they do not include.  .  CoQ10  Glucosamine ...
cundroyton sulfate ...thye do include floride ... which to my
knowledge as a Physician has absolutely no biological benefit
whatsoever. ... but it does make people complasent ... floride was
first used in the Goolog  ...because it was discovered that prisoners
who were fed floridated water ...  were complasent ...  and you could
do anything you wanted to them ...  thye were easy  to manage ... so
you have 18 nutrients  ... you have ittie bittie tiny winy doses ...
that are determined scientifically to have no effect ...  on any human
being  now in this country we have a problem ... we have ...DSHEA
-Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act ... we have to get rid of
DSHEA -Dietry Suppliments Health and Education Act  in order to  HARM
...on..ise ... with Codex... that part of Codex anyway .... so how do
we get rid of DSHEA ...  we attack it legislatively of course .. and
...  there are five.. count them.. five currently before Congress ...
designed to overturn ..gut ... invalidate .. and otherwise get rid of
DSHEA ...  because once DSHEA is gone we can HARM...on..ise with the
vitamin and mineral guideline   ...  so what we are talking about is
....  waking up one morning to find that high potency therapudiclly
effective clinicly significant nutrients are illegal ....
(Codex want to make nutients illegal ) in the way that Heroin is
illegal ..not available with a prescription ... Illegal ...  If these
nutrients have any impact on  the Human body ...  they are illegal ...
that's just the vitamin and mineral guidline ... let's talk about milk
.... we have    recombinant bovine  growth hormone and now we can
choose milk with it and milk without it ... butter with it or butter
without it ..right ...not under Codex ... because under Codex ...
every dairy cow ...  on the planet must be treated with Monsanto's
recombinant bovine hormone.... furthermore ..under Codex ... every
animal used for food on the planent whether it has fins, feet or
feathers ... every animal on the planet must be treated with sub
clinical antibiotics and and must be treated with exogenous growth
hormones ... Codex requires (mandates) that all food be irradiated
unless it's eaten locally and raw. including organic food of course
... so is it organis afterwards... well of course the organic
standards are incredibly low ...the organic  standards allow a farmer
to use vetinary drugs including exogenous growth hormone, anti biotics
etc ....on animals and then at his whim, reclassify them as organic
...  but farmers are our friends  and they would never do
that...right!!!  Right!!  Codex sets limits for the dangerous
industrial chemicals that you can have in your food..and the limits
are increditbly high ... go to Codex Alimentarius Commission ... look
at the toxins and vetinary  Chemicals  and the levels that are set.,,
they are terrifying ot me ..Terrifying ... the names of the Chemicals
that are permitted and the amounts of the chemicals that are permitted
are terrifying to me ...Why am I terrified?  Well perhaps I am just a
cowardly person ...it's possible... think about this.. in 2001,
"The levels that are permitted, developed and maintained by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission, by the are incredibly high in toxins and the
levels that are set the names and amounts of the chemicals are
terrifying..." states Dr Rimal Laibox MD a director of the National
Association of Nutrition Professionals (NANP)
In 2001, 176 Countries including the USA got together and stated that
there were 12 really bad dangerous organic chemicals  Chemicals.
They're called "Pops".,,"Persistent Organic Pollutants. There are a
lot of them, but there are 12 that are so bad that, nobody could
disagree that those 12 Pops had to be banned worldwide.Nine of the 12
worst organic Chemicals known are pesticides...not
surprisingly..because they kill things..and of course we have many
processes and enzime systems that are very much like insects and other
pests so, they are not too good for us..but Codex has different
ideas...Codex has brought back 7 of the 9 forbidden POPS, that 176
countries  banned
worldwide,,,Dieldrin..Aldrin...hexaclorabenzine...etc..and the food
that is imported from other countries that contains these substances
can not be stopped at our borders..because otherwise it would be God
Forbid, a Trade Violation...that's how Codex works..Codex, according
to the World Trade Organisation  (WTO) and the Food and Agricultural
Organisation's (FAO) joint projections..now i didn't  make this
up...please if you have unfastened you're Intellectual Seat
Belts...put them back on again...if you do the numbers in the who FAO
projections in their report headed Diet Nutrition and prevention of
Chronic Diseases..that just the vitamin and mineral guideline
alone...when it goes into global implimentation..on December 31st,
2009...will result in a minimum of 3 billion (that's B... Bad... Big
Billion) deaths - one billion through simple starvation..those folks
who die ar not particularily economicly successful from the point of
view of the Corporations..when you're starving to death, how much good
can you do, when the issue is that how much can you buy.. not a lot..
forget them..but Hah..but the next  two billion...they will die from
the preventable diseases (two billion people will die from diseases of
under nutrition)..of under nutrition// cancer.. the single most
profitable condition know to human kind..CardiovacularDisease..a good
second...diabetis...pritty good producer of income...and a whole host
of other preventable diseases. Who will die? Who Knows? Who Will Live?
Probably those people who are wealthy enough and powerful enough to
have their own pushers of clean food and nutriants..that's who will
live!!!  You and I? ..probably not...our children? probably not...our
grand children?...probably not!!! So we're talking about food
regulations that are in fact are the legalisation of the mandated
toxicity and under nutrition..It will become illegal..if there is a
famine...whereecer there is a famine...to ship high nutriant density
biscuits to that country.. and it will be illegal to distribute
them...that's what we're talking about!!! Codex is Big and It's
Bad..but it's not invunerable. So the point is...that we have to
protect ourselves, and I believe we have to regain global leadership,
which we have lost. surrendered..squandered..ah..sold..we have
sold..just joining the World Trade Organisation (WTO), surended our
sovereinghty...however as it just happens I have a team of
Constitutional Lawyers..looking at the following question...Are we
members of the WTO? Cause if you remember form High School
Civics..they way you get a treaty to be a real treaty..is ot have it
ratified by a two thirds majority of the Senate...and the way we got
into the WTO was, they passed a law allowing Bill Clinton to fast
track us into the WTO. "That's Not A Treaty"...the USA is not legally
not a member of the WTO..now that's a piece of the battle...Someone
says from the audience.."you will have to tell George.." we will tell
George Bush , but George Bush will not be relevant when we do tell
him..ah..so that's a piece of it, but  that's not going to save our
lives right now because..do you know..picture in your mind...a wasp or
a bee trap..were ot insect voluntarily goes down the funnel and then
can't get up out of the trap again..that's Codex..a regular law can be
over turned..it can be repealed...it can be corrected..by  another
piece of legislation..but once we become Codex Compliant...in nay
area...as long as we are members of the WTO..it can never be
repealed...because we have lost the sovereignty to become un_codex
compliant as long as we are in the WTO, so it's like going down that
funnel and not being able to get back out of it. So it's very
important that we make sure that we do not become codex
compliant...but we will be hit with all those bis trade sanctions from
the countries that are codex compliant,, so that the country will be
destroyed economically..right..no remember surprise..one of the
principles of war...remember mass..where you take your strength
against the enemies weekness ads week points. Well here's what we've
done.  We have a team of lawyers, who have spent hundreds of hours
with us pro bono..these are good guy lawyers...these two gentlemen and
we have spent hundreds of hours studying Codex, understanding it's
weekness..it's weeknesses..a lot of weeknesses.. and constructing a
strategy..which 'will take the succer down'....It will take it
down...but I need you...you are people that other people come to about
safe healthy food..and nutrients...
National Association of Nutritrional Professionals NANP 2005
Conference..you are ready made disenimation points..you are the
thousand million.... hundred million points of light. Here's what is
happening/ Every country in the world has ot be Codex compliant in
order not to get hit by WTO trade sanctions, as I told you of their
members of Codex and the WTO..and there are a few countries that are
not, but I can guarantee you they are not of any major significance.
So. the question is...What is Codex Compliance mean?
Well, most people in most countries..most legislators believe that
they have to adopt  as their national standard on that particular
subject...what Codex ratified. But that's not the case, any more than
we're in the WTO. That's not the case either. What is means is that
the format..the issues and the subjects..covered by a Codex
Guideline...Standard or Regulation..have to be addressed in the
country's guideline standard or regulation on the same topic. So what
we have done is create the first of many alternative Codex guidelines.
You can go to our website www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and you will see a
little button on the upper right handside that says sign this citzen's
partition. Now to briefly digress the citizen's partition is not like
a grocery store partition that you sign and bring to somebody and say
'I have 200,000 signatures and they dump it in the waist basket,
because it is in their mind, it is one signature that you and your
friends wrote 200,000 names. No...it is a legal challenge to the
policy of the United States Government on Codex. It's called a
citizen's partition. It's a legal challenge..We're suing the United
States Government..saying what you're doing is illegal folks...let us
tell you how..we want hearings of fact...we want redress..we want
correction..if we get what we want//that's dandy...if we don't get
what we want we have gone through a process..exhausting administrative
remedies.. we have made the case ripe for court.
So Ok, I need you and everybody you know, to sign this citizen's
partition..sating this is a bad policy on mass..and you do this on the
web..and you will see the instructions and we present the thousands
and thousands of pages that we print out that have people's signatures
to the US Codex Office and to the FDA (Federal Drug Administration)
and they don't like that at all..but that's OK. However, this
time..this is the second amendment of the citizen's partition that
we're asking you to sign. This time the revised vitamin and mineral
guideline is part of it. It is part of the law suit saying this needs
to be US Policy. The more voices that say..this is what I want...and
you work for me..mr and mrs beaureaucrat and mr and mrs congressman
and mr and mrs senator. The more voices the more weight. So step
number one is read and sign the citizen's partition. Step number two
diseminate the information..the weblink. put it out in your office.
get your patients...your friends and neighbours..your suppliers..to
sign the citizens partition and your suppliers..the companies you
use,, are going to tell you that you're out of your minds...they will
tell you that Codex is not a problem..and the will tell you..anyone
here have a dog..OK...dog owners know that you ask a dog to heal..sit
down...stay..that's codex in this country and worldwide, because the
more people that are in Codex comma, the less trouble they have
getting this through...any here of the NNFA.the National Nutrition
Foods Association..everybody's heard of the NNFA. Did you know that
the members of the NNFA and not just health foods stores and
manufacturers..but include companies with names you may have
heard...Pfizer ...Merck...Monsanto...Bayer...BASF..Archer Daniels
Midland..Glaxo....Aires..clyne welcome you get the idea..why?..because
after Tochet was passed and the nutriant business virgined..the
pharasutical folks who are not dumb, said there is gold in them there
pills..and they brought the means of production of many many many
companies.. and they brought the companies themselves..so there in the
nutriant business. What better way to kill the nutriant business,
which is not nearly as profitable as the toxic chemical drug business,
than to take it over. It works everytime..right!! CRN...anybody here
know about CRN..Council for Responsablr Nutritian.  Same
members...they hav lots of multi level marketing companies...same
members..OK..and their serving their members needs. CRN are
saying,,,Yeh...Codex is coming..Codex is going to protect us from
those dangerous vitamins and minerals and herbs and CRN is saying it's
fine...go to sleep lulaby and goodnight..and everything is fine...and
they use a report that they commissoned at a reputed cost of
$800,000..a report prepared by Sydley Austin Brown and Rute..a law
firm in Washington...wrote a report for them..and it said
lullaby...and goodnight everything is fine..it won't have an impact on
the United States..everything is fine..Sydley Austin Brown and Rute
has one major client..who's name you might know..Merk. Now it's
entirely possible that the NNFA just did a spectacular bad job of due
dilligence..or not..anyway...the report says everything is
fine..everything is dandy.there will be no problem..we'ver got dishet(
Touchet?) Yeh, sure we do. Now lets talk about Australia...remember
five laws befofore congress overturned dishet (?)
and you can write to congress on the website...Now congress uses the
multiplier of 13,000 to one...every email fax phone
call...letter..don't write letters...they get decontaminated, they
never get to congress...every email. fax and phone call..counts as
13,000 constituants opinions..they figure that if you write a letter
or send an email there are 12,999 lazy who can't bother to get to the
computer terminal to do the same thing, but they feel the way you do.
interesting..that's power my friends...that's power..that's 13,000 to
one. Suppose we have a million people...suppose we have 10 million
people..supposed we have 100 million people...saying,,  Don't You
Dare!!!  Now congress has one rule...above all others.. anybody know
what it is? Gte Re-elected! That's the primary rule,, the prime
directive is to get re-elected. No w touchet was passed you may
remember by  unaminous congressional consent. Was that because one
morning all members of Congress woke up and said..."I See Th Light..
Nutriants Are Better Than Drugs!! "... They said, oh, If I don't go
along with this..I'll never be re-elected to anything.....remember
critical mass...remember we were out on the streets and we were up on
our hind legs and we were making noise and we were rallying...and
rallying and we were writing letters and we said....Don't You Dare To
Take Away My Health Freedom!!! Remember?   Expect that we got fat dumb
and lazy and stopped protecting ourselves ...and we're in the same
place again.... exept that it's all food instead of just nutriants.
So! Thats point number One. Use the freedom mouse..ride the freedom
mouse. We've made it as easy as possible in the site...Sign up, for
the emails. I will never sell your information to anyone. I promise
you. Plus I will never rent it, I will never share it, you'll only get
an email from me, and wee need you to know what's going on. So I''ll
send you email blasts. I'll send you things that you can do... or not.
It is your choice.. Gte everybody you know..informed....now what else
can you do? Now we're going to write a series of alternative
guidelines. Everything bad in codes will have am alternative guideline
that turns it into a pro health guideline. What have wee done with the
vitamin and mineral guideline?  You can see that because we have a
mark up copy that has their guideline crossed out and ours written in
on the website..It's right there. What we've done is turn it into a
guideline that mandates "bio-chemicaly individually determined optimal
health" and it;s still Codex compliant...So we said..OK. now we need
congress to adopt this, and we need other countries in the world to
adopt this, so, Burt and I went to Washington DC and we met Daniel
Rorobocker from Orange County, who said to us, he's a
representative.... he said "I believe in pesticides...  " I went Oh..
He said I believe in GMO's I went Oh... He said " I believe in
Iradiation of food"  I went OH... "But he said...I believe in your
right to eat foods that have not been processed that way more than I
believe in those technologies... I will take this one..." We said. "
OH that's really nice.." He said now..."We need a coilition..."  So we
wnet across the ilse across he office building to see Peter Defozio's
staff from Oregan who would was a Liberal Democrat., whereas
Rorobocker is a Libritarian Republican, and Defazio's on board and we
have large numbers of others who actually has never heard of Codex.
before we told them about it. Never heard of Codex,,,we have called
ever health legislative aid on congress.  what's you're Congressmans's
position on Codex?  and they've said "Wah????"...We have spoken to the
trade legislative assistants and asked. What's you congressman's
position on Codex?  Congress and trade legislative's assistants and
staff are not informed on Codex   ... and they all said.. Wah Wah..
They don't know.  We had a congressional briefing set up on the 20th
of September, I was going to address Congress...and tell them about
it.. I thought that that was cool...10 days before it became a
briefing on something else.  Another Freedom Click ... you need to
write to Congress on the site and tell them that they need a
Congressional Briefing, by God and tell them you want me to brief
them. They don't know about Codex ..they've never heard of it any more
than the general public has heard of  Codex Gee How did that happen..
who knows? Every negative part of Codex can be over turned by
guideline, a regulation or a standard, that is positive, So we need
your help because the United States leadership in this guideline and
all the positive guidelines that is to follow is what is going to
literally follow is what is going to save the population of  the
planet earth and save your jobs and your children and your families
and mine. Thank you!!
Speach by Dr Rimal Laibox MD a director of the the National
Association of Nutrition Professionals (NANP) Produced by EON the
Ecological Options Network for Bauman College in cooperation with the
Natural Solutions Foundation and the National Association of Nutrition
Professionals (NANP) 2005
Codex Alimentarius summarized in 7 pointsPublished on 09-30-2009
Codex Alimentarius is scheduled for full global implementation on
December 31st, 2009, and not a word has been spoken in main stream
media about this threat to humanity.
The principle of self medication with herbal/vitamin/mineral food
supplements would be restricted to ‘prescription only’ status, if the
Codex Alimentarius is applied in the UK and elsewhere, particularly
the USA.
(UK only) Since the NHS priorities are ill health diagnosis and
treatment, the good health preservation that supplements provide will
be inaccessible to the majority of our population and the cost to the
NHS will increase.
According to the projections based on figures from the World Health
Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), a
minimum of 3 billion people will die from the Codex mandated vitamin
and mineral guidelines alone.
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Vitamins/
Deadline to sign the petition = 5th September 2009
Codex in Depth: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=161
Codex Alimentarius (World Food Code)
Summarized in 7 points
1) Started in 1962 by UN, Imposed by WTO Sanctions
Codex Alimentarius was created in 1962 as a trade Commission by the UN
to control the international trade of food. Its initial intentions may
have been altruistic but it has been taken over by corporate
interests, most notably the pharmaceutical, pesticide, biotechnology
and chemical industries.
Codex Alimentarius is backed up by the crippling trade sanctions of
the World Trade Organization (WTO). Any non Codex-compliant nation
would face huge economic punishment since they would automatically
lose in any food-trade dispute with a Codex compliant country.
2) “Nutrients are Toxins” Is Junk Science
Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) has two committees which impact nutrition.
One of them, the “Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special
Dietary Uses” (CCNFSDU), is chaired by Dr. Rolf Grossklaus, a
physician who believes that nutrition has no role in health. This is
the “top-guy” for Codex nutritional policy, and he has stated that
“nutrition is not relevant to health”.
As unbelievable as it may sound, Dr. Grossklaus actually declared
nutrients to be toxins in 1994 and instituted the use of toxicology
(Risk Assessment) to prevent nutrients from having any impact on
humans who take supplements! It is worth mentioning that Dr.
Grossklaus happens to own the Risk Assessment company advising CCNFSDU
and Codex on this issue. This company makes money when its toxicology
services are used for the “assessment” of nutrients. Here in the U.S.
we call that a “conflict of interest”.
Codex is made up of thousands of standards and guidelines. One of
them, the Vitamin and Mineral Guideline (VMG), is designed to permit
only ultra low doses of vitamins and minerals (and make clinically
effective nutrients illegal). How can the VMG restrict dosages of
vitamins and minerals? By using Risk Assessment (toxicology) to assess
nutrients.
While Risk Assessment is a legitimate science (it is a branch of
toxicology), it is the wrong science for assessing nutrients! In fact,
in this context, it is actually junk science. Biochemistry, the
science of life processes, is the correct science for assessing
nutrients. Codex Alimentarius treats nutrients as toxins, which is
literally insane.
Nutrients are not toxins – they are essential for life.
undefined
No matter what Codex Alimentarius officials say to convince you that
Risk Assessment is a “science-based” approach to nutrients, it is not.
And it is worth repeating that Dr. Grossklaus, the head of Codex
Alimentarius, owns the Risk Assessment company advising CCNFSDU and
Codex on the “benefit” of using Risk Assessment to assess nutrients.
3) Not Consumer Protection – That’s Propaganda
Contrary to the propaganda, Codex Alimentarius has nothing to do with
consumer protection. Nothing! Codex is about the economic ambitions of
multi-national corporations, in particular, the pharmaceutical
industry.
Using their multi billion-dollar marketing budgets, these industries
have launched a massive media propaganda campaign to paint Codex
Alimentarius as a benevolent tool of “consumer protection”, as well as
to negatively taint the image of natural health options and mislead
people to fear them as “dangerous”, so they will take drugs (which
really are dangerous). Natural health products and options have an
amazing safety record and are remarkably effective, especially when
compared to pharmaceutical drugs.
Unfortunately, one-time defenders of health freedom such as National
Nutritional Foods Association (NNFA) and Council for Responsible
Nutrition (CRN) have joined the propaganda bandwagon and are spreading
false information saying that Codex Alimentarius is either “harmless”
or benevolent “consumer protection”. Neither is true.
The membership of these one-time defenders of health freedom has
become permeated by people from the pharmaceutical industry (for
example, CRN counts as its members corporations such as Monsanto® and
Bayer®).
4) Codex: Serious Threat to Health and Health Freedom
If Codex Alimentarius is implemented in the United States of America,
therapeutic dosages of vitamins and minerals (and all other nutrients
soon to follow) will become unavailable because they will literally
become illegal.
Here’s how it would work, in a nut-shell:
Due to the junk science use of Risk Assessment (toxicology) to assess
supposedly toxic nutrients, a false belief is being engineered saying
that “nutritional supplements are dangerous to people’s health”.
Using this false belief generates calls to “protect” people from these
“toxic” nutrients. After the calls come the bills to set ultra low
permissible dosages (remember, nutrients are deemed “dangerous toxins”
under this false belief). If enough of us and our Congressional
delegates buy this nonsense, we and Congress would blindly comply with
Codex Alimentarius’ VMG. And blind compliance is what the industries
behind Codex Alimentarius intend.
Blind compliance goes hand-in-hand with lack of activism. This lack of
activism allows our protective laws, classifying nutrients as foods
with no upper limits (such as DSHEA), to be easily repealed and
replaced with draconian laws to classify nutrients as toxins. And
“harmonization” with the pro-illness, pro-pharmaceutical industry
Vitamin and Mineral Guideline is there to fill the void.
Only intentionally ineffective, ultra low dose supplements would be
legal, with or without a prescription, on the VMG list. If enough
people do not take action, we can expect to watch nutritional
supplement manufacturers and, thus health food stores, to go out of
business, in a domino effect. The only player left standing would be
Big Pharma.
Therapeutic grade vitamins, minerals, and amino acids would be
eliminated from the marketplace (although a few low-dose supplements
would be allowed by Codex, as a symbolic measure to avoid suspicion
about their ulterior motive).
Natural health professionals would lose the tools of their trade
(nutritional supplements) and health conscious people would be unable
to choose natural health options for health promotion and disease
treatment.
And that is, in a nutshell, how Codex Alimentarius is poised to make
Natural and Nutritional Medicine (NNM) disappear from the legal health
world and go underground. Who benefits? Big Pharma.
It would take a few years for the above scenarios to be feasible
(Codex Alimentarius is meant to go into full global effect by 2010).
The slower the process takes, the less alarmed people will be. That’s
probably the logic of the architects of Codex Alimentarius.
5) Serves Economic Interests of Sickness Industries Through WTO and
Napoleonic Code
More and more people are turning to natural health products globally.
The “wellness” trend is a major trend in today’s society. The more
natural health products people use, the fewer drugs they buy. The
pharmaceutical industry, which is part of the “Sickness Industry”,
fears the inevitable shift toward natural health care.
Instead of accepting the will of the people and rethinking the future
of the pharmaceutical industry, the industry has decided upon an
unethical course of action: the use of deception and deceit to
eliminate natural health products completely.
Codex Alimentarius is a shrewd vehicle for protecting the
pharmaceutical industry from the loss of income it stands to suffer
due to the inevitable growth of natural healthcare.
Codex Alimentarius is the resistance of the dinosaurs to
inevitability: the burgeoning desire of humanity for a healthier,
saner, and more sustainable way of life.
The World Trade Organization (WTO) intends to force Codex Alimentarius
upon the nations of the world, including the U.S. This would be done
under the threat of massive economic sanctions if WTO-countries do not
comply with Codex Alimentarius.
Furthermore, Codex is based in the Napoleonic Code, not Common Law.
That means that under Codex Alimentarius, anything not explicitly
permitted is forbidden. Under Common Law, we hold that anything not
explicitly forbidden is permitted. The difference is the difference
between health freedom and health tyranny. Codex Alimentarius would be
able to ban supplements by default.
6) DSHEA Protects America From Codex Alimentarius
The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA, 1994), an
American law classifying our supplements and herbs as foods (which can
have no upper limit set on their use), was passed by unanimous
Congressional consent following massive grass-roots support organized
by health food stores. Millions of American activists told Congress,
in no uncertain terms:
“Protect nutritional supplements as foods or we will remove you from office”.
Congress listened and carried out the will of the people.
DSHEA appropriately classifies nutritional supplements as foods which
can have no upper limits set on their use. DSHEA recognizes that
people use nutrients safely to deal with their individually differing
needs for nutrients. The concept of biochemical individuality means
that people have different needs for nutrients at different times. Are
nutrients toxins? No, they are not toxins. They are substances
essential to prevent, treat and cure any chronic condition, in
differing doses at different times in different people.
DSHEA protects the US from Codex Alimentarius’ deadly Vitamin and
Mineral Guideline. We must reach our Congressional members, educate
them about the facts on Codex Alimentarius and direct them to vote
against anything that would threaten DSHEA.
Congress holds the keys to our health freedom. And it is their job to
listen to us. Let’s not allow cynicism to tell us otherwise. We did it
for DSHEA in 1994. We can do it again this year.
7) Your Action is Needed Now!
DSHEA is under significant legislative attack right now. Your
letter-writing is crucial: if the members of Congress know that voting
against health freedom means losing their jobs come election time,
they will listen. Our job is to make sure they get the message loud
and clear. Take action via our 3 easy steps and send personalized
emails to Congress right now.
After taking action on HealthFreedomUSA.org, consider getting together
with others in your area and visit your Congressional members in their
home offices. If we wait, we lose our health freedoms. Once we
“HARMonize” with Codex, by the way, we no longer have the right, while
we belong to the WTO, to repeal or change that “HARMonization”!
Conclusion
The objective of the pro-Codex Alimentarius multi nationals is to
“boil the frog slowly” so that we do not wake up to it in time to
avoid Codex.
Once we have “HARMonize” to Codex Alimentarius, as long as we are in
the WTO, we cannot amend or change what we’ve been “HARMonize” to.
Codex Alimentarius will go into global implementation by December 31,
2009, unless We, the People, avert it. We must act now because right
now, with $758 Million spent on declared Congressional lobbying by Big
Pharma last year, there are members of Congress who are trying to
overturn DSHEA and allow Pharma-friendly free reign for Codex. If
protective laws like DSHEA are destroyed, the sanctioning power of the
autocratic WTO kicks in, and it will be impossible to get out from
under Codex Alimentarius. We can protect our access to high potency
nutrients and stave off an adulterated food supply only by putting
pressure on Congress.
If you would like to take action to try and stop Codex Alimentarius
<please click here (USA)>, If you would like more in-depth information
about Codex Alimentarius <please click here>
If you would like to take action to try and stop Codex Alimentarius
you can sign a petition to Gordon Brown <please click here (UK)> ~
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Vitamins/ ~ Deadline to sign the
petition = 5th September 2009
If you would like more in-depth information about Codex Alimentarius
<please click here>
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=157
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=161
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=183
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=160
http://www.therapure.com/codex.htm
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Vitamins/
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhApQ3QkG0Q&feature=related
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5266884912495233634
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2D4-noTiCg
http://www.naturalnews.com/026731_CODEX_food_health.html
http://www.anhcampaign.org/campaigns/codex
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Alimentarius
Stop Codex Alimentarius and Protect Health Freedom!
Unless stated otherwise everything in this note is © 2009 by Natural
Solutions Foundation
The Natural Solutions Foundation is a non-profit organization founded
to protect and promote health freedom in the USA.
Outide links are not covered by this © (rights of content creators respected).
http://www.blacklistednews.com/?news_id=5768
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Alimentarius
The Codex Alimentarius (Latin for "food code" or "food book") is a
collection of internationally recognized standards, codes of practice,
guidelines and other recommendations relating to foods, food
production and food safety. Its name derives from the Codex
Alimentarius Austriacus.[1] Its texts are developed and maintained by
the Codex Alimentarius Commission, a body that was established in 1963
by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
and the World Health Organization (WHO). The Commission's main aims
are stated as being to protect the health of consumers and ensure fair
practices in the international food trade. The Codex Alimentarius is
recognized by the World Trade Organization as an international
reference point for the resolution of disputes concerning food safety
and consumer protection.[2][3]
Scope
The Codex Alimentarius officially covers all foods, whether processed,
semi-processed or raw, but far more attention has been given to foods
that are marketed directly to consumers. In addition to standards for
specific foods, the Codex Alimentarius contains general standards
covering matters such as food labeling, food hygiene, food additives
and pesticideresidues, and procedures for assessing the safety of
foods derived from modern biotechnology. It also contains guidelines
for the management of official (i.e., governmental) import and export
inspection and certification systems for foods.
The Codex Alimentarius is published in Arabic, Chinese, English,
French and Spanish. Not all texts are available in all languages.
   * Food labelling (general standard, guidelines on nutrition
labelling, guidelines on labelling claims)
   * Food additives (general standard including authorized uses,
specifications for food grade chemicals)
   * Contaminants in foods (general standard, tolerances for specific
contaminants including radionuclides, aflatoxins and other mycotoxins)
   * Pesticide and veterinary chemical residues in foods (maximum
residue limits)
   * Risk assessment procedures for determining the safety of foods
derived from biotechnology (DNA-modified plants, DNA-modified
micro-organisms, allergens)
   * Food hygiene (general principles, codes of hygienic practice in
specific industries or food handling establishments, guidelines for
the use of the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point or “HACCP”
system)
   * Methods of analysis and sampling
[edit]Specific standards
   * Meat products (fresh, frozen, processed meats and poultry)
   * Fish and fishery products (marine, fresh water and aquaculture)
   * Milk and milk products
   * Foods for special dietary uses (including infant formulae and baby foods)
   * Fresh and processed vegetables, fruits, and fruit juices
   * Cereals and derived products, dried legumes
   * Fats, oils and derived products such as margarine
   * Miscellaneous food products (chocolate, sugar, honey, mineral water)
Controversy
The controversy over the Codex Alimentarius relates to a perception
that it is a mandatory standard for food - including vitamin and
mineral supplement - safety. Supporters of the Codex Alimentarius say
that it is a voluntary reference standard for food and that there is
no obligation on countries to adopt Codex standards as a member of
either Codex or any other international trade organization. From the
point of view of its opponents, however, one of the main causes of
concern is that the Codex Alimentarius is recognized by the World
Trade Organization as an international reference standard for the
resolution of disputes concerning food safety and consumer
protection.[2][3] Proponents argue that the use of Codex Alimentarius
during international disputes does not exclude the use of other
references or scientific studies as evidence of food safety and
consumer protection.
It is reported that in 1996 the German delegation put forward a
proposal that no herb, vitamin or mineral should be sold for
preventive or therapeutic reasons, and that supplements should be
reclassified as drugs.[4] The proposal was agreed, but protests halted
its implementation.[4] The 28th Session of the Codex Alimentarius
Commission was subsequently held July 4 - July 9, 2005.[5] Among the
many issues discussed were the "Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral
Food Supplements"[6], which were adopted during the meeting as new
global safety guidelines.[7] This text has been the subject of
considerable controversy, in part because many member countries may
choose to regulate dietary supplements as therapeutic goods or
pharmaceuticals or by some other category. The text does not seek to
ban supplements, but subjects them to labeling and packaging
requirements, sets criteria for the setting of maximum and minimum
dosage levels, and requires that safety and efficacy are considered
when determining ingredient sources. The United Nations' Food and
Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO)
have stated that the guidelines are "to stop consumers overdosing on
vitamin and mineral food supplements." The Codex Alimentarius
Commission (CAC) has said that the guidelines call "for labelling that
contains information on maximum consumption levels of vitamin and
mineral food supplements." The WHO has also said that the Guidelines
"ensure that consumers receive beneficial health effects from vitamins
and minerals." [8]
Similarities have been noted between the EU's Food Supplements
Directive and the Codex Alimentarius Guidelines for Vitamin and
Mineral Supplements.[9]
Texas Republican Rep. Ron Paul has said that the Central American Free
Trade Agreement "increases the possibility that Codex regulations will
be imposed on the American public." [10]
Additional controversy has been expressed by proponents of
ecologically and socially sustainable agriculture and food systems,
such as the Slow Food movement[11], who view the Codex Alimentarius as
antithetical to this goal. According to the Manifesto on the Future of
Food, the Codex Alimentarius has "codified policies designed to serve
the interest of global agribusiness above all others, while actively
undermining the rights of farmers and consumers".[12]
See also
   * Codex Alimentarius Austriacus
   * Food Chemicals Codex
   * E number
References
  1. ^ Codex Alimentarius: how it all began Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations website. Accessed 1 January 2009.
  2. ^ a b Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary
Measures World Trade Organization. Accessed 3 September 2008.
  3. ^ a b Understanding the Codex Alimentarius Preface. Third
Edition. Published in 2006 by the World Health Organization and the
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Accessed 3
September 2008.
  4. ^ a b 'Health supplements: R.I.P.'. The Guardian newspaper, UK.
Published 14 September 2002. Accessed 2 August 2008
  5. ^ Codex Alimentarius Commission 28th Session, FAO Headquarters,
Rome, Italy, 4-9 July, 2005. Official report.
  6. ^ Codex Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral Food Supplements
  7. ^ UN commission adopts safety guidelines for vitamin and food
supplements United Nations News Centre. Published 11 July 2005.
Accessed 1 January 2009
  8. ^ UN commission adopts safety guidelines for vitamin and food
supplements United Nations News Centre. Published 11 July 2005.
Accessed 26 March 2009
  9. ^ Nil by mouth. The Observer newspaper, UK. Published 29
February 2004. Accessed 1 January 2009
 10. ^ 'The vitamin police', by ALAN BOCK, Sr. editorial writer, The
Orange County Register. Published 14 August 2005. Accessed 2 September
2008.
 11. ^ http://www.slowfood.com/about_us/eng/campaigns.lasso
 12. ^ The International Commission on the Future of Food and
Agriculture (July 15, 2003). "Manifesto on the Future of Food".
   * Codex Alimentarius Commission - official website
   * 'Understanding the Codex Alimentarius' Published in 2005 by the
World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization of
the United Nations. Accessed 4 May 2007.
   * "Authority and Legitimacy in Global Governance: Deliberation,
Institutional Differentiation, and the Codex Alimentarius" Michael
Livermore, 81 NYU Law Review 766 (2006)
The Holocaust
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust
Victims of the Holocaust.
Ghettos were established in Europe in which Jews were confined before
being shipped to extermination camps.
The Holocaust (from Greek ????a?st?? [holókaustos]: hólos, "whole"
andkaustós, "burnt"[1]), also known as The Shoah (Hebrew: ?????,
Romanized ha'shoah; Yiddish: ?????, Romanized churben or hurban[2]) is
the term generally used to describe the genocide of approximately six
million European Jews during World War II, a program of systematic
state-sponsored extermination by Nazi Germany.[3]
Some scholars maintain that the definition of the Holocaust should
also include the Nazis' systematic murder of millions of people in
other groups, including ethnic Poles, Romani, Soviet civilians, Soviet
prisoners of war,people with disabilities, homosexuals, Jehovah's
Witnesses, and otherpolitical and religious opponents.[4] By this
definition, the total number ofHolocaust victims would be between 11
million and 17 million people.[5]
The persecution and genocide were carried out in stages. Legislation
to remove the Jews from civil society was enacted years before the
outbreak of World War II. Concentration camps were established in
which inmates were used as slave labor until they died of exhaustion
or disease. Where the Third Reichconquered new territory in eastern
Europe, specialized units called Einsatzgruppen murdered Jews and
political opponents in mass shootings. Jews and Romani were confined
in overcrowded ghettos before being transported by freight train
toextermination camps where, if they survived the journey, the
majority of them were killed in gas chambers. Every arm ofNazi
Germany's bureaucracy was involved in the logistics of the mass
murder, turning the country into what one Holocaust scholar has called
"a genocidal state".[6]







Assanation  fo JFK The State of the Evidence, The Evidence of the
State  by Edward Jay Epstein
http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/archived/state.htm

Evidence, by its very nature, can be controverted. If it could not be,
it would not be evidence but an act of faith. Any document can be a
forgery, any witness can give false testimony, and any object can be
either fabricated or misidentified. Nevertheless, some evidence is
better than other evidence. And when the best evidence is examined,
tested and placed in the proper context, it provides the best way we
have to establish the facts.
In the case of the assassination of President Kennedy, the central
facts have been investigated and re-investigated for nearly three
decades. The evidence-testers have included the FBI, the Treasury
Department, the Warren Commission, the Rockefeller Commission, the
House Select Committee on Assassination, the Department of Justice,
independent coroners and forensic experts, and assassination
researchers. Consider, for example, the much disputed autopsy findings
of President Kennedy. Although the autopsy examination itself was
badly handled by the Navy, and insufficiently probed by the Warren
Commission, many of the problems were resolved the re-examination of
the X-rays and photographs of the President's body by the panel of
nine independent pathologists (including one Warren Commission critic)
appointed by the House Select Committee. These findings, not those in
the Warren Commission (or my criticisms of the original process in
Inquest) constitute the best evidence.Since as imperfect as the
process has been, it has resulted in filling in much of the reality of
what happened on November 22nd, 1963. I believe that the seven
following questions now can be answered-- or at least narrowed down to
finite possibilities.1. Where did the bullets come from that hit
President Kennedy and Governor Connally?The best available evidence on
the nature of the discernible wounds inflicted on Kennedy is, first,
the photographs and X-Rays of the President taken during the autopsy
at Bethesda Naval Hospital and, second, the fibers of the President's
clothing.Although the photographs and X-Rays were not examined by the
Warren Commission or its staff, leading to considerable doubt as to
the validity of the Commission's conclusions, they were subsequently
examined ,first, by a panel of three pathologists and a radiologist
appointed by Attorney General Ramsey Clark in 1981, and then more
thoroughly in 1976 by the nine man panel appointed by the House Select
Committee. The members of this latter panel had between them
experience in performing over 100,000 autopsies. The House Select
Committee, moreover, established the authenticity of these photographs
by having forensic dentists compare them with Kennedy's pre-mortem
dental records and medical X-rays.All these pathologists agreed,
without any dissent, that all the detectable wounds in the photographs
and X-rays of President Kennedy had been caused by bullets fired from
behind and above him, confirming the conclusions of the doctors who
had performed the autopsy itself as well as those of the FBI and the
Warren Commission. They also agreed unanimously from a reconstruction
of the medical evidence that Governor Connally's multiple wounds had
been caused by a bullet fired from the same direction. The path of the
first bullet to hit the President was further established by the
President's shirt and jacket fibers. The FBI analysis, as well as the
re-analysis, showed that they were pushed inward, not outward, by the
projectile which could only have happened if the President was shot
from behind.The path of the bullet that hit Governor Connally was also
confirmed by Governor Connally's testimony that he was certain he was
hit from behind.The panel also unanimously concluded from the X-Rays
that the fatal bullet had entered the rear of the President's head
near the cowlick area and exited from the right front. None of the
nine pathologist, including Warren Commission critic Dr. Cyril Wecht,
were able to find any medical evidence that this massive wound was
caused by a bullet fired from in front or side of the President's car.
To be sure, a frame-by-frame analysis of the film of the assassination
made by Abraham Zapruder shows President Kennedy's head at the time of
impact moving backwards, not forward as might be expected. But this is
not the evidence it seems to be because, depending on the neurological
reactions to such a wound, the head can snap in any direction after
being shot. Wound ballistic experts demonstrated this counterintuitive
point to the House Select Committee through a filmed experiment that
clearly showed that, when hit with a rifle bullet from the rear, the
head could move either backward or forward. So there is not
necessarily a relationship between the direction that the head moves
and the direction from which the bullet strikes the head.By tracing
the trajectory of the bullets from the path of the wounds, an analyst
from the National Aeronautic and Space Administration was able to plot
all three shots to their source the upper floors of the southeast face
of the Texas Book Depository. This was the same building that five
witnesses --Howard Brennan, Amos Lee Euins, Carolyn Walther, Arnold
Rowland and Barbara Rowland-- claimed to have seen a rifle protruding
from a South-eastern window at about the time of the assassination
(Brennan told police he actually saw the rifle being fired and
reloaded before the suspect was apprehended). While it is possible
that numerous other shots may have been fired from other locations and
directions and missed their target, we know from the best evidence,
the autopsy photographs, that the shots that caused all the
discernible wounds came from the a high window on the south eastern
side of the Texas Book Depository.2. Did the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle
found by police on the sixth floor of the Texas Depository fire these
shots?The best evidence for identifying the assassination weapon is
the two bullet fragments found in the President's car and the nearly
whole bullet found in a stretcher in Parkland Hospital in Dallas. In
1964, FBI experts ballistically matched this bullet and fragments to
the rifle barrel of the Mannlicher-Carcano by microscopically
comparing of the markings in the barrel with those found on the bullet
and fragments. A firearms panel of independent experts appointed by
the House Select Committee re-examined this evidence in 1977 and
re-confirmed that the bullet and fragments had come from that
Mannlicher Carcano rifle.In addition, the House Select Committee
employed a very advanced form of neutron activation analysis to match
the recovered bullet and fragments to the ammunition used in the
Mannlicher Carcano. In this technique, traces from the ballistic
evidence are bombarded by neutrons in a nuclear reactor so that the
precise composition of elements-- antimony, silver, and copper-- can
be measured by their emissions on a gamma-ray spectrometer to an
accuracy of one-billionth of a gram. The composition of traces from
the bullet and fragments were thus compared to that of the unfired
bullet found in the chamber of the Mannlicher-Carcano and found to
exactly match. This analysis convincingly showed that all the
ballistic material that was recovered, and could be tested, came from
two bullets, and both bullets identically matched in their composition
the ammunition for the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle.Although questions can
be raised about the general accuracy of the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle
found in the depository, there can be no doubt that the particular
weapon can be fired with deadly accuracy at a target 100 yards away--
the distance from the depository to the President's car. After the
assassination three different FBI agents fired this exact rifle and
scored bull's-eyes two out of three times.
Although the suspicion has been raised that the Mannlicher-Carcano
rifle was "framed" as the murder weapon by a conspirator who planted
the nearly-intact bullet on a stretcher in Parkland Hospital, it lacks
any reasonable persuasiveness because i) the conspirator would have no
certainty that he could recover from the hospital, car, autopsy and
crime scene the "real" bullets that presumably would not match the
Mannlicher-Carcano; ii) the fragments found in the car and Governor
Connally's wrist match the Mannlicher-Carcano ammunition; iii) it
would be pointless to frame the Mannlicher-Carcano, which the
conspirators would have had to have in their possession anyway to
leave at the murder site, since it was a weapon perfectly capable of
hitting its target. So why not use it?We thus know that the Mannlicher
Carcano found in the depository fired at least two of the shots at the
President's motorcade.3. How many snipers fired at the President's
motorcade?The best evidence of the sequence of events remains the
ten-second long film taken by Zapruder. It fixes the earliest time
Kennedy could have been first hit in the back, the latest time
Connally was wounded, and the exact moment the President was shot in
the head. From an analysis of this film, the Warren Commission staff
determined that the interval between the time Kennedy and Connally
were first shot was not long enough for a single rifleman to have
fired two shots: therefore either both men were hit by the same
bullet, or there had to be two riflemen. This conclusion was confirmed
by the more sophisticated photographic analysis of the House Select
Committee's photographic evidence panel and of independent
researchers.Despite the crucial implications of this photographic
evidence, the issue of whether Kennedy and Connally were hit by the
same or separate bullets has not been satisfactorily resolved. The FBI
concluded it was separate shots, the Warren Commission begged the
question as "not relevant" and the House Select Committee, which went
most thoroughly into this evidence, was unable to reach a definitive
conclusion because members of its 9-doctor panel irreconcilably
disagreed. Eight doctors believed it was possible, though not
necessarily probable. that the bullet recovered had caused both
Kennedy's back wound and Connally's, multiple wounds; one doctor,
however, Cyril Wecht concluded from the photographic and medical
evidence that it was absolutely impossible for those wounds to have
been caused by a single bullet. Since Wecht marshals considerable
evidence to support his view (as will be recalled from Epilogue I), we
are left with two possible scenarios.A. The Single Bullet ScenarioOne
rifleman fired three bullets from the Mannlicher Carcano in the
depository. The first bullet missed the motorcade entirely and
incidentally wounded a bystander, James Teague. The second bullet hit
Kennedy and Connally and was recovered from Connally's stretcher.
About three seconds later, the rifleman fired a third bullet which
killed Kennedy, abandoned his rifle, and fled the depository.B. The
Separate Shot ScenarioOne rifleman fired the first shot that hit
Kennedy in the back from an unidentified rifle. The bullet exited the
car and was not recovered. He then fired a second shot that went
astray and nicked bystander Teague. About one second after the first
rifleman fired, a second rifleman, using the Mannlicher Carcano, hit
Connally; and, with his second shot, hit Kennedy in the head. While
the first rifleman left the depository with his rifle and shell
casings, the second rifleman left his behind.Both scenarios are
consistent with the testimony of eyewitnesses-- one of whom saw a
second person near the sniper's windows-- and the fingerprints found
on the boxes arranged at the site. So we can conclude that either one
or two riflemen participated in the assassination and that the one
with the Mannlicher Carcano killed Kennedy.4. Whose Mannlicher-Carcano
was it?The best evidence that identifies the ownership of the murder
weapon is the handwriting of the person who ordered the rifle under
the name "A. Hidell" from a mail order house in Chicago in March 1963
and rented the post office box in Dallas to which it was shipped.It
was Lee Harvey Oswald.FBI and Treasury Department experts determined
in 1964 that Lee Harvey Oswald had signed the name "A. Hidell" on both
the purchase order for the rifle and the post box application. A half
dozen other documents found in his possession, that Oswald used the
alias "Hidell". The House Select Committee panel of questioned
document experts, after re-examining the signatures, unequivocally
agreed. So Oswald had ordered the murder weapon-- and it had been
shipped to his post office box from Chicago on March
20,1963.PossessionMarina Oswald confirmed that Oswald had received the
rifle in late March, and four other witnesses--George De
Mohrenschildt, Jeanne De Mohrenschildt, Alexander Taylor and Gary
Taylor-- saw that Oswald had a rifle in either late March or Early
April.The best evidence of Oswald's actual possession of the
Mannlicher- Carcano, however, is the much disputed photographs of
Oswald holding the rifle in his hand that Marina Oswald said she took
on Sunday, March 31, 1963 in the backyard of their house in Dallas.
Oswald claimed after his arrest that the photograph had been faked by
superimposing his head on the rifleman's body but this theory is
contradicted by three pieces of evidence established by the House
Select Committee. First, De Mohrenschildt produced in 1976 an
inscribed copy of the backyard photograph which Oswald had given him
in April 1963. The Committee's questioned document panel authenticated
the signature-- which meant that Oswald had signed (and dated) the
photograph he later claimed was faked. Second, by examining the
negative with enhanced analytic techniques, the Committee' panel of
photographic experts found a unique random pattern of wear on the
rifle in the photograph which corresponded exactly to one on the
Mannlicher-Carcano Oswald had purchased. Since the experts agreed this
could not be faked, the rifle in the photograph had to be Oswald's.
Third, by microscopically examining the scratch marks that Oswald's
Imperial Reflex camera distributed on all negatives pulled through it,
which are the equivalent of camera fingerprints, the panel established
unequivocally that the backyard photographs could only have been taken
by Oswald's camera, just as Marina had testified. Moreover, using
digital processing analysis and stereo optic viewing techniques that
did not exist in 1963, the panel concluded there was no signs of
having been faked. Even two experts who had previously disputed the
authenticity of the photographs (using copies, rather than the
original) now agreed that the photograph was genuine. In light of this
evidence, there can be no serious doubt that Oswald possessed the
murder weapon at the end of March 1963.
UseMarina Oswald testified to the Warren Commission that when Oswald
left their house on April 10,1963, he left her dramatic instructions
in Russian about what she should if he were arrested, killed or had to
go into hiding, and when he returned late that evening, he explained
to her that he had just attempted to kill General Edwin Walker with
his rifle. Her testimony is corroborated by three elements of
evidence.First, the Russian handwriting in the note has been
unequivocally identified as that of Oswald by the questioned documents
experts of both the Warren Commission and the House Select Committee.
The note, which contains details that date it, confirms that Oswald
expected to be killed, arrested or a fugitive the week of April 10th
1963.Second, photographs of Walker's house taken from the position
were the sniper fired at Walker were found among Oswald's possessions
after the Kennedy assassination. Photographic experts established
these photographs were taken with Oswald's imperial reflex camera. By
referring to construction work in the background, the FBI was able to
determine that the photographs were taken on March 9th or 10th (which
was just about the date Oswald ordered the Mannlicher Carcano). Such
photographs show that Oswald had reconnoitered Walker's house.Third,
the previously-discussed Neutron Activation Analysis done in 1977
exactly matched the metallic elements found in the bullet that was
recovered in Walker's home to the batch of Mannlicher-Carcano
ammunition used in Oswald's rifle in the assassination of Kennedy.So
we know the murder weapon was purchased, delivered and shown off in an
inscribed photograph, and used in a prior attempted assassination by
Oswald. 5. Was Oswald at the sniper's window on the sixth floor of the
depository where the murder weapon was found.The best evidence here is
three palm prints (which are as uniquely identifiable as fingerprints)
found on the boxes stacked in front of the window to support the rifle
and the nearby paper sack which was long enough to accommodate the
Mannlicher Carcano. FBI experts matched them to Oswald hands. ( A
fourth palm print, found on one box, belonged to an unidentified
individual). The House Select Committee's fingerprint panel
unanimously confirmed this evidence. Since the "freshness" of palm
prints is of limited duration, it was further determined that Oswald
had handled those boxes and paper sack either the day of the
assassination or the preceding day. Moreover, two witnesses testified
he carried the paper sack into the depository that morning. So we know
Oswald arranged the boxes used by the sniper and handled the paper
sack within 24 hours of the assassination and, if the witnesses are
correct, brought the sack to the sniper's window the morning of the
assassination.6. Was Oswald framed?Whereas there is no doubt that
Oswald's rifle was used to shoot President Kennedy, the possibility
exists it was used by another party to frame Oswald. If Oswald was
totally innocent, his activities after the assassination would reflect
his lack of knowledge and involvement in the event. Instead, the
evidence is persuasive that he fled the building after the
assassination, changed his clothing, armed himself, fatally shot a
policeman resisted arrest by attempting to shoot another policeman,
and, after his arrest, lied repeatedly to his interrogators about
owning the rifle, appearing in the backyard photograph with the rifle,
and using the alias "Hidell" (which he purchased both the rifle and
pistol).The best evidence that he shot the policeman, J.D. Tippit, is
that the cartridge cases found at the murder scene matched the firing
pin of the revolver taken out of Oswald's hand when he was arrested.
The FBI determined no all other weapon could have ejected these
cartridges-- and these conclusions were reaffirmed by the Select
Committee's firearms panel. Oswald admission that he had decided only
on the spur of the moment to fetch this weapon effectively rules out
the possibility he was framed since no one but Oswald could have known
he would be carrying it.In addition, five witnesses identified Oswald
from the police line up as either the person who shot Tippit or the
person who fled from the scene with a gun in hand. The House Select
Committee produced an additional witness who testified he saw Oswald
stand over the downed policeman and fire a bullet into his head.His
post-arrest actions, especially his mendacity in consistently denying
ownership of the rifle to representatives of the FBI, Secret Service,
Post Office, and district attorney, further indicate consciousness of
guilt about owning the rifle. This would not be consistent with the
behavior of a framed and innocent man -- who believed his rifle was
still wrapped in a blanket in a friend's garage.While none of this
evidence is unimpeachable-- no evidence is-- and none of it proves
that Oswald was the only person involved in the shooting of Kennedy,
Tippit or General Walker, it convinces me that he was involved in the
assassination.The Conspiracy QuestionOne question, perhaps the only
one that still matters, cannot be answered by the state's evidence:
was Oswald part of a conspiracy? As we have seen, the
re-investigations of the assassination have left unresolved the issue
of whether or two shooters were involved but, even if they had
definitively established, as the Warren Commission attempted to do,
that a lone gunman had fired all the shots on November 22nd 1963, it
would not logically diminish the possibility that the assassination
resulted from a conspiracy.Conspiracies do not necessarily require
more than one rifleman to accomplish their purpose. In many cases,
such as the highly-sophisticated Rightist conspiracy in France to
assassinate President Charles De Gaulle, a single "Jackal" rifleman
was employed. One accurate rifleman might be preferable to a
conspiracy when it is expected that the intended victim could be
protected by his bodyguard immediately after the first shot is fired,
because each additional snipers would increase the chances of
detection, both before and after the act, but not necessarily increase
the probability of success. Moreover, if multiple gunmen are captured
(or killed), it would be difficult to divert the investigation away
from the conspiracy, whereas a lone gunman, especially if killed
himself, can be dismissed as a lone lunatic.The larger issue then is:
was Oswald, whether firing alone or in tandem, acting at the behest of
others.Oswald was not, to be sure, the sort of well-adjusted
individual with whom most people would want to associate. He was
wantonly self-destructive (e.g. his suicide attempt in Moscow);
militantly hostile towards symbols of authority (e.g. the threat he
made to blow up the FBI headquarters in Dallas); contemptuous of legal
restraints (e.g. his plan to hijack an airliner to get to Cuba) and
homicidal (e.g. his brutal murder of Tippit). As early as 1960, he
expressed a cold-blooded willingness to commit political murder in a
letter he presciently wrote his brother from Moscow: "What I say now I
do not say lightly or unknowingly ... I would kill any American who
put a uniform on in defense of the American Government, Any American".
The one position that such unrestrained aggression would not exclude a
person for employment would be a political assassin.In this context,
the bullet Oswald coolly fired at General Walker was, whether he meant
it to be or not, an advertisement of his willingness to kill or be
killed for a political cause. Less than a week before he went out to
assassinate Walker he distributed an inscribed photograph of himself
to De Mohrenschildt (and perhaps others). It showed him dressed in
black, armed to kill with a rifle and telescopic sight, and holding in
his hand the radical newspaper, The Militant. When he went to Mexico
to offer himself to the Cubans, he brought with him the tell-tale
photographs of Walker's house to establish his bona fides as a
revolutionary. Was his have gun, will kill message picked up of any
antennae that summer? Just as De Mohrenschildt and Marina learned of
his assassination attempt, so may have others in pro-Castro,
anti-Castro and other fringe groups he was active with in the summer
of 1963 (not to mention the various intelligence and police agencies
monitoring his movements).There couldn't be that many potential
assassins hanging around the militant peripheries of the Cold War with
Oswald's perverse virtues: a convenient defector background, military
training, complete disregard for human life, including his own, and
possession of a rifle he was more than ready to use. Here was as
assassin awaiting a mission. Did anyone pick him up as a shooter-- or,
lacking a sponsor but finding an opportunity, did he act alone?





http://karws.gso.uri.edu/jfk/conspiracy_theories/Primer/Primer_of_assassination_theories.html

A Primer of Assassination Theories
The whole spectrum of doubt, from the Warren commissioners to Ousman Ba
Esquire, December 1966, pp. 205 ff.
HOW IT HAPPENED

1. SINGLE-BULLET THEORY

Proponents: A 4-3 majority of the Warren Commission (see chart). And
most Commission lawyers, notably Arlen Specter, who developed the
theory in March, 1964, and Norman Redlich, who advocated it as the
only alternative to a two-assassin theory.

Thesis: The first bullet wounded both Kennedy and Connally. A second
bullet hit Kennedy in the head and killed him. Another bullet missed
the car entirely and was never found.

Selling Point: This is the only theory that explains the assassination
in terms of a single assassin. Why? Because films of the assassination
show that a maximum of only 1.8 seconds could have elapsed between the
earliest point at which Kennedy was first hit and the latest point at
which Connally was first hit. Since the bolt of the murder rifle
cannot be operated in less than 2.3 seconds, it could not possibly
have been fired twice during the time in which both men were hit.
Either both men were hit by the same bullet or there were two
assassins.

undefined

This precise bullet path is essential to the Commission's theory
that the first bullet went through Kennedy and then hit
 Connally (Exhibit 385). Any slight difference would
rule this out and thereby suggest a second assassin.

Drawback No. 1: The single-bullet theory is tenable if and only if the
three F.B.I. reports (November 26, December 9 and January 13) are
completely wrong on their statements of the autopsy. Why? Because
these three reports all state that the first bullet did not go
completely through Kennedy and therefore it could not have gone on to
hit Connally, who was seated in front of Kennedy.

Retorts: 1. The Incompetent F.B.I. J. Lee Rankin, at the time the
Commission’s general counsel, and Norman Redlich, his deputy, have
said—after the December 13 F.B.I. Summary Report was published in
Inquest—that the “so-called F.B.I. Summary Report” (which the
Commission considered of “principal importance”) was “evaluated and
discarded” during the inquiry. Redlich further said “the Commission
study used the actual (November 26) reports of the F.B.I.
investigative agents, not just the summary.” (However, the actual
report, just recently found in the National Archives, corroborates the
Summary Report.)

2. Time magazine proposes that the F.B.I. was completely wrong on all
reports and has long since publicly admitted these errors. (However,
the F.B.I. told The Washington Post that its Summary Report was
accurate as of when it was prepared, implying the doctors later may
have changed their opinion. The F.B.I. declined comment to The New
York Times in June, 1966, on the question of whether or not its
reports were erroneous. Even to Commission champion Fletcher Knebel,
the F.B.I. would only admit that it was possible that their initial
reports did not reflect a subsequent decision by the doctors.)

3. The Commission’s Post-Report, reported by Fletcher Knebel, holds
that the day after the autopsy, on receiving further information about
the throat wound from the Dallas doctors, the autopsy doctors reached
the conclusions that the bullet exited from Kennedy’s throat. Aside
from the fact that this theory contradicts the version of the autopsy
given in The Warren Report, it still leaves unresolved the problem of
the bullet wound “below the shoulder” (reported by the F.B.I.), that
later apparently moved up to the back of the neck.

Drawback No. 2: Photographs of the President’s shirt and jacket
support the F.B.I. report that the first bullet struck Kennedy below
the shoulder. If the bullet fired from above did enter below the
shoulder it is highly unlikely that it exited through the throat.

Retorts: 1. The Creeping Shirt. Norman Redlich has suggested (after
the F.B.I. photographs were published in Inquest) that the President’s
shirt somehow rose up a few inches so that the bullet hole in the
shirt coincided with a hole in the rear of the neck. Experimentation
indicates, however, that raising the shirt over the collar line
entails doubling it up, which would produce two holes in the back of
the shirt.

undefinedundefined

Exhibits 59 and 60 indicate that the bullet entered lower than the
Commission said it had.

2. Newsweek magazine suggests that Kennedy may have been bent over so
far that his shoulder was higher than his throat. But the films of the
assassination show that Kennedy was sitting erect, and his back brace,
according to the Warren Report “tended to make him sit up straight.”

undefined

.

This photograph of the F.B.I. restaging, which appeared in several editions
of the Warren Report, not only contradicts the Commission's placement
of the bullet path but shows that if the bullet entered where the hole in the
jacket is, and then went on to hit Connally, it would have come out
Kennedy's chest, not his throat. And Kennedy had no chest wounds

Drawback No. 3: Governor Connally says it is in conceivable that he
could have been struck by the same bullet that hit Kennedy. He
remembers that after hearing the first shot he turned to his right but
could not see the President. He then began to turn to his left, and
was hit. His story is corroborated by Mrs. Connally.

Retort: Connally was confused. The Commission brushed aside Governor
Connally’s testimony (and his wife’s) by declaring that in view of the
circumstances he could hardly be expected to recall clearly what
happened.

2. F.B.I. THEORY

Proponents: The F.B.I.

Thesis: 1. The first bullet hit Kennedy below the shoulder and
penetrated “only a distance of a finger length.” This bullet was
“expelled” onto the President’s stretcher when the Dallas doctors
applied external heart massage. 2. The second bullet struck Connally.
3. The third bullet entered Kennedy’s head and fragmentized. (The
impact of the shot sent a tiny fragment of bone through Kennedy’s
throat, causing a small throat wound.) All shots came from the Book
Depository.

undefined

Exhibit No. 397, the autopsy sketch drawn by Dr. Humes, shows
a bullet wound lower than the Commission's Exhibit 385 does.

Selling Points: 1. An entry wound below the shoulder would explain the
shirt and jacket holes being about six inches below the top of the
collar. It would also serve to explain the autopsy sketch showing a
wound well below the collar line. And it would explain the Secret
Service testimony that it was six inches below the collar.

2. The supposition that the bullet also fell out of Kennedy’s back
accounts for the bullet found on the stretcher. (See Planted-Bullet
Theory.)

3. The tiny bone fragment accounts for the small throat wound. Also, a
bone fragment would explain the absence of metallic traces on the
holes in the front of the shirt.

Drawback No. 1: The F.B.I. Theory, by positing that Kennedy and
Connally were hit by separate bullets, leads to a two-assassin theory.
As one Commission lawyer bluntly put it: “To say that they were hit by
separate bullets is synonymous with saying that there were two
assassins.”

Drawback No. 2: The Fourth Bullet. Late in the investigation, it was
discovered that a bystander, James Tague, had been wounded by one of
the shots. The F.B.I. Theory holds that all three shots hit inside the
President’s car. Yet it was unlikely that Tague was wounded by any of
these shots since he was standing about 260 feet away at the time of
the fusillade. This raises the possibility that Tague was wounded by a
fragment from a fourth bullet. But only three shells were found in the
Book Depository.

Drawback No. 3: If the F.B.I autopsy report is accurate, then the
Commission’s autopsy findings had to be purposely falsified. The
implications of this are almost too disturbing to imagine. Yet, the
fact that the autopsy surgeon, Commander Humes, burned “certain
preliminary notes” has given rise to the theory that the “preliminary
notes” actually contained the earlier version of the autopsy referred
to by the F.B.I. This question is unresolved.

One of the main stimuli for theories that shots came from someplace
other than the Book Depository is an amateur eight-millimeter film of
the assassination taken by Abraham Zapruder. In ten seconds of color
film, virtually the entire sequence of events is recorded. The
Zapruder film shows the motorcade proceeding down Elm Street with the
President smiling and waving, then suddenly he reaches for his throat,
apparently hit. About a second later Connally grimaces with pain and
begins toppling over. A few seconds elapse, then a bullet visibly
strikes the President’s head. From the film. the Commission judged
that the President was first hit between film frame 210 and 225, and
the fatal head shot occurred on film frame 313. By determining the
shutter speed of the camera (18.3 frames per second), the Commission
ascertained: 1) a maximum of 5.6 seconds elapsed from the first to the
final shot; and 2) no more than 1.8 seconds elapsed between the time
Kennedy and Connally were first hit. This time bind led directly to
the Commission’s Single-Bullet Theory (see above). The Zapruder film
also led to four other interesting theories.

3. HEAD MOVEMENT THEORY

Proponent: Vincent Salandria, a Philadelphia lawyer.

Using two slide projectors, and superimposing frame 316 over frame
313, Salandria finds that after the fatal head shot, Kennedy’s head
moves sharply backward and to the left, a direction inconsistent with
shots from the Depository. Salandria extrapolated the trajectory from
the direction in which the head moves and concludes that the shot came
from behind the picket fence or the arcade on the grassy knoll.
Salandria also suspects that, because of the massive devastation, this
second wound, unlike the first, may have been caused by a dumdum
bullet—which couldn’t have come from Oswald’s rifle.

undefined

4. EARLY HIT THEORY

A group of California theorists has used the Zapruder film to show
that the first shot hit Kennedy between film frames 190 and 210. If
true, this would be significant because the Commission established
that during this interval the line of sight from the sixth-floor
window in the Depository was obstructed by the foliage of an oak tree;
therefore the shot must have come from elsewhere.

Harold Weisberg also uses the Zapruder film to prove the Early-Hit
Theory. Since Zapruder testified that he saw Kennedy hit, and
Zapruder’s view was blocked by a traffic sign between film frames 205
and 225 (by which time Kennedy had already been hit), Weisberg
concludes that Kennedy was hit before film frame 205.

5. MISSING-FRAME THEORY

The fact that film frames 208 through 211 have been deleted from the
black-and-white frame-by-frame photographs published by the Warren
Commission (Exhibit 885) and from the color slides of the Zapruder
film at the National Archives—and the fact that frames 207 and 212
show obvious splice marks—has led a number of theorists to suspect
that Kennedy was shot during that interval and that the four missing
film frames were suppressed deliberately.

Drawback: Life magazine owns the original film and according to those
who have seen it, the film is complete, no frames are missing, and
Kennedy does not appear to have been hit in the sequence. The
Archive’s frames may just have been damaged innocently.

6. TRAFFIC SIGN THEORY

David Lifton, a U.C.L.A. graduate student, claims that he can detect
stress marks coming from the traffic sign starting at frame 212 and
continuing until frame 221. He interprets these as shock waves caused
by a bullet hitting the sign. This shot, he figures, could not have
been the same one that Oswald is supposed to have fired because of the
timing. And strangely, right after the assassination the sign was
removed.

7. ENTRY WOUND THEORY

Proponents: Mark Lane, Thomas Buchanan, Joachim Joesten, et. al.

Thesis: Early statements were made by Dallas doctors suggesting that
the throat wound was made by a bullet entering the throat. Since films
of the assassination firmly establish that the President’s car was
past the Book Depository when he was shot, a bullet entering the
throat must have come from a point well in front of the Depository.
“In front” was at first interpreted to mean the railroad overpass;
however, when the Commission showed that a bullet did not in fact pass
through the limousine’s windshield, as was believed by the proponents
of this theory, “in front” was then interpreted to mean the grassy
knoll. Mark Lane states in his latest version that Kennedy was
directly facing the knoll when he was shot in the throat, although
none of the films indicates this to be the case.

undefined

Selling point: The entry-wound theory explains the Dallas doctors’
early statements and the relatively small diameter of the wound,
although the doctors later testified that under certain conditions an
exit wound would have the same appearance as an entry wound.

Drawback: The entry-wound theory does not explain what finally
happened to the bullet that entered the throat. Since no exit wound
was found in the President’s back (and no bullet was in the
President’s body), the entry-wound theory depends on the assumption
that the autopsy and other evidence was changed.

8. OVER THE FENCE THEORY

Proponents: Maurice Schonfeld, U.P.I., Jack Fox, U.P.I., Burt
Reinhardt, U.P.I. In the United Press-International film library, a
New York hobbyist found an eight-millimeter color film of the
assassination made by Orville Nix. One of the frames of the Nix film
particularly interested him because it showed an object behind the
wall on the grassy knoll. He then employed a film specialist to blow
the frame up, and it became clear that the object was in fact a
vehicle. On the roof of the vehicle, he discerned a man aiming what
appeared to be a rifle at the President’s car. He immediately took his
photograph to Dallas and asked eyewitnesses about it.

U.P.I. editors, apparently impressed with the photograph, sent
reporter Jack Fox to Dallas to interview witnesses to the
assassination.

Lee E. Bowers, Jr. told him that the photograph was “exactly what I
saw.” S. M. Holland, who was standing on the overpass and had one of
the best views of any eyewitness, told Fox there were four shots:
“…the first came from the book building and hit the President. The
second came from the same place and hit Governor John Connally….The
third shot came from behind the picket fence to the north of Elm
Street. There was a puff of smoke under the trees like someone had
thrown out a Chinese firecracker and a report entirely different from
the one which was fired from the book building…”

According to Holland, the fourth shot came from the Book Depository.
When Holland reached the fence he found a station wagon and a sedan.
On the bumper of the station wagon there were two muddy marks “as if
someone had stood there to look over the fence.” At least seven other
witnesses on the overpass saw smoke rising from the same area, and
many other witnesses thought the shots came from behind the picket
fence. One Dallas policeman, J. M. Smith, even claimed to have “caught
the smell of gunpowder” behind the wooden fence.

The Nix-U.P.I. film and partial blowup.

9. EYEWITNESS THEORIES

Eyewitness accounts of the assassination are perhaps the most popular
source of two-assassin theories—virtually any armchair student of the
assassination, given the Report’s twenty-six volumes of testimony, can
develop an interesting theory as to where the shots came from. Right
after the twenty-six volumes were made public, Harold Feldman, a
writer on the psychology of assassins, counted up the various sources
of shots reported by 121 eyewitnesses. His tally revealed that 38 gave
“no clear opinion,” 32 thought the shots came from the Book
Depository, and 51 though the shots came from the grassy knoll area.
Largely on the basis of this analysis, Feldman advanced the theory
that there were two assassins: one on the grassy knoll and one in the
Book Depository.

Drawback: Eyewitness recollections often conflict: which means that
somebody has to be wrong.
WHO DID IT?

The following six theories name Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone assassin.

10. UNDERGROUND MAN THEORY

Proponent: The Warren Commission. The Commission did not reach a final
conclusion as to why Oswald killed President Kennedy. Instead, it
listed five “factors” (which, a Commission lawyer said, read like
clichés from a TV soap opera). They were:

   hostility to his environment;

   failure to establish “meaningful relationships”;

   desire for a place in history;

   a commitment to Marxism and communism (a “factor” inserted at the
insistence of Commissioner Gerald Ford);

   a capacity to act decisively without regard to the consequences.

According to this theory, Oswald had no motive; he acted out of blind
resentment.

11. MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE THEORY

Proponents: Some Commission lawyers and members of the C.I.A.

Since Oswald spent considerable time in a Soviet hospital, a few
Commission lawyers entertained the theory that Oswald might have been
brainwashed and conditioned as a “sleeper” assassin; then he went
haywire (i.e., he was accidentally turned on). The Commission decided
to send a letter to the C.I.A. requesting information on the “present
status of Soviet ‘mind-conditioning’ techniques.” A few weeks later, a
C.I.A. agent replied that this possibility was still “a main school of
thought” at the C.I.A. on the assassination, and although such
techniques were still in a relatively primitive stage, this form of
conditioning could be induced by drugs. The theory, however, was not
further developed.

12. DOMESTIC QUARREL THEORY

Proponent: Representative Gerald Ford.

Commissioner Gerald Ford, in his book, Portrait of the Assassin,
suggests that Oswald was still hedging on the eve of the assassination
when he returned home to see his wife, Marina. She spurned him. Oswald
then went to the garage. He got his rifle.

13. HORRIBLE ACCIDENT THEORY

Proponent: Marina Oswald.

In her final testimony before the Commission, Marina Oswald advanced
her own theory of Lee’s motive. She said she believed her husband was
actually trying to shoot Governor John Connally, and missed, and by a
horrible accident he killed the President.

14. OEDIPAL THEORY

Proponent: Dr. Renatus Hartogs, coauthor of The Two Assassins.

Dr. Hartogs, a psychiatrist who evaluated Oswald as a
thirteen-year-old boy, has recently advanced a theory explaining the
assassination in terms of Oswald’s repressed lust for his mother.
Hartogs observes that Oswald slept in his mother’s bed long after he
should have had a bed of his own, and suggests that inner guilt
feelings may have led him to kill President Kennedy. Dr. Hartogs finds
it significant that Oswald shot at both Kennedy and Tippit three
times, since the number “three” in psychoanalytic thinking symbolizes
the masculine genitals. However, Sylvia Meagher points out in her
review of Hartogs’ book that Tippit was shot four times.

15. KILLER-INSTINCT THEORY

Proponent: John J. McCloy.

In a secret colloquium between the Commission and three psychiatrists,
Commissioner McCloy advanced the “killer-instinct” theory. He noted
that Oswald had killed two men and had attempted to shoot at least
three others (Governor Connally, General Walker, and the police
officer who tried to arrest him). McCloy reasoned that this indicated
a pattern of innate violence. By the time the report was written,
however, McCloy’s hypothesis seems to have been lost in the shuffle.

The following four theories are based on the belief that Oswald was
innocent, that he was framed for both the Kennedy assassination and
murder of officer J. D. Tippit by the real conspirators who planted
evidence against him before and after the assassination. The logic of
these theories inevitably leads to a high-level conspiracy involving
law-enforcement agencies. For example, to believe that Oswald did not
kill Tippit, it is necessary to assume: a) shells from Oswald’s
revolver were planted at the scene by the real murderers; b) the
revolver then was planted on Oswald by the Dallas police (the plot
obviously could not have depended on Oswald going home and
conveniently fetching his pistol; and c) Oswald’s admission that he
had his revolver with him when arrested was fabricated.

16. PLANTED-RIFLE THEORY

Proponent: Mark Lane.

Thesis: A 7.65 caliber German Mauser was found in the Book Depository,
and later Oswald’s 6.5 caliber Italian Mannlicher-Carcano rifle was
substituted for it. This theory is based on testimony (and an
affidavit) indicating that the three Dallas law officers first
described the rifle as a Mauser. The problem with this theory is that
the bullet fragments found in the President’s car ballistically match
Oswald’s Carcano, proving that it was employed in the assassination
(no matter where or when it was found).

17. PLANTED-BULLET THEORY

Proponents: Professor Richard H. Popkin, Professor Josiah Thompson,
Sylvia Meagher, Vincent Salandria, Léo Sauvage, Harold Weisberg, Mark
Lane and Ray Marcus.

Thesis: A bullet, which the Warren Report states was found on
Connally’s stretcher, was fired from Oswald’s rifle sometime prior to
the assassination. Then, after the assassination, it was planted on a
stretcher in the Dallas hospital where Kennedy and Connally were
treated, thereby framing Oswald.

This theory is based on the fact that evidence developed by the
Commission precluded both Kennedy’s and Connally’s stretchers as
possible sources for the stretcher bullet. The Commission’s autopsy
report stated that the bullet exited Kennedy, therefore it could not
have come from his stretcher. And Drs. Finck, Humes, and Shaw
testified that more fragments were found in Connally’s wrist than were
missing from the bullet, thus ruling out Connally’s stretcher as a
source for the bullet. Furthermore, in missing tapes of the doctors’
press conference, which was held after the stretcher bullet was found,
Dr. Shaw supposedly says that a nearly whole bullet was lodged in
Connally’s thigh. The theorists thus deduce that the bullet must have
been planted on the stretcher. The fact that no blood or other organic
material was found on the bullet reinforces their argument. Professor
Thompson further points out that the only bullet similar in appearance
to the stretcher bullet was obtained by firing Oswald’s rifle into a
long tube of cotton. He believes that this test indicated that the
stretcher bullet was probably obtained by firing the bullet into
cotton.

The Commission claims this bullet pierced Kennedy's neck and
Connally's shoulder, ribs, wrist and thigh. Theorists say it's a fake.

The Commission claims this bullet pierced Kennedy’s neck and
Connally’s shoulder, ribs, wrist and thigh. Theorists say it’s a fake.

18. OSWALD IMPERSONATOR THEORY

Proponents: Léo Sauvage, Harold Weisberg, Sylvia Meagher, (See also
Popkin’s Two-Oswald Theory).

Thesis: Before the assassination, someone impersonating Oswald planted
clues that would incriminate Oswald in the assassination. According to
this theory, the impersonator made himself conspicuous at a nearby
rifle range, brought a gun into a neighborhood gunsmith, cashed large
checks, and acted suspiciously. The impersonator probably took part in
the assassination.

undefined

Who is this man? A C.I.A. report on Lee Harvey Oswald arrived at the
F.B.I. field office in Dallas they day of the assassination. It
revealed that Oswald had visited the Cuban Embassy in Mexico City on
September 27, 1963, and included a photograph taken by a secret C.I.A.
camera of the man identified as Oswald leaving the Embassy. After the
assassination, a problem developed; the man in the C.I.A. photograph
was not Oswald! Oswald’s mother added to the confusion by claiming the
man in the photograph was Jack Ruby. (Obviously, it isn’t.) Commission
lawyers, attempting to find out if the man in the photograph was
associated with Oswald or impersonating him, were never able to
identify the mystery man. All the C.I.A. would say was that it was a
“mix-up.”

19. FALL-GUY THEORY

Proponent: Joachim Joesten

Thesis: That the assassination was the work of a conspiracy involving
some officers of the C.I.A. and the F.B.I. as well as some Army
figures and some reactionary oil millionaires. The conspirators used
Oswald as a “fall guy, a red herring, to draw attention while the
murderers escaped.” The F.B.I. for reasons of its own, completed the
frame of Oswald and covered up evidence of the real conspirators.

The next three theories explain how the second assassin escaped from
the grassy knoll.

20. BOGUS SECRET-SERVICE MAN THEORY

Proponent: Sylvia Meagher.

Dallas policeman J. M. Smith ran to the parking lot behind the grassy
knoll immediately after the assassination. He suddenly encountered a
stranger and pulled his gun. The stranger identified himself as a
Secret Service agent and showed Smith his credentials (although Smith
later could not recall his name). Smith’s account is corroborated to
some degree by two other law officers—Deputy Constable Weitzman and
Sergeant Harkness.

Sylvia Meagher, an independent researcher, made a meticulous check of
Secret Service records and found that no Secret Service agent was on
or near the knoll area at the time that Smith encountered the “agent.”
Mrs. Meagher suggests that the assassin may have escaped by using fake
Secret Service credentials.

21. TRUNK THEORY

Proponents: S. M. Holland, Richard H. Popkin.

Soon after the shots were fired, S. M. Holland rushed to the picket
fence behind the knoll (where he thought he saw smoke) and found a
station wagon and a sedan parked near the fence (see Over the Fence
Theory). Muddy footprints led from the bumper of the station wagon to
the sedan and then mysteriously ended. Holland said: “I’ve often
wondered if a man could have climbed into the trunk of that car and
pulled the lid shut on himself, then someone else have driven it away
later.” Other theorists, like Professor Popkin, have thought it more
likely that the knoll assassin simply hid the rifle in the car, then
fled on foot.

22. STORM DRAIN THEORY

Proponent: Lillian Castellano.

Mrs. Castellano, a California accountant, located what appeared to be
a storm drain in a photograph of the grassy knoll taken at the time of
the assassination. However, it could not be located in later
photographs of the grassy knoll. Through a contact in Dallas, Mrs.
Castellano obtained a chart of the sewer and drainage system
surrounding the grassy knoll. Apparently, the drain was filled in
after the assassination. Mrs. Castellano suspected that it could have
been part of an escape system.

23. OSWALD AS F.B.I. INFORMER

According to Secret Service report 767, Alonzo Hudkins, a Houston
reporter, told the Secret Service that he had heard from Chief Allan
Sweatt of the Dallas sheriff’s office that Lee Harvey Oswald “was
being paid two hundred dollars per month by the F.B.I. in connection
with their subversive investigation” and that “Oswald had informant
number S-172.” The Commission never called Hudkins or Sweatt to
testify.

There are a number of other interesting circumstances surrounding
Oswald’s possible relationship with the F.B.I.

   Warren De Brueys, an F.B.I. agent who covered both the New Orleans
and Dallas beat, asked Carlos Bringuier to furnish the F.B.I.
information about the activities of his Anti-Castro group. When
Bringuier refused, De Brueys threatened to send an under-cover agent
to infiltrate the group.
   Later, Lee Harvey Oswald came to New Orleans from Dallas and tried
to infiltrate Bringuier’s group by pretending he was an
Anti-Castroite. Bringuier, at first, did not think this was a
coincidence.

   When Oswald was arrested for fighting with Bringuier, he asked to
see an F.B.I. agent. An F.B.I. agent visited him in jail and
questioned him about the activities of the Fair Play for Cuba
Committee.

   Oswald’s address book contained the address and license plate
number of Dallas F.B.I. agent James Hosty. It was later deleted from
the police list of Oswald’s addresses.

Drawback: J. Edgar Hoover categorically denied that Oswald had any
connection with the F.B.I. and offered the F.B.I.’s file on Oswald to
the Commission. (The Chief Justice refused it, however, on the grounds
that it might contain secret information.)

24. OSWALD AS SECRET AGENT

Proponents: Mrs. Marguerite Oswald and Norman Mailer.

Mrs. Oswald suggested long before the assassination, and is still of
the belief, that her son was a C.I.A. agent. His trip to Russia was a
C.I.A. mission, and so were his later activities. If Oswald was
involved in the assassination, Mrs. Oswald suggests, “Now it could
have been that my son and the Secret Service were all involved in a
mercy killing,” explaining, “If he [Kennedy] was dying of an incurable
disease, this would be for the security of our country.”

Norman Mailer, on the other hand, believes that it is quite possible
Oswald was an undercover agent for not one, but a number of espionage
services (who “tend to collect the same particular small agents in
common”).

Mailer wrote in Book Week: “It was all but a comedy of the most
horrible sort, but when Kennedy was assassinated, the espionage
services of half the world may have discovered in the next hour that
one little fellow in Dallas was…a secret, useless little undercover
agent who was on their private lists; what nightmares must have
ensued.” Oswald was then liquidated by one of his employer-agencies.
According to Mailer’s scenario, we hear an Ivy League voice cry out in
some unknown council-of-war room: “Well, can’t something be done,
can’t we do something about this man?”, and a little later a phone
call made and another, and finally a voice saying to our friend Ruby,
“Jack, I got good news. There’s a little job…”

25. TWO OSWALDS THEORY

Proponent: Richard H. Popkin.

Thesis: Professor Popkin (Chairman, Philosophy Department, University
of California at San Diego) has advanced a rather ingenious theory to
explain certain discrepancies in the Commission’s findings. Certain
witnesses claim to have encountered Oswald prior to November 22 in
places where he could not possibly have been. To explain these
anomalies, Popkin suggests that there were actually “two Oswalds”; the
second “Oswald” closely resembled the real Oswald. The real Oswald’s
role was to be a decoy—that is, he would lead the police astray by
becoming the prime suspect. The escape of the second Oswald, who
actually fired the shots from the Depository, was thus facilitated.
When Oswald’s trial came up, he would undoubtedly produce a surprise
alibi, and the evidence would be so confused by the second Oswald’s
pre-assassination maneuvers that the Oswald-on-trial would be
acquitted. What went wrong, however—and here the theory becomes a mite
complicated—was that the real Oswald met Officer Tippit, who knew the
second Oswald, and waved him down. In the ensuing confusion, Oswald
panicked and shot Tippit.

This theory differs from the Oswald Impersonator Theory in one
important way: here, the real Oswald is guilty.

Drawback: The sightings of this “second Oswald” all occurred before it
was even known that Kennedy would be coming to Dallas. Thus it seems
unlikely that a carefully deceptive plot cold have been underway.

Retort: Oswald and his double were only one of many pairs of assassins
being set up all over the country on a contingency basis, should the
opportunity for action arise.

26. POST-ASSASSINATION DOMINO THEORY

Proponents: Penn Jones Jr. and Mark Lane.

Penn Jones, the editor of the Midlothian, Texas, Mirror, notes that a
number of key witnesses have died under “clouded circumstances” since
the assassination and he suggests the theory that people who know too
much about the assassination are being silenced.

For example, Jones cites a meeting at Ruby’s apartment at which two
newspaper reporters, Bill Hunter and Jim Koethe, were present. Bill
Hunter was later killed by the “accidental discharge” of a policeman’s
revolver in a police station in Long Beach, California. Jim Koethe was
killed by a “karate chop” in his Dallas apartment. The murder is still
unsolved. Ruby’s lawyer, Tom Howard, also attended the meeting. He
later died of a “heart attack” (Jones notes “no autopsy was
performed”). Jones suggests that some important information was
divulged at the meeting, and those who heard the information had to be
disposed of.

Moreover, Jones’s paper has maintained a death-count on other relevant
individuals.

   Hank Killam, whose wife was a waitress at Ruby’s nightclub and
whose friend lived in Oswald’s rooming house, was found on a Florida
street with his throat cut.

   Dorothy Kilgallen, the only journalist who was granted a private
interview with Ruby, died. Jones points out (erroneously) that her
death occurred on the night of the “strange” Northeast Power Blackout.
(Jones missed the connection that the announcer of What’s My Line,
John Daly, is the Chief Justice’s son-in-law.)

   William Whaley, the cabdriver who took Oswald home after the
assassination and possibly talked to him, died in a car crash—the
first cabdriver to be killed on duty in Dallas since 1937.

   Karen Bennett Carlin, another performer at Ruby’s club and the
last person to talk to Ruby before he shot Oswald, died of gunshot
wounds in Houston, according to Penn Jones. This seems quite strange
since she testified to a Commission lawyer after the reported date of
her death.

   Earlene Roberts, the housekeeper at Oswald’s rooming house who
claimed she saw a police car stop in front of the house about ten
minutes before Oswald encountered Tippit, also died.

Mark Lane adds the case of Warren Reynolds, a witness to the Tippit
shooting, who was shot through the head (but survived); Nancy Money, a
former stripper in Ruby’s nightclub who also provided an alibi for the
man accused of shooting Reynolds, hanged herself in the Dallas jail;
and Lee E. Bowers, Jr., a bystander who saw a car making a getaway
from the grassy knoll, was killed in a car accident to which there
were no witnesses.

27. RACIST THEORY

Proponents: Léo Sauvage, Hans Habe (author of The Wounded Land).

Sauvage, an American correspondent for Figaro, suggests the theory
that Kennedy could have been killed by a conspiracy of Southern
racists to prevent him from carrying out his civil-rights program. To
turn blame away from themselves and onto Leftists, they methodically
framed Oswald (by impersonating him and by planting evidence against
him). Oswald’s murder, however, was not part of the racist conspiracy,
but a separate plot instigated by the Dallas police to prevent a trial
in which he might be acquitted of the crime

28. CUI BONO THEORY

Proponents: Izvestia, Trud, Joachim Joesten, Barbara Garson, Don B.
Reynolds, Jack Ruby and others.

Thesis: Although not one shred of hard evidence has been uncovered to
prove them right, many people have taken the “Who benefited?” line of
pursuit and point an accusing finger at Lyndon Johnson.

The Soviet Government newspaper Izvestia, after condemning The Warren
Report as slanderous to Russia, hinted by sly innuendo that President
Johnson may have been implicated in the assassination. They cite the
soon-to-be published works of Joachim Joesten (seven volumes to be
sold by subscription for $200) which argues that Johnson has been
covering up. The next day, Trud, the trade-union paper, made the
accusations more forcefully.

Californian Barbara Garson has written a satire, based on Macbeth,
called Macbird in which L.B.J. and Lady Bird take the parts of Macbeth
and Lady Macbeth in the murder of J.F.K. and Adlai Stevenson (the Egg
of Head).

In January of 1964 the Warren Commission learned that Don B. Reynolds,
insurance agent and close associate of Bobby Baker, had been heard to
say that the F.B.I. knew that Johnson was behind the assassination.
When interviewed by the F.B.I., he denied this. But he did recount an
incident during the swearing in of Kennedy in which Bobby Baker said
words to the effect that the s.o.b. would never live out his term and
that he would die a violent death. Reynolds also vaguely suggested
that Governor Connally may have called long distance from Washington
to Lee Oswald who was staying in a Dallas Y.M.C.A. He had no proof.

A number of letters allegedly written by Jack Ruby and smuggled out of
jail were auctioned off by New York autograph dealer Charles Hamilton.
Penn Jones, Jr. bought one and published part of it.

"I walked into a trap the moment I walked down the ramp Sunday
morning. This was the spot where they could frame the Jew, and that
way all of his people will be blamed as being Communists, this is what
they were waiting for. They alone had planned the killing, by they I
mean Johnson and others.”

“…read the book Texas Looks at Lyndon and you may learn quite a bit
about Johnson and how he fooled everyone.”

Drawback: In a letter to J. Lee Rankin, J. Edgar Hoover wrote, “I have
not received any information to implicate President Johnson or
Governor Connally in the assassination.”

29. DALLAS OLIGARCHY THEORY

Proponent: Thomas Buchanan.

According to Buchanan’s theory, “Mr. X,” a right-wing Texas oil
millionaire, had to eliminate Kennedy and Khrushchev to gain world
domination of the oil market. He decided to assassinate Kennedy in
such as way that Khrushchev would be discredited. Oswald was to be
framed as the assassin, then executed by Tippit. With Oswald dead, the
Soviet Union would be blamed for the assassination. Oswald, however,
outdrew Tippit and was captured alive later. The conspirators then
induced Ruby to kill Oswald as a means of silencing him for good.
Aside from Mr. X, Buchanan names the following “additional
conspirators”:

   The assassin on the bridge. (He hints this was Ruby.)

   A second assassin in the Depository who was wearing a police uniform.

   A police officer involved in Oswald’s arrest (who was, next to Mr.
X, the key conspirator).

   Tippit.

   Oswald.

   One of the policemen who missed Oswald as he left the building.

30. CUBA-FRAMED THEORY

Proponent: Fidel Castro.

About a week after the assassination, Castro suggested that the
conspirators intended that Cuba be blamed for the assassination.
According to this theory, Oswald may have been one of the riflemen,
but his prime role in the conspiracy was to ghost a trail that would
lead directly to Cuba. Thus, a few months before the assassination,
Oswald set up a phony Fair Play for Cuba Committee in New Orleans and
Dallas, engaged in “brawls” with anti-Castro Cubans, and identified
himself with Castro and Cuba on radio programs. Then he went to Mexico
where he tried to obtain a Cuban visa. (Castro notes that Oswald had
no reason to go to Cuba. If Oswald wanted to go to Russia, as he
claimed, it was shorter and easier to go via Europe.)

After the assassination, the plan called for Oswald to disappear.
Evidence planted at the scene would identify Oswald as the assassin,
and Oswald’s pre-assassination activities and other planted clues
would lead to the conclusion that Oswald had fled to Cuba. This, in
turn, might serve as a pretext for an American invasion of Cuba.

There is some later evidence which fits in very neatly with the Castro thesis.

   On September 26, just before Oswald’s trip to the Cuban Embassy in
Mexico, Mrs. Sylvia Odio, a Cuban Refugee leader, claims that three
men visited her in Dallas. Two were Latins, possibly Cubans, the third
was American. The American was called “Leon Oswald.” After the
assassination Mrs. Odio as well as her sister definitely identified
this man as Lee Harvey Oswald. The three men said that they had just
come from New Orleans (the Commission established Oswald left New
Orleans about September 25) and were about to take a trip. They wanted
backing for some violent anti-Castro activities, but Mrs. Odio
suspected that they might in fact be Castro agents. The next day one
of the Latins called Mrs. Odio and told her that Oswald was “kind of
nuts” and that he had said Kennedy should have been assassinated after
the Bay of Pigs, and that “it is so easy to do it.” Thus, Oswald
established himself as a potential assassin traveling with two Cubans.

   Two days before the assassination, three people spoke to Wayne
January, manager of Red Bird airport in Dallas, about renting a plane.
They told him they wanted to be flown to Yucatán Peninsula on November
22. After the assassination, January told the F.B.I. that one of the
three persons was Oswald. January later said that he suspected the
threesome might want to hijack his plane and go to Cuba, and thus
decided not to rent them the plane.

   Shortly after the assassination, there were literally dozens of
allegations and “tips” that Oswald was closely connected with the
Cubans. For example, one Latin American free-lance intelligence agent
claimed that he saw Oswald receive $6,500 for the purpose of
assassinating Kennedy. (The Commission found these allegations to be
false.) However, if Oswald escaped and disappeared, these tips might
very well have fed suspicion that Oswald was in Cuba.

31. CRYSTAL BALL THEORY

Proponent: Jeane Dixon.

In December, 1963, prophetess Jeane Dixon “got psychically” an inside
line on the assassination. “As I interpret my symbols,” she wrote,
“Fidel Castro believed that President Kennedy and Premier Khrushchev
had gotten together on a plan to eliminate him and replace him with
someone more acceptable to the United States and the U.N. Castro, in
his conniving way, therefore arranged for the assassination of John F.
Kennedy. Lee Harvey Oswald was the triggerman, but there were other
people involved in the plot.”

32. MAFIA THEORY

Proponent: Sergei Groussard.

In a series of articles in L’Aurore, Groussard offers the theory that
Kennedy was assassinated in order to forestall a planned crackdown on
organized crime. The “Al Capone gang” in Chicago ordered Ruby to set
up the assassination. Ruby then sent Oswald (who was in his debt) to
Mexico to visit the underworld’s own plastic surgery clinic and other
escape facilities; and Oswald agreed to be the rifleman. Tippit was
supposed to drive Oswald out of Dallas, but when he learned that
Oswald was the assassin he tried to arrest him and Oswald killed him.
Ruby then had to finish the job personally.

33. JUNTA THEORY

Proponent: M. S. Arnoni.

The editor of The Minority of One envisions a “titanic power struggle”
in the U.S. Government. He postulates that the insurrectionist forces
included the C.I.A., the Air Force, relevant defense contractors, and
a number of congressmen and that the Junta’s leaders were high-ranking
Air Force and Navy officers. The object was to deliver the U.S. into
the hands of a “military-industrial cabal.”

Because President Kennedy attempted to oppose the Junta, he had to be
eliminated. His fate was sealed when he signed the Nuclear Test Ban
Treaty in 1963—which he, according to this theory, “signed in his own
blood.”

34. RED EXECUTION THEORY

Proponent: Revilo P. Oliver.

Professor Oliver, in an article for the John Birch Society magazine,
advanced the theory that Moscow ordered Oswald to assassinate Kennedy.
It seems that Kennedy was threatening to desert the Communists and
“turn American.” But the President’s aides persuaded him to go to
Dallas where he was “executed.”

Although the assassin’s accomplices escaped, Oswald himself was
apprehended by dint of the heroic action of J. D. Tippit, and so it
became necessary that “Jakob Rubenstein” eliminate Oswald.

35. EVIL-FORCES THEORY

Proponent: Ousman Ba, Foreign Minister of Mali.

Ba charged in the United Nations Security Council that “Kennedy’s
assassination, the murder of Patrice Lumumba and Dag Hammarskjóld’s
death were all the work of forces that were behind the recent
U.S.-Belgian rescue operation in the Congo.” Ba did not elaborate.

Ahead to Second Primer of Assassination Theories

http://karws.gso.uri.edu/jfk/conspiracy_theories/Second_Primer/Second_primer.html

A Second Primer of Assassination Theories

Esquire, May 1967, pp. 104 ff.

Last December we thought we had offered you the complete works of the
assassination buffs. The opus grows: here are twenty-five new entries

As reported in last December’s Esquire, the Warren Commission’s
crucial Single-Bullet Theory (hereafter, the S.B.T.) seemed to be in
real trouble. This theory posits that President Kennedy and Governor
Connally both were first hit by the same bullet—a crucial assumption
because the Commission established that there was not enough time for
the murder rifle to be fired twice within the interval that both men
were first hit (1.8 seconds or less). In short, either the S.B.T.
stands, or a Two-Assassin Theory emerges.

Trouble first developed for the S.B.T. with the publication of
previously classified F.B.I. reports by Edward Jay Epstein’s Inquest,
which flatly contradicted the Commission’s autopsy statement that the
first bullet passed clean through President Kennedy and exited his
throat. The F.B.I. reports instead stated that the autopsy showed that
the bullet in question did not exit from the President’s throat, a
fact which would make it impossible for this bullet to continue on to
hit Governor Connally and thus would rule out the S.B.T. Next, Life
magazine enlarged its 8mm amateur film of the assassination frame by
frame, and, on the basis of this new evidence, concluded that Connally
and Kennedy may indeed have been hit by separate bullets. Governor
Connally also viewed the Life film frame by frame and stated
categorically that he was hit by a separate bullet. The most unkind
cut of all came when Governor Connally called a press conference for
the express purpose of defending the Commission, then inadvertently
mentioned that he still had a fragment of the bullet in his thigh.
Alas, that fact alone would invalidate the S.B.T. because the bullet
that is supposed to have wounded both men was found virtually intact.
Finally, Senator Richard Russell, member of the Commission who now
claims the dubious distinction of having been the only member “who
bucked the Report,” stated that “from the outset” he never really
believed in the S.B.T. Then Commissioner Hale Boggs followed suit
during a Face the Nation interview by expressing his own doubts about
the faltering S.B.T. But even as Commission members began deserting
the sinking S.B.T., a number of last-ditch theories were proposed by
the defenders of the Commission.






1. THE SECOND-THOUGHT AUTOPSY REPORT

Proponents: Arlen Specter and other Commission lawyers.

Thesis: Arlen Specter, a key investigator for the Commission and
principal author of the S.B.T., has attempted to explain the
contradiction between the F.B.I. Summary Reports and the Commission’s
autopsy report in terms of two different autopsy conclusions. In the
one and only autopsy examination conducted on the night of the
assassination at Bethesda Hospital, the doctors arrived at the
“tentative” conclusion that the bullet which struck President Kennedy
in the back penetrated only a short distance, then fell out through
the point of entrance when the Dallas doctors applied external heart
massage. The next day, however, the autopsy doctors found out about
the throat wound (which was obscured by the tracheotomy operation) and
changed their conclusion, now deciding that the bullet went completely
through the neck. This conclusion was reached without benefit of
having the corpse before them (or the autopsy and X-ray photographs).
Then, according to Specter’s theory, Commander Humes incinerated his
original autopsy report in his recreation-room fireplace, and drew up
a new autopsy report stating that the bullet exited the President’s
throat. The F.B.I. was not shown the new report and reiterated the old
conclusion in their summary reports.

Drawback: Specter’s theory contradicts The Warren Report’s description
of the autopsy, which he himself wrote in 1964. In The Warren Report
(pp. 88-89), Specter states that, during the autopsy, doctors rejected
the possibility that the bullet penetrated only a short distance, and
that the evidence from Dallas of a throat wound “confirmed” this
conclusion. Thus, whereas The Warren Report states that there was only
and only one conclusion of the autopsy reached during the examination,
the autopsy conclusion was changed (not confirmed) the next day by
evidence from Dallas, and thus there were two autopsy conclusions. The
question remains: Which one of these conflicting statements is true?

2. THE HOOVER HEGELIAN THEORY

Proponent: J. Edgar Hoover.

Thesis: Although the F.B.I. Supplementary Report of January 13, 1964,
states that the bullet that struck President Kennedy in the back
penetrated “to a distance of less than a finger length,” and the
Commission’s autopsy report states that this same bullet passed clean
through the neck and exited the throat, J. Edgar Hoover finds that
there is no “conflict” between the two statements of the autopsy, only
a “difference in the information reported.” Hoover further claims that
the F.B.I. of course knew that the bullet passed clean through the
President’s neck at the same time that the reported the bullet
penetrated only a finger’s length into his back. Since they also knew
that the Commission knew the true contents of the autopsy report,
there was no reason, Hoover insists, to make a false statement of the
autopsy results. Moreover he dialectically explains that although the
F.B.I. report flatly stated that the bullet did not pass through the
President’s body, the F.B.I. itself helpfully pointed to weaknesses in
its own theory by stating that there was a hole in the President’s
shirt caused by an exiting projectile.

Drawback: Thesis plus antithesis doesn’t equal J. Edgar’s synthesis.
Aside from the fact that the F.B.I. Supplementary Reports were
prepared initially for public release and not for the Warren
Commission, a major problem in Hoover’s explanation is that the F.B.I.
told The Washington Post on December 18, 1963, that the hole in the
shirt was caused by a fragment from the third shot which exploded
against the President’s head (not from the first shot). Therefore, the
F.B.I. report of the shirt hole does not “clearly” indicate that the
autopsy doctors’ early observation “that the bullet penetrated only a
short distance into the Presidents head probably was in error,” as
Hoover postulates.

3. VIEW FROM THE BRIDGE THEORY

Proponent: Lawrence Schiller, a photographer and producer of Capitol
Records album, The Controversy, on the assassination.

Thesis: A number of critics assume that shots came from the knoll
because a number of witnesses state they saw smoke coming from the
knoll area. The most celebrated puff-of-smoke witness is S. M.
Holland. Schiller brought Holland back to the exact spot where he said
he was standing, placed a camera level with his shoulder, aimed it at
the spot where Holland said he saw the puff of smoke, and snapped a
photograph. The photograph shows that directly behind and slightly
higher than the spot where Holland claims the smoke came from is the
sixth-floor window of the Texas School Book Depository. Thus, Schiller
suggests, “Maybe both Holland and the Warren Commission are right: the
shots came from the Book Depository but from Holland’s perspective the
smoke and the report of a gun appeared to come from the knoll.”

S. M. Holland (shown on the overpass where he stood November 22, 1963)
saw smoke under the tree directly above his right thumb.

Drawback: Holland, whose depth perception is normal, was just possibly
able to distinguish the knoll, 180 feet away, from the Book
Depository, which was 120 feet beyond that. Also, Schiller’s analysis
is destroyed completely in view of the fact that witnesses at other
points also thought the shots came from the knoll: the policeman who
ran up it, Abraham Zapruder, and others.

4. THE NOBLE LIE THEORY

Proponents: Drew Pearson, Henri Nannen (editor of Der Stern), and
Jacob Cohen (former instructor at Brandeis summer school and author of
Honest Verdict).

Thesis: Drew Pearson quotes Der Stern’s explanation that the original
autopsy report was suppressed “on the grounds that President Kennedy
was suffering from Addison’s disease” and “his family did not want it
known.” Why? Because “politically Kennedy’s illness could become
dangerous. Addison’s illness—it sounds sinister.” Thus, according to
this theory, the Kennedys withheld the autopsy report and “hid the
X-rays, even from the Warren Commission.” And “this would also explain
the lack of a date on the Warren Commission autopsy report” which was
changed “so that it contained no mention of the President’s illness,”
as well as why the autopsy surgeon burned the original autopsy report
(“otherwise hundreds of people would have been faced with lying under
oath, which would have been deplorable”).

Drawback: The fact that Kennedy had Addison’s desease was in the
Warren Report (as well as in Sorenson’s biography of Kennedy), so why
delete it from the autopsy report? And the Commission files show that
Attorney General Robert Kennedy explicitly gave his approval to the
Commission to look at the autopsy photographs and X-rays.

5. MANCHESTER THEORY

Proponent: William Manchester.

Thesis: In his sometime authorized account, author Manchester
recognizes that there was hardly enough time for Oswald to have fired
three shots. He therefore proposes that only two shots were fired: the
first hitting Kennedy in the back and then going on to cause all of
Connally’s wounds, the second inflicting Kennedy’s fatal head wound.
According to this theory, Oswald left an extra cartridge case at the
scene [from the Walker shooting?] and the some hundred witnesses who
thought they heard three or more shots actually heard only two and
echoes.

Drawback: More than a hundred witnesses heard more than two shots, and
a number of witnesses claim that they saw a bullet miss and hit the
pavement. Finally, one man, James Tague, was wounded by a fragment
from a bullet. As he was standing 260 feet from the President’s car at
the time of the head shot, it does not seem likely that he was wounded
by a fragment from that bullet.

Gaining wobbly support from the preceding sources, the S.B.T. runs
into stiff competition from most of the following theories.

6. CONNALLY’S SMALL-DETAIL THEORY

Proponent: John B. Connally, Governor of Texas.

Thesis: Immediately after he single-handedly demolished the S.B.T. in
Life, creating a nationwide outcry to reopen investigation, Connally
called a press conference in Texas. He said that although he was not
hit by the same bullet which hit Kennedy, it was only a small
“detail,” and he advised everyone to have faith in the Warren
Commission because they were all patriotic men.

Drawback: None.

7. RUSSELL LONG THEORY

Proponent: Senator Russell Long.

Thesis: The whole controversy over the S.B.T. was made to appear a bit
irrelevant when Senator Long told the A.P. that he didn’t doubt Oswald
played a part in the assassination. “But,” he added, “whoever fired
that second shot was a lot better shot than Oswald.”

8. SHOT-THROUGH-THE-TREE THEORY

Proponent: Alexander M. Bickel.

Thesis: Professor Bickel, writing in Commentary, finds that although
the S.B.T. is untenable, the single-assassin theory can be rescued by
constructing an alternate hypothesis to explain the first two shots.
The Commission concluded that the first shot could not have come
before the 210th frame (photo A) on the Zapruder film because before
that point an oak tree blocked the assassin’s line of sight. Bickel
has found, however, that on frames 185-186 on the Zapruder film there
was a “break” or window in the foliage of the tree (photo B). Bickel
thus suggests that Oswald might have fired through the foliage at this
point, which would have left sufficient time to operate the bolt and
fire again at frame 232 to wound Connally, then fire the fatal head
shot at film frame 313. According to this theory, the first bullet
lodged in the President’s back and was later expelled on his stretcher
at Parkland Hospital in Dallas, accounting for its pristine condition.
The second bullet wounded Connally and fragmentized, accounting for
the two fragments found in the front seat of the Presidential
limousine, and the final shot disintegrated when it struck the
President’s head, sending a minute fragment out through the throat and
accounting for the throat wound.

undefined

Drawback: Although Professor Bickel’s theory is certainly a possible
alternative to The Warren Report, it still leaves a few unsolved
problems. First, the opening in the tree gave the assassin a view of
the car for no more than a tenth of a second. It seems improbable that
a rifleman could aim, squeeze the tiger, and fire off an accurate shot
in this brief interval. Second, this theory means that the President
was hit in frame 186 but did not react until frame 225—a two-second
delayed reaction. Finally, the theory fails to account for the shot
that went astray and hit a bystander (although conceivably Oswald had
time to fire a fourth shot, but then why were only three cartridge
cases found?).

9. THE STEROID THEORY

Proponent: Ellen Leopold, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Thesis: President Kennedy may indeed have had a two-second delayed
reaction to the first shot “if he was on steroids.” Not infrequently,
Miss Leopold points out, sufferers of Addison’s disease are put on
steroids because they tend to suppress reactions of the adrenal
glands. This theory lends unexpected support to Professor Bickel’s
Shot-Through-The-Tree Theory and also to the Early-Hit Theory (which
posits a shot before the tree, as reported in Esquire for December,
1966).

Drawback: The Warren Commission, possibly for reasons pointed out by
Drew Pearson, never determined whether or not Kennedy was on steroids.
Until this question is settled, the Steroid Theory will be academic.

10. RIDDLE-NEWTON THEORY

Proponent: R. A. J. Riddle, member of the Brain Research Institute and
former Professor of physics at U.C.L.A.

Thesis: Dr. Riddle finds a discrepancy between the Warren Report and
Newton’s second law of motion—i.e. that an object struck by a
projectile will be given the same direction as that of the projectile.
Because the film of the assassination shows that the general direction
of motion of Kennedy is backward and to the left (viz. Vincent
Salandria’s “Head Movement Theory,” Esquire, December, 1966) and
because there is no evidence of a sudden acceleration of the car and
on the assumption that a neuromuscular reaction can be ruled out as
the cause for President Kennedy’s sudden violent backward motion, Dr.
Riddle believes that the projectile must have come from in front of
the President. His computations add weight to Vincent Salandria’s
“Head Movement Theory.”

Drawback: Are Newton’s laws sound if they contradict the Warren Commission?

11. DOUBLE HEAD-SHOT THEORY

Proponents: Professor Josiah Thompson and Ray Marcus, independently.

Thesis: The “third” shot, which caused Kennedy’s fatal head wound, was
actually two nearly simultaneous shots, one coming from the rear and
another from the right front.

This theory takes Vincent Salandria’s “Head Movement Theory” and
Riddle’s computations one step further. In a forthcoming book,
Thompson uses precise scientific studies made of the Zapruder film
frames and close analysis of the medical evidence to show that the
damage was inflicted by two bullets, not one. Also, he cites ear- and
eyewitness reports which back up his claim that the third shot was
really a third and fourth.

12. MARK LANE’S FRENCH FIVE-SHOT THEORY

Proponent: Mark Lane.

Thesis: In the French edition of his Rush to Judgment, Lane first
proposed a theory which was later appended to his paperback edition of
Rush to Judgment. In his original French version bullet “une” strikes
President Kennedy from the back. Bullet “deux” strikes Kennedy in the
throat. Bullet “trois” hit Governor Connally. Bullet “quatre” misses
and wounds the bystander James Tague. And bullet “cinq” fired from the
grassy knoll hits Kennedy in the head. Since one shot came from behind
the President (bullet no. 1), one shot came from in front of the
President (bullet. No. 2)—he was facing straight ahead when hit in the
throat—and one shot (bullet No. 5) came from the right (the knoll),
there must have been at least “trois” assassins firing from different
directions.

Drawbacks: If a bullet hit President Kennedy from in front, as Lane
suggests, where did it go? There are no exit wounds that could account
for a bullet entering through the throat. Then too, if the bullet
entered the head from the rear, as the autopsy shows, it could not
have entered from the right front, as Lane claims.

13. DAL-TEX THEORY

Proponent: Harold Weisberg (Whitewash series).

Thesis: Some of the shots may have come from the Dal-Tex Building
across the street from the Texas School Book Depository. In Whitewash
II, a sequel to his first book, Weisberg enlarges an A.P. photo of the
motorcade (A and B) and claims to see “a man in seeming distress” on a
fire escape (arrow) on the side of the Dal-Tex Building and “an
arm-like object projecting from the open second-story window”
(circle).

undefined

This theory receives some corroboration from a photograph that
appeared in The Saturday Evening Post on December 14, 1963 (C). It
purportedly showed the assassin’s line of sight through the cross
hairs of a telescopic lens. What the Post did not notice is that the
corner of the Texas School Book Depository is visible in the right
edge of the photo. Their photographer was shooting from the Dal-Tex
Building, not having been able to gain entrance into the Depository.
And strangely enough, according to Weisberg, the established bullet
trajectories still bear him out.

A tantalizing note adds intrigue to the theory: a man was arrested in
the Dal-Tex Building shortly after the assassination, allegedly for
having no business being there.

14. THE 24 FRAMES-PER-SECOND THEORY

Proponent: Harold Weisberg.

Thesis: The Commission’s conclusion that all three shots were fired in
5.6 seconds is based on the assumption that Abraham Zapruder’s camera
was operating at a speed of 18.3 frames per second. The 103 frames
that elapsed between frame 210 (the earliest point the Commission says
the first shot could have been fired) and frame 313 (the point at
which the third shot struck Kennedy’s head), divided by the speed of
the camera (18.3 frames per second), yields the 5.6-seconds time that
the assassin had to fire in. Weisberg has found, however, an F.B.I.
report in the National Archives in which Abe Zapruder claimed that his
camera was set to operate at twenty-four frames per second, not 18.3.
This would mean that the entire assassination occurred in less than
4.3 seconds (103 frames divided by 24), which is less time than the
murder weapon could be fired twice.

Drawback: The F.B.I. established the film speed of the camera by
filming the sweep second hand of a clock, and the camera’s
manufacturer recently confirmed that the camera speed was less than a
tenth of a frame from the figure reported by the F.B.I.

15. INDUCED CANCER THEORY

Proponents: Jack Ruby, Mark Lane, Penn Jones, Jr., Norman Mailer, and
an unidentified Russian newspaper.

Thesis: That Jack Ruby’s death was planned and brought about by
members of a conspiracy whose prior business had been the murders of
President Kennedy, Patrolman J. D. Tippit and, possibly, Lee Harvey
Oswald.

According to an Associated Press story by Bernard Gavzer (datelined
Dallas, January 3, 1967), Ruby had expressed the belief that mustard
gas had been seeped into his cell and that he was injected with
cancer.

The Dallas Times Herald states in an editorial that “the Communist
Russian press has accused the city of Dallas of being
“‘Co-Conspirators’ who…might have deliberately injected cancer cells
into the veins of Ruby.” This theory might in turn stem from such
statements as the one uttered by Mark Lane after a screening of his
movie, Rush to Judgment. Before a celebrity-packed audience he mused,
“Isn’t it strange that Ruby’s sniffles went from a cold to pneumonia
to cancer in twenty-four hours?”

Ditto Penn Jones, whose assassination-connected death count is now at
twenty (before ruby: the motorcycle death of James Worrell, who
allegedly saw somebody run out of the back door of the Texas School
Book Depository). Jones, of course, finds Ruby’s death “very
suspicious.”

In a rambling, emotional obituary entitled A Requiem for the Rube,
Norman Mailer offers his own interpretation of Ruby’s death and the
significance thereof. “Jack Ruby added a point to the general median
cancer potential by bugging the hope we could find one answer via Lee
Harvey Oswald. In turn, us, Great American Pure Breed Public, in for
feed, gave him his cans back. He died of cancer this morning, told us
the way. We do not know the cure, but son, now we know the way. We
know how to give cancer now…”

16. TWO-MEN IN-A-WINDOW THEORY

Proponent: Mrs. Eric Walther.

Thesis: A few weeks after the assassination, Mrs. Walther stated in an
F.B.I. report that she saw a rifleman in one window of the Texas
School Book Depository, and next to the man with the rifle was another
man in a brown suit coat. Mrs. Walther was unable to see whether or
not the second man had a rifle. A second rifleman of course would
explain how Governor Connally and President Kennedy were both hit less
than two seconds apart. The Commission never evaluated Mrs. Walther’s
statement.

Drawback: The window next to Oswald’s was closed during the assassination.

Retort: The second man may only have been a lookout.

17. DOCTORED PHOTOGRAPH THEORY

Proponents: Mark Lane, Harold Weisberg, David Lifton, et al.

Thesis: The photographs showing Oswald with the Kennedy and Tippit
murder weapons are clever paste-ups of Oswald’s head on another man’s
body.

When the Dallas police found the two photographs they were certain
they had positive evidence linking Oswald with the weapons. Life
magazine ran one of the pictures on its cover. Newsweek and The New
York Times also printed the picture.

Confusion reigned shortly. Careful observers had noticed that all
three publications had retouched the rifle and the pistol, but each
did it in different ways. Their editors were forced to write
humiliating letters to the Warren Commission admitting their
alterations, but in essence none had falsified the photographs. Those
accusations were to come later.

Mark Lane and Harold Weisberg noticed that the shadow under Oswald’s
nose seemed to be inconsistent with the other shadows in the picture.
Both the F.B.I. and the Dallas police rushed to prove such a
photograph was possible, but only succeeding in adding a touch of
Dogberry humor. The Dallas police shot a picture of a plainclothesman
on the scene, but on a cloudy day. The F.B.I. posed an agent on a roof
in bright sunlight, but the photograph they sent to the Commission had
the head cut off.

undefined
18. FALSE KNOLL THEORY

Proponent: David Lifton, a U.C.L.A. engineering graduate student and
coauthor of the three-assassins article in Ramparts which introduced
Riddle’s analysis. (See No. 11.)

Thesis: On the day of the assassination, three types of camouflage
were employed by conspirators positioned beneath, on, and above the
grassy knoll. Lifton reached this hypothesis after minute study of
photographs of the area during and after the assassination. It answers
the question why, despite the fact that eyewitness reports and the
Head Movement Theory indicate shots came from the grassy knoll,
nothing at all was found there immediately afterward.

Underground camouflage: Lifton suggests that prior to the
assassination, the grassy knoll was excavated from beneath and a
system of tunnels and bunkers was built into it. Peepholes covered by
grass-mesh camouflage were placed on the sloping surface of the knoll.
Subterranean nooks would explain the statement of witness Garland
Slack: “I have heard this same sort of sound when a shot had come from
within a cave…” Lifton goes further to suggest that the puff of smoke
seen by some people on the grassy knoll may have been the exhaust from
a gas engine incorporated within the camouflage mechanization.

Surface camouflage: Lifton finds alterations (“bulges”) in the wall
and the hedgerow on the grassy knoll, netting in the bushes and faint
images of heads. Borrowing support from deputy Constable Weitzman who
ran toward the wall and who said, “I scaled the wall and, apparently,
my hands grabbed steam pipes. I burned them,” Lifton points out that
there are no steam pipes atop the wall. This might, he says, be an
indication that things may have been altered for that day. Weitzman
also says a witness told him that he saw somebody throw something
through a bush.

Elevated camouflage: Because a comparison of certain photographs taken
during the assassination with others taken afterward indicates that
some tree structures had been altered on the knoll, and because he
sees images up in the trees in assassination photos, Lifton believes
there was some camouflage in the trees. Eyewitnesses S. M. Holland,
Austin Miller and Frank Reilly all state that shots seemed to have
come out of the trees.

Drawbacks: As even Lifton admits, the photo enlargements are of
extremely grainy quality (they could not be reproduced properly here)
and interpretations of them are questionable at best.

19. BLUNDERBUSS THEORY

Proponents: Mark Lane and Harold Weisberg.

Thesis: At least five witnesses saw a puff of smoke during the
assassination. Commission lawyers didn’t investigate because they
believed no modern weapon would emit puffs of smoke conforming to the
witnesses’ descriptions. (Some of the witnesses, when queried, guessed
the smoke came from a motorcycle or steam pipe.)

Since Commission lawyers were willing to accept the fact that Oswald
used “an antiquated rifle and twenty-year-old ammunition,” as Mark
Lane frequently points out on TV, why preclude the possibility that
the second assassin used even a more antiquated weapon?

20. MAKING OF THE PRESIDENT

Proponent: Vincent Salandria, a Philadelphia lawyer.

Thesis: Mr. Salandria finds a curious passage in Theodore H. White’s
The Making of the President, 1964. “On the flight [back to Washington
aboard Air Force One] the party learned that there was no conspiracy;
learned of the identity of Oswald and his arrest.” Salandria posits
that this announcement was deliberately misleading and may have been
the first sign of a conspiracy cover-up. The theory, obviously, would
have to implicate strategically powerful individuals. The argument is
as follows: Johnson’s party landed in Washington at 4:58 p.m. Dallas
time. But at this point, Oswald had not been charged with the
assassination. He had not yet been identified by any eyewitnesses in
the Tippit killing, much less the assassination. The rifle found in
the Depository had not yet been traced. The photographs of Oswald
holding a rifle and wearing a revolver in his holster were not
discovered until the next afternoon. No fingerprints were taken from
him for comparison purposes until sometime after six p.m. The fiber on
the rifle was not examined until Saturday morning. The brown-paper bag
had not been linked to him. Marina Oswald had not yet been questioned.
In short, none of the evidence itemized in the table of contents of
The Warren Report under Chapter IV, “The Assassin,” was known to the
Dallas police at the time. As to the statement that there was “no
conspiracy,” Salandria believes that the announcement was suspiciously
premature. At 4:58 p.m. it was understood that the shots had come from
the front, yet the suspect Oswald was positioned behind the President.
District Attorney Henry M. Wade told the Warren Commission that
discussions relating to a conspiracy charge were carried on by
telephone between his office and Washington until late that night. As
far as Wade could remember, these included calls from the White House,
the F.B.I. and the State Department. The general drift of the calls
seemed to be to discourage any conspiracy charge. Salandria finds this
disturbing. During Commission hearings, Congressman Gerald Ford told
Secretary of State Dean Rusk that a comment he made the day after the
assassination indicating that no foreign power was involved seemed a
bit hasty. Said Ford, “You really didn’t have much time to evaluate
all of the evidence.” Ford was concerned about who in the State
Department might have made telephone calls to Texas urging that no
charge of conspiracy be alleged.

Drawback: As yet the precise text of the announcement on the plane is
not known, nor is its origin. Theodore White refuses to comment except
to say that the plane was in constant touch with the White House, and
messages were relayed through a Signal Corps center in the Midwest.
But the announcement may have been based, innocently, on the lack of
any indication that there was a conspiracy afoot.

21. THE I-MURDER THEORY

Proponent: Malcom Muggeridge.

Thesis: According to this theory, Oswald “kills Kennedy for
Intelligence’s own sake; the perfect I-murder.” Presume that Oswald
was at least a double agent, recruited first by Soviet Intelligence
during his stay in Minsk, then turned around by the F.B.I., and
“finally reduced to a condition of bemusedness and lost identity which
led him, in a trance-like state, to murder the President, as van der
Lubbe, in a similarly trance-like state, set fire to the Reichstag.”
His shooting at Walker, Pro- and Anti-Cuban activities, etc. were all
done as a cover, in the hope he would lead the F.B.I. to the Soviet
contact. This bizarre game caused Oswald to lose touch with reality,
and, not knowing who he was working for or why, he shot Kennedy. To
avoid undue embarrassment, he had to be shot, and Jack Ruby was
standing by.

22. THE SUGAR THEORY

Proponent: J. I. Rodale, editor of Prevention and Organic Gardening and Farming.

Thesis: Oswald was seen minutes after the assassination with a Coke
bottle in his hand. This fact leads health-crusader J. I. Rodale to
suggest “Oswald was not responsible for this action: his brain was
confused because he was a sugar drunkard. So what is called for now is
a full-scale investigation of sugar consumption and crime.”

The Curb Exchange. James Tague, who was standing on the curb along the
south side of Main Street near the overpass, was struck sharply on the
cheek at the time of the shooting. Police officers investigated
immediately and said they found a “fresh chip in the curb” near where
he was standing. A photograph was taken of the chip in the curb the
next morning (photo A).

Eight months later (July, 1964) the photographer and two F.B.I. men
returned to the site to make measurements, but could not find the
chip. The F.B.I. men hypothesized that in the interim “there [had]
been numerous rains that could have possibly washed away such a mark
and also…the area is cleaned by a street-cleaning machine about one a
week, which would also wash away such a mark.” A month after that, J.
Edgar Hoover wrote the Commission that the F.B.I. had cut out the
section of curb with the mark (a photo of which he enclosed, B), and
that indeed the mark was the same as that in the original photograph!
This internal F.B.I. contradiction was discovered by Raymond Marcus,
who also claims that the curb cutout doesn’t have any mark at all.

23. THE WASHING-MACHINE THEORY : Proponent: George de Mohrenschildt.

Thesis: Marina Oswald, on the eve of the assassination, told her
husband that they couldn’t live together “unless he would equip the
apartment with a washing machine.” This demand caused a bitter
argument which evoked in Oswald “the wish to strike and hurt someone.”

Drawback: According to the Warren Commission, Oswald had the materials
for making the paper bag for his rifle before he visited with his
wife. Anyhow, as the Warren Report notes, they had lived near a
Laundromat.

24. KENNEDY LIVES THEORY

Proponent: George Thomson, a Los Angeles swimming-pool engineer and writer.

Thesis: Thomson, in monographs and tapes which have been underground
best sellers (reportedly 42,000 sold to date), advances the theory
that Tippit was substituted for Kennedy in the Presidential limousine,
and consequently it was Tippit not Kennedy who was shot. (Kennedy,
years after, was the secret guest of honor at Truman Capote’s
celebrated party.) This explains the illegal removal of Kennedy’s body
from Dallas by his close cohorts, the missing X-ray and autopsy
photographs, and subsequent confusion in reporting medical facts. The
Kennedy controversy, for Thomson, revolves around the question of
where Kennedy is today.

25. THE “WHAT HAVE WE HERE!” THEORY

Proponent: T. N. Tastmona.

Thesis: In a privately-printed 200-page volume called It Is As If:
($20), Mr. Tastmona (“American born of American-born parents)
scrutinizes the details of the assassination and the text of The
Warren Report, finding bizarre parallels with the life of Benjamin
Franklin, Sherlock Holmes, Mormon doctrine and American history. One
example, among many, is cited here as an extreme example of
assassination theorizing. In the Chronology index of The Autobiography
of Benjamin Franklin, Tastmona finds mention of Arthur Lee, an
American commissioner accompanying Franklin to France. Three pages
later he finds a reference to Richard Oswald, Chief British
negotiator. “The names ‘Lee’ and ‘Oswald’ sounded a responsive chord.
Lee Oswald!—assassin of President Kennedy. Could some sort of historic
parallel be coming to light? Could a Harvey be involved in these
diplomatic deals?” Sure enough, on the next page of the Franklin
autobiography Tastmona finds David Hartley, a British envoy.
“Hartley!—a close approximation of ‘Harvey’… “‘Hartley’ differs from
‘Harvey’ by two letters. Perceive a composite form—Har TLV ey. What
have we here! TLV equals a better approximation for ‘television’ that
even plain TV. Lee Oswald was shot by Jack Ruby in full view of a
national television audience.…It is as if this television crime had
somehow been arranged to expound the disparity existing between the
names Hartley and Harvey.” Tastmona goes on to reveal that David
Hartley was really David Hartley Junior, or Jr., and “it was Jack Ruby
with initials J. R. who by this brutal system of criminal cryptology
painstakingly identified the Hartley of scholarly historical allusion
to be J R. or Junior. “While in Russia, Lee Oswald kept what he called
a ‘Historic Diary.’ He affected interest in his place in history. This
attitude must be considered as part of a pre-instructed clue system,
hinting the historical parallels just adduced.”

 Back to First Primer of Assassination Theories

http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/archived/warrenreport.htm

Who's Afraid of the Warren Report? by Edward Jay Epstein (With
annotations by K. A. Rahn) Esquire, December 1966

The Warren Commission was supposed to end all doubts about the
assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Tragically, it hasn’t. The
distinguished members of the Commission never intended that their
Report should become the basis for an amateur detective game. Yet this
is precisely what is happening. A growing number of people are
spending their leisure hours scouring the Commission’s Report and the
twenty-six volumes of testimony and exhibits for possible clues to a
conspiracy. Others, using high-powered magnifying glasses and infrared
lights, are scrutinizing photographs of the assassination scene,
hoping to find snipers concealed in the shrubbery. Still others are
combing the National Archives on the hunch that they will locate
something relevant in the three hundred cubic feet of documents that
the Commission deemed irrelevant. Since the National Archives will
provide microfilm copies of any nonclassified document in the
assassination file at five cents a page, including F.B.I. and Secret
Service investigative reports, a syndicate of private researchers is
planning to buy all the available documents. Presumably they will then
subdivide the 20,000 or so pages into areas (e.g., Ruby, Oswald,
eyewitnesses, etc.) , and attempt a more definitive study than the
Commission itself conducted.1 Elizabeth Hardwick, a literary critic of
considerable stature, is considering joining the syndicate for another
purpose. She believes it might contain the American comédie humaine.
Meanwhile, more active private investigators are tracking down leads
in Dallas and re-interviewing star witnesses. A few are keeping the
death count2 on those who have been even remotely connected with the
case. And there is a burgeoning grapevine through which assassination
news is rapidly disseminated. As soon as a new discovery is made,
assassination buffs across the country are alerted by a telephonic
chain letter.This phenomenon would not be particularly disturbing if
the players were merely kooks. However, most of them are not.
Assassination buffs apparently are serious people—professionals,
students, housewives, etc.—bent on solving what they consider to be an
unsolved mystery. Perhaps this is all part of the American folklore
tradition of amateurs stepping in and solving cases that baffle the
police. Already amateurs have made some constructive contributions to
the case. Mrs. Sylvia Meagher, a U.N. careerist, has completely
indexed the  twenty-six volumes of testimony, a feat the Commission
never had time to accomplish. Mr. and Mrs. George Nash, sociologists,
found three new witnesses to the Tippit murder by following a tip
given to them by a Dallas undertaker. Vincent Salandria, a
Philadelphia lawyer, has charted the precise movements of the
President’s head after the bullet’s impact by superimposing on each
other the individual frames of the film of the assassination taken by
a bystander.3 And Paul Hoch, a Berkeley graduate student, has
unearthed some extremely important documents in the National Archives,
including the original F.B.I. report on the autopsy. The man who has
undoubtedly done the most to propagate the assassination cult is Mark
Lane, thirty-nine-year-old attorney and sometime New York State
Assemblyman. Lane began lecturing in coffeehouses, them stumped the
college circuit, and is currently promoting both a book and a
two-and-a-half-hour documentary film on the assassination. Above all,
the Warren Commission itself shares at least part of the
responsibility for the game. The Commission was obliged to publish all
twenty-six volumes of data, although Commissioner Allen Dulles saw no
point in doing so. “Nobody reads,” he said. “Don’t believe people read
in this country. There will be few professors who will read the
record.” Making the record public, however, is The American Way.
Indeed, the number of people who have bothered to read the record has
been small (less than a thousand sets of the twenty-six volumes have
been sold to date). But they have been an inquisitive group, often
ingenious. With their help, the public record has spawned a school of
theories that have been swimming in the eddies of the public press,
lately with increasing dizziness. Many of the theories, it is true,
depend on fragments of evidence which, although clear enough, are
palpably irrelevant (i.e., the death of several peripheral witnesses
since the assassination). But they are no more irrelevant than many of
the Report’s own meticulous entries (i.e., in July of 1962 Oswald
spent $3.87 for a subscription to Time). Assassination buffs have
seized, perhaps too eagerly, on discrepancies in the testimony of
witnesses who were understandably shaken and confused. But in this
they are no more at fault than the Commission, which appeared to
accept testimony, even though it may have been ambiguous, so long as
it aided its predisposition to prove Oswald the lone assassin. While
the Commission was obviously intent on proving there was no
conspiracy, selecting testimony and evidence for their Report that
particularly suited them, the assassination buffs have responded by
being suspicious of everything in which the Commission put credence.
Throughout the case, where an omission or a contradiction seems best
explained as simple human error, the private theorists loudly claim
intentional deceit on the part of the Dallas police, the F.B.I., the
witnesses, and the Commission itself.  Most of these accusations would
be difficult to prove without further evidence, and thus for the time
being they are rendered moot. But from the mass of such charges there
has emerged one flagrant contradiction in the Report which can be
proved or disproved very easily. More important, it is a crucial
contradiction upon which all of the other leading theories depend.

  This contradiction involves the one and only autopsy conducted on
the President at the Bethesda (Maryland) Naval Medical Center on the
night of the assassination. The report of the autopsy findings,
published by the Commission, virtually precluded the possibility of a
second assassin. First, it shows that both bullets that hit the
President came from behind and the general direction of the Texas
School Book Depository (where Oswald was at the time). This finding of
course would cut the ground out from under early theories that the
shots came from a point in front of the motorcade. Mark Lane’s theory
that the throat wound was an entrance wound, Thomas Buchanan’s theory
that the shots came from the triple overpass, and the many theories
based on eyewitness testimony that the shots came from the grassy
knoll would all be rendered invalid by the autopsy findings.  Second,
the autopsy report states that the first bullet hit the President in
the back of the neck and then exited through his throat. This led the
Commission to believe that the same bullet that exited from Kennedy’s
neck proceeded to wound Connally, who was seated directly in front of
the President. This finding would explain the split-second time lapse
between the first two shots. An amateur film of the assassination
shows that both Kennedy and Connally were hit no more than 1.8 seconds
apart. Yet, the bolt of the murder rifle cannot be operated in less
than 2.3 seconds. In other words, both men were shot in less time than
the rifle could be fired twice. And this fact has given rise to a
number of two-assassin theories. But if both men were hit by the same
bullet, as the autopsy report suggests, the time problem is resolved,
and there is only one assassin  Finally, if in fact Connally and
Kennedy were hit by the same bullet, it can be deduced that all the
bullet fragments found in the President’s car came from the rifle of
Lee Harvey Oswald. Since the autopsy findings indicate that only two
bullets hit Kennedy, and one bullet was found virtually intact
(raising some other problems), all the fragments must have come from
the other bullet. Since some of these fragments matched Oswald’s
rifle, the other fragments which were too deformed to be ballistically
identified also must have come from Oswald’s rifle. The autopsy report
thus leaves little ground for the two-assassin theories.  But the
Commission’s account of the autopsy is not the only one. Two F.B.I.
Summary Reports that were not published by the Commission give an
alarmingly different version of the autopsy findings. After the F.B.I.
Reports were published in my book Inquest, Norman Redlich, a former
Commission lawyer, told the New York Times that these Summary Reports
had to be deemed erroneous and instead the Commission relied on the
original F.B.I. report of the autopsy (known as the Sibert-O’Neill
report), prepared by the two F.B.I. agents who were present at the
autopsy. This heretofore unpublished F.B.I. report was only recently
made available to me. It gives a detailed description of the autopsy:
“Upon completion of X-rays and photographs, the first incision was
made at 8:15 p.m.” The F.B.I. Report then states that Commander J. J.
Humes, the chief autopsy surgeon, made a detailed examination of the
head wound to determine the exact path of the bullet. Only later, in
“the latter stages of autopsy,” did Commander Humes discover the wound
in the President’s back. It was, according to the F.B.I. Report,
“below the shoulders.” In probing the wound, Humes found that the
bullet had barely penetrated the skin “inasmuch as the end of the
opening could be felt with the finger.” The autopsy surgeons were
puzzled. The bullet hole was only a few inches deep, yet there was no
bullet to account for it. The doctors then learned that a bullet had
been found on a stretcher in the Dallas hospital where President
Kennedy was first treated, and Commander Humes concluded: “The pattern
was clear that one bullet entered the President’s back and worked its
way out of the body during external cardiac massage.” The autopsy
examination ended about eleven p.m.

   Ten months later, The Warren Report described autopsy findings
entirely different form those reported by the F.B.I. Now, in the
Report, there was no wound “below the shoulders.” Instead, there was a
wound in the back of the neck. Rather than barely penetrating the
skin, the bullet had gone clean through the neck and exited through
the throat. The Warren Report states these conclusions were reached
during the autopsy, the same autopsy that the F.B.I. report described.
How can two such accounts, diametrically opposed to each other, be
reconciled?  Former Commission lawyers have recently explained that at
the time of the autopsy the doctors were not aware of the wound in the
President’s throat. The outlines of this wound had been obliterated by
a tracheotomy performed earlier in the day in Dallas. Learning of the
throat wound the next day, the autopsy doctors changed their opinion
and deduced that the bullet exited through the throat. This would seem
to explain why a bullet that was first thought to have penetrated the
back only a distance of a few inches was later thought to have passed
entirely through the body. But it begs the question of how a wound
below the shoulder became a wound in the back of the neck. Obviously,
no amount of information about the throat wound could alter the
location of the back wound. And this is the crucial contradiction.
Of course, the contradiction might be dismissed (as Time magazine
dismisses it) simply as an F.B.I. error. But the fact is that other
evidence seems to corroborate the F.B.I. version. A diagram of the
President’s body, prepared by Commander Humes4 during the autopsy,
very clearly shows the wound to be below the shoulder. The other
autopsy surgeon, Lieutenant Colonel Pierre Finck, was quoted by a
secret Service agent as saying: “There are no lanes for an outlet in
this man’s shoulder.” Another Secret Service agent, who was called in
after the autopsy for the express purpose of viewing the President’s
body, later testified that he observed the back wound to be “about six
inches below the neckline.” F.B.I. photographs taken of the
President’s shirt and jacket (which were never published by the
Commission) show the bullet hole to be about six inches below the top
of the collar of both shirt and jacket, a position which corresponds
with the F.B.I.’s assertion of a wound “below the shoulders.”
Perhaps all this evidence of a wound below the shoulder is only a
strange series of random coincidences. But so long as these other
discrepancies stand, the contradiction cannot be discounted merely as
an “F.B.I. error.”   Nor can it be dismissed as irrelevant. It is
true, as former Commission lawyers now point out, that an
investigation as complex as the Kennedy assassination is bound to have
a few “loose ends.” But the contradiction between the F.B.I. and
Commission account of the autopsy findings is more than just a “loose
end.” It is crucial to the question of whether or not Oswald acted
alone.5 For if the bullet did hit the President below the shoulders,
it could not have exited through the throat and continued on to wound
Governor Connally. This is because the bullet was traveling downward
and was undeflected. If the F.B.I. report is accurate, President
Kennedy and Governor Connally were hit by two different bullets which,
in turn, gives grounds for theories of a second assassin.

   Perhaps this is why the publication of the F.B.I. Summary Reports
and photographs in my book precipitated a good deal of debate and
wrangling over the contradiction in the autopsy findings. In Look
magazine, Fletcher Knebel attempted to prove that the F.B.I. did not
receive a copy of the official autopsy findings until after its
Summary Reports were published. He stated that Treasury Department
records show that the Secret Service sent the autopsy report to the
F.B.I. on December 23, 1963. However, Professor Richard Popkin
countered in The New York Review of Books that Knebel inadvertently
had proved that the F.B.I. did have the final autopsy report in hand
when its final summary report was prepared on January 13, 1964 (a fact
Knebel apparently missed).6 Newsweek suggested that Kennedy “might
have been bent forward enough” to place the back wound higher than the
throat wound. But Life’s film of the assassination indicated that the
President was seated erect at the time of the shot. And Philadelphia
District Attorney Arlen Specter, a former Commission lawyer, attempted
to demonstrate to the Greater Philadelphia Magazine7 how a shirt could
rise high enough on the neck to that a bullet hole about six inches
below the top of the collar would be consistent with a neck wound. The
interviewer was not, however, fully convinced since it appeared that
this feat would require doubling over a portion of the shirt—and there
was only one bullet hole in the back of the President’s shirt.
Throughout the debate, the F.B.I. has remained coyly ambiguous. It
told The Washington Post that its December 9 Summary Report was “based
on the medical evidence at that time.” But it told the Los Angeles
Times that the F.B.I. report was wrong when it said that there was “no
point of exit” for the bullet, explaining “F.B.I. agents were not
doctors, but merely quoting doctors.” To the New York Times and other
papers, the F.B.I. declined comment.    The great irony of the
controversy is that it can be settled decisively by available evidence
that neither the Commission nor its critics have seen. Color
photographs, taken during the autopsy, would show exactly where the
bullet entered the President’s back, whether it was below the
shoulders, as F.B.I. reports claim, or in the back of the neck, as the
Commission’s autopsy report claims. After the autopsy, these
photographs were turned over undeveloped to the Protective Research
Section of the Secret Service. What happened to the photographs after
this is not definitely known: some Commission lawyers believe they
were given to the Kennedy family, others believe that they remained
with the Secret Service or White House. In any case, the Commission
never received either the autopsy photographs or X-rays. Not that the
Commission lawyers did not try to obtain them: Arlen Specter
reportedly was on the verge of tears when he found out that they were
not to be requested by the chairman     The whereabouts of these
photographs and X-rays has remained a mystery. Newsweek recently
reported that a two-month inquiry by its staff “failed to turn up a
single government official who can, or will, give a simple answer to
the question: ‘Where are the Kennedy autopsy pictures?’”    Moreover,
it is not known whether the autopsy photographs were ever developed.
Undeveloped color film tends to lose detail and decompose in about
five years. Three years have already elapsed. If the photographs fade
or are somehow accidentally destroyed, the opportunity to resolve the
contradiction will be lost forever. What is ascertainable today may
become a moot point in the near future.   What is to be done? The
Commission’s investigation of the assassination of President Kennedy
cannot be considered complete so long as the contradiction in the
autopsy findings remains unresolved. By viewing the photographs, the
contradiction can be resolved once and for all time. If they show the
wound to be in the back of the neck, then there can be no further
doubt as to the accuracy and authenticity of the autopsy report.
Theories of a second assassin, evolving out of the contradiction,
would be quashed. And virtually all of the speculation would be
reduced, at least among thinking people, to groundless banter.   There
is another possibility. The photographs might show the bullet wound to
be below the shoulders. If this were the case, the Commission (or any
other fact-finding body) would have very serious unfinished business
to attend to.8  Already, the conspiracy theories are proliferating at
an alarming rate. As the following Primer shows, doubts about the
authenticity of the autopsy report are at the root of all the
two-assassin theories. The assumption, either explicit or implicit,
that the autopsy report was changed makes tenable the theories that
hold that a shot came from the front of the President’s car. This in
turn leads to theories of suppressed and planted evidence, which
implicates the authorities and other important figures in the
conspiracy. Finally, there come theories speculating on the forces
behind the conspiracy to kill Kennedy, some of which go so far as to
accuse those with power to suppress evidence.

Annotations by K. Rahn
1.  This syndicate never materialized.
2. Refers mainly to the death count of Penn Jones, Jr., newspaper
editor of Midlothian, Texas.
3. The film, of course, was the famous Zapruder film. The
superposition of frames by Vincent Salandria revealed the backward
movement of the head and body. But the frames that Salandria chose
missed the more important forward snap from a couple frames earlier.
This seriously misled Salandria and may have set the tone for
misleading nearly the entire research community.
4. It was actually prepared by Dr. Boswell.
5. Actually, it is not crucial to the question of one assassin versus
two. The basic argument from the number of entrance and exit wounds in
the body, plus the lack of a bullet in the body, is far stronger.
6. The FBI may have had the official autopsy report on hand but not used it.
7. The reporter was Gaeton Fonzi, later a staff investigator for the
HSCA. For the full text of this article by Fonzi, click here.
8. The autopsy photographs are now available via a set that was stolen
and reproduced for the public. Ironically, Kennedy's back has enough
blood spots still on it that it is very hard to determine where the
wound is. Dr. Robert Artwohl, one of the few to have viewed the
original photos, says that the wound is significantly less than six
inches below the top of the collar.





http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/archived/oswald.htm

Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald WALL STREET JOURNAL November 22, 1983 by
Edward Jay Epstein

The endless tangle of questions about bullets, trajectories, wounds,
time sequences and inconsistent testimony that has surrounded the
assassination of President John F. Kennedy and has obsessively
fascinated, if not entirely blinded, a generation of assassination
buffs-probably never will be resolved.

Within this morass of facts. however, there is a central actor, Lee
Harvey Oswald. His rifle, which fired the fatal bullet into the
president, was found in the sniper's nest, His cartridge cases were
also found near the body of a murdered policeman on the route his
flight. He was captured resisting arrest with the loaded murder
revolver in his hand. In light of this overwhelming evidence, the
issue that ought to have concerned Americans was not Oswald's
technical guilt but his dangerous liaisons abroad. Only eight weeks
before the assassination he had excited FBI and CIA interest in his
activities by renewing his contacts with Cuban and Soviet intelligence
officers in Mexico City. Although these foreign connections remained
of great concern to the two U S. intellige agencies, they were
considered too sensitive to be aired, publicly in the emotional
aftermath of the president's slaying. Oswald was not a "loner- in the
conventional sense. Ever since he was handed a pamphlet about the
Rosenberg prosecution at the age of 15, he had sought out affiliations
with political organizations, front groups and foreign nations that
opposed the policies of the U.S. When
he was 16. he wrote the Socialist Party "I am a Marxist and have been
studying Socialist Principles for well over five years" and he
requested information about joining their "Youth League-." He also
attempted to persuade a friend to join the youth auxiliary of the
Communist
Party. He subsequently made membership inquiries to such organizations
as the Socialist Workers Party, the Socialist Labor Party, The Gus
Hall-Benjamin Davis Defense Committee, the Daily Worker, The Fair Play
for Cuba Committee and the Communist Party, USA— correspondence that
brought him under surveillance by the FBI,  While still in the early
stages of his flirtation with political causes, 0swald joined the
Marine Corps . In October 1959, after a two-year stint as a radar
operator, Oswald became the first Marine to defect to the Soviet
Union, In Moscow, he delivered a letter stating. "I affirm that my
allegiance is to the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics." Not only
did he publically renounce his American citizenship but he told the
U.S. consul that he intended to turn over to the Soviet Union military
secrets that he had acquired while serving in the Marines, adding that
he had data of "Special interest" to the Russians. Since he indeed had
exposure to military secrets such as the U-2 spy piane and radar
identitification system, and since he may have collected data while on
active duty, his defection had serious espionage implications.
Oswald thus had compromised all the secret data he had come in contact
with in the Marines. He had also through this act put himself in the
hands of his hosts.He was now completely dependent on the Soviets for
financial support, legal status and protection. Before disappearing
into the Soviet hinterland for a year, Oswald spelled out his
operational creed in a long letter to his brother. From Moscow, he
wrote presciently of his willingness to commit murder for a political
cause: "I want you to understand what I say now, I do not say lightly,
or unknowingly, since I've been in the military .... In the event of
war I would kill any American who put a uniform on in defense of the
American Government --", and then ominously added for emphasis, " Any
American." Although his letter was routinely intercepted by the CIA
and microfilmed, no discernable attention was paid to the threat
contained in it . When Oswald returned from the Soviet Union in June
1962 (with a little help from a State Department eager to demonstrate
that it could win back a defector from the Soviets), joined by a
Russian wife, he retained his militant convictions. In Dallas, where
he settled, he purchased a rifle with telescopic sights and a revolver
from a mail-order house under a false name. He also lectured his more
liberal acquaintances on the need for violent action rather than mere
words. General Edwin A. Walker, an extreme conservative, who had been
active in Dallas organizing anti-Castro guerrillas became in the
Spring of 1963 a particular focus of Oswald's attention. He repeatedly
suggested to a German geologist, Volkmar Schmidt, and other friends,
that General walker should be treated like a "murderer at large". He
did not stop at fierce words. For weeks, he methodically stalked
Walker's movements, photographing his residence from several angles.
He then had his wife photograph him, dressed entirely in black, with
his revolver strapped on a holster on his hip, his sniper's rifle in
his right hand, and two newspapers --~The Worker~ and the~Militant~ --
in his left hand. He made three copies of the photograph-- one of
which he inscribed, dated "5--IV-63" and sent to a Dallas
acquaintance, George De Mohrenschildt. He then left with his rifle
wrapped in a raincoat, telling his wife he was off to "target
practice", but his target, General Walker, was out of town that night.
Five nights later, Oswald returned to Walker's house, and fired a shot
at him that missed his head by inches, demonstrating that he had the
capacity as well as the willingness to kill "Any American". After the
failed assassination, Oswald went to New Orleans, where he became the
organizer for the Fair Play for Cuba Committee. Aside from printing
leaflets, staging demonstrations, getting arrested and appearing on
local radio talk shows in support of Castro that summer, Oswald
attempted to personally infiltrate an anti-Castro group that was
organizing sabotage raids against Cuba. He explained to friends that
he could figure out his "anti-imperialist" policy by "reading between
the lines" of the Militant and other such publications. In August, he
wrote the central committee of the Communist Party USA asking "Whether
in your opinion, I can compete with anti-progressive forces above
ground, or whether I should always remain in the background,i.e.
underground". During this hot summer, while Oswald spent evenings
practicing sighting his rifle in his backyard, the Militant raged on
about the Kennedy Administration's "terrorist bandit" attacks on Cuba.
And as the semi-secret war against Castro escalated, Oswald expressed
increasing interest in reaching Cuba. Oswald told his wife he planned
to hijack an airliner to Havana, suggesting, as the summer progressed,
that he might even earn a position in Castro's government. On
September 9th, in a report that appeared on the front page of the New
Orleans Times-Picayune, Castro himself warned that if American leaders
continued "aiding plans to eliminate Cuban leaders ... they themselves
will not be safe". The implication of this threat was not lost on
Oswald. Telling his wife that they might never meet again, he left New
Orleans two weeks later headed for the Cuban Embassy in Mexico City.
To convince the Cubans of his bona fides-- and seriousness-- he had
prepared a dossier on himself, which included a 10 page resume,
outlining his revolutionary activities, newspaper clippings about his
defection to the Soviet Union, propaganda material he had printed,
documents he had stolen from a printing company engaged in classified
map reproduction for the U.S Army, his correspondence with the Fair
Play for Cuba Committee executives and photographs linking him to the
Walker shooting. Oswald applied for a visa at the Cuban Embassy on the
morning of September 27th 1963. He said that he wanted to stop in
Havana en route to the Soviet Union. On the application the consular
office who interviewed him, noted: "The applicant states that he is a
member of the American Communist Party and Secretary in New Orleans of
the Fair Play for Cuba Committee." Despite such recommendations,
Oswald was told that he needed a Soviet visa before the Cuban visa
could be issued. He argued over this requisite with the Cuban counsel,
Eusebio Azque, in front of witnesses, and reportedly made wild claims
about services he might perform for the Cuban cause. During the next
five days, he traveled back and forth between the Soviet and Cuban
embassies attempting to straighten out the difficulty. When he
telephoned from the Cuban embassy to arrange an appointment at the
Soviet Embassy with an officer called Valery Vladimirovich Kostikov,
he set off alarm bells at the CIA, which had been surreptitiously
monitoring the phone line. Kostikov was a KGB officer who had been
under close surveillance in Mexico by the FBI ( and who,in 1971, was
identified by a KGB defector in London as the head of sabotage
operations in Mexico). By the time the CIA had identified Oswald, and
notified the FBI, he had left Mexico.

When he returned to Dallas that October, Oswald assumed a different
identity--"O.H.Lee-- and, separating himself from his family, he moved
to a rooming house. He also forbade his wife from divulging his
whereabouts. He then got a job at the Texas Book Depository, which
overlooked the convergence of the three main streets into central
Dallas. On October 18th, Oswald's visa was approved by the Cuban
Foreign Ministry (despite the fact that he had not officially received
a Soviet visa,as required.) Three weeks later, he wrote another letter
to the Soviet Embassy, referring to his meeting with Kostikov in
Mexico, and adding cryptically: "Had I been able to reach the Soviet
Embassy in Havana as planned, the embassy there would have had time to
complete our business."
FBI counterintelligence, which had intercepted this letter in
Washington, and evidently was interested in Oswald's "business" in
Havana, urgently requested its field agents in Dallas to locate him.
An FBI agent, James Hosty, rushed over to the home where Oswald's
family was living, and questioned his wife, but he did not find him
Oswald until November 22nd, when he had been arrested for the murder
of a Dallas policeman and President Kennedy. In the final analysis,
the Warren Commission turned out to be right: Oswald was the assassin.
He had brought his rifle to work on November 22nd, carefully prepared
a concealed sniper's position at a sixth floor window, and, waiting in
ambush for almost an hour, shot the President as the motorcade passed
below. The possibility that he had assistance-- for example, someone
setting off a firecracker as a diversion-- can never be precluded. But
the real question is not how but why Oswald assassinated the
President. The most obvious motive was provided by Oswald himself in
his letter from Moscow: To kill any American who put on a uniform
against his cause. He openly subscribed to the terrorist creed that a
man with a rifle could change history; and, as far as Oswald was
concerned, President Kennedy and General Walker were both actively
working to destroy his avowed hero-- Castro.
Whether Oswald , given his clear disposition towards killing an
American leader, was prodded or otherwise induced into committing the
assassination was the question that vexed American intelligence after
the shooting. Oswald had disappeared in the Soviet Union for more than
a year, without yielding a trace of what, if any, training and
indoctrination he had undergone. The only record of this missing year
was a "diary" he brought out with him, which had in fact been written
in two days presumably to provide him with a consistent cover story or
legend. His five days with the Cubans in Mexico City were also a blank
-- although friendly sources within the Cuban Embassy indicated that
he was pressured to prove his loyalty and worth. Although the Cuban
government insisted, through both official and intelligence channels,
that Oswald was presumed crazy and dismissed as such by the embassy
staff, it left unanswered the disturbing question of why a visa was
approved for Oswald-- after the report was received from the embassy.
Among the eleven questions prepared by the CIA for Mexican
interrogators was one that expressed its direct concern: "Was the
assassination of of President Kennedy planned by Fidel Castro ... and
were the final details worked out inside the Cuban Embassy". In
Dallas, before Mexican investigators could question their sources,
Oswald was shot dead, and with his death ended the hope of unraveling
his motive.






The Big Picture ?
"The end goal is to get everybody chipped, to
control the whole society, to have the bankers and the elite people
control the world.
"Nick Rockefeller quoted by Aaron Russo
 in this
interview.

It's not about more power, it's not about more money, it's about the
survival of the elite pyramid

Several years ago, after his popular video Mad As Hell was released
and he began his campaign to become Governor of Nevada, Russo was
noticed by Rockefeller and introduced to him by a female attorney.
Seeing Russo's passion and ability to affect change, Rockefeller set
about on a subtle mission to recruit Russo into the elite's CFR
(Council of Foreign Relation) organization. Aaron Russo, the famous
Film Maker of Trading Places starring Eddy Murphy, also made a film
called "America: Freedom To Fascism". The motive behind this latter is
surely linked to Nick (Nicholas) Rockefeller revelation about the
ultimate aim of the Elites New World Order.

As Russo refused to join them, Rockefeller coldly questioned why Russo
cared about the "serfs"

Russo rejected the invitation, saying he had no interest in "enslaving
the people" to which Rockefeller coldly questioned why he cared about
the "serfs." "I used to say to him what's the point of all this,"
states Russo, "you have all the money in the world you need, you have
all the power you need, what's the point, what's the end goal?" to
which Rockefeller replied (paraphrasing), "The end goal is to get
everybody chipped, to control the whole society, to have the bankers
and the elite people control the world."Rockefeller even assured Russo
that if he joined the elite his chip would be specially marked so as
to avoid undue inspection by the authorities.

Other themes are 9/11, agenda behind feminism the Rockefeller
Foundation has helped promoted with CIA and depopulation of the world
by 50%.

The Big Picture ?
Latest hubs on human microchips

   VeriChip: A Precursor of 666?

   It all seems rather harmless and it serves a real purpose-having a
small microchip implanted just under your skin that can be scanned for
ID or medical record information. The chip called, VeriChip, is
just... - 5 weeks ago
   Truth in the bible? Truth in god?

   Religion is the most confusing subject i can think of. The first
thing that comes to my mind when i think religion is divination of
labels like Christian, Hindu, Catholic. etcIsn't religion supposed
to... - 5 weeks ago
   BeatTheChip

   FROM BORDC http://www.constitutioncampaign.org/blog/?p=291 Since
the passage of the PATRIOT Act, Â pervasive citizen surveillance and
data collection have been combined as part of an ambitious effort
to... - 2 months ago
   As Above So Below

   An Egyptian legend, tells us about the Emerald Tablet, written by
the thrice great Hermes Trimegistus. In the tablet, Hermes
Trismegistus, discuss about the process of creation and summarized in
the quotation... - 2 months ago
   Embedded Systems: Choosing the right development board

   Have you ever been in the situation where you don't know which dev
board you need to buy? As an engineer I find it quite difficult to
choose which board is right form my needs. Some FPGA boards have way
too... - 3 months ago
   Pic chip - how to make a traffic light

   Here is a way of making a set of traffic lights using a 16f84
micro controller from Microchip. It is fairly simple, all you have to
do is wire up the microcontroller with a pair of red, green and yellow
leds.... - 3 months ago

   A SHORT TAIL ABOUT A DOG

   A short story about a small pet. Several weeks back, as I was
trudging home from a particularly engaging meeting, I had the distinct
feeling that I was being followed. It had been a long day and it was
nigh on the twilight hours. Each... -4 months ago
   Microchipping Your Pet - Unforeseen danger you need to know about!

   Microchipping your pet is the best way to ensure that you are
reunited with your loved one â so what is the problem? The problem is,
there are some unforeseen errors with the process you must know about
in order to ensure your pet is protected... - 4 months ago

http://hubpages.com/hub/Federal_Reserve_Act Federal Reserve Act: the
most Influential Act in US/World History since the Constitution72

By thecounterpunch

"In his final Senate years, Aldrich chaired the National Monetary
Commission. His Aldrich Plan, providing for flexible cash reserves,
was the forerunner of the Federal Reserve System."

-- Senate.gov

"This Act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth... The worst
legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and
currency Bill."

-- Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr (father of famous aviator), Congressman in
his book Banking and Currency and The Money Trust, 1913

"The Congress shall have Power... To coin Money, regulate the Value
thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and
Measures [see on the origin of the Gold Standard] ..."-- Article One,
Section Eight of the U.S. Constitution

"The name of Central Bank is carefully avoided, but the ‘Federal
Reserve Association’, the name given to the proposed central
organization, is endowed with the usual powers and responsibilities of
a European Central Bank."

-- Nation Magazine, January 19, 1911

The Federal Reserve Act was proposed in 1908 by Nelson Aldrich - whose
unique daughter married unique Rockefeller's son - in
theAldrich-Vreeland Act after the Panic of 1907.The Act created the
"Federal Reserve System" which transferred control of the money supply
from Congress [see above Article One, Section Eight of the U.S.
Constitution] to the banking system. Though the Treasury still coins
and prints our money under the authority of Congress, neither the
Treasurynor the Congress has the slightest thing to do with its issue
or regulating the value thereof. The Act was signed by President
Woodrow Wilson - under the influence of Colonel House - founder of the
CFR (controlled byRockefeller) - on December 23, 1913 during the night
(see timeline below) eighty years after President Jacksonrepelled the
charter of the Second Bank Of United States.

The Incredible Timeline

The Federal Reserve Act was scheduled during the unlikely hours of
1.30 am to 4.30 am - were most members probably sleeping ? - on Monday
22 December 1913, at which 20 to 40 substantial differences in the
House and Senate versions were supposedly described, deliberated upon,
debated, reconciled and voted upon in a near-miraculous
four-and-a-half to nine minutes per item, at that late hour. At 4.30
am, a prepared report of this Committee was handed to the printers.
Senator Bristow of Kansas, the Republican leader, stated on the
Congressional Record that the Conference Committee had met without
notifying them, and that Republicans were not present and were given
no opportunity either to read or sign the Conference Committee report.
The Conference report is normally read on the Senate floor. The
Republicans did not even see the report. Some senators stated on the
floor of the Senate that they had no knowledge of the contents of the
Bill. At 6.02 PM on 23 December, when many members had already left
the Capital for the Christmas holiday, the very same day that the Bill
was hurried through the House and Senate, President Woodrow Wilson
signed the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 into law.

Mike Mathiesen  says: 2 years ago This one of the many ways they have
watered down the Constitution and our rights over the years. There are
more going on today.

J D Murrah  says: 2 years ago Colonel House did a lot of damage to the
Constitution through Wilson. His influence allowed massive
centralization to occur in Washington. The only person who managed
doing more damage to the Constitution was Lincoln. I heard a new
saying the other day that the Federal Reserve is neither Federal nor
does it have a Reserve. Jeffrey Murrah, author Texans Always Move
Them: A True History of Texas.

DNKStore  says: 15 months ago We still live today under the influence
of actions taken by venal corrupt men taken nearly 100 years ago.
Nothing has changed much in this regard.

Socio-Image  says: 10 months ago Do you know if there was some process
that is on the record of the Republicans or whoever did not like the
bill, after it passed, took action to try and declare it as
unconstitutional and have it thrown out? Certainly it would seem
logical especially if they pushed the bill in the early morning hours
before Christmas.

James Jesse Emery St. Louis  says: 7 months ago: Hey Guys Did you know
these same men now operate 130 Central Banks in 130 Different
Sovereign Nations The EU is their Conquest of Consent, no more habeus
corpus in europe, Corpus Jurus, Judgement by the State, by The Court
it's self, Double Joepardy is a thing of the past in the European
Union, The North American union (Yes, that's, Mexico, Canada and The
United States Merging their Economies and infrastructure) Is the Next
Step in Their Plan, Their Plan is this Fraudulent, Manipulative, Self
Destructive, Monetary-Communism via Central Banking, issuance of the
currency, but on a global scale, The INTERNATIONAL Monetary (MONEY)
Fund, The WORLD Health Organization, the WORLD Trade Organization and
the WORLD BANK. we are fucked because the rothschilds are fucking
satanists, they financed hitler's rise to power because he was harshly
prejudiced, and would accomplish their goals for them, goals such as
mass genocide, They financed Mao, who slaughtered 60 Million, because
they are fucking satanists, and want no more than 500 Million People
to "Burden" the Earth The Money Changers express their goals openly in
the Georgia Guidestones, They are Raping third world countries of
their resources, and spinning the world on it's head upside down
drowing in debt 6 inches deep, and made of written agreements our own
politicians signed, They are going to outlaw nutrients with codex
alimentarius (not GNC Prodoucts, nutrients in our food) and neglect
the world, legislated famine in the Name of the Earth, the
environment, NCMR, you're ideas are not you're own "You Won't See this
in the News" Rick and Dick abc cnn msnbc viacom NbC bbc npr pbs and
everyone else didn't tell you about this, secret history, and current
events, the banker will venture elsewhere, and profiteer (See what he
Can BUY, to Make More MONEY) The Banker invested in industry, wartime
industry, and he invested in public awareness,in general knowledge, in
ideals, when he bought the newspapers, when he bought the Radio
stations and the television broadcasters, the Networks, and then, He
Proceeded to Buy, our Senators and representatives, and now he has
bought us barack, bush, cheney, clinton, rumsfeld, Kissinger, Woodrow
Wilson, Nixon, Greenspan, FDR, Ben Bernanke, Jay Rockefeller and many
others, forging our future economically through the issuance and
manipulation of the currency and it's value the other part of that
qute is "This Act Legalizes the INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT of the Monetary
(MONEY) Power." that was a hundred fucking years ago, nobody believes
this shit because it's not feasible that our ideas are manipulated
along with the economy to perpetuate debt to the men that killed
kennedy, lincoln, bobby kennedy and bobby kennedy jr. Taft was killed
for saying something about the monetary power two weeks after being
elected, and americans are all kept ignorant of the history of these
tycoons, manipulating governments through the issuance of the currency
all the way back to the dark ages to Egypt and Ceaser, the world is
kept ignorant to the true state of technology, and the possibilities
of modern science.

MikeNV  says: 2 months ago American People are uneducated and unaware.
I am amazed that an issue so important to the freedom and prosperity
of our country, and the world for that matter gets absolutely no
press. It's unfortunate but the average American is an idiot. They
play the party politics game continuing to vote for politicians who
perpetuate the fraud. People vote for candidates not on issues of
relevance but on issues of emotion that are created in the media each
election year. All the talk about the economy is laughable. People
like Fed Chairman Bernanke perpetuating the lie with a straight face.
I don't know how an issue so important can not make it to the
mainstream - other than to say that the wealthy bankers own the media
and continue to buy politicians so it can not.

I wish I could vote your hub up to 100. But I can only press the button once.

http://hubpages.com/hub/Nelson_Aldrich

Nelson Aldrich: the Rockefeller's Middle Man who crafted the Income
Tax and the Central Federal Reserve System
69  By thecounterpunch

"There are two distinct classes of men...those who pay taxes and those
who receive and live upon taxes." -- Thomas Paine (1737–1809),
pamphleteer and revolutionary

"You know, gentlemen, that I do not owe any personal income tax. But
nevertheless, I send a small check, now and then, to the Internal
Revenue Service out of the kindness of my heart." -- David Rockefeller
(1915-), before a Congressional Committee

"In his final Senate years, Aldrich chaired the National Monetary
Commission. His Aldrich Plan, providing for flexible cash reserves,
was the forerunner of the Federal Reserve System."

-- Senate.gov

Aldrich introduced established an income tax, although he had declared
a similar measure "communistic" a decade earlier

Born in Rhode Island, Nelson Aldrich (1841–1915) was a direct
descendant of Rhode Island founder, Roger Williams. He had directed
the Finance Committee and was tightly linked to Rockefeller as his
only daughter married the only son ofJohn D. Rockefeller (Nelson
Aldrich Rockefeller is his grandson and his son Winthrop Aldrich's
will become chairmanship of the Chase National Bank - Rockefeller's
Bank). In 1909, Aldrich introduced a constitutional amendment to
establish an income tax, although he had declared a similar measure
"communistic" a decade earlier. In 1908 he became the chief sponsor of
the Aldrich-Vreeland Act which created the National Monetary
Commission, later to become the Federal Reserve in 1913. Aldrich
became wealthy with investments in street railroads, sugar, rubber and
banking. In 1906 Aldrich and other American financiers invested
heavily in mines and rubber in the Belgian Congo. They supported
Belgium's King Leopold II, who was alleged to have imposed slave labor
conditions in the colony.

TAGS

   business
   finance
   education
   politics
   history
   bank
   tax
   federal reserve
   income tax
   elite
   ron paul
   fed
   central bank
   banking system
   rockefeller
   chase manhattan bank
   financial history
   rockfeller
   aldrich

http://hubpages.com/hub/Astonishing_Interview_with_Aaron_Russo_who_met_with_Nick_Rockefeller

Astounding Interview of Aaron Russo about Nicholas Rockefeller who
asked him to join the CFR
69

Conspiracy Video's
Illuminati, New World Order, Occult, Freemasonry, New Age
Short Breaks
UK holidays & short breaks at Center Parcs. Book online!

"The end goal is to get everybody chipped, to control the whole
society, to have the bankers and the elite people control the world."

- Nick Rockefeller quoted by Aaron Russo in this interview.

   Protest against youtube who has erased the Video Speech of Dick
Cheney about the CFR
   It was only a 1 min Video of a PUBLIC SPEECH and youtube pretends
it violates their TOS. Does youtube participate in the coverup about
the CFR ?

It's not about more power, it's not about more money, it's about the
survival of the elite pyramid

Several years ago, after his popular video Mad As Hell was released
and he began his campaign to become Governor of Nevada, Russo was
noticed by Rockefeller and introduced to him by a female attorney.
Seeing Russo's passion and ability to affect change, Rockefeller set
about on a subtle mission to recruit Russo into the elite's CFR
(Council of Foreign Relation) organization.

Aaron Russo, the famous Film Maker of Trading Places starring Eddy
Murphy, also made a film called "America: Freedom To Fascism". The
motive behind this latter is surely linked to Nick (Nicholas)
Rockefeller revelation about the ultimate aim of the Elites New World
Order.
As Russo refused to join them, Rockefeller coldly questioned why Russo
cared about the "serfs"

Russo rejected the invitation, saying he had no interest in "enslaving
the people" to which Rockefeller coldly questioned why he cared about
the "serfs."

"I used to say to him what's the point of all this," states Russo,
"you have all the money in the world you need, you have all the power
you need, what's the point, what's the end goal?" to which Rockefeller
replied (paraphrasing), "The end goal is to get everybody chipped, to
control the whole society, to have the bankers and the elite people
control the world."

Rockefeller even assured Russo that if he joined the elite his chip
would be specially marked so as to avoid undue inspection by the
authorities.

Other themes are 9/11, agenda behind feminism the Rockefeller
Foundation has helped promoted with CIA and depopulation of the world
by 50%.
The Big Picture ?
Aaron and Nick were friends ...until the Revelation about Microchips
... until the Revelation about Microchips.


TAGS

   business
   finance
   education
   politics
   kids
   freedom
   woman
   interview
   democracy
   secret
   socialism
   capitalism
   revelation
   privacy
   communism
   feminism
   liberty
   big brother
   globalization
   propaganda
   cia
   911
   elite
   ron paul
   population
   venezuela
   fascism
   1984
   feminist
   war on terror
   rfid
   rockefeller
   overpopulation
   microchip
   chavez
   cfr
   aaron russo
   irak
   neo-nazism
   best of thecounterpunch
   formal socialism
   malthusianism









http://hubpages.com/hub/The_Bilderberg_Group

The Bilderberg Group - no more a secret in mass Medias - 64
By thecounterpunch
Cities of the UnderworldUnveil the Hidden World Beneath Major Cities.
Videos at HISTORY Freemasony Warning:

Do Not Join The Freemasons Until

You've Seen This...
BBC - Bilderberg's head Viscount Davignon

In 1974, U.S. Senator James Buckley wrote: "I don't subscribe to the
theory that there exists an organization of international bankers
called the Bilderbergers." Bilderberg Group, so called because of
their first meeting in May 1954 at the Bilderberg Hotel, was kept in
secrecy for several dozens of years. Today they prefer not to hide any
more at least on European medias like the BBC (for example through
their article "Inside the secretive Bilderberg Group"). Prince
Bernhard, the Dutch aristocrat, former member of the honorary German
Reiter SS Corps, founded the group and chaired meetings for more than
30 years. Over the years the group became a model for transnational
diplomacy, lending support to European integration and oil company
policies. Its steering committee was virtually a who's who of
international finance; David Rockefeller, Gabriel Hauge
(Manufacturer's Hanover Trust), Emilio Collado (Standard Oil, later
Exxon) international lawyers such as Arthur Dean and George Ball. All
U.S. steering committee members were also members of the Council on
Foreign Relations (CFR), Rockefeller's organization (founded by
Colonel House), which has dominated US foreign policy planning since
World War II. Take George Ball, for example. A long-time CFR member,
director of the Trilateral Commission (founded by Brzezinski for David
Rockefeller - lifetime member), Undersecretary of State, and lawyer
with Lehman Brothers. Or Arthur Dean. CFR member, partner in Sullivan
and Cromwell law firm, whose partners included John Foster and Allen
Dulles. Before World War II Sullivan and Cromwell worked with German
chemical and steel monopolies. By the time the Bilderbergers began to
meet, attorney Allen Dulles had become CIA director. Is Bilderberg
goal the same as described by Caroll Quigley, Bill Clinton's mentor,
in his book "Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time" ?

"The powers of financial capitalism had far-reaching aim, nothing less
than to create a world system of financial control in private hands
able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy
of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a
feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in
concert." Carroll Quigley, Bill Clinton's mentor
Globalization: Astounding Interview of Aaron Russo about Nicholas
Rockefeller who asked him to join the CFR
Globalization: Maurice Allais, French Economics Nobel Prize for the
"theory of markets and efficient utilization of ressources"
Links

   BBC - Inside the secretive Bilderberg Group
   The World Bank, GATT and Free Trade by Noam Chomsky
   Novus Ordo Seclorum or New World Order

       THE HISTORY CHANNEL HISTORYS MYSTERIES SECRET SOCIETIES
Current Bid: $2.96
Conspiracy Theories and Secret Societies For Dummies    Conspiracy
Theories and Secret Societies For Dummies
Current Bid: $13.77
Secret Societies DVD Illuminati Bohemian Club   Secret Societies DVD
Illuminati Bohemian Club
Current Bid: $11.95
Secret Societies - History Channel DVD Skull & Bones    Secret Societies
- History Channel DVD Skull & Bones
Current Bid: $4.99
Comments William F. Torpey  says: 2 years ago : Fascinating stuff,
counterpunch. The wealthy and powerful don't need a secret conspiracy;
they've had an open conspiracy for decades (and much longer.) These
people deal with each other in business, attend all the same dinners
and luncheons, belong to the same exclusive golf courses, gather in
the same backroom political circles, etc. Just as the average guys
meet at the public golf courses and fraternal organizations etc. The
wealthy feel they are doing the world a favor by making all the big
decisions. It's a little bit like the old slave owners who would brag
about how well they treated their slaves, often refusing to believe
their slaves would even want to be free and fend for themselves.
Obviously, the world is headed in the wrong direction, and if
something isn't done about it, well.
BBC - Bilderberg's head Viscount Davignon
He plays down the group's role in setting the international agenda
He plays down the group's role in setting the international agenda
http://hubpages.com/hub/Tragedy_and_Hope Tragedy and Hope: A History
of the World in Our Time by Carroll Quigley (Bill Clinton's mentor) -
75 By thecounterpunch
Summary "The powers of financial capitalism had far-reaching aim,
nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in
private hands able to dominate the political system of each country
and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be
controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world
acting in concert." -- Carroll Quigley, Bill Clinton's mentor
Read before

   H.G. Wells on "a scientific investigation of the origins of the
Banking System"
   "... there remains a residuum of original and intelligent people,
who do realize that banking plays a very important and interesting
part in the world's affairs... Their enquiries carry them inevitably
outside the bankers' habitual field ..."
   Home-School.Com: an astonishing interview with John Taylor Gatto
   "When Bill Clinton was nominated by the Democratic Party for the
presidency in 1991, the New York Times printed his acceptance speech
for the nomination. The speech ended with the tribute to a college
professor who had been Clinton's mentor"
   Amazing: Youtube has erased the Dick Cheney video speech
   "it's good to be back at the Council on Foreign Relations
[Rockefeller's organization]. As Pete mentioned, I have been a member
for a long time, and was actually Director for some period of time. I
never mentioned that when I was campaigning ..."
   David Rockefeller proud to be an Internationalist and "Conspirator
in Chief" of the Global Empire
   "Some believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the
best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me
as 'internationalists' ... If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I
am proud of it."
   Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
   Economic hit men are highly paid professionals who cheat countries
around the globe out of trillions of dollars. They funnel money from
the World Bank, U.S. Agency for International Development, for a few
wealthy families who control the planet.
   Astounding Interview of Aaron Russo about Nicholas Rockefeller who
asked him to join the CFR
   "The end goal is to get everybody chipped, to control the whole
society, to have the bankers and the elite people control the world."

Excerpt

“There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international
Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the
radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network,
which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to
cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently
does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have
studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the
early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no
aversion to it or to most of its aims [theCounterpunch: not any more
see Home-School.Com: an astonishing interview with John Taylor Gatto]
and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its
instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few
of its policies (notably to its belief that England was an Atlantic
rather than a European Power and must be allied, or even federated,
with the United States and must remain isolated from Europe), but in
general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain
unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be
known.” “The Rhodes Scholarships, established by the terms of Cecil
Rhodes's seventh will, are known to everyone. What is not so widely
known is that Rhodes in five previous wills left his fortune to form a
secret society, which was to devote itself to the preservation and
expansion of the British Empire. And what does not seem to be known to
anyone is that this secret society was created by Rhodes and his
principal trustee, Lord Milner, and continues to exist to this day. To
be sure, this secret society is not a childish thing like the Ku Klux
Klan, and it does not have any secret robes, secret handclasps, or
secret passwords. It does not need any of these, since its members
know each other intimately. It probably has no oaths of secrecy nor
any formal procedure of initiation. It does, however, exist and holds
secret meetings, over which the senior member present presides. At
various times since 1891, these meetings have been presided over by
Rhodes, Lord Milner, Lord Selborne, Sir Patrick Duncan, Field Marshal
Jan Smuts, Lord Lothian, and Lord Brand. They have been held in all
the British Dominions, starting in South Africa about 1903; in various
places in London, chiefly Piccadilly; at various colleges at Oxford,
chiefly All Souls; and at many English country houses such as Tring
Park, Blickling Hall, Cliveden, and others.” “No country that values
its safety should allow what the Milner group accomplished in Britain,
that is, that a small number of men should be able to wield such power
in administration and politics, should be given almost complete
control over the publication of the documents relating to their
actions, should be able to exercise such influence over the avenues of
information that create public opinion, and should be able to
monopolize so completely the writing and teaching of the history of
their own period.” “The powers of financial capitalism had
far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of
financial control in private hands able to dominate the political
system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This
system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central
banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at
in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to
be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a
private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which
were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to
dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to
manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic
activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by
subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”
Links BIS - Bank of International Settlement: the Mother of all Central Banks

   John Kenneth Galbraith on the Central Federal Reserve Bank
   Milton Friedman on the Central Federal Reserve Bank

http://hubpages.com/hub/BIS_-_Bank_of_International_Settlement

undefined
BIS - Bank of International Settlement: the Mother of all Central Banks
59
Free Offshore Banking And 0% Entry Fees. No Time Limit.
Open An Offshore Account
Banking
Get a Business Checking Account & Check Card That Save You Money
The BIS was originally established in May 1930 by bankers and
diplomats of Europe and the United States to collect and disburse
Germany's World War I reparation payments (hence its name). It was
truly an extraordinary arrangement. Although the BIS was organized as
a commercial bank with publicly held shares, its immunity from
government interference, and even taxation, in both peace and war was
guaranteed by an international treaty signed in The Hague in 1930.
Although all its depositors are central banks, the BIS has made a
profit on every transaction. And because it has been highly
profitable, it has required no subsidy or aid from any government.

Since it also provided, in Basel, a safe and convenient repository for
the gold holdings of the European central banks, it quickly evolved
into the bank for central banks. As the world depression deepened in
the Thirties and- financial panics flared up in Austria, Hungary,
Yugoslavia, and Germany, the governors in charge of the key central
banks feared that the entire global financial system would collapse
unless they could closely coordinate their rescue efforts. The obvious
meeting spot for this desperately needed coordination was the BIS,
where they regularly went anyway to arrange gold swaps and war-damage
settlements. Even though an isolationist Congress officially refused
to allow the U.S. Federal Reserve to participate in the BIS, or to
accept shares in it (which were instead held in trust by the First
National City Bank [owned by William Rockefeller]), the chairman of
the Fed quietly slipped over to Basel for important meetings. World
monetary policy was evidently too important to leave to national
politicians. During World War 11, when the nations, if not their
central banks, were belligerents, the BIS continued operating in
Basel, though the monthly meetings were temporarily suspended. In
1944, following Czech accusations that the BIS was laundering gold
that the Nazis had stolen from occupied Europe, the American
government backed a resolution at the Bretton Woods Conference calling
for the liquidation of the BIS. The naive idea was that the settlement
and monetary-clearing functions it provided could be taken over by the
new International Monetary Fund. What could not be replaced, however,
was what existed behind the mask of an international clearing house: a
supranational organization for setting and implementing global
monetary strategy, which could not be accomplished by a democratic,
United Nations-like international agency. The central bankers, not
about to let their club be taken from them, quietly snuffed out the
American resolution. After World War 11, the BIS reemerged as the main
clearing house for European currencies and, behind the scenes, the
favored meeting place of central bankers. When the dollar came under
attack in the 1960s, massive swaps of money and gold were arranged at
the BIS for the defense of the American currency. It was undeniably
ironic that, as the president of the BIS observed, "the United States,
which had wanted to kill the BIS, suddenly finds it indispensable." In
any case, the Fed has become a leading member of the club, with either
Chairman Paul Volcker or Governor Henry Wallich attending every "Basel
weekend." Originally, the central bankers sought complete anonymity
for their activities. Their headquarters were in an abandoned six
story hotel, the Grand et Savoy Hotel Universe, with an annex above
the adjacent Frey's Chocolate Shop. There purposely was no sign over
the door identifying the BIS, so visiting central bankers and gold
dealers used Frey's, which is across the street from the railroad
station, as a convenient landmark. It was in the wood-paneled rooms
above the shop and the hotel that decisions were reached to devalue or
defend currencies, to fix the price of gold, to regulate offshore
banking, and to raise or lower short-term interest rates. And though
they shaped "a new world economic order" through these deliberations,
according to Guido Carli, the governor of the Italian central bank,,
the public, even in Basel, remained almost totally unaware of the club
and its activities. In May 1977, however, the BIS gave up its
anonymity, against the better judgment of some of its members, in
exchange for more efficient headquarters. The new building, an
eighteen story-high circular skyscraper that rises over the medieval
city like some misplaced nuclear reactor, quickly became known as the
"Tower of Basel" and began attracting attention from tourists. "That
was the last thing we wanted," Dr. Fritz Leutwiler, its president told
me, when I interviewed him in 1983. "If it had been up to me, it never
would have been built." While we talked, he kept his eyes glued to the
Reuters screen in his office, which signaled currency fluctuations
around the globe.

Bank Jobs
Bank Jobs, Vacancies & Salary News in Banking & Financial
Markets.www.eFinancialCareers.co.uk
Links and other Related Articles

   Source: The Money Club by Journalist Edward J. Epstein
   [BBC History Video Channel] Banking with Hitler during World War
II: not only the Swiss Banks .

These related pages might interest you instead ...

   The Most Famous Shipwrecks in American History
   Celebrating Christmas in Distant Jungles During World War II
   Top 5 Action World War II Movies
   Polish Poetry of World War II (Part 3)
   Polish Poetry of World War II (Part 2)
   Polish Poetry of World War II (Part 4)

Bilderberg's head Viscount Davignon plays down the group's role in
setting the international agenda
Bill Clinton was featured at a Bilderberg meeting while he was
governor of Arkansas

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4290944.stm
" There need to be places where these people can think about the main
challenges ahead, co-ordinate where policies should be going, and find
out where there could be a consensus ".....Professor Kees van der Pijl
" Business influences society and politics influences society - that's
purely common sense ..." Will Hutton Economist who has attended a
Builderberg meeting.Will Hutton, an economic analyst and former
newspaper editor who attended a Bilderberg meeting in 1997, says
people take part in these networks in order to influence the way the
world works, to create what he calls "the international common sense"
about policy.
Inside the secretive Bilderberg Group
How much influence do private networks of the rich and powerful have
on government policies and international relations? One group, the
Bilderberg, has often attracted speculation that it forms a shadowy
global government. As part of the BBC's Who Runs Your World? series,
Bill Hayton tries to find out more.

The chairman of the secretive - he prefers the word private -
Bilderberg Group is 73-year-old Viscount Etienne Davignon, corporate
director and former European Commissioner. In his office, on a private
floor above the Brussels office of the Suez conglomerate lined with
political cartoons of himself, he told me what he thought of
allegations that Bilderberg is a global conspiracy secretly ruling the
world. "It is unavoidable and it doesn't matter," he says. "There will
always be people who believe in conspiracies but things happen in a
much more incoherent fashion."

Lack of publicity

In an extremely rare interview, he played down the importance of
Bilderberg in setting the international agenda. "What can come out of
our meetings is that it is wrong not to try to deal with a problem.
But a real consensus, an action plan containing points 1, 2 and 3? The
answer is no. People are much too sensible to believe they can do
that.  Every year since 1954, a small network of rich and powerful
people have held a discussion meeting about the state of the
trans-Atlantic alliance and the problems facing Europe and the US.
Organised by a steering committee of two people from each of about 18
countries, the Bilderberg Group (named after the Dutch hotel in which
it held its first meeting) brings together about 120 leading business
people and politicians. At this year's meeting in Germany, the
audience included the heads of the World Bank and European Central
Bank, Chairmen or Chief Executives from Nokia, BP, Unilever,
DaimlerChrysler and Pepsi - among other multi-national corporations,
editors from five major newspapers, members of parliament, ministers,
European commissioners, the crown prince of Belgium and the queen of
the Netherlands. "I don't think (we are) a global ruling class because
I don't think a global ruling class exists. I simply think it's people
who have influence interested to speak to other people who have
influence," Viscount Davignon says.  "Bilderberg does not try to reach
conclusions - it does not try to say 'what we should do'. Everyone
goes away with their own feeling and that allows the debate to be
completely open, quite frank - and to see what the differences are.
"Business influences society and politics influences society - that's
purely common sense. It's not that business contests the right of
democratically-elected leaders to lead". For Bilderberg's critics the
fact that there is almost no publicity about the annual meetings is
proof that they are up to no good. Jim Tucker, editor of a right-wing
newspaper, the American Free Press for example, alleges they organise
wars and elect and depose political leaders. He describes the group as
simply 'evil'. So where does the truth lie? Professor Kees van der
Pijl of Sussex University in Britain says such private networks of
corporate and political leaders play an informal but crucial role in
the modern world. "There need to be places where these people can
think about the main challenges ahead, co-ordinate where policies
should be going, and find out where there could be a consensus."

'Common sense'

Will Hutton, an economic analyst and former newspaper editor who
attended a Bilderberg meeting in 1997, says people take part in these
networks in order to influence the way the world works, to create what
he calls "the international common sense" about policy.  "On every
issue that might influence your business you will hear at first-hand
the people who are actually making those decisions and you will play a
part in helping them to make those decisions and formulating the
common sense," he says. And that "common sense" is one which supports
the interests of Bilderberg's main participants - in particular free
trade. Viscount Davignon says that at the annual meetings,
"automatically around the table you have internationalists" - people
who support the work of the World Trade Organisation, trans-Atlantic
co-operation and European integration.

Bilderberg meetings often feature future political leaders shortly
before they become household names. Bill Clinton went in 1991 while
still governor of Arkansas, Tony Blair was there two years later while
still an opposition MP. All the recent presidents of the European
Commission attended Bilderberg meetings before they were appointed.

'Secret Government'

This has led to accusations that the group pushes its favoured
politicians into high office. But Viscount Davignon says his steering
committee are simply excellent talent spotters. The steering committee
"does its best assessment of who are the bright new boys or girls in
the beginning phase of their career who would like to get known."
"It's not a total accident, but it's not a forecast and if they go
places it's not because of Bilderberg, it's because of themselves,"
Viscount Davignon says. But its critics say Bilderberg's selection
process gives an extra boost to aspiring politicians whose views are
friendly to big business. None of this, however, is easy to prove - or
disprove. Observers like Will Hutton argue that such private networks
have both good and bad sides. They are unaccountable to voters but, at
the same time, they do keep the international system functioning. And
there are limits to their power - a point which Bilderberg chairman
was keen to stress, "When people say this is a secret government of
the world I say that if we were a secret government of the world we
should be bloody ashamed of ourselves." Informal and private networks
like Bilderberg have helped to oil the wheels of global politics and
globalisation for the past half a century. In the eyes of critics they
have undermined democracy, but their supporters believe they are
crucial to modern democracy's success. And so long as business and
politics remain mutually dependent, they will continue to thrive.



http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/archived/moneyclub.htm

Ruling The World of Money HARPER'S November 1983 by Edward Jay
Epsteinhttp://www.edwardjayepstein.com/archived/moneyclub.htm

Ten times a year— once a mouth except in August and October— a small
elite of well dressed men arrives in Basel, Switzerland. Carrying
overnight bags and attache cases, they discreetly check into the Euler
Hotel, across from the railroad station. They have come to this sleepy
city from places as disparate as Tokyo, London, and Washington, D.C.,
for the regular meeting of the most exclusive, secretive, and powerful
supranational club in the world. Each of the dozen or so visiting
members has his own office at the club, with secure telephone lines to
his home country. The members are fully serviced by a permanent staff
of about 300, including chauffeurs, chefs, guards, messengers,
translators, stenographers, secretaries, and researchers. Also at
their disposal are a brilliant research unit and an ultramodern
computer, as well as a secluded country club with tennis courts and a
swimming pool, a few kilometers outside Basel. The membership of this
club is restricted to a handful of powerful men who determine daily
the interest rate, the availability of credit, and the money supply of
the banks in their own countries. They include the governors of the
U.S. Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the Bank of Japan, the
Swiss National Bank, and the German Bundesbank. The club controls a
bank with a $40 billion kitty in cash, government securities, and gold
that constitutes about one tenth of the world's available foreign
exchange. The profits earned just from renting out its hoard of gold
(second only to that of Fort Knox in value) are more than sufficient
to pay for the expenses of the entire organization. And the unabashed
purpose of its elite monthly meetings is to coordinate and, if
possible, to control all monetary activities in the industrialized
world. The place where this club meets in Basel is a unique financial
institution called the Bank for International Settlements-or more
simply, and appropriately, the BIS (pronounced "biz" in German).THE
BIS was originally established in May 1930 by bankers and diplomats of
Europe and the United States to collect and disburse Germany's World
War I reparation payments (hence its name). It was truly an
extraordinary arrangement. Although the BIS was organized as a
commercial bank with publicly held shares, its immunity from
government interference, and even taxation, in both peace and war was
guaranteed by an international treaty signed in The Hague in 1930.
Although all its depositors are central banks, the BIS has made a
profit on every transaction. And because it has been highly
profitable, it has required no subsidy or aid from any
government.Since it also provided, in Basel, a safe and convenient
repository for the gold holdings of the European central banks, it
quickly evolved into the bank for central banks. As the world
depression deepened in the Thirties and- financial panics flared up in
Austria, Hungary, Yugoslavia, and Germany, the governors in charge of
the key central banks feared that the entire global financial system
would collapse unless they could closely coordinate their rescue
efforts. The obvious meeting spot for this desperately needed
coordination was the BIS, where they regularly went anyway to arrange
gold swaps and war-damage settlements.Even though an isolationist
Congress officially refused to allow the U.S. Federal Reserve to
participate in the BIS, or to accept shares in it (which were instead
held in trust by the First National City Bank), the chairman of the
Fed quietly slipped over to Basel for important meetings. World
monetary policy was evidently too important to leave to national
politicians. During World War 11, when the nations, if not their
central banks, were belligerents, the BIS continued operating in
Basel, though the monthly meetings were temporarily suspended. In
1944, following Czech accusations that the BIS was laundering gold
that the Nazis had stolen from occupied Europe, the American
government backed a resolution at the Bretton Woods Conference calling
for the liquidation of the BIS. The naive idea was that the settlement
and monetary-clearing functions it provided could be taken over by the
new International Monetary Fund.What could not be replaced, however,
was what existed behind the mask of an international clearing house: a
supranational organization for setting and implementing global
monetary strategy, which could not be accomplished by a democratic,
United Nations-like international agency. The central bankers, not
about to let their club be taken from them, quietly snuffed out the
American resolution.After World War 11, the BIS reemerged as the main
clearing house for European currencies and, behind the scenes, the
favored meeting place of central bankers. When the dollar came under
attack in the 1960s, massive swaps of money and gold were arranged at
the BIS for the defense of the American currency. It was undeniably
ironic that, as the president of the BIS observed, "the United States,
which had wanted to kill the BIS, suddenly finds it indispensable." In
any case, the Fed has become a leading member of the club, with either
Chairman Paul Volcker or Governor Henry Wallich attending every "Basel
weekend."Originally, the central bankers sought complete anonymity for
their activities. Their headquarters were in an abandoned six story
hotel, the Grand et Savoy Hotel Universe, with an annex above the
adjacent Frey's Chocolate Shop. There purposely was no sign over the
door identifying the BIS, so visiting central bankers and gold dealers
used Frey's, which is across the street from the railroad station, as
a convenient landmark. It was in the wood-paneled rooms above the shop
and the hotel that decisions were reached to devalue or defend
currencies, to fix the price of gold, to regulate offshore banking,
and to raise or lower short-term interest rates. And though they
shaped "a new world economic order" through these deliberations,
according to Guido Carli, the governor of the Italian central bank,,
the public, even in Basel, remained almost totally unaware of the club
and its activities.In May 1977, however, the BIS gave up its
anonymity, against the better judgment of some of its members, in
exchange for more efficient headquarters. The new building, an
eighteen story-high circular skyscraper that rises over the medieval
city like some misplaced nuclear reactor, quickly became known as the
"Tower of Basel" and began attracting attention from tourists. "That
was the last thing we wanted," Dr. Fritz Leutwiler, its president told
me, when I interviewed him in 1983. "If it had been up to me, it never
would have been built." While we talked, he kept his eyes glued to the
Reuters screen in his office, which signaled currency fluctuations
around the globe.Despite its irksome visibility, the new headquarters
does have the advantages of luxurious space and Swiss efficiency. The
building is completely air-conditioned and self-contained, with its
own nuclear-bomb shelter in the sub-basement, a triply redundant
fire-extinguishing system (so outside firemen never have to be called
in), a private hospital, and some twenty miles of subterranean
archives. "We try to provide a complete clubhouse for central bankers
... a home away from home," said Gunther Schleiminger, the
supercompetent general manager, as he arranged a rare tour of the
headquarters for me. The top floor, with a panoramic view of three
countries, Germany, France, and Switzerland, is a deluxe restaurant,
used only to serve the members a buffet dinner when they arrive on
Sunday evenings to begin the "Basel weekends." Aside from those ten
occasions, this floor remains ghostly empty.On the floor below,
Schleiminger and his small staff sit in spacious offices,
administering the day-today details of the BIS and monitoring
activities on lower floors as if they were running an out-of-season
hotel. The next three floors down are suites of offices reserved for
the central bankers. All are decorated in three colors— beige, brown,
and tan— and each has a similar modernistic lithograph over the desk.
Each office also has coded speed-dial telephones that at a push of a
button directly connect the club members to their offices in their
central banks back home. The completely deserted corridors and empty
offices, with nameplates on the doors and freshly sharpened pencils in
cups and neat stacks of incoming papers on the desks, are again
reminiscent of a ghost town. When the members arrive for their
forthcoming meeting in November, there will be a remarkable
transformation, according to Schleiminger, with multilingual
receptionists and secretaries at every desk, and constant meetings and
briefings.On the lower floors are the BIS computer, which is directly
linked to the computers of the member central banks and provides
instantaneous access to data about the global monetary situation, and
the actual bank, where eighteen traders, mainly from England and
Switzerland, continually roll over short" term loans on the Eurodollar
markets and guard against foreign-exchange losses (by simultaneously
selling the currency in which the loan is due). On yet another floor,
gold traders are constantly on the telephone arranging loans of the
bank's gold to international arbitragers, thus allowing central banks
to make interest on gold deposits.Occasionally there is an
extraordinary situation, such as the decision to sell gold for the
Soviet Union, which requires a decision from the "governors," as the
BIS staff calls the central bankers. But most of the banking is
routine, computerized, and riskless. Indeed, the BIS is prohibited by
its statutes from making anything but short-term loans. Most are for
thirty days or less that are government guaranteed or backed with gold
deposited at the BIS. The profits the BIS receives for essentially
turning over the billions of dollars deposited by the central banks
amounted to $162 million last year.As skilled as the BIS may be at all
this, the central banks themselves have highly competent staffs
capable of investing their deposits. The German Bundesbank, for
example, has a superb international trading department and 15,000
employees— at least twenty times as many as the BIS staff. Why then do
the Bundesbank and the other central banks transfer some $40 billion
of deposits to the BIS and thereby permit it to make such a profit?One
answer is of course secrecy. By commingling part of their reserves in
what amounts to a gigantic mutual fund of short term investments, the
central banks created' a convenient screen behind which they can hide
their own deposits and withdrawals in financial centers around the
world. And the central banks are apparently willing to pay a high fee
to use the cloak of the BIS.There is, however, another reason why the
central banks regularly transfer deposits to the BIS: they want to
provide it with a large enough profit to support the other services it
provides. Despite its name, the BIS is far more than a bank. From the
outside, it seems to be a small, technical organization. Just
eighty-six of its 298 employees are ranked as professional staff. But
the BIS is not a monolithic institution: artfully concealed within the
shell of an international bank, like a series of Chinese boxes one
inside another, are the real groups and services the central bankers
need-and pay to support.The first box inside the bank is the board of
directors, drawn from the eight European central banks (England,
Switzerland, Germany, Italy, France, Belgium, Sweden, and the
Netherlands), which meets on the Tuesday morning of each "Basel
weekend." The board also meets twice a year in Basel with the central
banks of other nations. It provides a formal apparatus for dealing
with European governments and international bureaucracies like the IMF
or the European Economic Community (the Common Market). The board
defines the rules and territories of the central banks with the goal
of preventing governments from meddling in their purview. For example,
a few years ago, when the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development in Paris appointed a low-level committee to study the
adequacy of bank reserves, the central bankers regarded it as poaching
on their monetary turf and turned to the BIS board for assistance. The
board then arranged for a high-level committee, under the head of
Banking Supervision at the Bank of England, to preempt the issue. The
OECD got the message and abandoned its effort.To deal with the world
at large, there is another Chinese box called the Group of Ten, or
simply the "G-10." It actually has eleven full-time members,
representing the eight European central banks, the U.S. Fed, the Bank
of Canada, and the Bank of Japan. It also has one unofficial member:
the governor of the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority. This powerful
group, which controls most of the transferable money in the world,
meets for long sessions on the Monday afternoon of the "Basel
weekend." It is here that broader policy issues, such as interest
rates, money-supply growth, economic stimulation (or suppression), and
currency rates are discussed-if not always resolved.Directly under the
G-10, and catering to all its special needs, is a small unit called
the "Monetary and Economic Development Department," which is, in
effect, its private think tank. The head of this unit, the Belgian
economist Alexandre Larnfalussy, sits in on all the G-10 meetings,
then assigns the appropriate research and analysis to the half dozen
economists on his staff. This unit also produces the occasional
blue-bound "economic papers" that provide central bankers from
Singapore to Rio de Janeiro, even though they are not BIS members,
with a convenient party line. For example, a recent paper called
"Rules versus Discretion: An Essay on Monetary Policy in an
Inflationary Environment," politely defused the Milton Friedmanesque
dogma and suggested a more pragmatic form of monetarism. And last May,
just before the Williamsburg summit conference, the unit released a
blue book on currency intervention by central banks that laid down the
boundaries and circumstances for such actions. When there are internal
disagreements, these blue books can express positions sharply contrary
to those held by some BIS members, but generally they reflect a
consensus of the G-10.Over A bratwurst-and-beer lunch on the top floor
of the Bundesbank, which is located in a huge concrete building
(called "the bunker") outside of Frankfurt, Karl Otto Pohl, its
president and a ranking governor of the BIS, complained to me in 1983
about the repetitiousness of the meetings during the "Basel weekend."
"First, there is the meeting on the Gold Pool, then, after lunch, the
same faces show up at the G-10, and the next day there is the board
which excludes the U.S., Japan, and Canada, and the European Community
meeting which excludes Sweden and Switzerland." He concluded: "They
are long and strenuous-and they are not where the real business gets
done." This occurs, as Pohl explained over our leisurely lunch, at
still another level of the BIS: "a sort of inner club."

The inner club is made up of the half dozen or so powerful central
bankers who find themselves more or less in the same monetary boat:
along with Pohl are Volcker and Wallich from the Fed, Leutwiler from
the Swiss National Bank, Lamberto Dini of the Bank of Italy, Haruo
Mayekawa of the Bank of Japan, and the retired governor of the Bank of
England, Lord Gordon Richardson (who had presided over the G-10
meetings for the past ten years). They are all comfortable speaking
English; indeed, Pohl recounted how he has found himself using English
with Leutwiler, though both are of course native German-speakers. And
they all speak the same language when it comes to governments, having
shared similar experiences. Pohl and Volcker were both under
secretaries of their respective treasuries; they worked closely with
each other, and with Lord Richardson, in the futile attempts to defend
the dollar and the pound in the 1960s. Dini was at the IMF in
Washington, dealing with many of the same problems. Pohl had worked
closely with Leutwiler in neighboring Switzerland for two decades.
"Some of us are very old friends," Pohl said. Far more important,
these men all share the same set of well-articulated values 'about
money.The prime value, which also seems to demarcate the inner club
from the rest of the BIS members, is the firm belief that central
banks should act independently of their home governments. This is an
easy position for Leutwiler to hold, since the Swiss National Bank is
privately owned (the only central bank that is not government owned)
and completely autonomous. ("I don't think many people know the name
of the president of Switzerland-even in Switzerland," Pohl joked, "but
everyone in Europe has heard of Leutwiler.") Almost as independent is
the Bundesbank; as its president, Pohl is not required to consult with
government officials or to answer the questions of Parliament-even
about such critical issues as raising interest rates. He even refuses
to fly to Basel in a government plane, preferring instead to drive in
his Mercedes limousine.The Fed is only a shade less independent than
the Bundesbank: Volcker is expected to make periodic visits to
Congress and at least to take calls from the White House-but he need
not follow their counsel. While in theory the Bank of Italy is under
government control, in practice it is an elite institution that acts
autonomously and often resists the government. (In 1979, its then
governor, Paolo Baffi, was threatened with arrest, but the inner club,
using unofficial channels, rallied to his support.) Although the exact
relationship between the Bank of Japan and the Japanese government
purposely remains inscrutable, even to the BIS governors, its
chairman, Mayekawa, at least espouses the principle of autonomy.
Finally, though the Bank of England is under the thumb of the British
government, Lord Richardson was accepted by the inner club because of
his personal adherence to this defining principle. But his successor,
Robin Leigh-Pemberton, lacking the years of business and personal
contact, probably won't be admitted to the inner circle.In any case,
the line is drawn at the Bank of England. The Bank of France is seen
as a puppet of the French government; to a lesser degree, the
remaining European banks are also perceived by the inner club as
extensions of their respective governments, and thus remain on the
outside.A second and closely related belief of the inner club is that
politicians should not be trusted to decide the fate of the
international monetary system. When Leutwiler became president of the
BIS in 1982, he insisted that no government official be allowed to
visit during a "Basel weekend." He recalled that in 1968, U.S.
Treasury undersecretary Fred Deming had been in Basel and stopped in
at the bank. "When word got around that an American Treasury official
was at the BIS," Leutwiler said, "bullion traders, speculating that
the U.S. was about to sell its gold, began a panic in the market."
Except for the annual meeting in June (called "the Jamboree" by the
staff ), when the ground floor of the BIS headquarters is open to
official visitors, Leutwiler has tried to enforce his rule strictly.
"To be frank," he I have no use for politicians. They lack the
judgment of central bankers." This effectively sums up the common
antipathy of the inner club toward "government muddling," as Pohl puts
it.The inner-club members also share a strong preference for
pragmatism and flexibility over any ideology, whether that of Lord
Keynes or Milton Friedman. Rather than resorting to rhetoric and
invoking principles, the inner club seeks any remedy that will relieve
a crisis. For example, earlier this year, when Brazil failed to pay
back on time a BIS loan that was guaranteed by the central banks, the
inner club quietly decided to extend the deadline instead of
collecting the money from the guarantors. "We are constantly engaged
in a balancing act-without a safety net," Leutwiler explained.THE
FINAL and by far the most important belief of the inner club is the
conviction that when the bell tolls for any single central bank, it
tolls for them all. When Mexico faced bankruptcy in the early
eighties. The issue for the inner club was not the welfare of that
country but, as Dini put it, "the stability of the entire banking
system." For months Mexico had been borrowing overnight funds from the
interbank market in New York-as every bank recognized by the Fed is
permitted to do-to pay the interest on its $80 billion external debt.
Each night it had to borrow more money to repay the interest on the
previous night's transactions, and, according to Dini, by August
Mexico had borrowed nearly one quarter of all the "Fed Funds," as
these overnight loans between banks are called.The Fed was caught in a
dilemma: if it suddenly stepped in and forbade Mexico from further
using the interbank market, Mexico would be unable to repay its
enormous debt the next day, and 25 percent of the entire banking
system's ready funds might be frozen. But if the Fed permitted Mexico
to continue borrowing in New York, in a matter of months it would suck
in most of the interbank funds, forcing the Fed to expand drastically
the supply of money.It was clearly an emergency for the inner club.
After speaking to Miguel Mancera, director of the Banco de Mexico,
Volcker immediately called Leutwiler, who was vacationing in the Swiss
mountain village of Grison. Leutwiler realized that the entire system
was confronted by a financial time bomb: even though the IMF was
prepared to extend $4.5 billion to Mexico to relieve the pressure on
its long-term debt, it would require months of paperwork to get
approval for the loan. And Mexico needed an immediate 1.85 billion
dollar loan to get out of the interbank market, which Mancera had
agreed to do. But in less than forty eight hours, Leutwiler had called
the members of the inner club and arranged the temporary bridging
loan.While this $1.85 billion appeared in the financial press to have
come from the BIS, virtually all the funds came from the central banks
in the inner club. Half came directly from the United States -$600
million from the Treasury's exchange-equalization fund and $325
million from the Fed's coffers; the remaining $925 million mainly from
deposits of the Bundesbank, Swiss National Bank, Bank of England, Bank
of Italy, and Bank of Japan, deposits that were specifically
guaranteed by these central banks, though advanced pro forma by the
BIS (with a token amount advanced by the BIS itself against the
collateral of Mexican gold). The BIS undertook virtually no risk in
this rescue operation; it merely provided a convenient cloak for the
inner club. Otherwise, its members, especially Volcker, would have had
to take the political heat individually for what appeared to be the
rescue of an underdeveloped country. In fact, they were true to their
paramount values: rescuing the banking system itself.Inner club
members publicly pay lip service to the ideal of preserving the
character of the BIS and not turning it into a lender of last resort
for the world at large. Privately, however, they will undoubtedly
continue their maneuvers to protect the banking system at whatever
point in the world it seems most vulnerable. After all, it is
ultimately the central banks' money at risk, not the BIS's. And the
inner club will also keep using the BIS as its public mask, and pay
the requisite price for the disguise.







http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/archived/moneyclub.htmhttp://www.edwardjayepstein.com/current.htm

This is a totally commerce-free site. No charges, no advertising.
The webmistress cannot be reached

Quention of the day Who Set The Reichstag On Fire-- And Brought Hitler To Power?

Archive: http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/archive.htm

HOLLYWOOD LOGIC

MURDER

MAMMON

WALL STREETCONFIDENTIAL

Hollywood Economist

WAR OF THE MOLES

ILLUSION

EXTREME ENTERTAINMENT

CYBERBOOKS

NY TIMES EXCLUSIVES


Rothschild International Banking Family who are Russian Khazars who
were originally  from a country called Khazaria, which occupied the
land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea which is now
predominantly occupied by Georgia and associates which also
includesmembers of the Royal Families of Europe, and the following
family names:  Astor; Bundy; Collins; duPont; Freeman; Kennedy;
Morgan;  Sachs, Oppenheimer; Rockefeller; Sassoon; Schiff; Taft; and
Van Duyn.are responsible for over 3 billion mass murders in the last
250 years through their manipulation, finance and control of wars and
conflicts, starvation, malnutrition, slavery, famine, holocausts,
genocide,  ethnic cleansing, disease and other methods are set to be
indited in the International Court of Justice as the biggest war
criminal the world has ever known after 30 years on investigations
have been complete by a special investigation team funded by the real
Jewish business people whose families were murdered in Death Camps by
poisons originally designed to kill insects made and produced in
factories belonging to these evil criminally insane Mass Murderers
Rothschild Banking Family Friends and business associates murderess
control of over three billion deaths on the planet earth for over 250
years. These people control the central banks in most major countries
around the world which includes The USA Federal Reserve Bank, the Bank
of England, the Federal Reserve Bank of Australia, the Federal Reserve
Bank of New Zealand, the Canadian Federal Reserve Bank and many more.
In fact there is only about six large countries they do not control
the central banks of which includes Iran. That is of the many reasons
why they are determined to make war against Iran which will be the
third world war, which will be used to create chaos and fear by
everyone in the world so that everyone willing agrees to their One
World Order plan with One Government, One Army and One Bank to control
the world with everyone on the world will willingly have Micro Chips
implanted in them which will track their every move  on the planet and
have all their personal information and money on  these RDIF Radio
Tracking Chips. In anyone wants to complain about the way the world is
run by these powerful elite, then they will simply just term off their
chip and they will not be able to buy food, obtain transport, get into
their house, or do anything else as the whole of society will be based
around the use of these micro chips. They have already named this "The
Brave New World" which one of their paid authors Arthur Huxley stated
in in book.
Rothschild Banking Family Friends and business associates murderess
control on the planet earth for over 200 years.
These evil, criminally insane Russian Khazars who were originally
from a country called Khazaria, which occupied the land locked between
the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea which is now predominantly occupied
by Georgia, and are fraudulent pretending to be Jews (which they are
not real or genuine Jews at all), so they can fraudulently claim
control of Palestine and Israel for themselves have been responsible
for the manipulation, and have taken over London and Britain, as their
head financial office, Washington and the USA as their main Military
office, and the Vatican City as the religious and spiritual office,
using each county's armies they control central banks in as their own
personal armies to fight what are really "bankers wars", not real
countries wars for power, money, gold, oil, land ownership and control
and control and ownership of all the natural resources on the on
planet earth, control, financing, execution and masterminding the
deaths of over one billion people on plant earth since the 1700's be
methods for having the shot, blown up, starved to death, manipulated
diseases  and convincing them that they should kill each other over
disputes over money, religion, land, power, oil, gold, and racial
hatred and any other possible way of getting people to fighteach other
and/or paying people to fight and kill each other, all for the purpose
of profit, greed and power, with the long term aim of obtaining
control and/or ownership of  all  the world's money, gold, silver,
oil, uranium and other precious metals and natural resources, the
world's food supply, the world's land and seas and rivers, with the
long term aim of becoming the sole rulers of a one World Government
and Powerbase, which has one World Bank and One World Army. In a world
were the whole world in run by one big computer monitored by a
satellite and every man women and child have a RIDF radio controlled
Mirco Chip implanted into the that monitors every move, action and
transaction they make with every part of society's activities being
fully dependant on on this micro chip being active, and all money on
these chips, everyone' ID and all their personal information will be
on these chips and if at anytime anyone dares to protest of what the
One World Government are doing tot he people on earth or violate what
the controllers of the One World Government want, they will simply
just turn off their chip. It will also be a world where the One World
Government will control the supply, production, coding, labelling and
licensing of all food, herbs, plants, animals, birds, fish, nuts,
fruits, vegetables etc under their One World Controlled Codex
Alimentarious Commission, their United Nations World Trade
Organisation (WHO), their United Nations and their Food and
Agricultural Organisation (FAO) so that all intake, production and
manufacture, licensing and labelling off food, herbs and nutrients
will be controlled by them and only foods, herbs and nutrients that
are listed on their approved list and the the nutrients and pesticide
levels approved by them are allowed to be consumed on earth with the
overall effect that over 3 billion people will die of starvation,
malnutrition and disease through low levels of healthy and naturally
nutritious nutrients, vitamins and minerals in the food and high
levels of dangerous toxic chemicals and pesticides, growth hormones
and geneticly engineered ingredients in the food for the general
population, with only the very elite at the top of their Illuminati
organisation and their families being able to purchase and grow
healthy and natural food where they will have a proper balanced
nutrients, vitamins and minerals.
http://www.coverups.com/jfk/who.htm
Who Killed Kennedy And Why? - Coverups.com
In reality
In reality it does not matter who one believes was the actual physical
killer or killers that shot President John F Kennedy, what matters
moire is who were the motivators and organisers of his assassination
and who had most to gain from his untimely death. When one analyses
all the recorded public and private information there leaves little
doubt that  President John F Kennedy was murdered for and on behalf of
the same group of people, the International Banking families,
businessmen and industrialists all working for and/or in partnership
with the infamous international Russian Tsar Rothschild Banking
Family,
{Note:The Rothschilds have been in control of the world for a very
long time, their tentacles reaching into many aspects of our daily
lives, as is documented in the following timeline.  However, before
you jump to the timeline, please read this invaluable introduction
which will tell you who the Rothschilds are as oppose to who they
claim to be.
The Rothschilds claim that they are Jewish, when in fact they are
Khazars.  They are from a country called Khazaria, which occupied the
land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea which is now
predominantly occupied by Georgia.  The reason the Rothschilds claim
to be Jewish is that the Khazars under the instruction of the King,
converted to the Jewish faith in 740 A.D., but of course that did not
include converting their Asiatic Mongolian genes to the genes of the
Jewish people.
You will find that approximately 90% of people in the world today who
call themselves Jews are actually Khazars, or as they like to be
known, Ashkenazi Jews.  These people knowingly lie to the world with
their claims that the land of Israel is theirs by birthright, when in
actual fact their real homeland is over 800 miles away in Georgia.
So, next time you hear an Israeli Prime Minister bleating about the
so-called persecution of the Jews, consider this, every Prime Minister
of Israel has been an Ashkenazi Jew.  Therefore when all these Prime
Ministers have curried favour with the West for their re-establishment
of a Jewish homeland, they have knowingly and deliberately lied to
you, as they were never from that region, and they well know it,
because it is they who call themselves Ashkenazi Jews.
The Book of Revelation, Chapter 2, Verse 9, states the following which
would appear to be about these Ashkenazi Jews:
"I know thy works, and tribulation and poverty, (but thou art rich)
and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not,
butare the synagogue of Satan."
The most wealthy bloodline in the world bar none and the leader of the
Ashkenazi Jews in the world today is the Rothschild family.  As you
will see in the timeline, the Rothschilds have obtained this position
through lies, manipulation and murder.  Their bloodline also extends
into the Royal Families of Europe, and the following family names:
Astor; Bundy; Collins; duPont; Freeman; Kennedy; Morgan; Oppenheimer;
Rockefeller; Sassoon; Schiff; Taft; and Van Duyn.
However, these are not the only bloodlines to worry about.  You are
probably aware of the centuries old pratice undertaken by many
Ashkenazi Jews whereby they would change their name, in order for them
to appear part of the dominant race of the country in which they
lived, so as they could obtain influential positions in that country,
which they would then exploit to serve their real masters elsewhere.
There is plenty of evidence to prove the Rothschilds continue that
deceptive tradition.
Furthermore the Rothschilds are known to sire many children secretly
that they can put into positions of power when required.  This started
with the very first man who took the name Rothschild, who had a secret
sixth son.  Finally, remember the world is a diverse place, I could if
I wanted change my name to Rothschild, or any of the names listed
above, and that would not make me part of this family anymore than
converting to Judaism in 740 A.D. will make these Ashkenazis Jewish.
Ashkenazi Jew, David Ben-Gurion, one of the father founders of Israel
and its first Prime Minister, candidly describes Zionist aims in his
diary (21 May 1948) as follows, “The Achilles heel of the Arab
coalition is the Lebanon. Muslim supremacy in this country is
artificial and can easily be overthrown. A Christian State ought to be
set up there, with its southern frontier on the river Litani. We would
sign a treaty of alliance with this State. Thus when we have broken
the strength of the Arab Legion and bombed Amman, we could wipe out
Trans-Jordan, after that Syria would fall. And if Egypt still dared to
make war on us, we would bomb Port Said, Alexandria and Cairo.
We should thus end the war and would have but paid to Egypt, Assyria
and Chaldea on behalf of our ancestors.”
1949:  On October 1, Mao Tse Tsung declares the founding of the
People's Republic Of China in Tiananmen Square, Beijing.  He is funded
by Rothschild created Communism in Russia and also the following
Rothschild agents:  Solomon Adler, a former United States Treasury
official who was a Soviet Spy; Israel Epstein, the son of a Jewish
Bolshevik imprisoned by the Tsar in Russia for trying to forment a
revolution there; and Frank Coe, a leading official of the Rothschild
owned IMF.
1950: Israel passes their law of return, guaranteeing every Jew
worldwide the right to dwell in the state of Israel, however the
Palestinians even though they had lived there for 1300 years, were
denied that right.
John Davitt, former chief of the Justice Department's internal
security section notes that the Israeli intelligence service is the
second most active in the United States after the Soviets and of
course both Israel and the Soviet Union are run by an Ashkenazi Jewish
leadership.
1951: On 1 April the Israeli Secret Intelligence Agency the Mossad,
which will go on to terrorize the world, is formed. The motto of the
Mossad is probably the most disgusting secret service motto in the
world, it is,
"By Way Of Deception,  Thou Shalt Do War."
1953: N. M. Rothschild & Sons found the British Newfoundland
Corporation Limited to develop 60,000 square miles of land in
Newfoundland, Canada, which comprised a power station to harness the
power of the Hamilton (later renamed Churchill) Falls. At the time
this was the largest construction project ever to be undertaken by a
private company.
1954: "The Lavon Affair."  Israeli agents recruit Egyptian citizens of
Jewish descent to bomb Western targets in Egypt, and plant evidence to
frame Arabs, in an apparent attempt to upset American/Egyptian
relations. Israeli defense minister, Ashkenazi Jew, Pinhas Lavon is
eventually removed from office, though many think real responsibility
lay with David Ben-Gurion.
A hidden microphone planted by the Israelis is discovered in the
Office of the US Ambassador in Tel Aviv.
1955: Edmond de Rothschild founds Compagnie Financiere, Paris.
1956: Telephone taps are found connected to two telephones in the
residence of the US military attaché in Tel Aviv.
1957: James de Rothschild dies and it is reported (by the Rothschild
owned media) that he bequeaths a large sum of money to the state of
Israel to pay for the construction of their parliament building, the
Knesset. He states that the Knesset should be, "a symbol, in the eyes
of all men, of the permanence of the State of Israel." On page 219 of
his book, "Tales of the British Aristocracy," L.G. Pine, the Editor of
Burke’s Peerage, states that the Jews, "have made themselves so
closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are
unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual. So closely linked are the
Jews and the lords that a blow against the Jews in this country would
not be possible without injuring the aristocracy also." Maurice de
Rothschild dies in Paris.
1962: de Rothschild Frères establishes Imétal as an umbrella company
for all their mineral mining interests.
Frederic Morton publishes his book, The Rothschilds, in which he states,
"Though they control scores of industrial, commercial, mining and
tourist corporations, not one bears the name Rothschild. Being private
partnerships, the family houses never need to, and never do, publish a
single public balance sheet, or any other report of their financial
condition." This attitude reveals the true aim of the Rothschilds, to
eliminate all competition and create their own worldwide monopoly.
1963: On June 4th President John F. Kennedy (the 35th President of the
United States 1961 – 1963) signs Executive Order 11110 which returned
to the U.S. government the power to issue currency, without going
through the Rosthchilds owned Federal Reserve. Less than 6 months
later on November 22nd , president Kennedy is assassinated by the
Rothschilds for the same reason as they assassinated President Abraham
Lincoln in 1865, he wanted to print American money for the American
people, as oppose to for the benefit of a money grabbing war mongering
foreign elite.
Another, and probably the primary, reason for Kennedy's assassination
is however, the fact that he made it quite clear to Israeli Prime
Minister, David Ben-Gurion, that under no circumstances would he agree
to Israel becoming a nuclear state.  The Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz on
February 5, 1999, in a review of, Avner Cohen's book, "Israel and the
Bomb," states the following,
"The murder of American President John F. Kennedy brought to an abrupt
end the massive pressure being applied by the U.S. administration on
the government of Israel to discontinue the nuclear program...The book
implied that, had Kennedy remained alive, it is doubtful whether
Israel would today have a nuclear option."
Edmond de Rothschild establishes La Compagnie Financière Edmond de
Rothschild (LCF), in Switzerland as a venture capital house. This
later develops into an investment bank and asset management company
with many affiliates. He also marries his wife Nadine and they have a
son, Benjamin de Rothschild.
1965: Israel illegally obtains enriched uranium from NUMEC (Nuclear
Materials and Equipment Corporation).
1967: The treatment of the Palestinians by the Zionist Jews, finally
ignites enough anger in the Arab world for Egypt, Jordan and Syria to
mobilise on Israel's borders.  All of these three countries are
suddenly attacked by Israel and as a result the Sinai which included
Gaza was stolen from Egypt, and the West Bank and the Jordan River
stolen from Jordan.
As a result of this, on June 8, the Israelis launch an attack on the
USS Liberty with Israeli aircraft and motor torpedo boats, in an
effort to blame it on Egypt, to bring America into the war on their
side, and of course follow to the letter, their Mossad motto, "By Way
Of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War."As a result of their attack, 34
American servicemen were killed and 174 wounded.  Israel lies as
usual, claiming it mistook this warship that was flying a large United
States flag, for an ancient out-of-service Egyptian horse carrier El
Quseir, that was 180 feet shorter.  They also claim the ship was in
the war zone, when it was actually in international waters, far from
any fighting.  The Israeli's attack on this warship lasts for 75
minutes during which time they shoot up one of the United States
flags, resulting in the sailors desperately raising another one. In
the aftermath of this attack, the American sailors who survived are
warned by the United States military not to discuss the matter with
anyone due to, "national security."  This story gets no prominence in
the Rothschild controlled mainstream media and as usual Israel is in
no way even rebuked for their crimes by their subservient country of
America.
1913: Jacob Schiff sets up the Anti Defamation League (ADL) in the
United States.  This organisation is formed to slander anyone who
questions or challenges the Rothschild global conspiracy as,
"anti-semitic."
1914:  The start of World War I.  In this war, the German Rothschilds
loan money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds loan money to the
British, and the French Rothschilds loan money to the French.
Futhermore, the Rothschilds have control of the three European news
agencies, Wolff (est. 1849) in Germany, Reuters (est. 1851) in
England, and Havas (est. 1835) in France.
The Rothschilds use Wolff to manipulate the German people into a
fervour for war. From around this time, the Rothschilds are rarely
reported in the media, because they own the media.
1914:  The start of World War I.  In this war, the German Rothschilds
loan money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds loan money to the
British, and the French Rothschilds loan money to the French.
Futhermore, the Rothschilds have control of the three European news
agencies, Wolff (est. 1849) in Germany, Reuters (est. 1851) in
England, and Havas (est. 1835) in France.
The Rothschilds use Wolff to manipulate the German people into a
fervour for war. From around this time, the Rothschilds are rarely
reported in the media, because they own the media.
1916:  On June 4, Ashkenazi Jew, Louis Dembitz Brandeis is appointed
to the Supreme Court of the United States by President Wilson as per
his agreed blackmail payment to Samuel Untermyer some three years
earlier.  Justice Brandeis is also the elected leader of the Executive
Committee for Zionist Affairs, a position he has held since 1914.
The middle of World War II.  Germany were winning the war as they were
being financed by the Rothschilds to a greater extent than France,
Italy and England, because Rothschilds, did not want to support the
Tsar in Russia, and of course Russia was on the same side as France,
Italy and England.
Then a significant event occurred.  Germany, although they were
winning the war and not one foreign soldier had set foot on their
soil, offered armistice to Britain with no requirement of reparations.
 The Rothschilds were anxious to make sure this didn't happen as they
were expecting to make far more money off this war, so they played
another card they had up their sleeve.
Whilst the British were considering Germany's offer, Rothschild agent
Louis Brandeis sends a Zionist delegation from America to Britain to
promise to bring America into the war on the side of the British,
provided the British agree to give the land of Palestine to the
Rothschilds.
The Rothschilds wanted Palestine for the following reason.  They had
great business interests in the far east and desired their own state
in that area along with their own military which they could use as an
aggressor to any state that threatened those interests.
The British subsequently agree to the deal for Palestine and the
Zionists in London contact their counterparts in America and inform
them of this fact.  Suddenly all the major newspapers in America that
up to that point had been pro-German turned on Germany running
propaganda pieces such as:  German soldiers were killing Red Cross
Nurses; German soldiers were cutting off babies hands, etc, in order
to manipulate the American public against the Germans. This same year,
President Woodrow Wilson, ran a re-election campaign under the slogan,
"Re-Elect The Man Who Will Keep Your Sons Out Of The War." On December
12, Germany and her allies offer peace terms to end the war.
1917:  The Rothschilds order the execution by the Bolsheviks they
control, of Tsar Nicholas II and his entire family in Russia, even
though the Tsar had already abdicated on March 2.  This is both to get
control of the country and an act of revenge for Tsar Alexander I
blocking their world government plan in 1815 at the Congress Of
Vienna, and Tsar Alexander II siding with President Abraham Lincoln in
1864.
It is extremely important for them to slaughter the entire family
including women and children in order to make good on the promise to
do so made by Nathan Mayer Rothschild in 1815.  It is designed to show
the world what happens if you ever attempt to cross the Rothschilds.
As a result of Germany's offer of peace the Rothschild war machine
goes into overdrive in America, spreading propaganda which leads to
President Wilson under the instructions of American Zionist leader and
Supreme Court Justice, Louis Dembitz Brandeis, reneging on his promise
to the electorate and taking America into the first world war on April
6.
As per the Rothschild Zionist promise to the British, to take America
into the war, they decide they want something in writing from the
British to prove that they will uphold their side of the bargain.  The
British Foreign Secretary, Arthur James Balfour therefore drafts a
letter which is commonly known as the, "Balfour Declaration," which is
reprinted below.
Foreign Office
November 2nd, 1917
Dear Lord Rothschild, I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on
behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of
sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to,
and approved by, the Cabinet. His Majesty's Government view with
favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the
Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the
achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing
shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of
existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and
political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. I should be
grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the
Zionist Federation.

Yours sincerely, Arthur James Balfour

The Rothschilds order the execution by the Bolsheviks they control, of
Tsar Nicholas II and his entire family in Russia, even though the Tsar
had already abdicated on March 2.  This is both to get control of the
country and an act of revenge for Tsar Alexander I blocking their
world government plan in 1815 at the Congress Of Vienna, and Tsar
Alexander II siding with President Abraham Lincoln in 1864

. It is extremely important for them to slaughter the entire family including
women and children in order to make good on the promise to do so made
by Nathan Mayer Rothschild in 1815.  It is designed to show the world
what happens if you ever attempt to cross the Rothschilds.
1962: de Rothschild Frères establishes Imétal as an umbrella company
for all their mineral mining interests.
Frederic Morton publishes his book, The Rothschilds, in which he states,
"Though they control scores of industrial, commercial, mining and
tourist corporations, not one bears the name Rothschild. Being private
partnerships, the family houses never need to, and never do, publish a
single public balance sheet, or any other report of their financial
condition."
This attitude reveals the true aim of the Rothschilds, to eliminate
all competition and create their own worldwide monopoly.
1963: On June 4th President John F. Kennedy (the 35th President of the
United States 1961 – 1963) signs Executive Order 11110 which returned
to the U.S. government the power to issue currency, without going
through the Rosthchilds owned Federal Reserve.
Less than 6 months later on November 22nd , president Kennedy is
assassinated by the Rothschilds for the same reason as they
assassinated President Abraham Lincoln in 1865, he wanted to print
American money for the American people, as oppose to for the benefit
of a money grabbing war mongering foreign elite.
}
who is said to personally own and/or control over half of the whole
world's wealth, natural energy and food resources, commodities like
gold and silver reserves and the whole of the world's money supply and
central banks that control that money supply with only a few countries
in the world left they do not control the money supply of being
associated and related families, International  and organisations that
organised the assassination of
1. USA President Abraham Lincoln in 1865; Lincoln (1809–1865) was shot
on the evening of April 14, 1865, as he sat in the presidential box at
Ford's Theatre in Washington, D.C., watching a performance of the play
Our American Cousin. The assassin was actor John Wilkes Booth
(1838–1865). After shooting Lincoln, Booth jumped onto the stage,
falling and breaking a leg. Wilkes limped away, calling out, "Sic
semper tyrannis" (a Latin phrase meaning "Thus always to tyrants")....
2. USA President James Garfield in 1881;
3. USA President William McKinley in 1901;
Note: 1913: Jacob Schiff sets up the Anti Defamation League (ADL) in
the United States.  This organisation is formed to slander anyone who
questions or
challenges the Rothschild global conspiracy as, "anti-semitic."
4. The assassination on 28 June 1914 of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of
Austria, the heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary,
   is seen as the immediate trigger of the 1st World War;
5. 1914:  The start of World War I.  In this war, the German
Rothschilds loan money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds loan
money to the British, and the French
Rothschilds loan money to the French. Futhermore, the Rothschilds have
control of the three European news agencies, Wolff (est. 1849) in
Germany, Reuters (est.
1851) in England, and Havas (est. 1835) in France.  The Rothschilds
use Wolff to manipulate the German people into a fervour for war. From
around this time, the
Rothschilds are rarely reported in the media, because  they own the
media. World War I was a military conflict that lasted from 1914 to
1918 and involved most of the
world's great powers, assembled in two opposing alliances: the Allies
(centred around the Triple Entente) against the Central Powers.

More than 70 million military personnel, including 60 million
Europeans, were mobilised in one of the largest wars in history. More
than 15 million people were killed,
making it one of the deadliest conflicts in history.This war
(abbreviated as WW-I, WWI, or WW1) is also known as the First World
War, the Great War, the
World War (prior to the outbreak of theSecond World War), and the War
to End All Wars. The assassination on 28 June 1914 of Archduke Franz
Ferdinand of Austria, the heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary, is
seen as the immediate trigger of the war, though long-term causes,
such as imperialistic foreign policy, played a major role. Ferdinand's
assassination at the hands of Serbian nationalist Gavrilo Princip
resulted in demands against the Kingdom of Serbia. Several alliances
that had been formed over the past decades were invoked, so within
weeks the major powers were at war; with all having colonies, the
conflict soon spread around the world. The conflict opened with the
German invasion of Belgium, Luxembourg and France; the
Austro-Hungarian invasion of Serbia and a Russian attack against
Prussia. After the German march on Paris was brought to a halt, the
Western Front settled into a static battle of attrition with a trench
line that changed little until 1917. In the East, the Russian army
successfully fought against the Austro-Hungarian forces but were
forced back by the German army. Additional fronts opened with the
Ottoman Empire joining the war in 1914, Italy in 1915 and Romania in
1916. Imperial Russia left the war in 1917. After a 1918 German
offensive along the western front, American forces entered the
trenches and the German armies were driven back in a series of
successfully allied offensives. Germany surrendered on Armistice Day,
November 11, 1918. By the war's end, four major imperial powers—the
German, Russian, Austro-Hungarianand Ottoman Empires—had been
militarily and politically defeated, with the last two ceasing to
exist. The revolutionised Soviet Union emerged from the Russian
Empire, while the map of central Europe was completely redrawn into
numerous smaller states.[8]The League of Nations was formed in the
hope of preventing another such conflict. The European nationalism
spawned by the war, the repercussions of Germany's defeat, and of the
Treaty of Versailles would eventually lead to the beginning of World
War II in 1939.
6. In 1917 the Rothschilds order the execution by the Bolsheviks they
control, of Tsar Nicholas II and his entire family in Russia, even
though the Tsar had already abdicated on March 2.  This is both to get
control of the country and an act of revenge for Tsar Alexander I
blocking their world government plan in 1815 at the Congress Of
Vienna, and Tsar Alexander II siding with President Abraham Lincoln in
1864. It is extremely important for them to slaughter the entire
family including women and children in order to make good on the
promise to do so made by Nathan Mayer Rothschild in 1815.  It is
designed to show the world what happens if you ever attempt to cross
the Rothschilds.
7. Assassination attempt on the life of USA President Franklin D,
Roosevelt in 1933.
8. The Rothschilds Banking Group and partners manipulate and finance
all sides of the Second World war causing million of people form both
sides to kill each other
and great profit and satisfaction to the Rothschilds and their
partners and also  in furtherance of their aim to have a One World
Government by the year 2012
.The Second World War, World War II, or the Second World War (often
abbreviated WWII or WW2), was a global military conflict between 1939
and 1945, which involved most of the world's nations, including all
great powers, organised into two opposing military alliances: the
Allies and the Axis. The war involved the mobilisation of over 100
million military personnel, making it the most widespread war in
history. In a state of "total war," the major participants placed
their entire economic, industrial, and scientific capabilities at the
service of the war effort, erasing the distinction between civilian
and military resources. Over seventy million people, the majority
civilians, were killed, making itthe deadliest conflict in human
history. The start of the war is generally held to be September 1,
1939, with the invasion of Poland by Nazi Germany and subsequent
declarations of war on Germany by most of the countries in the British
Empire and Commonwealth, and by France. Many countries were already at
war before this date, such as Ethiopia and Italy in theSecond
Italo-Abyssinian War and China and Japan in the Second Sino-Japanese
War. Many who were not initially involved joined the war later, as a
result of events such as the German invasion of the Soviet Union, the
Japanese attacks on Pearl Harbor and British colonies, and subsequent
declarations of war on Japan by theUnited States, the Netherlands,
and British Commonwealth. In 1945, the war ended in a victory for the
Allies. The Soviet Union and the United States subsequently emerged as
the world's superpowers, setting the stage for the Cold War which
lasted for the next 46 years. The United Nations (financed organised
and controlled by Rothschild and partner's money and influence as a
for runner towards  the concept of their long term aim of a one world
government) was formed in the hope of preventing another world
conflict. The acceptance of the principle of self-determination
accelerated decolonization movements in Asia and Africa, whileWestern
Europe itself began moving toward integration. The start of the war is
generally held to be September 1, 1939 with the German invasion of
Poland; Britain and France declared war on Germany two days later.
Other dates for the beginning of war include the Japanese invasion of
Manchuria on September 13, 1931; the start of the Second Sino-Japanese
War on July 7, 1937; or one of several other events.
Others follow A. J. P. Taylor, who holds that there was a simultaneous
Sino-Japanese War in East Asia, and a Second European War in Europe
and her colonies. The two wars merged in 1941, becoming a single
global conflict, at which point the war continued until 1945. This
article uses the conventional dating. The exact date of the war's end
is not universally agreed upon. It has been suggested that the war
ended at the armistice of August 14, 1945 (V-J Day), rather than the
formal surrender of Japan (September 2, 1945); in some European
histories, it ended on V-E Day (May 8, 1945). The Treaty of Peace with
Japan was not signed until 1951. A variety of events led to the
escalation of hostilities between the Axis and Allied powers prior to
the start of the war. In the aftermath of World War I, a defeated
Germany signed the Treaty of Versailles.  This caused Germany to lose
around 13 percent of its territory, stripped it of its colonies,
prohibited German annexation of other states, imposed massive
reparations and limited the size and makeup of Germany's armed forces.
The Russian Civil War led to the creation of the Soviet Union. After
Lenin's death, Stalin seized power in the USSR and repudiated the New
Economic Policy favoring the Five Year Plans instead. In Italy, Benito
Mussolini seized power as a fascist dictator promising to create a
"New Roman Empire."
The Kuomintang (KMT) party in China launched a unification campaign
against regional warlords and nominally unified China in the
mid-1920s, but was soon embroiled in a civil war against its former
Chinese communist allies. In 1931, an increasingly militaristic
Japanese Empire, which had long sought influence in China as the first
step of its right to rule Asia, used the Mukden Incident as
justification to invade Manchuria and anex two Chinese provinces. The
two nations then fought several small conflicts, in Shanghai, Rehe and
Hebei, until the Tanggu Truce in 1933. Thereafter, Chinese volunteer
forces continued the resistance to Japanese aggression in Manchuria,
and Chahar and Suiyuan. Rothschild's International  Banking Group and
partners backed  A variety of events led to the escalation of
hostilities between the Axis and Allied powers prior to the start of
the war. In the aftermath of World War I, a defeated Germany signed
the Treaty of Versailles. This caused Germany to lose around 13
percent of its territory, stripped it of its colonies, prohibited
German annexation of other states, imposed massive reparations and
limited the size and makeup of Germany's armed forces.  The Russian
Civil War led to the creation of the Soviet Union. After Lenin's
death, Stalin seized power in the USSR and repudiated the New Economic
Policy favoring the Five Year Plans instead. In Italy, Benito
Mussolini seized power as a fascist dictator promising to create a
"New Roman Empire."
The Kuomintang (KMT) party in China launched a unification campaign
against regional warlords and nominally unified China in the
mid-1920s, but was soon embroiled in a
civil war against its former Chinese communist allies.  In 1931, an
increasingly militaristic Japanese Empire, which had long sought
influence in China
 as the first step of its right to rule Asia, used the Mukden Incident
as justification to invade Manchuria and anex two Chinese provinces.
The two nations then fought several small conflicts, in Shanghai, Rehe
and Hebei, until the Tanggu Truce in 1933. Thereafter, Chinese
volunteer forces continued the
resistance to Japanese aggression in Manchuria, and Chahar and Suiyuan.
Estimates for the total casualties of the war vary, due to the fact
that many deaths went unrecorded. However, most suggest that some 60
million people died in the war, including about 20 million soldiers
and 40 million civilians.[253][254][255]Many civilians died because of
disease, starvation, massacres,bombing and deliberate genocide. The
Soviet Union lost around 27 million people during the war, almost half
of all World War II deaths.
Of the total deaths in World War II, approximately 85 percent were on
the Allied side (mostly Soviet and Chinese) and 15 percent were on the
Axis side. One estimate is that 12 million civilians died in Nazi
concentration camps,  1.5 million by bombs, 7 million in Europe from
other causes, and 7.5 million in China from other causes.
Many of these deaths were a result of genocidal actions committed in
Axis-occupied territories and other war crimescommitted by German as
well as Japanese forces. The most notorious of German atrocities was
The Holocaust, the systematic genocide of Jewsin territories
controlled by Germany and its allies.
The Nazis also targeted other groups, including the Roma (targeted in
the Porajmos), Slavs, and gay men, exterminating an estimated five
million additional people. The targets of the Axis-aligned Croatian
Ustaše regime were mostly Serbs.
The best-known Japanese atrocity is the Nanking Massacre, in which
several hundred thousand Chinese civilians were raped and murdered.
The Japanese military murdered from nearly 3 million to over 10
million civilians, mostly Chinese. Mitsuyoshi Himeta reported 2.7
million casualties occurred during the Sanko Sakusen. General Yasuji
Okamura implemented the policy in Heipei and Shantung.
Limited Axis usage of biological and chemical weapons is also known.
The Italians used mustard gas during their conquest of Abyssinia,
while the Japanese Imperial Army used a variety of such weapons during
their invasion and occupation of China  and in early conflicts against
the Soviets. Both the Germans and Japanese tested such weapons against
civilians and, in some cases, on prisoners of war.
While many of the Axis's acts were brought to trial in the world's
first international tribunals, incidents caused by the Allies were
not. Examples of such Allied actions include population transfer in
the Soviet Union, the Soviet forced labour camps (Gulag), Japanese
American internment in the United States, the Operation Keelhaul,
expulsion of Germans after World War II, mass rape of German women by
Soviet Red Army, the Soviet massacre of Polish citizens and the
mass-bombing of civilian areas in enemy territory, including Tokyo and
most notably atDresden. Large numbers of famine deaths can also be
partially attributed to the war, such as the Bengal famine of 1943 and
the Vietnamese famine of 1944–45.
Concentration camps and slave work
Further information: The Holocaust, Consequences of German Nazism,
Japanese war crimes, and Allied war crimes during World War II
The Nazis were responsible for The Holocaust, the killing of
approximately six million Jews (overwhelmingly Ashkenazim), as well as
two millionethnic Poles and four million others who were deemed
"unworthy of life" (including the disabled and mentally ill, Soviet
POWs, homosexuals,Freemasons, Jehovah's Witnesses, and the Roma) as
part of a programme of deliberate extermination. About 12 million,
most of whom were Eastern Europeans, were employed in the German war
economy as forced labor in Germany during World War II. In addition to
Nazi concentration camps, the Soviet gulags, or labor camps, led to
the death of citizens of occupied countries such as Poland, Lithuania,
Latvia, and Estonia, as well as German prisoners of war(POWs) and even
Soviet citizens who had been or were thought to be supporters of the
Nazis. Sixty percent of Soviet POWs of the Germans died during the
war. Richard Overy gives the number of 5.7 million Soviet POWs. Of
those, 57 percent died or were killed, a total of 3.6 million.  Some
of the survivors on their return to the USSR were treated as traitors.
(See Order No. 270)
Japanese prisoner-of-war camps, many of which were used as labour
camps, also had high death rates. TheInternational Military Tribunal
for the Far East found the death rate of Western prisoners was 27.1
percent (for American POWs, 37 percent), seven times that of POWs
under the Germans and Italians[280] The death rate among Chinese POWs
was much larger; a directive ratified on August 5, 1937 by Hirohito
declared that the Chinese were no longer protected under international
law.[281] While 37,583 prisoners from the UK, 28,500 from the
Netherlands and 14,473 from United States were released after the
surrender of Japan, the number for the Chinese was only 56.
According to a joint study of historians featuring Zhifen Ju, Mark
Peattie, Toru Kubo, and Mitsuyoshi Himeta, more than 10 million
Chinese were mobilized by the Japanese army and enslaved by the East
Asia Development Board for slave labor in Manchukuo and north
China.The U.S. Library of Congress estimates that in Java, between 4
and 10 million romusha (Japanese: "manual laborers"), were forced to
work by the Japanese military. About 270,000 of these Javanese
laborers were sent to other Japanese-held areas in South East Asia,
and only 52,000 were repatriated to Java. On February 19, 1942
Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066, interning thousands of
Japanese, Italians,German Americans, and some emigrants from Hawaii
who fled after the bombing of Pearl Harbor for the duration of the
war. The U.S. and Canadian
governments interned 150,000 Japanese-Americans,  as well as nearly
11,000 German and Italian residents of the U.S. Allied use of
involuntary labor occurred mainly in
the east, such as in Poland,  but more than a million were also put to
work in the west. In Hungary's case, Hungarians were forced to work
for the Soviet Union until 1955.
9. Assassination attempt on the life of USA President  Harry S Truman in 1950.
10. USA President John F. Kennedy in 1963; 1963: On June 4th President
John F. Kennedy (the 35th President of the United States 1961 – 1963)
signs Executive Order 11110 which returned to the U.S. government the
power to issue currency, without going through the Rosthchilds owned
Federal Reserve. Less than 6 months later on November 22nd , president
Kennedy is assassinated by the Rothschilds for the same reason as they
assassinated President Abraham Lincoln in 1865, he wanted to print
American money for the American people, as oppose to for the benefit
of a money grabbing war mongering foreign elite.
11. John K Kennedy's brother Robert Robert F. Kennedy, in June 5,
1968, a United States Senator  during celebrations of his successful
campaign in the California primary elections while seeking the
Democratic nomination for President of the United States. by an
assassin who was a twenty-four year old Palestinian immigrant named
Sirhan Sirhan, who remains incarcerated for this crime as of 2010. As
with the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, Robert Kennedy's
brother, in 1963, the senator's death has been the subject of
widespread analysis. Some individuals involved in the original
investigation and some researchers have suggested alternative
scenarios for the crime, or have argued that there are serious
problems with the official case.
 The assassination of Robert F. Kennedy, a United States Senator and
brother of assassinated President John F. Kennedy, took place shortly
after midnight on June 5, 1968 in Los Angeles, California. Robert F.
Kennedy was killed during celebrations of his successful campaign in
the California primary elections while seeking the Democratic
nomination for President of the United States. The assassin was a
twenty-four year old Palestinian immigrant named Sirhan Sirhan, who
remains incarcerated for this crime as of 2010. The shooting was
recorded on audio tape by a freelance newspaper reporter, and the
aftermath was captured on film. Kennedy's body lay in repose at St.
Patrick's Cathedral in New York for two days before a funeral mass was
held on June 8. His body was interred near his brother John at
Arlington National Cemetery. His death prompted the protection of
presidential candidates by the United States Secret Service. Hubert
Humphrey went on to win the Democratic nomination for the presidency,
but ultimately lost the election to Richard Nixon. As with his
brother's death, Robert Kennedy's assassination and the circumstances
surrounding it have spawned a variety of conspiracy theories,
particularly in relation to the existence of a supposed second gunman.
CIA involvement In November 2006, the BBC's Newsnight program
presented research by filmmaker Shane O'Sullivan alleging that several
CIA officers were present on the night of the assassination.[47] Three
men who appear in films and photographs from the night of the
assassination were positively identified by former colleagues and
associates as former senior CIA officers who had worked together in
1963 at JMWAVE, the CIA's main anti-Castro station based in Miami.
They were JMWAVE Chief of Operations David Morales, Chief of Maritime
Operations Gordon Campbell and Chief of Psychological Warfare
Operations George Joannides.  The program featured an interview with
Morales's former attorney Robert Walton, who quoted him as having
said, "I was in Dallas when we got the son of a bitch and I was in Los
Angeles when we got the little bastard".  O'Sullivan reported that the
CIA declined to comment on the officers in question. It was also
alleged that Morales was known for his deep anger toward the Kennedys
for what he saw as their betrayal during the Bay of Pigs Invasion.
After further investigation, O'Sullivan produced the feature
documentary, RFK Must Die. The film casts doubt on the earlier
identifications and ultimately reveals that the man previously
identified as Gordon Campbell may, in fact, have been Michael D.
Roman, a now-deceased Bulova Watch Company employee, who was at the
Ambassador Hotel for a company convention.[
Second gunman The location of Kennedy's wounds suggested that his
assailant had stood behind him, but some witnesses said that Sirhan
faced west as Kennedy moved through the pantry facing east. This has
led to the suggestion that a second gunman actually fired the fatal
shot, a possibility supported by coroner Thomas Noguchi. Other
witnesses, though, said that as Sirhan approached, Kennedy was turning
to his left shaking hands, facing north and so exposing his right
side. As recently as 2008, eyewitness John Pilger asserted his belief
that there must have been a second gunman. During a re-examination of
the case in 1975, the U.S. Supreme Court ordered expert examination of
the possibility of a second gun having been used, and the conclusion
of the experts was that there was little or no evidence to support
this theory. In 2007, analysis of an audio recording of the shooting
made by freelance reporter Stanislaw Pruszynski appeared to indicate,
according to forensic expert Philip van Praag, that thirteen shots
were fired, even though Sirhan's gun held only eight rounds. While
this would strongly indicate a second gunman, independent analysis by
other experts indicated that there are only eight shots recorded on
the tape.
12 . The assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. in April 1968
13. Two assassination attempts on the life of USA President Gerald R,
Ford bot in 1975 .
14. Attempted assassination of President Ronald Regan in 1981. The
movtivation for the Assassination attempt on President Ronald Regan
can be understood by the following information.  Prior to to the
election Ronald Regan had publicly stated that if he was elected he
was going to hold an inquiry into powerful secret societies.groups and
organisation like the Freemasons, the Klu Klux Klan, The Illuminati,
the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, the
Trilaterial  Commission and was definitely not going to have George
Bush Senior (HTW Bush)  involved in his campagn or as running mate for
vice president if he was the presidential election. Goerge Bush had
been incontrol of teh CIq and was known as being invlved with billions
of collars of drug dealing using thr CIA as a front for such drug
dealling as well as being 25% owner of some of the biggest arms ans
munician manufacturing companies in the world with his other partners
including the Rothschild International Banking Family and their other
assoicates such as the bllod line of Royal Families of Europe, and the
following family names:  Astor; Bundy; Collins; duPont; Freeman;
Kennedy; Morgan; Oppenheimer; Rockefeller; Sassoon; Schiff; Taft; and
Van Duyn who calls themselvesAshkenazi Jews have obtained theit
powerful ajd rich positions in ther world  through lies, manipulation
and murder.  Then all of a sudden just before the USPresidential
election Ronald Reagan announced George Bush as his running mate in
the presidential Elections. Goerge Bush wanted  to be US president of
behalf  of the drug, war lords and arms dealing and manufacturing
partners but not confident at that poin ton time of winning the US
Presidential Election Race. So he and his partners felt it would eb
better for him to be the vice president under Ronald Regan aznd have
him assassinated by a  CIA operative , which would mean George Bush
Senior would have automicly become US President a few years earlier
than he did. If the bullet had been an inch or two either way when it
hit President Ronald Regan, then the assassination attempt would have
been successful and George Busg Senior would have been president by
default being vice president. Either way the attempt obviously
frightened the life out of President Ronald Regan and after the he
certainly did not have any investigation into the powerful secret
societies  and organisations as he had promised before the election,
and if fact when and quickly joined the Freemason and Illuninati who
made him an honourary member.
The Reagan assassination attempt occurred on Monday, March 30, 1981,
just 69 days into the presidency of Ronald Reagan. While leaving a
speaking engagement at the Washington Hilton Hotel in Washington,
D.C., President Reagan and three others were shot and wounded by John
Hinckley, Jr.. Reagan suffered a punctured lung, but prompt medical
attention allowed him to recover quickly.
Reagan was the first serving United States president to survive being
shot in an assassination attempt. No formal invocation of presidential
succession took place, although a controversial statement by Secretary
of State Alexander Haig that he was "in control here" marked a short
period during which Vice President George H. W. Bush was physically
absent, flying back to Washington, D.C. aboard Air Force Two from a
speech in Fort Worth, Texas. Hinckley was found not guilty by reason
of insanity and has remained confined to a psychiatric facility where
he can live a very comfortable life protected by the US Government and
the Rothschild International Bakling Group. The false publicly stayed
motivation behind Hinckley's attack was an obsession with actress
Jodie Foster due to erotomania. While living in Hollywood in the late
1970s, he saw the film Taxi Driver at least 15 times, apparently
identifying strongly with Travis Bickle, the lead character.The arc of
the story involves Bickle's attempts to protect a 12-year-old child
prostitute, played by Foster; toward the end of the film, Bickle
attempts to assassinate a United States Senator who is running for
president. Over the following years, Hinckley trailed Foster around
the country, going so far as to enroll in a writing course at Yale
University in 1980 when he learned that she was a student there after
reading an article in People magazine. He wrote numerous letters and
notes to her in late 1980. He called her twice and refused to give up
when she indicated that she was not interested in him.Convinced that
by becoming a national figure he would be Foster's equal, Hinckley
began to stalk then-President Jimmy Carter — his decision to target
presidents was also likely inspired by Taxi Driver. He wrote three or
four more notes to her in early March 1981. Foster gave these notes to
her dean, who gave them to the Yale police department, which sought to
track Hinckley down but failed.
15.. On July 16, 1999, John F. Kennedy, Jr. who was about to run for
New York Senator against Hilliary Clinton ( along with her husband
President Bill Clinton were Rothschild agents and fiancialy back and
support by the Rothschild Banking Group and associates who could not
rist John F.Kennedy winning Senator of New York against Hillary
Clinton, as Hillary Clinton was ear marked to run for the President of
the USA in the future as another Rothschild controlled USA President
)was killed when the Piper Saratoga light aircraft he was piloting
crashed into the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Martha's Vineyard,
Massachusetts. His wife, Carolyn Jeanne Bessette, and sister-in-law,
Lauren Gail Bessette, were also killed. The flight originated from
Essex County Airport (CDW) in Fairfield Township, Essex County, New
Jersey. The intended flight path was along the coastline of
Connecticut and across Rhode Island Sound to Martha's Vineyard Airport
(MVY). The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) reported its
conclusion on July 6, 2000, stated that the crash was caused by
Kennedy's failure to maintain control of his airplane during a descent
over water at night, which was a result of spatial disorientation.
The NTSB and other aviation professionals have also cited additional
interrelated factors that may have contributed to the crash.
16. Since the end of the Second World War, The Rothschild
International Banking Group and partners who have had since the 1700's
had effective ownership and control of London Britain through London
City, the USA through ownership and control of Washington City and the
Catholic Church through control and ownership of Vatican City,
manipulated Rothschild controlled USA Presidents and British Prime
Ministers and loaned money to the USA and Britain to start and
maintain over 200 50 official and unofficial, internal and
external,wars and disputes lending money to every side of every war by
instructing their presidents and prime ministers, who that put in
power and control, to use the country's official armies from various
countries to fight each other for various manipulated and contrived
reasons, and paying  rebels and militia to create uprising uprisings,
ethnic cleansing. gencide, religeous arguments and racial hatred
arguments etc in various counties around the world causing the death
of over 1 billion people with the Rothschild Banking Family and
Associates making Trillions of Dollars in cash, gold and silver, land,
oil, minerals, art and resources grabs form each war and conflict.
There have been over one billion deaths in such wars and conflicts
since the second would war, alone and added to the over 1 billion
deaths as a result of the first and second world wars that accounts
for over 2 billion deaths caused in various ways by the Russian
Khazars, Rothschild International Banking Family from a country called
Khazaria, which occupied the land locked between the Black Sea and the
Caspian Sea which is now predominantly occupied by Georgia.  The
reason the Rothschilds claim to be Jewish is that the Khazars under
the instruction of the King, converted to the Jewish faith in 740
A.D., but of course that did not include converting their Asiatic
Mongolian genes to the genes of the Jewish people.
Paul Bellany in his book called Civil Wars of the World: Major
conflicts since World War Two, states that there have been the
following numbers of region conflicts:
Asian Conflicts-27
European Conflicts - 39
Latin American Conflicts 49
Middle Eastern and North American Conflicts - 59
Sub - Saharan African Conflicts - 69
which he has stated have included:
Afghanistan (1978-1992), however since his book was published the
Rothschild International Banking Group and associates manipulated,
after Soviet troops withdrew in 1989, the Kabul government fell to the
mujahideen in 1992. In the years that followed, various factions of
the mujahedeen fought each other for control. In 1996 the Taliban, an
Islamic fundamentalist movement formed in 1994, captured the capital
Kabul and subsequently overran approximately 90% of the country,
leaving only a small corner in the northeast under control of the
Northern Alliance.
Although members of the international community, including the United
States, initially viewed the Taliban as a potential source of
stability for the war-ravaged country, their tolerance for hosting
Islamic extremists combined with their reluctance to negotiate with
their enemies soon soured this. In 1996, Osama bin Laden and his
Al-Qaeda organization began using Taliban-controlled Afghanistan as a
base of operations. Under the Taliban, al-Qaeda was able to use
Afghanistan as a place to train and indoctrinate fighters, import
weapons, coordinate with other jihadists, and plot terrorist actions.
While Al-Qaeda maintained its own establishments in Afghanistan, it
also supported training camps belonging to other organisations. 10,000
to 20,000 people passed through these facilities before 9/11, most of
whom were sent to fight for the Taliban against the Northern Alliance
but a smaller number were inducted into al-Qaeda.
After the August 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings were linked to bin Laden
President Bill Clinton ordered missile strikes on militant training
camps in Afghanistan. U.S. officials pressed the Taliban to surrender
bin Laden, and the international community imposed sanctions of the
Taliban in 1999 calling for bin Laden to be surrendered to U.S.
custody. The Taliban repeatedly rebuffed the demands, however.
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Special Activities Division
paramilitary teams were active in Afghanistan in the 1990s in
clandestine operations to locate and kill or capture Osama Bin Laden.
These teams planned several operations, but did not receive the order
to execute from President Bill Clinton. These efforts did however
build many of the relationships that would prove essential in the 2001
U.S. Invasion of Afghanistan.
A formal National Security Presidential Directive submitted on
September 9, 2001, had outlined essentially the same war plan that the
White House, the CIA and the Pentagon put into action after the
September 11 attacks. The plan dealt with all aspects of a war against
al-Qaeda, ranging from diplomatic initiatives to military operations
in Afghanistan, including outlines to persuade Afghanistan’s Taliban
government to turn bin Laden over to the United States, with
provisions to use military force if it refused.
One day before the September 11, 2001 attacks, the Bush administration
agreed on a plan to oust the Taliban regime in Afghanistan by force if
it refused to hand over Osama bin Laden. At that September 10 meeting
of theBush administration's top national security officials it was
agreed that the Taliban would be presented with a final ultimatum to
hand over bin Laden. Failing that, covert military aid would be
channelled by the U.S. to anti-Taliban groups. If both those options
failed, "the deputies agreed that the United States would seek to
overthrow the Taliban regime through more direct action." The BBC News
reported that Niaz Naik, a former Foreign Secretary of Pakistan,
claimed that he had been told by senior American officials in mid-July
2001 that military action against Afghanistan would begin by the
middle of October at the latest. The message was conveyed during a
meeting on Afghanistan between senior U.S., Russian, Iranian, and
Pakistani diplomats. The meeting was the third in a series of meetings
on Afghanistan, with the previous meeting having been held in March
2001. During the July 2001 meeting, Naik was told that Washington
would launch its military operation from bases in Tajikistan – where
American advisers were already in place – and that the wider objective
was to topple the Taliban regime and install another government in
place.
The Rothschild International Banking Group and associates then went on
to manipulate. plan and finance
through their planed and funded attack on the world trade centre in
New York on the 11th September, 2001, as admitted by Nicholas
Rockefeller to Film maker and previous politician Arron Russ, USA to
re-ignited a new war Afghanistan  in 2001 fighting a make believe war
on terror created by the International Rothschild, Rockefeller Banking
and Business Group that has resulted in millions of deaths of soldiers
on both sides of the dispute as well a millions of innocent men women
and children. As Nicholas Rockefeller said to Aaron Russo, they will
be financing the USA and UK armies from loans by them, looking in
caves for people like Osama Ben Laden and other so called terrorists
that do not actually exist. Nicholas Rockefeller admitted the war on
terror was a make believe enemy that they will never find, just as an
excuse to have more internal and external wars and conflicts and as an
excuse to keep taking more and more of peoples liberties away.
The War in Afghanistan is an ongoing coalition conflict which began on
October 7, 2001 , as theUS military's Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF)
that was launched, along with a number of coalition allies, in
response to both the September 11, 2001 attacks on the US, and as a
result of other issues that had existed before the attacks. The UK
has, since 2002, led its own military operation, Operation Herrick, as
part of the same war in Afghanistan.
The character of the war evolved from a violent struggle against
Al-Qaeda and its Taliban supporters to a complex counterinsurgency
effort.
The first phase of the war was the aftermath of the terrorist attacks
of September 11, 2001, when the United States launched Operation
Enduring Freedom, to annihilate the safe haven to Al-Qaeda and its use
of the Afghan territory as a base of operations for terrorist
activities.
In that first phase, U.S. and coalition forces, working with the
Afghan opposition forces of the Northern Alliance, quickly ousted the
Taliban regime. During the following Karzai administration, the
character of the war shifted to an effort aimed at smothering
insurgency, in which the insurgents preferred not to directly confront
the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) troops, but blended
into the local population and mainly used improvised explosive devices
(IEDs) and suicide bombings.
The stated aim of the invasion was to find Osama bin Laden and other
high-ranking Al-Qaeda members to be put on trial, to destroy the whole
organization of Al-Qaeda, and to remove the Taliban regime which
supported and gave safe harbor to Al-Qaeda. The Bush administration
stated that, as policy, it would not distinguish between terrorist
organizations and nations or governments that harbor them. The United
Nationsdid not authorize the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan.
The second operation is the International Security Assistance Force
(ISAF), which was established by the UN Security Council at the end of
December 2001 to secure Kabul and the surrounding areas. NATOassumed
control of ISAF in 2003. By July 23, 2009, ISAF had around 64,500
troops from 42 countries, with NATO members providing the core of the
force. The NATO commitment is particularly important to the United
States because it gives international legitimacy to the war. The
United States has approximately 29,950 troops in ISAF.
The US and UK led the aerial bombing, in support of ground forces
supplied primarily by the Afghan Northern Alliance. In 2002, American,
British andCanadian infantry were committed, along with special forces
from several allied nations, including Australia. Later, NATO troops
were added.
The initial attack removed the Taliban from power, but Taliban forces
have since regained some strength. Since 2006, Afghanistan has seen
threats to its stability from increased Taliban-ledinsurgent activity,
record-high levels of illegal drug production,  and a fragile
government with limited control outside of Kabul.
By the end of 2008, the Taliban had severed any remaining ties with
al-Qaeda. According to senior U.S. military intelligence officials,
there are fewer than 100 members of Al-Qaeda remaining in Afghanistan.
On December 1, 2009, U.S. President Barack Obamaannounced that he
would escalate U.S. military involvement by deploying an additional
30,000 soldiers over a period of six months. He also proposed to begin
troop withdrawals 18 months from that date. The following day, the
American commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal,
cautioned that the timeline was flexible and “is not an absolute”and
Defense SecretaryRobert Gates, when asked by a member of the Senate
Armed Services Committee if it is possible that no soldiers would be
withdrawn in July 2011, responded, "The president, as commander in
chief, always has the option to adjust his decisions."
The History of Iraq Wars
that the Rothschild and Associates International Banking group funded
all all sides and maniplulated and panned them and again made
trillionbs of dollar from them in interest payments fornt he various
countries they lent moeny to to fund their sides of the war plas the
profits form their companies providing arms, municians and othe
rmaterials and supplies for the trops and armies fighting these wars
for the various sides of the wars
Iraq, as we know it today, did not exist prior to World War One.
Iraq, known in Classical Antiquity as Mesopotamia, was home to some of
the oldest civilizations in the world,  with a cultural history of
over 10,000 years,  hence its common epithet, the Cradle of
Civilization. Mesopotamia, as part of the larger Fertile Crescent, was
a significant part of the Ancient Near East throughout the Bronze Age
and the Iron Age. Successively ruled by the Assyrian, Medo-Persian,
Seleucid and Parthian empires during the Iron Age and Classical
Antiquity, Iraq was conquered by the Rashidun Caliphate and became a
center of the Islamic Golden Age during the medieval Abbasid
Caliphate. After a series of invasions and conquest by the Mongols and
Turkmens, Iraq fell under Ottoman rule in the 16th century,
intermittently falling under Mamluk and Safavid control.
Ottoman rule ended with World War I, and Iraq came to be administered
by the British Empire until the establishment of the Kingdom of Iraq
in 1932. The Republic of Iraq was established in 1958 following a coup
d'etat. The Republic was controlled by Saddam Hussein from 1979 to
2003, into which period falls the Iran-Iraq war and the First Gulf
War. Saddam Hussein was deposed in 2003 following the US-led invasion
of the country. After the invasion, the situation deteriorated and
from 2007 Iraq has been in or on the brink of a state of civil war.
For several hundred years prior to the First World War, the mostly
Arab region known as Mesopotamia lay within the Turkish Ottoman
Empire. During that war, the British invaded Ottoman Mesopotamia,
finally conquering the area. The peace treaty that ended Turkey's part
in World War One, caused the Turks to give up control of Mesopotamia,
which became known by the older name, Iraq. The new Iraq was under
British control at first, a fact which caused a great deal of unrest.
The current borders of Iraq and most Middle Eastern nations, such as
Syria and Palestine/Israel, were drawn by the conquering Europeans,
often with little regard to the preferences of the people who were to
live in these newly created nations.
Thus, Iraq became a nation with three large demographic groups; the
Sunni Kurds in the north, the Sunni (Sunna) Arabs in the middle of the
country, and the Shiite (Shia) Arabs in the south. The Kurds wanted a
nation of their own, as did the Kurds living in neighboring Turkey and
Iran. Though the British eventually granted full independence to Iraq,
it was not without much bloodshed and hard feelings in Iraq about the
long occupation.
Below is a list, with some details, on the wars and conflicts of Iraq.
World War One—1914-1918 -Also known as the Great War, this conflict
brought about the end of the Turkish Ottoman Empire, which aligned
itself with the German-led Central Powers. The Turks fought largely
against the British Empire forces mostly in Ottoman Palestine, and
Ottoman Mesopotamia, and the Russian Empire in the Caucasus region and
neighboring Iran. In November, 1914, British forces landed at Basra,
in what is now southern Iraq. Despite a serious British defeat at
al-Kut in 1916, Baghdad fell to the British army in March, 1917. By
November, 1918, the British had gained control over most of the
Ottoman vilayets (provinces) that formed Iraq.
The Great Iraqi Revolution (known in Iraq as Ath Thawra al Iraqiyya al
Kubra and by the British as the Arab Revolt of 1920)—May 1920-Feb.
1921-Rebellion by Iraqi Arabs against the rule of the British Mandate.
 The rebellion was suppressed by the British military. This can be
considered the First Anglo-Iraqi War.
The immediate causes of this conflict arose out of the results of the
British conquest of the Mesopotamian region from the Ottoman Turks
during World War I. Following that war, the British established, with
League of Nations approval, a colonial-style Mandate over the region
now named “Iraq.” Many Iraqi nationalists, who believed independence
would result from the ejection of the Turks, were severely
disappointed with the establishment of the British Mandate. Other,
related events and issues also inflamed Iraqi Arab opinion against the
British. The Mandate government almost completely excluded Iraqis, as
the British imported experienced civil servants from India (also ruled
by Britain) to help administer the country. In northern Iraq, the
British allowed thousands of Christian refugees escaping persecution
in Turkey, to settle in mostly Muslim Iraq.
Kurdish Revolt—1922-1924 -Rebellion by Iraqi Kurds against the British
Mandate. Kurdish tribesmen, led by Sheik Mahmud, a powerful Kurdish
leader, attempted to establish an independent Kurdish nation. British
forces, primarily using airpower, suppressed the rebellion.  This
turned out to be the first of many Kurdish rebellions against the
British Mandate and later, against the Iraqi government.  As with many
of the later Kurdish uprisings, the rebels were put down with some aid
from rival Kurds.
It should be noted that many similar and often related Kurdish
uprisings took place in neighboring Turkey and Iran.  Government
forces always succeeded in defeating the rebels in Iraq, Turkey and
Iran. Though Kurds in Iraq and Iran did enjoy some successes, they
almost always came with the aid of foreign nations.  When the foreign
aid eventually is withdrawn, the Kurds’ success, historically, also
fades away.
Assyrian “Revolt” and Massacre-- August, 1933-- The Iraqi military,
using a supposed revolt as an excuse, massacre at least 600 Iraqi
Assyrian Christians.
Shia Tribal Revolt-1935-Shiite uprising against the Iraqi government.
Anglo-Iraqi War of 1941 (Rashid Ali Coup)--During World War Two, Iraqi
politician Rashid Ali seized power in Iraq and aligned himself with
the German-led Axis Powers. British forces invaded Iraq and quickly
defeated the Iraqi military.
Kurdish Revolt—1943 (July to October)-Rebellion suppressed by the
Iraqi Army and the British RAF.  Led by Mullah Mustafa Barzani.
Kurdish Revolt--1945 (August 10 to October)-Rebellion suppressed by
the Iraqi Army and the British RAF.  Led by Mullah Mustafa Barzani,
who escaped into Iran after breaking through an Iraqi Army force. Once
in Iran, Mustafa Barzani and his forces joined the army of the new
“Mahabad Republic,” the first independent, though in this case,
(short-lived) Kurdish state.  After Mahabad’s crushing by the Iranian
Army, Barzani led his forces back into Iraq on April 28, 1947.
Kurdish Campaign —1947 (May 27 to June 15)- After returning to Iraq
from the failed Mahabad Republic, Iraqi government actions (arrests,
executions, etc.) caused Mustafa Barzani and 496 followers to begin a
fighting retreat from the Barzan region in northern Iraq through
Turkey and into Iran in an attempt to reach the Soviet Union. They
reached the U.S.S.R. on June 15, 1947, followed by the Iranian Army.
(O’Ballance, 1973).
al-Wathbah Uprising- (Jan. to May, 1948) -- Anti government uprising
led by Iraqi leftists. This revolt was sparked by the Treaty of
Portsmouth, in which Iraq agreed to let Britain keep military bases in
Iraq and maintain continued influence in Iraqi foreign affairs. The
imposition of martial law in May, 1948 allowed the government to crush
the rebellion, just in time for the Iraqi army to travel to Palestine
for the First Arab-Israeli War.
First Arab-Israeli War -1948-1949-Israel declared independence from
the British Mandate Authority on May 1, 1948, and is subsequently
invaded by the armies of Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Transjordan, Iraq, and
Saudi Arabia. This is actually a continuation of the violence between
Jewish (Israeli) militias and Palestinian Arab militias in the leadup
to the British withdrawal. The war concludes on July 20, 1949 with the
last Israeli armistice with the Arab nations. A legal state of war
continued to exist, despite the temporary end of conventional combat.
A legal state of war between Iraq and Israel continues to this day.
Army Revolt/Coup- July 14, 1958--Brigadier General Abdul Karim el
Qassim overthrows the royal government of King Faisal II. Both the
king and Prime Minister Nouri al Said are killed. Qassim soon withdrew
Iraq from the pro-Western Baghdad Pact and established friendly
relations with the Soviet Union.
Mosul Revolt--March, 1959--Pro-Qassim communist militia , called the
People's Resistance Force, violently suppressed an anti-Qassim Sunni
Army faction made up mostly of junior officers.
Kirkuk Violence-1959--Pro-Qassim(pro-Communist) Kurds and People's
Resistance Force killed ethnic Turkomen in Kirkuk .
Kurdish Revolt—1961-1970 –After a period of relative calm, Iraqi
government promises of Kurdish autonomy, or self-rule, went
unfulfilled, sparking discontent and eventual rebellion among the
Kurds in 1961.  Mullah Mustafa Barzani is again a leader of the
Kurdish forces.  Beginning in 1963, Syrian Army and Air Force units
aid the Iraqi military in fighting against the Kurds.  A cease-fire in
1964, lasting until April of  1965, can be seen as a dividing point
between two separate conflicts, though this web site interprets this
rebellion as one continuous conflict.  This prolonged period of
Kurdish-Iraqi fighting ends in 1970 with a cease-fire and a government
guarantee of Kurdish autonomy.
Six-Day War (3rd Arab-Israeli War) 1967--Israel launched a pre-emptive
attack on Egypt, Jordan, and Syria, fearing they were preparing to
launch their own attack. The Israeli air force also attacked Iraqi
airfields. Iraq sent ground forces to support the Jordanians and the
Syrians.
Ramadan (Yom Kipper) War -1973-1974 -Egypt and Syria launched a
surprise attack on Israel during the Jewish Yom Kippur holiday. The
attack also fell on the Muslim holiday of Ramadan. Iraq sent army and
air forces to support Syria.
Kurdish Revolt -March, 1974 -–In March, 1974, Kurdish rebels led by
Mullah Mustafa Barzani (having survived an assassination attempt)
rebelled against the government.  The Kurds felt that the government
was not living up to the agreement which ended the previous revolt.
The Iraqi Kurds were supported by the Shah (King) of neighboring Iran,
who sought to put pressure on the Iraqi government over a border
dispute.  The Kurds were also assisted by the American Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA), who opposed the Iraqi government due to its
friendly relations with the Soviet Union.  After an agreement between
the Shah of Iran and Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein in 1975, (which
temporarily settled the border dispute until the Iran-Iraq War began
in 1980), the Kurds collapsed under intense Iraqi military pressure.
The CIA, allied to the Shah, also suspended aid.  Kurds cite this
betrayal by two key allies as evidence supporting their future
distrust of American attempts to incite them to fight Saddam Hussein’s
forces in the 1990s and in the early years of the 21st Century.
Intra-Kurdish warfare 1978-1979 --In 1975, Jalal Talabani formed the
Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK)-urban-based and leftist) in
opposition the Barzani-led Kurdish Democratic Party (KDP).
Shia unrest in Karbala -February, 1979--Suppressed by the Saddam
regime. Under Saddam Hussein, the Shiites (Shia) were a persecuted
religious group, both despite the fact, and because of, their
numerical majority in the country.
The First Persian Gulf War (also known as the Iran-Iraq War)—1980-1988
- In 1975, Iraq and Iran came to an agreement on the disputed Shatt
al-Arab waterway which provides Iraq’s only outlet to the sea.  In
exchange for Iran stopping support for Kurdish rebels, Iraq agreed to
share the Shatt al-Arab with Iran.  This and other disputes over their
common border, plus the belief that the 1979 revolution had weakened
Iran, led Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein to launch  an invasion of Iran
on September 22, 1980.  After initial successes, the Iraqi army ground
to a halt and soon retreated under repeated assaults by the
numerically larger Iranian Army and Revolutionary Guards.  After the
Iranians pushed the war into Iraq, Saddam’s forces began using
chemical weapons.  By 1988, both nations faced exhaustion and, after
nearly a million casualties between them, agreed to end the conflict.
Osiraq Reactor Raid—June 7, 1981 –Fearing the consequences of a
successful Iraqi nuclear weapons program, Israel launched a
pre-emptive air strike on the Osiraq nuclear reactor (under
construction) in June, 1981.  One of the pilots (the youngest) in that
raid was Ilan Ramon, who later became Israel’s first astronaut, and
who died in the Space Shuttle Columbia tragedy on February 1, 2003.
Kurdish Revolt—1983-1988 –During the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), Iraqi
Kurds, aided by Iran, fought against Iraqi government forces. In 1987
and 1988, the Iraqi military used chemical weapons to kill thousands
of Kurds (including many civilians) in a successful effort to break
the back of the resistance.
Iraq-Kuwait Relations
1961- Iraq threatens Kuwait, claiming that it belonged to Iraq because
of old Ottoman territorial claims. The British supported Kuwait by
sending military forces to Kuwait. Saddam Hussein used similar excuses
for his 1991 invasion of Kuwait.
1973 (March)- Iraq occupies as Samitah, a border post on Kuwait-Iraq
border. Dispute began when Iraq demanded the right to occupy the
Kuwaiti islands of Bubiyan and Warbah. Saudi and the Arab League
convinced Iraq to withdraw.
The Second Persian Gulf War (known in the U.S. as “Operation Desert
Storm”—Aug. 2, 1990-Feb. 1991 – On August 2, 1990, Iraqi forces
invaded and quickly conquered the small, oil-rich emirate of Kuwait.
Almost immediately, an international coalition of nations gathered a
powerful military force under the authority of the United Nations and
the leadership of the United States, first to defend the United
States, first to defend the oil-rich kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and
secondly, to force Iraq to withdraw from occupied Kuwait. From the
beginning of the crisis, the United Kingdom, led by Prime Minister
Margaret Thatcher, worked very closely with the U.S. in assuming a
determined posture against Saddam Hussein's territorial ambition.
Kurdish Revolt—1991 –Encouraged by the stunning defeat of Saddam’s
forces in Kuwait and spurred by appeals by President George H. W. Bush
of the U.S., Kurds rose up against the Iraqi government  With the bulk
of his elite forces having escaped from the fighting in Kuwait and
southern Iraq, Saddam was able to quell the revolt, causing hundreds
of thousands of Kurdish refugees to flee into neighboring Turkey and
Iran to escape.
Shiite Revolt—1991 – Encouraged by the stunning defeat of Saddam’s
forces in Kuwait and spurred by appeals by President George H. W. Bush
of the U.S., the Shiites of southern Iraq rose up against the Iraqi
government, only to be crushed by Saddam’s forces. Sporadic guerrilla
resistance continued, with the bulk of the Shiite fighting forces
seeking refuge in neighboring Shiite Iran.
The "No-Fly Zone War" --1991-2003--Following the cease-fire ending the
Gulf War, the Allies, (U.S., U.K., and France) had the right to
conduct air patrols over parts of Iraq to ensure Iraqi compliance with
the cease-fire terms. France soon left the Coalition, but U.S. and
British planes continued to patrol Iraqi skies, often drawing
anti-aircraft fire from the ground. Several major bombing campaigns
were launched to punish the Baghdad regime. This conflict officially
ended when the Third Gulf War began in March, 2003.
Intra-Kurdish warfare --1996 – Combat between various Kurdish militias.
The Third Persian Gulf War (known in the U.S. as “Operation Iraqi
Freedom”)—March 19, 2003- Present– The current war can be seen in at
least two distinct phases: The Invasion and the Occupation. Though
Saddam's regime fell fairly quickly, the insurgency was able to gain
strength in large part because the U.S. and Coalition leadership was
slow to recognize that they had a nascent guerrilla movement
underfoot. Though the Iraqi people have voted, and now have an elected
government (featuring a Kurdish president!), the situation is now
changing from a war against the occupier, to becoming more of a civil
war among Iraqis.
The Gulf War ended on April 11, 1991 with a cease-fire negotiated
between the US, its allies and Iraq.  The U.S. and its allies
maintained a policy of “containment” towards Iraq. This policy
involved numerous economic sanctions by the UN Security Council, US
and UK enforcement of Iraqi no-fly zones declared by the US and the UK
to protect Kurds in Iraqi Kurdistan and Shias in the south, and
ongoing inspections to prevent Iraqi development of chemical,
biological, and nuclear weapons. Iraqi military helicopters and planes
regularly contested the no-fly zones.
In October 1998, removing the Hussein regime became official US
foreign policy with enactment of the "Iraq Liberation Act." Enacted
following the expulsion of UN weapons inspectors the preceding August
after some had been caught spying for the US, the act provided $97
million for Iraqi "democratic opposition organizations" to "establish
a program to support a transition to democracy in Iraq." This
legislation contrasted with the terms set out in United Nations
Security Council Resolution 687, which focused on weapons and weapons
programs and made no mention of regime change.  One month after the
passage of the “Iraq Liberation Act,” the US and UK launched a
bombardment campaign of Iraq called Operation Desert Fox. The
campaign’s express rationale was to hamper the Hussein government’s
ability to produce chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, but US
intelligence personnel also hoped it would help weaken Hussein’s grip
on power.
With the election of George W. Bush as US President in 2000, the US
moved towards a more aggressive policy toward Iraq. The United States
Republican Party's campaign platform in the US presidential election,
2000 called for "full implementation" of the Iraq Liberation Act and
removal of Hussein, and key Bush advisors, including Vice President
Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, and Rumsfeld’s Deputy
Paul Wolfowitz, had long desired to invade Iraq. After leaving the
George W. Bush administration, former US Treasury Secretary Paul
O'Neill said that an attack on Iraq had been planned since Bush's
inauguration, and that the first United States National Security
Council meeting involved discussion of an invasion. O'Neill later
backtracked, saying that these discussions were part of a continuation
of foreign policy first put into place by the Clinton administration.
Despite the Bush administration's stated interest in liberating Iraq,
little formal movement towards an invasion occurred until the
September 11, 2001 attacks. For example, the administration prepared
Operation Desert Badger to respond aggressively if any US Air Force
pilot was shot down while flying over Iraq, but this didn't happen.
According to aides who were with Rumsfeld in the National Military
Command Center on September 11, Rumsfeld asked for: "best info fast.
Judge whether good enough hit Saddam Hussein at same time. Not only
Osama bin Laden." The rationale for invading Iraq as a response to
9/11 has been widely questioned, as there was no cooperation between
Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda.
Shortly after September 11, 2001 (on September 20), President Bush
addressed a joint session of the US Congress (which was simulcast live
to the world), and announced his new "War on Terrorism". This
announcement was accompanied by the doctrine of 'pre-emptive' military
action, later termed the Bush Doctrine. Some Bush advisers favored an
immediate invasion of Iraq, while others advocated building an
international coalition and obtaining United Nations authorization.
Bush eventually decided to seek UN authorization, while still
reserving the option of invading without it.
Preparations for war
See also: Public relations preparations for 2003 invasion of Iraq
While there had been some earlier talk of action against Iraq, the
Bush administration waited until September 2002 to call for action,
with White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card saying, "From a marketing
point of view, you don't introduce new products in August."[38] Bush
began formally making his case to the international community for an
invasion of Iraq in his September 12, 2002 address to the UN Security
Council. Key US allies in NATO, such as the United Kingdom, agreed
with the US actions, while France and Germany were critical of plans
to invade Iraq, arguing instead for continued diplomacy and weapons
inspections. After considerable debate, the UN Security Council
adopted a compromise resolution, UN Security Council Resolution 1441,
which authorized the resumption of weapons inspections and promised
"serious consequences" for noncompliance. Security Council members
France and Russia made clear that they did not consider these
consequences to include the use of force to overthrow the Iraqi
government. Both the US ambassador to the UN, John Negroponte, and the
UK ambassador Jeremy Greenstock publicly confirmed this reading of the
resolution, assuring that Resolution 1441 provided no "automaticity"
or "hidden triggers" for an invasion without further consultation of
the Security Council.
Resolution 1441 gave Iraq "a final opportunity to comply with its
disarmament obligations" and set up inspections by the United Nations
Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) and the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Hussein accepted the
resolution on November 13 and inspectors returned to Iraq under the
direction of UNMOVIC chairman Hans Blix and IAEA Director General
Mohamed ElBaradei. As of February 2003, the IAEA "found no evidence or
plausible indication of the revival of a nuclear weapons programme in
Iraq"; the IAEA concluded that certain items which could have been
used in nuclear enrichment centrifuges, such as aluminum tubes, were
in fact intended for other uses. UNMOVIC "did not find evidence of the
continuation or resumption of programmes of weapons of mass
destruction" or significant quantities of proscribed items. UNMOVIC
did supervise the destruction of a small number of empty chemical
rocket warheads, 50 liters of mustard gas that had been declared by
Iraq and sealed by UNSCOM in 1998, and laboratory quantities of a
mustard gas precursor, along with about 50 Al-Samoud missiles of a
design that Iraq claimed did not exceed the permitted 150 km range,
but which had travelled up to 183 km in tests. Shortly before the
invasion, UNMOVIC stated that it would take "months" to verify Iraqi
compliance with resolution 1441.
In October 2002 the US Congress passed a "Joint Resolution to
Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq". The
resolution authorized the President to "use any means necessary"
against Iraq, Americans polled in January 2003 widely favored further
diplomacy over an invasion. Later that year, however, Americans began
to agree with Bush's plan. The US government engaged in an elaborate
domestic public relations campaign to market the war to its citizens.
Americans overwhelmingly believed Hussein did have weapons of mass
destruction: 85% said so, even though the inspectors had not uncovered
those weapons. Of those who thought Iraq had weapons sequestered
somewhere, about half responded that said weapons would not be found
in combat. By February 2003, 74% of Americans supported taking
military action to remove Hussein from power.
The Central Intelligence Agency's Special Activities Division (SAD)
teams were the first US forces to enter Iraq, in July 2002, before the
main invasion. Once on the ground, they prepared for the subsequent
arrival of US Army Special Forces to organize the Kurdish Peshmerga.
This joint team (called the Northern Iraq Liaison Element (NILE))
combined to defeat Ansar al-Islam, a group with ties to al Qaeda, in
Iraqi Kurdistan. This battle was for control of the territory that was
occupied by Ansar al-Islam and took place before the invasion. It was
carried out by Paramilitary Operations Officers from SAD and the
Army's 10th Special Forces Group. This battle resulted in the defeat
of Ansar and the capture of a chemical weapons facility at Sargat.
Sargat was the only facility of its type discovered in the Iraq war.
SAD teams also conducted missions behind enemy lines to identify
leadership targets. These missions led to the initial air strikes
against Hussein and his generals. Although the strike against Hussein
was unsuccessful in killing him, it effectively ended his ability to
command and control his forces. Strikes against Iraq's generals were
more successful and significantly degraded the Iraqi command's ability
to react to, and maneuver against the US-led invasion force. SAD
operations officers were also successful in convincing key Iraqi Army
officers into surrendering their units once the fighting started.
NATO member Turkey refused to allow the US army across its territory
into northern Iraq. Therefore, joint SAD and Army Special forces teams
and the Pershmerga were the entire Northern force against the Iraqi
army. They managed to keep the northern divisions in place rather than
allowing them to aid their colleagues against the US led coalition
force coming from the south. Four of these CIA officers were awarded
the Intelligence Star for their actions.
In February 2003, US Secretary of State Colin Powell addressed the
United Nations General Assembly, continuing US efforts to gain UN
authorization for an invasion. Powell presented evidence alleging that
Iraq was actively producing chemical and biological weapons and had
ties to al-Qaeda As a follow-up to Powell’s presentation, the United
States, United Kingdom, Poland, Italy, Australia, Denmark, Japan, and
Spain proposed a resolution authorizing the use of force in Iraq, but
NATO members like Canada, France, and Germany, together with Russia,
strongly urged continued diplomacy. Facing a losing vote as well as a
likely veto from France and Russia, the US, UK, Spain, Poland,
Denmark, Italy, Japan, and Australia eventually withdrew their
resolution.
 The 2003 invasion of Iraq, (from March 20 to May 1, 2003) was led by
the United States, alongside the United Kingdom and smaller
contingents from Australia, Denmark, Poland and Spain. Four countries
participated with troops during the initial invasion phase, which
lasted from March 20 to May 1. These were the United States (248,000),
United Kingdom (45,000), Australia (2,000), and Poland (194). 36 other
countries were involved in its aftermath. The invasion marked the
beginning of the current Iraq War. In preparation for the invasion,
100,000 US troops were assembled in Kuwait by February 18.  The United
States supplied the vast majority of the invading forces, but also
received support from Kurdish irregulars in Iraqi Kurdistan.
According to then President of the United States, George W. Bush and
then Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Tony Blair, the reasons for
the invasion were "to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction
(WMD), to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free the
Iraqi people."  According to Blair, the trigger was Iraq's failure to
take a "final opportunity" to disarm itself of nuclear, chemical, and
biological weapons that US and British officials called an immediate
and intolerable threat to world peace. Although some remnants of
pre-1991 production were found after the end of the war, US government
spokespeople confirmed that these were not the weapons for which the
US went to war. In 2005, the Central Intelligence Agency released a
report saying that no weapons of mass destruction had been found in
Iraq.
In a January 2003 CBS poll 64% of US nationals had approved of
military action against Iraq, however 63% wanted President Bush to
find a diplomatic solution rather than go to war, and 62% believed the
threat of terrorism directed against the US would increase due to war.
 The invasion of Iraq was strongly opposed by some traditional US
allies, including the governments of France, Germany, New Zealand, and
Canada.  Their leaders argued that there was no evidence of weapons of
mass destruction in Iraq and that invading the country was not
justified in the context of UNMOVIC's February 12, 2003 report. On
February 15, 2003, a month before the invasion, there were worldwide
protests against the Iraq war, including a rally of three million
people in Rome, which is listed in the Guinness Book of Records as the
largest ever anti-war rally. According to the French academic
Dominique Reynié, between January 3 and April 12, 2003, 36 million
people across the globe took part in almost 3,000 protests against the
Iraq war.
The invasion was preceded by an air strike on the Iraqi Presidential
Palace on 19 March 2003. The following day coalition forces launched
an incursion into Basra Province from their massing point near the
Iraqi-Kuwaiti border. While commandos launched an amphibious assault
from the Persian Gulf to secure Basra and the surrounding petroleum
fields, the main invasion army moved into southern Iraq, occupying the
region and engaging in the Battle of Nasiriyah on 23 March. Massive
air strikes across the country and against Iraqi command and control
threw the defending army into chaos and prevented an effective
resistance. On 26 March the 173rd Airborne Brigade was airdropped near
the northern city of Kirkuk where they joined forces with Kurdish
rebels and fought several actions against the Iraqi army to secure the
northern part of the country.
The main body of coalition forces continued their drive into the heart
of Iraq and met with little resistance. Most of the Iraqi military was
quickly defeated and Baghdad was occupied on 9 April. Other operations
occurred against pockets of the Iraqi army including the capture and
occupation of Kirkuk on April 10, and the attack and capture of Tikrit
on 15 April. Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and the central leadership
went into hiding as the coalition forces completed the occupation of
the country. On 1 May an end of major combat operations was declared,
ending the invasion period and beginning the military occupation
period.
SOURCES
Iraq: A Country Study Helen Chapin Metz, Federal Research Division,
Library of Congress. 1990, U.S. Government Printing Office.
firstworldwar.com--capture of Basra
Uprisings and betrayals: a brief history of the left in Iraq--By Felix
Zorba and Roberto Sarti --
Alergia War (1992 onwards),
Angola (1992-2002)
Azerbaijan and Magorno-Karabakh Republic (1992-1994)
Bangladesh (1972-1997)
Bisnia and Herzegovina (1992-1995)
Burundi (1972)
Cambodia (1970-1075 and 1979-1991)
Chad (1966-1979)
China (1946-1949
Columbia (1978 0nwards)
Democratic Republic of the Congo (1996-1997 and 1998 onwards)
El Salvador (197901992)
Ethiopia (1976-1985)
Greece (1944-1949)
Guatemala (1974-1994)
India (1946-1949)
Indonesia (1975-199)
Korea (1950-1953)
Lebanon (1975-1978)
Mozambique (1979-1992)
Myanmar/Burma ( 1968-1995)
Nicaragua (1978-1979 and 1980-1989)
Nieria ( 1967-1970)
Pakistan (1971)
Peru ( 1980-1996)
The Philippines ( 1972-1996)
Russia (1994-1996)
Somolia ( 1988-1991 and 1992 onwards)
South Africa ( 1976-1994)
Sri Lanka ( 1972 onwards)
Sudan (1983-2005)
Tajikistan (1992-1997)
Turkey (1984-1999 and 2004 onwards)
Uganda (1986 onwards)
Yemen ( 1962 -1970)
Zimbabwe ( 1972-1979)
Lincoln (1809–1865) was shot on the evening of April 14, 1865, as he
sat in the presidential box at Ford's Theatre in Washington, D.C.,
watching a performance of the play Our American Cousin. The assassin
was actor John Wilkes Booth (1838–1865). After shooting Lincoln, Booth
jumped onto the stage, falling and breaking a leg. Wilkes limped away,
calling out, "Sic semper tyrannis" (a Latin phrase meaning "Thus
always to tyrants")....
Public interest in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy has
never died down. People around the world want to know who killed the
president and why and how he died. They also want to know what the
killer's hidden motives might have been, and whether he had acted
alone. Their insistent questions led to the formation of the House
Select Committee on Assassinations, a congressional group.
In 1978, the House Select Committee came to a conclusion that many
un-official investigators had already reached: that the president's
slaying was the result of a conspiracy. As we have already seen, a
conspiracy means that two or more persons were involved in a criminal
act.
Until that time, the Warren Commissioned Report, originally released
in September 1964, was the only official one. The report stated that a
solitary gunman named Lee Harvey Oswald was responsible. Working
alone, he shot and killed the president. Oswald was soon captured and
held by the Dallas, Texas, police for two days. Then Oswald himself
was slain as he was being transferred from one jail to another.
Oswald's slayer was Jack Ruby.
The Warren Commission decided that Ruby acted for twisted emotional
reasons and that he, too, acted alone. There was no conspiracy
involved in either case. So said the Warren Commission.
The House Select Committee's declaration of conspiracy inspired a rash
of books and at least two movies, as well as several TV programs. New
ones keep popping up, well into the 1990's. Each book and movie has
asserted that its analysis is the only foolproof one. As yet, however,
none of these has been accepted as offering all the right answers.
Let's look at some of these accumulated ideas and theories, and
perhaps come to some conclusions of our own. Bear in mind that some of
these assertions and accusations sound highly believable. But
remember, too, that no charges have been filed against anyone, and no
arrests have been made. Will there be any in the future, you ask?
Perhaps so; perhaps not.





The JFK assassination data can be divided into three groups:

1. The Method, or Means: How was the president killed?
2. The Motives: Why was he killed?
3. The Men Involved: Who killed him?
1. THE METHOD OR MEANS:

The president was riding in his open limousine, his back to the Texas
School Book Depository, where, on the sixth floor, Oswald was said to
have been perched. His rifle, propped up by book cartons, was aimed
directly at the back of the president's head.
Ahead and to the right of the president's motorcade was the grassy
knoll. There many spectators stood, ready to cheer the president as he
passed by. Among them, another gunman may have been waiting for HIS
chance to fire.
Oswald was accused of firing several shots from his position in the
Texas School Book Depository. Two of these struck the president in the
back of the head. But a third shot is said to have entered the
president's throat, just above his Adam's apple, and emerged through
the back of his neck.
Did this third shot actually go from the front of his neck to the
back? Doctor's at Parkland Hospital in Dallas, where the dying
president was taken, and doctors at the Bethesda Naval Hospital, where
the dead president was AGAIN examined, disagree. The Parkland groups
say there was an entry wound in his throat. The Bethesda group, on the
other hand, says there was an EXIT wound in his throat.
Many spectators standing on the grassy knoll at the time of the
slaying reported hearing at least one rifle shot fired from nearby.
They also reported seeing as many as four men hurrying away from the
back of the knoll as soon as the shots were fired. The Warren
investigators quizzed several of these witnesses but came to no
conclusion.
Oswald may have indeed fired the shots that killed the president, but
there is no clear-cut evidence that he ALONE did so. Nor was he even
definitely linked with the sixth-floor window from where the shots
were fired. Only minutes after the shooting, he was drinking a
Coca-Cola. Could he have left the firing site and composed himself so
quickly? Here's another factor to consider: firing a cheap rifle, as
Oswald did, should have left a powder burn on his cheek. After Oswald
was arrested, his cheek was examined: no such powder burn was found!
After Oswald's death, his palm print was found on his rifle butt,
indicating that it was he who did the shooting. Some investigators
charge, however, that a palm print could have been transferred from
his hand to the rifle butt after Oswald's. This could have been one of
many illegal efforts to tie Oswald to the crime.
2. THE MOTIVES:

Why was President Kennedy assassinated? Many reasonable speculations
have been offered. None, however, has been positively proven.
One set of theories says that it was the president's plans for Vietnam
that prompted his murder. By 1963 (the assassination year), the United
States was becoming more and more involved in the Vietnam war. The
U.S. had already sent supplies, arms, and several thousand "advisers"
and "instructors."
But the president wanted to go no further in aiding South Vietnam. He
was ready to stop sending aid, even though South Vietnam claimed to
have a democratic government and an army eager to wage war against
North Vietnam. The president said that Vietnam was too far away from
the United States, that South Vietnam's claim to democracy was false,
and that the U.S. had no business sending American troops to fight in
what was really a local war.
So, the theory goes, the president was killed by those who wanted the
United States to become actively involved in the Vietnam war. Another
theory holds that Kennedy was killed because he failed to help the
Cuban exiles in their 1961 attempt to invade Cuba and overthrow the
Communist government of Fidel Castro. And still another theory claims
that, because he did not destroy Cuba in the Cuban missile crisis of
1962, he angered anti-Castro factions and so was slain. Another theory
involves the president's relationship with his brother when Robert
Kennedy was attorney general. Robert was a relentless foe of organized
crime. The only way to stop the attorney general was to kill the
president. That's what some investigators think. They accuse the Mafia
Leaders and Jimmy Hoffa, the Teamster Union chief. Mind you, we are
talking theory. No real proof exists.
THE MEN INVOLVED: The movie "JFK" was first shown in December, 1991,
and will probably continue to be shown in theaters, on TV, and on
videocassettes for years to come. "JFK" 's screen credits acknowledge
the help of two books: Jim Garrison's "On the Trail of the Assassins"
and Jim Marr's "Crossfire: The Plot That Killed Kennedy."
The Garrison book is the partial autobiography of this former New
Orleans district attorney. It is mainly about his struggle to convict
a man named Clay Shaw for involvement in the Kennedy slaying. The book
also tells of Shaw's friendship with Oswald during the summer of '63
in New Orleans, AKA the Big Easy. Garrison argues that Shaw's
connection with Oswald makes him part of the Kennedy slaying.
Garrison's book ends with the not-guilty verdict that freed Clay Shaw.
"On the Trail of the Assassins" is a true-to-life story, perhaps
over-dramatized a bit when Garrison puts made-up words in his
character's mouths. Marr's book is factual, without a story line as in
the Garrison book. It gathers up the accounts of many investigators,
but comes to no final conclusions.
The movie "JFK" is something else again. It follows the story line of
the Garrison book---up to a point, that is. The stunning conclusion
abandons the cautious approach of the Garrison and Marrs books.
Instead, it puts a direct, sweeping accusation in the mouth of a
fictitious character known only as "X."
X proclaims that the conspiracy to kill JFK extends right up the
highest levels of the U.S. government---to the Pentagon, to the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, to the FBI and the CIA, and to the White House
itself.
The movie's director, producer, and writer are all one man: Oliver
Stone. He is responsible for all these statements, and more. He goes
on to tie in the military with American industry in a
military/industrial alliance.
It should be noted that Stone does not name names, He only says that
certain high-ranking men in these organizations were responsible for
the death of the president. They wanted JFK killed because he was a
threat to their plans.
Stone further claims that American Industry wanted the Vietnam war to
continue for reasons of greed: the more war, the higher industrial
profits.
X's charge of conspiracy reaches up into the White House. Although X
does not directly accuse by name the president who followed JFK into
office, there can be no doubt that he meant President Lyndon B.
Johnson, in office from 1963 to 1969. Johnson was Kennedy's vice
president. Before that, he was the U.S. Senate's Majority Leader. He
ran the Senate with an iron hand.
Kennedy had chosen Johnson as his running mate because Johnson could
produce a winning number of votes. Johnson expected to take an active
role in the Kennedy government. After entering office in 1961,
however, he was largely ignored. His duties were mostly confined to
cutting the ribbon when a new bridge or park was dedicated.
And Johnson was losing many of his once-loyal Texas followers. He sat
silent, biding his time. That time came, his accusers say, when the
president rode in the open limousine down a Dallas street, Johnson,
his enemies claim, engineered the whole assassination program.
These are extremely serious charges, but they cannot be proven.
Investigators have not been able to definitively link LBJ to the
killing of JFK. There is no question that Johnson was an ambitious,
powerful politician. Author Craig Zirbel, in his book "The Texas
Connection," attempts to prove Johnson's guilt by eliminating all
other suspects. Eventually, only Johnson is left. Therefore, he must
be guilty, according to Zirbel.
As for Jack Ruby, Oswald's killer, new facts have come to life. Over
the years it has been shown that he was a close associate of many
criminals. They would have liked to see the president and his brother
killed so that their illegal and unlawful activities could expand. But
Ruby died, as we know, before he could tell his story.
http://www.coverups.com/jfk/who.htm

Who Killed Kennedy And Why? - Coverups.com

In reality

In reality it does not matter who one believes was the actual physical
killer or killers that shot President John F Kennedy, what matters
moire is who were the motivators and organisers of his assassination
and who had most to gain from his untimely death. When one analyses
all the recorded public and private information there leaves little
doubt that  President John F Kennedy was murdered for and on behalf of
the same group of people, the International Banking families,
businessmen and industrialists all working for and/or in partnership
with the infamous international Russian Tsar Rothschild Banking
Family,

{Note:The Rothschilds have been in control of the world for a very
long time, their tentacles reaching into many aspects of our daily
lives, as is documented in the following timeline.  However, before
you jump to the timeline, please read this invaluable introduction
which will tell you who the Rothschilds are as oppose to who they
claim to be.







The Rothschilds claim that they are Jewish,
when in fact they are Khazars.  

The Rothschilds are from a country called Khazaria,
 which occupied the land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea which is now predominantly occupied by Georgia.  

The reason the Rothschilds claim to be Jewish is that the Khazars
under the instruction of the King,
converted to the Jewish faith in 740 A.D., but of course that did not
include converting their Asiatic Mongolian genes to the genes of the
Jewish people.

You will find that approximately 90% of people in the world today who
call themselves Jews are actually Khazars, or as they like to be
known, Ashkenazi Jews.  These people knowingly lie to the world with
their claims that the land of Israel is theirs by birthright, when in
actual fact their real homeland is over 800 miles away in Georgia.

So, next time you hear an Israeli Prime Minister bleating about the
so-called persecution of the Jews, consider this, every Prime Minister
of Israel has been an Ashkenazi Jew.  Therefore when all these Prime
Ministers have curried favour with the West for their re-establishment
of a Jewish homeland, they have knowingly and deliberately lied to
you, as they were never from that region, and they well know it,
because it is they who call themselves Ashkenazi Jews.

The Book of Revelation, Chapter 2, Verse 9, states the following which
would appear to be about these Ashkenazi Jews:

   "I know thy works, and tribulation and poverty, (but thou art
rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and
are not, butare the synagogue of Satan."

The most wealthy bloodline in the world bar none and the leader of the
Ashkenazi Jews in the world today is the Rothschild family.  As you
will see in the timeline, the Rothschilds have obtained this position
through lies, manipulation and murder.  Their bloodline also extends
into the Royal Families of Europe, and the following family names:
Astor; Bundy; Collins; duPont; Freeman; Kennedy; Morgan; Oppenheimer;
Rockefeller; Sassoon; Schiff; Taft; and Van Duyn.

However, these are not the only bloodlines to worry about.  You are
probably aware of the centuries old pratice undertaken by many
Ashkenazi Jews whereby they would change their name, in order for them
to appear part of the dominant race of the country in which they
lived, so as they could obtain influential positions in that country,
which they would then exploit to serve their real masters elsewhere.
There is plenty of evidence to prove the Rothschilds continue that
deceptive tradition.

Furthermore the Rothschilds are known to sire many children secretly
that they can put into positions of power when required.  This started
with the very first man who took the name Rothschild, who had a secret
sixth son.  Finally, remember the world is a diverse place, I could if
I wanted change my name to Rothschild, or any of the names listed
above, and that would not make me part of this family anymore than
converting to Judaism in 740 A.D. will make these Ashkenazis Jewish.

Ashkenazi Jew, David Ben-Gurion, one of the father founders of Israel
and its first Prime Minister, candidly describes Zionist aims in his
diary (21 May 1948) as follows, “The Achilles heel of the Arab
coalition is the Lebanon. Muslim supremacy in this country is
artificial and can easily be overthrown. A Christian State ought to be
set up there, with its southern frontier on the river Litani. We would
sign a treaty of alliance with this State. Thus when we have broken
the strength of the Arab Legion and bombed Amman, we could wipe out
Trans-Jordan, after that Syria would fall. And if Egypt still dared to
make war on us, we would bomb Port Said, Alexandria and Cairo.

We should thus end the war and would have but paid to Egypt, Assyria
and Chaldea on behalf of our ancestors.”

1949:  On October 1, Mao Tse Tsung declares the founding of the
People's Republic Of China in Tiananmen Square, Beijing.  He is funded
by Rothschild created Communism in Russia and also the following
Rothschild agents:  Solomon Adler, a former United States Treasury
official who was a Soviet Spy; Israel Epstein, the son of a Jewish
Bolshevik imprisoned by the Tsar in Russia for trying to forment a
revolution there; and Frank Coe, a leading official of the Rothschild
owned IMF.

1950: Israel passes their law of return, guaranteeing every Jew
worldwide the right to dwell in the state of Israel, however the
Palestinians even though they had lived there for 1300 years, were
denied that right.

John Davitt, former chief of the Justice Department's internal
security section notes that the Israeli intelligence service is the
second most active in the United States after the Soviets and of
course both Israel and the Soviet Union are run by an Ashkenazi Jewish
leadership.

1951: On 1 April the Israeli Secret Intelligence Agency the Mossad,
which will go on to terrorize the world, is formed. The motto of the
Mossad is probably the most disgusting secret service motto in the
world, it is,

"By Way Of Deception,  Thou Shalt Do War."

1953: N. M. Rothschild & Sons found the British Newfoundland
Corporation Limited to develop 60,000 square miles of land in
Newfoundland, Canada, which comprised a power station to harness the
power of the Hamilton (later renamed Churchill) Falls. At the time
this was the largest construction project ever to be undertaken by a
private company.

1954: "The Lavon Affair."  Israeli agents recruit Egyptian citizens of
Jewish descent to bomb Western targets in Egypt, and plant evidence to
frame Arabs, in an apparent attempt to upset American/Egyptian
relations. Israeli defense minister, Ashkenazi Jew, Pinhas Lavon is
eventually removed from office, though many think real responsibility
lay with David Ben-Gurion.

A hidden microphone planted by the Israelis is discovered in the
Office of the US Ambassador in Tel Aviv.

1955: Edmond de Rothschild founds Compagnie Financiere, Paris.

1956: Telephone taps are found connected to two telephones in the
residence of the US military attaché in Tel Aviv.

1957: James de Rothschild dies and it is reported (by the Rothschild
owned media) that he bequeaths a large sum of money to the state of
Israel to pay for the construction of their parliament building, the
Knesset. He states that the Knesset should be, "a symbol, in the eyes
of all men, of the permanence of the State of Israel." On page 219 of
his book, "Tales of the British Aristocracy," L.G. Pine, the Editor of
Burke’s Peerage, states that the Jews, "have made themselves so
closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are
unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual. So closely linked are the
Jews and the lords that a blow against the Jews in this country would
not be possible without injuring the aristocracy also." Maurice de
Rothschild dies in Paris.

1962: de Rothschild Frères establishes Imétal as an umbrella company
for all their mineral mining interests.

Frederic Morton publishes his book, The Rothschilds, in which he states,

"Though they control scores of industrial, commercial, mining and
tourist corporations, not one bears the name Rothschild. Being private
partnerships, the family houses never need to, and never do, publish a
single public balance sheet, or any other report of their financial
condition." This attitude reveals the true aim of the Rothschilds, to
eliminate all competition and create their own worldwide monopoly.

1963: On June 4th President John F. Kennedy (the 35th President of the
United States 1961 – 1963) signs Executive Order 11110 which returned
to the U.S. government the power to issue currency, without going
through the Rosthchilds owned Federal Reserve. Less than 6 months
later on November 22nd , president Kennedy is assassinated by the
Rothschilds for the same reason as they assassinated President Abraham
Lincoln in 1865, he wanted to print American money for the American
people, as oppose to for the benefit of a money grabbing war mongering
foreign elite.

Another, and probably the primary, reason for Kennedy's assassination
is however, the fact that he made it quite clear to Israeli Prime
Minister, David Ben-Gurion, that under no circumstances would he agree
to Israel becoming a nuclear state.  The Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz on
February 5, 1999, in a review of, Avner Cohen's book, "Israel and the
Bomb," states the following,

"The murder of American President John F. Kennedy brought to an abrupt
end the massive pressure being applied by the U.S. administration on
the government of Israel to discontinue the nuclear program...The book
implied that, had Kennedy remained alive, it is doubtful whether
Israel would today have a nuclear option."

Edmond de Rothschild establishes La Compagnie Financière Edmond de
Rothschild (LCF), in Switzerland as a venture capital house. This
later develops into an investment bank and asset management company
with many affiliates. He also marries his wife Nadine and they have a
son, Benjamin de Rothschild.

1965: Israel illegally obtains enriched uranium from NUMEC (Nuclear
Materials and Equipment Corporation).

1967: The treatment of the Palestinians by the Zionist Jews, finally
ignites enough anger in the Arab world for Egypt, Jordan and Syria to
mobilise on Israel's borders.  All of these three countries are
suddenly attacked by Israel and as a result the Sinai which included
Gaza was stolen from Egypt, and the West Bank and the Jordan River
stolen from Jordan.

As a result of this, on June 8, the Israelis launch an attack on the
USS Liberty with Israeli aircraft and motor torpedo boats, in an
effort to blame it on Egypt, to bring America into the war on their
side, and of course follow to the letter, their Mossad motto, "By Way
Of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War."As a result of their attack, 34
American servicemen were killed and 174 wounded.  Israel lies as
usual, claiming it mistook this warship that was flying a large United
States flag, for an ancient out-of-service Egyptian horse carrier El
Quseir, that was 180 feet shorter.  They also claim the ship was in
the war zone, when it was actually in international waters, far from
any fighting.  The Israeli's attack on this warship lasts for 75
minutes during which time they shoot up one of the United States
flags, resulting in the sailors desperately raising another one. In
the aftermath of this attack, the American sailors who survived are
warned by the United States military not to discuss the matter with
anyone due to, "national security."  This story gets no prominence in
the Rothschild controlled mainstream media and as usual Israel is in
no way even rebuked for their crimes by their subservient country of
America.

1913: Jacob Schiff sets up the Anti Defamation League (ADL) in the
United States.  This organisation is formed to slander anyone who
questions or challenges the Rothschild global conspiracy as,
"anti-semitic."

1914:  The start of World War I.  In this war, the German Rothschilds
loan money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds loan money to the
British, and the French Rothschilds loan money to the French.
Futhermore, the Rothschilds have control of the three European news
agencies, Wolff (est. 1849) in Germany, Reuters (est. 1851) in
England, and Havas (est. 1835) in France.

The Rothschilds use Wolff to manipulate the German people into a
fervour for war. From around this time, the Rothschilds are rarely
reported in the media, because they own the media.

1914:  The start of World War I.  In this war, the German Rothschilds
loan money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds loan money to the
British, and the French Rothschilds loan money to the French.

Futhermore, the Rothschilds have control of the three European news
agencies, Wolff (est. 1849) in Germany, Reuters (est. 1851) in
England, and Havas (est. 1835) in France.

The Rothschilds use Wolff to manipulate the German people into a
fervour for war. From around this time, the Rothschilds are rarely
reported in the media, because they own the media.

1916:  On June 4, Ashkenazi Jew, Louis Dembitz Brandeis is appointed
to the Supreme Court of the United States by President Wilson as per
his agreed blackmail payment to Samuel Untermyer some three years
earlier.  Justice Brandeis is also the elected leader of the Executive
Committee for Zionist Affairs, a position he has held since 1914.

The middle of World War II.  Germany were winning the war as they were
being financed by the Rothschilds to a greater extent than France,
Italy and England, because Rothschilds, did not want to support the
Tsar in Russia, and of course Russia was on the same side as France,
Italy and England.

Then a significant event occurred.  Germany, although they were
winning the war and not one foreign soldier had set foot on their
soil, offered armistice to Britain with no requirement of reparations.
 The Rothschilds were anxious to make sure this didn't happen as they
were expecting to make far more money off this war, so they played
another card they had up their sleeve.

Whilst the British were considering Germany's offer, Rothschild agent
Louis Brandeis sends a Zionist delegation from America to Britain to
promise to bring America into the war on the side of the British,
provided the British agree to give the land of Palestine to the
Rothschilds.

The Rothschilds wanted Palestine for the following reason.  They had
great business interests in the far east and desired their own state
in that area along with their own military which they could use as an
aggressor to any state that threatened those interests.

The British subsequently agree to the deal for Palestine and the
Zionists in London contact their counterparts in America and inform
them of this fact.  Suddenly all the major newspapers in America that
up to that point had been pro-German turned on Germany running
propaganda pieces such as:  German soldiers were killing Red Cross
Nurses; German soldiers were cutting off babies hands, etc, in order
to manipulate the American public against the Germans. This same year,
President Woodrow Wilson, ran a re-election campaign under the slogan,
"Re-Elect The Man Who Will Keep Your Sons Out Of The War." On December
12, Germany and her allies offer peace terms to end the war.

1917:  The Rothschilds order the execution by the Bolsheviks they
control, of Tsar Nicholas II and his entire family in Russia, even
though the Tsar had already abdicated on March 2.  This is both to get
control of the country and an act of revenge for Tsar Alexander I
blocking their world government plan in 1815 at the Congress Of
Vienna, and Tsar Alexander II siding with President Abraham Lincoln in
1864.

It is extremely important for them to slaughter the entire family
including women and children in order to make good on the promise to
do so made by Nathan Mayer Rothschild in 1815.  It is designed to show
the world what happens if you ever attempt to cross the Rothschilds.

As a result of Germany's offer of peace the Rothschild war machine
goes into overdrive in America, spreading propaganda which leads to
President Wilson under the instructions of American Zionist leader and
Supreme Court Justice, Louis Dembitz Brandeis, reneging on his promise
to the electorate and taking America into the first world war on April
6.

As per the Rothschild Zionist promise to the British, to take America
into the war, they decide they want something in writing from the
British to prove that they will uphold their side of the bargain.  The
British Foreign Secretary, Arthur James Balfour therefore drafts a
letter which is commonly known as the, "Balfour Declaration," which is
reprinted below.

Foreign Office

November 2nd, 1917

Dear Lord Rothschild, I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on
behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of
sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to,
and approved by, the Cabinet. His Majesty's Government view with
favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the
Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the
achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing
shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of
existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and
political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. I should be
grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the
Zionist Federation.

Yours sincerely, Arthur James Balfour

The Rothschilds order the execution by the Bolsheviks they control, of
Tsar Nicholas II and his entire family in Russia, even though the Tsar
had already abdicated on March 2.  This is both to get control of the
country and an act of revenge for Tsar Alexander I blocking their
world government plan in 1815 at the Congress Of Vienna, and Tsar
Alexander II siding with President Abraham Lincoln in 1864. It is
extremely important for them to slaughter the entire family including
women and children in order to make good on the promise to do so made
by Nathan Mayer Rothschild in 1815.  It is designed to show the world
what happens if you ever attempt to cross the Rothschilds.

1962: de Rothschild Frères establishes Imétal as an umbrella company
for all their mineral mining interests.

Frederic Morton publishes his book, The Rothschilds, in which he states,

"Though they control scores of industrial, commercial, mining and
tourist corporations, not one bears the name Rothschild. Being private
partnerships, the family houses never need to, and never do, publish a
single public balance sheet, or any other report of their financial
condition."

This attitude reveals the true aim of the Rothschilds, to eliminate
all competition and create their own worldwide monopoly.

1963: On June 4th President John F. Kennedy (the 35th President of the
United States 1961 – 1963) signs Executive Order 11110 which returned
to the U.S. government the power to issue currency, without going
through the Rosthchilds owned Federal Reserve.

Less than 6 months later on November 22nd , president Kennedy is
assassinated by the Rothschilds for the same reason as they
assassinated President Abraham Lincoln in 1865, he wanted to print
American money for the American people, as oppose to for the benefit
of a money grabbing war mongering foreign elite.

}

who is said to personally own and/or control over half of the whole
world's wealth, natural energy and food resources, commodities like
gold and silver reserves and the whole of the world's money supply and
central banks that control that money supply with only a few countries
in the world left they do not control the money supply of being
associated and related families, International  and organisations that
organised the assassination of

1. USA President Abraham Lincoln in 1865; Lincoln (1809–1865) was shot
on the evening of April 14, 1865, as he sat in the presidential box at
Ford's Theatre in Washington, D.C., watching a performance of the play
Our American Cousin. The assassin was actor John Wilkes Booth
(1838–1865). After shooting Lincoln, Booth jumped onto the stage,
falling and breaking a leg. Wilkes limped away, calling out, "Sic
semper tyrannis" (a Latin phrase meaning "Thus always to tyrants")....

2. USA President James Garfield in 1881;

3. USA President William McKinley in 1901;

Note: 1913: Jacob Schiff sets up the Anti Defamation League (ADL) in
the United States.  This organisation is formed to slander anyone who
questions or

challenges the Rothschild global conspiracy as, "anti-semitic."

4. The assassination on 28 June 1914 of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of
Austria, the heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary,

   is seen as the immediate trigger of the 1st World War;

5. 1914:  The start of World War I.  In this war, the German
Rothschilds loan money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds loan
money to the British, and the French

Rothschilds loan money to the French. Futhermore, the Rothschilds have
control of the three European news agencies, Wolff (est. 1849) in
Germany, Reuters (est.

1851) in England, and Havas (est. 1835) in France.  The Rothschilds
use Wolff to manipulate the German people into a fervour for war. From
around this time, the

Rothschilds are rarely reported in the media, because  they own the
media. World War I was a military conflict that lasted from 1914 to
1918 and involved most of the

world's great powers, assembled in two opposing alliances: the Allies
(centred around the Triple Entente) against the Central Powers.

More than 70 million military personnel, including 60 million
Europeans, were mobilised in one of the largest wars in history. More
than 15 million people were killed,

making it one of the deadliest conflicts in history.This war
(abbreviated as WW-I, WWI, or WW1) is also known as the First World
War, the Great War, the

World War (prior to the outbreak of theSecond World War), and the War
to End All Wars. The assassination on 28 June 1914 of Archduke Franz
Ferdinand of Austria, the heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary, is
seen as the immediate trigger of the war, though long-term causes,
such as imperialistic foreign policy, played a major role. Ferdinand's
assassination at the hands of Serbian nationalist Gavrilo Princip
resulted in demands against the Kingdom of Serbia. Several alliances
that had been formed over the past decades were invoked, so within
weeks the major powers were at war; with all having colonies, the
conflict soon spread around the world. The conflict opened with the
German invasion of Belgium, Luxembourg and France; the
Austro-Hungarian invasion of Serbia and a Russian attack against
Prussia. After the German march on Paris was brought to a halt, the
Western Front settled into a static battle of attrition with a trench
line that changed little until 1917. In the East, the Russian army
successfully fought against the Austro-Hungarian forces but were
forced back by the German army. Additional fronts opened with the
Ottoman Empire joining the war in 1914, Italy in 1915 and Romania in
1916. Imperial Russia left the war in 1917. After a 1918 German
offensive along the western front, American forces entered the
trenches and the German armies were driven back in a series of
successfully allied offensives. Germany surrendered on Armistice Day,
November 11, 1918. By the war's end, four major imperial powers—the
German, Russian, Austro-Hungarianand Ottoman Empires—had been
militarily and politically defeated, with the last two ceasing to
exist. The revolutionised Soviet Union emerged from the Russian
Empire, while the map of central Europe was completely redrawn into
numerous smaller states.[8]The League of Nations was formed in the
hope of preventing another such conflict. The European nationalism
spawned by the war, the repercussions of Germany's defeat, and of the
Treaty of Versailles would eventually lead to the beginning of World
War II in 1939.

6. In 1917 the Rothschilds order the execution by the Bolsheviks they
control, of Tsar Nicholas II and his entire family in Russia, even
though the Tsar had already abdicated on March 2.  This is both to get
control of the country and an act of revenge for Tsar Alexander I
blocking their world government plan in 1815 at the Congress Of
Vienna, and Tsar Alexander II siding with President Abraham Lincoln in
1864. It is extremely important for them to slaughter the entire
family including women and children in order to make good on the
promise to do so made by Nathan Mayer Rothschild in 1815.  It is
designed to show the world what happens if you ever attempt to cross
the Rothschilds.

7. Assassination attempt on the life of USA President Franklin D,
Roosevelt in 1933.

8. The Rothschilds Banking Group and partners manipulate and finance
all sides of the Second World war causing million of people form both
sides to kill each other

and great profit and satisfaction to the Rothschilds and their
partners and also  in furtherance of their aim to have a One World
Government by the year 2012

.The Second World War, World War II, or the Second World War (often
abbreviated WWII or WW2), was a global military conflict between 1939
and 1945, which involved most of the world's nations, including all
great powers, organised into two opposing military alliances: the
Allies and the Axis. The war involved the mobilisation of over 100
million military personnel, making it the most widespread war in
history. In a state of "total war," the major participants placed
their entire economic, industrial, and scientific capabilities at the
service of the war effort, erasing the distinction between civilian
and military resources. Over seventy million people, the majority
civilians, were killed, making itthe deadliest conflict in human
history. The start of the war is generally held to be September 1,
1939, with the invasion of Poland by Nazi Germany and subsequent
declarations of war on Germany by most of the countries in the British
Empire and Commonwealth, and by France. Many countries were already at
war before this date, such as Ethiopia and Italy in theSecond
Italo-Abyssinian War and China and Japan in the Second Sino-Japanese
War. Many who were not initially involved joined the war later, as a
result of events such as the German invasion of the Soviet Union, the
Japanese attacks on Pearl Harbor and British colonies, and subsequent
declarations of war on Japan by theUnited States, the Netherlands,
and British Commonwealth. In 1945, the war ended in a victory for the
Allies. The Soviet Union and the United States subsequently emerged as
the world's superpowers, setting the stage for the Cold War which
lasted for the next 46 years. The United Nations (financed organised
and controlled by Rothschild and partner's money and influence as a
for runner towards  the concept of their long term aim of a one world
government) was formed in the hope of preventing another world
conflict. The acceptance of the principle of self-determination
accelerated decolonization movements in Asia and Africa, whileWestern
Europe itself began moving toward integration. The start of the war is
generally held to be September 1, 1939 with the German invasion of
Poland; Britain and France declared war on Germany two days later.
Other dates for the beginning of war include the Japanese invasion of
Manchuria on September 13, 1931; the start of the Second Sino-Japanese
War on July 7, 1937; or one of several other events.

Others follow A. J. P. Taylor, who holds that there was a simultaneous
Sino-Japanese War in East Asia, and a Second European War in Europe
and her colonies. The two wars merged in 1941, becoming a single
global conflict, at which point the war continued until 1945. This
article uses the conventional dating. The exact date of the war's end
is not universally agreed upon. It has been suggested that the war
ended at the armistice of August 14, 1945 (V-J Day), rather than the
formal surrender of Japan (September 2, 1945); in some European
histories, it ended on V-E Day (May 8, 1945). The Treaty of Peace with
Japan was not signed until 1951. A variety of events led to the
escalation of hostilities between the Axis and Allied powers prior to
the start of the war. In the aftermath of World War I, a defeated
Germany signed the Treaty of Versailles.  This caused Germany to lose
around 13 percent of its territory, stripped it of its colonies,
prohibited German annexation of other states, imposed massive
reparations and limited the size and makeup of Germany's armed forces.

The Russian Civil War led to the creation of the Soviet Union. After
Lenin's death, Stalin seized power in the USSR and repudiated the New
Economic Policy favoring the Five Year Plans instead. In Italy, Benito
Mussolini seized power as a fascist dictator promising to create a
"New Roman Empire."

The Kuomintang (KMT) party in China launched a unification campaign
against regional warlords and nominally unified China in the
mid-1920s, but was soon embroiled in a civil war against its former
Chinese communist allies. In 1931, an increasingly militaristic
Japanese Empire, which had long sought influence in China as the first
step of its right to rule Asia, used the Mukden Incident as
justification to invade Manchuria and anex two Chinese provinces. The
two nations then fought several small conflicts, in Shanghai, Rehe and
Hebei, until the Tanggu Truce in 1933. Thereafter, Chinese volunteer
forces continued the resistance to Japanese aggression in Manchuria,
and Chahar and Suiyuan. Rothschild's International  Banking Group and
partners backed  A variety of events led to the escalation of
hostilities between the Axis and Allied powers prior to the start of
the war. In the aftermath of World War I, a defeated Germany signed
the Treaty of Versailles. This caused Germany to lose around 13
percent of its territory, stripped it of its colonies, prohibited
German annexation of other states, imposed massive reparations and
limited the size and makeup of Germany's armed forces.  The Russian
Civil War led to the creation of the Soviet Union. After Lenin's
death, Stalin seized power in the USSR and repudiated the New Economic
Policy favoring the Five Year Plans instead. In Italy, Benito
Mussolini seized power as a fascist dictator promising to create a
"New Roman Empire."

The Kuomintang (KMT) party in China launched a unification campaign
against regional warlords and nominally unified China in the
mid-1920s, but was soon embroiled in a

civil war against its former Chinese communist allies.  In 1931, an
increasingly militaristic Japanese Empire, which had long sought
influence in China

 as the first step of its right to rule Asia, used the Mukden Incident
as justification to invade Manchuria and anex two Chinese provinces.

The two nations then fought several small conflicts, in Shanghai, Rehe
and Hebei, until the Tanggu Truce in 1933. Thereafter, Chinese
volunteer forces continued the

resistance to Japanese aggression in Manchuria, and Chahar and Suiyuan.

Estimates for the total casualties of the war vary, due to the fact
that many deaths went unrecorded. However, most suggest that some 60
million people died in the war, including about 20 million soldiers
and 40 million civilians.[253][254][255]Many civilians died because of
disease, starvation, massacres,bombing and deliberate genocide. The
Soviet Union lost around 27 million people during the war, almost half
of all World War II deaths.

Of the total deaths in World War II, approximately 85 percent were on
the Allied side (mostly Soviet and Chinese) and 15 percent were on the
Axis side. One estimate is that 12 million civilians died in Nazi
concentration camps,  1.5 million by bombs, 7 million in Europe from
other causes, and 7.5 million in China from other causes.

Many of these deaths were a result of genocidal actions committed in
Axis-occupied territories and other war crimescommitted by German as
well as Japanese forces. The most notorious of German atrocities was
The Holocaust, the systematic genocide of Jewsin territories
controlled by Germany and its allies.

The Nazis also targeted other groups, including the Roma (targeted in
the Porajmos), Slavs, and gay men, exterminating an estimated five
million additional people. The targets of the Axis-aligned Croatian
Ustaše regime were mostly Serbs.

The best-known Japanese atrocity is the Nanking Massacre, in which
several hundred thousand Chinese civilians were raped and murdered.
The Japanese military murdered from nearly 3 million to over 10
million civilians, mostly Chinese. Mitsuyoshi Himeta reported 2.7
million casualties occurred during the Sanko Sakusen. General Yasuji
Okamura implemented the policy in Heipei and Shantung.

Limited Axis usage of biological and chemical weapons is also known.
The Italians used mustard gas during their conquest of Abyssinia,
while the Japanese Imperial Army used a variety of such weapons during
their invasion and occupation of China  and in early conflicts against
the Soviets. Both the Germans and Japanese tested such weapons against
civilians and, in some cases, on prisoners of war.

While many of the Axis's acts were brought to trial in the world's
first international tribunals, incidents caused by the Allies were
not. Examples of such Allied actions include population transfer in
the Soviet Union, the Soviet forced labour camps (Gulag), Japanese
American internment in the United States, the Operation Keelhaul,
expulsion of Germans after World War II, mass rape of German women by
Soviet Red Army, the Soviet massacre of Polish citizens and the
mass-bombing of civilian areas in enemy territory, including Tokyo and
most notably atDresden. Large numbers of famine deaths can also be
partially attributed to the war, such as the Bengal famine of 1943 and
the Vietnamese famine of 1944–45.
Concentration camps and slave work
Further information: The Holocaust, Consequences of German Nazism,
Japanese war crimes, and Allied war crimes during World War II

The Nazis were responsible for The Holocaust, the killing of
approximately six million Jews (overwhelmingly Ashkenazim), as well as
two millionethnic Poles and four million others who were deemed
"unworthy of life" (including the disabled and mentally ill, Soviet
POWs, homosexuals,Freemasons, Jehovah's Witnesses, and the Roma) as
part of a programme of deliberate extermination. About 12 million,
most of whom were Eastern Europeans, were employed in the German war
economy as forced labor in Germany during World War II. In addition to
Nazi concentration camps, the Soviet gulags, or labor camps, led to
the death of citizens of occupied countries such as Poland, Lithuania,
Latvia, and Estonia, as well as German prisoners of war(POWs) and even
Soviet citizens who had been or were thought to be supporters of the
Nazis. Sixty percent of Soviet POWs of the Germans died during the
war. Richard Overy gives the number of 5.7 million Soviet POWs. Of
those, 57 percent died or were killed, a total of 3.6 million.  Some
of the survivors on their return to the USSR were treated as traitors.
(See Order No. 270)

Japanese prisoner-of-war camps, many of which were used as labour
camps, also had high death rates. TheInternational Military Tribunal
for the Far East found the death rate of Western prisoners was 27.1
percent (for American POWs, 37 percent), seven times that of POWs
under the Germans and Italians[280] The death rate among Chinese POWs
was much larger; a directive ratified on August 5, 1937 by Hirohito
declared that the Chinese were no longer protected under international
law.[281] While 37,583 prisoners from the UK, 28,500 from the
Netherlands and 14,473 from United States were released after the
surrender of Japan, the number for the Chinese was only 56.

According to a joint study of historians featuring Zhifen Ju, Mark
Peattie, Toru Kubo, and Mitsuyoshi Himeta, more than 10 million
Chinese were mobilized by the Japanese army and enslaved by the East
Asia Development Board for slave labor in Manchukuo and north
China.The U.S. Library of Congress estimates that in Java, between 4
and 10 million romusha (Japanese: "manual laborers"), were forced to
work by the Japanese military. About 270,000 of these Javanese
laborers were sent to other Japanese-held areas in South East Asia,
and only 52,000 were repatriated to Java. On February 19, 1942
Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066, interning thousands of
Japanese, Italians,German Americans, and some emigrants from Hawaii
who fled after the bombing of Pearl Harbor for the duration of the
war. The U.S. and Canadian

governments interned 150,000 Japanese-Americans,  as well as nearly
11,000 German and Italian residents of the U.S. Allied use of
involuntary labor occurred mainly in

the east, such as in Poland,  but more than a million were also put to
work in the west. In Hungary's case, Hungarians were forced to work
for the Soviet Union until 1955.

9. Assassination attempt on the life of USA President  Harry S Truman in 1950.

10. USA President John F. Kennedy in 1963; 1963: On June 4th President
John F. Kennedy (the 35th President of the United States 1961 – 1963)
signs Executive Order 11110 which returned to the U.S. government the
power to issue currency, without going through the Rosthchilds owned
Federal Reserve. Less than 6 months later on November 22nd , president
Kennedy is assassinated by the Rothschilds for the same reason as they
assassinated President Abraham Lincoln in 1865, he wanted to print
American money for the American people, as oppose to for the benefit
of a money grabbing war mongering foreign elite.

11. John K Kennedy's brother Robert Robert F. Kennedy, in June 5,
1968, a United States Senator  during celebrations of his successful
campaign in the California primary elections while seeking the
Democratic nomination for President of the United States. by an
assassin who was a twenty-four year old Palestinian immigrant named
Sirhan Sirhan, who remains incarcerated for this crime as of 2010. As
with the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, Robert Kennedy's
brother, in 1963, the senator's death has been the subject of
widespread analysis. Some individuals involved in the original
investigation and some researchers have suggested alternative
scenarios for the crime, or have argued that there are serious
problems with the official case.

 The assassination of Robert F. Kennedy, a United States Senator and
brother of assassinated President John F. Kennedy, took place shortly
after midnight on June 5, 1968 in Los Angeles, California. Robert F.
Kennedy was killed during celebrations of his successful campaign in
the California primary elections while seeking the Democratic
nomination for President of the United States. The assassin was a
twenty-four year old Palestinian immigrant named Sirhan Sirhan, who
remains incarcerated for this crime as of 2010. The shooting was
recorded on audio tape by a freelance newspaper reporter, and the
aftermath was captured on film. Kennedy's body lay in repose at St.
Patrick's Cathedral in New York for two days before a funeral mass was
held on June 8. His body was interred near his brother John at
Arlington National Cemetery. His death prompted the protection of
presidential candidates by the United States Secret Service. Hubert
Humphrey went on to win the Democratic nomination for the presidency,
but ultimately lost the election to Richard Nixon. As with his
brother's death, Robert Kennedy's assassination and the circumstances
surrounding it have spawned a variety of conspiracy theories,
particularly in relation to the existence of a supposed second gunman.
CIA involvement In November 2006, the BBC's Newsnight program
presented research by filmmaker Shane O'Sullivan alleging that several
CIA officers were present on the night of the assassination.[47] Three
men who appear in films and photographs from the night of the
assassination were positively identified by former colleagues and
associates as former senior CIA officers who had worked together in
1963 at JMWAVE, the CIA's main anti-Castro station based in Miami.
They were JMWAVE Chief of Operations David Morales, Chief of Maritime
Operations Gordon Campbell and Chief of Psychological Warfare
Operations George Joannides.  The program featured an interview with
Morales's former attorney Robert Walton, who quoted him as having
said, "I was in Dallas when we got the son of a bitch and I was in Los
Angeles when we got the little bastard".  O'Sullivan reported that the
CIA declined to comment on the officers in question. It was also
alleged that Morales was known for his deep anger toward the Kennedys
for what he saw as their betrayal during the Bay of Pigs Invasion.
After further investigation, O'Sullivan produced the feature
documentary, RFK Must Die. The film casts doubt on the earlier
identifications and ultimately reveals that the man previously
identified as Gordon Campbell may, in fact, have been Michael D.
Roman, a now-deceased Bulova Watch Company employee, who was at the
Ambassador Hotel for a company convention.[
Second gunman The location of Kennedy's wounds suggested that his
assailant had stood behind him, but some witnesses said that Sirhan
faced west as Kennedy moved through the pantry facing east. This has
led to the suggestion that a second gunman actually fired the fatal
shot, a possibility supported by coroner Thomas Noguchi. Other
witnesses, though, said that as Sirhan approached, Kennedy was turning
to his left shaking hands, facing north and so exposing his right
side. As recently as 2008, eyewitness John Pilger asserted his belief
that there must have been a second gunman. During a re-examination of
the case in 1975, the U.S. Supreme Court ordered expert examination of
the possibility of a second gun having been used, and the conclusion
of the experts was that there was little or no evidence to support
this theory. In 2007, analysis of an audio recording of the shooting
made by freelance reporter Stanislaw Pruszynski appeared to indicate,
according to forensic expert Philip van Praag, that thirteen shots
were fired, even though Sirhan's gun held only eight rounds. While
this would strongly indicate a second gunman, independent analysis by
other experts indicated that there are only eight shots recorded on
the tape.
12 . The assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. in April 1968
13. Two assassination attempts on the life of USA President Gerald R,
Ford bot in 1975 .
14. Attempted assassination of President Ronald Regan in 1981.
15.. On July 16, 1999, John F. Kennedy, Jr. who was about to run for
New York Senator against Hilliary Clinton ( along with her husband
President Bill Clinton were Rothschild agents and fiancialy back and
support by the Rothschild Banking Group and associates who could not
rist John F.Kennedy winning Senator of New York against Hillary
Clinton, as Hillary Clinton was ear marked to run for the President of
the USA in the future as another Rothschild controlled USA President
)was killed when the Piper Saratoga light aircraft he was piloting
crashed into the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Martha's Vineyard,
Massachusetts. His wife, Carolyn Jeanne Bessette, and sister-in-law,
Lauren Gail Bessette, were also killed. The flight originated from
Essex County Airport (CDW) in Fairfield Township, Essex County, New
Jersey. The intended flight path was along the coastline of
Connecticut and across Rhode Island Sound to Martha's Vineyard Airport
(MVY). The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) reported its
conclusion on July 6, 2000, stated that the crash was caused by
Kennedy's failure to maintain control of his airplane during a descent
over water at night, which was a result of spatial disorientation.
The NTSB and other aviation professionals have also cited additional
interrelated factors that may have contributed to the crash.

16. Since the end of the Second World War, The Rothschild
International Banking Group and partners who have had since the 1700's
had effective ownership and control of London Britain through London
City, the USA through ownership and control of Washington City and the
Catholic Church through control and ownership of Vatican City,
manipulated Rothschild controlled USA Presidents and British Prime
Ministers and loaned money to the USA and Britain to start and
maintain about 50 official and unofficial wars in various counties
around the world with the death of over 50 mill

Lincoln (1809–1865) was shot on the evening of April 14, 1865, as he
sat in the presidential box at Ford's Theatre in Washington, D.C.,
watching a performance of the play Our American Cousin. The assassin
was actor John Wilkes Booth (1838–1865). After shooting Lincoln, Booth
jumped onto the stage, falling and breaking a leg. Wilkes limped away,
calling out, "Sic semper tyrannis" (a Latin phrase meaning "Thus
always to tyrants")....

Public interest in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy has
never died down. People around the world want to know who killed the
president and why and how he died. They also want to know what the
killer's hidden motives might have been, and whether he had acted
alone. Their insistent questions led to the formation of the House
Select Committee on Assassinations, a congressional group.

In 1978, the House Select Committee came to a conclusion that many
un-official investigators had already reached: that the president's
slaying was the result of a conspiracy. As we have already seen, a
conspiracy means that two or more persons were involved in a criminal
act.

Until that time, the Warren Commissioned Report, originally released
in September 1964, was the only official one. The report stated that a
solitary gunman named Lee Harvey Oswald was responsible. Working
alone, he shot and killed the president. Oswald was soon captured and
held by the Dallas, Texas, police for two days. Then Oswald himself
was slain as he was being transferred from one jail to another.
Oswald's slayer was Jack Ruby.

The Warren Commission decided that Ruby acted for twisted emotional
reasons and that he, too, acted alone. There was no conspiracy
involved in either case. So said the Warren Commission.

The House Select Committee's declaration of conspiracy inspired a rash
of books and at least two movies, as well as several TV programs. New
ones keep popping up, well into the 1990's. Each book and movie has
asserted that its analysis is the only foolproof one. As yet, however,
none of these has been accepted as offering all the right answers.

Let's look at some of these accumulated ideas and theories, and
perhaps come to some conclusions of our own. Bear in mind that some of
these assertions and accusations sound highly believable. But
remember, too, that no charges have been filed against anyone, and no
arrests have been made. Will there be any in the future, you ask?
Perhaps so; perhaps not.






The JFK assassination data can be divided into three groups:

   1. The Method, or Means: How was the president killed?
   2. The Motives: Why was he killed?
   3. The Men Involved: Who killed him?

1. THE METHOD OR MEANS:



The president was riding in his open limousine, his back to the Texas
School Book Depository, where, on the sixth floor, Oswald was said to
have been perched. His rifle, propped up by book cartons, was aimed
directly at the back of the president's head.

Ahead and to the right of the president's motorcade was the grassy
knoll. There many spectators stood, ready to cheer the president as he
passed by. Among them, another gunman may have been waiting for HIS
chance to fire.

Oswald was accused of firing several shots from his position in the
Texas School Book Depository. Two of these struck the president in the
back of the head. But a third shot is said to have entered the
president's throat, just above his Adam's apple, and emerged through
the back of his neck.

Did this third shot actually go from the front of his neck to the
back? Doctor's at Parkland Hospital in Dallas, where the dying
president was taken, and doctors at the Bethesda Naval Hospital, where
the dead president was AGAIN examined, disagree. The Parkland groups
say there was an entry wound in his throat. The Bethesda group, on the
other hand, says there was an EXIT wound in his throat.

Many spectators standing on the grassy knoll at the time of the
slaying reported hearing at least one rifle shot fired from nearby.
They also reported seeing as many as four men hurrying away from the
back of the knoll as soon as the shots were fired. The Warren
investigators quizzed several of these witnesses but came to no
conclusion.

Oswald may have indeed fired the shots that killed the president, but
there is no clear-cut evidence that he ALONE did so. Nor was he even
definitely linked with the sixth-floor window from where the shots
were fired. Only minutes after the shooting, he was drinking a
Coca-Cola. Could he have left the firing site and composed himself so
quickly? Here's another factor to consider: firing a cheap rifle, as
Oswald did, should have left a powder burn on his cheek. After Oswald
was arrested, his cheek was examined: no such powder burn was found!

After Oswald's death, his palm print was found on his rifle butt,
indicating that it was he who did the shooting. Some investigators
charge, however, that a palm print could have been transferred from
his hand to the rifle butt after Oswald's. This could have been one of
many illegal efforts to tie Oswald to the crime.

2. THE MOTIVES:



Why was President Kennedy assassinated? Many reasonable speculations
have been offered. None, however, has been positively proven.

One set of theories says that it was the president's plans for Vietnam
that prompted his murder. By 1963 (the assassination year), the United
States was becoming more and more involved in the Vietnam war. The
U.S. had already sent supplies, arms, and several thousand "advisers"
and "instructors."

But the president wanted to go no further in aiding South Vietnam. He
was ready to stop sending aid, even though South Vietnam claimed to
have a democratic government and an army eager to wage war against
North Vietnam. The president said that Vietnam was too far away from
the United States, that South Vietnam's claim to democracy was false,
and that the U.S. had no business sending American troops to fight in
what was really a local war.

So, the theory goes, the president was killed by those who wanted the
United States to become actively involved in the Vietnam war. Another
theory holds that Kennedy was killed because he failed to help the
Cuban exiles in their 1961 attempt to invade Cuba and overthrow the
Communist government of Fidel Castro. And still another theory claims
that, because he did not destroy Cuba in the Cuban missile crisis of
1962, he angered anti-Castro factions and so was slain. Another theory
involves the president's relationship with his brother when Robert
Kennedy was attorney general. Robert was a relentless foe of organized
crime. The only way to stop the attorney general was to kill the
president. That's what some investigators think. They accuse the Mafia
Leaders and Jimmy Hoffa, the Teamster Union chief. Mind you, we are
talking theory. No real proof exists.

THE MEN INVOLVED: The movie "JFK" was first shown in December, 1991,
and will probably continue to be shown in theaters, on TV, and on
videocassettes for years to come. "JFK" 's screen credits acknowledge
the help of two books: Jim Garrison's "On the Trail of the Assassins"
and Jim Marr's "Crossfire: The Plot That Killed Kennedy."


The Garrison book is the partial autobiography of this former New
Orleans district attorney. It is mainly about his struggle to convict
a man named Clay Shaw for involvement in the Kennedy slaying. The book
also tells of Shaw's friendship with Oswald during the summer of '63
in New Orleans, AKA the Big Easy. Garrison argues that Shaw's
connection with Oswald makes him part of the Kennedy slaying.
Garrison's book ends with the not-guilty verdict that freed Clay Shaw.
"On the Trail of the Assassins" is a true-to-life story, perhaps
over-dramatized a bit when Garrison puts made-up words in his
character's mouths. Marr's book is factual, without a story line as in
the Garrison book. It gathers up the accounts of many investigators,
but comes to no final conclusions.

The movie "JFK" is something else again. It follows the story line of
the Garrison book---up to a point, that is. The stunning conclusion
abandons the cautious approach of the Garrison and Marrs books.
Instead, it puts a direct, sweeping accusation in the mouth of a
fictitious character known only as "X."

X proclaims that the conspiracy to kill JFK extends right up the
highest levels of the U.S. government---to the Pentagon, to the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, to the FBI and the CIA, and to the White House
itself.

The movie's director, producer, and writer are all one man: Oliver
Stone. He is responsible for all these statements, and more. He goes
on to tie in the military with American industry in a
military/industrial alliance.

It should be noted that Stone does not name names, He only says that
certain high-ranking men in these organizations were responsible for
the death of the president. They wanted JFK killed because he was a
threat to their plans.

Stone further claims that American Industry wanted the Vietnam war to
continue for reasons of greed: the more war, the higher industrial
profits.

X's charge of conspiracy reaches up into the White House. Although X
does not directly accuse by name the president who followed JFK into
office, there can be no doubt that he meant President Lyndon B.
Johnson, in office from 1963 to 1969. Johnson was Kennedy's vice
president. Before that, he was the U.S. Senate's Majority Leader. He
ran the Senate with an iron hand.

Kennedy had chosen Johnson as his running mate because Johnson could
produce a winning number of votes. Johnson expected to take an active
role in the Kennedy government. After entering office in 1961,
however, he was largely ignored. His duties were mostly confined to
cutting the ribbon when a new bridge or park was dedicated.

And Johnson was losing many of his once-loyal Texas followers. He sat
silent, biding his time. That time came, his accusers say, when the
president rode in the open limousine down a Dallas street, Johnson,
his enemies claim, engineered the whole assassination program.

These are extremely serious charges, but they cannot be proven.
Investigators have not been able to definitively link LBJ to the
killing of JFK. There is no question that Johnson was an ambitious,
powerful politician. Author Craig Zirbel, in his book "The Texas
Connection," attempts to prove Johnson's guilt by eliminating all
other suspects. Eventually, only Johnson is left. Therefore, he must
be guilty, according to Zirbel.

As for Jack Ruby, Oswald's killer, new facts have come to life. Over
the years it has been shown that he was a close associate of many
criminals. They would have liked to see the president and his brother
killed so that their illegal and unlawful activities could expand. But
Ruby died, as we know, before he could tell his story.




WIKILEAKS founder Julian Assange's lawyer says he has seen police documents that prove the whistleblower is innocent of rape claims.

Bjrn Hurtig, who is representing Assange in Sweden, said the documents, which form part of the official Swedish investigation, revealed two women had lied about being coerced into having sex with Mr Assange, 39. Assange is being held in Wandsworth prison, London, while fighting extradition to Sweden.

Assange met both women at a seminar in Stockholm last August. After having intercourse with each, at different times, he faced sex charges, which he strenuously denies, that were withdrawn and then reinstated.

 

In an interview from his Stockholm office, Mr Hurtig said: "From what I have read, it is clear that the women are lying and that they had an agenda when they went to the police, which had nothing to do with a crime having taken place.

 

"It was, I believe, more about jealousy and disappointment on their part ...

"If I am able to reveal what I know, everyone will realise this is all a charade," he said. MAIL ON SUNDAY


WikiLeaks cable shed light on Singaporeans' view of Anwar

 2010-12-12 16:19

KUALA LUMPUR, Sunday 12 December 2010 (Bernama) -- Singapore's intelligence services as well as its senior minister Lee Kuan Yew believe that opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim "did indeed commit the acts for which he is currently indicted."

This was revealed by WikiLeaks through a release of a US State Department cable issued in November 2008.

The cable was exclusively released to the Australian tabloid, The Sun-Herald, and was widely reported by other Australian newspapers today.

WikiLeaks is a website that publishes anonymous submissions and leaks of sensitive governmental, corporate, organisational, or religious documents, while attempting to preserve the anonymity and untraceability of its contributors.

The US State Department cable that dealt with Anwar's sodomy case, dated November 2008, and was released exclusively to The Sun-Herald by WikiLeaks, had stated:''The Australians said that Singapore's intelligence services and [Singaporean elder statesman] Lee Kuan Yew have told ONA in their exchanges that Opposition leader Anwar 'did indeed commit the acts for which he is currently indicted'.''

In the newspaper report, it said the document stated that the Singaporeans told ONA that they made this assessment on the basis of ''technical intelligence'', which was likely to relate to intercepted communications.

WIKILEAKS founder Julian Assange's lawyer says he has seen police documents that prove the whistleblower is innocent of rape claims.

MySinchew 2010.12.12

Martijn Gonlag


Second Dutch teenager arrested for WikiLeaks-related DDoS attacks



by Graham Cluley on December 12, 2010 | Comments (4)

FILED UNDER: Featured, Law & order, Malware

Police in the Netherlands have arrested a second teenager in relation to the pro-WikiLeaks distributed denial-of-service attacks seen earlier this week.

The arrest of the 19-year-old man follows Friday's attacks on websites belonging to Dutch Police and national prosecutor's office, which were themselves widely seen as retaliation against the apprehension the day before of a 16-year-old Dutch boy alleged to have participated in "Anonymous" pro-WikiLeaks attacks against a number of websites, including MasterCard and PayPal.

Prosecutors claim that the 19-year-old, from Hoogezand-Sappemeer, in the north east of the Netherlands, flooded the prosecutor's website with internet traffic:

"From behind his computer, the man used hacker software to flood the website of the prosecutor’s office with as much digital traffic as possible. Investigations by the National Police Services Agency showed that the man, who was active under the internet nickname Awinee, urged other internet users to participate in the attack."

However, it is reported that the DDoS attack software being used did not hide the IP address of the computer involved, making it easy for high-tech crime cops to identify where the attack was coming from.

That's a pretty silly mistake to make if you're going to attack the website of your country's national prosecutor.

Who is "Awinee"? Well, a quick search on Google found a gaming website of a guy who lives in Hoogezand-Sappemeer, is 19 years old, and uses the online nickname "Awinee", going by the real name of Martijn Gonlag:




Wikileaks Mirrors

Find all the current Wikileaks Mirrors and Links here. Helpful, if the main site - wikileaks.org - is down.



Important Wikileaks Links

Protests expected outside court for WikiLeaks Julian Assange


Protests expected outside court  for WikiLeaks Julian Assange

Tuesday 14 December 2010
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange will ask to be granted bail when he appears before City of Westminster Magistrates' Court for a second time today.
The former computer hacker was remanded in custody last week, despite the offer of surety from a number of high-profile backers, including journalist John Pilger, director Ken Loach, and charity fundraiser Jemima Khan.

If Julian Assange is denied bail, he is expected to appeal at the High Court.

The Australian, 39, turned himself into police after an international warrant was issued accusing him of sex offences in Sweden. Charges are thought to include rape and molestation in one case, and molestation and unlawful coercion in a second. Assange has denied the allegations, which he has claimed stem from a dispute over "consensual but unprotected sex." He has vowed to fight extradition to Sweden.

According to Australian media reports, supporters of Assange and WikiLeaks are expected to protest outside the court.

Yesterday, around 15 supporters of the 'Justice for Assange' campaign gathered outside the Swedish Embassy in central London. They held banners saying "political prisoner" and "gagging the truth" and wore masks of Assange's face.
His court appearance comes as another cable released through the WikiLeaks site reveals the United States was concerned that the UK was struggling to cope with home-grown extremists in the year after the 7th July bombings in London.

In the cable, a diplomat noted that Tony Blair's embarked on a drive to isolate radicals from the mainstream Muslim community after the 2005 attacks.

The message from the US Embassy states: "Since 7/7, HMG [Her Majesty's Government] has invested considerable time and resources in engaging the British Muslim community. The current tensions demonstrate just how little progress has been made."

Another cable suggests British police helped 'develop' evidence against Madeleine McCann's parents as they were investigated by Portuguese authorities investigating the disappearance of their daughter.

Julian Assange
Enemy of the State Hero of the People
By Lucy Carne LONDON
SEEDS OF CHANGE: Julian Assange the boy and the thorn in the side of governments, and a rally by his Brisbane supporters this week
In front of an adoring crowd at the Frontline journalist’s club in London last month, Australia Julian Assange explained why he’s risking the wrath of the world’s most powerful governments.
In his face could still be seen traces of the sweet natured, sensitive little boy his Sunshine Coast-based mother has described and, smiling, the Queensland born 39 year old leaned into the microphone.
“They say I enjoy crushing bastards and. Yes, that’s part of my motivation,” Assange said.
“For some reason, the White House finds that offensive.”
Today, the founder if whistle blowing website WikiLeaks and the man on whom the world’s spotlight is focused, sits is a grey tracksuit in one of western Europe’s biggest prsions.
This week he was remanded in custody of rape, sexual assault and unlawful coercion stemming from alleged  non-consensual sex without a condom with two women in Sweden.
Assange’s imprisonment, after he handed himself in, was met with relief in the US, where authorities were angered by his website’s release of embarrassing diplomatic cables last week.
The man who kicked the hornets’ nest had been silences they thought.
“I hadn’t heard that but it sounds like good news to me,” US Defence Secretary Robert Gates said on being told of Assange’s arrest.
But while Assange grows restless behind bars – he has already complained about the “boring” daytime television and his request to be reunited with his own laptop has been denied – a global groundswell of support has grown.
The strongest act of revenge is coming from a group of ”hacktivists”  known as Anomymous, which temporariiy shut down the websites of US and Swedish corporations this week.
The group also froze the websites of credit-card companies Visa and Mastercard,n which had cancelled financial donations to WikiLeaks.
Post Finance – the Swiss bank that froze Assange’s private account – was disabled too, as was the Swedish prosecution office and the Swedish lawyers representing the two  women who claim  to have been sexually assaulted by Assange.
The Anonymous group’s spokesman, known only as Coldblood, told reports they had not met Assange and were not connected to his organization but felt the need to defend him.
“If we let WikiLeaks fall without a fight then government will think they can just take down any sites they wish or disagree with,” Coldblood said.
In Brisbane on Thursday, some 300 protestors took to the streets in anger at Assange’s imprisonment.
Protests in London were due to be held today.
More than 35,000 people have joined a Facebook group to support Assange, with calls for all members to donate to his legal fund, while around 28,000 Australians have signed a letter to US President BARACK Obama supporting him.
In an open letter published yesterday, prominent supports, including Australia documentary film maker John Pilger, Minty Python member Terry Jones, English actress Miriam Margolyes and author Iain Banks, call for his immediate release from jail
Assange’s unusually harsh imprisonment for allegedly ignoring two women’s  requests to use contraception has caused this sudden swell of skepticism and fury.
Many believe it is a flimsy excuse to keep Assange, who was placed on Interpol’s most wanted list, within reach of the US Justice Department so it can prosecute him under the Espionage Act.
Even while he is hailed by the public as a champion of transparency, to the governments of Australia and the US he remains a menace. To them he is not an innocent messenger but an anti-government terrorist who wants to harm the US and governments across the world.
Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard labeled WikiLeaks’s activities illegal but, despite calls for her to do so, has failed to outline any Australian law that Assange has broken.
Federal Attorney-General Robert McClelland also has stood by his condemnation of Assange, while arch-conservative US politician Sarah Palin called him an anti-American operative with blood on his hands.”
How did the tousled-haired boy in overalls grow up to become an Andy Warhol-esque hero of the people.
“Hr can seem – with his spectral white hair, pa8iled skin, cool eyes, and expansive forehead – like a rail thin being who has rocketed to Earth to deliver humanity some hidden truth,” The New Yorker wrote in June.
Born in Townsville in 1971, Assange has described his childhood as “pretty Tom Sawyer”’ filled with horseriding, building rafts and fishing.
I was, however, far from Idyllic. By the age od 14, his family had moved 37 times, living everywhere from Magnetic Island to Byron Bay. It set the scene for his future nomadic life.
The young boy was home schooled, sporadically educated by university professors and even taught himself in hours spent alone in council libraries.
But his life changed when his mother’s abusive boyfriend tried to gain custody of Assange’s half brother in order to submit him to religious sect The Family.
His mother and her young family “disappeared”, constantly moving, never leaving a trail.
But at the age of 16, in 1987, Assange got a computer and modem and his life was suddenly transformed.
He embraced the random problem-solving and solace if life as a computer hacker.
“We were bright sensitive kinds who didn’t fit the dominant subculture and fiercely castigated those who did as irredeemable boneheads,” he wrote of himself and a teenage friend.
He was arrested in the early 1990’sw for hacking into the computer system of a major Canadian telecommunications company, but avoided a prison sentence of up to 10 years.
A brief spell in hospital for depression soon followed, as well as time spent living rough in the Dandenong Ranges National Park in Victoria and a stint motorcycling across Vietnam.
While working towards a physics degree at the University of Melbourne in 2006, He founded WikiLeaks.
It was a site for anyone wishing to “reveal illegal or immoral behavior in their own governments and corporations” he wrote at the time of the site’s launch.
“ I am the one who9 takes that risk,” he said prophetically, explaining his role at WikiLeaks while addressing the Frontline club last monthly. “As a consequence, I also get a lot of undue credit. I also get all the criticism.”
His original WikiLeaks mandate was to9 “make the news, not be the news”.
But that seems to have backfired, with Assange now a household name around the world.
“Is is weird?” an audience member asked him of his new celebrity status.
“No,” Assange shrugged.” Actually, I find it quite boring.”
Lucy Marne is The Courier-Mail’s European correspondent

Dear Friend,

Sarah Palin wants Julian Assange hunted as a terrorist.1 She's among a swelling chorus of American politicians calling for the arrest - and even the death - of the Australian citizen who runs WikiLeaks. It's a shame that real terrorists, the kind we should be focusing our attention on, don't show up at British Police stations with their lawyers, as WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange did yesterday.

Here in Australia, Prime Minister Gillard pre-emptively judged Mr. Assange "illegal," even as the Attorney General confirmed that no Australian nor international crime by WikiLeaks has been identified.2

The death penalty? Judgment before trial? This isn't the kind of justice system we have in Australia. If our Government won't stand up for the rights of Australian citizens, let's do it ourselves.

We're printing ads in The Washington Times and The New York Times with the statement our Government should have made, signed by as many Australians as possible. Will you add your name to the signatories, and invite your friends to join too?

http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/Wikileaks

The statement:Dear President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder:

We, as Australians, condemn calls for violence, including assassination, against Australian citizen and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, or for him to be labeled a terrorist, enemy combatant or be treated outside the ordinary course of justice in any way.

As Thomas Jefferson said, "information is the currency of democracy."3 Publishing leaked information in collaboration with major news outlets, as Wikileaks and Mr. Assange have done, is not a terrorist act.

Australia and the United States are the strongest of allies. Our soldiers serve side by side and we've experienced, and condemned, the consequences of terrorism together. To label WikiLeaks a terrorist organisation is an insult to those Australians and Americans who have lost their lives to acts of terrorism and to terrorist forces.

If WikiLeaks or their staff have broken international or national laws, let that case be heard in a just and fair court of law. At the moment, no such charges have been brought.

We are writing as Australians to say what our Government should have said: that all Australian citizens deserve to be free from persecution, threats of violence and detention without charge, especially from our friend and ally, the United States.

We call upon you to stand up for our shared democratic principles of the presumption of innocence and freedom of information.We're printing this statement in The Washington Times and The New York Times early next week - and the more Australians sign, the more powerful the message will be. Please add your name by clicking below, and forward this message to friends and family:

http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/WikiLeaks

What has started with WikiLeaks being branded as terrorists won't end there.

In fact, just yesterday U.S. Senator Joe Lieberman, Chair of the Senate's Homeland Security Committee, said thatThe New York Times should also be investigated under the U.S. Espionage Act for publishing a number of the diplomatic cables leaked to WikiLeaks.4 We can help stop such plans in their tracks, by showing how they are affecting the image of the US in the eyes of their staunchest friends and allies.

Click here to sign the statement before it's published in The New York Times and Washington Times.

Thanks for being part of this,
The GetUp team

---

1 Beckford, M., 'Sarah Palin: hunt WikiLeaks founder like al-Qaeda and Taliban leaders', The Telegraph, 30 November 2010.

2 Oakes, L., 'Oakes: Gillard gushes over US leaks', Perth Now, 4 December 2010.

3 The quote is widely attributed to Jefferson, but some now dispute whether he actually said it. We know, at least, that he said "knowledge is power," even if Francis Bacon did say it first.

4 Savage, C., 'U.S. prosecuters study WikiLeaks prosecution', The New York Times, 7 December 2010.



Julian Assange from Jail to Masion






Former Guantanamo Bay detainee David Hicks. Photo: Jacky Ghossein

 \

Assange gets bail but still locked up (01:12)
British judge grants bail to WikiLeaks founder under strict monitoring conditions, but he remains in jail as Sweden appeals the ruling.

Assange will never receive a fair trial: Hicks
Cameron Atfield
December 15, 2010

Hicks answers the tough questions
Former terrorism suspect David Hicks has come out in support of jailed freedom-of-speech campaigner Julian Assange, saying he feared for Mr Assange's safety should he end up in American hands.
Mr Assange, the founder of the WikiLeaks website, has been returned to London's notorious Wandsworth prison despite winning bail from a British Court.
He will be held there for another 48 hours while Swedish prosecutors, who want to extradite him to Sweden to face allegations of sex crimes, mount a High Court appeal against the decision.
Supporters of Mr Assange, including his lawyer, have claimed the charges are politically motivated after the release of thousands of secret diplomatic cables, causing embarrassment for several governments.
Yesterday, Mr Hicks told Fairfax Radio he was concerned about what might happen to Mr Assange if he was extradited to the United States.
"He will never receive a fair trial," he said.
"We have already established that it's a political decision rather than a legal one. It's important that our governments are held to account for any war crimes they may be involved in and that is why the work of WikiLeaks is so important."
Mr Hicks spent six years at Guantanamo Bay, the US-run prison camp in Cuba, before he returned home to Australia to serve nine months at Adelaide's Yatala jail.
He was convicted by a US military commission of "providing material support for terrorism".
Mr Hicks said he believed future WikiLeaks releases could contain information about his incarceration.
"I will watch with interest in more leaks released because I have heard that they might contain information about my treatment in Guantanamo and the political interference in my case," he said.
"I just hope the Australian government doesn't abandon him like they did to me."
WikiLeaks: Julian Assange sex assault court case branded a 'show trial'
The Swedish authorities are turning the sexual assault case against Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founder, into a "show trial", his lawyers claimed.

Mark Stephens attacked the decision by the Swedish authorities to appeal against a judge's ruling to grant the 39 year-old Australian bail.
He said their decision was now a "'persecution" rather than a prosecution and was politically motivated.
He accused the authorities of stopping at nothing to have the Wikileaks founder behind bars, a claim they denied.

 

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is refused bail
15 Dec 2010
WikiLeaks: summary of the latest disclosures
15 Dec 2010
Julian Assange: is 'Wikileaker' on a crusade or an ego trip?
15 Dec 2010
Julian Assange: Jemima Khan comes to aid of Wikileaks founder in Swedish extradition fight
15 Dec 2010
Julian Assange: 'don't shoot the messenger'
15 Dec 2010

Julian Assange: 'don't shoot the messenger'
Governments around the world must not "shoot the messenger" by attacking disclosures by WikiLeaks, Julian Assange said on Tuesday.
Julian Assange says his whistle-blowing website deserves protection and has not cost a single life despite the claims of critics

The former computer hacker said his whistle-blowing website deserves protection and has not cost a single life despite the claims of critics.
Writing for The Australian newspaper, Mr Assange quoted its founder, Rupert Murdoch, as once saying the truth will inevitably win over secrecy.
He said: "Nearly a century later, WikiLeaks is also fearlessly publishing facts that need to be made public."
Mr Assange said WikiLeaks has coined "scientific journalism" that allows readers to study the original evidence for themselves.
He added: "Democratic societies need a strong media and WikiLeaks is part of that media. The media helps keep government honest.
"WikiLeaks has revealed some hard truths about the Iraq and Afghan wars, and broken stories about corporate corruption."
The campaigner denied he is anti-war, but said Governments must tell the truth about their reasons for fighting.
He claimed the United States, supported by its "acolytes", has attacked WikiLeaks instead of other media groups because it is "young and small".
Branding the website "underdogs", he accused Australia Prime Minister Julia Gillard of "disgraceful pandering" to the Americans.
He said: "The Gillard government is trying to shoot the messenger because it doesn't want the truth revealed, including information about its own diplomatic and political dealings."
Mr Assange highlighted some of the most high-profile revelations made by his website over the last week.
He added: "The swirling storm around WikiLeaks today reinforces the need to defend the right of all media to reveal the truth."

In news
  
The WikiLeaks bunker
  
WikiLeaks: 10 greatest scoops
  
WikiLeaks: do they have a right to privacy?
  
The key WikiLeaks revelations
  
Why law is powerless to stop WikiLeaks

 

WikiLeaks 'will continue releasing documents'
15 Dec 2010

 
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is driven into Westminster Magistrates Court in London Photo: Stefan Rousseau/PA
WikiLeaks 'will continue releasing documents'
WikiLeaks has pledged to continue releasing confidential documents after Julian Assange, the website's founder and chief, arrived at court for an extradition hearing.
Wednesday 15 December 2010

Richard Edwards and Nick Collins 2:53PM GMT 07 Dec 2010
Mr Assange handed himself over to police in central London on Tuesday morning after a warrant was issued for his arrest on rape charges.
But ahead of his first court appearance a spokesman for the website insisted the arrest would not prevent the planned release of further cables on Tuesday evening.
The spokesman wrote on Twitter: "Today's actions against our editor-in-chief Julian Assange won't affect our operations: we will release more cables tonight as normal."

The 39-year-old Australian was due to appear before a district judge at City of Westminster Magistrates' Court on Tuesday afternoon, where his lawyers were expected to fight extradition proceedings.
A Metropolitan Police spokesman said: "Officers from the Metropolitan Police Extradition Unit have this morning arrested Julian Assange on behalf of the Swedish authorities on suspicion of rape.
"Assange is due to appear at City of Westminster Magistrates' Court today."
Supporters of Assange were told to protest against censorship outside the Horseferry Road court house on several websites.
His arrest came after an Australian newspaper published an editorial written by Assange, in which he urged governments around the world not to "shoot the messenger".
He wrote: "Democratic societies need a strong media and WikiLeaks is part of that media. The media helps keep government honest."
He accused the Australian government and prime minister Julia Gillard of "disgraceful pandering" to the Americans, adding: "The Gillard government is trying to shoot the messenger because it doesn't want the truth revealed, including information about its own diplomatic and political dealings."
Mr Assange has not been seen publicly for 31 days, since an appearance in Geneva, and was believed to have been in hiding in the south-east of England as the latest tranche of WikiLeaks material was released.
A European Arrest Warrant was issued by the Swedish last month but could not be acted upon because it did not contain sufficient information for the British authorities. A spokesman for Marianne Ny, the Swedish prosecutor, said the extra details were sent last week.
Police processed the warrant yesterday and arrangements were made with Mark Stephens, Mr Assange’s British lawyer, for the Wikileaks founder to attend a central London police station.
Mr Stephens said his client was keen to discover what allegations he was facing so he could clear his name.
"It's about time we got to the end of the day and we got some truth, justice and rule of law," he said.
"Julian Assange has been the one in hot pursuit to vindicate himself to clear his good name.
"He has been trying to meet with her (the Swedish prosecutor) to find out what the allegations are he has to face and also the evidence against him, which he still hasn't seen."
The 39-year-old Australian has been under intense pressure since the release of thousands of secret documents in recent weeks.
Kristinn Hrafnsson, spokesman for WikiLeaks, said Mr Assange had been forced to keep a low profile after several threats on his life.
Sweden’s Supreme Court upheld a court order to detain Mr Assange for questioning on suspicion of “rape, sexual molestation and unlawful coercion” after he appealed against two lower court rulings. He denies the allegations.
His details were also added to Interpol’s most wanted website, alerting police forces around the world.
Mr Stephens said he would fight any bid to extradite his client. He added that Mr Assange “has been trying to meet with the Swedish prosecutor since August this year”.
Mr Assange’s troubles deepened when his Swiss bank account was shut down after it was found he had given a false address. Postfinance, the financial arm of Swiss Post, said: “The Australian citizen provided false information regarding his place of residence during the account opening process.”
Mr Assange had allegedly told Postfinance he lived in Geneva but could offer no proof that he was a Swiss resident.
News of his potential arrest came as WikiLeaks was criticised for publishing details of hundreds of sites around the world that could be targeted in terrorist attacks.
Among the British sites listed are a transatlantic undersea cable landing in Cornwall; naval and motoring engineering firm MacTaggart Scott, based in the small Scottish town of Loanhead; and BAE Systems sites, including one in Preston, Lancashire.
The revelations prompted Sir Peter Ricketts, David Cameron’s national security adviser, to order a review of computer security across all government departments.
Julian Assange: Jemima Khan comes to aid of Wikileaks founder in Swedish extradition fight
Jemima Khan appeared in court to lend her support to Wikileaks founder Julian Assange as he was put behind bars over sexual allegations originating from Sweden.
By Andrew Hough, and Caroline Gammell  07 Dec 2010

Khan, the socialite and charity worker, offered to provide a £20,000 surety to prevent the 39-year-old Australian from being remanded in custody in Britain over the claims.
Swedish officials want him extradited to answer questions over the alleged rape of one woman and molestation of another while he was in Stockholm this summer.
Mr Assange, who was also supported in court by film director Ken Loach and four others, has repeatedly denied the claims.

The 36-year-old former wife of Imran Khan said she would pay “whatever sum was required” to ensure he was granted bail.
However, a district judge at City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court decided he was too much of risk as it emerged that there was no record him ever arriving in Britain.
During Tuesday's hearing he was accompanied by officials from the Australian High Commission after asking for consular assistance.
Outside court, Khan said: “I am not here to make any kind of judgement on the Julian Assange as an individual as I do not know him and I have never met him.
“I am here because I believe in the principle of the human right to freedom of information and our right to be told the truth.”
Mr Assange’s supporters believe his arrest is a political stunt to detract from the revelations being made on a daily basis on the Wikileaks website.
Geoffrey Robertson QC, a prominent Australian human rights barrister who was a defending lawyer at the Brighton Bombing trial in the mid 1980s, has reportedly agreed to act for Mr Assange in future hearings.
The former computer hacker claims he had received several death threats since the secret documents were published and that someone had called for the kidnap of his 20-year-old son in Australia.

Julian Assange in British prison on rape charge
08 Dec 2010
Julian Assange: Extradition case involving Wikileaks founder could last many months
08 Dec 2010
Julian Assange: question of consent
08 Dec 2010
Julian Assange: 'don't shoot the messenger'
07 Dec 2010
The Scarlet Pimpernel of cyberspace
07 Dec 2010
US Attorney General taking 'significant' action
07 Dec 2010

 

Julian Assange: is 'Wikileaker' on a crusade or an ego trip?
Julian Assange, the man who published the Afghan war files on his Wikileaks website, is unlikely to be chastened by Admiral Mike Mullen’s claims that he might now have “blood on his hands”.
Julian Assange outside court in Melbourne in 1995, where he was later convicted of hacking offences.

Julian Assange, pictured in London this week, relies on donations and the hospitality of wellwishers as he travels the globe.

WikiLeaks: summary of the latest disclosures
The latest round of WikiLeaks releases disclose more detail about the US's relationships with allies and foes across the globe. Here is a round-up of today’s headlines.

Britain
Prince Andrew criticised a variety of governments, including those of Britain and America, as corrupt, stupid and backward in a conversation with a US diplomat.
In his wave of “almost neuralgic patriotism”, the Duke also made the bizarre claim that British geography teachers are the best in the world.

Families of British servicemen killed in Sangin, Afghanistan have reacted furiously after it was claimed WikiLeaks would disclose dismissive remarks by US commanders on British efforts to secure the town.
The Welsh family of Bradley Manning, the US soldier suspected of handing the classified documents to WikiLeaks, have flown to America but been prevented from visiting him in prison.
The internet has been rife with speculation about which former Labour minister was labelled “a bit of a hound dog” with women by an American official.
David Cameron was seen as “lightweight” by Barack Obama after the first meeting between the two leaders, leaked files will show.
Prince Charles does not command the same respect as the Queen, according to a senior Commonwealth official.
International
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, dismissed claims that Arab countries had asked the US to attack his country as a deliberate attempt by the US to destabilise the Middle East.
Released Guantánamo Bay prisoners should have electronic tagging devices implanted so that they can be followed by security officials, the King of Saudi Arabia suggested to a White House official.
Silvio Berlusconi responded to leaked claims by American diplomats that he has a penchant for “wild parties” by claiming he only throws parties in a “proper, dignified and elegant way”.
One of the more unlikely stories to surface from the leaked documents was that of a 77-year-old American dentist who fled Iran on horseback after the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
American officials suspect that North Korea has been secretly aiding Iran in its attempts to build nuclear weapons under the auspices of the Chinese government.
Colonel Gaddafi was believed to be very close to a “voluptuous” Ukrainian nurse who followed him everywhere he went, a US cable claimed.
An exile from Iran was living in London when he was targeted in an assassination plot by an Iranian agent, who was later arrested in America.
Hillary Clinton asked US diplomats in Argentina about the mental health of President Cristina Kirchner and questioned whether she was using medication to help her “calm down”.
The White House has told federal agencies to tighten security around the US military computer network following the leaking of classified information.
China would support a unified Korea controlled from Seoul because it believes the North is behaving like a “spoiled child”, documents show.
Sarah Palin has accused Barack Obama of taking insufficient action to prevent the release of the latest batch of WikiLeaks files.
The Supreme Leader of Iran, Ayatollah Khamenei, could die within months from terminal cancer, an Iranian informant told American officials.
Angela Merkel is the only leader “man” enough to lead the European Union, according to American cables.
The United Nations has angrily hit back at American “interference” after learning that Hillary Clinton ordered what amounted to an espionage campaign on its senior officials.
Julian Assange
The WikiLeaks founder is in hiding after an international warrant was issued for his arrest on rape allegations.
Assange’s next target will be the banking sector, with one American bank in particular to suffer from his next revelations, which he compared to the Enron scandal.
Assange has accused Barack Obama of attempting to smother the freedom of the press.
A criminal investigation is underway into how the latest batch of documents was made public, and Barack Obama could take legal action against Mr Assange.

Kazakh defence minister 'was openly drunk'
01 Dec 2010
WikiLeaks: Best quotes from Duke of York's Kyrgyzstan breakfast with US ambassador
30 Nov 2010
WikiLeaks: bereaved families' fury at US 'insult' over Afghanistan
30 Nov 2010
WikiLeaks: British and US governments stupid, says Prince Andrew
30 Nov 2010
WikiLeaks: Criminal investigation underway into leak of classified diplomatic documents
30 Nov 2010
WikiLeaks: Hillary Clinton states WikiLeaks release is "an attack"
30 Nov 2010



Wikileaks Mirrors and Links here. Helpful, if the main site - wikileaks.org - is down


Julian Assange's alleged dating profile surfaces

December 14, 2010

Julian Assange allegedly used dating website OkCupid, his supposed profile now becoming fodder for media scrutiny around the world.

Intrepid internet users tracked down the disused profile that existed around 2006, revealing insightful information into Assange's personality, if it is to be believed that the information was written by Assange himself.

The WikiLeaks founder reportedly describes himself on the website: "Passionate, and often pig headed activist intellectual seeks siren for love affair, children and occasional criminal conspiracy,"

Prefacing his profile with a "warning", Assange explains: "Want a regular down to earth guy? Keep moving. I am not the droid you are looking for. Save us both while you still can"

When asserting what he likes in a woman, Assange's alleged profile states a woman should be "spirited, erotic, non-conformist. Non-conformity is not the adoption of some pre-existing alternative subculture. I seek innate perceptiveness and spunk"

"I like women from countries that have sustained political turmoil. Western culture seems to forge women who are valueless and inane. OK. Not only women!" he continues.

When describing what he is doing with his life, the profile states "Directing a consuming, dangerous human rights project", not without giving reference to his background in mathematics, neuroscience and philosophy.

According to the profile, Assange would have last used it on New Year's Eve December 2006. It states that he has never used drugs and only drinks socially, and that he spends a lot of time thinking about "Changing the world through passion, inspiration and trickery."

Ellingham Hall near Bungay, Suffolk

Pheasant dinners, port and brisk walks may be just days away for Julian Assange, whose bail address is to be Ellingham Hall. Photograph: Alban Donohoe

Julian Assange offered bail haven at former soldier's Suffolk manor


guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 14 December 2010

Maverick libertarian Vaughan Smith rescued WikiLeaks founder from jail - but then came appeal


His supporters include teenage hackers, freedom of speech activists and a motley group of celebrities. But it was the maverick British establishment that rode to the rescue of Julian Assange, offering to whisk him from dull confinement in Wandsworth jail to a large and comfy manor house in Suffolk.

For once, Assange was not the star at the afternoon bail hearing at Westminster magistrates' court. Dressed in a white shirt and blue suit, he watched the proceedings impassively. Instead the hero was Vaughan Smith, a former army officer, journalist adventurer and rightwing libertarian. For much of the past five months, until his arrest last week, Assange has been living at Smith's Frontline Club in Paddington, west London.

Standing to address district judge Howard Riddle, Geoffrey Robertson QC announced that "Captain Smith" was now ready to put Assange up at his rambling country home, Ellingham Hall, near Bungay in Suffolk – that is, should he be granted bail. The WikiLeaks saga has so far been short of jokes. But Robertson had one ready-made.

It would not be so much "house arrest as manor arrest", he quipped. Not only that, but it was inconceivable Assange would attempt to escape "since darkness descends rather early in that part of Britain". Additionally, Assange was willing to give up his Australian passport and wear an electronic tag. Finally, he wasn't likely to get very far given that "media exposure" had made him "well-known around the world", Robertson said with understatement.

Last week Assange was refused bail after he unwisely gave an Australian postal address as his place of residence. This time his legal team would allow no such mistake.

Robertson, Assange's new barrister, asked Smith to give his own assessment of WikiLeaks' controversial founder, in the light of Sweden's attempts to have him extradited on sex allegations.

"He is a very honourable person, hugely clever, self-deprecatory and warm. Not the kind of things you read about," Smith said loyally. But the clincher came when Robertson asked Smith to explain what precisely Assange's new rustic home would look like. After establishing that Smith was a former Guards officer and one-time captain of the British army's shooting team, the QC asked for details of Smith's family home and organic farm. "It has 10 bedrooms and 600 acres," Smith replied. Better still, there was even a police station. "It's a short distance on a bicycle. I can cycle it in about 15 minutes," Smith explained. "It's about a mile. Perhaps a little bit more." Smith added helpfully: "It's an environment where he would be surrounded. We have members of staff. My parents live in proximity as well. My father was a Queen's Messenger and a colonel in the Grenadier Guards."

On the second floor of the court several celebrity supporters had gathered outside next to the coffee machine and green metal benches – John Pilger, Jemima Khan, Ken Loach, Bianca Jagger, and others. But it turned out they weren't really needed – though their money was. Outside on the pavement, a polyglot scrum of journalists waited impatiently for news.

Judging from his appearance, Assange appeared to be surviving his ordeal in Wandsworth prison pretty well. From inside a glass box for the defendant, he confirmed his identity and address. He also gave a cheery thumbs-up to his team.

Robertson, however, made clear that Assange was having a miserable time of it. His conditions inside Wandsworth were nothing short of living hell, he suggested. "He can't read any newspapers other than the Daily Express. This is the kind of Victorian situation he finds himself in," Robertson lamented. He went on: "Time magazine sent him a magazine with his picture on the cover but all the person would allow him to have was the envelope!"

To no one's great surprise, the judge announced that "bail was going to be granted under certain conditions". These turned out to be not overly onerous: an electronic tag, an afternoon and night curfew and a requirement to report to Bungay police station between 6-8pm every evening. Oh, and £200,000 in cash.

Assange's lawyers asked if it might be possible to hand cheques into the court instead? The magistrate was unimpressed, insisting in these financially troubled times it had to be money up front.

Outside, the tweeted news of Assange's bail brought a loud cheer from the 150 or so people who had gathered opposite the court to cheer on their hero and share their banners and placards with the world.

One read: "Sex crimes! My arse!" Another, "That's just what we need – another innocent man in jail", and a third: "Sweden: muppets of the US." Despite the indignant slogans, the judge's verdict plainly delighted the protesters. Three young activists were so thrilled, in fact, that they broke into an impromptu chorus of We Wish You a Merry Christmas.

Soon afterwards, however, there was confusion as news filtered through that the Swedish prosecutor was to appeal against the bail decision, meaning that Assange has to remain for the time being in jail. But his lawyers appear confident he will be out in time for Christmas.

Pheasant dinners, port and brisk walks around the estate may be only a matter of days away.

If he wins his next bail hearing in the high court, Julian Assange's new home will be a historic rural estate on the borders of Norfolk and Suffolk. For more than three centuries Ellingham Hall, a sprawling and elegant Georgian manor house near the village of Bungay, has belonged to the Smith family.

Its owner today is Vaughan Smith, a friend of Assange, and a strong supporter. Smith has previously given the WikiLeaks founder a home at his Frontline club in Paddington, west London, which includes several flats.

Surrounded by 600 acres of woods and fields, the estate is the perfect retreat. It has 10 bedrooms, a large dining room with a convivial circular table, and portraits of Smith's ancestors hanging on the walls. There is a housekeeper who cooks meals. There is also a well-stocked cellar with wine and port – the decent Quinta Do Infantado.

The estate is usually home to Smith's wife and their two children.

Speaking to the Guardian before today's bail hearing, Smith made clear that Assange and his team will be expected to pay for food and accommodation. Other paying guests have included games sports enthusiasts – the hall boasts a pheasant shoot, with pheasants wandering freely over the grounds. The local Norfolk hunt sometimes clatters through the gardens.

"It's a Georgian house from the 18th century. It's been in my family as Smith for the past 225 years, but before that it belonged to the Johnsons, whom the Smiths married into.

"Some of the buildings are even older. On the walls are paintings of the people who bred me," Smith said. "My grandfather liked shooting and I'm partial to it myself."

The estate is exceptionally isolated. The nearest train station is Diss. From there it is a £27 ride in a taxi. It takes half an hour by car from the hall into Norwich, the nearest city.

The remoteness of the location is likely to afford Assange some privacy, since it is impossible to reach the manor house without trespassing on Smith's land.

According to friends, Assange shows little interest in food, and is invariably late for meals. But Ellingham Hall is also home to a large ecologically conscious organic farm. Smith looks after it himself together with two employees; the organic produce is served at his restaurant at the Frontline Club.






Wikileaks Mirrors

Find all the current Wikileaks Mirrors and Links here. Helpful, if the main site - wikileaks.org - is down.



Important Wikileaks Links

"Could become as important a journalistic tool as the Freedom of Information Act." - Time Magazine

WikiLeaks is a non-profit media organization dedicated to bringing important news and information to the public. We provide an innovative,

secure and anonymous way for independent sources around the world to leak information to our journalists. We publish material of ethical, political and historical significance while keeping the identity of our sources anonymous, thus providing a universal way for the revealing of suppressed and censored injustices.

WikiLeaks relies on its supporters in order to stay strong. Please keep us at the forefront of anti-censorship and support us today.

You can also read more about WikiLeaks, our mission and objectives.

Cablegate: 250,000 US Embassy Diplomatic Cables

2010-11-28

On Sunday 28th Novembre 2010, Wikileaks began publishing 251,287 leaked United States embassy cables, the largest set of confidential documents ever to be released into the public domain. The documents will give people around the world an unprecedented insight into the US Government's foreign activities.

All released leaks archived

2010-11-28

Due to recent attacks on our infrastructure, we've decided to make sure everyone can reach our content. As part of this process we're releasing archived copy of all files we ever released - that's almost 20,000 files. The archive linked here contains a torrent generated for each file and each directory.

War Diary: Iraq War Logs

2010-10-22

The 391,832 reports ('The Iraq War Logs'), document the war and occupation in Iraq, from 1st January 2004 to 31st December 2009 (except for the months of May 2004 and March 2009) as told by soldiers in the United States Army. Each is a 'SIGACT' or Significant Action in the war. They detail events as seen and heard by the US military troops on the ground in Iraq and are the first real glimpse into the secret history of the war that the United States government has been privy to throughout.

War Diary: Afghanistan War Logs

2010-07-25

From here, you can browse through all of the documents that have been released, organized by type, category, date, number of casualties, and many other properties. From any document page, clicking on the green underlined text will open a popup that links to other documents that contain those phrases, making it possible to see important search terms and connections that you might not otherwise notice.

Video: Collateral Murder

2010-04-05

WikiLeaks has released a classified US military video depicting the indiscriminate slaying of over a dozen people in the Iraqi suburb of New Baghdad -- including two Reuters news staff. Reuters has been trying to obtain the video through the Freedom of Information Act, without success since the time of the attack. The video, shot from an Apache helicopter gun-sight, clearly shows the unprovoked slaying of a wounded Reuters employee and his rescuers. Two young children involved in the rescue were also seriously wounded.

Spamhaus' False Allegations Against wikileaks.info

Published 15-Dec-2010, 8:00 AM GMT

On Tuesday, 14-Dec-2010 Spamhaus has issued a statement wherein it labels wikileaks.info as "unsafe", as they consider our hosting company as a malware facilitator:

http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=665

We find it very disturbing that Spamhaus labels a site as dangerous without even checking if there is any malware on it. We monitor the wikileaks.info site and we can guarantee that there is no malware on it. We do not know who else is hosted with Heihachi Ltd and it is none of our business. They provide reliable hosting to us. That's it.

While we are in favour of "Blacklists", be it for mail servers or web sites, they have to be compiled with care. Just listing whole IP blocks as "bad" may be quick and easy for the blacklist editors, but will harm hosters and web site users.

Wikileaks has been pulled from big hosters like Amazon. That's why we are using a "bulletproof" hoster that does not just kick a site when it gets a letter from government or a big company. Our hoster is giving home to many political sites like castor-schottern.org and should not be blocked just because they might have hosted some malware sites.

Fortunately, more responsible blacklists, like stopbadware.org (which protects the Firefox browser, for example), don't list us. We do hope that Spamhaus hasn't issued this statement due to political pressure.

Wikileaks.info will always be safe and clean. Promised:

Google Safe Browsing Check for wikileaks.info

Update (15-Dec-2010 17:00 PM GMT): Spamhaus has updated their statement to say that they don't blacklist us.

The wikileaks.info Team


http://213.251.145.96/iraq/diarydig/

WarLogs.Wikileaks.org is a website which provides an easy way to search through the Iraq and Afghan War Logs, which were made public by Wikileaks on 22nd October 2010. The documents are a set of over 391,000 reports which

cover the war in Iraq from 2004 to 2009 and Afghanistan from 2004 to 2009.

From here, you can browse through all of the documents that have been released, organized by type, category, date, number of casualties, and many other properties. From any document page, clicking on the green underlined text will open

a popup that links to other documents that contain those phrases, making it possible to see important search terms and connections that you might not otherwise notice.

Our hope is that this tool will be helpful to reporters and researchers who are interested in learning more about the US's war in Afghanistan and making sense of this important database. If you wish to support this work, we encourage

you to make a donation to wikileaks.

Source code for this website is freely available on github – we welcome any contributions, improvements or suggestions.

On to the documents.

  • CACHE FOUND/CLEARED Other 2003-12-31 18:00:00
    AFG: Cache Found/Cleared, RC EAST, 0 casualties

    KAF-1BDE -S3 REPORTS: GERONIMO 11 SALUTE AS FOLLOWS: S - 1 CAVE, A CACHE, L - 42 SWB758 778, U UNK, T 0641, E - 1X UXO, 2000RDS 7.62MM....

  • IZ RUNS TCP BY /%%% IN ZONE %%%: NO INJURIES 2003-12-31 18:00:00
    iraq: Accident, MND-BAGHDAD, 0 casualties

    WHILE CONDUCTING A JOINT CHECKPOINT /%%% MP CO FIRED ON A VEHICLE WHEN THE DRIVER FAILED TO OBEY THE POSTED WARNINGS AND COMMANDS OF THE IPS WHO WERE MANNING THE CHECKPOINT. THE VEHICLE, A %%% SEDAN ...

  • CACHE FOUND/CLEARED Other 2003-12-31 18:00:00
    AFG: Cache Found/Cleared, RC EAST, 0 casualties

    USSF FINDS CACHE IN VILLAGE OF WALU TANGAY: USSF CONDUCTED A MEET AND GREET IN THE VILLAGE OF WALU TANGAY. USSF MEMBERS WERE APPROACHED BY A LOCAL BOY WHO SPOKE OF A CACHE IN A CAVE ON A NEARBY HILL....

  • PROPAGANDA Other 2003-12-31 18:00:00
    AFG: Propaganda, RC SOUTH, 0 casualties

    (M) NIGHT LETTERS DISTRIBUTED AROUND HAZARJUFT: THE FOLLOWING IS A TRANSLATED VERSION OF ONE LETTER: ISLAMIC IMARATS OF AFGHANISTAN. FOR THE BRAVE WARLORDS OF AFGHANISTAN, SALAM ALAIKOOM. AS YOU KNO...

  • DIRECT FIRE Other 2003-12-31 18:00:00
    AFG: Direct Fire, RC EAST, 3 casualties

    KAF-1BDE -S3 REPORTS: SUMMIT 09 B CO ELEMENT SALUTE REPORT AS FOLLOWS: S- 3-4 PAX, A- SMALL ARMS FIRE, L-IVO 42 SWB 3910 1617, U-UNK, T-0415Z, E-AK-47. 0448Z ENEMY ELEMENTS BROKEN CONTACT. 0442Z AIR Q...

  • DIRECT FIRE Other 2003-12-31 18:00:00
    AFG: Direct Fire, RC EAST, 8 casualties

    KAF-1BDE -S3: SUMMIT 6 REPORTS TIC SALUTE TO FOLLOW: S-18X ACM, A- SMALL ARMS FIRES, L-WB340120, T-1256Z. 1319Z: BDA UPDATE: REPORTING INDICATES POSSIBLY 8X SUSPECTED

  • ACM&apos;&apos;S WERE KIA....

  • A /%%% and local car have been involved in a RTA. No any CAS were reported. 2003-12-31 18:10:00
    iraq: Accident, MND-SE, 0 casualties

    A /%%% and local car have been involved in a RTA. No any CAS were reported. Imported MND-SE Report Event ID:%%% Number of Rounds: Number of Blinds: Number inside the Wire: : : %%%: ...

  • /%%% INVOLVED IN TRAFFIC ACCIDENT: NO INJURIES 2003-12-31 18:10:00
    iraq: Accident, MND-SE, 0 casualties

    DURING A ROUTINE PATROL A /%%% GOT INTO %%% TO A CIVILIAN CAR. NO ANY CAS WERE REPORTED....

  • SAF ATTACK ON CAMP %%% GUARD TOWER IN BAGHDAD (ZONE %%%) - NO BDA 2003-12-31 18:20:00
    iraq: Direct Fire, MND-BAGHDAD, 0 casualties

    RED SEDAN WITH A WHITE TOP WAS DRIVING NORTHWEST ON ROUTE %%%, AND ENGAGED ONE OF THE TOWER GUARDS AT CAMP %%% WITH SMALL ARMS FIRE. THERE WERE NO INJURIES TO US PERSONNEL OR DAMAGE TO ANY EQUIPMENT....

  • %%% CONDUCTS RAID VIC BALAD: %%% DETAINED 2003-12-31 20:00:00
    iraq: Raid, MND-N, 0 casualties

    %%% REPORTS THAT %%% CONDUCTED A RAID ON 2X %%% VIC %%% AND %%% (SOUTH OF BALAD) AT 0200C. THE INTENDED TARGETS WERE SUSPECTED IED ATTACKERS. %%%

  • OBSERVED 4X IZ RUNNING FROM THE OBJ AND CAPTURED THE...





Content copyright 2021. International News Limited. All rights reserved.
Web Hosting Companies